20151224-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Malcolm Turnbull Re Australias Civil & Religious Rights-health Issues-etc

8/20/2019 20151224-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Malcolm Turnbull Re Australias Civil & Religious Rights-health Issues-…

1/15

1

p1 24-12-2015 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD

A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0

Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati

Mr Malcolm Turnbull 24-12-2015 [email protected]

5Cc: Bill Shorten [email protected]

Senator George Brandis [email protected]

Mr Clive Palmer [email protected]

Jacqui Lambie [email protected] 0

Re: 20151224-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Malcolm Turnbull Re Australias civil & religious rights-health issues-etc

Malcolm,

as a CONSTITUTIONALIST my first concern is if any legislation or government

regulation is constitutionally valid.5CRUDEN v. NEALE 2 NC 338 Chief Justice Paul de Jersey AC [1796]

http://www.publicnoticeposted.com/cruden.htm QUOTE

"When we speak of ‘the law’, we contemplate the legislature which enacts it, the police service which

enforces it – at least on the criminal side, and the courts of law which ensure the delivery of justice according0to law.It must be remembered that the charter of the courts is not to do justice, but to do justice according to law.

Subjective notions of justice vary immensely from person to person. The legal system would be unworkably

uncertain and unpredictable if judges applied their idiosyncratic notions of what is just. Accordingly, judges –

and police officers, are constrained by the law enacted by the people’s elected representatives in the5Parliament.

The stipulation is for equal justice, of which the probably best-known symbol of the Supreme Court is thestatue of Themis standing with dignity before the courthouse in George Street. She is quite regularly

displayed in television coverage of legal proceedings. That regular ‘air time’ probably increases her notoriety,

but more fundamentally, it reflects her enduring iconic status – an ancient goddess whose influential message0still defines modern civil society."

END QUOTE

https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F.Cas/0003.f.cas/0003.f.cas.0221.pdf

BENNETT V. BOGGS . 5QUOTE

We cannot declare legislative act void because it conflicts with our opinions of policy, expediency or

justice. We are not the guardians of the rights of the people of a state unless they are secured by some

constitutional provision which comes within our judicial cognizance. The remedy for unwise or

oppressive legislation, within constitutional bounds, is by an appeal to the justice and patriotism of the0representatives of the people. If this fails, the people in their sovereign capacity can correct the evil; but

courts cannot assume their rights.

END QUOTE

As such we need to look at the rule of law as it is and not what we may desire, regardless what5

each our positions are.

No doubt there is an anti-Muslim push through many parts of the world and Australia is not

exempted from this. After all, who wants to be the future victim of some terrorist?

We have far too many politicians being bleeding hearts for certain refugees disregarding the fact

that no matter who they are in the end when they come into Australia they will get services such0

as public housing that Australian s are waiting for and on the waiting list for a decade or more.

As such, even if one were to ignore (not that I seek to promote this) any Islamic issue we still

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatimailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.publicnoticeposted.com/cruden.htmhttp://www.publicnoticeposted.com/cruden.htmhttps://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F.Cas/0003.f.cas/0003.f.cas.0221.pdfhttps://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F.Cas/0003.f.cas/0003.f.cas.0221.pdfhttps://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F.Cas/0003.f.cas/0003.f.cas.0221.pdfhttp://www.publicnoticeposted.com/cruden.htmmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatimailto:[email protected]


2/15

2





have that while Australians who are homeless are sleeping in the streets, under bridges, etc,

aliens who never paid a cent tax in Australia that ism, are so to say showered with all kinds of

services.

Hansard 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian5Convention)

QUOTE

Mr. WISE.-You cannot impose exceptional treatment upon the citizens of another state; that applies

to everything.

END QUOTE0

If no exceptional treatment can be imposed upon a citizen of another state as all people must be

equal then how can “aliens” being it refugees or economical refugees be given a better treatment

than that of ordinary tax citizens one has to ask!

Politicians who have abandoned to represent their constituency should be expelled from the5

Parliament, this as they are receiving “allowances” or “salary” as to represent constituents. They

are elected to represent their constituents foremost above the interest of aliens.

Having stated the above I will now refer to some legal principles embedded in our constitution.

HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates 0QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-

What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-theliberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of

liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good

government for the whole of the peoples whom it will embrace and unite. 5END QUOTE

HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE

Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in thi s Convention are about to commi t to the0people of Australia a new charter of un ion and li berty ; we are about to commit th is new Magna Charta

for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole

history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of

Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new

charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves. 5END QUOTE


QUOTE

Mr. BARTON.- We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of0the Constitution. . It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under

it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-

the Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the

Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of

this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow5degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the

guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the

court you are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal aswill preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of

constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere0of the Commonwealth.

END QUOTE.

As one Member of Parliament highlighted to me in Maree (SA) a Mosque existed prior to

federation. Indeed we can freely admit that Muslims have been very much a part of the5

development of Australia and so in a positive manner.

Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE Sir EDWARD BRADDON (Tasmania).-I have an amendment to move on behalf of Tasmania, and also an0

amendment of my own. The clause we have before us says that a state shall not make any law prohibiting the

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatimailto:[email protected]


3/15

3





free exercise of any religion. It is quite possible that this might make lawfull practices which would otherwise

be strictly prohibited. Take, for instance, the Hindoos. One of their religious rites is the "suttee," and

another is the "churruck,"-one meaning simply murder, and the other barbarous cruelty, to the

devotees who offer themselves for the sacrifice.

Dr. COCKBURN.-The Thugs are a religious sect. 5Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-Yes. If this is to be the law, these people will be able to practise the rites

of their religion, and the amendment I have to suggest is the insertion of some such words as these:-

But shall prevent the performance of any such religious rites, as are of a cruel or demoralizing

character or contrary to the law of the Commonwealth.

END QUOTE 0

While I have in the past written that we need Muslims to abandon aggressiveness/violence and

embrace a contemporary kind of religious view this also as to avoid any clashes with criminal

law provisions we must never however judge all people who have an Islamic tradition/custom to

be then some kind of potential terrorist.5

Many have become well established pillars in the community they reside in.

