2012 FEI EVENTING RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR Warendorf … 2012 ERMSeminar... · 2012 FEI EVENTING RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR – Warendorf (GER) REPORT Page 2 Updated: 23-Mar-12 J:\WINDATA\TDE\TDE\Safety

$Page 1: 2012 FEI EVENTING RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR Warendorf … 2012 ERMSeminar... · 2012 FEI EVENTING RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR – Warendorf (GER) REPORT Page 2 Updated: 23-Mar-12 J:\WINDATA\TDE\TDE\Safety$
2012 FEI EVENTING RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR – Warendorf (GER)

REPORT Page 1

Updated: 23-Mar-12

J:\WINDATA\TDE\TDE\Safety Program\2012\ERMS Warendorf 28-29 January\REPORT\FINAL 2012 ERMSeminar Report-22.03.2012.docx

FEI EVENTING RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR

Warendorf (GER), 28-29 January 2012

REPORT

30 Eventing National Safety Officers (NSOs) from 24 NFs: AUS, AUT, BEL, BRA, CAN,

CZE, DEN, ESP, FIN, FRA, GBR, GER, IRL, ITA, JPN, NED, NOR, NZL, POL, POR, SVK,

SWE, THA, USA -5 Continents– (see participants list annex I) met in Warendorf (GER) for

the annual Eventing Risk Management Seminar.

RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS of the 2011 Eventing Risk management

Seminar

1. 2013 EVENTING NSO SEMINAR date: 26-27 January 2013, location TBC (Rome,

Wroclaw or Portugal)

2. NATIONAL STATISTICS CONCLUSIONS:

- NSOs to emphasize to the Officials the importance of accurate reporting both at

International and National competitions

3. RIDERS AND HORSES CROSS COUNTRY EDUCATION AND PREPARATION:

- NSOs to share awareness with their NF and trainers regarding the importance of having

regular/repetitive XC training. Regular XC training with repeated simple progressive

exercise to increase confidence and ability of horses and riders as part of effective active

measure to lower the risk in Eventing long term. Safe riding.= good pictures on fences

4. UPDATE ON THE PRODUCTION OF CROSS COUNTRY EDUCATIONAL DVD

- NSOs / NFs to send available footage to Jonathan Clissold

- DVD to be finalized by end April 2012

5. 2013 RULES FOR EVENTING:

- Strong recommendation to raise the minimum age for horses to compete in FEI

competitions to 6 years old (current 5-year old too young to be considered competent

and trained for 1 star level)

- regulate the maximum number of cross-country fences that can be shared between

levels

- add list of recommended type of fences to be included at each level in XC Course

design guidelines

WORKING GROUPS

6. Standardization of Cross Country Courses / Min. qualification standard 1*

level competitions

NFs to introduce levels of competition leading to the FEI equivalent grades, providing

a natural progression for riders and horses.

All elements of Cross Country Course Design to be introduced at low a level of

competition and progressively in degree of difficulty throughout the levels

Minimum MER to be obtained in the last 12 months achieved at the previous level to

be of a minimum level of 1m05 to be checked by NFs.

7. Education and update of Officials

Increased education to Course Designers, Technical Delegates and trainers necessary

to ensure understanding and implementation of the progressive competition levels &

standards.

8. Style Cross Country


REPORT Page 2

Updated: 23-Mar-12


- Working Group (SWE + GER NSO) to finalize a concept based on the GER & SWE cross

country style competition rules and made available to interested NFs.

9. Improvement of National Data Collection

- NFs to support a program to collect the national statistics in a database system.

Guidelines to be set by the FEI to help the NFs.

- Modification to the template for the National statistics included removing the total

number of competitions, improve definition of categories of injuries and adding the total

number of slight injuries

10. Guidelines for Cross Country Fence Judges / Cross Country Controllers

- Guidelines for both Cross County Fence Judges and Cross Country Controllers to be

finalized based on GER NF template and published on FEI website for easy access.

11. Future of NSO Seminars- possibility to extend the seminar to 2 full days

INTRODUCTION

The Eventing Risk Management Seminar Director, Giuseppe Della Chiesa, welcomed and

thanked all participants for attending this seminar. The German National Federation was

specially thanked for hosting the seminar in Warendorf, providing an occasion for all to

visit the National Equestrian Centre.

He noted that the main objective of the seminar was to provide an opportunity for the

Eventing representative of the NF to share experiences, views, exchange ideas and

continue the discussion within their national sport. The change of sport culture was now

apparent/evident and proven by the number of NFs and continents represented.

AGENDA – 2011 FEI EVENTING RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR

List of participants Annex I

1. National Federations presentations

1.1 BEL presentation: 1. A scientific approach to Eventing

qualification requirements

2. National Statistics BEL NF

Annex II

1.2 CAN presentation: 2011 Canadian Eventing National Safety

Report

Annex III

1.3 ESP presentation: Eventing National Safety Report Annex IV

1.4 FRA presentation: Consultation Process / Eventing Rules

revision 2013

Annex V

1.5 NZL presentation: Minimum Cross Country Standards Annex VI

1.6 SWE presentation: Changes and actions taken for the Safety of

the Sport

Annex VII

1.7 DEN presentation: Danish Eventing Annex VIII

2. Statistics - Review of International statistics – benchmarking report by

the Eventing Committee Chairman

3. Statistics - Review of National statistics – benchmarking presentation

by the Eventing Committee Chairman

4. Riders and horses Cross Country education and preparation


REPORT Page 3

Updated: 23-Mar-12


presentation by Rudiger Schwarz (GER NF)

5. Guidelines for Cross Country Fence Judges presentation by

Philine Ganders (GER NF) Annex IX

6. 2013 Rules Revision Consultation Process update by the Eventing

Committee Chairman

7. Update on the production of a Cross Country educational DVD

report by Jonathan Clissold (GBR NF)

8. Update on FEI standard for the minimum strength of

frangible/deformable cross country fences by the Eventing

Committee Chairman

Annex X

9. WORKING GROUPS REPORTS

9.1 Standardization of Cross Country Courses

9.2 Minimum qualification standard for 1* level competition

9.3 Education and update of Officials

9.4 Style Cross Country

9.5 Improvement of National Data Collection

9.6 Guidelines for Cross Country fence Judges

Guidelines for Cross Country Controllers

Annex XI

9.7 Rule revision consultation process

9.8 Future of NSO Seminars

1. PRESENTATIONS BY NSOs

1.1 BEL NF– Dominique Maes Annex II

Topic I : A scientific approach to Eventing qualification requirements

The presentation focused on the possibility of using more statistical information as a

guideline for setting qualification requirements, following the example of other sports.

The concept was based on the fact that experienced riders/ horses had a lesser risk of

accident. Taking into account that certain factors might influence the level of risk, e.g.

age of horse or rider, experience, number of results, etc.

