Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A
BC
E
D
IHG
F
UBC FARM
UBC SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOOD
SCHEMATIC DESIGN DETAIL AREASTACY PASSMORE -MARCH 10, 2009
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO - PROF. M. SENBEL
VICINITY MAP
CIRCULATION
OPEN SPACE
TO S.W. MARINE DRIVETO UBC MAIN
CAMPUS
VIA WESTBR
OOK M
ALL
COMMUNITY CENTER
PUBLIC PARK
FARM MARKET
SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOOD
DETAIL AREA
SCHOOL
FARM CENTER
PLAZA
SPORTS FIELD
AND PARK
GARDENS
GARDENS
Parcel No.A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
Total* Calculations apply to detail area only. Same area in existing plan proposes to house only 910 people.
Avg. No. Floors Residential Area (M2) No. Units No. People5.50 29,988.48 272.62 627.03
5.50 13,418.35 121.99 280.57
5.50 13,165.35 119.69 275.28
5.50 4,042.50 36.75 84.53
6.00 8,032.00 73.02 167.94
5.50 14,421.17 131.10 301.53
5.50 18,942.17 172.20 396.06
5.50 13,168.37 119.71 275.34
6.40 18,307.90 166.44 382.80
5.66 133,486.28 1,213.51 2,791.08* Calculations apply to detail area only. Same area in existing plan proposes to house only 910 people.
DENSITY AND POPULATION DATA
FSR4.24
3.41
4.25
3.79
2.65
5.50
2.92
4.50
6.93
4.24
TO UBC ENDOWMENT LANDS
AND FOREST
LOW-DENSITY HOUSING
JOYCE PARK
HIGH-DENSITY HOUSING
COMMUNITY CENTER
PUBLIC PLAZA AND PERFOR-MANCE SPACE
PRODUCTIVE LANDSCAPE
PARK & SPORTS FIELD
PRODUCTIVE LANSCAPE
STREET FOR FARMERS MAR-
KET
FARM CENTER AND URBAN
AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTION
UBC FARM
FOREST BUFFER
(TRANSIT)
(TRANSIT)
THIS NON-TRADITIONAL BOULEVARD CREATES A STRONG PHYSICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE FARM AND THE COMMUNITY
INCREASING FLOOR SPACE RATIOS (FSR) ALLOWS US TO CONSOLIDATE DENSITY AND MAXIMIZE OPEN SPACE
ANCHORED AT EACH END WITH IMPORTANT PUB-LIC CENTERS, THIS DESIGN PROVIDES MANY COM-
MUNITY AMENITIES
THIS PLAZA IS A NATURAL AMPHITHEATER, CRE-ATING FLEXIBLE PARK SPACE THAT CAN BE USED FOR PERFORMANCES OR OTHER PUBLIC USES
THE ARCHITECTURAL PROPORTIONS ARE CRITI-CAL FOR DIMENISHING THE STATURE OF THE RES-
IDENCES, AVERAGING 5-1/2 LEVELS
PRODUCTIVE LANDSCAPES ENRICH THE COMMU-NITY AND ENHANCE CONNECTIONS TO THE FARM
CENTER AND STREET MARKET
LAND USE & DENSITY ANALYSIS |snapshot
THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009
B4A
2A2B
2C
G
4A
3A
3F
3B
D
2E
2F
3C
D
3E
B1E1F
1C
5A
D2
6
7
8
0
25
6
20
9
2
4B4B4B4A4A4A
2A2A2A2B2B2B
C2C2C
2G2G2G
4A4A4A
3A3A3A
3F3F3F
3B3B3B
2D2D2D
2E2E2E
2F2F2F
3C3C3C
3D3D3D
3E3E3E
1B1B1B1E1E1E1F1F1F
1C1C1C
55A5A
5D5D5D11
2222222
3333333 666666666
777
88888888
000000110000
1111
221122225555155
6666616666
00000022222202000
9911999999
121222
4B4A
2A2B
2C
2G
4A
3A
3F
3B
2D
2E
2F
3C
3D
3E
1B1E1F
1C
5A
5D1
2
3
45
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
9
15
16
17
18
20
19
21
LOCATIONThe South Campus neighbourhood is located south of 16th Avenue, bounded by Paci! c Spirit Park to the east and Marine Drive to the southwest, at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC.
VISIONTo provide infrastructure for a vibrant, livable community that integrates - and indeed, celebrates - the UBC Farm, provides for future growth, and connects agriculture with commerce.
