2014-2015 Graduation Data SCSD

7/23/2019 2014-2015 Graduation Data SCSD

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2014-2015-graduation-data-scsd 1/38

SCSD High School OutcomeGraduation Performance for 2011 Total

Cohort

J A N U A R Y 1 1 , 2 0 1 6

O F F I C E O F S H A R E D A C C O U N T AB I L I T Y

SUPERINTENDENT

SHARON L . CONTRERAS, PH.D .

1



2

4 5 %

4 6

%

4 8 %

4 8 %

4

9 %

5 1 %

5 5 %

2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort 2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort

Syracuse CSD

Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents

with Advanced Designation Diploma After 4 Years

Results Through June, All Students

SCSD 4-Year Graduation Rate-June Increased by FourPercentage Points in 2014-15



5 8

%

5 6 %

5 2 %

5 1 %

5 3 %

5 1 %

2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort 2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort

Syracuse CSD

Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents

with Advanced Designation Diploma After 4 Years

Results Through August, All Students

3

SCSD 4-Year Graduation Rate-August Increased by TwoPercentage Points in 2014-15

2011 Cohort August Graduation Rate has not been

released publicly yet on data.nysed.gov by the NYSED.

This data was pulled from NYSED level 2 database.



4

Cohort Members

2005 1,528

2006 1,571

2007 1,673

2008 1,547

2009 1,552

2010 1,509

2011 1,443

SCSD 4-Year and 5-Year Graduation Rates Maintained anIncreasing Trend in the Past Three Cohorts

54

45

54

46

56

48

54

48

55

49

60

51

0

55

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Five Years

Four Years

Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents orLocal Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years

Results Through June

2011 Cohrot 2010 Cohort 2009 Cohort 2008 Cohort

2007 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2005 Cohort



5

Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents Diploma Increased by Three PercentagePoints within Four Years, Four Percentage Points within Five Years in 2014-15

8% 8% 8% 7% 6% 5% 6% 8% 8% 8% 6% 6% 6%

22% 22%28%

36% 37% 41%44%

24% 24%31%

41% 43%47%

16% 16%

13%5% 6%

6%5%

22% 23%

18%7%

6%

7%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Four Years Five Years

Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents, Regents with AdvancedDesignation and Local Diploma, After 4 and 5 Years

Results Through June

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma



6

All But One Schools’ 4 Year June Graduation Rates Increased in 2014-15

51%

60%

49%

62%

76%

30%

55%

62%

55%

61%

79%

34%

SCSD Nottingham Henninger Corcoran ITC Fowler

Graduation Rate Comparison

4-Year June Results, All Students

2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort



7

6%

11%

4%

8%

5%

1%

6%

10%

7%6%

4%

1%


Percentage of Students Received Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation



No Significant Change is Made in the Percentage of Students Receiving RegentsDiploma with Advanced Designation in 2014-15



8

9%

19%

7%

10%

7%

4%

11%

13%

9%

16%

15%

3%


Percentage of Students Achieved APM on ELA & Math



Three Schools Made Significant Gains in the Percentage of Students Achieving the Aspirational Performance Measurement in 2014-15. Generally, There was a Two

Percentage Point Increase at the District Level



9

All But One Schools’ 4-Year August Graduation Rates Increased in 2014-15

56%

67%

35%

56%

82%

62%58%

65%

37%

59%

85%

65%

SCSD Corcoran Fowler Henninger ITC Nottingham

Graduation Rate Comparison

4-Years August Results, All Students




10

No Significant Change is Made in the Percentage of Students Receiving RegentsDiploma with Advanced Designation in 2014-15

6%

8%

1%

4%

5%

11%

6% 6%

1%

7%

4%

10%


Percentage of Students Received Regents Diploma with Advanced

Designation

4-Year August Results, All Students




11

All Schools’ 5-Year Graduation Rates Increased in 2014-15

55%

68%

39%

51%

79%

58%60%

70%

41%

59%

85%

66%


Graduation Rate Comparison5-Year Results, All Students




12

No Significant Change is Made in the Percentage of Students Received RegentsDiploma with Advanced Designation in 2014-15