In order to combine the criteria, the information was to be entered in a multidimensional

data setting reduced to 2 dimensions to take into account the average of all data

collected to facilitate the analysis and extraction of factors and correlations influencing

the risk. Statistical techniques (PCA and FA principal component analysis) had to be used

to allow the analysis of the file.

An example was shown to understand the technique by using the historical dataset

(Bumpus (measure of birds). Taking the total length of the wings data and the total body

length data, provided two dimensions. Using the data within the reference line instead of

the X/Y data, (principle component “PC”), enabled to use only one dimension with a very

low percent of data loss (3% loss of variation).

Another example was shown using the results of the Olympic decathlon providing 10

dimensions data set. The data set was reduced from 10 dimensions to 2 dimensions by

using the same method explained for the Bumpus measure of birds data.


REPORT Page 4

Updated: 23-Mar-12


According to Dominique Maes the same principle could be applied effectively to the FEI

International data entered in the database. The first step would be to define the factors

which might affect the risk and the statistical data file could then be extracted and

analysed. This would allow the trends to be established and support rule revisions for

qualification.

Discussion:

(DEN NSO) Adrienne Hofer: It was questioned how much percentage of data was lost

using the 10 dimensions dataset. For the Olympic decathlon the loss was of approx 25

%.

(NED NSO) Teun Platenkamp: Referring to the qualifications in Eventing but also the

capabilities of the riders / horses, and minimum requirements was important.

Giuseppe Della Chiesa informed that the Eventing Committee were studying the

possibility of introducing the concept of reverse qualifications for horses to be presented

to the NFs through the 2013 Rule Revision.

The participants agreed that this approach was interesting and the risk factors were to

be determined, e.g. age of riders, age of horses and possibly the relation to the results

of the other tests (Dressage, Show Jumping), etc.

(GBR NF) Jonathan Clissold added that he was of the opinion that the risk of the sport

was currently well managed. The GBR figures showed that a rider had a 0.07 % chance

of being seriously injured. The data should not be over analysed which could lead to

analysing a problem which did not exist.

It was concluded that the introduction of a statistical study was a support to the bigger

picture of the sport and the management of its risk. The identification of risk factors were

needed to confirm the trends to be monitored with statistical collection.

Topic II : National Statistics BEL NF

A general overview on the collection of national data in Belgium was provided by

Dominique Maes. It was explained that the national statistics provided only covered

national competitions organised from 0,90 cm up to 2* level. The fall reports and

accident description, including injuries of horses after the competition, were very difficult

to obtain and were therefore missing.

As Belgium is divided in two regions (Flemish & French speaking), the sport is organised

by two different National leagues (VLP & LEWB). Unfortunately one league did not

provide y any reliable information but it was expected to improve for 2012. In addition

the rural riders were another organisation involved in Eventing competitions, but their

information for 2011 had not been processed.

On another subject, it was questioned whether top level horses (for example finishing in

the top 5 of Championships/Olympic Games) could also benefit from a lifelong 3 star

qualification (as is the case for injured athletes or those out of competition for . a long

duration)

1.2 CAN NF NSO – Peter Gray Annex III

Topic : 2011 Canadian Eventing National Safety Report

A summary on the Eventing sport in Canada was provided. Canada, although a large

country, only organised 50 competitions. Despite that situation the national trainer,

David O’Connor, did a great job with the Eventing team. The education of riders had


REPORT Page 5

Updated: 23-Mar-12


been the main priority and a second video had been produced to explain good Cross

Country techniques to young riders .

The statistics mentioned that 250 falls occurred in the 51 competitions. More falls were

registered at the lower levels and it was a fact that as riders improved their skills the falls

decreased. Medical clearance was required after a fall. No serious horse injuries were

reported for 2011. The type of fence causing the most falls was ascending single fences.

Falls at the lower levels were mostly without injuries. The relation between the injuries

and the falls would be important to maintain a good understanding of the sport. Injuries

not related to a fall were also to be examined as it was necessary to obtain better

information on horse injuries.

One factor identified was the Course Design. Depending on the Course Designer, the rate

of falls could be significantly different (e.g. Florida tour events where out of 1000 starters

only 46 falls occurred).

Discussion:

Giuseppe Della Chiesa mentioned that it was important to understand that falls were part

of the sport. The focus needs be more on rotational or falls that cause injuries rather

than the actual number of falls. In addition it was essential that injuries of horses be

monitored. Injuries related to falls and injuries not related to falls at International and

National levels of competition had to be reported and examined. The focus should be on

the risk of injuries rather than only on the actual number of falls.

(AUS NF) Bob Powles: it was important to take into consideration that the opinion of the

fence judge could be incorrect due to the lack of experience or misjudgement of a

situation.

Giuseppe Della Chiesa: it was necessary to cross check the “gut” feeling with the

information entered in the database. It was clarified that for the international data, the

opinion of the fence judge regarding injuries was counterchecked with the Medical Officer

and Veterinary Delegate using the FEI report form for riders and horses.

(GER NF) Fritz Otto-Erley: It was very important for young riders to learn how to fall,

training sessions were organised in Germany to teach young riders the “tuck and roll”

technique of falling.

1.3 ESP NF NSO – Felicisimo Aguado Arroyo Annex IV

Topic : Eventing National Safety Report

The National Statistics were presented. It was explained that Spain was a small country

and not many Eventing competitions were organised.

The total number of starters for 2011 was 592, 11 falls occurred representing 1.85 %. At

the 1* level for 191 starters, 1 fall was reported (0.52 %), 2* level 73 starters, 1 fall

(1,3 %), 3* level 22 starters, 1 fall (4.5 %). (The number would be corrected in the next

version)

It was difficult to obtain information from regional competitions. The aim of the

organisers was to have competitors and these were mainly not professional riders but

just riders wishing to enjoy one day of Cross County. The issue in Spain was the low

number of events and XC courses. It was frequent to have the same Course Designer

and the same XC courses with little alteration from one year to the next.

Regarding the statistics the general feeling was that there were not enough participants

to draw conclusions on the percentage of falls at national level.


REPORT Page 6

Updated: 23-Mar-12


1.4 FRA NF – NF representative – Anne de Sainte Marie Annex V

Topic : Consultation Process / Eventing Rules revision 2013

In the framework of consultation process regarding 2013 FEI Eventing Rules Revision

the FRA NF Delegate presented the FRA NF with suggestions linked directly or indirectly

to the Risk Management questions as follows:

Promotion of Eventing: To encourage a better promotion of Eventing discipline

(and continue to limit the risks during competitions).

The proposal included the use of only one competition name “CCI” to enable a better

understanding and avoid confusion for public, media and spectators. 5 international

levels proposed with relevant technical standards. This would enable a simple

progressive qualification system.

