2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

1

GOODUE COUNTY EDUCATION DISTRICTGCED K-12 Total Population 7815 100.00%GCED Total Population Tested in Reading 2917 37.33%GCED Total Population Tested in Math 3289 42.09%GCED K-12 Sped Population 1146 14.66%

GCED WIDE READING DATA Low Risk Mod Risk High Risk

Cannon Falls 66.50% 21.31% 12.20%Goodhue 72.27% 20.09% 7.64%Kenyon-Wanamingo 57.19% 20.30% 22.52%Lake City 75.00% 15.13% 9.87%Red Wing 62.62% 18.11% 19.28%River Bluff Ed Ctr 30.95% 28.57% 40.48%Zumbrota-Mazeppa 59.03% 25.06% 15.90%

423.55% 148.56% 127.88%Total 60.51% 21.22% 18.27%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

2

GCED WIDE MATH DATA Low Risk Mod Risk High Risk

Cannon Falls 66.45% 23.00% 10.55%Goodhue 69.26% 23.59% 7.14%Kenyon-Wanamingo 61.07% 23.66% 15.27%Lake CityRed Wing 57.56% 24.84% 17.60%River Bluff Ed Ctr 25.00% 21.00% 54.00%Zumbrota-Mazeppa 63.50% 20.44% 16.06%

342.86% 136.53% 120.61%Total 57.14% 22.76% 20.10%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

3

CANNON FALLSCF K-12 Total Population 1179 100.00% 100.00%CF Total Population Tested in Reading 779 66.07% 66.07%CF Total Population Tested in Math 787 66.75% 66.75%CF K-12 Sped Population 136 11.54% 11.54%

CF READING

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 76 67 8 1 88.2% 10.53% 1.32%1 83 45 31 7 54.2% 37.35% 8.43%2 90 72 10 8 80.0% 11.11% 8.89%3 89 59 13 17 66.3% 14.61% 19.10%4 77 52 16 9 67.5% 20.78% 11.69%5 84 51 23 10 60.7% 27.38% 11.90%6 93 62 17 14 66.7% 18.28% 15.05%7 90 49 27 14 54.4% 30.00% 15.56%8 97 61 21 15 62.9% 21.65% 15.46%9 0

10 0TOTAL 779 518 166 95 66.50% 21.31% 12.20%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

4

CF MATH

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 76 61 11 4 4 14.47% 5.26%1 83 58 19 6 6 22.89% 7.23%2 90 57 26 7 7 28.89% 7.78%3 89 69 11 9 9 12.36% 10.11%4 89 67 12 10 10 13.48% 11.24%5 83 41 29 13 13 34.94% 15.66%6 91 58 22 11 13 24.18% 12.09%7 90 53 28 9 13 31.11% 10.00%8 96 59 23 14 13 23.96% 14.58%9 0

10 0TOTAL 787 523 181 83 66.45% 23.00% 10.55%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

5

GOODHUEGD K-12 Total Population 846 100.00%GD Total Population Tested in Reading 458 54.14%GD Total Population Tested in Math 462 54.61%GD K-12 Sped Population 121 14.30%

GDREADING

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 50 36 12 2 72.00% 24.00% 4.00%1 50 37 10 3 74.00% 20.00% 6.00%2 56 49 4 3 87.50% 7.14% 5.36%3 45 34 8 3 75.56% 17.78% 6.67%4 57 33 20 4 57.89% 35.09% 7.02%5 43 31 9 3 72.09% 20.93% 6.98%6 45 26 12 7 57.78% 26.67% 15.56%7 55 44 9 2 80.00% 16.36% 3.64%8 57 41 8 8 71.93% 14.04% 14.04%

TOTAL 458 331 92 35 72.27% 20.09% 7.64%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

6

GDMATH

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 49 37 10 2 75.5% 20.41% 4.08%1 50 34 10 6 68.0% 20.00% 12.00%2 58 44 10 4 75.9% 17.24% 6.90%3 46 32 8 6 69.6% 17.39% 13.04%4 57 43 7 7 75.4% 12.28% 12.28%5 44 22 21 1 50.0% 47.73% 2.27%6 46 27 13 6 58.7% 28.26% 13.04%7 55 48 7 0 87.3% 12.73% 0.00%8 57 33 23 1 57.9% 40.35% 1.75%

TOTAL 462 320 109 33 69.3% 23.59% 7.14%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

7

KENYON-WANAMINGOKW K-12 Total Population 846 100.00%KW Total Population Tested in Reading 675 79.79%KW Total Population Tested in Math 655 77.42%KW K-12 Sped Population 121 14.30%

KWREADING

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 58 47 10 1 81.0% 17.24% 1.72%1 49 26 18 5 53.1% 36.73% 10.20%2 56 39 6 11 69.6% 10.71% 19.64%3 70 34 15 21 48.6% 21.43% 30.00%4 73 41 18 14 56.2% 24.66% 19.18%5 61 43 8 10 70.5% 13.11% 16.39%6 59 36 8 15 61.0% 13.56% 25.42%7 58 32 11 15 55.2% 18.97% 25.86%8 59 26 14 19 44.1% 23.73% 32.20%9 66 25 20 21 37.9% 30.30% 31.82%

10 66 37 9 20 56.1% 13.64% 30.30%TOTAL 675 386 137 152 57.19% 20.30% 22.52%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

