2/15/2013 Dear Secretary Steven Chu, · 2/19/2013 . Dear Secretary Steven Chu, d natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export

2/15/2013

Dear Secretary Steven Chu,

While not a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG)

export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other

things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011

study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s --

while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry. In addition, the job market will

expand along with the new industry. Can anyone doubt this benefit??? Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by

Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we

have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic

increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas

prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing

the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from

between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural

gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by

becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study

commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits

from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the

level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than

corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the

economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are

supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of

dollars annually in much needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for

flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and

employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to

create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy security.

Sincerely,

D Douglas

Phoenix, AZ

2/15/2013


What better way to move us to renewables but, to exhaust our existing energy sources Millions of Americans own oil and

natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent

of the oil and natural gas industry. Why not try to maximize that worth reasonably? As a nation, we have an abundance of

natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the daily

produced volumes from shale gas resources located in the United States. As has been demonstrated, higher gas production is

cheaper at the nozzle. Across all reasonable scenarios, the U.S. is projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG

exports.

Sincerely,

Nick Privett

Edmond, OK

2/15/2013


We need i here to keep prices low so I can afford to heat my house. Thank you. mark

Sincerely,

mark Wiley

tigard, OR

2/19/2013


d natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG)

export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other



while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of

LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the

benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal

drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns

about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled

\"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG

exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets

limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas

prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here

at home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net

economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic

benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net

economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report

for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000

total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate

billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would

allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production

and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export

permits to create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy security.

Sincerely,

Wayne Charlton

Ogdensburg, NY

2/15/2013


The oil and gas industry is a bright spot in our economy. Please help our economy thrive by supporting the export of U.S.

natural gas. The proliferation of shale gas production should be a jackpot for the U.S. Currently, we can\'t take advantage of the

opportunity because the abundant supply has saturated the market depressing domestic prices. Let\'s capitalize on this

unexpected opportunity by allowing natural gas to be sold abroad, creating thousands of jobs and helping to stabilize the world

gas market, for the benefit the global economy. I disagree with Congressman Markey\'s objections and don\'t want our

economy to be held hostage by protectionism. Please support efforts to export natural gas for the benefit of our country and

our economy.

Sincerely,

Jan Sieving

The Woodlands, TX

2/22/2013


Sending our liquified natural gas over seas creates private profit from public lands. The pollution of our environment and the

addition of those extra fossil fuels let loose on our earth would have a huge impact on our children\'s future. Keep all fossil fuels

in the ground where they belong. Save the earth.

Sincerely,

Patt Doyle

Heisson, WA

2/14/2013


I want to express my support of LNG exports as an employee of the oil industry. They should be approved because we\'ll have

an abundance of natural gas that future technical advances will only increase and because pricing issues raised in opposition to

increased exports appear overstated from recent analyses. The benefits of added domestic jobs, support of allies in an

increasingly hostile world, and the higher net benefits and deficit reductions of unconstrained exports outweigh such concerns.

Added flexibility in periods of market imbalances is a further added advantage. In a recovering economy such LNG exports

create jobs, reduce trade deficites, and increase energy security.

Sincerely,

Will Ollison

Rockville, MD

2/16/2013


I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought

up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment

benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil

and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three

percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we

should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of

natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the

estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem

to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.

Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11

percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,

showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG

supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE

states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG

exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG

exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding

cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of

shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout

the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much

needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in

times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and

enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the

American economy and increase energy security.

Sincerely,

M. Davis

Pittsboro, IN

2/16/2013

























Sincerely,

Sue Gilbert

Surprise, AZ

2/15/2013

























Sincerely,

Martha Shirley

Hope Hull, AL

2/15/2013
























American economy and increase energy security. Please use the Natural Resources that we ALREADY have.

