2015 CIC Street Alley Condition Report

8/9/2019 2015 CIC Street Alley Condition Report

1/27

Infrastructure Services Division

Street & Alley Condition Report


2/27

Pavement Management Objectives

Preserve and/or improve quality of streets and alleys

Consider immediate and long term needs

Systematic process to rank projects

Publish 2-year program


3/27

Pavement Management Plan

Evaluate condition Apply appropriate treatment

Preventative maintenance

Resurface or reconstruct

Get the most out of every dollar


4/27

Street Inventory

All Streets

City Maintained

County Highway

State Highway

Freeways

2 %

3 %

3 %

City Maintained

92%71.5 %

17.5 %

5 %

6%

1272.2 miles

32.4 miles

40.6 miles

39.7 miles


5/27

How are streets and treatments chosen?

Pavement Quality Index (PQI) rates street segments to narrow the list

Visual inspection

Street Maintenance experience

Pavement core samples

Traffic volume (including transit, freight, pedestrian and bicycle)

Coordinate needed pavement work with needed utility work

Citizen complaints

Allocate appropriate funding levels to maintenance, resurfacing and reco

Leverage grants and other funding opportunities

Developments and TIDs


6/27

Pavement Condition Rating

Transportation Aids Distributions: Per State Statute, since 2001 ea

and county shall assess the physical condition of highways under its ja pavement rating system approved by the WISDOT. In 2015, $2,202mileage aid payment shall be available for each mile of road or street

jurisdiction of a municipality.

Stantec Consultant WISDOT approved pavement rating system

2013 2014 last survey Data was delivered in Dec, 2014 will be analyzed to assist with ranking paving


7/27

Pavement Condition Ratings

Every seven years DPW obtains a condition rating for every street

segment in the City under the PMS (Pavement Management Systemand rates them on various pavement distresses such as:

Severity of cracking

Potholes

Joint failure Rutting


8/27

Pavement Ratings

A PQI (Pavement Quality Index) is identified from the distresses o

scale of 20 to 100 for the new Road Matrix system

100 is the best, brand new street

70-90 is Good

45-70 is Fair20-45 is Poor


9/27

Preventative Maintenance Program Benefits

Most cost effective address issues when they first appear

More predictable funding needs

Fewer premature pavement failures

Safer road conditions

Reduces disruption to traffic Require proper pavement restoration when issuing DPW permits


10/27

Street Maintenance: Pothole Report

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

2008 2012 2013 2014

Pothole Repair Requests

2014 16,8042013 12,836

2012 8,0172008 16,778
http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=z62DxcPzkA0elM&tbnid=X9mqr1btnIc-HM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://nenc-la.org/2012/03/april-pothole-project/&ei=r3DxUrmcHtLE2QWw8IDoCw&bvm=bv.60799247,d.b2I&psig=AFQjCNEhP-gPpWbH3-4jpo-5gzNWfJk90A&ust=1391641083188896


11/27

Street Maintenance: Repair Strategies

Slurry & Chip Sealing Crack Filling

Pot Hole Patching

Patching

Joint Repair

Frost Heave Repair

i


12/27

Street Maintenance: Supercrews


13/27

Street Improvements: Local Street Progr

2013Local Program - $13 m (17.4 miles)

HIP - $1 m (3.6 miles)2014

Local Program - $13.5 m (15.6 miles)HIP - $3.0 m (9 miles)

2015Local Program - $8.0 m (8.0 miles)

HIP - $7 m (21.0 miles)

Based on a 36 foot street

Minus $2m for Capital Maintenance &

Engineering/Administration Costs


14/27

Street Improvements: 2-3 yr. Extreme MPaving Strategy

2016

Local Program - $5 (5 miles)HIP - $10.5 m (30.5 miles)

2017Local Program - $5 m (5 miles)HIP - $10 m (30 miles)

Based on a 36 foot street

Minus $2m for Capital Maintenance &

Engineering/Administration Costs

Increase in Miles Pav

2015 32%2016 82%2017 84%


15/27

High Impact Paving

Good candidates

Major arterial for traffic movement

Located in a business district Good sub base

No curb and gutter or sidewalk work

No major utility work

Construction Work:

Mill 2 inches existing pavement

Place 2 inches new asphaltic pavement

Construction time 1-5 days (road closure, weather)

Cost $1 mil = 3.6 miles vs $1 mil = 1 mile resurface/reconstruct


16/27

1993-2015 Local Street Budget and LRIP fun

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

16000000

18000000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39


17/27

Local Street Miles Constructed

Year Mile

2007 4.2

2008 9.72009 9.5

2010 19.5

2011 15.9

2012 19.3

2013 15.22014 12.7

2015 8 (estimated)


18/27

Street Improvements: Major Street Progra

Provide design and construction funding for major and minor arterial streets

Design and construction funding for projects thru Milwaukee Urbanized Surface TraProgram (STP-M), Connecting Highway Program, Highway Safety Improvement PSafe Routes to School (SRTS), Transportation Enhancement (TE), American RecoveReinvestment Act (ARRA), Municipal Streets Improvement Program (MSIP) or ConAir Quality (CMAQ) program.

Coordinate with adjacent outlying communities on arterial paving projects crossingboundaries funded by State and Federal Aid

Coordinate with the WisDOT on State Trunk Highway Projects within the City Limit

Represent City Interests on Milwaukee County Highway Paving and Bridge projects

Coordinate with WisDOT on Mega Projects


19/27

2015 Major Street Program ($45,049,435)

State Trunk Highways $11,000,000

Connecting Highways $ 5,075,000

County Trunk Highways $ 80,000 State Transportation Program $ 9,981,000

Other (CH,TE, CMAQ, LRIP, SRTS, etc.) $18,913,435


20/27

2002- 2014 Major Street Funding

$0

$10,000,000

$20,000,000

$30,000,000

$40,000,000

$50,000,000

$60,000,000

$70,000,000

$80,000,000

$90,000,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Major Street Fundin

Portion)Major Street Fundin

$7,841,528

$45,049,435


21/27

STP (State Transportation Program) Funding to thCity From WISDOT for Paving of Arterial Streets

Funding Year STP Funds

2004-2005 $12,042,850

2006-2007 $11,687,730

2008-2009 $10,965,750

2010-2012 $12,309,509

2013-2014 $11,796,858

2015-2018 $41,830,098


22/27

Miles of Major Streets Constructed

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Miles


23/27

Alleys:

Alley in need of repair New alley

4,028 paved alleys with a length of 414 miles


24/27

2015 Adopted Alley

Alley

Year

Millions

2015

$2.025

2016

$2.125

2017

$2.125

2018

$2.125

2019

$2.125

2020

$2.125

6 Yr Total $12.650


25/27

Alley pavement types

Surface

Asphalt

Concrete

Brick/Block

86%

12%2%


26/27

Funding for Alleys1993- 2013

$0

$500,000

$1,000,000

$1,500,000

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

$3,000,000

$3,500,000

1993-2015 funding for alleys

1990 68


27/27

1991 34

1992 62

1993 65

1994 44

1995 34

1996 41

1997 12

1998 26

1999 37

2000 43

2001 25

2002 20

2003 15

2004 37

2005 25

2006 72007 13

2008 9

2009 6

2010 12

2011 5

2012 41

2013 27

2014 25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Alleys constructed 1990-2014

Documents

2015 CIC Street Alley Condition Report