When the Federal Government intended to pursue compulsory vaccination I wrote and published

numerous documents about it and covering many issues. But basically politicians and officials

could so to say give a red arse as they just will do whatever they desire to do. Don’t we know

how John Howard claimed that the armed murderous (unconstitutional) armed invasion was to0

make the world a safer place, when in fact IS arose from its ashes, and well terrorism is now rife.So much for the world being a safer place when the exact opposite resulted. Yet, those criminals

who caused this are left to enjoy huge pays (many in retirement) for undermining Australia’ s

security.

What the misplaced concept with terrorist is that they take the soft option, to attack innocent5

people, rather than the real terrorist the politicians and their officials. But is this about to change?.

WELSH v. UNI TED STATES, 398 U.S. 333 (1970 ), 398 U.S. 333, WELSH v. UNI TED STATES ,

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, No. 76.,

Argued January 20, 1970, Decided June 15, 19700QUOTE

1. The language of 6 (j) cannot be construed (as it was in United States v. Seeger, supra, and as it is in the

prevailing opinion) to exempt from military service all individuals who in good faith oppose all war, it

being clear from both the legislative history and textual analysis of that provision that Congress used the

words "by reason of religious training and belief" to limit religion to its theistic sense and to confine it to5formal, organized worship or shared beliefs by a recognizable and cohesive group. Pp. 348-354.

2. The question of the constitutionality of 6 (j) cannot be avoided by a construction of that provision that is

contrary to its intended meaning. Pp. 354-356.

3. Section 6 (j) contravenes the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by exempting those whose

conscientious objection claims are founded on a theistic belief while not exempting those whose claims are0 based on a secular belief. To comport with that clause an exemption must be "neutral" and include those

whose belief emanates from a purely moral, ethical, or philosophical source. Pp. 356-361.

4. In view of the broad discretion conferred by the Act's severability clause and the longstanding policy of

exempting religious conscientious objectors, the Court, rather than nullifying the exemption entirely, should

extend its coverage to those like petitioner who have been unconstitutionally excluded from its coverage.5

Pp. 361-367.END QUOTE

Religious objections clearly includes any theistic objection!0

Hansard 6-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National

Australasian Convention)

QUOTE Mr. BARTON:

I hope that I am at any rate acting in the spirit in which we all labour together, and that the result of our

labour will be to found a state of high and august aims, working by the eternal principles of justice and not to5the music of bullets, and affording an example of freedom, political morality, and just action to the

individual, the state and the nation which will one day be the envy of the world.

END QUOTE

Hansard 9-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates



4/15

4





QUOTE Mr. FITZGERALD:

The people of Australia have stretched their limbs. They feel themselves animated by that high spirit

which characterised their ancestors. They feel within them that they are doing a duty inspired by the

same motives as those of their race before them. They know that men of their race have fashioned

and formed a large portion of the globe in a manner that redounds to their honor and credit, and to5the freedom of the world. They know that you cannot advance this country without adding to the

wealth, and the national importance, and the power of that grand empire to which we belong, and

they know that the expansion of the empire means the happiness and the freedom of everybody who

lives under the protection of its flag.

END QUOTE 0Hansard 15-9-1897 Constitution convention DebatesQUOTE

The Hon. J.H. HOWE: Not in the case of money bills. The power of the purse is the golden key which rules

everything and opens every door. We know that we have allowed these things to be frittered away, and for5the sake of federation and for the sake of entering into a brotherhood we have actually departed from the first

position which we took up. After we have done that, some hon. members want to bring in these insidious

amendments, so that the states shall have no independent life. Since I joined this Convention in Adelaide,

that fair city of the south, where the people are as free as their air is pure, and whose freedom I wish to

maintain, I have undergone the difficult task of fighting an election.0END QUOTE

Hansard 13-2-1890 UNION OF THE COLONIES Debates QUOTE Sir HENRY PARKES.

I have confidence that that policy will gain strength in the next appeal to the people, and I tell this5Conference that, whether we federate or not, I shall not abate one jot of my efforts to promote the noble

policy of freedom for the exertions of civilized men. I only mention my determination, as a citizen of New

South Wales, to still promote our own policy, first, that there may be no misunderstanding in the matter,and, secondly, to show the genuineness of my professions.

END QUOTE0The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National

Australasian Convention) QUOTE Mr. CLARK .-5

the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled toclaim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.

END QUOTE.

HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates0QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-

The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution ,

END QUOTE.

HANSARD 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates 5QUOTE

Mr. BARTON.-Our civil rights are not in the hands of any Government, but the rights of the Crown

in prosecuting criminals are.

END QUOTE .0Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE

Mr. HIGGINS.-But suppose they go beyond their power?

Mr. GORDON.-It is still the expression of Parliament. Directly a Ministry seeks to enforce improperly

any law the citizen has his right. 5END QUOTE

HANSARD 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE

Mr. BARTON.-We do not propose to hand over contracts and civil rights to the Federation, and they0are intimately allied to this question.

END QUOTE



5/15

5





Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Mr. HIGGINS.-

"religion is ever a matter between God and the individual; the imposing of religious tests hath been the

greatest engine of tyranny in the world." END QUOTE 5

Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian

Convention)

QUOTE

Mr. HIGGINS.-But suppose they go beyond their power?0Mr. GORDON.-It is still the expression of Parliament. Directly a Ministry seeks to enforce improperly

any law the citizen has his right.

END QUOTE 5

Hansard 31-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National

Australasian Convention)QUOTE Mr. SOLOMON.-

We shall not only look to the Federal Judiciary for the protection of our interests, but also for the just

interpretation of the Constitution: 0END QUOTE


QUOTE Mr. GORDON.-The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the Constitution we will have to5wipe it out."

END QUOTE


QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-0The position with regard to this Constitution is that it has no legislative power, except that which is

actually given to it in express terms or which is necessary or incidental to a power given.END QUOTE

Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates5QUOTE

Mr. GLYNN.-I think they would, because it is fixed in the Constitution. There is no special court, butthe general courts would undoubtedly protect the states. What Mr. Isaacs seeks to do is to prevent the

question of ultr a vir es arising after a law has been passed.

[start page 2004] 0Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultr a vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid.

END QUOTE

Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.- 5

No one is more in favour of that than I am. But, at the same time, it is said-"Let the Houses of Parliament act

capriciously and variously from day to day-allow this 'tacking' to go on if the Houses choose to agree to it-letthe Houses do one thing one day and another the next, and do not bother about altering the Constitution, but

trust the Parliament." Of course; but Parliament must only be trusted when it is within the Constitution.

