2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 …...2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 3 Table 1-3 Summary of Key Data I

2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 1Table 1-1Summary of Key Data I BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% STATE GOV'T PROTECTIONS 891 173 141 89 159 140 96 344 546 233 196 145 187 125 145 141 59 283 191 67 117 269 487(D/S) 37% 43% 35% 22% 40% 35% 24% 30% 44% 48% 34% 36% 37% 29% 30% 32% 25% 49% 41% 34% 13% 38% 63%----------------------- MORE 1125 202 188 146 201 175 146 484 641 254 257 197 235 176 200 194 89 311 238 87 257 337 509 47% 50% 47% 37% 50% 44% 37% 42% 51% 53% 45% 49% 47% 41% 41% 45% 38% 54% 51% 44% 29% 48% 66% LESS 234 28 47 57 42 36 50 139 95 21 61 52 48 51 55 54 31 27 47 21 140 68 22 10% 7% 12% 14% 11% 9% 13% 12% 8% 4% 11% 13% 10% 12% 11% 12% 13% 5% 10% 10% 16% 10% 3% ENOUGH 969 157 157 177 141 175 197 499 470 189 247 141 210 177 217 180 100 219 171 77 455 274 224 40% 39% 39% 44% 35% 44% 49% 43% 38% 39% 43% 35% 42% 41% 45% 41% 43% 38% 37% 39% 51% 39% 29% LAWS THAT GOVERN INDUSTRY -808 -121 -134 -99 -121 -185 -142 -314 -494 -165 -256 -108 -141 -131 -174 -79 -61 -248 -170 -70 -53 -264 -475(D/S) -34% -30% -33% -25% -30% -46% -35% -27% -40% -34% -44% -27% -28% -30% -36% -18% -26% -43% -36% -35% -6% -38% -62%------------------------- BURDENSOME REGS 699 125 118 131 123 91 108 375 323 142 134 134 163 126 133 166 77 143 131 50 376 185 126 29% 31% 29% 33% 31% 23% 27% 33% 26% 30% 23% 33% 33% 29% 28% 38% 33% 25% 28% 25% 42% 26% 16% IMPORTANT SAFEGUARDS 1506 246 252 230 244 276 250 689 817 307 390 242 304 257 307 244 138 390 301 119 429 449 601 63% 61% 63% 58% 61% 69% 62% 60% 65% 64% 68% 60% 61% 60% 64% 56% 59% 68% 64% 60% 48% 64% 78% PUBLICLY OWNED LAND (D/S) 879 152 157 114 157 140 176 318 561 191 218 153 177 136 154 121 43 255 209 93 203 273 395------------------------- 37% 38% 39% 29% 39% 35% 44% 28% 45% 40% 38% 38% 35% 32% 32% 28% 19% 45% 45% 47% 23% 39% 51% CREATES JOBS 1114 181 192 174 191 202 218 451 663 227 272 189 232 189 198 170 82 301 250 106 336 339 425 46% 45% 48% 43% 48% 51% 55% 39% 53% 47% 47% 47% 46% 44% 41% 39% 35% 52% 54% 53% 38% 48% 55% COSTS JOBS 235 28 35 60 34 62 42 133 102 36 54 36 55 53 44 49 39 45 42 13 133 66 30 10% 7% 9% 15% 8% 16% 10% 12% 8% 7% 9% 9% 11% 12% 9% 11% 17% 8% 9% 7% 15% 9% 4% LITTLE IMPACT 986 182 164 149 166 121 138 548 438 210 236 168 196 174 233 207 106 214 157 68 389 280 296 41% 46% 41% 37% 41% 30% 34% 48% 35% 44% 41% 42% 39% 40% 48% 48% 46% 37% 34% 34% 44% 40% 39% EPA UPDATE AIR QUALITY 1033 185 177 139 155 168 107 279 754 282 317 136 171 119 197 56 27 402 251 92 45 328 649STANDARDS (D/S) 43% 46% 44% 35% 39% 42% 27% 24% 60% 59% 55% 34% 34% 27% 41% 13% 11% 70% 54% 46% 5% 47% 84%---------------------- STRONGLY SUPPORT 1221 219 214 161 206 168 148 503 718 276 294 193 248 206 229 176 98 341 265 108 248 358 599 51% 55% 54% 40% 52% 42% 37% 44% 58% 57% 51% 48% 50% 48% 47% 40% 42% 59% 57% 54% 28% 51% 78% TOTAL SUPPORT 1684 288 284 261 272 277 248 702 982 377 434 267 331 268 335 242 126 477 356 142 453 505 702 70% 72% 71% 65% 68% 69% 62% 61% 79% 78% 75% 66% 66% 62% 69% 56% 54% 83% 76% 71% 51% 72% 91% TOTAL OPPOSE 652 104 107 122 117 109 142 423 228 95 117 131 159 149 138 186 99 74 105 49 408 177 53 27% 26% 27% 30% 29% 27% 35% 37% 18% 20% 20% 33% 32% 34% 29% 43% 43% 13% 22% 25% 46% 25% 7% STRONGLY OPPOSE 437 70 71 85 82 62 94 299 137 55 67 97 103 115 80 140 79 41 60 36 278 117 34 18% 17% 18% 21% 21% 16% 24% 26% 11% 11% 12% 24% 21% 27% 17% 32% 34% 7% 13% 18% 31% 17% 4%

P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S

2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 2Table 1-2Summary of Key Data I BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% STATE GOV'T PROTECTIONS 891 584 304 190 230 354 65 124 17 101 144 125 179 308 55 62 147 121 218 265 78 102 34(D/S) 37% 33% 54% 57% 26% 39% 51% 60% 4% 23% 36% 41% 62% 64% 15% 12% 42% 35% 67% 61% 11% 12% 27%----------------------- MORE 1125 781 328 199 348 433 70 129 98 160 187 150 190 318 107 151 173 162 223 282 192 239 44 47% 44% 58% 59% 39% 48% 55% 62% 22% 36% 47% 49% 66% 66% 29% 29% 49% 47% 68% 65% 28% 29% 35% LESS 234 197 25 9 118 79 5 4 81 59 43 25 11 10 51 89 26 41 5 17 114 137 10 10% 11% 4% 3% 13% 9% 4% 2% 18% 13% 11% 8% 4% 2% 14% 17% 7% 12% 1% 4% 16% 17% 8% ENOUGH 969 751 197 116 390 362 51 65 251 203 157 117 84 140 196 255 140 133 95 129 364 420 57 40% 42% 35% 35% 44% 40% 40% 31% 56% 46% 40% 38% 29% 29% 54% 49% 40% 38% 29% 30% 52% 51% 47% LAWS THAT GOVERN INDUSTRY -808 -601 -203 -138 -227 -373 -77 -62 15 -68 -132 -131 -198 -277 -42 -12 -161 -100 -212 -260 -28 -53 -34(D/S) -34% -34% -36% -41% -26% -41% -60% -30% 3% -15% -33% -43% -69% -58% -11% -2% -46% -29% -65% -60% -4% -6% -28%------------------------- BURDENSOME REGS 699 524 155 83 297 227 20 63 209 166 116 70 40 85 146 230 76 109 52 74 301 346 38 29% 29% 27% 25% 34% 25% 16% 30% 47% 38% 29% 23% 14% 18% 40% 44% 22% 31% 16% 17% 43% 42% 31% IMPORTANT SAFEGUARDS 1506 1125 358 221 524 601 96 125 195 234 248 201 239 362 187 242 237 210 263 334 329 399 72 63% 63% 63% 66% 59% 67% 76% 60% 44% 53% 62% 66% 83% 75% 51% 47% 68% 60% 80% 77% 47% 49% 59% PUBLICLY OWNED LAND (D/S) 879 671 203 106 235 436 40 66 66 137 118 155 135 260 96 105 147 125 163 231 142 178 41------------------------- 37% 38% 36% 31% 27% 48% 31% 31% 15% 31% 30% 51% 47% 54% 26% 20% 42% 36% 50% 53% 20% 22% 34% CREATES JOBS 1114 849 251 136 349 500 46 90 136 200 163 175 147 278 146 188 172 165 179 244 257 310 53 46% 48% 44% 40% 40% 55% 36% 43% 30% 45% 41% 58% 51% 58% 40% 36% 49% 47% 55% 56% 37% 38% 43% COSTS JOBS 235 178 48 30 113 64 6 24 70 63 45 21 12 18 50 83 25 40 15 13 115 132 12 10% 10% 8% 9% 13% 7% 5% 12% 16% 14% 11% 7% 4% 4% 14% 16% 7% 12% 5% 3% 17% 16% 10% LITTLE IMPACT 986 699 264 168 401 298 74 94 232 157 181 98 125 171 158 229 151 129 127 169 299 353 54 41% 39% 47% 50% 46% 33% 58% 45% 52% 36% 46% 32% 44% 36% 43% 44% 43% 37% 39% 39% 43% 43% 44% EPA UPDATE AIR QUALITY 1033 714 315 219 167 547 80 139 -87 132 135 193 231 418 94 -51 207 118 288 358 -12 36 42STANDARDS (D/S) 43% 40% 55% 65% 19% 61% 63% 67% -20% 30% 34% 64% 80% 87% 26% -10% 59% 34% 88% 82% -2% 4% 34%---------------------- STRONGLY SUPPORT 1221 853 356 230 348 505 91 139 95 153 184 174 220 379 120 126 190 166 251 347 181 227 47 51% 48% 63% 69% 40% 56% 72% 67% 21% 35% 46% 57% 76% 79% 33% 24% 54% 48% 77% 80% 26% 28% 38% TOTAL SUPPORT 1684 1226 434 272 514 712 103 169 174 279 263 242 257 445 223 228 274 228 303 395 331 416 81 70% 69% 77% 81% 58% 79% 81% 81% 39% 63% 66% 80% 89% 93% 61% 44% 78% 66% 93% 90% 48% 51% 66% TOTAL OPPOSE 652 512 120 53 347 165 23 30 261 147 128 49 26 27 130 279 67 110 16 37 343 380 39 27% 29% 21% 16% 39% 18% 18% 14% 58% 33% 32% 16% 9% 6% 35% 54% 19% 32% 5% 9% 49% 46% 32% STRONGLY OPPOSE 437 337 84 35 243 93 12 23 184 93 91 27 17 17 70 207 40 77 11 23 240 256 27 18% 19% 15% 10% 28% 10% 10% 11% 41% 21% 23% 9% 6% 4% 19% 40% 11% 22% 3% 5% 35% 31% 22%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 3Table 1-3Summary of Key Data I BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% STATE GOV'T PROTECTIONS 891 82 404 370 11 102 23 225 48 432 276 304 203 102 119 156 135 169 69 135 18 84 468 423(D/S) 37% 8% 49% 71% 2% 42% 10% 52% 47% 66% 43% 38% 37% 26% 39% 47% 34% 42% 25% 48% 11% 38% 39% 35%----------------------- MORE 1125 264 445 378 135 117 69 246 55 446 327 368 260 160 153 174 171 197 105 155 48 112 581 544 47% 27% 54% 72% 21% 48% 29% 57% 55% 68% 51% 46% 47% 41% 50% 52% 44% 48% 39% 55% 28% 51% 48% 45% LESS 234 182 42 8 124 14 46 21 8 14 52 64 56 58 34 18 36 28 36 20 30 28 113 121 10% 19% 5% 2% 20% 6% 20% 5% 7% 2% 8% 8% 10% 15% 11% 5% 9% 7% 13% 7% 18% 13% 9% 10% ENOUGH 969 498 326 118 345 105 111 151 37 184 240 344 223 155 114 126 170 174 128 95 83 72 475 494 40% 51% 40% 23% 55% 43% 47% 35% 36% 28% 38% 43% 40% 40% 37% 38% 43% 43% 47% 34% 49% 33% 40% 41% LAWS THAT GOVERN INDUSTRY -808 6 -443 -346 44 -95 -7 -245 -32 -437 -273 -336 -132 -62 -128 -145 -127 -210 -48 -84 -13 -49 -394 -414(D/S) -34% 1% -54% -66% 7% -39% -3% -57% -32% -67% -43% -42% -24% -16% -42% -44% -32% -52% -18% -30% -8% -22% -33% -34%------------------------- BURDENSOME REGS 699 447 166 70 309 63 101 76 30 94 159 195 187 149 80 79 114 81 102 85 72 77 355 344 29% 46% 20% 13% 49% 26% 43% 18% 30% 14% 25% 24% 34% 38% 26% 24% 29% 20% 38% 30% 43% 35% 30% 29% IMPORTANT SAFEGUARDS 1506 441 609 416 265 158 108 321 62 531 432 531 319 211 208 224 241 291 150 169 85 126 749 757 63% 45% 74% 80% 42% 65% 46% 75% 62% 81% 68% 67% 58% 54% 68% 67% 61% 72% 55% 60% 50% 58% 63% 63% PUBLICLY OWNED LAND (D/S) 879 195 372 286 106 95 54 203 37 354 284 266 187 132 119 164 97 169 71 117 27 104 397 482------------------------- 37% 20% 45% 55% 17% 39% 23% 47% 37% 54% 44% 33% 34% 34% 39% 50% 25% 42% 26% 42% 16% 48% 33% 40% CREATES JOBS 1114 363 423 296 223 109 91 227 46 375 322 339 258 182 137 185 139 200 108 150 61 121 518 595 46% 37% 51% 57% 35% 45% 39% 53% 45% 57% 50% 42% 47% 47% 45% 56% 35% 49% 40% 53% 36% 55% 43% 50% COSTS JOBS 235 167 51 10 117 14 38 24 8 21 38 73 71 51 18 21 41 32 38 33 34 17 121 114 10% 17% 6% 2% 19% 6% 16% 6% 8% 3% 6% 9% 13% 13% 6% 6% 11% 8% 14% 12% 20% 8% 10% 9% LITTLE IMPACT 986 418 332 208 269 113 97 172 45 245 261 365 209 141 147 114 207 159 121 88 67 74 528 458 41% 43% 40% 40% 43% 46% 41% 40% 44% 37% 41% 46% 38% 36% 48% 34% 53% 39% 45% 31% 40% 34% 44% 38% EPA UPDATE AIR QUALITY 1033 -28 545 473 -70 109 -11 311 52 590 359 389 196 78 114 245 128 261 38 158 -5 83 500 533STANDARDS (D/S) 43% -3% 66% 91% -11% 44% -5% 72% 51% 90% 56% 49% 36% 20% 37% 74% 33% 64% 14% 56% -3% 38% 42% 44%---------------------- STRONGLY SUPPORT 1221 249 503 435 121 120 62 274 63 532 372 416 275 143 175 197 168 248 108 167 45 98 609 612 51% 25% 61% 83% 19% 49% 26% 64% 63% 81% 58% 52% 50% 37% 57% 59% 43% 61% 40% 60% 27% 45% 51% 51% TOTAL SUPPORT 1684 461 676 492 273 172 109 365 74 620 493 585 364 224 208 285 255 331 152 213 79 146 834 851 70% 47% 82% 94% 43% 70% 46% 85% 73% 94% 77% 73% 66% 58% 68% 86% 65% 81% 56% 76% 47% 67% 70% 71% TOTAL OPPOSE 652 489 132 20 342 63 120 54 22 29 134 196 169 146 94 40 127 69 114 55 84 62 334 317 27% 50% 16% 4% 54% 26% 51% 13% 22% 4% 21% 25% 31% 38% 31% 12% 32% 17% 42% 20% 49% 28% 28% 26% STRONGLY OPPOSE 437 348 69 11 238 38 88 27 19 14 87 123 121 101 63 24 82 40 85 35 64 37 210 227 18% 35% 8% 2% 38% 16% 37% 6% 19% 2% 14% 15% 22% 26% 21% 7% 21% 10% 32% 13% 38% 17% 18% 19%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 4Table 1-4Summary of Key Data I BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% STATE GOV'T PROTECTIONS 891 35 783 11 87 401 372 667 187 278 262 140 124 594 232 657 41 202 336 51 143 94 92 155(D/S) 37% 5% 50% 2% 25% 67% 23% 43% 24% 30% 32% 22% 24% 41% 33% 39% 31% 33% 43% 9% 54% 51% 71% 36%----------------------- MORE 1125 187 855 116 117 425 578 802 277 393 355 235 197 712 298 825 50 264 388 160 157 103 92 199 47% 27% 55% 24% 33% 71% 36% 52% 36% 42% 44% 37% 38% 50% 43% 49% 38% 44% 50% 29% 59% 56% 71% 46% LESS 234 152 72 105 30 24 206 134 90 115 93 95 73 118 66 168 9 61 52 109 15 9 - 44 10% 22% 5% 22% 9% 4% 13% 9% 12% 12% 11% 15% 14% 8% 9% 10% 7% 10% 7% 19% 5% 5% - 10% ENOUGH 969 331 582 242 189 139 764 563 377 420 356 301 237 543 305 659 63 259 320 273 89 62 36 167 40% 48% 37% 50% 54% 23% 48% 36% 49% 45% 44% 47% 46% 38% 44% 39% 48% 43% 41% 49% 33% 34% 28% 39% LAWS THAT GOVERN INDUSTRY -808 60 -805 79 -116 -420 -308 -660 -128 -184 -169 -59 -44 -610 -209 -596 -23 -196 -340 65 -130 -123 -100 -154(D/S) -34% 9% -52% 16% -33% -71% -19% -43% -17% -20% -21% -9% -8% -43% -30% -35% -17% -32% -44% 12% -49% -67% -77% -36%------------------------- BURDENSOME REGS 699 347 319 259 101 71 578 383 285 341 292 265 216 352 216 480 49 180 188 293 60 24 9 117 29% 50% 21% 54% 29% 12% 36% 25% 37% 36% 36% 42% 42% 25% 31% 28% 38% 30% 24% 52% 23% 13% 7% 27% IMPORTANT SAFEGUARDS 1506 287 1124 181 217 491 886 1043 413 525 460 325 260 962 426 1076 72 376 528 228 190 146 109 271 63% 41% 72% 38% 62% 83% 55% 67% 54% 56% 57% 51% 51% 67% 61% 63% 55% 62% 68% 41% 71% 80% 85% 63% PUBLICLY OWNED LAND (D/S) 879 140 669 91 99 316 453 626 217 295 271 149 124 573 213 666 23 195 356 79 107 89 73 152------------------------- 37% 20% 43% 19% 28% 53% 28% 40% 28% 31% 33% 23% 24% 40% 30% 39% 17% 32% 46% 14% 40% 49% 57% 35% CREATES JOBS 1114 268 761 179 133 338 653 764 303 417 367 253 202 682 284 828 42 252 402 184 133 98 75 196 46% 39% 49% 37% 38% 57% 41% 49% 40% 44% 45% 39% 39% 48% 41% 49% 32% 42% 52% 33% 50% 54% 58% 46% COSTS JOBS 235 128 93 88 34 22 200 138 86 122 96 104 78 109 72 162 19 57 46 105 26 9 2 44 10% 18% 6% 18% 10% 4% 13% 9% 11% 13% 12% 16% 15% 8% 10% 10% 15% 9% 6% 19% 10% 5% 1% 10% LITTLE IMPACT 986 276 662 196 175 222 697 606 352 379 333 267 220 600 321 662 65 278 305 253 105 75 50 173 41% 40% 43% 41% 50% 37% 44% 39% 46% 40% 41% 42% 43% 42% 46% 39% 50% 46% 39% 45% 40% 41% 39% 40% EPA UPDATE AIR QUALITY 1033 -111 1056 -119 139 506 380 779 226 242 223 80 60 771 237 793 33 217 513 -100 199 137 123 139STANDARDS (D/S) 43% -16% 68% -25% 40% 85% 24% 50% 30% 26% 27% 12% 12% 54% 34% 47% 25% 36% 66% -18% 75% 75% 95% 32%---------------------- STRONGLY SUPPORT 1221 153 987 85 138 470 617 889 291 401 357 235 191 802 311 909 60 267 453 109 178 137 107 207 51% 22% 64% 18% 39% 79% 39% 57% 38% 43% 44% 37% 37% 56% 45% 54% 46% 44% 58% 19% 67% 75% 83% 48% TOTAL SUPPORT 1684 283 1287 176 238 545 967 1144 484 579 507 352 279 1082 458 1221 80 403 634 224 228 158 125 280 70% 41% 83% 37% 68% 92% 60% 74% 63% 62% 62% 55% 54% 76% 66% 72% 62% 67% 82% 40% 86% 86% 97% 65% TOTAL OPPOSE 652 394 231 295 99 39 587 365 259 336 284 272 219 311 221 428 47 186 121 324 29 22 2 141 27% 57% 15% 61% 28% 7% 37% 24% 34% 36% 35% 43% 43% 22% 32% 25% 36% 31% 16% 58% 11% 12% 2% 33% STRONGLY OPPOSE 437 297 128 220 51 23 402 242 173 231 192 193 153 202 159 276 29 141 70 242 15 15 2 84 18% 43% 8% 46% 14% 4% 25% 16% 23% 25% 24% 30% 30% 14% 23% 16% 22% 23% 9% 43% 6% 8% 1% 19%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 5Table 1-5Summary of Key Data I BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% STATE GOV'T PROTECTIONS 891 387 376 50 502 787 89 1125 -234 - 44 789 934 -63 101 768 861 8 435 36 376 834 49 -2(D/S) 37% 39% 40% 54% 36% 42% 20% 100% -100% - 6% 52% 55% -10% 20% 45% 55% 1% 59% 7% 37% 51% 12% -1%----------------------- MORE 1125 469 455 55 654 934 164 1125 - - 201 853 992 109 190 878 920 165 466 145 457 920 104 76 47% 47% 48% 60% 47% 50% 36% 100% - - 29% 57% 59% 17% 38% 52% 59% 23% 64% 29% 45% 56% 27% 25% LESS 234 82 79 5 152 147 75 - 234 - 156 64 58 171 89 110 59 157 32 109 81 86 56 78 10% 8% 8% 6% 11% 8% 17% - 100% - 22% 4% 3% 26% 18% 6% 4% 22% 4% 22% 8% 5% 14% 26% ENOUGH 969 409 385 29 555 737 205 - - 969 318 561 596 340 207 661 532 370 212 242 446 582 219 147 40% 41% 40% 31% 40% 39% 45% - - 100% 45% 37% 35% 52% 41% 39% 34% 52% 29% 48% 44% 36% 56% 48% LAWS THAT GOVERN INDUSTRY -808 -387 -357 -47 -418 -716 -54 -652 93 -243 699 -1506 -1003 207 -25 -798 -964 177 -389 90 -445 -857 -37 103(D/S) -34% -39% -38% -51% -30% -38% -12% -58% 40% -25% 100% -100% -60% 32% -5% -47% -62% 25% -53% 18% -44% -52% -9% 34%------------------------- BURDENSOME REGS 699 261 257 18 435 508 180 201 156 318 699 - 283 399 218 390 243 413 149 277 248 329 160 189 29% 26% 27% 19% 31% 27% 40% 18% 67% 33% 100% - 17% 61% 44% 23% 16% 58% 20% 55% 25% 20% 41% 62% IMPORTANT SAFEGUARDS 1506 647 615 65 854 1224 234 853 64 561 - 1506 1286 192 243 1188 1207 235 538 187 693 1186 197 87 63% 65% 65% 71% 61% 65% 52% 76% 27% 58% - 100% 76% 29% 49% 70% 78% 33% 73% 37% 69% 73% 50% 28% PUBLICLY OWNED LAND (D/S) 879 391 380 38 486 730 114 552 -7 307 68 746 835 24 137 688 777 73 375 82 355 755 91 3------------------------- 37% 39% 40% 41% 35% 39% 25% 49% -3% 32% 10% 50% 50% 4% 27% 40% 50% 10% 51% 16% 35% 46% 23% 1% CREATES JOBS 1114 469 454 41 642 894 183 624 59 398 214 814 910 173 215 815 839 224 428 180 427 853 133 91 46% 47% 48% 45% 46% 48% 40% 56% 25% 41% 31% 54% 54% 27% 43% 48% 54% 32% 58% 36% 42% 52% 34% 30% COSTS JOBS 235 78 75 3 156 164 69 72 66 91 146 68 75 149 78 127 61 151 53 98 72 98 43 88 10% 8% 8% 3% 11% 9% 15% 6% 28% 9% 21% 4% 4% 23% 16% 7% 4% 21% 7% 19% 7% 6% 11% 29% LITTLE IMPACT 986 422 399 48 561 770 187 410 99 451 312 597 664 304 192 726 626 309 241 209 488 646 211 111 41% 43% 42% 51% 40% 41% 41% 36% 42% 47% 45% 40% 39% 47% 38% 43% 40% 44% 33% 41% 48% 40% 54% 36% EPA UPDATE AIR QUALITY 1033 494 466 55 535 921 79 883 -113 256 -116 1094 1684 -652 68 939 1220 -219 530 -79 505 1105 43 -119STANDARDS (D/S) 43% 50% 49% 60% 38% 49% 17% 79% -48% 26% -17% 73% 100% -100% 14% 55% 78% -31% 72% -16% 50% 68% 11% -39%---------------------- STRONGLY SUPPORT 1221 542 516 56 675 1019 168 821 21 354 168 977 1221 - 177 981 1069 122 491 129 522 1012 133 55 51% 55% 54% 60% 48% 54% 37% 73% 9% 37% 24% 65% 72% - 35% 58% 69% 17% 67% 26% 52% 62% 34% 18% TOTAL SUPPORT 1684 732 698 72 946 1376 258 992 58 596 283 1286 1684 - 276 1299 1370 236 622 207 744 1351 210 89 70% 74% 73% 78% 68% 73% 57% 88% 25% 62% 40% 85% 100% - 55% 76% 88% 33% 85% 41% 74% 83% 54% 29% TOTAL OPPOSE 652 238 232 17 411 455 179 109 171 340 399 192 - 652 209 360 151 455 92 286 239 246 167 208 27% 24% 24% 18% 29% 24% 39% 10% 73% 35% 57% 13% - 100% 42% 21% 10% 64% 13% 57% 24% 15% 43% 68% STRONGLY OPPOSE 437 150 147 12 284 296 124 56 135 221 312 94 - 437 150 226 72 341 54 214 149 137 111 167 18% 15% 15% 13% 20% 16% 27% 5% 57% 23% 45% 6% - 67% 30% 13% 5% 48% 7% 42% 15% 8% 28% 55%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 6Table 2-1Summary of Key Data II BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% SUSPEND ENVIRO PROTECTIONS -1202 -204 -185 -179 -160 -209 -187 -631 -571 -267 -322 -182 -238 -187 -313 -200 -116 -276 -221 -70 -241 -394 -545TO STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION -50% -51% -46% -45% -40% -52% -47% -55% -46% -56% -56% -45% -48% -43% -65% -46% -50% -48% -47% -35% -27% -56% -71%(D/S)--------------------------- NECESSARY 499 87 89 85 99 78 87 223 276 95 98 97 107 100 68 103 52 125 101 49 274 122 94 21% 22% 22% 21% 25% 20% 22% 19% 22% 20% 17% 24% 21% 23% 14% 24% 22% 22% 22% 25% 31% 17% 12% UNNECESSARY 1701 291 274 264 259 287 274 854 847 362 420 279 345 287 381 303 168 401 322 119 515 516 639 71% 73% 68% 66% 65% 72% 69% 74% 68% 75% 73% 69% 69% 66% 79% 70% 72% 70% 69% 60% 58% 74% 83% DON'T KNOW 200 22 38 51 42 35 39 75 124 23 58 26 48 44 33 29 14 48 45 31 99 63 35 8% 5% 9% 13% 10% 9% 10% 7% 10% 5% 10% 6% 10% 10% 7% 7% 6% 8% 10% 16% 11% 9% 5% PRIORITY FOR MEETING ENERGY 845 149 147 68 155 130 41 227 617 275 254 135 147 29 166 59 2 362 223 27 -79 319 588NEEDS (D/S) 35% 37% 37% 17% 39% 32% 10% 20% 49% 57% 44% 34% 29% 7% 34% 14% 1% 63% 48% 13% -9% 46% 77%--------------------------- EXPANDING USE OF CLEAN 1554 267 264 219 265 247 205 657 897 365 401 260 306 215 313 233 111 453 333 104 364 488 672 ENERGY 65% 67% 66% 55% 66% 62% 51% 57% 72% 76% 70% 65% 61% 50% 65% 54% 47% 79% 71% 53% 41% 70% 87% DRILLING & DIGGING 709 118 116 151 111 117 164 429 280 91 147 125 159 186 147 174 108 91 110 78 444 169 83 30% 29% 29% 38% 28% 29% 41% 37% 22% 19% 25% 31% 32% 43% 30% 40% 46% 16% 23% 39% 50% 24% 11% IMPACT OF MORE USE OF 231 72 3 9 79 18 -52 -19 250 78 82 39 44 -14 19 -8 -30 141 91 16 -54 51 232RENEWABLES ON ELECTRICITY 10% 18% 1% 2% 20% 4% -13% -2% 20% 16% 14% 10% 9% -3% 4% -2% -13% 25% 19% 8% -6% 7% 30%SYSTEM (D/S)------------------------- MORE RELIABLE 734 145 97 100 154 104 78 287 448 170 187 116 157 100 126 112 49 231 162 51 208 210 307 31% 36% 24% 25% 38% 26% 19% 25% 36% 35% 32% 29% 32% 23% 26% 26% 21% 40% 35% 26% 23% 30% 40% LESS RELIABLE 504 73 94 91 75 86 130 306 198 93 105 77 114 114 107 120 79 90 70 35 261 160 74 21% 18% 24% 23% 19% 21% 33% 27% 16% 19% 18% 19% 23% 26% 22% 28% 34% 16% 15% 18% 29% 23% 10% NO IMPACT 1010 162 180 172 150 176 176 504 506 200 247 187 194 179 219 188 96 228 193 83 361 274 351 42% 40% 45% 43% 38% 44% 44% 44% 41% 42% 43% 46% 39% 42% 45% 43% 41% 40% 41% 42% 41% 39% 46%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 7Table 2-2Summary of Key Data II BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% SUSPEND ENVIRO PROTECTIONS -1202 -912 -261 -181 -488 -424 -85 -96 -149 -92 -247 -147 -226 -318 -100 -141 -233 -159 -244 -297 -190 -232 -49TO STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION -50% -51% -46% -54% -55% -47% -67% -46% -33% -21% -62% -48% -79% -66% -27% -27% -67% -46% -75% -68% -27% -28% -40%(D/S)--------------------------- NECESSARY 499 353 139 68 167 186 20 49 131 143 60 62 27 67 111 161 43 79 38 56 212 249 30 21% 20% 24% 20% 19% 21% 15% 23% 29% 32% 15% 21% 9% 14% 30% 31% 12% 23% 12% 13% 31% 30% 25% UNNECESSARY 1701 1266 400 249 655 610 104 145 280 235 307 209 253 386 211 302 276 238 282 353 402 481 79 71% 71% 71% 74% 74% 68% 82% 69% 63% 53% 77% 69% 88% 80% 58% 58% 79% 68% 86% 81% 58% 59% 64% DON'T KNOW 200 165 28 19 59 106 3 15 36 63 31 32 8 27 44 55 31 32 7 29 79 92 13 8% 9% 5% 6% 7% 12% 3% 7% 8% 14% 8% 11% 3% 6% 12% 11% 9% 9% 2% 7% 11% 11% 11% PRIORITY FOR MEETING ENERGY 845 553 292 210 132 421 77 133 -108 29 115 204 217 371 28 -109 209 108 280 307 -85 -64 17NEEDS (D/S) 35% 31% 51% 63% 15% 47% 61% 64% -24% 7% 29% 67% 75% 77% 8% -21% 60% 31% 85% 70% -12% -8% 14%--------------------------- EXPANDING USE OF CLEAN 1554 1108 424 270 478 630 102 168 155 210 242 247 249 423 180 183 271 215 303 366 276 342 65 ENERGY 65% 62% 75% 80% 54% 70% 80% 81% 35% 48% 61% 81% 86% 88% 49% 35% 77% 62% 92% 84% 40% 42% 53% DRILLING & DIGGING 709 555 133 60 346 209 24 35 263 180 127 42 32 51 152 292 62 106 23 59 361 406 48 30% 31% 23% 18% 39% 23% 19% 17% 59% 41% 32% 14% 11% 11% 41% 56% 18% 31% 7% 14% 52% 49% 39% IMPACT OF MORE USE OF 231 94 148 100 -40 134 20 80 -69 16 -20 70 72 161 -3 -49 55 -6 101 129 -56 -50 -2RENEWABLES ON ELECTRICITY 10% 5% 26% 30% -5% 15% 16% 38% -16% 4% -5% 23% 25% 34% -1% -9% 16% -2% 31% 29% -8% -6% -2%SYSTEM (D/S)------------------------- MORE RELIABLE 734 483 244 144 198 285 44 101 81 127 94 117 109 198 95 113 116 92 140 164 154 191 30 31% 27% 43% 43% 22% 32% 34% 48% 18% 29% 24% 38% 38% 41% 26% 22% 33% 26% 43% 38% 22% 23% 25% LESS RELIABLE 504 389 96 44 238 151 24 21 150 111 114 46 37 37 98 162 61 98 39 36 210 241 32 21% 22% 17% 13% 27% 17% 19% 10% 34% 25% 29% 15% 13% 8% 27% 31% 17% 28% 12% 8% 30% 29% 26% NO IMPACT 1010 794 194 127 404 390 52 75 196 165 170 104 128 223 150 210 153 120 137 213 285 336 52 42% 45% 34% 38% 46% 43% 41% 36% 44% 37% 43% 34% 44% 46% 41% 40% 44% 34% 42% 49% 41% 41% 42%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 8Table 2-3Summary of Key Data II BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% SUSPEND ENVIRO PROTECTIONS -1202 -206 -542 -403 -101 -138 -62 -302 -35 -499 -344 -473 -240 -134 -181 -162 -250 -224 -137 -103 -59 -75 -646 -556TO STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION -50% -21% -66% -77% -16% -56% -26% -70% -35% -76% -54% -59% -44% -35% -59% -49% -64% -55% -51% -37% -35% -34% -54% -46%(D/S)--------------------------- NECESSARY 499 327 114 52 225 45 69 51 30 63 118 131 133 111 52 67 56 74 60 73 50 61 230 269 21% 33% 14% 10% 36% 18% 29% 12% 30% 10% 19% 16% 24% 29% 17% 20% 14% 18% 22% 26% 29% 28% 19% 22% UNNECESSARY 1701 533 656 454 326 183 131 353 66 563 462 604 373 245 233 229 306 298 197 176 109 136 876 825 71% 54% 79% 87% 52% 75% 55% 82% 65% 86% 72% 76% 68% 63% 76% 69% 78% 73% 73% 63% 64% 62% 73% 69% DON'T KNOW 200 123 56 16 81 17 36 25 5 30 58 63 45 32 21 37 30 34 13 32 10 22 92 107 8% 13% 7% 3% 13% 7% 15% 6% 5% 5% 9% 8% 8% 8% 7% 11% 8% 8% 5% 11% 6% 10% 8% 9% PRIORITY FOR MEETING ENERGY 845 -161 517 444 -164 79 -18 308 20 562 301 374 124 37 113 188 129 245 12 112 -27 64 411 434NEEDS (D/S) 35% -16% 63% 85% -26% 32% -8% 72% 20% 86% 47% 47% 23% 10% 37% 57% 33% 60% 4% 40% -16% 29% 34% 36%--------------------------- EXPANDING USE OF CLEAN 1554 366 654 480 204 155 96 360 59 603 450 564 323 201 201 249 247 316 135 188 66 135 772 782 ENERGY 65% 37% 79% 92% 32% 63% 41% 84% 59% 92% 71% 71% 59% 52% 66% 75% 63% 78% 50% 67% 39% 62% 64% 65% DRILLING & DIGGING 709 528 137 36 367 76 114 52 40 42 149 190 199 164 88 61 119 71 123 76 93 71 362 348 30% 54% 17% 7% 58% 31% 48% 12% 39% 6% 23% 24% 36% 42% 29% 18% 30% 18% 45% 27% 55% 32% 30% 29% IMPACT OF MORE USE OF 231 -111 173 156 -88 38 -35 76 16 208 86 101 41 - 5 81 9 91 -7 48 -22 22 81 149RENEWABLES ON ELECTRICITY 10% -11% 21% 30% -14% 15% -15% 18% 16% 32% 13% 13% 8% - 2% 24% 2% 23% -2% 17% -13% 10% 7% 12%SYSTEM (D/S)------------------------- MORE RELIABLE 734 225 286 202 127 80 54 143 42 257 206 238 173 109 83 124 94 144 74 99 35 74 361 374 31% 23% 35% 39% 20% 33% 23% 33% 41% 39% 32% 30% 31% 28% 27% 37% 24% 35% 27% 35% 20% 34% 30% 31% LESS RELIABLE 504 335 113 46 215 42 89 67 25 49 121 137 132 109 78 43 85 52 81 51 57 52 279 225 21% 34% 14% 9% 34% 17% 38% 16% 25% 7% 19% 17% 24% 28% 26% 13% 22% 13% 30% 18% 34% 24% 23% 19% NO IMPACT 1010 360 384 239 248 109 74 189 33 315 259 375 216 149 127 132 194 181 103 113 73 77 493 517 42% 37% 46% 46% 39% 45% 31% 44% 32% 48% 41% 47% 39% 39% 42% 40% 49% 45% 38% 40% 43% 35% 41% 43%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 9Table 2-4Summary of Key Data II BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% SUSPEND ENVIRO PROTECTIONS -1202 -144 -1014 -74 -151 -459 -656 -861 -314 -386 -356 -199 -168 -807 -305 -891 -43 -283 -451 -92 -153 -135 -103 -240TO STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION -50% -21% -65% -15% -43% -77% -41% -56% -41% -41% -44% -31% -33% -56% -44% -53% -33% -47% -58% -16% -58% -74% -80% -56%(D/S)--------------------------- NECESSARY 499 235 222 172 85 59 395 279 193 235 193 187 144 255 165 333 38 133 132 201 50 18 12 77 21% 34% 14% 36% 24% 10% 25% 18% 25% 25% 24% 29% 28% 18% 24% 20% 29% 22% 17% 36% 19% 10% 9% 18% UNNECESSARY 1701 379 1236 247 236 518 1051 1141 507 622 548 386 312 1062 471 1224 81 416 583 294 203 153 114 316 71% 55% 80% 51% 67% 87% 66% 74% 66% 66% 67% 60% 61% 74% 67% 72% 62% 69% 75% 52% 76% 83% 89% 74% DON'T KNOW 200 79 96 62 29 17 152 129 64 83 74 67 57 114 62 138 11 56 61 67 13 13 3 37 8% 11% 6% 13% 8% 3% 10% 8% 8% 9% 9% 10% 11% 8% 9% 8% 8% 9% 8% 12% 5% 7% 2% 9% PRIORITY FOR MEETING ENERGY 845 -150 911 -151 55 496 227 697 134 132 116 2 -14 701 172 670 40 144 398 -179 188 145 113 152NEEDS (D/S) 35% -22% 59% -31% 16% 84% 14% 45% 18% 14% 14% - -3% 49% 25% 40% 31% 24% 51% -32% 71% 79% 87% 35%--------------------------- EXPANDING USE OF CLEAN 1554 248 1197 147 188 539 856 1082 425 504 434 301 231 1032 410 1139 77 356 562 175 223 160 119 277 ENERGY 65% 36% 77% 31% 54% 91% 54% 70% 56% 54% 53% 47% 45% 72% 59% 67% 59% 59% 72% 31% 84% 87% 92% 64% DRILLING & DIGGING 709 398 286 298 132 43 629 385 291 372 318 299 245 330 239 468 37 212 164 354 35 16 6 125 30% 57% 18% 62% 38% 7% 39% 25% 38% 40% 39% 47% 48% 23% 34% 28% 28% 35% 21% 63% 13% 9% 5% 29% IMPACT OF MORE USE OF 231 -106 302 -73 11 185 6 242 -11 12 13 -26 -25 221 49 183 13 36 139 -115 67 60 33 29RENEWABLES ON ELECTRICITY 10% -15% 19% -15% 3% 31% - 16% -1% 1% 2% -4% -5% 15% 7% 11% 10% 6% 18% -21% 25% 33% 26% 7%SYSTEM (D/S)------------------------- MORE RELIABLE 734 153 522 103 85 231 432 511 198 268 233 174 139 461 213 522 42 178 263 109 101 79 50 108 31% 22% 34% 21% 24% 39% 27% 33% 26% 29% 29% 27% 27% 32% 30% 31% 33% 29% 34% 19% 38% 43% 39% 25% LESS RELIABLE 504 259 220 176 74 46 426 269 210 256 220 200 164 240 164 338 29 142 124 225 34 20 17 79 21% 37% 14% 37% 21% 8% 27% 17% 27% 27% 27% 31% 32% 17% 23% 20% 22% 24% 16% 40% 13% 11% 13% 18% NO IMPACT 1010 239 720 172 167 290 646 653 329 369 322 237 189 628 276 729 46 246 328 199 113 78 58 214 42% 34% 46% 36% 48% 49% 40% 42% 43% 39% 40% 37% 37% 44% 40% 43% 35% 41% 42% 35% 42% 42% 45% 50%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 10Table 2-5Summary of Key Data II BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% SUSPEND ENVIRO PROTECTIONS -1202 -560 -539 -59 -636 -1020 -162 -688 -21 -454 -172 -945 -1023 -151 499 -1701 -1013 -143 -387 -113 -638 -981 -162 -39TO STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION -50% -56% -57% -64% -45% -54% -36% -61% -9% -47% -25% -63% -61% -23% 100% -100% -65% -20% -53% -22% -63% -60% -41% -13%(D/S)--------------------------- NECESSARY 499 173 164 11 325 356 122 190 89 207 218 243 276 209 499 - 229 240 156 164 153 274 96 112 21% 17% 17% 12% 23% 19% 27% 17% 38% 21% 31% 16% 16% 32% 100% - 15% 34% 21% 32% 15% 17% 24% 37% UNNECESSARY 1701 733 703 70 961 1376 284 878 110 661 390 1188 1299 360 - 1701 1242 382 543 277 791 1255 258 151 71% 74% 74% 76% 69% 73% 63% 78% 47% 68% 56% 79% 77% 55% - 100% 80% 54% 74% 55% 78% 77% 66% 49% DON'T KNOW 200 86 85 11 113 142 48 56 34 101 91 76 109 83 - - 83 87 36 63 65 105 39 43 8% 9% 9% 12% 8% 8% 11% 5% 15% 10% 13% 5% 6% 13% - - 5% 12% 5% 13% 6% 6% 10% 14% PRIORITY FOR MEETING ENERGY 845 453 430 49 389 767 65 754 -99 162 -169 972 1134 -304 -11 859 1554 -709 483 -152 445 986 -8 -147NEEDS (D/S) 35% 46% 45% 52% 28% 41% 14% 67% -42% 17% -24% 65% 67% -47% -2% 51% 100% -100% 66% -30% 44% 60% -2% -48%--------------------------- EXPANDING USE OF CLEAN 1554 698 666 67 850 1271 244 920 59 532 243 1207 1370 151 229 1242 1554 - 594 156 704 1274 176 68 ENERGY 65% 70% 70% 72% 61% 68% 54% 82% 25% 55% 35% 80% 81% 23% 46% 73% 100% - 81% 31% 70% 78% 45% 22% DRILLING & DIGGING 709 245 236 18 462 504 179 165 157 370 413 235 236 455 240 382 - 709 111 309 258 288 184 215 30% 25% 25% 20% 33% 27% 39% 15% 67% 38% 59% 16% 14% 70% 48% 22% - 100% 15% 61% 26% 18% 47% 71% IMPACT OF MORE USE OF 231 114 103 23 117 269 -42 321 -77 -30 -128 351 416 -194 -8 266 438 -197 734 -504 - 430 -40 -162RENEWABLES ON ELECTRICITY 10% 11% 11% 25% 8% 14% -9% 29% -33% -3% -18% 23% 25% -30% -2% 16% 28% -28% 100% -100% - 26% -10% -53%SYSTEM (D/S)------------------------- MORE RELIABLE 734 305 290 38 427 620 94 466 32 212 149 538 622 92 156 543 594 111 734 - - 619 68 28 31% 31% 30% 41% 31% 33% 21% 41% 14% 22% 21% 36% 37% 14% 31% 32% 38% 16% 100% - - 38% 17% 9% LESS RELIABLE 504 191 187 15 310 351 137 145 109 242 277 187 207 286 164 277 156 309 - 504 - 189 108 191 21% 19% 20% 17% 22% 19% 30% 13% 47% 25% 40% 12% 12% 44% 33% 16% 10% 44% - 100% - 12% 28% 62% NO IMPACT 1010 430 413 37 576 792 189 457 81 446 248 693 744 239 153 791 704 258 - - 1010 715 198 79 42% 43% 43% 40% 41% 42% 42% 41% 35% 46% 35% 46% 44% 37% 31% 47% 45% 36% - - 100% 44% 50% 26%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 11Table 3-1Summary of Issues: % Extremely Serious BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 502 80 91 85 92 81 83 250 252 108 110 73 123 86 97 108 45 121 89 40 209 132 154 OIL 42% 40% 46% 43% 46% 41% 41% 44% 40% 45% 38% 39% 47% 40% 42% 51% 35% 41% 38% 46% 47% 38% 40% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 212 43 26 11 22 52 11 71 141 64 50 30 44 22 42 21 8 72 53 14 49 74 79 18% 22% 13% 5% 11% 26% 5% 12% 23% 27% 17% 14% 18% 10% 17% 9% 8% 26% 23% 13% 11% 21% 21% (2) (2) (8) (10) (11) (2) (11) (7) (2) (2) (3) (5) (5) (8) (3) (9) (8) (2) (4) (9) (4) (2) (4) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 193 37 27 40 38 21 19 72 121 28 36 41 46 39 30 21 20 34 66 19 47 70 70 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 16% 19% 14% 20% 19% 11% 10% 13% 19% 12% 13% 19% 19% 18% 12% 9% 19% 12% 28% 17% 10% 20% 18% WATER (3) (3) (5) (3) (3) (5) (8) (6) (3) (7) (8) (2) (4) (2) (6) (10) (2) (9) (2) (3) (6) (3) (8) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 190 31 31 18 46 19 20 85 105 33 41 34 50 32 31 39 14 42 45 18 54 60 71 16% 15% 16% 9% 23% 10% 10% 15% 17% 14% 14% 16% 21% 15% 13% 18% 14% 15% 19% 16% 12% 17% 18% (4) (5) (2) (7) (2) (8) (7) (2) (6) (6) (5) (4) (3) (4) (5) (2) (4) (5) (5) (4) (3) (5) (7) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 186 29 30 42 35 30 38 76 109 13 48 36 52 37 27 32 18 35 56 19 74 61 45 RANCHES 15% 14% 15% 21% 18% 15% 19% 13% 18% 5% 17% 17% 22% 17% 11% 14% 17% 12% 24% 17% 17% 17% 12% (5) (7) (3) (2) (5) (3) (2) (5) (4) (11) (4) (3) (2) (3) (8) (3) (3) (8) (3) (2) (2) (4) (11) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 174 30 27 30 38 20 21 65 108 38 52 16 40 23 25 25 16 66 32 8 46 44 83 AND STREAMS 14% 15% 13% 15% 19% 10% 10% 11% 17% 16% 18% 8% 16% 11% 11% 11% 12% 22% 14% 9% 10% 12% 22% (6) (6) (6) (4) (4) (7) (6) (8) (5) (4) (2) (11) (7) (6) (7) (6) (5) (3) (9) (10) (7) (8) (2) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 167 34 22 11 31 26 21 78 89 37 33 25 46 26 34 31 13 35 40 14 47 39 81 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 14% 17% 11% 6% 16% 13% 11% 14% 14% 15% 11% 13% 18% 12% 15% 14% 10% 12% 17% 15% 11% 11% 21% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (4) (11) (9) (7) (4) (5) (3) (7) (5) (10) (6) (6) (5) (4) (4) (6) (10) (6) (5) (5) (9) (3) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 158 26 28 22 29 21 25 76 81 45 33 22 38 20 40 29 8 38 31 12 32 53 71 AND WILDLIFE 13% 13% 14% 11% 15% 10% 12% 13% 13% 19% 12% 11% 15% 9% 17% 13% 6% 13% 13% 14% 7% 15% 19% (8) (9) (4) (5) (8) (6) (4) (4) (10) (3) (9) (9) (8) (10) (2) (5) (12) (7) (10) (7) (9) (6) (6) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 133 21 22 11 26 18 26 55 77 28 37 19 32 17 24 22 9 41 29 7 25 36 72 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 11% 11% 11% 5% 13% 9% 13% 10% 12% 12% 13% 10% 12% 8% 10% 10% 7% 14% 12% 8% 6% 10% 19% AND WATER (9) (10) (10) (11) (9) (9) (3) (10) (11) (8) (7) (10) (11) (11) (9) (8) (9) (6) (11) (11) (11) (11) (5) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 128 19 26 19 24 16 19 44 84 22 27 25 31 23 17 19 8 32 37 15 21 48 55 LAND AND WATER 11% 10% 13% 9% 12% 8% 9% 8% 13% 9% 9% 12% 13% 11% 7% 9% 7% 12% 16% 14% 5% 14% 14% (10) (12) (7) (6) (10) (10) (9) (11) (9) (10) (12) (8) (10) (7) (12) (11) (10) (11) (7) (8) (12) (7) (10) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 127 21 23 16 34 10 7 40 87 26 38 11 31 21 18 14 8 46 28 13 40 22 61 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 11% 11% 11% 8% 17% 5% 3% 7% 14% 11% 13% 6% 12% 10% 8% 6% 6% 16% 12% 15% 9% 6% 16% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (11) (9) (8) (6) (12) (12) (12) (8) (9) (6) (12) (12) (9) (11) (12) (11) (4) (12) (6) (8) (12) (9) TOYS CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 117 27 15 9 18 13 17 58 58 11 32 25 32 16 23 25 10 20 32 6 32 39 40 PARKS 10% 14% 8% 4% 9% 7% 8% 10% 9% 5% 11% 12% 13% 7% 9% 11% 9% 7% 14% 6% 7% 11% 10% (12) (8) (12) (12) (12) (11) (10) (9) (12) (12) (11) (7) (9) (12) (10) (7) (7) (12) (8) (12) (10) (10) (12)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 12Table 3-2Summary of Issues: % Extremely Serious BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 502 372 115 76 184 189 36 40 114 95 79 53 56 98 80 129 66 65 70 84 162 195 24 OIL 42% 42% 40% 45% 43% 41% 54% 39% 54% 41% 40% 35% 36% 43% 42% 51% 37% 37% 45% 38% 47% 47% 42% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 212 134 73 37 47 87 8 30 11 38 33 41 20 59 25 23 36 38 47 32 37 41 12 18% 15% 26% 22% 10% 19% 12% 28% 5% 18% 17% 27% 15% 23% 14% 9% 20% 22% 28% 15% 11% 10% 18% (2) (2) (2) (4) (7) (2) (9) (2) (10) (3) (4) (2) (7) (3) (2) (7) (2) (4) (2) (10) (5) (6) (3) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 193 130 58 32 50 80 9 23 12 35 35 34 19 51 10 33 23 47 27 43 32 39 11 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 16% 15% 21% 19% 11% 18% 15% 22% 5% 17% 18% 23% 15% 20% 6% 13% 13% 27% 16% 20% 9% 10% 17% WATER (3) (3) (4) (7) (6) (3) (8) (6) (8) (4) (2) (4) (8) (5) (10) (4) (5) (2) (8) (3) (7) (8) (4) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 190 124 62 32 62 63 13 19 21 33 35 25 27 44 16 38 24 36 34 37 42 46 12 16% 14% 22% 19% 14% 14% 21% 18% 9% 16% 18% 17% 20% 17% 9% 14% 14% 21% 20% 17% 12% 11% 19% (4) (5) (3) (6) (2) (7) (2) (8) (3) (5) (3) (6) (3) (8) (7) (3) (4) (5) (5) (7) (3) (3) (2) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 186 125 56 34 57 68 9 25 34 40 25 36 16 30 20 54 23 38 19 27 59 70 9 RANCHES 15% 14% 20% 20% 13% 15% 15% 23% 15% 19% 12% 24% 12% 12% 11% 20% 13% 22% 11% 12% 17% 17% 14% (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (7) (5) (2) (2) (6) (3) (11) (11) (6) (2) (6) (3) (11) (11) (2) (2) (5) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 174 118 53 37 43 74 13 25 18 28 20 24 27 56 26 20 22 21 42 39 36 46 6 AND STREAMS 14% 13% 19% 22% 10% 16% 19% 24% 8% 12% 10% 16% 17% 25% 14% 8% 13% 12% 27% 17% 10% 11% 11% (6) (7) (7) (3) (8) (4) (4) (4) (5) (8) (10) (7) (4) (2) (3) (8) (7) (7) (3) (6) (6) (4) (7) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 167 121 44 27 55 66 14 14 17 30 23 16 37 44 25 22 20 19 24 56 39 44 6 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 14% 14% 15% 16% 13% 15% 21% 13% 8% 13% 12% 10% 24% 19% 13% 9% 12% 11% 16% 25% 11% 11% 10% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (6) (8) (8) (3) (6) (3) (9) (6) (7) (7) (10) (2) (7) (4) (5) (8) (10) (9) (2) (4) (5) (8) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 158 115 42 25 53 62 12 13 18 14 32 20 25 47 14 18 34 18 30 42 25 34 2 AND WILDLIFE 13% 13% 15% 15% 12% 14% 18% 13% 9% 6% 16% 13% 16% 21% 7% 7% 20% 11% 19% 19% 7% 8% 4% (8) (8) (9) (9) (5) (8) (5) (10) (4) (12) (5) (8) (6) (4) (9) (9) (3) (11) (6) (4) (9) (9) (9) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 133 96 36 24 42 54 6 18 5 19 23 13 26 45 16 9 17 19 32 40 22 25 1 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 11% 11% 13% 14% 10% 12% 9% 18% 3% 8% 12% 8% 17% 20% 8% 3% 10% 11% 20% 18% 6% 6% 2% AND WATER (9) (9) (12) (10) (9) (10) (12) (7) (12) (9) (8) (12) (5) (6) (8) (12) (11) (9) (4) (5) (11) (11) (11) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 128 86 40 14 32 53 7 6 8 13 18 31 15 40 8 13 18 30 20 34 14 18 7 LAND AND WATER 11% 10% 14% 8% 7% 12% 12% 6% 3% 6% 9% 20% 11% 16% 5% 5% 11% 17% 12% 16% 4% 4% 11% (10) (10) (10) (12) (11) (9) (10) (12) (11) (11) (11) (5) (12) (10) (12) (11) (9) (6) (10) (8) (12) (12) (6) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 127 71 56 39 22 49 12 28 10 30 7 15 22 39 23 16 13 10 28 34 31 41 1 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 11% 8% 20% 23% 5% 11% 18% 27% 5% 13% 4% 10% 14% 17% 12% 6% 7% 6% 18% 15% 9% 10% 2% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (12) (6) (2) (12) (11) (6) (3) (9) (6) (12) (11) (9) (9) (5) (10) (12) (12) (7) (9) (8) (7) (12) TOYS CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 117 77 38 17 41 36 6 12 15 17 23 16 17 23 8 23 18 20 15 25 24 30 2 PARKS 10% 9% 13% 10% 9% 8% 9% 11% 6% 8% 11% 11% 13% 9% 5% 9% 10% 12% 9% 12% 7% 7% 2% (12) (11) (11) (11) (10) (12) (11) (11) (7) (10) (9) (9) (10) (12) (11) (6) (10) (8) (12) (12) (10) (10) (10)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 13Table 3-3Summary of Issues: % Extremely Serious BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 502 228 151 108 167 40 39 84 22 131 107 144 145 98 54 53 71 72 75 70 46 52 502 - OIL 42% 45% 39% 40% 52% 33% 33% 39% 38% 41% 36% 36% 51% 47% 37% 35% 36% 36% 53% 50% 54% 42% 42% - (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 212 52 84 67 22 25 13 54 12 66 71 76 40 24 30 41 28 48 9 31 4 21 - 212 18% 11% 19% 26% 7% 20% 11% 25% 28% 19% 21% 19% 15% 14% 19% 22% 14% 23% 7% 23% 4% 22% - 18% (2) (5) (2) (2) (8) (2) (5) (2) (3) (6) (3) (2) (6) (8) (3) (4) (2) (2) (10) (3) (12) (6) (1) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 193 58 60 63 34 11 12 49 10 59 69 50 43 31 24 45 23 27 19 24 6 25 - 193 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 16% 12% 14% 25% 11% 9% 10% 23% 24% 17% 20% 12% 16% 17% 15% 25% 12% 13% 14% 17% 7% 26% - 16% WATER (3) (4) (5) (3) (4) (10) (6) (3) (6) (8) (4) (5) (4) (4) (4) (2) (6) (6) (3) (5) (8) (3) (2) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 190 71 49 62 42 13 18 38 12 59 81 37 33 36 38 43 21 16 15 18 9 27 - 190 16% 15% 11% 24% 13% 10% 15% 17% 27% 17% 24% 9% 12% 20% 24% 24% 11% 8% 11% 13% 10% 28% - 16% (4) (3) (8) (4) (3) (7) (2) (6) (4) (7) (2) (9) (8) (3) (2) (3) (7) (11) (7) (9) (6) (2) (3) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 186 87 51 36 56 16 17 39 15 30 51 44 48 40 17 34 23 21 17 31 17 24 - 186 RANCHES 15% 18% 12% 14% 18% 13% 14% 18% 34% 9% 15% 11% 18% 22% 11% 19% 12% 10% 13% 22% 20% 25% - 15% (5) (2) (7) (12) (2) (4) (3) (5) (2) (12) (5) (7) (3) (2) (10) (5) (4) (9) (6) (4) (2) (4) (4) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 174 53 60 54 33 13 14 27 5 73 40 51 52 31 18 23 17 34 19 33 11 19 174 - AND STREAMS 14% 10% 15% 20% 10% 10% 12% 13% 9% 23% 14% 13% 18% 15% 12% 15% 9% 17% 14% 23% 13% 16% 14% - (6) (6) (3) (7) (5) (6) (4) (9) (10) (2) (7) (4) (2) (6) (7) (8) (9) (3) (4) (2) (4) (8) (2) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 167 52 52 56 31 16 7 28 15 64 43 51 44 26 17 26 24 27 24 20 11 15 167 - PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 14% 10% 13% 21% 10% 13% 6% 13% 26% 20% 15% 13% 16% 12% 12% 17% 12% 13% 17% 14% 13% 12% 14% - NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (7) (6) (6) (6) (3) (10) (8) (5) (4) (6) (3) (5) (10) (8) (6) (3) (5) (2) (8) (5) (9) (3) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 158 35 58 58 21 11 7 41 7 64 38 46 42 29 18 20 23 23 18 24 15 14 158 - AND WILDLIFE 13% 7% 15% 22% 7% 9% 6% 19% 12% 20% 13% 12% 15% 14% 12% 14% 12% 11% 13% 17% 18% 12% 13% - (8) (8) (4) (5) (9) (9) (11) (4) (7) (3) (9) (6) (7) (7) (6) (10) (5) (7) (5) (7) (3) (10) (4) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 133 32 38 53 20 4 7 25 5 62 39 43 32 18 15 24 21 23 13 18 5 13 133 - DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 11% 6% 10% 20% 6% 3% 6% 12% 9% 20% 13% 11% 11% 8% 10% 16% 11% 11% 9% 13% 6% 10% 11% - AND WATER (9) (10) (11) (9) (10) (12) (9) (11) (9) (5) (8) (8) (11) (11) (11) (7) (8) (8) (9) (10) (10) (11) (5) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 128 23 46 51 10 9 10 33 3 51 45 33 21 29 18 27 14 19 6 15 5 24 - 128 LAND AND WATER 11% 5% 11% 20% 3% 7% 8% 16% 7% 15% 13% 8% 8% 16% 11% 15% 7% 9% 5% 11% 6% 25% - 11% (10) (12) (9) (8) (12) (11) (7) (7) (11) (10) (10) (11) (12) (5) (9) (9) (11) (10) (12) (12) (11) (5) (5) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 127 34 40 49 25 13 3 17 6 55 28 35 34 28 13 15 7 28 10 24 8 20 127 - WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 11% 7% 10% 18% 8% 11% 2% 8% 11% 17% 10% 9% 12% 13% 9% 10% 4% 14% 7% 17% 9% 16% 11% - HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (9) (10) (10) (7) (5) (12) (12) (8) (9) (12) (10) (9) (9) (12) (12) (12) (4) (11) (6) (7) (7) (6) TOYS CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 117 31 40 40 19 12 9 25 2 37 41 27 32 15 22 19 15 12 14 18 5 9 - 117 PARKS 10% 6% 9% 16% 6% 10% 8% 12% 5% 11% 12% 7% 12% 8% 13% 10% 8% 6% 11% 13% 6% 10% - 10% (12) (11) (12) (11) (11) (8) (8) (10) (12) (11) (11) (12) (10) (12) (5) (11) (10) (12) (8) (11) (9) (12) (6)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 14Table 3-4Summary of Issues: % Extremely Serious BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 502 204 267 143 51 135 327 322 167 220 196 168 144 272 138 363 30 119 139 150 45 48 31 84 OIL 42% 55% 35% 57% 31% 43% 42% 42% 43% 50% 51% 53% 55% 37% 44% 41% 61% 42% 37% 54% 36% 49% 46% 39% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 212 30 168 13 33 81 107 151 52 82 74 36 29 127 58 154 18 43 86 22 19 27 9 45 18% 9% 21% 6% 17% 29% 13% 19% 14% 16% 17% 11% 11% 18% 15% 19% 22% 13% 22% 8% 14% 32% 15% 21% (2) (6) (2) (11) (2) (2) (3) (3) (2) (4) (3) (8) (7) (2) (6) (2) (3) (8) (2) (6) (7) (2) (9) (2) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 193 37 145 23 21 72 105 139 47 75 64 39 28 116 67 125 12 58 72 40 17 13 9 38 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 16% 11% 18% 10% 11% 26% 13% 18% 13% 15% 15% 12% 11% 17% 18% 15% 14% 18% 18% 14% 12% 15% 16% 18% WATER (3) (4) (3) (4) (5) (3) (5) (5) (3) (7) (7) (7) (8) (3) (3) (3) (7) (3) (3) (4) (10) (10) (8) (3) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 190 56 123 30 22 70 107 155 33 87 70 53 36 99 63 125 17 50 61 45 27 16 14 26 16% 17% 15% 13% 12% 25% 13% 20% 9% 17% 16% 16% 14% 14% 16% 15% 21% 15% 15% 16% 19% 18% 22% 12% (4) (3) (6) (3) (4) (5) (4) (2) (6) (3) (6) (3) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) (5) (5) (3) (5) (7) (4) (8) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 186 66 107 44 28 39 131 143 36 98 76 70 49 87 70 114 14 60 64 55 13 18 6 29 RANCHES 15% 20% 13% 19% 15% 14% 16% 18% 10% 19% 18% 22% 19% 13% 18% 14% 17% 19% 16% 20% 9% 21% 9% 14% (5) (2) (9) (2) (3) (11) (2) (4) (5) (2) (2) (2) (2) (8) (2) (6) (6) (2) (4) (2) (12) (6) (12) (6) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 174 36 121 23 11 82 75 128 40 64 52 42 31 106 42 132 5 40 41 28 31 21 14 34 AND STREAMS 14% 10% 16% 9% 7% 26% 9% 17% 10% 14% 14% 13% 12% 14% 13% 15% 11% 14% 11% 10% 25% 21% 21% 16% (6) (5) (5) (5) (9) (4) (7) (7) (4) (8) (8) (6) (6) (5) (8) (5) (10) (6) (10) (5) (2) (5) (5) (4) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 167 28 126 21 17 76 80 133 31 70 64 48 42 94 50 117 11 46 49 16 25 31 18 23 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 14% 7% 17% 9% 11% 24% 10% 17% 8% 16% 17% 15% 16% 13% 16% 13% 23% 16% 13% 6% 20% 32% 27% 11% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (7) (4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (8) (5) (5) (4) (3) (6) (5) (7) (2) (4) (6) (10) (3) (3) (3) (10) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 158 26 115 16 9 75 65 122 32 69 65 43 39 86 42 115 10 39 47 13 16 25 19 34 AND WILDLIFE 13% 7% 15% 6% 5% 24% 8% 16% 8% 16% 17% 13% 15% 12% 14% 13% 21% 14% 12% 5% 13% 26% 28% 15% (8) (8) (7) (8) (11) (7) (9) (8) (7) (6) (4) (5) (4) (9) (7) (8) (5) (7) (7) (11) (8) (4) (2) (5) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 133 17 112 15 6 72 58 104 27 37 35 24 22 93 24 109 4 21 42 11 22 15 14 25 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 11% 5% 15% 6% 4% 23% 7% 13% 7% 8% 9% 8% 8% 13% 8% 12% 8% 7% 11% 4% 18% 15% 20% 11% AND WATER (9) (12) (8) (10) (12) (8) (10) (10) (10) (12) (12) (11) (10) (7) (12) (9) (11) (12) (8) (12) (6) (11) (6) (9) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 128 22 96 10 11 60 53 113 13 54 48 19 14 73 36 91 9 30 43 19 17 15 11 22 LAND AND WATER 11% 7% 12% 4% 6% 22% 6% 15% 4% 11% 11% 6% 5% 11% 9% 11% 11% 9% 11% 7% 12% 18% 18% 10% (10) (10) (10) (12) (10) (9) (12) (9) (12) (9) (9) (12) (12) (10) (11) (10) (9) (11) (9) (8) (9) (8) (7) (11) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 127 25 84 16 12 56 58 98 26 47 43 32 27 76 34 93 6 29 39 17 24 17 8 15 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 11% 7% 11% 7% 8% 18% 7% 13% 7% 11% 11% 10% 11% 10% 11% 11% 12% 10% 10% 6% 19% 18% 12% 7% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (9) (12) (7) (8) (10) (11) (11) (11) (10) (10) (9) (9) (11) (10) (11) (8) (10) (11) (9) (4) (9) (10) (12) TOYS CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 117 20 90 14 18 38 72 77 29 52 46 27 21 62 42 74 6 40 37 21 14 9 7 28 PARKS 10% 6% 11% 6% 10% 14% 9% 10% 8% 10% 11% 8% 8% 9% 11% 9% 7% 12% 9% 7% 10% 10% 11% 13% (12) (11) (11) (9) (7) (12) (8) (12) (9) (11) (11) (10) (11) (12) (9) (12) (12) (9) (12) (7) (11) (12) (11) (7)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 15Table 3-5Summary of Issues: % Extremely Serious BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 502 204 196 23 296 395 97 238 51 200 174 292 315 181 116 349 292 183 156 126 196 340 75 75 OIL 42% 42% 42% 49% 42% 42% 41% 41% 45% 42% 49% 39% 38% 54% 50% 40% 38% 51% 43% 45% 40% 42% 38% 49% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 212 95 91 5 117 169 37 156 8 39 49 151 180 23 36 166 179 28 102 19 79 180 18 6 18% 19% 19% 11% 17% 18% 17% 29% 7% 8% 14% 20% 21% 7% 13% 20% 23% 8% 27% 8% 15% 22% 9% 4% (2) (2) (2) (7) (5) (2) (2) (2) (4) (5) (3) (2) (2) (5) (7) (2) (2) (6) (2) (8) (2) (2) (7) (11) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 193 67 65 5 126 154 29 131 8 51 40 138 160 26 47 133 146 39 81 20 79 161 20 10 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 16% 13% 14% 10% 18% 16% 13% 24% 7% 10% 11% 18% 19% 8% 17% 16% 19% 11% 22% 9% 15% 20% 10% 6% WATER (3) (8) (8) (8) (2) (4) (6) (4) (6) (2) (5) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (4) (7) (3) (3) (4) (8) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 190 68 68 1 121 154 31 125 14 47 42 139 149 37 38 133 131 51 69 33 74 142 23 17 16% 14% 14% 3% 17% 16% 14% 23% 11% 10% 12% 18% 18% 12% 14% 16% 17% 15% 19% 15% 14% 17% 12% 12% (4) (5) (5) (11) (3) (3) (3) (5) (3) (3) (4) (3) (5) (3) (5) (3) (7) (3) (9) (2) (4) (4) (3) (5) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 186 67 66 4 118 150 30 111 23 46 68 106 126 49 54 113 109 65 78 31 65 129 26 26 RANCHES 15% 13% 14% 8% 17% 16% 14% 20% 19% 9% 20% 14% 15% 16% 20% 14% 14% 19% 21% 14% 13% 16% 13% 18% (5) (7) (7) (9) (4) (5) (4) (8) (2) (4) (2) (9) (9) (2) (2) (8) (11) (2) (5) (3) (5) (6) (2) (2) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 174 68 67 9 106 140 31 141 5 28 32 131 150 22 33 132 143 26 87 27 51 134 12 26 AND STREAMS 14% 14% 14% 19% 15% 15% 13% 24% 4% 6% 9% 17% 18% 7% 15% 15% 18% 7% 24% 10% 10% 16% 6% 17% (6) (4) (4) (3) (6) (6) (7) (3) (7) (8) (6) (5) (4) (6) (4) (6) (4) (7) (3) (6) (8) (5) (11) (3) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 167 80 78 12 87 129 32 129 8 30 31 123 146 19 30 131 131 29 74 28 59 125 20 18 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 14% 16% 17% 26% 12% 14% 13% 22% 7% 6% 9% 16% 18% 6% 13% 15% 17% 8% 20% 10% 12% 15% 10% 12% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (3) (3) (2) (8) (7) (5) (7) (5) (7) (7) (6) (6) (8) (8) (7) (6) (5) (6) (4) (7) (7) (5) (4) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 158 66 66 9 92 128 24 133 4 17 22 123 135 19 21 132 137 13 66 27 61 120 20 15 AND WILDLIFE 13% 13% 14% 19% 13% 14% 10% 23% 4% 4% 6% 16% 16% 6% 9% 15% 18% 4% 18% 10% 12% 15% 10% 10% (8) (6) (6) (4) (7) (8) (8) (6) (8) (11) (10) (7) (7) (7) (12) (5) (5) (10) (10) (5) (6) (8) (6) (6) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 133 57 56 8 75 113 16 108 2 22 18 107 128 5 24 107 123 7 67 12 44 110 15 7 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 11% 12% 12% 17% 11% 12% 7% 19% 2% 5% 5% 14% 15% 1% 10% 12% 16% 2% 19% 4% 9% 14% 8% 5% AND WATER (9) (9) (9) (6) (12) (9) (11) (10) (12) (9) (11) (8) (8) (12) (10) (9) (8) (12) (8) (12) (10) (9) (9) (10) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 128 50 46 1 78 110 14 107 2 16 24 99 116 12 26 97 109 16 58 15 44 102 15 5 LAND AND WATER 11% 10% 10% 2% 11% 12% 6% 20% 2% 3% 7% 13% 14% 4% 10% 12% 14% 5% 16% 7% 9% 12% 8% 3% (10) (11) (11) (12) (9) (10) (12) (9) (11) (12) (9) (10) (10) (10) (11) (10) (10) (9) (11) (9) (11) (10) (8) (12) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 127 50 50 8 77 104 18 89 3 33 17 93 109 13 28 90 114 9 71 15 37 98 15 13 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 11% 10% 11% 18% 11% 11% 7% 15% 3% 7% 5% 12% 13% 4% 12% 10% 15% 2% 20% 5% 7% 12% 8% 8% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (10) (10) (5) (10) (11) (10) (12) (10) (6) (12) (11) (11) (11) (9) (11) (9) (11) (7) (10) (12) (11) (10) (7) TOYS CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 117 40 38 2 76 94 19 87 4 22 25 86 103 14 38 72 91 22 52 12 47 97 11 8 PARKS 10% 8% 8% 5% 11% 10% 9% 16% 3% 4% 7% 11% 12% 4% 14% 9% 12% 6% 14% 5% 9% 12% 6% 5% (12) (12) (12) (10) (11) (12) (9) (11) (9) (10) (8) (12) (12) (9) (6) (12) (12) (8) (12) (11) (9) (12) (12) (9)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 16Table 4-1Summary of Issues: % Extremely/Very Serious BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 886 148 147 146 150 155 151 419 467 165 214 136 210 156 163 171 86 216 175 71 334 259 280 OIL 74% 74% 73% 73% 75% 77% 75% 73% 75% 69% 74% 72% 80% 72% 70% 80% 67% 73% 74% 80% 75% 74% 73% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 516 92 81 35 55 125 30 176 340 142 122 79 102 70 90 61 25 174 120 45 139 161 203 43% 46% 41% 18% 27% 62% 15% 30% 54% 59% 42% 37% 43% 32% 36% 28% 23% 62% 52% 41% 31% 46% 53% (2) (2) (3) (12) (11) (2) (12) (7) (2) (2) (2) (4) (4) (7) (4) (8) (8) (2) (3) (6) (4) (2) (3) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 480 88 67 50 126 55 49 206 275 96 109 76 115 84 84 89 33 121 103 51 159 136 172 40% 44% 33% 25% 63% 27% 25% 36% 44% 40% 38% 36% 48% 39% 34% 40% 32% 43% 44% 46% 36% 39% 45% (3) (4) (7) (8) (2) (8) (9) (3) (5) (5) (3) (6) (2) (4) (7) (2) (4) (3) (5) (4) (3) (5) (7) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 472 73 86 95 77 85 85 182 290 78 104 81 115 94 71 74 37 111 122 58 173 149 141 RANCHES 39% 36% 43% 47% 39% 42% 42% 32% 46% 32% 36% 38% 48% 44% 28% 34% 35% 40% 52% 52% 39% 43% 37% (4) (7) (2) (2) (5) (3) (2) (6) (4) (9) (5) (3) (3) (2) (10) (4) (2) (6) (2) (2) (2) (3) (11) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 460 79 78 84 83 64 51 169 291 91 102 78 99 86 74 62 32 119 116 54 133 146 169 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 38% 39% 39% 42% 42% 32% 25% 29% 47% 38% 36% 37% 41% 40% 30% 28% 30% 43% 50% 49% 30% 42% 44% WATER (5) (5) (5) (3) (4) (6) (7) (8) (3) (8) (6) (5) (5) (3) (9) (7) (5) (4) (4) (3) (5) (4) (8) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 438 72 77 62 88 61 51 183 254 91 107 59 102 75 80 62 42 119 99 33 113 111 206 AND STREAMS 37% 36% 38% 31% 44% 30% 26% 32% 41% 38% 37% 31% 39% 35% 34% 29% 33% 40% 42% 38% 25% 32% 54% (6) (8) (6) (5) (3) (7) (6) (4) (6) (7) (4) (8) (7) (5) (6) (6) (3) (5) (6) (7) (6) (9) (2) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 434 91 66 55 75 65 50 209 225 96 84 72 103 74 91 82 36 89 93 38 109 134 188 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 36% 45% 33% 27% 38% 32% 25% 36% 36% 40% 29% 38% 40% 34% 39% 38% 28% 30% 40% 43% 25% 38% 49% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (3) (8) (7) (6) (4) (8) (2) (7) (4) (8) (2) (6) (6) (2) (3) (6) (11) (7) (5) (7) (6) (4) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 392 57 78 66 75 64 58 182 210 105 73 59 99 54 88 66 27 90 92 27 99 115 175 AND WILDLIFE 33% 28% 39% 33% 37% 32% 29% 32% 34% 44% 26% 31% 38% 25% 38% 31% 21% 31% 39% 30% 22% 33% 46% (8) (10) (4) (4) (7) (5) (3) (5) (8) (3) (12) (7) (8) (10) (3) (5) (10) (10) (8) (11) (8) (8) (6) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 359 78 52 43 48 54 51 155 203 75 86 65 74 57 75 53 28 86 86 29 93 118 135 PARKS 30% 39% 26% 21% 24% 27% 26% 27% 33% 31% 30% 30% 31% 26% 30% 24% 26% 31% 37% 26% 21% 34% 35% (9) (6) (11) (11) (12) (9) (5) (10) (10) (10) (7) (9) (10) (9) (8) (10) (7) (9) (9) (12) (9) (7) (12) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 351 56 64 48 62 47 55 159 192 93 83 40 79 52 84 50 25 93 69 27 69 95 184 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 29% 28% 32% 24% 31% 24% 27% 28% 31% 39% 29% 21% 30% 24% 36% 24% 19% 32% 29% 31% 15% 27% 48% AND WATER (10) (11) (10) (10) (8) (10) (4) (9) (11) (6) (9) (12) (11) (11) (5) (11) (11) (8) (12) (9) (11) (11) (5) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 325 49 65 58 60 44 45 134 191 57 75 57 77 58 55 55 23 77 79 35 55 105 156 LAND AND WATER 27% 25% 33% 29% 30% 22% 22% 23% 31% 24% 26% 27% 32% 27% 22% 25% 22% 27% 34% 32% 12% 30% 40% (11) (12) (9) (6) (10) (11) (10) (11) (12) (12) (11) (10) (9) (8) (11) (9) (9) (12) (10) (8) (12) (10) (9) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 315 57 51 49 62 41 37 106 208 67 81 44 74 45 49 40 18 99 78 27 85 81 142 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 26% 29% 25% 24% 31% 20% 19% 19% 33% 28% 28% 23% 29% 21% 21% 19% 14% 34% 33% 31% 19% 23% 37% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (12) (9) (12) (9) (9) (12) (11) (12) (9) (11) (10) (11) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (7) (11) (10) (10) (12) (10) TOYS


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 17Table 4-2Summary of Issues: % Extremely/Very Serious BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 886 670 198 122 313 357 54 68 159 176 148 111 109 171 136 198 121 137 119 158 270 317 40 OIL 74% 76% 69% 73% 73% 78% 82% 67% 75% 76% 75% 73% 70% 75% 72% 78% 69% 79% 76% 71% 79% 76% 69% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 516 365 144 101 127 238 28 73 41 98 73 89 55 147 61 75 89 72 106 96 104 118 26 43% 41% 51% 60% 28% 53% 46% 68% 17% 47% 36% 59% 42% 58% 35% 28% 51% 41% 62% 45% 30% 29% 40% (2) (2) (2) (2) (7) (2) (4) (1) (9) (3) (4) (2) (7) (2) (2) (5) (2) (4) (2) (8) (4) (4) (3) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 480 346 126 70 152 194 27 43 64 95 74 61 63 110 59 101 69 67 74 98 123 139 29 40% 39% 45% 42% 34% 43% 45% 40% 27% 45% 37% 41% 48% 43% 33% 38% 39% 38% 44% 46% 35% 34% 45% (3) (3) (4) (5) (3) (5) (5) (7) (3) (4) (3) (5) (5) (8) (3) (3) (3) (6) (5) (6) (3) (3) (2) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 472 343 118 69 133 210 24 45 69 104 66 83 41 99 55 118 65 84 60 81 140 163 22 RANCHES 39% 38% 42% 41% 29% 47% 39% 42% 30% 49% 33% 55% 31% 39% 31% 44% 37% 48% 35% 38% 40% 40% 34% (4) (4) (5) (6) (5) (3) (8) (5) (2) (2) (6) (3) (11) (11) (5) (2) (6) (2) (12) (10) (2) (2) (5) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 460 317 137 79 116 200 26 53 44 89 65 81 53 116 48 83 67 79 72 98 101 118 26 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 38% 35% 48% 47% 26% 45% 43% 49% 19% 42% 33% 53% 41% 46% 27% 31% 38% 45% 42% 46% 29% 29% 39% WATER (5) (6) (3) (3) (9) (4) (6) (3) (7) (5) (7) (4) (9) (7) (7) (4) (4) (3) (6) (7) (5) (5) (4) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 438 312 119 77 126 187 33 45 42 71 59 51 79 126 62 51 50 60 86 117 79 111 14 AND STREAMS 37% 35% 42% 46% 29% 41% 50% 44% 20% 31% 30% 34% 51% 56% 33% 20% 29% 35% 55% 53% 23% 27% 24% (6) (7) (6) (4) (6) (6) (3) (4) (6) (6) (8) (8) (2) (3) (4) (8) (10) (7) (3) (3) (7) (6) (6) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 434 319 107 64 147 171 36 28 46 64 87 47 76 113 58 52 61 71 61 126 89 110 11 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 36% 36% 37% 38% 34% 38% 55% 27% 22% 28% 44% 31% 49% 50% 30% 20% 35% 41% 39% 56% 26% 26% 19% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (5) (7) (8) (2) (7) (2) (11) (5) (7) (2) (11) (4) (4) (6) (7) (7) (5) (8) (2) (6) (7) (9) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 392 297 92 53 133 163 24 29 48 51 66 49 66 109 50 49 67 48 62 112 75 99 13 AND WILDLIFE 33% 33% 32% 31% 31% 36% 37% 28% 23% 22% 33% 32% 42% 48% 26% 19% 38% 28% 39% 50% 22% 24% 23% (8) (8) (11) (11) (4) (8) (9) (10) (4) (10) (5) (9) (6) (5) (8) (9) (5) (10) (7) (4) (8) (8) (7) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 359 257 96 57 116 141 21 36 44 49 58 60 48 87 32 59 60 58 65 70 73 86 13 PARKS 30% 29% 34% 34% 26% 32% 35% 34% 19% 23% 29% 40% 36% 34% 19% 22% 34% 33% 38% 33% 21% 21% 20% (9) (9) (9) (10) (10) (9) (10) (8) (8) (9) (9) (6) (10) (12) (11) (6) (8) (9) (9) (12) (9) (9) (8) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 351 251 95 59 112 139 28 30 25 43 54 41 76 108 41 28 54 40 79 103 51 68 10 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 29% 28% 33% 35% 26% 30% 43% 30% 12% 19% 27% 27% 49% 48% 21% 11% 31% 23% 50% 46% 15% 16% 18% AND WATER (10) (10) (10) (9) (8) (12) (7) (9) (10) (11) (10) (12) (3) (6) (10) (12) (9) (12) (4) (5) (11) (11) (11) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 325 242 76 43 101 141 18 25 22 33 52 53 54 102 18 37 45 60 64 91 47 54 12 LAND AND WATER 27% 27% 27% 26% 22% 32% 30% 24% 9% 16% 26% 35% 41% 40% 10% 14% 26% 34% 38% 43% 13% 13% 19% (11) (11) (12) (12) (11) (10) (12) (12) (12) (12) (11) (7) (8) (10) (12) (11) (11) (8) (10) (9) (12) (12) (10) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 315 207 99 64 64 143 23 42 24 61 32 49 48 95 49 35 40 41 57 82 67 87 8 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 26% 23% 35% 38% 15% 31% 34% 41% 11% 26% 16% 32% 31% 42% 26% 14% 23% 24% 36% 37% 19% 21% 14% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (12) (12) (8) (7) (12) (11) (11) (6) (11) (8) (12) (10) (12) (9) (9) (10) (12) (11) (11) (11) (10) (10) (12) TOYS


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 18Table 4-3Summary of Issues: % Extremely/Very Serious BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 886 386 292 182 257 75 84 160 42 232 211 292 219 150 104 107 138 154 108 112 65 85 886 - OIL 74% 77% 74% 68% 81% 62% 71% 75% 74% 73% 72% 74% 78% 72% 72% 72% 70% 77% 77% 79% 76% 70% 74% - (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 516 147 202 149 82 53 42 109 18 183 163 189 104 59 57 106 69 120 32 72 17 41 - 516 43% 30% 47% 59% 26% 42% 36% 51% 41% 54% 47% 47% 39% 33% 35% 58% 35% 59% 25% 52% 21% 43% - 43% (2) (4) (2) (2) (5) (2) (3) (2) (7) (3) (2) (2) (3) (5) (6) (2) (3) (2) (8) (2) (9) (6) (1) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 480 167 167 131 108 48 39 89 19 153 158 146 93 77 76 82 62 84 35 58 28 49 - 480 40% 35% 38% 51% 35% 39% 33% 41% 43% 45% 46% 36% 35% 43% 47% 45% 32% 41% 27% 42% 33% 51% - 40% (3) (3) (7) (4) (3) (3) (4) (7) (4) (7) (3) (3) (7) (3) (2) (4) (5) (4) (7) (6) (3) (4) (2) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 472 198 170 84 126 44 48 90 23 117 127 137 106 97 48 79 56 81 36 70 38 59 - 472 RANCHES 39% 41% 39% 33% 40% 35% 41% 42% 52% 35% 37% 34% 39% 54% 30% 43% 28% 39% 28% 50% 46% 61% - 39% (4) (2) (5) (12) (2) (4) (2) (6) (2) (12) (8) (6) (2) (2) (10) (5) (7) (5) (6) (3) (2) (2) (3) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 460 143 164 132 87 43 36 96 18 151 137 141 103 75 54 84 56 85 38 65 18 57 - 460 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 38% 30% 38% 52% 28% 35% 30% 45% 40% 45% 40% 35% 38% 42% 33% 46% 29% 42% 29% 47% 21% 59% - 38% WATER (5) (5) (8) (3) (4) (6) (5) (4) (8) (8) (6) (4) (5) (4) (7) (3) (6) (3) (4) (5) (8) (3) (4) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 438 134 159 131 71 42 32 73 28 172 128 133 109 66 66 62 54 79 40 70 24 42 438 - AND STREAMS 37% 27% 40% 49% 22% 35% 27% 34% 48% 54% 43% 33% 39% 32% 46% 41% 27% 39% 28% 49% 27% 34% 37% - (6) (6) (4) (6) (7) (5) (6) (9) (3) (2) (4) (7) (4) (6) (3) (7) (9) (6) (5) (4) (5) (7) (2) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 434 128 176 120 71 37 32 96 24 162 127 137 101 61 65 63 69 68 49 52 23 37 434 - PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 36% 26% 45% 45% 22% 31% 27% 45% 42% 51% 43% 34% 36% 29% 45% 42% 35% 34% 35% 37% 27% 30% 36% - NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (7) (3) (8) (6) (8) (7) (3) (6) (4) (5) (5) (6) (9) (4) (6) (2) (7) (2) (9) (6) (8) (3) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 392 96 153 133 60 39 18 90 17 155 101 124 97 64 44 57 64 61 44 54 28 36 392 - AND WILDLIFE 33% 19% 39% 50% 19% 32% 15% 42% 30% 49% 34% 31% 35% 31% 30% 38% 33% 30% 31% 38% 33% 29% 33% - (8) (8) (6) (5) (8) (7) (10) (5) (10) (5) (9) (8) (8) (8) (9) (9) (4) (9) (3) (8) (4) (10) (4) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 359 89 142 113 55 36 27 84 7 127 112 116 79 48 46 66 55 61 32 47 21 27 - 359 PARKS 30% 19% 33% 45% 17% 29% 23% 39% 15% 37% 33% 29% 29% 27% 29% 36% 28% 30% 24% 34% 25% 28% - 30% (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (8) (8) (12) (11) (10) (9) (9) (10) (11) (10) (8) (10) (9) (10) (7) (11) (5) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 351 84 125 123 43 25 16 69 24 154 111 110 78 46 54 57 51 59 33 45 17 29 351 - DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 29% 17% 32% 46% 13% 21% 14% 32% 42% 49% 38% 28% 28% 22% 37% 38% 26% 29% 24% 32% 20% 24% 29% - AND WATER (10) (11) (10) (7) (11) (11) (11) (11) (5) (6) (7) (10) (10) (12) (5) (8) (10) (11) (10) (11) (10) (12) (5) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 325 68 133 112 31 22 25 72 11 144 100 102 66 56 50 50 44 58 25 40 13 43 - 325 LAND AND WATER 27% 14% 31% 44% 10% 17% 21% 34% 24% 42% 29% 25% 24% 31% 31% 27% 23% 28% 19% 29% 16% 44% - 27% (11) (12) (11) (10) (12) (12) (9) (10) (11) (9) (11) (11) (12) (7) (8) (12) (11) (12) (11) (12) (12) (5) (6) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 315 86 112 101 54 29 13 60 18 120 85 97 73 52 34 50 35 63 18 55 15 37 315 - WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 26% 17% 28% 38% 17% 24% 11% 28% 31% 38% 29% 25% 26% 25% 24% 33% 18% 31% 13% 39% 17% 30% 26% - HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (12) (10) (12) (11) (10) (10) (12) (12) (9) (10) (12) (12) (11) (11) (12) (11) (12) (8) (12) (7) (11) (9) (6) TOYS


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 19Table 4-4Summary of Issues: % Extremely/Very Serious BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 886 302 530 207 103 232 581 581 284 338 291 242 195 535 240 644 40 215 267 235 90 76 50 152 OIL 74% 82% 70% 83% 64% 73% 74% 75% 73% 77% 76% 77% 75% 72% 76% 73% 82% 76% 70% 84% 72% 78% 74% 70% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 516 86 387 57 71 158 290 341 144 168 143 96 71 342 144 371 39 110 201 84 54 48 29 91 43% 26% 49% 25% 37% 57% 36% 44% 38% 34% 33% 30% 28% 49% 38% 46% 48% 34% 51% 30% 38% 57% 48% 43% (2) (5) (2) (5) (3) (2) (3) (3) (2) (8) (7) (8) (8) (2) (4) (2) (2) (7) (2) (5) (7) (2) (4) (2) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 480 113 335 75 73 153 275 347 115 183 148 117 82 294 148 330 36 120 152 94 79 39 23 83 40% 35% 42% 33% 39% 55% 34% 45% 31% 37% 34% 36% 32% 43% 39% 40% 44% 37% 38% 33% 56% 46% 38% 39% (3) (3) (4) (3) (2) (4) (4) (2) (4) (3) (5) (3) (5) (3) (3) (3) (4) (4) (6) (3) (2) (6) (8) (5) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 472 152 293 101 62 113 322 315 141 215 178 150 113 255 167 303 27 146 155 127 44 28 22 86 RANCHES 39% 47% 37% 44% 33% 41% 40% 41% 37% 43% 41% 46% 45% 37% 44% 37% 33% 45% 39% 45% 31% 33% 36% 40% (4) (2) (9) (2) (4) (10) (2) (7) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (6) (2) (6) (6) (2) (5) (2) (12) (12) (9) (3) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 460 97 332 62 62 143 257 331 109 174 144 107 77 284 142 317 36 111 162 87 59 42 20 84 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 38% 30% 42% 27% 33% 51% 32% 43% 29% 35% 33% 33% 30% 41% 37% 39% 45% 34% 41% 31% 41% 49% 33% 39% WATER (5) (4) (6) (4) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (4) (5) (4) (3) (6) (3) (4) (6) (4) (10) (4) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 438 87 319 56 39 180 223 338 93 154 127 106 79 275 109 328 16 103 150 64 69 37 32 73 AND STREAMS 37% 24% 42% 22% 24% 57% 28% 44% 24% 35% 33% 33% 30% 37% 35% 37% 32% 36% 39% 23% 56% 38% 47% 34% (6) (6) (5) (6) (8) (3) (7) (4) (9) (5) (8) (5) (7) (5) (7) (5) (7) (5) (4) (6) (4) (10) (6) (8) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 434 70 339 47 48 158 241 320 107 154 139 111 96 273 112 321 14 108 138 56 69 47 41 66 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 36% 19% 45% 19% 30% 50% 31% 41% 28% 35% 36% 35% 37% 37% 36% 37% 29% 38% 36% 20% 56% 48% 60% 30% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (9) (3) (8) (6) (8) (6) (6) (6) (4) (3) (4) (3) (7) (6) (7) (10) (3) (7) (7) (3) (5) (2) (9) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 392 71 290 49 36 158 195 296 89 150 137 99 86 233 100 292 17 91 124 53 44 52 34 75 AND WILDLIFE 33% 19% 38% 20% 22% 50% 25% 38% 23% 34% 36% 31% 33% 31% 32% 33% 35% 32% 33% 19% 36% 53% 50% 34% (8) (8) (8) (7) (9) (9) (9) (8) (10) (7) (4) (7) (4) (9) (8) (8) (5) (8) (8) (9) (9) (3) (3) (7) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 359 68 274 37 52 110 213 236 100 143 125 84 65 212 101 255 22 87 118 56 47 35 17 77 PARKS 30% 21% 34% 16% 28% 39% 26% 30% 26% 29% 29% 26% 26% 31% 26% 31% 26% 27% 30% 20% 33% 42% 27% 36% (9) (7) (10) (9) (7) (12) (8) (11) (7) (9) (9) (9) (9) (10) (10) (9) (12) (9) (10) (8) (10) (7) (12) (6) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 351 41 296 28 33 160 168 245 101 108 98 74 64 233 83 266 15 75 123 29 55 34 32 66 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 29% 11% 39% 11% 20% 51% 21% 32% 26% 25% 25% 24% 24% 31% 26% 30% 32% 27% 32% 11% 44% 34% 47% 30% AND WATER (10) (12) (7) (12) (11) (7) (10) (10) (8) (11) (11) (10) (10) (8) (9) (10) (8) (10) (9) (12) (5) (11) (5) (10) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 325 48 262 27 28 149 138 259 59 125 111 62 47 199 94 230 22 78 114 36 47 35 27 57 LAND AND WATER 27% 15% 33% 12% 15% 54% 17% 33% 16% 25% 26% 19% 19% 29% 25% 28% 27% 24% 29% 13% 33% 41% 44% 27% (11) (11) (11) (11) (12) (5) (12) (9) (12) (10) (10) (12) (12) (11) (12) (11) (11) (12) (11) (10) (11) (8) (7) (11) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 315 58 230 37 33 128 152 231 77 103 92 71 60 205 78 234 15 73 108 34 47 38 20 49 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 26% 16% 30% 15% 21% 40% 19% 30% 20% 23% 24% 23% 23% 28% 25% 27% 31% 26% 28% 12% 38% 39% 30% 22% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (12) (10) (12) (10) (10) (11) (11) (12) (11) (12) (12) (11) (11) (12) (11) (12) (9) (11) (12) (11) (8) (9) (11) (12) TOYS


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 20Table 4-5Summary of Issues: % Extremely/Very Serious BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 886 362 345 36 520 707 165 425 90 349 269 556 595 277 189 630 553 285 273 207 355 592 145 128 OIL 74% 74% 74% 78% 74% 76% 69% 73% 80% 74% 76% 74% 71% 83% 82% 72% 72% 79% 76% 74% 72% 73% 73% 83% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 516 221 213 17 294 433 70 326 13 156 107 370 443 59 110 364 415 82 209 54 213 413 56 26 43% 44% 44% 37% 42% 46% 32% 60% 10% 31% 31% 49% 52% 19% 41% 44% 53% 24% 56% 24% 41% 50% 29% 18% (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (4) (2) (9) (2) (4) (2) (2) (6) (3) (2) (2) (5) (2) (7) (2) (2) (3) (7) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 480 211 205 16 269 389 79 287 34 137 119 334 374 94 91 354 346 109 175 78 190 371 53 40 40% 42% 43% 34% 39% 41% 37% 53% 28% 28% 34% 44% 44% 30% 34% 43% 44% 31% 47% 35% 37% 45% 28% 27% (3) (3) (3) (7) (5) (3) (3) (6) (3) (4) (3) (5) (6) (3) (5) (3) (6) (3) (6) (3) (3) (3) (5) (4) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 472 200 195 16 272 373 85 249 52 151 143 294 326 130 124 298 297 150 179 80 187 329 66 60 RANCHES 39% 40% 41% 35% 39% 40% 39% 46% 43% 31% 42% 39% 38% 41% 46% 36% 38% 43% 48% 36% 36% 40% 34% 40% (4) (4) (4) (6) (4) (4) (2) (9) (2) (3) (2) (7) (9) (2) (2) (7) (9) (2) (4) (2) (5) (7) (2) (2) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 460 194 187 16 266 372 70 291 25 129 97 327 376 69 99 326 349 91 179 59 182 369 49 25 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 38% 38% 39% 34% 38% 39% 32% 53% 20% 26% 28% 43% 44% 22% 37% 40% 45% 26% 48% 26% 35% 45% 26% 17% WATER (5) (6) (6) (8) (6) (5) (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (6) (5) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (5) (5) (7) (4) (6) (8) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 438 160 156 17 275 359 70 326 14 93 77 335 382 49 75 343 358 63 174 68 176 339 57 36 AND STREAMS 37% 33% 33% 37% 39% 39% 29% 56% 13% 19% 22% 45% 46% 15% 33% 39% 46% 17% 48% 25% 36% 42% 28% 24% (6) (8) (8) (5) (3) (7) (6) (3) (5) (7) (6) (3) (3) (9) (7) (5) (3) (8) (3) (6) (6) (5) (4) (6) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 434 193 189 24 239 360 65 309 13 105 70 334 369 56 75 335 351 66 156 75 181 333 49 44 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 36% 40% 40% 51% 34% 39% 27% 53% 11% 22% 20% 45% 44% 17% 33% 38% 45% 18% 43% 27% 37% 41% 24% 28% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (7) (5) (5) (2) (7) (6) (7) (5) (6) (6) (9) (4) (4) (8) (6) (6) (4) (7) (8) (4) (4) (6) (7) (3) QUALITY LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 392 176 172 22 216 322 61 307 13 64 71 289 327 58 58 313 322 56 138 60 174 299 48 37 AND WILDLIFE 33% 36% 37% 48% 31% 35% 26% 53% 11% 13% 20% 39% 39% 17% 25% 36% 42% 16% 38% 22% 35% 37% 24% 24% (8) (7) (7) (3) (9) (8) (9) (7) (7) (12) (8) (8) (7) (7) (9) (8) (7) (9) (10) (8) (8) (8) (8) (5) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 359 139 134 10 220 293 58 237 13 93 71 261 291 60 69 272 277 69 139 44 148 287 45 18 PARKS 30% 28% 28% 23% 31% 31% 27% 44% 11% 19% 21% 34% 34% 19% 25% 33% 35% 20% 37% 20% 29% 35% 24% 12% (9) (11) (10) (12) (8) (10) (8) (11) (8) (8) (7) (11) (10) (5) (8) (10) (11) (6) (11) (9) (9) (9) (9) (11) THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 351 139 136 15 210 293 49 269 2 73 55 278 320 25 45 297 313 25 158 41 138 285 38 24 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 29% 28% 29% 33% 30% 31% 20% 46% 2% 15% 16% 37% 38% 7% 20% 34% 40% 7% 44% 15% 28% 35% 19% 15% AND WATER (10) (9) (9) (9) (10) (9) (12) (8) (12) (10) (10) (9) (8) (12) (12) (9) (8) (12) (7) (12) (10) (10) (10) (10) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 325 140 130 11 184 267 50 244 8 69 52 263 290 26 56 248 287 33 131 35 138 277 30 8 LAND AND WATER 27% 28% 27% 24% 26% 28% 23% 45% 7% 14% 15% 35% 34% 8% 21% 30% 37% 10% 35% 16% 27% 34% 16% 5% (11) (10) (11) (11) (12) (11) (10) (10) (11) (11) (11) (10) (11) (11) (11) (11) (10) (10) (12) (10) (11) (11) (11) (12) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 315 124 123 13 188 257 50 221 11 76 45 243 276 31 50 243 267 32 149 41 106 259 28 24 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 26% 25% 26% 27% 27% 28% 21% 38% 10% 16% 13% 32% 33% 9% 22% 28% 35% 9% 41% 15% 21% 32% 14% 16% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (12) (12) (12) (10) (11) (12) (11) (12) (10) (9) (12) (12) (12) (10) (10) (12) (12) (11) (9) (11) (12) (12) (12) (9) TOYS


