Upload
buidien
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2016 Competitions Annual2
Published in the USA by The Competition Project, Inc.
Copyright © 2017 by The Competition Project, Inc.1731 Fernwood Avenue, Louisville, KY 40205Tel: (502) 451-3623www.competitions.org
All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproducedor transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechani-cal, including photocopy, recording or any other information storageand retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from thepublisher. Requests to the Publisher should be addressed to TheCompetition Project, Inc., P.O. Box 20445, Louisville, KY 40250, faxedto: (502) 451-3623, or emailed to [email protected].
PDF files may be placed at www.competitions.org
ISBN: 978-1-4951-1140-2
Digital format version
FRONT COVER
SHoP ArchitectsNew YorkNational Veterans Resource CenterSyracuse University
PREVIOUS PAGE
Zaha Hadid ArchitectsLondon, U.K.Forest Green Rovers Soccer StadiumStroud, Gloucestershire, U.K.
OPPOSITE PAGE
3XNCopenhagen, DenmarkMälardalen University CompetitionEskilstuna, Sweden
2016 Competitions Annual 3
2016COMPETITIONS Annual
Editor in Chief: G. Stanley Collyer, Ph.D, Hon. AIAAssociate Editor: Daniel Madryga, MS Arch.
with contributions by Michael Speaks, Gretchen Millikinand Wilfred Wang
2016 Competitions Annual4
6 Introduction
8 Latvian Museum of Contemporary Art
8 Adjaye Associates (winner)London, U.K.
16 Sauerbruch HuttonBerlin, Germany
20 Lahdelma & MahlamakiHelsinki, Finland
24 Caruso St John ArchitectsLondon, U.K.
26 Henning Larsen ArchitectsCopenhagen, Denmark
30 wHY ArchitectureLos Angeles, California
34 Neutelings Riedijk ArchitectsRotterdam, The Netherlands
38 Jack Layton Ferry Terminal Competition
38 KPMB Architects (winner)Toronto, Canada
42 Stoss Landscape Urbanism + nARCHITECTS + ZAS ArchitectsBoston/Brooklyn/Toronto
46 Clement Blanchet Architecture + RVTR + Batlle i RoigParis/Ann Arbor/Barcelona
48 Diller Scofidio+Renfro + architectsAlliance + Hood DesignNew York/ Toronto,/Oakland
48 Diller Scofidio+Renfro + architectsAlliance + Hood DesignNew York/ Toronto,/Oakland
50 Quadrangle Architects + aLL Design + Janet Rosenberg & StudioToronto
52 Berlin Forum M20 Competition
53 Herzog & de Meuron (winner)Basel, Switzerland2nd Place
58 Lundgaard & Tranberg Arkitekter A/S with Schønherr A/SCopenhagen, Denmark3rd Place
62 Bruno Fioretti Marquez Architektenwith Capatti Staubach LandschaftsarchitektenBerlin, GermanyHonorable Mentions
66 Office of Metropolitan ArchitectureRotterdam, The Netherlands
70 Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa/SANAATokyo, Japan
74 Volker Staab - Staab ArchitektenBerlin, Germany
78 Aires Mateus & AssociadosLisbon, Portugal
Contents82 The Museum of the 20th Century (open competition)
83 Arga16, Berlin, GermanyChoe Hackh Netter Architekten, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
84 ARGE Weyell Zipse Architekten und Hörner ArchitektenBasel, SwitzerlandPedro Domingos arquitectos unip., Ida + Pedro Matos Gameiro arq.Lisbon, Portugal
85 TOPOTEK 1, Berlin, Germany and Pordenone, ItalyHeinle, Wischer und Partner, Berlin, Germany
86 Florian Hoogen Architekt, Mo nchengladbach, GermanyShenzhen Huahui Design, Shenzhen/Beijing, China
87 Dost Architektur, Schaffhausen, SwitzerlandBeatriz Ale�s + Elena Zaera, Castello� , Spain
88 The Tri An Monument Competition
88 Grega Vezjak Architect (Winner)Bilje, Miren-Kostanjevica, SloveniaFinalists
92 David Chisholm, CMC ArchitectsPrague, Czech Republic
95 Jordan Hines, Informal Office, llcLexington, KentuckyHonorable Mentions
96 Jin Young Song, Buffalo, NY97 Anh Nguyen, Riverside, CA98 Rob Kiester, Denver, CO99 Yongwon Kwon, New York100 Justin Arleo, Chandler, AZ101 Tianyu Wu, Athens, GA102 Tom Lucey, Perth, Australia