Sincerely,

Michelle Hollien

Gainesville, FL

2/15/2013

























Sincerely,

Marie Ferrell-Mewes

Pocahontas, IL

2/15/2013

























Sincerely,

Roger Teeter

Lake Tapps, WA

2/14/2013

























Sincerely,

Teresa Stone

Florissant, MO

2/14/2013

























Sincerely,

Cheryl Little

Chandler, AZ

2/14/2013

























Sincerely,

Mike McEuen

Concordia, KS

2/14/2013

























Sincerely,

David Dunham

Oxnard, CA

2/14/2013

























Sincerely,

Porter Conerly

Chapel Hill, NC

2/5/2013

























Sincerely,

Suzanne Schuelke

Waukesha, WI

2/15/2013


I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address points brought up in the

comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would

not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas

holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil

and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these

significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry

advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale

gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent

studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied

Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64

cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG

exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our

allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE states the

following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports.

Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports

increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases

with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale

gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the

economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much





Sincerely,

Sarah Anderson

Tyler, TX

2/16/2013


I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits. As a 2011 study found that millions of

Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s, but corporate management owns less

than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry. Rather than delay the export of LNG, we should approve these significant

projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. The US has an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic

fracturing and horizontal drilling have also led to a dramatic increase in our recoverable shale gas resources. Concerns about

domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such indicate that the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG

exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). One study concludes that global markets limit how

high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic prices. By becoming a

larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad we could create many new liveable wage jobs here at home. The domestic job creation

potential is so great that one report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale

gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. The additional gas production for

export would generate billions of tax dollars that federal and state governments alike really need every year, and especially in

view of our soaring federal deficit. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market

imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, and maintain production and employment levels,. In our still fragile

economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy

security. Thank you for your consideration of my remarks.

Sincerely,

Ray Taylor

West Linn, OR

2/15/2013


Dear Steven, As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas

(LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other






















Sincerely,

Brenda Teachman

Houston, TX

2/15/2013


As user of the products of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas

(LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other






















Sincerely,

Frances Innes

Villa Hills, KY

2/14/2013


As someone who has been chronically unemployed over the past 3 years, but have the electronics, electrical and other skills

well suited for the LNG industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and

address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman

Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found,

millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate

management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested

by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we

have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic

increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas

prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing

the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from

between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural

gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by

becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study

commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits

from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the

level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than

corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the

economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are

supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of

dollars annually in much needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for

flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and

employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to

create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy security.

Sincerely,

Perry Bonney

Rosharon, TX

2/15/2013


As President of the Albuquerque Petroleum Association, and a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my

support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment

from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue

widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings

through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural

gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant

projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in

hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources

located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as

the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state

the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings

study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a

minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could

create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these

scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the

market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with

unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job

creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of

shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas

production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state government

revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps

the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still

fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy

security.

Sincerely,

Jerra Gonzales

Albuquerque, NM

2/15/2013


As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export

permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.

Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.

As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and

401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry

Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that

the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic

fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the

United States.

Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings

report, entitled "Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas," state the price impact of 6

bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that

global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on

domestic natural gas prices.

In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at

home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following:

"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for

every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In

particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited

exports."

The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for

every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the

additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state

government revenue.

In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the

industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security.

In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and

increase energy security.

Sincerely,

Lisa Lewis

Louisville, CO

2/16/2013










United States.











exports."




government revenue.





Sincerely,

William Kropf

Wauwatosa, WI

2/14/2013










United States.











exports."




government revenue.





Sincerely,

N.L. Hauser

Carmel, IN

2/14/2013










United States.











exports."




government revenue.





Sincerely,

Thomas Hauck

Pittsboro, NC

2/15/2013










United States.











exports."




government revenue.





Sincerely,

Don & Sue McFarland

Grand Junction, CO

2/15/2013










United States.











exports."




government revenue.





Sincerely,

Kerry Stone

Fort Lauderdale, FL

2/15/2013










United States.











exports."




government revenue.





Sincerely,

Michael Gamble

Dallas, OR

2/14/2013










United States.











exports."




government revenue.





Sincerely,

Mark Franck

Papillion, NE

2/14/2013









fracturing and horizontal drilling

Documents

2/15/2013 Dear Secretary Steven Chu, · 2/19/2013 . Dear Secretary Steven Chu, d natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export