6%

4%

1%

6%

8%

11%

6%

8%

1%

4%

5%

11%


Percentage of Students Received Regents Diploma with Advanced

Designation

5-Year Results, All Students




Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with AdvancedDesignation Diploma After 4 YearsResults Through June, by Subgroup

13

48 48 4951

55

51

4749 49

51

1820

2825

34

35

34

3538

35

5051 52

5456

4744 45

48

53

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

All Students EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Limited EnglishProficient

Students withDisabilities

Female Male



Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with AdvancedDesignation Diploma After 4 YearsResults Through June, by Subgroup

14

40

25

37

56

47

3943

4145

59

47 4650

50

56

34

46

39 4044

79

6663 65

93

5754 53

59

54

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

AmericanIndian/Alaska

Native

Asian/PacificIslander

Black Hispanic Multiracial White



Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma After 4 Years

Results Through August, by Subgroup

15

5351 52

5658

56

5052

54 55

22 22

2934

37 39

35

37

4139

54 55 5659 59

52

47 48

53

57

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1




Female Male




Results Through August, by Ethnicity

16

40

32

42

61

53

43 4641

50

62

52 5054 55 60

39

50

40

47 47

82

72

65 67

93

6055 55

63

57

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1


Native





Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with AdvancedDesignation Diploma After 5 Years

Results Through June, by Subgroup

17

5456

54 55

6063

61

5557

59

31

27 27

33

41

37

4139

4244

56 56 5759

63

51

56

51 50

57

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0




Female Male



Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with AdvancedDesignation Diploma After 5 YearsResults Through June, by Ethnicity

18

45

36

47

69

76

46 46 43

5854

5654

58 59

3943

53

44

51

86

76

7168

57

63

58 57

65

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0


Native





Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with AdvancedDesignation Diploma After 5 Years

Results Through August, by Subgroup

19

5557

54 56

6164

62

5558 59

3229 28

36

43

38

4140

4245

57 57 5760

64

52

57

51 51

58

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0




Female Male




Results Through August, by Ethnicity

20

45

36

47

69

76

48 47

44

5855 56

54

5961

39 44

54

44

51

86

76 76

68

58

64

58 57

65

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0


Native





4 Year June Graduation Rates of All Schools Except One Increased in 2011Cohort Compared to 2010 Cohort

21

5 3

3 3

4 7 5

1

4 5

5 6

3 5

4 8

4 8

4 6

5 7

2 8

4 9

6 9

5 3

4 8

5 7

3 0

5 0

7 4

5 0

4 8

5

9

3 2

4 5

7 4

5 4

4 9

6 2

3 0

5 0

7 6

6

0

5 1

6 1

3 4

5 5

7 9

6 2

5 5

Corcoran Fowler Henninger ITC Nottingham District

Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents withAdvanced Designation Diploma After 4 Years

Results Through June, by School




4 Year August Graduation Rates of All Schools Except One Increased in2011 Cohort Compared to 2010 Cohort

22

5

8

3 8

5 1

5 4

4 9

6 1

3 9

5 4

5 1

5 1

6 4

3 2

5 4

7 5

5 5

5 3

6 0

3 3

5 3

7 7

5 2

5 1

6 5

3 4

4 7

8 0

5 5

5 2

6 7

3 5

5 6

8 2

6 2

5 6

6 5

3 7

5 9

8 5

6 5

5

8


Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents withAdvanced Designation Diploma After 4 Years

Results Through August, by School




5 Year June Graduation Rates of All Schools Increased in 2010 CohortCompared to 2009 Cohort

23

5 9

4 8

6 0

6 1

5

6 6

2

4 2

5 5

6 3

5 4

6 2

4 1

5

7

5 3

5 4

6 7

3 7

5 8

7 7

5 8

5

6

6 3

3 5

5 8

7 9

5 4

5 4

6 8

3 9

5 1

7 9

5 8

5 5

7 0

4 1

5 9

8 5

6 6

6 0


Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with

Advanced Designation Diploma After 5 YearsResults Through June, by School

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort2 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort 2010 Cohort