Costs: Necessity to make CCI3*/2*/1* more cost-effective for organisers.

To maintain a sufficient number of professional riders in Eventing a special attention

needed to be given to cost issues. In order to continue great shows, a particular

concern needs to be given to Organisers. The events could be organised on 2 or 3

days, two of the tests to be organised on the same day (Dressage and Jumping or

Jumping and XC) ; order to be chosen by the OC. This could reduce the number of

days away for the riders and reduce the stabling costs for the OC. The 1st veterinary

inspection could be dropped and replaced by a sanitary check up when horses

entered the venue. The 2nd veterinary inspection could be organized like a vet-gate

after the Cross Country test. Prior to the inspection horses need a recovery stage.

A minimum prize money level for major events 3* and 4*(currently minimum prize

money applies only for 4*) would help with the shows homogenization.

FEI Eventing Nations Cup Series

FEI Eventing Nations Cup Series had been developed by several NFs (FRA, GBR, GER)

on a trial basis commencing in 2012. 6 events would be organised in Europe. Each

event is based on 50 riders, 6 teams (of 5 riders), 20 reserve individuals.

1.5 NZL NF NSO – Neil Mosley Annex VI

Topic : Minimum Cross Country Standards

Due to the big distances between New Zealand and other countries it was difficult to

keep the standards of XC in line with the European development. There was a big effort

to bring New Zealand back to the top of the worldwide Eventing sport. Concerns had to

be addressed to maintain the level of the Cross Country courses designed in New

Zealand. This is following a period of pressure on the Course Designers, Technical

Delegates and Organisers to dumb down the courses with the objective of gaining

qualifications and enabling horses to be sold on the international market with a clean

competition history.

The Technical Committee and the Performance Committee of New Zealand decided to

introduce minimum standards of Cross Country course design initially based on the FEI

Cross Country Course Design guidelines.

Cross Country courses now need to include a certain number of technical questions and

requirements (listed in the annexed presentation).

In addition TDs need to fill in a form on Cross Country minimum standards, including

several questions on the standards. It was enforced since July 2011 and currently only a

couple of courses reported back to be lower than the standard.


REPORT Page 7

Updated: 23-Mar-12


The Organising Committee also work with the Technical Advisor of the region (FEI

official), in order to improve the quality of courses.

Discussion:

Giuseppe Della Chiesa: this approach is in line with the evolution of Risk Management

and presents interesting possibilities. No favours or cheating should be allowed on the

standards of Cross Country. When designing a course it was important to achieve the

level. It was one of the main objectives of the Eventing Committee to establish

requirements to ensure that standards be respected at both International and National

events, an essential part of the Risk Management program.

BEL NF Dominique Maes: further to a query if similar programmes had been developed in

other countries, both NED and ITA NF explained that they had introduced a comparable

approach.

1.6 SWE NF NSO - Lars (Christian) Christensson / NF Rep. Christina (Lisa)

Klingspor

Topic : Changes and actions taken for the Safety of the Sport Annex VII

Major changes were adopted at the beginning of 2010. Different problems have been

addressed by the Eventing Committee and Sub-Committees.

An overview of the national statistics was provided. A check list and 4 forms (fall report,

TD report, superior Judge report, riders representative report) were sent to the

organisers.

The revision of the SWE National rules included:

• Minor changes and clarifications regarding deformable fences and time-limits for

changes to the Cross Country course according to Rider Representative’s input

• Increased responsibilities for Course Designers in all * classes

• Major revision 2013, following new FEI rules

• Green card compulsory in order to compete (before the age of 13 course to be

followed with parents)

• Rider’s booklet: registering all falls. The trainer must sign the booklet to allow

riders to enter their first competition as well as for their first 1* competition.

• Compulsory license for trainers

• Elimination: further to an elimination in any discipline, riders are forbidden to use

a whip. If a whip or strong legs are used the rider will be awarded a red card.

A new concept for the medical card will be tested during 2012. The riders will have to fill

in on the entry form their information (name, personal number, relatives, phone

numbers, grooms, medical data is optional). The organiser will include the information on

the bibs to be worn by riders (front and back, left and right side).

Style riding: As from 2012, style riding competitions will be organised (as per Germany

format), at all level of events.

Other actions taken include:

• Swedish Chef d’Equipes have to have a discussion (education) to riders having

received a yellow card

• Budgets for the education of National Officials have been awarded (CDs, TDs,

Judges Controllers and Stewards)


REPORT Page 8

Updated: 23-Mar-12


• Cross Country standard: the national levels of each class have been raised in line

with FEI standards. Guidelines have been developed to specify what is allowed

and recommended at each level and what is not recommended (ponies and

horses), this is a great help for Course Designers.

• The Swedish Eventing Committee has encouraged the organisers to upgrade their

competitions to international status.

• Swedish Championships for ponies are style judged to encourage good riding from

the start.

• Activities such as regional Cross Country training, “Sugar Cup” and the new Talent

Recruitment Program have been developed.

• Guidelines have been developed for the Controllers’ responsibilities.

• Promote: POSITIVE ATMOSPHERE = SAFER SPORT

Discussion:

NZL NF Neil Mosley: How does style riding affect results?

SWE NF Lars Christensson: a total figure is given, different groups are judged, they

include position, influence of the horse, speed, refusals, etc.

NED NF Gert Naber: NED NF have also introduced style classes as of 2012.

BEL NF Dominique Maes: regarding the riders booklet, how is the information recorded at

the NF.

SWE NF Lars Christensson: in the future the information will be entered into the

database. For the time being the trainer’s signature for the first competition is checked

and falls are recorded.

1.7 DEN NF NSO – Adrienne Hofer Annex VIII

Topic : Danish Eventing

Being a smaller nation, Denmark had approximately 2’000 starters in Eventing and one

problem was the lack of educated trainers in the country. Since 2008, courses have been

developed for instructors, and riders have to follow fall courses every two years.

The national rule changes include:

• Riders must receive medical attention after every fall

• No sharp bits allowed

• 6 qualifying rounds with 0 faults on fences (up to 0,90 cm before starting 1m00)

• 4 qualifying rounds with 0 faults on fences (at 1m00)

• Young horses must qualify at 0,90 cm (2 competitions, even for experienced

riders)

• 2 serious falls at a level and rider must re-qualify for the level

Officials were not trained enough to be up to date (sharp), especially Course Designers,

who very often have only designed one course and always the same, lose their

objectivity. It is now recommended that Course Designers follow courses and go abroad.

Technical Delegates were appointed by the National Safety Officer or the National

Eventing Committee. The training of officials had been reorganised and the permissions

could be withdrawn.

Minimum requirements of officials have been introduced at all levels of competitions. All

competitions over 80 starters have to appoint 2 officials.

