55
2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society Cardiconcept.com

2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and ...cardiconcept.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2017-ACCAHA-GL-on...2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management

  • Upload
    doduong

  • View
    223

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and

Management of Patients With Syncope

A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association

Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society

Cardiconcept.com

Epidemiology and Demographics

19% reported an episode of syncope in their lifetime

Female (22%) > Male (15%)

Trimodal distribution

20 Yo 60 Yo 80 Yo

Causes of Syncope

%

Unknown 37%

Reflex syncope 21%

Cardiac syncope 9%

Orthostatic syncope 9% Others 24%

Initial evaluation

T-LOC

Hx, PE, ECG (class I)

Cause Certain Cause Uncertain Risk ?

Suspected Syncope

Treatment Further evaluation

Evaluation as clinically indicated

N

Y

History and Physical Examination

A detailed history and physical examination should be performed in patients with syncope I

Cardiac Versus Non-cardiac

Cardiac

Non Cardiac

Older Male sex Brief prodome (or no prodome) Syncope on exertion Syncope in supine position Low in number (1 or 2) Abnormal cardiac examination FHx of SCD

Younger No known cardiac disease

Standing position Presence of prodome (N/V)

Triggers (dehydration, pain, stress) Postional change (supine sitting)

Situation trigger (micturation, defecation, cough, largh)

Electrocardiography

I In the initial evaluation of patients with syncope, a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is useful

Brady & Tachyarrhythmia WPWs Long QT Short QT Brugada pattern ARVC HCM

Find the CLUES !!

Risk Assessment:

Evaluation of the cause and assessment for the short- and long-term morbidity and mortality risk of syncope are recommended

I

Use of risk stratification scores IIb

Risk factors Short term risk factors (< 30 days)

Male sex Older age > 60 yo No prodome Palpitation precede LOC Exertional syncope Structural heart disease Heart failure Cerebrovascular disease FHx of SCD Trauma

Long term risk factors (> 30 days)

Male sex Older age Absence of N/V precede LOC Ventricular arrhythmia Cancer Structural heart disease Heart failure Cerebrovascular disease Diabetes mellitus High CHADS2

Abnormal ECG Low GFR

Evidence of bleeding Persistent abnormal vital signs Abnormal ECG Positive troponin

LAB

Hx

Exam

ple

of

syn

cop

e ri

sk s

core

Patient Disposition After Initial Evaluation for Syncope

Syncope initial evaluation

Serious medical condition ?

Inpatient evaluation (I)

Y

Mx as reflex-mediated

syncope in OPD (IIa)

Observe at ED in intermediate risk

(IIa)

Mx selected pts. With suspected cardiac

syncope in OPD (IIb)

N

No serious medical condition No admission

Serious medical condition ?

Cardiac arrhythmic condition

Cardiac or vascular Nonarrhythmic condition

Noncardiac condition

1. Sustain or symptomatic VT 2. Symptomatic conduction

system or mobitz II or 3rd degree heart block

3. Symptomatic bradycardia or sinus pause

4. Symptomatic SVT 5. Pacemaker or ICD

malfunction 6. Inheritable predisposing to

arrhythmia

1. Cardiac ischemia 2. Severe aortic stenosis 3. Cardiac tamponade 4. HCM 5. Severe prosthetic valve

dysfunction 6. Pulmonary embolism 7. Aortic dissection 8. Acute HF 9. Moderate to severe LV

dysfunction

1. Severe anemia/GI bleeding

2. Major traumatic injury due to syncope

3. Persistent vital sign abnormalities

Recommendations for Disposition After Initial Evaluation

I Hospital evaluation and treatment are recommended for patients

presenting with syncope who have a serious medical condition potentially relevant to the cause of syncope identified during initial evaluation

IIa It is reasonable to manage patients with presumptive reflex-mediated syncope in the outpatient setting in the absence of serious medical conditions

In intermediate-risk patients with an unclear cause of syncope, use of a structured ED observation protocol can be effective in reducing hospital admission

IIa It may be reasonable to manage selected patients with suspected cardiac syncope in the outpatient setting in the absence of serious medical conditions

IIb

Additional Evaluation and Diagnosis

Syncope additional evaluation and diagnosis

Hx, PE, ECG (class I)

Initial evaluation Clear

No additional investigation needed

Initial evaluation Unclear

See below….

