Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2013 EMEA EXPATRIATE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 11-12 APRIL 2013
ADDRESSING THE COMPLEXITIES OF EXPATRIATE COST-OF-LIVING ISSUES 12 APRIL 2013
Nathalie Constantin Métral,
Geneva
Ulrike Hellenkamp
Hamburg
MERCER
Agenda
• Cost of Living: one concept, several methodologies
• Cost of Living trends
• How to address the challenges of currency fluctuations ?
• Case study with various pay delivery options
• Managing the expatriate purchasing power in high inflation locations
• Negative Cost of Living indices
Section 1
Cost of Living: concept & methodology
MERCER
PROTECTING ASSIGNEES’ PURCHASING POWER THE BALANCE SHEET APPROACH
Expatriates kept on same base salary structure as peers at home
• Series of allowances and differentials to ensure that expatriates neither gain nor lose financially while assigned abroad; typically covered are:
- Goods & services
- Housing
- Income taxes
- Potentially enlarged to car, family allowances …
• Incentives
- Premiums
- Hardship
- Other
Appropriate for limited-duration assignments; generally 1–5 years
MERCER
THE COMPOSITION OF BASE PAY GOODS AND SERVICES SPENDABLE INCOME
Différentiel B&S
Reserve/Savings
Spendable Income
(Goods & Services)
Housing
Income Taxes
Differential
= BASE PAY HOME SPENDABLE INCOME breakdown:
Food at Home
Food Away from Home Tobacco and Alcohol Household Supplies
Personal Care Clothing and Footwear
Domestic Services Recreation, Sports, Leisure
Transportation* Utilities*
*optional in the multinational approach
Home Country
MERCER
What Philosophy Best Suits Your Organization? 2 choices in compensation approach assume international assignees…
% o
f in
co
me
sp
en
t
% o
f in
co
me
sp
en
t
Multinational philosophy Home-Host philosophy
YES YES
… spend SIMILARLY regardless
of where they come from. Or…spend DIFFERENTLY
depending
on their country of origin?
MERCER
Consider Mercer’s Multinational Approach Assumes all assignees spend similarly, regardless of nationality Three index options
Mean to Mean Compares average of prices at home
to average at host for common items
at comparable retail outlets. The best
indicator of absolute price differences
between locations without
consideration of assignee efficiency or
availability of goods in location.
Efficient Assumes assignee has a wide variety
of outlets and retail prices in the
assignment location to choose from, but
due to short term nature of assignment
may not have same efficiency in
purchasing as in home location.
Convenience Based on more expensive or
convenience stores in the host
location. Applicable for locations where
shopping convenience is essential, or
locations that lack a wide variety of
alternative retail outlets.
Host Prices Home Prices Allowance
=
=
=
Low Med High Low Med High
MERCER
Consider Mercer’s Home-Host Approach Assumes assignees spend differently, depending on their home habits Three index options
Efficient Purchaser Assumes assignee has familiarity with
local market and is therefore more
efficient by purchasing combination of
international and local/regional brands
and outlets.
High Income Purchaser Designed for high income employees
from lesser developed/low wage
countries who, due to their higher
income, have spending practices more
typical of the expatriate or international
community than of typical locals from
their home country.
Expatriate Based on comparison of prices in
retail outlets frequented by local
nationals in the home location to
prices from retail outlets frequented by
expatriates in the assignment location.
Appropriate for newly arrived
expatriates or lesser developed
locations where local brands / outlets
are inappropriate.
Host Prices Home Prices Allowance
=
=
=
Low Med Low Med
Section 2
Cost of Living trends
MERCER
International assignment program administration For which package elements do German companies receive the most requests for exceptions?