Introduction of XC Controllers at all events had been made compulsory. Regular contact

with the fences judges was introduced some years ago. Courses for education of fence

judges has been looked at.


REPORT Page 9

Updated: 23-Mar-12


Discussion:

GER NF Fritz Otto-Erley: commented that small Federations have a major problem as the

education system is based on a small number of competitions; 2-3 competitions are

organised per year. It is a major issue to provide an appropriate education of officials,

riders and horses.

2. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL STATISTICS - presentation G. Della Chiesa

The collection of International data had been ongoing since 2004, allowing 8 years of

data. The collection of information had now spread down to the national federations.

• The total number of FEI competitions has increased from 318 in 2004 to 568 in

2011, the Eventing sport is growing. The number of competitions at 4 star level

was stable as it was limited to top events. The 1 star level had doubled since

2004. The 3 star competitions from 2010 to 2011 had increased from 159 to 214,

this tendency had been observed several times prior to the Olympic games for

qualification purposes.

The number of competitions for 2011 was based on the calendar whilst the

number of starters was based on the number of processed competitions. The data

shown regarding starters and falls was therefore at the time incomplete as

another 38 competitions were to be entered. As from 2011 the total number of

competitions included the double sections increasing the total number by 22

competitions.

• The total number of starters had also increased. The 1* and 2* competitions

represented 80% of the sport. The 1* level alone equalled 50 % of starters.

• The number of falls from 2004 to 2010 showed a decrease in the percentage of

total number of falls per starters. For 2011 a small increase can be noticed. This

increase needs to be closely monitored as the reasons could be various. In

addition, the 4 star percentage of falls per starters was approximately the double

of the average of all levels. This was not the image needed for the sport. The

number of rotational had decreased

• Benchmarks set by the Eventing Committee were explained and examined. The

goal was to try to reduce the average falls of 2004-2008 by 10% over the next 5

years. The target was 10 % less for the 1* to 3* levels and 20 % for 4* level.

Alert levels have been set at the double of the average 2004-2008. It was stated

that the average for 2009-2011 remained within the target although the figures

for 2011 alone were out of target.

The 1* level was not within the target and it was commented that it was

important to have riders and horses prepared for the first international level of

competition.

• It was also mentioned the sport was run on a 4 year cycle due to World

Equestrian Games and Olympic Games. It could be recommended to base the

average benchmarking on 4 years instead of 5 years.

• Horse falls had decreased overall although a slight increase was shown for 2011.

The split between rotational and non rotational falls show that the number of

rotational horse falls has reduced from 0,51 % in 2004 to 0,20 % in 2011.

• Injuries of riders (slight and serious) had decreased. The reasons could be

multiple, such as the improvement of the data accuracy (reporting system), rider

protection improvements (helmet, body protector), etc. It was explained that

injuries were followed up through the form filled in by the Chief Medical Officer at


REPORT Page 10

Updated: 23-Mar-12


the competition. When the Chief Medical Officer had no information on the injury

the National Federation received an e-mail to provide the FEI with an update.

3. REVIEW OF NATIONAL STATISTICS – BENCHMARKING - G. Della Chiesa

The difficulty of obtaining accurate data was highlighted. Quantitative information was

important to back up the “gut” feeling. It was also commented that no information was

better than incorrect information.

The compilation of the 2011 National Statistics showed that the reporting was yet not

stable nor comparable; significant differences between National Federations were noted

especially in regard to the count of the total number of competitions. Clarification on

definitions had to be provided. A working group would review the template in order to

clarify the requested data.

The FEI average level of unseated rider falls for 2011 was 3,89 %, for horse falls it was

1.77 %. When comparing to the national statistics most National Federations were under

both averages.

NSOs were urged to communicate to their Officials the importance and necessity of

providing accurate information in the reports.

A working group session was to better define the headings (definitions) and provide

definitions on what data the NFs/NSOs had to provide in order to make the figures

comparable between the countries. Currently the difference was too big between the FEI

and national data to identify trends. However the effort of NFs to collect the data is a

huge step forward. The development of the thought process in the different countries is

the main contribution to the Risk management program to allow the FEI to monitor the

risk in a transparent way.

• The NSOs were asked to communicate to the Officials the importance of

reporting both at International and National competitions.

4. RIDERS AND HORSES CROSS COUNTRY EDUCATION AND PREPARATION –

Rudiger Schwarz

GER NF Rudiger Schwarz gave a presentation on the Riders and Horses Cross Country

Education and Preparation. The current sport had developed with riders and horses

lacking Cross Country education and preparation. At all levels but especially at the lower

levels, horses were often going too fast, riders were fighting with bits (strong bits). He

explained that it was important to learn to work a horse with a normal bridle for all

classes. In certain situations some horses could need another bit, but it should not be

used only for brakes.

The overall feeling was that most riders did not work their horses enough outdoors in

country terrain.

In Germany since 2012, the Young Riders and Junior training system included minimum

3 days per week trotting and cantering outdoors for 5-7 kilometres. After a rest the

horses did the normal work of Dressage and Show Jumping. It was stated that after 4

weeks of such training the horses were less nervous.

Improving and making Cross Country safer was also part of the training. Riders and

horses had to learn progressively to answer different questions including sunken roads,

coffins, drops, to bring more confidence to the rider and horse and avoid excessive use of

whip and spurs.


REPORT Page 11

Updated: 23-Mar-12


Mobile fences and Show Jumping fences with no colour and normal cups were used for

training, starting very low on the ground, the height was increased gradually. Later

working uphill and downhill, the distances were to be changed, adjusting also the tempo.

The training started early in the year (March). During winter months more Show Jumping

was done to improve the horses or change certain points of the last season which were

not so good. Gymnastic sessions were also done with the horses.

As from April, to build confidence, Show Jumping fences were mixed with Cross Country

fences (e.g. a pole on top of a 1.30 brush). It was very important to evaluate the level of

competence of riders and horses to avoid loss of confidence.

In the early competitions in the year, it was explained that not too many different fences

were presented to the young horses. In competition there was only one chance to jump a

fence. In training however it was possible to repeat as many attempts as necessary until

the horse become relaxed and confident.

It was stated that amateur riders sometimes started too early at 3* level and leading

back to the discussion regarding qualifications, (combinations with the necessary

Minimum Eligibility Requirements were not automatically ready for the level). There was

a confusion between being qualified and being ready for a level. It was also more difficult

for amateur riders to be objective on their level of riding.

Education was very important to bring awareness for riders, horses and trainers.