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 21Table 5-1Summary of Issues: % Total Serious BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 1121 186 190 180 190 188 194 533 588 219 273 179 245 198 216 202 116 276 223 83 419 329 354 OIL 94% 93% 95% 90% 95% 94% 97% 93% 94% 91% 95% 95% 94% 92% 92% 94% 91% 94% 95% 94% 94% 94% 92% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 938 167 157 93 123 187 84 402 537 203 231 157 190 155 182 151 68 252 196 87 309 275 336 78% 84% 79% 46% 62% 93% 42% 70% 86% 85% 80% 73% 80% 72% 73% 69% 65% 90% 84% 79% 70% 79% 87% (2) (3) (5) (12) (12) (2) (12) (7) (2) (2) (3) (7) (3) (6) (5) (7) (7) (2) (2) (5) (4) (4) (3) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 929 158 160 142 173 143 125 428 500 197 222 144 200 161 180 154 94 239 190 68 298 284 333 AND STREAMS 78% 79% 80% 71% 86% 72% 62% 75% 80% 82% 77% 76% 77% 75% 77% 72% 73% 81% 81% 77% 67% 81% 87% (3) (6) (4) (3) (3) (7) (6) (2) (5) (4) (4) (3) (6) (3) (3) (4) (4) (5) (7) (8) (5) (2) (4) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 928 146 161 174 154 163 153 419 509 177 204 181 188 176 165 173 80 217 195 96 337 278 297 RANCHES 77% 73% 81% 87% 77% 81% 77% 73% 81% 74% 71% 85% 78% 81% 66% 79% 76% 77% 84% 87% 76% 79% 77% (4) (9) (3) (2) (5) (3) (2) (4) (4) (9) (8) (2) (4) (2) (10) (2) (2) (7) (3) (2) (3) (3) (11) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 923 168 149 132 160 148 129 428 495 198 232 140 191 157 190 149 88 240 182 69 294 270 346 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 77% 84% 75% 66% 80% 74% 65% 74% 80% 83% 81% 74% 73% 73% 81% 70% 69% 82% 77% 78% 66% 77% 90% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (5) (2) (6) (7) (4) (4) (4) (3) (6) (3) (2) (5) (7) (4) (2) (5) (5) (4) (8) (7) (6) (5) (2) QUALITY TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 911 154 161 141 145 138 126 383 528 190 218 163 184 153 165 152 65 244 194 88 294 270 330 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 76% 77% 81% 71% 72% 69% 63% 66% 85% 79% 76% 76% 77% 71% 66% 69% 61% 87% 84% 80% 66% 77% 86% WATER (6) (7) (2) (4) (8) (8) (5) (8) (3) (6) (6) (4) (5) (7) (11) (6) (10) (3) (4) (4) (7) (6) (5) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 900 163 144 107 174 129 118 410 490 165 220 159 197 157 173 166 70 212 190 87 339 244 299 75% 81% 72% 54% 87% 64% 59% 71% 78% 69% 76% 74% 82% 73% 70% 75% 66% 76% 82% 79% 76% 69% 78% (7) (4) (7) (11) (2) (9) (9) (6) (8) (11) (5) (6) (2) (5) (6) (3) (6) (8) (5) (6) (2) (9) (10) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 867 161 139 123 145 143 122 371 496 182 211 157 170 145 168 138 65 225 188 80 272 258 322 PARKS 72% 80% 69% 61% 72% 72% 61% 64% 79% 76% 73% 73% 71% 67% 67% 62% 62% 80% 81% 72% 61% 73% 84% (8) (5) (9) (9) (7) (6) (7) (10) (7) (8) (7) (8) (8) (9) (8) (10) (9) (6) (6) (9) (8) (8) (6) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 858 151 143 139 146 146 118 414 445 192 194 138 182 148 177 142 94 208 177 54 266 268 310 AND WILDLIFE 72% 75% 71% 69% 73% 73% 59% 72% 71% 80% 67% 73% 70% 69% 76% 67% 74% 71% 75% 61% 60% 76% 81% (9) (8) (8) (6) (6) (5) (8) (5) (10) (5) (10) (9) (9) (8) (4) (8) (3) (10) (9) (11) (9) (7) (7) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 810 140 134 140 135 124 132 373 437 163 199 140 162 144 165 139 68 197 164 76 255 238 301 LAND AND WATER 67% 70% 67% 70% 67% 62% 66% 65% 70% 68% 69% 66% 68% 66% 66% 63% 64% 70% 71% 68% 57% 68% 78% (10) (10) (12) (5) (9) (11) (3) (9) (11) (12) (9) (10) (10) (10) (9) (9) (8) (11) (11) (10) (10) (10) (9) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 785 136 135 124 133 127 101 322 463 168 193 118 164 137 147 111 64 214 171 73 250 228 295 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 66% 68% 67% 62% 67% 63% 50% 56% 74% 70% 67% 63% 63% 63% 63% 52% 50% 73% 73% 83% 56% 65% 77% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (11) (11) (8) (10) (10) (11) (12) (9) (10) (11) (11) (11) (11) (12) (11) (12) (9) (10) (3) (11) (11) (12) TOYS THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 736 114 136 113 129 110 116 336 400 186 173 111 143 118 162 109 65 196 145 54 193 227 307 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 61% 57% 68% 56% 64% 55% 58% 58% 64% 78% 60% 59% 55% 55% 70% 51% 51% 67% 62% 61% 44% 65% 80% AND WATER (12) (12) (10) (10) (11) (12) (10) (11) (12) (7) (12) (12) (12) (12) (7) (12) (11) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (8)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 22Table 5-2Summary of Issues: % Total Serious BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 1121 841 255 151 404 438 59 92 200 218 186 143 139 214 177 242 166 160 144 206 329 393 53 OIL 94% 95% 89% 90% 94% 96% 89% 91% 94% 95% 94% 94% 89% 94% 93% 96% 95% 92% 92% 92% 95% 95% 92% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (4) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 938 696 226 140 310 387 43 97 140 170 149 126 105 231 123 185 143 133 161 175 234 271 48 78% 78% 80% 83% 69% 87% 70% 90% 60% 81% 75% 83% 80% 91% 70% 69% 82% 76% 95% 82% 67% 67% 73% (2) (2) (4) (4) (7) (2) (10) (3) (6) (3) (5) (4) (7) (3) (5) (4) (2) (6) (1) (5) (4) (5) (3) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 929 688 225 135 319 370 55 80 130 167 164 120 127 206 139 159 141 142 136 194 218 277 43 AND STREAMS 78% 78% 79% 81% 74% 81% 83% 79% 61% 72% 83% 79% 82% 90% 73% 63% 81% 82% 86% 87% 63% 67% 75% (3) (3) (5) (6) (2) (5) (4) (6) (5) (6) (2) (6) (5) (4) (4) (6) (3) (2) (6) (3) (7) (6) (2) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 928 695 214 122 329 366 43 79 168 169 145 134 99 198 118 217 134 144 123 173 269 309 47 RANCHES 77% 78% 76% 73% 73% 82% 71% 74% 71% 80% 73% 88% 75% 78% 67% 81% 77% 82% 72% 81% 77% 76% 72% (4) (4) (6) (8) (3) (4) (9) (8) (3) (4) (6) (2) (11) (11) (6) (2) (7) (3) (12) (8) (2) (2) (5) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 923 663 242 148 308 355 61 87 133 161 154 116 137 209 143 151 137 131 147 197 225 279 37 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 77% 75% 85% 88% 72% 78% 93% 85% 63% 70% 78% 76% 87% 92% 75% 60% 78% 76% 94% 88% 65% 67% 64% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (5) (6) (2) (2) (5) (8) (1) (5) (4) (7) (4) (8) (2) (2) (3) (8) (4) (5) (2) (2) (5) (4) (10) QUALITY TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 911 658 239 143 291 367 44 99 128 166 142 128 103 227 112 179 132 138 156 174 222 264 47 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 76% 73% 85% 85% 65% 82% 72% 93% 55% 79% 72% 84% 78% 90% 64% 67% 75% 79% 92% 81% 64% 65% 73% WATER (6) (7) (3) (3) (9) (3) (8) (1) (10) (5) (7) (3) (8) (5) (8) (5) (8) (4) (3) (6) (6) (7) (4) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 900 683 199 113 325 358 40 74 168 171 133 110 100 199 135 202 117 127 127 171 267 308 46 75% 76% 71% 67% 72% 80% 65% 69% 72% 81% 67% 73% 76% 79% 77% 76% 67% 72% 75% 80% 76% 76% 70% (7) (5) (9) (11) (4) (6) (11) (9) (2) (2) (9) (11) (9) (10) (2) (3) (11) (8) (11) (10) (3) (3) (6) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 867 647 211 139 291 356 46 93 129 143 136 121 99 223 104 166 135 122 148 173 215 252 40 PARKS 72% 72% 75% 82% 65% 80% 75% 86% 55% 68% 68% 80% 75% 88% 59% 62% 77% 70% 87% 81% 61% 62% 62% (8) (8) (7) (5) (8) (7) (7) (4) (9) (8) (8) (5) (10) (6) (11) (7) (6) (10) (5) (7) (8) (8) (11) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 858 640 204 119 304 336 56 63 126 139 154 113 128 182 128 138 136 129 119 189 197 246 38 AND WILDLIFE 72% 72% 72% 71% 71% 73% 85% 62% 59% 60% 78% 74% 82% 80% 67% 54% 78% 75% 76% 85% 57% 59% 66% (9) (9) (8) (9) (6) (10) (3) (11) (7) (10) (3) (9) (3) (9) (7) (9) (5) (7) (10) (4) (10) (9) (7) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 810 610 191 108 283 327 50 58 130 126 127 111 108 193 110 144 115 123 129 172 201 234 42 LAND AND WATER 67% 68% 68% 64% 63% 73% 82% 54% 55% 60% 64% 74% 82% 76% 63% 54% 66% 70% 76% 80% 57% 58% 65% (10) (10) (11) (12) (10) (11) (5) (12) (8) (11) (10) (10) (4) (12) (10) (10) (12) (9) (9) (9) (9) (10) (8) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 785 581 192 118 242 339 40 78 97 153 111 117 110 185 121 129 117 109 120 172 185 234 37 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 66% 66% 67% 70% 56% 74% 61% 77% 46% 66% 56% 77% 71% 82% 64% 51% 67% 63% 76% 77% 54% 56% 65% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (11) (12) (10) (11) (9) (12) (7) (11) (9) (12) (7) (12) (7) (9) (11) (10) (11) (8) (12) (11) (11) (9) TOYS THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 736 530 194 123 239 291 53 70 84 109 123 104 125 182 103 90 123 103 127 176 144 184 30 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 61% 60% 68% 73% 55% 64% 81% 69% 40% 47% 62% 68% 80% 80% 54% 35% 70% 60% 81% 79% 42% 44% 51% AND WATER (12) (12) (10) (7) (12) (12) (6) (10) (12) (12) (11) (12) (6) (8) (12) (12) (9) (12) (7) (11) (12) (12) (12)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 23Table 5-3Summary of Issues: % Total Serious BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 1121 465 379 242 301 114 102 211 55 288 277 366 267 196 133 144 181 185 131 137 81 114 1121 - OIL 94% 93% 97% 90% 94% 94% 86% 98% 97% 91% 94% 92% 95% 94% 92% 96% 92% 92% 93% 97% 95% 93% 94% - (1) (1) (1) (4) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 938 324 357 232 207 97 80 182 33 301 282 335 194 122 117 164 147 187 87 107 45 77 - 938 78% 67% 82% 91% 66% 78% 68% 84% 75% 89% 82% 83% 72% 68% 73% 90% 75% 92% 67% 77% 54% 80% - 78% (2) (4) (4) (1) (4) (4) (4) (4) (7) (4) (4) (2) (6) (7) (5) (3) (4) (2) (5) (9) (10) (5) (1) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 929 328 338 236 193 101 83 188 45 281 244 309 211 152 120 124 145 164 93 118 63 89 929 - AND STREAMS 78% 65% 86% 88% 61% 84% 70% 88% 79% 89% 83% 78% 75% 73% 83% 83% 74% 81% 66% 83% 74% 73% 78% - (3) (6) (2) (5) (7) (2) (3) (2) (4) (3) (2) (3) (4) (5) (3) (5) (5) (5) (7) (2) (3) (9) (2) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 928 379 332 189 239 93 95 167 41 254 258 303 207 155 113 144 140 163 91 116 71 83 - 928 RANCHES 77% 79% 76% 74% 76% 75% 81% 77% 93% 75% 75% 76% 77% 86% 70% 79% 71% 80% 70% 83% 85% 87% - 77% (4) (2) (7) (12) (2) (7) (2) (8) (2) (12) (7) (5) (2) (2) (7) (8) (7) (6) (2) (3) (2) (3) (2) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 923 323 328 242 197 96 73 182 50 286 241 309 211 148 121 120 152 157 94 117 54 95 923 - PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 77% 65% 83% 90% 62% 79% 62% 85% 87% 90% 82% 78% 75% 71% 84% 80% 77% 78% 67% 83% 63% 77% 77% - NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (5) (7) (3) (3) (6) (3) (8) (3) (3) (2) (3) (4) (3) (6) (2) (7) (2) (7) (4) (4) (6) (6) (3) QUALITY TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 911 316 346 221 202 87 75 178 33 296 278 302 191 133 112 165 133 169 82 109 50 84 - 911 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 76% 66% 80% 87% 64% 70% 64% 83% 76% 87% 81% 75% 71% 74% 70% 91% 68% 82% 63% 78% 60% 87% - 76% WATER (6) (5) (5) (7) (5) (8) (6) (6) (6) (5) (5) (7) (8) (4) (8) (2) (9) (3) (10) (8) (7) (2) (3) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 900 345 322 206 237 94 72 158 32 266 256 302 196 139 115 141 148 154 86 110 56 83 - 900 75% 72% 74% 81% 76% 76% 61% 74% 73% 78% 74% 75% 73% 77% 71% 77% 75% 75% 66% 79% 67% 86% - 75% (7) (3) (8) (8) (3) (6) (9) (11) (8) (10) (8) (6) (5) (3) (6) (9) (3) (8) (8) (5) (4) (4) (4) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 867 292 319 231 186 81 75 167 27 293 253 301 192 114 105 147 134 167 83 109 44 70 - 867 PARKS 72% 61% 74% 91% 59% 65% 64% 78% 62% 86% 73% 75% 71% 63% 65% 81% 68% 82% 64% 78% 53% 73% - 72% (8) (8) (10) (2) (8) (11) (5) (7) (11) (6) (9) (8) (7) (11) (11) (6) (8) (4) (9) (7) (11) (8) (5) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 858 291 312 234 171 92 75 181 40 266 231 285 190 139 116 115 142 143 93 97 56 83 858 - AND WILDLIFE 72% 58% 79% 87% 54% 76% 64% 84% 70% 84% 79% 72% 67% 67% 80% 77% 72% 71% 66% 69% 65% 68% 72% - (9) (9) (6) (6) (9) (5) (7) (5) (9) (7) (6) (9) (10) (9) (4) (10) (6) (9) (6) (12) (5) (11) (4) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 810 276 322 191 167 82 70 155 34 266 230 271 186 121 110 120 126 145 88 99 48 73 - 810 LAND AND WATER 67% 57% 74% 75% 53% 66% 60% 72% 79% 78% 67% 68% 69% 67% 68% 66% 64% 71% 67% 71% 57% 76% - 67% (10) (10) (9) (11) (10) (10) (10) (12) (5) (11) (12) (10) (9) (8) (9) (12) (10) (10) (3) (10) (9) (7) (6) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 785 254 289 215 164 83 54 159 33 256 205 256 178 136 80 125 120 136 67 111 50 86 785 - WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 66% 51% 74% 80% 51% 69% 46% 74% 58% 81% 70% 64% 63% 65% 56% 84% 61% 67% 47% 79% 59% 70% 66% - HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (11) (11) (10) (11) (9) (11) (10) (12) (9) (10) (11) (12) (10) (12) (4) (11) (11) (12) (6) (8) (10) (5) TOYS THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 736 213 281 215 124 67 51 164 37 262 201 243 181 104 98 103 114 128 81 100 39 65 736 - DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 61% 43% 72% 80% 39% 56% 43% 76% 65% 83% 68% 61% 64% 50% 68% 69% 58% 64% 58% 71% 46% 53% 61% - AND WATER (12) (12) (12) (9) (12) (12) (12) (9) (10) (8) (11) (12) (11) (12) (10) (11) (12) (12) (11) (11) (12) (12) (6)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 24Table 5-4Summary of Issues: % Total Serious BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 1121 354 703 241 149 298 732 726 361 413 359 292 238 692 300 817 47 268 361 261 116 88 66 200 OIL 94% 96% 93% 96% 92% 94% 93% 94% 93% 94% 93% 92% 91% 93% 95% 93% 96% 95% 95% 93% 93% 90% 98% 92% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 938 211 662 144 150 246 594 614 282 353 300 210 157 576 290 646 62 239 325 197 121 70 56 153 78% 65% 83% 63% 79% 88% 73% 79% 75% 71% 70% 65% 62% 83% 76% 79% 76% 74% 82% 70% 85% 83% 91% 72% (2) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (7) (8) (8) (9) (2) (5) (2) (3) (5) (4) (3) (4) (6) (4) (5) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 929 234 629 155 115 285 565 617 286 329 288 233 191 586 245 681 35 226 318 186 110 88 56 146 AND STREAMS 78% 64% 83% 62% 71% 90% 72% 80% 74% 75% 75% 74% 73% 79% 78% 78% 72% 80% 83% 66% 88% 90% 83% 67% (3) (6) (4) (6) (6) (2) (5) (2) (4) (4) (4) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (5) (2) (3) (6) (3) (2) (7) (8) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 928 266 601 186 133 221 628 618 271 400 340 261 200 519 303 622 59 256 313 236 100 69 44 146 RANCHES 77% 81% 76% 81% 70% 80% 77% 80% 72% 80% 79% 81% 79% 75% 79% 76% 72% 79% 79% 84% 70% 81% 73% 69% (4) (2) (9) (2) (7) (11) (2) (3) (5) (2) (2) (2) (2) (7) (2) (5) (6) (3) (6) (2) (12) (7) (10) (6) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 923 210 656 141 127 275 571 611 291 331 295 226 189 579 239 681 34 221 325 165 111 83 65 147 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 77% 57% 86% 56% 79% 87% 73% 79% 75% 75% 77% 71% 73% 78% 76% 77% 71% 78% 85% 59% 89% 84% 95% 67% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (5) (7) (2) (7) (4) (6) (4) (5) (2) (3) (3) (5) (4) (5) (4) (4) (8) (4) (2) (8) (2) (4) (2) (7) QUALITY TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 911 209 642 143 134 233 576 608 263 354 302 218 167 551 288 620 70 234 306 191 118 75 50 156 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 76% 64% 81% 62% 71% 84% 71% 78% 70% 71% 70% 68% 66% 80% 75% 76% 86% 72% 78% 68% 83% 88% 82% 74% WATER (6) (5) (5) (5) (5) (8) (7) (7) (6) (6) (7) (7) (7) (3) (6) (6) (2) (8) (7) (5) (6) (3) (8) (3) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 900 229 612 164 154 227 582 611 257 359 306 233 180 534 281 616 58 238 303 195 119 68 40 160 75% 70% 77% 71% 82% 82% 72% 79% 68% 72% 71% 72% 71% 77% 73% 75% 71% 74% 77% 69% 84% 80% 65% 75% (7) (3) (8) (3) (2) (9) (6) (6) (7) (5) (6) (4) (5) (6) (7) (7) (7) (6) (8) (4) (5) (9) (12) (2) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 867 186 621 127 130 242 548 575 255 343 295 205 158 517 254 611 60 208 295 171 103 71 53 156 PARKS 72% 57% 78% 55% 69% 87% 67% 74% 68% 68% 69% 63% 62% 75% 66% 75% 73% 65% 75% 61% 73% 83% 87% 73% (8) (8) (7) (8) (8) (5) (8) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (8) (8) (10) (8) (4) (10) (9) (7) (10) (5) (5) (4) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 858 206 600 136 106 272 509 598 244 310 276 216 182 535 226 630 30 205 304 154 101 75 57 139 AND WILDLIFE 72% 56% 79% 54% 66% 86% 65% 77% 63% 70% 72% 68% 70% 72% 72% 72% 61% 72% 80% 55% 81% 77% 84% 64% (9) (9) (6) (9) (10) (7) (9) (8) (9) (8) (5) (6) (6) (9) (8) (9) (12) (7) (5) (9) (7) (11) (6) (9) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 810 169 593 120 124 247 488 561 213 315 274 182 142 489 258 551 52 219 286 153 104 62 56 135 LAND AND WATER 67% 52% 75% 52% 66% 89% 60% 72% 56% 63% 64% 56% 56% 71% 67% 68% 63% 68% 72% 54% 74% 72% 92% 64% (10) (10) (10) (11) (9) (3) (10) (10) (10) (10) (10) (10) (10) (10) (9) (10) (11) (9) (10) (10) (9) (12) (3) (10) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 785 187 546 132 97 247 467 553 211 267 231 176 140 506 199 584 33 179 268 142 97 79 45 130 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 66% 51% 72% 53% 60% 78% 59% 72% 55% 61% 60% 56% 54% 68% 63% 66% 69% 63% 70% 51% 78% 81% 66% 60% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (11) (12) (10) (11) (12) (11) (11) (12) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (9) (11) (12) (11) (8) (8) (11) (11) TOYS THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 736 136 560 85 87 256 421 495 218 242 212 169 138 482 176 558 31 158 275 93 89 77 51 126 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 61% 37% 74% 34% 54% 81% 54% 64% 56% 55% 55% 53% 53% 65% 56% 63% 64% 56% 72% 33% 72% 79% 75% 58% AND WATER (12) (12) (11) (12) (12) (10) (12) (12) (11) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (10) (12) (11) (12) (11) (10) (9) (12)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 25Table 5-5Summary of Issues: % Total Serious BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 1121 455 436 45 659 880 214 547 109 441 334 702 776 315 220 813 720 342 346 256 458 760 190 145 OIL 94% 93% 93% 98% 94% 95% 90% 94% 97% 93% 94% 94% 93% 94% 96% 93% 93% 95% 96% 92% 93% 93% 95% 94% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 938 410 389 29 528 751 161 500 58 348 229 645 735 180 198 665 677 215 327 138 406 694 136 81 78% 81% 81% 64% 76% 80% 75% 92% 48% 70% 67% 85% 86% 57% 74% 81% 87% 62% 87% 61% 79% 85% 70% 54% (2) (2) (2) (8) (4) (3) (3) (2) (7) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (2) (3) (4) (3) (6) (4) (2) (5) (7) POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 929 381 369 38 543 735 172 523 60 329 215 640 727 184 169 700 667 215 308 179 391 670 142 99 AND STREAMS 78% 78% 79% 82% 77% 79% 72% 90% 54% 69% 60% 85% 87% 55% 73% 80% 86% 60% 85% 64% 79% 82% 71% 64% (3) (4) (4) (2) (3) (4) (6) (5) (4) (4) (7) (3) (3) (5) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (3) (5) (3) (3) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 928 385 368 31 542 732 168 448 92 360 263 594 669 235 227 622 603 276 297 177 401 642 139 116 RANCHES 77% 76% 76% 68% 78% 78% 78% 82% 76% 73% 76% 78% 79% 74% 84% 75% 77% 79% 80% 79% 78% 78% 72% 77% (4) (5) (6) (7) (2) (5) (2) (9) (2) (2) (2) (9) (9) (2) (2) (8) (11) (2) (8) (2) (5) (8) (2) (2) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 923 386 378 34 532 746 158 529 50 325 215 641 729 170 168 704 675 204 301 178 395 680 141 85 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 77% 79% 81% 74% 76% 80% 66% 91% 44% 68% 61% 86% 87% 51% 73% 80% 87% 56% 83% 64% 80% 83% 70% 55% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (5) (3) (3) (6) (5) (2) (7) (3) (8) (6) (6) (2) (2) (8) (6) (3) (2) (7) (5) (5) (2) (4) (4) (5) QUALITY TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 911 385 370 23 525 722 158 495 63 325 214 634 712 170 197 645 666 199 331 129 385 692 121 68 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 76% 76% 77% 50% 75% 77% 73% 91% 52% 66% 62% 84% 84% 54% 73% 78% 85% 57% 89% 58% 74% 84% 63% 45% WATER (6) (6) (5) (12) (6) (6) (5) (4) (5) (7) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (6) (2) (7) (7) (3) (7) (9) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 900 384 366 27 515 712 160 446 83 342 236 596 671 205 190 632 609 243 289 148 396 650 133 94 75% 76% 76% 60% 74% 75% 74% 82% 68% 69% 69% 79% 79% 65% 71% 77% 78% 70% 77% 66% 77% 79% 69% 62% (7) (7) (7) (11) (7) (7) (4) (10) (3) (5) (3) (8) (8) (3) (7) (7) (8) (3) (10) (3) (6) (6) (6) (4) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 867 369 349 29 497 707 137 470 62 306 196 601 681 163 180 635 630 193 311 124 373 647 117 77 PARKS 72% 73% 72% 63% 71% 75% 63% 86% 51% 62% 57% 79% 80% 51% 67% 77% 81% 55% 83% 55% 72% 79% 61% 51% (8) (9) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (6) (6) (9) (8) (7) (7) (7) (8) (6) (7) (8) (6) (9) (9) (7) (9) (8) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 858 366 356 36 488 687 149 498 46 295 198 595 675 161 149 652 640 181 291 159 363 632 124 84 AND WILDLIFE 72% 75% 76% 77% 69% 74% 63% 86% 41% 62% 56% 79% 81% 48% 65% 74% 83% 50% 81% 57% 74% 78% 62% 55% (9) (8) (8) (3) (9) (9) (10) (8) (9) (8) (9) (6) (6) (9) (9) (9) (6) (9) (7) (8) (8) (9) (8) (6) THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 810 364 347 28 444 654 137 467 49 280 184 572 651 138 151 599 601 173 275 110 369 628 102 58 LAND AND WATER 67% 72% 72% 60% 64% 69% 64% 86% 40% 57% 54% 76% 77% 43% 56% 73% 77% 50% 73% 49% 71% 77% 53% 38% (10) (10) (10) (10) (11) (10) (8) (7) (10) (10) (10) (10) (10) (10) (11) (10) (12) (10) (12) (10) (10) (10) (11) (11) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 785 326 315 35 455 638 129 471 45 250 168 565 630 139 139 593 597 150 281 128 326 587 112 69 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 66% 67% 67% 76% 65% 69% 54% 81% 40% 53% 47% 75% 76% 41% 60% 68% 77% 42% 78% 46% 66% 72% 56% 45% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (11) (11) (11) (5) (10) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (10) (11) (10) (11) (9) (11) (11) (11) (10) (10) TOYS THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 736 302 291 35 429 590 128 450 28 244 143 546 616 102 106 590 599 100 278 113 304 562 101 59 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 61% 62% 62% 76% 61% 63% 54% 78% 25% 51% 40% 73% 74% 31% 46% 67% 78% 28% 77% 41% 62% 69% 50% 38% AND WATER (12) (12) (12) (4) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (9) (12) (11) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 26Table 6-1Summary of Issues: % Not a Problem BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 437 84 57 83 65 85 81 232 204 48 107 73 117 92 69 103 60 86 86 32 243 116 67 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 36% 42% 28% 42% 32% 42% 40% 40% 33% 20% 37% 39% 45% 43% 30% 48% 47% 29% 37% 37% 55% 33% 17% AND WATER (1) (1) (2) (3) (3) (1) (5) (2) (1) (5) (1) (1) (1) (1) (4) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (3) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 407 64 65 72 66 71 99 250 157 71 92 68 96 78 85 101 64 78 63 15 192 121 85 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 34% 32% 32% 36% 33% 36% 50% 43% 25% 30% 32% 36% 37% 36% 36% 47% 50% 27% 27% 17% 43% 34% 22% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (2) (2) (1) (4) (2) (2) (2) (1) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (2) (8) (2) (1) (1) TOYS THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 328 48 54 53 47 67 63 190 138 57 80 67 66 58 81 76 33 56 57 24 164 96 63 LAND AND WATER 27% 24% 27% 27% 24% 33% 32% 33% 22% 24% 28% 31% 28% 27% 33% 34% 32% 20% 25% 22% 37% 27% 16% (3) (3) (5) (10) (7) (4) (10) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (4) (6) (2) (4) (6) (5) (3) (4) (4) (4) (6) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 316 45 54 61 53 45 82 158 158 46 80 50 77 62 53 71 34 73 56 28 168 78 65 AND WILDLIFE 26% 23% 27% 31% 26% 22% 41% 28% 25% 19% 28% 27% 30% 29% 23% 33% 26% 25% 24% 32% 38% 22% 17% (4) (4) (4) (7) (4) (8) (3) (8) (2) (7) (4) (4) (3) (3) (9) (5) (9) (3) (4) (2) (3) (5) (4) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 290 36 51 63 48 48 66 183 106 52 63 52 63 60 71 76 35 44 38 25 158 77 50 PARKS 24% 18% 25% 32% 24% 24% 33% 32% 17% 21% 22% 24% 26% 28% 28% 35% 33% 16% 16% 22% 35% 22% 13% (5) (8) (6) (6) (6) (7) (8) (5) (8) (4) (8) (7) (5) (5) (6) (3) (5) (8) (8) (3) (5) (6) (7) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 287 34 55 88 21 69 81 159 127 75 65 53 40 52 73 51 33 66 42 19 99 102 84 24% 17% 28% 44% 10% 35% 41% 28% 20% 31% 22% 25% 17% 24% 30% 23% 31% 24% 18% 17% 22% 29% 22% (6) (9) (3) (2) (11) (3) (4) (7) (5) (1) (7) (6) (10) (8) (5) (10) (7) (4) (7) (7) (10) (3) (2) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 269 44 36 53 50 55 72 185 84 48 67 49 48 56 80 65 39 35 32 17 143 76 47 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 22% 22% 18% 27% 25% 28% 36% 32% 13% 20% 23% 23% 20% 26% 32% 30% 37% 13% 14% 15% 32% 22% 12% WATER (7) (5) (10) (9) (5) (5) (7) (4) (10) (6) (5) (9) (8) (7) (3) (7) (3) (10) (10) (10) (6) (7) (9) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 261 33 41 106 77 13 116 174 86 37 58 56 48 61 67 68 37 28 35 23 133 75 49 22% 16% 20% 53% 38% 7% 58% 30% 14% 15% 20% 26% 20% 28% 27% 31% 35% 10% 15% 21% 30% 21% 13% (8) (10) (8) (1) (1) (11) (1) (6) (9) (11) (10) (5) (9) (4) (7) (6) (4) (11) (9) (5) (9) (8) (8) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 248 28 46 67 37 44 66 135 113 38 45 44 68 51 36 62 37 47 50 14 136 71 33 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 21% 14% 23% 33% 18% 22% 33% 23% 18% 16% 16% 24% 26% 24% 16% 29% 29% 16% 21% 16% 31% 20% 9% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (9) (11) (7) (5) (8) (9) (9) (10) (6) (10) (11) (8) (6) (9) (11) (8) (8) (7) (5) (9) (8) (9) (11) QUALITY POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 246 37 37 57 25 51 74 136 110 40 61 42 58 45 49 58 30 51 43 16 137 60 42 AND STREAMS 21% 18% 19% 29% 13% 26% 37% 24% 18% 17% 21% 22% 22% 21% 21% 27% 23% 17% 18% 18% 31% 17% 11% (10) (7) (9) (8) (10) (6) (6) (9) (7) (9) (9) (10) (7) (10) (10) (9) (10) (6) (6) (6) (7) (10) (10) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 199 40 29 19 26 27 41 125 73 43 66 28 30 30 67 35 23 43 24 7 76 55 64 RANCHES 17% 20% 15% 9% 13% 13% 20% 22% 12% 18% 23% 13% 13% 14% 27% 16% 22% 15% 10% 6% 17% 16% 17% (11) (6) (11) (11) (9) (10) (11) (11) (11) (8) (6) (11) (11) (11) (8) (11) (11) (9) (11) (11) (11) (11) (5) OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 69 14 9 17 8 8 6 39 30 18 13 9 14 16 18 10 12 14 12 4 24 20 25 OIL 6% 7% 4% 9% 4% 4% 3% 7% 5% 8% 4% 5% 5% 7% 8% 5% 9% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 7% (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 27Table 6-2Summary of Issues: % Not a Problem BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 437 342 83 41 186 156 13 28 124 119 74 42 31 36 83 160 47 69 24 42 195 227 26 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 36% 39% 29% 25% 43% 34% 19% 28% 58% 52% 37% 27% 20% 16% 44% 63% 27% 40% 16% 19% 57% 55% 45% AND WATER (1) (1) (2) (5) (1) (1) (7) (4) (1) (1) (2) (1) (7) (5) (1) (1) (4) (1) (6) (3) (1) (1) (1) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 407 301 92 50 186 115 26 24 114 78 86 35 46 39 68 124 58 62 36 50 159 181 20 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 34% 34% 32% 30% 43% 25% 39% 23% 54% 34% 43% 23% 29% 17% 36% 49% 33% 36% 23% 22% 46% 44% 35% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (1) (5) (2) (3) (1) (3) (1) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (3) TOYS THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 328 246 71 45 158 88 10 35 98 66 68 28 21 42 57 107 51 44 29 34 131 151 19 LAND AND WATER 27% 27% 25% 27% 35% 20% 16% 33% 42% 31% 34% 19% 16% 17% 32% 40% 29% 25% 17% 16% 38% 37% 29% (3) (3) (5) (3) (3) (4) (9) (2) (5) (4) (3) (6) (9) (3) (5) (4) (3) (5) (5) (6) (4) (4) (7) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 316 231 75 44 123 108 10 34 83 85 44 34 28 37 56 112 37 41 31 33 140 162 18 AND WILDLIFE 26% 26% 26% 26% 29% 24% 15% 33% 39% 37% 22% 22% 18% 16% 29% 44% 21% 23% 20% 15% 41% 39% 31% (4) (4) (4) (4) (7) (3) (10) (1) (7) (2) (8) (4) (8) (4) (7) (3) (6) (7) (4) (8) (3) (3) (5) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 290 214 64 28 141 73 14 15 100 57 52 25 29 21 66 91 31 46 17 33 125 140 23 PARKS 24% 24% 23% 17% 31% 16% 22% 14% 43% 27% 26% 17% 22% 8% 38% 34% 18% 26% 10% 16% 36% 35% 35% (5) (6) (6) (9) (5) (8) (6) (9) (4) (5) (6) (8) (3) (9) (2) (7) (10) (3) (8) (7) (5) (5) (2) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 287 202 81 54 120 82 22 32 65 34 61 41 32 52 39 59 58 44 42 42 79 92 19 24% 23% 29% 32% 27% 18% 35% 30% 28% 16% 31% 27% 24% 20% 22% 22% 33% 25% 25% 19% 23% 23% 30% (6) (7) (3) (1) (8) (6) (2) (3) (10) (10) (4) (2) (2) (1) (9) (10) (1) (4) (1) (2) (10) (10) (6) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 269 216 43 25 151 66 17 8 103 40 54 22 26 21 61 82 40 35 13 34 122 136 16 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 22% 24% 15% 15% 33% 15% 28% 7% 44% 19% 27% 14% 20% 8% 35% 31% 23% 20% 8% 16% 35% 33% 25% WATER (7) (5) (10) (10) (4) (9) (4) (12) (3) (8) (5) (10) (6) (10) (4) (8) (5) (9) (9) (5) (6) (6) (10) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 261 199 55 29 140 59 18 10 94 39 50 25 27 22 53 79 32 42 9 39 115 134 16 22% 22% 19% 17% 31% 13% 30% 10% 40% 19% 25% 16% 20% 9% 30% 30% 18% 24% 5% 18% 33% 33% 25% (8) (9) (8) (8) (6) (10) (3) (10) (6) (9) (7) (9) (5) (7) (6) (9) (9) (6) (11) (4) (8) (7) (9) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 248 199 41 20 113 87 5 15 73 63 41 30 18 16 40 96 33 38 8 24 109 126 19 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 21% 22% 14% 12% 26% 19% 7% 15% 34% 27% 21% 20% 11% 7% 21% 38% 19% 22% 5% 11% 32% 30% 33% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (9) (8) (11) (11) (9) (5) (12) (8) (9) (6) (10) (5) (11) (11) (11) (5) (8) (8) (12) (10) (9) (9) (4) QUALITY POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 246 182 57 32 105 77 11 21 79 58 33 27 23 20 46 91 31 29 21 21 119 130 14 AND STREAMS 21% 20% 20% 19% 24% 17% 17% 21% 37% 25% 17% 18% 14% 9% 24% 36% 18% 17% 14% 9% 35% 31% 25% (10) (10) (7) (7) (10) (7) (8) (6) (8) (7) (11) (7) (10) (8) (8) (6) (11) (10) (7) (11) (7) (8) (8) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 199 145 51 37 99 46 15 22 53 23 44 11 27 37 39 36 33 22 37 28 55 67 14 RANCHES 17% 16% 18% 22% 22% 10% 24% 21% 23% 11% 22% 7% 21% 15% 22% 13% 19% 13% 21% 13% 16% 17% 21% (11) (11) (9) (6) (11) (11) (5) (7) (11) (11) (9) (11) (4) (6) (10) (11) (7) (11) (3) (9) (11) (11) (11) OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 69 41 27 14 26 15 6 8 12 12 12 8 15 10 14 11 7 12 10 15 15 22 5 OIL 6% 5% 9% 8% 6% 3% 9% 8% 6% 5% 6% 5% 10% 4% 7% 4% 4% 7% 6% 7% 4% 5% 8% (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (11) (11) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (10) (12) (12) (12) (12)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 28Table 6-3Summary of Issues: % Not a Problem BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 437 283 101 45 191 50 66 46 20 45 86 145 98 101 46 40 79 67 58 41 46 55 437 - DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 36% 56% 26% 17% 60% 42% 56% 22% 35% 14% 29% 37% 35% 49% 32% 27% 40% 33% 41% 29% 54% 45% 36% - AND WATER (1) (1) (2) (5) (1) (1) (1) (4) (3) (6) (2) (1) (2) (1) (3) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 407 244 103 50 154 38 63 55 24 58 88 138 103 72 64 24 74 64 73 30 35 37 407 - WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 34% 49% 26% 19% 48% 31% 53% 26% 42% 18% 30% 35% 37% 35% 44% 16% 38% 32% 52% 21% 41% 30% 34% - HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (7) (2) (2) (1) (5) (4) (2) (2) TOYS THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 328 184 92 45 128 36 45 47 9 53 82 119 70 50 46 36 66 53 40 30 34 16 - 328 LAND AND WATER 27% 38% 21% 18% 41% 29% 38% 22% 21% 16% 24% 30% 26% 28% 29% 20% 33% 26% 31% 22% 41% 17% - 27% (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (3) (8) (4) (4) (3) (7) (6) (4) (3) (3) (4) (10) (4) (5) (8) (1) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 316 202 78 29 141 26 42 33 17 46 55 105 87 67 28 27 51 54 47 40 30 37 316 - AND WILDLIFE 26% 40% 20% 11% 44% 22% 36% 15% 30% 14% 19% 26% 31% 32% 20% 18% 26% 27% 34% 28% 35% 30% 26% - (4) (3) (6) (6) (3) (8) (6) (7) (4) (5) (6) (4) (3) (4) (9) (4) (6) (3) (6) (2) (8) (3) (3) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 290 172 90 20 118 38 37 38 16 33 77 88 68 56 52 25 54 34 41 27 36 20 - 290 PARKS 24% 36% 21% 8% 38% 31% 31% 18% 37% 10% 22% 22% 25% 31% 32% 14% 27% 17% 31% 19% 44% 21% - 24% (5) (5) (5) (11) (5) (3) (9) (5) (2) (9) (5) (7) (8) (5) (2) (9) (5) (8) (9) (7) (3) (5) (2) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 287 126 107 47 70 29 44 54 12 71 84 93 72 38 44 40 45 48 45 27 26 11 - 287 24% 26% 25% 18% 22% 24% 37% 25% 27% 21% 24% 23% 27% 21% 27% 22% 23% 23% 34% 20% 32% 12% - 24% (6) (10) (3) (3) (10) (6) (4) (2) (5) (1) (3) (5) (5) (10) (6) (2) (9) (5) (4) (6) (9) (10) (3) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 269 158 81 26 107 34 42 33 8 39 63 92 72 42 46 17 62 30 48 24 30 12 - 269 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 22% 33% 19% 10% 34% 28% 35% 15% 19% 12% 18% 23% 27% 23% 28% 9% 31% 15% 37% 17% 36% 12% - 22% WATER (7) (8) (7) (8) (8) (5) (7) (8) (9) (7) (8) (6) (6) (9) (5) (11) (4) (9) (3) (8) (7) (9) (4) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 261 155 76 22 104 27 38 33 11 38 62 64 75 57 44 18 48 16 43 32 39 19 - 261 22% 32% 18% 9% 33% 22% 32% 15% 25% 11% 18% 16% 28% 32% 27% 10% 25% 8% 33% 23% 46% 19% - 22% (8) (9) (8) (9) (9) (7) (8) (9) (6) (8) (9) (11) (4) (3) (7) (10) (7) (11) (7) (3) (2) (7) (5) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 248 165 59 19 112 23 43 27 7 26 46 77 66 56 21 25 35 42 45 20 32 24 248 - PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 21% 33% 15% 7% 35% 19% 37% 13% 13% 8% 15% 19% 23% 27% 14% 17% 18% 21% 32% 15% 37% 20% 21% - NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (9) (7) (10) (12) (7) (10) (5) (10) (10) (11) (10) (9) (10) (7) (11) (5) (11) (6) (8) (10) (6) (6) (4) QUALITY POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 246 167 47 28 120 18 35 24 12 29 45 78 70 51 22 22 44 34 48 23 21 30 246 - AND STREAMS 21% 33% 12% 10% 38% 15% 30% 11% 21% 9% 15% 20% 25% 25% 15% 15% 22% 17% 34% 16% 24% 25% 21% - (10) (6) (11) (7) (6) (11) (10) (11) (7) (10) (11) (8) (9) (8) (10) (8) (10) (7) (5) (9) (10) (4) (5) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 199 72 70 54 50 24 19 36 3 62 63 71 45 17 34 30 47 24 34 11 9 8 - 199 RANCHES 17% 15% 16% 21% 16% 19% 16% 17% 6% 18% 18% 18% 17% 9% 21% 16% 24% 12% 26% 8% 11% 8% - 17% (11) (11) (9) (1) (11) (9) (11) (6) (11) (3) (7) (10) (11) (11) (8) (6) (8) (10) (11) (11) (11) (11) (6) OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 69 36 11 22 18 7 16 2 2 24 14 30 12 12 10 4 15 15 10 2 4 8 69 - OIL 6% 7% 3% 8% 6% 6% 14% 1% 3% 7% 5% 8% 4% 6% 7% 3% 8% 8% 7% 2% 5% 7% 6% - (12) (12) (12) (10) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (6)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 29Table 6-4Summary of Issues: % Not a Problem BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 437 228 186 163 73 56 351 264 159 193 168 146 121 239 135 299 17 121 97 183 31 21 14 87 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 36% 62% 25% 65% 45% 18% 45% 34% 41% 44% 44% 46% 46% 32% 43% 34% 36% 43% 26% 66% 25% 21% 21% 40% AND WATER (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (3) (4) (1) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 407 180 208 119 64 68 315 214 176 171 152 140 120 232 115 290 15 103 110 138 26 19 23 86 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 34% 49% 27% 47% 40% 22% 40% 28% 45% 39% 39% 44% 46% 31% 37% 33% 31% 36% 29% 49% 21% 19% 34% 40% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (1) (2) (4) (4) (2) (2) TOYS THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 328 140 165 97 55 29 285 177 143 173 145 132 105 153 109 219 28 87 94 110 28 19 5 64 LAND AND WATER 27% 43% 21% 42% 29% 10% 35% 23% 38% 35% 34% 41% 41% 22% 28% 27% 34% 27% 24% 39% 20% 23% 8% 30% (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (9) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (4) (3) (3) (4) (3) (5) (5) (1) (10) (4) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 316 158 140 111 51 45 257 159 137 128 107 100 78 184 87 227 17 76 70 124 21 22 11 67 AND WILDLIFE 26% 43% 18% 44% 31% 14% 33% 21% 35% 29% 28% 31% 30% 25% 28% 26% 36% 27% 18% 44% 17% 22% 16% 31% (4) (3) (7) (3) (3) (5) (4) (6) (4) (5) (8) (6) (7) (3) (5) (4) (2) (5) (7) (3) (6) (2) (5) (3) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 290 126 148 95 55 28 236 170 110 146 123 111 89 142 112 177 18 101 91 98 31 13 6 44 PARKS 24% 39% 19% 41% 29% 10% 29% 22% 29% 29% 29% 34% 35% 21% 29% 22% 22% 31% 23% 35% 22% 16% 10% 21% (5) (6) (6) (5) (5) (10) (5) (4) (6) (6) (5) (5) (5) (6) (3) (7) (9) (3) (4) (6) (2) (7) (8) (10) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 287 93 174 62 34 46 221 157 113 139 121 89 71 144 96 190 23 79 85 83 22 16 21 52 24% 28% 22% 27% 18% 17% 27% 20% 30% 28% 28% 28% 28% 21% 25% 23% 29% 25% 21% 29% 15% 19% 35% 24% (6) (10) (3) (10) (10) (3) (7) (7) (5) (7) (6) (9) (8) (5) (6) (5) (5) (8) (5) (10) (8) (5) (1) (9) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 269 112 140 84 50 34 226 155 106 139 120 98 79 128 90 178 10 86 84 85 22 7 9 53 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 22% 34% 18% 37% 27% 12% 28% 20% 28% 28% 28% 30% 31% 18% 24% 22% 13% 27% 21% 30% 15% 9% 15% 25% WATER (7) (9) (8) (9) (6) (6) (6) (8) (7) (8) (7) (7) (6) (8) (8) (6) (11) (6) (6) (8) (7) (12) (6) (8) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 261 115 131 85 38 32 216 161 93 148 130 114 96 112 94 167 19 83 70 85 21 15 6 59 22% 35% 17% 37% 20% 11% 27% 21% 25% 29% 30% 35% 38% 16% 24% 20% 24% 26% 18% 30% 15% 17% 9% 28% (8) (8) (9) (8) (9) (7) (9) (5) (8) (4) (4) (4) (4) (11) (7) (9) (8) (7) (8) (9) (9) (6) (9) (6) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 248 151 86 103 29 35 199 144 88 105 87 88 70 140 72 174 12 60 49 112 9 14 3 59 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 21% 41% 11% 41% 18% 11% 25% 19% 23% 24% 23% 28% 27% 19% 23% 20% 25% 21% 13% 40% 8% 14% 5% 27% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (9) (5) (11) (6) (11) (8) (10) (9) (10) (10) (10) (8) (9) (7) (9) (10) (6) (9) (11) (4) (11) (8) (11) (7) QUALITY POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 246 132 110 95 40 25 209 141 94 107 93 83 69 136 64 180 10 55 59 91 10 10 10 65 AND STREAMS 21% 36% 15% 38% 25% 8% 27% 18% 24% 24% 24% 26% 26% 18% 20% 21% 21% 19% 16% 33% 8% 10% 15% 30% (10) (7) (10) (7) (7) (11) (8) (10) (9) (9) (9) (10) (10) (9) (10) (8) (10) (10) (9) (7) (10) (10) (7) (5) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 199 42 150 30 41 43 139 118 77 80 74 53 47 117 62 137 20 49 59 36 30 12 14 44 RANCHES 17% 13% 19% 13% 22% 15% 17% 15% 21% 16% 17% 17% 18% 17% 16% 17% 25% 15% 15% 13% 21% 14% 23% 21% (11) (11) (5) (11) (8) (4) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (11) (10) (11) (11) (7) (11) (10) (11) (3) (9) (3) (11) OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 69 13 51 9 13 18 48 42 24 26 25 24 22 43 14 55 1 14 16 17 7 10 1 18 OIL 6% 3% 7% 4% 8% 6% 6% 5% 6% 6% 7% 7% 9% 6% 4% 6% 3% 5% 4% 6% 6% 10% 2% 8% (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (11) (12) (12)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 30Table 6-5Summary of Issues: % Not a Problem BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS 437 172 165 11 262 323 105 116 83 227 209 193 199 228 120 266 155 258 76 161 179 237 95 92 DRILLING ON OUR LAND, AIR 36% 35% 35% 24% 37% 35% 44% 20% 74% 48% 59% 26% 24% 68% 52% 30% 20% 72% 21% 58% 36% 29% 48% 60% AND WATER (1) (1) (1) (8) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) (3) (1) (3) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) TOXIC CHEMICALS IN PRODUCTS 407 162 154 10 242 289 108 108 68 223 187 180 200 195 90 279 171 210 77 151 164 222 87 85 WE HAVE IN OUR HOMES LIKE 34% 33% 33% 23% 34% 31% 45% 19% 60% 47% 53% 24% 24% 58% 39% 32% 22% 58% 21% 54% 33% 27% 44% 55% HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS OR (2) (2) (2) (10) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) TOYS THE IMPACT OF MINING ON 328 118 115 16 210 237 73 52 70 189 154 140 151 167 100 188 138 161 77 106 130 153 79 85 LAND AND WATER 27% 23% 24% 34% 30% 25% 34% 9% 57% 38% 45% 19% 18% 53% 37% 23% 18% 46% 21% 47% 25% 19% 41% 57% (3) (4) (4) (5) (3) (3) (4) (7) (4) (3) (3) (5) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (5) (3) (2) LOSS OF HABITAT FOR FISH 316 115 106 11 199 225 86 73 67 172 154 140 138 171 80 208 116 178 57 121 127 165 74 67 AND WILDLIFE 26% 24% 23% 23% 28% 24% 36% 13% 59% 36% 43% 19% 17% 51% 35% 24% 15% 49% 16% 43% 26% 20% 37% 43% (4) (3) (6) (9) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (3) (7) (3) (5) (4) (3) (3) (4) (8) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 290 117 116 17 172 203 72 54 57 168 138 128 140 143 81 160 123 141 51 93 124 148 69 68 PARKS 24% 23% 24% 36% 25% 22% 33% 10% 47% 34% 40% 17% 16% 45% 30% 19% 16% 41% 14% 42% 24% 18% 36% 45% (5) (5) (3) (4) (5) (6) (5) (6) (8) (5) (5) (6) (6) (7) (5) (7) (6) (7) (7) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) INADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES 287 117 113 19 169 220 52 92 35 147 104 151 170 109 73 183 167 99 81 74 115 161 56 56 24% 23% 23% 40% 24% 23% 24% 17% 29% 30% 30% 20% 20% 34% 27% 22% 21% 28% 22% 33% 22% 20% 29% 37% (6) (6) (5) (2) (6) (5) (10) (3) (10) (8) (10) (3) (3) (10) (6) (5) (2) (10) (1) (10) (7) (4) (8) (9) TOXINS AND PESTICIDES IN 269 112 107 22 156 200 57 34 58 163 129 106 120 145 68 163 97 146 38 95 117 112 71 79 OUR FOOD AND DRINKING 22% 22% 22% 48% 22% 21% 26% 6% 48% 33% 38% 14% 14% 46% 25% 20% 12% 42% 10% 42% 23% 14% 37% 52% WATER (7) (7) (7) (1) (8) (7) (7) (11) (7) (6) (7) (9) (8) (6) (9) (6) (9) (6) (11) (5) (6) (11) (5) (4) AIR POLLUTION AND SMOG 261 94 93 17 166 190 54 42 61 146 115 109 115 135 71 157 103 133 45 86 110 122 57 70 22% 19% 19% 36% 24% 20% 25% 8% 51% 30% 33% 14% 14% 43% 26% 19% 13% 38% 12% 39% 21% 15% 30% 46% (8) (9) (8) (3) (7) (8) (9) (9) (6) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (7) (8) (8) (9) (9) (7) (8) (9) (7) (5) CUTS TO FUNDING FOR STATE 248 89 78 12 157 168 72 41 60 142 134 94 89 154 56 154 80 151 51 94 91 118 53 67 PARKS, PROTECTION OF OUR 21% 18% 17% 26% 22% 18% 30% 7% 53% 30% 38% 13% 11% 46% 24% 18% 10% 42% 14% 34% 18% 14% 27% 44% NATURAL AREAS AND WATER (9) (10) (11) (7) (9) (10) (6) (10) (5) (7) (8) (11) (11) (5) (10) (11) (11) (5) (6) (8) (10) (10) (10) (7) QUALITY POLLUTION OF RIVERS, LAKES 246 94 88 9 149 179 62 51 51 136 134 98 92 146 59 158 91 141 42 94 100 125 57 55 AND STREAMS 21% 19% 19% 18% 21% 19% 26% 9% 45% 29% 38% 13% 11% 44% 25% 18% 12% 39% 12% 34% 20% 15% 28% 36% (10) (8) (9) (11) (10) (9) (8) (8) (9) (10) (6) (10) (10) (8) (8) (10) (10) (8) (10) (9) (9) (8) (9) (10) LOSS OF FAMILY FARMS AND 199 89 85 13 109 150 38 60 21 104 60 116 133 62 27 155 126 54 50 38 92 133 37 28 RANCHES 17% 18% 18% 28% 16% 16% 18% 11% 17% 21% 18% 15% 16% 19% 10% 19% 16% 16% 13% 17% 18% 16% 19% 18% (11) (11) (10) (6) (11) (11) (11) (5) (11) (11) (11) (7) (7) (11) (11) (9) (5) (11) (8) (11) (11) (7) (11) (11) OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN 69 31 31 - 38 45 22 30 3 33 19 43 50 19 8 59 45 20 14 20 33 48 10 8 OIL 6% 6% 7% 1% 5% 5% 9% 5% 3% 7% 5% 6% 6% 6% 3% 7% 6% 5% 4% 7% 7% 6% 5% 5% (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 31Table 7-1Summary of Statements: % Strongly Agree BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 926 156 159 150 157 149 172 440 486 182 221 147 207 166 182 159 99 221 195 67 297 285 326 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 77% 78% 79% 75% 79% 75% 86% 77% 78% 76% 77% 78% 79% 77% 78% 74% 77% 75% 83% 76% 67% 81% 85% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 814 122 145 146 130 140 148 367 446 136 204 156 176 138 159 147 60 181 185 79 250 251 300 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 68% 61% 72% 73% 65% 70% 74% 64% 71% 57% 71% 73% 74% 64% 64% 66% 56% 64% 80% 71% 56% 72% 78% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 640 110 104 99 123 94 112 308 332 143 137 95 145 116 133 111 64 147 129 52 176 192 260 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 53% 55% 52% 50% 61% 47% 56% 54% 53% 60% 48% 51% 56% 54% 57% 52% 50% 50% 55% 59% 40% 55% 68% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (3) (4) (4) (3) (4) (4) (3) (4) (2) (5) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (5) (3) (3) (4) (3) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 610 100 109 101 106 97 119 269 341 116 155 108 128 102 130 97 42 140 139 59 166 193 238 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 51% 50% 54% 51% 53% 49% 60% 47% 54% 48% 54% 51% 53% 47% 52% 44% 40% 50% 60% 54% 37% 55% 62% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (4) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (5) (5) (3) (4) (4) (3) (4) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 533 95 91 91 86 76 87 205 327 100 141 84 128 79 90 83 31 150 129 47 128 162 226 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 44% 48% 46% 45% 43% 38% 44% 36% 52% 41% 49% 39% 53% 36% 36% 38% 30% 53% 55% 43% 29% 46% 59% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (4) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (8) (3) (4) (6) (7) (6) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 497 88 84 77 77 74 85 231 266 92 122 83 102 95 93 81 56 121 105 38 126 171 188 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 41% 44% 42% 39% 38% 37% 43% 40% 43% 38% 42% 44% 39% 44% 40% 38% 44% 41% 44% 44% 28% 49% 49% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (4) (6) (6) (5) (8) (5) (6) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 513 78 84 112 101 82 126 297 216 79 88 88 126 133 95 130 72 72 83 62 317 127 58 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 21% 19% 21% 28% 25% 20% 31% 26% 17% 16% 15% 22% 25% 31% 20% 30% 31% 13% 18% 31% 36% 18% 8% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (7) (7) (7) (8) (7) (7) (8) (8) (7) (7) (8) (7) (7) (7) (8) (8) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 500 77 83 129 76 76 129 315 185 75 102 85 116 122 107 131 76 70 70 45 324 122 42 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 21% 19% 21% 32% 19% 19% 32% 27% 15% 16% 18% 21% 23% 28% 22% 30% 33% 12% 15% 23% 36% 17% 6% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (8) (8) (8) (7) (8) (8) (7) (7) (8) (8) (7) (8) (8) (8) (7) (7) (6) (8) (8) (8) (5) (8) (8) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 202 31 31 33 50 28 43 110 92 27 60 33 40 40 49 39 22 38 34 18 96 65 39 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 8% 8% 8% 8% 13% 7% 11% 10% 7% 6% 10% 8% 8% 9% 10% 9% 9% 7% 7% 9% 11% 9% 5% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 32Table 7-2Summary of Statements: % Strongly Agree BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 926 699 207 121 330 369 55 66 138 159 157 128 139 187 124 173 144 138 130 196 240 282 42 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 77% 79% 72% 72% 77% 81% 83% 65% 65% 69% 79% 84% 89% 82% 65% 68% 82% 80% 83% 88% 70% 68% 72% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 814 609 191 109 285 324 38 71 131 119 133 119 99 201 80 168 129 122 127 173 200 232 37 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 68% 68% 68% 65% 63% 73% 62% 66% 56% 57% 67% 78% 75% 80% 45% 63% 74% 70% 74% 81% 57% 57% 58% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 640 458 168 104 213 245 51 53 80 96 110 82 113 148 82 94 95 94 100 160 137 171 26 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 53% 52% 59% 62% 49% 54% 77% 52% 38% 42% 56% 54% 72% 65% 43% 37% 55% 54% 63% 72% 40% 41% 46% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (2) (5) (5) (3) (3) (5) (3) (3) (3) (5) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 610 446 157 99 207 240 35 63 82 84 100 93 82 156 66 98 99 94 99 139 136 155 28 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 51% 50% 56% 59% 46% 54% 58% 59% 35% 40% 50% 61% 62% 62% 38% 37% 57% 53% 58% 65% 39% 38% 43% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (5) (3) (6) (4) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (6) (3) (4) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 533 368 150 86 147 221 29 56 55 74 72 89 71 155 54 72 76 86 102 123 105 121 23 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 44% 41% 53% 51% 33% 50% 48% 53% 23% 35% 36% 59% 54% 61% 31% 27% 43% 49% 60% 57% 30% 30% 35% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (5) (5) (6) (6) (5) (6) (4) (8) (5) (6) (4) (5) (5) (6) (7) (6) (6) (4) (5) (7) (7) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 497 363 127 87 164 199 41 46 50 75 95 76 83 105 62 64 84 86 66 121 97 124 19 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 41% 41% 45% 52% 38% 44% 62% 45% 24% 33% 48% 50% 53% 46% 32% 25% 48% 50% 42% 54% 28% 30% 33% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (6) (6) (5) (5) (6) (3) (6) (7) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (5) (8) (5) (5) (6) (6) (8) (8) (6) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 513 389 105 40 228 161 25 15 182 135 84 43 26 32 108 209 42 84 16 42 257 286 39 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 21% 22% 18% 12% 26% 18% 20% 7% 41% 31% 21% 14% 9% 7% 29% 40% 12% 24% 5% 10% 37% 35% 32% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (7) (7) (7) (9) (8) (7) (7) (9) (4) (7) (8) (7) (7) (7) (8) (4) (8) (7) (8) (7) (6) (6) (7) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 500 380 104 47 246 134 17 31 193 131 95 27 18 24 108 216 54 67 15 28 269 305 30 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 21% 21% 18% 14% 28% 15% 13% 15% 43% 30% 24% 9% 6% 5% 29% 42% 15% 19% 4% 6% 39% 37% 24% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (8) (8) (8) (7) (7) (8) (9) (7) (3) (8) (7) (9) (9) (8) (7) (3) (7) (8) (9) (8) (5) (5) (8) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 202 132 65 41 72 60 22 19 51 44 36 29 20 19 36 58 34 30 16 23 84 92 8 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 8% 7% 11% 12% 8% 7% 17% 9% 11% 10% 9% 9% 7% 4% 10% 11% 10% 9% 5% 5% 12% 11% 6% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (7) (9) (9) (9) (9) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 33Table 7-3Summary of Statements: % Strongly Agree BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 926 347 324 228 205 90 90 180 47 274 245 319 197 150 122 123 155 164 95 102 61 89 926 - MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 77% 69% 83% 85% 64% 74% 76% 84% 82% 86% 83% 80% 70% 72% 85% 82% 79% 82% 67% 73% 71% 73% 77% - AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 814 274 316 205 166 81 78 162 28 270 225 276 189 119 100 124 130 146 86 103 48 71 - 814 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 68% 57% 73% 81% 53% 65% 66% 75% 65% 80% 65% 69% 70% 66% 62% 68% 66% 71% 66% 74% 58% 74% - 68% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 640 190 233 192 108 66 46 135 36 218 176 194 156 101 87 90 100 94 80 76 34 67 640 - PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 53% 38% 59% 72% 34% 54% 39% 63% 62% 69% 60% 49% 55% 48% 60% 60% 51% 47% 57% 54% 40% 54% 53% - FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (5) (3) (3) (5) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (5) (3) (5) (4) (4) (2) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 610 178 257 157 100 62 51 131 26 211 182 188 152 83 87 95 82 106 67 84 29 55 - 610 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 51% 37% 59% 62% 32% 50% 43% 61% 58% 62% 53% 47% 56% 46% 54% 52% 42% 52% 52% 61% 34% 57% - 51% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (6) (4) (4) (6) (4) (3) (4) (5) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (4) (5) (5) (3) (4) (3) (6) (3) (2) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 533 155 217 144 86 42 38 111 26 199 175 154 122 79 74 101 57 98 45 77 28 51 - 533 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 44% 32% 50% 56% 27% 34% 32% 52% 59% 59% 51% 38% 45% 44% 46% 55% 29% 48% 34% 55% 33% 53% - 44% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (7) (5) (5) (7) (6) (8) (6) (4) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (4) (6) (4) (6) (4) (7) (5) (3) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 497 157 178 141 79 45 44 116 31 152 128 162 113 83 60 68 88 74 54 59 26 57 497 - COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 41% 31% 45% 53% 25% 37% 37% 54% 54% 48% 44% 41% 40% 40% 42% 45% 45% 37% 38% 42% 30% 47% 41% - PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (8) (6) (6) (8) (5) (5) (5) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (4) (6) (5) (6) (8) (6) (3) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 513 398 79 28 277 40 84 40 30 27 109 138 149 111 69 40 72 66 87 62 65 46 256 258 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 21% 40% 10% 5% 44% 16% 36% 9% 30% 4% 17% 17% 27% 29% 22% 12% 18% 16% 32% 22% 38% 21% 21% 21% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (7) (3) (7) (7) (4) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (8) (8) (7) (8) (7) (8) (7) (5) (8) (4) (4) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 500 395 71 24 286 37 84 33 20 22 107 124 147 118 69 38 81 44 92 55 69 48 243 257 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 21% 40% 9% 5% 45% 15% 36% 8% 20% 3% 17% 16% 27% 30% 22% 11% 21% 11% 34% 20% 41% 22% 20% 21% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (8) (4) (8) (9) (3) (8) (6) (8) (8) (9) (8) (8) (8) (7) (7) (8) (7) (8) (7) (8) (3) (7) (5) (5) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 202 145 27 25 83 13 45 17 15 22 37 51 66 45 18 19 30 21 37 28 22 23 103 98 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 8% 15% 3% 5% 13% 5% 19% 4% 15% 3% 6% 6% 12% 12% 6% 6% 8% 5% 14% 10% 13% 11% 9% 8% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (6) (6) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 34Table 7-4Summary of Statements: % Strongly Agree BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 926 230 635 149 125 263 587 624 282 334 295 227 188 577 253 669 41 226 312 166 97 80 68 177 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 77% 63% 84% 59% 77% 83% 75% 81% 73% 76% 77% 72% 72% 78% 81% 76% 85% 80% 82% 59% 78% 82% 100% 81% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 814 197 568 129 110 224 519 570 209 347 303 218 174 460 259 552 49 225 287 169 94 59 51 138 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 68% 60% 71% 56% 59% 80% 64% 73% 55% 69% 70% 68% 69% 67% 68% 68% 60% 70% 73% 60% 66% 69% 83% 65% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (3) (3) (2) (2) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 640 134 473 88 73 233 357 455 168 244 219 168 143 383 171 465 27 154 226 88 85 68 49 102 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 53% 37% 62% 35% 45% 74% 45% 59% 43% 56% 57% 53% 55% 52% 54% 53% 55% 55% 59% 32% 68% 70% 72% 47% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (5) (3) (5) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (6) (2) (2) (3) (5) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 610 116 457 76 83 178 378 424 153 243 217 155 129 359 198 410 36 172 226 106 72 51 42 103 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 51% 35% 58% 33% 44% 64% 47% 55% 41% 49% 50% 48% 51% 52% 52% 50% 44% 53% 57% 37% 51% 59% 69% 48% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (6) (4) (6) (4) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (5) (4) (4) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 533 101 389 61 60 169 314 374 132 216 184 141 109 312 173 358 37 148 186 82 66 51 35 105 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 44% 31% 49% 26% 32% 61% 39% 48% 35% 43% 43% 44% 43% 45% 45% 44% 46% 46% 47% 29% 46% 60% 58% 49% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (7) (5) (7) (6) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (4) (6) (5) (7) (6) (4) (6) (3) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 497 95 368 59 52 187 270 350 137 157 141 111 95 335 140 356 18 131 160 80 70 51 41 77 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 41% 26% 48% 23% 32% 59% 34% 45% 35% 36% 37% 35% 36% 45% 45% 41% 37% 46% 42% 29% 56% 52% 61% 35% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (8) (6) (8) (5) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (8) (4) (6) (5) (6) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 513 313 175 233 73 45 443 289 201 271 235 220 183 236 161 350 29 141 110 260 29 14 13 80 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 21% 45% 11% 49% 21% 8% 28% 19% 26% 29% 29% 34% 36% 16% 23% 21% 22% 23% 14% 46% 11% 8% 10% 19% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (7) (3) (7) (4) (7) (7) (7) (7) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (7) (7) (7) (7) (8) (8) (3) (8) (7) (7) (8) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 500 313 167 239 72 42 437 277 205 277 239 223 185 218 160 338 24 143 123 238 31 10 7 84 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 21% 45% 11% 50% 20% 7% 27% 18% 27% 29% 29% 35% 36% 15% 23% 20% 18% 24% 16% 42% 12% 6% 6% 20% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (8) (4) (8) (3) (8) (8) (8) (8) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (8) (8) (8) (8) (7) (7) (4) (7) (8) (8) (7) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 202 87 103 60 32 23 167 102 82 114 94 94 73 86 51 151 10 44 65 79 16 5 7 25 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 8% 13% 7% 12% 9% 4% 10% 7% 11% 12% 11% 15% 14% 6% 7% 9% 8% 7% 8% 14% 6% 3% 5% 6% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 35Table 7-5Summary of Statements: % Strongly Agree BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 926 403 384 40 516 725 178 491 64 348 208 640 703 201 156 711 657 224 293 191 391 664 149 95 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 77% 82% 82% 86% 73% 78% 75% 84% 56% 73% 59% 85% 84% 60% 68% 81% 85% 62% 81% 68% 79% 81% 75% 62% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (3) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 814 330 313 35 482 653 132 429 56 305 184 566 631 160 172 574 590 181 286 122 351 601 114 75 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 68% 66% 65% 75% 69% 69% 61% 79% 46% 62% 53% 75% 74% 51% 64% 70% 76% 52% 76% 54% 68% 73% 59% 50% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 640 259 249 29 375 528 99 424 16 189 116 482 539 92 93 515 502 119 236 108 259 491 78 60 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 53% 53% 53% 63% 53% 57% 41% 73% 14% 40% 33% 64% 65% 27% 40% 59% 65% 33% 65% 39% 52% 60% 39% 39% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (9) (4) (6) (3) (3) (6) (5) (3) (3) (5) (3) (5) (3) (3) (4) (5) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 610 257 250 23 352 507 91 364 23 201 121 439 502 94 126 447 473 111 230 71 262 481 76 34 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 51% 51% 52% 50% 51% 54% 42% 67% 19% 41% 35% 58% 59% 30% 47% 54% 60% 32% 62% 32% 51% 59% 39% 22% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (7) (3) (5) (4) (4) (5) (3) (4) (4) (6) (5) (6) (4) (4) (3) (6) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 533 215 207 10 318 451 69 321 24 173 91 414 431 86 104 393 426 96 232 47 219 423 61 24 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 44% 43% 43% 22% 46% 48% 32% 59% 20% 35% 26% 55% 51% 27% 39% 48% 55% 28% 62% 21% 42% 52% 32% 16% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (8) (5) (5) (7) (6) (5) (5) (7) (4) (8) (5) (5) (6) (9) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 497 182 179 22 314 405 75 321 21 144 94 363 396 86 73 392 385 96 185 86 201 392 64 31 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 41% 37% 38% 47% 45% 44% 31% 55% 19% 30% 26% 48% 48% 26% 32% 45% 50% 27% 51% 31% 41% 48% 32% 20% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (8) (6) (7) (6) (6) (8) (8) (6) (6) (8) (6) (7) (6) (6) (5) (7) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 513 175 169 13 336 366 126 115 144 234 337 133 153 341 184 261 112 370 85 224 181 210 115 168 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 21% 18% 18% 14% 24% 20% 28% 10% 61% 24% 48% 9% 9% 52% 37% 15% 7% 52% 12% 44% 18% 13% 29% 55% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (7) (7) (7) (8) (7) (7) (7) (7) (1) (8) (3) (8) (8) (2) (7) (7) (7) (2) (8) (3) (7) (8) (7) (2) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 500 162 157 15 336 354 125 108 134 241 308 156 165 315 205 229 101 366 94 220 166 223 103 155 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 21% 16% 17% 16% 24% 19% 28% 10% 57% 25% 44% 10% 10% 48% 41% 13% 6% 52% 13% 44% 16% 14% 26% 51% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (8) (8) (8) (7) (8) (8) (8) (8) (2) (7) (4) (7) (7) (4) (4) (8) (8) (4) (7) (4) (8) (7) (8) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 202 65 62 5 137 146 50 69 61 68 120 66 89 107 84 101 78 115 67 75 47 108 37 49 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 8% 7% 7% 6% 10% 8% 11% 6% 26% 7% 17% 4% 5% 16% 17% 6% 5% 16% 9% 15% 5% 7% 10% 16% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (5) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (8) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 36Table 8-1Summary of Statements: % Total Agree BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1154 194 194 190 188 192 198 554 600 237 275 182 249 206 228 205 121 283 226 85 417 342 375 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 96% 97% 97% 95% 94% 96% 99% 96% 96% 99% 96% 96% 96% 96% 98% 96% 95% 97% 96% 96% 94% 98% 98% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1096 180 186 187 171 189 194 516 580 215 264 194 221 199 218 196 100 260 219 99 393 321 365 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 91% 90% 93% 93% 85% 95% 97% 89% 93% 89% 92% 90% 92% 92% 88% 89% 95% 93% 94% 89% 88% 92% 95% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1034 177 171 171 168 169 174 496 538 214 255 150 217 192 211 173 112 258 194 80 356 310 350 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 86% 89% 86% 86% 84% 84% 87% 86% 86% 89% 89% 80% 83% 89% 90% 81% 88% 88% 83% 91% 80% 89% 91% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (4) (2) (4) (3) (3) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1022 174 165 170 174 181 176 469 553 206 251 181 203 179 212 173 83 245 211 96 359 298 349 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 85% 87% 82% 85% 87% 90% 88% 81% 88% 85% 87% 85% 85% 83% 85% 79% 79% 87% 91% 87% 81% 85% 91% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (4) (4) (4) (2) (3) (3) (4) (3) (4) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (4) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 832 145 139 133 122 138 144 363 469 174 201 151 172 131 158 145 60 218 178 71 252 249 311 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 69% 73% 69% 67% 61% 69% 72% 63% 75% 72% 70% 71% 72% 61% 63% 66% 57% 78% 77% 64% 57% 71% 81% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (6) (5) (7) (5) (5) (5) (8) (5) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 814 142 136 133 126 131 140 377 437 170 199 128 171 141 157 136 85 213 163 56 258 249 291 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 68% 71% 68% 66% 63% 65% 70% 66% 70% 71% 69% 68% 66% 66% 67% 64% 67% 73% 69% 64% 58% 71% 76% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (5) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1123 179 169 243 178 222 240 643 480 223 251 193 224 229 260 246 137 214 172 92 625 312 169 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 47% 45% 42% 61% 45% 55% 60% 56% 38% 46% 44% 48% 45% 53% 54% 57% 59% 37% 37% 46% 70% 44% 22% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (8) (5) (7) (7) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 902 140 137 194 166 174 193 484 418 156 187 153 198 208 176 194 113 167 157 94 548 226 114 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 35% 34% 49% 42% 43% 48% 42% 33% 33% 32% 38% 40% 48% 37% 45% 49% 29% 33% 47% 62% 32% 15% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (7) (6) (8) (8) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 503 79 80 107 102 86 97 260 243 103 118 87 103 90 118 87 55 103 103 35 268 154 77 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 21% 20% 20% 27% 25% 21% 24% 23% 19% 21% 20% 22% 21% 21% 24% 20% 24% 18% 22% 18% 30% 22% 10% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 37Table 8-2Summary of Statements: % Total Agree BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1154 860 269 157 412 447 65 92 200 217 194 149 154 221 181 236 170 170 155 216 321 390 56 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 96% 97% 94% 93% 96% 98% 98% 90% 94% 94% 98% 98% 98% 97% 95% 93% 97% 98% 99% 97% 93% 94% 97% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1096 819 259 158 405 413 56 102 211 182 178 144 122 243 146 244 165 157 162 202 313 363 56 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 91% 91% 92% 94% 90% 93% 91% 95% 90% 87% 89% 95% 92% 96% 83% 92% 94% 89% 95% 95% 89% 90% 86% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (3) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1034 774 241 149 372 402 62 86 172 184 176 135 142 208 162 195 156 152 148 199 270 333 49 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 86% 87% 84% 89% 86% 88% 94% 85% 81% 80% 89% 89% 91% 92% 85% 77% 89% 88% 94% 89% 78% 80% 85% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (2) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (2) (4) (3) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (3) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1022 770 236 144 370 400 49 95 186 173 161 137 114 234 146 211 152 146 150 198 285 329 54 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 85% 86% 84% 86% 82% 90% 81% 89% 79% 82% 81% 90% 87% 93% 83% 79% 87% 83% 88% 93% 82% 81% 84% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (3) (3) (3) (4) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 832 617 198 119 289 328 39 80 127 125 126 123 102 209 104 146 129 120 134 177 199 226 45 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 69% 69% 70% 71% 64% 74% 64% 75% 54% 60% 63% 82% 77% 83% 59% 55% 74% 69% 79% 83% 57% 56% 70% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (6) (5) (5) (6) (5) (6) (5) (8) (7) (6) (5) (5) (5) (7) (8) (5) (6) (5) (5) (8) (8) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 814 614 189 116 284 329 46 70 115 142 138 111 120 172 119 139 124 123 123 167 203 247 36 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 68% 69% 66% 69% 66% 72% 70% 69% 54% 62% 70% 73% 77% 75% 62% 55% 71% 71% 78% 75% 59% 59% 62% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (5) (6) (6) (5) (6) (5) (6) (7) (5) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (5) (6) (6) (7) (7) (6) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1123 867 233 115 515 352 44 71 353 272 209 102 70 99 247 379 150 161 77 90 501 585 69 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 47% 49% 41% 34% 58% 39% 34% 34% 79% 62% 53% 34% 24% 21% 67% 73% 43% 46% 24% 21% 72% 71% 56% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (5) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (5) (5) (7) (7) (7) (7) (5) (5) (7) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 902 701 181 77 381 320 35 42 291 257 141 85 45 69 205 343 91 135 47 67 439 504 62 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 39% 32% 23% 43% 35% 28% 20% 65% 58% 35% 28% 16% 14% 56% 66% 26% 39% 15% 15% 63% 61% 50% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (9) (6) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (6) (8) (8) (8) (8) (6) (6) (8) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 503 363 130 70 192 171 26 45 138 129 84 70 33 44 112 154 78 75 31 46 222 264 20 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 21% 20% 23% 21% 22% 19% 20% 21% 31% 29% 21% 23% 12% 9% 31% 30% 22% 22% 10% 10% 32% 32% 17% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 38Table 8-3Summary of Statements: % Total Agree BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1154 470 382 265 294 119 114 212 57 308 290 385 265 198 143 147 191 194 134 131 78 120 1154 - MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 96% 94% 97% 99% 92% 99% 97% 98% 99% 97% 99% 97% 94% 95% 99% 98% 98% 96% 95% 93% 91% 98% 96% - AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1096 422 399 249 278 109 104 203 36 328 303 377 242 167 136 167 181 195 119 124 75 92 - 1096 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 91% 88% 92% 98% 89% 88% 88% 94% 81% 97% 88% 94% 90% 93% 84% 92% 92% 95% 91% 89% 90% 95% - 91% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1034 389 353 257 242 112 93 200 49 292 250 347 250 172 122 127 173 173 125 126 68 105 1034 - PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 86% 78% 90% 96% 76% 93% 79% 93% 85% 92% 85% 87% 89% 83% 85% 85% 89% 86% 89% 89% 79% 85% 86% - FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (3) (4) (3) (5) (2) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1022 365 392 236 242 111 84 196 35 312 291 349 235 138 133 158 162 187 108 128 60 78 - 1022 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 85% 76% 90% 93% 77% 90% 72% 91% 81% 92% 85% 87% 87% 77% 83% 87% 82% 91% 83% 92% 72% 81% - 85% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (2) (4) (4) (2) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 832 280 317 216 169 82 74 163 32 279 252 274 184 116 116 137 120 154 77 106 45 71 - 832 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 69% 58% 73% 85% 54% 66% 63% 76% 72% 82% 73% 68% 68% 65% 72% 75% 61% 75% 59% 76% 54% 74% - 69% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (7) (6) (5) (7) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (7) (5) (8) (5) (3) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 814 280 302 209 171 85 64 173 41 245 197 286 187 131 94 104 142 144 90 97 47 84 814 - COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 68% 56% 77% 78% 54% 70% 54% 81% 72% 77% 67% 72% 67% 63% 65% 69% 73% 71% 64% 69% 55% 69% 68% - PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (8) (5) (6) (8) (5) (8) (5) (5) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (5) (6) (7) (6) (3) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1123 690 305 105 488 133 157 144 38 130 245 355 296 218 137 107 212 144 171 125 117 102 566 557 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 47% 70% 37% 20% 77% 54% 67% 34% 37% 20% 38% 44% 54% 56% 45% 32% 54% 35% 63% 44% 69% 46% 47% 46% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (7) (5) (7) (7) (4) (7) (5) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (5) (7) (4) (4) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 902 615 213 55 444 102 128 91 36 75 206 266 236 186 106 100 141 125 127 109 104 82 447 455 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 63% 26% 11% 70% 42% 54% 21% 35% 11% 32% 33% 43% 48% 35% 30% 36% 31% 47% 39% 61% 38% 37% 38% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (8) (6) (8) (8) (6) (8) (7) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (6) (8) (5) (5) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 503 334 106 53 223 41 83 67 25 51 100 147 145 106 56 45 75 72 76 69 50 56 264 239 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 21% 34% 13% 10% 35% 17% 35% 16% 25% 8% 16% 18% 26% 27% 18% 13% 19% 18% 28% 25% 30% 25% 22% 20% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (6) (6) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 39Table 8-4Summary of Statements: % Total Agree BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1154 340 746 232 156 302 760 743 378 420 371 298 249 717 305 845 46 275 376 254 117 97 68 212 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 96% 93% 98% 93% 96% 95% 97% 96% 97% 96% 96% 94% 95% 97% 97% 96% 94% 97% 99% 91% 94% 99% 100% 97% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1096 291 737 202 170 256 737 726 328 460 398 292 230 628 353 740 73 299 367 248 129 79 59 191 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 91% 89% 93% 88% 90% 92% 91% 93% 87% 92% 93% 90% 91% 91% 92% 91% 90% 93% 93% 88% 91% 93% 97% 90% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (3) (2) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1034 273 701 187 143 293 654 684 323 375 332 264 221 644 270 760 37 247 351 215 112 89 66 173 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 86% 74% 92% 75% 88% 93% 83% 89% 83% 85% 86% 83% 85% 87% 86% 86% 76% 88% 92% 77% 90% 91% 98% 79% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (4) (3) (6) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (4) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (3) (2) (4) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1022 246 708 176 161 251 671 670 311 406 356 254 204 605 312 707 63 263 345 223 134 72 51 177 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 85% 75% 89% 77% 86% 90% 83% 86% 83% 81% 83% 79% 81% 88% 81% 87% 77% 81% 87% 79% 94% 84% 84% 83% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (3) (4) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (3) (2) (5) (4) (3) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 832 184 586 124 113 237 507 567 224 325 280 206 161 502 262 568 56 218 279 164 95 68 49 163 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 69% 56% 74% 54% 60% 85% 62% 73% 60% 65% 65% 64% 64% 73% 68% 70% 69% 67% 71% 58% 67% 79% 80% 77% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (7) (5) (7) (7) (5) (6) (5) (6) (5) (6) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (7) (6) (6) (6) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 814 202 559 132 107 249 498 550 242 278 251 190 162 524 211 600 30 194 254 155 92 85 56 148 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 68% 55% 74% 53% 66% 79% 63% 71% 62% 63% 65% 60% 62% 71% 67% 68% 62% 69% 67% 55% 74% 86% 83% 68% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (8) (6) (8) (5) (6) (5) (6) (5) (6) (5) (7) (7) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (8) (5) (4) (5) (6) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1123 514 545 383 212 128 927 628 446 540 461 408 329 575 342 777 67 297 327 403 99 45 28 200 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 47% 74% 35% 80% 60% 21% 58% 41% 58% 57% 57% 64% 64% 40% 49% 46% 51% 49% 42% 72% 37% 25% 22% 47% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (7) (5) (7) (3) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (5) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (5) (7) (7) (7) (7) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 902 478 381 369 156 88 745 529 343 446 385 342 281 445 291 609 62 244 234 394 61 30 16 151 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 69% 25% 77% 44% 15% 47% 34% 45% 47% 47% 54% 55% 31% 42% 36% 48% 40% 30% 70% 23% 16% 12% 35% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (8) (6) (8) (4) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (6) (8) (8) (8) (8) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 503 243 227 179 78 49 421 264 211 265 222 209 166 233 156 347 30 132 155 205 26 17 12 77 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 21% 35% 15% 37% 22% 8% 26% 17% 28% 28% 27% 33% 32% 16% 22% 20% 23% 22% 20% 36% 10% 9% 9% 18% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 40Table 8-5Summary of Statements: % Total Agree BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1154 477 458 46 670 897 228 569 101 455 329 736 821 304 217 851 757 335 351 262 480 797 191 139 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 96% 98% 98% 100% 95% 96% 96% 98% 89% 96% 93% 98% 99% 91% 94% 97% 98% 93% 97% 94% 97% 98% 96% 90% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 1096 453 431 41 642 863 194 510 98 449 298 706 794 272 236 769 731 298 350 185 479 766 171 125 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 91% 90% 89% 89% 92% 91% 90% 94% 81% 91% 87% 93% 93% 86% 88% 93% 94% 86% 94% 83% 93% 93% 89% 83% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (4) (4) (2) (2) (3) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1034 420 403 43 607 822 188 547 57 408 247 709 784 225 181 780 719 270 328 215 434 736 171 107 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 86% 86% 86% 93% 86% 88% 79% 94% 51% 86% 70% 95% 94% 67% 79% 89% 93% 75% 91% 77% 88% 90% 86% 70% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (3) (3) (4) (2) (3) (3) (4) (3) (7) (3) (6) (2) (2) (6) (3) (3) (3) (5) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (5) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 1022 430 417 34 590 818 171 512 66 404 254 688 780 214 208 730 723 246 339 162 449 737 151 99 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 85% 86% 87% 73% 85% 87% 80% 94% 55% 82% 74% 91% 92% 67% 77% 88% 93% 71% 91% 72% 87% 90% 78% 66% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (4) (4) (3) (5) (4) (4) (3) (2) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (4) (6) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (6) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 832 349 339 28 481 683 131 444 51 304 181 597 653 162 163 615 632 171 306 102 366 637 108 58 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 69% 69% 70% 61% 69% 72% 61% 82% 42% 62% 53% 79% 77% 51% 60% 75% 81% 49% 82% 46% 71% 78% 56% 39% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (5) (5) (6) (6) (5) (6) (5) (8) (5) (7) (5) (5) (8) (6) (5) (5) (8) (5) (8) (5) (5) (7) (9) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 814 323 312 36 487 644 149 467 42 290 171 579 619 171 130 636 591 189 267 160 346 598 129 71 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 68% 66% 66% 77% 69% 69% 63% 80% 37% 61% 48% 77% 74% 51% 56% 73% 77% 52% 74% 57% 70% 73% 65% 46% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (6) (6) (6) (4) (5) (6) (5) (6) (9) (6) (8) (6) (6) (7) (7) (6) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (6) (5) (7) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1123 443 421 45 676 809 267 307 206 568 528 491 571 518 330 675 443 596 249 360 457 613 233 242 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 47% 45% 44% 48% 48% 43% 59% 27% 88% 59% 76% 33% 34% 80% 66% 40% 29% 84% 34% 71% 45% 37% 60% 79% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (2) (7) (3) (7) (7) (3) (5) (7) (7) (3) (7) (5) (7) (7) (6) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 902 330 323 30 570 644 224 225 192 452 500 329 378 499 275 513 297 540 187 339 332 440 205 227 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 33% 34% 33% 41% 34% 49% 20% 82% 47% 72% 22% 22% 77% 55% 30% 19% 76% 25% 67% 33% 27% 52% 75% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (3) (8) (5) (8) (8) (4) (8) (8) (8) (4) (8) (6) (8) (8) (8) (4) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 503 189 186 15 312 360 123 145 122 223 304 156 221 271 179 264 181 289 126 183 167 259 104 124 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 21% 19% 20% 16% 22% 19% 27% 13% 52% 23% 44% 10% 13% 42% 36% 16% 12% 41% 17% 36% 17% 16% 27% 41% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (6) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (8) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 41Table 9-1Summary of Statements: % Total Disagree BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1871 317 314 284 292 311 301 879 992 372 453 311 393 336 359 343 175 466 360 160 604 544 685 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 78% 79% 79% 71% 73% 78% 75% 76% 79% 77% 79% 77% 79% 78% 74% 79% 75% 81% 77% 81% 68% 78% 89% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 1437 253 257 191 217 212 197 644 793 313 372 243 293 207 297 234 111 389 302 96 305 462 645 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 60% 63% 64% 48% 54% 53% 49% 56% 64% 65% 65% 60% 59% 48% 62% 54% 48% 68% 65% 48% 34% 66% 84% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (4) (2) (2) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1209 209 220 142 213 166 154 480 729 243 309 198 262 191 213 178 88 339 282 102 234 363 589 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 50% 52% 55% 35% 53% 42% 39% 42% 58% 51% 54% 49% 52% 44% 44% 41% 38% 59% 60% 51% 26% 52% 77% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (5) (3) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 347 51 59 58 68 62 55 185 162 59 80 56 84 65 69 74 42 70 66 24 175 83 84 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 29% 25% 29% 29% 34% 31% 28% 32% 26% 24% 28% 30% 32% 30% 30% 35% 33% 24% 28% 27% 39% 24% 22% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (2) (5) (4) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 332 52 54 54 71 54 49 197 136 60 82 58 60 71 85 72 38 57 46 33 172 90 68 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 28% 26% 27% 27% 35% 27% 25% 34% 22% 25% 29% 27% 25% 33% 34% 32% 36% 20% 20% 30% 39% 26% 18% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (4) (4) (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (3) (4) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 161 24 32 26 22 18 22 98 64 34 35 28 33 29 37 41 19 32 21 10 78 50 32 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 12% 16% 13% 11% 9% 11% 17% 10% 14% 12% 13% 14% 14% 15% 18% 18% 12% 9% 9% 18% 14% 8% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (6) (6) (6) (8) (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (6) (7) (7) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 151 22 29 24 29 24 23 74 77 24 29 37 40 21 20 40 15 34 37 6 79 36 32 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 11% 14% 12% 14% 12% 11% 13% 12% 10% 10% 20% 15% 10% 8% 19% 12% 12% 16% 6% 18% 10% 8% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (8) (7) (6) (6) (7) (8) (6) (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 90 18 11 11 25 9 6 58 32 25 24 15 14 12 30 22 6 18 7 6 45 24 15 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 7% 9% 5% 5% 13% 4% 3% 10% 5% 10% 8% 7% 6% 6% 12% 10% 5% 7% 3% 6% 10% 7% 4% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (8) (8) (8) (7) (8) (8) (8) (8) (7) (8) (8) (8) (8) (7) (8) (8) (8) (9) (8) (8) (8) (8) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 40 6 6 7 11 6 2 18 22 3 11 6 12 8 4 9 5 10 9 3 24 7 8 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 3% 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% 1% 3% 4% 1% 4% 3% 4% 4% 2% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 5% 2% 2% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (9) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 42Table 9-2Summary of Statements: % Total Disagree BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1871 1401 433 264 678 722 100 164 300 304 313 231 251 434 248 355 270 272 295 386 460 544 100 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 78% 79% 76% 79% 77% 80% 79% 79% 67% 69% 79% 76% 87% 90% 68% 68% 77% 78% 90% 88% 66% 66% 81% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 1437 1031 378 253 483 548 87 166 141 164 250 212 241 404 143 161 254 205 277 364 233 284 57 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 60% 58% 67% 75% 55% 61% 68% 79% 32% 37% 63% 70% 84% 84% 39% 31% 73% 59% 85% 83% 34% 35% 46% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (4) (2) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1209 866 321 211 344 522 80 131 84 150 178 185 210 379 107 125 186 175 247 340 173 209 50 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 50% 49% 57% 63% 39% 58% 63% 63% 19% 34% 45% 61% 73% 79% 29% 24% 53% 50% 75% 78% 25% 25% 41% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (6) (5) (3) (3) (3) (3) (5) (5) (3) (3) (3) (3) (5) (5) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 347 243 89 52 138 105 20 32 93 81 53 30 34 50 69 105 39 44 31 52 134 162 17 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 29% 27% 31% 31% 32% 23% 30% 31% 44% 35% 27% 19% 22% 22% 36% 42% 22% 25% 19% 24% 39% 39% 29% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (4) (5) (4) (2) (3) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) (2) (5) (5) (5) (4) (2) (3) (4) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 332 247 79 48 146 101 21 27 101 72 65 24 28 40 65 106 43 47 34 33 135 159 18 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 28% 28% 28% 28% 32% 23% 34% 25% 43% 34% 33% 16% 21% 16% 37% 40% 24% 27% 20% 16% 39% 39% 27% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (4) (5) (3) (4) (4) (5) (5) (5) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (5) (3) (2) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 161 111 46 24 72 39 12 12 45 33 35 14 16 16 28 48 23 26 18 14 61 71 9 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 12% 16% 14% 16% 9% 19% 11% 19% 16% 18% 10% 12% 6% 16% 18% 13% 15% 10% 7% 17% 17% 13% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (7) (5) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (6) (6) (6) (7) (7) (7) (6) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 151 101 44 19 54 47 4 15 38 41 21 15 14 18 26 53 17 20 9 23 68 77 7 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 11% 15% 11% 13% 10% 6% 15% 18% 18% 11% 10% 9% 8% 13% 21% 10% 11% 6% 10% 20% 18% 12% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (8) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (8) (6) (7) (7) (7) (6) (6) (6) (7) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 90 63 22 11 44 19 5 5 23 22 19 5 10 5 29 16 10 14 7 7 35 38 8 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 7% 7% 8% 6% 10% 4% 9% 5% 10% 10% 10% 3% 7% 2% 16% 6% 6% 8% 4% 3% 10% 9% 12% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (8) (8) (9) (8) (8) (7) (9) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (9) (6) (9) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 40 24 16 11 16 9 1 10 11 13 4 3 2 6 8 16 5 2 2 6 21 24 - MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 3% 3% 6% 7% 4% 2% 2% 10% 5% 6% 2% 2% 1% 3% 4% 6% 3% 1% 1% 3% 6% 6% 1% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 43Table 9-3Summary of Statements: % Total Disagree BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1871 634 709 469 397 200 151 362 76 599 530 642 402 277 247 283 312 331 191 211 117 160 919 952 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 78% 65% 86% 90% 63% 82% 64% 84% 75% 91% 83% 80% 73% 71% 81% 85% 79% 81% 71% 75% 70% 73% 77% 79% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 1437 335 596 460 163 135 102 334 64 573 414 518 299 191 192 222 243 275 140 159 62 130 716 720 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 60% 34% 72% 88% 26% 55% 43% 78% 64% 87% 65% 65% 54% 49% 63% 67% 62% 68% 52% 57% 37% 59% 60% 60% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (4) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1209 261 502 402 126 101 66 272 62 517 369 424 238 163 161 208 170 254 93 145 49 114 597 612 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 50% 27% 61% 77% 20% 41% 28% 63% 62% 79% 58% 53% 43% 42% 53% 63% 43% 63% 34% 52% 29% 52% 50% 51% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (5) (3) (3) (7) (3) (5) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (5) (3) (5) (3) (3) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 347 207 75 54 140 34 49 31 16 64 83 98 90 71 46 38 50 48 49 41 36 35 347 - COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 29% 41% 19% 20% 44% 28% 42% 14% 28% 20% 28% 25% 32% 34% 32% 25% 25% 24% 35% 29% 43% 28% 29% - PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (2) (5) (4) (2) (5) (3) (5) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (4) (2) (4) (4) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 332 183 102 37 130 36 40 47 12 56 84 115 78 54 41 43 71 44 50 28 35 19 - 332 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 28% 38% 24% 14% 42% 29% 34% 22% 26% 16% 24% 29% 29% 30% 25% 24% 36% 22% 38% 20% 41% 20% - 28% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (3) (4) (5) (3) (4) (4) (4) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (3) (5) (3) (5) (4) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 161 106 38 15 66 11 31 19 8 24 49 43 33 37 27 22 30 13 21 11 20 17 - 161 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 22% 9% 6% 21% 9% 26% 9% 19% 7% 14% 11% 12% 21% 17% 12% 15% 7% 16% 8% 24% 18% - 13% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (6) (5) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 151 100 38 11 69 9 21 14 8 24 42 45 30 34 22 20 20 24 15 15 16 17 151 - PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 20% 10% 4% 22% 7% 18% 7% 15% 7% 14% 11% 11% 16% 15% 13% 10% 12% 11% 11% 19% 14% 13% - FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (7) (6) (7) (5) (8) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (7) (5) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 90 50 28 5 30 13 11 9 6 9 33 23 23 11 23 10 15 8 11 11 8 3 - 90 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 7% 10% 6% 2% 10% 10% 10% 4% 13% 3% 10% 6% 8% 6% 14% 5% 7% 4% 9% 8% 10% 3% - 7% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (6) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (6) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 40 29 8 3 23 1 3 3 - 7 3 11 15 10 1 3 4 8 6 10 8 2 40 - MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 3% 6% 2% 1% 7% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 5% 5% - 2% 2% 4% 4% 7% 9% 2% 3% - AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (6) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 44Table 9-4Summary of Statements: % Total Disagree BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1871 440 1317 292 268 544 1156 1269 545 666 587 421 342 1182 535 1329 100 466 612 351 237 166 116 346 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 78% 63% 85% 61% 76% 92% 72% 82% 71% 71% 72% 66% 67% 83% 77% 78% 76% 77% 79% 62% 89% 90% 90% 80% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 1437 195 1145 95 185 502 813 975 411 469 406 275 212 953 384 1048 63 343 524 155 193 151 113 265 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 60% 28% 74% 20% 53% 84% 51% 63% 54% 50% 50% 43% 41% 67% 55% 62% 48% 57% 68% 28% 73% 82% 88% 62% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (4) (2) (6) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1209 159 974 87 127 458 629 872 301 374 333 217 176 817 337 870 60 292 439 142 155 135 99 208 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 50% 23% 63% 18% 36% 77% 39% 56% 39% 40% 41% 34% 34% 57% 48% 51% 46% 48% 57% 25% 58% 74% 77% 48% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (6) (3) (7) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (5) (3) (3) (3) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 347 152 179 112 52 60 265 199 132 152 126 119 93 190 94 251 19 79 111 116 29 13 10 63 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 29% 41% 24% 45% 32% 19% 34% 26% 34% 35% 33% 38% 36% 26% 30% 29% 38% 28% 29% 42% 23% 13% 14% 29% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (2) (5) (2) (5) (4) (5) (4) (5) (4) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (2) (5) (5) (6) (4) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 332 129 191 94 68 37 279 189 136 160 135 105 80 168 103 229 18 93 108 105 43 16 12 43 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 28% 39% 24% 41% 36% 13% 34% 24% 36% 32% 31% 33% 32% 24% 27% 28% 22% 29% 27% 37% 30% 19% 20% 20% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (3) (4) (3) (4) (5) (4) (5) (4) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (4) (5) (3) (4) (4) (4) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 161 73 78 47 27 23 130 96 59 88 68 64 43 73 62 100 14 52 42 57 8 11 10 32 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 22% 10% 20% 14% 8% 16% 12% 16% 18% 16% 20% 17% 11% 16% 12% 17% 16% 11% 20% 5% 13% 16% 15% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (7) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (7) (8) (6) (5) (7) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 151 87 54 58 18 23 120 80 62 61 49 50 38 88 44 107 11 34 29 61 9 7 1 41 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 24% 7% 23% 11% 7% 15% 10% 16% 14% 13% 16% 15% 12% 14% 12% 23% 12% 8% 22% 7% 8% 2% 19% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (5) (7) (4) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (5) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (8) (6) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 90 31 50 24 16 20 63 41 42 36 27 29 20 53 24 65 5 20 24 29 13 6 1 17 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 7% 10% 6% 10% 9% 7% 8% 5% 11% 7% 6% 9% 8% 8% 6% 8% 6% 6% 6% 10% 9% 7% 2% 8% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (6) (8) (7) (8) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 40 27 11 18 6 15 23 28 9 19 13 17 11 22 10 31 3 7 4 24 6 - - 6 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 3% 7% 1% 7% 4% 5% 3% 4% 2% 4% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 6% 2% 1% 9% 5% - - 3% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 45Table 9-5Summary of Statements: % Total Disagree BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1871 792 753 76 1074 1495 327 975 108 733 380 1345 1453 366 316 1424 1362 410 605 314 833 1362 285 175 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 78% 80% 79% 82% 77% 80% 72% 87% 46% 76% 54% 89% 86% 56% 63% 84% 88% 58% 82% 62% 82% 83% 73% 58% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (4) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 1437 644 610 60 788 1180 226 873 42 487 192 1143 1265 142 206 1159 1231 151 528 152 660 1156 180 67 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 60% 65% 64% 65% 56% 63% 50% 78% 18% 50% 28% 76% 75% 22% 41% 68% 79% 21% 72% 30% 65% 71% 46% 22% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (7) (2) (5) (2) (2) (6) (2) (2) (2) (6) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (6) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 1209 514 496 43 692 1016 169 792 25 373 157 990 1070 115 154 985 1075 97 472 126 536 977 151 53 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 50% 52% 52% 46% 49% 54% 37% 70% 11% 38% 23% 66% 64% 18% 31% 58% 69% 14% 64% 25% 53% 60% 38% 17% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (8) (3) (7) (3) (3) (7) (5) (3) (3) (7) (3) (6) (3) (3) (3) (7) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 347 146 138 10 198 254 85 104 67 168 175 146 186 155 94 216 154 168 84 105 142 196 66 75 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 29% 30% 29% 22% 28% 27% 36% 18% 59% 35% 49% 20% 22% 46% 41% 25% 20% 47% 23% 38% 29% 24% 33% 49% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (4) (4) (6) (5) (4) (5) (4) (1) (4) (2) (4) (4) (2) (3) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (4) (5) (3) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 332 133 122 16 199 233 79 90 66 171 152 144 176 147 99 190 136 162 60 113 139 168 71 85 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 28% 26% 25% 34% 29% 25% 37% 17% 55% 35% 44% 19% 21% 46% 37% 23% 17% 47% 16% 50% 27% 21% 37% 56% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (5) (5) (4) (4) (5) (4) (5) (2) (5) (3) (5) (5) (3) (4) (5) (5) (2) (5) (2) (5) (5) (4) (2) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 161 66 58 10 95 109 43 28 54 79 83 61 62 96 59 80 49 95 27 61 59 70 41 47 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 13% 12% 22% 14% 12% 20% 5% 44% 16% 24% 8% 7% 30% 22% 10% 6% 27% 7% 27% 11% 9% 21% 31% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (7) (7) (5) (6) (6) (6) (8) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (7) (7) (4) (7) (5) (6) (7) (6) (4) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 151 66 63 3 85 100 48 34 53 60 102 35 46 102 47 92 50 86 29 61 56 73 26 44 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 13% 13% 14% 7% 12% 11% 20% 6% 47% 13% 29% 5% 5% 31% 20% 10% 6% 24% 8% 22% 11% 9% 13% 28% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (6) (6) (8) (7) (7) (7) (6) (3) (7) (4) (8) (7) (4) (7) (6) (6) (5) (6) (7) (7) (6) (7) (5) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 90 42 42 5 48 67 19 28 23 38 42 45 43 43 30 48 40 46 21 33 32 42 21 22 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 7% 8% 9% 11% 7% 7% 9% 5% 19% 8% 12% 6% 5% 13% 11% 6% 5% 13% 6% 15% 6% 5% 11% 15% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (8) (8) (7) (8) (8) (8) (7) (6) (8) (8) (7) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 40 12 12 - 29 30 10 11 11 19 26 11 10 29 12 24 13 25 8 16 13 17 6 15 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 3% 2% 2% - 4% 3% 4% 2% 9% 4% 7% 1% 1% 9% 5% 3% 2% 7% 2% 6% 3% 2% 3% 10% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) (9) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 46Table 10-1Summary of Statements: % Strongly Disagree BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1343 231 225 211 217 203 212 611 732 248 324 232 296 238 237 245 128 334 283 110 330 397 585 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 56% 58% 56% 53% 54% 51% 53% 53% 59% 52% 56% 58% 59% 55% 49% 56% 55% 58% 61% 55% 37% 57% 76% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 906 169 155 117 147 116 111 432 475 169 217 170 202 144 182 167 80 203 205 64 158 286 445 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 42% 39% 29% 37% 29% 28% 37% 38% 35% 38% 42% 40% 33% 38% 39% 34% 35% 44% 32% 18% 41% 58% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 768 127 148 87 148 103 83 304 465 144 179 129 182 131 124 115 64 199 195 67 109 215 426 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 32% 32% 37% 22% 37% 26% 21% 26% 37% 30% 31% 32% 36% 30% 26% 27% 27% 35% 42% 34% 12% 31% 56% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (4) (3) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 132 19 21 24 29 20 36 73 58 14 27 22 45 23 14 40 19 28 26 3 64 27 36 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 11% 10% 11% 12% 14% 10% 18% 13% 9% 6% 10% 12% 17% 11% 6% 19% 15% 10% 11% 4% 14% 8% 10% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (4) (4) (6) (3) (5) (4) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 122 22 19 25 33 17 24 85 37 14 32 23 23 30 36 32 17 10 14 12 53 45 22 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 10% 11% 10% 12% 17% 9% 12% 15% 6% 6% 11% 11% 10% 14% 14% 14% 17% 4% 6% 11% 12% 13% 6% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (4) (5) (4) (5) (6) (4) (5) (4) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 61 7 12 12 12 3 10 38 23 11 9 13 16 12 12 20 6 8 8 6 29 14 17 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 3% 6% 6% 6% 2% 5% 7% 4% 5% 3% 6% 7% 6% 5% 9% 6% 3% 4% 5% 7% 4% 4% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (6) (7) (6) (7) (7) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (7) (5) (6) (7) (6) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 56 5 12 12 13 10 9 29 27 9 8 17 15 7 7 16 7 11 16 - 28 15 9 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 3% 6% 6% 6% 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% 3% 9% 6% 3% 3% 7% 5% 4% 7% 1% 6% 4% 2% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (6) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (5) (9) (7) (6) (7) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 4 1 5 8 3 1 16 3 1 4 3 5 6 5 8 3 1 - 3 10 5 3 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 2% - 3% 4% 1% 1% 3% 1% - 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% 4% 3% - - 2% 2% 1% 1% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (8) (9) (8) (8) (8) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (8) (8) (9) (7) (9) (9) (8) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 3 1 4 4 2 2 10 9 3 6 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 4 - 10 6 2 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (8) (8) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (9) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 47Table 10-2Summary of Statements: % Strongly Disagree BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1343 977 337 203 458 519 77 126 154 176 222 174 221 364 127 203 193 202 239 342 256 307 63 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 56% 55% 59% 60% 52% 58% 61% 60% 34% 40% 56% 57% 77% 76% 35% 39% 55% 58% 73% 78% 37% 37% 51% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 906 644 241 152 304 340 66 86 71 87 172 115 179 266 62 95 148 136 165 279 127 146 34 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 36% 42% 45% 35% 38% 52% 41% 16% 20% 43% 38% 62% 55% 17% 18% 42% 39% 51% 64% 18% 18% 28% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 768 542 212 130 214 328 42 88 34 75 109 106 153 273 46 61 97 117 168 257 75 95 30 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 32% 30% 37% 39% 24% 36% 33% 42% 8% 17% 27% 35% 53% 57% 13% 12% 28% 33% 51% 59% 11% 12% 25% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (5) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (5) (3) (3) (2) (3) (5) (5) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 132 85 40 17 53 32 3 14 36 27 21 6 13 24 19 44 7 19 15 22 52 63 6 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 11% 10% 14% 10% 12% 7% 4% 14% 17% 12% 10% 4% 8% 11% 10% 18% 4% 11% 10% 10% 15% 15% 10% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (4) (6) (4) (2) (4) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (3) (6) (5) (4) (4) (3) (3) (5) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 122 88 31 16 58 30 11 4 39 14 34 11 10 12 20 34 19 26 7 14 39 48 7 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 10% 10% 11% 9% 13% 7% 19% 4% 17% 7% 17% 7% 8% 5% 11% 13% 11% 15% 4% 7% 11% 12% 10% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (4) (8) (3) (6) (4) (4) (6) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) (5) (5) (4) (4) (4) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 61 41 18 12 28 13 4 8 16 13 11 3 11 6 9 20 4 10 7 10 24 27 4 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 5% 6% 7% 6% 3% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 2% 8% 3% 5% 7% 2% 6% 4% 5% 7% 7% 6% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (5) (5) (6) (7) (6) (7) (4) (6) (6) (7) (8) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 56 40 16 6 21 19 2 4 12 16 9 6 6 3 7 21 8 7 - 9 23 27 4 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 4% 6% 4% 5% 4% 2% 4% 6% 7% 5% 4% 4% 2% 4% 8% 5% 4% - 4% 7% 6% 8% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (5) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (6) (5) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 17 2 - 15 2 - - 8 2 4 1 2 1 5 5 - 5 - 3 7 8 2 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 2% 1% - 3% - - - 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% - 3% 2% - 3% - 1% 2% 2% 4% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 12 7 6 9 3 1 5 5 5 3 3 1 1 3 7 5 2 1 1 9 10 - MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 1% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (8) (8) (6) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (7) (9) (7) (9) (8) (8) (9) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 48Table 10-3Summary of Statements: % Strongly Disagree BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1343 340 544 408 188 136 90 280 57 519 405 454 281 188 189 217 209 246 124 157 80 108 662 681 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 56% 35% 66% 78% 30% 56% 38% 65% 56% 79% 64% 57% 51% 48% 62% 65% 53% 60% 46% 56% 47% 49% 55% 57% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 906 171 366 336 81 72 47 217 40 402 258 341 181 114 144 114 161 180 79 102 41 73 438 468 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 17% 44% 64% 13% 30% 20% 50% 39% 61% 40% 43% 33% 29% 47% 34% 41% 44% 29% 36% 24% 33% 37% 39% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 768 123 300 309 58 44 27 168 36 385 234 247 161 113 104 131 96 151 62 99 36 78 368 400 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 32% 13% 36% 59% 9% 18% 11% 39% 36% 59% 37% 31% 29% 29% 34% 39% 24% 37% 23% 35% 21% 36% 31% 33% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (5) (3) (3) (5) (3) (5) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 132 86 21 15 54 9 19 5 11 22 34 29 33 32 15 18 19 10 20 13 15 17 132 - COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 11% 17% 5% 6% 17% 7% 16% 2% 18% 7% 11% 7% 12% 15% 11% 12% 10% 5% 14% 9% 17% 14% 11% - PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (3) (5) (5) (2) (5) (4) (7) (4) (4) (4) (5) (5) (4) (4) (4) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (4) (4) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 122 68 33 15 41 10 22 21 4 17 21 40 38 23 16 5 26 14 28 10 15 8 - 122 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 10% 14% 8% 6% 13% 8% 19% 10% 10% 5% 6% 10% 14% 13% 10% 3% 13% 7% 22% 7% 18% 8% - 10% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (6) (5) (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (7) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (5) (4) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 61 42 14 5 27 3 9 5 6 12 19 16 11 16 11 8 9 6 9 2 8 7 - 61 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 9% 3% 2% 8% 2% 7% 2% 13% 3% 5% 4% 4% 9% 7% 4% 5% 3% 7% 1% 10% 7% - 5% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (6) (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (7) (7) (6) (6) (5) (6) (7) (6) (9) (6) (6) (5) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 56 36 13 6 23 5 9 6 3 6 12 17 14 11 6 6 8 9 8 6 5 6 56 - PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 7% 3% 2% 7% 4% 7% 3% 6% 2% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 5% 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% - FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (7) (6) (6) (7) (6) (7) (5) (7) (7) (7) (6) (6) (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (7) (5) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 12 5 2 8 2 3 2 1 2 6 6 6 2 6 - 6 - 3 3 2 - - 19 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 4% - 3% - 2% 2% 2% - - 2% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (9) (9) (8) (9) (8) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (7) (9) (6) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 13 6 - 10 - 3 3 - 2 2 6 7 4 1 1 2 3 4 3 3 1 19 - MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 3% 1% - 3% - 3% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% - 1% 1% 2% 3% 2% 4% 1% 2% - AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (8) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) (6) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 49Table 10-4Summary of Statements: % Strongly Disagree BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1343 249 1012 144 158 478 739 937 361 457 397 280 220 869 386 952 69 336 442 188 176 145 95 263 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 56% 36% 65% 30% 45% 80% 46% 60% 47% 49% 49% 44% 43% 61% 55% 56% 53% 56% 57% 33% 66% 79% 73% 61% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 906 108 746 53 97 392 441 650 224 282 244 165 127 616 266 637 47 234 319 72 128 112 76 170 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 16% 48% 11% 28% 66% 28% 42% 29% 30% 30% 26% 25% 43% 38% 38% 36% 39% 41% 13% 48% 61% 59% 40% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (4) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 768 83 638 40 62 355 330 565 173 230 205 123 98 526 214 552 34 188 261 70 92 103 69 144 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 32% 12% 41% 8% 18% 60% 21% 36% 23% 24% 25% 19% 19% 37% 31% 33% 26% 31% 34% 13% 35% 56% 53% 34% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (5) (3) (6) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 132 61 67 40 21 13 115 80 47 67 56 59 48 61 49 81 11 42 30 50 12 4 2 32 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 11% 17% 9% 16% 13% 4% 15% 10% 12% 15% 14% 19% 18% 8% 16% 9% 23% 15% 8% 18% 9% 4% 3% 15% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (3) (4) (2) (4) (6) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (2) (5) (5) (5) (4) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 122 58 62 35 16 17 99 79 41 63 49 47 33 57 36 86 6 33 44 34 13 8 1 19 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 10% 18% 8% 15% 9% 6% 12% 10% 11% 13% 11% 15% 13% 8% 9% 11% 7% 10% 11% 12% 9% 9% 1% 9% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (2) (5) (3) (5) (4) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (4) (7) (5) (4) (6) (4) (4) (6) (5) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 61 35 23 21 6 14 45 37 22 40 24 33 16 21 29 32 10 22 17 25 4 2 4 9 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 11% 3% 9% 3% 5% 6% 5% 6% 8% 6% 10% 6% 3% 7% 4% 12% 7% 4% 9% 3% 2% 6% 4% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (6) (6) (5) (7) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (7) (5) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (4) (7) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 56 37 17 20 6 10 42 31 19 27 17 25 15 30 18 38 4 14 4 34 3 2 - 13 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 10% 2% 8% 4% 3% 5% 4% 5% 6% 5% 8% 6% 4% 6% 4% 9% 5% 1% 12% 3% 2% - 6% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (6) (7) (7) (5) (7) (7) (6) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 10 9 8 2 3 14 10 9 5 4 5 4 14 7 12 1 7 4 9 2 - - 4 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% - - 2% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (8) (8) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 16 2 10 - 7 12 14 2 12 6 11 5 7 5 14 1 4 - 16 - - - 3 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 4% - 4% - 2% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% - 6% - - - 1% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (8) (8) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 50Table 10-5Summary of Statements: % Strongly Disagree BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% WE CAN TRUST COS TO ACT 1343 565 535 58 774 1094 222 822 45 443 204 1057 1124 181 201 1071 1083 209 488 158 615 1063 162 83 RESPONSIBLY TO PROTECT 56% 57% 56% 63% 55% 58% 49% 73% 19% 46% 29% 70% 67% 28% 40% 63% 70% 29% 66% 31% 61% 65% 41% 27% LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (4) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT LAWS AND REGS THAT REQUIRE THEM TO DO SO. ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO 906 396 373 44 505 763 124 633 21 230 90 766 818 73 103 771 808 65 365 72 412 757 96 28 CREATE JOBS IS TO CUT 38% 40% 39% 48% 36% 41% 27% 56% 9% 24% 13% 51% 49% 11% 21% 45% 52% 9% 50% 14% 41% 46% 25% 9% BACK ENVIRO REGS THAT ARE (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (6) (2) (4) (2) (2) (6) (2) (2) (2) (5) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (7) WEIGHING DOWN BUSINESSES. WE NEED TO ALLOW COS 768 312 301 27 454 646 107 552 15 185 84 647 704 52 90 643 699 46 332 61 330 645 74 30 GREATER ACCESS TO OUR 32% 31% 32% 29% 32% 34% 24% 49% 6% 19% 12% 43% 42% 8% 18% 38% 45% 6% 45% 12% 33% 39% 19% 10% NATURAL RESOURCES, BY (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (7) (3) (5) (3) (3) (7) (3) (3) (3) (7) (3) (5) (3) (3) (3) (6) ENSURING THEM THE ABILITY TO EXTRACT RESOURCES FROM OUR PUBLIC LANDS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 132 46 43 3 83 98 31 52 31 48 67 54 68 60 41 78 49 77 35 56 35 70 23 36 COS TO PROFIT FROM USING 11% 9% 9% 6% 12% 11% 13% 9% 27% 10% 19% 7% 8% 18% 18% 9% 6% 21% 10% 20% 7% 9% 11% 23% PUBLIC LANDS WHEN THEIR (4) (4) (4) (5) (5) (4) (4) (4) (1) (5) (2) (4) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (2) (4) (2) (5) (4) (5) (2) DOING SO WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW PRIVATE 122 38 38 7 83 91 26 41 24 53 63 49 56 62 43 63 46 65 23 44 46 57 29 30 COS TO DEVELOP PUBLIC 10% 8% 8% 15% 12% 10% 12% 7% 20% 11% 18% 6% 7% 20% 16% 8% 6% 19% 6% 19% 9% 7% 15% 20% LANDS WHEN THEIR DOING SO (5) (5) (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (5) (2) (4) (3) (5) (5) (2) (5) (5) (5) (3) (5) (3) (4) (5) (4) (3) WOULD LIMIT THE PUBLIC'S ENJOYMENT OR ACCESS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 61 24 18 2 37 41 18 11 18 32 27 31 24 37 23 26 19 40 8 23 24 25 15 20 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 5% 4% 4% 5% 4% 8% 2% 15% 7% 8% 4% 3% 12% 9% 3% 2% 12% 2% 10% 5% 3% 8% 13% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT AND (6) (6) (7) *(7) (6) (6) (6) (7) (5) (6) (7) (6) (6) (5) (6) (7) (7) (4) (7) (6) (6) (7) (6) (4) MAINTAIN STATE PARKS. EVEN WITH STATE BUDGET 56 21 21 2 36 37 18 17 22 18 38 12 16 40 19 35 20 30 13 26 16 29 8 18 PROBLEMS, WE SHOULD STILL 5% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 8% 3% 19% 4% 11% 2% 2% 12% 8% 4% 3% 8% 4% 9% 3% 4% 4% 11% FIND MONEY TO PROTECT (7) (7) (6) (6) (7) (7) (7) (6) (3) (7) (6) (7) (7) (4) (7) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (7) (6) (7) (5) LAND, WATER AND WILDLIFE. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 6 6 2 14 16 2 4 6 9 11 7 6 13 13 2 4 14 4 7 7 7 1 11 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 1% 1% 4% 2% 2% 1% 1% 5% 2% 3% 1% 1% 4% 5% - - 4% 1% 3% 1% 1% - 7% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (8) (9) (9) *(7) (8) (8) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) (8) (9) (9) (8) (9) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) PART OF [STATE'S] ECONOMY. OUR PARKS, FORESTS, 19 7 7 - 12 15 4 3 6 10 13 2 - 17 6 13 5 14 4 7 7 9 2 7 MONUMENTS, AND WILDLIFE 2% 1% 1% - 2% 2% 2% - 5% 2% 4% - - 5% 3% 1% 1% 4% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 4% AREAS ARE AN ESSENTIAL (9) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) (9) (8) (8) (8) (9) (9) (8) (9) (8) (8) (9) (8) (9) (9) (8) (8) (9) PART OF [STATE'S] QUALITY OF LIFE.


