Assessment ResultsBourbon County

Schools2013-14

School Year

Unbridled Learning

Next Generation Learners (100%)

Next Generation Support(23%)

Next Generation Professionals(10%)

Next Generation Schools and Districts

2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 ?

-Achievement-Gap-Growth-Readiness for College /Career-Graduation Rate

Program ReviewsPL/CS, Writing, The Arts

K-3 added 14-15; World Language HS

Percent Effective Teachers

Percent Effective Leaders

=

Overall AccountabilityScore

College & Career Readiness for ALL

Achievement

Gap Growth CCR GradRate

ELEM KPREP: Reading, math, ss, science, writing

All Tested Areas

Reading andMath

N/A N/A

MS KPREP: Reading, math, ss, science, writing

All Tested Areas

Reading andMath

Explore N/A

HS End of Course and On-Demand Writing

End of Course and On-Demand Writing

PLAN to ACTReading & Math

College and Career Rate

AFGR/Cohort Model

Who is Accountable for What?

Achievement

Gap Growth CCR GradRate

ELEM 30% 30% 40% -- --

MS 28% 28% 28% 16%

HS 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%

Within Achievement and GAP—all areas are weighted equally except writing and language mechanics are split

16%/4%.

Growth includes Math and Reading only—K-8 from KPREP; HS from Plan to ACT.

The Test and Content

Across the board 3-12 everyone tested the same.

What is the same?

Scores include program reviews statewide◦ That means…the School Report Card now has

different scores in it from last year.

Can’t compare the overall scores—they will be quite a bit higher.

CAN compare individual area scores for each area (Achievement, Gap, Growth, proficiency of students, and other measures)

What has changed

Locked Proficient and Distinguished Levels for this year, will change next year◦ Elementary: 62.5, 69.8◦ MS: 58.7, 64.9◦ HS 58, 64.4

Progressing: Made AMO (Annual Measurable Objective)—our Annual Goal for progress.

High Performing School (90th percentile) School of Distinction (95th percentile) High Progress (Top 10% of improvement) Priority and Focus (lowest 10%, below 3rd SD in an

area)

Labels

Public reporting in the paper used a shortened ranking system; I used an extended ranking system to stick with the number of schools/districts

Provides basis for comparison for consistency

Information about how well are we adapting to CCSS compared to others

District School Rank/Labels

Rankings & Percentile Comparisons for Bourbon

Overall Score 69.7*AMO 69.8

62/173 Districts32/174 last year

83rd Percentile per reporting

*cannot be compared to previous year score

Bourbon County Schools

Clark 95/173◦ 74/174

Fayette 97/173◦ 62/174

Harrison 86/173◦ 105/174

Jessamine 66/173◦ 99/174

Mason 91/173◦ 115/175

Mercer 114/173◦ 93/174

Montgomery 29/173◦ 29/174

Nicholas 160/173◦ 111/174

Paris 139/173◦ 143/174

Pendleton 102/173◦ 121/174

Scott 57/173◦ 58/174

Madison 48/173◦ 70/174

Boyle 6/173◦ 12/174

Surrounding DistrictsCompared to BoCo’s 62/173 32/174

Each school’s ranking among their grade span

Label AMO status

◦ Proficient schools expected to make .5 gain◦ Needs improvement schools expected to make 1

point gain.

Breakdown

Cane Ridge 353/720◦ 366/739 last year◦ Needs Improvement◦ Did not make AMO

Overall 69.2 (AMO 69.4)

School Scores

Bourbon Central 332/720◦ 231/739 last year◦ Proficient School◦ Did not make AMO

Overall 69.8 (AMO 72.0)

North Middletown 274/720◦ 86/739 last year◦ Proficient School◦ Did not make AMO

71.4 (AMO 76.5)

Middle School 153/330◦ 80/328 last year◦ Proficient School◦ Did not make AMO

66.8 (AMO 68.2)◦ Focus School (Disbability/Science and Reading)—

Not New, Carryover because did not meeting AMO

High School 96/229◦ 97/232 last year◦ Proficient School, Progressing (Met AMO)

AMO 70.4◦ Focus School (Disability/Writing)—New

Designation

Professional Learning Communities—Improve Student learning

Work toward meeting AMO Move to Distinguished Status Remove Focus School Status

Next Steps