17%21% 21%
24%28% 30%
35%40%
48% 50%
70%
81%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Har
dship
prem
ium
s
Dep
enda
nt e
duca
tion
Dua
l car
eer a
llowan
ce
Tran
spor
tatio
n allowan
ce
Hom
e ho
using
norm
s
Tem
pora
ry living
Ince
ntive
prem
ium
s
Tax eq
ualis
ation
Hom
e leav
e –
clas
s of
airfar
e
Cos
t-of-l
iving allowan
ces
Hos
t hou
sing
allo
wan
ces
Hom
e leav
e –
num
ber o
f trip
s
Source: 2012 Worldwide Survey of International Assignment Policies and Practices
% o
f re
sp
on
de
nts
MERCER
International assignment program administration For which package elements do German companies grant the most requests for exceptions?
13% 14%
25% 25% 25% 27% 29%35% 36%
43%
63%68%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Har
dship
prem
ium
s
Dua
l car
eer a
llowan
ce
Hom
e ho
using
norm
s
Ince
ntive
prem
ium
s
Tax eq
ualis
ation
Tran
spor
tatio
n allowan
ce
Cos
t-of-l
iving allowan
ces
Hom
e leav
e –
clas
s of
airfar
e
Tem
pora
ry living
Dep
enda
nt e
duca
tion
Hom
e leav
e –
num
ber o
f trip
s
Hos
t hou
sing
allo
wan
ces
Source: 2012 Worldwide Survey of International Assignment Policies and Practices
% o
f re
sp
on
de
nts
MERCER
Goods-and-services/cost-of-living allowance What index pricing level do you primarily use for typical long-term assignments?
14%
59%
12%
7%
13%
48%
23%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
High Medium Low A combination
Globally
Europeancompanies
MERCER
Goods-and-services/cost-of-living allowance Is there a cap or a limit on the amount paid for goods and services differentials/COLA?
17%
4% 6%
73%
8%2%
6%
85%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Yes, for assignees
with salaries above
a predefined
threshold
Yes, based on a flat
amount
Yes, other No
Globally
Europeancompanies
% o
f re
sp
on
de
nts
Source: 2012 Worldwide Survey of International Assignment Policies and Practices
Section 3
How to address the challenges of currency
fluctuations ?
Case study with various pay delivery options
MERCER
INDEX CHANGE AND IMPACT ON THE SPENDABLE INCOME TRANSFER FROM BOSTON TO SAO PAULO MARRIED COUPLE + 2 CHILDREN
Survey dates Gross salary Spendable
income
COL Index
Mean to
Mean
Exchange
rate USD 1 =
? BRL
Exchange
rate
variation
Spendable
income adjusted
by COL index
Variation
Spendable
Income
adjusted by
COL index
6 month
Mercer
basket
inflation
Boston
6 month
Mercer
basket
inflation Sao
Paulo
USD USD (%) USD (%) BRL (%) (%)
March 2012 70'000 24'035 145 1.719345 34'851 59'920
sept.12 70'000 24'035 125 2.027000 17.89% 30'044 -13.79% 60'899 1.00% 1.75%
MERCER
Remuneration approach How do companies typically deliver expatriate remuneration?
31%
30%
21%
5%
13%
Source: 2012 Worldwide Survey of International Assignment Policies and Practices
Split pay
Home country currency
Host country currency
Case by case/other
According to expat’s wishes
MERCER
METHODS OF PAY 100% AT HOME
• Amount paid directly into home bank account: need for currency
protection
• Host obligations: housing, spendable income, other host expenses
• Monitoring - employee speculation
• Lead time between pay determination and exchange rates may
cause large gains/losses
• Typically requires inter-company recharge: watch out for transfer
pricing issues
• Ease of administration (?)
Full salary paid in home currency: currency protection needed for
the host part*
*Spendable income, housing, car, school fees or any other
expense to be paid for in local currency
MERCER
METHODS OF PAY 100% AT HOST
• Need for FX monitoring – employee speculation
• Home obligations (storage costs, mortgage etc)
• Employee loses ability to save in home
• May be a legal requirement (e.g. local contract)
• Ensures local company bears full cost
• Highlights cost of expatriation to receiving company
Full salary paid in local currency, currency protection needed
for the saving part*
*Home country reserve (i.e. net salary minus spendable
income and housing) plus premiums and incentives
MERCER
Paid by
Company
Paid at
Host
Paid at
Home
Split Pay Method
Income
Taxes
Goods &
Services
Housing
Savings/Reserve
Premia &
Incentives
MERCER
METHODS OF PAY SPLIT PAY (PROTECTING THE EXPATRIATE)
• Stable number of local host currency units
• Stable number of home-country currency units
• Neutralised effect of foreign currency fluctuation
• Adjustment only when prices change (inflation) in the home country
or in the host country
• May add payroll and reporting complexity
No need of any currency protection
The assignee receives salary and premiums in the currency it
needs to be spent; no need to monitor currency fluctuations.