Initial evaluation Unclear

Targeted blood testing(IIa)

Suggested Neurogenic orthostatic

hypotension

Suggested Reflex

syncope

Suggested Cardiac syncope

Autonomic evaluation

(IIa)

Tilt table test (IIa)

Cardiac monitoring

(I)

optional

Stress test (IIa)

TTE (IIa)

EPS (IIa)

MRI/CT (IIb)

CBC and electrolyte panel (IIa)

BNP and troponin (IIb)

Routine broad panel laboratory testing (III)

Cardiovascular testing

IIa in selected patients presenting with syncope if structural heart disease is suspected

in selected patients presenting with syncope of suspected cardiac etiology IIb

Transthoracic echocardiography

Cardiac CT / MRI

Routine cardiac imaging

III Routine cardiac imaging is not useful in the evaluation of patients with syncope unless cardiac etiology is suspected– particularly transthoracic echocardiography

Stress Testing

can be useful to establish the cause of syncope in selected patients who experience syncope or presyncope during exertion

IIa

Cardiac monitoring

I The choice of a specific cardiac monitor should be determined on the basis of the frequency and nature of syncope events.

the following external cardiac monitoring approaches can be useful Holter monitoring 24-72 hr Event monitor 2-6 weeks External loop recorder 2-6 weeks External patch recorder 2-14 days Mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry realtime monitoring

IIa

IIb Implantable cardiac monitoring

In-Hospital Telemetry

I Continuous ECG monitoring is useful for hospitalized patients admitted for syncope evaluation with suspected cardiac etiology

Electrophysiological Study

IIa EPS can be useful for evaluation of selected patients with syncope of suspected arrhythmic etiology

EPS is not recommended for syncope evaluation in patients with a normal ECG and normal cardiac structure and function, unless an arrhythmic etiology is suspected III

Tilt-Table Testing

IIa useful for patients with suspected VVS useful for patients with syncope and suspected delayed OH when initial evaluation is not diagnostic reasonable to distinguish convulsive syncope from epilepsy in selected patients establish a diagnosis of pseudosyncope

Tilt-table testing is not recommended to predict a response to medical treatments for VVS III

Recommendation for Autonomic Evaluation

IIa Referral for autonomic evaluation can be useful to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in selected patients with syncope and known or suspected neurodegenerative disease

CNS multiple system atrophy , Parkinson’s disease , and Lewy Body dementia . Peripheral autonomic dysfunctions pure autonomic failure , or may accompany autonomic peripheral neuropathies diabetes amyloidosis, immunemediated neuropathies hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies, inflammatory neuropathies. Peripheral neuropathies vitamin B12 deficiency, neurotoxic exposure, HIV and other infections, and porphyria

Neurological and Imaging Diagnostics

Simultaneous monitoring of an EEG and hemodynamic parameters during tilt-table testing can be useful to distinguish among syncope, pseudosyncope, and epilepsy

IIa

Neurological and Imaging Diagnostics

MRI and CT of the head are not recommended in the routine evaluation of patients with syncope in the absence of focal neurological findings or head injury that support further evaluation

III

Carotid artery imaging is not recommended in the routine evaluation of patients with syncope in the absence of focal neurological findings that support further evaluation

Routine recording of an EEG is not recommended in the evaluation of patients with syncope in the absence of specific neurological features suggestive of a seizure

Management of Cardiovascular Conditions

Rx the disease Bradycardia, SVT, AF, VA

I In patients with syncope associated with bradycardia, GDMT is recommended. In patients with syncope and SVT, GDMT is recommended In patients with AF, GDMT is recommended. In patients with syncope and VA, GDMT is recommended

Rx the disease Cardiomyopathy, VHD, HCM

I In patients with syncope associated with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, GDMT is recommended In patients with syncope associated with valvular heart disease, GDMT is recommended In patients with syncope associated with HCM, GDMT is recommended

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC)

I ICD implantation is recommended in patients with ARVC who present with syncope and have a documented sustained VA

IIa ICD implantation is reasonable in patients with ARVC who present with syncope of suspected arrhythmic etiology

Syncope With Documented sustained VA

Syncope Without Documented sustained VA

Brugada Syndrome

ICD implantation is reasonable in patients with Brugada ECG pattern and syncope of suspected arrhythmic etiology IIa

IIb Invasive EPS may be considered in patients with Brugada ECG pattern and syncope of suspected arrhythmic etiology .

III ICD implantation is not recommended in patients with Brugada ECG pattern and reflex-mediated syncope in the absence of other risk factors

Short-QT Syndrome

ICD implantation may be considered in patients with short-QT pattern and syncope of suspected arrhythmic etiology.