CORE PRINCIPLES• Enmesh sustainability within all aspects of design;• Design around and in response to existing natural and built environ-
ment, including the UBC Farm and Neighbourhood Village.• Consider neighborhood as micro-climate/ecosystem; • Prioritize land use ef! ciency, by minimizing the scale of features to
maximize ef! ciency; • Increase residential density and provide a range of housing options; • Facilitate the use of alternative modes of transportation; and• Balance innovation with pragmatism.
MAIN FEATURESOur design seeks to emphasize three special areas:(1) Intersect between the Commercial Village (Wesbrook Mall) and the greenway;(2) Greenway, running parallel between Biney and Gray Avenues, con-necting the Commercial Village with the UBC Farm; and(3) Farm Entrance, featuring an Agricultural Education Centre as an institutional and community resource.
DENSITYThe authors of this plan strongly recommend that the UBC Farm remain intact. Here, the entire population from the proposed Future Housing Reserve on the Farm is completely transferred to the Northeast Sub-Area of South Campus (to lots shown in red, above). It is expected that the population would increase by approximately 2,250 people, or by 57%, as compared to the estimated total population for South Campus as laid out in UBC’s OCP (6,231 compared to 3978 persons, respec-tively).
Page 1
Pacifi c Spirit Regional Park
LotArea
LotName
ZoningType
No.Storeys
Bldg.Footprint FSR
3611 SC1B Low 3 1,685 1.43437 SC1C Low 3 1,604 1.43978 SC1E Low 3 1,856 1.42258 SC1F Medium 4 903 1.64,658 SC2A High 18 725 2.804,639 SC2B High 18 722 2.805,138 SC2C High 18 799 2.805,120 SC2D High 18 796 2.805,219 SC2E High 18 812 2.805,179 SC2F Medium 4 2,071 1.605,209 SC2G Medium 4 2,083 1.602,359 SC3A Medium 4 944 1.605,133 SC3B Medium 4 2,053 1.606,880 SC3C Medium 4 3,440 2.008,432 SC3D Low 4 4,216 2.004,663 SC3E Low 3 2,176 1.402,280 SC3F Medium 4 912 1.601,768 SC4A Mixed Use 4 707 1.603,190 SC4A Mixed Use 4 1,276 1.60
28,896 SC4B Mixed Use 4 11,559 1.605,072 SC5A Medium 4 2,029 1.602,268 SC5D Medium 4 907 1.604,107 1 Medium 4 1,715 1.67
2a 3 1,5502b 3 1,4063a 4 3,0893b 3 8173c 4 1,489
2,208 4 Medium 4 1,077 1.952,361 5 High 4 1,400 2.37
6a 3 8206b 4 696
2,366 7 High 5 1,035 2.192,213 8 Medium 4 1,059 1.912,729 9 High 4 1,610 2.362,412 10 Mixed Use 4 1,606 2.662,340 11 High 4 1,270 2.173,215 12 High 4 2,048 2.55
13a 3 1,00013b 4 766
2,421 14 Medium 3 1,372 1.7015a 5 1,00515b 4 72515c 4 66715d 4 56416a 4 1,23716b 4 1,17516c 4 933
2,455 17 Medium 4 1,313 2.143,672 18 Low 4 1,441 1.573,085 19 Medium 4 1,349 1.75
20a 4 84420b 4 1,707
4,413 21 Medium 4 1,878 1.70
2.425,103
1,771 2.96
2.162,157
6,077 1.68
1.94
1.673,623
6,914
High
Low
Medium
2.455,235
High
High
High
Medium
ResidentialOnly
Res. units per m^2
(110m^2/unit)
Populationper unit
(2.0/unit)5,055 46 924,812 44 875,569 51 1013,613 33 66
13,043 119 23712,988 118 23614,386 131 26214,335 130 26114,614 133 2668,286 75 1518,334 76 1523,775 34 698,213 75 149
13,760 125 25016,864 153 3076,528 59 1193,649 33 662,122 19 393,829 35 70
30,515 277 5558,115 74 1483,629 33 666,860 62 125
4,308 39 785,600 51 102
5,175 47 944,236 39 776,440 59 1174,818 44 885,080 46 928,192 74 149
4,116 37 75
5,252 48 955,764 52 1055,396 49 98
7,512 68 137
112 225
42 85
3,376 31 61
13,380 122 243
6,064 55 110
12,849 117 234
48 95
4,659
12,356
5,244
Wesbrook M
all
Pacifi c Spirit Regional Park
West 16th Avenue
East Malll
Binney Avenue
Gary Avenue
Commercial VillageCommunity
Centre
School
Plaza
Greenway
Green Edge
Green Edge
PlayingField
Binning Ro
ad
UBC Farm
Agricultural Education
Centre
Mixed-Use
Greenway
Future Housing Reserve
To Marine Drive
To Academic Core
Medium to High Density Residential
Low DensityResidential
Mixed-Use
MediumDensity Residential
Park
Park
Pacifi c Spirit Regional Park
To Marine Drive
N
!