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 51Table 11-1Summary of Impact of Regulations: % Very Positive BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 592 94 104 102 97 97 99 254 338 141 139 97 115 99 122 93 39 157 119 60 167 188 224 STATE 49% 47% 52% 51% 49% 48% 49% 44% 54% 59% 48% 45% 48% 46% 49% 42% 37% 56% 51% 54% 38% 54% 58% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 483 76 85 91 79 77 76 210 274 126 108 85 86 76 107 74 29 127 97 48 118 164 191 40% 38% 42% 45% 40% 38% 38% 36% 44% 52% 37% 40% 36% 35% 43% 34% 27% 45% 42% 43% 26% 47% 50% (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 390 69 62 55 68 75 62 174 217 80 94 55 89 70 75 57 42 99 88 28 117 119 144 OUTDOOR RECREATION 33% 35% 31% 28% 34% 38% 31% 30% 35% 33% 33% 29% 34% 33% 32% 27% 33% 34% 37% 32% 26% 34% 38% (3) (3) (4) (5) (4) (3) (5) (3) (3) (3) (3) (5) (4) (3) (4) (4) (2) (3) (5) (3) (4) (3) (4) PUBLIC SAFETY 376 63 63 63 69 58 75 160 215 73 88 77 71 67 72 55 33 90 92 33 118 110 142 31% 31% 31% 32% 35% 29% 38% 28% 34% 30% 31% 36% 30% 31% 29% 25% 32% 32% 40% 30% 27% 32% 37% (4) (5) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (5) (4) (5) (4) (3) (5) (4) (5) (5) (3) (4) (3) (4) (2) (4) (5) PUBLIC HEALTH 351 64 61 46 56 55 51 164 187 78 75 48 91 59 83 47 33 69 92 26 81 95 166 29% 32% 30% 23% 28% 28% 26% 28% 30% 32% 26% 25% 35% 27% 36% 22% 26% 24% 39% 29% 18% 27% 43% (5) (4) (5) (6) (6) (5) (6) (4) (5) (4) (5) (6) (3) (5) (3) (6) (5) (5) (4) (5) (6) (5) (3) OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 616 97 113 119 113 92 131 315 301 116 144 118 133 104 137 122 55 123 129 49 213 183 208 FISH 26% 24% 28% 30% 28% 23% 33% 27% 24% 24% 25% 29% 27% 24% 28% 28% 24% 21% 28% 25% 24% 26% 27% (6) (7) (6) (4) (5) (6) (4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (4) (6) (6) (6) (3) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) JOBS 469 101 52 85 78 72 64 205 264 93 105 86 98 87 90 74 41 108 110 46 154 119 190 20% 25% 13% 21% 19% 18% 16% 18% 21% 19% 18% 21% 20% 20% 19% 17% 18% 19% 24% 23% 17% 17% 25% (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 52Table 11-2Summary of Impact of Regulations: % Very Positive BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 592 431 151 83 204 227 23 60 75 92 101 87 74 150 78 87 101 86 97 127 137 153 31 STATE 49% 48% 54% 49% 45% 51% 38% 56% 32% 44% 51% 58% 56% 59% 44% 33% 58% 49% 57% 60% 39% 38% 47% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 483 339 137 83 156 183 27 56 53 64 88 76 67 124 49 67 90 74 92 99 104 115 19 40% 38% 49% 49% 35% 41% 44% 52% 23% 31% 44% 50% 51% 49% 28% 25% 52% 42% 54% 46% 30% 28% 29% (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (3) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 390 292 90 53 128 164 24 29 47 70 61 58 63 81 52 65 58 60 62 81 92 114 15 OUTDOOR RECREATION 33% 33% 32% 31% 30% 36% 36% 28% 22% 30% 31% 38% 41% 35% 27% 26% 33% 34% 40% 36% 27% 27% 26% (3) (3) (4) (5) (3) (3) (3) (5) (5) (4) (5) (3) (4) (5) (4) (3) (3) (3) (4) (5) (4) (3) (5) PUBLIC SAFETY 376 260 110 58 127 133 11 46 53 65 63 48 42 99 48 70 53 57 60 82 103 110 18 31% 29% 39% 34% 28% 30% 18% 43% 23% 31% 32% 31% 32% 39% 28% 26% 31% 33% 35% 38% 30% 27% 27% (4) (5) (3) (3) (4) (5) (7) (3) (2) (2) (3) (4) (5) (4) (3) (2) (4) (4) (5) (4) (3) (4) (4) PUBLIC HEALTH 351 263 82 45 114 149 23 22 36 45 58 37 66 101 34 47 50 45 65 101 57 76 14 29% 30% 29% 27% 26% 33% 35% 22% 17% 19% 29% 24% 42% 44% 18% 19% 28% 26% 41% 45% 16% 18% 24% (5) (4) (7) (7) (6) (4) (4) (7) (6) (6) (6) (5) (3) (3) (6) (6) (5) (6) (3) (3) (7) (6) (6) OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 616 442 169 95 237 205 42 54 99 114 124 58 90 118 96 116 88 94 72 135 167 199 38 FISH 26% 25% 30% 28% 27% 23% 33% 26% 22% 26% 31% 19% 31% 25% 26% 22% 25% 27% 22% 31% 24% 24% 31% (6) (6) (5) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (4) (5) (4) (6) (6) (7) (5) (5) (6) (5) (7) (6) (5) (5) (2) JOBS 469 299 167 107 136 162 42 65 75 80 66 53 64 127 61 93 54 65 81 109 128 147 20 20% 17% 29% 32% 15% 18% 33% 31% 17% 18% 17% 17% 22% 26% 17% 18% 15% 19% 25% 25% 18% 18% 16% (7) (7) (6) (4) (7) (7) (5) (4) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (7)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 53Table 11-3Summary of Impact of Regulations: % Very Positive BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 592 181 220 171 102 61 49 129 28 194 177 195 138 78 76 101 85 110 57 81 33 44 - 592 STATE 49% 38% 51% 67% 33% 49% 42% 60% 64% 57% 52% 49% 51% 43% 47% 55% 43% 53% 44% 58% 40% 46% - 49% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 483 134 182 150 77 39 38 116 18 172 158 146 115 60 77 81 61 86 52 64 18 41 - 483 40% 28% 42% 59% 24% 31% 32% 54% 41% 51% 46% 36% 43% 33% 48% 45% 31% 42% 40% 46% 22% 43% - 40% (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (3) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (5) (2) (2) OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 390 127 145 105 82 33 28 84 16 126 98 154 78 53 52 47 60 94 38 41 21 32 390 - OUTDOOR RECREATION 33% 25% 37% 39% 26% 27% 23% 39% 28% 40% 33% 39% 28% 25% 36% 31% 31% 47% 27% 29% 25% 26% 33% - (3) (4) (3) (5) (2) (5) (6) (3) (7) (4) (4) (2) (5) (5) (4) (5) (3) (2) (6) (5) (4) (4) (1) PUBLIC SAFETY 376 124 134 103 75 41 29 73 19 122 110 120 91 50 47 63 51 69 39 51 21 30 - 376 31% 26% 31% 40% 24% 33% 24% 34% 43% 36% 32% 30% 34% 28% 29% 34% 26% 34% 30% 37% 25% 31% - 31% (4) (3) (5) (4) (4) (2) (3) (4) (2) (5) (5) (4) (3) (3) (6) (4) (4) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) PUBLIC HEALTH 351 94 135 113 46 34 28 63 18 146 110 102 84 48 53 57 48 55 40 43 18 31 351 - 29% 19% 34% 42% 15% 29% 24% 30% 32% 46% 37% 26% 30% 23% 37% 38% 24% 27% 29% 31% 21% 25% 29% - (5) (6) (4) (3) (7) (4) (5) (5) (5) (3) (3) (5) (4) (6) (3) (3) (5) (5) (5) (4) (6) (5) (2) OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 616 241 217 135 148 60 57 113 33 173 174 183 150 100 96 78 87 96 80 71 47 53 272 344 FISH 26% 24% 26% 26% 23% 25% 24% 26% 33% 26% 27% 23% 27% 26% 31% 24% 22% 24% 29% 25% 28% 24% 23% 29% (6) (5) (6) (6) (5) (6) (4) (6) (4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (4) (5) (7) (6) (6) (4) (6) (2) (6) (3) (4) JOBS 469 173 149 131 104 50 40 70 29 157 154 125 119 65 71 83 48 76 59 60 24 41 225 244 20% 18% 18% 25% 16% 21% 17% 16% 29% 24% 24% 16% 22% 17% 23% 25% 12% 19% 22% 21% 14% 19% 19% 20% (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (4) (5)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 54Table 11-4Summary of Impact of Regulations: % Very Positive BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 592 108 439 72 88 188 345 418 143 241 212 135 105 346 168 422 48 128 189 98 83 57 48 110 STATE 49% 33% 55% 31% 47% 67% 42% 54% 38% 48% 49% 42% 42% 50% 44% 52% 59% 40% 48% 35% 58% 67% 79% 52% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 483 79 366 50 62 164 266 340 119 183 156 108 81 297 144 337 37 112 167 77 60 44 38 88 40% 24% 46% 22% 33% 59% 33% 44% 32% 36% 36% 33% 32% 43% 38% 41% 45% 35% 42% 27% 42% 51% 62% 41% (2) (5) (2) (5) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 390 92 272 63 38 120 241 278 107 132 119 98 85 253 102 286 21 91 133 68 44 45 34 57 OUTDOOR RECREATION 33% 25% 36% 25% 24% 38% 31% 36% 28% 30% 31% 31% 32% 34% 33% 33% 44% 32% 35% 24% 35% 46% 50% 26% (3) (3) (4) (2) (6) (5) (3) (4) (3) (5) (5) (4) (2) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (5) (5) PUBLIC SAFETY 376 80 267 57 58 113 224 281 78 164 135 96 67 209 134 240 37 103 126 68 47 34 31 63 31% 24% 34% 25% 31% 41% 28% 36% 21% 33% 31% 30% 27% 30% 35% 29% 45% 32% 32% 24% 33% 39% 50% 30% (4) (4) (5) (3) (3) (4) (4) (3) (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (5) (3) (4) (2) (4) (4) (4) (5) (5) (4) (3) PUBLIC HEALTH 351 58 276 33 39 156 175 245 101 92 85 62 54 248 89 258 18 82 108 41 51 44 39 60 29% 16% 36% 13% 24% 49% 22% 32% 26% 21% 22% 20% 21% 33% 28% 29% 38% 29% 28% 15% 41% 45% 58% 27% (5) (7) (3) (7) (5) (3) (6) (5) (4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (4) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (7) (3) (4) (3) (4) OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 616 175 399 113 89 177 379 439 156 308 266 204 162 302 195 419 47 158 187 128 80 49 55 99 FISH 26% 25% 26% 24% 25% 30% 24% 28% 20% 33% 33% 32% 32% 21% 28% 25% 36% 26% 24% 23% 30% 27% 43% 23% (6) (2) (6) (4) (4) (6) (5) (6) (6) (3) (3) (3) (4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) JOBS 469 112 320 86 58 155 269 331 115 185 161 117 94 279 132 335 31 109 166 90 60 41 42 64 20% 16% 21% 18% 16% 26% 17% 21% 15% 20% 20% 18% 18% 19% 19% 20% 24% 18% 21% 16% 23% 22% 32% 15% (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 55Table 11-5Summary of Impact of Regulations: % Very Positive BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 592 257 248 23 335 495 75 342 23 208 117 434 497 79 121 429 446 119 223 73 255 456 80 39 STATE 49% 51% 51% 50% 48% 52% 35% 63% 19% 42% 34% 57% 58% 25% 45% 52% 57% 34% 60% 32% 49% 56% 42% 26% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 483 214 206 19 269 408 53 296 18 151 85 365 402 71 92 361 368 95 193 58 199 364 67 33 40% 43% 43% 41% 39% 43% 25% 54% 15% 30% 25% 48% 47% 22% 34% 44% 47% 27% 52% 26% 38% 44% 35% 22% (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (3) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 390 175 166 22 213 312 69 238 13 131 63 304 322 62 72 303 293 75 146 67 158 313 39 27 OUTDOOR RECREATION 33% 36% 35% 47% 30% 34% 29% 41% 11% 28% 18% 41% 39% 19% 31% 35% 38% 21% 41% 24% 32% 38% 20% 18% (3) (3) (3) (2) (4) (3) (2) (3) (5) (3) (6) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (5) (4) (4) (3) (3) (5) (5) PUBLIC SAFETY 376 150 146 9 226 309 52 218 21 127 72 291 307 59 78 270 286 76 167 43 141 291 52 25 31% 30% 30% 19% 32% 33% 24% 40% 17% 26% 21% 38% 36% 18% 29% 33% 37% 22% 45% 19% 27% 36% 27% 17% (4) (5) (5) (7) (3) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (3) (3) (5) (5) (4) (3) (6) PUBLIC HEALTH 351 153 147 14 193 289 56 220 7 115 48 284 312 35 54 280 285 50 126 50 150 279 37 31 29% 31% 31% 30% 28% 31% 24% 38% 6% 24% 14% 38% 37% 10% 24% 32% 37% 14% 35% 18% 30% 34% 19% 20% (5) (4) (4) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) (7) (5) (4) (7) (7) (5) (4) (7) (5) (6) (4) (5) (7) (4) OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 616 263 255 33 351 499 96 339 48 219 137 436 478 128 150 424 427 147 228 123 232 450 84 63 FISH 26% 26% 27% 36% 25% 27% 21% 30% 20% 23% 20% 29% 28% 20% 30% 25% 27% 21% 31% 24% 23% 28% 21% 21% (6) (6) (6) (4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (1) (6) (4) (6) (6) (3) (4) (6) (6) (4) (6) (3) (6) (6) (4) (3) JOBS 469 185 178 23 284 404 55 276 25 144 124 319 372 90 122 318 332 112 205 71 159 354 74 31 20% 19% 19% 24% 20% 22% 12% 25% 10% 15% 18% 21% 22% 14% 24% 19% 21% 16% 28% 14% 16% 22% 19% 10% (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (5) (7) (7) (6) (6) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7)


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 56Table 12-1Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 864 140 148 145 140 145 137 379 485 183 232 160 143 143 188 137 54 227 167 90 280 265 304 STATE 72% 70% 74% 72% 70% 73% 69% 66% 78% 76% 80% 75% 60% 66% 75% 62% 51% 81% 72% 81% 63% 76% 79% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 953 156 161 159 152 161 156 432 521 199 248 169 171 164 205 157 69 241 184 94 317 293 326 79% 78% 81% 80% 76% 81% 78% 75% 83% 83% 86% 79% 72% 76% 83% 71% 66% 86% 79% 85% 71% 84% 85% TOTAL NEGATIVE 89 16 14 15 12 16 19 53 36 16 16 9 28 20 18 20 15 14 17 5 37 29 22 7% 8% 7% 7% 6% 8% 10% 9% 6% 7% 5% 4% 12% 9% 7% 9% 14% 5% 7% 4% 8% 8% 6% NO IMPACT 139 25 21 19 32 17 22 80 59 26 18 31 35 29 22 39 18 22 26 11 80 26 32 12% 13% 11% 10% 16% 9% 11% 14% 9% 11% 6% 14% 15% 13% 9% 18% 17% 8% 11% 10% 18% 7% 8% OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 709 105 124 122 121 122 125 281 428 163 175 144 110 114 137 103 41 202 151 74 183 217 297 ----------------- 59% 52% 62% 61% 60% 61% 63% 49% 68% 68% 61% 67% 46% 53% 55% 47% 39% 72% 65% 66% 41% 62% 77% TOTAL POSITIVE 863 136 146 144 145 152 152 378 486 187 208 164 154 147 173 141 62 222 177 85 268 267 314 72% 68% 73% 72% 73% 76% 76% 65% 78% 78% 72% 77% 64% 68% 70% 64% 59% 79% 76% 77% 60% 76% 82% TOTAL NEGATIVE 154 32 22 22 25 30 27 96 58 24 33 20 45 33 36 38 21 20 27 11 84 51 17 13% 16% 11% 11% 12% 15% 13% 17% 9% 10% 11% 10% 19% 15% 15% 17% 20% 7% 11% 10% 19% 15% 4% NO IMPACT 149 31 21 20 25 13 21 93 56 22 38 24 34 31 34 36 21 25 21 10 81 27 37 12% 16% 11% 10% 12% 7% 10% 16% 9% 9% 13% 11% 14% 14% 14% 16% 20% 9% 9% 9% 18% 8% 10% PUBLIC SAFETY 722 112 116 125 120 130 130 293 428 150 192 138 109 131 138 101 54 204 146 76 225 194 296 ----------- 60% 56% 58% 63% 60% 65% 65% 51% 69% 62% 67% 65% 45% 60% 55% 46% 52% 73% 63% 69% 51% 55% 77% TOTAL POSITIVE 845 135 137 140 143 147 145 373 472 175 218 152 149 149 172 134 67 221 168 82 280 236 318 70% 67% 69% 70% 71% 73% 73% 65% 76% 73% 76% 71% 62% 69% 69% 61% 63% 79% 72% 74% 63% 67% 83% TOTAL NEGATIVE 123 23 21 15 22 17 15 79 44 25 26 14 41 18 34 33 12 17 22 6 55 42 21 10% 11% 11% 8% 11% 8% 8% 14% 7% 10% 9% 6% 17% 8% 14% 15% 12% 6% 9% 5% 12% 12% 6% NO IMPACT 192 36 36 31 28 30 36 108 84 35 38 41 43 33 35 52 19 38 32 14 96 56 36 16% 18% 18% 15% 14% 15% 18% 19% 13% 15% 13% 19% 18% 15% 14% 24% 18% 14% 14% 13% 22% 16% 9% PUBLIC HEALTH 620 108 109 103 87 109 108 297 323 150 132 100 117 120 132 93 72 150 123 48 168 195 244 ----------- 52% 54% 54% 51% 43% 55% 54% 52% 52% 62% 46% 53% 45% 56% 57% 43% 56% 51% 52% 55% 38% 56% 64% TOTAL POSITIVE 786 135 137 127 115 138 132 374 412 176 174 122 165 145 162 127 86 188 161 59 259 224 288 66% 68% 68% 63% 57% 69% 66% 65% 66% 73% 61% 65% 63% 67% 69% 59% 67% 64% 68% 67% 59% 64% 75% TOTAL NEGATIVE 165 28 28 24 28 28 24 77 88 26 42 22 49 25 29 34 14 39 37 11 91 29 45 14% 14% 14% 12% 14% 14% 12% 13% 14% 11% 15% 12% 19% 11% 13% 16% 11% 13% 16% 12% 21% 8% 12% NO IMPACT 193 30 30 41 41 25 40 104 89 30 50 41 41 30 36 49 20 45 33 11 79 68 41 16% 15% 15% 21% 20% 13% 20% 18% 14% 13% 17% 22% 16% 14% 15% 23% 15% 15% 14% 12% 18% 19% 11% OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 517 95 74 83 91 108 82 226 291 103 109 82 110 111 85 75 66 127 116 45 128 173 203 OUTDOOR RECREATION 43% 47% 37% 42% 45% 54% 41% 39% 47% 43% 38% 43% 42% 52% 36% 35% 52% 43% 49% 51% 29% 49% 53% ------------------------ TOTAL POSITIVE 719 124 114 118 123 131 119 327 392 148 162 113 151 141 130 113 84 180 151 57 229 221 254 60% 62% 57% 59% 62% 65% 60% 57% 63% 62% 56% 60% 58% 65% 56% 53% 66% 61% 64% 65% 52% 63% 66% TOTAL NEGATIVE 201 29 41 34 32 23 37 101 101 46 52 31 42 29 45 38 17 53 35 12 101 48 51 17% 15% 20% 17% 16% 12% 18% 17% 16% 19% 18% 16% 16% 14% 19% 18% 13% 18% 15% 14% 23% 14% 13% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E SContinued

2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 57Table 12-1Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- NO IMPACT 238 41 40 41 38 40 39 129 108 42 57 41 62 35 51 57 21 48 46 14 96 65 71 20% 20% 20% 20% 19% 20% 20% 23% 17% 17% 20% 22% 24% 16% 22% 27% 17% 16% 20% 16% 22% 19% 19% OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 900 137 154 148 170 147 182 400 500 160 215 169 184 170 172 148 80 203 204 90 215 288 384 FISH 38% 34% 38% 37% 42% 37% 45% 35% 40% 33% 37% 42% 37% 39% 36% 34% 34% 35% 44% 45% 24% 41% 50% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 1330 208 227 229 237 223 248 637 693 257 309 235 277 247 266 238 132 300 274 115 443 410 453 55% 52% 57% 57% 59% 56% 62% 55% 56% 54% 54% 58% 55% 57% 55% 55% 57% 52% 59% 58% 50% 59% 59% TOTAL NEGATIVE 429 71 73 81 67 76 66 236 193 97 94 67 94 77 94 90 52 97 70 26 228 122 69 18% 18% 18% 20% 17% 19% 17% 20% 15% 20% 16% 17% 19% 18% 19% 21% 22% 17% 15% 13% 26% 17% 9% NO IMPACT 490 95 79 61 67 76 77 232 258 115 117 80 100 74 103 87 40 129 93 34 173 123 190 20% 24% 20% 15% 17% 19% 19% 20% 21% 24% 20% 20% 20% 17% 21% 20% 17% 23% 20% 17% 19% 18% 25% JOBS 391 63 58 55 56 97 47 104 287 115 67 71 63 74 56 38 11 126 95 63 10 104 272 -- 16% 16% 15% 14% 14% 24% 12% 9% 23% 24% 12% 18% 13% 17% 12% 9% 5% 22% 20% 32% 1% 15% 35% TOTAL POSITIVE 1121 186 176 191 184 211 186 500 621 246 244 202 223 203 209 195 96 281 230 107 361 317 424 47% 47% 44% 48% 46% 53% 47% 43% 50% 51% 42% 50% 45% 47% 43% 45% 41% 49% 49% 54% 41% 45% 55% TOTAL NEGATIVE 729 123 118 136 128 114 139 395 334 131 177 130 160 129 152 157 85 156 134 44 351 213 152 30% 31% 29% 34% 32% 28% 35% 34% 27% 27% 31% 32% 32% 30% 32% 36% 36% 27% 29% 22% 39% 30% 20% NO IMPACT 421 75 84 52 63 50 65 211 210 82 115 59 90 72 97 70 43 99 79 29 132 125 156 18% 19% 21% 13% 16% 12% 16% 18% 17% 17% 20% 15% 18% 17% 20% 16% 18% 17% 17% 15% 15% 18% 20%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 58Table 12-2Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 864 628 224 131 291 337 47 85 135 145 139 125 98 206 136 142 133 131 140 164 223 256 45 STATE 72% 70% 79% 78% 65% 76% 76% 79% 58% 69% 70% 83% 75% 81% 77% 53% 76% 75% 82% 77% 64% 63% 70% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 953 703 237 138 334 368 49 89 159 158 159 134 107 219 144 171 150 143 147 179 252 290 51 79% 78% 84% 82% 74% 83% 81% 83% 68% 75% 80% 89% 81% 87% 82% 64% 86% 82% 87% 84% 72% 72% 78% TOTAL NEGATIVE 89 75 13 7 43 31 3 4 24 13 20 9 9 13 8 29 16 12 7 15 28 34 5 7% 8% 5% 4% 10% 7% 4% 4% 10% 6% 10% 6% 7% 5% 5% 11% 9% 7% 4% 7% 8% 8% 8% NO IMPACT 139 102 31 23 64 38 9 14 45 35 18 8 15 16 19 59 8 18 16 15 62 70 7 12% 11% 11% 14% 14% 8% 15% 13% 19% 17% 9% 5% 12% 6% 11% 22% 5% 10% 9% 7% 18% 17% 11% OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 709 513 185 125 210 302 42 83 74 109 110 106 94 203 70 111 122 94 140 157 141 165 34 ----------------- 59% 57% 66% 74% 47% 68% 69% 78% 31% 52% 55% 70% 72% 80% 40% 42% 70% 54% 82% 74% 40% 41% 53% TOTAL POSITIVE 863 638 211 133 293 345 45 88 127 141 142 125 104 210 105 160 142 125 141 172 207 244 43 72% 71% 75% 79% 65% 77% 74% 82% 54% 67% 71% 83% 79% 83% 60% 60% 81% 71% 83% 81% 59% 60% 67% TOTAL NEGATIVE 154 125 26 7 82 43 3 4 53 31 32 19 10 7 35 49 20 31 1 15 66 78 9 13% 14% 9% 4% 18% 10% 5% 4% 23% 15% 16% 13% 7% 3% 20% 18% 11% 18% 1% 7% 19% 19% 14% NO IMPACT 149 105 39 26 67 38 12 14 50 31 23 4 16 21 29 52 9 18 19 17 63 69 12 12% 12% 14% 15% 15% 8% 19% 13% 21% 15% 12% 3% 12% 8% 16% 19% 5% 10% 11% 8% 18% 17% 18% PUBLIC SAFETY 722 523 190 132 230 293 42 90 101 124 105 89 89 207 105 119 101 93 134 162 177 207 38 ----------- 60% 58% 68% 78% 51% 66% 68% 84% 43% 59% 53% 59% 67% 82% 60% 45% 58% 53% 79% 76% 51% 51% 59% TOTAL POSITIVE 845 615 218 142 290 325 48 94 137 143 133 103 99 218 123 155 121 115 145 173 217 253 48 70% 69% 77% 84% 64% 73% 79% 88% 58% 68% 67% 68% 75% 86% 70% 58% 69% 66% 85% 81% 62% 62% 74% TOTAL NEGATIVE 123 92 28 10 60 32 6 4 36 19 28 14 11 11 19 36 20 22 10 11 39 46 10 10% 10% 10% 6% 13% 7% 10% 4% 15% 9% 14% 9% 8% 4% 11% 14% 11% 12% 6% 5% 11% 11% 16% NO IMPACT 192 157 28 14 90 67 5 8 56 40 29 27 21 15 29 66 29 27 15 20 81 93 5 16% 18% 10% 8% 20% 15% 9% 8% 24% 19% 14% 18% 16% 6% 16% 25% 17% 16% 9% 10% 23% 23% 8% PUBLIC HEALTH 620 474 132 89 213 261 48 41 77 91 113 82 103 141 84 84 98 95 97 146 126 161 24 ----------- 52% 53% 46% 53% 50% 57% 72% 40% 36% 39% 57% 54% 66% 62% 44% 33% 56% 55% 62% 66% 37% 39% 41% TOTAL POSITIVE 786 595 173 104 277 319 50 54 119 140 131 93 118 170 122 137 109 114 115 171 199 247 32 66% 67% 61% 62% 64% 70% 76% 54% 56% 61% 66% 61% 76% 75% 64% 54% 62% 66% 73% 77% 58% 59% 55% TOTAL NEGATIVE 165 121 41 16 63 58 2 13 42 49 19 11 16 29 38 53 11 18 19 24 73 86 8 14% 14% 14% 9% 15% 13% 3% 13% 20% 21% 9% 7% 10% 13% 20% 21% 6% 11% 12% 11% 21% 21% 14% NO IMPACT 193 128 61 39 74 54 12 27 43 35 40 27 18 23 24 54 36 31 20 22 62 71 14 16% 14% 21% 23% 17% 12% 19% 26% 20% 15% 20% 18% 12% 10% 13% 21% 21% 18% 13% 10% 18% 17% 25% OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 517 408 98 62 167 241 33 30 58 70 84 89 81 122 54 73 73 98 83 119 96 122 20 OUTDOOR RECREATION 43% 46% 34% 37% 39% 53% 50% 29% 27% 30% 42% 58% 52% 54% 29% 29% 42% 57% 53% 53% 28% 29% 34% ------------------------ TOTAL POSITIVE 719 542 160 96 239 304 44 53 101 127 117 103 104 151 101 128 104 115 103 149 179 219 28 60% 61% 56% 57% 55% 66% 66% 52% 48% 55% 59% 68% 67% 66% 53% 51% 59% 66% 66% 67% 52% 53% 48%

P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E SContinued

2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 59Table 12-2Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- TOTAL NEGATIVE 201 134 62 34 72 62 11 23 44 58 33 15 23 28 47 55 31 17 20 30 82 97 8 17% 15% 22% 20% 17% 14% 16% 23% 21% 25% 17% 10% 15% 12% 25% 22% 18% 10% 13% 13% 24% 23% 15% NO IMPACT 238 176 58 33 102 74 12 21 57 39 43 22 27 44 34 62 30 35 32 40 73 88 15 20% 20% 20% 20% 24% 16% 18% 21% 27% 17% 22% 14% 17% 20% 18% 25% 17% 20% 20% 18% 21% 21% 26% OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 900 659 231 140 287 371 64 77 91 124 174 114 137 247 98 117 129 160 145 235 166 209 31 FISH 38% 37% 41% 42% 33% 41% 50% 37% 20% 28% 44% 38% 47% 51% 27% 23% 37% 46% 44% 54% 24% 25% 25% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 1330 987 324 187 479 508 80 107 221 221 240 171 168 285 192 250 193 217 175 275 340 417 62 55% 55% 57% 56% 54% 56% 63% 51% 50% 50% 60% 56% 58% 59% 53% 48% 55% 62% 53% 63% 49% 51% 51% TOTAL NEGATIVE 429 328 93 47 192 136 16 30 131 97 66 57 31 38 94 133 64 57 30 40 175 208 32 18% 18% 16% 14% 22% 15% 13% 15% 29% 22% 17% 19% 11% 8% 26% 26% 18% 16% 9% 9% 25% 25% 26% NO IMPACT 490 361 116 79 178 182 31 48 84 89 76 48 72 118 66 103 69 55 94 95 141 156 21 20% 20% 20% 24% 20% 20% 24% 23% 19% 20% 19% 16% 25% 25% 18% 20% 20% 16% 29% 22% 20% 19% 17% JOBS 391 239 152 126 67 172 38 88 -3 13 34 70 79 193 9 2 52 53 118 150 -7 10 12 -- 16% 13% 27% 37% 8% 19% 30% 42% -1% 3% 9% 23% 27% 40% 3% - 15% 15% 36% 34% -1% 1% 10% TOTAL POSITIVE 1121 798 305 200 378 420 69 132 183 178 169 148 144 280 152 209 158 159 174 247 281 336 51 47% 45% 54% 60% 43% 47% 54% 63% 41% 40% 43% 49% 50% 58% 41% 40% 45% 46% 53% 56% 40% 41% 42% TOTAL NEGATIVE 729 559 152 74 311 248 31 44 185 165 135 78 65 88 142 207 107 105 56 97 288 326 39 30% 31% 27% 22% 35% 28% 24% 21% 41% 38% 34% 26% 22% 18% 39% 40% 31% 30% 17% 22% 42% 40% 32% NO IMPACT 421 321 89 44 156 165 23 22 67 65 70 55 71 85 58 74 56 67 80 75 98 124 20 18% 18% 16% 13% 18% 18% 18% 10% 15% 15% 18% 18% 25% 18% 16% 14% 16% 19% 25% 17% 14% 15% 17%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 60Table 12-3Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 864 284 335 218 181 94 70 178 31 272 242 300 213 105 105 137 139 161 93 121 40 65 - 864 STATE 72% 59% 77% 86% 58% 76% 59% 83% 70% 80% 70% 75% 79% 58% 65% 75% 71% 79% 71% 87% 48% 67% - 72% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 953 333 367 225 211 100 84 192 34 290 271 321 226 130 121 150 152 169 103 123 54 76 - 953 79% 69% 85% 88% 67% 81% 72% 89% 78% 86% 79% 80% 84% 73% 75% 82% 77% 83% 79% 89% 65% 79% - 79% TOTAL NEGATIVE 89 49 32 6 31 6 14 14 4 18 29 21 13 25 16 13 12 9 10 2 14 12 - 89 7% 10% 7% 2% 10% 5% 12% 7% 9% 5% 8% 5% 5% 14% 10% 7% 6% 4% 8% 2% 16% 12% - 7% NO IMPACT 139 86 31 21 61 17 17 9 6 26 43 49 26 20 24 19 25 24 15 11 15 5 - 139 12% 18% 7% 8% 20% 14% 15% 4% 13% 8% 12% 12% 10% 11% 15% 10% 13% 12% 11% 8% 17% 5% - 12% OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 709 185 305 199 110 73 47 156 26 269 214 243 159 88 82 132 100 143 70 90 27 61 - 709 ----------------- 59% 38% 70% 78% 35% 59% 39% 73% 60% 79% 62% 61% 59% 49% 51% 73% 51% 70% 53% 65% 32% 64% - 59% TOTAL POSITIVE 863 283 344 211 175 88 73 179 32 280 251 294 195 118 104 147 134 160 91 104 45 73 - 863 72% 59% 79% 83% 56% 71% 62% 83% 74% 82% 73% 73% 72% 66% 65% 81% 68% 78% 70% 75% 54% 76% - 72% TOTAL NEGATIVE 154 98 39 12 66 15 27 23 6 11 37 51 36 30 22 15 34 17 22 14 18 11 - 154 13% 20% 9% 5% 21% 12% 23% 11% 13% 3% 11% 13% 13% 17% 14% 8% 17% 8% 17% 10% 22% 12% - 13% NO IMPACT 149 89 37 22 66 14 15 11 4 33 44 45 34 25 30 14 26 19 17 17 18 7 - 149 12% 18% 8% 9% 21% 12% 13% 5% 9% 10% 13% 11% 13% 14% 19% 8% 13% 9% 13% 12% 21% 7% - 12% PUBLIC SAFETY 722 231 277 193 145 78 51 129 34 261 197 244 174 102 80 118 99 146 71 103 42 59 - 722 ----------- 60% 48% 64% 76% 46% 63% 44% 60% 77% 77% 57% 61% 64% 57% 49% 64% 50% 71% 54% 74% 51% 62% - 60% TOTAL POSITIVE 845 294 321 207 188 89 68 154 35 281 235 283 197 124 101 135 128 155 88 110 54 70 - 845 70% 61% 74% 81% 60% 71% 57% 72% 81% 83% 68% 71% 73% 69% 62% 74% 65% 76% 67% 79% 64% 73% - 70% TOTAL NEGATIVE 123 63 43 14 43 11 16 25 2 20 38 39 24 22 21 17 29 10 17 7 11 10 - 123 10% 13% 10% 6% 14% 9% 14% 12% 4% 6% 11% 10% 9% 12% 13% 9% 15% 5% 13% 5% 14% 11% - 10% NO IMPACT 192 104 57 27 75 19 23 32 5 32 61 66 40 23 36 26 33 33 23 17 14 9 - 192 16% 22% 13% 11% 24% 15% 20% 15% 11% 9% 18% 16% 15% 13% 22% 14% 17% 16% 17% 12% 17% 9% - 16% PUBLIC HEALTH 620 188 251 165 100 67 61 128 23 219 172 206 151 83 87 85 101 105 77 73 27 56 620 - ----------- 52% 38% 64% 62% 31% 55% 51% 59% 40% 69% 59% 52% 53% 40% 60% 57% 52% 52% 55% 52% 31% 46% 52% - TOTAL POSITIVE 786 279 295 193 170 87 70 145 34 252 214 258 183 121 109 105 126 132 88 95 47 73 786 - 66% 56% 75% 72% 53% 72% 59% 67% 59% 80% 73% 65% 65% 58% 75% 70% 64% 66% 62% 67% 55% 60% 66% - TOTAL NEGATIVE 165 91 44 28 71 21 9 17 11 34 42 51 32 38 22 20 25 27 10 22 20 18 165 - 14% 18% 11% 10% 22% 17% 8% 8% 19% 11% 14% 13% 11% 18% 15% 13% 13% 13% 7% 15% 24% 14% 14% - NO IMPACT 193 116 40 30 72 7 30 36 12 24 30 69 55 37 11 19 38 31 38 17 16 21 193 - 16% 23% 10% 11% 22% 6% 25% 17% 21% 7% 10% 17% 19% 18% 8% 13% 19% 16% 27% 12% 19% 17% 16% - OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 517 149 218 135 77 49 52 112 15 184 140 187 107 78 66 74 78 109 45 61 35 43 517 - OUTDOOR RECREATION 43% 30% 55% 50% 24% 41% 44% 52% 27% 58% 48% 47% 38% 37% 46% 49% 40% 54% 32% 43% 41% 35% 43% - ------------------------ TOTAL POSITIVE 719 256 271 173 156 70 67 145 28 223 188 247 161 114 94 94 108 139 73 88 49 65 719 - 60% 51% 69% 65% 49% 58% 57% 67% 49% 70% 64% 62% 57% 55% 65% 63% 55% 69% 52% 62% 57% 53% 60% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 61Table 12-3Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- TOTAL NEGATIVE 201 107 53 39 79 21 15 32 13 38 47 60 55 36 28 20 30 30 28 27 14 23 201 - 17% 21% 14% 14% 25% 17% 13% 15% 22% 12% 16% 15% 19% 17% 19% 13% 15% 15% 20% 19% 16% 19% 17% - NO IMPACT 238 121 64 41 71 25 32 30 16 49 55 76 57 46 22 33 49 26 33 24 23 24 238 - 20% 24% 16% 15% 22% 21% 27% 14% 28% 16% 19% 19% 20% 22% 15% 22% 25% 13% 23% 17% 27% 19% 20% - OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 900 202 419 252 102 112 62 206 36 345 269 256 236 134 121 148 109 147 113 124 56 78 400 500 FISH 38% 21% 51% 48% 16% 46% 26% 48% 36% 53% 42% 32% 43% 35% 39% 45% 28% 36% 42% 44% 33% 35% 33% 42% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 1330 469 525 299 292 146 116 272 54 396 375 415 322 208 181 194 197 218 161 161 92 116 618 711 55% 48% 64% 57% 46% 59% 49% 63% 54% 60% 59% 52% 59% 54% 59% 58% 50% 54% 60% 58% 54% 53% 52% 59% TOTAL NEGATIVE 429 267 106 47 190 34 54 67 17 51 106 159 86 74 60 46 88 71 49 37 35 39 218 211 18% 27% 13% 9% 30% 14% 23% 15% 17% 8% 17% 20% 16% 19% 20% 14% 23% 17% 18% 13% 21% 18% 18% 18% NO IMPACT 490 201 157 122 120 51 54 62 27 163 117 167 117 83 56 60 83 84 54 64 37 45 269 221 20% 20% 19% 23% 19% 21% 23% 14% 26% 25% 18% 21% 21% 21% 18% 18% 21% 21% 20% 23% 22% 21% 22% 18% JOBS 391 -59 208 227 -47 57 -12 110 8 260 150 109 104 19 31 119 26 82 47 57 -7 26 145 247 -- 16% -6% 25% 43% -7% 23% -5% 26% 8% 40% 24% 14% 19% 5% 10% 36% 7% 20% 17% 20% -4% 12% 12% 21% TOTAL POSITIVE 1121 379 416 295 239 117 90 213 48 371 321 349 273 165 133 188 155 194 137 136 66 98 519 602 47% 39% 50% 56% 38% 48% 38% 49% 47% 57% 50% 44% 50% 43% 43% 57% 40% 48% 50% 49% 39% 45% 43% 50% TOTAL NEGATIVE 729 438 209 68 286 61 102 102 40 111 171 241 169 146 101 70 129 112 90 79 74 72 374 355 30% 45% 25% 13% 45% 25% 43% 24% 40% 17% 27% 30% 31% 38% 33% 21% 33% 27% 33% 28% 44% 33% 31% 30% NO IMPACT 421 124 169 115 82 49 31 87 9 144 117 159 87 51 68 48 84 75 35 52 21 30 223 198 18% 13% 20% 22% 13% 20% 13% 20% 9% 22% 18% 20% 16% 13% 22% 15% 21% 18% 13% 19% 12% 14% 19% 16%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 62Table 12-4Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 864 159 640 116 142 235 551 581 245 345 306 210 172 510 246 617 65 196 295 154 111 74 52 162 STATE 72% 48% 81% 50% 75% 85% 68% 75% 65% 69% 71% 65% 68% 74% 64% 76% 79% 61% 75% 54% 78% 86% 86% 76% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 953 203 681 143 151 249 617 637 277 388 339 245 196 555 286 665 69 232 322 190 121 76 56 168 79% 62% 86% 62% 80% 89% 76% 82% 73% 78% 79% 76% 78% 80% 75% 82% 85% 72% 82% 67% 85% 89% 92% 79% TOTAL NEGATIVE 89 45 40 28 9 13 65 55 32 43 33 34 24 46 40 48 5 36 28 36 9 2 4 6 7% 14% 5% 12% 5% 5% 8% 7% 8% 9% 8% 11% 10% 7% 10% 6% 6% 11% 7% 13% 7% 3% 6% 3% NO IMPACT 139 69 66 51 26 14 117 69 65 62 52 38 28 77 50 90 7 48 38 51 10 5 1 34 12% 21% 8% 22% 14% 5% 14% 9% 17% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 13% 11% 8% 15% 10% 18% 7% 6% 2% 16% OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 709 96 576 72 105 228 416 504 180 265 240 147 121 440 216 491 55 165 274 95 97 62 48 121 ----------------- 59% 29% 73% 31% 56% 82% 51% 65% 48% 53% 56% 45% 48% 64% 56% 60% 67% 51% 69% 34% 68% 73% 78% 57% TOTAL POSITIVE 863 178 632 126 128 240 543 587 243 344 301 208 164 512 269 592 63 216 311 160 109 68 52 148 72% 54% 79% 55% 68% 86% 67% 76% 65% 69% 70% 64% 65% 74% 70% 73% 77% 67% 79% 57% 77% 79% 85% 70% TOTAL NEGATIVE 154 82 55 55 23 12 127 83 64 80 61 61 43 73 53 101 8 51 37 65 12 5 4 26 13% 25% 7% 24% 12% 4% 16% 11% 17% 16% 14% 19% 17% 11% 14% 12% 10% 16% 9% 23% 8% 6% 7% 12% NO IMPACT 149 58 86 44 32 21 118 78 63 66 58 47 40 83 52 97 8 47 41 52 13 11 5 26 12% 18% 11% 19% 17% 7% 15% 10% 17% 13% 14% 15% 16% 12% 14% 12% 10% 15% 10% 18% 9% 13% 8% 12% PUBLIC SAFETY 722 137 529 90 115 208 452 509 175 301 253 183 134 411 203 517 60 154 255 117 96 65 43 131 ----------- 60% 42% 66% 39% 61% 75% 56% 66% 47% 60% 59% 56% 53% 59% 53% 63% 73% 48% 65% 41% 68% 76% 70% 62% TOTAL POSITIVE 845 193 591 129 130 228 540 577 228 349 296 218 165 486 253 589 66 202 291 163 112 67 49 148 70% 59% 74% 56% 69% 82% 66% 74% 61% 70% 69% 67% 65% 70% 66% 72% 81% 63% 74% 57% 79% 79% 80% 70% TOTAL NEGATIVE 123 55 63 39 15 20 88 68 53 48 44 35 31 75 50 72 6 48 35 46 16 2 6 16 10% 17% 8% 17% 8% 7% 11% 9% 14% 10% 10% 11% 12% 11% 13% 9% 7% 15% 9% 16% 11% 3% 9% 8% NO IMPACT 192 70 113 56 37 25 156 103 82 86 74 59 47 106 60 132 8 55 54 64 12 13 7 41 16% 21% 14% 24% 20% 9% 19% 13% 22% 17% 17% 18% 19% 15% 16% 16% 10% 17% 14% 22% 8% 15% 11% 20% PUBLIC HEALTH 620 132 457 85 66 214 352 433 185 201 178 135 112 404 146 470 25 132 212 98 72 65 52 106 ----------- 52% 36% 60% 34% 40% 68% 45% 56% 48% 46% 46% 43% 43% 55% 46% 53% 52% 47% 56% 35% 58% 66% 77% 49% TOTAL POSITIVE 786 201 539 138 100 243 478 533 239 265 234 182 150 505 193 588 31 175 262 152 90 73 56 135 66% 55% 71% 55% 61% 77% 61% 69% 62% 60% 61% 58% 58% 68% 61% 67% 65% 62% 69% 54% 72% 75% 82% 62% TOTAL NEGATIVE 165 68 82 52 34 29 125 100 54 64 55 48 38 101 47 118 6 43 50 55 17 8 4 29 14% 19% 11% 21% 21% 9% 16% 13% 14% 15% 14% 15% 15% 14% 15% 13% 13% 15% 13% 20% 14% 8% 5% 13% NO IMPACT 193 85 100 55 22 32 150 108 78 93 81 71 59 99 57 136 9 49 57 61 8 15 8 43 16% 23% 13% 22% 13% 10% 19% 14% 20% 21% 21% 23% 23% 13% 18% 15% 18% 17% 15% 22% 7% 15% 12% 20% OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 517 99 400 64 47 155 329 375 139 137 138 84 85 370 130 386 25 118 181 69 64 54 52 81 OUTDOOR RECREATION 43% 27% 53% 25% 29% 49% 42% 48% 36% 31% 36% 27% 33% 50% 41% 44% 52% 42% 47% 25% 51% 55% 77% 37% ------------------------ TOTAL POSITIVE 719 184 496 122 84 205 461 491 214 247 226 168 147 460 186 530 34 167 244 134 82 69 57 115 60% 50% 65% 49% 52% 65% 59% 63% 55% 56% 59% 53% 56% 62% 59% 60% 71% 59% 64% 48% 66% 70% 84% 53% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E SContinued

2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 63Table 12-4Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- TOTAL NEGATIVE 201 85 97 58 37 50 132 116 74 111 88 84 62 90 57 145 9 49 63 65 19 14 4 34 17% 23% 13% 23% 23% 16% 17% 15% 19% 25% 23% 27% 24% 12% 18% 16% 19% 17% 17% 23% 15% 15% 6% 16% NO IMPACT 238 84 143 60 36 53 168 142 84 70 62 54 45 163 65 171 5 60 68 69 20 13 7 55 20% 23% 19% 24% 22% 17% 21% 18% 22% 16% 16% 17% 17% 22% 21% 19% 10% 21% 18% 25% 16% 13% 10% 25% OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 900 131 716 87 113 297 528 706 180 367 334 217 184 523 277 622 59 230 329 124 114 88 83 145 FISH 38% 19% 46% 18% 32% 50% 33% 46% 24% 39% 41% 34% 36% 37% 40% 37% 45% 38% 42% 22% 43% 48% 64% 34% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 1330 332 915 232 182 370 847 938 352 583 511 385 313 732 403 922 79 345 455 267 157 112 91 219 55% 48% 59% 48% 52% 62% 53% 61% 46% 62% 63% 60% 61% 51% 58% 54% 61% 57% 59% 47% 59% 61% 71% 51% TOTAL NEGATIVE 429 201 199 144 69 73 320 232 173 216 177 168 129 209 127 300 21 115 126 142 43 24 8 74 18% 29% 13% 30% 20% 12% 20% 15% 23% 23% 22% 26% 25% 15% 18% 18% 16% 19% 16% 25% 16% 13% 6% 17% NO IMPACT 490 123 342 80 83 114 343 281 193 120 108 72 60 365 127 363 19 110 156 126 52 36 30 90 20% 18% 22% 17% 24% 19% 21% 18% 25% 13% 13% 11% 12% 26% 18% 21% 15% 18% 20% 22% 19% 19% 23% 21% JOBS 391 -49 415 -21 27 246 99 359 23 96 84 33 22 285 69 319 24 44 172 -37 83 63 81 31 -- 16% -7% 27% -4% 8% 41% 6% 23% 3% 10% 10% 5% 4% 20% 10% 19% 18% 7% 22% -7% 31% 34% 63% 7% TOTAL POSITIVE 1121 269 778 192 144 340 685 767 313 436 378 284 227 671 303 814 61 255 384 215 150 102 90 166 47% 39% 50% 40% 41% 57% 43% 50% 41% 46% 46% 44% 44% 47% 43% 48% 47% 42% 50% 38% 56% 56% 70% 39% TOTAL NEGATIVE 729 317 363 213 117 94 585 408 290 340 294 251 205 386 234 495 37 211 212 252 66 39 8 135 30% 46% 23% 44% 33% 16% 37% 26% 38% 36% 36% 39% 40% 27% 34% 29% 28% 35% 27% 45% 25% 21% 6% 31% NO IMPACT 421 80 320 55 69 130 253 285 124 129 111 82 64 288 125 293 23 108 138 76 39 28 29 98 18% 12% 21% 11% 20% 22% 16% 18% 16% 14% 14% 13% 12% 20% 18% 17% 18% 18% 18% 14% 15% 15% 22% 23%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 64Table 12-5Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF OUR 864 382 368 39 482 720 110 460 33 341 157 631 707 141 164 625 637 180 309 109 375 658 129 59 STATE 72% 76% 76% 85% 69% 76% 51% 85% 27% 69% 46% 83% 83% 44% 61% 76% 81% 52% 83% 48% 73% 80% 67% 39% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 953 416 398 41 536 779 139 486 57 380 205 666 745 187 193 679 677 226 327 141 410 702 144 83 79% 83% 83% 88% 77% 83% 64% 89% 47% 77% 60% 88% 88% 59% 72% 82% 87% 65% 88% 63% 79% 86% 75% 55% TOTAL NEGATIVE 89 34 30 1 54 59 29 26 24 39 49 35 38 45 28 54 40 46 18 32 36 44 15 24 7% 7% 6% 3% 8% 6% 13% 5% 20% 8% 14% 5% 4% 14% 10% 7% 5% 13% 5% 14% 7% 5% 8% 16% NO IMPACT 139 50 50 4 89 92 42 23 37 69 80 47 56 80 43 84 55 69 24 45 64 65 33 37 12% 10% 10% 9% 13% 10% 19% 4% 31% 14% 23% 6% 7% 25% 16% 10% 7% 20% 7% 20% 12% 8% 17% 25% OUR QUALITY OF LIFE 709 318 301 31 392 601 78 421 11 253 91 560 635 59 140 521 562 109 273 68 317 573 95 24 ----------------- 59% 63% 62% 67% 56% 64% 36% 77% 9% 51% 26% 74% 75% 19% 52% 63% 72% 31% 73% 30% 61% 70% 49% 16% TOTAL POSITIVE 863 372 354 36 491 705 124 464 51 320 180 613 694 147 189 614 624 191 308 122 373 644 123 71 72% 74% 74% 79% 70% 75% 58% 85% 42% 65% 52% 81% 82% 46% 70% 74% 80% 55% 82% 55% 72% 79% 64% 47% TOTAL NEGATIVE 154 55 54 5 99 105 47 43 41 66 90 53 60 88 49 93 62 82 35 54 55 71 28 48 13% 11% 11% 12% 14% 11% 22% 8% 33% 13% 26% 7% 7% 28% 18% 11% 8% 24% 9% 24% 11% 9% 14% 32% NO IMPACT 149 59 56 4 90 104 40 28 24 90 64 70 69 76 26 104 73 67 22 43 75 79 37 28 12% 12% 12% 9% 13% 11% 18% 5% 20% 18% 19% 9% 8% 24% 10% 13% 9% 19% 6% 19% 14% 10% 19% 19% PUBLIC SAFETY 722 302 291 29 419 590 104 387 23 296 109 561 608 99 138 525 549 141 269 71 327 559 118 33 ----------- 60% 60% 60% 62% 60% 63% 48% 71% 19% 60% 32% 74% 71% 31% 51% 64% 70% 40% 72% 31% 63% 68% 61% 22% TOTAL POSITIVE 845 351 336 29 493 678 136 434 52 338 176 609 673 151 177 603 610 193 300 113 371 628 132 65 70% 70% 70% 63% 71% 72% 63% 80% 43% 69% 51% 80% 79% 48% 66% 73% 78% 56% 80% 50% 72% 77% 69% 43% TOTAL NEGATIVE 123 49 45 - 74 88 32 48 29 43 67 48 65 53 39 78 61 52 31 42 44 69 15 32 10% 10% 9% 1% 11% 9% 15% 9% 24% 9% 19% 6% 8% 17% 15% 9% 8% 15% 8% 19% 9% 8% 8% 21% NO IMPACT 192 87 84 11 106 142 44 51 37 93 91 78 91 96 46 124 92 84 28 64 86 98 41 44 16% 17% 17% 24% 15% 15% 21% 9% 30% 19% 27% 10% 11% 30% 17% 15% 12% 24% 8% 28% 17% 12% 21% 30% PUBLIC HEALTH 620 277 271 22 337 485 118 357 14 243 108 482 531 84 77 511 476 117 209 112 270 472 85 54 ----------- 52% 57% 58% 47% 48% 52% 50% 61% 12% 51% 30% 64% 64% 25% 33% 58% 62% 32% 58% 40% 55% 58% 43% 35% TOTAL POSITIVE 786 334 327 28 445 615 151 424 46 301 177 559 619 156 130 608 560 186 255 158 333 571 115 84 66% 68% 70% 61% 63% 66% 63% 73% 41% 63% 50% 75% 74% 47% 57% 69% 73% 52% 71% 57% 68% 70% 58% 55% TOTAL NEGATIVE 165 57 56 7 108 130 32 67 32 59 69 77 88 71 54 97 84 69 46 47 63 99 30 30 14% 12% 12% 15% 15% 14% 14% 11% 28% 12% 19% 10% 11% 21% 23% 11% 11% 19% 13% 17% 13% 12% 15% 20% NO IMPACT 193 78 69 9 116 141 50 72 32 87 102 87 93 97 39 136 95 91 45 64 79 106 49 35 16% 16% 15% 20% 16% 15% 21% 12% 28% 18% 29% 12% 11% 29% 17% 16% 12% 25% 13% 23% 16% 13% 24% 23% OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE IN 517 246 232 38 267 404 95 334 20 154 68 431 446 56 76 409 417 66 206 78 202 422 43 39 OUTDOOR RECREATION 43% 50% 49% 83% 38% 43% 40% 58% 18% 32% 19% 58% 53% 17% 33% 47% 54% 18% 57% 28% 41% 52% 22% 26% ------------------------