The Senate of to-day and the House of Representatives must not be put in a position superior to the0 Constitution.END QUOTE.


QUOTE5Mr. HIGGINS.-I did not say that it took place under this clause, and the honorable member is quite right in

saying that it took place under the next clause; but I am trying to point out that laws would be valid if

they had one motive, while they would be invalid if they had another motive. END QUOTE.0Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE



6/15

6





Mr. HIGGINS.-The particular danger is this: That we do not want to give to the Commonwealth

powers which ought to be left to the states. The point is that we are not going to make the

Commonwealth a kind of social and religious power over us. END QUOTE

5As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I made clear in past writings that in my view the

Commonwealth has no legislative powers to enforce vaccinations upon any person in violation of

s116. But again politicians are generally immune from common sense when it comes to exercise

their kind of terrorism.

As I have quoted below I received various emails with content that may even upset the most0

peace-loving Muslim where they and/or their children may have been immunized with pig DNA.

Many may now want to directly target politicians and/or officials who caused this upon them and

by this infringed their constitutional rights of “religious liberty”.

Besides that Muslims may be severely offended if they were to discover that they, so their

children, may have been vaccinated with pig DNA many others may also be offended if they5

discover some of the items that were in vaccinations and the dangers associated with it.

But, when it comes to Muslims they may view that the Federal Government with its

officials violated their constitutional rights and perhaps may pursue a class action rather

than to wage their own personal retribution upon those who harmed them..0Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER .-

I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond

the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say

that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the5Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as

any private person would be. END QUOTE

I below will quote details provided to me via email and I would urge anyone to consider the0

severe consequences if the details and claims in the emails are proven to be correct.

And not to overlook the possible consequences if anyone who considers to have been violated

such as contrary to their religious/atheist beliefs what they may engage in as to perhaps punishthe wrongdoers personally.

Politicians should come to grip with reality that if they place their so called personal powers5

above that of their duties and obligations within the context of the constitution then they may

have to accept that they may become the personal target of those who’s constitutional/civil and

other rights they deliberately violated.

QUOTE EMAILS & ATTACHMENTS (23-12-2015)0FW: GovCorp Crimes… (4) A

People

David Rode

Today at 10:22 AM

Message body5

This is GovCorp (Australian 'Health' Agencies & 'Our' Democratic Media) misleading Concept of vaccine

'Safe & Effective' status.

These Criminal LIARS have, acting in concert, knowingly misled Parliament to the extreme Detriment of the0entire Populace... Lying by Omission - Lying using Fraudulent & Misleading Data - Lying by Censorship -

Lying by False Ridicule - is only starters to what is kept hidden from Public review and Understanding.

Vaccine Action Letter: Expanded Research Potential Vaccination Risks:

1. The proposed swine flu squalene adjuvant live virus vaccination is neither adequately or sufficiently tested, nor5 proven effective or safe; is uninsurable, can stimulate the onset of a variety of debilitating auto-immune diseases,

and is a serious assault on the immune system... At issue is what we consider to be the serious deception and general

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatimailto:[email protected]


7/15

7





misinformation about the safety of the impending live virus swine flu vaccine, which is neither adequately tested nor

safe, although the so-called “researchers” have publicly declared it safer than the regular flu vaccine before even

beginning the testing process. They may be right in that the regular flu vaccine was anything but safe. There were an

average of 8,364 adverse reactions to the flu vaccine reported to the Federal Government in 2007 and 2008.5

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a passive reporting system, notorious for under-representing true reaction rates. Passive reporting systems may capture just 1 percent or less of true damage to

recipients of pharmaceutical drugs (as noted by David Kessler, former head of the FDA). Based on the VAERS

data, calculations suggest an average of 850,000 life threatening, life crippling side effects, or deaths associated with

all vaccinations given per year based on an extrapolation of the CDC data.0Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny, Director of the Initiative for Vaccine Research at the World Health Organization (WHO)

Headquarters, even stated herself that vaccines “do induce adverse reactions and this can be the case as well for

adjuvanted vaccines and non-adjuvanted vaccines.” She also said the vaccine safety data is, for certain populations,

significantly lacking; and for quite a few populations, there is no data at all to verify the safety of vaccines — 5including children, those over 65, pregnant mothers, and asthmatics. Dr. Kieny actually says that she doesn’t even

know what the proportions of the ingredients are in the 4.9 billion vaccines they are about to inject into people.

There have been no complete clinical trials for a medical product that is about to be administered on mass to

pregnant women and children. There literally is no data for this vaccine as per its use in children, pregnant women,0and asthmatics. There is a considerable amount of data with squalene in Gulf War vets receiving both anexperimental Anthrax vaccine and experimental HIV vaccine. It is highly associated with at least 300,000 vets

who have made permanent claims for total disability. Animal research also supports these findings.

As reported in the Irish Times, the Lancet recently stated: “Countries need to assess carefully the risks and benefits5of the rapid approval of a human swine flu vaccine to avoid repeat of past problems with mass- vaccination.” According to the London Evening Standard, WHO officials have warned that H1N1 vaccines may be unsafe. The

Institute of Science and Society has said that the vaccines will be far more deadly than the swine flu, and that mass

vaccinations are a recipe for disaster... (Comment ~ Yes, a planned disaster ). 0

The new swine flu live virus vaccine could be more dangerous than “seasonal” flu vaccines because some of them

are using new technologies, and all of them are being fast-tracked, reducing testing periods and safety requirements

before licensing occurs.

2. The swine flu vaccine contains dangerous & life-threatening fillers, including adjuvants such as squalene, animal5tissues (which may include pig tissue), viral and bacterial proteins, and live viruses — all of which contain pig DNA.

The contents of this live swine flu virus vaccine injection are cause for concern. One of the most dangeroussubstances contained in this injection is squalene. There are over two-dozen animal studies that show squalene’s

ability to induce severe autoimmunity... Research at this point suggests squalene is heavily associated with the

debilitating and life-destroying Gulf War Syndrome. Because of this, there is a serious risk of a Gulf War Syndrome0outbreak amongst the vaccinated general public. Of course, this Autoimmune syndrome will not show up after oneweek of human vaccine trials, nor will Autism, Guillain – Barre syndrome (a demyelisation of the nervous system that

can paralyse a person from the neck down), or an assortment of autoimmune disorders including Type 1 diabetes.