General principles for riding Cross Country fences:

• Preparation (speed, correct length of canter, the correct canter to fences, seat of

the rider)

• Tempo and stride length

• Control of direction (on the right line)

• Safety seat (legs are for steering, arms to show direction) balance

Rules for type of Cross Country fences and combination of fences

• Rhythm fences need preparation within the rhythm

• Appropriate speed for each fence

• Hidden fences only to be used in the CHs and 4*

• Special tempo for related angle fences

• Coffins – balanced collected canter

• How to achieve the optimum time (no loss of time in the first minutes)

Course Walking

• Understanding the question through the horse’s eye (not the same view as a

human)

• Considering the options for the horse ridden

• Identifying clear preparation points (tempo, gear, line)

• Considering the shape of the fences and minute markers

A DVD with different falls was shown and comments were given regarding the different

cases. The importance of training was emphasized.

The training sessions of a rider (Michael Jung) were shown highlighting the importance of

repeating the same questions (fences) with control and in a relaxed way.


REPORT Page 12

Updated: 23-Mar-12


In Germany, seminars for trainers were organised on a regular basis to share the

knowledge.

The old mentality including that as long as horses are clear over a fence it is acceptable,

must change as this is not any longer sufficient . The link also needs to be done with the

style riding. Producing a nice picture and having a happy horse was to be part of the

sport. Riders and horses had to learn how to go up the ladder in a progressive way

according to their aptitudes.

Ideas were quite easy to bring to Officials through officials seminars. The question was

how could these messages be brought to the trainers. It was recommended that NSOs

communicate to their National Federations to share the awareness and change of sport

culture for a lowered risk and better pictures in the sport.

5. GUIDELINES FOR CROSS COUNTRY FENCE JUDGES

GER NF Philine Ganders presented the topic on guidelines for Cross Country Fences

Judges.

The main goals of fence judges in connection with Risk Management were to:

• reduce the consequences of falls by securing and obtaining immediate and

appropriate help.

• reduce risk of accidents by ensuring good conditions and applying the correct

stopping procedures in order to avoid additional accident.

• producing correct statistics (falls).

Cross Country Control Centre had to work closely with fence judges.

The responsibilities of fence judges included keeping the XC track free, assuring the

same conditions for each competitor (especially the ground), helping when falls (rider /

horse) occurred.

It was important to have a sensible allocation of tasks (watching the approach of the

fence, repairing the ground). The fence judges had to keep radios with them at all times.

It was explained that sector stewards were there to help the fence judges, to brief them

directly at the fence, in order to know where the emergency roads were and which part

of the track had to be kept free from spectators.

The fence judge was also to help the Ground Jury with the dangerous riding, tired horse

or rider and other Risk Management issues.

When fence judges were not 100 % sure of a situation it was important that control was

informed.

Special incidents included for example when a fence was damaged. If the fence could

not be repaired, control had to be advised.

In case of an accident the recommendations were to stay calm, analyse the situation,

answer the questions from the control centre. It was stated that examples of questions

were to be given during the briefing (do you need a doctor, paramedics or veterinary, is

the track clear, is the fence ok, can horse and rider leave the track).

In case of a serious fall, telephone to be used and not the radio, photographers to be

kept away from the scene, screens to be put up. Later notes had to be made and report

form be filled in with all necessary information.

The function of the radios had to be clearly explained, it was important to mention that

only one speaks at a time.


REPORT Page 13

Updated: 23-Mar-12


The fence judges had to be informed not to speak to spectators and not to get distracted.

Discussion:

SWE NF Lars Christensson: mentioned that at Aachen the XC fence judges meeting was

very impressive and well prepared.

NED NF Teun Platenkamp: mentioned that in his instructions he included that the fence

judge had to stay during any protest time or provide a mobile number.

Conclusions:

It was agreed that guidelines together with the powerpoint presentation be made

available on the FEI website to help the Technical Delegate brief the fence judges. A

checklist would be included also for Fence Judges Briefings.

Philine Ganders mentioned that a page on the use of frangible fences and how to deal

with them was to be added to the presentation.

The role of a fence judge was to make sure that a fence was safe to be jumped, the

fence judge was the eyes of the controller and emergency services. It is a very important

task, fence judges had to remain calm and objective. The fence judge was the first

person to report back regarding falls. Awareness of the role was very important and had

to be emphasized. Use of video systems or photos should be encouraged to be added to

the reporting. Videos were part of the evidence the ground jury could use to evaluate

and balance their decisions. This should be clearly communicated to all officials.

6. 2013 RULES REVISION CONSULTATION PROCESS

The Chairman of the Eventing Committee provided a review of the 2013 Rules revision

consultation process. Three Open forums had been organised (Germany, Mexico and

Australia) to discuss the different proposals regarding the Rule revision. An additional

Open forum was to be organised in New Zealand in April 2012. Furthermore, the FEI

sports forum will take place 30 April -2 May 2012 in Lausanne where the Eventing

proposal for the revision of the rules will be presented and discussed.

The Eventing Committee met earlier in the week of the seminar to focus on the

proposition for the rule revision, particularly the discussion platform for the Forum.

The topics of discussions included:

• Formats: (was it still relevant to keep 2 competition formats), with the emphasis

on the CCI. CICs were seen as preparation competitions and the question was if

they be international or national and how to integrate these competitions for

developing National Federations.

A proposal would be made in view of maintaining the two formats with a clearer

definition between CCIs and CICs with no overlapping of the distances and

number of efforts. The name could be changed to long and short format.

Mandatory Show Jumping at the end for the long format, short format would be

encouraged to have Showing Jumping last but not mandatory. A better

differentiation of the competitions was followed by certain benefits such as the

horse inspections (easier for short), the role of officials could be modified for short

format.

The aim was to lower, if possible, the costs for short competitions for the

Organising Committees.

• Qualifications: implemented to make sure that riders and horses were going up

the levels in a progressive way and were not exposed to a higher risk than what


REPORT Page 14

Updated: 23-Mar-12


was necessary for the competition. The qualification system was not to take away

the responsibilities of where they belonged. The rider and trainer had to evaluate

and decide on the level of competence. More emphasis was to be given to the

riders going up the levels.

• Reverse qualifications: It was explained that this system would apply to horses.

The proposal included downgrading horses after 2 eliminations on Cross Country

(falls, 3 refusals on XC, dangerous riding) within a 12 months rolling period of

time.

NED NF commented that they had a similar system of downgrading riders who

had been eliminated twice in a row on Cross Country. The system was working

well and no negative comments had been received.

• Permanent Athlete Qualification/riders licence: the proposal was to enable

riders having 5 MERs (with clear rounds) at a level (short or long) to be confirmed

at the level for 5 years without competing. After the period of 5 years one level

would be lost.

• Distances and efforts: the proposition was to review the overall table of

distances-speeds-efforts in line with the different objectives of the two formats and

in order to better differentiate them. In this process the proposal is also to lower

the speed at the short level to 500 m/min for 1*, 520 m/min for 2* and 550

m/min for 3*.

