Upload
giulia
View
60
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2014 : extra dimensions centennial from the Standard Model to extra dimensions many “flavors” of extra dimensions direct and indirect effects of extra dimensions at the TeV scale current results and upcoming discoveries. :. Gunnar Nordstrom - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
2014 : extra dimensions centennial
from the Standard Model to extra dimensions
many “flavors” of extra dimensions
direct and indirect effects of extra dimensions at the TeV scale
current results and upcoming discoveries
Gunnar NordstromGunnar Nordstrom
Uber die Moglichkeit das Uber die Moglichkeit das electromagnetiche Feld und das electromagnetiche Feld und das Gravitationsfeld zu vereiningenGravitationsfeld zu vereiningenPhys. Z. Phys. Z. 1515, 504 , 504 19141914
:: ::
::
Abstract. It is shown that a unified treatment of the electromagnetic and gravitational fields is possible if one views the four dimensional space time as a surface in a five dimensional world
Thedor KaluzaThedor Kaluza Oscar KleinOscar Klein
Kaluza Th.Sitzungsber. Press.Akad.Wiss.Math K1 (1921) 966Klein O. Z.Phys. 37 (1926) 895
Kaluza and Klein started from 5-dim gravity and derived Kaluza and Klein started from 5-dim gravity and derived 4-dim gravity plus electromagnetism4-dim gravity plus electromagnetism
They compactified the 5th dimensionThey compactified the 5th dimensionaround a circle of radius Raround a circle of radius R
(“cylinder condition”)(“cylinder condition”)
RgxdM 53*
RgxdM 53*
]4
1[ 24
FFRgMxd P]
4
1[ 24
FFRgMxd P
55
44
GGNN=1/(M=1/(MPP))22
the Standard Modelthe Standard Model
a list of particles with their “quantum numbers”, about 20 numbers that specify the strength of the
various particle interactions, a mathematical formula that you could write on a
napkin.
20s
extra dimensions?6?7?32?
String theory demands extra dimensions.
Experiments can actually discover them!
20sec
10-33 cmPlanck scale
GN ~lPl2 =1/(M1/(MPlPl))22
10-17 cmElectroweak scale
range of weak forcemass is generated (W,Z)
strong, weak, electromagneticforces have comparable strengths
1028 cmHubble scale
size of universe lu
hierarchy of scales
16 orders of magnitudepuzzle
1m
signals from extra dimensionssignals from extra dimensions
in short range gravity observations in particle collision observations in astrophysical/cosmological observations
? what particles can move in that dimension
? how big is that dimension
? what is its shape
how do we see a hidden dimension?how do we see a hidden dimension?
ADD type of models: the extra dimension(s) are finite (i.e. compactified), the world is a “braneworld”, gravity (or SM singlets) propagate in the bulk. Hierarchy is generated by a large volume of the extra dimensions.
Direct emission/virtual exchange.
Universal (Yale) type of models : No branes. Momentum conservation; Pair production of KK excitations.
RS type of models: the extra dimension(s) are infinite. Hierarchy is generated from a strong curvature of the extra dimensional space.
Direct resonant production of the spin-2 states in the graviton KK tower.
Frameworks
compactificationcompactification
Nima Arkani-HamedSavas DimopoulosGia Dvali
hiding the extra dimensions (I)
1m
Gauss’s LawGauss’s Law
Rr r
1
1~)(
Rr 1
~)(
212
)4(
121
2)4(
nnnPl
nnnPl
R
mm
MrV
r
mm
MrV
Rr r
1
1~)(
Rr 1
~)(
212
)4(
121
2)4(
nnnPl
nnnPl
R
mm
MrV
r
mm
MrV
If the n extra dimensions are compactified down to sizes R, then Gauss’s Law
nnPl
nPlanck MRM
2
)4(2 ~
nnPl
nPlanck MRM
2
)4(2 ~
1m
Kaluza-Klein modesKaluza-Klein modes
If a spatial dimension is periodic then the momentum in that dimension is quantized:
R
np
R
np
From our dimensions of view the KK modes get mass:
2
220
2
R
nmm 2
220
2
R
nmm
pR
1R
1R
2R
2R
3R
3R
4R
4
0
R R
KK momentumtower of states
(n is the mode number, for 2 extradimensions two modes etc…)
fm 10~ 7,6
nm1~ 3
mm1~ 2
Km10~ 1 9
Rn
Rn
Rn
Rn
fm 10~ 7,6
nm1~ 3
mm1~ 2
Km10~ 1 9
Rn
Rn
Rn
Rn
Pick the effective (higher dimensional) Pick the effective (higher dimensional) Planck Scale at 1TeV, thenPlanck Scale at 1TeV, then
brane-worldsbrane-worlds
Standard Model particles are trapped on a brane and Standard Model particles are trapped on a brane and can’t move in the extra dimensionscan’t move in the extra dimensions
There could be There could be other branes which other branes which would look like would look like dark matter to usdark matter to us
hiding the extra dimensions (II)
Mother braneMother brane
GG
Our world braneOur world brane
Randall - SundrumRandall - SundrumRandall - SundrumRandall - Sundrum
Zero mode graviton is trappedZero mode graviton is trappedon the mother brane (Planckon the mother brane (Planckbrane) brane)
5th dimension5th dimension5th dimension5th dimension
InfiniteInfinite
gravity gets stronger at extremely high energies (or short distances).
forc
e st
ren
gth
energy
4d gravity
(4+n
)d g
ravi
ty
it gets stronger at lower energies ifthere are extra dimensions….