In one study of over 100,000 vaccinated children in Finland, there was a 147% increase in the rate of Type 1

diabetes in those vaccinated. The lack of sufficient testing on this experimental live virus vaccine raises many5concerns. There are no criteria on its efficacy or valid statistics to speak of.

During the 1976 swine flu scare, the swine flu vaccine itself killed hundreds & sickened countless others, and had an

unusually high rate of Guillain-Barre Syndrome associated with it. Dr. Leonard Horowitz (author of 'Emerging

Viruses: AIDS And Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional?' ) says the swine-bird-human flu strain, reported to be0 found first in Mexico in late-March 2009, most likely came from Dr. James S. Robertson and his colleagues inassociation with the US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and vaccine manufacturer Novavax, Inc., which was

ready to profit from the release.

Nobody else takes H5N1 Asian-flu infected chickens, takes them to Europe, extracts their DNA, combines5their proteins with H1N1 viruses from the 1918 Spanish flu isolate, additionally mixes in some swine-flu genes

from pigs, then reverse engineers them to infect humans, he said.

What is key to this understanding is that two researchers have made a very strong case for this being a laboratory-

created virus. http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/30/dr-horowitz-mexicanswine-flu-made-in-lab/ 0

Some of the new H1N1 (swine flu) vaccines are going to be made by Novartis. These shots will probably be made in

PER.C6 cells (human retina cells) and contain MF59, a potentially debilitating adjuvant... MF-59 is an oil-based

adjuvant primarily composed of squalene. All rats injected with squalene oil adjuvants developed a disease that left

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/30/dr-horowitz-mexicanswine-flu-made-in-lab/http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/30/dr-horowitz-mexicanswine-flu-made-in-lab/http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/30/dr-horowitz-mexicanswine-flu-made-in-lab/http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/30/dr-horowitz-mexicanswine-flu-made-in-lab/http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatimailto:[email protected]


8/15

8





them crippled, dragging their paralysed hindquarters across their cages. Injected squalene can cause severe arthritis

and severe immune responses, such as Autoimmune Arthritis and Lupus.

Reference (1): Kenney, RT. Edleman, R. “Survey of human-use adjuvants.” Expert Review of Vaccines. 2 (2003)

p171. Reference (2): Matsumoto, Gary. Vaccine A: The Covert Government Experiment That’s Killing Our Soldiers5and Why GI’s Are Only the First Victims of this Vaccine. New York: Basic Books ~ P54: LIST OF VACCINEFILLERS & ADJUVENTS...

This list, officially administered by design with every vaccine provided to the public, in addition to the squalene that

appears to be in this upcoming swine flu vaccine, is of great concern to many parents and grandparents, with the0announcement that they will start vaccinating children and pregnant women first and then “wait to see if there aretoo many adverse events” (including seizures, neurological problems, and death)...

In addition to the viral and bacterial RNA or DNA that is part of the vaccines, here are the fillers: • Aluminium

hydroxide – directly linked to causing Alzheimer’s disease • Aluminum phosphate – directly linked to causing5 Alzheimer’s disease • Ammonium sulphate – an inorganic chemical compound used as fertilizer and “protein purifier” - known to cause kidney & liver damage, gastrointestinal dysfunctions • Amphotericin B – an “antifungal

disinfectant” and anti-biotic, which damages the urinary tract, bowels, and heart functions • Animal tissues (a

causal element for all the various auto-immune diseases associated with vaccination): horse blood, rabbit brain,

dog kidney, monkey kidney, chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg, pig blood, Porcine (pig) pancreatic0hydrolysate of casein (the pig protein / tissue is an additional objectionable issue for Jewish and Muslimpeople) • Calf (bovine) serum & foetal bovine serum (cow blood is recognised as a significant transmitter of Mad

Cow Disease) • Betapropiolactone • Formaldehyde – used as “a preservative & disinfectant”, known to cause

cancer, chronic bronchitis, eye irritation when exposed to the body’s immune system • Formalin • Gelatin • Glycerol• Human diploid cells (originating from human aborted foetal tissue) • Hydrolysed gelatin • Monosodium glutamate5(MSG) – now known to cause cancer in humans, also linked to obesity • Neomycin (anti-biotic) • Neomycin

sulphate (anti-biotic) • Phenol Red indicator – a highly toxic disinfectant dye, attributed to liver, kidney, heart &

respiratory damage • Phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) – proven to have extreme neurotoxic side effects • Potassium

diphosphate • Potassium monophosphate • Polymyxin B • Polysorbate 20 • Polysorbate 80 – associated with

infertility when injected • Residual MRC5 proteins • Sorbitol • Sucrose • Thimerosal (mercury) – a neurotoxin linked0to psychological, neurological, & immunological problems —especially Autism…

… Nervous system damage, ( such as sub-acute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), brachial plexitis, post-vaccinal

encephalitis, transverse myelitis and peripheral neuropathies), kidney disease, birth defects, dental problems, mood

swings, mental changes, hallucinations, memory loss, and inability to concentrate can occur... Symptoms also5include tremors, loss of dermal sensitivity, slurred speech, and — in rare cases — even death and paralysis. This

mercury additive alone was the catalyst for another recent Class Action Lawsuit organised by mothers of children born with Autism & the many related behavioural disorders associated with it. Autism is now occurring at levelsnever seen before in history; depending on the State, its rate is now *1 in 45 to 1 in 150. The autism rates used to be

1 in 20,000.0(1:45 Latest CDC statistics U.S. - released in 2015).

Mercury may also be associated with the significantly increased rates of Senility and Alzheimer’s, which is

associated with five or more successive flu vaccinations. Although most mercury (thimerosal ) has been removed

from some children’s vaccines, it is still in all flu vaccines at toxic doses. • Tri(n)butylphosphate, • VERO cells (a5continuous line of monkey kidney cells – linked to the SV-40 virus known to cause Leukaemia) • Washed sheep red

blood cells ~ *This data is available via: www.mercola.com ...