CAN NF Peter Gray questioned whether a study had been done regarding the distance

and number of jumps to which a horse gets fatigue (around 8 minutes). The minimum

age of horse was raised for CIC1/2* and it was agreed to propose that it should be

reviewed.

7. DVD UPDATE – Jonathan Clissold

Jonathan Clissold gave an update on the production of the FEI DVD to help education of

officials. It would include footage of dangerous riding and horse abuse.

It was explained that British Eventing was also producing a DVD to help the training of

riders, trainers, officials, etc. which would serve as a basis for the FEI DVD.

The process of trailing the pictures was very long to obtain the appropriate pictures.

An overview of the planning was shown. The headings of the DVD for the FEI would be

slightly different to the DVD produced by British Eventing.

The headings for the FEI DVD would include the following subjects (according to art. 519

and 520 of Rules for Eventing): excessive use of spurs and/or whips, dangerous riding,

riding out of control, riding too fast or too slow, standing of fences, out of balance and

riding a tired horse.

The aim was to produce a system to enable all the sport to share the vision of what was

considered inappropriate riding and what was considered “good pictures” or good riding

in order to facilitate the correct implementation of articles 519 and 520 of the Rules for

Eventing.

The headers of British Eventing DVD would include what is a refusal, last minute change

of mind with a refusal, jumping a fence incompletely, black flag rules, what is a horse

fall.

It was important to include a goal in the Action Plan to produce a DVD to help the

understanding of what was considered dangerous riding, what were pictures we wanted


REPORT Page 15

Updated: 23-Mar-12


to see and the pictures we didn’t want to see. Borderline cases were very important to

enable discussions and a better understanding.

Awareness of the public was different depending on the country as backgrounds/cultures

were different. Sharing images to discuss was a way to evolve.

It was stated that for this DVD it was difficult to find interesting footage of unsafe riding.

All NSOs/NFs were asked if they had access to any interesting footage and if so to

provide it urgently to Jonathan Clissold.

The finalisation of the DVD was scheduled for the end of April 2012.

8. UPDATE ON THE FEI STANDARD FOR THE MINIMUM STRENGTH OF

FRANGIBLE / DEFORMABLE CROSS COUNTRY FENCES

The Chairman of the Eventing Committee provided an update on the frangible

technology. The development had been ongoing for some time as the first pins were

implemented in 2001. The reasoning for introducing some mechanisms of passive safety

were to limit the consequences of an accident. The rotational falls were the incidents

causing the bigger injuries and therefore the studies concentrated on these falls. After

that initial approach with the study, financed by British Eventing (with TRL), other

methods were tested.

The acceptance of the use of traditional frangible pins in international competitions were

done under the understanding that the integrity of the Cross Country test (jumping fixed

fences) would not be affected.

The traditional frangible pin was in fact only acting under vertical force (not horizontal),

the aim was to avoid rotational falls.

The Eventing Committee later allowed other mechanisms to be used for a testing period

under the condition that they had to be approved each time by the officials of the

competition. The reverse pin, the MIM Clip, the Dutch log, and Prolog were all used

during the testing phase under these conditions.

Following the testing period, it was requested to try to establish a more formal

framework for the use of these technologies in FEI competitions leading to the setup of a

dedicated working group (Course Designers, Technical Delegates, Universities,

Manufactures) coordinated by TRL (Transport Research Laboratory.

The conclusion was that a standard was possible but it would not be a standard of safety,

but a standard of minimum strength and repeatability of performance.

The foreword of the standard mentions “This standard represents a necessary step in

order to integrate frangible / deformable fence construction technology alongside with

traditional Cross Country fence construction while maintaining the fundamental principle

of the Cross Country test.”

It was not disputable that a fence that gives way had a lesser risk than a non-moving

fence, but it was also clear that the fundamental principle of the Cross Country test (fixed

fences) had to be maintained. (Show Jumping has already been invented some time

ago).

The aim of the standard was to find a way to introduce frangible deformable devices

alongside the traditional Cross Country fences ensuring that the characteristics of such

frangible/deformable fences did not to change the nature of the sport.

The three aims of the standard and related tests were to:


REPORT Page 16

Updated: 23-Mar-12


• ensure that the fence will not expose the rider/horse to a higher risk than a

traditional fence, in particular when activated.

• ensure that the fences have a minimum strength representative of a fixed fence.

• ensure a repeatable activation to be fair to all competitors (system must perform

in the same way for all competitors).

In order to have devices approved to be used in FEI competitions the manufacturers from

now on are called to comply with this standard and apply for the registration of their

product on the FEI list of approved frangible/deformable devices to be used in FEI

competitions.

The device can and will be approved by the FEI after passing all the tests and

requirements (fitting instructions, etc) as detailed in the standard

The request for the standard was pushed forward by manufacturers. A framework was

necessary to work. Attention was given that the tests developed needed to be simple and

achievable in all parts of the world. The testing machine could be done anywhere and the

testing was then to be certified by an FEI approved laboratory.

GBR NF Jonathan Clissold explained that in 2011 a total of 244 pins had been sold mainly

in GBR, USA and CAN. The frangible pin to a higher specification than the FEI standard

was already being tested by TRL. Jonathan Clissold felt that the FEI standard developed

only covered part of the specification which required in the future as no upper level was

defined.

Giuseppe Della Chiesa answered that FEI was in no way developing a safetystandard ,

only a standard for the use of frangible / deformable mechanisms in FEI competitions.

Three conditions had been identified to be fulfilled for these standard:

1. mechanism should not make the fence more dangerous than a traditional XC fence,

2. should not change the nature of the sport (i.e. moving to Show Jumping),

3. ensure fair conditions to all competitors.

9. WORKING GROUPS REPORTS

9.1 STANDARDISATION OF CROSS COUNTRY COURSES

The working group lead by Neil Mosley (Wayne Copping, Anton Granhus, Robert

Kellerhouse, Chalermcharn Yotviriyapanit, Kalle Nykänen) made the following

recommendations:

1. It was essential that, from a Risk management perspective, all National Federations

correspond to the FEI levels regarding the level of XC course. FEI Cross Country

Guidelines was the basis to be used.

2. All National Federations must establish levels of competition leading into the FEI

equivalent grades to give a natural progression for riders and horses. However the level

needed to be agreed worldwide and the international level serve as reference.

3. All different elements of Cross Country Course Design should be introduced at as low a

level of competition as possible and be progressive in degree of difficulty throughout the

grades. It was mentioned that education for National Course Designers, Technical

Delegates and trainers needed to be improved to ensure the understanding and

implementation of this concept.

Discussion:


REPORT Page 17

Updated: 23-Mar-12


Jonathan Clissold mentioned that the National competitions were stepping stones to get

to the International competitions. Therefore the level of difficulty could be slightly lower

for National competitions.