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 65Table 12-5Summary of Impact of Regulations: Ranked by % Total Positive BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- TOTAL POSITIVE 719 322 307 40 393 561 136 407 47 251 156 521 556 145 129 540 516 158 258 142 280 530 93 76 60% 66% 65% 86% 56% 60% 57% 70% 41% 53% 44% 70% 67% 43% 56% 62% 67% 44% 72% 51% 57% 65% 47% 49% TOTAL NEGATIVE 201 76 75 1 126 157 41 73 27 97 88 90 110 89 53 131 99 93 52 65 78 109 50 37 17% 15% 16% 3% 18% 17% 17% 13% 24% 20% 25% 12% 13% 27% 23% 15% 13% 26% 14% 23% 16% 13% 25% 24% NO IMPACT 238 76 74 5 159 181 54 86 35 113 97 122 142 92 39 176 125 104 42 65 118 142 54 39 20% 16% 16% 12% 23% 19% 23% 15% 31% 24% 27% 16% 17% 27% 17% 20% 16% 29% 12% 23% 24% 17% 27% 25% OPPORTUNITIES TO HUNT AND 900 385 371 44 514 754 112 581 -7 308 100 761 817 66 144 690 735 109 365 97 385 730 127 28 FISH 38% 39% 39% 48% 37% 40% 25% 52% -3% 32% 14% 51% 49% 10% 29% 41% 47% 15% 50% 19% 38% 45% 32% 9% ----------------------- TOTAL POSITIVE 1330 553 533 59 774 1060 227 719 83 494 312 934 1032 268 269 960 940 310 471 227 554 967 205 126 55% 56% 56% 64% 55% 57% 50% 64% 36% 51% 45% 62% 61% 41% 54% 56% 60% 44% 64% 45% 55% 59% 52% 41% TOTAL NEGATIVE 429 167 162 14 260 306 114 139 90 186 212 173 215 202 125 270 205 201 106 131 169 237 78 97 18% 17% 17% 15% 19% 16% 25% 12% 38% 19% 30% 11% 13% 31% 25% 16% 13% 28% 14% 26% 17% 15% 20% 32% NO IMPACT 490 209 197 19 279 388 89 195 50 228 147 306 331 153 80 375 303 165 116 123 227 321 91 69 20% 21% 21% 20% 20% 21% 20% 17% 21% 24% 21% 20% 20% 23% 16% 22% 20% 23% 16% 24% 22% 20% 23% 22% JOBS 391 181 158 30 208 428 -55 409 -93 45 -118 496 538 -145 34 361 488 -102 264 -94 185 471 14 -88 -- 16% 18% 17% 32% 15% 23% -12% 36% -40% 5% -17% 33% 32% -22% 7% 21% 31% -14% 36% -19% 18% 29% 4% -29% TOTAL POSITIVE 1121 471 444 55 647 937 147 632 54 392 250 798 896 204 228 818 813 253 419 174 462 842 168 91 47% 47% 47% 60% 46% 50% 32% 56% 23% 40% 36% 53% 53% 31% 46% 48% 52% 36% 57% 35% 46% 52% 43% 30% TOTAL NEGATIVE 729 289 286 26 439 509 202 222 146 348 369 302 358 349 195 458 324 355 155 268 277 371 153 179 30% 29% 30% 28% 31% 27% 44% 20% 63% 36% 53% 20% 21% 54% 39% 27% 21% 50% 21% 53% 27% 23% 39% 59% NO IMPACT 421 188 180 9 230 328 87 209 27 177 65 319 329 85 58 331 320 78 124 50 215 319 58 32 18% 19% 19% 10% 16% 17% 19% 19% 12% 18% 9% 21% 20% 13% 12% 19% 21% 11% 17% 10% 21% 20% 15% 11%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 66Table 13-1QUESTION 1:And, do you approve or disapprove of the job [NAME] is doing as Governor? Arizona - Jan Brewer Colorado - John Hickenlooper Montana - Brian Schweitzer New Mexico - Susana Martinez Utah - Gary Herbert Wyoming - Matt Mead BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (APPROVE - 723 10 190 164 136 201 265 378 346 146 165 120 127 160 174 122 81 138 124 79 512 175 20 DISAPPROVE) 30% 3% 48% 41% 34% 50% 66% 33% 28% 30% 29% 30% 25% 37% 36% 28% 35% 24% 27% 40% 58% 25% 3% TOTAL APPROVE 1415 189 266 259 245 270 308 705 711 268 338 248 290 265 295 266 142 311 271 123 648 385 358------------- 59% 47% 67% 65% 61% 68% 77% 61% 57% 56% 59% 62% 58% 61% 61% 61% 61% 54% 58% 62% 73% 55% 47% TOTAL DISAPPROVE 692 179 76 96 108 70 42 327 365 122 173 128 162 105 122 144 61 173 147 44 136 210 338---------------- 29% 45% 19% 24% 27% 17% 11% 28% 29% 25% 30% 32% 33% 24% 25% 33% 26% 30% 31% 22% 15% 30% 44% STRONGLY APPROVE 582 75 101 143 136 91 137 278 303 88 132 102 128 131 106 105 68 114 126 63 262 141 169 24% 19% 25% 36% 34% 23% 34% 24% 24% 18% 23% 25% 26% 30% 22% 24% 29% 20% 27% 32% 30% 20% 22% SOMEWHAT APPROVE 834 114 165 116 108 179 171 427 407 180 206 146 161 134 189 162 74 197 145 60 386 244 188 35% 28% 41% 29% 27% 45% 43% 37% 33% 38% 36% 36% 32% 31% 39% 37% 32% 34% 31% 30% 43% 35% 25% SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 317 73 45 46 51 35 32 145 172 66 76 54 63 58 56 50 38 85 67 20 77 105 131 13% 18% 11% 12% 13% 9% 8% 13% 14% 14% 13% 13% 13% 14% 12% 12% 16% 15% 14% 10% 9% 15% 17% STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 375 106 31 50 57 35 10 183 193 57 97 74 99 47 66 93 23 88 80 24 59 105 206 16% 26% 8% 12% 14% 9% 3% 16% 15% 12% 17% 18% 20% 11% 14% 22% 10% 15% 17% 12% 7% 15% 27% DON'T KNOW 257 30 52 35 43 49 42 105 152 82 59 24 41 51 60 19 27 81 46 24 88 95 66 11% 8% 13% 9% 11% 12% 11% 9% 12% 17% 10% 6% 8% 12% 12% 4% 11% 14% 10% 12% 10% 13% 9% REFUSED 36 3 6 10 4 11 8 15 21 8 6 3 6 11 5 5 4 8 3 8 16 11 6 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 4% 2% 2% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 67Table 13-2QUESTION 1:And, do you approve or disapprove of the job [NAME] is doing as Governor? Arizona - Jan Brewer Colorado - John Hickenlooper Montana - Brian Schweitzer New Mexico - Susana Martinez Utah - Gary Herbert Wyoming - Matt Mead BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (APPROVE - 723 613 94 32 325 288 14 18 271 241 112 63 -10 30 221 288 81 94 5 13 395 462 78 DISAPPROVE) 30% 34% 17% 10% 37% 32% 11% 9% 61% 55% 28% 21% -3% 6% 60% 55% 23% 27% 1% 3% 57% 56% 64% TOTAL APPROVE 1415 1092 295 161 559 533 60 101 334 314 230 155 130 228 263 382 190 195 147 208 507 592 93------------- 59% 61% 52% 48% 63% 59% 47% 48% 75% 71% 58% 51% 45% 47% 72% 74% 54% 56% 45% 48% 73% 72% 76% TOTAL DISAPPROVE 692 479 201 129 234 245 46 83 63 73 118 92 140 198 42 94 109 101 142 194 112 130 15---------------- 29% 27% 35% 38% 27% 27% 36% 40% 14% 16% 30% 30% 49% 41% 11% 18% 31% 29% 43% 45% 16% 16% 12% STRONGLY APPROVE 582 437 132 67 212 225 17 50 129 133 85 56 58 111 99 163 58 83 59 111 232 256 31 24% 25% 23% 20% 24% 25% 13% 24% 29% 30% 21% 18% 20% 23% 27% 31% 17% 24% 18% 25% 34% 31% 25% SOMEWHAT APPROVE 834 654 163 94 346 308 43 51 205 181 144 100 72 117 163 220 131 112 88 97 274 336 62 35% 37% 29% 28% 39% 34% 34% 24% 46% 41% 36% 33% 25% 24% 45% 42% 37% 32% 27% 22% 40% 41% 50% SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 317 221 92 56 112 108 14 42 36 40 57 48 49 82 19 58 55 50 67 64 58 71 8 13% 12% 16% 17% 13% 12% 11% 20% 8% 9% 14% 16% 17% 17% 5% 11% 16% 14% 21% 15% 8% 9% 7% STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 375 258 109 73 121 136 32 41 27 32 61 44 90 116 22 37 54 51 75 130 54 59 6 16% 14% 19% 22% 14% 15% 25% 20% 6% 7% 15% 15% 31% 24% 6% 7% 15% 15% 23% 30% 8% 7% 5% DON'T KNOW 257 187 67 45 79 108 19 25 41 47 45 49 17 50 55 33 45 49 38 29 67 89 8 11% 10% 12% 13% 9% 12% 15% 12% 9% 11% 11% 16% 6% 10% 15% 6% 13% 14% 12% 7% 10% 11% 7% REFUSED 36 27 4 2 10 17 2 - 8 7 4 7 2 5 6 10 7 3 - 6 8 11 7 1% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 1% - 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 68Table 13-3QUESTION 1:And, do you approve or disapprove of the job [NAME] is doing as Governor? Arizona - Jan Brewer Colorado - John Hickenlooper Montana - Brian Schweitzer New Mexico - Susana Martinez Utah - Gary Herbert Wyoming - Matt Mead BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (APPROVE - 723 457 249 3 367 140 73 95 13 14 120 229 219 146 53 67 125 105 122 97 75 71 369 354 DISAPPROVE) 30% 47% 30% 1% 58% 57% 31% 22% 12% 2% 19% 29% 40% 38% 17% 20% 32% 26% 45% 35% 45% 32% 31% 29% TOTAL APPROVE 1415 668 486 230 472 171 136 233 51 304 342 472 346 242 163 179 241 230 183 164 111 131 715 701------------- 59% 68% 59% 44% 75% 70% 58% 54% 51% 46% 54% 59% 63% 62% 53% 54% 61% 57% 67% 59% 66% 60% 60% 58% TOTAL DISAPPROVE 692 210 236 227 105 31 63 138 39 290 221 242 127 96 110 112 117 126 60 67 36 60 345 347---------------- 29% 21% 29% 43% 17% 12% 27% 32% 38% 44% 35% 30% 23% 25% 36% 34% 30% 31% 22% 24% 21% 28% 29% 29% STRONGLY APPROVE 582 274 199 94 189 68 57 78 26 143 157 183 133 104 76 81 82 101 69 64 48 56 280 301 24% 28% 24% 18% 30% 28% 24% 18% 25% 22% 25% 23% 24% 27% 25% 24% 21% 25% 26% 23% 28% 26% 23% 25% SOMEWHAT APPROVE 834 394 287 137 283 102 79 155 26 161 185 288 213 139 87 98 159 130 113 100 63 76 434 400 35% 40% 35% 26% 45% 42% 33% 36% 26% 25% 29% 36% 39% 36% 28% 30% 40% 32% 42% 36% 37% 35% 36% 33% SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 317 105 128 77 59 18 33 69 13 116 79 117 69 50 35 44 52 65 39 30 18 32 163 154 13% 11% 15% 15% 9% 7% 14% 16% 13% 18% 12% 15% 13% 13% 11% 13% 13% 16% 14% 11% 10% 15% 14% 13% STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 375 106 108 149 47 12 30 70 26 174 142 125 58 46 75 67 65 60 21 36 18 28 183 193 16% 11% 13% 29% 7% 5% 13% 16% 26% 27% 22% 16% 10% 12% 24% 20% 16% 15% 8% 13% 11% 13% 15% 16% DON'T KNOW 257 92 92 58 45 38 35 52 10 56 68 70 72 43 31 37 30 40 25 47 18 25 117 140 11% 9% 11% 11% 7% 16% 15% 12% 10% 8% 11% 9% 13% 11% 10% 11% 8% 10% 9% 17% 11% 11% 10% 12% REFUSED 36 12 12 7 9 6 2 7 1 6 6 15 5 6 2 4 5 10 3 2 4 2 21 15 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 69Table 13-4QUESTION 1:And, do you approve or disapprove of the job [NAME] is doing as Governor? Arizona - Jan Brewer Colorado - John Hickenlooper Montana - Brian Schweitzer New Mexico - Susana Martinez Utah - Gary Herbert Wyoming - Matt Mead BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (APPROVE - 723 374 322 289 207 28 642 430 242 314 262 226 173 394 241 476 39 213 264 285 38 25 -10 101 DISAPPROVE) 30% 54% 21% 60% 59% 5% 40% 28% 32% 33% 32% 35% 34% 27% 35% 28% 30% 35% 34% 51% 14% 14% -8% 23% TOTAL APPROVE 1415 498 855 365 259 286 1034 887 469 575 490 401 316 821 437 972 79 380 485 396 134 94 55 219------------- 59% 72% 55% 76% 74% 48% 65% 57% 61% 61% 60% 63% 61% 57% 63% 57% 61% 63% 62% 70% 50% 51% 42% 51% TOTAL DISAPPROVE 692 124 533 76 52 258 392 457 227 261 229 175 143 428 196 496 41 167 221 111 96 69 65 118---------------- 29% 18% 34% 16% 15% 43% 25% 30% 30% 28% 28% 27% 28% 30% 28% 29% 31% 28% 28% 20% 36% 38% 50% 28% STRONGLY APPROVE 582 221 339 157 96 113 434 372 187 232 197 170 135 339 194 385 35 174 203 173 60 35 20 70 24% 32% 22% 33% 27% 19% 27% 24% 24% 25% 24% 27% 26% 24% 28% 23% 26% 29% 26% 31% 23% 19% 15% 16% SOMEWHAT APPROVE 834 276 517 208 163 173 600 515 282 344 293 230 180 482 244 587 45 206 281 223 73 58 35 149 35% 40% 33% 43% 47% 29% 38% 33% 37% 37% 36% 36% 35% 34% 35% 35% 35% 34% 36% 40% 28% 32% 27% 35% SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 317 80 219 45 29 84 214 200 115 120 105 83 68 197 91 225 21 74 95 74 39 17 27 57 13% 11% 14% 9% 8% 14% 13% 13% 15% 13% 13% 13% 13% 14% 13% 13% 16% 12% 12% 13% 15% 9% 21% 13% STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 375 44 315 31 23 174 178 257 112 141 124 92 75 230 105 270 20 93 126 37 56 52 38 62 16% 6% 20% 6% 6% 29% 11% 17% 15% 15% 15% 14% 15% 16% 15% 16% 15% 15% 16% 7% 21% 28% 30% 14% DON'T KNOW 257 65 143 34 33 44 146 177 61 95 88 58 51 157 56 201 10 49 56 49 35 18 7 87 11% 9% 9% 7% 9% 7% 9% 11% 8% 10% 11% 9% 10% 11% 8% 12% 7% 8% 7% 9% 13% 10% 5% 20% REFUSED 36 8 23 7 8 6 26 28 6 9 8 5 4 27 9 27 - 9 14 7 2 3 2 6 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 70Table 13-5QUESTION 1:And, do you approve or disapprove of the job [NAME] is doing as Governor? Arizona - Jan Brewer Colorado - John Hickenlooper Montana - Brian Schweitzer New Mexico - Susana Martinez Utah - Gary Herbert Wyoming - Matt Mead BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (APPROVE - 723 293 296 16 427 555 151 180 69 452 290 365 380 313 224 403 313 345 93 191 375 384 183 126 DISAPPROVE) 30% 30% 31% 17% 31% 30% 33% 16% 30% 47% 41% 24% 23% 48% 45% 24% 20% 49% 13% 38% 37% 24% 47% 41% TOTAL APPROVE 1415 581 566 48 829 1103 276 586 138 657 460 845 925 452 331 952 830 496 372 318 636 911 266 197------------- 59% 59% 60% 52% 59% 59% 61% 52% 59% 68% 66% 56% 55% 69% 66% 56% 53% 70% 51% 63% 63% 56% 68% 64% TOTAL DISAPPROVE 692 288 270 33 402 548 125 405 68 204 170 480 546 139 107 549 517 152 279 127 261 527 83 70---------------- 29% 29% 28% 35% 29% 29% 28% 36% 29% 21% 24% 32% 32% 21% 21% 32% 33% 21% 38% 25% 26% 32% 21% 23% STRONGLY APPROVE 582 234 231 14 344 463 102 227 52 287 193 345 370 193 138 379 318 225 168 133 246 364 111 83 24% 24% 24% 15% 25% 25% 23% 20% 22% 30% 28% 23% 22% 30% 28% 22% 20% 32% 23% 26% 24% 22% 28% 27% SOMEWHAT APPROVE 834 347 335 34 485 640 174 358 86 369 267 500 556 259 192 573 512 271 204 185 390 547 154 114 35% 35% 35% 37% 35% 34% 38% 32% 37% 38% 38% 33% 33% 40% 39% 34% 33% 38% 28% 37% 39% 33% 39% 37% SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 317 125 112 15 189 241 73 168 32 113 92 209 238 78 59 240 210 96 125 74 111 227 44 40 13% 13% 12% 16% 14% 13% 16% 15% 14% 12% 13% 14% 14% 12% 12% 14% 13% 13% 17% 15% 11% 14% 11% 13% STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 375 163 158 18 212 307 52 237 36 91 78 271 308 61 48 309 308 56 154 53 150 300 38 30 16% 16% 17% 19% 15% 16% 11% 21% 16% 9% 11% 18% 18% 9% 10% 18% 20% 8% 21% 11% 15% 18% 10% 10% DON'T KNOW 257 107 100 11 149 198 44 121 20 99 62 155 190 52 54 176 185 51 73 51 96 174 39 32 11% 11% 11% 12% 11% 11% 10% 11% 9% 10% 9% 10% 11% 8% 11% 10% 12% 7% 10% 10% 10% 11% 10% 11% REFUSED 36 15 15 - 20 26 9 13 8 10 7 27 24 8 7 24 22 11 10 8 16 22 5 5 1% 2% 2% - 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 71Table 14-1QUESTION M1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Denny Rehberg, Republican and John Tester, Democrat? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 - - 400 - - - 192 208 82 86 67 84 80 86 69 36 82 82 44 112 184 96 100% - - 100% - - - 48% 52% 21% 21% 17% 21% 20% 22% 17% 9% 20% 21% 11% 28% 46% 24% **D/S (REHBERG - TESTER) 15 - - 15 - - - 19 -5 -1 3 21 -3 -6 -4 18 4 6 - -11 87 -6 -68 4% - - 4% - - - 10% -2% -1% 4% 32% -3% -8% -5% 26% 12% 7% - -24% 77% -3% -71% TOTAL REHBERG 186 - - 186 - - - 95 91 35 41 41 34 33 38 38 18 38 37 15 95 76 11------------- 46% - - 46% - - - 50% 44% 43% 48% 61% 41% 42% 44% 56% 50% 47% 45% 35% 85% 41% 12% TOTAL TESTER 171 - - 171 - - - 76 95 37 38 20 37 40 42 20 14 33 37 26 9 82 79------------ 43% - - 43% - - - 40% 46% 45% 44% 29% 44% 50% 49% 29% 38% 40% 44% 59% 8% 45% 82% DEFINITELY REHBERG 134 - - 134 - - - 74 60 24 30 27 27 26 28 32 14 25 23 12 77 50 5 34% - - 34% - - - 39% 29% 29% 35% 41% 32% 32% 33% 46% 38% 31% 28% 27% 69% 27% 5% PROBABLY REHBERG 51 - - 51 - - - 21 31 12 11 13 7 8 9 7 4 13 14 4 18 27 7 13% - - 13% - - - 11% 15% 14% 13% 20% 8% 10% 11% 10% 12% 16% 17% 8% 16% 14% 7% PROBABLY TESTER 51 - - 51 - - - 29 22 9 19 10 8 5 20 6 3 8 12 2 6 27 18 13% - - 13% - - - 15% 11% 11% 22% 14% 10% 6% 23% 8% 9% 10% 15% 4% 5% 14% 19% DEFINITELY TESTER 120 - - 120 - - - 47 73 27 19 10 29 35 22 14 10 24 25 24 3 56 61 30% - - 30% - - - 25% 35% 33% 22% 15% 35% 43% 26% 21% 29% 30% 30% 55% 2% 30% 64% UNDECIDED 36 - - 36 - - - 17 18 8 7 5 10 6 5 9 3 10 6 3 8 23 4 9% - - 9% - - - 9% 9% 9% 8% 8% 12% 7% 6% 13% 9% 12% 8% 6% 7% 12% 4% REFUSED 7 - - 7 - - - 4 4 2 - 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 3 - - 3 2 2% - - 2% - - - 2% 2% 3% - 2% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 3% - - 1% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 72Table 14-2QUESTION M1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Denny Rehberg, Republican and John Tester, Democrat? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 362 34 2 165 197 2 - 52 60 101 83 33 63 44 68 85 98 36 60 199 234 59 100% 91% 8% - 41% 49% - - 13% 15% 25% 21% 8% 16% 11% 17% 21% 25% 9% 15% 50% 58% 15% **D/S (REHBERG - TESTER) 15 25 -10 1 29 -4 1 - 45 42 -2 -3 -24 -44 32 55 -10 3 -21 -47 64 78 2 4% 7% -30% 59% 18% -2% 59% - 86% 70% -2% -4% -73% -70% 71% 82% -11% 3% -57% -79% 32% 33% 4% TOTAL REHBERG 186 174 10 1 88 86 1 - 47 48 42 34 3 8 36 59 33 42 6 5 123 145 26------------- 46% 48% 30% 59% 53% 44% 59% - 90% 81% 42% 41% 10% 12% 82% 88% 39% 43% 17% 9% 62% 62% 44% TOTAL TESTER 171 149 20 - 59 90 - - 2 6 45 37 28 52 5 4 43 39 27 52 59 66 24------------ 43% 41% 60% - 36% 46% - - 4% 11% 44% 45% 82% 83% 11% 6% 50% 40% 74% 88% 29% 28% 40% DEFINITELY REHBERG 134 124 8 1 68 56 1 - 40 37 31 19 1 3 27 50 23 26 3 2 98 113 12 34% 34% 24% 59% 41% 29% 59% - 76% 62% 31% 22% 4% 5% 60% 75% 27% 26% 8% 3% 49% 49% 21% PROBABLY REHBERG 51 50 2 - 20 30 - - 7 11 11 15 2 4 10 9 10 16 3 3 25 31 14 13% 14% 5% - 12% 15% - - 14% 18% 11% 18% 6% 7% 22% 13% 12% 17% 9% 5% 13% 13% 23% PROBABLY TESTER 51 40 9 - 20 20 - - 2 4 20 6 7 12 4 2 16 11 8 10 24 28 4 13% 11% 26% - 12% 10% - - 3% 7% 20% 8% 20% 18% 8% 4% 19% 11% 23% 16% 12% 12% 7% DEFINITELY TESTER 120 109 12 - 39 70 - - 1 2 25 31 21 40 1 2 27 28 18 43 35 38 19 30% 30% 34% - 24% 35% - - 1% 3% 24% 37% 62% 64% 2% 2% 32% 29% 51% 71% 18% 16% 33% UNDECIDED 36 32 4 1 14 18 1 - 3 5 13 10 2 2 3 4 9 14 2 2 16 21 8 9% 9% 11% 41% 9% 9% 41% - 5% 9% 12% 13% 6% 3% 8% 7% 11% 14% 6% 3% 8% 9% 14% REFUSED 7 7 - - 4 4 - - - - 1 2 1 1 - - - 3 1 1 2 2 1 2% 2% - - 2% 2% - - - - 1% 2% 2% 2% - - - 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 73Table 14-3QUESTION M1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Denny Rehberg, Republican and John Tester, Democrat? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 169 152 67 83 29 67 107 16 80 36 45 161 155 17 19 16 29 79 82 78 77 200 200 100% 42% 38% 17% 21% 7% 17% 27% 4% 20% 9% 11% 40% 39% 4% 5% 4% 7% 20% 20% 20% 19% 50% 50% **D/S (REHBERG - TESTER) 15 90 -38 -33 67 20 30 -33 -10 -58 -17 -7 13 24 -8 -8 -6 -1 9 3 23 1 2 13 4% 53% -25% -49% 80% 69% 46% -31% -62% -73% -46% -15% 8% 16% -50% -43% -36% -3% 12% 4% 30% 1% 1% 6% TOTAL REHBERG 186 123 48 13 73 23 44 30 3 9 9 16 80 80 3 5 4 11 41 40 46 34 89 97------------- 46% 73% 32% 19% 88% 78% 67% 28% 16% 11% 24% 35% 50% 52% 19% 29% 26% 39% 52% 49% 59% 44% 45% 48% TOTAL TESTER 171 33 86 46 6 3 14 63 12 67 25 22 68 56 12 14 10 12 31 37 23 33 87 84------------ 43% 19% 57% 68% 7% 9% 21% 59% 78% 83% 70% 50% 42% 36% 69% 71% 62% 42% 40% 45% 29% 43% 44% 42% DEFINITELY REHBERG 134 96 28 8 62 15 31 17 1 3 7 9 64 53 3 4 3 6 32 32 35 18 66 69 34% 57% 18% 12% 74% 53% 46% 16% 7% 4% 19% 21% 40% 34% 19% 19% 19% 22% 41% 39% 44% 24% 33% 34% PROBABLY REHBERG 51 26 20 5 11 7 14 13 1 5 2 6 16 27 - 2 1 5 8 8 11 16 24 28 13% 16% 13% 7% 13% 25% 21% 12% 9% 7% 5% 14% 10% 18% - 10% 7% 18% 10% 10% 15% 20% 12% 14% PROBABLY TESTER 51 15 25 7 3 3 5 18 6 12 6 8 18 19 3 3 5 3 8 10 12 7 24 27 13% 9% 17% 10% 4% 9% 7% 17% 41% 15% 16% 18% 11% 12% 20% 14% 32% 10% 11% 12% 15% 9% 12% 14% DEFINITELY TESTER 120 18 61 39 3 - 9 45 6 55 19 14 49 37 8 11 5 9 23 27 11 26 64 56 30% 10% 40% 58% 3% - 14% 42% 37% 69% 54% 32% 31% 24% 50% 58% 31% 32% 29% 33% 14% 34% 32% 28% UNDECIDED 36 13 17 4 4 4 7 14 1 3 1 5 11 18 1 - 1 4 6 5 9 9 16 19 9% 7% 11% 5% 5% 12% 11% 13% 6% 4% 2% 11% 7% 12% 4% - 6% 14% 8% 6% 12% 11% 8% 10% REFUSED 7 1 - 5 - - 1 1 - 2 1 2 2 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 - 1 7 1 2% - - 7% - - 1% 1% - 2% 3% 5% 1% 1% 7% - 6% 4% 1% 1% - 1% 3% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 74Table 14-4QUESTION M1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Denny Rehberg, Republican and John Tester, Democrat? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 115 262 66 40 82 280 280 102 231 211 196 175 169 126 274 29 103 116 98 54 27 20 74 100% 29% 65% 17% 10% 21% 70% 70% 25% 58% 53% 49% 44% 42% 32% 68% 7% 26% 29% 25% 13% 7% 5% 19% **D/S (REHBERG - TESTER) 15 83 -75 59 25 -44 63 4 10 29 24 32 27 -15 13 2 6 8 -18 63 -8 -12 -11 5 4% 72% -29% 89% 62% -54% 22% 1% 10% 13% 11% 17% 16% -9% 10% 1% 21% 8% -16% 64% -15% -45% -54% 7% TOTAL REHBERG 186 93 79 62 29 14 159 129 49 119 106 104 91 67 63 123 16 50 41 77 21 7 4 33------------- 46% 81% 30% 94% 73% 18% 57% 46% 49% 51% 50% 53% 52% 40% 49% 45% 55% 48% 35% 79% 39% 24% 20% 45% TOTAL TESTER 171 11 154 3 5 59 97 125 39 89 82 72 64 82 50 122 10 42 59 14 29 19 15 28------------ 43% 9% 59% 5% 11% 71% 35% 44% 38% 39% 39% 37% 37% 48% 39% 44% 34% 40% 51% 14% 55% 69% 75% 38% DEFINITELY REHBERG 134 76 49 52 22 8 118 98 33 90 82 79 72 45 48 86 12 39 32 61 12 3 1 23 34% 66% 19% 79% 54% 9% 42% 35% 32% 39% 39% 40% 41% 26% 38% 31% 43% 38% 28% 62% 23% 11% 5% 31% PROBABLY REHBERG 51 18 30 10 8 7 41 30 17 29 24 25 20 23 14 37 3 11 8 16 9 3 3 10 13% 16% 11% 15% 19% 8% 15% 11% 17% 12% 11% 13% 11% 13% 11% 14% 12% 10% 7% 17% 17% 13% 15% 14% PROBABLY TESTER 51 4 44 3 3 13 35 31 20 25 23 22 20 25 16 35 5 13 18 6 9 4 8 5 13% 4% 17% 4% 7% 16% 13% 11% 19% 11% 11% 11% 11% 15% 13% 13% 16% 13% 16% 6% 17% 14% 41% 7% DEFINITELY TESTER 120 6 110 1 2 45 62 93 20 64 59 50 44 56 34 87 5 28 41 8 20 15 7 23 30% 6% 42% 1% 5% 55% 22% 33% 19% 28% 28% 25% 25% 33% 27% 32% 18% 28% 35% 9% 38% 55% 34% 31% UNDECIDED 36 9 25 1 6 4 22 20 12 22 21 19 18 14 12 23 3 10 14 6 2 2 1 10 9% 7% 10% 2% 15% 5% 8% 7% 12% 9% 10% 9% 10% 8% 10% 8% 11% 10% 12% 6% 4% 7% 5% 13% REFUSED 7 2 4 - - 5 2 7 1 2 2 2 2 6 2 5 - 2 2 1 1 - - 3 2% 2% 1% - - 6% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% - 2% 2% 1% 2% - - 4%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 75Table 14-5QUESTION M1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Denny Rehberg, Republican and John Tester, Democrat? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 161 159 14 235 320 62 146 57 177 131 230 261 122 85 264 219 151 100 91 172 251 72 61 100% 40% 40% 3% 59% 80% 15% 37% 14% 44% 33% 58% 65% 30% 21% 66% 55% 38% 25% 23% 43% 63% 18% 15% **D/S (REHBERG - TESTER) 15 -6 -7 -3 22 -6 16 -32 36 8 61 -54 -63 74 29 -17 -73 78 -29 47 -5 -42 17 32 4% -4% -4% -21% 9% -2% 26% -22% 63% 5% 47% -24% -24% 61% 34% -6% -33% 52% -29% 51% -3% -17% 24% 53% TOTAL REHBERG 186 68 67 5 117 139 36 48 46 83 92 73 86 91 52 111 60 107 30 66 73 91 41 44------------- 46% 42% 42% 35% 50% 43% 58% 33% 80% 47% 70% 32% 33% 75% 61% 42% 28% 71% 30% 72% 43% 36% 57% 72% TOTAL TESTER 171 74 74 8 95 146 20 80 9 74 31 127 149 17 23 128 134 28 60 19 78 133 24 12------------ 43% 46% 47% 56% 40% 45% 33% 55% 16% 42% 23% 55% 57% 14% 27% 48% 61% 19% 59% 21% 45% 53% 33% 19% DEFINITELY REHBERG 134 39 39 3 94 101 25 36 34 59 75 42 56 73 38 76 36 85 21 48 54 65 26 37 34% 24% 24% 20% 40% 32% 41% 25% 58% 33% 57% 18% 21% 60% 45% 29% 17% 56% 21% 53% 31% 26% 36% 61% PROBABLY REHBERG 51 29 29 2 23 38 11 12 12 23 17 31 31 19 13 35 24 22 9 17 20 25 15 7 13% 18% 18% 15% 10% 12% 17% 8% 21% 13% 13% 14% 12% 15% 16% 13% 11% 15% 9% 19% 11% 10% 21% 11% PROBABLY TESTER 51 22 22 3 28 42 7 19 5 24 11 35 45 5 9 37 29 15 15 11 23 36 12 3 13% 14% 14% 21% 12% 13% 11% 13% 8% 13% 8% 15% 17% 4% 11% 14% 13% 10% 15% 12% 13% 14% 17% 4% DEFINITELY TESTER 120 52 52 5 66 104 13 61 4 51 20 92 105 12 14 91 104 13 44 8 55 97 12 9 30% 32% 33% 35% 28% 32% 22% 42% 8% 29% 15% 40% 40% 10% 16% 34% 48% 9% 44% 9% 32% 39% 16% 15% UNDECIDED 36 16 16 - 20 30 4 13 2 19 9 22 20 12 8 21 21 14 8 5 17 21 7 5 9% 10% 10% - 9% 9% 6% 9% 3% 11% 7% 10% 8% 10% 10% 8% 10% 9% 8% 6% 10% 8% 9% 9% REFUSED 7 3 2 1 3 6 2 5 1 1 - 7 5 2 2 5 4 2 2 1 4 7 1 - 2% 2% 1% 9% 1% 2% 3% 4% 1% - - 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 76Table 15-1QUESTION N1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Heather Wilson, Republican and Martin Heinrich, Democrat? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 - - - 400 - - 192 208 80 60 63 108 88 65 85 41 75 86 47 144 43 208 100% - - - 100% - - 48% 52% 20% 15% 16% 27% 22% 16% 21% 10% 19% 22% 12% 36% 11% 52% **D/S (WILSON - HEINRICH) -7 - - - -7 - - -6 -2 4 - -4 -21 15 9 -12 -1 -4 -13 16 118 1 -126 -2% - - - -2% - - -3% -1% 5% 1% -6% -20% 17% 13% -14% -4% -6% -15% 34% 82% 2% -61% TOTAL WILSON 174 - - - 174 - - 83 91 36 27 25 39 48 32 32 18 31 31 29 125 15 32------------ 44% - - - 44% - - 43% 44% 45% 45% 39% 36% 54% 50% 38% 44% 41% 36% 63% 87% 34% 15% TOTAL HEINRICH 181 - - - 181 - - 89 93 32 27 29 60 33 24 44 20 35 45 13 8 14 158-------------- 45% - - - 45% - - 46% 45% 40% 44% 45% 56% 37% 37% 52% 48% 47% 52% 28% 5% 33% 76% DEFINITELY WILSON 135 - - - 135 - - 63 72 23 18 22 32 41 21 27 15 19 28 25 105 8 21 34% - - - 34% - - 33% 35% 28% 29% 35% 30% 46% 32% 31% 38% 26% 32% 54% 73% 18% 10% PROBABLY WILSON 39 - - - 39 - - 20 19 13 9 2 7 7 11 6 3 11 4 4 21 7 11 10% - - - 10% - - 10% 9% 17% 16% 4% 6% 8% 18% 7% 7% 15% 4% 9% 14% 16% 5% PROBABLY HEINRICH 46 - - - 46 - - 22 24 7 12 9 12 7 8 11 4 11 10 3 4 4 38 12% - - - 12% - - 12% 12% 9% 20% 14% 11% 8% 12% 13% 9% 15% 11% 7% 3% 10% 18% DEFINITELY HEINRICH 135 - - - 135 - - 66 69 25 15 20 48 26 16 33 16 24 35 10 4 10 120 34% - - - 34% - - 35% 33% 32% 24% 32% 45% 29% 25% 39% 39% 32% 41% 21% 3% 23% 58% UNDECIDED 40 - - - 40 - - 17 23 10 6 9 8 7 8 6 3 8 11 4 10 13 17 10% - - - 10% - - 9% 11% 13% 10% 15% 7% 8% 12% 7% 7% 11% 12% 9% 7% 30% 8% REFUSED 4 - - - 4 - - 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 - - 1 1 1 1% - - - 1% - - 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% - - 1% 3% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 77Table 15-2QUESTION N1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Heather Wilson, Republican and Martin Heinrich, Democrat? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 203 189 136 98 105 65 71 69 75 26 17 93 115 52 92 20 23 68 139 117 136 8 100% 51% 47% 34% 24% 26% 16% 18% 17% 19% 7% 4% 23% 29% 13% 23% 5% 6% 17% 35% 29% 34% 2% **D/S (WILSON - HEINRICH) -7 26 -35 -34 23 3 -22 -12 56 62 2 -1 -65 -61 44 74 2 -2 -42 -83 96 111 7 -2% 13% -18% -25% 24% 3% -34% -17% 81% 82% 8% -9% -70% -53% 84% 80% 12% -7% -61% -60% 82% 82% 81% TOTAL WILSON 174 108 62 40 57 51 16 24 61 64 10 5 10 22 46 79 7 8 10 22 103 118 8------------ 44% 53% 33% 29% 58% 48% 25% 33% 89% 85% 36% 31% 11% 19% 89% 86% 35% 34% 15% 16% 88% 87% 90% TOTAL HEINRICH 181 81 97 74 34 47 38 36 6 2 7 7 75 83 2 5 5 9 52 105 7 7 1-------------- 45% 40% 51% 55% 34% 45% 59% 50% 8% 3% 28% 40% 80% 72% 5% 6% 23% 41% 76% 76% 6% 5% 10% DEFINITELY WILSON 135 80 50 33 41 40 14 19 53 52 5 3 4 17 32 72 3 4 5 17 88 100 5 34% 40% 27% 24% 41% 38% 21% 27% 76% 69% 18% 17% 4% 15% 62% 78% 18% 18% 7% 12% 75% 74% 58% PROBABLY WILSON 39 27 12 7 16 11 3 4 9 12 5 2 6 5 14 7 3 4 6 5 15 18 3 10% 13% 6% 5% 17% 10% 4% 6% 13% 16% 18% 14% 7% 4% 26% 8% 18% 16% 8% 4% 13% 13% 32% PROBABLY HEINRICH 46 20 26 15 8 12 6 9 4 - 2 2 15 22 2 2 2 2 14 23 3 3 1 12% 10% 14% 11% 8% 12% 9% 13% 6% - 9% 10% 16% 19% 5% 2% 12% 7% 21% 17% 3% 2% 10% DEFINITELY HEINRICH 135 61 71 59 26 35 32 27 2 2 5 5 60 61 - 4 2 8 38 81 4 4 - 34% 30% 38% 43% 27% 33% 50% 37% 2% 3% 19% 29% 64% 53% - 4% 11% 34% 56% 59% 3% 3% - UNDECIDED 40 13 27 20 6 7 8 12 2 8 8 5 7 10 2 7 8 5 6 11 7 10 - 10% 7% 14% 15% 6% 7% 12% 16% 3% 10% 30% 29% 7% 9% 5% 8% 38% 23% 9% 8% 6% 7% - REFUSED 4 1 3 2 1 - 2 - - 1 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 - 1 - 1 - 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% - 3% - - 1% 5% - 2% - 2% - 4% 3% - 1% - 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 78Table 15-3QUESTION N1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Heather Wilson, Republican and Martin Heinrich, Democrat? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 168 138 81 113 25 11 29 43 162 106 67 113 107 55 50 34 33 62 51 37 70 200 200 100% 42% 34% 20% 28% 6% 3% 7% 11% 41% 26% 17% 28% 27% 14% 13% 8% 8% 15% 13% 9% 17% 50% 50% **D/S (WILSON - HEINRICH) -7 99 -49 -60 98 16 4 -3 -3 -122 -3 -1 3 -5 -10 8 -1 - 8 -5 - -5 -12 5 -2% 59% -35% -74% 86% 65% 34% -10% -7% -75% -3% -2% 2% -4% -19% 15% -4% - 13% -11% -1% -7% -6% 3% TOTAL WILSON 174 125 35 9 102 20 7 7 16 16 46 31 49 46 20 26 14 16 31 18 16 30 86 88------------ 44% 74% 26% 11% 90% 79% 61% 25% 38% 10% 44% 45% 44% 43% 36% 51% 43% 48% 50% 36% 43% 43% 43% 44% TOTAL HEINRICH 181 26 84 69 4 4 3 10 19 138 49 32 47 51 30 18 16 16 23 24 16 34 99 83-------------- 45% 16% 61% 85% 4% 14% 27% 35% 45% 85% 46% 47% 41% 47% 55% 36% 47% 48% 37% 46% 44% 49% 49% 41% DEFINITELY WILSON 135 100 26 4 84 17 3 4 13 8 38 25 36 35 15 22 12 13 22 13 13 22 72 63 34% 60% 19% 5% 75% 66% 25% 14% 30% 5% 36% 37% 32% 33% 28% 44% 34% 39% 36% 26% 35% 32% 36% 31% PROBABLY WILSON 39 25 9 5 18 3 4 3 3 8 8 6 14 11 5 4 3 3 9 5 3 8 14 25 10% 15% 6% 6% 16% 13% 36% 10% 8% 5% 8% 9% 12% 10% 9% 7% 8% 9% 14% 9% 8% 11% 7% 13% PROBABLY HEINRICH 46 10 27 9 2 2 1 3 7 31 11 4 16 14 7 4 2 3 8 9 5 9 26 20 12% 6% 20% 10% 2% 7% 11% 10% 16% 19% 10% 6% 15% 13% 12% 9% 5% 8% 13% 17% 15% 12% 13% 10% DEFINITELY HEINRICH 135 16 57 60 2 2 2 7 12 107 38 28 30 37 24 14 14 13 15 15 11 26 72 63 34% 10% 41% 74% 2% 6% 15% 25% 28% 66% 36% 41% 27% 34% 43% 28% 42% 40% 25% 29% 29% 37% 36% 31% UNDECIDED 40 15 16 4 6 2 1 11 8 7 9 5 14 10 3 6 4 1 6 8 4 6 14 26 10% 9% 12% 5% 5% 7% 12% 38% 18% 4% 9% 7% 13% 9% 6% 12% 11% 4% 10% 16% 11% 8% 7% 13% REFUSED 4 2 2 - 1 - - 1 - 1 1 - 2 1 1 - - - 1 1 1 - 1 3 1% 1% 2% - 1% - - 3% - 1% 1% - 2% - 3% - - - 2% 2% 1% - 1% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 79Table 15-4QUESTION N1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Heather Wilson, Republican and Martin Heinrich, Democrat? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 118 251 92 37 123 237 269 112 170 140 133 103 219 152 247 24 141 136 78 58 36 13 66 100% 30% 63% 23% 9% 31% 59% 67% 28% 43% 35% 33% 26% 55% 38% 62% 6% 35% 34% 19% 15% 9% 3% 17% **D/S (WILSON - HEINRICH) -7 82 -100 77 28 -71 64 8 -7 16 9 17 10 -21 30 -37 1 34 -12 47 -4 -11 -11 -11 -2% 69% -40% 84% 76% -58% 27% 3% -6% 9% 6% 13% 10% -9% 20% -15% 3% 24% -9% 61% -7% -30% -79% -17% TOTAL WILSON 174 94 62 81 32 22 137 125 45 84 70 67 53 86 85 90 10 82 55 61 24 9 - 23------------ 44% 79% 24% 89% 86% 18% 58% 46% 41% 49% 50% 51% 51% 39% 56% 36% 41% 58% 40% 78% 41% 26% - 35% TOTAL HEINRICH 181 12 161 4 4 94 73 117 52 68 60 50 43 107 55 126 9 48 67 14 28 20 11 35-------------- 45% 10% 64% 5% 9% 76% 31% 43% 47% 40% 43% 38% 41% 49% 36% 51% 37% 34% 49% 18% 48% 57% 79% 52% DEFINITELY WILSON 135 81 45 71 25 12 113 99 33 66 56 52 43 67 70 65 6 68 45 48 22 4 - 15 34% 68% 18% 78% 67% 10% 47% 37% 29% 39% 40% 39% 42% 30% 46% 26% 26% 48% 33% 61% 38% 12% - 22% PROBABLY WILSON 39 13 17 10 7 10 24 26 13 18 13 15 10 20 15 24 4 14 10 13 2 5 - 9 10% 11% 7% 11% 18% 8% 10% 10% 11% 11% 10% 11% 10% 9% 10% 10% 15% 10% 7% 17% 4% 14% - 13% PROBABLY HEINRICH 46 5 41 2 2 19 25 24 16 18 13 13 9 27 12 34 3 9 18 6 4 3 3 12 12% 5% 16% 2% 5% 15% 10% 9% 14% 10% 9% 10% 9% 12% 8% 14% 13% 6% 13% 7% 7% 8% 23% 18% DEFINITELY HEINRICH 135 7 120 2 2 75 48 92 36 50 47 37 34 80 43 92 6 39 49 8 24 18 8 23 34% 6% 48% 2% 4% 61% 20% 34% 32% 30% 34% 28% 33% 36% 28% 37% 25% 28% 36% 10% 42% 49% 56% 35% UNDECIDED 40 10 27 5 2 5 25 26 11 17 10 14 7 23 11 28 4 9 11 3 6 6 2 7 10% 8% 11% 5% 5% 4% 11% 10% 10% 10% 7% 10% 7% 10% 8% 11% 17% 7% 8% 4% 10% 17% 15% 11% REFUSED 4 2 2 1 - 2 2 1 3 1 - 1 - 3 1 3 1 1 3 - - - 1 1 1% 2% 1% 1% - 2% 1% - 3% 1% - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 5% 1% 2% - - - 6% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 80Table 15-5QUESTION N1:And, if the election for United States Senate were being held today, for whom would you vote if the candidates were Heather Wilson, Republican and Martin Heinrich, Democrat? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 139 139 10 260 322 66 201 42 141 123 244 272 117 99 259 265 111 154 75 150 279 59 46 100% 35% 35% 2% 65% 80% 16% 50% 11% 35% 31% 61% 68% 29% 25% 65% 66% 28% 38% 19% 38% 70% 15% 12% **D/S (WILSON - HEINRICH) -7 2 1 -1 -9 -13 6 -68 29 33 55 -60 -81 73 24 -42 -71 57 -41 49 -20 -51 14 27 -2% 1% 1% -14% -3% -4% 9% -34% 70% 23% 45% -25% -30% 62% 24% -16% -27% 52% -27% 65% -13% -18% 24% 59% TOTAL WILSON 174 61 60 4 114 137 33 59 34 77 84 78 81 89 57 94 80 81 47 59 56 98 34 35------------ 44% 44% 43% 43% 44% 43% 50% 29% 82% 54% 69% 32% 30% 76% 57% 36% 30% 73% 31% 78% 37% 35% 57% 76% TOTAL HEINRICH 181 59 59 6 122 150 27 127 5 44 29 138 162 15 33 135 152 23 89 10 76 149 20 8-------------- 45% 42% 43% 57% 47% 47% 41% 63% 12% 31% 24% 56% 59% 13% 34% 52% 57% 21% 58% 13% 50% 53% 34% 17% DEFINITELY WILSON 135 45 45 3 90 107 24 38 27 68 71 53 56 74 51 70 54 71 33 49 44 71 26 31 34% 33% 32% 30% 35% 33% 37% 19% 65% 48% 58% 22% 20% 64% 51% 27% 20% 64% 22% 65% 30% 25% 45% 68% PROBABLY WILSON 39 15 15 1 24 30 9 20 7 9 13 24 25 14 6 23 26 9 14 10 12 27 7 4 10% 11% 11% 13% 9% 9% 13% 10% 17% 6% 11% 10% 9% 12% 6% 9% 10% 9% 9% 14% 8% 10% 12% 8% PROBABLY HEINRICH 46 16 16 4 31 33 12 28 - 17 9 32 37 8 16 30 38 8 20 2 23 35 6 4 12% 11% 11% 44% 12% 10% 18% 14% - 12% 7% 13% 14% 7% 16% 12% 14% 7% 13% 3% 15% 12% 11% 9% DEFINITELY HEINRICH 135 43 43 1 92 117 15 99 5 27 20 105 125 7 18 106 114 15 68 8 53 115 14 3 34% 31% 31% 13% 35% 36% 23% 49% 12% 19% 17% 43% 46% 6% 18% 41% 43% 14% 44% 10% 35% 41% 23% 7% UNDECIDED 40 18 18 - 22 31 5 14 1 18 8 26 27 12 7 27 29 7 16 5 18 31 4 4 10% 13% 13% - 8% 10% 7% 7% 3% 13% 6% 11% 10% 10% 7% 10% 11% 6% 10% 6% 12% 11% 6% 8% REFUSED 4 2 2 - 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 1 2 3 4 - 2 2 1 1 1 - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% - 1% 3% - - 2% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 81Table 16-1QUESTION U1:Do you think Orrin Hatch has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 - - - - 400 - 192 208 96 112 65 77 48 99 72 21 109 71 27 188 141 68 100% - - - - 100% - 48% 52% 24% 28% 16% 19% 12% 25% 18% 5% 27% 18% 7% 47% 35% 17% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION -102 - - - - -102 - -60 -41 -24 -20 -29 -20 -8 -31 -25 -4 -13 -24 -4 -6 -53 -41 - NEW PERSON) -25% - - - - -25% - -31% -20% -25% -18% -44% -26% -17% -32% -34% -20% -12% -34% -15% -3% -38% -60% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 132 - - - - 132 - 61 71 32 40 16 25 17 32 21 8 40 21 10 82 37 13 33% - - - - 33% - 32% 34% 34% 36% 25% 33% 36% 33% 29% 36% 37% 29% 36% 44% 26% 19% NEW PERSON 234 - - - - 234 - 121 113 57 60 45 45 26 64 45 12 53 45 14 88 90 54 58% - - - - 58% - 63% 54% 59% 54% 69% 59% 53% 64% 63% 57% 49% 64% 51% 47% 64% 79% DEPENDS 7 - - - - 7 - 1 7 - 2 1 1 3 - - 1 2 2 2 6 2 - 2% - - - - 2% - - 3% - 2% 1% 1% 6% - - 3% 2% 3% 9% 3% 1% - UNSURE 27 - - - - 27 - 10 17 7 9 3 6 2 3 6 1 13 3 1 12 13 1 7% - - - - 7% - 5% 8% 7% 8% 5% 7% 4% 3% 8% 3% 12% 4% 5% 6% 9% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 82Table 16-2QUESTION U1:Do you think Orrin Hatch has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 365 31 16 174 191 10 6 89 99 69 72 33 35 101 87 72 68 34 33 147 174 14 100% 91% 8% 4% 43% 48% 2% 2% 22% 25% 17% 18% 8% 9% 25% 22% 18% 17% 9% 8% 37% 43% 4% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION -102 -86 -15 -12 -52 -34 -10 -2 -10 4 -26 -27 -25 -16 -5 - -22 -32 -17 -22 -6 -4 -2 - NEW PERSON) -25% -23% -48% -76% -30% -18% -100% -35% -11% 4% -37% -38% -75% -46% -5% - -30% -47% -51% -68% -4% -2% -12% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 132 125 6 2 58 67 - 2 38 45 19 18 4 9 43 39 21 15 8 5 63 76 6 33% 34% 20% 12% 33% 35% - 32% 42% 45% 27% 25% 13% 25% 43% 45% 29% 22% 24% 14% 43% 44% 44% NEW PERSON 234 210 21 14 110 101 10 4 47 41 45 45 29 25 49 39 43 47 26 27 69 80 8 58% 58% 67% 88% 63% 53% 100% 68% 53% 41% 64% 63% 87% 71% 48% 45% 59% 69% 76% 82% 47% 46% 56% DEPENDS 7 7 - - 1 7 - - 1 5 - 2 - - 1 4 1 1 - - 6 6 - 2% 2% - - - 3% - - 1% 5% - 2% - - 1% 5% 1% 1% - - 4% 3% - UNSURE 27 23 4 - 6 17 - - 4 8 6 7 - 1 8 4 7 6 - 1 10 12 - 7% 6% 13% - 3% 9% - - 4% 9% 9% 9% - 4% 8% 5% 10% 8% - 4% 7% 7% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 83Table 16-3QUESTION U1:Do you think Orrin Hatch has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 206 125 61 143 42 58 80 3 64 70 184 101 44 36 33 83 101 49 52 23 21 200 200 100% 52% 31% 15% 36% 10% 14% 20% 1% 16% 17% 46% 25% 11% 9% 8% 21% 25% 12% 13% 6% 5% 50% 50% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION -102 -27 -31 -41 -4 -2 -21 -31 -1 -38 -21 -44 -25 -12 -16 -5 -20 -24 -17 -8 -8 -4 -53 -49 - NEW PERSON) -25% -13% -25% -67% -3% -6% -37% -39% -41% -60% -30% -24% -25% -27% -44% -15% -24% -24% -35% -16% -36% -17% -26% -24% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 132 80 41 9 62 20 17 19 1 12 23 59 35 14 10 13 27 32 15 20 7 7 65 68 33% 39% 33% 15% 43% 47% 29% 23% 30% 19% 33% 32% 35% 33% 27% 39% 33% 31% 31% 38% 32% 34% 32% 34% NEW PERSON 234 107 73 50 66 22 38 50 2 50 44 103 60 26 26 18 48 56 32 28 16 11 117 116 58% 52% 58% 82% 46% 53% 66% 62% 70% 79% 63% 56% 60% 60% 71% 54% 58% 55% 65% 54% 68% 51% 59% 58% DEPENDS 7 6 2 - 6 - - 2 - - 1 3 1 2 1 - - 3 - 1 - 2 5 3 2% 3% 1% - 4% - - 2% - - 1% 2% 1% 4% 2% - - 3% - 2% - 9% 2% 1% UNSURE 27 14 9 2 10 - 3 10 - 1 2 19 5 1 - 2 8 11 2 3 - 1 14 13 7% 7% 7% 3% 7% - 5% 12% - 2% 3% 10% 5% 2% - 7% 9% 11% 4% 6% - 5% 7% 7%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 84Table 16-4QUESTION U1:Do you think Orrin Hatch has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 115 248 73 96 65 285 241 139 153 138 100 85 243 82 318 14 69 136 98 41 23 13 79 100% 29% 62% 18% 24% 16% 71% 60% 35% 38% 35% 25% 21% 61% 20% 80% 4% 17% 34% 24% 10% 6% 3% 20% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION -102 -25 -67 -17 11 -48 -45 -74 -29 -34 -37 -23 -27 -68 -16 -86 -2 -14 -19 -33 -9 -13 -7 -16 - NEW PERSON) -25% -22% -27% -23% 11% -74% -16% -31% -21% -22% -27% -23% -31% -28% -19% -27% -16% -20% -14% -34% -22% -56% -55% -20% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 132 38 83 25 49 7 110 74 49 51 43 35 27 80 28 104 3 26 54 27 16 4 3 25 33% 33% 34% 34% 51% 11% 38% 30% 36% 34% 31% 35% 31% 33% 34% 33% 20% 38% 40% 28% 39% 19% 22% 31% NEW PERSON 234 63 150 41 38 55 154 148 78 85 80 59 53 148 44 190 5 40 74 60 25 17 10 41 58% 55% 60% 57% 40% 85% 54% 61% 56% 56% 58% 59% 63% 61% 54% 60% 36% 57% 54% 62% 61% 75% 78% 52% DEPENDS 7 3 3 3 3 1 4 6 1 2 2 1 1 6 1 7 - 1 3 3 - - - 1 2% 2% 1% 4% 3% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% - 1% 2% 3% - - - 1% UNSURE 27 10 12 5 5 1 17 14 10 15 14 5 4 11 9 18 6 3 6 7 - 1 - 12 7% 9% 5% 6% 5% 2% 6% 6% 7% 10% 10% 5% 5% 4% 11% 6% 44% 4% 4% 7% - 6% - 16%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 85Table 16-5QUESTION U1:Do you think Orrin Hatch has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 179 172 21 221 303 84 175 36 175 91 276 277 109 78 287 247 117 104 86 176 257 71 61 100% 45% 43% 5% 55% 76% 21% 44% 9% 44% 23% 69% 69% 27% 20% 72% 62% 29% 26% 21% 44% 64% 18% 15% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION -102 -36 -33 4 -66 -84 -15 -67 -10 -23 -21 -72 -68 -30 -20 -80 -65 -33 -9 -22 -56 -67 -7 -26 - NEW PERSON) -25% -20% -19% 19% -30% -28% -18% -38% -29% -13% -23% -26% -25% -27% -25% -28% -26% -29% -9% -25% -32% -26% -10% -43% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 132 66 64 13 66 96 31 50 11 66 30 92 93 36 23 95 82 37 45 27 50 84 29 16 33% 37% 37% 60% 30% 32% 37% 28% 32% 38% 33% 33% 34% 33% 29% 33% 33% 32% 44% 32% 29% 33% 41% 26% NEW PERSON 234 102 96 9 132 180 46 117 22 89 51 164 161 66 43 174 147 71 55 49 106 151 36 42 58% 57% 56% 40% 60% 59% 55% 67% 61% 51% 56% 60% 58% 60% 55% 61% 60% 61% 53% 57% 60% 59% 50% 69% DEPENDS 7 3 3 - 5 7 - 1 2 5 - 5 2 4 1 6 3 5 - 3 5 2 3 2 2% 2% 2% - 2% 2% - - 4% 3% - 2% 1% 4% 1% 2% 1% 4% - 3% 3% 1% 4% 3% UNSURE 27 9 9 - 18 20 6 8 1 15 10 14 21 4 12 12 15 4 4 7 15 20 3 1 7% 5% 5% - 8% 6% 8% 4% 3% 9% 11% 5% 8% 3% 15% 4% 6% 3% 4% 8% 8% 8% 5% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 86Table 17-1QUESTION W1:Do you think John Barrasso has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 - - - - - 400 192 208 72 92 62 110 64 84 83 25 80 89 39 252 52 88 100% - - - - - 100% 48% 52% 18% 23% 15% 28% 16% 21% 21% 6% 20% 22% 10% 63% 13% 22% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION 121 - - - - - 121 69 52 28 46 10 30 7 35 33 1 39 8 6 154 -12 -20 - NEW PERSON) 30% - - - - - 30% 36% 25% 39% 50% 17% 27% 10% 42% 39% 2% 48% 9% 16% 61% -22% -23% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 248 - - - - - 248 124 123 48 65 34 69 33 56 56 12 56 46 21 195 19 31 62% - - - - - 62% 65% 59% 66% 70% 55% 62% 51% 67% 68% 46% 70% 51% 55% 77% 37% 35% NEW PERSON 127 - - - - - 127 56 71 19 19 23 39 26 21 24 11 17 38 15 41 31 51 32% - - - - - 32% 29% 34% 27% 21% 38% 35% 41% 25% 29% 43% 22% 43% 39% 16% 59% 58% DEPENDS 5 - - - - - 5 4 1 - 2 1 - 3 2 1 2 - - 1 1 2 1 1% - - - - - 1% 2% - - 2% 1% - 4% 2% 1% 7% - - 2% - 3% 1% UNSURE 21 - - - - - 21 8 13 5 7 4 3 2 5 2 1 6 5 1 15 - 5 5% - - - - - 5% 4% 6% 7% 7% 6% 3% 4% 6% 2% 4% 8% 6% 3% 6% 1% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 87Table 17-2QUESTION W1:Do you think John Barrasso has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 359 37 20 163 196 15 5 132 120 28 25 29 59 104 148 27 25 30 58 202 237 65 100% 90% 9% 5% 41% 49% 4% 1% 33% 30% 7% 6% 7% 15% 26% 37% 7% 6% 8% 14% 51% 59% 16% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION 121 115 6 -1 61 53 5 -5 84 70 -10 -1 -6 -14 71 83 -3 -8 8 -28 105 118 25 - NEW PERSON) 30% 32% 16% -3% 38% 27% 33% -100% 64% 58% -37% -6% -21% -24% 68% 56% -12% -33% 26% -49% 52% 49% 38% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 248 225 21 10 107 118 10 - 105 91 8 12 11 20 84 112 11 8 18 13 147 170 44 62% 63% 56% 48% 66% 60% 67% - 79% 76% 28% 47% 38% 33% 80% 76% 40% 33% 58% 23% 73% 71% 67% NEW PERSON 127 110 15 10 45 65 5 5 20 21 18 13 17 34 12 29 14 17 10 41 42 52 19 32% 31% 40% 52% 28% 33% 33% 100% 15% 17% 64% 53% 59% 58% 12% 19% 52% 67% 33% 72% 21% 22% 29% DEPENDS 5 3 2 - 3 1 - - - 1 2 - 1 - - 1 2 - - 1 3 3 - 1% 1% 5% - 2% - - - - 1% 6% - 3% - - 1% 6% - - 2% 1% 1% - UNSURE 21 21 - - 8 13 - - 7 8 - - - 5 8 7 - - 3 2 10 13 3 5% 6% - - 5% 7% - - 6% 6% 2% - - 9% 8% 4% 2% - 9% 4% 5% 5% 4%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 88Table 17-3QUESTION W1:Do you think John Barrasso has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 185 148 56 148 102 20 32 16 68 40 28 230 97 22 18 16 12 111 119 43 54 200 200 100% 46% 37% 14% 37% 25% 5% 8% 4% 17% 10% 7% 58% 24% 6% 4% 4% 3% 28% 30% 11% 14% 50% 50% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION 121 112 35 -24 107 47 - -11 4 -23 16 7 54 44 7 9 2 6 45 10 15 29 45 76 - NEW PERSON) 30% 61% 24% -43% 72% 46% -1% -36% 26% -34% 40% 26% 24% 46% 31% 50% 10% 46% 40% 8% 35% 54% 22% 38% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 248 144 86 15 124 70 10 9 9 21 26 18 134 67 13 13 9 9 74 60 27 40 116 131 62% 78% 58% 27% 84% 69% 49% 29% 60% 30% 65% 63% 58% 69% 60% 71% 55% 73% 67% 51% 64% 74% 58% 66% NEW PERSON 127 32 51 39 16 23 10 21 5 44 10 10 80 23 7 4 7 3 29 50 13 11 71 55 32% 17% 34% 69% 11% 23% 49% 65% 34% 64% 25% 37% 35% 24% 29% 21% 45% 27% 27% 42% 30% 20% 36% 28% DEPENDS 5 1 3 - - 1 - 2 1 - 2 - 3 - 2 - - - 3 1 - - 4 1 1% - 2% - - 1% - 6% 6% - 4% - 1% - 8% - - - 2% 1% - - 2% - UNSURE 21 8 9 2 8 7 - - - 4 2 - 12 6 1 1 - - 5 8 3 4 8 12 5% 5% 6% 4% 5% 7% 2% - - 6% 5% - 5% 7% 3% 8% - - 4% 6% 6% 7% 4% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 89Table 17-4QUESTION W1:Do you think John Barrasso has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 155 230 132 111 71 294 285 104 251 216 190 155 148 117 280 18 100 125 129 37 25 11 70 100% 39% 58% 33% 28% 18% 74% 71% 26% 63% 54% 47% 39% 37% 29% 70% 5% 25% 31% 32% 9% 6% 3% 17% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION 121 106 13 109 43 -24 141 75 40 105 89 95 79 17 26 94 7 20 37 83 -2 -5 2 7 - NEW PERSON) 30% 68% 6% 83% 39% -34% 48% 26% 39% 42% 41% 50% 51% 12% 23% 34% 37% 20% 30% 64% -5% -19% 19% 10% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 248 127 112 117 72 22 208 172 68 168 144 136 112 79 70 176 13 58 77 103 17 10 7 34 62% 82% 49% 89% 65% 31% 70% 60% 66% 67% 67% 72% 72% 54% 60% 63% 69% 58% 61% 80% 45% 38% 59% 49% NEW PERSON 127 21 99 8 29 47 67 98 28 63 55 42 33 62 44 82 6 38 39 20 19 14 5 27 32% 14% 43% 6% 27% 66% 23% 34% 27% 25% 25% 22% 21% 42% 37% 29% 31% 38% 31% 16% 50% 57% 41% 39% DEPENDS 5 1 4 1 - - 5 3 2 5 5 3 3 - 2 3 - 2 3 1 2 - - - 1% 1% 2% 1% - - 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% - 1% 1% - 2% 2% 1% 5% - - - UNSURE 21 6 14 6 9 2 15 12 6 14 12 9 7 7 2 19 - 2 7 4 - 1 - 9 5% 4% 6% 5% 8% 3% 5% 4% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 4% 2% 7% - 2% 5% 3% - 5% - 12%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 90Table 17-5QUESTION W1:Do you think John Barrasso has done his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election or do you think it is time to give a new person a chance? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 143 140 19 254 320 63 146 50 197 108 250 248 142 87 274 205 164 78 130 176 223 58 111 100% 36% 35% 5% 64% 80% 16% 37% 13% 49% 27% 62% 62% 35% 22% 69% 51% 41% 19% 33% 44% 56% 15% 28% **D/S (DESERVES RE-ELECTION 121 58 58 8 62 99 14 -17 25 114 61 42 22 94 34 64 1 104 2 63 58 25 24 68 - NEW PERSON) 30% 41% 41% 40% 24% 31% 23% -11% 49% 58% 56% 17% 9% 66% 39% 23% - 63% 2% 48% 33% 11% 41% 61% DESERVES RE-ELECTION 248 96 94 12 150 198 37 61 34 150 81 139 127 113 59 161 95 130 36 92 112 117 39 87 62% 67% 68% 65% 59% 62% 58% 41% 69% 76% 76% 56% 51% 80% 67% 59% 46% 79% 47% 71% 64% 53% 66% 78% NEW PERSON 127 38 36 5 87 99 23 77 10 36 21 97 105 20 24 97 94 26 35 29 55 92 15 20 32% 27% 26% 26% 34% 31% 36% 53% 19% 18% 19% 39% 42% 14% 28% 35% 46% 16% 45% 22% 31% 41% 25% 18% DEPENDS 5 2 2 2 3 5 - 3 1 1 1 4 3 3 - 4 4 1 - 3 2 4 1 - 1% 1% 1% 9% 1% 2% - 2% 2% - 1% 2% 1% 2% - 2% 2% - - 3% 1% 2% 1% - UNSURE 21 7 7 - 14 17 4 5 5 9 5 9 14 6 4 11 12 8 7 6 8 10 4 4 5% 5% 5% - 5% 5% 6% 3% 10% 5% 4% 3% 6% 4% 5% 4% 6% 5% 9% 4% 4% 4% 7% 4%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 91Table 201-1QUESTION 2:I'm going to read you a pair of statements, and please tell me which one comes closest to your own views, even if neither of the statements matches your views exactly. We can protect land and water and have a strong economy with good jobs at the same time, without having to choose one over the other. ...or... Sometimes protections for land and water and a strong economy are in conflict and we must choose one over the other. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (SAME TIME - IN 1420 236 229 258 256 219 256 606 814 312 345 227 308 220 269 234 101 388 302 119 485 381 533 CONFLICT) 59% 59% 57% 65% 64% 55% 64% 53% 65% 65% 60% 56% 62% 51% 56% 54% 43% 68% 64% 60% 55% 54% 69% PROTECT LAND AND WATER AND 1874 312 311 320 322 303 320 860 1013 389 456 309 396 316 368 329 161 476 376 155 673 526 644HAVE A STRONG ECONOMY AT 78% 78% 78% 80% 80% 76% 80% 75% 81% 81% 79% 77% 79% 73% 76% 76% 69% 83% 80% 78% 76% 75% 84%THE SAME TIME PROTECTIONS FOR LAND AND 454 76 82 62 66 84 63 254 200 77 110 82 89 96 99 96 60 88 75 37 188 144 111WATER AND A STRONG ECONOMY 19% 19% 21% 15% 16% 21% 16% 22% 16% 16% 19% 20% 18% 22% 21% 22% 26% 15% 16% 18% 21% 21% 14%ARE IN CONFLICT BOTH 31 6 1 10 4 6 11 16 15 2 2 10 5 9 3 7 6 2 8 3 10 12 9 1% 2% - 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% - - 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3% - 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% NO OPINION/UNSURE 39 6 5 8 9 6 6 19 20 12 6 1 10 10 11 3 6 8 8 4 17 18 5 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% - 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% REFUSED 2 - - 1 - 2 - 2 - - 1 - - 1 1 - 1 - - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 92Table 201-2QUESTION 2:I'm going to read you a pair of statements, and please tell me which one comes closest to your own views, even if neither of the statements matches your views exactly. We can protect land and water and have a strong economy with good jobs at the same time, without having to choose one over the other. ...or... Sometimes protections for land and water and a strong economy are in conflict and we must choose one over the other. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (SAME TIME - IN 1420 1034 360 253 457 576 101 152 207 278 210 171 187 346 198 286 227 151 228 301 379 458 63 CONFLICT) 59% 58% 64% 75% 52% 64% 79% 73% 46% 63% 53% 56% 65% 72% 54% 55% 65% 43% 70% 69% 55% 56% 51% PROTECT LAND AND WATER AND 1874 1380 457 293 656 725 113 180 320 353 295 231 234 409 277 395 282 241 277 362 527 629 89HAVE A STRONG ECONOMY AT 78% 77% 80% 87% 74% 80% 89% 86% 72% 80% 74% 76% 81% 85% 76% 76% 80% 69% 85% 83% 76% 77% 72%THE SAME TIME PROTECTIONS FOR LAND AND 454 347 96 40 198 148 13 28 113 74 85 59 47 64 79 109 54 90 50 61 148 171 26WATER AND A STRONG ECONOMY 19% 19% 17% 12% 23% 16% 10% 13% 25% 17% 21% 20% 16% 13% 22% 21% 16% 26% 15% 14% 21% 21% 21%ARE IN CONFLICT BOTH 31 25 6 1 14 11 1 - 5 5 6 6 5 4 1 8 3 8 - 8 7 7 6 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% - 1% 1% 2% - 2% 1% 1% 5% NO OPINION/UNSURE 39 30 9 2 11 19 1 1 8 9 10 7 1 3 9 8 9 8 - 5 12 14 2 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% - 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% - 1% 2% 2% 2% REFUSED 2 2 - - 2 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 93Table 201-3QUESTION 2:I'm going to read you a pair of statements, and please tell me which one comes closest to your own views, even if neither of the statements matches your views exactly. We can protect land and water and have a strong economy with good jobs at the same time, without having to choose one over the other. ...or... Sometimes protections for land and water and a strong economy are in conflict and we must choose one over the other. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (SAME TIME - IN 1420 466 544 356 313 161 89 267 66 455 395 455 325 230 165 230 212 242 137 187 86 145 693 728 CONFLICT) 59% 47% 66% 68% 50% 66% 38% 62% 65% 69% 62% 57% 59% 59% 54% 69% 54% 60% 51% 67% 51% 66% 58% 61% PROTECT LAND AND WATER AND 1874 705 677 433 460 201 157 341 82 550 503 617 430 304 229 274 296 321 201 229 123 180 931 943HAVE A STRONG ECONOMY AT 78% 72% 82% 83% 73% 82% 67% 79% 81% 84% 79% 77% 78% 78% 75% 82% 75% 79% 74% 82% 73% 82% 78% 78%THE SAME TIME PROTECTIONS FOR LAND AND 454 239 134 77 147 41 69 74 16 95 109 162 105 73 65 44 84 78 64 42 38 36 238 216WATER AND A STRONG ECONOMY 19% 24% 16% 15% 23% 17% 29% 17% 16% 14% 17% 20% 19% 19% 21% 13% 21% 19% 24% 15% 22% 16% 20% 18%ARE IN CONFLICT BOTH 31 11 8 8 8 3 2 6 1 7 13 5 10 3 6 6 3 2 4 6 3 - 13 18 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% - 1% 1% NO OPINION/UNSURE 39 26 6 5 16 - 8 7 2 3 13 12 5 8 5 8 7 5 2 4 5 3 14 26 2% 3% 1% 1% 3% - 3% 2% 2% - 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% REFUSED 2 1 1 - - - 1 1 - - - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 94Table 201-4QUESTION 2:I'm going to read you a pair of statements, and please tell me which one comes closest to your own views, even if neither of the statements matches your views exactly. We can protect land and water and have a strong economy with good jobs at the same time, without having to choose one over the other. ...or... Sometimes protections for land and water and a strong economy are in conflict and we must choose one over the other. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (SAME TIME - IN 1420 347 975 266 187 406 884 978 391 504 426 364 286 896 428 990 74 370 515 270 185 133 76 218 CONFLICT) 59% 50% 63% 55% 53% 68% 55% 63% 51% 54% 52% 57% 56% 63% 61% 58% 57% 61% 66% 48% 69% 73% 59% 51% PROTECT LAND AND WATER AND 1874 510 1241 366 263 489 1218 1242 564 707 606 492 391 1143 552 1317 101 478 631 409 221 156 102 318HAVE A STRONG ECONOMY AT 78% 74% 80% 76% 75% 82% 76% 80% 74% 75% 74% 77% 76% 80% 79% 78% 77% 79% 81% 73% 83% 85% 79% 74%THE SAME TIME PROTECTIONS FOR LAND AND 454 163 266 100 76 82 334 264 173 203 180 127 105 247 125 327 27 108 116 139 37 23 26 100WATER AND A STRONG ECONOMY 19% 23% 17% 21% 22% 14% 21% 17% 23% 22% 22% 20% 20% 17% 18% 19% 21% 18% 15% 25% 14% 12% 20% 23%ARE IN CONFLICT BOTH 31 11 19 6 5 17 13 25 6 13 13 7 7 18 11 20 1 10 12 4 4 3 - 7 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% - 2% NO OPINION/UNSURE 39 9 27 8 6 6 31 18 21 16 13 12 9 23 9 30 2 9 16 10 5 2 - 4 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% - 1% REFUSED 2 - 1 - - - 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 95Table 201-5QUESTION 2:I'm going to read you a pair of statements, and please tell me which one comes closest to your own views, even if neither of the statements matches your views exactly. We can protect land and water and have a strong economy with good jobs at the same time, without having to choose one over the other. ...or... Sometimes protections for land and water and a strong economy are in conflict and we must choose one over the other. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (SAME TIME - IN 1420 594 560 51 823 1874 -454 770 72 533 328 990 1118 276 235 1092 1027 325 526 214 603 1070 185 127 CONFLICT) 59% 60% 59% 56% 59% 100% -100% 68% 31% 55% 47% 66% 66% 42% 47% 64% 66% 46% 72% 43% 60% 66% 47% 42% PROTECT LAND AND WATER AND 1874 780 743 69 1088 1874 - 934 147 737 508 1224 1376 455 356 1376 1271 504 620 351 792 1331 282 210HAVE A STRONG ECONOMY AT 78% 79% 78% 75% 78% 100% - 83% 63% 76% 73% 81% 82% 70% 71% 81% 82% 71% 84% 70% 78% 81% 72% 69%THE SAME TIME PROTECTIONS FOR LAND AND 454 186 183 18 265 - 454 164 75 205 180 234 258 179 122 284 244 179 94 137 189 261 96 82WATER AND A STRONG ECONOMY 19% 19% 19% 19% 19% - 100% 15% 32% 21% 26% 16% 15% 27% 24% 17% 16% 25% 13% 27% 19% 16% 25% 27%ARE IN CONFLICT BOTH 31 10 10 2 21 - - 15 4 10 5 23 24 6 7 20 22 7 9 6 16 17 9 4 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - - 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% NO OPINION/UNSURE 39 15 15 3 24 - - 12 8 16 5 25 26 11 14 19 16 17 11 11 11 24 5 9 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% - - 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% REFUSED 2 - - - 2 - - - - 1 1 - - 1 - 2 - 2 - - 2 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 96Table 202-1QUESTION 26:As part of efforts to improve the state economy and generate jobs as quickly as possible, some people have proposed reducing protections for land, air and water that apply tomajor industries. Would you prefer that: [INSERT STATE] reduce protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries ...OR... [INSERT STATE] maintain protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (REDUCE PROTECTIONS - -1354 -215 -222 -226 -206 -264 -250 -547 -806 -290 -349 -200 -262 -244 -246 -175 -125 -393 -287 -119 -297 -412 -613 MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS) -56% -54% -56% -57% -52% -66% -63% -48% -65% -60% -61% -50% -52% -56% -51% -40% -53% -68% -61% -60% -33% -59% -80% REDUCE PROTECTIONS 449 80 78 75 85 55 67 262 187 81 90 92 107 78 97 119 46 74 81 32 260 120 64 19% 20% 20% 19% 21% 14% 17% 23% 15% 17% 16% 23% 21% 18% 20% 27% 20% 13% 17% 16% 29% 17% 8% MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS 1803 295 300 301 291 320 317 810 993 371 439 292 369 322 343 294 171 466 368 151 557 532 677 75% 74% 75% 75% 73% 80% 79% 70% 80% 77% 76% 73% 74% 75% 71% 68% 73% 81% 79% 76% 63% 76% 88% BOTH 17 2 3 4 1 6 2 15 2 - 11 3 1 1 10 4 - 1 - 1 9 8 - 1% - 1% 1% - 2% - 1% - - 2% 1% - - 2% 1% - - - 1% 1% 1% - INCREASE PROTECTIONS 21 3 5 3 7 2 4 13 9 2 5 4 6 3 4 5 3 2 5 - 4 5 12 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - - 1% 2% UNSURE/DON'T KNOW 97 18 13 13 10 15 10 44 52 24 31 8 12 22 25 10 9 30 9 13 52 33 11 4% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 4% 5% 5% 2% 2% 5% 5% 2% 4% 5% 2% 6% 6% 5% 1% REFUSED 13 1 1 4 5 2 - 8 5 2 - 2 4 5 2 2 4 - 4 1 6 3 4 1% - - 1% 1% - - 1% - - - 1% 1% 1% - - 2% - 1% - 1% - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 97Table 202-2QUESTION 26:As part of efforts to improve the state economy and generate jobs as quickly as possible, some people have proposed reducing protections for land, air and water that apply tomajor industries. Would you prefer that: [INSERT STATE] reduce protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries ...OR... [INSERT STATE] maintain protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (REDUCE PROTECTIONS - -1354 -977 -352 -203 -408 -569 -64 -139 -106 -191 -213 -200 -218 -395 -157 -137 -215 -195 -254 -356 -211 -283 -67 MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS) -56% -55% -62% -60% -46% -63% -50% -67% -24% -43% -53% -66% -76% -82% -43% -26% -61% -56% -78% -81% -30% -34% -55% REDUCE PROTECTIONS 449 349 89 53 205 145 30 24 148 112 81 39 29 35 87 173 53 67 30 34 217 239 21 19% 20% 16% 16% 23% 16% 23% 11% 33% 25% 20% 13% 10% 7% 24% 33% 15% 19% 9% 8% 31% 29% 17% MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS 1803 1326 441 257 613 714 94 163 255 302 293 239 248 429 245 309 268 262 284 389 427 522 88 75% 74% 78% 76% 70% 79% 74% 78% 57% 69% 74% 79% 86% 89% 67% 60% 76% 75% 87% 89% 62% 63% 72% BOTH 17 16 1 - 14 2 - - 8 1 7 2 - - 6 3 5 3 - - 5 8 1 1% 1% - - 2% - - - 2% - 2% 1% - - 2% 1% 2% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% INCREASE PROTECTIONS 21 18 3 2 11 7 - 2 2 2 5 - 5 7 2 2 1 4 4 8 3 4 - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% - 2% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 2% - 1% - UNSURE/DON'T KNOW 97 63 32 23 31 32 4 19 28 24 11 21 4 7 26 26 23 10 7 4 36 43 10 4% 4% 6% 7% 3% 4% 3% 9% 6% 5% 3% 7% 1% 1% 7% 5% 7% 3% 2% 1% 5% 5% 8% REFUSED 13 12 1 1 8 3 - 1 6 1 1 2 2 2 - 6 - 3 2 2 5 5 2 1% 1% - - 1% - - 1% 1% - - 1% 1% - - 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 98Table 202-3QUESTION 26:As part of efforts to improve the state economy and generate jobs as quickly as possible, some people have proposed reducing protections for land, air and water that apply tomajor industries. Would you prefer that: [INSERT STATE] reduce protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries ...OR... [INSERT STATE] maintain protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (REDUCE PROTECTIONS - -1354 -233 -628 -440 -130 -160 -42 -341 -57 -550 -397 -481 -272 -182 -168 -230 -204 -278 -104 -168 -61 -121 -671 -683 MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS) -56% -24% -76% -84% -20% -65% -18% -79% -57% -84% -62% -60% -49% -47% -55% -69% -52% -68% -38% -60% -36% -55% -56% -57% REDUCE PROTECTIONS 449 334 82 28 227 33 82 35 21 42 98 135 125 91 58 39 78 56 74 51 51 40 232 217 19% 34% 10% 5% 36% 13% 35% 8% 21% 6% 15% 17% 23% 24% 19% 12% 20% 14% 27% 18% 30% 18% 19% 18% MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS 1803 567 710 468 356 193 125 376 78 591 495 616 396 273 226 269 282 334 178 218 112 161 903 900 75% 58% 86% 90% 56% 79% 53% 88% 77% 90% 78% 77% 72% 70% 74% 81% 72% 82% 66% 78% 66% 74% 75% 75% BOTH 17 11 5 1 6 2 5 3 - - 2 8 5 2 1 - 8 - 4 1 1 1 7 10 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 2% 1% - - - 1% 1% 1% - - 2% - 1% - 1% - 1% 1% INCREASE PROTECTIONS 21 5 9 7 2 2 1 3 1 11 3 8 6 2 2 2 3 4 5 1 1 2 10 11 1% - 1% 1% - 1% - 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 2% - - 1% 1% 1% UNSURE/DON'T KNOW 97 61 14 17 40 10 21 12 - 8 36 26 18 16 16 20 15 11 10 9 3 13 38 59 4% 6% 2% 3% 6% 4% 9% 3% - 1% 6% 3% 3% 4% 5% 6% 4% 3% 4% 3% 2% 6% 3% 5% REFUSED 13 5 7 2 1 5 3 - 1 3 4 5 1 3 2 1 5 - - 1 - 3 9 4 1% - 1% - - 2% 1% - 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% - - - - 1% 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 99Table 202-4QUESTION 26:As part of efforts to improve the state economy and generate jobs as quickly as possible, some people have proposed reducing protections for land, air and water that apply tomajor industries. Would you prefer that: [INSERT STATE] reduce protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries ...OR... [INSERT STATE] maintain protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (REDUCE PROTECTIONS - -1354 -131 -1131 -64 -206 -476 -749 -1010 -294 -398 -337 -228 -168 -941 -375 -972 -66 -317 -556 -75 -202 -153 -89 -241 MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS) -56% -19% -73% -13% -59% -80% -47% -65% -38% -42% -41% -36% -33% -66% -54% -57% -50% -52% -72% -13% -76% -83% -69% -56% REDUCE PROTECTIONS 449 255 172 188 62 46 370 223 210 242 212 188 157 201 142 307 29 128 94 223 25 7 17 78 19% 37% 11% 39% 18% 8% 23% 14% 27% 26% 26% 29% 31% 14% 20% 18% 22% 21% 12% 40% 10% 4% 13% 18% MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS 1803 387 1303 252 268 523 1120 1233 504 640 549 416 325 1142 517 1279 95 445 650 298 227 160 107 318 75% 56% 84% 52% 76% 88% 70% 80% 66% 68% 67% 65% 63% 80% 74% 75% 73% 74% 84% 53% 85% 87% 83% 74% BOTH 17 7 8 5 2 3 13 12 4 6 5 4 3 10 5 11 - 5 7 4 4 1 - 1 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - INCREASE PROTECTIONS 21 4 15 2 - 8 12 13 8 14 14 7 7 8 5 16 2 4 5 2 - 3 3 9 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 2% 2% UNSURE/DON'T KNOW 97 37 47 31 15 9 76 57 37 34 31 21 19 63 23 73 5 18 19 32 9 8 3 20 4% 5% 3% 6% 4% 1% 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 2% 6% 3% 4% 2% 5% REFUSED 13 5 8 2 4 5 7 12 1 4 4 3 3 8 5 9 - 5 1 4 1 4 - 4 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% - - - - 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - 1% - 2% - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 100Table 202-5QUESTION 26:As part of efforts to improve the state economy and generate jobs as quickly as possible, some people have proposed reducing protections for land, air and water that apply tomajor industries. Would you prefer that: [INSERT STATE] reduce protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries ...OR... [INSERT STATE] maintain protections for land, air and water that apply to major industries BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (REDUCE PROTECTIONS - -1354 -560 -541 -61 -787 -1163 -157 -910 48 -468 -5 -1239 -1342 18 -157 -1153 -1241 -61 -523 -88 -632 -1181 -156 23 MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS) -56% -56% -57% -66% -56% -62% -35% -81% 20% -48% -1% -82% -80% 3% -31% -68% -80% -9% -71% -17% -63% -72% -40% 8% REDUCE PROTECTIONS 449 185 177 11 263 298 139 92 127 219 329 100 134 304 155 229 122 299 84 185 167 187 101 150 19% 19% 19% 12% 19% 16% 31% 8% 54% 23% 47% 7% 8% 47% 31% 13% 8% 42% 12% 37% 17% 11% 26% 49% MAINTAIN PROTECTIONS 1803 745 718 72 1050 1461 296 1002 79 687 334 1340 1475 286 312 1382 1363 360 608 272 800 1368 257 127 75% 75% 75% 78% 75% 78% 65% 89% 34% 71% 48% 89% 88% 44% 63% 81% 88% 51% 83% 54% 79% 84% 66% 42% BOTH 17 6 6 1 11 16 1 3 5 7 1 11 10 6 4 13 10 5 5 3 8 10 1 4 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 2% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% INCREASE PROTECTIONS 21 7 7 2 14 16 5 13 6 3 3 17 17 5 8 14 14 5 10 3 8 15 3 4 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - - 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% UNSURE/DON'T KNOW 97 43 41 6 53 74 11 10 15 49 29 31 40 47 19 53 37 37 24 38 20 47 26 18 4% 4% 4% 6% 4% 4% 3% 1% 7% 5% 4% 2% 2% 7% 4% 3% 2% 5% 3% 8% 2% 3% 7% 6% REFUSED 13 5 3 - 8 9 2 5 2 5 3 8 9 4 1 10 7 3 3 2 6 8 3 1 1% - - 1% 1% - - - 1% - - - 1% 1% - 1% - - - - 1% - 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 101Table 20-1QUESTION 35:Now, some of the public lands in [INSERT STATE] have been designated as National Monuments by past Presidents, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those innational parks. The public can recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites there, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. Would you support or oppose designating more of our existing public lands as national monuments? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 1708 400 - 400 400 400 400 805 903 329 406 283 371 312 306 330 169 429 325 143 663 497 524 100% 23% - 23% 23% 23% 23% 47% 53% 19% 24% 17% 22% 18% 18% 19% 10% 25% 19% 8% 39% 29% 31% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 283 124 - -25 120 -36 -57 21 262 127 111 34 22 -15 45 -3 -20 194 60 5 -143 82 335 17% 31% - -6% 30% -9% -14% 3% 29% 39% 27% 12% 6% -5% 15% -1% -12% 45% 19% 3% -22% 16% 64% TOTAL SUPPORT 963 256 - 174 251 174 165 398 565 225 252 152 187 142 170 157 71 307 182 71 249 279 419------------- 56% 64% - 43% 63% 44% 41% 49% 63% 69% 62% 54% 50% 45% 56% 47% 42% 72% 56% 50% 38% 56% 80% TOTAL OPPOSE 679 132 - 199 131 210 223 377 303 98 141 117 165 157 125 160 91 114 122 66 391 197 84------------ 40% 33% - 50% 33% 53% 56% 47% 34% 30% 35% 41% 44% 50% 41% 49% 54% 27% 38% 46% 59% 40% 16% STRONGLY SUPPORT 563 153 - 88 152 86 91 234 329 125 133 90 121 91 94 89 51 164 122 40 130 150 274 33% 38% - 22% 38% 22% 23% 29% 36% 38% 33% 32% 33% 29% 31% 27% 30% 38% 38% 28% 20% 30% 52% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 400 103 - 86 99 88 75 164 236 100 119 62 66 51 76 68 20 143 60 31 119 129 146 23% 26% - 21% 25% 22% 19% 20% 26% 30% 29% 22% 18% 16% 25% 20% 12% 33% 19% 21% 18% 26% 28% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 313 73 - 72 55 84 87 146 167 48 79 50 69 67 59 53 34 68 66 33 175 92 43 18% 18% - 18% 14% 21% 22% 18% 18% 15% 19% 18% 19% 22% 19% 16% 20% 16% 20% 23% 26% 19% 8% STRONGLY OPPOSE 366 59 - 126 76 126 135 231 136 50 62 68 96 90 66 107 57 46 56 33 216 105 41 21% 15% - 32% 19% 31% 34% 29% 15% 15% 15% 24% 26% 29% 22% 33% 34% 11% 17% 23% 33% 21% 8% DON'T KNOW 58 11 - 27 17 12 11 26 32 5 12 14 17 8 9 12 4 7 19 4 20 19 18 3% 3% - 7% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 1% 3% 5% 5% 3% 3% 4% 3% 2% 6% 3% 3% 4% 3% REFUSED 8 2 - 1 2 3 1 5 4 - 1 - 2 5 1 1 3 - 1 2 3 2 3 - - - - - 1% - 1% - - - - - 2% - - 2% - - 2% - - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 102Table 20-2QUESTION 35:Now, some of the public lands in [INSERT STATE] have been designated as National Monuments by past Presidents, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those innational parks. The public can recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites there, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. Would you support or oppose designating more of our existing public lands as national monuments? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 1708 1257 425 255 611 646 94 161 328 335 262 235 205 319 281 380 238 256 207 314 557 648 94 100% 74% 25% 15% 36% 38% 5% 9% 19% 20% 15% 14% 12% 19% 16% 22% 14% 15% 12% 18% 33% 38% 5% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 283 132 148 117 -32 163 41 75 -118 -24 7 74 130 206 -12 -131 75 6 170 163 -149 -139 -13 17% 10% 35% 46% -5% 25% 44% 47% -36% -7% 3% 32% 63% 64% -4% -34% 31% 2% 82% 52% -27% -22% -14% TOTAL SUPPORT 963 667 281 182 277 390 66 115 98 151 128 151 166 253 130 119 154 123 187 229 192 242 39------------- 56% 53% 66% 71% 45% 60% 71% 72% 30% 45% 49% 64% 81% 79% 46% 31% 65% 48% 90% 73% 35% 37% 42% TOTAL OPPOSE 679 536 133 65 309 227 25 40 216 175 121 76 36 48 142 249 79 117 17 66 342 381 52------------ 40% 43% 31% 26% 51% 35% 27% 25% 66% 52% 46% 32% 18% 15% 50% 66% 33% 46% 8% 21% 61% 59% 55% STRONGLY SUPPORT 563 373 183 118 152 221 44 74 54 76 63 87 114 160 61 68 83 65 112 160 99 126 20 33% 30% 43% 46% 25% 34% 47% 46% 17% 23% 24% 37% 56% 50% 22% 18% 35% 26% 54% 51% 18% 19% 21% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 400 294 98 64 125 170 23 41 44 75 65 64 52 94 68 50 71 58 75 69 93 115 19 23% 23% 23% 25% 20% 26% 24% 25% 13% 22% 25% 27% 25% 29% 24% 13% 30% 23% 36% 22% 17% 18% 21% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 313 254 55 33 129 125 4 29 95 80 40 52 10 33 78 98 39 53 10 32 153 172 20 18% 20% 13% 13% 21% 19% 5% 18% 29% 24% 15% 22% 5% 10% 28% 26% 16% 21% 5% 10% 27% 27% 21% STRONGLY OPPOSE 366 281 78 32 180 101 21 11 121 95 81 24 26 15 64 152 40 64 7 34 189 209 32 21% 22% 18% 13% 29% 16% 22% 7% 37% 28% 31% 10% 13% 5% 23% 40% 17% 25% 3% 11% 34% 32% 34% DON'T KNOW 58 46 11 8 21 26 2 6 11 9 11 8 3 15 8 10 5 14 3 15 20 23 3 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 1% 5% 3% 3% 2% 5% 1% 5% 4% 3% 3% REFUSED 8 8 - - 5 4 - - 3 - 2 - - 3 1 2 - 2 - 3 3 3 - - 1% - - 1% 1% - - 1% - 1% - - 1% - - - 1% - 1% 1% - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 103Table 20-3QUESTION 35:Now, some of the public lands in [INSERT STATE] have been designated as National Monuments by past Presidents, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those innational parks. The public can recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites there, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. Would you support or oppose designating more of our existing public lands as national monuments? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 1708 734 578 350 471 185 169 304 85 428 480 526 403 286 238 243 242 284 194 209 125 161 853 855 100% 43% 34% 21% 28% 11% 10% 18% 5% 25% 28% 31% 24% 17% 14% 14% 14% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 283 -161 177 245 -155 9 -36 108 25 299 169 80 29 3 58 110 24 56 -32 60 -30 33 133 150 17% -22% 31% 70% -33% 5% -21% 35% 30% 70% 35% 15% 7% 1% 24% 46% 10% 20% -16% 29% -24% 20% 16% 18% TOTAL SUPPORT 963 275 366 289 150 94 64 199 54 354 314 292 209 140 142 172 128 163 79 130 46 95 479 484------------- 56% 37% 63% 82% 32% 51% 38% 66% 64% 83% 65% 55% 52% 49% 60% 71% 53% 58% 41% 62% 37% 59% 56% 57% TOTAL OPPOSE 679 436 189 44 305 85 100 91 29 55 145 212 180 138 84 62 105 108 111 70 76 62 346 333------------ 40% 59% 33% 13% 65% 46% 59% 30% 34% 13% 30% 40% 45% 48% 35% 25% 43% 38% 57% 33% 61% 38% 41% 39% STRONGLY SUPPORT 563 155 224 165 76 53 33 104 42 227 177 158 134 86 86 91 66 93 53 82 27 60 300 263 33% 21% 39% 47% 16% 29% 20% 34% 50% 53% 37% 30% 33% 30% 36% 38% 27% 33% 27% 39% 21% 37% 35% 31% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 400 120 142 124 74 41 31 95 12 127 137 134 75 54 56 81 63 71 26 48 19 35 179 221 23% 16% 25% 35% 16% 22% 18% 31% 14% 30% 28% 25% 19% 19% 24% 33% 26% 25% 14% 23% 15% 22% 21% 26% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 313 173 109 29 125 50 37 55 11 32 84 119 65 44 39 45 46 72 38 26 21 23 159 154 18% 24% 19% 8% 27% 27% 22% 18% 13% 7% 18% 23% 16% 15% 17% 18% 19% 25% 20% 13% 17% 14% 19% 18% STRONGLY OPPOSE 366 263 79 15 180 34 63 37 18 23 61 94 116 94 44 17 58 35 72 43 55 39 187 179 21% 36% 14% 4% 38% 19% 37% 12% 21% 5% 13% 18% 29% 33% 19% 7% 24% 12% 37% 21% 44% 24% 22% 21% DON'T KNOW 58 21 18 17 14 6 6 11 2 17 19 17 13 8 12 7 6 11 4 9 3 5 23 35 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% 2% 4% 2% 4% 2% 3% 3% 4% REFUSED 8 2 6 - 2 1 - 2 - 3 3 5 - - 1 2 4 2 - - - - 5 3 - - 1% - - - - 1% - 1% 1% 1% - - - 1% 2% 1% - - - - 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 104Table 20-4QUESTION 35:Now, some of the public lands in [INSERT STATE] have been designated as National Monuments by past Presidents, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those innational parks. The public can recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites there, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. Would you support or oppose designating more of our existing public lands as national monuments? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 1708 504 1092 358 263 414 1137 1083 563 676 583 467 374 1013 516 1191 93 448 517 419 217 123 84 305 100% 29% 64% 21% 15% 24% 67% 63% 33% 40% 34% 27% 22% 59% 30% 70% 5% 26% 30% 25% 13% 7% 5% 18% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 283 -140 389 -131 -17 252 -34 260 24 55 70 -16 -1 234 80 204 17 69 112 -131 102 78 64 38 17% -28% 36% -37% -7% 61% -3% 24% 4% 8% 12% -3% - 23% 16% 17% 18% 15% 22% -31% 47% 63% 76% 12% TOTAL SUPPORT 963 173 720 108 117 319 539 646 286 355 316 220 182 602 287 676 53 249 304 139 156 99 72 162------------- 56% 34% 66% 30% 45% 77% 47% 60% 51% 52% 54% 47% 49% 59% 56% 57% 57% 56% 59% 33% 72% 81% 85% 53% TOTAL OPPOSE 679 314 331 239 134 68 573 385 262 299 247 236 183 368 207 472 36 180 192 269 54 21 8 125------------ 40% 62% 30% 67% 51% 16% 50% 36% 47% 44% 42% 51% 49% 36% 40% 40% 39% 40% 37% 64% 25% 17% 9% 41% STRONGLY SUPPORT 563 100 424 61 62 213 301 383 160 211 188 131 109 349 192 371 36 167 178 79 86 61 54 86 33% 20% 39% 17% 24% 51% 26% 35% 29% 31% 32% 28% 29% 34% 37% 31% 39% 37% 34% 19% 40% 50% 64% 28% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 400 74 296 47 55 106 238 262 126 144 128 89 73 253 95 304 16 82 126 59 69 38 18 76 23% 15% 27% 13% 21% 26% 21% 24% 22% 21% 22% 19% 20% 25% 18% 26% 18% 18% 24% 14% 32% 31% 21% 25% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 313 126 166 104 62 38 250 184 120 111 92 84 65 193 91 221 10 84 93 117 28 9 5 58 18% 25% 15% 29% 24% 9% 22% 17% 21% 16% 16% 18% 17% 19% 18% 19% 10% 19% 18% 28% 13% 7% 6% 19% STRONGLY OPPOSE 366 187 165 135 73 30 323 201 142 188 154 152 118 176 116 250 26 96 98 152 26 13 3 67 21% 37% 15% 38% 28% 7% 28% 19% 25% 28% 27% 33% 32% 17% 22% 21% 28% 22% 19% 36% 12% 10% 3% 22% DON'T KNOW 58 15 35 10 9 24 22 45 13 19 17 10 7 38 18 40 1 17 20 10 6 2 3 16 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 6% 2% 4% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 4% 4% 3% 1% 4% 4% 2% 3% 1% 3% 5% REFUSED 8 1 5 1 2 2 3 7 1 3 3 1 1 5 4 4 3 1 2 - 2 - 2 2 - - - - 1% 1% - 1% - - - - - 1% 1% - 3% - - - 1% - 2% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 105Table 20-5QUESTION 35:Now, some of the public lands in [INSERT STATE] have been designated as National Monuments by past Presidents, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those innational parks. The public can recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites there, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. Would you support or oppose designating more of our existing public lands as national monuments? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 1708 701 671 63 1003 1339 313 810 155 685 503 1068 1193 467 359 1213 1098 510 567 335 704 1188 279 195 100% 41% 39% 4% 59% 78% 18% 47% 9% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 64% 30% 33% 20% 41% 70% 16% 11% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 283 183 176 25 99 319 -37 447 -88 -89 -148 429 526 -244 -30 344 494 -194 291 -91 85 404 -46 -75 17% 26% 26% 40% 10% 24% -12% 55% -57% -13% -29% 40% 44% -52% -8% 28% 45% -38% 51% -27% 12% 34% -16% -39% TOTAL SUPPORT 963 429 410 43 531 806 131 616 30 284 169 728 835 106 161 752 773 152 425 116 378 772 110 58------------- 56% 61% 61% 69% 53% 60% 42% 76% 19% 42% 34% 68% 70% 23% 45% 62% 70% 30% 75% 35% 54% 65% 40% 30% TOTAL OPPOSE 679 245 234 18 432 487 169 168 118 373 317 299 308 350 191 408 279 345 134 207 293 368 156 133------------ 40% 35% 35% 29% 43% 36% 54% 21% 76% 54% 63% 28% 26% 75% 53% 34% 25% 68% 24% 62% 42% 31% 56% 68% STRONGLY SUPPORT 563 258 242 25 303 485 64 401 13 134 97 439 496 62 94 449 467 84 284 62 201 465 53 31 33% 37% 36% 40% 30% 36% 20% 50% 8% 20% 19% 41% 42% 13% 26% 37% 43% 16% 50% 18% 29% 39% 19% 16% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 400 171 168 18 228 321 68 214 17 151 73 289 338 44 67 303 307 68 140 54 177 307 57 26 23% 24% 25% 29% 23% 24% 22% 26% 11% 22% 14% 27% 28% 9% 19% 25% 28% 13% 25% 16% 25% 26% 21% 14% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 313 113 110 8 199 226 75 94 31 180 118 169 189 116 75 207 169 118 66 67 154 194 67 42 18% 16% 16% 13% 20% 17% 24% 12% 20% 26% 24% 16% 16% 25% 21% 17% 15% 23% 12% 20% 22% 16% 24% 21% STRONGLY OPPOSE 366 132 125 10 234 261 94 75 87 193 199 130 119 234 116 201 110 227 67 139 139 174 89 91 21% 19% 19% 16% 23% 19% 30% 9% 56% 28% 40% 12% 10% 50% 32% 17% 10% 45% 12% 42% 20% 15% 32% 47% DON'T KNOW 58 24 23 2 34 41 11 20 8 27 15 38 44 12 7 48 38 13 7 9 31 41 11 4 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 1% 3% 4% 3% 4% 2% REFUSED 8 3 3 - 5 5 2 6 - 1 1 3 6 - - 5 7 - 1 3 1 7 1 - - - - - 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 1% - - - 1% - - 1% - 1% - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 106Table 21-1QUESTION C1:Now, some of the public lands in Colorado are designated as National Monuments, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those in national parks. The publiccan recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. There is a proposal to designate some of the public lands in the Arkansas River Canyon in Colorado as a National Monument. Would you support or oppose designating theseexisting public lands as a national monument? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 - 400 - - - - 192 208 85 91 79 84 60 93 67 32 83 96 28 136 118 136 100% - 100% - - - - 48% 52% 21% 23% 20% 21% 15% 23% 17% 8% 21% 24% 7% 34% 30% 34% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 180 - 180 - - - - 68 112 46 42 40 40 11 41 23 4 47 57 7 17 58 97 45% - 45% - - - - 35% 54% 54% 46% 51% 48% 19% 44% 35% 12% 56% 60% 26% 12% 49% 72% TOTAL SUPPORT 266 - 266 - - - - 118 148 61 59 54 57 34 61 40 17 59 71 17 67 81 110------------- 66% - 66% - - - - 62% 71% 72% 65% 68% 68% 56% 66% 59% 53% 71% 74% 60% 49% 68% 81% TOTAL OPPOSE 86 - 86 - - - - 50 36 16 18 14 17 23 21 16 13 12 14 10 50 23 12------------ 22% - 22% - - - - 26% 17% 18% 19% 17% 20% 38% 22% 25% 41% 15% 15% 34% 37% 19% 9% STRONGLY SUPPORT 158 - 158 - - - - 67 91 37 28 38 34 22 29 28 10 36 44 12 32 48 72 39% - 39% - - - - 35% 44% 43% 30% 48% 40% 36% 31% 42% 31% 43% 46% 41% 24% 40% 53% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 108 - 108 - - - - 51 57 24 31 16 24 12 32 12 7 23 28 5 35 33 37 27% - 27% - - - - 27% 27% 29% 34% 20% 28% 20% 35% 18% 22% 28% 29% 19% 26% 28% 27% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 42 - 42 - - - - 22 20 11 9 6 6 10 12 6 4 8 7 5 19 15 8 10% - 10% - - - - 11% 9% 12% 10% 8% 8% 16% 13% 8% 14% 9% 7% 19% 14% 13% 6% STRONGLY OPPOSE 45 - 45 - - - - 28 17 5 9 8 11 13 9 11 9 5 7 4 32 8 4 11% - 11% - - - - 15% 8% 6% 9% 10% 12% 21% 9% 16% 27% 6% 8% 15% 23% 7% 3% DON'T KNOW 31 - 31 - - - - 18 13 5 12 6 5 2 11 6 1 6 5 2 13 8 9 8% - 8% - - - - 9% 6% 6% 13% 7% 6% 4% 12% 9% 2% 7% 5% 6% 10% 7% 7% REFUSED 17 - 17 - - - - 6 11 3 3 6 5 1 - 5 1 6 5 - 5 7 5 4% - 4% - - - - 3% 5% 3% 3% 7% 5% 2% - 7% 4% 7% 6% - 4% 6% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 107Table 21-2QUESTION C1:Now, some of the public lands in Colorado are designated as National Monuments, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those in national parks. The publiccan recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. There is a proposal to designate some of the public lands in the Arkansas River Canyon in Colorado as a National Monument. Would you support or oppose designating theseexisting public lands as a national monument? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 311 81 48 153 158 18 30 70 66 76 42 42 94 47 88 61 58 66 70 83 105 15 100% 78% 20% 12% 38% 39% 4% 8% 18% 16% 19% 10% 10% 24% 12% 22% 15% 14% 16% 17% 21% 26% 4% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 180 134 43 29 51 83 12 17 5 12 34 24 28 69 4 12 34 24 47 50 12 10 9 45% 43% 53% 61% 33% 53% 67% 58% 6% 19% 44% 58% 68% 73% 9% 14% 56% 42% 71% 72% 14% 10% 58% TOTAL SUPPORT 266 203 58 38 91 112 15 23 32 35 51 29 32 78 23 44 42 39 54 56 44 53 11------------- 66% 65% 71% 79% 60% 71% 83% 76% 46% 53% 67% 69% 77% 82% 48% 50% 69% 67% 82% 80% 53% 50% 74% TOTAL OPPOSE 86 69 15 8 40 29 3 5 28 23 18 5 4 9 18 32 8 15 7 5 32 43 3------------ 22% 22% 19% 18% 26% 18% 17% 18% 39% 35% 23% 12% 9% 9% 39% 36% 13% 26% 11% 8% 39% 40% 16% STRONGLY SUPPORT 158 116 40 26 49 66 9 17 14 18 33 15 20 52 9 23 22 26 32 40 24 26 5 39% 37% 50% 54% 32% 42% 50% 57% 19% 28% 43% 36% 48% 56% 19% 26% 36% 45% 49% 58% 29% 25% 32% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 108 87 17 12 42 45 6 6 19 16 19 14 12 25 14 21 20 13 22 15 20 27 7 27% 28% 21% 24% 27% 29% 34% 19% 26% 25% 25% 34% 29% 27% 29% 24% 33% 23% 33% 22% 24% 25% 43% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 42 31 8 7 17 15 3 4 6 13 14 1 2 6 7 11 6 9 6 2 9 16 - 10% 10% 10% 14% 11% 9% 17% 12% 9% 19% 18% 2% 4% 6% 15% 13% 10% 15% 9% 3% 11% 16% 2% STRONGLY OPPOSE 45 37 7 2 23 14 - 2 22 10 4 4 2 3 11 21 2 6 1 4 24 26 2 11% 12% 8% 4% 15% 9% - 6% 31% 15% 5% 9% 5% 3% 23% 23% 3% 11% 1% 5% 28% 25% 14% DON'T KNOW 31 28 3 - 16 12 - - 8 6 5 2 5 4 6 7 8 - 3 7 7 10 1 8% 9% 3% - 10% 7% - - 11% 9% 7% 6% 12% 5% 13% 8% 13% - 4% 10% 9% 10% 10% REFUSED 17 12 5 2 6 6 - 2 3 2 2 5 1 4 - 5 3 4 2 2 - - - 4% 4% 7% 4% 4% 4% - 6% 4% 3% 2% 13% 3% 4% - 6% 5% 7% 4% 3% - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 108Table 21-3QUESTION C1:Now, some of the public lands in Colorado are designated as National Monuments, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those in national parks. The publiccan recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. There is a proposal to designate some of the public lands in the Arkansas River Canyon in Colorado as a National Monument. Would you support or oppose designating theseexisting public lands as a national monument? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 145 146 96 100 33 36 76 7 129 92 153 89 59 37 56 80 74 46 43 26 33 200 200 100% 36% 37% 24% 25% 8% 9% 19% 2% 32% 23% 38% 22% 15% 9% 14% 20% 18% 12% 11% 6% 8% 50% 50% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 180 13 84 76 1 18 7 44 5 93 62 68 30 17 21 41 38 30 8 22 - 16 98 82 45% 9% 57% 79% 1% 55% 19% 58% 61% 72% 67% 44% 34% 28% 57% 73% 48% 40% 18% 51% 1% 50% 49% 41% TOTAL SUPPORT 266 68 108 80 43 23 19 55 5 104 72 100 57 32 27 45 53 47 26 31 9 23 139 126------------- 66% 47% 74% 84% 43% 71% 52% 73% 71% 81% 78% 65% 63% 55% 74% 81% 67% 63% 56% 71% 37% 69% 70% 63% TOTAL OPPOSE 86 55 24 4 42 5 12 11 1 12 10 32 26 16 6 4 16 17 18 9 9 6 42 45------------ 22% 38% 16% 4% 42% 16% 33% 14% 10% 9% 11% 21% 29% 27% 16% 8% 20% 23% 38% 20% 36% 19% 21% 22% STRONGLY SUPPORT 158 29 61 62 18 13 9 34 1 71 49 58 31 17 17 32 30 28 14 18 5 12 81 77 39% 20% 42% 65% 18% 41% 24% 45% 17% 55% 53% 38% 35% 29% 47% 57% 37% 38% 30% 41% 21% 35% 40% 39% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 108 40 46 18 25 10 10 21 4 33 24 42 25 15 10 14 24 18 12 13 4 11 59 49 27% 27% 32% 19% 25% 30% 28% 28% 54% 26% 25% 28% 28% 26% 27% 24% 30% 25% 27% 30% 15% 34% 29% 25% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 42 21 16 2 13 4 7 8 1 7 4 19 14 5 3 2 7 11 9 4 3 3 22 19 10% 15% 11% 2% 13% 11% 21% 10% 10% 6% 4% 12% 15% 9% 7% 3% 9% 15% 20% 10% 10% 8% 11% 10% STRONGLY OPPOSE 45 34 8 2 29 2 4 3 - 4 6 14 13 10 3 3 8 6 8 4 7 4 19 25 11% 24% 5% 2% 29% 5% 12% 4% - 3% 7% 9% 14% 17% 9% 5% 10% 8% 18% 10% 26% 11% 10% 13% DON'T KNOW 31 14 10 7 9 4 3 5 1 8 5 18 3 5 4 1 10 8 1 2 3 2 14 17 8% 10% 7% 7% 9% 13% 9% 6% 19% 6% 6% 12% 4% 8% 10% 3% 13% 11% 3% 4% 11% 5% 7% 8% REFUSED 17 7 4 5 5 - 2 5 - 5 5 3 3 6 - 5 1 2 1 2 4 2 5 12 4% 5% 3% 6% 5% - 6% 7% - 4% 5% 2% 4% 11% - 8% 1% 3% 3% 5% 16% 7% 3% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 109Table 21-4QUESTION C1:Now, some of the public lands in Colorado are designated as National Monuments, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those in national parks. The publiccan recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. There is a proposal to designate some of the public lands in the Arkansas River Canyon in Colorado as a National Monument. Would you support or oppose designating theseexisting public lands as a national monument? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 114 264 74 53 103 268 269 119 152 132 99 79 244 104 294 22 89 146 90 27 35 26 72 100% 28% 66% 19% 13% 26% 67% 67% 30% 38% 33% 25% 20% 61% 26% 74% 5% 22% 36% 23% 7% 9% 7% 18% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 180 2 168 -4 19 84 80 143 32 45 39 17 12 131 37 141 6 32 81 17 21 17 20 20 45% 1% 64% -5% 36% 82% 30% 53% 27% 29% 30% 17% 15% 54% 36% 48% 26% 36% 56% 19% 78% 48% 77% 27% TOTAL SUPPORT 266 52 199 30 32 89 155 193 66 87 76 51 40 175 61 203 14 51 106 48 22 24 21 41------------- 66% 45% 75% 40% 60% 87% 58% 72% 55% 57% 57% 52% 51% 72% 59% 69% 63% 57% 73% 53% 82% 70% 81% 56% TOTAL OPPOSE 86 50 31 34 13 5 75 50 34 42 36 34 29 44 24 62 8 19 25 31 1 8 1 21------------ 22% 44% 12% 46% 24% 5% 28% 18% 28% 28% 28% 34% 36% 18% 23% 21% 37% 22% 17% 34% 4% 22% 4% 29% STRONGLY SUPPORT 158 21 126 10 18 64 78 123 32 47 43 25 21 109 37 121 10 28 66 20 17 17 11 26 39% 18% 48% 13% 34% 62% 29% 46% 27% 31% 32% 25% 26% 44% 35% 41% 45% 32% 45% 22% 65% 49% 40% 36% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 108 31 73 20 14 25 77 70 34 40 33 26 20 66 24 82 4 22 40 27 5 8 11 15 27% 27% 28% 27% 27% 24% 29% 26% 29% 26% 25% 26% 25% 27% 23% 28% 17% 25% 27% 30% 17% 22% 40% 20% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 42 19 20 11 6 5 33 24 18 15 14 11 10 27 13 28 6 10 11 12 1 7 1 9 10% 17% 7% 15% 11% 5% 12% 9% 15% 10% 10% 11% 12% 11% 13% 10% 26% 11% 8% 14% 4% 19% 4% 12% STRONGLY OPPOSE 45 31 11 23 7 - 42 26 16 27 23 23 19 18 11 34 2 9 13 19 - 1 - 12 11% 27% 4% 31% 13% - 16% 10% 13% 18% 17% 23% 24% 7% 10% 12% 11% 11% 9% 21% - 3% - 17% DON'T KNOW 31 7 22 6 7 6 23 15 14 14 11 10 7 16 8 22 - 8 10 8 2 2 2 6 8% 6% 8% 9% 13% 6% 9% 6% 12% 9% 8% 10% 9% 7% 8% 8% - 9% 7% 9% 9% 6% 6% 9% REFUSED 17 5 12 4 1 3 14 12 5 9 9 4 4 8 10 7 - 10 5 3 1 1 2 4 4% 5% 4% 6% 2% 3% 5% 4% 5% 6% 7% 4% 5% 3% 10% 2% - 11% 3% 4% 5% 2% 9% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 110Table 21-5QUESTION C1:Now, some of the public lands in Colorado are designated as National Monuments, with protections for natural areas and water similar to those in national parks. The publiccan recreate or view unique natural, cultural, and historic sites, and the lands are protected from development and resource extraction. There is a proposal to designate some of the public lands in the Arkansas River Canyon in Colorado as a National Monument. Would you support or oppose designating theseexisting public lands as a national monument? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 167 163 18 231 311 82 188 47 157 118 252 284 107 89 274 264 116 97 94 180 257 67 61 100% 42% 41% 4% 58% 78% 21% 47% 12% 39% 29% 63% 71% 27% 22% 68% 66% 29% 24% 24% 45% 64% 17% 15% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 180 78 76 14 100 160 19 152 -16 43 -4 171 197 -19 9 156 184 -3 74 -8 94 165 20 -12 45% 47% 47% 79% 43% 51% 23% 81% -34% 27% -4% 68% 69% -18% 10% 57% 70% -2% 76% -9% 52% 65% 30% -20% TOTAL SUPPORT 266 113 111 15 152 216 48 163 14 86 51 196 226 36 42 201 210 49 80 38 125 197 39 20------------- 66% 67% 68% 86% 66% 69% 58% 86% 29% 55% 44% 78% 79% 33% 48% 74% 80% 42% 83% 41% 69% 77% 58% 33% TOTAL OPPOSE 86 34 34 1 52 56 29 10 29 44 56 25 28 55 34 45 26 52 7 46 31 32 18 33------------ 22% 20% 21% 8% 23% 18% 35% 6% 63% 28% 47% 10% 10% 51% 38% 17% 10% 45% 7% 49% 17% 12% 28% 53% STRONGLY SUPPORT 158 66 65 12 92 131 25 109 3 44 26 124 139 16 24 121 133 18 50 17 72 127 18 4 39% 39% 40% 66% 40% 42% 31% 58% 7% 28% 22% 49% 49% 15% 27% 44% 51% 16% 51% 18% 40% 50% 26% 7% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 108 47 46 4 60 84 23 54 10 43 26 72 86 19 18 80 77 31 30 21 53 70 21 16 27% 28% 28% 20% 26% 27% 27% 29% 22% 27% 22% 29% 30% 18% 20% 29% 29% 27% 31% 23% 29% 27% 32% 26% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 42 20 20 - 22 29 11 7 11 23 21 19 21 19 11 27 17 21 6 17 18 23 7 11 10% 12% 12% 3% 9% 9% 14% 4% 23% 15% 18% 8% 7% 17% 12% 10% 6% 18% 6% 18% 10% 9% 11% 18% STRONGLY OPPOSE 45 14 14 1 30 27 18 3 19 20 34 6 8 36 23 19 9 31 1 30 13 9 11 21 11% 9% 9% 5% 13% 9% 21% 2% 40% 13% 29% 2% 3% 34% 26% 7% 4% 27% 1% 31% 7% 4% 17% 35% DON'T KNOW 31 12 11 1 19 26 2 7 3 19 5 19 20 9 5 17 16 10 4 7 16 16 8 5 8% 7% 7% 6% 8% 8% 2% 4% 6% 12% 4% 8% 7% 8% 6% 6% 6% 9% 4% 8% 9% 6% 12% 8% REFUSED 17 9 7 - 8 14 4 8 1 8 6 12 10 7 7 10 12 5 6 2 9 12 2 4 4% 5% 4% - 4% 4% 4% 4% 2% 5% 5% 5% 3% 7% 8% 4% 5% 4% 6% 3% 5% 5% 3% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 111Table 22-1QUESTION 38:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% SOLAR POWER 962 238 112 53 170 105 32 418 544 196 269 166 199 125 191 160 66 275 205 59 251 278 423 40% 59% 28% 13% 42% 26% 8% 36% 44% 41% 47% 41% 40% 29% 40% 37% 28% 48% 44% 30% 28% 40% 55% WIND POWER 443 33 93 140 78 101 124 171 271 98 118 73 82 70 93 51 28 124 104 43 138 135 163 18% 8% 23% 35% 20% 25% 31% 15% 22% 21% 21% 18% 16% 16% 19% 12% 12% 22% 22% 21% 16% 19% 21% NATURAL GAS 352 49 71 42 62 63 79 226 127 55 52 58 80 105 70 93 63 38 45 42 198 97 49 15% 12% 18% 11% 16% 16% 20% 20% 10% 11% 9% 14% 16% 24% 15% 21% 27% 7% 10% 21% 22% 14% 6% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 217 32 44 26 36 47 31 93 124 70 38 28 48 33 43 29 21 64 47 12 59 81 69 9% 8% 11% 7% 9% 12% 8% 8% 10% 15% 7% 7% 10% 8% 9% 7% 9% 11% 10% 6% 7% 12% 9% OIL 113 16 13 50 16 19 30 60 53 24 26 15 23 26 20 27 13 29 11 13 66 28 17 5% 4% 3% 12% 4% 5% 7% 5% 4% 5% 5% 4% 5% 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% 2% 6% 7% 4% 2% COAL 87 4 23 31 5 20 44 49 38 8 19 17 26 17 16 21 11 10 22 6 54 25 4 4% 1% 6% 8% 1% 5% 11% 4% 3% 2% 3% 4% 5% 4% 3% 5% 5% 2% 5% 3% 6% 4% 1% ALL/COMBINATION 188 21 39 51 25 37 57 112 76 23 48 38 37 42 42 47 22 29 28 20 103 47 33 8% 5% 10% 13% 6% 9% 14% 10% 6% 5% 8% 9% 7% 10% 9% 11% 10% 5% 6% 10% 12% 7% 4% NONE OF THESE 22 4 4 4 4 4 3 14 8 2 4 7 3 6 4 6 4 2 4 2 10 7 5 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% UNSURE/REFUSED 15 3 1 3 2 4 1 9 7 4 2 - 1 8 2 1 5 3 - 3 9 2 4 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - - - 2% 1% - 2% 1% - 2% 1% - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 112Table 22-2QUESTION 38:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% SOLAR POWER 962 664 281 179 291 372 65 114 115 135 143 135 153 270 111 136 163 113 187 234 190 225 34 40% 37% 49% 53% 33% 41% 51% 55% 26% 31% 36% 45% 53% 56% 30% 26% 47% 33% 57% 54% 27% 27% 28% WIND POWER 443 343 97 43 131 212 16 27 53 85 60 75 57 105 76 62 69 65 68 95 102 134 31 18% 19% 17% 13% 15% 24% 13% 13% 12% 19% 15% 25% 20% 22% 21% 12% 20% 19% 21% 22% 15% 16% 26% NATURAL GAS 352 276 65 39 190 86 12 27 126 72 71 27 24 26 59 140 30 68 19 29 165 181 14 15% 15% 12% 12% 22% 10% 9% 13% 28% 16% 18% 9% 8% 5% 16% 27% 8% 19% 6% 7% 24% 22% 12% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 217 161 50 36 73 88 14 22 23 36 39 42 28 41 27 33 47 34 29 39 32 49 11 9% 9% 9% 11% 8% 10% 11% 10% 5% 8% 10% 14% 10% 8% 7% 6% 13% 10% 9% 9% 5% 6% 9% OIL 113 78 34 21 43 35 10 11 36 31 22 5 2 15 29 37 10 17 10 8 57 66 8 5% 4% 6% 6% 5% 4% 8% 5% 8% 7% 6% 2% 1% 3% 8% 7% 3% 5% 3% 2% 8% 8% 7% COAL 87 75 9 5 44 31 1 4 30 24 18 7 1 3 16 39 9 15 2 2 39 48 9 4% 4% 2% 1% 5% 3% - 2% 7% 6% 5% 2% - 1% 4% 7% 3% 4% - - 6% 6% 8% ALL/COMBINATION 188 156 25 11 90 66 8 3 56 47 37 11 15 17 40 63 20 27 11 22 94 102 10 8% 9% 4% 3% 10% 7% 6% 2% 13% 11% 9% 3% 5% 4% 11% 12% 6% 8% 3% 5% 14% 12% 8% NONE OF THESE 22 19 3 2 12 7 2 - 4 6 7 - 3 2 6 4 - 7 - 5 10 10 - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% - 1% - 2% 1% - 2% - 1% 1% 1% - UNSURE/REFUSED 15 13 3 - 6 6 - - 4 5 1 2 4 - 3 5 1 1 2 3 4 6 3 1% 1% - - 1% 1% - - 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% 1% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 113Table 22-3QUESTION 38:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% SOLAR POWER 962 269 356 307 164 85 61 197 40 378 321 343 163 127 149 171 149 194 74 90 44 83 470 492 40% 27% 43% 59% 26% 35% 26% 46% 39% 58% 50% 43% 30% 33% 49% 52% 38% 48% 27% 32% 26% 38% 39% 41% WIND POWER 443 145 188 100 78 59 39 90 26 136 99 139 132 69 34 65 58 81 54 78 24 45 214 228 18% 15% 23% 19% 12% 24% 16% 21% 26% 21% 15% 17% 24% 18% 11% 20% 15% 20% 20% 28% 14% 21% 18% 19% NATURAL GAS 352 250 79 18 167 30 62 34 19 30 77 108 85 78 48 29 81 27 47 38 46 32 182 170 15% 25% 10% 3% 26% 12% 26% 8% 19% 5% 12% 14% 15% 20% 16% 9% 21% 7% 17% 13% 27% 15% 15% 14% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 217 56 100 54 39 19 13 67 5 63 43 84 51 32 17 26 35 49 24 27 11 21 119 98 9% 6% 12% 10% 6% 8% 6% 16% 4% 10% 7% 11% 9% 8% 6% 8% 9% 12% 9% 10% 7% 10% 10% 8% OIL 113 80 22 10 50 16 21 6 7 10 28 26 37 22 17 12 13 13 19 18 12 10 49 64 5% 8% 3% 2% 8% 7% 9% 1% 7% 1% 4% 3% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 3% 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 5% COAL 87 66 15 7 45 9 20 5 1 4 15 20 30 23 6 9 11 8 19 10 12 11 39 48 4% 7% 2% 1% 7% 4% 8% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 5% 6% 2% 3% 3% 2% 7% 4% 7% 5% 3% 4% ALL/COMBINATION 188 100 58 20 77 24 17 25 4 29 41 71 45 30 28 13 39 31 26 18 17 13 110 78 8% 10% 7% 4% 12% 10% 7% 6% 4% 4% 6% 9% 8% 8% 9% 4% 10% 8% 10% 6% 10% 6% 9% 7% NONE OF THESE 22 9 5 4 6 - 3 4 - 5 7 7 4 4 5 2 5 3 3 - 1 3 5 18 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% UNSURE/REFUSED 15 8 3 2 7 2 2 1 - 2 7 1 5 3 2 5 1 - 4 1 2 1 9 6 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% - - - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% - 1% - 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 114Table 22-4QUESTION 38:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% SOLAR POWER 962 176 716 117 118 331 534 638 291 314 256 179 121 634 266 696 56 227 334 137 145 71 74 173 40% 25% 46% 24% 34% 56% 33% 41% 38% 33% 31% 28% 24% 44% 38% 41% 43% 38% 43% 24% 55% 39% 57% 40% WIND POWER 443 80 332 52 72 126 265 310 122 185 169 132 116 256 119 324 21 104 176 62 46 54 16 83 18% 12% 21% 11% 21% 21% 17% 20% 16% 20% 21% 21% 23% 18% 17% 19% 16% 17% 23% 11% 17% 29% 13% 19% NATURAL GAS 352 188 149 134 57 30 303 213 128 176 153 133 109 169 131 218 26 112 83 175 18 14 5 53 15% 27% 10% 28% 16% 5% 19% 14% 17% 19% 19% 21% 21% 12% 19% 13% 20% 19% 11% 31% 7% 7% 4% 12% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 217 54 147 36 18 69 128 151 58 69 55 50 36 145 55 160 6 49 71 35 30 18 23 34 9% 8% 9% 7% 5% 12% 8% 10% 8% 7% 7% 8% 7% 10% 8% 9% 5% 8% 9% 6% 11% 10% 18% 8% OIL 113 64 46 47 17 5 104 56 48 51 48 42 38 61 29 84 6 23 19 50 3 8 1 32 5% 9% 3% 10% 5% 1% 7% 4% 6% 5% 6% 7% 7% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 3% 9% 1% 4% 1% 7% COAL 87 60 26 42 12 1 84 50 31 46 43 36 34 42 36 52 4 32 20 46 4 2 - 12 4% 9% 2% 9% 3% - 5% 3% 4% 5% 5% 6% 7% 3% 5% 3% 3% 5% 3% 8% 1% 1% - 3% ALL/COMBINATION 188 63 109 46 47 25 151 103 76 83 78 60 55 104 55 132 10 50 63 50 17 12 8 35 8% 9% 7% 10% 13% 4% 9% 7% 10% 9% 10% 9% 11% 7% 8% 8% 7% 8% 8% 9% 6% 6% 6% 8% NONE OF THESE 22 6 16 5 4 5 16 16 6 12 10 6 4 10 3 20 1 3 6 4 2 3 2 3 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% UNSURE/REFUSED 15 3 12 3 6 2 13 11 4 3 3 1 1 12 5 10 - 5 3 2 2 2 - 5 1% - 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% - - - - - 1% 1% 1% - 1% - - 1% 1% - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 115Table 22-5QUESTION 38:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% SOLAR POWER 962 437 419 39 522 778 168 560 42 337 176 707 815 126 153 744 812 116 391 112 398 785 112 35 40% 44% 44% 42% 37% 42% 37% 50% 18% 35% 25% 47% 48% 19% 31% 44% 52% 16% 53% 22% 39% 48% 29% 12% WIND POWER 443 186 177 21 256 355 71 245 22 168 82 337 370 62 80 334 352 71 169 41 207 359 57 18 18% 19% 19% 23% 18% 19% 16% 22% 9% 17% 12% 22% 22% 9% 16% 20% 23% 10% 23% 8% 21% 22% 14% 6% NATURAL GAS 352 107 103 6 244 257 87 91 67 180 181 139 137 206 103 212 81 241 42 160 127 135 91 115 15% 11% 11% 6% 17% 14% 19% 8% 29% 19% 26% 9% 8% 32% 21% 12% 5% 34% 6% 32% 13% 8% 23% 38% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 217 99 92 12 116 177 34 112 13 86 39 161 181 32 37 163 185 27 66 28 107 160 37 16 9% 10% 10% 13% 8% 9% 8% 10% 6% 9% 6% 11% 11% 5% 7% 10% 12% 4% 9% 6% 11% 10% 9% 5% OIL 113 44 44 2 68 88 24 29 27 49 74 33 36 76 39 59 23 86 20 49 40 35 33 40 5% 4% 5% 2% 5% 5% 5% 3% 12% 5% 11% 2% 2% 12% 8% 3% 1% 12% 3% 10% 4% 2% 8% 13% COAL 87 33 33 1 54 55 29 18 32 36 58 23 22 62 36 41 12 72 6 57 23 20 20 45 4% 3% 3% 1% 4% 3% 6% 2% 14% 4% 8% 2% 1% 9% 7% 2% 1% 10% 1% 11% 2% 1% 5% 15% ALL/COMBINATION 188 71 69 7 117 142 35 60 23 101 77 85 103 74 42 123 76 85 30 47 97 118 37 29 8% 7% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 5% 10% 10% 11% 6% 6% 11% 8% 7% 5% 12% 4% 9% 10% 7% 9% 10% NONE OF THESE 22 10 10 2 12 13 5 8 7 6 9 11 11 11 4 16 8 8 3 9 7 9 5 5 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% UNSURE/REFUSED 15 4 4 2 11 9 2 3 1 7 3 9 10 4 5 8 5 3 6 1 3 12 1 1 1% - - 2% 1% - - - - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% - - - 1% - - 1% - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 116Table 23-1QUESTION 38C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% SOLAR POWER 1475 297 218 162 264 205 120 636 839 316 406 238 300 207 301 224 110 421 315 98 397 450 607 61% 74% 55% 40% 66% 51% 30% 55% 67% 66% 70% 59% 60% 48% 62% 51% 47% 73% 67% 49% 45% 64% 79% WIND POWER 1177 177 185 219 209 221 167 501 676 256 303 191 247 173 244 177 80 315 261 93 330 331 500 49% 44% 46% 55% 52% 55% 42% 43% 54% 53% 53% 47% 49% 40% 51% 41% 34% 55% 56% 47% 37% 47% 65% NATURAL GAS 631 95 113 90 105 117 161 360 271 112 112 99 144 161 126 144 88 98 99 73 338 182 100 26% 24% 28% 23% 26% 29% 40% 31% 22% 23% 19% 25% 29% 37% 26% 33% 38% 17% 21% 37% 38% 26% 13% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 557 112 100 58 77 91 58 239 318 152 121 103 100 80 109 86 44 165 117 36 162 193 190 23% 28% 25% 15% 19% 23% 15% 21% 26% 32% 21% 26% 20% 19% 23% 20% 19% 29% 25% 18% 18% 27% 25% OIL 260 34 41 88 49 38 76 144 117 41 52 44 57 67 42 64 38 51 37 29 156 62 34 11% 9% 10% 22% 12% 10% 19% 12% 9% 9% 9% 11% 11% 15% 9% 15% 16% 9% 8% 14% 18% 9% 4% COAL 218 23 50 62 22 35 91 140 78 21 48 38 61 50 42 65 33 27 34 17 135 61 17 9% 6% 13% 16% 5% 9% 23% 12% 6% 4% 8% 9% 12% 12% 9% 15% 14% 5% 7% 9% 15% 9% 2% ALL/COMBINATION 197 23 39 51 30 37 58 117 80 27 48 38 40 44 46 47 25 29 31 20 108 48 34 8% 6% 10% 13% 7% 9% 15% 10% 6% 6% 8% 10% 8% 10% 9% 11% 11% 5% 7% 10% 12% 7% 4% NONE OF THESE 34 7 6 7 8 5 5 22 12 2 5 7 6 13 4 7 10 3 6 3 17 11 6 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 4% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% UNSURE/REFUSED 25 3 4 4 3 6 2 12 13 4 3 1 5 12 2 3 6 5 3 5 12 8 5 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 117Table 23-2QUESTION 38C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% SOLAR POWER 1475 1064 387 242 473 591 78 163 180 217 232 218 215 392 184 210 253 194 275 330 297 366 59 61% 60% 68% 72% 54% 65% 62% 78% 40% 49% 58% 72% 75% 82% 50% 40% 72% 56% 84% 75% 43% 44% 48% WIND POWER 1177 845 318 189 348 496 78 111 135 195 168 163 193 308 156 173 176 152 222 276 241 301 68 49% 47% 56% 56% 40% 55% 61% 53% 30% 44% 42% 54% 67% 64% 43% 33% 50% 44% 68% 63% 35% 37% 55% NATURAL GAS 631 484 124 77 292 192 25 52 195 143 123 59 35 66 114 223 73 108 36 62 269 309 32 26% 27% 22% 23% 33% 21% 19% 25% 44% 32% 31% 19% 12% 14% 31% 43% 21% 31% 11% 14% 39% 38% 26% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 557 409 140 89 192 217 31 58 73 89 96 97 68 122 80 82 108 85 78 111 119 144 25 23% 23% 25% 26% 22% 24% 24% 28% 16% 20% 24% 32% 23% 25% 22% 16% 31% 24% 24% 26% 17% 18% 20% OIL 260 190 63 33 109 81 16 18 89 67 40 22 8 26 54 103 25 37 12 22 132 150 15 11% 11% 11% 10% 12% 9% 12% 8% 20% 15% 10% 7% 3% 5% 15% 20% 7% 11% 4% 5% 19% 18% 12% COAL 218 178 33 15 119 59 6 9 85 50 42 19 11 6 43 92 20 40 5 11 106 125 15 9% 10% 6% 4% 13% 7% 5% 4% 19% 11% 11% 6% 4% 1% 12% 18% 6% 11% 2% 3% 15% 15% 12% ALL/COMBINATION 197 163 28 12 95 69 9 3 61 47 37 11 17 17 42 66 20 27 12 22 95 106 12 8% 9% 5% 4% 11% 8% 7% 2% 14% 11% 9% 4% 6% 4% 11% 13% 6% 8% 4% 5% 14% 13% 10% NONE OF THESE 34 28 5 3 18 10 3 - 9 9 10 1 3 3 7 10 1 10 - 6 15 17 2 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% - 2% 2% 2% - 1% 1% 2% 2% - 3% - 1% 2% 2% 2% UNSURE/REFUSED 25 18 7 - 8 11 - - 4 8 4 5 4 1 5 7 1 7 2 3 6 8 4 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - - 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 118Table 23-3QUESTION 38C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% SOLAR POWER 1475 442 562 435 248 145 120 308 67 533 442 517 292 206 200 242 231 286 123 169 74 132 736 740 61% 45% 68% 83% 39% 59% 51% 72% 66% 81% 69% 65% 53% 53% 65% 73% 59% 70% 45% 60% 44% 60% 61% 62% WIND POWER 1177 344 472 325 196 130 78 232 65 426 323 385 278 181 139 184 171 214 124 154 66 116 572 605 49% 35% 57% 62% 31% 53% 33% 54% 64% 65% 51% 48% 50% 47% 45% 55% 44% 53% 46% 55% 39% 53% 48% 50% NATURAL GAS 631 403 170 46 274 62 97 79 28 72 153 197 158 119 76 77 127 70 87 70 64 54 297 334 26% 41% 21% 9% 43% 25% 41% 18% 28% 11% 24% 25% 29% 31% 25% 23% 32% 17% 32% 25% 38% 25% 25% 28% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 557 172 215 154 118 42 41 143 12 176 133 215 121 79 61 72 86 129 55 66 29 50 302 255 23% 18% 26% 30% 19% 17% 17% 33% 12% 27% 21% 27% 22% 20% 20% 22% 22% 32% 20% 24% 17% 23% 25% 21% OIL 260 191 49 17 128 28 42 19 15 18 61 66 79 49 28 33 44 22 45 35 23 26 123 138 11% 19% 6% 3% 20% 12% 18% 4% 15% 3% 9% 8% 14% 13% 9% 10% 11% 6% 16% 12% 14% 12% 10% 11% COAL 218 167 37 12 111 23 50 10 6 11 52 50 59 56 35 17 28 22 40 19 36 20 107 111 9% 17% 5% 2% 18% 10% 21% 2% 6% 2% 8% 6% 11% 14% 12% 5% 7% 5% 15% 7% 21% 9% 9% 9% ALL/COMBINATION 197 103 61 23 80 26 17 26 4 30 42 74 47 32 28 14 42 31 27 21 20 13 115 82 8% 10% 7% 4% 13% 11% 7% 6% 4% 5% 7% 9% 9% 8% 9% 4% 11% 8% 10% 7% 12% 6% 10% 7% NONE OF THESE 34 13 12 5 10 4 3 7 - 6 9 12 6 7 7 2 9 3 3 2 3 5 6 28 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% - 2% UNSURE/REFUSED 25 12 7 2 9 3 3 4 - 2 7 2 9 8 2 5 2 - 4 5 4 4 15 10 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% - 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 119Table 23-4QUESTION 38C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% SOLAR POWER 1475 280 1091 180 185 489 840 992 433 505 431 326 252 951 422 1050 82 364 534 230 198 125 96 254 61% 40% 70% 37% 53% 82% 53% 64% 57% 54% 53% 51% 49% 66% 60% 62% 63% 60% 69% 41% 74% 68% 74% 59% WIND POWER 1177 211 882 141 163 376 679 789 350 457 389 293 226 708 332 845 71 279 453 162 153 110 78 194 49% 30% 57% 29% 46% 63% 42% 51% 46% 49% 48% 46% 44% 49% 47% 50% 54% 46% 58% 29% 57% 60% 60% 45% NATURAL GAS 631 313 289 225 102 62 529 375 230 296 250 217 170 325 200 428 35 174 163 267 40 28 17 106 26% 45% 19% 47% 29% 10% 33% 24% 30% 31% 31% 34% 33% 23% 29% 25% 27% 29% 21% 48% 15% 16% 13% 25% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 557 128 389 84 65 170 330 390 156 168 143 99 73 381 143 411 21 125 162 98 82 49 43 113 23% 18% 25% 18% 18% 29% 21% 25% 20% 18% 17% 15% 14% 27% 20% 24% 16% 21% 21% 17% 31% 27% 34% 26% OIL 260 158 95 113 37 16 231 146 97 127 120 101 93 131 78 181 14 66 50 131 8 15 1 53 11% 23% 6% 24% 11% 3% 14% 9% 13% 13% 15% 16% 18% 9% 11% 11% 11% 11% 6% 23% 3% 8% 1% 12% COAL 218 146 66 103 28 7 203 127 78 123 106 101 85 94 84 133 13 74 38 116 10 5 2 41 9% 21% 4% 21% 8% 1% 13% 8% 10% 13% 13% 16% 16% 7% 12% 8% 10% 12% 5% 21% 4% 3% 2% 10% ALL/COMBINATION 197 64 117 47 51 27 158 111 78 86 81 63 58 110 57 140 10 51 64 52 18 12 8 39 8% 9% 8% 10% 14% 5% 10% 7% 10% 9% 10% 10% 11% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 9% 7% 6% 6% 9% NONE OF THESE 34 10 23 9 7 8 24 23 11 17 15 10 8 17 11 23 2 11 9 8 2 3 2 8 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% UNSURE/REFUSED 25 7 18 5 7 2 22 17 8 4 4 2 2 21 7 18 - 6 8 4 2 2 - 8 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% - 1% - - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 120Table 23-5QUESTION 38C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to encourage the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% SOLAR POWER 1475 650 623 62 820 1189 255 830 74 542 288 1077 1236 206 239 1135 1191 224 571 168 650 1174 192 69 61% 66% 65% 67% 59% 63% 56% 74% 32% 56% 41% 71% 73% 32% 48% 67% 77% 32% 78% 33% 64% 72% 49% 23% WIND POWER 1177 505 487 50 668 971 174 681 45 422 215 886 991 158 181 929 968 161 483 134 490 966 141 48 49% 51% 51% 54% 48% 52% 38% 61% 19% 44% 31% 59% 59% 24% 36% 55% 62% 23% 66% 27% 48% 59% 36% 16% NATURAL GAS 631 223 213 18 406 464 153 168 115 320 295 275 294 323 180 376 213 369 98 251 240 280 158 176 26% 22% 22% 19% 29% 25% 34% 15% 49% 33% 42% 18% 17% 50% 36% 22% 14% 52% 13% 50% 24% 17% 40% 58% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 557 264 253 24 291 440 105 307 30 204 118 405 451 97 101 420 453 94 167 79 280 399 91 49 23% 27% 27% 25% 21% 23% 23% 27% 13% 21% 17% 27% 27% 15% 20% 25% 29% 13% 23% 16% 28% 24% 23% 16% OIL 260 83 72 8 175 191 66 63 66 120 162 78 77 174 102 128 54 195 46 124 75 82 67 101 11% 8% 8% 9% 13% 10% 15% 6% 28% 12% 23% 5% 5% 27% 20% 8% 3% 27% 6% 25% 7% 5% 17% 33% COAL 218 77 77 3 140 143 68 52 73 90 137 62 56 156 89 102 34 175 21 135 53 65 49 94 9% 8% 8% 3% 10% 8% 15% 5% 31% 9% 20% 4% 3% 24% 18% 6% 2% 25% 3% 27% 5% 4% 12% 31% ALL/COMBINATION 197 73 71 7 124 149 36 64 23 103 78 92 107 77 43 130 83 85 30 47 105 127 37 29 8% 7% 7% 8% 9% 8% 8% 6% 10% 11% 11% 6% 6% 12% 9% 8% 5% 12% 4% 9% 10% 8% 9% 10% NONE OF THESE 34 15 15 2 19 20 7 8 9 12 12 19 17 16 5 23 12 13 7 10 14 14 7 8 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 4% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% UNSURE/REFUSED 25 8 8 2 17 17 2 5 2 11 5 13 16 7 7 12 10 7 6 1 6 21 2 1 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 121Table 24-1QUESTION 39:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% COAL 989 174 149 130 190 181 84 434 556 186 242 178 208 169 194 152 87 234 235 82 286 286 406 41% 43% 37% 33% 48% 45% 21% 38% 45% 39% 42% 44% 42% 39% 40% 35% 37% 41% 50% 41% 32% 41% 53% OIL 467 98 74 61 61 67 52 206 261 142 120 79 71 52 98 83 24 163 68 27 106 149 205 19% 24% 18% 15% 15% 17% 13% 18% 21% 29% 21% 20% 14% 12% 20% 19% 10% 28% 14% 14% 12% 21% 27% WIND POWER 244 47 42 38 30 34 67 138 106 27 41 50 63 64 35 62 41 32 51 23 145 68 25 10% 12% 10% 9% 7% 8% 17% 12% 8% 6% 7% 12% 13% 15% 7% 14% 18% 6% 11% 12% 16% 10% 3% SOLAR POWER 115 14 20 32 15 22 50 66 49 25 22 13 31 24 24 29 13 23 15 12 59 27 21 5% 4% 5% 8% 4% 5% 13% 6% 4% 5% 4% 3% 6% 6% 5% 7% 5% 4% 3% 6% 7% 4% 3% NATURAL GAS 94 11 19 18 23 12 13 43 51 30 32 6 20 6 32 8 3 30 18 3 27 34 32 4% 3% 5% 4% 6% 3% 3% 4% 4% 6% 6% 2% 4% 1% 7% 2% 1% 5% 4% 1% 3% 5% 4% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 69 10 15 10 8 9 9 40 30 16 18 7 14 14 18 13 8 16 8 6 45 16 8 3% 3% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% 2% 3% 5% 2% 1% ALL/COMBINATION 27 2 8 9 7 4 3 15 12 3 3 4 7 10 2 7 7 5 4 3 13 3 12 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 2% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% NONE OF THESE 347 37 66 88 57 64 113 200 148 40 90 62 75 80 79 80 41 51 58 39 189 97 52 14% 9% 17% 22% 14% 16% 28% 17% 12% 8% 16% 15% 15% 19% 16% 18% 18% 9% 12% 20% 21% 14% 7% UNSURE/REFUSED 47 6 8 14 7 8 8 11 36 11 8 3 11 14 1 1 9 19 12 5 19 21 7 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% - - 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 122Table 24-2QUESTION 39:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% COAL 989 764 214 125 349 415 44 81 125 161 163 123 139 267 120 162 138 148 164 239 215 261 43 41% 43% 38% 37% 40% 46% 34% 39% 28% 37% 41% 40% 48% 56% 33% 31% 39% 42% 50% 55% 31% 32% 35% OIL 467 305 154 97 130 175 39 59 57 49 62 87 86 118 58 48 97 49 100 104 66 96 22 19% 17% 27% 29% 15% 19% 30% 28% 13% 11% 16% 29% 30% 25% 16% 9% 28% 14% 31% 24% 10% 12% 18% WIND POWER 244 190 43 25 116 75 8 17 85 61 45 24 8 16 44 101 16 52 7 18 124 135 13 10% 11% 8% 7% 13% 8% 6% 8% 19% 14% 11% 8% 3% 3% 12% 19% 5% 15% 2% 4% 18% 16% 10% SOLAR POWER 115 69 40 23 44 24 10 14 33 26 19 8 7 13 22 36 13 14 9 11 47 58 5 5% 4% 7% 7% 5% 3% 7% 7% 7% 6% 5% 3% 3% 3% 6% 7% 4% 4% 3% 3% 7% 7% 4% NATURAL GAS 94 60 34 22 32 28 9 13 6 21 22 12 15 17 23 4 19 15 20 12 27 31 - 4% 3% 6% 7% 4% 3% 7% 6% 1% 5% 6% 4% 5% 4% 6% 1% 5% 4% 6% 3% 4% 4% - ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 69 41 25 13 21 21 4 9 28 17 10 6 2 6 23 22 8 8 4 4 37 43 2 3% 2% 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 4% 6% 4% 3% 2% 1% 1% 6% 4% 2% 2% 1% 1% 5% 5% 1% ALL/COMBINATION 27 18 10 5 7 11 4 1 7 6 2 1 6 6 4 9 - 2 2 10 13 14 1 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% - 2% 1% - - 2% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% NONE OF THESE 347 303 36 18 174 129 8 10 102 88 70 27 23 29 65 125 47 50 18 34 151 168 31 14% 17% 6% 5% 20% 14% 7% 5% 23% 20% 18% 9% 8% 6% 18% 24% 13% 14% 6% 8% 22% 20% 26% UNSURE/REFUSED 47 33 13 7 9 25 1 6 6 12 4 17 - 7 7 12 11 10 2 5 13 15 5 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 3% 1% 3% 1% 6% - 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 1% 2% 2% 4%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 123Table 24-3QUESTION 39:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% COAL 989 298 402 270 182 102 74 200 40 364 254 367 224 134 104 150 175 192 95 129 57 77 468 521 41% 30% 49% 52% 29% 41% 31% 47% 40% 56% 40% 46% 41% 35% 34% 45% 45% 47% 35% 46% 34% 35% 39% 43% OIL 467 98 202 151 53 51 25 113 19 183 161 171 76 52 72 89 78 93 33 43 18 34 248 219 19% 10% 24% 29% 8% 21% 11% 26% 19% 28% 25% 21% 14% 14% 23% 27% 20% 23% 12% 15% 11% 16% 21% 18% WIND POWER 244 193 39 8 130 15 42 23 19 6 60 71 56 54 34 27 37 34 34 22 30 23 110 134 10% 20% 5% 2% 21% 6% 18% 5% 19% 1% 9% 9% 10% 14% 11% 8% 9% 8% 13% 8% 18% 11% 9% 11% SOLAR POWER 115 74 19 13 44 14 24 3 4 13 25 24 40 24 10 14 17 7 25 15 11 13 54 61 5% 8% 2% 2% 7% 6% 10% 1% 4% 2% 4% 3% 7% 6% 3% 4% 4% 2% 9% 5% 7% 6% 4% 5% NATURAL GAS 94 26 27 36 14 11 5 27 7 24 31 17 35 11 20 10 6 11 13 22 4 7 49 45 4% 3% 3% 7% 2% 5% 2% 6% 7% 4% 5% 2% 6% 3% 7% 3% 2% 3% 5% 8% 2% 3% 4% 4% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 69 51 16 2 37 8 9 7 5 3 10 23 21 15 8 2 13 10 13 9 7 9 32 38 3% 5% 2% - 6% 3% 4% 2% 5% - 2% 3% 4% 4% 3% 1% 3% 2% 5% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% ALL/COMBINATION 27 11 9 7 8 4 1 2 2 10 9 6 7 5 6 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 14 13 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - - 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% NONE OF THESE 347 209 99 27 149 36 50 43 5 46 78 106 83 78 47 31 63 43 50 33 39 40 194 153 14% 21% 12% 5% 24% 15% 21% 10% 5% 7% 12% 13% 15% 20% 15% 9% 16% 11% 18% 12% 23% 18% 16% 13% UNSURE/REFUSED 47 21 12 9 14 4 6 11 1 6 10 14 8 15 5 5 - 14 5 3 1 14 29 18 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% - 3% 2% 1% - 6% 2% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 124Table 24-4QUESTION 39:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% COAL 989 195 731 126 140 313 575 683 270 351 302 208 160 627 293 693 46 257 352 131 126 82 84 185 41% 28% 47% 26% 40% 53% 36% 44% 35% 37% 37% 33% 31% 44% 42% 41% 35% 42% 45% 23% 47% 45% 65% 43% OIL 467 78 350 51 45 160 246 313 137 138 120 89 71 322 121 345 22 101 185 58 76 31 34 75 19% 11% 22% 11% 13% 27% 15% 20% 18% 15% 15% 14% 14% 22% 17% 20% 17% 17% 24% 10% 29% 17% 27% 17% WIND POWER 244 133 103 97 45 14 225 129 109 136 122 103 89 105 82 161 13 75 47 130 7 5 1 47 10% 19% 7% 20% 13% 2% 14% 8% 14% 14% 15% 16% 17% 7% 12% 10% 10% 12% 6% 23% 3% 3% 1% 11% SOLAR POWER 115 62 51 46 11 3 107 60 44 54 44 50 40 56 34 78 12 23 29 57 4 6 - 18 5% 9% 3% 10% 3% 1% 7% 4% 6% 6% 5% 8% 8% 4% 5% 5% 9% 4% 4% 10% 1% 3% - 4% NATURAL GAS 94 21 70 13 13 50 36 66 25 41 37 27 22 52 17 77 6 15 25 17 17 12 1 19 4% 3% 4% 3% 4% 8% 2% 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 2% 5% 4% 2% 3% 3% 6% 7% 1% 4% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 69 41 28 32 13 10 58 33 35 39 38 29 28 30 22 48 3 20 14 35 7 1 - 13 3% 6% 2% 7% 4% 2% 4% 2% 5% 4% 5% 5% 6% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 6% 3% - - 3% ALL/COMBINATION 27 7 17 5 4 9 17 23 4 14 11 5 3 14 5 22 1 5 9 5 1 8 2 2 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - 5% 1% 1% NONE OF THESE 347 142 179 103 69 31 299 211 125 155 132 118 95 192 103 244 26 90 96 118 24 31 5 67 14% 20% 12% 22% 20% 5% 19% 14% 16% 16% 16% 18% 18% 13% 15% 14% 20% 15% 12% 21% 9% 17% 4% 16% UNSURE/REFUSED 47 15 25 6 11 4 35 32 14 13 8 10 6 34 20 26 3 20 20 11 3 7 1 5 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 1% 4% - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 125Table 24-5QUESTION 39:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? First Choice BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% COAL 989 431 417 42 553 793 176 556 35 372 155 767 850 125 170 758 796 146 354 97 471 797 136 37 41% 43% 44% 46% 40% 42% 39% 49% 15% 38% 22% 51% 50% 19% 34% 45% 51% 21% 48% 19% 47% 49% 35% 12% OIL 467 218 210 20 249 398 59 284 17 157 98 327 408 45 69 380 408 49 186 52 198 377 49 31 19% 22% 22% 22% 18% 21% 13% 25% 7% 16% 14% 22% 24% 7% 14% 22% 26% 7% 25% 10% 20% 23% 12% 10% WIND POWER 244 83 80 3 161 173 66 56 58 128 158 68 70 170 81 130 37 195 18 137 82 66 77 99 10% 8% 8% 3% 11% 9% 15% 5% 25% 13% 23% 5% 4% 26% 16% 8% 2% 28% 2% 27% 8% 4% 20% 33% SOLAR POWER 115 37 35 6 76 86 25 32 31 43 60 44 36 74 36 66 39 72 27 55 32 35 22 49 5% 4% 4% 6% 5% 5% 5% 3% 13% 4% 9% 3% 2% 11% 7% 4% 2% 10% 4% 11% 3% 2% 6% 16% NATURAL GAS 94 44 42 4 50 72 19 70 5 19 20 71 83 10 27 66 78 15 47 21 26 80 7 7 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 6% 2% 2% 3% 5% 5% 1% 5% 4% 5% 2% 6% 4% 3% 5% 2% 2% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 69 30 27 1 40 39 27 12 16 41 49 14 17 45 22 45 22 45 9 30 29 28 23 18 3% 3% 3% 1% 3% 2% 6% 1% 7% 4% 7% 1% 1% 7% 4% 3% 1% 6% 1% 6% 3% 2% 6% 6% ALL/COMBINATION 27 10 10 2 18 16 11 14 2 11 5 21 17 6 3 21 18 7 7 6 13 18 3 5 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% NONE OF THESE 347 123 119 10 224 259 70 79 67 181 148 157 165 169 77 215 128 170 72 101 150 201 72 53 14% 12% 13% 11% 16% 14% 16% 7% 29% 19% 21% 10% 10% 26% 15% 13% 8% 24% 10% 20% 15% 12% 18% 17% UNSURE/REFUSED 47 16 12 5 29 39 1 21 3 17 7 36 39 7 15 22 28 12 16 6 10 32 3 6 2% 2% 1% 5% 2% 2% - 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 126Table 25-1QUESTION 39C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% COAL 1466 274 224 181 251 252 134 658 808 303 378 262 284 230 296 239 121 384 307 109 424 436 588 61% 68% 56% 45% 63% 63% 34% 57% 65% 63% 66% 65% 57% 53% 61% 55% 52% 67% 66% 55% 48% 62% 77% OIL 1223 229 197 131 198 202 116 554 669 301 322 205 240 149 266 211 77 357 234 72 288 402 514 51% 57% 49% 33% 49% 50% 29% 48% 54% 63% 56% 51% 48% 35% 55% 48% 33% 62% 50% 36% 32% 57% 67% WIND POWER 389 71 66 60 56 58 98 220 169 57 67 78 94 92 69 94 57 55 78 35 223 101 55 16% 18% 17% 15% 14% 15% 25% 19% 14% 12% 12% 20% 19% 21% 14% 22% 24% 10% 17% 18% 25% 14% 7% NATURAL GAS 291 53 53 55 56 24 30 103 189 93 72 42 57 27 63 30 9 102 69 18 75 76 136 12% 13% 13% 14% 14% 6% 7% 9% 15% 19% 13% 10% 11% 6% 13% 7% 4% 18% 15% 9% 8% 11% 18% SOLAR POWER 252 34 43 66 28 50 92 150 102 45 50 29 60 67 47 57 46 48 32 21 141 68 34 10% 8% 11% 17% 7% 13% 23% 13% 8% 9% 9% 7% 12% 16% 10% 13% 20% 8% 7% 11% 16% 10% 4% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 158 24 32 31 22 22 43 86 73 26 32 17 39 42 33 32 21 26 24 21 96 37 22 7% 6% 8% 8% 6% 6% 11% 7% 6% 5% 6% 4% 8% 10% 7% 7% 9% 4% 5% 11% 11% 5% 3% ALL/COMBINATION 30 3 8 9 7 5 4 17 13 3 4 4 7 11 2 7 8 6 4 3 14 4 12 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% - 2% 4% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% NONE OF THESE 471 52 82 133 87 89 137 267 205 61 109 86 100 112 103 104 57 67 81 54 253 129 79 20% 13% 20% 33% 22% 22% 34% 23% 16% 13% 19% 21% 20% 26% 21% 24% 25% 12% 17% 27% 29% 18% 10% UNSURE/REFUSED 99 14 13 22 22 21 22 25 74 16 15 12 26 29 4 7 13 27 31 16 41 31 25 4% 4% 3% 6% 5% 5% 5% 2% 6% 3% 3% 3% 5% 7% 1% 2% 6% 5% 7% 8% 5% 4% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 127Table 25-2QUESTION 39C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% COAL 1466 1072 366 214 495 576 82 132 198 226 226 210 225 362 193 229 230 203 250 334 318 389 64 61% 60% 65% 64% 56% 64% 65% 63% 44% 51% 57% 69% 78% 75% 53% 44% 66% 58% 76% 77% 46% 47% 52% OIL 1223 898 307 187 408 490 79 109 134 154 213 189 199 314 149 139 227 172 237 274 216 268 43 51% 50% 54% 56% 46% 54% 62% 52% 30% 35% 53% 62% 69% 65% 41% 27% 65% 49% 72% 63% 31% 33% 35% WIND POWER 389 291 87 48 176 115 17 31 133 90 72 30 13 42 70 153 33 68 18 37 190 210 17 16% 16% 15% 14% 20% 13% 13% 15% 30% 20% 18% 10% 5% 9% 19% 30% 10% 19% 6% 9% 27% 26% 14% NATURAL GAS 291 181 110 67 72 108 15 52 23 52 39 36 41 96 48 27 45 31 72 65 59 77 10 12% 10% 19% 20% 8% 12% 12% 25% 5% 12% 10% 12% 14% 20% 13% 5% 13% 9% 22% 15% 8% 9% 8% SOLAR POWER 252 175 67 45 117 59 18 27 82 59 49 18 13 21 54 86 23 44 16 18 115 136 13 10% 10% 12% 14% 13% 7% 14% 13% 18% 13% 12% 6% 4% 4% 15% 17% 7% 13% 5% 4% 17% 17% 11% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 158 108 41 24 58 50 8 16 55 41 20 17 8 14 38 58 12 25 6 15 72 87 10 7% 6% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 8% 12% 9% 5% 6% 3% 3% 10% 11% 4% 7% 2% 4% 10% 11% 8% ALL/COMBINATION 30 20 10 5 8 12 4 1 8 6 2 2 6 6 4 10 1 2 2 10 14 15 1 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% - 2% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% NONE OF THESE 471 403 60 30 224 179 14 16 134 119 92 37 35 44 88 163 56 73 27 51 196 227 43 20% 23% 11% 9% 25% 20% 11% 8% 30% 27% 23% 12% 12% 9% 24% 31% 16% 21% 8% 12% 28% 28% 35% UNSURE/REFUSED 99 66 29 19 15 51 3 17 13 29 6 24 5 20 13 28 13 17 5 21 31 37 8 4% 4% 5% 6% 2% 6% 2% 8% 3% 7% 2% 8% 2% 4% 4% 5% 4% 5% 1% 5% 4% 5% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 128Table 25-3QUESTION 39C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% COAL 1466 441 588 395 265 155 109 303 65 517 405 539 311 190 171 234 267 272 132 179 75 114 715 751 61% 45% 71% 76% 42% 63% 46% 70% 64% 79% 64% 67% 56% 49% 56% 70% 68% 67% 49% 64% 45% 52% 60% 62% OIL 1223 294 507 391 164 121 83 297 44 466 369 462 237 141 168 201 223 238 99 138 56 85 615 609 51% 30% 61% 75% 26% 49% 35% 69% 44% 71% 58% 58% 43% 36% 55% 61% 57% 59% 37% 49% 33% 39% 51% 51% WIND POWER 389 286 78 17 192 31 68 30 23 28 95 101 103 86 53 42 51 50 67 35 45 41 193 196 16% 29% 9% 3% 30% 12% 29% 7% 23% 4% 15% 13% 19% 22% 17% 13% 13% 12% 25% 13% 27% 19% 16% 16% NATURAL GAS 291 84 94 105 46 27 18 52 21 114 88 80 79 42 41 47 17 63 31 48 13 29 140 151 12% 9% 11% 20% 7% 11% 7% 12% 20% 17% 14% 10% 14% 11% 13% 14% 4% 15% 12% 17% 7% 13% 12% 13% SOLAR POWER 252 177 49 17 113 27 48 19 12 17 52 58 84 56 27 25 41 17 53 31 28 28 116 136 10% 18% 6% 3% 18% 11% 20% 5% 12% 3% 8% 7% 15% 14% 9% 8% 11% 4% 19% 11% 16% 13% 10% 11% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 158 111 38 6 78 15 20 16 10 12 31 59 40 29 16 15 30 28 23 17 16 13 68 91 7% 11% 5% 1% 12% 6% 8% 4% 10% 2% 5% 7% 7% 7% 5% 4% 8% 7% 8% 6% 10% 6% 6% 8% ALL/COMBINATION 30 13 9 8 10 4 1 3 2 10 9 9 7 5 6 3 5 4 3 4 3 2 14 15 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% - 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% NONE OF THESE 471 272 138 49 192 56 61 63 12 66 111 141 112 105 65 45 83 58 63 49 54 51 248 223 20% 28% 17% 9% 30% 23% 26% 15% 12% 10% 17% 18% 20% 27% 21% 14% 21% 14% 23% 17% 32% 23% 21% 19% UNSURE/REFUSED 99 45 32 15 33 8 7 20 5 19 19 23 31 24 6 13 1 22 12 19 6 17 50 49 4% 5% 4% 3% 5% 3% 3% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 6% 6% 2% 4% - 6% 4% 7% 4% 8% 4% 4%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 129Table 25-4QUESTION 39C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% COAL 1466 283 1089 190 203 456 853 999 412 515 450 320 255 927 414 1045 70 358 510 229 188 107 112 280 61% 41% 70% 40% 58% 77% 53% 64% 54% 55% 55% 50% 50% 65% 59% 62% 54% 59% 66% 41% 71% 58% 87% 65% OIL 1223 224 916 133 136 430 663 829 352 399 349 239 190 814 331 889 63 281 452 149 163 106 103 223 51% 32% 59% 28% 39% 72% 41% 53% 46% 42% 43% 37% 37% 57% 47% 52% 48% 46% 58% 27% 61% 58% 80% 52% WIND POWER 389 210 168 160 59 23 358 201 173 206 184 165 142 177 131 257 21 118 84 198 21 8 2 69 16% 30% 11% 33% 17% 4% 22% 13% 23% 22% 23% 26% 28% 12% 19% 15% 16% 19% 11% 35% 8% 4% 1% 16% NATURAL GAS 291 60 219 35 34 124 144 189 94 113 96 76 59 172 67 224 17 54 89 46 59 33 18 42 12% 9% 14% 7% 10% 21% 9% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 10% 13% 13% 9% 11% 8% 22% 18% 14% 10% SOLAR POWER 252 140 104 102 34 18 222 146 91 120 102 98 80 126 82 166 14 70 57 122 13 10 1 45 10% 20% 7% 21% 10% 3% 14% 9% 12% 13% 13% 15% 16% 9% 12% 10% 11% 12% 7% 22% 5% 5% 1% 10% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 158 84 69 64 29 22 127 85 66 84 71 61 48 74 51 107 7 46 47 66 10 4 2 28 7% 12% 4% 13% 8% 4% 8% 5% 9% 9% 9% 10% 9% 5% 7% 6% 6% 8% 6% 12% 4% 2% 1% 7% ALL/COMBINATION 30 7 19 5 6 10 19 23 4 14 12 6 3 16 5 25 1 5 9 6 1 8 3 2 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - 5% 2% 1% NONE OF THESE 471 185 249 139 96 48 395 295 162 214 187 156 128 254 143 328 34 123 135 153 40 37 9 87 20% 27% 16% 29% 27% 8% 25% 19% 21% 23% 23% 24% 25% 18% 20% 19% 26% 20% 17% 27% 15% 20% 7% 20% UNSURE/REFUSED 99 31 54 19 19 12 65 66 30 34 27 26 19 63 43 56 6 40 45 22 8 7 1 10 4% 4% 3% 4% 5% 2% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% 6% 3% 4% 7% 6% 4% 3% 4% - 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 130Table 25-5QUESTION 39C:Which one of the following sources of energy would you want to DISCOURAGE the use of here in [INSERT STATE]? Combined Choice BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% COAL 1466 638 615 60 821 1190 244 825 66 541 269 1089 1229 211 245 1140 1171 241 533 168 678 1153 202 81 61% 64% 65% 65% 59% 64% 54% 73% 28% 56% 38% 72% 73% 32% 49% 67% 75% 34% 73% 33% 67% 71% 51% 27% OIL 1223 551 528 53 667 1013 186 735 43 424 208 930 1065 132 179 989 1043 138 451 125 571 1002 138 58 51% 56% 56% 58% 48% 54% 41% 65% 18% 44% 30% 62% 63% 20% 36% 58% 67% 19% 61% 25% 57% 61% 35% 19% WIND POWER 389 145 140 9 244 276 101 90 89 203 226 130 131 251 130 213 86 287 47 200 128 131 105 148 16% 15% 15% 10% 17% 15% 22% 8% 38% 21% 32% 9% 8% 39% 26% 12% 6% 40% 6% 40% 13% 8% 27% 49% NATURAL GAS 291 145 138 8 146 234 50 192 9 82 65 213 250 39 76 206 247 38 135 54 91 231 40 19 12% 15% 15% 8% 10% 12% 11% 17% 4% 8% 9% 14% 15% 6% 15% 12% 16% 5% 18% 11% 9% 14% 10% 6% SOLAR POWER 252 81 80 6 169 184 60 73 59 105 149 83 84 157 74 151 68 171 44 127 72 78 54 111 10% 8% 8% 7% 12% 10% 13% 6% 25% 11% 21% 5% 5% 24% 15% 9% 4% 24% 6% 25% 7% 5% 14% 36% ENERGY EFFICIENCY EFFORTS 158 56 53 6 102 93 60 33 37 86 92 54 60 87 56 91 57 96 24 63 67 66 49 35 7% 6% 6% 6% 7% 5% 13% 3% 16% 9% 13% 4% 4% 13% 11% 5% 4% 14% 3% 13% 7% 4% 13% 11% ALL/COMBINATION 30 11 11 2 19 17 13 15 3 11 7 22 18 8 4 22 19 9 7 6 16 19 5 5 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% NONE OF THESE 471 173 167 19 298 343 105 131 80 237 196 214 241 214 112 286 184 220 101 132 197 267 104 74 20% 17% 18% 20% 21% 18% 23% 12% 34% 24% 28% 14% 14% 33% 22% 17% 12% 31% 14% 26% 20% 16% 27% 24% UNSURE/REFUSED 99 35 31 5 62 84 6 42 10 40 26 64 71 22 27 47 57 30 33 18 27 69 8 14 4% 4% 3% 6% 4% 4% 1% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 4% 5% 3% 3% 4% 2% 5%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 131Table 203-1QUESTION 42:Which of the following comes closer to your point of view: Increasing the use of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power: BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (CREATE JOBS - COST 1329 255 195 190 233 196 112 567 763 279 350 233 270 192 256 217 95 373 286 97 317 389 599 JOBS) 55% 64% 49% 47% 58% 49% 28% 49% 61% 58% 61% 58% 54% 45% 53% 50% 41% 65% 61% 49% 36% 55% 78% WILL CREATE NEW JOBS IN 1634 289 257 251 279 257 223 743 891 342 401 283 339 262 322 284 137 422 339 125 488 484 632[INSERT STATE] 68% 72% 64% 63% 70% 64% 56% 64% 71% 71% 70% 70% 68% 61% 67% 65% 59% 73% 72% 63% 55% 69% 82% WILL NOT AFFECT JOBS IN 392 69 67 72 59 71 58 208 184 66 106 65 75 79 83 75 49 89 64 30 202 102 85[INSERT STATE] 16% 17% 17% 18% 15% 18% 15% 18% 15% 14% 18% 16% 15% 18% 17% 17% 21% 15% 14% 15% 23% 14% 11% WILL COST JOBS IN [INSERT 305 34 61 61 46 61 111 176 129 63 51 50 69 69 66 67 42 49 53 28 171 95 33STATE] 13% 8% 15% 15% 12% 15% 28% 15% 10% 13% 9% 12% 14% 16% 14% 15% 18% 8% 11% 14% 19% 14% 4% UNSURE/REFUSED 69 8 16 16 16 11 7 25 43 9 17 4 16 22 11 8 6 15 12 17 27 20 18 3% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 1% 3% 5% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 8% 3% 3% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 132Table 203-2QUESTION 42:Which of the following comes closer to your point of view: Increasing the use of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power: BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (CREATE JOBS - COST 1329 943 376 241 398 545 98 142 120 197 202 187 238 361 151 166 212 175 256 341 233 298 60 JOBS) 55% 53% 66% 72% 45% 60% 77% 68% 27% 45% 51% 62% 83% 75% 41% 32% 61% 50% 78% 78% 34% 36% 49% WILL CREATE NEW JOBS IN 1634 1184 427 263 542 642 105 158 223 266 263 221 246 385 216 271 251 231 266 363 371 457 76[INSERT STATE] 68% 66% 75% 78% 62% 71% 83% 76% 50% 60% 66% 73% 86% 80% 59% 52% 72% 66% 81% 83% 53% 56% 62% WILL NOT AFFECT JOBS IN 392 308 73 40 173 135 14 26 113 88 65 36 29 57 79 123 52 50 41 43 165 183 23[INSERT STATE] 16% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 11% 13% 25% 20% 16% 12% 10% 12% 22% 24% 15% 14% 12% 10% 24% 22% 19% WILL COST JOBS IN [INSERT 305 241 51 22 144 97 7 16 103 68 61 34 8 25 65 104 38 56 11 22 138 159 17STATE] 13% 14% 9% 7% 16% 11% 5% 7% 23% 15% 15% 11% 3% 5% 18% 20% 11% 16% 3% 5% 20% 19% 14% UNSURE/REFUSED 69 51 16 10 21 29 1 9 8 19 9 11 4 13 5 22 9 11 10 8 20 22 7 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 1% 4% 2% 4% 2% 4% 2% 3% 1% 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 133Table 203-3QUESTION 42:Which of the following comes closer to your point of view: Increasing the use of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power: BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (CREATE JOBS - COST 1329 293 551 445 175 141 62 302 52 536 389 466 269 187 176 213 216 251 102 167 65 122 661 668 JOBS) 55% 30% 67% 85% 28% 57% 26% 70% 52% 82% 61% 58% 49% 48% 58% 64% 55% 62% 38% 60% 38% 56% 55% 56% WILL CREATE NEW JOBS IN 1634 505 623 457 312 170 123 335 64 556 449 557 359 249 210 239 267 290 156 204 100 148 815 819[INSERT STATE] 68% 51% 75% 87% 49% 70% 52% 78% 64% 85% 70% 70% 65% 64% 69% 72% 68% 71% 57% 73% 59% 68% 68% 68% WILL NOT AFFECT JOBS IN 392 227 112 44 161 39 40 54 23 63 103 129 91 66 50 53 66 63 59 33 31 35 200 193[INSERT STATE] 16% 23% 14% 8% 26% 16% 17% 13% 23% 10% 16% 16% 17% 17% 16% 16% 17% 16% 22% 12% 18% 16% 17% 16% WILL COST JOBS IN [INSERT 305 212 72 12 138 30 60 33 12 21 60 91 90 62 34 26 51 39 53 37 35 26 154 151STATE] 13% 22% 9% 2% 22% 12% 26% 8% 12% 3% 9% 11% 16% 16% 11% 8% 13% 10% 20% 13% 21% 12% 13% 13% UNSURE/REFUSED 69 38 20 9 21 5 13 7 2 16 25 22 10 12 11 14 8 14 3 7 3 9 29 40 3% 4% 2% 2% 3% 2% 5% 2% 2% 2% 4% 3% 2% 3% 4% 4% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 134Table 203-4QUESTION 42:Which of the following comes closer to your point of view: Increasing the use of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power: BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (CREATE JOBS - COST 1329 143 1100 94 200 489 694 913 364 419 354 256 191 905 384 946 83 326 536 90 188 131 118 233 JOBS) 55% 21% 71% 20% 57% 82% 43% 59% 48% 45% 43% 40% 37% 63% 55% 56% 63% 54% 69% 16% 71% 72% 92% 54% WILL CREATE NEW JOBS IN 1634 327 1206 220 235 515 963 1089 482 577 496 379 299 1043 471 1160 93 406 590 253 206 147 121 278[INSERT STATE] 68% 47% 78% 46% 67% 87% 60% 70% 63% 61% 61% 59% 58% 73% 67% 68% 72% 67% 76% 45% 77% 80% 94% 65% WILL NOT AFFECT JOBS IN 392 155 207 118 71 48 315 238 144 179 154 115 90 209 116 277 20 99 114 127 37 16 5 87[INSERT STATE] 16% 22% 13% 25% 20% 8% 20% 15% 19% 19% 19% 18% 18% 15% 17% 16% 15% 16% 15% 22% 14% 9% 4% 20% WILL COST JOBS IN [INSERT 305 184 106 126 36 25 269 176 118 158 142 124 108 138 87 215 11 80 54 162 18 15 3 45STATE] 13% 27% 7% 26% 10% 4% 17% 11% 15% 17% 17% 19% 21% 10% 12% 13% 8% 13% 7% 29% 7% 8% 2% 11% UNSURE/REFUSED 69 28 35 16 9 7 52 47 20 26 22 21 17 42 25 44 7 19 18 21 5 5 - 20 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% - 5%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 135Table 203-5QUESTION 42:Which of the following comes closer to your point of view: Increasing the use of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power: BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (CREATE JOBS - COST 1329 570 538 62 755 1121 178 844 8 435 140 1099 1262 38 162 1105 1206 72 591 -1 637 1634 - -305 JOBS) 55% 58% 57% 67% 54% 60% 39% 75% 3% 45% 20% 73% 75% 6% 32% 65% 78% 10% 80% - 63% 100% - -100% WILL CREATE NEW JOBS IN 1634 684 651 68 944 1331 261 920 86 582 329 1186 1351 246 274 1255 1274 288 619 189 715 1634 - -[INSERT STATE] 68% 69% 68% 73% 67% 71% 57% 82% 37% 60% 47% 79% 80% 38% 55% 74% 82% 41% 84% 38% 71% 100% - - WILL NOT AFFECT JOBS IN 392 170 164 16 222 282 96 104 56 219 160 197 210 167 96 258 176 184 68 108 198 - 392 -[INSERT STATE] 16% 17% 17% 18% 16% 15% 21% 9% 24% 23% 23% 13% 12% 26% 19% 15% 11% 26% 9% 21% 20% - 100% - WILL COST JOBS IN [INSERT 305 114 113 6 189 210 82 76 78 147 189 87 89 208 112 151 68 215 28 191 79 - - 305STATE] 13% 11% 12% 6% 14% 11% 18% 7% 33% 15% 27% 6% 5% 32% 22% 9% 4% 30% 4% 38% 8% - - 100% UNSURE/REFUSED 69 24 24 2 44 51 15 25 14 21 21 37 35 30 18 38 37 23 19 16 18 - - - 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 6% 2% 3% 2% 2% 5% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 136Table 27-1QUESTION M2:Would you support or oppose Montana increasing the amount of its electric supply that comes from clean, renewable energy like wind, solar, and geothermal from the alreadyachieved standard of ten percent to a standard of twenty-five percent by the year 2025? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 - - 400 - - - 192 208 82 86 67 84 80 86 69 36 82 82 44 112 184 96 100% - - 100% - - - 48% 52% 21% 21% 17% 21% 20% 22% 17% 9% 20% 21% 11% 28% 46% 24% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 226 - - 226 - - - 92 133 61 50 37 40 38 51 28 13 60 49 24 26 109 86 56% - - 56% - - - 48% 64% 74% 59% 55% 48% 47% 59% 41% 37% 73% 60% 55% 23% 59% 89% TOTAL SUPPORT 301 - - 301 - - - 139 162 71 67 51 58 55 69 46 24 69 63 31 62 143 89------------- 75% - - 75% - - - 72% 78% 86% 78% 76% 68% 69% 80% 66% 68% 85% 76% 70% 55% 78% 93% TOTAL OPPOSE 75 - - 75 - - - 46 29 10 17 14 17 17 18 17 11 9 14 6 36 34 4------------ 19% - - 19% - - - 24% 14% 12% 19% 21% 20% 21% 20% 25% 30% 11% 17% 14% 32% 19% 4% STRONGLY SUPPORT 190 - - 190 - - - 84 106 51 40 28 34 37 43 28 13 48 34 25 28 95 65 48% - - 48% - - - 44% 51% 62% 47% 42% 40% 47% 50% 41% 35% 58% 41% 56% 25% 52% 67% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 111 - - 111 - - - 55 56 20 27 22 24 18 26 17 12 21 29 6 34 48 25 28% - - 28% - - - 28% 27% 25% 31% 33% 28% 22% 30% 25% 33% 26% 35% 14% 31% 26% 26% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 20 - - 20 - - - 12 9 6 6 2 2 5 6 3 3 6 1 2 11 9 - 5% - - 5% - - - 6% 4% 7% 7% 3% 2% 6% 6% 4% 9% 7% 1% 4% 10% 5% - STRONGLY OPPOSE 55 - - 55 - - - 35 20 5 11 12 15 12 12 14 8 3 13 5 24 25 4 14% - - 14% - - - 18% 10% 6% 12% 18% 18% 15% 14% 21% 21% 4% 15% 10% 22% 14% 4% DON'T KNOW 21 - - 21 - - - 5 16 1 2 2 8 7 - 5 1 3 6 6 13 6 3 5% - - 5% - - - 3% 8% 1% 3% 4% 10% 9% - 7% 2% 4% 7% 15% 11% 3% 3% REFUSED 2 - - 2 - - - 1 1 - - - 1 1 - 1 - - - 1 1 1 - 1% - - 1% - - - 1% - - - - 2% 1% - 2% - - - 2% 1% - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 137Table 27-2QUESTION M2:Would you support or oppose Montana increasing the amount of its electric supply that comes from clean, renewable energy like wind, solar, and geothermal from the alreadyachieved standard of ten percent to a standard of twenty-five percent by the year 2025? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 362 34 2 165 197 2 - 52 60 101 83 33 63 44 68 85 98 36 60 199 234 59 100% 91% 8% - 41% 49% - - 13% 15% 25% 21% 8% 16% 11% 17% 21% 25% 9% 15% 50% 58% 15% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 226 203 19 2 79 124 2 - - 26 60 49 29 56 23 4 54 55 32 53 89 104 31 56% 56% 55% 100% 48% 63% 100% - - 44% 60% 58% 88% 90% 51% 6% 64% 56% 89% 89% 45% 44% 52% TOTAL SUPPORT 301 271 26 2 118 152 2 - 23 39 81 63 31 58 33 29 69 75 34 55 139 161 43------------- 75% 75% 78% 100% 72% 77% 100% - 43% 66% 80% 75% 94% 93% 74% 43% 80% 76% 94% 92% 70% 69% 74% TOTAL OPPOSE 75 68 8 - 40 28 - - 23 13 20 14 2 2 10 25 14 19 2 2 49 58 13------------ 19% 19% 22% - 24% 14% - - 43% 22% 20% 17% 6% 3% 24% 38% 17% 20% 6% 3% 25% 25% 22% STRONGLY SUPPORT 190 169 19 2 69 100 2 - 7 21 55 40 21 44 15 13 49 46 26 39 84 94 29 48% 47% 55% 100% 42% 51% 100% - 13% 35% 54% 48% 63% 70% 33% 20% 58% 47% 72% 65% 42% 40% 50% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 111 101 8 - 49 52 - - 16 19 26 22 10 14 19 16 19 29 8 16 55 67 14 28% 28% 22% - 30% 27% - - 30% 31% 25% 27% 31% 23% 42% 24% 22% 29% 23% 28% 27% 29% 24% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 20 19 1 - 12 8 - - 10 2 2 7 - - 5 6 6 3 - - 12 17 4 5% 5% 3% - 7% 4% - - 18% 3% 2% 8% - - 12% 9% 7% 3% - - 6% 7% 6% STRONGLY OPPOSE 55 48 7 - 28 20 - - 13 11 18 7 2 2 5 19 8 17 2 2 37 41 9 14% 13% 20% - 17% 10% - - 25% 19% 18% 9% 6% 3% 12% 28% 9% 17% 6% 3% 18% 17% 16% DON'T KNOW 21 21 - - 5 16 - - 5 7 - 6 - 3 1 12 2 3 - 3 11 14 3 5% 6% - - 3% 8% - - 11% 12% - 7% - 4% 2% 17% 3% 4% - 5% 5% 6% 4% REFUSED 2 2 - - 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - 1% 1% - - 1% - - - 3% - - 1% - - - 2% - 1% - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 138Table 27-3QUESTION M2:Would you support or oppose Montana increasing the amount of its electric supply that comes from clean, renewable energy like wind, solar, and geothermal from the alreadyachieved standard of ten percent to a standard of twenty-five percent by the year 2025? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 169 152 67 83 29 67 107 16 80 36 45 161 155 17 19 16 29 79 82 78 77 200 200 100% 42% 38% 17% 21% 7% 17% 27% 4% 20% 9% 11% 40% 39% 4% 5% 4% 7% 20% 20% 20% 19% 50% 50% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 226 43 117 57 8 18 26 76 9 76 22 39 100 65 12 10 13 26 44 56 24 41 109 116 56% 26% 77% 85% 10% 63% 38% 71% 57% 95% 60% 86% 62% 42% 69% 51% 78% 91% 56% 68% 30% 54% 55% 58% TOTAL SUPPORT 301 97 132 62 39 23 45 90 11 78 27 42 127 103 14 13 15 27 61 66 47 56 148 153------------- 75% 57% 87% 93% 47% 79% 67% 84% 70% 98% 75% 92% 79% 67% 85% 66% 89% 94% 78% 81% 61% 73% 74% 77% TOTAL OPPOSE 75 54 15 5 31 5 19 14 2 2 5 3 28 39 3 3 2 1 17 11 24 15 39 37------------ 19% 32% 10% 7% 38% 16% 29% 13% 13% 2% 15% 6% 17% 25% 15% 15% 11% 3% 22% 13% 30% 19% 19% 18% STRONGLY SUPPORT 190 49 92 43 16 12 25 63 7 58 21 26 83 59 8 13 11 16 37 46 28 31 91 100 48% 29% 61% 64% 19% 40% 37% 59% 43% 72% 57% 58% 51% 38% 47% 66% 65% 55% 47% 56% 35% 41% 45% 50% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 111 48 40 20 23 11 20 27 4 20 6 15 45 44 6 - 4 11 25 20 20 25 57 53 28% 28% 26% 29% 28% 39% 30% 25% 27% 25% 18% 34% 28% 29% 37% - 24% 39% 31% 25% 25% 32% 29% 27% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 20 12 7 2 8 4 4 5 - - 2 - 7 11 2 - - - 3 4 6 5 13 7 5% 7% 4% 3% 9% 13% 6% 5% - - 5% - 4% 7% 11% - - - 4% 5% 8% 7% 7% 4% STRONGLY OPPOSE 55 42 9 3 23 1 15 9 2 2 4 3 21 27 1 3 2 1 14 7 17 10 26 30 14% 25% 6% 4% 28% 3% 22% 8% 13% 2% 10% 6% 13% 18% 4% 15% 11% 3% 18% 8% 22% 13% 13% 15% DON'T KNOW 21 16 4 - 11 2 2 3 3 - 4 1 5 11 - 4 - 1 - 5 5 5 11 10 5% 10% 3% - 13% 5% 3% 2% 17% - 10% 2% 3% 7% - 19% - 3% - 6% 7% 7% 6% 5% REFUSED 2 2 - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - 1 1 2 - 1% 1% - - 2% - 1% - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - 2% 1% 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 139Table 27-4QUESTION M2:Would you support or oppose Montana increasing the amount of its electric supply that comes from clean, renewable energy like wind, solar, and geothermal from the alreadyachieved standard of ten percent to a standard of twenty-five percent by the year 2025? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 115 262 66 40 82 280 280 102 231 211 196 175 169 126 274 29 103 116 98 54 27 20 74 100% 29% 65% 17% 10% 21% 70% 70% 25% 58% 53% 49% 44% 42% 32% 68% 7% 26% 29% 25% 13% 7% 5% 19% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 226 14 200 3 23 67 131 160 60 122 110 98 85 104 67 158 17 54 81 27 33 16 20 41 56% 12% 77% 5% 57% 82% 47% 57% 59% 53% 52% 50% 49% 62% 53% 58% 59% 53% 70% 28% 61% 59% 100% 55% TOTAL SUPPORT 301 57 228 29 31 74 197 212 78 172 156 143 127 129 90 211 21 73 95 58 43 21 20 56------------- 75% 50% 87% 44% 77% 90% 70% 76% 76% 74% 74% 73% 73% 77% 71% 77% 75% 71% 82% 59% 80% 76% 100% 75% TOTAL OPPOSE 75 43 28 26 8 7 66 52 18 50 46 45 42 26 23 53 5 19 15 30 10 5 - 15------------ 19% 38% 11% 39% 20% 9% 24% 19% 18% 22% 22% 23% 24% 15% 18% 19% 16% 18% 13% 31% 19% 17% - 20% STRONGLY SUPPORT 190 24 155 11 15 58 116 137 43 105 95 84 74 85 59 131 13 51 51 29 31 17 15 41 48% 21% 59% 16% 38% 71% 42% 49% 42% 45% 45% 43% 42% 51% 47% 48% 45% 49% 44% 29% 58% 62% 78% 54% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 111 33 73 18 16 16 80 75 35 67 61 59 53 44 31 80 8 22 44 29 12 4 4 16 28% 29% 28% 28% 40% 19% 29% 27% 34% 29% 29% 30% 30% 26% 24% 29% 29% 22% 38% 29% 22% 13% 22% 21% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 20 10 10 7 4 2 18 14 6 14 13 13 12 6 3 17 1 3 4 6 3 2 - 6 5% 8% 4% 10% 10% 2% 6% 5% 6% 6% 6% 7% 7% 4% 3% 6% 3% 3% 3% 6% 6% 6% - 9% STRONGLY OPPOSE 55 33 18 19 4 6 49 38 12 36 33 32 29 19 19 36 4 16 11 25 7 3 - 9 14% 29% 7% 29% 11% 7% 17% 14% 12% 15% 16% 16% 17% 11% 15% 13% 13% 15% 9% 25% 13% 10% - 12% DON'T KNOW 21 13 5 9 1 1 15 15 5 8 7 7 6 13 13 8 3 11 6 9 1 2 - 3 5% 12% 2% 14% 2% 1% 5% 6% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 8% 11% 3% 9% 10% 5% 9% 2% 8% - 4% REFUSED 2 1 - 1 - - 2 1 1 1 1 - - 1 - 2 - - - 1 - - - 1 1% 1% - 2% - - 1% - 1% 1% 1% - - - - 1% - - - 1% - - - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 140Table 27-5QUESTION M2:Would you support or oppose Montana increasing the amount of its electric supply that comes from clean, renewable energy like wind, solar, and geothermal from the alreadyachieved standard of ten percent to a standard of twenty-five percent by the year 2025? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=MONTANA 400 161 159 14 235 320 62 146 57 177 131 230 261 122 85 264 219 151 100 91 172 251 72 61 100% 40% 40% 3% 59% 80% 15% 37% 14% 44% 33% 58% 65% 30% 21% 66% 55% 38% 25% 23% 43% 63% 18% 15% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 226 116 114 12 105 190 26 121 4 93 24 186 223 -7 30 173 197 11 88 -7 125 210 29 -19 56% 72% 72% 88% 45% 59% 41% 83% 7% 52% 18% 81% 86% -6% 35% 66% 90% 7% 88% -8% 72% 84% 40% -30% TOTAL SUPPORT 301 137 135 13 160 247 41 131 30 129 72 205 238 51 54 215 206 74 93 39 146 226 48 18------------- 75% 85% 85% 94% 68% 77% 67% 89% 51% 73% 55% 89% 91% 42% 63% 81% 94% 49% 92% 43% 84% 90% 67% 29% TOTAL OPPOSE 75 21 21 1 55 58 16 10 25 36 48 19 14 58 24 41 8 63 5 47 21 16 20 36------------ 19% 13% 13% 6% 23% 18% 26% 7% 44% 20% 37% 8% 6% 48% 28% 16% 4% 42% 5% 52% 12% 6% 27% 59% STRONGLY SUPPORT 190 99 99 7 88 159 24 97 8 77 38 132 162 23 30 137 149 31 73 14 87 159 23 5 48% 61% 62% 48% 38% 50% 39% 67% 13% 43% 29% 57% 62% 19% 35% 52% 68% 21% 72% 15% 50% 64% 31% 8% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 111 38 36 6 72 88 18 33 22 52 34 73 75 28 24 78 56 42 20 25 59 67 26 13 28% 24% 23% 46% 31% 27% 28% 23% 38% 29% 26% 32% 29% 23% 28% 29% 26% 28% 20% 28% 34% 27% 36% 22% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 20 5 5 - 15 19 2 5 6 8 14 5 4 14 5 13 5 14 - 12 7 5 6 8 5% 3% 3% - 6% 6% 3% 3% 10% 5% 11% 2% 2% 12% 6% 5% 2% 9% - 13% 4% 2% 8% 13% STRONGLY OPPOSE 55 15 15 1 40 39 14 5 19 28 34 15 10 44 19 29 3 49 5 35 14 11 14 29 14% 10% 10% 6% 17% 12% 23% 3% 34% 16% 26% 6% 4% 36% 22% 11% 2% 32% 5% 38% 8% 5% 19% 47% DON'T KNOW 21 4 4 - 18 14 4 5 3 12 9 6 9 10 6 8 5 12 2 5 6 8 4 6 5% 2% 2% - 7% 4% 6% 3% 4% 7% 7% 2% 3% 8% 7% 3% 2% 8% 2% 5% 3% 3% 6% 9% REFUSED 2 - - - 2 1 1 1 - 1 1 - - 2 1 - - 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 1% - - - 1% - 1% 1% - - 1% - - 2% 2% - - 1% 1% - - - - 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 141Table 28-1QUESTION N2:As you may know, New Mexico set a standard in 2007 for use of renewable energy - including solar power and wind. It requires major utilities to obtain 20 percent of theirelectricity from renewable sources by the year 2020, in order to create clean energy jobs, promote energy independence and support locally produced energy. Some people havesuggested lowering the standard and requiring less renewable energy, which would bring down electricity rates in the short-term. Would you want your State Legislator to... Lower the standard and allow utilities to get more of our electricity from non-renewable sources like coal and gas ...OR... Keep the existing standard for the amount of our energy to be met by renewable sources like wind and solar? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 - - - 400 - - 192 208 80 60 63 108 88 65 85 41 75 86 47 144 43 208 100% - - - 100% - - 48% 52% 20% 15% 16% 27% 22% 16% 21% 10% 19% 22% 12% 36% 11% 52% **D/S (LOWER - KEEP) -189 - - - -189 - - -83 -106 -55 -36 -22 -52 -23 -36 -34 -11 -55 -40 -11 -14 -21 -151 -47% - - - -47% - - -43% -51% -68% -60% -34% -49% -26% -56% -40% -28% -73% -46% -24% -9% -50% -73% LOWER THE STANDARD 97 - - - 97 - - 50 47 12 11 19 25 30 14 23 13 10 21 17 64 10 23 24% - - - 24% - - 26% 22% 15% 19% 30% 23% 34% 21% 27% 33% 13% 24% 35% 44% 23% 11% KEEP THE EXISTING STANDARD 286 - - - 286 - - 133 153 67 47 40 78 53 50 57 25 64 61 28 77 31 174 71% - - - 71% - - 69% 73% 83% 79% 64% 72% 60% 77% 68% 60% 86% 70% 60% 54% 73% 83% INCREASE THE STANDARD 5 - - - 5 - - 3 2 1 - 1 2 - 1 1 - - 2 - 2 - 3 1% - - - 1% - - 2% 1% 2% - 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% - 2% - 1% 1% 1% GET RID OF STANDARD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - 1% - UNSURE/REFUSED 11 - - - 11 - - 5 7 - 1 2 3 5 - 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 9 3% - - - 3% - - 2% 3% - 2% 3% 3% 5% - 3% 6% 2% 4% 5% 1% 2% 4%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 142Table 28-2QUESTION N2:As you may know, New Mexico set a standard in 2007 for use of renewable energy - including solar power and wind. It requires major utilities to obtain 20 percent of theirelectricity from renewable sources by the year 2020, in order to create clean energy jobs, promote energy independence and support locally produced energy. Some people havesuggested lowering the standard and requiring less renewable energy, which would bring down electricity rates in the short-term. Would you want your State Legislator to... Lower the standard and allow utilities to get more of our electricity from non-renewable sources like coal and gas ...OR... Keep the existing standard for the amount of our energy to be met by renewable sources like wind and solar? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 203 189 136 98 105 65 71 69 75 26 17 93 115 52 92 20 23 68 139 117 136 8 100% 51% 47% 34% 24% 26% 16% 18% 17% 19% 7% 4% 23% 29% 13% 23% 5% 6% 17% 35% 29% 34% 2% **D/S (LOWER - KEEP) -189 -82 -106 -84 -31 -51 -41 -43 -5 -8 -15 -6 -61 -90 -29 16 -10 -12 -52 -98 - -11 -3 -47% -40% -56% -61% -32% -49% -63% -60% -8% -11% -56% -39% -66% -78% -57% 17% -48% -51% -76% -71% - -8% -30% LOWER THE STANDARD 97 56 38 23 32 24 10 13 31 33 5 5 13 9 11 53 5 5 8 15 58 61 3 24% 27% 20% 17% 32% 23% 15% 18% 45% 44% 20% 28% 14% 8% 20% 58% 24% 22% 12% 10% 50% 45% 35% KEEP THE EXISTING STANDARD 286 138 143 106 63 75 51 56 36 41 20 11 75 99 40 37 14 17 60 113 58 72 5 71% 68% 76% 78% 64% 71% 78% 78% 52% 55% 77% 67% 80% 86% 77% 41% 73% 73% 88% 81% 49% 53% 65% INCREASE THE STANDARD 5 5 - - 3 2 - - 2 - - - 1 2 1 1 - - - 3 1 2 - 1% 2% - - 3% 2% - - 3% - 2% - 1% 2% 3% 1% - 2% - 2% - 1% - GET RID OF STANDARD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - 2% - - - - - UNSURE/REFUSED 11 5 7 7 1 4 4 3 - 1 - 1 4 5 - 1 1 - 1 8 - 1 - 3% 2% 4% 5% 1% 4% 6% 4% - 1% - 5% 4% 4% - 1% 3% 1% 1% 6% - 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 143Table 28-3QUESTION N2:As you may know, New Mexico set a standard in 2007 for use of renewable energy - including solar power and wind. It requires major utilities to obtain 20 percent of theirelectricity from renewable sources by the year 2020, in order to create clean energy jobs, promote energy independence and support locally produced energy. Some people havesuggested lowering the standard and requiring less renewable energy, which would bring down electricity rates in the short-term. Would you want your State Legislator to... Lower the standard and allow utilities to get more of our electricity from non-renewable sources like coal and gas ...OR... Keep the existing standard for the amount of our energy to be met by renewable sources like wind and solar? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 168 138 81 113 25 11 29 43 162 106 67 113 107 55 50 34 33 62 51 37 70 200 200 100% 42% 34% 20% 28% 6% 3% 7% 11% 41% 26% 17% 28% 27% 14% 13% 8% 8% 15% 13% 9% 17% 50% 50% **D/S (LOWER - KEEP) -189 -17 -103 -63 3 -13 - -19 -20 -132 -49 -36 -32 -64 -27 -22 -19 -17 -15 -17 -18 -46 -91 -98 -47% -10% -75% -78% 3% -50% -1% -65% -46% -82% -46% -54% -28% -60% -48% -44% -56% -52% -24% -33% -49% -66% -45% -49% LOWER THE STANDARD 97 71 16 7 57 6 5 5 8 12 26 14 39 18 13 13 6 8 23 16 8 10 49 48 24% 42% 12% 9% 50% 25% 48% 16% 19% 8% 25% 20% 35% 17% 24% 26% 18% 23% 37% 31% 22% 14% 25% 24% KEEP THE EXISTING STANDARD 286 88 119 71 54 19 5 23 28 145 75 50 71 83 39 35 25 25 38 33 26 56 140 146 71% 52% 87% 87% 48% 75% 49% 81% 65% 89% 71% 75% 63% 77% 72% 70% 74% 75% 62% 65% 71% 80% 70% 73% INCREASE THE STANDARD 5 2 - 2 2 - - - 1 2 1 2 - 1 1 1 2 - - - - 1 3 2 1% 1% - 3% 2% - - - 1% 1% 1% 4% - 1% 1% 1% 7% - 1% - - 2% 2% 1% GET RID OF STANDARD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3% - - - - 1% - - - - 1% - - - - - - - UNSURE/REFUSED 11 7 3 1 - - - 1 6 3 3 1 2 5 2 1 - 1 - 2 2 3 8 4 3% 4% 2% 1% - - - 3% 15% 2% 3% 1% 2% 5% 4% 3% - 2% - 4% 6% 4% 4% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 144Table 28-4QUESTION N2:As you may know, New Mexico set a standard in 2007 for use of renewable energy - including solar power and wind. It requires major utilities to obtain 20 percent of theirelectricity from renewable sources by the year 2020, in order to create clean energy jobs, promote energy independence and support locally produced energy. Some people havesuggested lowering the standard and requiring less renewable energy, which would bring down electricity rates in the short-term. Would you want your State Legislator to... Lower the standard and allow utilities to get more of our electricity from non-renewable sources like coal and gas ...OR... Keep the existing standard for the amount of our energy to be met by renewable sources like wind and solar? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 118 251 92 37 123 237 269 112 170 140 133 103 219 152 247 24 141 136 78 58 36 13 66 100% 30% 63% 23% 9% 31% 59% 67% 28% 43% 35% 33% 26% 55% 38% 62% 6% 35% 34% 19% 15% 9% 3% 17% **D/S (LOWER - KEEP) -189 5 -180 10 -16 -93 -69 -126 -48 -71 -60 -53 -42 -112 -68 -120 -8 -61 -76 1 -42 -25 -5 -32 -47% 4% -72% 11% -42% -76% -29% -47% -43% -42% -43% -40% -41% -51% -45% -49% -34% -43% -56% 1% -72% -71% -41% -49% LOWER THE STANDARD 97 60 31 49 11 12 80 66 29 45 37 37 28 50 38 59 7 36 25 39 7 5 4 16 24% 51% 12% 54% 29% 10% 34% 24% 26% 27% 26% 28% 28% 23% 25% 24% 31% 26% 18% 50% 12% 13% 30% 24% KEEP THE EXISTING STANDARD 286 55 211 40 26 105 149 192 77 116 97 90 70 161 107 179 16 98 101 37 49 30 9 48 71% 46% 84% 43% 70% 85% 63% 71% 69% 68% 69% 68% 69% 74% 70% 72% 65% 69% 75% 48% 84% 84% 70% 73% INCREASE THE STANDARD 5 2 3 2 - 5 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 3 1 5 - 1 2 1 - 1 - 1 1% 2% 1% 2% - 4% - 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% - - 2% 1% - 3% - 2% GET RID OF STANDARD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% UNSURE/REFUSED 11 2 5 1 - 1 7 9 2 6 4 4 2 5 7 5 1 7 7 1 3 - - - 3% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 4% 2% 5% 5% 5% 1% 5% - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 145Table 28-5QUESTION N2:As you may know, New Mexico set a standard in 2007 for use of renewable energy - including solar power and wind. It requires major utilities to obtain 20 percent of theirelectricity from renewable sources by the year 2020, in order to create clean energy jobs, promote energy independence and support locally produced energy. Some people havesuggested lowering the standard and requiring less renewable energy, which would bring down electricity rates in the short-term. Would you want your State Legislator to... Lower the standard and allow utilities to get more of our electricity from non-renewable sources like coal and gas ...OR... Keep the existing standard for the amount of our energy to be met by renewable sources like wind and solar? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=NEW MEXICO 400 139 139 10 260 322 66 201 42 141 123 244 272 117 99 259 265 111 154 75 150 279 59 46 100% 35% 35% 2% 65% 80% 16% 50% 11% 35% 31% 61% 68% 29% 25% 65% 66% 28% 38% 19% 38% 70% 15% 12% **D/S (LOWER - KEEP) -189 -77 -76 -9 -112 -155 -29 -157 14 -38 -5 -173 -211 25 -35 -138 -206 21 -115 19 -80 -196 -5 13 -47% -55% -55% -95% -43% -48% -44% -78% 34% -27% -4% -71% -77% 22% -35% -53% -77% 19% -75% 25% -53% -70% -8% 29% LOWER THE STANDARD 97 29 29 - 68 77 18 18 28 48 57 30 25 70 31 54 24 66 18 45 32 36 26 29 24% 21% 21% - 26% 24% 27% 9% 67% 34% 47% 12% 9% 60% 31% 21% 9% 59% 12% 60% 21% 13% 45% 62% KEEP THE EXISTING STANDARD 286 106 105 9 180 232 46 175 14 86 62 203 235 45 66 192 229 44 133 26 112 231 31 15 71% 76% 76% 95% 69% 72% 70% 87% 32% 61% 50% 83% 86% 38% 66% 74% 86% 40% 86% 35% 75% 83% 53% 33% INCREASE THE STANDARD 5 3 3 1 2 5 - 4 - - 1 4 5 - - 5 4 - 1 1 2 5 - - 1% 2% 2% 5% 1% 1% - 2% - - 1% 2% 2% - - 2% 2% - 1% 2% 1% 2% - - GET RID OF STANDARD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% UNSURE/REFUSED 11 1 1 - 10 8 2 4 - 6 2 7 8 2 2 8 8 1 2 3 4 8 1 2 3% 1% 1% - 4% 2% 2% 2% - 4% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2% 5%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 146Table 29-1QUESTION U2:Utah state government sets standards for the building of new homes, to ensure that they do not waste energy. Those standards have not been updated in several years. Wouldyou prefer that Utah... Require developers to meet updated standards to reduce energy waste and reduce home owners' utility bills, even if it increases the price of brand new homes by somewherebetween one and eight thousand dollars. ...OR... Allow developers to build new homes that are not as energy efficient in order to save buyers of newly built homes somewhere between one and eight thousand dollars on theirpurchase, even if it results in more waste of energy and higher utility bills? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 - - - - 400 - 192 208 96 112 65 77 48 99 72 21 109 71 27 188 141 68 100% - - - - 100% - 48% 52% 24% 28% 16% 19% 12% 25% 18% 5% 27% 18% 7% 47% 35% 17% **D/S (MEET UPDATED 233 - - - - 233 - 104 130 60 56 44 41 29 51 37 16 66 48 13 93 83 53 STANDARDS - BUILD NEW 58% - - - - 58% - 54% 62% 63% 50% 68% 53% 61% 51% 51% 75% 60% 69% 50% 50% 59% 78% HOMES THAT ARE NOT ENERGY EFFICIENT) REQUIRE DEVELOPERS TO MEET 304 - - - - 304 - 141 163 77 79 53 57 36 73 51 17 83 59 20 134 108 59UPDATED STANDARDS TO REDUCE 76% - - - - 76% - 73% 78% 80% 71% 81% 74% 76% 74% 71% 79% 76% 83% 74% 71% 76% 87%ENERGY WASTE ALLOW DEVELOPERS TO BUILD 71 - - - - 71 - 38 34 16 23 9 16 7 23 14 1 17 10 6 41 24 6NEW HOMES THAT ARE NOT AS 18% - - - - 18% - 20% 16% 17% 21% 13% 20% 15% 23% 20% 4% 16% 14% 23% 22% 17% 9%ENERGY EFFICIENT NO PREFERENCE/EITHER 15 - - - - 15 - 8 7 2 7 3 3 1 3 5 1 6 1 - 9 5 1 4% - - - - 4% - 4% 3% 2% 6% 4% 3% 1% 3% 6% 3% 6% 1% - 5% 4% 2% UNSURE/REFUSED 10 - - - - 10 - 6 4 1 3 1 2 4 1 2 3 3 1 1 5 4 1 2% - - - - 2% - 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% 8% 1% 3% 15% 2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 147Table 29-2QUESTION U2:Utah state government sets standards for the building of new homes, to ensure that they do not waste energy. Those standards have not been updated in several years. Wouldyou prefer that Utah... Require developers to meet updated standards to reduce energy waste and reduce home owners' utility bills, even if it increases the price of brand new homes by somewherebetween one and eight thousand dollars. ...OR... Allow developers to build new homes that are not as energy efficient in order to save buyers of newly built homes somewhere between one and eight thousand dollars on theirpurchase, even if it results in more waste of energy and higher utility bills? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 365 31 16 174 191 10 6 89 99 69 72 33 35 101 87 72 68 34 33 147 174 14 100% 91% 8% 4% 43% 48% 2% 2% 22% 25% 17% 18% 8% 9% 25% 22% 18% 17% 9% 8% 37% 43% 4% **D/S (MEET UPDATED 233 206 28 16 89 117 10 6 37 56 37 46 29 24 53 40 38 45 24 28 70 86 7 STANDARDS - BUILD NEW 58% 56% 89% 100% 51% 61% 100% 100% 41% 57% 54% 64% 88% 69% 53% 46% 53% 65% 71% 85% 48% 50% 49% HOMES THAT ARE NOT ENERGY EFFICIENT) REQUIRE DEVELOPERS TO MEET 304 274 29 16 125 148 10 6 59 75 51 57 31 28 74 60 54 53 28 30 103 124 10UPDATED STANDARDS TO REDUCE 76% 75% 93% 100% 72% 78% 100% 100% 66% 76% 74% 79% 94% 81% 73% 69% 75% 78% 82% 92% 70% 71% 71%ENERGY WASTE ALLOW DEVELOPERS TO BUILD 71 68 1 - 36 32 - - 22 19 14 11 2 4 20 20 16 9 4 3 33 37 3NEW HOMES THAT ARE NOT AS 18% 19% 4% - 21% 16% - - 24% 19% 20% 15% 6% 12% 20% 23% 22% 13% 11% 8% 22% 22% 22%ENERGY EFFICIENT NO PREFERENCE/EITHER 15 15 - - 8 7 - - 5 3 2 3 - 1 6 3 2 3 1 - 7 8 1 4% 4% - - 4% 4% - - 6% 3% 3% 4% - 3% 6% 3% 3% 4% 4% - 5% 4% 7% UNSURE/REFUSED 10 9 1 - 4 4 - - 3 1 2 2 - 1 1 3 1 3 1 - 5 5 - 2% 2% 2% - 3% 2% - - 4% 1% 3% 2% - 4% 1% 4% 1% 5% 4% - 3% 3% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 148Table 29-3QUESTION U2:Utah state government sets standards for the building of new homes, to ensure that they do not waste energy. Those standards have not been updated in several years. Wouldyou prefer that Utah... Require developers to meet updated standards to reduce energy waste and reduce home owners' utility bills, even if it increases the price of brand new homes by somewherebetween one and eight thousand dollars. ...OR... Allow developers to build new homes that are not as energy efficient in order to save buyers of newly built homes somewhere between one and eight thousand dollars on theirpurchase, even if it results in more waste of energy and higher utility bills? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 206 125 61 143 42 58 80 3 64 70 184 101 44 36 33 83 101 49 52 23 21 200 200 100% 52% 31% 15% 36% 10% 14% 20% 1% 16% 17% 46% 25% 11% 9% 8% 21% 25% 12% 13% 6% 5% 50% 50% **D/S (MEET UPDATED 233 93 89 47 61 31 27 56 3 49 51 102 51 28 31 19 41 61 19 32 12 16 127 106 STANDARDS - BUILD NEW 58% 45% 71% 77% 42% 73% 47% 70% 100% 77% 73% 56% 50% 64% 86% 58% 50% 60% 38% 62% 51% 78% 64% 53% HOMES THAT ARE NOT ENERGY EFFICIENT) REQUIRE DEVELOPERS TO MEET 304 141 104 53 97 35 40 67 3 55 58 138 71 36 33 25 59 79 31 40 17 18 157 147UPDATED STANDARDS TO REDUCE 76% 69% 83% 87% 67% 85% 69% 83% 100% 86% 83% 75% 70% 82% 91% 75% 71% 78% 62% 78% 75% 89% 79% 73%ENERGY WASTE ALLOW DEVELOPERS TO BUILD 71 48 15 7 36 5 13 11 - 6 7 36 20 8 2 6 18 18 12 8 6 2 30 41NEW HOMES THAT ARE NOT AS 18% 24% 12% 11% 25% 11% 22% 13% - 10% 11% 19% 20% 18% 5% 17% 22% 17% 25% 15% 25% 11% 15% 20%ENERGY EFFICIENT NO PREFERENCE/EITHER 15 11 3 1 8 1 3 2 - 1 4 7 4 - 1 3 4 3 3 1 - - 9 6 4% 5% 2% 2% 5% 2% 5% 2% - 2% 5% 4% 4% - 2% 9% 5% 3% 6% 3% - - 4% 3% UNSURE/REFUSED 10 5 3 - 3 1 2 1 - 1 1 4 6 - 1 - 2 2 3 2 - - 3 6 2% 3% 2% - 2% 2% 4% 1% - 2% 1% 2% 6% - 1% - 2% 2% 7% 4% - - 2% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 149Table 29-4QUESTION U2:Utah state government sets standards for the building of new homes, to ensure that they do not waste energy. Those standards have not been updated in several years. Wouldyou prefer that Utah... Require developers to meet updated standards to reduce energy waste and reduce home owners' utility bills, even if it increases the price of brand new homes by somewherebetween one and eight thousand dollars. ...OR... Allow developers to build new homes that are not as energy efficient in order to save buyers of newly built homes somewhere between one and eight thousand dollars on theirpurchase, even if it results in more waste of energy and higher utility bills? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 115 248 73 96 65 285 241 139 153 138 100 85 243 82 318 14 69 136 98 41 23 13 79 100% 29% 62% 18% 24% 16% 71% 60% 35% 38% 35% 25% 21% 61% 20% 80% 4% 17% 34% 24% 10% 6% 3% 20% **D/S (MEET UPDATED 233 38 171 18 65 47 149 149 73 93 83 53 43 136 58 175 11 48 86 39 31 16 9 43 STANDARDS - BUILD NEW 58% 33% 69% 25% 68% 72% 52% 62% 53% 61% 60% 53% 50% 56% 71% 55% 80% 70% 63% 40% 77% 69% 69% 55% HOMES THAT ARE NOT ENERGY EFFICIENT) REQUIRE DEVELOPERS TO MEET 304 71 205 41 78 55 208 188 101 119 107 73 61 181 67 237 12 56 106 66 36 17 11 59UPDATED STANDARDS TO REDUCE 76% 62% 82% 57% 82% 84% 73% 78% 73% 78% 77% 73% 71% 74% 82% 75% 87% 81% 78% 67% 88% 75% 85% 74%ENERGY WASTE ALLOW DEVELOPERS TO BUILD 71 33 33 23 13 8 58 39 28 26 23 21 18 45 9 62 1 8 20 27 5 1 2 15NEW HOMES THAT ARE NOT AS 18% 29% 13% 31% 14% 12% 20% 16% 20% 17% 17% 21% 21% 19% 11% 20% 6% 11% 15% 27% 12% 5% 15% 19%ENERGY EFFICIENT NO PREFERENCE/EITHER 15 8 5 7 2 3 12 8 7 5 5 3 3 10 3 11 1 2 6 4 - 2 - 4 4% 7% 2% 9% 2% 4% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 7% 4% 4% 4% - 7% - 5% UNSURE/REFUSED 10 3 6 2 3 - 7 7 2 3 3 3 3 7 3 7 - 3 4 2 - 3 - 1 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% - 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% - 4% 3% 2% - 13% - 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 150Table 29-5QUESTION U2:Utah state government sets standards for the building of new homes, to ensure that they do not waste energy. Those standards have not been updated in several years. Wouldyou prefer that Utah... Require developers to meet updated standards to reduce energy waste and reduce home owners' utility bills, even if it increases the price of brand new homes by somewherebetween one and eight thousand dollars. ...OR... Allow developers to build new homes that are not as energy efficient in order to save buyers of newly built homes somewhere between one and eight thousand dollars on theirpurchase, even if it results in more waste of energy and higher utility bills? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=UTAH 400 179 172 21 221 303 84 175 36 175 91 276 277 109 78 287 247 117 104 86 176 257 71 61 100% 45% 43% 5% 55% 76% 21% 44% 9% 44% 23% 69% 69% 27% 20% 72% 62% 29% 26% 21% 44% 64% 18% 15% **D/S (MEET UPDATED 233 118 113 16 115 190 37 129 14 82 29 205 203 27 42 184 184 33 78 22 114 193 27 14 STANDARDS - BUILD NEW 58% 66% 66% 76% 52% 63% 44% 74% 40% 47% 32% 74% 73% 24% 54% 64% 75% 28% 75% 25% 65% 75% 38% 22% HOMES THAT ARE NOT ENERGY EFFICIENT) REQUIRE DEVELOPERS TO MEET 304 142 136 19 162 238 57 151 22 121 58 234 234 63 57 228 210 70 90 49 140 218 47 35UPDATED STANDARDS TO REDUCE 76% 79% 79% 88% 74% 79% 68% 86% 62% 69% 64% 85% 84% 58% 74% 79% 85% 60% 87% 57% 80% 85% 66% 57%ENERGY WASTE ALLOW DEVELOPERS TO BUILD 71 24 23 3 47 48 20 21 8 39 29 29 31 36 15 44 26 38 12 27 26 25 20 21NEW HOMES THAT ARE NOT AS 18% 13% 13% 12% 21% 16% 24% 12% 22% 23% 32% 11% 11% 33% 19% 15% 10% 32% 12% 32% 15% 10% 27% 35%ENERGY EFFICIENT NO PREFERENCE/EITHER 15 12 12 - 3 10 4 1 4 8 2 10 7 6 2 10 8 3 - 5 8 9 5 1 4% 7% 7% - 1% 3% 5% 1% 11% 5% 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% 3% 3% 3% - 5% 5% 4% 7% 1% UNSURE/REFUSED 10 1 1 - 9 6 3 2 2 6 2 3 5 4 3 5 3 5 1 5 1 4 - 4 2% 1% 1% - 4% 2% 3% 1% 5% 3% 2% 1% 2% 4% 4% 2% 1% 5% 1% 6% 1% 2% - 7%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 151Table 30-1QUESTION C2:Today, state lottery funds are distributed around Colorado for natural areas, wildlife habitat, land along rivers and streams, state and local parks, trails, and natureeducation. If Lottery funds exceed a certain amount in any given year, the additional money goes to a kindergarten through twelfth grade school construction fund. Knowingthis, would you prefer to... Continue to have Lottery funds distributed to protect natural areas and to school construction. ...OR... Eliminate this source of funding for land and water conservation and school construction so that all Lottery funds are redirected to the general state education budget? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 - 400 - - - - 192 208 85 91 79 84 60 93 67 32 83 96 28 136 118 136 100% - 100% - - - - 48% 52% 21% 23% 20% 21% 15% 23% 17% 8% 21% 24% 7% 34% 30% 34% **D/S (CONTINUE - 244 - 244 - - - - 139 106 61 51 45 51 36 68 49 20 43 46 16 78 73 86 ELIMINATE) 61% - 61% - - - - 72% 51% 71% 56% 57% 61% 60% 74% 74% 64% 51% 48% 57% 58% 61% 63% CONTINUE TO HAVE LOTTERY 303 - 303 - - - - 157 146 69 68 57 62 46 77 55 24 60 64 22 101 87 106FUNDS DISTRIBUTED TO 76% - 76% - - - - 82% 70% 82% 74% 72% 74% 77% 83% 82% 77% 72% 67% 77% 74% 74% 78%PROTECT NATURAL AREAS ANDTO SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION ELIMINATE THIS SOURCE OF 59 - 59 - - - - 18 40 9 17 12 11 10 9 5 4 17 18 6 22 15 21FUNDING FOR LAND AND WATER 15% - 15% - - - - 9% 19% 10% 18% 15% 13% 16% 10% 8% 13% 20% 19% 20% 16% 12% 15%CONSERVATION AND SCHOOLCONSTRUCTION SO THAT ALLLOTTERY FUNDS AREREDIRECTED TO THE GENERALSTATE EDUCATION BUDGET BOTH 6 - 6 - - - - 1 5 - 1 3 2 - 1 - - - 5 - - 3 3 2% - 2% - - - - 1% 3% - 1% 4% 3% - 1% - - - 6% - - 3% 2% NEITHER 9 - 9 - - - - 6 3 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 6 3 - 2% - 2% - - - - 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 1% 1% 3% 4% 3% - UNSURE/REFUSED 23 - 23 - - - - 10 14 5 4 7 6 2 3 5 2 6 8 - 7 10 6 6% - 6% - - - - 5% 7% 5% 5% 9% 7% 3% 3% 7% 6% 7% 8% - 5% 9% 4%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 152Table 30-2QUESTION C2:Today, state lottery funds are distributed around Colorado for natural areas, wildlife habitat, land along rivers and streams, state and local parks, trails, and natureeducation. If Lottery funds exceed a certain amount in any given year, the additional money goes to a kindergarten through twelfth grade school construction fund. Knowingthis, would you prefer to... Continue to have Lottery funds distributed to protect natural areas and to school construction. ...OR... Eliminate this source of funding for land and water conservation and school construction so that all Lottery funds are redirected to the general state education budget? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 311 81 48 153 158 18 30 70 66 76 42 42 94 47 88 61 58 66 70 83 105 15 100% 78% 20% 12% 38% 39% 4% 8% 18% 16% 19% 10% 10% 24% 12% 22% 15% 14% 16% 17% 21% 26% 4% **D/S (CONTINUE - 244 192 45 30 107 85 16 14 51 27 51 22 34 52 23 55 41 31 47 38 48 64 9 ELIMINATE) 61% 62% 55% 63% 70% 54% 89% 48% 73% 42% 66% 52% 80% 55% 48% 62% 68% 54% 71% 55% 57% 61% 59% CONTINUE TO HAVE LOTTERY 303 237 58 38 123 114 17 21 58 43 60 28 36 70 34 66 47 40 54 51 63 81 12FUNDS DISTRIBUTED TO 76% 76% 72% 80% 80% 72% 94% 71% 82% 66% 78% 66% 87% 74% 71% 75% 78% 69% 83% 74% 75% 77% 78%PROTECT NATURAL AREAS ANDTO SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION ELIMINATE THIS SOURCE OF 59 45 13 8 16 29 1 7 7 16 9 6 3 18 11 11 6 9 8 13 15 17 3FUNDING FOR LAND AND WATER 15% 14% 17% 17% 10% 19% 6% 23% 9% 24% 12% 13% 6% 19% 23% 13% 10% 15% 12% 19% 18% 16% 19%CONSERVATION AND SCHOOLCONSTRUCTION SO THAT ALLLOTTERY FUNDS AREREDIRECTED TO THE GENERALSTATE EDUCATION BUDGET BOTH 6 6 1 - 1 5 - - - - 1 2 - 3 - - 1 2 - 3 - - - 2% 2% 1% - 1% 3% - - - - 1% 5% - 3% - - 2% 4% - 5% - - - NEITHER 9 7 2 - 5 2 - - 3 3 3 - - - 2 4 2 1 - - 4 5 - 2% 2% 3% - 3% 1% - - 5% 4% 4% - - - 3% 5% 3% 2% - - 5% 4% 3% UNSURE/REFUSED 23 17 6 2 9 8 - 2 3 4 4 7 3 3 1 6 4 6 4 2 1 2 - 6% 5% 8% 4% 6% 5% - 6% 4% 6% 5% 16% 7% 3% 2% 7% 7% 10% 6% 3% 1% 2% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 153Table 30-3QUESTION C2:Today, state lottery funds are distributed around Colorado for natural areas, wildlife habitat, land along rivers and streams, state and local parks, trails, and natureeducation. If Lottery funds exceed a certain amount in any given year, the additional money goes to a kindergarten through twelfth grade school construction fund. Knowingthis, would you prefer to... Continue to have Lottery funds distributed to protect natural areas and to school construction. ...OR... Eliminate this source of funding for land and water conservation and school construction so that all Lottery funds are redirected to the general state education budget? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 145 146 96 100 33 36 76 7 129 92 153 89 59 37 56 80 74 46 43 26 33 200 200 100% 36% 37% 24% 25% 8% 9% 19% 2% 32% 23% 38% 22% 15% 9% 14% 20% 18% 12% 11% 6% 8% 50% 50% **D/S (CONTINUE - 244 85 85 66 54 20 23 47 5 81 54 91 61 33 25 29 60 30 35 26 14 19 122 122 ELIMINATE) 61% 58% 58% 69% 54% 62% 64% 62% 68% 63% 58% 59% 68% 56% 69% 51% 76% 41% 76% 60% 55% 57% 61% 61% CONTINUE TO HAVE LOTTERY 303 105 109 77 71 26 26 57 6 100 68 117 72 40 29 39 68 49 39 33 18 23 154 148FUNDS DISTRIBUTED TO 76% 72% 75% 81% 71% 80% 72% 75% 84% 78% 73% 76% 81% 68% 79% 70% 85% 67% 84% 78% 68% 69% 77% 74%PROTECT NATURAL AREAS ANDTO SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION ELIMINATE THIS SOURCE OF 59 21 24 12 17 6 3 10 1 19 14 26 11 7 4 10 7 19 4 8 3 4 32 26FUNDING FOR LAND AND WATER 15% 14% 17% 12% 17% 17% 8% 13% 16% 15% 15% 17% 13% 12% 10% 18% 9% 25% 8% 18% 13% 12% 16% 13%CONSERVATION AND SCHOOLCONSTRUCTION SO THAT ALLLOTTERY FUNDS AREREDIRECTED TO THE GENERALSTATE EDUCATION BUDGET BOTH 6 - 4 2 - - - 3 - 3 2 1 - 3 1 1 - 1 - - - 3 3 3 2% - 3% 2% - - - 4% - 3% 2% 1% - 4% 3% 2% - 1% - - - 8% 2% 2% NEITHER 9 8 1 - 5 1 3 - - - 2 4 2 1 2 - 2 2 2 - 1 - 1 7 2% 5% 1% - 5% 3% 8% - - - 2% 3% 2% 2% 5% - 3% 3% 4% - 2% 1% 1% 4% UNSURE/REFUSED 23 11 7 4 7 - 4 6 - 6 7 5 4 8 1 6 2 2 2 2 4 3 8 15 6% 8% 5% 5% 7% - 12% 8% - 5% 7% 3% 5% 13% 3% 10% 3% 3% 5% 5% 16% 10% 4% 7%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 154Table 30-4QUESTION C2:Today, state lottery funds are distributed around Colorado for natural areas, wildlife habitat, land along rivers and streams, state and local parks, trails, and natureeducation. If Lottery funds exceed a certain amount in any given year, the additional money goes to a kindergarten through twelfth grade school construction fund. Knowingthis, would you prefer to... Continue to have Lottery funds distributed to protect natural areas and to school construction. ...OR... Eliminate this source of funding for land and water conservation and school construction so that all Lottery funds are redirected to the general state education budget? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 114 264 74 53 103 268 269 119 152 132 99 79 244 104 294 22 89 146 90 27 35 26 72 100% 28% 66% 19% 13% 26% 67% 67% 30% 38% 33% 25% 20% 61% 26% 74% 5% 22% 36% 23% 7% 9% 7% 18% **D/S (CONTINUE - 244 67 161 39 34 69 162 167 66 96 89 66 59 144 59 184 10 49 85 51 19 25 20 41 ELIMINATE) 61% 59% 61% 53% 64% 68% 61% 62% 56% 63% 67% 67% 74% 59% 57% 62% 47% 56% 58% 56% 70% 71% 78% 57% CONTINUE TO HAVE LOTTERY 303 83 202 51 43 84 202 204 88 116 103 78 65 182 73 228 16 61 111 65 20 28 22 52FUNDS DISTRIBUTED TO 76% 73% 77% 69% 81% 82% 75% 76% 74% 77% 78% 79% 82% 75% 71% 77% 72% 69% 76% 72% 76% 82% 86% 72%PROTECT NATURAL AREAS ANDTO SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION ELIMINATE THIS SOURCE OF 59 16 41 12 9 15 39 37 21 20 15 12 6 38 15 44 6 12 26 14 2 4 2 11FUNDING FOR LAND AND WATER 15% 14% 16% 16% 17% 14% 15% 14% 18% 13% 11% 12% 8% 16% 14% 15% 26% 13% 18% 15% 6% 11% 8% 16%CONSERVATION AND SCHOOLCONSTRUCTION SO THAT ALLLOTTERY FUNDS AREREDIRECTED TO THE GENERALSTATE EDUCATION BUDGET BOTH 6 - 4 - - - 2 6 - - - - - 6 1 5 - 1 3 - 3 - - - 2% - 1% - - - 1% 2% - - - - - 3% 1% 2% - 1% 2% - 13% - - - NEITHER 9 7 2 6 - - 9 5 3 5 5 4 4 4 3 6 - 3 1 5 - - - 2 2% 6% 1% 8% - - 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% 4% 5% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 1% 6% - - - 3% UNSURE/REFUSED 23 7 15 5 1 4 16 17 7 10 9 5 4 13 12 11 - 12 5 7 1 2 2 6 6% 6% 6% 7% 2% 4% 6% 6% 5% 7% 7% 5% 5% 5% 12% 4% - 14% 3% 7% 5% 7% 6% 9%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 155Table 30-5QUESTION C2:Today, state lottery funds are distributed around Colorado for natural areas, wildlife habitat, land along rivers and streams, state and local parks, trails, and natureeducation. If Lottery funds exceed a certain amount in any given year, the additional money goes to a kindergarten through twelfth grade school construction fund. Knowingthis, would you prefer to... Continue to have Lottery funds distributed to protect natural areas and to school construction. ...OR... Eliminate this source of funding for land and water conservation and school construction so that all Lottery funds are redirected to the general state education budget? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=COLORADO 400 167 163 18 231 311 82 188 47 157 118 252 284 107 89 274 264 116 97 94 180 257 67 61 100% 42% 41% 4% 58% 78% 21% 47% 12% 39% 29% 63% 71% 27% 22% 68% 66% 29% 24% 24% 45% 64% 17% 15% **D/S (CONTINUE - 244 101 102 10 142 186 54 118 32 93 78 146 173 65 48 175 158 73 50 61 118 153 43 37 ELIMINATE) 61% 60% 63% 54% 61% 60% 66% 63% 68% 59% 66% 58% 61% 61% 55% 64% 60% 63% 52% 65% 65% 60% 65% 60% CONTINUE TO HAVE LOTTERY 303 126 125 13 175 234 65 145 37 117 91 188 217 78 64 213 200 88 69 73 142 195 52 44FUNDS DISTRIBUTED TO 76% 75% 77% 71% 76% 75% 79% 77% 79% 75% 77% 75% 76% 73% 72% 78% 76% 75% 71% 78% 79% 76% 78% 72%PROTECT NATURAL AREAS ANDTO SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION ELIMINATE THIS SOURCE OF 59 25 23 3 34 48 11 27 5 24 13 42 44 13 15 38 42 14 18 12 25 41 9 7FUNDING FOR LAND AND WATER 15% 15% 14% 17% 15% 15% 13% 14% 11% 15% 11% 17% 16% 12% 17% 14% 16% 12% 19% 13% 14% 16% 14% 12%CONSERVATION AND SCHOOLCONSTRUCTION SO THAT ALLLOTTERY FUNDS AREREDIRECTED TO THE GENERALSTATE EDUCATION BUDGET BOTH 6 1 1 - 5 6 - 4 - 2 1 4 6 1 - 5 6 - 1 - 2 5 - - 2% 1% 1% - 2% 2% - 2% - 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% - 2% 2% - 1% - 1% 2% - - NEITHER 9 3 3 1 6 6 1 1 2 4 4 3 2 7 - 5 - 7 2 5 2 - 3 5 2% 2% 2% 6% 3% 2% 1% - 5% 3% 4% 1% 1% 6% 1% 2% - 6% 2% 5% 1% - 4% 9% UNSURE/REFUSED 23 12 10 1 11 18 6 12 2 9 9 14 15 9 9 13 15 8 7 4 10 15 3 5 6% 7% 6% 6% 5% 6% 7% 6% 5% 6% 7% 6% 5% 8% 11% 5% 6% 7% 7% 5% 5% 6% 4% 8%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 156Table 31-1QUESTION W2:Here in Wyoming, the State Legislature created the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust in 2005. To date, the Legislature has set aside 95 million dollars in theTrust, so that the interest can be used for protecting fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water. But, the Legislature COULD set aside up to 200 million dollarsunder current law, WITHOUT increasing taxes. Knowing this, would you support or oppose the State Legislature fully funding the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust topreserve fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water in the state? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 - - - - - 400 192 208 72 92 62 110 64 84 83 25 80 89 39 252 52 88 100% - - - - - 100% 48% 52% 18% 23% 15% 28% 16% 21% 21% 6% 20% 22% 10% 63% 13% 22% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 209 - - - - - 209 105 104 41 68 26 46 28 64 30 11 45 42 16 104 40 60 52% - - - - - 52% 55% 50% 58% 74% 43% 42% 43% 76% 37% 45% 57% 47% 42% 41% 77% 68% TOTAL SUPPORT 299 - - - - - 299 147 151 57 79 42 76 44 74 55 18 63 63 25 174 45 72------------- 75% - - - - - 75% 77% 73% 79% 86% 69% 69% 69% 87% 67% 73% 78% 71% 66% 69% 87% 82% TOTAL OPPOSE 90 - - - - - 90 42 48 15 12 16 31 16 10 25 7 17 21 9 71 5 13------------ 22% - - - - - 22% 22% 23% 21% 13% 26% 28% 25% 12% 30% 27% 22% 24% 24% 28% 10% 15% STRONGLY SUPPORT 154 - - - - - 154 76 79 27 48 20 36 24 40 27 9 34 29 16 78 24 47 39% - - - - - 39% 39% 38% 37% 52% 33% 32% 38% 48% 33% 34% 43% 32% 41% 31% 46% 53% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 144 - - - - - 144 72 73 30 32 22 41 19 34 28 10 28 35 10 96 22 25 36% - - - - - 36% 37% 35% 42% 35% 36% 37% 30% 40% 34% 39% 36% 39% 25% 38% 41% 29% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 43 - - - - - 43 16 27 11 4 7 14 7 3 10 2 12 10 5 33 4 5 11% - - - - - 11% 8% 13% 15% 5% 11% 13% 11% 4% 13% 8% 15% 11% 14% 13% 7% 5% STRONGLY OPPOSE 47 - - - - - 47 26 21 4 8 9 16 9 6 15 5 6 11 4 37 1 8 12% - - - - - 12% 14% 10% 6% 8% 15% 15% 14% 8% 18% 20% 7% 12% 10% 15% 3% 9% DON'T KNOW 9 - - - - - 9 3 6 - 1 3 2 3 1 2 - - 3 3 4 2 3 2% - - - - - 2% 1% 3% - 1% 5% 2% 4% 1% 2% - - 4% 7% 2% 3% 3% REFUSED 3 - - - - - 3 - 3 - - - 2 1 - - - - 2 1 3 - - 1% - - - - - 1% - 1% - - - 1% 2% - - - - 2% 3% 1% - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 157Table 31-2QUESTION W2:Here in Wyoming, the State Legislature created the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust in 2005. To date, the Legislature has set aside 95 million dollars in theTrust, so that the interest can be used for protecting fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water. But, the Legislature COULD set aside up to 200 million dollarsunder current law, WITHOUT increasing taxes. Knowing this, would you support or oppose the State Legislature fully funding the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust topreserve fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water in the state? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 359 37 20 163 196 15 5 132 120 28 25 29 59 104 148 27 25 30 58 202 237 65 100% 90% 9% 5% 41% 49% 4% 1% 33% 30% 7% 6% 7% 15% 26% 37% 7% 6% 8% 14% 51% 59% 16% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 209 183 26 20 87 96 15 5 61 43 23 17 19 41 61 42 24 16 22 38 81 104 40 52% 51% 72% 100% 54% 49% 100% 100% 46% 36% 83% 71% 65% 69% 59% 29% 89% 64% 71% 66% 40% 44% 61% TOTAL SUPPORT 299 265 32 20 124 142 15 5 96 79 25 20 24 49 82 92 26 20 26 46 139 168 51------------- 75% 74% 86% 100% 76% 72% 100% 100% 72% 66% 91% 82% 81% 83% 79% 62% 95% 79% 86% 81% 69% 71% 79% TOTAL OPPOSE 90 82 5 - 36 46 - - 35 36 2 3 5 8 21 50 2 4 4 8 57 64 11------------ 22% 23% 14% - 22% 23% - - 26% 30% 9% 11% 16% 14% 20% 34% 5% 14% 14% 15% 28% 27% 18% STRONGLY SUPPORT 154 135 19 14 63 72 9 5 43 35 12 11 17 30 37 41 14 10 22 25 62 75 27 39% 38% 50% 72% 38% 37% 61% 100% 33% 29% 45% 46% 59% 51% 36% 28% 49% 42% 71% 44% 31% 32% 42% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 144 130 13 6 61 69 6 - 52 44 13 9 6 19 45 51 12 9 5 21 77 93 24 36% 36% 36% 28% 38% 35% 39% - 39% 37% 46% 35% 22% 32% 43% 35% 45% 37% 15% 36% 38% 39% 37% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 43 42 - - 15 27 - - 12 21 2 2 2 3 13 21 2 2 1 4 28 32 5 11% 12% - - 9% 14% - - 9% 18% 6% 8% 6% 5% 12% 14% 5% 8% 3% 7% 14% 13% 7% STRONGLY OPPOSE 47 41 5 - 22 19 - - 23 15 1 1 3 5 9 29 - 1 3 5 29 32 7 12% 11% 14% - 13% 10% - - 17% 12% 2% 4% 10% 9% 8% 19% - 6% 11% 8% 15% 14% 10% DON'T KNOW 9 9 - - 3 6 - - 2 2 - 2 1 2 1 3 - 2 - 3 3 3 2 2% 2% - - 2% 3% - - 1% 2% - 7% 3% 3% 1% 2% - 7% - 5% 2% 1% 4% REFUSED 3 3 - - - 3 - - - 3 - - - - - 3 - - - - 3 3 - 1% 1% - - - 1% - - - 2% - - - - - 2% - - - - 1% 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 158Table 31-3QUESTION W2:Here in Wyoming, the State Legislature created the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust in 2005. To date, the Legislature has set aside 95 million dollars in theTrust, so that the interest can be used for protecting fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water. But, the Legislature COULD set aside up to 200 million dollarsunder current law, WITHOUT increasing taxes. Knowing this, would you support or oppose the State Legislature fully funding the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust topreserve fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water in the state? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 185 148 56 148 102 20 32 16 68 40 28 230 97 22 18 16 12 111 119 43 54 200 200 100% 46% 37% 14% 37% 25% 5% 8% 4% 17% 10% 7% 58% 24% 6% 4% 4% 3% 28% 30% 11% 14% 50% 50% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 209 74 85 41 53 49 17 24 4 54 22 12 146 25 11 11 9 3 74 72 10 15 98 111 52% 40% 57% 74% 35% 48% 83% 74% 29% 79% 56% 44% 63% 26% 51% 61% 58% 27% 67% 60% 24% 27% 49% 55% TOTAL SUPPORT 299 127 114 48 99 74 18 28 10 59 31 20 184 59 17 14 12 8 92 92 26 33 148 151------------- 75% 69% 77% 85% 67% 72% 87% 87% 64% 87% 77% 72% 80% 61% 74% 81% 79% 63% 83% 77% 61% 62% 74% 75% TOTAL OPPOSE 90 53 30 6 46 25 1 4 6 6 9 8 39 34 5 3 3 5 18 21 16 19 50 40------------ 22% 28% 20% 11% 31% 24% 4% 13% 36% 9% 21% 28% 17% 35% 23% 19% 21% 37% 16% 17% 36% 35% 25% 20% STRONGLY SUPPORT 154 57 58 31 42 35 9 14 5 39 17 13 92 29 11 6 9 4 45 47 11 18 72 82 39% 31% 39% 55% 28% 35% 47% 45% 31% 58% 42% 46% 40% 30% 48% 35% 55% 34% 41% 39% 26% 33% 36% 41% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 144 70 56 17 57 38 8 13 5 20 14 7 92 30 6 8 4 4 47 45 15 16 76 69 36% 38% 38% 30% 38% 38% 40% 42% 33% 30% 35% 26% 40% 31% 26% 46% 24% 30% 42% 38% 34% 29% 38% 34% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 43 23 15 4 22 12 - 4 1 3 4 4 19 16 1 3 2 2 8 11 5 10 23 20 11% 12% 10% 8% 15% 11% - 11% 5% 5% 9% 15% 8% 16% 4% 16% 12% 19% 7% 10% 12% 19% 11% 10% STRONGLY OPPOSE 47 30 15 2 24 13 1 1 5 3 5 4 19 19 4 1 1 2 10 9 10 8 27 19 12% 16% 10% 3% 16% 13% 4% 2% 31% 4% 12% 13% 8% 19% 19% 3% 9% 17% 9% 8% 24% 15% 14% 10% DON'T KNOW 9 4 3 2 2 2 2 - - 3 1 - 5 3 1 - - - 1 4 1 2 2 7 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 9% - - 4% 2% - 2% 3% 3% - - - 1% 3% 3% 4% 1% 3% REFUSED 3 1 2 - 1 2 - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - 3 - - - 3 1% 1% 1% - 1% 2% - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - 2% - - - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 159Table 31-4QUESTION W2:Here in Wyoming, the State Legislature created the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust in 2005. To date, the Legislature has set aside 95 million dollars in theTrust, so that the interest can be used for protecting fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water. But, the Legislature COULD set aside up to 200 million dollarsunder current law, WITHOUT increasing taxes. Knowing this, would you support or oppose the State Legislature fully funding the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust topreserve fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water in the state? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 155 230 132 111 71 294 285 104 251 216 190 155 148 117 280 18 100 125 129 37 25 11 70 100% 39% 58% 33% 28% 18% 74% 71% 26% 63% 54% 47% 39% 37% 29% 70% 5% 25% 31% 32% 9% 6% 3% 17% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 209 60 136 47 48 54 136 170 35 138 125 109 96 70 54 152 9 45 61 56 25 19 10 34 52% 38% 59% 35% 43% 76% 46% 60% 34% 55% 58% 57% 62% 47% 46% 54% 50% 45% 49% 44% 67% 76% 88% 49% TOTAL SUPPORT 299 105 180 88 78 61 212 224 68 191 167 147 123 107 83 212 13 71 92 90 31 22 10 51------------- 75% 67% 78% 66% 70% 86% 72% 78% 65% 76% 78% 77% 80% 72% 71% 76% 71% 71% 73% 70% 84% 88% 94% 73% TOTAL OPPOSE 90 45 44 41 30 8 76 54 33 53 42 38 27 37 29 60 4 26 30 33 6 3 1 16------------ 22% 29% 19% 31% 27% 11% 26% 19% 32% 21% 19% 20% 17% 25% 25% 22% 22% 26% 24% 26% 16% 12% 6% 23% STRONGLY SUPPORT 154 49 99 41 36 43 98 120 33 96 85 74 63 57 36 117 2 35 49 43 16 15 5 24 39% 32% 43% 31% 32% 60% 33% 42% 31% 38% 40% 39% 41% 38% 31% 42% 12% 35% 39% 33% 44% 60% 49% 35% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 144 55 81 47 42 19 114 104 35 95 82 73 60 50 47 95 11 36 43 47 15 7 5 26 36% 36% 35% 35% 38% 26% 39% 37% 34% 38% 38% 38% 39% 34% 40% 34% 60% 36% 34% 36% 40% 28% 45% 38% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 43 19 24 18 16 5 34 29 13 23 16 14 6 19 12 31 3 10 18 12 1 1 1 10 11% 12% 10% 13% 14% 7% 12% 10% 13% 9% 7% 8% 4% 13% 10% 11% 14% 10% 15% 9% 3% 6% 6% 14% STRONGLY OPPOSE 47 26 20 23 14 3 41 25 20 30 26 24 20 17 17 29 1 16 12 22 5 2 - 6 12% 17% 9% 18% 13% 4% 14% 9% 19% 12% 12% 13% 13% 12% 15% 11% 8% 16% 10% 17% 14% 6% - 9% DON'T KNOW 9 5 4 2 2 1 6 6 2 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 1 2 3 4 - - - 1 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 7% 2% 2% 3% - - - 2% REFUSED 3 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 - - 1 1 2 - 1 - 1 - - - 2 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% - 1% - 1% - - - 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 160Table 31-5QUESTION W2:Here in Wyoming, the State Legislature created the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust in 2005. To date, the Legislature has set aside 95 million dollars in theTrust, so that the interest can be used for protecting fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water. But, the Legislature COULD set aside up to 200 million dollarsunder current law, WITHOUT increasing taxes. Knowing this, would you support or oppose the State Legislature fully funding the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resources Trust topreserve fish and wildlife, ranchlands, natural areas and water in the state? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=WYOMING 400 143 140 19 254 320 63 146 50 197 108 250 248 142 87 274 205 164 78 130 176 223 58 111 100% 36% 35% 5% 64% 80% 16% 37% 13% 49% 27% 62% 62% 35% 22% 69% 51% 41% 19% 33% 44% 56% 15% 28% **D/S (SUPPORT - OPPOSE) 209 91 88 19 115 162 36 114 8 84 24 176 178 28 32 167 145 55 59 48 96 133 29 48 52% 64% 63% 100% 45% 51% 56% 78% 17% 43% 22% 71% 72% 20% 37% 61% 71% 34% 76% 37% 55% 60% 49% 43% TOTAL SUPPORT 299 116 113 19 180 237 49 128 28 138 63 212 210 82 58 218 173 107 67 88 134 175 44 78------------- 75% 81% 81% 100% 71% 74% 77% 87% 56% 70% 59% 85% 85% 58% 67% 79% 84% 65% 86% 67% 76% 78% 74% 70% TOTAL OPPOSE 90 24 24 - 65 74 13 14 20 54 39 36 32 55 26 51 28 52 8 40 38 42 15 29------------ 22% 17% 17% - 26% 23% 21% 9% 39% 28% 36% 14% 13% 39% 30% 19% 14% 31% 10% 31% 21% 19% 26% 26% STRONGLY SUPPORT 154 62 59 10 89 123 26 78 11 60 16 125 118 33 32 113 100 46 40 38 71 97 17 39 39% 43% 42% 51% 35% 39% 41% 54% 21% 31% 15% 50% 48% 23% 37% 41% 49% 28% 52% 30% 40% 43% 29% 35% SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 144 54 54 9 91 113 23 50 17 78 47 87 92 50 26 104 73 61 27 49 63 78 26 38 36% 38% 39% 49% 36% 35% 36% 34% 35% 39% 44% 35% 37% 35% 30% 38% 36% 37% 35% 38% 36% 35% 45% 34% SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 43 11 11 - 32 34 8 7 8 26 15 20 15 26 9 25 17 18 1 18 20 25 3 12 11% 8% 8% - 13% 11% 13% 5% 17% 13% 13% 8% 6% 18% 10% 9% 8% 11% 1% 14% 12% 11% 6% 11% STRONGLY OPPOSE 47 14 14 - 33 40 5 6 11 28 25 16 17 28 17 26 12 33 7 22 17 17 11 17 12% 10% 10% - 13% 13% 8% 4% 23% 14% 23% 6% 7% 20% 19% 10% 6% 20% 9% 17% 10% 8% 20% 16% DON'T KNOW 9 1 1 - 8 7 1 2 2 4 5 1 4 3 3 4 2 4 1 1 5 5 - 3 2% 1% 1% - 3% 2% 2% 1% 4% 2% 5% 1% 2% 2% 4% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% 3% 2% - 3% REFUSED 3 2 2 - 1 2 - 3 - - - - 2 1 - 2 2 1 2 1 - 2 - 1 1% 1% 1% - - - - 2% - - - - 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - 1% - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 161Table 32-1QUESTION D1:Age. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% 18 - 34 480 80 85 82 80 96 72 231 249 480 - - - - 231 - - 249 - - 147 173 151 20% 20% 21% 21% 20% 24% 18% 20% 20% 100% - - - - 48% - - 43% - - 17% 25% 20% 35 - 44 576 92 91 86 60 112 92 251 325 - 576 - - - 251 - - 325 - - 218 177 176 24% 23% 23% 21% 15% 28% 23% 22% 26% - 100% - - - 52% - - 57% - - 25% 25% 23% 45 - 54 402 65 79 67 63 65 62 211 191 - - 402 - - - 211 - - 191 - 152 101 142 17% 16% 20% 17% 16% 16% 15% 18% 15% - - 100% - - - 49% - - 41% - 17% 14% 18% 55 - 64 500 81 84 84 108 77 110 224 276 - - - 500 - - 224 - - 276 - 193 130 166 21% 20% 21% 21% 27% 19% 28% 19% 22% - - - 100% - - 51% - - 59% - 22% 19% 22% 65 AND ABOVE 432 80 60 80 88 48 64 233 199 - - - - 432 - - 233 - - 199 175 118 129 18% 20% 15% 20% 22% 12% 16% 20% 16% - - - - 100% - - 100% - - 100% 20% 17% 17% REFUSED 10 2 1 1 1 2 - 2 8 - - - - - - - - - - - 3 3 4 - 1% - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 162Table 32-2QUESTION D1:Age. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% 18 - 34 480 315 161 108 160 156 38 71 65 82 105 68 58 93 147 - 173 - 151 - 113 151 16 20% 18% 28% 32% 18% 17% 30% 34% 15% 19% 26% 22% 20% 19% 40% - 49% - 46% - 16% 18% 13% 35 - 44 576 409 156 95 192 217 30 65 107 112 92 86 49 127 218 - 177 - 176 - 182 213 24 24% 23% 28% 28% 22% 24% 24% 31% 24% 25% 23% 28% 17% 26% 60% - 51% - 54% - 26% 26% 19% 45 - 54 402 272 117 62 144 127 29 33 88 64 58 43 61 81 - 152 - 101 - 142 129 144 11 17% 15% 21% 19% 16% 14% 23% 16% 20% 14% 15% 14% 21% 17% - 29% - 29% - 32% 19% 18% 9% 55 - 64 500 410 80 43 180 231 17 26 94 99 64 66 61 105 - 193 - 130 - 166 158 176 26 21% 23% 14% 13% 20% 26% 14% 12% 21% 22% 16% 22% 21% 22% - 37% - 37% - 38% 23% 21% 21% 65 AND ABOVE 432 371 53 27 203 168 13 14 92 83 78 39 59 71 - 175 - 118 - 129 111 137 45 18% 21% 9% 8% 23% 19% 10% 7% 21% 19% 20% 13% 20% 15% - 34% - 34% - 30% 16% 17% 37% REFUSED 10 6 - - 2 5 - - 1 2 - 3 1 4 - - - - - - - 2 2 - - - - - 1% - - - - - 1% - 1% - - - - - - - - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 163Table 32-3QUESTION D1:Age. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% 18 - 34 480 141 195 131 85 56 41 129 14 135 143 159 121 54 69 74 76 83 67 54 16 37 240 240 20% 14% 24% 25% 13% 23% 17% 30% 14% 21% 22% 20% 22% 14% 23% 22% 19% 20% 25% 19% 10% 17% 20% 20% 35 - 44 576 244 177 139 158 59 61 108 24 148 149 222 121 83 65 85 109 112 50 72 28 55 288 288 24% 25% 21% 27% 25% 24% 26% 25% 23% 23% 23% 28% 22% 21% 21% 25% 28% 28% 18% 26% 17% 25% 24% 24% 45 - 54 402 167 153 73 103 49 39 54 22 118 119 150 62 65 67 52 70 80 34 28 35 30 188 214 17% 17% 18% 14% 16% 20% 17% 13% 22% 18% 19% 19% 11% 17% 22% 16% 18% 20% 13% 10% 21% 14% 16% 18% 55 - 64 500 198 172 116 145 46 31 90 19 147 111 142 130 108 49 62 64 78 58 72 47 61 261 239 21% 20% 21% 22% 23% 19% 13% 21% 18% 22% 17% 18% 24% 28% 16% 19% 16% 19% 22% 26% 28% 28% 22% 20% 65 AND ABOVE 432 230 125 63 140 33 63 49 23 104 113 124 114 78 56 57 71 52 61 53 42 35 216 216 18% 23% 15% 12% 22% 13% 27% 11% 23% 16% 18% 15% 21% 20% 18% 17% 18% 13% 23% 19% 25% 16% 18% 18% REFUSED 10 3 5 1 2 1 1 - - 4 3 3 2 - 1 3 1 1 - 2 - - 6 4 - - 1% - - 1% - - - 1% 1% - - - - 1% - - - 1% - - 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 164Table 32-4QUESTION D1:Age. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% 18 - 34 480 109 328 66 67 123 288 247 207 197 164 141 108 274 78 399 27 58 141 67 54 45 54 112 20% 16% 21% 14% 19% 21% 18% 16% 27% 21% 20% 22% 21% 19% 11% 24% 21% 10% 18% 12% 20% 25% 42% 26% 35 - 44 576 134 395 96 102 116 414 349 209 225 200 154 130 347 96 480 19 84 183 116 82 36 30 122 24% 19% 25% 20% 29% 20% 26% 23% 27% 24% 25% 24% 25% 24% 14% 28% 15% 14% 24% 21% 31% 20% 23% 28% 45 - 54 402 129 261 90 58 114 270 273 121 172 149 116 93 226 120 283 23 104 144 95 39 27 18 66 17% 19% 17% 19% 16% 19% 17% 18% 16% 18% 18% 18% 18% 16% 17% 17% 18% 17% 19% 17% 15% 15% 14% 15% 55 - 64 500 162 317 119 68 143 319 353 127 200 175 132 107 297 182 315 38 153 150 137 58 47 20 77 21% 23% 20% 25% 19% 24% 20% 23% 17% 21% 22% 21% 21% 21% 26% 19% 29% 25% 19% 24% 22% 26% 16% 18% 65 AND ABOVE 432 160 245 110 54 95 302 322 96 144 125 95 76 282 218 212 22 202 157 145 32 27 6 52 18% 23% 16% 23% 15% 16% 19% 21% 13% 15% 15% 15% 15% 20% 31% 13% 17% 33% 20% 26% 12% 15% 5% 12% REFUSED 10 1 9 - 3 2 5 6 4 3 2 2 - 7 4 6 - 4 2 2 2 1 - 2 - - 1% - 1% - - - 1% - - - - - 1% - - 1% - - 1% - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 165Table 32-5QUESTION D1:Age. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% 18 - 34 480 316 303 37 162 389 77 254 21 189 142 307 377 95 95 362 365 91 170 93 200 342 66 63 20% 32% 32% 40% 12% 21% 17% 23% 9% 19% 20% 20% 22% 15% 19% 21% 24% 13% 23% 18% 20% 21% 17% 21% 35 - 44 576 297 282 24 279 456 110 257 61 247 134 390 434 117 98 420 401 147 187 105 247 401 106 51 24% 30% 30% 25% 20% 24% 24% 23% 26% 26% 19% 26% 26% 18% 20% 25% 26% 21% 25% 21% 24% 25% 27% 17% 45 - 54 402 155 150 24 247 309 82 197 52 141 134 242 267 131 97 279 260 125 116 77 187 283 65 50 17% 16% 16% 26% 18% 16% 18% 18% 22% 15% 19% 16% 16% 20% 19% 16% 17% 18% 16% 15% 18% 17% 17% 16% 55 - 64 500 147 140 5 349 396 89 235 48 210 163 304 331 159 107 345 306 159 157 114 194 339 75 69 21% 15% 15% 6% 25% 21% 20% 21% 21% 22% 23% 20% 20% 24% 21% 20% 20% 22% 21% 23% 19% 21% 19% 23% 65 AND ABOVE 432 74 73 3 357 316 96 176 51 177 126 257 268 149 100 287 215 186 100 114 179 262 79 69 18% 7% 8% 3% 26% 17% 21% 16% 22% 18% 18% 17% 16% 23% 20% 17% 14% 26% 14% 23% 18% 16% 20% 23% REFUSED 10 4 4 - 6 8 - 5 - 4 - 6 8 - 2 8 7 2 4 2 4 7 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 166Table 33-1Summary of Descriptions: % Yes BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% CONSERVATIONIST (D/S) 785 89 150 178 157 103 182 355 430 39 140 152 226 226 77 168 108 103 210 118 234 179 344--------------------- 33% 22% 38% 45% 39% 26% 45% 31% 34% 8% 24% 38% 45% 52% 16% 39% 46% 18% 45% 59% 26% 26% 45% YES 1549 239 269 280 269 241 285 735 814 247 349 273 353 322 272 294 167 323 332 155 542 430 543 65% 60% 67% 70% 67% 60% 71% 64% 65% 51% 61% 68% 71% 75% 56% 68% 72% 56% 71% 78% 61% 61% 71% NO 764 151 119 102 112 139 104 380 384 207 209 121 127 96 195 126 59 220 122 37 308 251 199 32% 38% 30% 25% 28% 35% 26% 33% 31% 43% 36% 30% 25% 22% 41% 29% 25% 38% 26% 19% 35% 36% 26% DK/REF 87 10 12 18 18 20 11 37 50 26 19 8 20 14 15 15 7 30 14 6 37 20 26 4% 2% 3% 4% 5% 5% 3% 3% 4% 5% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% TEA PARTY (D/S) -860 -149 -150 -147 -133 -134 -75 -346 -514 -219 -261 -132 -155 -85 -218 -91 -36 -262 -196 -49 130 -348 -635--------------- -36% -37% -38% -37% -33% -33% -19% -30% -41% -46% -45% -33% -31% -20% -45% -21% -15% -46% -42% -25% 15% -50% -83% YES 694 115 114 115 118 115 155 376 318 109 134 129 162 160 117 165 94 126 126 66 481 154 46 29% 29% 28% 29% 30% 29% 39% 33% 25% 23% 23% 32% 32% 37% 24% 38% 40% 22% 27% 33% 54% 22% 6% NO 1554 264 264 262 251 248 230 722 832 328 395 261 317 245 335 256 130 388 322 115 351 502 681 65% 66% 66% 65% 63% 62% 58% 63% 67% 68% 69% 65% 63% 57% 69% 59% 56% 68% 69% 58% 40% 72% 89% DK/REF 152 21 22 23 30 37 15 54 98 42 48 13 21 28 30 14 9 60 20 18 57 45 41 6% 5% 5% 6% 8% 9% 4% 5% 8% 9% 8% 3% 4% 6% 6% 3% 4% 10% 4% 9% 6% 6% 5% OCCUPY WALL STREET (D/S) -1004 -155 -165 -198 -114 -220 -223 -511 -493 -165 -298 -156 -176 -207 -202 -191 -117 -261 -141 -90 -662 -287 -32------------------------ -42% -39% -41% -50% -29% -55% -56% -44% -40% -34% -52% -39% -35% -48% -42% -44% -50% -45% -30% -45% -75% -41% -4% YES 594 106 103 82 123 65 71 284 310 123 116 114 143 95 120 113 50 120 144 45 78 174 336 25% 26% 26% 21% 31% 16% 18% 25% 25% 26% 20% 28% 29% 22% 25% 26% 22% 21% 31% 23% 9% 25% 44% NO 1599 260 268 280 237 285 294 795 803 288 414 270 319 302 322 304 167 380 284 135 740 462 368 67% 65% 67% 70% 59% 71% 74% 69% 64% 60% 72% 67% 64% 70% 67% 70% 72% 66% 61% 68% 83% 66% 48% DK/REF 207 34 29 37 40 50 34 72 135 68 45 19 38 34 40 17 15 74 40 19 71 65 64 9% 9% 7% 9% 10% 13% 9% 6% 11% 14% 8% 5% 8% 8% 8% 4% 7% 13% 8% 10% 8% 9% 8%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 167Table 33-2Summary of Descriptions: % Yes BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% CONSERVATIONIST (D/S) 785 614 159 94 290 324 40 54 128 106 90 89 127 217 43 188 30 147 95 251 157 209 47--------------------- 33% 34% 28% 28% 33% 36% 31% 26% 29% 24% 23% 29% 44% 45% 12% 36% 9% 42% 29% 58% 23% 25% 39% YES 1549 1170 350 207 574 597 80 127 280 263 239 192 203 339 196 343 185 244 204 338 409 498 84 65% 66% 62% 62% 65% 66% 63% 61% 63% 60% 60% 63% 71% 71% 54% 66% 53% 70% 62% 77% 59% 61% 68% NO 764 556 191 113 284 272 40 73 151 157 149 102 76 122 153 155 154 96 109 87 252 289 36 32% 31% 34% 34% 32% 30% 32% 35% 34% 36% 37% 34% 27% 25% 42% 30% 44% 28% 33% 20% 36% 35% 29% DK/REF 87 57 27 16 24 34 7 9 16 21 10 10 8 19 17 21 11 9 15 12 32 35 3 4% 3% 5% 5% 3% 4% 6% 4% 4% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% 5% 4% 3% 2% 4% 3% 5% 4% 3% TEA PARTY (D/S) -860 -585 -270 -185 -215 -370 -89 -96 93 36 -187 -161 -249 -386 -6 139 -213 -134 -253 -378 79 83 -3--------------- -36% -33% -48% -55% -24% -41% -70% -46% 21% 8% -47% -53% -86% -80% -2% 27% -61% -38% -77% -87% 11% 10% -3% YES 694 548 126 63 313 235 17 46 258 223 97 57 15 31 162 318 54 99 25 21 369 425 57 29% 31% 22% 19% 36% 26% 13% 22% 58% 50% 24% 19% 5% 6% 44% 61% 16% 28% 8% 5% 53% 52% 47% NO 1554 1132 397 248 528 605 106 142 164 186 284 218 264 417 169 179 268 232 278 399 290 342 60 65% 63% 70% 74% 60% 67% 83% 68% 37% 42% 71% 72% 92% 87% 46% 34% 76% 67% 85% 91% 42% 42% 49% DK/REF 152 103 44 25 40 63 4 21 25 32 16 29 9 32 34 22 28 17 24 17 34 54 5 6% 6% 8% 7% 5% 7% 3% 10% 5% 7% 4% 9% 3% 7% 9% 4% 8% 5% 7% 4% 5% 7% 4% OCCUPY WALL STREET (D/S) -1004 -796 -181 -96 -429 -366 -21 -75 -363 -299 -157 -131 18 -50 -244 -415 -155 -133 -58 27 -524 -599 -78------------------------ -42% -45% -32% -29% -49% -41% -17% -36% -81% -68% -39% -43% 6% -10% -67% -80% -44% -38% -18% 6% -76% -73% -63% YES 594 419 169 104 197 221 51 53 32 46 106 68 143 193 37 41 79 93 122 213 61 80 16 25% 23% 30% 31% 22% 25% 40% 25% 7% 10% 27% 22% 50% 40% 10% 8% 23% 27% 37% 49% 9% 10% 13% NO 1599 1214 350 200 627 587 72 128 395 345 263 199 125 243 281 456 235 226 181 186 585 679 94 67% 68% 62% 60% 71% 65% 57% 61% 88% 78% 66% 65% 44% 51% 77% 88% 67% 65% 55% 43% 84% 83% 76% DK/REF 207 151 48 32 57 94 4 28 20 51 28 37 19 44 48 23 36 29 24 37 48 63 13 9% 8% 9% 9% 6% 10% 3% 13% 4% 11% 7% 12% 7% 9% 13% 4% 10% 8% 7% 9% 7% 8% 10%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 168Table 33-3Summary of Descriptions: % Yes BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% CONSERVATIONIST (D/S) 785 237 272 255 150 82 44 127 33 304 228 216 188 139 105 124 102 114 74 114 69 71 385 400--------------------- 33% 24% 33% 49% 24% 34% 19% 30% 33% 46% 36% 27% 34% 36% 34% 37% 26% 28% 27% 41% 41% 32% 32% 33% YES 1549 594 533 381 379 158 137 272 66 468 426 497 350 258 203 223 242 255 165 185 117 141 773 776 65% 60% 64% 73% 60% 65% 58% 63% 65% 71% 67% 62% 64% 67% 66% 67% 62% 63% 61% 66% 69% 65% 65% 65% NO 764 357 261 126 229 76 93 145 33 164 198 281 162 119 98 99 140 141 91 72 48 71 387 377 32% 36% 32% 24% 36% 31% 39% 34% 32% 25% 31% 35% 29% 31% 32% 30% 36% 35% 34% 26% 28% 32% 32% 31% DK/REF 87 32 33 16 24 11 6 13 2 24 14 21 39 11 5 10 10 11 15 23 4 6 38 49 4% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% 7% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 6% 8% 3% 3% 3% 4% TEA PARTY (D/S) -860 108 -522 -414 199 -62 -29 -300 -62 -566 -319 -343 -131 -62 -145 -174 -157 -185 -40 -92 -3 -60 -392 -468--------------- -36% 11% -63% -79% 32% -25% -12% -70% -61% -86% -50% -43% -24% -16% -47% -52% -40% -46% -15% -33% -1% -27% -33% -39% YES 694 513 129 40 397 83 95 54 16 27 134 204 196 153 73 61 110 94 110 86 78 74 367 327 29% 52% 16% 8% 63% 34% 40% 13% 16% 4% 21% 26% 36% 39% 24% 18% 28% 23% 41% 31% 46% 34% 31% 27% NO 1554 405 650 455 198 145 124 354 78 593 453 546 327 215 218 235 267 279 150 178 81 134 759 795 65% 41% 79% 87% 31% 59% 53% 82% 78% 91% 71% 68% 59% 55% 71% 71% 68% 69% 55% 64% 48% 61% 63% 66% DK/REF 152 64 48 27 38 17 17 22 6 35 50 49 27 20 14 36 16 33 11 16 9 11 72 80 6% 7% 6% 5% 6% 7% 7% 5% 6% 5% 8% 6% 5% 5% 5% 11% 4% 8% 4% 6% 6% 5% 6% 7% OCCUPY WALL STREET (D/S) -1004 -749 -302 77 -525 -130 -166 -108 -50 21 -199 -388 -226 -183 -71 -128 -203 -185 -139 -87 -90 -93 -470 -534------------------------ -42% -76% -37% 15% -83% -53% -70% -25% -50% 3% -31% -49% -41% -47% -23% -38% -52% -46% -51% -31% -53% -43% -39% -44% YES 594 78 228 274 32 46 24 141 21 311 185 179 138 86 106 79 84 95 57 81 36 50 316 278 25% 8% 28% 52% 5% 19% 10% 33% 21% 47% 29% 22% 25% 22% 35% 24% 21% 23% 21% 29% 21% 23% 26% 23% NO 1599 827 530 197 557 176 190 249 71 290 384 567 364 270 177 207 287 280 196 168 126 144 786 812 67% 84% 64% 38% 88% 72% 81% 58% 71% 44% 60% 71% 66% 70% 58% 62% 73% 69% 72% 60% 75% 66% 66% 68% DK/REF 207 77 68 51 43 23 22 40 8 55 68 53 49 32 23 46 22 31 18 31 7 25 95 112 9% 8% 8% 10% 7% 9% 9% 9% 8% 8% 11% 7% 9% 8% 7% 14% 6% 8% 7% 11% 4% 11% 8% 9%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 169Table 33-4Summary of Descriptions: % Yes BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% CONSERVATIONIST (D/S) 785 261 433 170 31 331 333 1549 -764 357 331 220 193 426 238 544 39 208 270 130 119 83 45 141--------------------- 33% 38% 28% 35% 9% 56% 21% 100% -100% 38% 41% 34% 38% 30% 34% 32% 30% 34% 35% 23% 45% 45% 35% 33% YES 1549 465 973 316 184 458 937 1549 - 638 563 422 346 898 456 1089 81 398 511 333 189 131 86 277 65% 67% 63% 66% 52% 77% 59% 100% - 68% 69% 66% 67% 63% 65% 64% 62% 66% 66% 59% 71% 71% 67% 64% NO 764 203 540 146 153 127 604 - 764 281 232 202 153 472 218 546 41 191 241 204 71 48 41 135 32% 29% 35% 30% 44% 21% 38% - 100% 30% 28% 32% 30% 33% 31% 32% 32% 32% 31% 36% 27% 26% 32% 31% DK/REF 87 26 41 18 15 9 58 - - 22 20 16 14 62 24 60 8 16 24 26 6 5 2 18 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 2% 4% - - 2% 2% 2% 3% 4% 3% 4% 6% 3% 3% 5% 2% 3% 2% 4% TEA PARTY (D/S) -860 694 -1554 481 -351 -395 -401 -508 -337 -164 -171 -52 -59 -690 -174 -689 -15 -172 -453 234 -177 -121 -109 -196--------------- -36% 100% -100% 100% -100% -66% -25% -33% -44% -17% -21% -8% -12% -48% -25% -41% -12% -28% -58% 42% -66% -66% -85% -45% YES 694 694 - 481 - 90 564 465 203 353 290 270 207 333 237 454 54 195 137 384 35 27 4 102 29% 100% - 100% - 15% 35% 30% 27% 38% 36% 42% 40% 23% 34% 27% 41% 32% 18% 68% 13% 15% 3% 24% NO 1554 - 1554 - 351 485 964 973 540 517 461 322 266 1023 411 1143 69 367 590 150 212 148 114 297 65% - 100% - 100% 82% 60% 63% 71% 55% 57% 50% 52% 71% 59% 67% 53% 61% 76% 27% 80% 81% 88% 69% DK/REF 152 - - - - 19 71 111 20 70 63 48 41 76 51 99 8 44 49 29 20 7 11 31 6% - - - - 3% 4% 7% 3% 7% 8% 7% 8% 5% 7% 6% 6% 7% 6% 5% 7% 4% 8% 7% OCCUPY WALL STREET (D/S) -1004 -473 -479 -369 -264 594 -1599 -479 -477 -449 -390 -358 -299 -539 -343 -658 -72 -294 -344 -457 -76 -7 41 -149------------------------ -42% -68% -31% -77% -75% 100% -100% -31% -62% -48% -48% -56% -58% -38% -49% -39% -55% -49% -44% -81% -28% -4% 32% -35% YES 594 90 485 43 32 594 - 458 127 206 179 109 82 385 149 445 22 135 188 36 80 84 84 107 25% 13% 31% 9% 9% 100% - 30% 17% 22% 22% 17% 16% 27% 21% 26% 17% 22% 24% 6% 30% 46% 65% 25% NO 1599 564 964 412 296 - 1599 937 604 655 569 467 381 925 492 1103 93 428 532 493 155 91 43 255 67% 81% 62% 86% 84% - 100% 60% 79% 70% 70% 73% 74% 65% 70% 65% 72% 71% 69% 88% 58% 49% 33% 59% DK/REF 207 40 104 25 24 - - 154 33 79 66 64 50 122 57 147 15 42 56 33 31 9 2 68 9% 6% 7% 5% 7% - - 10% 4% 8% 8% 10% 10% 9% 8% 9% 12% 7% 7% 6% 12% 5% 2% 16%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 170Table 33-5Summary of Descriptions: % Yes BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% CONSERVATIONIST (D/S) 785 228 225 12 554 678 91 525 45 186 98 630 660 106 87 633 657 95 313 59 324 607 94 58--------------------- 33% 23% 24% 13% 40% 36% 20% 47% 19% 19% 14% 42% 39% 16% 17% 37% 42% 13% 43% 12% 32% 37% 24% 19% YES 1549 596 574 51 949 1242 264 802 134 563 383 1043 1144 365 279 1141 1082 385 511 269 653 1089 238 176 65% 60% 60% 55% 68% 66% 58% 71% 57% 58% 55% 69% 68% 56% 56% 67% 70% 54% 70% 53% 65% 67% 61% 58% NO 764 368 349 38 395 564 173 277 90 377 285 413 484 259 193 507 425 291 198 210 329 482 144 118 32% 37% 37% 42% 28% 30% 38% 25% 38% 39% 41% 27% 29% 40% 39% 30% 27% 41% 27% 42% 33% 30% 37% 39% DK/REF 87 28 28 4 56 69 18 46 10 29 31 51 56 28 27 53 47 33 25 26 28 63 11 11 4% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 5% 3% 3% 5% 3% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% TEA PARTY (D/S) -860 -426 -408 -59 -433 -730 -103 -668 80 -251 28 -837 -1004 163 14 -857 -950 112 -369 38 -481 -879 -52 78--------------- -36% -43% -43% -64% -31% -39% -23% -59% 34% -26% 4% -56% -60% 25% 3% -50% -61% 16% -50% 8% -48% -54% -13% 26% YES 694 255 244 17 438 510 163 187 152 331 347 287 283 394 235 379 248 398 153 259 239 327 155 184 29% 26% 26% 18% 31% 27% 36% 17% 65% 34% 50% 19% 17% 60% 47% 22% 16% 56% 21% 51% 24% 20% 39% 60% NO 1554 680 652 76 870 1241 266 855 72 582 319 1124 1287 231 222 1236 1197 286 522 220 720 1206 207 106 65% 69% 68% 82% 62% 66% 59% 76% 31% 60% 46% 75% 76% 35% 44% 73% 77% 40% 71% 44% 71% 74% 53% 35% DK/REF 152 57 56 - 92 123 25 82 9 56 33 95 115 27 42 86 109 26 59 25 51 100 31 14 6% 6% 6% - 7% 7% 5% 7% 4% 6% 5% 6% 7% 4% 8% 5% 7% 4% 8% 5% 5% 6% 8% 5% OCCUPY WALL STREET (D/S) -1004 -402 -378 -38 -599 -729 -252 -154 -182 -626 -507 -395 -422 -548 -336 -533 -317 -586 -201 -380 -356 -448 -267 -244------------------------ -42% -40% -40% -41% -43% -39% -55% -14% -78% -65% -73% -26% -25% -84% -67% -31% -20% -83% -27% -75% -35% -27% -68% -80% YES 594 260 253 25 333 489 82 425 24 139 71 491 545 39 59 518 539 43 231 46 290 515 48 25 25% 26% 27% 27% 24% 26% 18% 38% 10% 14% 10% 33% 32% 6% 12% 30% 35% 6% 31% 9% 29% 31% 12% 8% NO 1599 662 631 63 932 1218 334 578 206 764 578 886 967 587 395 1051 856 629 432 426 646 963 315 269 67% 67% 66% 68% 67% 65% 74% 51% 88% 79% 83% 59% 57% 90% 79% 62% 55% 89% 59% 85% 64% 59% 80% 88% DK/REF 207 70 67 4 134 167 37 122 5 66 50 130 173 26 45 131 158 37 71 31 74 157 30 10 9% 7% 7% 5% 10% 9% 8% 11% 2% 7% 7% 9% 10% 4% 9% 8% 10% 5% 10% 6% 7% 10% 8% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 171Table 34-1QUESTION D5:From which ONE of the following television networks or shows do you receive MOST of your information about current and political events? If you do not watch any of these,please just say so. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% BROADCAST NETWORK NEWS, 776 112 146 116 136 136 125 325 451 141 183 144 150 157 141 115 67 182 178 89 243 215 305SUCH AS NBC, ABC, OR CBS 32% 28% 36% 29% 34% 34% 31% 28% 36% 29% 32% 36% 30% 36% 29% 27% 29% 32% 38% 45% 27% 31% 40% FOX NEWS 562 101 90 98 78 98 129 289 274 67 116 95 137 145 80 125 83 103 107 62 380 122 52 23% 25% 23% 25% 19% 24% 32% 25% 22% 14% 20% 24% 27% 34% 17% 29% 36% 18% 23% 31% 43% 17% 7% CNN 266 54 27 54 58 41 37 117 149 54 82 39 58 32 57 48 12 79 49 20 62 76 121 11% 13% 7% 13% 15% 10% 9% 10% 12% 11% 14% 10% 12% 7% 12% 11% 5% 14% 10% 10% 7% 11% 16% MSNBC 183 29 35 27 36 23 25 81 102 45 36 27 47 27 32 31 18 49 43 10 26 57 100 8% 7% 9% 7% 9% 6% 6% 7% 8% 9% 6% 7% 9% 6% 7% 7% 8% 9% 9% 5% 3% 8% 13% DAILY SHOW WITH JOHN 129 24 26 20 13 13 11 91 38 54 30 18 20 6 60 27 5 24 12 1 16 43 69STEWART OR THE COLBERT 5% 6% 7% 5% 3% 3% 3% 8% 3% 11% 5% 5% 4% 1% 12% 6% 2% 4% 3% 1% 2% 6% 9%REPORT WITH STEPHEN COLBERT NONE OF THESE 430 70 72 74 66 79 70 219 211 112 122 66 77 52 102 77 38 132 65 14 151 163 108 18% 17% 18% 19% 17% 20% 17% 19% 17% 23% 21% 16% 15% 12% 21% 18% 16% 23% 14% 7% 17% 23% 14% OTHER 39 8 3 8 8 7 2 24 15 4 3 11 8 11 6 9 9 1 11 2 8 17 12 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% - 3% 2% 3% 1% 2% 4% - 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% UNSURE/REFUSED 14 2 1 3 5 2 1 6 8 4 5 2 2 1 4 2 1 5 2 - 3 8 - 1% - - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% - - 1% 1% - - 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 172Table 34-2QUESTION D5:From which ONE of the following television networks or shows do you receive MOST of your information about current and political events? If you do not watch any of these,please just say so. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% BROADCAST NETWORK NEWS, 776 571 193 129 216 355 56 73 98 145 119 96 101 204 106 135 100 115 114 191 187 234 28SUCH AS NBC, ABC, OR CBS 32% 32% 34% 39% 25% 39% 44% 35% 22% 33% 30% 32% 35% 42% 29% 26% 29% 33% 35% 44% 27% 28% 23% FOX NEWS 562 439 110 60 248 191 16 44 199 180 68 53 17 35 110 269 46 74 26 25 296 340 40 23% 25% 19% 18% 28% 21% 12% 21% 45% 41% 17% 18% 6% 7% 30% 52% 13% 21% 8% 6% 43% 41% 33% CNN 266 185 77 38 90 95 14 24 30 32 44 32 41 81 35 27 43 33 55 65 46 55 16 11% 10% 14% 11% 10% 10% 11% 12% 7% 7% 11% 11% 14% 17% 10% 5% 12% 9% 17% 15% 7% 7% 13% MSNBC 183 127 53 41 53 73 15 26 14 13 33 24 34 66 15 11 31 26 35 64 23 25 8 8% 7% 9% 12% 6% 8% 12% 12% 3% 3% 8% 8% 12% 14% 4% 2% 9% 7% 11% 15% 3% 3% 6% DAILY SHOW WITH JOHN 129 88 41 22 65 23 18 4 12 4 34 10 46 24 7 9 30 13 47 23 14 17 5STEWART OR THE COLBERT 5% 5% 7% 7% 7% 3% 14% 2% 3% 1% 8% 3% 16% 5% 2% 2% 9% 4% 14% 5% 2% 2% 4%REPORT WITH STEPHEN COLBERT NONE OF THESE 430 339 81 40 190 149 7 33 86 64 87 76 42 66 89 60 91 71 50 58 117 140 25 18% 19% 14% 12% 22% 17% 5% 16% 19% 15% 22% 25% 15% 14% 24% 12% 26% 21% 15% 13% 17% 17% 21% OTHER 39 29 6 1 16 13 1 - 6 2 10 7 6 6 4 5 2 13 1 12 8 9 2 2% 2% 1% - 2% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% - 3% 1% 1% 1% UNSURE/REFUSED 14 5 6 5 2 3 - 5 2 1 2 6 - - - 3 6 2 - - 2 3 - 1% - 1% 1% - - - 2% - - 1% 2% - - - 1% 2% 1% - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 173Table 34-3QUESTION D5:From which ONE of the following television networks or shows do you receive MOST of your information about current and political events? If you do not watch any of these,please just say so. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% BROADCAST NETWORK NEWS, 776 262 321 174 154 84 54 151 50 254 212 265 176 117 94 118 97 168 82 94 51 66 381 395SUCH AS NBC, ABC, OR CBS 32% 27% 39% 33% 24% 34% 23% 35% 50% 39% 33% 33% 32% 30% 31% 36% 25% 41% 30% 34% 30% 30% 32% 33% FOX NEWS 562 441 87 30 327 52 87 32 22 31 117 169 146 126 55 62 88 81 84 62 59 67 279 283 23% 45% 11% 6% 52% 21% 37% 7% 21% 5% 18% 21% 27% 32% 18% 19% 23% 20% 31% 22% 35% 31% 23% 24% CNN 266 65 134 63 34 27 18 55 13 109 85 94 49 33 40 45 45 49 19 29 9 25 124 142 11% 7% 16% 12% 5% 11% 8% 13% 13% 17% 13% 12% 9% 9% 13% 14% 12% 12% 7% 11% 5% 11% 10% 12% MSNBC 183 28 67 80 13 10 9 43 6 93 55 59 55 14 29 26 23 36 24 31 5 9 98 85 8% 3% 8% 15% 2% 4% 4% 10% 6% 14% 9% 7% 10% 4% 10% 8% 6% 9% 9% 11% 3% 4% 8% 7% DAILY SHOW WITH JOHN 129 14 56 55 7 9 2 41 5 62 35 63 20 11 23 12 48 15 14 5 6 6 68 61STEWART OR THE COLBERT 5% 1% 7% 11% 1% 4% 1% 9% 5% 9% 5% 8% 4% 3% 8% 4% 12% 4% 5% 2% 3% 3% 6% 5%REPORT WITH STEPHEN COLBERT NONE OF THESE 430 159 144 107 91 58 62 90 4 98 121 132 99 74 56 64 79 53 45 53 35 39 218 212 18% 16% 17% 20% 14% 24% 26% 21% 4% 15% 19% 17% 18% 19% 18% 19% 20% 13% 17% 19% 21% 18% 18% 18% OTHER 39 11 14 10 5 4 3 10 1 9 11 15 5 7 8 3 11 4 1 3 3 3 20 20 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% - 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% UNSURE/REFUSED 14 3 3 5 3 - - 8 - - 2 2 2 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 11 4 1% - - 1% - - - 2% - - - - - 1% - - - - - - 1% 2% 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 174Table 34-4QUESTION D5:From which ONE of the following television networks or shows do you receive MOST of your information about current and political events? If you do not watch any of these,please just say so. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% BROADCAST NETWORK NEWS, 776 137 590 84 140 188 532 511 241 299 259 197 157 471 234 542 31 207 776 - - - - -SUCH AS NBC, ABC, OR CBS 32% 20% 38% 17% 40% 32% 33% 33% 32% 32% 32% 31% 31% 33% 33% 32% 24% 34% 100% - - - - - FOX NEWS 562 384 150 300 69 36 493 333 204 269 226 209 167 284 204 357 47 166 - 562 - - - - 23% 55% 10% 62% 20% 6% 31% 22% 27% 29% 28% 33% 33% 20% 29% 21% 36% 27% - 100% - - - - CNN 266 35 212 22 33 80 155 189 71 70 58 50 38 194 80 186 15 71 - - 266 - - - 11% 5% 14% 5% 9% 13% 10% 12% 9% 7% 7% 8% 7% 14% 11% 11% 11% 12% - - 100% - - - MSNBC 183 27 148 11 14 84 91 131 48 58 53 32 26 124 49 134 13 42 - - - 183 - - 8% 4% 10% 2% 4% 14% 6% 8% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 9% 7% 8% 10% 7% - - - 100% - - DAILY SHOW WITH JOHN 129 4 114 1 12 84 43 86 41 56 54 29 26 73 41 87 7 39 - - - - 129 -STEWART OR THE COLBERT 5% 1% 7% - 4% 14% 3% 6% 5% 6% 7% 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% 6% 6% - - - - 100% -REPORT WITH STEPHEN COLBERT NONE OF THESE 430 102 297 60 76 107 255 277 135 170 149 114 92 253 77 351 13 68 - - - - - 430 18% 15% 19% 12% 22% 18% 16% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 11% 21% 10% 11% - - - - - 100% OTHER 39 4 35 2 7 11 25 20 16 16 14 8 6 24 12 27 4 11 - - - - - - 2% 1% 2% - 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% - - - - - - UNSURE/REFUSED 14 1 9 1 1 6 5 3 9 3 2 2 1 9 1 10 - 1 - - - - - - 1% - 1% - - 1% - - 1% - - - - 1% - 1% - - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 175Table 34-5QUESTION D5:From which ONE of the following television networks or shows do you receive MOST of your information about current and political events? If you do not watch any of these,please just say so. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% BROADCAST NETWORK NEWS, 776 299 293 25 476 631 116 388 52 320 188 528 634 121 132 583 562 164 263 124 328 590 114 54SUCH AS NBC, ABC, OR CBS 32% 30% 31% 28% 34% 34% 25% 34% 22% 33% 27% 35% 38% 19% 26% 34% 36% 23% 36% 25% 32% 36% 29% 18% FOX NEWS 562 198 197 9 364 409 139 160 109 273 293 228 224 324 201 294 175 354 109 225 199 253 127 162 23% 20% 21% 10% 26% 22% 31% 14% 47% 28% 42% 15% 13% 50% 40% 17% 11% 50% 15% 45% 20% 15% 32% 53% CNN 266 107 102 9 157 221 37 157 15 89 60 190 228 29 50 203 223 35 101 34 113 206 37 18 11% 11% 11% 10% 11% 12% 8% 14% 6% 9% 9% 13% 14% 4% 10% 12% 14% 5% 14% 7% 11% 13% 10% 6% MSNBC 183 102 93 16 80 156 23 103 9 62 24 146 158 22 18 153 160 16 79 20 78 147 16 15 8% 10% 10% 18% 6% 8% 5% 9% 4% 6% 3% 10% 9% 3% 4% 9% 10% 2% 11% 4% 8% 9% 4% 5% DAILY SHOW WITH JOHN 129 86 82 14 43 102 26 92 - 36 9 109 125 2 12 114 119 6 50 17 58 121 5 3STEWART OR THE COLBERT 5% 9% 9% 15% 3% 5% 6% 8% - 4% 1% 7% 7% - 2% 7% 8% 1% 7% 3% 6% 7% 1% 1%REPORT WITH STEPHEN COLBERT NONE OF THESE 430 181 167 16 247 318 100 199 44 167 117 271 280 141 77 316 277 125 108 79 214 278 87 45 18% 18% 18% 17% 18% 17% 22% 18% 19% 17% 17% 18% 17% 22% 15% 19% 18% 18% 15% 16% 21% 17% 22% 15% OTHER 39 15 14 3 24 27 10 23 5 11 6 27 29 9 7 28 24 9 18 5 14 29 5 5 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% UNSURE/REFUSED 14 3 3 - 8 11 4 2 1 11 2 8 6 3 3 10 14 1 6 1 7 10 2 2 1% - - - 1% 1% 1% - - 1% - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 176Table 35-1QUESTION D6:Did you access a Facebook, Twitter or other social media site yesterday? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (TOTAL YES - NO) -408 -55 -64 -74 -121 -41 -111 -250 -158 154 17 -91 -202 -283 82 -169 -161 88 -124 -122 -168 -91 -127 -17% -14% -16% -19% -30% -10% -28% -22% -13% 32% 3% -23% -40% -65% 17% -39% -69% 15% -26% -61% -19% -13% -16% TOTAL YES 992 172 167 161 139 179 143 449 543 316 297 155 147 74 281 132 36 331 170 38 360 304 320--------- 41% 43% 42% 40% 35% 45% 36% 39% 44% 66% 51% 39% 29% 17% 58% 30% 15% 58% 36% 19% 41% 43% 42% FACEBOOK 951 160 163 159 139 172 140 429 522 303 282 150 140 73 269 124 36 316 166 37 347 291 307 40% 40% 41% 40% 35% 43% 35% 37% 42% 63% 49% 37% 28% 17% 56% 29% 15% 55% 35% 19% 39% 41% 40% TWITTER 92 16 18 14 10 21 19 62 30 37 24 24 5 3 41 19 3 19 10 - 29 30 30 4% 4% 4% 3% 2% 5% 5% 5% 2% 8% 4% 6% 1% 1% 9% 4% 1% 3% 2% - 3% 4% 4% OTHER 40 8 5 2 8 7 1 25 15 10 17 5 8 1 15 11 - 11 3 1 17 11 12 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% - 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 2% - 3% 2% - 2% 1% - 2% 2% 2% NO/NONE 1400 227 231 235 260 221 254 699 701 162 279 247 349 357 199 301 197 243 294 160 528 395 447 58% 57% 58% 59% 65% 55% 64% 61% 56% 34% 48% 61% 70% 83% 41% 69% 84% 42% 63% 81% 59% 56% 58% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 8 1 1 4 - - 3 5 4 2 - - 5 1 2 2 - - 3 - - 2 1 - - - 1% - - 1% - - 1% - - 1% - 1% - - - 1% - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 177Table 35-2QUESTION D6:Did you access a Facebook, Twitter or other social media site yesterday? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (TOTAL YES - NO) -408 -319 -73 -66 -245 -74 2 -67 -124 -44 -66 -25 -50 -77 54 -219 56 -147 65 -191 -72 -116 -50 -17% -18% -13% -20% -28% -8% 1% -32% -28% -10% -16% -8% -17% -16% 15% -42% 16% -42% 20% -44% -10% -14% -41% TOTAL YES 992 730 247 135 318 413 65 71 161 199 166 138 119 202 210 150 203 99 196 123 310 353 36--------- 41% 41% 44% 40% 36% 46% 51% 34% 36% 45% 42% 45% 41% 42% 57% 29% 58% 29% 60% 28% 45% 43% 30% FACEBOOK 951 709 230 124 303 407 62 62 151 196 164 127 112 194 202 145 191 98 189 116 298 340 36 40% 40% 41% 37% 34% 45% 48% 30% 34% 44% 41% 42% 39% 40% 55% 28% 54% 28% 58% 26% 43% 41% 29% TWITTER 92 66 27 11 44 22 5 6 21 9 24 6 17 13 24 5 21 9 12 18 24 30 4 4% 4% 5% 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 5% 2% 6% 2% 6% 3% 7% 1% 6% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% OTHER 40 23 14 9 18 5 4 5 13 4 5 6 7 5 8 9 9 2 9 3 14 16 2 2% 1% 3% 3% 2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% NO/NONE 1400 1049 320 201 563 486 63 138 286 242 232 163 169 278 156 369 147 247 131 314 383 468 86 58% 59% 56% 60% 64% 54% 49% 66% 64% 55% 58% 54% 59% 58% 43% 71% 42% 71% 40% 72% 55% 57% 70% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 8 4 - - 1 4 - - - - - 2 - - - - - 2 - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - 1% - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 178Table 35-3QUESTION D6:Did you access a Facebook, Twitter or other social media site yesterday? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (TOTAL YES - NO) -408 -250 -107 -29 -141 -29 -54 -18 -43 -84 -87 -56 -125 -135 -39 -48 -71 15 -62 -63 -74 -61 -214 -194 -17% -25% -13% -6% -22% -12% -23% -4% -43% -13% -14% -7% -23% -35% -13% -14% -18% 4% -23% -23% -44% -28% -18% -16% TOTAL YES 992 366 359 246 246 108 91 205 29 285 275 370 212 126 133 142 161 210 104 108 48 79 489 503--------- 41% 37% 43% 47% 39% 44% 38% 48% 29% 44% 43% 46% 39% 33% 44% 43% 41% 52% 39% 39% 28% 36% 41% 42% FACEBOOK 951 358 338 234 242 98 88 195 27 273 262 351 210 120 127 135 151 200 102 108 46 74 470 482 40% 36% 41% 45% 38% 40% 37% 45% 27% 42% 41% 44% 38% 31% 42% 41% 39% 49% 38% 39% 27% 34% 39% 40% TWITTER 92 24 45 23 13 16 7 23 3 27 25 39 15 13 19 6 26 14 10 5 8 6 46 46 4% 2% 5% 4% 2% 6% 3% 5% 3% 4% 4% 5% 3% 3% 6% 2% 7% 3% 4% 2% 4% 3% 4% 4% OTHER 40 10 21 8 5 11 4 7 1 10 13 14 6 7 6 7 11 3 5 1 3 4 12 29 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% - 2% 2% 1% 2% NO/NONE 1400 616 466 275 386 137 145 223 72 370 362 426 338 261 172 190 231 195 166 171 121 140 702 697 58% 63% 56% 53% 61% 56% 61% 52% 71% 56% 57% 53% 61% 67% 56% 57% 59% 48% 61% 61% 72% 64% 59% 58% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 8 - 2 1 - - - 2 - 1 1 2 1 - - 1 - 2 - 1 - - 7 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 179Table 35-4QUESTION D6:Did you access a Facebook, Twitter or other social media site yesterday? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (TOTAL YES - NO) -408 -183 -190 -114 -25 -73 -271 -354 -27 -183 -156 -164 -137 -222 -188 -218 -25 -170 -177 -166 -51 22 44 -67 -17% -26% -12% -24% -7% -12% -17% -23% -4% -19% -19% -26% -27% -15% -27% -13% -19% -28% -23% -29% -19% 12% 34% -16% TOTAL YES 992 255 680 184 163 260 662 596 368 379 329 238 188 603 255 737 53 218 299 198 107 102 86 181--------- 41% 37% 44% 38% 46% 44% 41% 38% 48% 40% 40% 37% 37% 42% 37% 43% 41% 36% 39% 35% 40% 56% 67% 42% FACEBOOK 951 244 652 179 155 253 631 574 349 369 321 235 187 573 250 701 53 213 293 197 102 93 82 167 40% 35% 42% 37% 44% 43% 39% 37% 46% 39% 39% 37% 36% 40% 36% 41% 41% 35% 38% 35% 38% 51% 64% 39% TWITTER 92 17 76 8 21 25 63 51 38 30 30 17 16 60 17 75 1 17 25 9 9 16 14 16 4% 2% 5% 2% 6% 4% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 1% 3% 3% 2% 3% 9% 10% 4% OTHER 40 8 32 6 9 10 27 27 12 16 15 8 7 24 10 31 2 8 8 3 3 5 7 14 2% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 5% 3% NO/NONE 1400 438 870 297 188 333 932 949 395 562 485 402 325 825 443 955 77 387 476 364 157 80 43 247 58% 63% 56% 62% 54% 56% 58% 61% 52% 60% 60% 63% 63% 58% 63% 56% 59% 64% 61% 65% 59% 44% 33% 58% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 8 2 3 - - 1 4 4 1 - - - - 4 - 3 - - 1 - 2 - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 180Table 35-5QUESTION D6:Did you access a Facebook, Twitter or other social media site yesterday? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (TOTAL YES - NO) -408 992 951 92 -1400 -308 -79 -185 -70 -145 -175 -206 -214 -174 -152 -228 -152 -216 -122 -119 -146 -260 -52 -75 -17% 100% 100% 100% -100% -16% -17% -16% -30% -15% -25% -14% -13% -27% -30% -13% -10% -31% -17% -24% -14% -16% -13% -25% TOTAL YES 992 992 951 92 - 780 186 469 82 409 261 647 732 238 173 733 698 245 305 191 430 684 170 114--------- 41% 100% 100% 100% - 42% 41% 42% 35% 42% 37% 43% 43% 36% 35% 43% 45% 35% 42% 38% 43% 42% 43% 37% FACEBOOK 951 951 951 80 - 743 183 455 79 385 257 615 698 232 164 703 666 236 290 187 413 651 164 113 40% 96% 100% 86% - 40% 40% 40% 34% 40% 37% 41% 41% 36% 33% 41% 43% 33% 39% 37% 41% 40% 42% 37% TWITTER 92 92 80 92 - 69 18 55 5 29 18 65 72 17 11 70 67 18 38 15 37 68 16 6 4% 9% 8% 100% - 4% 4% 5% 2% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 2% 4% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 4% 4% 2% OTHER 40 40 12 5 - 35 5 12 2 26 6 29 31 10 11 29 31 8 13 6 18 32 6 2 2% 4% 1% 5% - 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% NO/NONE 1400 - - - 1400 1088 265 654 152 555 435 854 946 411 325 961 850 462 427 310 576 944 222 189 58% - - - 100% 58% 58% 58% 65% 57% 62% 57% 56% 63% 65% 57% 55% 65% 58% 62% 57% 58% 57% 62% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 8 - - - - 6 2 2 1 5 3 6 6 2 1 7 5 2 2 2 4 6 - 2 - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 181Table 36-1QUESTION D7:How would you describe the area where you currently live? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (BIG CITY/SUBURBS - 498 165 97 -234 -47 109 -258 258 239 127 166 142 14 45 158 75 24 136 81 20 83 144 253 SMALL TOWN/RURAL) 21% 41% 24% -59% -12% 27% -65% 22% 19% 26% 29% 35% 3% 10% 33% 17% 10% 24% 17% 10% 9% 21% 33% TOTAL BIG CITY/SUBURBS 1436 282 245 81 173 254 68 698 738 301 371 269 253 237 319 250 128 354 272 109 483 421 505---------------------- 60% 70% 61% 20% 43% 63% 17% 61% 59% 63% 64% 67% 51% 55% 66% 57% 55% 62% 58% 55% 54% 60% 66% TOTAL SMALL TOWN/RURAL 939 117 148 315 220 145 327 440 499 174 205 127 239 192 161 175 103 218 191 88 399 276 252---------------------- 39% 29% 37% 79% 55% 36% 82% 38% 40% 36% 36% 32% 48% 44% 33% 40% 44% 38% 41% 44% 45% 39% 33% A BIG CITY 638 148 92 36 106 70 40 306 332 143 149 119 111 113 133 115 56 158 114 57 195 173 264 27% 37% 23% 9% 26% 17% 10% 27% 27% 30% 26% 29% 22% 26% 28% 27% 24% 28% 24% 28% 22% 25% 34% A SUBURBAN AREA 799 134 153 45 67 184 28 392 406 159 222 150 142 124 185 134 71 195 158 52 288 248 241 33% 34% 38% 11% 17% 46% 7% 34% 33% 33% 38% 37% 28% 29% 38% 31% 31% 34% 34% 26% 32% 35% 31% A SMALL TOWN 551 69 89 161 113 101 230 271 280 121 121 62 130 114 117 93 61 125 100 53 227 164 155 23% 17% 22% 40% 28% 25% 58% 24% 22% 25% 21% 15% 26% 26% 24% 21% 26% 22% 21% 27% 26% 23% 20% A RURAL AREA 388 47 59 155 107 44 97 169 219 54 83 65 108 78 44 82 42 92 91 35 172 113 97 16% 12% 15% 39% 27% 11% 24% 15% 18% 11% 14% 16% 22% 18% 9% 19% 18% 16% 19% 18% 19% 16% 13% DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE 19 2 5 3 6 2 4 9 10 2 - 5 6 3 - 7 2 2 5 1 6 3 10 1% - 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - 1% REFUSED 6 - 1 1 1 - 1 5 - 2 - 1 2 - 2 3 - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 182Table 36-2QUESTION D7:How would you describe the area where you currently live? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (BIG CITY/SUBURBS - 498 335 139 86 176 158 37 49 40 43 84 60 130 123 29 55 113 31 143 106 42 44 -7 SMALL TOWN/RURAL) 21% 19% 24% 26% 20% 18% 29% 23% 9% 10% 21% 20% 45% 26% 8% 11% 32% 9% 44% 24% 6% 5% -6% TOTAL BIG CITY/SUBURBS 1436 1053 350 210 526 527 82 128 242 241 240 181 206 299 197 284 231 189 234 267 366 431 57---------------------- 60% 59% 62% 62% 60% 58% 64% 61% 54% 55% 60% 59% 72% 62% 54% 55% 66% 54% 72% 61% 53% 52% 46% TOTAL SMALL TOWN/RURAL 939 719 211 124 350 369 44 79 202 197 156 120 76 176 168 229 119 157 91 161 323 386 64---------------------- 39% 40% 37% 37% 40% 41% 35% 38% 45% 45% 39% 40% 26% 37% 46% 44% 34% 45% 28% 37% 47% 47% 52% A BIG CITY 638 433 191 119 211 223 55 65 92 103 93 80 119 145 73 121 96 77 122 139 147 171 26 27% 24% 34% 35% 24% 25% 43% 31% 21% 23% 23% 26% 41% 30% 20% 23% 28% 22% 37% 32% 21% 21% 21% A SUBURBAN AREA 799 620 158 91 316 305 27 63 150 138 147 100 87 154 124 163 135 112 112 128 218 260 31 33% 35% 28% 27% 36% 34% 21% 30% 34% 31% 37% 33% 30% 32% 34% 31% 39% 32% 34% 29% 31% 32% 25% A SMALL TOWN 551 420 125 83 209 212 35 48 115 112 105 59 49 106 111 114 69 94 61 94 186 220 34 23% 24% 22% 25% 24% 23% 27% 23% 26% 25% 26% 19% 17% 22% 30% 22% 20% 27% 19% 22% 27% 27% 27% A RURAL AREA 388 299 86 41 141 157 9 32 87 86 51 61 27 70 57 116 50 63 30 67 137 167 31 16% 17% 15% 12% 16% 17% 7% 15% 19% 19% 13% 20% 9% 15% 16% 22% 14% 18% 9% 15% 20% 20% 25% DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE 19 11 7 2 5 6 1 1 3 3 1 2 6 5 - 6 - 1 2 8 5 5 1 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 1% - 1% - - 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% REFUSED 6 - 1 - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 183Table 36-3QUESTION D7:How would you describe the area where you currently live? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (BIG CITY/SUBURBS - 498 79 222 179 41 38 24 113 10 240 638 799 -551 -388 306 332 392 406 -271 -280 -169 -219 201 296 SMALL TOWN/RURAL) 21% 8% 27% 34% 6% 16% 10% 26% 10% 37% 100% 100% -100% -100% 100% 100% 100% 100% -100% -100% -100% -100% 17% 25% TOTAL BIG CITY/SUBURBS 1436 528 521 347 334 141 130 271 55 443 638 799 - - 306 332 392 406 - - - - 691 745---------------------- 60% 54% 63% 66% 53% 58% 55% 63% 55% 68% 100% 100% - - 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - - 58% 62% TOTAL SMALL TOWN/RURAL 939 449 299 168 293 103 106 158 45 203 - - 551 388 - - - - 271 280 169 219 490 449---------------------- 39% 46% 36% 32% 46% 42% 45% 37% 45% 31% - - 100% 100% - - - - 100% 100% 100% 100% 41% 37% A BIG CITY 638 231 206 178 135 56 59 105 36 221 638 - - - 306 332 - - - - - - 294 344 27% 24% 25% 34% 21% 23% 25% 25% 36% 34% 100% - - - 100% 100% - - - - - - 25% 29% A SUBURBAN AREA 799 297 315 169 198 85 71 166 19 222 - 799 - - - - 392 406 - - - - 397 401 33% 30% 38% 32% 31% 35% 30% 39% 19% 34% - 100% - - - - 100% 100% - - - - 33% 33% A SMALL TOWN 551 246 174 116 163 60 60 95 22 132 - - 551 - - - - - 271 280 - - 282 269 23% 25% 21% 22% 26% 25% 25% 22% 21% 20% - - 100% - - - - - 100% 100% - - 24% 22% A RURAL AREA 388 203 125 52 130 43 46 63 24 71 - - - 388 - - - - - - 169 219 208 179 16% 21% 15% 10% 21% 17% 19% 15% 24% 11% - - - 100% - - - - - - 100% 100% 17% 15% DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE 19 6 4 7 5 - - 1 - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 8 1% 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 2% - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% 1% REFUSED 6 - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 184Table 36-4QUESTION D7:How would you describe the area where you currently live? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (BIG CITY/SUBURBS - 498 -11 457 -15 74 140 317 315 197 -26 -18 -97 -88 514 94 402 26 78 184 14 97 46 67 80 SMALL TOWN/RURAL) 21% -2% 29% -3% 21% 24% 20% 20% 26% -3% -2% -15% -17% 36% 13% 24% 20% 13% 24% 2% 36% 25% 52% 19% TOTAL BIG CITY/SUBURBS 1436 338 999 231 212 364 951 923 478 454 395 269 210 966 393 1041 78 339 477 286 179 114 98 253---------------------- 60% 49% 64% 48% 60% 61% 59% 60% 63% 48% 49% 42% 41% 67% 56% 61% 60% 56% 61% 51% 67% 62% 76% 59% TOTAL SMALL TOWN/RURAL 939 349 542 245 138 224 634 608 281 480 413 366 298 452 300 639 52 261 293 272 82 69 31 173---------------------- 39% 50% 35% 51% 39% 38% 40% 39% 37% 51% 51% 57% 58% 32% 43% 38% 40% 43% 38% 48% 31% 38% 24% 40% A BIG CITY 638 134 453 91 80 185 384 426 198 210 186 121 97 416 191 444 37 166 212 117 85 55 35 121 27% 19% 29% 19% 23% 31% 24% 27% 26% 22% 23% 19% 19% 29% 27% 26% 28% 27% 27% 21% 32% 30% 27% 28% A SUBURBAN AREA 799 204 546 139 132 179 567 497 281 244 209 148 113 550 202 597 41 174 265 169 94 59 63 132 33% 29% 35% 29% 38% 30% 35% 32% 37% 26% 26% 23% 22% 38% 29% 35% 32% 29% 34% 30% 35% 32% 49% 31% A SMALL TOWN 551 196 327 133 87 138 364 350 162 272 234 197 159 277 155 396 26 137 176 146 49 55 20 99 23% 28% 21% 28% 25% 23% 23% 23% 21% 29% 29% 31% 31% 19% 22% 23% 20% 23% 23% 26% 18% 30% 15% 23% A RURAL AREA 388 153 215 112 51 86 270 258 119 209 179 169 139 175 145 243 26 124 117 126 33 14 11 74 16% 22% 14% 23% 15% 15% 17% 17% 16% 22% 22% 26% 27% 12% 21% 14% 20% 20% 15% 22% 13% 8% 9% 17% DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE 19 5 12 5 1 6 11 16 3 6 6 5 5 13 5 14 - 5 6 4 4 - - 3 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 2% - - 1% REFUSED 6 2 1 - - - 2 3 1 - - - - 1 - 2 - - - - 1 - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 185Table 36-5QUESTION D7:How would you describe the area where you currently live? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (BIG CITY/SUBURBS - 498 307 283 36 189 386 92 276 2 206 18 433 490 16 5 448 489 -24 162 18 269 398 76 -1 SMALL TOWN/RURAL) 21% 31% 30% 39% 14% 21% 20% 25% 1% 21% 3% 29% 29% 2% 1% 26% 31% -3% 22% 4% 27% 24% 19% - TOTAL BIG CITY/SUBURBS 1436 645 613 64 788 1120 271 695 116 584 354 963 1078 330 249 1066 1013 339 444 258 635 1006 232 151---------------------- 60% 65% 64% 69% 56% 60% 60% 62% 50% 60% 51% 64% 64% 51% 50% 63% 65% 48% 61% 51% 63% 62% 59% 49% TOTAL SMALL TOWN/RURAL 939 339 330 28 599 734 179 419 114 378 336 530 589 314 244 618 524 363 282 240 365 608 157 152---------------------- 39% 34% 35% 31% 43% 39% 39% 37% 49% 39% 48% 35% 35% 48% 49% 36% 34% 51% 38% 48% 36% 37% 40% 50% A BIG CITY 638 275 262 25 362 503 109 327 52 240 159 432 493 134 118 462 450 149 206 121 259 449 103 60 27% 28% 28% 27% 26% 27% 24% 29% 22% 25% 23% 29% 29% 21% 24% 27% 29% 21% 28% 24% 26% 28% 26% 20% A SUBURBAN AREA 799 370 351 39 426 617 162 368 64 344 195 531 585 196 131 604 564 190 238 137 375 557 129 91 33% 37% 37% 42% 30% 33% 36% 33% 27% 35% 28% 35% 35% 30% 26% 36% 36% 27% 32% 27% 37% 34% 33% 30% A SMALL TOWN 551 212 210 15 338 430 105 260 56 223 187 319 364 169 133 373 323 199 173 132 216 359 91 90 23% 21% 22% 16% 24% 23% 23% 23% 24% 23% 27% 21% 22% 26% 27% 22% 21% 28% 24% 26% 21% 22% 23% 30% A RURAL AREA 388 126 120 13 261 304 73 160 58 155 149 211 224 146 111 245 201 164 109 109 149 249 66 62 16% 13% 13% 14% 19% 16% 16% 14% 25% 16% 21% 14% 13% 22% 22% 14% 13% 23% 15% 22% 15% 15% 17% 20% DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE 19 8 8 - 11 18 1 9 4 4 7 11 15 4 5 13 13 6 7 4 7 16 3 - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - REFUSED 6 - - - 2 2 3 1 - 4 2 3 3 3 1 4 4 2 - 2 3 4 - 2 - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 186Table 37-1QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (YES - NO) -492 -112 -92 63 -49 -90 103 50 -541 -77 -122 -54 -96 -138 42 35 -29 -241 -185 -109 -24 -92 -360 -20% -28% -23% 16% -12% -23% 26% 4% -43% -16% -21% -13% -19% -32% 9% 8% -12% -42% -40% -55% -3% -13% -47% TOTAL YES 940 143 152 231 170 153 251 598 343 197 225 172 200 144 261 233 102 160 139 42 428 304 199--------- 39% 36% 38% 58% 43% 38% 63% 52% 27% 41% 39% 43% 40% 33% 54% 54% 44% 28% 30% 21% 48% 43% 26% HUNTER ONLY 126 21 20 21 30 15 35 59 67 33 25 23 25 19 28 23 8 30 25 11 67 28 30 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 4% 9% 5% 5% 7% 4% 6% 5% 4% 6% 5% 4% 5% 5% 6% 8% 4% 4% ANGLER ONLY 301 55 53 36 38 53 61 189 112 56 70 56 68 49 79 72 36 47 52 13 110 97 90 13% 14% 13% 9% 9% 13% 15% 16% 9% 12% 12% 14% 14% 11% 16% 17% 16% 8% 11% 6% 12% 14% 12% BOTH 514 67 79 175 103 85 155 350 164 108 130 93 107 76 154 138 57 83 62 19 251 179 79 21% 17% 20% 44% 26% 21% 39% 30% 13% 22% 22% 23% 21% 18% 32% 32% 24% 14% 13% 9% 28% 25% 10% NO/NEITHER 1432 254 244 169 219 243 148 548 884 274 347 226 297 282 219 198 131 401 325 152 452 396 558 60% 64% 61% 42% 55% 61% 37% 48% 71% 57% 60% 56% 59% 65% 45% 46% 56% 70% 69% 76% 51% 56% 73% UNSURE/REFUSED 27 3 4 - 11 4 1 6 21 10 5 4 3 6 2 3 1 12 4 5 9 1 11 1% 1% 1% - 3% 1% - 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - 2% 1% 3% 1% - 1% TOTAL HUNTER 640 88 99 196 133 100 190 409 231 141 154 116 132 95 182 161 66 113 87 29 318 207 109 27% 22% 25% 49% 33% 25% 47% 35% 18% 29% 27% 29% 26% 22% 38% 37% 28% 20% 19% 15% 36% 29% 14% TOTAL ANGLER 815 122 132 211 140 138 216 539 276 164 200 149 175 125 233 211 94 130 114 31 361 276 169 34% 30% 33% 53% 35% 35% 54% 47% 22% 34% 35% 37% 35% 29% 48% 48% 40% 23% 24% 16% 41% 39% 22% GOP SPORTSMEN 428 68 76 71 66 65 180 271 157 70 118 76 93 70 111 114 45 77 55 25 428 - - 18% 17% 19% 18% 17% 16% 45% 24% 13% 15% 20% 19% 19% 16% 23% 26% 19% 13% 12% 13% 48% - - GOP NON-SPORTSMEN 452 74 60 41 74 119 72 176 276 73 100 74 100 103 61 68 46 111 106 57 452 - - 19% 19% 15% 10% 19% 30% 18% 15% 22% 15% 17% 18% 20% 24% 13% 16% 20% 19% 23% 29% 51% - - IND SPORTSMEN 304 45 51 111 21 64 29 208 96 85 69 49 56 46 107 63 38 47 41 8 - 304 - 13% 11% 13% 28% 5% 16% 7% 18% 8% 18% 12% 12% 11% 11% 22% 15% 16% 8% 9% 4% - 43% - IND NON-SPORTSMEN 396 81 67 73 20 77 23 190 206 87 109 52 74 72 90 59 41 106 67 31 - 396 - 16% 20% 17% 18% 5% 19% 6% 16% 17% 18% 19% 13% 15% 17% 19% 14% 18% 18% 14% 16% - 56% - DEM SPORTSMEN 199 30 24 45 80 23 39 113 86 41 36 46 48 26 42 53 18 35 41 9 - - 199 8% 8% 6% 11% 20% 6% 10% 10% 7% 9% 6% 11% 10% 6% 9% 12% 8% 6% 9% 4% - - 26% DEM NON-SPORTSMEN 558 93 110 51 123 45 49 174 385 109 136 94 116 100 65 67 41 180 143 60 - - 558 23% 23% 27% 13% 31% 11% 12% 15% 31% 23% 24% 23% 23% 23% 13% 15% 18% 31% 31% 30% - - 73% SPORTSMEN/MEN 598 88 95 148 105 100 162 598 - 130 131 103 130 102 261 233 102 - - - 271 208 113 25% 22% 24% 37% 26% 25% 40% 52% - 27% 23% 26% 26% 24% 54% 54% 44% - - - 30% 30% 15% NOT-SPORTSMEN/MEN 548 104 95 44 84 92 30 548 - 99 120 106 92 131 219 198 131 - - - 176 190 174 23% 26% 24% 11% 21% 23% 8% 48% - 21% 21% 26% 18% 30% 45% 46% 56% - - - 20% 27% 23% SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 343 54 56 83 66 53 89 - 343 67 93 69 70 42 - - - 160 139 42 157 96 86 14% 14% 14% 21% 16% 13% 22% - 27% 14% 16% 17% 14% 10% - - - 28% 30% 21% 18% 14% 11% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E SContinued