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/03/07/vaccine-ingredients.aspx THESE ADDITIVES ARE

GIVEN TO 'OUR' CHILDREN WITHOUT PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT. See more at:0 http://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpuf

(Part Extract & Part A only, above).5

ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY: The overwhelming scientif ic studies and research do not in any way support the

action of mandatory f lu , squalene adjuvant, li ve virus vaccination; to do so might result in the desecration of a

significant amount of God’s creation of humanity on planet Earth; the science strongly suggests that mandatory

vaccinations are both immoral and ethically i ll egal (ethics that are core in the Judaic-Chr istian system) and th is

mandatory vaccination violates the basic Ten Commandments in at least 6 ways: Thou shal l not mur der, steal,0li e, bear f alse witness, engage in i dol worship (money and power) , envy or covet.

See more at: http://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-

expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpuf

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.mercola.com/http://www.mercola.com/http://www.mercola.com/http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/03/07/vaccine-ingredients.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/03/07/vaccine-ingredients.aspxhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/#sthash.p7hkTLDa.dpufhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/03/07/vaccine-ingredients.aspxhttp://www.mercola.com/http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatimailto:[email protected]


9/15

9





http://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-

2/

……………………………………………...

5IF IT INTEREST YOU-Fw: Federal Drug Administration (FDA) Document (Current)...

People

Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Today at 2:59 PM

To0

Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Hide

Attachments

Vx - Simian Virus 40 (SV40).docx

ATT000015

Download All

Message body

The content of the email I passed on without either supporting or denouncing the claims in it.0

Gerrit

Constitutionalist & Consultant

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® 5Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B., GUARDIAN

(OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN) 107 Graham Road, Viewbank, 3084, Victoria, Australia

Ph (International) 61394577209.0Email; [email protected]

The content of this email and any attachments are provided WITHOUT PREJUDICE , unless specifically otherwise

stated.5

If you find any typing/grammatical errors then I know you read it, all you now need to do is to consider the content

appropriately!

A FOOL IS A PERSON WHO DOESN'T ASK THE QUESTION BECAUSE OF BEING CONCERNED TO BE

LABELLED A FOOL.0

----- Forwarded Message -----From: David Rode To: Sent: Wednesday, 23 December 2015, 10:145Subject: FW: Federal Drug Administration (FDA) Document (Current)...

Investigating Viru ses in Cells Used to Make Vaccin es; and Evaluating the Potential Threat Posed

by Transmission of Viruses to Humans. .. Page Last Updated: 11/06/2015. http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ScienceResearch/BiologicsResearchAreas/ucm1273207.htm Quote: ‘In some cases the cell lines that are used might be tumorigenic, that is, they form tumours wheninjected into rodents. Some of these tumour-forming cell lines may contain cancer-causing viruses thatare not actively reproducing. Such viruses are hard to detect using standard methods. These latent,or "quiet" viruses pose a potential threat, since they might become active under vaccine manufacturing5conditions. Therefore, to ensure the safety of vaccines, our laboratory is investigating ways toactivate latent viruses in cell lines and to detect the activated viruses, as well as other unknownviruses, using new technologies. We will then adapt our findings to detect viruses in the same types of

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/http://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/http://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/https://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qtmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ScienceResearch/BiologicsResearchAreas/ucm127327.htmhttp://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ScienceResearch/BiologicsResearchAreas/ucm127327.htmhttp://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ScienceResearch/BiologicsResearchAreas/ucm127327.htmhttp://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ScienceResearch/BiologicsResearchAreas/ucm127327.htmhttp://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ScienceResearch/BiologicsResearchAreas/ucm127327.htmmailto:[email protected]://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttp://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/http://treeoflifecenterus.com/blog-posts-by-gabriel-cousens-m-d-swine-flu-vaccine-action-letter-expanded-research-2/http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatimailto:[email protected]


10/15

10





cell substrates that are used to produce vaccines. We are also trying to identify specific biologicalprocesses that reflect virus activity.’ ***** Comment: FDA statement (2015)... So, an admission that ALL vaccines past and currentalmost certainly contain viruses from animal and insect origins – and are of unknown type andwith unknown consequences when forcibly injected into humans (an enforced trans-species5biohazard event). Just exactly what is “SAFE’ and ‘EFFECTIVE’ with this lunacy????? …………………………………………………………………………….

And this is known to have happened with Polio vaccines contaminated with cancer causing virus SV40.

Millions injected with this biological trash. 0File attached - 7 pages.

Potential Threat??? Lung, Brain, and Bone cancers being the 'benefit' of the mandatory Polio vaccination

programmes in the 50's and 60's.5

And of course ALL inoculations and ALL vaccinations since enforced Smallpox inoculations from year 1757.

��.. 0

2 Attachments

View all

Download all

No preview5

Download

Vx - Simian Virus 40 (SV40) .docx

No preview

Download 0

ATT00001

20151223-IF IT INTEREST YOU-Fw- Federal Drug Administration (FDA) Document (Current)...-Vx - Simian

Virus 40 (SV40)

QUOTE5Simian Virus 40 (SV40): A Cancer Causing Mo nkey Virus from FDA -Appro ved Vaccines... MichaelE. Horwin, M.A., J.D.* (Extracts)... This ar t ic le was or ig inally publ ished in the Albany Law Journalof Scienc e & Techno logy , Volume 13, Number 3, 2003.

The Creation and Production of the Polio Vaccines: In the 1950s, scientists like Doctors0

Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin had isolated the poliovirus strains to make vaccines [1]. Dr. Salk’s strainswould be inactivated with formaldehyde and injected into children... Dr. Sabin’s strains would beattenuated or weakened by transferring or passaging [2] the live viruses through different host cells andthen fed to children orally.

5Because his goal was to create a live attenuated vaccine, Dr. Sabin had to isolate the poliovirus strainsand then passage the strains through a myriad of host cells in order to attain the right virulence ~ strongenough to illicit an immune response, but weak enough so as to not cause polio in the recipient.Sabin’s oral polio vaccine (OPV) is a trivalent vaccine and was, therefore, comprised of three types - TypeI, II, and III.0

For example, Type I has the following lineage: In 1941, Drs. Francis and Mack isolated the Mahoneypoliovirus “from the pooled faeces of three healthy children in Cleveland.” [3] - Dr. Salk then subjected thestrain to passages through 14 living monkeys and 2 cultures of monkey testicular cultures. [4] - In 1954,the strain (now called Monk14 T2 ) was given to Drs. Li and Schaeffer who subjected the virus to 9 more5

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttps://au-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=47icbpd0667qthttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatimailto:[email protected]


11/15

11





passages through monkey testicular cultures. [5] - Next, the strain (now called Monk14 T11) underwent15 more passages in monkey testicular cultures, 18 passages in monkey kidney cells, 2 passagesthrough the skin of living rhesus monkeys, and additional passages through African Green monkey skinand monkey kidney cell cultures. [6] - This strain was now called MS10 T43 or LS-c.