The Percentages of Students Who Dropped Out DecreasedOver the Past Six Cohorts in Syracuse

24

2726

3133

19

2625

31 31

19

26 2627

31

24

19

17

27

191717

15

22

15

1716 16

17

23

17

All Students General EducationStudents



EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Percentage of Students Who Dropped Out After 4 Years,Results Through June, All Students




The Percentages of Students Who Dropped Out Decreased by 13 Percentage Pointsin the Past Four Cohorts in Black Students

25

35

27

41

10

25

0

40

25

40

18

25

4

46

2730

18

25

3

21

15

31

14

23

9

28

1720

12

16

8

26

14

25

14

18

0


Native

Black Hispanic Asian/PacificIslander

White Multiracial

Percentage of Students Who Dropped Out After 4 Years,Results Through June, All Students




The Percentages of Students Who Dropped Out Decreased Significantly in All but One School from 2008 Cohort to 2011 Cohort

26

2 0

4 2

2 8

2 3

2 7

2 0

4 0

2 8

1 3

2 1

2 6

2 4

4 0

2 3

1 0

2 3 2

6

1 6

2 1

2 3

8

1 6 1

9

1 7

2 9

1 5

3

1 2

1 7

1 6

3

7

1 1

3

9

1 6


Percentage of Students Who Dropped OutAfter 4 Years,

Results Through June by School, All Students




Big Five Comparison: Syracuse’s Graduation Rate Increased by Four PercentagePoints Compared to Two Percentage Points Increase for All Public Schools in NY

State

27

53

61

43

49

66

75

53

64

43

51

69

76

58

67

46

55

7478

Buffalo NYC Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public

Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents withAdvanced Designation Diploma After 4 YearsResults Through June

2009 Cohrot 2010 Cohort 2011 Cohort



Diploma Types and Endorsements

Local Diploma

Pass 5 Assessments*

2 Score Appeals (62-64)

for all Students

ELA Score Appeal (55-61)for ELL’s

1-2 Score Appeals (52-54) for Students with

Disabilities

Low Pass orCompensatory Safety Netfor Students with

Disabilities

With or without a CTETechnical Endorsement

Regents Diploma

Pass 5 Assessments*

1 Score Appeal (62-64)for all students

With or Without Honors

With or Without a CTETechnical Endorsement

Regents Diploma with Advanced

Designation

Pass 8-9 Assessments*

With or Without honors

With or WithoutMastery in Math and/or

Science

With or Without a CTETechnical Endorsement

All students must earn 22 diploma credits to earn a:

or

or

and

or

and

and

and

or

*Assessments include Regents Examinations, Department Approved Alternatives, Department Approved Pathway Assessments

28



Current Appeal Process

Under the following circumstances students can appeal to theirsuperintendent to be allowed to graduate with a lower score on a Regents

Exam. Students must:

*If one appeal is granted the student earns a Regents diploma. If two appeals are granted the student

earns a local diploma.

Score within 3 points of passing (62-64); and

Have taken the Regents Examination under appeal at least two times; and

Present evidence that the student has taken advantage of academic help provided by the schoolin the subject tested by the Regents Examination under appeal; and

Have an attendance rate of 95 percent; and

Passed the course for which the appeal is being sought; and

Be recommended for the appeal by the student’s teacher or Department chairperson in thesubject of the Regents examination under appeal

29



ProposedExpansion of

the AppealProvision

• Permit students to appeal scores of 60-64 onup to two Regents examinations

•

Review current attendance requirements

• Students who are granted 1 appeal by theirdistrict will earn a Regents diploma

•

Students who are granted 2 appeals by theirdistrict will earn a local diploma

Proposed Appeal Process30



Analysis of Expanded Appeal Impact

4,800additional

students

If the Expanded Appeal

option were implemented

approximately

From Cohort 2010

would meet

testing requirements.