2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 187Table 37-1QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- NOT-SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 884 151 149 125 135 152 117 - 884 175 226 120 205 152 - - - 401 325 152 276 206 385 37% 38% 37% 31% 34% 38% 29% - 71% 37% 39% 30% 41% 35% - - - 70% 69% 76% 31% 29% 50%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 188Table 37-2QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (YES - NO) -492 -399 -83 -71 2 -401 39 -110 95 -119 18 -110 -60 -299 15 -38 -42 -47 -168 -190 7 16 -20 -20% -22% -15% -21% - -44% 30% -53% 21% -27% 5% -36% -21% -62% 4% -7% -12% -14% -51% -43% 1% 2% -16% TOTAL YES 940 685 239 129 441 244 83 47 271 157 208 96 113 86 188 239 153 151 77 121 347 415 51--------- 39% 38% 42% 39% 50% 27% 65% 22% 61% 36% 52% 32% 39% 18% 51% 46% 44% 43% 24% 28% 50% 50% 42% HUNTER ONLY 126 90 32 28 50 40 4 23 31 36 12 16 15 15 31 36 15 13 12 17 54 65 6 5% 5% 6% 8% 6% 4% 4% 11% 7% 8% 3% 5% 5% 3% 8% 7% 4% 4% 4% 4% 8% 8% 5% ANGLER ONLY 301 228 68 28 138 90 26 2 72 39 62 36 53 37 41 68 48 49 35 55 88 99 13 13% 13% 12% 8% 16% 10% 20% 1% 16% 9% 15% 12% 18% 8% 11% 13% 14% 14% 11% 12% 13% 12% 11% BOTH 514 367 138 74 253 114 52 21 168 83 134 45 45 34 116 135 90 88 30 49 206 251 32 21% 21% 24% 22% 29% 13% 41% 10% 38% 19% 34% 15% 16% 7% 32% 26% 26% 25% 9% 11% 30% 31% 26% NO/NEITHER 1432 1084 321 201 439 645 44 157 176 276 190 206 174 385 173 277 196 198 245 310 340 399 71 60% 61% 57% 60% 50% 71% 34% 75% 39% 63% 48% 68% 60% 80% 47% 53% 56% 57% 75% 71% 49% 49% 58% UNSURE/REFUSED 27 14 8 6 1 14 1 5 1 8 - 1 1 10 5 3 1 - 5 6 7 9 - 1% 1% 1% 2% - 2% 1% 2% - 2% - - - 2% 1% 1% - - 2% 1% 1% 1% - TOTAL HUNTER 640 458 171 101 303 154 57 45 199 118 146 60 60 49 146 171 105 101 42 66 259 316 38 27% 26% 30% 30% 34% 17% 45% 21% 45% 27% 37% 20% 21% 10% 40% 33% 30% 29% 13% 15% 37% 38% 31% TOTAL ANGLER 815 595 207 102 391 204 78 24 240 121 196 80 98 70 157 203 138 137 65 104 294 350 45 34% 33% 36% 30% 44% 23% 61% 11% 54% 27% 49% 26% 34% 15% 43% 39% 40% 39% 20% 24% 42% 43% 37% GOP SPORTSMEN 428 349 71 32 218 131 19 13 271 157 - - - - 188 239 - - - - 317 379 38 18% 20% 12% 9% 25% 14% 15% 6% 61% 36% - - - - 51% 46% - - - - 46% 46% 31% GOP NON-SPORTSMEN 452 373 71 33 152 221 6 27 176 276 - - - - 173 277 - - - - 320 375 65 19% 21% 12% 10% 17% 24% 5% 13% 39% 63% - - - - 47% 53% - - - - 46% 46% 53% IND SPORTSMEN 304 221 80 41 158 63 28 13 - - 208 96 - - - - 153 151 - - 30 36 14 13% 12% 14% 12% 18% 7% 22% 6% - - 52% 32% - - - - 44% 43% - - 4% 4% 11% IND NON-SPORTSMEN 396 314 69 28 157 157 6 22 - - 190 206 - - - - 196 198 - - 20 24 7 16% 18% 12% 8% 18% 17% 5% 10% - - 48% 68% - - - - 56% 57% - - 3% 3% 6% DEM SPORTSMEN 199 110 85 56 62 47 36 20 - - - - 113 86 - - - - 77 121 - - - 8% 6% 15% 17% 7% 5% 28% 10% - - - - 39% 18% - - - - 24% 28% - - - DEM NON-SPORTSMEN 558 379 178 136 125 254 31 105 - - - - 174 385 - - - - 245 310 - - - 23% 21% 31% 41% 14% 28% 25% 50% - - - - 60% 80% - - - - 75% 71% - - - SPORTSMEN/MEN 598 441 146 83 441 - 83 - 271 - 208 - 113 - 111 159 107 101 42 71 213 258 39 25% 25% 26% 25% 50% - 65% - 61% - 52% - 39% - 30% 31% 30% 29% 13% 16% 31% 31% 32% NOT-SPORTSMEN/MEN 548 439 94 44 439 - 44 - 176 - 190 - 174 - 61 114 90 100 65 108 130 153 29 23% 25% 17% 13% 50% - 34% - 39% - 48% - 60% - 17% 22% 26% 29% 20% 25% 19% 19% 23%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 189Table 37-2QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 343 244 92 47 - 244 - 47 - 157 - 96 - 86 77 80 47 50 35 49 134 156 12 14% 14% 16% 14% - 27% - 22% - 36% - 32% - 18% 21% 15% 13% 14% 11% 11% 19% 19% 10% NOT-SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 884 645 227 157 - 645 - 157 - 276 - 206 - 385 111 163 106 98 180 202 210 246 43 37% 36% 40% 47% - 71% - 75% - 63% - 68% - 80% 30% 31% 30% 28% 55% 46% 30% 30% 35%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 190Table 37-3QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (YES - NO) -492 -21 -197 -267 - -25 -3 -89 -10 -341 -206 -306 -5 34 -26 -179 -83 -223 99 -104 60 -26 -301 -190 -20% -2% -24% -51% - -10% -1% -21% -10% -52% -32% -38% -1% 9% -9% -54% -21% -55% 36% -37% 36% -12% -25% -16% TOTAL YES 940 476 311 126 313 108 116 170 44 153 210 244 272 209 139 71 155 89 185 87 115 94 440 501--------- 39% 48% 38% 24% 50% 44% 49% 40% 43% 23% 33% 31% 49% 54% 46% 21% 39% 22% 68% 31% 68% 43% 37% 42% HUNTER ONLY 126 87 24 12 59 7 16 12 12 17 24 35 38 29 14 10 8 27 24 14 13 17 55 71 5% 9% 3% 2% 9% 3% 7% 3% 12% 3% 4% 4% 7% 8% 5% 3% 2% 7% 9% 5% 8% 8% 5% 6% ANGLER ONLY 301 97 129 66 69 40 22 68 6 84 89 96 75 40 53 36 67 29 44 30 25 15 124 177 13% 10% 16% 13% 11% 16% 9% 16% 6% 13% 14% 12% 14% 10% 17% 11% 17% 7% 16% 11% 15% 7% 10% 15% BOTH 514 292 158 48 185 61 77 90 26 53 97 113 159 139 72 25 80 33 116 43 77 62 261 253 21% 30% 19% 9% 29% 25% 33% 21% 26% 8% 15% 14% 29% 36% 24% 8% 20% 8% 43% 15% 46% 28% 22% 21% NO/NEITHER 1432 497 507 393 314 133 119 260 54 494 416 550 277 175 166 251 238 312 86 191 54 121 741 691 60% 51% 61% 75% 50% 54% 50% 60% 53% 75% 65% 69% 50% 45% 54% 75% 61% 77% 32% 68% 32% 55% 62% 57% UNSURE/REFUSED 27 9 8 4 5 4 1 - 3 8 11 5 2 4 1 10 - 5 1 2 - 4 17 10 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - 3% 1% 2% 1% - 1% - 3% - 1% - 1% - 2% 1% 1% TOTAL HUNTER 640 379 182 60 244 68 94 102 38 69 121 148 197 169 86 35 88 60 140 57 90 79 316 323 27% 39% 22% 12% 39% 28% 40% 24% 38% 11% 19% 18% 36% 44% 28% 11% 22% 15% 52% 20% 53% 36% 26% 27% TOTAL ANGLER 815 389 287 114 254 101 100 159 32 137 186 209 234 179 125 62 147 62 161 73 102 78 385 430 34% 40% 35% 22% 40% 41% 42% 37% 32% 21% 29% 26% 42% 46% 41% 19% 37% 15% 59% 26% 60% 36% 32% 36% GOP SPORTSMEN 428 313 88 20 313 108 - - - - 82 112 127 105 48 33 71 41 85 43 64 41 200 228 18% 32% 11% 4% 50% 44% - - - - 13% 14% 23% 27% 16% 10% 18% 10% 31% 15% 38% 19% 17% 19% GOP NON-SPORTSMEN 452 314 115 18 314 133 - - - - 109 174 99 66 43 66 79 95 30 69 23 43 237 215 19% 32% 14% 3% 50% 54% - - - - 17% 22% 18% 17% 14% 20% 20% 23% 11% 25% 13% 20% 20% 18% IND SPORTSMEN 304 116 127 43 - - 116 170 - - 59 89 96 59 42 17 64 25 71 25 31 28 141 163 13% 12% 15% 8% - - 49% 40% - - 9% 11% 17% 15% 14% 5% 16% 6% 26% 9% 18% 13% 12% 14% IND NON-SPORTSMEN 396 119 177 83 - - 119 260 - - 113 158 67 54 51 62 83 75 34 33 21 33 208 187 16% 12% 21% 16% - - 50% 60% - - 18% 20% 12% 14% 17% 19% 21% 18% 13% 12% 12% 15% 17% 16% DEM SPORTSMEN 199 44 93 61 - - - - 44 153 68 40 47 42 48 20 18 22 28 19 18 24 96 103 8% 4% 11% 12% - - - - 43% 23% 11% 5% 8% 11% 16% 6% 5% 5% 10% 7% 11% 11% 8% 9% DEM NON-SPORTSMEN 558 54 211 284 - - - - 54 494 192 199 107 52 70 122 69 129 22 85 9 44 283 276 23% 5% 25% 54% - - - - 53% 75% 30% 25% 19% 13% 23% 37% 18% 32% 8% 30% 5% 20% 24% 23% SPORTSMEN/MEN 598 303 205 70 198 68 83 112 20 92 139 155 185 115 139 - 155 - 185 - 115 - 274 324 25% 31% 25% 13% 31% 28% 35% 26% 20% 14% 22% 19% 33% 30% 46% - 39% - 68% - 68% - 23% 27% NOT-SPORTSMEN/MEN 548 208 185 141 123 51 62 120 16 153 166 238 86 54 166 - 238 - 86 - 54 - 296 252 23% 21% 22% 27% 20% 21% 26% 28% 16% 23% 26% 30% 16% 14% 54% - 61% - 32% - 32% - 25% 21%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 191Table 37-3QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 343 173 106 55 115 40 33 59 24 62 71 89 87 94 - 71 - 89 - 87 - 94 166 177 14% 18% 13% 11% 18% 16% 14% 14% 23% 9% 11% 11% 16% 24% - 21% - 22% - 31% - 43% 14% 15% NOT-SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 884 289 323 251 190 82 57 140 37 342 251 312 191 121 - 251 - 312 - 191 - 121 445 439 37% 29% 39% 48% 30% 33% 24% 32% 37% 52% 39% 39% 35% 31% - 75% - 77% - 68% - 55% 37% 36%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 192Table 37-4QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (YES - NO) -492 20 -506 34 -55 -179 -270 -260 -191 940 815 640 514 -1432 -65 -426 -5 -55 -173 -16 -124 -66 -17 -83 -20% 3% -33% 7% -16% -30% -17% -17% -25% 100% 100% 100% 100% -100% -9% -25% -4% -9% -22% -3% -46% -36% -13% -19% TOTAL YES 940 353 517 255 146 206 655 638 281 940 815 640 514 - 314 626 62 273 299 269 70 58 56 170--------- 39% 51% 33% 53% 42% 35% 41% 41% 37% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 45% 37% 47% 45% 38% 48% 26% 32% 44% 40% HUNTER ONLY 126 63 56 40 26 27 86 76 49 126 - 126 - - 43 83 13 32 40 42 12 6 2 22 5% 9% 4% 8% 7% 5% 5% 5% 6% 13% - 20% - - 6% 5% 10% 5% 5% 8% 4% 3% 2% 5% ANGLER ONLY 301 83 195 61 44 97 188 216 79 301 301 - - - 88 213 13 79 102 59 20 27 28 57 13% 12% 13% 13% 12% 16% 12% 14% 10% 32% 37% - - - 13% 13% 10% 13% 13% 11% 8% 14% 21% 13% BOTH 514 207 266 154 77 82 381 346 153 514 514 514 514 - 182 331 35 163 157 167 38 26 26 92 21% 30% 17% 32% 22% 14% 24% 22% 20% 55% 63% 80% 100% - 26% 20% 27% 27% 20% 30% 14% 14% 20% 21% NO/NEITHER 1432 333 1023 221 201 385 925 898 472 - - - - 1432 379 1052 67 328 471 284 194 124 73 253 60% 48% 66% 46% 57% 65% 58% 58% 62% - - - - 100% 54% 62% 51% 54% 61% 51% 73% 68% 56% 59% UNSURE/REFUSED 27 8 14 4 3 3 19 13 11 - - - - - 5 16 2 3 6 10 2 - - 7 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - - - - - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - - 2% TOTAL HUNTER 640 270 322 193 103 109 467 422 202 640 514 640 514 - 226 414 48 195 197 209 50 32 29 114 27% 39% 21% 40% 29% 18% 29% 27% 26% 68% 63% 100% 100% - 32% 24% 37% 32% 25% 37% 19% 17% 22% 26% TOTAL ANGLER 815 290 461 215 120 179 569 563 232 815 815 514 514 - 271 543 48 241 259 226 58 53 54 149 34% 42% 30% 45% 34% 30% 36% 36% 30% 87% 100% 80% 100% - 39% 32% 37% 40% 33% 40% 22% 29% 42% 35% GOP SPORTSMEN 428 255 146 255 146 46 349 289 130 428 361 318 251 - 142 286 29 119 116 190 17 14 13 70 18% 37% 9% 53% 42% 8% 22% 19% 17% 45% 44% 50% 49% - 20% 17% 22% 20% 15% 34% 6% 8% 10% 16% GOP NON-SPORTSMEN 452 221 201 221 201 32 385 248 176 - - - - 452 150 302 27 127 124 187 45 12 3 78 19% 32% 13% 46% 57% 5% 24% 16% 23% - - - - 32% 21% 18% 21% 21% 16% 33% 17% 7% 2% 18% IND SPORTSMEN 304 79 197 - - 63 209 204 90 304 276 207 179 - 108 196 17 98 97 57 26 22 24 71 13% 11% 13% - - 11% 13% 13% 12% 32% 34% 32% 35% - 16% 12% 13% 16% 12% 10% 10% 12% 19% 17% IND NON-SPORTSMEN 396 75 304 - - 111 251 225 161 - - - - 396 95 301 10 90 117 65 50 35 19 91 16% 11% 20% - - 19% 16% 15% 21% - - - - 28% 14% 18% 8% 15% 15% 12% 19% 19% 15% 21% DEM SPORTSMEN 199 17 168 - - 95 90 137 60 199 169 109 79 - 60 139 15 53 82 21 25 22 19 27 8% 2% 11% - - 16% 6% 9% 8% 21% 21% 17% 15% - 9% 8% 11% 9% 11% 4% 9% 12% 15% 6% DEM NON-SPORTSMEN 558 29 504 - - 239 269 403 131 - - - - 558 130 428 28 107 222 26 95 77 50 79 23% 4% 32% - - 40% 17% 26% 17% - - - - 39% 19% 25% 22% 18% 29% 5% 36% 42% 39% 18% SPORTSMEN/MEN 598 226 337 161 94 121 443 407 180 598 539 409 350 - 199 399 38 179 189 170 41 36 40 108 25% 33% 22% 34% 27% 20% 28% 26% 24% 64% 66% 64% 68% - 28% 24% 29% 30% 24% 30% 15% 20% 31% 25% NOT-SPORTSMEN/MEN 548 147 384 96 71 163 349 324 201 - - - - 548 171 377 17 158 135 117 76 45 51 110 23% 21% 25% 20% 20% 27% 22% 21% 26% - - - - 38% 24% 22% 13% 26% 17% 21% 29% 24% 40% 26% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E SContinued