5In 1956, Dr. Sabin took this virus and passaged it through 7 cultures of African Green Monkey kidneycells. [7] - That same year, the pharmaceutical company Merck, Sharp & Dohme passed the strain (nowcalled LS-c, 2ab/KP 2 ) through a rhesus monkey kidney cell culture. [8] - The resulting material was calledSabin Original Merck (SOM) and was provided to Lederle in 1960 as the seed material to manufacture its

polio vaccine. Types II and III were created in a similar fashion. [9]0Once their strains were isolated, pharmaceutical companies needed a method to propagate the viruses inorder to produce the vast quantities of vaccine needed for nation-wide immunisation campaigns. Thisrequired a substrate upon which the poliovirus could be efficiently grown and harvested. Kidney cells fromrhesus monkeys were chosen because they were found to be an effective growth medium. [10] - A small5quantity of poliovirus could be added to the minced kidneys surgically removed from these monkeys andwithin a few days, large quantities of poliovirus could then be harvested from these same monkey cells.

There was a problem, however, with using these monkey kidney cells to both create the original vaccinestrains and grow the vaccine in large quantities. Monkeys contain simian viruses. [11] - When the0poliovirus was passaged through the monkeys or grown on the monkey kidney cells for production,extraneous viruses became part of the final poliovirus vaccine. [12]

As early as 1953, Dr. Herald R. Cox, a scientist working at Lederle Laboratories, one of the polio vaccinemanufacturers, published an article in a peer reviewed scientific journal in which he stated, “Poliomyelitis5virus has so far been cultivated only in the tissues of certain susceptible species ~ namely, monkey orhuman tissues. Here again we would always be confronted with the potential danger of picking up othercontaminating viruses or other microbic agents infectious for man.” [13]

In fact, in 1958, a scientific journal reported, “the rate of isolation of new simian viruses (from monkey0kidney cells) has continued unabated.” [14]

Additionally, in 1960, the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. wrote to the U.S. Surgeon General: ‘Ourscientific staff have emphasised to us that there are a number of serious scientific and technical problemsthat must be solved before we could engage in large-scale production of live poliovirus vaccine. Most5important among these is the problem of extraneous contaminating simian viruses that may be extremely

difficult to eliminate and which may be difficult if not impossible to detect at the present stage of thetechnology.’ [15]

Between 1959 and 1960, Bernice Eddy, Ph.D., of the National Institute of Health (NIH) examined minced0rhesus monkey kidney cells under a microscope. [16] - These were the cells of the same species ofmonkeys used to create and produce the oral polio vaccine. Dr. Eddy discovered that the cells woulddie without any apparent cause... She then took suspensions of the cellular material from these kidneycell cultures and injected them into hamsters... Cancers grew in the hamsters. [17]

5Shortly thereafter, scientists at the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. discovered what would later bedetermined to be the same virus identified by Eddy. [18] - This virus was named Simian Virus 40(SV40) because it was the 40th simian virus found in monkey kidney cells.

In 1960, Doctors Benjamin Sweet and Maurice Hilleman, the Merck scientists who named the virus SV40,0published their findings: ‘Viruses are commonly carried by monkeys and may appear as contaminants incell cultures of their tissues, especially the kidney. The discovery of this new virus, the vacuolating agent,represents the detection for the first time of a hitherto “non-detectable” simian virus of monkey renalcultures and raises the important question of the existence of other such viruses.’

5As shown in this report, all 3 types of Sabin’s live poliovirus vaccine, now fed to millions ofpersons of all ages, were contaminated with vacuolating virus. [19]

The vacuolating virus was another name for SV40. In 1962, Dr. Bernice Eddy published her findings inthe journal produced by the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. She wrote: ‘There0is now an impressive list of oncogenic (cancer causing) viruses ~ the rabbit papilloma, polyoma, Roussarcoma, the leukaemia viruses. I t has been know n for a num ber of years that monkeys harborlatent virus es. The (SV40) virus was injected at once into 13 newborn hamsters and 10 newborn mice.

Subcutaneous neoplasms indistinguishable from those induced by the rhesus monkey kidney extractsdeveloped in 11 of the 13 hamsters between 156 and 380 days.’ [20] 5



12/15

12





Subsequent studies performed in the early 1960s demonstrated that SV40 caused brain tumours inanimals [21] and that SV40 could transform or turn cancerous normal human tissue in vi t ro. [22] -

A disturbing experiment performed during this era also suggested that SV40 could cause human cancersin man in vivo. [23] - In 1964, Fred Jensen et al took tissue from patients who were terminally ill with5cancer [24] - They exposed the tissue to SV40 and then after it was transformed, they implanted thetissue back into the patient. [25] - These implants grew into tumours in their human hosts. [26] - This

suggested the possibility that SV40 could cause cancers in man.

New Regulations are Implemented: By 1960, the Salk injectable polio vaccine (IPV) had been0administered to about 98 million American children and adults, and Sabin’s OPV had been administeredto about 10,000 Americans and millions in the USSR where the clinical trials had been conducted. [27] Itwas estimated that 10% to 30% of the vaccines contained live SV40. [28]

The Federal agency in charge of vaccine licensing and safety at the time was the Division of Biologics5Standards (DBS) of the National Institute of Health (NIH). [29] - Incredibly, this agency did not order arecall of any of the SV40-contaminated vaccines. [30] - The tainted vaccines continued to beadministered until 1963 when they were all used and replaced by allegedly SV40-free vaccines asrequired by the new Federal regulations promulgated in 1961. [31]

0On March 25, 1961, the Federal regulations that controlled the production of oral poliovirus vaccine wereamended. [32] - These new regulations did not require the vaccine manufacturers to discard their SV40-contaminated poliovirus seeds, which were the source for all subsequent polio vaccines. [33] - Instead,

the rules required that “each seed virus used in manufacture shall be demonstrated to be free ofextraneous microbial agents.” [34] - The new regulations also required that each pair of monkey5kidneys removed from a monkey for vaccine production “shall be examined microscopically for evidenceof cell degeneration.” [35]

Furthermore, fluid from the monkey kidney cells had to be combined with other tissue cultures in order todetect if there was any contaminating virus. [36] - The regulations required that “the cultures shall be0observed for at least 14 days.” [37]

In essence these regulations required an SV40 test that was comprised of taking the monkey kidney cellsupon which the vaccine would be grown and: (1) Looking at them through a microscope to see if theydemonstrated SV40; (2) Taking fluids from them; (3) Introducing those fluids into other cell cultures; (4)5Waiting 14 days; and (5) Seeing whether the other cell cultures were changed as a result of the presence

of SV40.

