2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

    1/9

    MQXF Preliminary Dose Requirement

    G. Ambrosio, E. Fornasiere, E. Todesco

    Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting

    Napa Valley, CA, USA

    8-10 April, 2013

    The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework

    Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme, Grant Agreement 284404

    Work supported by the US LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) through US Department of Energy contracts DE-AC02-07CH11359, DE-AC02-98CH10886,

    DE-AC02-05CH11231, and DE-AC02-76SF00515

  • 7/28/2019 2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

    2/9

    Requirements DOSE Requirements

    Coil structural req. Min shear strength

    Max allowable swelling

    Electrical req. Energy deposition and heat evacuation req.

    Max DT

    Minimum thermal conductivity Quench protection and stability req.

    Minimum copper RRR

    09/04/2013G. Ambrosio, E. Fornasiere and E. Todesco 2

  • 7/28/2019 2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

    3/9

    Elvis Fornasiere | CERN, 26th February 2013 TE-MSC-MDT

    Acknowledgments: G. Ambrosio, F. Cerutti, S. Clment, L. S. Esposito, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia, R. Flukiger,

    R. Gauthier, M. Juchno, A. Mereghetti, N. Peray, J.-C. Perez, G. de Rijk, E. Todesco,

    Radiation resistance of

    insulation systems for IR

    Triplets - Summary

  • 7/28/2019 2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

    4/9

    4

    Relative mechanical

    properties for CTD-101K

    Elvis Fornasiere | CERN, 26th February 2013 TE-MSC-MDT

    Outline

    Structural

    req + energy

    deposition

    Measurement

    techniques

    CTD-101K +

    CE-epoxy

    results

    1%

    10%

    100%

    0 1 10 100Relative

    mechanicalproperties(tests77K)

    Absorbed dose (MGy)

    CTD-101K, with 50% Vf virgin S-2 Glass

    Torsional Shear Modulus

    Compressive Strength

    Compressive Modulus

    Flexural Modulus

    Torsional Shear Strength

    Fracture Resistance GIC

    Torsional Shear StrainShear Strength

    ILSS0 120 MPa30% degradation at 50 MGy

    [29]+[30]+[31]+[32]+[33]+[34]

    UTS: 35% reduction at 180 Mgy from UTS0 ~ 1050 MPa

    Compressive strength = 1080 MPa at 160 Mgy (Loss 20%)Fracture Resistance GIC: 66% reduction at 230 MGy

    95% degradation

    at 160 MGy

    Plan

    70% degradation

    at 90 MGy

  • 7/28/2019 2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

    5/9

    5

    Outline

    Stress in the coil

    Elvis Fornasiere | CERN, 26th February 2013 TE-MSC-MDT

    Structural

    req + energy

    deposition

    Measurement

    techniques

    CTD-101K +

    CE-epoxy

    results

    Plan

    ~0 MPa shear

    30-40 MPa sheart

    t t

    t

    Shear stress

    Max-gradient (155 T/m)

    160 MPa compression stress

    Azimuthal stress

    Observation of Shear stress between turns and

    shear between inner and outer layers

  • 7/28/2019 2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

    6/9

    6

    Suggested plan

    Internal test campaign prior to irradiation campaign (unirradiatedfibers)

    SBS test of heat treated fibers with 3 resins (CTD-101K,

    CE/epoxy blend, MY750) Resin with 1)virgin fiber, 2) 50h @700C fiber, 3) 50h @700C ht fiber +

    ceramic binder + 4) 50h @700C ht fiber + PVA

    10 off axis-test as support of SBS test

    Shear/compression test of the system [cable + insulation]

    Irradiation campaign (to be discussed)

    What is the maximum dose level (20 MGy)?

    SBS Interlaminar shear test (qualitative)

    Shear/compression test of the system [cable + insulation]

    (Quantitative)

    Elvis Fornasiere | CERN, 26th February 2013 TE-MSC-MDT

    CTD-101K MY750 CE

    Virgin fibers

    Fibers after reaction

    Fibers after reaction

    and ceramic binder

    Plan

    Outline

    Structural

    req + energy

    deposition

    Measurement

    techniques

    CTD-101K +

    CE-epoxy

    results

    Tests to be performed on

    samples with all features of

    QXF coils

  • 7/28/2019 2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

    7/926 July 2012, joint WP2, WP3, and WP10 meeting

    Beam screen shielding

    Beam screen withW absorbers at

    mid-planes

    * 0.5 mm clearance between BP and W

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

    MGy

    distance from IP (m)

    triplet integrated dose on innermost 3 mm

    7.0 TeV proton per 3000 fb-1

    2.3 mm W inserts7.0 mm W inserts2 mm BS + 6 mm W absorbers

    7

    Configurations Diameter aperture

    at mid-planes (mm)

    3.7 mm BP + 7 mm W inserts 114.6

    3.7 mm BP + 2 mm BS + 6 mm W absorbers* 111.6

    Minimum aperture requested from optics is 116 mm

    To go below20 MGy one would need

    2 mm BS + 9 mm W absorbers(105.6 mm residual aperture)

    Maximum thickness shielding forQ1-first half Q2A tailor-made

    Possible use of other materials for BS/CB

    under investigationWith courtesy of F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team [1]

    140 mm Nb3Sn

    Structural

    req + energy

    depositionWith 150 mm aperture

    3.7 mm BP + 2 mm BS

    + 9 mm W absorber

    Dose < 20 MGy

  • 7/28/2019 2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

    8/9

    Requirements DOSE Requirements

    Coil structural req. Min shear strength < 20-40 MGy OK prelim.

    Max allowable swelling

    Electrical req. < 40 MGy OK

    Energy deposition and heat evacuation req.

    Max DT < 20-40 MGy OK prelim.

    Minimum thermal conductivity

    Quench protection and stability req.

    Minimum copper RRR

    09/04/2013G. Ambrosio, E. Fornasiere and E. Todesco 8

  • 7/28/2019 2013 04 Larp-hilumi Dose Req v4

    9/9

    Max Allowable Temperature During Quench

    Thot-spot < 350 K using CTD-101K

    Detailed analysis in WAMSDO proceeding:

    G. Ambrosio Maximum Allowable TemperatureDuring Quench in Nb3Sn Accelerator Magnets

    To be confirmed by tests with high-temperaturequenches in magnets with cored cable

    09/04/2013G. Ambrosio, E. Fornasiere and E. Todesco 9