Grand Unification Fo
rce S
tren
gth
Higher Energy
electromagnetic
strong
weak
gravity
new
gravitonsgravitons
are the most robust probe of extra dimensions
gravity is so weak that we have never even seen a graviton.
The gravitational attraction between two electrons is about 1042 times smaller than the electromagnetic repulsion.
F=GF=GNN
melectronmelectron
r2
rmelectron melectron
graviton production in collider experiments:
graviton emission
graviton Exchange Fermion or VB pairs at hadron or e+e- colliders
Each KK-graviton state couplesto the wall with Planck supressedstrength
The number of KK-states ~(ER)
The sum over all KK-states is not MPl supressed but MPl(4+d)
supressed i.e. MEWK supressedso we have sizable cross sections
Collider Detector at Fermilab
graviton emission in particle collisionsgraviton emission in particle collisions
www.columbia.edu/~lab71
graviton emission simulation:
concentric cylindrical layers
energy deposited from the particle debrisof the collision in the middle
“lego” event display
Two events are graviton simulation and one is real CDF data: Can you pick the gravitons?
two events are real CDF data and one is graviton simulation; Can you pick the graviton?
Lykken/Matchev/Burkett/Spiropulu
)41(216161861
221141
1,
,1
36
3232
21
2
12
xyxxyxxxy
xxxxxyx
yxF
s
m
s
tF
sMgGqq
dt
dnS
S
[Giudice, Rattazzi, Wells, Nucl. Phys. B544, 3 (1999) and corrected version, hep-ph/9811291]
qqbar->g G (=2, M=1TeV, s=1.8TeV)
Case =6
Only qqbar->g G (PYTHIA 6.115 + graviton process), =6, M=1TeV, s=1.8TeV
qq Gg
900 GeV700 GeV5
1000 GeV850 GeV4
1150 GeV950 GeV3
1400 GeV 1100 GeV2
MS reach, Run II
MSreach,Run I
n
[Mirabelli, Perelstein, Peskin, PRL 82, 2236 (1999)]very very optimistic estimates
8.5 TeV6.8 TeV5.8 TeV5.0 TeV
LHC 100fb-1
Monojet+missing energy: DØ limit
Expected number of gravitons for 84pb-1Monojet+missing energy: CDF
Result very soon
4422222
12/
22/2
coscos)1(3)1()2()cos1(
)1(2)cos,(
2 )cos,(
)2/(32cos
xxxxxxx
xxf
sE
xxfM
s
sGee
dxd
d
D
e+e- G@L3
[Giudice, Rattazzi, Wells, Nucl. Phys. B544, 3 (1999) and cor. version: hep ph/9811291]
(GMSB analyses)
e+e-G
20.64
0.56
0.29
0.60
30.080.560.300.38
40.010.550.300.29
nZG(pb)
ZG
95%(pb)Ms(TeV)
MET+jets
[Balazs, Dicus, He, Repko, Yuan, hep-ph/9904220, Z width]
[Cheung, Keung, hep-ph/9903294, recoil mass]
L3: Phys. Lett. B470, 281 (1999)Visible Mass analysisALEPH-CONF-99-027
Total cross section analysis
( a la Higgs analyses)
2nfor /1066.1)(
8
1
ff
ff 47
2
Z
MnIM
M
Z
GZn
n 14 TeV100 fb-1
14 TeV1000 fb-1
28 TeV100 fb-1
28 TeV1000 fb-1
2 9 12 15 19
3 6.8 8.3 11.5 14
4 5.8 6.9 10 12
Ian Hinchliffe
Monojet + missing energy: LHC reach
Pair production via virtual graviton exchange
2e.g
> Gravity effects interfere with SM effects> 3 terms in the production cross section: SM, intrerference, gravity> the sum over the KK states is divergent anda cutoff is required (Ms)
Virtual exchange: dielectron and diphoton D0 limits
M() = 574 GeVcos* = 0.86
Virtual exchange: diphoton CDF analysis
e+e- VV
8
2
42
2
22
1
cos11
4
)cos1(
)cos1(
2)(
cos
T
T
O
s
see
d
d
Standard Model
Interference Term
Gravity
Giudice, Rattazzi, Wells, Nucl. Phys. B544, 3 (1999) and corrected version, hep-ph/9811291] Agashe, Deshpande, Phys. Lett. B456, 60 (1999)
)(2
)()( 4
1
4
1
4 GRWJHMADM TSS
(anomalous Z couplings analyses,WW x-section,Z)
Two-photon measurements at LEP-II
|)( JHMsMs
0.50 0.63
0.63 0.60
0.49 0.490.58 0.54
0.56 0.69
0.91 0.99
0.56 0.65
0.59 0.73
0.66/0.61 0.55/0.55 (bb)
0.57 0.59
0.63 0.68
0.80 1.03
qqee
ee ZGee G
0.58
0.68
0.66
n=5
0.60
0.35
n=2
0.38
0.22
n=3
0.29
0.17
n=4
0.24
0.14
n=5
1.02
1.38
1.28
n=2
0.81
1.02
0.97
n=3
