Upload
cassie
View
41
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2012-2013 Statewide Core Performance Indicators. By Krishnan Sudharsan Data, Accountability, and Technical Assessments OCTE November 7, 2013. Acknowledgments. OCTE Staff PTD Technology Ferris State University. Overview. Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
By
Krishnan SudharsanData, Accountability, and Technical Assessments
OCTE
November 7, 2013
Acknowledgments
OCTE Staff PTD Technology Ferris State University
2
Overview
Consolidated Annual Report (CAR)Secondary Core Performance
Indicators (CPIs) and Regional GIS maps
Data Analysis Example (State CPIs)
3
Consolidated Annual Report
Reports to OVAE on Michigan’s CPIs8 secondary CPIsPerformance of 26 regionsImprovement plans (when 90% target
not met)
4
Secondary CPIs1S1: Academic Attainment in Reading1S2: Academic Attainment in Mathematics2S1: Technical Skill Attainment3S1: School Completion4S1: Student Graduation Rate5S1: Placement6S1: Nontraditional Participation6S2: Nontraditional Completion
5
Secondary CPIs 2013 TargetsCore
Indicator2009-2010
TargetLevel
2010-2011
TargetLevel
2011-2012
Target Level
2012-2013 TargetLevel
1S1: English 47.50% 48.00% () 57.00% () 59.00% ()
1S2: Math 45.05% 46.00% () 30.00% () 36.00%()
2S1: TSA 35.00% 35.05% () 48.00% () 49.00%()
3S1: Sch. Comp 90.00% 83.00% () 93.00% () 93.50%()
4S1: Sch. Grad 80.00% 80.00% (=) 85.00% () 88.00%()
5S1: Placement 94.79% 95.04% () 93.00% () 93.00% (=)
6S1: Nontrad Part.
22.50% 25.00% () 23.00% () 23.50%()
6S2: Nontrad Comp.
66.56% 21.20% () 22.00% () 23.00%()
6
Secondary CPIs: CARCore
Indicator2011-2012
TargetLevel
2011-2012
Actual
2012-2013 Target Level
2012-2013
Actual
1S1: English 57.00% () 51.69%() 59.00% () 55.20%()
1S2: Math 30.00% () 23.05%() 36.00%() 25.12%()
2S1: TSA 48.00% () 55.27%() 49.00%() 59.15%()
3S1: Sch. Comp
93.00% () 94.67%() 93.50%() 95.26%()
4S1: Graduation
85.00% () 94.85%() 88.00%() 94.86%()
5S1: Placement
93.00% () 95.33%() 93.00% (=) 94.87%()
6S1: NonTrad P
23.00% () 24.44%() 23.50%() 25.55%()
6S2: NonTrad C
22.00% () 28.90%() 23.00%() 31.07%%()7
Secondary CPIs: CAR2 out of 25 regions met all 8 indicator targets (1
met all 8 in 2011-2012 & 10 met all 8 in 2010-2011), 24 regions failed to make 90% of at least one indicator
The number of regions not meeting 90% of the Adjusted Level of Performance (ALP) improved for indicator 1S1 (from 11 to 9 regions) and for 6S2 (from 4 to 3 regions) compared to last year
8
Secondary CPIs: CAR
The number of regions not meeting 90% of the ALP increased for indicators 1S2 (from 21 to 23 regions) compared to last year
All 25 regions exceeded the 90% ALP for Indicators 3S1, 4S1, and 5S1 in 2010-2011, 2011-2012, and 2012-2013
The number of regions not meeting 90% of the ALP remained the same for 2S1 (constant at 2) and 6S1 (constant at 6)
9
Thought Question/Exercise
Do you think a relationship exists between 1S1/1S2 and 2S1? Would you expect this relationship to have a high r2 value? Why or why not?
How would you describe the nature of this relationship (positive, negative)?
10
1S1: Academic Attainment Reading
Numerator = Number of CTE concentrators who have met the proficient or advanced level on the statewide high school reading assessment
Denominator = Number of CTE concentrators who took the ESEA assessment in reading and who, in the reporting year, left secondary education
11
1S1: Statewide Trends
12
13
1S2: Academic Attainment in Mathematics
Numerator = Number of CTE concentrators who have met the proficient or advanced level on the statewide high school mathematics assessment
Denominator = Number of CTE concentrators who took the ESEA assessment in mathematics and who, in the reporting year, left secondary education
14
1S2: Statewide Trends
15
16
2S1: Technical Skill Attainment
Numerator = Number of CTE concentrators who passed technical skill assessments that are aligned with industry-recognized standards, if available and appropriate during the reporting year
Denominator = Number of CTE concentrators who took assessments during the reporting year
17
2S1: Statewide Trends
18
19
3S1: School CompletionNumerator = Number of CTE concentrators who
earned a regular secondary school diploma, earned a General Education Development (GED) credential, or earned a state-recognized equivalent, during the reporting year
Denominator = Number of CTE concentrators who, in the reporting year, were included in the state’s computation of its five-year graduation rate
20
3S1: Statewide Trends
21
22
4S1: Student Graduation RatesNumerator = Number of CTE program
concentrators who, in the reporting year, were included as graduated in the state’s computation of its graduation rate
Denominator = Number of CTE program concentrators who, in the reporting year, were included in the state’s computation of its graduation rate as defined in the state’s Consolidated Accountability Plan pursuant to Section 1111(b)(2)(C)(vi) of the ESEA
23
4S1: Statewide Trends
24
25
5S1: PlacementNumerator = Number of 11th and 12th grade CTE
completers who left secondary education and were placed in postsecondary education or advanced training, in the military service, or employment in the third quarter following the program year in which they left secondary education
Denominator = The number of 11th and 12th grade grade CTE completers who left secondary education during the reporting year
26
5S1: Statewide Trends
27
28
6S1: Nontraditional ParticipationNumerator = Number of CTE participants from
underrepresented gender groups who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year
Denominator = Number of CTE participants who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year
29
6S1: Statewide Trends
30
31
6S2: Nontraditional CompletionNumerator = Number of CTE participants from
underrepresented gender groups, who completed a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields prior to leaving secondary education and who left school in the reporting year
Denominator = Number of CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups, who had participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields and who left school in the reporting year
32
6S2: Statewide Trends
33
34
Why is Data Important?15 days (Data)“From October 1st to 16th, 2013 the US Federal
government was shutdown.” (Information)“Moody’s Analytics estimated cost for 3-4 week
shutdown was $55 billion and Goldman Sachs estimated a decline of 0.9% in GDP.” (Knowledge)
“The government’s failure to raise the debt ceiling could have halted a $5 trillion lending mechanism and thrown the entire world into a recession” is (Wisdom)
35
Data Dashboards
“A dashboard is a visual display of the most important information needed to achieve one or more objectives; consolidated and arranged on a single screen so the information can be monitored at a glance.”
36
Creating CPI DashboardsTableau software (download Tableau
Reader 8.0 to use 2012-2013 CPI dashboards) Overall Dashboard Gender Dashboard Race Dashboard Special Populations Dashboard Gender/Race Dashboards
37
QuestionsCTE Administrators
What CPI information would help you in planning and making improvements?
Would the information generated provide actionable steps?
What can OCTE do better to help you?
38