These tests were not designed to detect the contaminating viruses themselves. One cannot see

SV40 or any virus with a standard light microscope or the naked eye. Instead, the Government’s SV400test relied on the observation of the presumed effect of an SV40 infection on certain tissue cells todemonstrate the presence of the virus.

On November 8, 1961, after the new regulations were in force, an internal Lederle Laboratories memostated that 3 lots of OPV that had been released for clinical trials were probably contaminated with SV40.5[38] - The memo states, “The decision by Dr. Murray to allow SV40 to be present at the PCB-2 level wasthe basis for our allowing these lots to pass.” [39] - The PCB-2 level comprised one set of fluids takenfrom the monkey kidney cells and introduced into other cell cultures to detect SV40. [40] - It was used toperform the 14-day observation tests for the presence of SV40 and had indicated that these particularpolio harvests were SV40 contaminated. [41] 0

“Dr. Murray” referred to above is Dr. Roderick Murray who was the director of the Division of BiologicsStandards (DBS) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) from 1955 to 1972. [42] - It is unknown why, according to this internal memorandum, the DBS would allow polio vaccines to be released when the verytests designed to find SV40 produced positive results of SV40 infection.5

A. The Scientific Rationale for the New Regulations: In 1962, an article received for publication onSeptember 29, 1961, appeared in the Journal of Immunology ; entitled, ‘Studies on Simian Virus 40 .’ Itwas written by scientists from the DBS of the NIH. [43] This article presented the rationale for the newSV40 safety regulations that would remain in place, ostensibly unchanged, for the next four decades. [44] 0- The article’s lead author was Harry M. Meyer, Jr. [45] - Dr. Meyer would succeed Dr. Murray as thedirector of the DBS and would hold this post from 1972 to 1987. [46]

This article discussed some of the challenges with SV40 and polio vaccine production, including the factthat the time required for SV40 to show itself in tissue culture tests was “directly related” to the amount of5



13/15

13





SV40 present. [47] In other words, the testing required by the Federal regulations for SV40detection was dependent on the amount of SV40 present.

The authors also pointed out that it could take up to thirty-five days for SV40 detection when thevirus was removed from the blood of an infected monkey. [48] - Interestingly, however, the authors5also stated that it took only eleven days for low doses of SV40 [49] to be detected when it was removedfrom monkey kidney cells. [50] - This was reportedly based on a single experiment...The eleven-day result was significant because the regulations only required four teen days ofobservation. [51] - If low doses of SV40 could be detected in eleven days then the fourteen-day

observation period would be sufficient. A close reading of this article, however, reveals that this crucial0 study was at best incomplete.

B. A Critique of the Scientific Basis of the New Regulations: The authors of the Journal ofImmunology article stated that 10 to 100 TCID50 (“Tissue Culture Infective Dose” ) of SV40 was detected ineleven days. [52] 5TCID50 is defined as that dilution of virus required to infect 50% of a given batch of inoculated cellcultures. [53] - Therefore, a titre (titer) of 10 to 100 TCID50 represents a substantial amount of SV40because one-half of the cells are infected... In other words, if it took a certain sized dose to infect 50% ofthe cells in eleven days, it would probably take a substantially smaller dose to infect 1% of the cells in thesame period. This smaller dose would then take longer to infect 50% of the cell cultures.0

Therefore, this article left out the important fact that very low doses of SV40 would most likely notbe detected in eleven days.

Second, the Government scientists used pure SV40 as a surrogate for SV40-contaminated monkeykidney cells. [54] - There is no study that demonstrates the validity of this...5

During vaccine production, polio seed virus is inoculated into monkey kidney cells in order to grow thevaccine. Samples of these cells are set aside and fluids are drawn off and injected into other cell culturesto test for the presence of SV40... Since these fluids are drawn from monkey kidney cells, they contain avariety of viruses, cellular components, growth medium, and other debris... The sensitivity of the SV400test for detection of SV40 from this amalgam was the important public health question. The Division ofBiologics Standards, however, did not perform this test, or if they did, they did not report their findings.Instead, they used pure SV40 without any other ingredients to determine that eleven days wassufficient.

5This flaw in the methodology was demonstrated when the authors discussed the fact that after three

weeks of observation, SV40 did not appear from the kidneys of four monkeys that were known to carrySV40 antibodies in their blood. The Government scientists stated, “The failure to demonstrate virus in therenal tissue of an appreciable number of rhesus monkeys that had been infected some time earlier was ofinterest.” [55] - This is an admission that even after three weeks of observation (one week longer than0the federally mandated two-week observation period ) the SV40 from the kidneys of SV40 contaminatedmonkeys (not pure SV40 ) did not reveal itself in culture. Unfortunately, the Government scientists didnot act on this important observation other than to note that it “was of interest.”

Third, the eleven-day finding was apparently based on a single experiment. [56] - There is no mention of5it being repeated to ensure the accuracy of the results as required by the scientific method.

By 1965, it was well established in the scientific literature that there were several problems with the SV40tests mandated by the Code of Federal Regulations.