Giuseppe Della Chiesa explained that directives regarding the level of national

competitions used for qualification were to be of equivalent standard of difficulty as the

relevant international star level competition (art. 506.3.2 Rules for Eventing). It was

mentioned that CCIs were not necessarily more difficult but the distance was longer.

Wayne Copping stated that when he was building a course no difference was made in

difficulty for CCIs and CICs.

9.2 MINIMUM QUALIFICATION STANDARD FOR 1* LEVEL COMPETITIONS

The working group led by Wayne Copping (Neil Mosley, Anton Granhus, Robert

Kellerhouse, Chalermcharn Yotviriyapanit, Kalle Nykänen) made the following

recommendations:

The qualifications for the 1st level of competition was not possible for the FEI to check as

the national results were too variable in quality for a systematic review.

• National Federations responsible for qualifications as currently in the rules

• Minimum MER achieved at the previous level to be of a minimum level of 1m05 to

be checked by NFs. MERs to be obtained in the last 12 months.

• Competitors participating in another country in national competitions should be

obliged to fulfil the criteria’s of that specific country.

It was questioned whether the first level of competition could be harmonized in all

countries, the issue was how to enforce the requirement.

However the problem occurred in general when National competitions were used for

qualification for International competitions. If a two star national competition was not of

the equivalent level the riders and horses were not prepared to enter the International

competition.

Rudiger Schwarz mentioned that not all Course Designers had the same style within the

levels. However a 1m10 competition should always respect that level. It was strongly

recommended that no more than 2 fences should be shared between levels. Directives on

the number and type of fences at the level could be included in the FEI XC course

guidelines.

Deadline for qualification was discussed. It was felt that National Federations were the

only body that could take responsibility for entering their riders and horses in the

International competitions. Rules for Eventing article 506.4.2 to be referred to.

9.3 EDUCATION AND UPDATE OF OFFICIALS

The working group lead by Lars Christensson (Peter Gray, Marcin Konarski, Giacomo

Della Chiesa, Rudiger Schwarz, Adrienne Hofer, Gert Naber, Charly Boess, Bohumil

Rejnek) recommended the following:

Structure:

The education of officials for Eventing should include Ground Juries, Dressage Judges,

Course Designers, Technical Delegates, Stewards, Controllers, Fence Judges, Style

Judges and Trainers.


REPORT Page 18

Updated: 23-Mar-12


A clear structure was needed to including the rationale for stricter education and clear

description of responsibilities of National Federations and FEI. In addition, the

responsibilities had to be delegated and mandated to the appropriate persons.

Measurements and tools to be developed to evaluate the level of education (sufficient or

insufficient).

The debriefing with the candidates and national federations was very important. The

economical sources within the National Federations and at the FEI had to be studied to

define how the education of Controllers, Fence judges, Course Designers, etc could be

part of the Risk Management program.

It was felt that licences/authorisations could be implemented for trainers, fence judges,

controllers and stewards to facilitate the processes.

Officials Role:

Eventing Officials were the essence of spreading and sharing Eventing values and

therefore the continuous education allows consistency throughout the Judging. Rider

should be allow to expect the same standard of Judging in every event worldwide.

Education:

• Eventing Judges had to be upgraded and up to speed as the level of Dressage

had improved in the last years in Eventing. The discussion included use of “pure”

Dressage judges. It was important that if they were included in the GJ they

needed to receive education in Eventing, including the risk management. The

recommendation was to have one Eventing Judge and the other 2 could be “pure”

Dressage judges.

Conclusion: more education and more knowledge of the Eventing sport was felt

necessary for Dressage judges. It was questioned whether an additional judge

could be added to the Ground Jury to have a balance between the “pure”

Dressage judges and the Eventing judges.

However it was accepted that it would be difficult to find “pure” Dressage judges

function only for the Dressage. It would increase costs for the Organisers as it

added an extra member to the Ground Jury. However at high level events it was

important to have the full review of the entire competition from Dressage and

Cross Country to Jumping for consistency.

• Course Designers: The refresher courses for National level every year or every

second year. For FEI course levels it was currently on a three years basis.

Nationally maintaining the education of CD was crucial to ensure that the

standards of levels were respected.

• Technical Delegates: the role of TD is essential in Eventing. National Technical

Delegates were often also Course Designers and it was a plus for FEI Technical

Delegates to have experience as Course Designer. It was recommended that

upcoming TDs work with experienced TDs.

• Stewards: in some countries no education was available for stewards. It was

explained that an FEI updated manual, together with an education plan, would be

available soon.

• Controllers: the quality of Controllers depend on the countries. It was strongly

recommended that the FEI sets standards for the education of controllers (as in

Sweden). A handbook/guidelines to be developed and posted on the FEI website.

• Fence judges: only some countries have education for fence judges. Competent

fence judges needed to be brought into the system at all levels of competitions.


REPORT Page 19

Updated: 23-Mar-12


Guidelines (GER NF Ganders Philine and GBR NF Jonathan Clissold to provide) to

be compiled and posted on FEI website.

• Trainers: National Federations have different levels and categories of trainers.

However the NF national trainers are responsible to sign off the riders as

competent to compete. It was suggested that a symposium to train coaches could

be organised, including a Risk management element, and certified coaches were

allow to sign off Eventing riders before competitions. Refresher courses to be

organised every 2 years. As the FEI was not involved with the national level of

education such education directives needed to be established directly by each NF

9.4 STYLE CROSS COUNTRY

The working group lead by Lars Christensson (Peter Gray, Marcin Konarski, Giacomo

Della Chiesa, Rudiger Schwarz, Adrienne Hofer, Gert Naber, Charly Boess, Bohumil

Rejnek) made the following recommendations:

Style Cross Country competitions were organised in several countries with the main goal

to promote “good pictures =safe riding”. For young horses (4-6 years) it was very

important, but even more so for young riders. These type of events could be easily

organised by all NFs at the lower level The judging of style on Cross Country would be

useful for Risk Management promotion and for better pictures in the sport.

The necessary facilities included a XC course, designed technical fences, including fences

for gallop and jumping in a balanced way and within the right rhythm. These

competitions could act as an introduction and explanation to the sport.

Protocol, video and immediate comment from the judges to the rider was important

Judges need education with experienced trainers and judges to get a level standard. The

NF need to establish the connection between the protocol, the results and the coach,

trainer and rider.

German protocol and Swedish protocol could be provided (translated) to all interested

National Federations as a basis. It included the protocol of judging of tempo, rhythm, the

lines, balanced turning, feeling for the distances, the seat in a two point position,

smooth, weight down in the stirrups. The influence of the horse, communication, the

aids, the ability to ride in a rhythm and balanced in control, smooth, calm and secure

riding. Marks from 1-10. Points are removed for refusal, knocking down a fence and

dangerous riding. A final mark is given according to all the above.