Yi-Chen Lee, Taipei, Taiwan103 Tommy Haddock, San Francisco, CA
Palita Simapaisal, Bangkok, Thailand
104 Science Island Competition in Kaunas
104 SMAR Architecture Studio (Winner) Madrid and Western Australia
108 SimpsonHaugh and Partners (Winner)London/Manchester, U.K.
112 Donghua Chen Team (Winner)Beijing, ChinaHonorable Mentions
116 Alper Derinbogaz, SalonIstanbul, Turkey
117 Amid.cero9 / ElsewhereMadrid, Spain
118 Mark Foster Gage ArchitectsNew York, NY
119 UAB Architektų biuras G. Natkevičius ir partneriaiLithuania
120 Wolfgang Tschapeller ZTGmbHVienna, Austria
2016 Competitions Annual 5
122 Syracuse University National Veterans Resource CenterInterview with Michael Speaks
122 SHoP Architects (Winner)New York, NY
126 Snøhetta (Finalist)New York / Oslo
132 Strategizing for Expansion: Mälerdalen University
Winner132 3XN, Copenhagen, Denmark
Finalists138 Arkitema, Stockholm142 Christensen & Co, Copenhagen146 Juul/Frost, Copenhagen150 Wingårdh Architectural Office, Stockholm/Göteborg154 White Arkitekter, Göteborg
158 Not Just a Coming Attraction: ZNE Is Already Here!
158 Dialog (Merit Award), Vancouver, Canada162 Little (Merit Award), Charlotte, NC164 Modus Studio (Citation Award), Fayatteville, AR166 Romain Dechavanne (Student Honor Award)
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture, Grenoble, France167 Steven Loutherback (Student Merit Award)
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TXTamkang University (Student Special Recognition)Taipei City, Taiwan
168 The Museum of London Competition
168 Winning EntryStanton Williams with Asif Khan, London, U.K.Finalists
172 BIG - Bjarke Ingels Group, Copenhagen, Denmark173 Caruso St John, London, U.K.174 Diener and Diener Architekten, Basel, Switzerland176 Lacaton & Vassal Architectes. Paris, France177 Studio Milou architecture, Singapore
178 A Fitting Gateway for Gallaudet UniversityA Fitting Gateway for Gallaudet University
178 Hall McKnight (Winner)London / BelfastFinalists
182 Kennedy & Violich Architecture, LtdBoston, MA
184 Marvel ArchitectsNew York, NY
186 MASS Design GroupBoston, MA
188 New Rosa Luxemburg Foundation in BerlinNew Rosa Luxemburg Foundation in Berlin
188 Arge Kim Nallweg with César Trujillo Moya (1st Place)Berlin, Germany
192 bube (3rd Place - shared), Rotterdam, The Netherlands194 R + S Architekten (3rdPlace - shared), Lippstadt, Germany196 Rohdecan (3rdPlace - shared), Dresden, Germany198 Laura Alvarez Architecture (Honorable Mention), Amsterdam200 Lankes Koengeter Architekten (Honorable Mention), Berlin
202 Forest Green Rovers CompetitionForest Green Rovers Competition
202 Zaha Hadid Architects (Winner)London, U.K.
208 Glenn Howells Architects (Runnerup)Birmingham, U.K.Finalists
210 George King Architects, London, U.K.212 AFL Architects, Manchester, U.K. 213 Studio 12, Surrey, U.K.214 Zed Factory, Wallington, UK
DP Architects, Singapore215 Gianni Botsford Architects, London, U.K.
