2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    1/19

    Making MEL Powerful

    December 2013

    Laura Roper, Ph.D.

    Roper LYV Consulting

    ([email protected])

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    2/19

    Obstacles to MEL

    Poor program planningaspirations far exceed capacities; sloppythinking (lack of theory of change; theory of action); MEL notresourced

    Overwhelmed and under-resourcedlack of time biggest foe togood MEL

    Reluctance to be held accountable or to hold others accountable MEL imposed from above or outside; MEL gets caught up in

    politics;

    MEL design inappropriate to programtoo heavy; measures thewrong things; culturally inappropriate; data not used [Somerville

    housing example] No incentives to do MEL (not in work plan, not part of

    performance review)

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    3/19

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    4/19

    The Power of Good MEL

    Closing the Loop

    Building off tested instruments (e.g. survey questions into

    culturally adapted focus group questions); then focus group

    questions/responses informed survey design.

    Surveys (frequently) and focus groups repeatedlongitudinal data

    to test their hypothesis about changing needs over time. Mixed methodsFGD, survey, content analysis of text messages

    Generated actionable information (e.g. around need for and

    effectiveness of cholera prevention messaging; most trusted

    media outlets; information needs [invalidating hypothesis aboutmen and women having different needs], etc. etc.)

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    5/19

    The Power of Good MEL

    Closing the Loop

    Well presented in a visually compelling wayMost Important Issue

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    6/19

    Closing the LoopLearn A Little, Do a Little

    Diagnostic/Ne

    edsAssessment

    MediaProgram

    Content

    UserSatisfaction,

    Knowledge

    Adjusting Radio

    Programming

    AND

    Aid Delivery

    UserSatisfaction,

    Knowledge &

    Actions

    Dialogic

    At inception, 3 month, 6month, 1 year

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    7/19

    A Review of the Basics

    The Basic Evaluation Questions

    How do we do what we do better?

    What difference does it make?

    Does it make more difference than other investments?

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    8/19

    Self-Interested MEL

    Proactive on what are fair terms for judging your work, dont

    let the donor dictate

    Use MEL reporting to tell a compelling narrative about yourwork (why it is important; how you confront challenges; that

    you are strategically nimble; that you are always building up

    your foundation of alliances/political capital)

    Use MEL to educate your colleagues, make the more effective

    stakeholders

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    9/19

    Laying Out Program Cycle

    Problem Identification

    and Diagnosis

    Stakeholder

    Analysis

    Theory of ChangeActors

    Motivations

    How Power is

    Deployed and

    other assumptions

    Causal If-Then to

    Get to Solution

    (Theory of Action)

    Strategy

    GoalsObjectives

    Strategic Elements

    - ActivitiesImplementation

    (Operational Plans/Log Frame)

    -Activities completed (outputs)

    MEL

    (contin-

    uous and

    iterative)

    -- First Order Outcomes

    -- 2nd, 3rd, etc. Order Outcomes

    -- Impacts

    G

    O

    A

    L

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    10/19

    Addressing Gun ViolenceTheory of Change:

    All the major factors and actors that affect gun-

    related morbidity and mortality

    Theory of ActionGun Legislation

    (i.e. what your

    organization can

    address)

    Theory of Action

    Gun Violence as

    Public Health

    problem

    Theory of Action

    Drugs and Gang

    Violence

    Theory of ActionMedia and Video

    Violence

    LOG FRAME: passing gunlegislation

    activities outputs outcomes impacts

    Obj 1

    Obj 2

    Obj 3

    Getting from Broad Theory of Change to

    Organizational ActionA Three Step Process

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    11/19

    Assessment Levels of MEL and

    what they can tell you

    Theory of Change

    Actors

    Motivations

    How Power is Deployed

    and other assumptions

    Causal If-Then to

    Get to Solution

    Strategy

    GoalsObjectives

    Strategic Elements

    - Activities

    Implementation

    -Activities completed (outputs)

    -- First Order Outcomes

    -- 2ndOrder Outcomes

    -- 3rdOrder Outcomes

    -- Impacts

    Monitoring: Did you

    do what you said you

    would and did you do

    it well?Evaluation: Did you

    get the results you

    expected; why or

    why not?

    Whats the

    problem?

    Theory,

    Strategy,

    Execution?

    Learning: What are

    we going to dodifferently in this

    instance and in

    similar or future

    cases?

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    12/19

    Need clarity on program goals/objectives (end state)

    AND point of departure (baseline)

    Problem Identification

    and Diagnosis

    Power Analysis

    Theory of Change

    Actors

    Motivations

    How Power is

    Deployed and

    other assumptions

    Causal If-Then to

    Get to Solution

    Strategy

    GoalsObjectives

    Strategic Elements

    - ActivitiesImplementation

    -Activities completed (outputs)

    -- First Order Outcomes

    -- 2ndOrder Outcomes

    - 3rd Order Outcomes

    -- Impacts

    Baseline

    End State-Accountable

    for delivering(aspirational vs

    realistic; process vs

    specific)

    Intermediate

    markers

    Benchmarks

    G

    O

    A

    L

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    13/19

    Finding the Breadth/Depth BalanceBroad, but Light

    Routine Monitoring,

    Self-Assessment and reportingacross projects/programs

    Targeted

    Evaluation

    Problem Solving

    Best Practice

    Cost-

    effectiveness

    Capacities built

    Summative Evaluation

    AccountabilityBroader

    Learning;

    More strategic, less

    expensive if monitoring anddocumentation has been

    strongLearning

    Create space (time andincentives)

    Create

    Framework/Strategy forlearning

    Create Platforms

    Knowledge

    Management - Tools

    Formative

    Mid-term or

    critical juncture

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    14/19

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    15/19

    What type of evaluator are you?

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    16/19

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    17/19

    Regardless of what type of evaluator you are,

    there are some basic principles to follow (AEA

    Principles for evaluators:

    A. Systematic Inquiry

    B. Competence

    C. Integrity/Honesty

    D. Respect for People

    E. Responsibilities for General Public/WelfareAEA Principles for Evaluators

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    18/19

    Ethical Principles in Data Collection in

    Humanitarian Response - InterAction

    Broad PrinciplesRespect, Do No Harm, Non-

    Discrimination

    Broad Principles Operationalized:

    Risk Benefit Analysis

    Informed Consent

    Confidentiality

    SecurityFairness

    Dignity (subjects, not objects of evaluation)

  • 8/13/2019 2013 Roper Making MEL Powerful

    19/19

    Mindful Practice

    Know you strengths

    Know your biases

    Be clear what values youre bringing to the process

    Seek information from multiple sources; ideally use

    mixed methodsMake an extra effort to identify and reach stakeholders

    who may not typically have a voice

    Listen to what is said and what is going unsaid

    Dont just document; seek to understandBe familiar with resources in your field; seek out expert

    advice when you need it.