8

KWMATH

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 58 42 12 4 72.4% 20.69% 6.90%1 48 29 14 5 60.4% 29.17% 10.42%2 55 39 13 3 70.9% 23.64% 5.45%3 67 47 14 6 70.1% 20.90% 8.96%4 73 51 14 8 69.9% 19.18% 10.96%5 60 37 15 8 61.7% 25.00% 13.33%6 59 38 15 6 64.4% 25.42% 10.17%7 51 24 12 15 47.1% 23.53% 29.41%8 59 20 19 20 33.9% 32.20% 33.90%9 64 35 14 15 54.7% 21.88% 23.44%

10 61 38 13 10 62.3% 21.31% 16.39%TOTAL 655 400 155 100 61.07% 23.66% 15.27%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

9

LAKE CITYLC K-12 Total Population 1286 100.00% 100.00%LC Total Population Tested in Reading 21 1.63% 1.63%LC Total Population Tested in Math 0 0.00% 0.00%LC K-12 Sped Population 121 9.41% 9.41%

LCREADING

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 80 57 14 9 71.3% 17.50% 11.25%1 63 48 9 6 76.2% 14.29% 9.52%2 81 61 12 8 75.3% 14.81% 9.88%3 104 78 16 10 75.0% 15.38% 9.62%4 116 88 17 11 75.9% 14.66% 9.48%5 93 70 14 9 75.3% 15.05% 9.68%6 91 69 13 9 75.8% 14.29% 9.89%

TOTALS 628 471 95 62 75.00% 15.13% 9.87%

LCMATH

# of Students Assessed

0

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

10

RED WINGRW K-12 Total Population 2742 100.00%RW Total Population Tested in Reading 856 31.22%RW Total Population Tested in Math 1256 45.81%RW K-12 Sped Population 473 17.25%

RWREADING

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 25.0% 21.00% 54.00%1 44.0% 34.00% 22.00%

2SSE 74.0% 9.00% 17.00%2 BSE 153 98 21 34 64.1% 13.73% 22.22%

3 204 136 34 34 66.7% 16.67% 16.67%4 199 114 52 33 57.3% 26.13% 16.58%5 100 68 16 16 68.0% 16.00% 16.00%6 100 64 14 22 64.0% 14.00% 22.00%7 100 56 18 26 56.0% 18.00% 26.00%8 09 0

10 0TOTAL 856 536 155 165 62.62% 18.11% 19.28%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

11

RWMATH

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 0 44.0% 32.00% 24.00%1 0 57.0% 29.00% 14.00%

2SSE 0 40.0% 40.00% 21.00%2BSE 153 59 57 37 38.6% 37.25% 24.18%

3 204 147 37 20 72.1% 18.14% 9.80%4 197 146 28 23 74.1% 14.21% 11.68%5 100 56 29 15 56.0% 29.00% 15.00%6 100 69 11 20 69.0% 11.00% 20.00%7 100 59 27 14 59.0% 27.00% 14.00%8 188 105 49 34 55.9% 26.06% 18.09%9 192 79 70 43 41.1% 36.46% 22.40%

10 22 3 4 15 13.6% 18.18% 68.18%TOTAL 1256 723 312 221 57.56% 24.84% 17.60%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

12

RIVER BLUFF EDUCATION CENTER - All of our students.RBEC K-12 Total Population 70 100.00%RBEC Total Population Tested in Reading 42 60.00%RBEC Total Population Tested in Math 31 44.29%RBEC K-12 Sped Population 53 75.71%

RBEC READING

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K - 10 42 13 12 17 31.0% 28.57% 40.48%

RBEC MATH

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K - 10 31 7 4 20 25.0% 21.00% 54.00%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

13

ZUMBROTA-MAZEPPAZM K-12 Total Population 846 100.00%ZM Total Population Tested in Reading 86 10.17%ZM Total Population Tested in Math 98 11.58%ZM K-12 Sped Population 121 14.30%

ZM READING

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 86 38 33 15 44.2% 38.37% 17.44%1 102 58 27 17 56.9% 26.47% 16.67%2 88 49 23 16 55.7% 26.14% 18.18%3 98 71 16 11 72.4% 16.33% 11.22%4 92 45 33 14 48.9% 35.87% 15.22%5 103 65 20 18 63.1% 19.42% 17.48%6 89 60 16 13 67.4% 17.98% 14.61%7 93 61 18 14 65.6% 19.35% 15.05%8 09 35 17 11 7 48.6% 31.43% 20.00%

10 0TOTALS 786 464 197 125 59.03% 25.06% 15.90%

2016-17 Winter Assessment Window Data

14

ZM MATH

# of Students Assessed

Low Risk#

Mod Risk#

High Risk#

Low Risk %

Mod Risk %

High Risk %

K 01 02 88 55 16 17 0.00% 18.18% 19.32%3 98 77 15 6 16.33% 15.31% 6.12%4 92 71 11 10 77.17% 11.96% 10.87%5 103 49 39 15 47.57% 37.86% 14.56%6 89 53 15 21 59.55% 16.85% 23.60%7 08 09 0

10 78 43 16 19 55.13% 20.51% 24.36%TOTALS 548 348 112 88 63.50% 20.44% 16.06%