2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 193Table 37-4QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 343 127 180 94 52 85 212 231 101 343 276 231 164 - 115 227 24 94 110 98 30 22 16 62 14% 18% 12% 19% 15% 14% 13% 15% 13% 36% 34% 36% 32% - 17% 13% 18% 16% 14% 18% 11% 12% 13% 15% NOT-SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 884 186 638 125 131 222 576 574 271 - - - - 884 208 675 50 171 336 167 118 80 21 143 37% 27% 41% 26% 37% 37% 36% 37% 36% - - - - 62% 30% 40% 38% 28% 43% 30% 44% 43% 17% 33%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 194Table 37-5QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (YES - NO) -492 -225 -204 -29 -263 -437 -44 -320 -3 -123 -11 -437 -504 25 -20 -441 -528 41 -193 16 -259 -466 -30 20 -20% -23% -21% -32% -19% -23% -10% -28% -1% -13% -2% -29% -30% 4% -4% -26% -34% 6% -26% 3% -26% -29% -8% 7% TOTAL YES 940 379 369 30 562 707 203 393 115 420 341 525 579 336 235 622 504 372 268 256 369 577 179 158--------- 39% 38% 39% 33% 40% 38% 45% 35% 49% 43% 49% 35% 34% 52% 47% 37% 32% 52% 37% 51% 37% 35% 46% 52% HUNTER ONLY 126 49 48 1 77 101 23 38 22 64 49 65 72 53 43 74 70 54 35 36 47 81 25 16 5% 5% 5% 1% 5% 5% 5% 3% 9% 7% 7% 4% 4% 8% 9% 4% 4% 8% 5% 7% 5% 5% 6% 5% ANGLER ONLY 301 141 134 14 160 215 75 158 20 119 76 201 227 64 48 236 203 73 95 57 133 197 64 34 13% 14% 14% 15% 11% 11% 17% 14% 9% 12% 11% 13% 13% 10% 10% 14% 13% 10% 13% 11% 13% 12% 16% 11% BOTH 514 188 187 16 325 391 105 197 73 237 216 260 279 219 144 312 231 245 139 164 189 299 90 108 21% 19% 20% 17% 23% 21% 23% 18% 31% 24% 31% 17% 17% 34% 29% 18% 15% 35% 19% 32% 19% 18% 23% 35% NO/NEITHER 1432 603 573 60 825 1143 247 712 118 543 352 962 1082 311 255 1062 1032 330 461 240 628 1043 209 138 60% 61% 60% 65% 59% 61% 54% 63% 51% 56% 50% 64% 64% 48% 51% 62% 66% 47% 63% 48% 62% 64% 53% 45% UNSURE/REFUSED 27 10 10 2 13 24 4 20 1 6 5 19 23 4 9 17 18 7 5 7 13 15 4 9 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% TOTAL HUNTER 640 238 235 17 402 492 127 235 95 301 265 325 352 272 187 386 301 299 174 200 237 379 115 124 27% 24% 25% 18% 29% 26% 28% 21% 41% 31% 38% 22% 21% 42% 37% 23% 19% 42% 24% 40% 23% 23% 29% 41% TOTAL ANGLER 815 329 321 30 485 606 180 355 93 356 292 460 507 284 193 548 434 318 233 220 322 496 154 142 34% 33% 34% 32% 35% 32% 40% 32% 40% 37% 42% 31% 30% 44% 39% 32% 28% 45% 32% 44% 32% 30% 39% 47% GOP SPORTSMEN 428 178 172 14 250 328 87 117 73 231 198 191 208 204 146 242 152 237 95 141 175 228 95 93 18% 18% 18% 15% 18% 17% 19% 10% 31% 24% 28% 13% 12% 31% 29% 14% 10% 33% 13% 28% 17% 14% 24% 31% GOP NON-SPORTSMEN 452 175 167 13 276 338 100 133 67 222 174 234 239 202 125 269 209 202 110 118 184 256 105 75 19% 18% 18% 14% 20% 18% 22% 12% 29% 23% 25% 16% 14% 31% 25% 16% 13% 29% 15% 23% 18% 16% 27% 25% IND SPORTSMEN 304 121 119 8 183 208 83 133 32 134 99 176 191 104 60 211 188 95 82 85 115 185 55 56 13% 12% 12% 9% 13% 11% 18% 12% 14% 14% 14% 12% 11% 16% 12% 12% 12% 13% 11% 17% 11% 11% 14% 18% IND NON-SPORTSMEN 396 182 170 22 211 316 62 202 36 140 87 272 313 73 62 304 299 74 127 74 159 300 47 38 16% 18% 18% 24% 15% 17% 14% 18% 15% 14% 12% 18% 19% 11% 12% 18% 19% 10% 17% 15% 16% 18% 12% 12% DEM SPORTSMEN 199 79 76 8 120 162 32 136 8 53 41 154 173 25 27 161 156 37 89 29 74 157 29 8 8% 8% 8% 9% 9% 9% 7% 12% 3% 5% 6% 10% 10% 4% 5% 9% 10% 5% 12% 6% 7% 10% 7% 3% DEM NON-SPORTSMEN 558 240 229 22 318 470 79 364 14 170 85 439 518 28 62 471 507 45 217 42 271 467 55 23 23% 24% 24% 24% 23% 25% 17% 32% 6% 18% 12% 29% 31% 4% 13% 28% 33% 6% 30% 8% 27% 29% 14% 7% SPORTSMEN/MEN 598 221 212 24 377 438 139 231 81 277 229 325 333 250 135 411 289 268 143 182 244 359 113 114 25% 22% 22% 26% 27% 23% 31% 21% 35% 29% 33% 22% 20% 38% 27% 24% 19% 38% 19% 36% 24% 22% 29% 38%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 195Table 37-5QUESTION D8:Do you consider yourself a hunter, an angler or both? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- NOT-SPORTSMEN/MEN 548 228 217 39 320 419 113 252 57 218 144 361 366 171 86 439 364 160 144 122 257 380 95 59 23% 23% 23% 42% 23% 22% 25% 22% 24% 22% 21% 24% 22% 26% 17% 26% 23% 23% 20% 24% 25% 23% 24% 19% SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 343 158 157 7 185 268 64 161 34 143 112 200 246 86 100 211 214 104 125 75 125 218 66 44 14% 16% 17% 7% 13% 14% 14% 14% 14% 15% 16% 13% 15% 13% 20% 12% 14% 15% 17% 15% 12% 13% 17% 14% NOT-SPORTSMEN/WOMEN 884 375 355 21 505 725 134 460 61 325 208 601 716 140 170 623 668 171 317 118 371 663 114 78 37% 38% 37% 23% 36% 39% 30% 41% 26% 34% 30% 40% 43% 21% 34% 37% 43% 24% 43% 23% 37% 41% 29% 26%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 196Table 38-1QUESTION D9:No matter how you feel today, are you registered to vote as a Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? / And, in politics today, do you consider yourself to bea Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (REPUBLICAN - 120 20 - 16 -64 120 164 159 -39 -4 43 10 27 46 65 60 33 -26 -23 12 888 - -768 DEMOCRAT) 5% 5% - 4% -16% 30% 41% 14% -3% -1% 7% 3% 5% 11% 13% 14% 14% -5% -5% 6% 100% - -100% REPUBLICAN 888 144 136 112 144 188 252 447 441 147 218 152 193 175 172 182 92 194 163 83 888 - - 37% 36% 34% 28% 36% 47% 63% 39% 35% 31% 38% 38% 39% 40% 36% 42% 39% 34% 35% 42% 100% - - DEMOCRAT 768 124 136 96 208 68 88 288 480 151 176 142 166 129 107 122 59 220 186 71 - - 768 32% 31% 34% 24% 52% 17% 22% 25% 38% 32% 31% 35% 33% 30% 22% 28% 25% 38% 40% 35% - - 100% INDEPENDENT/SOMETHING ELSE 701 126 118 184 43 141 52 398 304 173 177 101 130 118 196 122 78 154 108 39 - 701 - 29% 31% 30% 46% 11% 35% 13% 35% 24% 36% 31% 25% 26% 27% 41% 28% 34% 27% 23% 20% - 100% - REFUSED 43 6 10 8 5 3 8 20 23 9 4 8 12 11 7 9 4 6 11 6 - - - 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 3% - - - WHITE DEMOCRATS 495 77 98 82 86 55 78 188 308 73 98 90 122 109 65 75 47 106 137 62 - - 495 21% 19% 24% 21% 22% 14% 19% 16% 25% 15% 17% 22% 24% 25% 14% 17% 20% 19% 29% 31% - - 64% GOP/TEA PARTY 481 84 74 66 92 73 132 258 223 66 96 90 119 110 78 115 65 84 94 45 481 - - 20% 21% 19% 17% 23% 18% 33% 22% 18% 14% 17% 22% 24% 25% 16% 26% 28% 15% 20% 23% 54% - - GOP/NON-TEA PARTY 351 54 53 40 37 96 111 164 186 67 102 58 68 54 80 61 22 89 64 32 351 - - 15% 13% 13% 10% 9% 24% 28% 14% 15% 14% 18% 14% 14% 12% 17% 14% 9% 15% 14% 16% 40% - - IND/DEM/TEA PARTY 200 31 33 45 26 41 22 112 88 42 37 35 39 46 38 47 27 41 27 19 - 154 46 8% 8% 8% 11% 6% 10% 5% 10% 7% 9% 6% 9% 8% 11% 8% 11% 12% 7% 6% 9% - 22% 6% IND/DEM/NON-TEA PARTY 1183 205 209 220 211 151 113 548 635 257 289 200 242 189 251 190 107 295 252 83 - 502 681 49% 51% 52% 55% 53% 38% 28% 48% 51% 53% 50% 50% 48% 44% 52% 44% 46% 51% 54% 42% - 72% 89%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 197Table 38-2QUESTION D9:No matter how you feel today, are you registered to vote as a Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? / And, in politics today, do you consider yourself to bea Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (REPUBLICAN - 120 234 -126 -130 183 51 -43 -86 447 441 - - -288 -480 366 519 - - -327 -437 644 762 102 DEMOCRAT) 5% 13% -22% -39% 21% 6% -34% -41% 100% 100% - - -100% -100% 100% 100% - - -100% -100% 93% 93% 83% REPUBLICAN 888 729 143 66 371 359 25 41 447 441 - - - - 366 519 - - - - 644 762 102 37% 41% 25% 20% 42% 40% 19% 20% 100% 100% - - - - 100% 100% - - - - 93% 93% 83% DEMOCRAT 768 495 268 196 188 308 68 127 - - - - 288 480 - - - - 327 437 - - - 32% 28% 47% 58% 21% 34% 54% 61% - - - - 100% 100% - - - - 100% 100% - - - INDEPENDENT/SOMETHING ELSE 701 535 151 70 315 220 34 36 - - 398 304 - - - - 350 348 - - 50 60 20 29% 30% 27% 21% 36% 24% 27% 17% - - 100% 100% - - - - 100% 100% - - 7% 7% 17% REFUSED 43 24 6 4 8 16 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 2% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WHITE DEMOCRATS 495 495 - - 188 308 - - - - - - 188 308 - - - - 172 321 - - - 21% 28% - - 21% 34% - - - - - - 65% 64% - - - - 52% 74% - - - GOP/TEA PARTY 481 397 72 30 214 184 13 17 258 223 - - - - 162 318 - - - - 356 409 53 20% 22% 13% 9% 24% 20% 10% 8% 58% 50% - - - - 44% 61% - - - - 51% 50% 43% GOP/NON-TEA PARTY 351 285 62 31 135 150 9 22 164 186 - - - - 169 179 - - - - 257 302 45 15% 16% 11% 9% 15% 17% 7% 11% 37% 42% - - - - 46% 34% - - - - 37% 37% 37% IND/DEM/TEA PARTY 200 144 51 30 96 49 4 26 - - 97 57 15 31 - - 54 99 25 21 13 16 4 8% 8% 9% 9% 11% 5% 3% 13% - - 24% 19% 5% 6% - - 16% 28% 8% 5% 2% 2% 3% IND/DEM/NON-TEA PARTY 1183 835 333 216 389 446 97 119 - - 284 218 264 417 - - 268 232 278 399 34 40 15 49% 47% 59% 64% 44% 49% 76% 57% - - 71% 72% 92% 87% - - 76% 67% 85% 91% 5% 5% 12%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 198Table 38-3QUESTION D9:No matter how you feel today, are you registered to vote as a Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? / And, in politics today, do you consider yourself to bea Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (REPUBLICAN - 120 531 -100 -310 632 245 - - -101 -656 -70 47 72 75 -27 -43 63 -16 66 5 60 15 60 60 DEMOCRAT) 5% 54% -12% -59% 100% 100% - - -100% -100% -11% 6% 13% 19% -9% -13% 16% -4% 24% 2% 35% 7% 5% 5% REPUBLICAN 888 632 207 38 632 245 - - - - 195 288 227 172 92 103 150 138 115 112 87 86 443 445 37% 64% 25% 7% 100% 100% - - - - 30% 36% 41% 44% 30% 31% 38% 34% 43% 40% 51% 39% 37% 37% DEMOCRAT 768 101 307 348 - - - - 101 656 264 241 155 97 119 145 87 154 49 106 27 70 383 385 32% 10% 37% 67% - - - - 100% 100% 41% 30% 28% 25% 39% 44% 22% 38% 18% 38% 16% 32% 32% 32% INDEPENDENT/SOMETHING ELSE 701 236 303 126 - - 236 430 - - 173 248 164 113 93 80 147 100 105 59 51 61 350 351 29% 24% 37% 24% - - 100% 100% - - 27% 31% 30% 29% 30% 24% 38% 25% 39% 21% 30% 28% 29% 29% REFUSED 43 13 9 9 - - - - - - 6 22 5 5 2 4 8 14 1 3 4 2 21 22 2% 1% 1% 2% - - - - - - 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 4% - 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% WHITE DEMOCRATS 495 44 200 247 - - - - 44 447 144 173 109 63 64 80 68 105 35 74 17 46 242 253 21% 4% 24% 47% - - - - 44% 68% 23% 22% 20% 16% 21% 24% 17% 26% 13% 27% 10% 21% 20% 21% GOP/TEA PARTY 481 397 66 17 397 83 - - - - 91 139 133 112 48 43 79 60 75 58 54 59 251 230 20% 40% 8% 3% 63% 34% - - - - 14% 17% 24% 29% 16% 13% 20% 15% 28% 21% 32% 27% 21% 19% GOP/NON-TEA PARTY 351 198 127 18 198 145 - - - - 80 132 87 51 35 45 68 64 35 51 26 25 162 189 15% 20% 15% 4% 31% 59% - - - - 13% 17% 16% 13% 11% 14% 17% 16% 13% 18% 16% 11% 14% 16% IND/DEM/TEA PARTY 200 111 61 20 - - 95 54 16 27 41 60 62 37 25 16 31 29 34 27 22 15 106 94 8% 11% 7% 4% - - 40% 13% 16% 4% 6% 8% 11% 10% 8% 5% 8% 7% 13% 10% 13% 7% 9% 8% IND/DEM/NON-TEA PARTY 1183 202 517 431 - - 124 354 78 593 371 402 238 161 182 188 192 210 114 124 53 108 591 592 49% 21% 63% 82% - - 53% 82% 78% 91% 58% 50% 43% 42% 60% 57% 49% 52% 42% 44% 32% 49% 49% 49%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 199Table 38-4QUESTION D9:No matter how you feel today, are you registered to vote as a Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? / And, in politics today, do you consider yourself to bea Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (REPUBLICAN - 120 435 -330 481 351 -258 371 - 109 229 192 209 172 -107 101 19 13 85 -62 327 -60 -73 -53 43 DEMOCRAT) 5% 63% -21% 100% 100% -43% 23% - 14% 24% 24% 33% 33% -7% 14% 1% 10% 14% -8% 58% -22% -40% -41% 10% REPUBLICAN 888 481 351 481 351 78 740 542 308 428 361 318 251 452 293 594 57 248 243 380 62 26 16 151 37% 69% 23% 100% 100% 13% 46% 35% 40% 45% 44% 50% 49% 32% 42% 35% 44% 41% 31% 68% 23% 14% 12% 35% DEMOCRAT 768 46 681 - - 336 368 543 199 199 169 109 79 558 193 575 44 163 305 52 121 100 69 108 32% 7% 44% - - 57% 23% 35% 26% 21% 21% 17% 15% 39% 28% 34% 34% 27% 39% 9% 46% 54% 54% 25% INDEPENDENT/SOMETHING ELSE 701 154 502 - - 174 462 430 251 304 276 207 179 396 203 498 27 187 215 122 76 57 43 163 29% 22% 32% - - 29% 29% 28% 33% 32% 34% 32% 35% 28% 29% 29% 21% 31% 28% 22% 29% 31% 34% 38% REFUSED 43 13 20 - - 6 29 34 6 10 9 6 6 26 9 28 3 8 13 9 7 - - 9 2% 2% 1% - - 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% - - 2% WHITE DEMOCRATS 495 20 460 - - 237 214 374 111 110 96 43 29 379 105 391 17 90 193 18 74 71 48 83 21% 3% 30% - - 40% 13% 24% 15% 12% 12% 7% 6% 26% 15% 23% 13% 15% 25% 3% 28% 38% 37% 19% GOP/TEA PARTY 481 481 - 481 - 43 412 316 146 255 215 193 154 221 175 306 38 144 84 300 22 11 1 60 20% 69% - 100% - 7% 26% 20% 19% 27% 26% 30% 30% 15% 25% 18% 29% 24% 11% 53% 8% 6% 1% 14% GOP/NON-TEA PARTY 351 - 351 - 351 32 296 184 153 146 120 103 77 201 105 245 14 94 140 69 33 14 12 76 15% - 23% - 100% 5% 18% 12% 20% 16% 15% 16% 15% 14% 15% 14% 11% 15% 18% 12% 12% 8% 10% 18% IND/DEM/TEA PARTY 200 200 - - - 46 140 136 57 96 73 74 51 104 62 138 15 50 49 79 12 16 3 39 8% 29% - - - 8% 9% 9% 7% 10% 9% 12% 10% 7% 9% 8% 12% 8% 6% 14% 4% 9% 2% 9% IND/DEM/NON-TEA PARTY 1183 - 1183 - - 450 655 775 382 365 336 217 188 808 299 884 52 267 444 79 174 134 101 216 49% - 76% - - 76% 41% 50% 50% 39% 41% 34% 37% 56% 43% 52% 40% 44% 57% 14% 65% 73% 78% 50%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 200Table 38-5QUESTION D9:No matter how you feel today, are you registered to vote as a Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? / And, in politics today, do you consider yourself to bea Republican, a Democrat, Independent, or something else? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (REPUBLICAN - 120 40 40 -1 81 29 77 -251 119 231 250 -172 -249 356 180 -124 -307 360 -99 187 10 -143 116 138 DEMOCRAT) 5% 4% 4% -1% 6% 2% 17% -22% 51% 24% 36% -11% -15% 55% 36% -7% -20% 51% -14% 37% 1% -9% 30% 45% REPUBLICAN 888 360 347 29 528 673 188 257 140 455 376 429 453 408 274 515 364 444 208 261 361 488 202 171 37% 36% 36% 32% 38% 36% 41% 23% 60% 47% 54% 28% 27% 63% 55% 30% 23% 63% 28% 52% 36% 30% 51% 56% DEMOCRAT 768 320 307 30 447 644 111 509 22 224 126 601 702 53 94 639 672 83 307 74 351 632 85 33 32% 32% 32% 33% 32% 34% 24% 45% 9% 23% 18% 40% 42% 8% 19% 38% 43% 12% 42% 15% 35% 39% 22% 11% INDEPENDENT/SOMETHING ELSE 701 304 291 30 395 526 144 337 68 274 185 449 505 177 122 516 488 169 210 160 274 484 102 95 29% 31% 31% 33% 28% 28% 32% 30% 29% 28% 27% 30% 30% 27% 24% 30% 31% 24% 29% 32% 27% 30% 26% 31% REFUSED 43 8 7 2 30 32 11 21 4 16 12 27 25 13 9 31 29 13 10 9 24 30 3 6 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% WHITE DEMOCRATS 495 215 209 22 280 408 76 323 16 149 60 411 461 29 38 429 441 45 180 42 254 420 48 17 21% 22% 22% 24% 20% 22% 17% 29% 7% 15% 9% 27% 27% 4% 8% 25% 28% 6% 24% 8% 25% 26% 12% 5% GOP/TEA PARTY 481 184 179 8 297 366 100 116 105 242 259 181 176 295 172 247 147 298 103 176 172 220 118 126 20% 18% 19% 8% 21% 20% 22% 10% 45% 25% 37% 12% 10% 45% 35% 14% 9% 42% 14% 35% 17% 13% 30% 41% GOP/NON-TEA PARTY 351 163 155 21 188 263 76 117 30 189 101 217 238 99 85 236 188 132 85 74 167 235 71 36 15% 16% 16% 23% 13% 14% 17% 10% 13% 19% 14% 14% 14% 15% 17% 14% 12% 19% 12% 15% 17% 14% 18% 12% IND/DEM/TEA PARTY 200 71 65 9 129 135 58 65 44 86 83 98 102 91 58 124 94 92 50 77 59 102 34 52 8% 7% 7% 9% 9% 7% 13% 6% 19% 9% 12% 7% 6% 14% 12% 7% 6% 13% 7% 15% 6% 6% 9% 17% IND/DEM/NON-TEA PARTY 1183 511 490 52 668 961 186 726 41 387 211 897 1034 129 134 983 992 151 428 146 543 954 135 70 49% 52% 52% 57% 48% 51% 41% 65% 18% 40% 30% 60% 61% 20% 27% 58% 64% 21% 58% 29% 54% 58% 34% 23%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 201Table 39-1QUESTION D9A:And how likely are you to participate in a Presidential primary or caucus in your state this year? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 969 144 136 296 144 188 304 492 477 168 236 166 207 188 195 197 99 210 177 89 888 81 - 100% 15% 14% 31% 15% 19% 31% 51% 49% 17% 24% 17% 21% 19% 20% 20% 10% 22% 18% 9% 92% 8% - **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 112 90 175 127 160 172 344 355 135 189 134 150 92 148 137 58 176 147 34 660 39 - LIKELY) 72% 78% 66% 59% 88% 85% 57% 70% 74% 80% 80% 80% 73% 49% 76% 70% 58% 84% 83% 38% 74% 49% - TOTAL LIKELY 822 128 105 234 136 174 237 412 410 151 213 144 176 137 171 162 78 192 159 59 762 60 ------------- 85% 89% 78% 79% 94% 92% 78% 84% 86% 90% 90% 87% 85% 73% 88% 82% 78% 92% 90% 67% 86% 74% - VERY LIKELY 694 111 83 199 117 147 202 344 350 113 182 129 158 111 133 143 67 163 144 44 644 50 - 72% 77% 61% 67% 81% 78% 66% 70% 73% 67% 77% 77% 77% 59% 68% 73% 68% 78% 82% 49% 72% 62% - SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 17 22 34 18 26 35 68 60 38 31 15 17 26 39 18 10 30 15 16 119 10 - 13% 12% 16% 12% 13% 14% 12% 14% 13% 22% 13% 9% 8% 14% 20% 9% 10% 14% 8% 18% 13% 12% - NOT LIKELY 123 16 15 59 8 14 65 68 55 16 24 11 26 45 23 25 20 16 12 25 102 20 - 13% 11% 11% 20% 6% 8% 21% 14% 11% 9% 10% 6% 12% 24% 12% 12% 20% 8% 7% 28% 12% 25% - DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 - 15 4 - - 2 12 12 2 - 11 5 6 - 11 1 2 6 4 23 1 - 2% - 11% 1% - - 1% 2% 3% 1% - 7% 3% 3% - 5% 1% 1% 4% 5% 3% 1% - ------------- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 112 90 175 127 160 172 344 355 135 189 134 150 92 148 137 58 176 147 34 660 39 - LIKELY) 29% 28% 23% 44% 32% 40% 43% 30% 28% 28% 33% 33% 30% 21% 31% 32% 25% 31% 31% 17% 74% 6% - TOTAL LIKELY 822 128 105 234 136 174 237 412 410 151 213 144 176 137 171 162 78 192 159 59 762 60 ------------- 34% 32% 26% 58% 34% 43% 59% 36% 33% 31% 37% 36% 35% 32% 35% 37% 33% 34% 34% 30% 86% 9% - VERY LIKELY 694 111 83 199 117 147 202 344 350 113 182 129 158 111 133 143 67 163 144 44 644 50 - 29% 28% 21% 50% 29% 37% 51% 30% 28% 24% 32% 32% 32% 26% 27% 33% 29% 28% 31% 22% 72% 7% - SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 17 22 34 18 26 35 68 60 38 31 15 17 26 39 18 10 30 15 16 119 10 - 5% 4% 5% 9% 5% 7% 9% 6% 5% 8% 5% 4% 3% 6% 8% 4% 4% 5% 3% 8% 13% 1% - NOT LIKELY 123 16 15 59 8 14 65 68 55 16 24 11 26 45 23 25 20 16 12 25 102 20 - 5% 4% 4% 15% 2% 4% 16% 6% 4% 3% 4% 3% 5% 10% 5% 6% 9% 3% 3% 13% 12% 3% - DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 - 15 4 - - 2 12 12 2 - 11 5 6 - 11 1 2 6 4 23 1 - 1% - 4% 1% - - - 1% 1% - - 3% 1% 1% - 2% 1% - 1% 2% 3% - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 202Table 39-2QUESTION D9A:And how likely are you to participate in a Presidential primary or caucus in your state this year? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 969 798 154 69 407 392 27 42 447 441 45 36 - - 366 519 39 42 - - 694 822 123 100% 82% 16% 7% 42% 40% 3% 4% 46% 46% 5% 4% - - 38% 54% 4% 4% - - 72% 85% 13% **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 575 109 61 280 294 20 42 325 334 18 21 - - 304 357 20 19 - - 694 822 -123 LIKELY) 72% 72% 71% 89% 69% 75% 72% 100% 73% 76% 41% 58% - - 83% 69% 53% 45% - - 100% 100% -100% TOTAL LIKELY 822 676 130 64 339 337 22 42 380 382 31 28 - - 334 427 30 30 - - 694 822 ------------- 85% 85% 84% 93% 83% 86% 82% 100% 85% 87% 70% 79% - - 91% 82% 76% 71% - - 100% 100% - VERY LIKELY 694 573 107 55 280 293 20 35 318 326 26 24 - - 271 372 24 26 - - 694 694 - 72% 72% 69% 80% 69% 75% 75% 84% 71% 74% 58% 67% - - 74% 72% 62% 62% - - 100% 84% - SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 103 23 9 59 44 2 7 63 56 5 4 - - 62 55 6 4 - - - 128 - 13% 13% 15% 13% 14% 11% 7% 16% 14% 13% 12% 12% - - 17% 11% 15% 9% - - - 16% - NOT LIKELY 123 102 20 3 58 43 3 - 55 47 13 7 - - 30 70 9 11 - - - - 123 13% 13% 13% 4% 14% 11% 10% - 12% 11% 29% 20% - - 8% 14% 24% 27% - - - - 100% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 20 4 2 9 11 2 - 11 12 - 1 - - 2 22 - 1 - - - - - 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 9% - 3% 3% 1% 1% - - - 4% - 2% - - - - - ------------- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 575 109 61 280 294 20 42 325 334 18 21 - - 304 357 20 19 - - 694 822 -123 LIKELY) 29% 32% 19% 18% 32% 33% 16% 20% 73% 76% 5% 7% - - 83% 69% 6% 5% - - 100% 100% -100% TOTAL LIKELY 822 676 130 64 339 337 22 42 380 382 31 28 - - 334 427 30 30 - - 694 822 ------------- 34% 38% 23% 19% 38% 37% 18% 20% 85% 87% 8% 9% - - 91% 82% 8% 9% - - 100% 100% - VERY LIKELY 694 573 107 55 280 293 20 35 318 326 26 24 - - 271 372 24 26 - - 694 694 - 29% 32% 19% 16% 32% 32% 16% 17% 71% 74% 7% 8% - - 74% 72% 7% 7% - - 100% 84% - SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 103 23 9 59 44 2 7 63 56 5 4 - - 62 55 6 4 - - - 128 - 5% 6% 4% 3% 7% 5% 2% 3% 14% 13% 1% 1% - - 17% 11% 2% 1% - - - 16% - NOT LIKELY 123 102 20 3 58 43 3 - 55 47 13 7 - - 30 70 9 11 - - - - 123 5% 6% 4% 1% 7% 5% 2% - 12% 11% 3% 2% - - 8% 14% 3% 3% - - - - 100% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 20 4 2 9 11 2 - 11 12 - 1 - - 2 22 - 1 - - - - - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 3% 3% - - - - - 4% - - - - - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 203Table 39-3QUESTION D9A:And how likely are you to participate in a Presidential primary or caucus in your state this year? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 969 661 244 49 632 245 29 48 - - 200 297 260 205 94 106 154 143 135 125 106 100 483 486 100% 68% 25% 5% 65% 25% 3% 5% - - 21% 31% 27% 21% 10% 11% 16% 15% 14% 13% 11% 10% 50% 50% **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 498 163 28 483 168 16 23 - - 145 229 186 136 67 77 113 117 94 92 66 70 359 341 LIKELY) 72% 75% 67% 57% 76% 68% 53% 49% - - 72% 77% 72% 66% 71% 73% 73% 82% 70% 73% 63% 70% 74% 70% TOTAL LIKELY 822 569 203 38 546 205 22 35 - - 171 260 220 167 81 90 132 127 113 107 83 84 416 406------------ 85% 86% 83% 79% 86% 84% 76% 74% - - 85% 88% 85% 81% 86% 85% 86% 89% 84% 85% 78% 84% 86% 83% VERY LIKELY 694 494 161 29 475 162 20 29 - - 147 218 186 137 69 78 107 111 94 92 70 68 344 349 72% 75% 66% 60% 75% 66% 66% 61% - - 74% 74% 71% 67% 74% 73% 70% 78% 70% 73% 66% 68% 71% 72% SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 74 41 9 72 44 3 6 - - 24 42 34 29 11 12 25 16 19 15 13 16 72 56 13% 11% 17% 18% 11% 18% 10% 14% - - 12% 14% 13% 14% 12% 12% 16% 12% 14% 12% 12% 16% 15% 12% NOT LIKELY 123 70 39 10 64 38 7 12 - - 26 31 34 31 14 13 20 11 18 15 16 14 58 65 13% 11% 16% 21% 10% 15% 23% 25% - - 13% 10% 13% 15% 14% 12% 13% 8% 14% 12% 16% 14% 12% 13% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 22 2 - 22 2 - - - - 3 6 7 8 - 3 2 5 4 3 6 1 9 16 2% 3% 1% - 3% 1% 1% - - - 2% 2% 3% 4% - 3% 1% 3% 3% 2% 6% 1% 2% 3% ------------- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 498 163 28 483 168 16 23 - - 145 229 186 136 67 77 113 117 94 92 66 70 359 341 LIKELY) 29% 51% 20% 5% 76% 68% 7% 5% - - 23% 29% 34% 35% 22% 23% 29% 29% 35% 33% 39% 32% 30% 28% TOTAL LIKELY 822 569 203 38 546 205 22 35 - - 171 260 220 167 81 90 132 127 113 107 83 84 416 406------------ 34% 58% 25% 7% 86% 84% 9% 8% - - 27% 33% 40% 43% 26% 27% 34% 31% 42% 38% 49% 38% 35% 34% VERY LIKELY 694 494 161 29 475 162 20 29 - - 147 218 186 137 69 78 107 111 94 92 70 68 344 349 29% 50% 20% 6% 75% 66% 8% 7% - - 23% 27% 34% 35% 23% 23% 27% 27% 35% 33% 41% 31% 29% 29% SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 74 41 9 72 44 3 6 - - 24 42 34 29 11 12 25 16 19 15 13 16 72 56 5% 8% 5% 2% 11% 18% 1% 2% - - 4% 5% 6% 8% 4% 4% 6% 4% 7% 5% 8% 7% 6% 5% NOT LIKELY 123 70 39 10 64 38 7 12 - - 26 31 34 31 14 13 20 11 18 15 16 14 58 65 5% 7% 5% 2% 10% 15% 3% 3% - - 4% 4% 6% 8% 4% 4% 5% 3% 7% 5% 10% 7% 5% 5% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 22 2 - 22 2 - - - - 3 6 7 8 - 3 2 5 4 3 6 1 9 16 1% 2% - - 3% 1% - - - - - 1% 1% 2% - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 204Table 39-4QUESTION D9A:And how likely are you to participate in a Presidential primary or caucus in your state this year? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 969 501 407 481 351 96 796 595 332 477 406 361 289 483 320 648 63 269 267 396 71 32 21 168 100% 52% 42% 50% 36% 10% 82% 61% 34% 49% 42% 37% 30% 50% 33% 67% 6% 28% 28% 41% 7% 3% 2% 17% **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 368 282 356 257 64 585 414 253 363 305 278 219 327 222 477 42 191 206 300 40 17 12 115 LIKELY) 72% 73% 69% 74% 73% 66% 73% 70% 76% 76% 75% 77% 76% 68% 69% 74% 66% 71% 77% 76% 56% 53% 56% 68% TOTAL LIKELY 822 425 342 409 302 80 679 498 289 415 350 316 251 399 267 554 52 227 234 340 55 25 17 140------------ 85% 85% 84% 85% 86% 83% 85% 84% 87% 87% 86% 88% 87% 83% 84% 85% 83% 84% 88% 86% 78% 76% 78% 83% VERY LIKELY 694 369 290 356 257 61 585 409 252 347 294 259 206 340 226 468 38 196 187 296 46 23 14 117 72% 74% 71% 74% 73% 63% 73% 69% 76% 73% 72% 72% 71% 70% 71% 72% 61% 73% 70% 75% 65% 73% 67% 70% SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 56 52 54 45 19 94 88 37 67 56 57 45 59 42 86 14 31 46 44 9 1 2 23 13% 11% 13% 11% 13% 20% 12% 15% 11% 14% 14% 16% 16% 12% 13% 13% 22% 12% 17% 11% 13% 4% 10% 14% NOT LIKELY 123 57 60 53 45 16 94 84 36 51 45 38 32 71 46 77 10 36 28 40 16 8 5 25 13% 11% 15% 11% 13% 17% 12% 14% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 15% 14% 12% 17% 13% 11% 10% 22% 24% 22% 15% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 18 4 18 3 - 24 14 8 11 11 7 7 13 7 17 - 7 5 16 - - - 3 2% 4% 1% 4% 1% - 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% - 2% 2% 4% - - - 2% ------------- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 368 282 356 257 64 585 414 253 363 305 278 219 327 222 477 42 191 206 300 40 17 12 115 LIKELY) 29% 53% 18% 74% 73% 11% 37% 27% 33% 39% 37% 43% 43% 23% 32% 28% 32% 32% 26% 53% 15% 9% 9% 27% TOTAL LIKELY 822 425 342 409 302 80 679 498 289 415 350 316 251 399 267 554 52 227 234 340 55 25 17 140------------ 34% 61% 22% 85% 86% 13% 42% 32% 38% 44% 43% 49% 49% 28% 38% 33% 40% 38% 30% 60% 21% 13% 13% 33% VERY LIKELY 694 369 290 356 257 61 585 409 252 347 294 259 206 340 226 468 38 196 187 296 46 23 14 117 29% 53% 19% 74% 73% 10% 37% 26% 33% 37% 36% 41% 40% 24% 32% 28% 29% 32% 24% 53% 17% 13% 11% 27% SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 56 52 54 45 19 94 88 37 67 56 57 45 59 42 86 14 31 46 44 9 1 2 23 5% 8% 3% 11% 13% 3% 6% 6% 5% 7% 7% 9% 9% 4% 6% 5% 10% 5% 6% 8% 4% 1% 2% 5% NOT LIKELY 123 57 60 53 45 16 94 84 36 51 45 38 32 71 46 77 10 36 28 40 16 8 5 25 5% 8% 4% 11% 13% 3% 6% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 6% 5% 7% 5% 8% 6% 4% 7% 6% 4% 4% 6% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 18 4 18 3 - 24 14 8 11 11 7 7 13 7 17 - 7 5 16 - - - 3 1% 3% - 4% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 3% - - - 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 205Table 39-5QUESTION D9A:And how likely are you to participate in a Presidential primary or caucus in your state this year? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL ASKED 969 395 381 33 573 738 200 288 152 490 400 478 505 434 290 571 412 471 229 281 394 541 215 184 100% 41% 39% 3% 59% 76% 21% 30% 16% 51% 41% 49% 52% 45% 30% 59% 42% 49% 24% 29% 41% 56% 22% 19% **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 317 304 26 382 540 145 195 127 363 309 327 335 341 218 402 277 358 161 209 284 381 160 143 LIKELY) 72% 80% 80% 79% 67% 73% 73% 68% 83% 74% 77% 68% 66% 78% 75% 70% 67% 76% 70% 74% 72% 70% 74% 78% TOTAL LIKELY 822 353 340 30 468 629 171 239 137 420 346 399 416 380 249 481 342 406 191 241 336 457 183 159------------ 85% 89% 89% 89% 82% 85% 86% 83% 90% 86% 86% 83% 82% 88% 86% 84% 83% 86% 83% 86% 85% 85% 85% 87% VERY LIKELY 694 310 298 24 383 527 148 192 114 364 301 329 331 343 212 402 276 361 154 210 285 371 165 138 72% 79% 78% 72% 67% 71% 74% 67% 75% 74% 75% 69% 66% 79% 73% 70% 67% 77% 67% 75% 72% 69% 77% 75% SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 42 42 6 86 102 24 47 22 57 45 70 85 37 37 79 66 45 37 31 51 86 18 22 13% 11% 11% 17% 15% 14% 12% 16% 15% 12% 11% 15% 17% 8% 13% 14% 16% 10% 16% 11% 13% 16% 8% 12% NOT LIKELY 123 36 36 4 86 89 26 44 10 57 38 72 81 39 30 79 65 48 30 32 52 76 23 17 13% 9% 9% 11% 15% 12% 13% 15% 6% 12% 9% 15% 16% 9% 11% 14% 16% 10% 13% 12% 13% 14% 11% 9% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 6 6 - 18 20 3 6 5 13 16 7 8 15 11 11 5 17 8 8 7 7 9 8 2% 1% 2% - 3% 3% 1% 2% 4% 3% 4% 2% 2% 3% 4% 2% 1% 4% 3% 3% 2% 1% 4% 4% ------------- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (TOTAL LIKELY - NOT 699 317 304 26 382 540 145 195 127 363 309 327 335 341 218 402 277 358 161 209 284 381 160 143 LIKELY) 29% 32% 32% 28% 27% 29% 32% 17% 54% 37% 44% 22% 20% 52% 44% 24% 18% 50% 22% 41% 28% 23% 41% 47% TOTAL LIKELY 822 353 340 30 468 629 171 239 137 420 346 399 416 380 249 481 342 406 191 241 336 457 183 159------------ 34% 36% 36% 32% 33% 34% 38% 21% 58% 43% 50% 26% 25% 58% 50% 28% 22% 57% 26% 48% 33% 28% 47% 52% VERY LIKELY 694 310 298 24 383 527 148 192 114 364 301 329 331 343 212 402 276 361 154 210 285 371 165 138 29% 31% 31% 26% 27% 28% 33% 17% 49% 38% 43% 22% 20% 53% 43% 24% 18% 51% 21% 42% 28% 23% 42% 45% SOMEWHAT LIKELY 128 42 42 6 86 102 24 47 22 57 45 70 85 37 37 79 66 45 37 31 51 86 18 22 5% 4% 4% 6% 6% 5% 5% 4% 10% 6% 7% 5% 5% 6% 7% 5% 4% 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% 5% 7% NOT LIKELY 123 36 36 4 86 89 26 44 10 57 38 72 81 39 30 79 65 48 30 32 52 76 23 17 5% 4% 4% 4% 6% 5% 6% 4% 4% 6% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 5% 4% 7% 4% 6% 5% 5% 6% 5% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24 6 6 - 18 20 3 6 5 13 16 7 8 15 11 11 5 17 8 8 7 7 9 8 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% - - 2% 2% 1% - 2% 1% 2% 1% - 2% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 206Table 40-1QUESTION D10:Generally speaking, do you consider yourself to be conservative, moderate, or liberal on most issues? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (CONSERVATIVE - 460 76 50 101 87 145 129 300 161 10 105 94 82 167 70 138 92 45 39 74 594 110 -248 LIBERAL) 19% 19% 12% 25% 22% 36% 32% 26% 13% 2% 18% 23% 16% 39% 15% 32% 40% 8% 8% 37% 67% 16% -32% CONSERVATIVE 982 164 145 169 168 206 185 512 471 141 244 167 198 230 180 204 127 205 161 103 632 236 101 41% 41% 36% 42% 42% 52% 46% 44% 38% 29% 42% 42% 40% 53% 37% 47% 54% 36% 34% 52% 71% 34% 13% MODERATE 826 136 146 152 138 125 148 391 435 195 177 153 172 125 176 150 64 196 175 61 207 303 307 34% 34% 37% 38% 34% 31% 37% 34% 35% 41% 31% 38% 34% 29% 36% 34% 28% 34% 37% 30% 23% 43% 40% LIBERAL 522 89 96 67 81 61 56 212 310 131 139 73 116 63 110 66 35 160 122 28 38 126 348 22% 22% 24% 17% 20% 15% 14% 18% 25% 27% 24% 18% 23% 15% 23% 15% 15% 28% 26% 14% 4% 18% 45% DON'T KNOW 50 10 5 11 12 8 7 27 23 8 13 9 8 11 12 8 6 8 9 4 8 29 12 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 4% 1% REFUSED 19 1 8 2 1 - 4 11 9 6 2 1 7 4 4 6 1 4 1 3 3 6 - 1% - 2% - - - 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - 2% - 1% - CONS GOP 632 102 100 83 113 143 148 322 310 85 158 103 145 140 116 132 74 127 115 66 632 - - 26% 26% 25% 21% 28% 36% 37% 28% 25% 18% 27% 25% 29% 32% 24% 30% 32% 22% 25% 33% 71% - - MOD/LIB GOP 245 42 33 29 25 42 102 120 125 56 59 49 46 33 53 48 17 63 47 15 245 - - 10% 10% 8% 7% 6% 10% 25% 10% 10% 12% 10% 12% 9% 8% 11% 11% 7% 11% 10% 8% 28% - - CONS IND 236 37 36 67 11 58 20 145 91 41 61 39 31 63 55 44 45 47 26 18 - 236 - 10% 9% 9% 17% 3% 14% 5% 13% 7% 9% 11% 10% 6% 15% 11% 10% 20% 8% 6% 9% - 34% - MOD/LIB IND 430 81 76 107 29 80 32 232 198 129 108 54 90 49 133 69 29 104 75 20 - 430 - 18% 20% 19% 27% 7% 20% 8% 20% 16% 27% 19% 13% 18% 11% 28% 16% 12% 18% 16% 10% - 61% - CONS DEM 101 23 7 16 43 3 16 36 64 14 24 22 19 23 7 24 6 30 17 17 - - 101 4% 6% 2% 4% 11% 1% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 1% 5% 2% 5% 4% 9% - - 13% MOD/LIB DEM 656 98 129 80 162 64 68 245 410 135 148 118 147 104 98 96 51 185 169 53 - - 656 27% 24% 32% 20% 41% 16% 17% 21% 33% 28% 26% 29% 29% 24% 20% 22% 22% 32% 36% 26% - - 85%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 207Table 40-2QUESTION D10:Generally speaking, do you consider yourself to be conservative, moderate, or liberal on most issues? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (CONSERVATIVE - 460 386 51 16 259 127 12 4 306 288 75 35 -84 -163 218 374 16 92 -121 -126 465 531 60 LIBERAL) 19% 22% 9% 5% 29% 14% 9% 2% 68% 65% 19% 12% -29% -34% 60% 72% 5% 27% -37% -29% 67% 65% 49% CONSERVATIVE 982 761 196 111 414 347 40 71 322 310 145 91 36 64 243 387 101 134 37 63 494 569 70 41% 43% 35% 33% 47% 38% 32% 34% 72% 70% 36% 30% 13% 13% 66% 75% 29% 38% 11% 15% 71% 69% 57% MODERATE 826 611 205 118 291 320 53 65 103 104 162 142 124 183 90 115 152 151 125 179 161 203 39 34% 34% 36% 35% 33% 35% 41% 31% 23% 24% 41% 47% 43% 38% 25% 22% 43% 43% 38% 41% 23% 25% 32% LIBERAL 522 375 145 95 155 219 28 67 17 21 70 56 121 228 25 13 85 41 158 190 29 38 10 22% 21% 26% 28% 18% 24% 22% 32% 4% 5% 18% 19% 42% 47% 7% 3% 24% 12% 48% 43% 4% 5% 9% DON'T KNOW 50 26 21 11 15 12 6 5 3 4 17 12 6 6 4 4 9 18 7 5 5 9 2 2% 1% 4% 3% 2% 1% 5% 3% 1% 1% 4% 4% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 5% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% REFUSED 19 11 - - 6 5 - - 2 2 4 2 - - 3 - 2 4 - - 3 3 - 1% 1% - - 1% 1% - - - - 1% 1% - - 1% - 1% 1% - - - - - CONS GOP 632 527 90 44 271 256 14 30 322 310 - - - - 243 387 - - - - 475 546 64 26% 30% 16% 13% 31% 28% 11% 14% 72% 70% - - - - 66% 75% - - - - 68% 66% 52% MOD/LIB GOP 245 194 49 20 96 98 10 10 120 125 - - - - 115 128 - - - - 162 205 38 10% 11% 9% 6% 11% 11% 8% 5% 27% 28% - - - - 32% 25% - - - - 23% 25% 31% CONS IND 236 181 50 25 121 60 11 14 - - 145 91 - - - - 101 134 - - 20 22 7 10% 10% 9% 7% 14% 7% 9% 6% - - 36% 30% - - - - 29% 38% - - 3% 3% 5% MOD/LIB IND 430 332 90 43 180 152 20 22 - - 232 198 - - - - 237 193 - - 29 35 12 18% 19% 16% 13% 20% 17% 16% 11% - - 58% 65% - - - - 68% 55% - - 4% 4% 10% CONS DEM 101 44 55 43 19 25 15 27 - - - - 36 64 - - - - 37 63 - - - 4% 2% 10% 13% 2% 3% 12% 13% - - - - 13% 13% - - - - 11% 15% - - - MOD/LIB DEM 656 447 206 147 166 281 51 96 - - - - 245 410 - - - - 283 369 - - - 27% 25% 36% 44% 19% 31% 40% 46% - - - - 85% 85% - - - - 86% 84% - - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 208Table 40-3QUESTION D10:Generally speaking, do you consider yourself to be conservative, moderate, or liberal on most issues? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (CONSERVATIVE - 460 982 - -522 632 -38 236 -126 101 -348 53 128 130 151 54 -1 65 63 93 37 91 60 233 227 LIBERAL) 19% 100% - -100% 100% -16% 100% -29% 100% -53% 8% 16% 24% 39% 18% - 16% 16% 34% 13% 54% 27% 19% 19% CONSERVATIVE 982 982 - - 632 - 236 - 101 - 231 297 246 203 126 105 149 148 132 114 102 101 501 482 41% 100% - - 100% - 100% - 100% - 36% 37% 45% 52% 41% 32% 38% 36% 49% 41% 60% 46% 42% 40% MODERATE 826 - 826 - - 207 - 303 - 307 206 315 174 125 101 105 149 166 87 87 51 74 393 434 34% - 100% - - 84% - 71% - 47% 32% 39% 32% 32% 33% 32% 38% 41% 32% 31% 30% 34% 33% 36% LIBERAL 522 - - 522 - 38 - 126 - 348 178 169 116 52 72 106 84 85 40 76 11 41 268 254 22% - - 100% - 16% - 29% - 53% 28% 21% 21% 13% 24% 32% 21% 21% 15% 27% 6% 19% 22% 21% DON'T KNOW 50 - - - - - - - - - 17 12 11 7 6 11 8 4 9 2 4 3 30 20 2% - - - - - - - - - 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% REFUSED 19 - - - - - - - - - 5 6 4 1 1 4 2 4 3 1 1 - 7 12 1% - - - - - - - - - 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% 1% - - - 1% 1% CONS GOP 632 632 - - 632 - - - - - 135 198 163 130 68 67 101 97 83 81 68 62 319 313 26% 64% - - 100% - - - - - 21% 25% 30% 33% 22% 20% 26% 24% 31% 29% 40% 28% 27% 26% MOD/LIB GOP 245 - 207 38 - 245 - - - - 56 85 60 43 23 33 48 37 29 31 19 24 121 124 10% - 25% 7% - 100% - - - - 9% 11% 11% 11% 8% 10% 12% 9% 11% 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% CONS IND 236 236 - - - - 236 - - - 59 71 60 46 40 18 40 31 41 20 23 22 118 118 10% 24% - - - - 100% - - - 9% 9% 11% 12% 13% 6% 10% 8% 15% 7% 14% 10% 10% 10% MOD/LIB IND 430 - 303 126 - - - 430 - - 105 166 95 63 50 55 99 67 57 38 26 38 215 215 18% - 37% 24% - - - 100% - - 17% 21% 17% 16% 16% 17% 25% 16% 21% 14% 15% 17% 18% 18% CONS DEM 101 101 - - - - - - 101 - 36 19 22 24 17 19 4 15 8 14 8 16 57 44 4% 10% - - - - - - 100% - 6% 2% 4% 6% 6% 6% 1% 4% 3% 5% 4% 7% 5% 4% MOD/LIB DEM 656 - 307 348 - - - - - 656 221 222 132 71 99 122 83 139 40 92 18 53 316 339 27% - 37% 67% - - - - - 100% 35% 28% 24% 18% 32% 37% 21% 34% 15% 33% 10% 24% 26% 28%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 209Table 40-4QUESTION D10:Generally speaking, do you consider yourself to be conservative, moderate, or liberal on most issues? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (CONSERVATIVE - 460 473 -49 380 179 -196 630 212 231 350 275 319 243 104 215 245 48 188 88 412 2 -51 -41 52 LIBERAL) 19% 68% -3% 79% 51% -33% 39% 14% 30% 37% 34% 50% 47% 7% 31% 14% 37% 31% 11% 73% 1% -28% -32% 12% CONSERVATIVE 982 513 405 397 198 78 827 594 357 476 389 379 292 497 320 662 67 277 262 441 65 28 14 159 41% 74% 26% 83% 56% 13% 52% 38% 47% 51% 48% 59% 57% 35% 46% 39% 52% 46% 34% 78% 24% 16% 11% 37% MODERATE 826 129 650 66 127 228 530 533 261 311 287 182 158 507 253 573 42 221 321 87 134 67 56 144 34% 19% 42% 14% 36% 38% 33% 34% 34% 33% 35% 28% 31% 35% 36% 34% 33% 36% 41% 16% 50% 36% 44% 33% LIBERAL 522 40 455 17 18 274 197 381 126 126 114 60 48 393 105 417 19 88 174 30 63 80 55 107 22% 6% 29% 3% 5% 46% 12% 25% 16% 13% 14% 9% 9% 27% 15% 25% 14% 15% 22% 5% 24% 43% 43% 25% DON'T KNOW 50 9 33 1 5 12 29 32 16 23 20 16 13 27 16 33 2 16 15 3 3 3 3 19 2% 1% 2% - 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% - 1% 2% 2% 4% REFUSED 19 3 11 - 3 2 14 10 4 5 5 3 3 8 3 9 - 3 5 2 1 6 - 2 1% - 1% - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 3% - 1% CONS GOP 632 397 198 397 198 32 557 379 229 313 254 244 185 314 209 423 42 175 154 327 34 13 7 91 26% 57% 13% 83% 56% 5% 35% 24% 30% 33% 31% 38% 36% 22% 30% 25% 33% 29% 20% 58% 13% 7% 5% 21% MOD/LIB GOP 245 83 145 83 145 46 176 158 76 108 101 68 61 133 82 162 14 70 84 52 27 10 9 58 10% 12% 9% 17% 41% 8% 11% 10% 10% 11% 12% 11% 12% 9% 12% 10% 11% 12% 11% 9% 10% 5% 7% 13% CONS IND 236 95 124 - - 24 190 137 93 116 100 94 77 119 77 159 13 70 54 87 18 9 2 62 10% 14% 8% - - 4% 12% 9% 12% 12% 12% 15% 15% 8% 11% 9% 10% 12% 7% 16% 7% 5% 2% 14% MOD/LIB IND 430 54 354 - - 141 249 272 145 170 159 102 90 260 112 318 12 104 151 32 55 43 41 90 18% 8% 23% - - 24% 16% 18% 19% 18% 19% 16% 18% 18% 16% 19% 9% 17% 19% 6% 21% 24% 32% 21% CONS DEM 101 16 78 - - 21 71 66 33 44 32 38 26 54 30 71 10 28 50 22 13 6 5 4 4% 2% 5% - - 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 8% 5% 6% 4% 5% 3% 4% 1% MOD/LIB DEM 656 27 593 - - 311 290 468 164 153 137 69 53 494 161 494 34 133 254 31 109 93 62 98 27% 4% 38% - - 52% 18% 30% 21% 16% 17% 11% 10% 35% 23% 29% 26% 22% 33% 5% 41% 51% 48% 23%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 210Table 40-5QUESTION D10:Generally speaking, do you consider yourself to be conservative, moderate, or liberal on most issues? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (CONSERVATIVE - 460 120 124 1 341 272 163 -114 174 381 377 25 -31 470 275 78 -114 492 22 290 121 49 182 200 LIBERAL) 19% 12% 13% 1% 24% 15% 36% -10% 74% 39% 54% 2% -2% 72% 55% 5% -7% 69% 3% 58% 12% 3% 47% 66% CONSERVATIVE 982 366 358 24 616 705 239 264 182 498 447 441 461 489 327 533 366 528 225 335 360 505 227 212 41% 37% 38% 26% 44% 38% 53% 23% 78% 51% 64% 29% 27% 75% 65% 31% 24% 74% 31% 67% 36% 31% 58% 70% MODERATE 826 359 338 45 466 677 134 445 42 326 166 609 676 132 114 656 654 137 286 113 384 623 112 72 34% 36% 36% 49% 33% 36% 29% 40% 18% 34% 24% 40% 40% 20% 23% 39% 42% 19% 39% 22% 38% 38% 29% 24% LIBERAL 522 246 234 23 275 433 77 378 8 118 70 416 492 20 52 454 480 36 202 46 239 457 44 12 22% 25% 25% 25% 20% 23% 17% 34% 3% 12% 10% 28% 29% 3% 10% 27% 31% 5% 28% 9% 24% 28% 11% 4% DON'T KNOW 50 16 16 - 34 42 2 31 - 16 10 29 41 6 4 42 40 5 18 4 17 38 9 2 2% 2% 2% - 2% 2% - 3% - 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% REFUSED 19 5 5 - 9 17 3 6 2 11 6 13 13 5 3 16 14 4 4 6 10 11 1 7 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - 2% CONS GOP 632 246 242 13 386 460 147 135 124 345 309 265 273 342 225 326 204 367 127 215 248 312 161 138 26% 25% 25% 15% 28% 25% 32% 12% 53% 36% 44% 18% 16% 53% 45% 19% 13% 52% 17% 43% 25% 19% 41% 45% MOD/LIB GOP 245 108 98 16 137 201 41 117 14 105 63 158 172 63 45 183 155 76 80 42 109 170 39 30 10% 11% 10% 17% 10% 11% 9% 10% 6% 11% 9% 11% 10% 10% 9% 11% 10% 11% 11% 8% 11% 10% 10% 10% CONS IND 236 91 88 7 145 157 69 69 46 111 101 108 109 120 69 131 96 114 54 89 74 123 40 60 10% 9% 9% 8% 10% 8% 15% 6% 20% 11% 14% 7% 6% 18% 14% 8% 6% 16% 7% 18% 7% 8% 10% 20% MOD/LIB IND 430 205 195 23 223 341 74 246 21 151 76 321 365 54 51 353 360 52 143 67 189 335 54 33 18% 21% 20% 25% 16% 18% 16% 22% 9% 16% 11% 21% 22% 8% 10% 21% 23% 7% 20% 13% 19% 21% 14% 11% CONS DEM 101 29 27 3 72 82 16 55 8 37 30 62 74 22 30 66 59 40 42 25 33 64 23 12 4% 3% 3% 3% 5% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 6% 4% 4% 6% 6% 5% 3% 4% 6% 4% MOD/LIB DEM 656 285 273 27 370 550 95 446 14 184 94 531 620 29 63 563 603 42 257 49 315 556 63 21 27% 29% 29% 30% 26% 29% 21% 40% 6% 19% 13% 35% 37% 5% 13% 33% 39% 6% 35% 10% 31% 34% 16% 7%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 211Table 41-1QUESTION D11:What is your main ethnic or racial heritage? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% WHITE 1784 281 311 362 203 365 359 881 903 315 409 272 410 371 352 324 203 373 358 168 729 535 495 74% 70% 78% 91% 51% 91% 90% 76% 72% 66% 71% 68% 82% 86% 73% 75% 87% 65% 77% 84% 82% 76% 64% HISPANIC AMERICAN OR LATINO 336 60 48 2 136 16 20 127 209 108 95 62 43 27 68 46 13 135 59 14 66 70 196 14% 15% 12% - 34% 4% 5% 11% 17% 23% 17% 16% 9% 6% 14% 11% 6% 24% 13% 7% 7% 10% 25% NATIVE AMERICAN 96 16 8 24 32 8 12 45 51 27 27 20 17 5 24 19 2 30 18 3 37 37 21 4% 4% 2% 6% 8% 2% 3% 4% 4% 6% 5% 5% 3% 1% 5% 4% 1% 5% 4% 2% 4% 5% 3% AFRICAN AMERICAN OR BLACK 48 16 9 - 4 2 2 19 29 9 11 11 8 8 7 9 3 13 11 6 8 13 26 2% 4% 2% - 1% - - 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% 3% OTHER 88 19 16 8 17 5 3 51 36 16 23 24 12 12 22 21 9 18 15 3 31 30 26 4% 5% 4% 2% 4% 1% 1% 4% 3% 3% 4% 6% 2% 3% 5% 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% 4% 4% 3% REFUSED 49 8 8 4 8 4 4 29 20 3 11 13 9 9 9 16 3 5 7 5 16 15 4 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 4% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 212Table 41-2QUESTION D11:What is your main ethnic or racial heritage? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% WHITE 1784 1784 - - 881 903 - - 371 359 315 220 188 308 286 441 260 274 172 321 573 676 102 74% 100% - - 100% 100% - - 83% 81% 79% 73% 65% 64% 78% 85% 74% 79% 52% 74% 83% 82% 83% HISPANIC AMERICAN OR LATINO 336 - 336 336 - - 127 209 25 41 34 36 68 127 36 30 48 23 120 76 55 64 3 14% - 59% 100% - - 100% 100% 6% 9% 9% 12% 24% 27% 10% 6% 14% 7% 37% 17% 8% 8% 2% NATIVE AMERICAN 96 - 96 - - - - - 22 15 13 25 9 11 21 16 18 19 15 6 23 32 12 4% - 17% - - - - - 5% 3% 3% 8% 3% 2% 6% 3% 5% 6% 5% 1% 3% 4% 10% AFRICAN AMERICAN OR BLACK 48 - 48 - - - - - 2 6 5 8 10 16 8 - 6 7 6 19 2 6 2 2% - 8% - - - - - 1% 1% 1% 3% 4% 3% 2% - 2% 2% 2% 4% - 1% 2% OTHER 88 - 88 - - - - - 18 14 22 8 12 14 13 18 12 17 14 12 27 28 4 4% - 15% - - - - - 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% REFUSED 49 - - - - - - - 9 6 9 6 1 4 2 14 6 8 - 3 14 16 1 2% - - - - - - - 2% 1% 2% 2% - 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% - 1% 2% 2% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 213Table 41-3QUESTION D11:What is your main ethnic or racial heritage? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% WHITE 1784 761 611 375 527 194 181 332 44 447 433 620 420 299 211 223 316 305 209 212 141 157 887 897 74% 77% 74% 72% 83% 79% 77% 77% 44% 68% 68% 78% 76% 77% 69% 67% 80% 75% 77% 76% 84% 72% 74% 75% HISPANIC AMERICAN OR LATINO 336 111 118 95 44 20 25 43 43 147 119 91 83 41 55 65 27 63 35 48 9 32 168 168 14% 11% 14% 18% 7% 8% 10% 10% 43% 22% 19% 11% 15% 11% 18% 19% 7% 16% 13% 17% 6% 15% 14% 14% NATIVE AMERICAN 96 33 37 22 16 21 13 19 3 17 18 18 28 29 5 13 12 6 15 13 11 19 48 48 4% 3% 4% 4% 2% 9% 6% 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% 8% 2% 4% 3% 1% 6% 5% 6% 9% 4% 4% AFRICAN AMERICAN OR BLACK 48 14 19 13 6 2 3 10 4 20 27 13 3 5 12 15 3 10 1 1 2 4 24 24 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 4% 3% 4% 2% - 1% 4% 4% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% OTHER 88 39 31 15 25 6 9 19 4 22 27 37 11 10 17 10 23 14 8 4 3 6 46 42 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 5% 2% 3% 5% 3% 6% 4% 3% 1% 2% 3% 4% 3% REFUSED 49 25 10 2 15 1 5 8 2 2 13 20 6 3 7 7 12 8 3 3 2 1 26 23 2% 3% 1% - 2% - 2% 2% 2% - 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 214Table 41-4QUESTION D11:What is your main ethnic or racial heritage? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% WHITE 1784 548 1132 397 285 419 1214 1170 556 685 595 458 367 1084 504 1279 72 451 571 439 185 127 88 339 74% 79% 73% 83% 81% 70% 76% 76% 73% 73% 73% 72% 72% 76% 72% 75% 55% 75% 74% 78% 70% 69% 68% 79% HISPANIC AMERICAN OR LATINO 336 63 248 30 31 104 200 207 113 129 102 101 74 201 87 249 31 65 129 60 38 41 22 40 14% 9% 16% 6% 9% 18% 13% 13% 15% 14% 13% 16% 14% 14% 12% 15% 24% 11% 17% 11% 14% 22% 17% 9% NATIVE AMERICAN 96 33 53 20 17 35 54 58 29 58 57 34 33 38 39 57 11 29 24 24 15 2 13 17 4% 5% 3% 4% 5% 6% 3% 4% 4% 6% 7% 5% 6% 3% 6% 3% 9% 5% 3% 4% 5% 1% 10% 4% AFRICAN AMERICAN OR BLACK 48 1 43 - 4 14 30 31 16 21 20 14 13 25 22 26 3 20 11 5 10 8 6 6 2% - 3% - 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 4% 4% 5% 1% OTHER 88 30 53 22 10 17 65 54 33 31 28 21 19 57 31 56 11 25 28 22 14 3 - 18 4% 4% 3% 5% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 3% 9% 4% 4% 4% 5% 1% - 4% REFUSED 49 20 25 11 4 7 34 29 17 17 13 12 8 27 15 28 1 15 12 13 4 3 - 10 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% - 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 215Table 41-5QUESTION D11:What is your main ethnic or racial heritage? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% WHITE 1784 730 709 66 1049 1380 347 781 197 751 524 1125 1226 512 353 1266 1108 555 483 389 794 1184 308 241 74% 74% 75% 71% 75% 74% 76% 69% 84% 78% 75% 75% 73% 79% 71% 74% 71% 78% 66% 77% 79% 72% 79% 79% HISPANIC AMERICAN OR LATINO 336 135 124 11 201 293 40 199 9 116 83 221 272 53 68 249 270 60 144 44 127 263 40 22 14% 14% 13% 12% 14% 16% 9% 18% 4% 12% 12% 15% 16% 8% 14% 15% 17% 8% 20% 9% 13% 16% 10% 7% NATIVE AMERICAN 96 47 47 5 49 70 21 59 6 31 34 61 68 28 35 59 68 25 36 28 28 72 15 9 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 5% 5% 2% 3% 5% 4% 4% 4% 7% 3% 4% 4% 5% 6% 3% 4% 4% 3% AFRICAN AMERICAN OR BLACK 48 16 15 5 32 35 10 27 1 20 8 32 38 7 12 32 33 15 31 7 8 33 8 7 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% - 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% OTHER 88 49 45 6 39 58 25 44 9 30 30 44 56 31 23 60 53 33 32 17 32 59 10 13 4% 5% 5% 6% 3% 3% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 5% 5% 4% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% REFUSED 49 15 12 - 30 37 11 15 12 21 20 24 24 19 7 35 22 22 8 19 22 23 11 13 2% 1% 1% - 2% 2% 2% 1% 5% 2% 3% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 4% 2% 1% 3% 4%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 216Table 42-1QUESTION D12:Are you, or is anyone in your household, an active member of the military or a military veteran? BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% **D/S (YES - NO) -997 -149 -191 -147 -95 -237 -162 -406 -591 -321 -385 -163 -133 6 -318 -134 48 -388 -162 -41 -301 -295 -382 -42% -37% -48% -37% -24% -59% -41% -35% -47% -67% -67% -40% -27% 1% -66% -31% 20% -68% -35% -21% -34% -42% -50% TOTAL YES 698 126 104 126 152 82 117 371 327 78 96 120 182 218 81 149 140 93 153 78 293 203 193--------- 29% 31% 26% 32% 38% 20% 29% 32% 26% 16% 17% 30% 36% 51% 17% 34% 60% 16% 33% 39% 33% 29% 25% YES/SELF/ACTIVE 25 2 7 8 3 8 4 21 4 5 4 3 12 2 6 13 2 3 1 - 9 12 5 1% - 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 3% 1% - - - 1% 2% 1% YES/SELF/VETERAN 287 57 34 56 62 34 52 258 29 12 31 36 69 138 37 92 129 7 13 9 123 103 57 12% 14% 9% 14% 15% 8% 13% 22% 2% 3% 5% 9% 14% 32% 8% 21% 55% 1% 3% 4% 14% 15% 7% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/ACTIVE 109 22 17 21 21 6 16 39 70 25 16 21 28 20 16 18 5 25 30 16 48 19 39 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% 2% 4% 3% 6% 5% 3% 5% 6% 5% 3% 4% 2% 4% 6% 8% 5% 3% 5% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/VETERAN 330 54 55 53 86 38 52 88 243 46 54 69 89 69 33 40 14 66 118 55 129 87 110 14% 13% 14% 13% 21% 9% 13% 8% 19% 10% 9% 17% 18% 16% 7% 9% 6% 12% 25% 28% 15% 12% 14% NO 1695 274 294 274 247 318 280 777 918 399 480 283 315 212 399 283 93 481 314 119 594 498 575 71% 69% 74% 68% 62% 80% 70% 67% 74% 83% 83% 70% 63% 49% 83% 65% 40% 84% 67% 60% 67% 71% 75% REFUSED 7 - 2 - - - 3 4 3 3 - - 3 2 2 2 - - 1 2 - - - - - 1% - - - 1% - - 1% - - 1% - 1% - - - - 1% - - - TOTAL SELF 311 59 42 64 64 41 55 279 32 17 35 39 80 139 43 105 130 10 13 9 131 115 62 13% 15% 10% 16% 16% 10% 14% 24% 3% 4% 6% 10% 16% 32% 9% 24% 56% 2% 3% 4% 15% 16% 8% TOTAL HH 414 69 68 71 97 43 67 115 299 64 62 85 112 87 41 57 17 85 141 70 172 98 137 17% 17% 17% 18% 24% 11% 17% 10% 24% 13% 11% 21% 22% 20% 9% 13% 7% 15% 30% 35% 19% 14% 18% TOTAL ACTIVE 130 24 22 29 24 14 18 56 74 27 19 23 38 22 19 30 7 27 31 16 57 27 44 5% 6% 5% 7% 6% 4% 5% 5% 6% 6% 3% 6% 8% 5% 4% 7% 3% 5% 7% 8% 6% 4% 6% TOTAL VETERAN 605 110 89 103 141 69 100 337 268 58 84 104 153 202 70 128 139 72 129 63 248 187 163 25% 28% 22% 26% 35% 17% 25% 29% 21% 12% 15% 26% 31% 47% 14% 30% 60% 13% 28% 32% 28% 27% 21%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 217Table 42-2QUESTION D12:Are you, or is anyone in your household, an active member of the military or a military veteran? BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% **D/S (YES - NO) -997 -775 -209 -163 -320 -456 -60 -103 -136 -165 -129 -165 -133 -250 -245 -53 -234 -60 -220 -164 -242 -287 -32 -42% -43% -37% -48% -36% -50% -47% -49% -30% -37% -33% -54% -46% -52% -67% -10% -67% -17% -67% -38% -35% -35% -26% TOTAL YES 698 504 179 87 281 223 34 53 155 138 134 69 78 115 60 233 58 144 53 136 226 267 46--------- 29% 28% 32% 26% 32% 25% 26% 25% 35% 31% 34% 23% 27% 24% 16% 45% 17% 41% 16% 31% 33% 33% 37% YES/SELF/ACTIVE 25 19 7 3 14 4 3 - 7 2 11 1 3 2 2 7 4 8 3 2 9 10 - 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 2% - 2% - 3% - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - 1% 1% - YES/SELF/VETERAN 287 224 53 23 202 22 21 2 112 11 98 6 46 11 20 103 17 85 6 51 105 118 18 12% 13% 9% 7% 23% 2% 16% 1% 25% 3% 25% 2% 16% 2% 5% 20% 5% 24% 2% 12% 15% 14% 15% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/ACTIVE 109 58 50 29 22 36 8 20 12 37 11 8 14 25 17 32 7 12 17 22 30 42 10 5% 3% 9% 8% 2% 4% 7% 10% 3% 8% 3% 2% 5% 5% 5% 6% 2% 3% 5% 5% 4% 5% 8% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/VETERAN 330 238 86 43 66 172 8 35 34 95 27 60 24 85 26 103 35 52 37 70 95 113 19 14% 13% 15% 13% 8% 19% 6% 17% 8% 21% 7% 20% 8% 18% 7% 20% 10% 15% 11% 16% 14% 14% 15% NO 1695 1279 388 249 600 679 94 156 291 303 264 234 210 365 305 286 292 204 274 300 468 554 77 71% 72% 68% 74% 68% 75% 74% 75% 65% 69% 66% 77% 73% 76% 83% 55% 83% 59% 84% 69% 67% 67% 63% REFUSED 7 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL SELF 311 241 60 26 216 25 24 2 119 12 109 6 49 13 22 109 22 93 9 53 113 128 18 13% 14% 11% 8% 25% 3% 19% 1% 27% 3% 27% 2% 17% 3% 6% 21% 6% 27% 3% 12% 16% 16% 15% TOTAL HH 414 285 121 63 85 201 11 52 44 128 35 63 33 103 40 131 38 60 45 89 121 148 29 17% 16% 21% 19% 10% 22% 9% 25% 10% 29% 9% 21% 12% 22% 11% 25% 11% 17% 14% 20% 17% 18% 24% TOTAL ACTIVE 130 72 57 31 32 40 11 20 18 38 19 8 17 26 18 39 9 18 19 24 38 52 10 5% 4% 10% 9% 4% 4% 9% 10% 4% 9% 5% 3% 6% 6% 5% 7% 3% 5% 6% 6% 6% 6% 8% TOTAL VETERAN 605 451 139 65 260 191 29 36 143 104 123 65 67 95 45 203 52 134 43 117 196 227 36 25% 25% 24% 19% 30% 21% 22% 17% 32% 24% 31% 21% 23% 20% 12% 39% 15% 39% 13% 27% 28% 28% 29%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 218Table 42-3QUESTION D12:Are you, or is anyone in your household, an active member of the military or a military veteran? BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% **D/S (YES - NO) -997 -342 -320 -312 -214 -81 -82 -206 -42 -333 -253 -395 -241 -99 -124 -129 -160 -234 -96 -145 -25 -74 -565 -432 -42% -35% -39% -60% -34% -33% -35% -48% -41% -51% -40% -49% -44% -25% -41% -39% -41% -58% -35% -52% -15% -34% -47% -36% TOTAL YES 698 320 253 105 209 82 77 112 30 161 191 202 155 145 91 101 116 86 88 68 72 72 315 383--------- 29% 33% 31% 20% 33% 33% 33% 26% 29% 25% 30% 25% 28% 37% 30% 30% 30% 21% 32% 24% 43% 33% 26% 32% YES/SELF/ACTIVE 25 16 9 1 8 1 7 5 1 4 3 12 6 4 3 - 9 3 5 1 4 - 10 16 1% 2% 1% - 1% - 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 2% - 3% - 1% 1% YES/SELF/VETERAN 287 146 100 28 90 32 44 51 10 45 60 89 80 54 54 5 80 9 67 13 52 2 138 149 12% 15% 12% 5% 14% 13% 18% 12% 10% 7% 9% 11% 15% 14% 18% 2% 20% 2% 25% 5% 31% 1% 11% 12% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/ACTIVE 109 56 33 18 35 13 9 8 10 30 34 31 22 22 11 22 17 14 6 16 4 18 41 68 5% 6% 4% 3% 6% 5% 4% 2% 9% 5% 5% 4% 4% 6% 4% 7% 4% 3% 2% 6% 2% 8% 3% 6% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/VETERAN 330 138 125 61 88 39 28 55 19 90 111 86 62 72 34 77 21 65 17 44 16 56 153 177 14% 14% 15% 12% 14% 16% 12% 13% 19% 14% 17% 11% 11% 18% 11% 23% 5% 16% 6% 16% 9% 26% 13% 15% NO 1695 662 573 417 423 162 159 318 71 494 444 597 396 243 215 229 276 320 183 212 97 146 879 816 71% 67% 69% 80% 67% 66% 67% 74% 71% 75% 70% 75% 72% 63% 70% 69% 70% 79% 68% 76% 57% 67% 73% 68% REFUSED 7 - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - - - 4 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - TOTAL SELF 311 161 108 29 98 32 51 55 10 50 63 100 85 58 57 6 89 11 71 13 56 2 147 164 13% 16% 13% 6% 16% 13% 22% 13% 10% 8% 10% 13% 15% 15% 19% 2% 23% 3% 26% 5% 33% 1% 12% 14% TOTAL HH 414 176 153 77 117 53 33 60 21 115 133 111 80 89 37 96 36 75 23 57 19 70 179 234 17% 18% 19% 15% 19% 21% 14% 14% 21% 18% 21% 14% 15% 23% 12% 29% 9% 18% 8% 20% 11% 32% 15% 20% TOTAL ACTIVE 130 67 42 19 42 14 13 12 10 34 37 41 26 26 14 23 25 17 9 17 8 18 48 82 5% 7% 5% 4% 7% 6% 6% 3% 10% 5% 6% 5% 5% 7% 5% 7% 6% 4% 3% 6% 5% 8% 4% 7% TOTAL VETERAN 605 277 221 88 175 70 70 104 28 133 166 174 137 124 84 81 100 73 82 55 66 58 282 323 25% 28% 27% 17% 28% 29% 30% 24% 28% 20% 26% 22% 25% 32% 28% 24% 26% 18% 30% 19% 39% 27% 24% 27%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 219Table 42-4QUESTION D12:Are you, or is anyone in your household, an active member of the military or a military veteran? BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% **D/S (YES - NO) -997 -217 -732 -131 -140 -296 -611 -633 -328 -312 -272 -188 -148 -673 698 -1695 130 605 -308 -153 -106 -85 -46 -274 -42% -31% -47% -27% -40% -50% -38% -41% -43% -33% -33% -29% -29% -47% 100% -100% 100% 100% -40% -27% -40% -46% -36% -64% TOTAL YES 698 237 411 175 105 149 492 456 218 314 271 226 182 379 698 - 130 605 234 204 80 49 41 77--------- 29% 34% 26% 36% 30% 25% 31% 29% 29% 33% 33% 35% 36% 26% 100% - 100% 100% 30% 36% 30% 27% 32% 18% YES/SELF/ACTIVE 25 13 13 5 3 3 20 19 5 17 16 12 10 8 25 - 25 3 6 11 2 - - 5 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 4% - 20% 1% 1% 2% 1% - - 1% YES/SELF/VETERAN 287 105 164 74 43 56 217 194 85 150 134 112 97 137 287 - 10 287 98 83 27 20 14 35 12% 15% 11% 15% 12% 9% 14% 13% 11% 16% 16% 18% 19% 10% 41% - 8% 47% 13% 15% 10% 11% 11% 8% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/ACTIVE 109 43 58 33 11 19 78 64 38 47 35 37 25 61 109 - 109 34 27 38 13 13 7 8 5% 6% 4% 7% 3% 3% 5% 4% 5% 5% 4% 6% 5% 4% 16% - 84% 6% 3% 7% 5% 7% 5% 2% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/VETERAN 330 96 209 73 52 81 220 215 108 129 111 87 69 199 330 - 28 330 114 85 44 22 26 37 14% 14% 13% 15% 15% 14% 14% 14% 14% 14% 14% 14% 13% 14% 47% - 21% 55% 15% 15% 17% 12% 20% 9% NO 1695 454 1143 306 245 445 1103 1089 546 626 543 414 331 1052 - 1695 - - 542 357 186 134 87 351 71% 65% 74% 64% 70% 75% 69% 70% 71% 67% 67% 65% 64% 73% - 100% - - 70% 63% 70% 73% 68% 82% REFUSED 7 3 1 - - - 4 4 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 2 - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL SELF 311 117 175 80 46 59 235 212 89 166 150 123 107 144 311 - 34 289 103 94 29 20 14 40 13% 17% 11% 17% 13% 10% 15% 14% 12% 18% 18% 19% 21% 10% 45% - 26% 48% 13% 17% 11% 11% 11% 9% TOTAL HH 414 129 252 100 63 94 279 264 136 163 136 111 84 247 414 - 111 339 138 116 53 31 27 42 17% 19% 16% 21% 18% 16% 17% 17% 18% 17% 17% 17% 16% 17% 59% - 85% 56% 18% 21% 20% 17% 21% 10% TOTAL ACTIVE 130 54 69 38 14 22 93 81 41 62 48 48 35 67 130 - 130 37 31 47 15 13 7 13 5% 8% 4% 8% 4% 4% 6% 5% 5% 7% 6% 8% 7% 5% 19% - 100% 6% 4% 8% 6% 7% 6% 3% TOTAL VETERAN 605 195 367 144 94 135 428 398 191 273 241 195 163 328 605 - 37 605 207 166 71 42 39 68 25% 28% 24% 30% 27% 23% 27% 26% 25% 29% 30% 30% 32% 23% 87% - 29% 100% 27% 30% 27% 23% 30% 16%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 220Table 42-5QUESTION D12:Are you, or is anyone in your household, an active member of the military or a military veteran? BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% **D/S (YES - NO) -997 -482 -451 -58 -512 -765 -202 -527 -102 -355 -264 -650 -763 -207 -168 -753 -728 -230 -309 -174 -452 -690 -161 -128 -42% -49% -47% -62% -37% -41% -45% -47% -43% -37% -38% -43% -45% -32% -34% -44% -47% -32% -42% -35% -45% -42% -41% -42% TOTAL YES 698 255 250 17 443 552 125 298 66 305 216 426 458 221 165 471 410 239 213 164 276 471 116 87--------- 29% 26% 26% 19% 32% 29% 27% 27% 28% 31% 31% 28% 27% 34% 33% 28% 26% 34% 29% 33% 27% 29% 29% 28% YES/SELF/ACTIVE 25 14 14 - 11 18 7 3 2 20 6 19 15 9 9 16 13 7 3 8 13 17 6 3 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% YES/SELF/VETERAN 287 78 78 5 209 215 59 107 27 140 100 158 171 110 64 201 143 124 71 82 119 187 52 40 12% 8% 8% 6% 15% 11% 13% 10% 12% 14% 14% 10% 10% 17% 13% 12% 9% 17% 10% 16% 12% 11% 13% 13% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/ACTIVE 109 42 42 1 67 86 20 48 8 45 45 55 66 42 31 68 67 31 40 25 33 78 14 10 5% 4% 4% 1% 5% 5% 4% 4% 3% 5% 7% 4% 4% 6% 6% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 3% 5% 4% 3% YES/SOMEONE ELSE/VETERAN 330 140 135 11 191 269 55 161 37 122 84 226 240 81 72 222 223 92 113 62 131 228 49 41 14% 14% 14% 12% 14% 14% 12% 14% 16% 13% 12% 15% 14% 12% 15% 13% 14% 13% 15% 12% 13% 14% 12% 13% NO 1695 737 701 75 955 1317 327 825 168 659 480 1076 1221 428 333 1224 1139 468 522 338 729 1160 277 215 71% 74% 74% 81% 68% 70% 72% 73% 72% 68% 69% 71% 72% 66% 67% 72% 73% 66% 71% 67% 72% 71% 70% 70% REFUSED 7 - - - 2 5 2 2 - 5 2 5 5 2 - 6 5 2 - 2 5 3 - 4 - - - - - - 1% - - 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% TOTAL SELF 311 93 93 5 218 232 66 111 28 160 106 175 185 118 73 215 154 131 73 89 132 203 58 43 13% 9% 10% 6% 16% 12% 14% 10% 12% 16% 15% 12% 11% 18% 15% 13% 10% 18% 10% 18% 13% 12% 15% 14% TOTAL HH 414 169 164 12 245 335 70 196 41 159 120 266 290 113 98 273 272 116 148 81 155 287 60 48 17% 17% 17% 13% 17% 18% 15% 17% 18% 16% 17% 18% 17% 17% 20% 16% 18% 16% 20% 16% 15% 18% 15% 16% TOTAL ACTIVE 130 53 53 1 77 101 27 50 9 63 49 72 80 47 38 81 77 37 42 29 46 93 20 11 5% 5% 6% 1% 6% 5% 6% 4% 4% 6% 7% 5% 5% 7% 8% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 5% 6% 5% 3% TOTAL VETERAN 605 218 213 17 387 478 108 264 61 259 180 376 403 186 133 416 356 212 178 142 246 406 99 80 25% 22% 22% 18% 28% 25% 24% 23% 26% 27% 26% 25% 24% 29% 27% 24% 23% 30% 24% 28% 24% 25% 25% 26%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 221Table 43-1QUESTION D13:Gender. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% MALE 1152 192 192 192 192 192 192 1152 - 231 251 211 224 233 482 435 233 - - - 447 398 288 48% 48% 48% 48% 48% 48% 48% 100% - 48% 44% 52% 45% 54% 100% 100% 100% - - - 50% 57% 37% FEMALE 1248 208 208 208 208 208 208 - 1248 249 325 191 276 199 - - - 574 468 199 441 304 480 52% 52% 52% 52% 52% 52% 52% - 100% 52% 56% 48% 55% 46% - - - 100% 100% 100% 50% 43% 63%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 222Table 43-2QUESTION D13:Gender. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% MALE 1152 881 242 127 881 - 127 - 447 - 398 - 288 - 172 274 196 201 107 180 344 412 68 48% 49% 43% 38% 100% - 100% - 100% - 100% - 100% - 47% 53% 56% 58% 33% 41% 50% 50% 55% FEMALE 1248 903 325 209 - 903 - 209 - 441 - 304 - 480 194 246 154 147 220 256 350 410 55 52% 51% 57% 62% - 100% - 100% - 100% - 100% - 100% 53% 47% 44% 42% 67% 59% 50% 50% 45%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 223Table 43-3QUESTION D13:Gender. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% MALE 1152 512 391 212 322 120 145 232 36 245 306 392 271 169 306 - 392 - 271 - 169 - 575 577 48% 52% 47% 41% 51% 49% 61% 54% 36% 37% 48% 49% 49% 44% 100% - 100% - 100% - 100% - 48% 48% FEMALE 1248 471 435 310 310 125 91 198 64 410 332 406 280 219 - 332 - 406 - 280 - 219 623 625 52% 48% 53% 59% 49% 51% 39% 46% 64% 63% 52% 51% 51% 56% - 100% - 100% - 100% - 100% 52% 52%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 224Table 43-4QUESTION D13:Gender. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% MALE 1152 376 722 258 164 284 795 735 380 598 539 409 350 548 371 777 56 337 325 289 117 81 91 219 48% 54% 46% 54% 47% 48% 50% 47% 50% 64% 66% 64% 68% 38% 53% 46% 43% 56% 42% 51% 44% 44% 71% 51% FEMALE 1248 318 832 223 186 310 803 814 384 343 276 231 164 884 327 918 74 268 451 274 149 102 38 211 52% 46% 54% 46% 53% 52% 50% 53% 50% 36% 34% 36% 32% 62% 47% 54% 57% 44% 58% 49% 56% 56% 29% 49%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 225Table 43-5QUESTION D13:Gender. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% MALE 1152 449 429 62 699 860 254 484 139 499 375 689 702 423 223 854 657 429 287 306 504 743 208 176 48% 45% 45% 68% 50% 46% 56% 43% 59% 52% 54% 46% 42% 65% 45% 50% 42% 61% 39% 61% 50% 45% 53% 58% FEMALE 1248 543 522 30 701 1013 200 641 95 470 323 817 982 228 276 847 897 280 448 198 506 891 184 129 52% 55% 55% 32% 50% 54% 44% 57% 41% 48% 46% 54% 58% 35% 55% 50% 58% 39% 61% 39% 50% 55% 47% 42%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 226Table 44-1STATE. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% ARIZONA 866 400 - - - - - 397 469 150 212 146 185 169 128 167 102 233 164 66 342 223 291 36% 100% - - - - - 34% 38% 31% 37% 36% 37% 39% 27% 38% 44% 41% 35% 33% 38% 32% 38% COLORADO 692 - 400 - - - - 347 345 151 170 119 128 120 177 105 64 145 143 56 225 204 244 29% - 100% - - - - 30% 28% 32% 30% 30% 26% 28% 37% 24% 28% 25% 31% 28% 25% 29% 32% MONTANA 139 - - 400 - - - 69 70 30 30 23 28 27 31 25 13 28 27 15 36 69 30 6% - - 100% - - - 6% 6% 6% 5% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 6% 7% 4% 10% 4% NEW MEXICO 280 - - - 400 - - 132 148 48 53 48 76 55 43 62 26 57 62 28 90 49 135 12% - - - 100% - - 11% 12% 10% 9% 12% 15% 13% 9% 14% 11% 10% 13% 14% 10% 7% 18% UTAH 345 - - - - 400 - 168 177 88 93 53 62 48 86 60 22 94 56 25 146 144 52 14% - - - - 100% - 15% 14% 18% 16% 13% 12% 11% 18% 14% 9% 16% 12% 13% 16% 21% 7% WYOMING 78 - - - - - 400 38 40 12 19 12 21 14 16 17 6 15 17 8 48 12 16 3% - - - - - 100% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 4% 4% 5% 2% 2%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 227Table 44-2STATE. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% ARIZONA 866 604 246 139 297 306 38 101 172 169 116 107 105 186 138 202 104 117 115 174 262 298 43 36% 34% 43% 41% 34% 34% 30% 48% 39% 38% 29% 35% 36% 39% 38% 39% 30% 34% 35% 40% 38% 36% 35% COLORADO 692 526 143 81 270 257 34 48 119 106 136 69 83 161 84 140 112 93 120 122 137 174 29 29% 30% 25% 24% 31% 28% 27% 23% 27% 24% 34% 23% 29% 33% 23% 27% 32% 27% 37% 28% 20% 21% 24% MONTANA 139 123 15 1 58 65 1 - 17 19 39 31 11 19 15 21 32 37 12 19 70 83 21 6% 7% 3% - 7% 7% 1% - 4% 4% 10% 10% 4% 4% 4% 4% 9% 11% 4% 4% 10% 10% 17% NEW MEXICO 280 146 130 95 71 75 42 54 42 48 29 20 57 78 33 57 21 29 48 87 73 85 5 12% 8% 23% 28% 8% 8% 33% 26% 10% 11% 7% 7% 20% 16% 9% 11% 6% 8% 15% 20% 11% 10% 4% UTAH 345 315 26 15 152 163 10 5 70 76 72 72 26 26 77 69 75 68 27 24 113 135 11 14% 18% 5% 4% 17% 18% 8% 2% 16% 17% 18% 24% 9% 5% 21% 13% 22% 19% 8% 6% 16% 16% 9% WYOMING 78 70 8 4 33 37 3 1 26 23 6 5 6 10 19 30 6 5 6 10 39 47 13 3% 4% 1% 1% 4% 4% 2% 1% 6% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 6% 2% 1% 2% 2% 6% 6% 11%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 228Table 44-3STATE. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% ARIZONA 866 357 286 200 236 106 69 140 48 235 321 297 141 103 157 164 136 162 60 81 43 60 432 434 36% 36% 35% 38% 37% 43% 29% 32% 48% 36% 50% 37% 26% 27% 51% 49% 35% 40% 22% 29% 25% 27% 36% 36% COLORADO 692 248 248 172 160 60 67 126 16 228 157 272 148 102 68 90 150 122 77 72 44 58 345 347 29% 25% 30% 33% 25% 24% 28% 29% 16% 35% 25% 34% 27% 26% 22% 27% 38% 30% 28% 26% 26% 26% 29% 29% MONTANA 139 58 53 24 27 10 25 41 5 25 13 15 56 54 6 7 5 9 28 27 28 26 69 70 6% 6% 6% 5% 4% 4% 10% 9% 5% 4% 2% 2% 10% 14% 2% 2% 1% 2% 10% 10% 17% 12% 6% 6% NEW MEXICO 280 111 99 60 70 17 13 33 26 106 76 48 79 72 38 38 25 23 40 38 26 46 140 140 12% 11% 12% 12% 11% 7% 6% 8% 26% 16% 12% 6% 14% 19% 12% 11% 6% 6% 15% 14% 15% 21% 12% 12% UTAH 345 172 112 55 110 33 57 83 2 49 62 160 84 37 32 30 73 88 44 40 19 18 172 173 14% 17% 14% 10% 17% 14% 24% 19% 2% 7% 10% 20% 15% 10% 11% 9% 19% 22% 16% 14% 11% 8% 14% 14% WYOMING 78 36 29 11 29 19 5 7 3 12 8 6 44 19 5 4 3 2 22 22 8 11 39 39 3% 4% 3% 2% 5% 8% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 8% 5% 2% 1% 1% 1% 8% 8% 5% 5% 3% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 229Table 44-4STATE. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% ARIZONA 866 256 559 199 128 224 572 530 310 295 250 181 135 563 273 593 52 233 245 224 117 61 52 146 36% 37% 36% 41% 36% 38% 36% 34% 41% 31% 31% 28% 26% 39% 39% 35% 40% 39% 32% 40% 44% 34% 40% 34% COLORADO 692 191 462 123 88 181 462 466 201 264 232 172 140 419 182 504 37 157 259 144 49 61 45 125 29% 27% 30% 25% 25% 30% 29% 30% 26% 28% 28% 27% 27% 29% 26% 30% 29% 26% 33% 26% 18% 33% 35% 29% MONTANA 139 39 91 21 13 29 97 96 37 82 75 70 63 57 44 95 10 36 41 34 18 9 7 27 6% 6% 6% 4% 4% 5% 6% 6% 5% 9% 9% 11% 12% 4% 6% 6% 8% 6% 5% 6% 7% 5% 5% 6% NEW MEXICO 280 81 179 57 25 89 164 190 78 117 96 89 68 155 106 174 17 97 90 54 41 27 10 49 12% 12% 12% 12% 7% 15% 10% 12% 10% 12% 12% 14% 13% 11% 15% 10% 13% 16% 12% 10% 15% 15% 8% 11% UTAH 345 97 217 56 75 58 247 211 117 132 120 88 76 210 71 275 10 62 117 82 35 20 14 69 14% 14% 14% 12% 21% 10% 15% 14% 15% 14% 15% 14% 15% 15% 10% 16% 8% 10% 15% 15% 13% 11% 11% 16% WYOMING 78 30 45 25 21 14 58 56 20 49 43 38 31 28 23 55 3 20 25 25 7 5 2 13 3% 4% 3% 5% 6% 2% 4% 4% 3% 5% 5% 6% 6% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 230Table 44-5STATE. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% ARIZONA 866 365 342 30 499 680 160 430 67 341 276 526 617 230 184 630 576 255 320 155 346 633 147 68 36% 37% 36% 33% 36% 36% 35% 38% 29% 35% 39% 35% 37% 35% 37% 37% 37% 36% 44% 31% 34% 39% 37% 22% COLORADO 692 291 281 30 397 535 141 315 79 285 196 438 491 184 141 488 456 199 168 169 306 446 113 110 29% 29% 30% 32% 28% 29% 31% 28% 34% 29% 28% 29% 29% 28% 28% 29% 29% 28% 23% 34% 30% 27% 29% 36% MONTANA 139 56 55 5 82 111 22 51 21 61 45 80 90 43 30 92 77 52 35 31 60 88 24 21 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 9% 6% 6% 5% 5% 7% 6% 5% 5% 7% 5% 6% 6% 5% 6% 7% NEW MEXICO 280 99 99 7 180 225 47 144 28 98 83 176 195 78 65 187 190 71 105 53 108 201 38 30 12% 10% 10% 8% 13% 12% 10% 13% 12% 10% 12% 12% 12% 12% 13% 11% 12% 10% 14% 11% 11% 12% 10% 10% UTAH 345 154 149 17 191 260 72 157 30 146 77 237 242 90 62 252 215 100 92 69 155 224 58 53 14% 16% 16% 18% 14% 14% 16% 14% 13% 15% 11% 16% 14% 14% 12% 15% 14% 14% 12% 14% 15% 14% 15% 17% WYOMING 78 27 27 3 50 62 12 28 10 39 21 48 48 28 18 53 40 33 15 25 34 42 12 22 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 5% 2% 5% 3% 3% 3% 7%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 231Table 45-1Arizona./DMA. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 400 - - - - - 397 469 150 212 146 185 169 128 167 102 233 164 66 342 223 291 100% 46% - - - - - 46% 54% 17% 24% 17% 21% 19% 15% 19% 12% 27% 19% 8% 39% 26% 34% ALBUQUERQUE 20 6 - - - - - 8 12 13 - - 2 5 4 2 2 9 - 4 17 2 2 2% 1% - - - - - 2% 3% 9% - - 1% 3% 3% 1% 2% 4% - 5% 5% 1% 1% PHOENIX 649 309 - - - - - 307 342 94 171 117 126 137 97 124 87 168 119 50 256 187 196 75% 77% - - - - - 77% 73% 63% 81% 80% 68% 81% 75% 74% 85% 72% 73% 75% 75% 84% 67% TUCSON 176 76 - - - - - 69 106 35 39 27 52 23 22 38 10 52 41 13 66 24 86 20% 19% - - - - - 17% 23% 23% 18% 18% 28% 14% 17% 23% 10% 22% 25% 20% 19% 11% 29% YUMA 21 9 - - - - - 13 8 8 2 2 5 3 6 4 3 4 4 - 4 10 7 2% 2% - - - - - 3% 2% 5% 1% 1% 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 2% - 1% 4% 3%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 232Table 45-2Arizona./DMA. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 604 246 139 297 306 38 101 172 169 116 107 105 186 138 202 104 117 115 174 262 298 43 100% 70% 28% 16% 34% 35% 4% 12% 20% 20% 13% 12% 12% 21% 16% 23% 12% 14% 13% 20% 30% 34% 5% ALBUQUERQUE 20 7 13 - 4 4 - - 6 10 2 - - 2 13 4 - 2 - 2 8 12 4 2% 1% 5% - 1% 1% - - 4% 6% 2% - - 1% 9% 2% - 2% - 1% 3% 4% 10% PHOENIX 649 479 155 91 238 241 19 72 132 124 102 85 70 126 97 157 81 104 82 113 198 223 33 75% 79% 63% 65% 80% 79% 50% 71% 77% 73% 88% 80% 66% 68% 70% 78% 78% 89% 71% 65% 76% 75% 76% TUCSON 176 107 69 42 51 56 13 29 31 35 7 17 32 54 28 38 15 10 32 54 53 60 6 20% 18% 28% 31% 17% 18% 34% 29% 18% 21% 6% 16% 30% 29% 20% 19% 14% 8% 27% 31% 20% 20% 14% YUMA 21 11 9 6 5 6 6 - 4 - 6 4 3 4 - 4 8 2 2 5 4 4 - 2% 2% 4% 4% 2% 2% 15% - 2% - 5% 4% 3% 2% - 2% 8% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 233Table 45-3Arizona./DMA. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 357 286 200 236 106 69 140 48 235 321 297 141 103 157 164 136 162 60 81 43 60 432 434 100% 41% 33% 23% 27% 12% 8% 16% 6% 27% 37% 34% 16% 12% 18% 19% 16% 19% 7% 9% 5% 7% 50% 50% ALBUQUERQUE 20 7 9 4 4 13 2 - 2 - - - 11 10 - - - - 4 6 4 6 8 13 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 12% 3% - 4% - - - 8% 9% - - - - 7% 8% 9% 10% 2% 3% PHOENIX 649 254 241 138 174 82 60 117 17 173 247 245 90 64 132 114 115 130 33 57 25 39 316 333 75% 71% 84% 69% 74% 77% 87% 84% 35% 74% 77% 82% 64% 62% 84% 70% 85% 81% 55% 70% 59% 64% 73% 77% TUCSON 176 85 33 54 55 11 2 18 28 58 71 51 27 28 23 48 19 31 15 12 12 15 93 83 20% 24% 11% 27% 23% 10% 3% 13% 57% 25% 22% 17% 19% 27% 15% 29% 14% 19% 25% 15% 28% 26% 21% 19% YUMA 21 11 4 4 4 - 6 4 2 4 4 2 14 2 2 2 2 - 8 6 2 - 16 5 2% 3% 1% 2% 1% - 8% 3% 4% 2% 1% 1% 10% 2% 1% 1% 1% - 13% 8% 4% - 4% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 234Table 45-4Arizona./DMA. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 256 559 199 128 224 572 530 310 295 250 181 135 563 273 593 52 233 245 224 117 61 52 146 100% 30% 65% 23% 15% 26% 66% 61% 36% 34% 29% 21% 16% 65% 31% 69% 6% 27% 28% 26% 14% 7% 6% 17% ALBUQUERQUE 20 14 4 12 4 4 12 12 4 6 6 6 6 12 6 14 4 2 4 5 4 - - 6 2% 5% 1% 6% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% 4% 2% 2% 2% 8% 1% 2% 2% 4% - - 4% PHOENIX 649 180 436 143 101 155 441 400 240 209 179 123 94 437 204 446 32 178 181 176 96 44 34 105 75% 70% 78% 72% 79% 69% 77% 76% 77% 71% 72% 68% 69% 78% 75% 75% 61% 76% 74% 79% 82% 72% 66% 72% TUCSON 176 58 102 40 22 61 102 110 57 67 50 40 23 107 58 118 14 49 54 37 14 15 16 33 20% 23% 18% 20% 17% 27% 18% 21% 18% 23% 20% 22% 17% 19% 21% 20% 27% 21% 22% 17% 12% 25% 30% 22% YUMA 21 4 17 4 - 4 17 7 9 14 14 12 12 7 5 16 2 5 6 5 2 2 2 2 2% 1% 3% 2% - 2% 3% 1% 3% 5% 5% 7% 9% 1% 2% 3% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 4% 1%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 235Table 45-5Arizona./DMA. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 365 342 30 499 680 160 430 67 341 276 526 617 230 184 630 576 255 320 155 346 633 147 68 100% 42% 40% 4% 58% 79% 18% 50% 8% 39% 32% 61% 71% 27% 21% 73% 67% 29% 37% 18% 40% 73% 17% 8% ALBUQUERQUE 20 2 2 - 19 19 2 15 5 - 14 4 11 10 7 13 6 14 4 8 8 13 3 4 2% - 1% - 4% 3% 1% 3% 8% - 5% 1% 2% 4% 4% 2% 1% 5% 1% 5% 2% 2% 2% 6% PHOENIX 649 282 266 23 366 508 127 310 53 261 210 393 456 185 129 477 439 191 226 116 274 466 118 52 75% 77% 78% 77% 73% 75% 79% 72% 79% 77% 76% 75% 74% 81% 70% 76% 76% 75% 71% 75% 79% 74% 80% 77% TUCSON 176 68 61 7 108 135 32 97 9 68 48 114 137 30 44 123 117 43 75 27 63 134 26 12 20% 19% 18% 23% 22% 20% 20% 23% 13% 20% 17% 22% 22% 13% 24% 19% 20% 17% 23% 17% 18% 21% 17% 17% YUMA 21 14 14 - 7 19 - 8 - 11 4 15 14 5 4 17 14 7 15 4 2 19 - - 2% 4% 4% - 1% 3% - 2% - 3% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 5% 3% 1% 3% - -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 236Table 46-1Arizona./Region. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 400 - - - - - 397 469 150 212 146 185 169 128 167 102 233 164 66 342 223 291 100% 46% - - - - - 46% 54% 17% 24% 17% 21% 19% 15% 19% 12% 27% 19% 8% 39% 26% 34% MARICOPA 520 234 - - - - - 258 263 85 133 108 95 96 84 111 62 134 92 34 191 154 168 60% 59% - - - - - 65% 56% 57% 63% 74% 52% 57% 65% 67% 61% 57% 56% 51% 56% 69% 58% NORTH 115 56 - - - - - 44 71 20 19 9 32 34 11 14 19 28 27 15 67 22 24 13% 14% - - - - - 11% 15% 13% 9% 6% 17% 20% 8% 9% 19% 12% 17% 22% 20% 10% 8% PIMA 145 64 - - - - - 46 98 23 37 24 44 18 12 30 5 48 38 13 50 22 72 17% 16% - - - - - 12% 21% 15% 17% 16% 24% 11% 9% 18% 5% 20% 23% 20% 15% 10% 25% SOUTH 86 46 - - - - - 49 37 23 24 5 14 20 22 12 15 24 7 5 34 25 27 10% 11% - - - - - 12% 8% 15% 11% 4% 7% 12% 17% 7% 15% 10% 4% 8% 10% 11% 9%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 237Table 46-2Arizona./Region. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 604 246 139 297 306 38 101 172 169 116 107 105 186 138 202 104 117 115 174 262 298 43 100% 70% 28% 16% 34% 35% 4% 12% 20% 20% 13% 12% 12% 21% 16% 23% 12% 14% 13% 20% 30% 34% 5% MARICOPA 520 367 137 79 197 170 16 63 102 88 85 69 66 101 72 118 71 81 69 97 140 161 30 60% 61% 56% 57% 66% 55% 41% 63% 59% 52% 73% 64% 63% 54% 52% 59% 69% 69% 60% 56% 53% 54% 68% NORTH 115 93 23 4 34 58 - 4 29 38 12 10 3 21 30 36 2 20 6 18 51 60 8 13% 15% 9% 3% 12% 19% - 4% 17% 23% 10% 10% 3% 11% 22% 18% 2% 17% 6% 10% 20% 20% 18% PIMA 145 89 56 29 33 56 8 21 18 32 5 17 23 49 23 27 15 8 22 51 39 46 4 17% 15% 23% 21% 11% 18% 21% 21% 10% 19% 4% 16% 22% 26% 17% 13% 14% 7% 19% 29% 15% 16% 8% SOUTH 86 55 30 27 33 22 14 12 23 11 14 11 12 15 13 21 15 9 18 9 31 31 3 10% 9% 12% 19% 11% 7% 38% 12% 13% 6% 12% 10% 11% 8% 9% 10% 15% 8% 16% 5% 12% 11% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 238Table 46-3Arizona./Region. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 357 286 200 236 106 69 140 48 235 321 297 141 103 157 164 136 162 60 81 43 60 432 434 100% 41% 33% 23% 27% 12% 8% 16% 6% 27% 37% 34% 16% 12% 18% 19% 16% 19% 7% 9% 5% 7% 50% 50% MARICOPA 520 187 199 120 126 64 48 98 9 152 245 236 16 20 132 113 113 123 6 10 5 15 249 271 60% 52% 70% 60% 54% 61% 69% 71% 19% 65% 76% 79% 11% 19% 84% 69% 83% 76% 10% 12% 11% 25% 58% 63% NORTH 115 49 42 23 38 29 6 14 5 19 2 1 72 40 - 2 - 1 25 47 20 21 53 63 13% 14% 15% 11% 16% 28% 8% 10% 11% 8% 1% 1% 51% 39% - 1% - 1% 41% 58% 45% 35% 12% 14% PIMA 145 66 23 52 45 5 2 16 19 53 66 51 12 16 18 48 19 31 5 7 4 12 82 62 17% 18% 8% 26% 19% 5% 3% 12% 40% 23% 20% 17% 9% 16% 11% 29% 14% 19% 9% 9% 9% 20% 19% 14% SOUTH 86 56 22 6 27 7 14 11 15 11 9 9 42 27 7 2 3 5 24 17 15 12 48 38 10% 16% 8% 3% 11% 7% 20% 8% 30% 4% 3% 3% 29% 26% 4% 1% 2% 3% 41% 21% 34% 20% 11% 9%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 239Table 46-4Arizona./Region. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 256 559 199 128 224 572 530 310 295 250 181 135 563 273 593 52 233 245 224 117 61 52 146 100% 30% 65% 23% 15% 26% 66% 61% 36% 34% 29% 21% 16% 65% 31% 69% 6% 27% 28% 26% 14% 7% 6% 17% MARICOPA 520 128 362 104 75 126 352 315 199 140 123 78 60 377 157 364 28 134 149 125 88 38 25 86 60% 50% 65% 52% 59% 56% 62% 59% 64% 47% 49% 43% 44% 67% 57% 61% 54% 58% 61% 56% 75% 62% 49% 59% NORTH 115 54 58 45 23 29 76 82 29 57 48 42 32 56 40 75 4 36 29 39 8 4 9 23 13% 21% 10% 22% 18% 13% 13% 16% 9% 19% 19% 23% 24% 10% 15% 13% 8% 15% 12% 18% 7% 6% 17% 16% PIMA 145 40 93 26 21 56 80 94 46 51 42 26 17 91 38 107 6 32 49 25 13 15 10 25 17% 16% 17% 13% 16% 25% 14% 18% 15% 17% 17% 14% 12% 16% 14% 18% 11% 14% 20% 11% 11% 25% 20% 17% SOUTH 86 34 47 25 9 13 64 38 36 47 37 36 26 39 38 48 14 31 18 35 8 4 7 12 10% 13% 8% 12% 7% 6% 11% 7% 12% 16% 15% 20% 19% 7% 14% 8% 27% 13% 7% 15% 7% 7% 14% 8%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 240Table 46-5Arizona./Region. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 866 365 342 30 499 680 160 430 67 341 276 526 617 230 184 630 576 255 320 155 346 633 147 68 100% 42% 40% 4% 58% 79% 18% 50% 8% 39% 32% 61% 71% 27% 21% 73% 67% 29% 37% 18% 40% 73% 17% 8% MARICOPA 520 238 223 20 280 410 97 243 44 208 167 318 371 143 87 394 362 139 176 89 223 379 87 41 60% 65% 65% 66% 56% 60% 61% 56% 66% 61% 60% 60% 60% 62% 47% 63% 63% 54% 55% 57% 64% 60% 59% 60% NORTH 115 33 33 3 83 90 24 72 14 30 46 64 73 40 39 72 65 51 43 25 47 87 14 14 13% 9% 10% 11% 17% 13% 15% 17% 21% 9% 17% 12% 12% 18% 21% 11% 11% 20% 13% 16% 14% 14% 10% 20% PIMA 145 55 50 7 90 104 32 78 7 58 38 95 118 19 28 107 102 29 63 16 54 108 24 9 17% 15% 15% 23% 18% 15% 20% 18% 10% 17% 14% 18% 19% 8% 15% 17% 18% 11% 20% 10% 16% 17% 16% 13% SOUTH 86 39 37 - 46 77 7 37 2 45 25 50 56 27 29 56 48 36 38 25 22 58 21 5 10% 11% 11% - 9% 11% 5% 9% 3% 13% 9% 9% 9% 12% 16% 9% 8% 14% 12% 16% 6% 9% 14% 7%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 241Table 47-1Colorado./DMA. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 - 400 - - - - 347 345 151 170 119 128 120 177 105 64 145 143 56 225 204 244 100% - 58% - - - - 50% 50% 22% 25% 17% 19% 17% 26% 15% 9% 21% 21% 8% 33% 30% 35% ALBUQUERQUE/SANTA FE 16 - 7 - - - - 9 8 5 4 - 3 4 6 2 1 4 1 3 10 3 3 2% - 2% - - - - 3% 2% 4% 2% - 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 5% 5% 2% 1% COLORADO SPRINGS/PUEBLO 101 - 69 - - - - 44 57 16 7 22 25 30 10 22 12 12 25 19 42 28 28 15% - 17% - - - - 13% 16% 10% 4% 18% 20% 25% 6% 21% 18% 8% 17% 34% 18% 14% 12% DENVER 535 - 308 - - - - 267 267 122 150 91 92 79 149 71 46 123 112 32 161 154 203 77% - 77% - - - - 77% 77% 81% 88% 77% 72% 66% 84% 68% 72% 85% 79% 58% 72% 76% 83% GRAND JUNCTION/MONTROSE 40 - 16 - - - - 27 13 8 10 6 8 7 11 9 5 7 4 2 12 18 9 6% - 4% - - - - 8% 4% 5% 6% 5% 6% 6% 6% 9% 7% 5% 3% 4% 5% 9% 4%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 242Table 47-2Colorado./DMA. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 526 143 81 270 257 34 48 119 106 136 69 83 161 84 140 112 93 120 122 137 174 29 100% 76% 21% 12% 39% 37% 5% 7% 17% 15% 20% 10% 12% 23% 12% 20% 16% 13% 17% 18% 20% 25% 4% ALBUQUERQUE/SANTA FE 16 16 - - 9 8 - - 7 3 - 3 1 1 7 3 2 1 - 3 5 9 - 2% 3% - - 3% 3% - - 6% 3% - 5% 2% 1% 9% 2% 2% 2% - 2% 4% 5% - COLORADO SPRINGS/PUEBLO 101 65 33 20 33 32 7 13 20 22 15 14 10 18 9 33 8 20 5 22 22 28 5 15% 12% 23% 25% 12% 12% 21% 27% 16% 21% 11% 20% 12% 11% 11% 23% 7% 21% 4% 18% 16% 16% 16% DENVER 535 412 104 61 202 210 27 35 86 75 107 47 65 139 61 100 93 62 113 91 106 129 22 77% 78% 73% 75% 75% 82% 79% 73% 72% 71% 79% 69% 78% 86% 72% 72% 83% 67% 94% 74% 77% 74% 76% GRAND JUNCTION/MONTROSE 40 33 5 - 27 6 - - 6 6 14 5 6 3 7 4 9 9 2 7 4 8 2 6% 6% 4% - 10% 2% - - 5% 5% 10% 7% 8% 2% 8% 3% 8% 10% 2% 6% 3% 5% 7%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 243Table 47-3Colorado./DMA. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 248 248 172 160 60 67 126 16 228 157 272 148 102 68 90 150 122 77 72 44 58 345 347 100% 36% 36% 25% 23% 9% 10% 18% 2% 33% 23% 39% 21% 15% 10% 13% 22% 18% 11% 10% 6% 8% 50% 50% ALBUQUERQUE/SANTA FE 16 8 2 3 7 2 - 2 1 1 - - 6 10 - - - - 5 1 4 6 13 3 2% 3% 1% 2% 4% 3% - 1% 8% 1% - - 4% 10% - - - - 7% 2% 8% 11% 4% 1% COLORADO SPRINGS/PUEBLO 101 44 34 19 31 11 9 17 3 26 24 17 36 21 6 18 6 11 22 14 7 14 59 42 15% 18% 14% 11% 19% 18% 14% 14% 16% 11% 15% 6% 25% 21% 9% 20% 4% 9% 29% 20% 17% 24% 17% 12% DENVER 535 174 197 147 112 46 48 99 10 193 132 241 90 61 60 72 137 104 39 51 25 36 250 284 77% 70% 79% 85% 70% 77% 71% 78% 66% 85% 84% 89% 61% 60% 89% 80% 91% 85% 51% 72% 57% 63% 72% 82% GRAND JUNCTION/MONTROSE 40 22 15 3 11 1 10 9 2 8 1 14 15 10 1 - 7 7 10 5 8 1 22 18 6% 9% 6% 2% 7% 2% 14% 7% 10% 3% 1% 5% 10% 9% 2% - 5% 5% 13% 7% 18% 3% 6% 5%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 244Table 47-4Colorado./DMA. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 191 462 123 88 181 462 466 201 264 232 172 140 419 182 504 37 157 259 144 49 61 45 125 100% 28% 67% 18% 13% 26% 67% 67% 29% 38% 34% 25% 20% 61% 26% 73% 5% 23% 37% 21% 7% 9% 6% 18% ALBUQUERQUE/SANTA FE 16 9 8 7 4 5 11 11 3 12 12 9 9 4 3 14 1 3 1 5 1 2 - 6 2% 5% 2% 6% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 6% 1% 2% 3% 4% 2% - 4% 3% 3% - 4% COLORADO SPRINGS/PUEBLO 101 35 63 22 19 15 75 72 26 33 24 27 18 67 35 64 7 31 31 33 4 6 1 25 15% 18% 14% 18% 22% 8% 16% 15% 13% 12% 10% 16% 13% 16% 19% 13% 20% 20% 12% 23% 8% 10% 3% 20% DENVER 535 130 374 88 64 149 351 355 163 194 172 119 97 333 132 398 24 115 216 86 43 50 43 87 77% 68% 81% 72% 72% 82% 76% 76% 81% 73% 74% 69% 69% 80% 72% 79% 66% 73% 84% 60% 89% 83% 97% 69% GRAND JUNCTION/MONTROSE 40 16 18 5 1 12 24 28 10 25 24 17 16 14 12 28 4 8 10 19 - 3 - 8 6% 9% 4% 4% 1% 6% 5% 6% 5% 10% 10% 10% 11% 3% 7% 6% 11% 5% 4% 13% - 5% - 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 245Table 47-5Colorado./DMA. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 291 281 30 397 535 141 315 79 285 196 438 491 184 141 488 456 199 168 169 306 446 113 110 100% 42% 41% 4% 57% 77% 20% 45% 11% 41% 28% 63% 71% 27% 20% 71% 66% 29% 24% 24% 44% 64% 16% 16% ALBUQUERQUE/SANTA FE 16 2 2 - 15 14 1 5 5 7 7 8 6 7 1 14 10 3 3 5 7 7 1 8 2% 1% 1% - 4% 3% 1% 2% 6% 2% 3% 2% 1% 4% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 7% COLORADO SPRINGS/PUEBLO 101 40 40 2 61 79 22 55 13 32 27 65 73 26 24 71 66 33 26 20 46 61 23 9 15% 14% 14% 6% 15% 15% 16% 17% 17% 11% 14% 15% 15% 14% 17% 15% 15% 17% 16% 12% 15% 14% 20% 8% DENVER 535 235 225 28 296 417 105 249 50 225 145 347 394 132 106 377 369 140 126 131 239 361 78 80 77% 81% 80% 94% 74% 78% 75% 79% 63% 79% 74% 79% 80% 72% 75% 77% 81% 70% 75% 77% 78% 81% 69% 73% GRAND JUNCTION/MONTROSE 40 15 15 - 25 26 12 7 11 21 17 19 18 19 10 27 11 22 12 14 14 16 11 13 6% 5% 5% - 6% 5% 8% 2% 14% 7% 9% 4% 4% 10% 7% 6% 2% 11% 7% 8% 5% 4% 9% 12%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 246Table 48-1Colorado./Region. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 - 400 - - - - 347 345 151 170 119 128 120 177 105 64 145 143 56 225 204 244 100% - 58% - - - - 50% 50% 22% 25% 17% 19% 17% 26% 15% 9% 21% 21% 8% 33% 30% 35% COLORADO SPRINGS 73 - 55 - - - - 26 47 5 11 18 18 19 4 17 6 13 20 13 24 22 24 11% - 14% - - - - 8% 14% 4% 7% 15% 14% 16% 2% 16% 9% 9% 14% 23% 10% 11% 10% DENVER 99 - 52 - - - - 47 52 33 27 11 9 19 34 3 10 26 17 9 20 25 52 14% - 13% - - - - 14% 15% 22% 16% 10% 7% 16% 19% 3% 16% 18% 12% 15% 9% 12% 21% EASTERN PLAINS 124 - 70 - - - - 48 76 30 29 16 23 25 23 12 14 37 27 12 53 36 33 18% - 17% - - - - 14% 22% 20% 17% 13% 18% 21% 13% 11% 22% 26% 19% 21% 24% 18% 13% NORTH SUBURBS 103 - 60 - - - - 57 46 23 23 19 26 13 32 18 7 13 27 6 22 36 42 15% - 15% - - - - 16% 13% 15% 13% 16% 20% 11% 18% 17% 11% 9% 19% 11% 10% 18% 17% SOUTH/WEST SUBURBS 202 - 111 - - - - 120 82 40 63 42 32 26 67 36 17 35 37 9 72 55 65 29% - 28% - - - - 35% 24% 26% 37% 35% 25% 22% 38% 35% 26% 24% 26% 16% 32% 27% 27% WESTERN SLOPE 92 - 52 - - - - 48 44 21 18 14 21 18 17 19 10 21 15 7 35 30 27 13% - 13% - - - - 14% 13% 14% 10% 11% 16% 15% 10% 19% 16% 14% 11% 13% 15% 15% 11% DENVER METRO 326 - 179 - - - - 177 149 75 92 59 52 48 108 43 26 60 68 22 90 99 128 47% - 45% - - - - 51% 43% 50% 54% 49% 41% 40% 61% 41% 41% 41% 47% 39% 40% 48% 53%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 247Table 48-2Colorado./Region. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 526 143 81 270 257 34 48 119 106 136 69 83 161 84 140 112 93 120 122 137 174 29 100% 76% 21% 12% 39% 37% 5% 7% 17% 15% 20% 10% 12% 23% 12% 20% 16% 13% 17% 18% 20% 25% 4% COLORADO SPRINGS 73 50 20 7 24 26 - 7 13 10 7 15 6 18 3 20 10 12 3 19 11 14 3 11% 9% 14% 8% 9% 10% - 14% 11% 10% 5% 22% 7% 11% 4% 14% 9% 13% 3% 16% 8% 8% 11% DENVER 99 70 25 17 30 40 10 7 6 14 17 8 22 30 5 15 22 3 30 22 14 14 4 14% 13% 17% 21% 11% 16% 29% 15% 5% 13% 13% 11% 26% 19% 6% 10% 20% 3% 25% 18% 10% 8% 15% EASTERN PLAINS 124 94 26 20 37 57 7 13 15 38 24 13 8 25 21 32 18 19 21 12 30 42 6 18% 18% 18% 25% 14% 22% 21% 28% 13% 36% 17% 18% 9% 16% 25% 23% 16% 20% 17% 10% 22% 24% 20% NORTH SUBURBS 103 86 16 11 45 40 7 4 15 7 28 8 14 28 7 15 22 14 15 28 12 19 1 15% 16% 11% 14% 17% 16% 22% 8% 12% 7% 21% 12% 17% 18% 8% 11% 20% 15% 12% 23% 9% 11% 4% SOUTH/WEST SUBURBS 202 147 47 22 87 60 10 12 51 21 41 14 23 43 32 40 28 27 41 24 53 59 9 29% 28% 33% 27% 32% 23% 29% 26% 43% 19% 30% 20% 27% 27% 37% 29% 25% 30% 34% 20% 39% 34% 33% WESTERN SLOPE 92 80 9 4 47 33 - 4 19 16 19 11 11 16 16 18 13 17 9 18 17 25 5 13% 15% 6% 5% 17% 13% - 8% 16% 15% 14% 16% 13% 10% 19% 13% 11% 18% 8% 15% 12% 15% 17% DENVER METRO 326 241 73 43 126 115 23 21 52 39 76 23 44 84 33 58 64 35 65 63 61 72 12 47% 46% 51% 53% 47% 45% 67% 43% 43% 36% 56% 33% 53% 52% 39% 41% 57% 38% 55% 51% 45% 42% 43%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 248Table 48-3Colorado./Region. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 248 248 172 160 60 67 126 16 228 157 272 148 102 68 90 150 122 77 72 44 58 345 347 100% 36% 36% 25% 23% 9% 10% 18% 2% 33% 23% 39% 21% 15% 10% 13% 22% 18% 11% 10% 6% 8% 50% 50% COLORADO SPRINGS 73 33 21 17 18 6 12 10 1 23 21 12 15 23 6 15 3 9 7 7 7 16 37 35 11% 13% 9% 10% 11% 9% 18% 8% 7% 10% 13% 4% 10% 23% 9% 16% 2% 7% 9% 10% 16% 28% 11% 10% DENVER 99 14 41 36 9 8 6 17 - 52 74 18 2 1 40 34 5 13 - 2 - 1 44 55 14% 6% 16% 21% 5% 13% 8% 14% - 23% 47% 7% 1% 1% 59% 38% 3% 11% - 3% - 2% 13% 16% EASTERN PLAINS 124 56 42 22 37 16 14 21 5 28 13 23 70 14 2 11 11 12 32 38 2 13 69 55 18% 23% 17% 13% 23% 26% 20% 17% 32% 12% 8% 8% 47% 14% 2% 13% 8% 10% 42% 53% 4% 22% 20% 16% NORTH SUBURBS 103 26 42 33 20 3 5 29 2 41 9 62 18 12 3 6 34 29 13 5 6 6 45 57 15% 11% 17% 19% 12% 4% 8% 23% 10% 18% 6% 23% 12% 12% 5% 6% 22% 24% 17% 7% 14% 11% 13% 17% SOUTH/WEST SUBURBS 202 73 76 48 47 25 17 34 5 60 35 143 12 11 15 20 90 53 5 7 9 2 91 111 29% 29% 30% 28% 29% 42% 26% 27% 33% 26% 23% 53% 8% 10% 23% 22% 60% 44% 7% 9% 20% 3% 26% 32% WESTERN SLOPE 92 46 27 16 30 3 13 15 3 24 5 14 32 40 1 4 7 7 19 12 21 20 59 33 13% 18% 11% 9% 19% 6% 19% 12% 18% 11% 3% 5% 21% 39% 2% 4% 5% 5% 25% 17% 46% 34% 17% 9% DENVER METRO 326 91 129 92 63 24 23 69 3 125 106 168 32 15 50 56 96 72 20 12 7 8 141 185 47% 37% 52% 54% 39% 40% 34% 55% 20% 55% 67% 62% 21% 15% 73% 63% 64% 59% 26% 17% 17% 13% 41% 54%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 249Table 48-4Colorado./Region. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 191 462 123 88 181 462 466 201 264 232 172 140 419 182 504 37 157 259 144 49 61 45 125 100% 28% 67% 18% 13% 26% 67% 67% 29% 38% 34% 25% 20% 61% 26% 73% 5% 23% 37% 21% 7% 9% 6% 18% COLORADO SPRINGS 73 27 43 15 9 12 53 54 18 24 18 17 11 47 35 36 3 35 18 23 3 3 1 24 11% 14% 9% 12% 10% 6% 11% 12% 9% 9% 8% 10% 8% 11% 19% 7% 8% 22% 7% 16% 6% 4% 3% 19% DENVER 99 7 85 7 10 40 50 61 34 25 25 9 9 71 23 74 3 23 44 3 7 22 12 7 14% 4% 18% 6% 11% 22% 11% 13% 17% 9% 11% 5% 6% 17% 13% 15% 9% 15% 17% 2% 15% 36% 26% 6% EASTERN PLAINS 124 39 80 25 25 22 94 80 38 47 37 36 27 75 35 87 9 28 51 33 8 8 3 20 18% 20% 17% 20% 28% 12% 20% 17% 19% 18% 16% 21% 19% 18% 19% 17% 24% 18% 20% 23% 16% 14% 7% 16% NORTH SUBURBS 103 22 71 14 6 40 54 79 19 42 37 31 25 60 22 81 3 18 42 10 10 2 14 26 15% 12% 15% 11% 7% 22% 12% 17% 10% 16% 16% 18% 18% 14% 12% 16% 9% 12% 16% 7% 20% 3% 32% 20% SOUTH/WEST SUBURBS 202 60 133 40 32 40 153 132 65 72 63 42 34 128 48 154 13 38 81 34 19 22 13 28 29% 31% 29% 33% 36% 22% 33% 28% 32% 27% 27% 25% 24% 31% 26% 31% 35% 24% 31% 24% 39% 36% 30% 22% WESTERN SLOPE 92 36 50 22 8 27 58 61 27 55 52 37 34 37 19 73 5 15 23 39 1 4 1 21 13% 19% 11% 18% 9% 15% 13% 13% 14% 21% 22% 22% 24% 9% 10% 14% 15% 10% 9% 27% 3% 7% 3% 17% DENVER METRO 326 65 236 46 38 106 200 221 93 113 106 71 65 210 78 246 13 70 138 30 26 39 33 54 47% 34% 51% 38% 43% 58% 43% 47% 46% 43% 46% 41% 46% 50% 43% 49% 35% 45% 53% 21% 53% 64% 73% 43%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 250Table 48-5Colorado./Region. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 692 291 281 30 397 535 141 315 79 285 196 438 491 184 141 488 456 199 168 169 306 446 113 110 100% 42% 41% 4% 57% 77% 20% 45% 11% 41% 28% 63% 71% 27% 20% 71% 66% 29% 24% 24% 44% 64% 16% 16% COLORADO SPRINGS 73 25 25 - 47 50 23 39 12 21 19 44 51 21 19 48 51 22 17 14 34 46 18 6 11% 9% 9% - 12% 9% 16% 12% 15% 7% 10% 10% 10% 11% 13% 10% 11% 11% 10% 8% 11% 10% 16% 5% DENVER 99 46 40 4 51 82 16 51 5 41 16 80 87 12 14 82 85 9 20 18 52 79 11 6 14% 16% 14% 12% 13% 15% 11% 16% 6% 14% 8% 18% 18% 7% 10% 17% 19% 5% 12% 11% 17% 18% 10% 6% EASTERN PLAINS 124 68 68 8 54 93 30 59 10 52 43 75 86 34 31 81 70 46 29 40 45 79 18 20 18% 23% 24% 28% 14% 17% 21% 19% 13% 18% 22% 17% 17% 19% 22% 17% 15% 23% 17% 23% 15% 18% 16% 18% NORTH SUBURBS 103 39 37 7 63 87 14 53 14 35 21 76 82 19 16 72 79 20 25 12 55 74 15 11 15% 13% 13% 24% 16% 16% 10% 17% 18% 12% 11% 17% 17% 10% 12% 15% 17% 10% 15% 7% 18% 17% 13% 10% SOUTH/WEST SUBURBS 202 83 80 9 119 158 36 86 20 92 58 117 140 59 39 144 128 63 48 56 86 123 35 40 29% 29% 29% 31% 30% 29% 26% 27% 26% 32% 30% 27% 28% 32% 28% 29% 28% 32% 29% 33% 28% 28% 31% 37% WESTERN SLOPE 92 30 30 1 62 67 21 27 18 44 38 47 46 40 22 61 44 39 28 29 34 45 17 26 13% 10% 11% 5% 16% 13% 15% 9% 23% 15% 19% 11% 9% 22% 16% 12% 10% 20% 17% 17% 11% 10% 15% 24% DENVER METRO 326 134 124 20 190 268 51 157 27 138 72 227 256 65 57 237 236 71 85 63 158 230 48 40 47% 46% 44% 67% 48% 50% 36% 50% 34% 48% 37% 52% 52% 36% 41% 49% 52% 36% 50% 37% 52% 52% 42% 37%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 251Table 49-1Montana./DMA. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 139 - - 400 - - - 69 70 30 30 23 28 27 31 25 13 28 27 15 36 69 30 100% - - 288% - - - 50% 50% 21% 22% 17% 20% 20% 22% 18% 9% 20% 19% 11% 26% 50% 22% BILLINGS 30 - - 91 - - - 16 14 9 8 4 5 4 9 5 2 7 4 3 9 15 6 22% - - 23% - - - 23% 20% 29% 27% 19% 17% 16% 30% 20% 13% 26% 16% 18% 25% 21% 19% BUTTE 24 - - 69 - - - 13 11 6 7 4 4 3 7 5 1 5 4 2 4 13 7 18% - - 17% - - - 19% 16% 19% 23% 19% 16% 11% 23% 20% 7% 18% 15% 14% 11% 19% 23% GLENDIVE 2 - - 4 - - - 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 1 - - - - 2 - 1% - - 1% - - - 1% 1% 2% - 2% - 4% - 1% 5% 2% - 2% - 3% - GREAT FALLS 23 - - 64 - - - 11 12 5 3 4 5 6 4 4 3 4 4 3 7 8 6 16% - - 16% - - - 16% 17% 15% 12% 15% 18% 21% 13% 17% 20% 14% 16% 22% 20% 12% 20% HELENA 10 - - 29 - - - 4 6 1 2 3 3 1 - 2 1 3 4 - 3 5 2 7% - - 7% - - - 6% 9% 3% 7% 13% 10% 5% 1% 9% 10% 9% 14% - 7% 8% 7% MINOT-BISMARCK-DICKINSON 6 - - 14 - - - 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 - 1 1 2 - 1 5 - 4% - - 4% - - - 4% 5% 3% 7% 6% 2% 4% 5% - 8% 4% 7% - 2% 7% 1% MISSOULA 41 - - 121 - - - 20 21 8 7 6 10 10 8 8 5 7 8 6 12 20 8 30% - - 30% - - - 29% 30% 28% 22% 27% 35% 38% 25% 31% 38% 25% 31% 39% 32% 29% 28% RAPID CITY - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - 2% - - 1% SPOKANE 2 - - 7 - - - 1 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - - 1 1 - 2% - - 2% - - - 2% 1% 1% 3% - 2% 1% 2% 1% - 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% EAST/CENTRAL DMAS 61 - - 174 - - - 31 30 15 14 10 10 12 15 10 6 13 11 7 17 29 13 44% - - 44% - - - 44% 43% 49% 46% 41% 37% 45% 48% 38% 45% 46% 39% 45% 47% 42% 41% WEST DMAS 78 - - 226 - - - 38 39 15 16 14 18 15 16 15 7 15 16 8 19 40 18 56% - - 56% - - - 56% 57% 51% 54% 59% 63% 55% 52% 62% 55% 54% 61% 55% 53% 58% 59%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 252Table 49-2Montana./DMA. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 139 123 15 1 58 65 1 - 17 19 39 31 11 19 15 21 32 37 12 19 70 83 21 100% 89% 11% 1% 42% 47% 1% - 12% 14% 28% 22% 8% 14% 11% 15% 23% 26% 8% 13% 50% 60% 15% BILLINGS 30 30 - - 16 14 - - 5 4 7 7 3 3 5 4 8 6 3 3 17 19 4 22% 24% 3% - 27% 22% - - 29% 21% 19% 24% 25% 15% 35% 18% 25% 17% 28% 14% 25% 23% 18% BUTTE 24 23 1 - 12 11 - - 2 2 9 5 2 5 3 1 7 6 2 5 10 13 4 18% 19% 8% - 21% 17% - - 12% 10% 22% 15% 22% 24% 22% 4% 22% 17% 18% 26% 14% 16% 20% GLENDIVE 2 1 1 - - 1 - - - - 1 1 - - - - - 1 - - 1 2 - 1% 1% 4% - 1% 1% - - - - 2% 3% - - - - 1% 4% - - 1% 2% - GREAT FALLS 23 18 5 1 7 11 1 - 3 4 4 4 3 3 2 6 4 5 2 4 10 12 3 16% 14% 33% 43% 11% 17% 43% - 17% 23% 10% 14% 31% 14% 12% 26% 11% 13% 20% 20% 14% 15% 14% HELENA 10 9 1 - 3 6 - - - 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 - 5 1 1 6 6 2 7% 7% 10% - 5% 9% - - 2% 12% 8% 8% 6% 7% 9% 5% 1% 14% 10% 5% 9% 8% 7% MINOT-BISMARCK-DICKINSON 6 4 2 - 3 1 - - - 1 3 2 - - 1 - 2 3 - - 4 5 1 4% 3% 15% - 5% 1% - - - 3% 7% 7% - 2% 4% - 7% 7% - 2% 5% 6% 3% MISSOULA 41 37 4 1 17 20 1 - 6 5 12 8 2 7 2 9 10 10 3 6 21 24 8 30% 30% 27% 57% 29% 31% 57% - 36% 29% 31% 27% 17% 34% 15% 44% 30% 29% 25% 30% 30% 29% 36% RAPID CITY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - 2% - - - - - 2% - - - SPOKANE 2 2 - - 1 1 - - 1 - - - - - - 1 1 - - - 1 1 - 2% 2% - - 2% 2% - - 4% 2% 1% 1% - 2% 2% 3% 3% - - 2% 1% 1% 2% EAST/CENTRAL DMAS 61 53 8 1 25 28 1 - 8 9 15 15 6 6 8 9 14 15 6 7 32 38 8 44% 43% 55% 43% 44% 42% 43% - 46% 48% 38% 48% 56% 32% 52% 44% 44% 41% 47% 37% 46% 46% 35% WEST DMAS 78 71 7 1 33 38 1 - 9 10 24 16 5 13 7 12 18 22 6 12 38 45 14 56% 57% 45% 57% 56% 58% 57% - 54% 52% 62% 52% 44% 68% 48% 56% 56% 59% 53% 63% 54% 54% 65%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 253Table 49-3Montana./DMA. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 139 58 53 24 27 10 25 41 5 25 13 15 56 54 6 7 5 9 28 27 28 26 69 70 100% 41% 38% 17% 19% 7% 18% 29% 4% 18% 9% 11% 40% 39% 5% 5% 4% 7% 20% 20% 20% 19% 50% 50% BILLINGS 30 14 10 5 7 2 6 8 - 5 3 6 11 10 2 2 1 4 7 4 6 4 14 17 22% 24% 20% 22% 27% 21% 25% 19% 7% 21% 27% 39% 20% 19% 29% 24% 26% 47% 25% 15% 21% 16% 20% 24% BUTTE 24 9 10 5 3 1 5 8 2 5 3 2 13 7 2 - 1 1 6 7 4 3 12 12 18% 16% 20% 20% 10% 14% 18% 21% 36% 21% 21% 12% 23% 13% 37% 5% 18% 8% 21% 25% 14% 12% 18% 17% GLENDIVE 2 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - - - - 1 1 - - - - - 1 1 - - 1 1% 1% 1% 3% - - 3% 3% - - - - 1% 2% - - - - - 3% 3% - 1% 2% GREAT FALLS 23 9 9 4 5 2 2 5 2 5 3 2 8 9 1 2 1 1 4 4 5 4 10 12 16% 16% 16% 15% 19% 24% 7% 13% 31% 18% 25% 14% 15% 16% 24% 27% 10% 16% 14% 16% 17% 15% 15% 18% HELENA 10 4 4 1 1 2 3 3 - 2 1 1 3 5 - 1 - 1 2 1 2 3 5 5 7% 7% 8% 6% 3% 17% 10% 6% 8% 7% 8% 10% 5% 8% - 16% - 16% 6% 3% 7% 10% 8% 7% MINOT-BISMARCK-DICKINSON 6 2 4 - - 1 2 3 - - - - 2 3 - - - - 1 1 1 2 3 2 4% 3% 7% - - 6% 8% 7% - 1% - - 4% 6% - - - - 5% 4% 4% 8% 5% 4% MISSOULA 41 17 14 8 10 1 7 12 1 8 2 4 16 19 1 2 2 1 8 8 9 10 23 19 30% 30% 27% 34% 38% 15% 27% 30% 12% 31% 19% 25% 29% 34% 10% 27% 46% 13% 28% 31% 31% 37% 33% 27% RAPID CITY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - 1% - - 1% - - - - - - 1% - - - - SPOKANE 2 1 - - 1 - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - 1 1 - 1 1 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 7% - - - 2% 2% - - - - 1% 2% 3% 1% 2% 1% EAST/CENTRAL DMAS 61 26 24 9 12 5 10 17 2 11 7 8 23 23 3 3 2 6 13 11 13 10 28 33 44% 45% 45% 39% 46% 50% 43% 42% 37% 42% 52% 53% 41% 42% 53% 51% 36% 63% 44% 39% 45% 39% 40% 48% WEST DMAS 78 32 29 15 14 5 14 23 3 15 6 7 33 31 3 3 3 3 16 17 16 16 42 36 56% 55% 55% 61% 54% 50% 57% 58% 63% 58% 48% 47% 59% 58% 47% 49% 64% 37% 56% 61% 55% 61% 60% 52%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 254Table 49-4Montana./DMA. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 139 39 91 21 13 29 97 96 37 82 75 70 63 57 44 95 10 36 41 34 18 9 7 27 100% 28% 65% 15% 10% 21% 70% 69% 26% 59% 54% 50% 45% 41% 32% 68% 7% 26% 30% 24% 13% 7% 5% 19% BILLINGS 30 9 20 5 3 7 21 21 7 19 15 16 12 12 8 22 2 7 11 7 3 1 2 6 22% 23% 22% 25% 25% 24% 22% 22% 20% 23% 20% 22% 19% 21% 18% 24% 16% 20% 28% 20% 16% 11% 36% 21% BUTTE 24 5 19 2 2 7 14 17 6 14 13 12 10 10 6 19 1 5 6 4 3 3 1 7 18% 13% 21% 10% 13% 24% 15% 18% 16% 18% 17% 17% 16% 18% 12% 20% 10% 13% 14% 13% 18% 31% 11% 27% GLENDIVE 2 1 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 - - - - - 1% 3% 1% - - 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% - 2% 3% 1% 2% - - - GREAT FALLS 23 5 16 3 4 3 17 14 7 13 12 12 11 10 7 15 2 5 7 8 3 2 - 2 16% 13% 18% 15% 27% 10% 17% 15% 20% 16% 16% 18% 18% 17% 16% 16% 20% 14% 17% 23% 20% 21% 6% 7% HELENA 10 2 7 1 2 2 7 7 2 6 6 5 5 4 5 5 1 5 4 2 1 1 - 2 7% 5% 8% 3% 12% 9% 7% 8% 5% 8% 8% 8% 8% 7% 11% 5% 10% 13% 9% 6% 7% 7% 5% 6% MINOT-BISMARCK-DICKINSON 6 2 4 - 1 1 5 3 2 4 4 3 3 2 2 3 - 2 2 1 1 - - 1 4% 4% 4% - 4% 2% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 3% 5% 4% 4% 7% 4% 4% 7% 3% - 4% MISSOULA 41 14 24 9 2 8 30 30 11 23 22 20 19 18 15 27 4 11 10 11 5 3 2 9 30% 35% 26% 44% 16% 27% 31% 31% 30% 28% 30% 29% 30% 32% 33% 28% 40% 31% 25% 32% 28% 27% 37% 32% RAPID CITY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - 1% 1% - - 1% - - 2% - - - SPOKANE 2 1 1 1 - - 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 - - 2 - - - 1 - - - 1 2% 3% 1% 3% 2% - 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% - - 5% 3% EAST/CENTRAL DMAS 61 17 40 9 7 11 44 41 17 36 32 32 28 25 19 42 4 16 21 16 8 3 3 8 44% 44% 44% 40% 56% 40% 46% 42% 47% 44% 43% 46% 44% 43% 42% 45% 41% 43% 52% 48% 47% 35% 41% 31% WEST DMAS 78 22 51 13 6 17 53 56 20 46 43 38 35 32 26 52 6 21 20 18 9 6 4 19 56% 56% 56% 60% 44% 60% 54% 58% 53% 56% 57% 54% 56% 57% 58% 55% 59% 57% 48% 52% 53% 65% 59% 69%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 255Table 49-5Montana./DMA. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 139 56 55 5 82 111 22 51 21 61 45 80 90 43 30 92 77 52 35 31 60 88 24 21 100% 40% 39% 4% 59% 80% 16% 37% 15% 44% 33% 58% 65% 31% 21% 66% 55% 37% 25% 23% 43% 63% 17% 15% BILLINGS 30 14 14 1 16 24 4 10 5 15 8 19 21 8 7 20 16 13 7 7 14 18 5 6 22% 25% 25% 29% 19% 22% 19% 19% 23% 25% 18% 24% 23% 20% 25% 22% 20% 25% 21% 23% 23% 21% 19% 28% BUTTE 24 9 9 2 16 21 3 11 3 9 7 16 16 7 2 19 17 7 6 6 11 16 4 3 18% 16% 16% 32% 19% 19% 13% 21% 15% 15% 16% 20% 18% 17% 7% 20% 22% 13% 17% 18% 19% 18% 18% 15% GLENDIVE 2 - - - 1 2 - - - 1 1 - - 1 - 1 - 2 - - 1 1 - 1 1% 1% 1% - 2% 2% - 1% 2% 2% 3% 1% - 3% 1% 2% - 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% GREAT FALLS 23 8 8 - 15 18 4 7 4 11 9 12 14 8 8 12 13 9 6 4 9 16 3 2 16% 14% 14% - 18% 16% 20% 14% 17% 19% 19% 15% 15% 18% 26% 14% 17% 18% 17% 13% 16% 18% 14% 10% HELENA 10 5 5 1 5 9 1 4 1 5 5 5 7 2 2 8 6 3 4 2 3 8 1 2 7% 10% 9% 18% 6% 8% 5% 7% 3% 8% 10% 6% 8% 4% 6% 8% 8% 5% 11% 6% 5% 9% 3% 8% MINOT-BISMARCK-DICKINSON 6 2 2 - 3 5 1 2 2 2 1 5 3 2 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 4% 4% 4% 6% 4% 4% 4% 4% 7% 3% 3% 6% 4% 5% 9% 3% 4% 5% 2% 7% 4% 3% 3% 8% MISSOULA 41 17 17 1 24 31 8 15 7 16 13 22 27 13 7 27 21 15 10 9 19 24 10 6 30% 30% 30% 15% 29% 28% 38% 30% 31% 27% 28% 28% 30% 31% 25% 30% 28% 30% 27% 28% 31% 28% 41% 27% RAPID CITY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2% 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SPOKANE 2 - - - 2 2 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 - 2 - - 2% 1% 1% - 2% 2% - 3% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 3% 1% 2% - 2% EAST/CENTRAL DMAS 61 24 24 2 36 48 10 20 10 29 19 36 39 19 18 37 31 26 15 14 27 38 9 10 44% 44% 44% 35% 44% 44% 44% 39% 50% 48% 43% 45% 43% 45% 61% 40% 41% 51% 42% 45% 44% 43% 38% 49% WEST DMAS 78 31 31 3 46 63 12 31 10 31 26 44 51 23 12 55 45 25 21 17 33 50 15 11 56% 56% 56% 65% 56% 56% 56% 61% 50% 52% 57% 55% 57% 55% 39% 60% 59% 49% 58% 55% 56% 57% 62% 51%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 256Table 50-1New Mexico./DMA. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 - - - 400 - - 132 148 48 53 48 76 55 43 62 26 57 62 28 90 49 135 100% - - - 143% - - 47% 53% 17% 19% 17% 27% 20% 15% 22% 9% 21% 22% 10% 32% 18% 48% ALBUQUERQUE-SANTE FE 249 - - - 352 - - 117 133 44 46 43 67 49 40 53 23 50 57 26 78 42 124 89% - - - 88% - - 88% 90% 90% 87% 90% 89% 90% 91% 86% 88% 87% 92% 92% 87% 85% 92% AMARILLO 6 - - - 13 - - 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 - 3 - 1 - 1 3 1 2 2% - - - 3% - - 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% 2% 3% - 4% - 2% 1% 5% 3% 1% 1% EL PASO 25 - - - 35 - - 13 12 4 6 3 7 4 4 6 3 6 5 1 9 7 9 9% - - - 9% - - 10% 8% 8% 11% 7% 10% 8% 9% 10% 12% 11% 8% 3% 10% 14% 6%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 257Table 50-2New Mexico./DMA. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 146 130 95 71 75 42 54 42 48 29 20 57 78 33 57 21 29 48 87 73 85 5 100% 52% 46% 34% 25% 27% 15% 19% 15% 17% 10% 7% 20% 28% 12% 20% 7% 10% 17% 31% 26% 30% 2% ALBUQUERQUE-SANTE FE 249 129 117 84 63 66 35 49 37 41 26 16 50 74 28 50 15 27 46 78 62 73 5 89% 89% 90% 88% 89% 89% 85% 91% 87% 86% 89% 79% 89% 94% 87% 86% 72% 94% 97% 89% 85% 86% 100% AMARILLO 6 4 1 - 1 3 - - - 2 1 - 1 1 1 2 - 1 - 2 3 3 - 2% 3% - - 1% 4% - - 1% 5% 2% - 2% 1% 4% 3% - 2% - 2% 4% 3% - EL PASO 25 12 13 11 7 5 6 5 5 4 3 4 5 3 3 6 6 1 1 7 9 9 - 9% 8% 10% 12% 9% 7% 15% 9% 12% 9% 9% 21% 9% 4% 9% 11% 28% 4% 3% 9% 12% 11% -