Style competitions were combined with Dressage and Show Jumping or could be only

Cross Country. To avoid confusion the recommendation would be to have Cross Country

style competitions .

Conclusion: A working group (SWE and GER) to come up with a proposition to be made

available to all interested National Federations and report to the next meeting.

9.5 IMPROVEMENT OF NATIONAL DATA COLLECTION

A working group lead by Bob Powles (Philine Ganders, Anne de Sainte Marie, Christina

Klingspor, Anibal Marianito, Jonathan Clissold, Katrin Eichinger-Kniely, Dominique Maes,

Paul Brady) reviewed the national data collection in order to set uniform parameters to

improve the comparison level of the data collected.


REPORT Page 20

Updated: 23-Mar-12


The consistency of the national data needed to be redefined to enable the comparison

between the National Federations data and International data. The national figures also

allowed to establish the dimension of the sport in a defined county.

The difference of reporting of the total number of competitions was an issue. Certain NFs

provided number of events, others competitions, etc. It was agreed that the definition

“total number of competitions” should be based on each time the results/classification

were produced (to count as one competition).

The total number of starters was a better indicator per NF as no confusion was possible.

The serious injury definition was questioned. It was defined that serious injury was a fall

with permanent disability. Slight injury referred to a fall with temporary injury. It was

agreed by the NSOs that slight injury / temporary disability should be added to the

collection of national data as from 2012.

The template of the National Statistics was examined, clarifying the definitions was key

to allow a good understanding (definitions should be included in the template for

reference).

The total number of registered riders and horses was problematic in many countries as

certain NFs did not register all riders and horses, especially at the lower levels (regional).

In other countries riders and horses were registered without mentioning the discipline. It

was impossible to extract the Eventing riders and horses (e.g. GER).

Updated data to be collected for the National statistics:

Total number of starters per level: Total number of combinations starting the Cross

Country

Average number of starters per level (based on starters in Dressage):

Total number of riders falls per level: total number of unseated riders (not

cumulative with the horse falls)

Total number of horse falls per level: total number of horse falls

Total number of serious injuries per level: Rider/horse with permanent disability

Total number of slight injuries per level: Rider/horse with temporary disability

For all definitions: add up to 0,80 cm for the first level of competition

Total number of registered riders and horses: total number of unique riders and

horses participating in Eventing

If the data was not reliable it was agreed that it should not be included

Recommendation: Each National Federation to support the national setup of a national

database system for collection of national statistics. Guidelines as per FEI

recommendations to encourage National Federations.

9.6 GUIDELINES FOR CROSS COUNTRY FENCE JUDGES

GUIDELINES FOR CROSS COUNTRY CONTROLLERS

The working group lead by Bob Powles (Philine Ganders, Anne de Sainte Marie, Christina

Klingspor, Anibal Marianito, Jonathan Clissold, Katrin Eichinger-Kniely, Dominique Maes,

Paul Brady) made the following recommendations:

- guidelines to be provided on the FEI website (memorandum, presentation,

handbook) for the Cross Country Fence Judges and for the Cross Country

Controllers.


REPORT Page 21

Updated: 23-Mar-12


(GER NF (Philine Ganders) and GBR NF (Jonathan Clissold) to provide their presentation)

Recommendation to NFs: It was mentioned that each NF could buy a stock of radios

which could then be rented or provided to Organising Committees.

9.7 2013 RULES REVISION CONSULTATION PROCESS – Qualifications and age

of horses

The working group lead by Teun Platenkamp (Felicisimo Aguado Arroyo, Delano Miranda,

Fritz Otto-Erley, Yasuhiko Haruta, Utta Helkenberg, Silvia Gavornikova) identified the

areas of the rules related to risk management and as the risk management standards

needed to be highlighted.

The minimum age of horses for FEI competition was reviewed and agreed that in the 2

star competitions the 5-year old horses should no longer be authorised as too young to

be competent and well trained at that level.

Mental and physical ability of riders was strongly emphasised. Being fit to compete was

essential.

It was explained that the percent of human factors in incidents at events was 86 %,.

Technical was 9% and the rest was weather or outside elements.

9.8 FUTURE OF NSO SEMINARS

The working group lead by Teun Platenkamp (Felicisimo Aguado Arroyo, Delano Miranda,

Fritz Otto-Erley, Yasuhiko Haruta, Utta Helkenberg, Silvia Gavornikova) made the

following recommendations:

It was concluded that the main objective of NSO seminar was to discuss and contribute

to the Risk Management and safety of the sport on a regular basis (preferably once per

year).

it was suggested that the agenda of the NSO seminar to include:

• Fixed agenda year to year

• Seminar to be separated in three parts: 1 - presentations, 2 - discussions, 3 -

working progress in Eventing

It was agreed that the current format of the seminar, dedicated mainly to NSOs with

invited persons for specific presentations, was efficient.

NSOs provide information on the sport from the national environment and ideas that can

benefit the sport overall. Points discussed and reviewed with the FEI Eventing

management, together with other National Federations, allows NSOs to bring back

substantial information, ideas and discussing points to their NF.

It was suggested that defined list of subjects to be covered during the NSO seminar (10

or 12 topics) in advance could be produced and NSOs contribution on the specific areas

could be useful. The topics should include active and passive Risk Management actions

from the ERMAP (Industry products, research, statistics). Each year the priority topic

should be defined

Since the first 2009 ERM seminars organised many valuable topics have been included.

The NSO dedicated seminars have now evolved to a valuable/practical forum enabling

the understanding and providing the tools for developing awareness of risk management

on a larger scale.


REPORT Page 22

Updated: 23-Mar-12


The aim was to try to share and deliver a vision and a clear concept of the modern sport.

Small countries profited from larger countries which is very important. Also bigger

nations went back with a lot of information.

The NSOs mentioned that the presentations should be provided earlier (by September) to

allow a good preparation. The presentations given by other parties were felt to be of

great interest and value. In addition, having the seminar over 2 full days instead of 1 ½

days would allow to cover certain subjects in depth.

Peter Gray felt that he always went back to his NF with much more than what he

brought. He mentioned that the biggest highlight of this seminar was the presentation of

Rudiger Schwarz on riders and horses Cross Country Education and Preparation.

10. 2012 NSO SEMINAR

The next NSO seminar was confirmed to take place on 26-27 January 2013.

Location TBC the ITA NF was to inform the FEI of possibly Rome (propositions also

included Wroclaw (POL), and Lisbon (POR).

Documents

2012 FEI EVENTING RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR Warendorf … 2012 ERMSeminar... · 2012 FEI EVENTING RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR – Warendorf (GER) REPORT Page 2 Updated: 23-Mar-12 J:\WINDATA\TDE\TDE\Safety