1
Article: 2778 Topic: 47 - Emergency Psychiatry IDENTIFICATION OF DEPENDENTS DURING EMERGENCY PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENTS S. Nabi London Deanery, London, UK Introduction: Child protection guidelines within a London mental health trust state that all mental health professionals should identify patients who have dependents, if so it should be established that these dependents are safe, and any concerns should be taken forward to relevant agencies. Objectives: Establish if child protection guidelines are being followed in emergency psychiatric assessments. Aims: Establish whether patients are being asked whether they have dependents, if the dependents are safe, and whether concerns are being discussed with child protection services. Methods: An audit was carried out in which documentation from 3 days of emergency assessments where examined to see whether the above questions were being asked. Results: In cycle 1, 11 out of 18 patients asked about dependents, 7 had dependents, 4 were documented as being safe, 3 raised child protection concerns, 0 taken forward. In cycle 2, 7 out of 17 patients asked about dependent, 6 had dependents, 3 documented as being safe, 0 child protection concerns were raised.

2778 – Identification of dependents during emergency psychiatric assessments

  • Upload
    s

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2778 – Identification of dependents during emergency psychiatric assessments

Article: 2778Topic: 47 - Emergency Psychiatry

IDENTIFICATION OF DEPENDENTS DURING EMERGENCY PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENTS

S. Nabi

London Deanery, London, UK

Introduction: Child protection guidelines within a London mental health trust state that all mental health professionals shouldidentify patients who have dependents, if so it should be established that these dependents are safe, and any concerns shouldbe taken forward to relevant agencies. Objectives: Establish if child protection guidelines are being followed in emergency psychiatric assessments. Aims: Establish whether patients are being asked whether they have dependents, if the dependents are safe, and whetherconcerns are being discussed with child protection services. Methods: An audit was carried out in which documentation from 3 days of emergency assessments where examined to seewhether the above questions were being asked. Results: In cycle 1, 11 out of 18 patients asked about dependents, 7 had dependents, 4 were documented as being safe, 3raised child protection concerns, 0 taken forward. In cycle 2, 7 out of 17 patients asked about dependent, 6 had dependents, 3 documented as being safe, 0 child protectionconcerns were raised.