IIb

Long-QT Syndrome

Beta-blocker therapy, in the absence of contraindications, is indicated as a first-line therapy in patients with LQTS and suspected arrhythmic syncope.

I

IIa ICD implantation is reasonable in patients with LQTS and suspected arrhythmic syncope who are on beta-blocker therapy or are intolerant to beta-blocker therapy

Left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) is reasonable in patients with LQTS and recurrent syncope of suspected arrhythmic mechanism who are intolerant to beta-blocker therapy or for whom beta-blocker therapy has failed

Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT)

I Exercise restriction is recommended in patients with CPVT presenting with syncope of suspected arrhythmic etiology

Beta blockers lacking intrinsic sympathomimetic activity are recommended in patients with CPVT and stress-induced syncope.

Exercise restriction, Betablocker

Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT)

Flecainide is reasonable in patients with CPVT who continue to have syncope of suspected VA despite beta-blocker therapy

IIa

ICD therapy is reasonable in patients with CPVT and a history of exercise or stress-induced syncope despite use of optimal medical therapy or LCSD

Flecainide, ICD despite OMT

Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT)

In patients with CPVT who continue to experience syncope or VA, verapamil with or without beta-blocker therapy may be considered IIb

LCSD may be reasonable in patients with CPVT, syncope, and symptomatic VA despite optimal medical therapy

Verapamil, Left cardiac sympathetic denervation

Early Repolarization Pattern

IIb ICD implantation may be considered in patients with early repolarization pattern and suspected arrhythmic syncope in the presence of a family history of early repolarization pattern with cardiac arrest.

EPS should not be performed in patients with early repolarization pattern and history of syncope in the absence of other indications.

III

Management of VVS

Vasovagal Syncope

Patient education on the diagnosis and prognosis of VVS is recommended. I

IIa Physical counter-pressure maneuvers can be useful in patients with VVS who have a sufficiently long prodromal period

Midodrine is reasonable in patients with recurrent VVS with no history of hypertension, HF, or urinary retention

Vasovagal Syncope orthostatic training Fludrocortisone Betablocker in patients with >/= 42 year old Encorage increase salt and water intake reduce or withdra medications that cause hypotension SSRI Dual-chamber pacing might be reasonable in a select population ofpatients 40 years of age or older with recurrent VVS and prolonged spontaneous pauses

IIb

VVS

Education on diagnosis and prognosis (I)

Counter pressure maneuver (IIa)

Increase salt and water intake (IIb)

VVS recurs

Midodrine (IIa) Fludrocortisone(IIb) Betablocker (in > 42

yo )(IIb) Orthostatic training IIb)

SSRI (IIb) Dual chamber

pacemaker (IIb)

Carotid Sinus Syndrome

Permanent cardiac pacing is reasonable in patients with carotid sinus syndrome that is cardioinhibitory or mixed IIa

It may be reasonable to implant a dual-chamber pacemaker in patients with carotid sinus syndrome who require permanent pacing

Management of Neurogenic OH

Recommendations for Neurogenic OH

I Acute water ingestion is recommended in patients with syncope caused by neurogenic OH for occasional, temporary relief

Physical counter-pressure maneuvers Compression garments Midodrine Droxidopa Fludrocortisone Encorage salt and water intake

IIa

Pyridostigmine Octreotide IIb

Dehydration and Drugs: Recommendations

I Fluid resuscitation via oral or intravenous bolus is recommended in patients with syncope due to acute dehydration

IIa Reducing or withdrawing medications that may cause hypotension can be beneficial in selected patients with syncope In selected patients with syncope due to dehydration, it is reasonable to encourage increased salt and fluid intake

Uncommon Conditions Associated With Syncope

Uncommon Conditions Associated With Syncope

Uncommon Conditions Associated With Syncope

Uncommon Conditions Associated With Syncope

Special population

Recommendations for Adult congenital heart disease

For evaluation of patients with ACHD and syncope, referral to a specialist with expertise in ACHD can be beneficial

IIa

EPS is reasonable in patients with moderate or severe ACHD and unexplained syncope

Recommendations for Geriatric Patients

For the assessment and management of older adults with syncope, a comprehensive approach in collaboration with an expert in geriatric care can be beneficial.

It is reasonable to consider syncope as a cause of nonaccidental falls in older adults

IIa

IIb

Driving syncope

It can be beneficial for healthcare providers managing patients with syncope to know the driving laws and restrictions in their regions and discuss implications with the patient.

IIa

Avo

idan

ce o

f Private

Drivin

g Afte

r an

Episo

de

of Syn

cop

e