Section 4
Managing Cost of Living in high inflation locations
MERCER
Managing Cost of Living in high inflation locations
• Only a handful of locations with high price movement in 2012
Cities with twelve-month price movement > 10% from September 2011 to September 2012
City Country Price
Movement
ADDIS ABABA ET 19.89 %
BLANTYRE MW 26.06%
BUENOS AIRES AR 24.30%
CARACAS VE 14.22%
CORDOBA AR 24.30%
KHARTOUM SD 12.36%
MANAGUA NI 11.55%
MINSK BY 59.45%
SAMARKAND UZ 11.93%
TASHKENT UZ 10.44%
TEHRAN IR 21.78%
MERCER
HOW TO MANAGE COST OF LIVING IN HIGH INFLATION LOCATIONS TRANSFER LISBON TO BUENOS AIRES: MARRIED COUPLE + 2 CHILDREN
COL Index
increases
Total Host Spendable
income in local
currency increases in
host city (positive price
movement)
Section 5
Negative Cost of Living indices
MERCER
Cost-of-living / goods-and-services allowance
32% 33%
47%53%
61%67%
72% 72% 74% 75% 77%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Fran
ce
Sca
ndinav
ia
Net
herla
nds
Switz
erland
Ger
man
y
Em
erging
cou
ntrie
s
Unite
d Kingd
om
Unite
d State
s
Can
ada
Spa
in
Aus
tralia
Headquarters country
% of companies indicating that they never apply negative COLA (employees receive a
windfall)
Source: 2012 Worldwide Survey of International Assignment Policies and Practices
MERCER
Goods-and-services/cost-of-living allowance Do you apply negative COLA?
66%
13%
2%
9% 9%
55%
35%
3% 4% 3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
We never apply
a negative cost-
of-living index;
assignee
receives windfall
We apply
negative index
We make a
deduction from
other
assignment
related
allowances
We handle
case-by-case
No assignees
assigned to
such locations
Globally
Europeancompanies
% o
f re
sp
on
de
nts
Source: 2012 Worldwide Survey of International Assignment Policies and Practices
MERCER
NEGATIVE COST-OF-LIVING INDEX: BAD PRACTICE OR LOGICAL SOLUTION?
Boston1st assignment 03/2011 :
La Paz, Bolivia
2nd assignment 09/2012 :
Johannesburg, South Africa
100 75 89
100 100 100
0 +25 + 11
... +25 -14
MilanBuenos Aires, Argentina -
03/2011
Buenos Aires, Argentina -
09/2012
100 73 93
100 100 100
0 + 27 7
... + 27 -20
Gain/Loss
Employee's perception
Employee's perception
Index increase
COL Index
Paid by company
Multiple assignments
COL Index
Paid by company
Gain/Loss
MERCER
Cost-of-living / goods-and-services allowance
Source: 2012 Worldwide Survey of International Assignment Policies and Practices
16%
12%
18%
17%
28%
11%
15%
30%
16%
12%
7%
11%
4%
6%
13%
13%
11%
0%
7%
31%
12%
29%
16%
42%
53%
50%
43%
63%
77%
56%
47%
71%
64%
58%
42%
20%
18%
16%
8%
7%
6%
5%
0%
24%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Scandinavia
Germany
Switzerland
France
Emerging countries
Netherlands
Australia
United Kingdom
Canada
United States
Spain
A combination High Medium Low
Given availability, what index pricing level do you primarily use for typical long-term
assignments?
Hea
dq
uart
ers
co
un
try