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 258Table 50-3New Mexico./DMA. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 111 99 60 70 17 13 33 26 106 76 48 79 72 38 38 25 23 40 38 26 46 140 140 100% 40% 35% 22% 25% 6% 5% 12% 9% 38% 27% 17% 28% 26% 14% 13% 9% 8% 14% 14% 9% 17% 50% 50% ALBUQUERQUE-SANTE FE 249 97 87 56 60 14 12 27 24 98 72 42 65 66 36 35 22 20 32 33 24 42 130 120 89% 87% 88% 93% 86% 85% 87% 83% 90% 93% 95% 88% 82% 91% 96% 93% 87% 88% 78% 86% 92% 90% 93% 85% AMARILLO 6 3 2 - 2 - - 1 1 1 - - 2 4 - - - - 2 - 1 3 1 5 2% 3% 2% - 3% 3% - 2% 2% 1% - - 2% 6% - - - - 4% - 4% 7% 1% 4% EL PASO 25 11 10 4 7 2 2 5 2 7 4 6 13 2 2 2 3 3 7 5 1 1 9 16 9% 10% 10% 7% 10% 12% 13% 15% 8% 6% 5% 12% 16% 3% 4% 7% 13% 12% 18% 14% 4% 3% 7% 11%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 259Table 50-4New Mexico./DMA. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 81 179 57 25 89 164 190 78 117 96 89 68 155 106 174 17 97 90 54 41 27 10 49 100% 29% 64% 20% 9% 32% 58% 68% 28% 42% 34% 32% 24% 55% 38% 62% 6% 35% 32% 19% 14% 10% 4% 18% ALBUQUERQUE-SANTE FE 249 69 160 48 22 81 144 168 72 109 91 82 64 134 91 158 13 83 85 49 34 22 10 41 89% 86% 89% 85% 87% 91% 88% 88% 93% 93% 95% 92% 94% 86% 86% 91% 77% 86% 94% 89% 85% 84% 100% 82% AMARILLO 6 2 4 2 1 1 5 4 1 2 1 2 1 3 3 3 1 2 3 1 - 1 - 1 2% 3% 2% 3% 4% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 7% 2% 3% 2% - 4% - 2% EL PASO 25 9 15 7 2 7 15 18 5 6 4 5 3 18 12 12 3 11 3 5 6 3 - 8 9% 12% 8% 12% 8% 8% 9% 9% 6% 5% 4% 6% 4% 12% 12% 7% 16% 12% 3% 9% 15% 12% - 15%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 260Table 50-5New Mexico./DMA. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 99 99 7 180 225 47 144 28 98 83 176 195 78 65 187 190 71 105 53 108 201 38 30 100% 36% 35% 2% 64% 80% 17% 51% 10% 35% 30% 63% 70% 28% 23% 67% 68% 25% 37% 19% 39% 72% 14% 11% ALBUQUERQUE-SANTE FE 249 85 85 6 164 201 41 133 24 84 75 156 177 67 54 170 171 61 92 50 97 181 33 27 89% 85% 86% 92% 91% 90% 86% 93% 87% 86% 90% 88% 91% 86% 83% 91% 90% 86% 87% 94% 89% 90% 86% 89% AMARILLO 6 3 3 - 3 5 1 3 1 1 2 3 3 3 2 4 4 2 3 1 2 4 1 1 2% 3% 3% - 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% EL PASO 25 12 11 1 13 19 6 7 2 12 6 18 16 8 10 13 15 8 11 2 9 16 5 2 9% 12% 11% 8% 7% 8% 12% 5% 8% 12% 7% 10% 8% 10% 15% 7% 8% 12% 10% 4% 9% 8% 12% 8%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 261Table 51-1New Mexico./Region. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 - - - 400 - - 132 148 48 53 48 76 55 43 62 26 57 62 28 90 49 135 100% - - - 143% - - 47% 53% 17% 19% 17% 27% 20% 15% 22% 9% 21% 22% 10% 32% 18% 48% EAST 38 - - - 59 - - 21 18 3 7 6 13 9 8 8 5 2 11 5 16 7 13 14% - - - 15% - - 16% 12% 7% 13% 12% 17% 17% 19% 12% 18% 3% 18% 16% 18% 14% 10% GREATER ALBUQUERQUE 130 - - - 186 - - 63 67 23 23 25 30 28 19 31 13 27 24 16 44 19 64 46% - - - 46% - - 48% 45% 47% 44% 52% 40% 52% 43% 50% 48% 47% 39% 55% 49% 38% 47% NORTH 46 - - - 61 - - 19 27 9 9 8 16 4 7 10 2 12 13 2 10 5 31 16% - - - 15% - - 14% 18% 19% 18% 16% 21% 7% 15% 16% 8% 21% 22% 6% 11% 10% 23% NORTHWEST 29 - - - 40 - - 10 19 8 6 5 7 5 4 5 1 9 6 4 10 7 12 11% - - - 10% - - 8% 13% 16% 11% 10% 9% 9% 10% 8% 4% 16% 10% 13% 11% 15% 9% SOUTHWEST 37 - - - 54 - - 19 17 5 7 5 10 9 5 8 6 7 7 3 11 11 14 13% - - - 13% - - 15% 12% 11% 14% 11% 13% 16% 12% 13% 22% 13% 11% 10% 12% 23% 10%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 262Table 51-2New Mexico./Region. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 146 130 95 71 75 42 54 42 48 29 20 57 78 33 57 21 29 48 87 73 85 5 100% 52% 46% 34% 25% 27% 15% 19% 15% 17% 10% 7% 20% 28% 12% 20% 7% 10% 17% 31% 26% 30% 2% EAST 38 22 14 9 9 13 7 2 7 9 6 1 7 7 5 11 3 5 3 11 15 15 1 14% 15% 11% 10% 13% 18% 17% 4% 16% 19% 21% 6% 12% 8% 15% 19% 13% 16% 6% 12% 21% 18% 10% GREATER ALBUQUERQUE 130 68 61 49 36 32 18 30 20 23 12 7 29 36 14 30 6 12 25 38 37 42 2 46% 47% 47% 51% 51% 43% 44% 56% 48% 49% 40% 34% 50% 45% 43% 52% 30% 43% 53% 44% 50% 49% 41% NORTH 46 23 22 20 10 13 6 14 7 3 3 2 10 22 6 4 1 3 12 20 4 8 2 16% 16% 17% 21% 14% 17% 15% 26% 16% 6% 9% 12% 17% 28% 17% 7% 7% 12% 25% 23% 6% 9% 40% NORTHWEST 29 10 19 5 4 7 2 3 3 7 4 4 4 9 5 4 3 4 5 7 7 10 - 11% 7% 14% 5% 5% 9% 6% 5% 7% 14% 12% 19% 7% 11% 16% 8% 14% 15% 11% 8% 10% 11% - SOUTHWEST 37 22 15 12 12 10 7 5 6 6 5 6 8 6 3 8 7 4 2 11 10 11 - 13% 15% 12% 13% 16% 13% 17% 9% 13% 12% 18% 30% 14% 7% 9% 14% 36% 14% 5% 13% 14% 13% 9%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 263Table 51-3New Mexico./Region. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 111 99 60 70 17 13 33 26 106 76 48 79 72 38 38 25 23 40 38 26 46 140 140 100% 40% 35% 22% 25% 6% 5% 12% 9% 38% 27% 17% 28% 26% 14% 13% 9% 8% 14% 14% 9% 17% 50% 50% EAST 38 20 15 1 13 3 2 4 4 9 2 1 18 15 1 1 1 - 10 7 7 8 15 23 14% 18% 15% 2% 19% 16% 12% 13% 16% 9% 3% 3% 22% 21% 4% 2% 5% - 26% 19% 26% 17% 11% 17% GREATER ALBUQUERQUE 130 52 40 36 33 9 5 13 12 52 67 33 11 16 34 34 16 16 5 6 6 10 67 63 46% 46% 41% 60% 47% 52% 40% 40% 46% 49% 89% 68% 14% 23% 88% 89% 65% 71% 13% 15% 23% 23% 48% 45% NORTH 46 13 17 13 7 2 1 4 6 24 1 4 20 21 1 - 3 1 7 12 8 13 27 19 16% 12% 17% 22% 9% 10% 6% 12% 22% 23% 1% 8% 25% 29% 2% - 10% 6% 18% 32% 30% 29% 19% 13% NORTHWEST 29 12 12 3 8 2 3 3 1 11 2 4 12 12 1 1 2 2 6 6 2 9 15 14 11% 11% 12% 5% 11% 10% 19% 9% 5% 10% 2% 9% 15% 16% 1% 3% 7% 11% 14% 15% 9% 20% 11% 10% SOUTHWEST 37 15 14 7 9 2 3 8 3 10 4 6 19 8 2 2 3 3 12 7 3 5 16 21 13% 14% 15% 11% 13% 12% 23% 25% 12% 10% 5% 12% 24% 11% 4% 7% 13% 12% 29% 18% 11% 11% 11% 15%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 264Table 51-4New Mexico./Region. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 81 179 57 25 89 164 190 78 117 96 89 68 155 106 174 17 97 90 54 41 27 10 49 100% 29% 64% 20% 9% 32% 58% 68% 28% 42% 34% 32% 24% 55% 38% 62% 6% 35% 32% 19% 14% 10% 4% 18% EAST 38 14 22 11 4 12 24 24 11 17 14 14 10 20 15 23 1 14 14 5 4 4 3 8 14% 17% 12% 19% 16% 13% 15% 13% 14% 15% 14% 16% 15% 13% 14% 13% 7% 15% 16% 8% 10% 17% 27% 15% GREATER ALBUQUERQUE 130 36 84 26 13 42 76 90 36 52 44 37 28 73 51 79 10 45 45 29 16 11 4 19 46% 44% 47% 46% 52% 47% 47% 47% 46% 44% 46% 41% 42% 47% 48% 46% 58% 46% 50% 54% 40% 41% 35% 39% NORTH 46 11 30 5 3 16 24 30 15 20 15 16 11 25 16 30 2 15 15 7 6 4 3 10 16% 14% 17% 9% 12% 18% 14% 16% 19% 17% 16% 18% 16% 16% 15% 17% 10% 15% 17% 13% 14% 15% 26% 21% NORTHWEST 29 8 21 7 3 10 15 20 7 16 15 13 11 14 7 22 1 7 10 5 7 3 - 2 11% 10% 12% 12% 12% 11% 9% 11% 9% 14% 15% 14% 17% 9% 7% 13% 6% 8% 11% 10% 18% 13% 5% 3% SOUTHWEST 37 12 23 8 2 10 24 26 9 12 8 10 7 24 17 20 3 16 5 8 7 4 1 10 13% 14% 13% 14% 8% 11% 15% 14% 11% 10% 9% 12% 10% 16% 16% 11% 19% 16% 6% 15% 18% 15% 8% 21%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 265Table 51-5New Mexico./Region. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 280 99 99 7 180 225 47 144 28 98 83 176 195 78 65 187 190 71 105 53 108 201 38 30 100% 36% 35% 2% 64% 80% 17% 51% 10% 35% 30% 63% 70% 28% 23% 67% 68% 25% 37% 19% 39% 72% 14% 11% EAST 38 17 17 4 21 30 6 15 8 13 14 23 26 12 11 23 21 13 19 7 11 27 6 3 14% 17% 17% 52% 12% 13% 12% 10% 29% 14% 17% 13% 13% 15% 17% 12% 11% 18% 18% 14% 10% 13% 17% 10% GREATER ALBUQUERQUE 130 44 44 2 85 108 19 70 11 47 35 82 92 34 26 92 89 32 42 29 51 93 16 17 46% 45% 45% 24% 47% 48% 40% 49% 38% 48% 42% 46% 47% 44% 40% 49% 47% 45% 40% 55% 47% 46% 41% 56% NORTH 46 13 13 1 34 38 7 29 3 13 15 30 33 13 8 34 36 10 16 7 21 36 7 3 16% 13% 13% 8% 19% 17% 15% 20% 10% 13% 18% 17% 17% 17% 12% 18% 19% 14% 16% 13% 19% 18% 18% 10% NORTHWEST 29 12 12 - 18 22 7 17 2 9 9 17 23 6 8 17 22 4 11 4 13 21 3 4 11% 12% 12% 7% 10% 10% 14% 12% 6% 10% 11% 9% 12% 8% 13% 9% 12% 6% 10% 8% 12% 11% 8% 14% SOUTHWEST 37 14 14 1 22 26 9 13 5 16 10 25 22 13 12 21 23 12 17 5 12 24 6 3 13% 15% 14% 8% 12% 12% 19% 9% 17% 16% 12% 14% 11% 16% 18% 11% 12% 17% 16% 10% 11% 12% 16% 10%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 266Table 52-1Utah./Region. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 345 - - - - 400 - 168 177 88 93 53 62 48 86 60 22 94 56 25 146 144 52 100% - - - - 116% - 49% 51% 26% 27% 15% 18% 14% 25% 17% 6% 27% 16% 7% 42% 42% 15% SALT LAKE CO 136 - - - - 149 - 68 68 43 39 19 22 13 40 24 4 42 16 9 38 63 34 39% - - - - 37% - 41% 38% 48% 43% 36% 35% 26% 47% 41% 17% 44% 29% 34% 26% 44% 65% OTHER WASATCH FRONT 130 - - - - 159 - 60 70 25 34 22 24 24 27 21 12 32 25 12 66 52 10 38% - - - - 40% - 35% 39% 28% 37% 41% 38% 50% 31% 36% 52% 34% 44% 48% 45% 36% 20% REST OF STATE 80 - - - - 92 - 40 39 21 19 12 17 11 19 14 7 20 15 5 42 29 8 23% - - - - 23% - 24% 22% 23% 20% 23% 27% 24% 22% 24% 30% 21% 27% 18% 29% 20% 15%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 267Table 52-2Utah./Region. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 345 315 26 15 152 163 10 5 70 76 72 72 26 26 77 69 75 68 27 24 113 135 11 100% 91% 8% 4% 44% 47% 3% 1% 20% 22% 21% 21% 8% 7% 22% 20% 22% 20% 8% 7% 33% 39% 3% SALT LAKE CO 136 118 16 11 58 61 7 4 16 22 32 30 20 14 21 17 39 24 21 13 29 36 2 39% 38% 63% 73% 38% 37% 72% 73% 23% 29% 45% 42% 75% 55% 27% 25% 52% 35% 76% 52% 25% 26% 23% OTHER WASATCH FRONT 130 123 4 1 57 67 1 - 32 34 26 26 2 9 31 35 25 26 3 7 54 61 5 38% 39% 15% 8% 37% 41% 13% - 46% 45% 36% 36% 7% 33% 40% 51% 34% 38% 11% 31% 48% 45% 42% REST OF STATE 80 73 6 3 38 35 1 1 22 20 13 16 5 3 25 17 11 18 4 4 31 38 4 23% 23% 22% 19% 25% 22% 15% 27% 31% 26% 19% 22% 19% 12% 32% 25% 14% 27% 14% 17% 27% 28% 36%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 268Table 52-3Utah./Region. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 345 172 112 55 110 33 57 83 2 49 62 160 84 37 32 30 73 88 44 40 19 18 172 173 100% 50% 32% 16% 32% 10% 17% 24% 1% 14% 18% 46% 24% 11% 9% 9% 21% 25% 13% 12% 6% 5% 50% 50% SALT LAKE CO 136 52 48 35 27 10 23 40 1 32 47 81 4 3 23 24 41 40 2 3 2 1 68 68 39% 30% 43% 63% 25% 30% 40% 48% 38% 66% 75% 51% 5% 9% 72% 79% 57% 46% 4% 6% 12% 5% 40% 39% OTHER WASATCH FRONT 130 74 37 15 52 13 21 30 1 10 14 67 36 11 8 5 27 40 18 17 5 6 67 62 38% 43% 34% 28% 47% 38% 37% 36% 27% 20% 22% 42% 43% 31% 26% 18% 37% 46% 42% 43% 26% 36% 39% 36% REST OF STATE 80 45 26 5 31 11 13 13 1 7 2 12 44 23 1 1 4 8 24 20 12 11 37 43 23% 27% 24% 8% 28% 32% 23% 16% 35% 15% 3% 7% 52% 61% 3% 3% 6% 9% 54% 50% 62% 59% 21% 25%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 269Table 52-4Utah./Region. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 345 97 217 56 75 58 247 211 117 132 120 88 76 210 71 275 10 62 117 82 35 20 14 69 100% 28% 63% 16% 22% 17% 71% 61% 34% 38% 35% 26% 22% 61% 20% 80% 3% 18% 34% 24% 10% 6% 4% 20% SALT LAKE CO 136 27 94 13 20 30 89 89 43 50 48 27 25 86 23 113 4 19 44 24 18 10 7 30 39% 28% 43% 23% 27% 52% 36% 42% 36% 38% 40% 31% 33% 41% 33% 41% 39% 31% 38% 30% 52% 49% 51% 43% OTHER WASATCH FRONT 130 41 78 26 36 15 99 74 47 40 33 26 19 88 33 97 3 30 44 38 11 5 4 24 38% 42% 36% 45% 48% 25% 40% 35% 40% 30% 28% 29% 25% 42% 46% 35% 29% 48% 38% 47% 30% 26% 28% 34% REST OF STATE 80 28 45 18 18 13 58 48 28 42 39 35 32 36 15 65 3 13 29 19 6 5 3 16 23% 29% 21% 32% 24% 22% 24% 23% 23% 32% 33% 40% 42% 17% 21% 24% 32% 21% 24% 24% 17% 26% 21% 23%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 270Table 52-5Utah./Region. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 345 154 149 17 191 260 72 157 30 146 77 237 242 90 62 252 215 100 92 69 155 224 58 53 100% 45% 43% 5% 55% 75% 21% 45% 9% 42% 22% 69% 70% 26% 18% 73% 62% 29% 27% 20% 45% 65% 17% 15% SALT LAKE CO 136 64 62 5 72 101 27 75 8 49 19 108 111 20 19 108 101 26 42 23 63 103 15 14 39% 41% 42% 32% 38% 39% 37% 48% 25% 33% 25% 46% 46% 22% 30% 43% 47% 27% 46% 33% 40% 46% 25% 26% OTHER WASATCH FRONT 130 59 55 10 71 100 27 49 13 62 33 82 83 43 22 91 73 43 30 31 56 75 27 22 38% 38% 37% 58% 37% 38% 38% 32% 44% 43% 43% 35% 34% 47% 36% 36% 34% 43% 33% 44% 36% 33% 46% 43% REST OF STATE 80 32 31 2 48 60 18 32 9 35 25 47 48 28 21 53 40 30 20 16 37 46 17 17 23% 21% 21% 10% 25% 23% 25% 20% 30% 24% 32% 20% 20% 31% 34% 21% 19% 30% 21% 23% 24% 21% 29% 32%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 271Table 53-1Wyoming./DMA. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 - - - - - 400 38 40 12 19 12 21 14 16 17 6 15 17 8 48 12 16 100% - - - - - 513% 49% 51% 16% 24% 16% 27% 17% 21% 21% 7% 19% 21% 10% 62% 15% 21% BILLINGS 6 - - - - - 33 3 2 1 - 1 2 2 1 2 1 - 1 1 4 1 1 7% - - - - - 8% 8% 6% 5% 1% 8% 9% 13% 4% 9% 18% 1% 8% 10% 9% 7% 3% CASPER-RIVERTON 20 - - - - - 99 10 10 4 5 2 4 5 4 4 2 5 2 3 12 4 4 25% - - - - - 25% 26% 25% 33% 24% 19% 19% 35% 25% 25% 29% 31% 14% 40% 24% 30% 26% CHEYENNE-SCOTTSBLUFF 14 - - - - - 73 8 7 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 10 2 2 18% - - - - - 18% 20% 17% 13% 17% 20% 19% 23% 17% 19% 29% 13% 20% 19% 21% 16% 11% DENVER 15 - - - - - 79 8 7 3 4 3 5 1 4 3 1 3 4 1 8 3 3 20% - - - - - 20% 21% 18% 22% 23% 21% 22% 9% 26% 20% 9% 18% 23% 9% 17% 28% 21% IDAHO FALLS-POCATELLO 4 - - - - - 19 1 3 1 1 - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - 2 - 1 5% - - - - - 5% 3% 7% 7% 5% 4% 5% 2% 4% 1% 3% 8% 8% 2% 3% 4% 7% RAPID CITY 7 - - - - - 36 3 4 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 - 2 2 1 5 - 2 9% - - - - - 9% 8% 10% 11% 10% 7% 9% 7% 11% 7% 3% 11% 9% 10% 10% 4% 12% SALT LAKE CITY 12 - - - - - 61 6 6 1 4 3 4 1 2 3 - 3 3 1 8 1 3 15% - - - - - 15% 15% 16% 8% 20% 20% 17% 9% 13% 19% 9% 18% 18% 9% 16% 11% 19%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 272Table 53-2Wyoming./DMA. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 70 8 4 33 37 3 1 26 23 6 5 6 10 19 30 6 5 6 10 39 47 13 100% 89% 10% 6% 42% 47% 4% 2% 33% 29% 8% 7% 7% 13% 24% 38% 8% 7% 7% 13% 50% 60% 17% BILLINGS 6 5 - - 3 2 - - 2 2 - - - - 1 4 - 1 - 1 4 4 1 7% 7% 4% - 8% 7% - - 10% 8% 6% 7% 6% 2% 3% 12% 3% 11% - 5% 10% 8% 9% CASPER-RIVERTON 20 18 2 1 9 9 - - 6 6 2 1 1 3 5 7 2 2 2 2 9 12 3 25% 26% 25% 19% 27% 25% 13% 33% 23% 25% 35% 25% 26% 25% 25% 24% 30% 31% 39% 19% 23% 25% 26% CHEYENNE-SCOTTSBLUFF 14 12 2 1 6 7 1 - 5 5 1 1 - 1 4 6 1 1 - 2 8 9 3 18% 18% 24% 31% 18% 18% 43% - 21% 21% 21% 10% 7% 13% 21% 21% 9% 25% 4% 15% 22% 19% 24% DENVER 15 13 2 1 7 6 1 - 5 3 2 2 1 2 3 5 2 1 2 2 7 9 2 20% 19% 25% 29% 21% 17% 27% 34% 19% 15% 27% 28% 24% 20% 16% 18% 35% 18% 27% 18% 18% 19% 18% IDAHO FALLS-POCATELLO 4 3 - - 1 2 - - 1 1 - - - 1 1 1 - - - 1 1 2 1 5% 5% - - 3% 7% - - 2% 5% 4% 4% 3% 9% 5% 2% 8% - - 11% 3% 3% 5% RAPID CITY 7 7 - - 3 4 - - 3 2 - - 1 1 2 3 - - 1 1 4 4 1 9% 10% 2% - 9% 11% - - 10% 9% - 9% 9% 14% 11% 9% 4% 4% 20% 8% 9% 10% 5% SALT LAKE CITY 12 10 2 1 5 6 1 - 4 4 - 1 1 2 4 4 1 1 1 2 6 7 2 15% 15% 20% 21% 14% 15% 16% 34% 15% 17% 6% 16% 25% 16% 19% 14% 11% 11% 11% 24% 15% 15% 13%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 273Table 53-3Wyoming./DMA. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 36 29 11 29 19 5 7 3 12 8 6 44 19 5 4 3 2 22 22 8 11 39 39 100% 47% 37% 14% 37% 25% 6% 9% 4% 16% 11% 7% 56% 24% 6% 5% 4% 3% 28% 28% 11% 14% 50% 50% BILLINGS 6 4 1 1 3 1 1 - - 1 - - 5 1 - - - - 3 2 1 1 3 3 7% 10% 5% 6% 10% 7% 17% - - 4% - - 11% 5% - - - - 12% 9% 6% 5% 7% 7% CASPER-RIVERTON 20 11 7 2 8 4 2 2 1 3 4 2 9 4 2 2 1 1 5 4 2 2 10 10 25% 29% 24% 17% 27% 20% 40% 23% 20% 26% 47% 41% 21% 22% 37% 59% 40% 43% 22% 20% 24% 20% 25% 26% CHEYENNE-SCOTTSBLUFF 14 5 7 1 5 6 - 1 1 1 4 3 5 4 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 2 8 7 18% 15% 24% 14% 16% 30% 8% 21% 19% 8% 42% 43% 10% 19% 43% 41% 49% 36% 9% 12% 21% 17% 20% 17% DENVER 15 7 5 3 5 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 9 5 1 - - 1 5 4 2 3 7 9 20% 20% 18% 26% 17% 17% 26% 29% 37% 19% 7% 12% 21% 24% 12% - 6% 21% 24% 18% 24% 24% 17% 22% IDAHO FALLS-POCATELLO 4 1 1 1 1 1 - - - 1 - - 3 1 - - - - 1 2 - 1 2 1 5% 2% 5% 7% 2% 4% - 7% - 8% - - 6% 4% - - - - 4% 7% - 7% 6% 4% RAPID CITY 7 3 3 1 3 2 - - - 2 - - 5 2 - - - - 2 3 1 1 3 4 9% 8% 9% 13% 11% 8% - 7% - 16% 2% 3% 11% 10% 4% - 5% - 10% 12% 7% 12% 9% 9% SALT LAKE CITY 12 6 4 2 5 3 - 1 1 2 - - 9 3 - - - - 4 5 1 2 6 6 15% 16% 14% 18% 17% 14% 9% 12% 24% 19% 2% - 20% 16% 4% - - - 19% 22% 17% 15% 16% 15%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 274Table 53-4Wyoming./DMA. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 30 45 25 21 14 58 56 20 49 43 38 31 28 23 55 3 20 25 25 7 5 2 13 100% 39% 58% 33% 27% 18% 74% 72% 25% 63% 55% 49% 40% 36% 29% 70% 4% 25% 32% 32% 9% 7% 3% 17% BILLINGS 6 3 2 3 1 1 4 4 1 4 4 3 3 2 3 3 - 3 1 2 - - - 2 7% 12% 4% 11% 6% 4% 7% 7% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 6% 12% 5% 6% 13% 6% 9% 5% - - 13% CASPER-RIVERTON 20 7 12 6 6 2 15 14 5 13 11 10 8 7 5 14 2 4 7 6 2 1 1 3 25% 23% 27% 22% 29% 17% 27% 26% 26% 26% 27% 26% 27% 24% 24% 26% 46% 21% 29% 26% 23% 19% 35% 23% CHEYENNE-SCOTTSBLUFF 14 6 8 5 5 2 11 10 3 8 7 5 4 6 4 10 - 4 5 4 2 1 - 2 18% 19% 18% 21% 22% 16% 19% 18% 17% 16% 16% 13% 12% 23% 19% 18% 6% 21% 22% 16% 23% 22% 23% 11% DENVER 15 6 9 5 3 4 10 12 4 10 9 8 6 5 3 12 1 3 3 5 1 2 1 3 20% 19% 21% 18% 15% 26% 18% 21% 19% 20% 20% 21% 21% 19% 15% 21% 27% 13% 13% 20% 21% 31% 33% 25% IDAHO FALLS-POCATELLO 4 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 - 1 1 1 1 - - 1 5% 2% 6% 2% 4% 12% 3% 4% 7% 4% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 2% 11% 3% - 8% RAPID CITY 7 3 4 3 2 1 6 5 1 4 3 3 2 3 2 5 - 2 2 3 - - - 2 9% 9% 9% 11% 8% 9% 10% 9% 6% 7% 7% 8% 7% 12% 10% 9% 5% 11% 9% 11% 6% - - 12% SALT LAKE CITY 12 5 7 4 3 2 9 8 4 9 7 8 6 3 4 8 - 3 4 4 1 1 - 1 15% 17% 15% 16% 16% 15% 16% 15% 18% 17% 17% 20% 20% 12% 16% 15% 6% 17% 18% 17% 11% 25% 8% 8%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 275Table 53-5Wyoming./DMA. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 27 27 3 50 62 12 28 10 39 21 48 48 28 18 53 40 33 15 25 34 42 12 22 100% 35% 34% 4% 65% 80% 16% 36% 12% 50% 27% 62% 62% 36% 23% 68% 51% 42% 19% 33% 44% 54% 15% 29% BILLINGS 6 2 2 - 4 5 1 2 - 3 1 4 3 2 2 3 2 3 1 1 3 4 1 1 7% 7% 7% 6% 8% 8% 4% 7% 5% 8% 7% 7% 6% 9% 11% 6% 5% 8% 7% 5% 9% 9% 4% 7% CASPER-RIVERTON 20 7 6 1 13 15 4 6 3 11 4 13 13 6 4 14 11 8 4 7 8 10 3 7 25% 25% 24% 20% 26% 24% 35% 22% 27% 28% 20% 27% 27% 23% 25% 26% 27% 26% 23% 29% 24% 23% 22% 31% CHEYENNE-SCOTTSBLUFF 14 3 2 1 12 11 3 6 2 7 4 9 9 5 3 10 8 6 3 4 6 10 2 3 18% 10% 9% 20% 23% 18% 24% 20% 22% 17% 20% 18% 18% 19% 18% 18% 21% 18% 19% 17% 19% 23% 18% 11% DENVER 15 7 7 1 9 12 2 7 2 6 5 8 9 6 2 11 7 7 2 5 8 8 3 3 20% 25% 26% 27% 17% 20% 16% 24% 17% 16% 23% 17% 19% 22% 13% 21% 19% 20% 10% 20% 22% 20% 26% 14% IDAHO FALLS-POCATELLO 4 2 2 - 1 3 - 1 - 2 1 3 3 - 1 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 5% 9% 9% 15% 2% 5% 3% 5% - 5% 3% 6% 7% 1% 4% 5% 7% 2% 9% 2% 5% 5% 7% 2% RAPID CITY 7 2 2 - 5 6 1 2 1 4 3 4 3 3 1 5 3 3 2 3 2 3 1 3 9% 7% 7% - 10% 10% 8% 7% 8% 11% 14% 8% 7% 12% 7% 9% 7% 10% 10% 12% 7% 7% 6% 14% SALT LAKE CITY 12 5 5 - 7 10 1 4 2 5 3 8 8 4 4 8 6 5 3 4 5 5 2 4 15% 17% 18% 12% 15% 16% 10% 16% 21% 14% 14% 17% 16% 15% 22% 15% 14% 16% 22% 14% 14% 13% 18% 20%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 276Table 54-1Wyoming./Region. BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 - - - - - 400 38 40 12 19 12 21 14 16 17 6 15 17 8 48 12 16 100% - - - - - 513% 49% 51% 16% 24% 16% 27% 17% 21% 21% 7% 19% 21% 10% 62% 15% 21% CENTRAL 21 - - - - - 107 10 10 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 2 5 3 3 12 3 5 27% - - - - - 27% 27% 26% 34% 27% 24% 20% 32% 26% 27% 29% 34% 16% 34% 26% 26% 32% NORTHEAST 13 - - - - - 69 6 6 2 3 2 4 2 3 3 - 2 3 1 9 1 3 16% - - - - - 17% 17% 16% 16% 15% 20% 19% 12% 18% 19% 6% 12% 20% 16% 18% 9% 17% NORTHWEST 12 - - - - - 65 5 7 2 1 2 4 3 2 2 1 2 3 2 7 2 2 15% - - - - - 16% 13% 18% 18% 7% 12% 18% 22% 10% 12% 24% 14% 20% 21% 15% 19% 12% SOUTHEAST 20 - - - - - 98 11 9 3 6 3 5 3 5 4 2 3 4 2 12 4 3 26% - - - - - 25% 29% 24% 23% 31% 23% 26% 26% 33% 23% 32% 22% 26% 21% 25% 35% 21% SOUTHWEST 12 - - - - - 61 6 6 1 4 3 4 1 2 3 - 3 3 1 8 1 3 15% - - - - - 15% 15% 16% 8% 20% 20% 17% 9% 13% 19% 9% 18% 18% 9% 16% 11% 19%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 277Table 54-2Wyoming./Region. BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 70 8 4 33 37 3 1 26 23 6 5 6 10 19 30 6 5 6 10 39 47 13 100% 89% 10% 6% 42% 47% 4% 2% 33% 29% 8% 7% 7% 13% 24% 38% 8% 7% 7% 13% 50% 60% 17% CENTRAL 21 19 2 - 9 10 - - 7 6 2 1 1 4 5 7 2 1 2 3 9 11 4 27% 27% 20% 10% 28% 27% 13% - 27% 24% 33% 17% 26% 35% 28% 24% 26% 26% 43% 25% 24% 24% 30% NORTHEAST 13 13 - - 6 6 - - 5 4 - 1 1 2 3 6 - 1 1 1 7 9 1 16% 18% 2% - 19% 17% - - 21% 16% 3% 16% 16% 17% 16% 20% 7% 11% 23% 13% 17% 19% 9% NORTHWEST 12 11 1 - 4 6 - - 3 4 1 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 - 2 6 7 2 15% 16% 9% 9% 14% 17% - 33% 13% 18% 15% 24% 9% 13% 11% 18% 19% 19% - 18% 16% 16% 16% SOUTHEAST 20 17 4 3 8 8 2 - 6 6 3 1 1 2 5 7 2 2 1 2 11 12 4 26% 24% 49% 60% 25% 23% 70% 34% 25% 25% 42% 27% 24% 19% 26% 24% 37% 33% 23% 20% 29% 26% 31% SOUTHWEST 12 10 2 1 5 6 1 - 4 4 - 1 1 2 4 4 1 1 1 2 6 7 2 15% 15% 20% 21% 14% 15% 16% 34% 15% 17% 6% 16% 25% 16% 19% 14% 11% 11% 11% 24% 15% 15% 13%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 278Table 54-3Wyoming./Region. BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 36 29 11 29 19 5 7 3 12 8 6 44 19 5 4 3 2 22 22 8 11 39 39 100% 47% 37% 14% 37% 25% 6% 9% 4% 16% 11% 7% 56% 24% 6% 5% 4% 3% 28% 28% 11% 14% 50% 50% CENTRAL 21 12 7 2 9 4 2 1 1 4 4 2 9 5 2 2 1 1 5 4 3 2 11 10 27% 32% 24% 19% 30% 20% 36% 19% 41% 28% 47% 41% 21% 26% 37% 59% 40% 43% 22% 20% 30% 23% 28% 25% NORTHEAST 13 6 4 2 6 3 - 1 - 3 1 1 8 3 1 - - - 4 4 1 2 6 7 16% 16% 15% 21% 19% 17% 8% 10% - 22% 7% 12% 19% 16% 12% - 11% 14% 19% 19% 15% 17% 15% 18% NORTHWEST 12 5 4 2 4 3 1 1 - 2 - - 9 2 - - - - 4 5 1 2 6 6 15% 14% 15% 15% 13% 17% 25% 15% - 12% - - 21% 13% - - - - 20% 22% 8% 17% 15% 15% SOUTHEAST 20 8 9 3 6 6 1 3 1 2 4 3 8 5 2 1 2 1 5 4 2 3 10 10 26% 22% 32% 28% 21% 32% 22% 44% 36% 19% 44% 46% 19% 29% 47% 41% 49% 42% 21% 17% 29% 28% 26% 27% SOUTHWEST 12 6 4 2 5 3 - 1 1 2 - - 9 3 - - - - 4 5 1 2 6 6 15% 16% 14% 18% 17% 14% 9% 12% 24% 19% 2% - 20% 16% 4% - - - 19% 22% 17% 15% 16% 15%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 279Table 54-4Wyoming./Region. BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 30 45 25 21 14 58 56 20 49 43 38 31 28 23 55 3 20 25 25 7 5 2 13 100% 39% 58% 33% 27% 18% 74% 72% 25% 63% 55% 49% 40% 36% 29% 70% 4% 25% 32% 32% 9% 7% 3% 17% CENTRAL 21 8 12 7 6 3 16 16 5 13 11 10 8 8 5 16 2 4 7 7 2 1 1 4 27% 26% 28% 26% 27% 22% 27% 28% 24% 26% 26% 26% 27% 29% 22% 29% 51% 18% 28% 27% 23% 24% 34% 27% NORTHEAST 13 6 6 5 3 2 11 9 3 8 7 6 5 5 4 9 1 3 3 5 1 1 - 2 16% 19% 14% 21% 15% 12% 18% 17% 14% 16% 16% 17% 17% 17% 17% 16% 20% 16% 13% 20% 16% 14% 11% 17% NORTHWEST 12 5 6 3 4 2 8 8 3 8 7 6 4 3 5 7 1 4 3 4 1 - - 3 15% 15% 14% 13% 17% 16% 14% 15% 17% 16% 15% 16% 14% 12% 22% 12% 17% 23% 13% 14% 19% 7% 14% 22% SOUTHEAST 20 7 13 6 5 5 14 15 5 12 10 8 7 8 5 15 - 5 7 5 2 2 1 4 26% 23% 29% 25% 26% 36% 24% 26% 27% 24% 25% 21% 21% 30% 23% 27% 6% 26% 28% 22% 31% 30% 33% 28% SOUTHWEST 12 5 7 4 3 2 9 8 4 9 7 8 6 3 4 8 - 3 4 4 1 1 - 1 15% 17% 15% 16% 16% 15% 16% 15% 18% 17% 17% 20% 20% 12% 16% 15% 6% 17% 18% 17% 11% 25% 8% 8%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 280Table 54-5Wyoming./Region. BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 78 27 27 3 50 62 12 28 10 39 21 48 48 28 18 53 40 33 15 25 34 42 12 22 100% 35% 34% 4% 65% 80% 16% 36% 12% 50% 27% 62% 62% 36% 23% 68% 51% 42% 19% 33% 44% 54% 15% 29% CENTRAL 21 7 7 1 13 16 4 6 3 12 4 13 14 7 4 15 12 9 3 8 9 11 3 6 27% 27% 27% 20% 26% 25% 31% 22% 28% 30% 20% 27% 28% 25% 22% 29% 30% 26% 21% 31% 26% 26% 26% 29% NORTHEAST 13 4 4 - 9 11 2 4 2 6 6 6 6 6 2 9 4 8 2 6 4 5 2 5 16% 15% 15% - 18% 18% 13% 16% 20% 16% 27% 12% 12% 23% 13% 16% 10% 24% 13% 25% 12% 12% 19% 21% NORTHWEST 12 5 5 1 7 10 2 4 1 7 3 8 8 3 4 7 6 4 3 3 6 7 2 3 15% 19% 19% 21% 13% 15% 15% 15% 9% 17% 14% 17% 17% 12% 22% 14% 15% 14% 19% 12% 17% 16% 14% 14% SOUTHEAST 20 6 6 2 14 16 4 9 2 9 5 13 13 7 4 14 13 7 4 5 10 14 3 4 26% 22% 22% 47% 29% 26% 30% 31% 22% 23% 25% 27% 26% 25% 22% 27% 32% 21% 25% 18% 30% 33% 24% 17% SOUTHWEST 12 5 5 - 7 10 1 4 2 5 3 8 8 4 4 8 6 5 3 4 5 5 2 4 15% 17% 18% 12% 15% 16% 10% 16% 21% 14% 14% 17% 16% 15% 22% 15% 14% 16% 22% 14% 14% 13% 18% 20%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 281Table 55-1QUESTION A/B/Sample.: BANNER 1 STATES GENDER AGE GENDER/AGE PARTY ==================================== =========== ============================= =================================== ================= ARI- COLO- MONT- NEW WYOM- MEN MEN MEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN TOTAL ZONA RADO ANA MEXICO UTAH ING MEN WOMEN 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ 18-44 45-64 65+ GOP IND DEM ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1152 1248 480 576 402 500 432 482 435 233 574 468 199 888 701 768 100% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 48% 52% 20% 24% 17% 21% 18% 20% 18% 10% 24% 19% 8% 37% 29% 32% PHONE TYPE (D/S) -1368 -259 -201 -225 -213 -194 -237 -562 -806 -14 -347 -282 -383 -333 -78 -305 -177 -284 -359 -156 -562 -357 -422---------------- -57% -65% -50% -56% -53% -49% -59% -49% -65% -3% -60% -70% -77% -77% -16% -70% -76% -49% -77% -78% -63% -51% -55% CELL 516 70 100 88 93 103 82 295 221 233 114 60 59 49 202 65 28 145 54 22 163 172 173 21% 18% 25% 22% 23% 26% 20% 26% 18% 49% 20% 15% 12% 11% 42% 15% 12% 25% 12% 11% 18% 25% 23% LANDLINE 1884 330 300 312 307 297 318 857 1027 247 462 342 441 383 280 370 205 429 413 177 725 529 595 79% 82% 75% 78% 77% 74% 80% 74% 82% 51% 80% 85% 88% 89% 58% 85% 88% 75% 88% 89% 82% 75% 77% SURVEY LANGUAGE--------------- ENGLISH 2393 399 398 400 397 400 400 1151 1242 480 572 401 498 432 482 434 233 570 465 199 887 701 761 100% 100% 99% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% 99% SPANISH 7 1 2 - 3 - - 1 6 - 4 2 2 - 1 1 - 3 3 - 1 - 7 - - 1% - 1% - - - - - 1% - - - - - - 1% 1% - - - 1% SAMPLE (D/S)------------ SAMPLE A 1198 200 200 200 200 200 200 575 623 240 288 188 261 216 233 214 128 294 235 88 443 350 383 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 47% 52% 50% 48% 49% 55% 51% 50% 44% 50% 50% 50% SAMPLE B 1202 200 200 200 200 200 200 577 625 240 288 214 239 216 249 221 106 280 232 111 445 351 385 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 53% 48% 50% 52% 51% 45% 49% 50% 56% 50% 50% 50%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 282Table 55-2QUESTION A/B/Sample.: BANNER 2 PARTICIPATE ETHNICITY ETHNICITY/GENDER PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE IN PRIMARY/CAUCUS ================= ======================= =================================== =================================== ================= HISP- HISP- NON- HISP- WHITE WHITE ANIC ANIC GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM VERY TOTAL NOT TOTAL WHITE WHITE ANIC MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ 18-44 45+ LKLY LKLY LKLY ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 1784 568 336 881 903 127 209 447 441 398 304 288 480 366 519 350 348 327 437 694 822 123 100% 74% 24% 14% 37% 38% 5% 9% 19% 18% 17% 13% 12% 20% 15% 22% 15% 15% 14% 18% 29% 34% 5% PHONE TYPE (D/S) -1368 -1020 -309 -176 -429 -592 -53 -122 -251 -312 -173 -184 -127 -295 -175 -384 -117 -238 -65 -353 -422 -490 -85---------------- -57% -57% -54% -52% -49% -66% -42% -59% -56% -71% -43% -61% -44% -61% -48% -74% -34% -68% -20% -81% -61% -60% -70% CELL 516 382 129 80 226 155 37 43 98 65 112 60 80 92 95 68 116 55 131 42 136 166 19 21% 21% 23% 24% 26% 17% 29% 21% 22% 15% 28% 20% 28% 19% 26% 13% 33% 16% 40% 10% 20% 20% 15% LANDLINE 1884 1402 438 256 655 747 90 166 349 376 285 244 207 388 271 451 234 293 196 395 558 656 104 79% 79% 77% 76% 74% 83% 71% 79% 78% 85% 72% 80% 72% 81% 74% 87% 67% 84% 60% 90% 80% 80% 85% SURVEY LANGUAGE--------------- ENGLISH 2393 1783 561 331 880 903 127 204 446 441 398 304 287 474 365 519 350 348 324 434 693 821 123 100% 100% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% SPANISH 7 1 6 5 1 - - 5 1 - - - 1 6 1 - - - 3 3 1 1 - - - 1% 1% - - - 2% - - - - - 1% - - - - 1% 1% - - - SAMPLE (D/S)------------ SAMPLE A 1198 887 285 168 430 457 66 102 212 231 198 152 156 227 190 253 175 173 157 223 344 416 58 50% 50% 50% 50% 49% 51% 52% 49% 48% 52% 50% 50% 54% 47% 52% 49% 50% 50% 48% 51% 50% 51% 47% SAMPLE B 1202 897 282 168 451 446 61 107 234 210 199 151 132 253 175 266 175 175 170 214 349 406 65 50% 50% 50% 50% 51% 49% 48% 51% 52% 48% 50% 50% 46% 53% 48% 51% 50% 50% 52% 49% 50% 49% 53%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 283Table 55-3QUESTION A/B/Sample.: BANNER 3 IDEOLOGY IDEOLOGY/PARTY GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY/GENDER SAMPLE ================= =================================== ======================= =============================================== =========== MOD/ MOD/ MOD/ CONS LIB CONS LIB CONS LIB SUB- CITY CITY BURBS BURBS TOWN TOWN RURAL RURAL TOTAL CONS MOD LIB GOP GOP IND IND DEM DEM CITY URBS TOWN RURAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN A B ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 982 826 522 632 245 236 430 101 656 638 799 551 388 306 332 392 406 271 280 169 219 1198 1202 100% 41% 34% 22% 26% 10% 10% 18% 4% 27% 27% 33% 23% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 11% 12% 7% 9% 50% 50% PHONE TYPE (D/S) -1368 -658 -476 -214 -435 -128 -143 -207 -68 -345 -305 -498 -285 -269 -129 -175 -199 -299 -116 -169 -113 -156 -678 -690---------------- -57% -67% -58% -41% -69% -52% -60% -48% -67% -53% -48% -62% -52% -69% -42% -53% -51% -74% -43% -60% -67% -71% -57% -57% CELL 516 162 175 154 99 58 47 111 17 156 167 150 133 59 88 78 97 53 77 56 28 31 260 256 21% 17% 21% 30% 16% 24% 20% 26% 16% 24% 26% 19% 24% 15% 29% 24% 25% 13% 29% 20% 17% 14% 22% 21% LANDLINE 1884 820 651 368 533 186 189 319 84 500 471 648 418 328 217 254 295 353 194 224 141 187 938 946 79% 83% 79% 70% 84% 76% 80% 74% 84% 76% 74% 81% 76% 85% 71% 76% 75% 87% 71% 80% 83% 86% 78% 79% SURVEY LANGUAGE--------------- ENGLISH 2393 980 821 522 631 245 236 430 99 651 638 794 551 387 306 332 392 401 271 280 168 219 1193 1200 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 99% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% SPANISH 7 2 5 - 1 - - - 2 5 - 5 - 1 - - - 5 - - 1 - 5 2 - - 1% - - - - - 2% 1% - 1% - - - - - 1% - - 1% - - - SAMPLE (D/S)------------ SAMPLE A 1198 501 393 268 319 121 118 215 57 316 294 397 282 208 144 150 196 201 141 141 86 123 1198 - 50% 51% 48% 51% 50% 49% 50% 50% 57% 48% 46% 50% 51% 54% 47% 45% 50% 50% 52% 50% 51% 56% 100% - SAMPLE B 1202 482 434 254 313 124 118 215 44 339 344 401 269 179 161 182 197 205 130 139 83 96 - 1202 50% 49% 52% 49% 50% 51% 50% 50% 43% 52% 54% 50% 49% 46% 53% 55% 50% 50% 48% 50% 49% 44% - 100%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 284Table 55-4QUESTION A/B/Sample.: BANNER 4 TEA OCCUPY CONSER- MILITARY TEA PARTY PARTY/PARTY WALL STREET VATIONIST SPORTSMEN MILITARY HH HH TYPE TV NEWS SOURCE =========== =========== =========== =========== =============================== =========== =========== =================================== DAILY GOP SHOW/ GOP NON TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ACT- BROAD COL- TOTAL YES NO TEA -TEA YES NO YES NO YES ANGLER HUNTER BOTH NO YES NO IVE VET -CAST FOX CNN MSNBC BERT NONE ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 694 1554 481 351 594 1599 1549 764 940 815 640 514 1432 698 1695 130 605 776 562 266 183 129 430 100% 29% 65% 20% 15% 25% 67% 65% 32% 39% 34% 27% 21% 60% 29% 71% 5% 25% 32% 23% 11% 8% 5% 18% PHONE TYPE (D/S) -1368 -428 -886 -317 -227 -317 -968 -890 -443 -500 -424 -357 -281 -862 -458 -909 -69 -405 -510 -365 -159 -70 -40 -195---------------- -57% -62% -57% -66% -65% -53% -61% -57% -58% -53% -52% -56% -55% -60% -66% -54% -53% -67% -66% -65% -60% -38% -31% -45% CELL 516 133 334 82 62 139 315 330 161 220 196 141 117 285 120 393 31 100 133 99 54 57 44 117 21% 19% 21% 17% 18% 23% 20% 21% 21% 23% 24% 22% 23% 20% 17% 23% 24% 17% 17% 18% 20% 31% 34% 27% LANDLINE 1884 561 1220 399 289 455 1283 1220 603 720 619 498 397 1147 578 1302 99 505 643 464 212 127 85 313 79% 81% 79% 83% 82% 77% 80% 79% 79% 77% 76% 78% 77% 80% 83% 77% 76% 83% 83% 82% 80% 69% 66% 73% SURVEY LANGUAGE--------------- ENGLISH 2393 694 1547 480 351 594 1592 1548 758 938 813 637 512 1427 692 1694 127 599 774 562 264 180 129 429 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 97% 99% 100% 100% 99% 98% 100% 100% SPANISH 7 1 7 1 - 1 7 2 6 2 2 2 2 5 6 1 3 6 2 - 2 3 - 1 - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - 1% - 3% 1% - - 1% 2% - - SAMPLE (D/S)------------ SAMPLE A 1198 367 759 251 162 316 786 773 387 440 385 316 261 741 315 879 48 282 381 279 124 98 68 218 50% 53% 49% 52% 46% 53% 49% 50% 51% 47% 47% 49% 51% 52% 45% 52% 37% 47% 49% 50% 47% 53% 53% 51% SAMPLE B 1202 327 795 230 189 278 812 776 377 501 430 323 253 691 383 816 82 323 395 283 142 85 61 212 50% 47% 51% 48% 54% 47% 51% 50% 49% 53% 53% 51% 49% 48% 55% 48% 63% 53% 51% 50% 53% 47% 47% 49%