0.67
0.84
0.78
n=4
0.51
0.58
0.57
n=6
0.21
0.12
n=6
202 GeV
189 GeV
184 GeV
Virtual Graviton Exchange
Summary LEP Graviton Emission
A
D
L3
A
D
L3
O 0.61/0.68 (ff) (<189)
0.87/1.07 (<189) 0.82/0.89 (VV)
0.60/0.76 (ff) (<202)
0.84/1.12 (<189) 0.75/1.00
Combined ALL
0.61 0.68
0.84 1.00
0.60 0.76
0.82 1.04
f f
0.63 0.64
0.76 0.77
0.68 0.79
0.80 0.79
0.69 0.71
0.91 0.92
ZZWW
Davoudiasl, Hewett,Rizzo
1500 GeV KK graviton/ its tower of states at LHC
500 GeV KK gravitonand neutral gauge boson excitations
e+e-
500 GeV KK graviton/ its tower of states at a lepton collider
RS phenomenology
A spin 2 graviton: Can we tell?
1.5 TeV gravitonin Randal Sundrumat LHC
Large Hadron Collider (CERN, 2006)
new accelerators for new physics
Linear Collider (?,~2012)
Plethora of new models that involve extra dimensions
Use Extra Dimensions Geomerty to solve:EWKBhierarchy problemSUSY Breakingflavor Breakingneutrino massesproton decay supressionGrand Unificationthe cosmological problem
More ideas are being explored
extra-new ideas
Deconstructing dimensions and sting theories:
The extra dimension(s) emerges from the theory, is well used, and then the theory comes back to the normal 4 dimensions serviced and healthy and with all the necessary Higgses. No tricks.
(Arkani-Hamed et al, Hill et al…..)
hiding the extra dimensions (III)no need to hide them
what is the physics that connects the gravitational scale and the scale of the typical mass of the elementary particles
what are the dimensions and dynamics behind spacetime
how is string theory connected to the world
If you ask questions about what happened at very early times, and you compute the answer, the answer is: Time doesn’t mean anything. S. Coleman
Space and time may be doomed. E. Witten
I am almost certain that space and time are illusions. N. Seiberg
The notion of space-time is clearly something we’re going to have to give up. A. Strominger
Nima Arkani-Hamed
Eot-WashEot-WashGroupGroup
Adelbergeret al
Adelbergeret al
::
Measured gravityat the sub-mm level(down 0.2 mm)
PRL 86 1418 (2001)PRL 86 1418 (2001)
12
12
2121 -exp 1
)()()( r
r
rrGdrdrrV N
10-10
1030
1023
Purdue (AFM experiment 2001)Fischbach et al
short range gravity measurements
C.D. Hoyle, Ph.D thesisUniversity of Washington, 2001
<150 mmM*>4 TeV
short range gravity measurements
100u
(Price &Long)(Price &Long)
e+e- ff
),(),(),(ff
2
44ts
Mts
MtsSMee
d
dGRV
sINTF
s
For ff other than ee the integrated interference term for scattering angles from 0 to is ZERO.The interference between graviton and t-channel SM Bhabha is giving sizable contributions good sensitivity
Terms ~cos3, ~cos4 make differential cross sections a unique signature
Every author and every experiment choose their Ms, T,sign conventions as different ap from the others...
(QED analyses)
[Hewett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4765 (1999) - DY] [Giudice, Rattazzi, Wells Nucl. Phys. B544, 3 (1999) and corrected version, hep-ph/9811291 – DY, Bhabha][Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D59, 115010 (1999) - Bhabha]
11
1
41
2
RizzoS
HewettS
GRWT
HewettS
MM
M
Bhabha scattering results
ALEPH,OPAL,DELPHI,L3 combined:(Bourilkov hep-ph/9907380)
MS>1.26 TeV (=+1)
Ms>960 TeV (=-1)
Black Hole productionat high energy collisions (Banks et al., Dimopoulos et al. Giddings et al.)
L. BORISSOV
Collider Black Hole Production?
• If the Planck scale is the TeV scale, gravity becomes strong at the TeV scale : In high energy particle collisions short-lived microscopic black holes will be created
• These decaying black holes could be observed in future colliders, such as CERN’s LHC!
p
p
( bets?)