"
#W
esb
roo
k Ma
ll
Green Edge
Green Edge
High DensityResidential
Medium DensityResidential
High DensityResidential
LOT NUMBERS
SCALE IS 1:2000
DETAILED STUDY AREA |greenway
THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009
Page 2PO
LYCU
LTU
RE
CRO
P RO
TATI
ON
COVE
R C
ROPS
OP
OP
ROOTATT
TTAA
LAND ECONOMICS - MARKETING
ANIM
AL
INTE
GRA
TIO
N
AGRO-ECOLOGY
AGRO
-FO
REST
RY
EDIB
LE
LAN
DSC
APE
1.60 FSR
2.55 FSR
1.67 FSR
2.19 FSR
2.96 FSR
VICINITY MAP
FARM & COMMUNITY INTEGRATION
Com
merce
Agriculture
Detail Design Area
CommunityVillageNode
FoodPrecinct
Node
Agricul
tura
l
Residentia
l Density
Intensity
Agricultural Education
Centre
UBC Farm
East MalllWindmill
WaterTower
Boardwalk
UrbanAgriculture
UrbanAgriculture
UrbanAg.
1.70 FSR4 storeys37 units
2.36 FSR4 storeys59 units
1.91 FSR4 storeys39 units
4 storeys47 units
3-4 storeys55 units
OpenSpace
4 storeys74 units
2.17 FSR4 storeys46 units
OpenSpace
Boardwalk
OpenSpace
UrbanAgriculture
PrivateCourtyard
Semi-PrivateCourtyard
OpenSpace
Semi-PrivateCourtyard
Private
Private
Private
PublicPlaza
Playground
Greenway Path
Gre
enw
ay P
ath
Path
way
UrbanAgriculture
UrbanAgriculture
PathwayConnecting
to Trail Network
Private
Private
Private
“Flower Canal”
2.66 FSR4 storeys44 units
2.37 FSR4 storeys51 units
3-4 storeys48 units
1.95 FSR4 storeys39 units
3 storeys33 units
PlazaAccess
Gary
Ave
nue
Binney Avenue
CaféSeating
Heart of Commercial
Village(see section on p. 5)
Wesbrook M
all
PathwayConnecting
to School
Water Drainage
Water Drainage
A Functional Greenway: Connecting the Natural Environment with Commodifi ed Land Uses Through Principles of Sustainable Agriculture.
N
SCALE IS 1:500
PUBLIC SPACE|transition
THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009
Page 3
PRINCIPLES FOR PUBLIC SPACEThe following principles for public places in UBC South Campus will provide the framework for a range of open spaces, including plazas, greenways, trail systems, natural landscapes, and urban agriculture: • Emphasize diversity, catering to a variety of functions and aesthetics;• Protects, conserves, and contributes to eco-system of neighborhood;• Encourages non-motorized transportation;• Promotes public health through active recreation, food security, & enhanced air quality. • Directly exposes community residents to agriculture.• Facilitates positive inhabitant interaction, & provides for strengthened community identityKey features to the design are the public plaza and greenway. The greenway is meant to provide a natu-ral gradient and transitional experience between the Commercial Village and the UBC Farm. The landscape will be organic and natural, including native species of plantings, in addition to a special
emphasis on edible, herbal or " oral (i.e. productive) vegetation. The plaza serves as a central place for community gatherings, weekend markets, and offers equitable space for the neighbourhood’s political, cultural, spiritual activities.
Open spaces double as a circulation path for pedestrians and cyclists, connecting major hubs (e.g., the Commercial Village) and nodes. The greenway, in particular, differs from a traditional park in that it also serves as pathway or bridge between popular destinations. Strong emphasis is placed on non-motor-ized transportation.
Our design draws on compact building form to establish a strong public/private realm interface. The gentle slope from the greenway upwards to private residences further distinguishes this interface.
“WALKING” NARRATIVEThe diagram above demonstrates the layering of private to public space. In addition to the highly public greenway, the design provides for private, resident-only open space and gardens in between residential buildings.