Richard Kroeker, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
216 Lamborghini Monument CompetitionLamborghini Monument Competition
216 ACQ studio (1st Prize - Shared), Florence, Italy218 Team 0.9 (1st Prize - Shared), Milan, Italy219 Team: FPMG (2nd Prize)220 Casamassima Mazzocchini Notari (3rd Prize)221 Team: CDA (Gold Mention)
Mass & Volume / Architecture, Art & Design Studio (Gold Mention)222 Florian Marquet (Honorable Mention)223 Team: HYPNOS - Jan Popowski, Nicola Brembilla (Honorable Mention)
224 Canterbury Earthquake Memorial DedicationCanterbury Earthquake Memorial Dedication
224224 Grega Vezjak Architect (Winner), Bilje, Miren-Kostanjevica, Slovenia
230 Twin Creeks: Trail as Experience MakerTwin Creeks: Trail as Experience Maker
230 APLIZ (Winner)Borba, Portugal
234 Cadaster, (Winner)Brooklyn, New York
236 Small Wonders (Winner)New York/Seattle
238 Notable 2016/2017 CompetitionsNotable 2016/2017 Competitions
240240 Illustration CreditsIllustration Credits
2016 Competitions Annual6
Introduction
Of all the competitions won by Zaha Hadid over the past decades, two standout, not because they were built and received universal praise, but because theyrepresented two of her best designs that went unbuilt: the Cardiff Opera House(1994) and the New National Stadium in Japan (2012). Since her passing in 2016,those two competitions seem almost like bookends, containing a life’s work span-ning over two decades.
Zaha Hadid was the consummate competitor, and her meteoric career could beattributed at least in part to her participation in numerous competitions. Althoughthe Cardiff Opera House competition did not result in a commission, it certainlycontributed to her presence as a designer to be reconed with on the nationalstage. Her name came up as a frequent participant in invited competitions, andshe must have lost twice as many of those as she won. An architect, who wasclosely involved with organizing a competition in Ireland once responded to myquestion, as to why Zaha had been shortlisted: “We needed somebody to runagainst.” The message to her competitors: Can you beat this?
Zaha was known for her exuberant, sweeping, curvilinear designs. However, shecould pursue an entirely different strategy when the situation dictated. A primeexample is the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati, Ohio—her first Americancommission. There she was confronted with a very small, constrained, corner site,and the end product—a structure sporting a facade that related more to cubism—seemed like the perfect urbanistic solution. For one who saw her there for the firsttime, she exuded supreme confidence in justifying her solution for this difficultchallenge. This, turning a building that needed more space for exhibits into a citylandmark.
Her later design for Michigan State University’s Eli Broad Art Museum, also theproduct of a competition, bore no resemblance to her Cincinnati project, spreadingout over a larger site, with no need to go up two or three stories. And when sheturned the BMW automobile plant in Leipzig into a spectacular experience, it wastime to look differently at what most regarded as a mundane building type.
And what other major contribution did she make to the profession of architec-ture? She proved that a woman could compete with any man when the playingfield was level. Maybe that is why she turned to competitions as a way to advancea promising career.
2016 Competitions Annual 7
“All sorts of rumours sweptCardiff on the weeks that fol-lowed that decision: it was theresult of a direct order fromNo. 10; it came from prejudicebecause Zaha Hadid is awoman, and an Iraqi at that;the Commissioners hated thedesign. I do not believe any of these
rumours, but I do know thatfear is perhaps the most sig-nificant of all political reali-ties, and leadership combinedwith vision is required to over-come it.So in the end the verdict
must be reached that politicsand dissension were decisive.”-Nicholas Crickhowell fromOpera House Lottery
2016 Competitions Annual8
Poland and the Baltic states have been playing cultural catch-up with the rest ofthe world ever since the former gained their independence after the breakup of theSoviet Union in 1989. These have included several high-profile competitions formuseums in Poland, but also interesting projects in Estonia. Now Latvia andLithuania are saying that they too should also have modern art museums on parwith those in western Europe and Scandinavia. In Latvia, a movement to establish amodern art museum dates back to the early decade of the 21st century. It was thenin 2005 that the ABLV Charitable Foundation, established by a local bank, providedendowment funds for purchasing modern art for a museum. They were joined inthe museum project by The Boris and Inara Teterev Foundation, which was foundedwith the purpose of promoting culture.
Finland has always had close times culturally to the Baltic States, especially toEstonia, and the recent Guggenheim competition there could hardly have goneunnoticed by its southern neighbors. So it should come as no surprise that theLatvian sponsors engaged Malcolm Reading Consultants, the Guggenheim competi-tion adviser, to organize their competition for the Latvian Museum ofContemporary Art in the nation’s capital, Riga. Contrary to the Guggenheim compe-tition, this time the finalists were the result of a closed shortlisting process.
Prioritizing Arts on the BalticThe Latvian Museum of Contemporary Art
Winning Entry
Adjaye Associates (UK) with AB3D (Latvia)
ABOVE
View from southwest
OPPOSITE PAGE
View to front entrance
©Adjaye Associates Images courtesy Malcolm Reading Consultants