The impact would be significant for vulnerable subgroups.

The number of students who meet testing requirements could increase by:

An additional 3,430 Economically Disadvantaged students

An additional 1,751 Hispanic students

An additional 1,580 Black students

917 ELL students For the ELL Population, this would be an increase of

almost 10% of students who meet testing requirements!

31



All Students must pass one Regentsexamination in each discipline:

• Math• Science• Social Studies• English Language Arts

Before Pathways (prior to June 2015)

Current Pathways (June 2015 and thereafter)

Choose one Pathway Assessment in:

• Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math(STEM)• Humanities• Arts• Biliteracy (LOTE)• Career & Technical Education (CTE)

Required Examinations:

• 1 Math, 1 Science, English Language Arts, Global History and Geography, US History

Assessment Requirements

32



Current +1 Pathway Options

CTE• Any of the 14 approved technical assessments aftera student has successfully completed a

Department approved CTE Program (Additional16 exams will be approved in early 2016)

STEM

• Any additional Math or Science Regents exam orany Math or Science exam from the list of

Department Approved Alternatives, after a studenthas completed a course in the subject.

Humanities

• Any additional Social Studies Regents Exam or anySocial Studies or English exam from the list ofDepartment Approved Alternatives after a student

has completed a course in the subject.

Arts• Pending approval: AP examinations and IB

Examinations

Biliteracy(LOTE)

• Examinations currently in the review process

Current +1 Pathway Options

33



Proposed Addition to 4 + 1 Pathway Option

English ScienceSocial

StudiesMath

4 Required Regents Examinations

CDOS

CTE

STEM

Humanities

Arts

LOTE

Proposed Addition to 4 + 1 Pathway Option

34



*For students with disabilities, the safety net (compensatory option and low-pass option) and

the appeal options for all students would remain available to demonstrate a passing score on

the Regents examinations for purposes of graduation with a local diploma.

Complete

• 22 diploma credits as required of alldiplomas

Pass

• 4 required Regents examinations; 1 in eachdiscipline as required of all other pathways

Complete

• All requirements to earn the CDOS

Commencement Credential

To Earn a Regents* Diploma Students Would:

CDOS Pathway Option35

CDOS A P i f Skill D l t f



CareerExploration

Applied Academics

SoftSkills

TechnicalSkills

Career Majors:

• Career specific technicalknowledge/skills

Universal Foundation Skills (softskills):

• Foundation skills and competenciesessential for success in the workplace

Integrated Learning:

• Academic knowledge and skills appliedin the workplace and other settings

Career Exploration:

• knowledgeable about the world of work,

• explore career options, and

• relate personal skills, abilities and

aptitudes to future career decisions

CDOS: A Progression of Skill Development forEmployability

36



Meet requirements for one of thenationally-recognized workreadiness credentials

• National Work ReadinessCredential;

• SkillsUSA Work Force ReadyEmployability Assessment;

• National Career ReadinessCertificate WorkKeys - (ACT);and

• Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment Systems Workforce Skills CertificationSystem.

• Career Plan

• Commencement level CDOSlearning standards for:

• Career Development

• Integrated Learning

• Universal Foundation Skills

• 216 hours of instruction in CTEand/or work-based learning (atleast 54 hours must be in

work-based learning)

• Employability Profile

OR

Current Requirements to Earn a CDOS CommencementCredential

37



Offers the CDOS credential to all students and expands the opportunity forstudents at risk of dropping out of school to graduate with a regular highschool diploma and be prepared for the world of work.

Comparably educationally rigorous to other Pathways, and modeled after

business & industry expectations.

Would further incentivize schools to continue to provide more students withaccess to CTE and work-based learning opportunities as well as instructionin the CDOS learning standards. These skills are essential for post-schoolsuccess for all students.

Students would still be held to the same high standards and expected to passthe courses in the required subjects.

Advantages to CDOS Pathway Option

38

Documents

2014-2015 Graduation Data SCSD