2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 285Table 55-5QUESTION A/B/Sample.: BANNER 5 SUSPEND IMPACT LAWS THAT EPA UPDATE PROTECTIONS/ PRIORITY OF RENEWABLES INCREASE ECON STATE GOVERN AIR QUAL STOP FOR ENERGY ON ELECTRICITY USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA VS. ENVIRO GOV'T PROTECTIONS INDUSTRY STDS ILLEGALS NEEDS SYSTEM RENEWABLES ======================= ============ ================= ============ =========== =========== ============ ================== ================= YES/ BURD- IMPT TOTAL UN- MORE LESS CREA- NOT TOTAL YES/ TWI- HAVE CHOOSE EN- ENSOM SAFE- TOTAL OPP- NECE- NECE- EXPAND DRILL RELI- RELI- NO TE AFFE- COST TOTAL YES FB TTER NO BOTH ONE MORE LESS OUGH REGS GUARDS SPPRT OSE SSARY SSARY CLEAN & DIG ABLE ABLE IMPACT JOBS CTED JOBS ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 2400 992 951 92 1400 1874 454 1125 234 969 699 1506 1684 652 499 1701 1554 709 734 504 1010 1634 392 305 100% 41% 40% 4% 58% 78% 19% 47% 10% 40% 29% 63% 70% 27% 21% 71% 65% 30% 31% 21% 42% 68% 16% 13% PHONE TYPE (D/S) -1368 -461 -438 -29 -905 -1085 -236 -613 -151 -552 -378 -870 -932 -386 -301 -950 -860 -431 -438 -268 -590 -941 -223 -168---------------- -57% -46% -46% -31% -65% -58% -52% -55% -64% -57% -54% -58% -55% -59% -60% -56% -55% -61% -60% -53% -58% -58% -57% -55% CELL 516 265 257 32 247 394 109 256 42 209 161 318 376 133 99 376 347 139 148 118 210 347 85 68 21% 27% 27% 34% 18% 21% 24% 23% 18% 22% 23% 21% 22% 20% 20% 22% 22% 20% 20% 23% 21% 21% 22% 22% LANDLINE 1884 727 695 61 1152 1480 345 869 192 760 538 1188 1308 519 400 1326 1207 570 586 386 800 1287 308 236 79% 73% 73% 66% 82% 79% 76% 77% 82% 78% 77% 79% 78% 80% 80% 78% 78% 80% 80% 77% 79% 79% 78% 78% SURVEY LANGUAGE--------------- ENGLISH 2393 987 946 92 1398 1867 454 1123 233 965 697 1501 1677 652 497 1696 1549 707 731 504 1006 1627 392 305 100% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% SPANISH 7 6 6 - 2 7 - 2 1 5 2 6 7 - 2 5 5 2 3 - 4 7 - - - 1% 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SAMPLE (D/S)------------ SAMPLE A 1198 489 470 46 702 931 238 581 113 475 355 749 834 334 230 876 772 362 361 279 493 815 200 154 50% 49% 49% 50% 50% 50% 52% 52% 48% 49% 51% 50% 49% 51% 46% 51% 50% 51% 49% 55% 49% 50% 51% 51% SAMPLE B 1202 503 482 46 697 943 216 544 121 494 344 757 851 317 269 825 782 348 374 225 517 819 193 151 50% 51% 51% 50% 50% 50% 48% 48% 52% 51% 49% 50% 51% 49% 54% 49% 50% 49% 51% 45% 51% 50% 49% 49%


Documents

2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 …...2012 WESTERN STATES STUDY / 12001 / JANUARY 2-5, 7 2012 PAGE 3 Table 1-3 Summary of Key Data I