From the plaza, we follow linear garden plots are woven into the verdant greenway. This initial experi-ence is more formalized compared to the rest of the greenway, with a single straight pathway and orga-nized garden landscapes. A comfortable outdoor room, replete with playground, is provided for children and families, embraced by the intimate residential scale. The transition between the public greenway and private residences has also been carefully considered. The spaces will step up progressively, ! rst into a layer of small, enclosed yards, and next up to private decks that allow space for grills or patio fur-niture, and entrances to personal homes.
As we continue down the pathway, we cross a trail that connects to the greater trail network. This trail
system provides a connection to the Paci! c Spirit Regional Park, and meanders about the farm. In this-sense, residents are invited into the farm.
Past this trail crossing, we gradually realize that the landscape is changing and becoming less organized and linear, and more organic and natural. A less ridgid “building wall” is the ! rst indication of this subtle, " owing evolution. There is a creek, which we learn is for water drainage. The waterway informs the topography in this location, as well as our paths. At this point there is a division of pathways. One is a continuation of the straight, concrete pathway, offering ef! cient access to the farm. The alternative path is a rustic boardwalk that undulates, overlapping and crossing vegetation and water. This boardwalk signi! es our desire to “tread lightly” on the soil. The boardwalk is surrounded by lush, native vegetation, as well as more cultivated edible gardens.
We arrive at the Farm!
AERIAL OF PUBLIC PLAZA & PARK
“FORMAL” GREENWAY PATH TOWARDS FARM
BOARDWALK, WATER, & PRODUCTIVE LANDSCAPE INTERACT
PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC PLAZA & COMMERCIAL VILLAGE CENTRE
“ORGANIC” GREENWAY PATH TOWARDS FARM
Street & Sidewalk
Housing Units
Private Gardens
Housing Units
Walking Path
Greenway ParkDrainage Water
Course
BoardwalkHousing Units
Private Gardens
PERSPECTIVE & SECTION OF GREENWAY
THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS |integration Page 4
SYSTEMS ANALYSISA key focus of this design is to provide strong linkages between the farm and the South Campus Community. Through the integration of drainage, irrigation, power generation, food production and circulation, a strong relationship is envisioned between the proposed community and the neighboring agricultural land. The pro-posed design is based on principles of resource exchange and urban design that invites the public to engage in farming activities. These principles are embodied in each individual system.
A. Water Systems • Collects runoff from roofs and non-street drainage to be collected for re-use as farming irrigation. • Storage and treatment of water located at the entrance to the farm (adjacent to Agricultural Education Cen-tre).
B. Energy Systems• Alternative energy sources include solar panels and wind mills. • Converts renewable energy (wind) to potential energy through elevated water storage at farm irrigation wa-ter tower.
C. Food Systems• Agricultural food production is introduced to the community through a strong connection with the farm.• Farmers markets and urban agriculture extend the culture of food production into the community.
D. Transportation and Circulation• Range of transportation options and pedestrian-friendly environment give this community a variety of mo-bility options, thereby reducing the reliance on the private automobile.• Non-motorized transportation (walking, biking, and wheeling), in particular, have been consciously integrat-ed within the design of the greenway and streetscape.
“When we tug at a single thing in nature, we fi nd it
attached to the rest of the world.” —John Muir
A
C
B
D
EXAMPLES OF BOARDWALK & WATER FEATRUES
CROSS-SECTION ILLUSTRATING INTEGRTION OF SYSTEMS
VIEW FROM FARM
SYSTEMS INTEGRATION DIAGRAM
Primary Water Treatment &
Pump Station
THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER B.C. CANADA
BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. MAGED SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009
COMPLETE, COMPACT COMMUNITY |balance Page 5
3m 1.5m 3m 0.5m 6.5m 3m 6.5m 1.5m 3m
Recreational Space
Productive Agricultural SpaceOpen Plaza
OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM
Community Shuttle Stop
Community Entry Point
Public Transit Bus Stop
Transit and Vehicle Route
GreenwayVehicle RouteTrail
OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM
FIGURE GROUND
Tra
nsp
orta
tion
Cho
ice
sH
ous
ing
Op
tions
Eco
log
ica
lPr
ese
rva
tion
Mix
ed
Land
Use
s
GOAL STATEMENT: Create more accessible land use patterns and improve transportation options, with special emphasis on public transit and active modes of transport.
GOAL STATEMENT: To provide for a variety of different uses and community members, for ultimate neighborhood vitality and sustainability. This means enforcing socially responsible poli-cies that support a representative diversity including income, age, ethnicity, family size.
GOAL STATEMENT: By minimizing carbon emissions and maximizing resource conservation through green infrastructure and vegetated surface area, this community will strive to function as a natural ecosystem.