0First, the fourteen-day SV40 tests were not long enough to detect the virus. [57] - Numerousexperiments by leading virologists (all non-govt. scientists) found that it took from two to five weeks forthe detection of low doses of SV40. [58] - Second, there were more sophisticated microbiological toolsavailable that could detect SV40 with greater accuracy. [59] - These tests were all widely used andaccepted virological techniques. Third, there were several more sophisticated measures available to5eliminate SV40 from cultures used to make the poliovirus vaccine. [60]

Nonetheless, despite the mounting scientific evidence that the SV40 tests were crude and unreliable, theregulations were no t changed, and oral polio vaccine manufacturers did not voluntarily adopt anytechnical improvements to ensure that SV40 was detected and eliminated from their products.0

The Flawed Epidemiology: After SV40 was originally detected in the Salk and Sabin vaccines that hadbeen administered to millions of children around the world, the scientific community held its breath

and wondered if these children would be stricken with cancer. [61] ~ Indeed, the paediatric cancer rate



14/15

14





continued to climb through the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s and 90’s. [62] But, the few epidemiological studies thatlooked for a direct link between SV40 and human cancer provided inconsistent conclusions...

Some reports found there was an increased risk of cancer from SV40 exposure [63] and others foundthere was no risk. [64] - Each of these studies suffered from major flaws, including the fact no one knew5who received the SV40-contaminated vaccines and who did not, so it was impossible to compare anSV40-exposed group with a non-exposed group. [65]

SV40—A Human Carcinogen: By 1999, numerous pathologists, microbiologists, and virologiststhroughout the world had detected SV40 in a variety of human cancers, such as brain tumours [66] ~0including medulloblastomas, [67] bone cancers, [68] and mesotheliomas [69] a fatal lung cancer... Thesewere the very same cancers that were created when SV40 was introduced into animals. [70]

The advent of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology that could identify the genetic code ofspecific strands of DNA demonstrated with precision that it was this monkey virus that was being5detected in human cancers, and no other. [71] Moreover, the rates of these part icular cancers hadsteadily increased ov er the last few decades. [72]

The question that had been left unanswered for almost four decades now faced scientists again—wasSV40 responsible for causing or contributing to human cancers? Over the last forty years since its0discovery, SV40 had become one of the most widely studied and best understood viruses in microbiology.[73] It was routinely used to create human cancers in the laboratory in order to test cancer therapies. [74] - In

addition, it is now known how this virus caused cancer on a molecular level... After careful studydocumented in peer-reviewed publications, leaders in SV40 research announced that SV40 was a5Class 2A human carcinogen. [75]

The Government’s Response: Nonetheless, the various United States government agencies such asthe Centres for Disease Control (CDC) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) disputed these conclusions...

According to the CDC, “SV40 virus has been found in cert ain types of cancer in humans, but it has not0been determined that SV40 causes these cancers.” [76] - According to the National Institutes of Health(NIH), “the NCI is continuing to evaluate the possible link between SV40 infection and human cancers.” [77] A question has been raised whether this continuing evaluation is being performed with completescientific integrity...5

One article written by an attorney and published in a peer reviewed scientific journal describes how theNCI deliberately compromised a study that would have demonstrated the association between SV40 andmesothelioma. [78]While the United States Government continues to evaluate whether or not SV40 represents a public0health threat and whether SV40 is a human carcinogen, several scientists at the NCI concluded SV40contributed to the formation of mesotheliomas. [79] - In fact, the Federal Government has licensedtechnology to target SV40 in treatment of human mesotheliomas. [80]

SV40 and the Public Health: Despite the government’s foot dragging, in the last several years,5scientists from around the world have made startling and disturbing discoveries... They have found SV40antibodies in a significant percentage of people, including children, who were too young toreceive the SV40 contaminated vaccines of the early 1960’s. [81] - They have also discovered thatcancers with SV40 are less likely to be responsive to chemotherapy and radiation because SV40

interferes with the genes necessary for cancer cells to die when they are exposed to chemo or0 radiation therapy. [82]

The Institute of Medicine Report: In July 2002, the National Academy of Science Institute of Medicine

(IOM) Immunisation Safety Committee convened a study into SV40 and cancer that culminated in a reportpublished in October 2002...5

According to the IOM report “ SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer ” – ‘ The committeeconcludes that the biological evidence is s t rong that SV40 is a transforming [ i .e., cancer-causin g ] virus;that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humansunder natural conditions; and that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 expos ure0from the polio vaccine is related to SV40 infection in humans.’ [83]END QUOTE

END QUOTE EMAILS & ATTACHMENTS



15/15

15





Remember the piggy bank?While it is one thing to hold that if people arriving in Australia don’ t like Australian Way of Life

then they have the option to leave and find a country they do like, it is another thing for so to say

some Prime Minister to kiss their butts as if they are welcome and secretly directly and/or

indirectly violate their constitutional and other civil rights, by them to be injected with pig DNA,5

etc, Indeed, innocent citizens in the Commonwealth of Australia who have done nothing wrong

may also have been hoodwinked in themselves and/or their children to be immunized with pig

DNA and other substances against their religious/atheist beliefs. While much is argued about people protesting about the building of Mosque, not strange when one consider how some

Mosque are being misused for terrorism activities, it still is better for a protest, as long as it is0

peacefully conducted, then to have a person being so to say nice to Muslims while

directly/indirectly causing grave harm upon them. With the (unconstitutional) removal of

religious objection against immunizations, in defiance of s116 of the constitution it underlines

how at least in my view the Commonwealth of Australia is directly/indirectly causing harm.

In my view parents/carers/guardians should always be given pamphlet with a written set out of5

the items that are in a vaccination and if they consent to this being administered. As a parent I

never experienced what was vaccinated in myself or any of my children always trusting the

medical profession, this even so my first child nearly died because of vaccination, just that I was

not aware of the cause until long afterwards.Commonwealth of Australi a Constitu tion Act 1900 (UK)0QUOTE

(xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment,

pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize

any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;

END QUOTE5This constitutional provision as I understand it prevents doctors to be compulsory required to

work for the Commonwealth but has no application whatsoever as to compulsory immunization,

this as compulsory immunization is not within the Commonwealth constitutional powers in the

first place. The Framers of the Constitution debated human rights, human nature, humanity, etc,

when the United Nations (allegedly pursuing similar issues) didn’t even exist prior to federation0

in the end politicians as they are more interested in their personal powers, etc, will be violatingconstitutional embedded rights unless and until they are held accountable. Do you really like to

discover what this might be in time to come? Last but not least: Ever wondered why children

vaccinated are prone to fall ill whereas those not vaccinated may have developed natural

resistance but are wrongly blamed for causing a break out?5

This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all details/issues.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®(Our name is our motto! )

Documents

20151224-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Malcolm Turnbull Re Australias Civil & Religious Rights-health Issues-etc