7
A B C E D I H G F UBC FARM UBC SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOOD SCHEMATIC DESIGN DETAIL AREA STACY PASSMORE MARCH 10, 2009 URBAN DESIGN STUDIO PROF. M. SENBEL VICINITY MAP CIRCULATION OPEN SPACE TO S.W. MARINE DRIVE TO UBC MAIN CAMPUS VIA WESTBROOK MALL COMMUNITY CENTER PUBLIC PARK FARM MARKET SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL AREA SCHOOL FARM CENTER PLAZA SPORTS FIELD AND PARK GARDENS GARDENS Parcel No. A B C D E F G H I Total * Calculations ap Avg. No. Floors Residential Area (M 2 ) No. Units No. People 5.50 29,988.48 272.62 627.03 5.50 13,418.35 121.99 280.57 5.50 13,165.35 119.69 275.28 5.50 4,042.50 36.75 84.53 6.00 8,032.00 73.02 167.94 5.50 14,421.17 131.10 301.53 5.50 18,942.17 172.20 396.06 5.50 13,168.37 119.71 275.34 6.40 18,307.90 166.44 382.80 5.66 133,486.28 1,213.51 2,791.08 pply to detail area only. Same area in existing plan proposes to house only 910 people. DENSITY AND POPULATION DATA FSR 4.24 3.41 4.25 3.79 2.65 5.50 2.92 4.50 6.93 4.24

WordPress.com · 2012. 2. 19. · E d u c ati o n C e n t re UBC Farm East Malll indmill ater ower dwalk Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture Urban Ag. 1.70 FSR 4 storeys 37 units

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: WordPress.com · 2012. 2. 19. · E d u c ati o n C e n t re UBC Farm East Malll indmill ater ower dwalk Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture Urban Ag. 1.70 FSR 4 storeys 37 units

A

BC

E

D

IHG

F

UBC  FARM

UBC  SOUTH  CAMPUS  NEIGHBORHOOD

SCHEMATIC  DESIGN  DETAIL  AREASTACY  PASSMORE  -­MARCH  10,  2009  

URBAN  DESIGN  STUDIO  -­  PROF.  M.  SENBEL

VICINITY MAP

CIRCULATION

OPEN SPACE

TO  S.W.  MARINE  DRIVETO  UBC  MAIN

 CAMPUS  

VIA  WESTBR

OOK  M

ALL

COMMUNITY CENTER

PUBLIC PARK

FARM MARKET

SOUTH  CAMPUS  NEIGHBORHOOD

DETAIL  AREA

SCHOOL

FARM CENTER

PLAZA

SPORTS  FIELD  

AND  PARK

GARDENS

GARDENS

Parcel No.A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

Total* Calculations apply to detail area only. Same area in existing plan proposes to house only 910 people.

Avg. No. Floors Residential Area (M2) No. Units No. People5.50 29,988.48 272.62 627.03

5.50 13,418.35 121.99 280.57

5.50 13,165.35 119.69 275.28

5.50 4,042.50 36.75 84.53

6.00 8,032.00 73.02 167.94

5.50 14,421.17 131.10 301.53

5.50 18,942.17 172.20 396.06

5.50 13,168.37 119.71 275.34

6.40 18,307.90 166.44 382.80

5.66 133,486.28 1,213.51 2,791.08* Calculations apply to detail area only. Same area in existing plan proposes to house only 910 people.

DENSITY AND POPULATION DATA

FSR4.24

3.41

4.25

3.79

2.65

5.50

2.92

4.50

6.93

4.24

Page 2: WordPress.com · 2012. 2. 19. · E d u c ati o n C e n t re UBC Farm East Malll indmill ater ower dwalk Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture Urban Ag. 1.70 FSR 4 storeys 37 units

TO  UBC  ENDOWMENT  LANDS  

AND  FOREST

LOW-­DENSITY  HOUSING

JOYCE  PARK

HIGH-­DENSITY  HOUSING

COMMUNITY  CENTER

PUBLIC  PLAZA  AND  PERFOR-­MANCE  SPACE  

PRODUCTIVE  LANDSCAPE

PARK  &  SPORTS  FIELD

PRODUCTIVE  LANSCAPE

STREET  FOR  FARMERS  MAR-­

KET

FARM  CENTER  AND  URBAN  

AGRICULTURAL  INSTITUTION

UBC  FARM

FOREST  BUFFER

(TRANSIT)

(TRANSIT)

THIS  NON-­TRADITIONAL  BOULEVARD  CREATES  A  STRONG  PHYSICAL  CONNECTION  BETWEEN  THE  FARM  AND  THE  COMMUNITY

INCREASING  FLOOR  SPACE  RATIOS  (FSR)  ALLOWS  US  TO  CONSOLIDATE  DENSITY  AND  MAXIMIZE  OPEN  SPACE

ANCHORED  AT  EACH  END  WITH  IMPORTANT  PUB-­LIC  CENTERS,  THIS  DESIGN  PROVIDES  MANY  COM-­

MUNITY  AMENITIES

THIS  PLAZA  IS  A  NATURAL  AMPHITHEATER,  CRE-­ATING  FLEXIBLE  PARK  SPACE  THAT  CAN  BE  USED  FOR  PERFORMANCES  OR  OTHER  PUBLIC  USES

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  PROPORTIONS  ARE  CRITI-­CAL  FOR  DIMENISHING  THE  STATURE  OF  THE  RES-­

IDENCES,  AVERAGING  5-­1/2  LEVELS

PRODUCTIVE  LANDSCAPES  ENRICH  THE  COMMU-­NITY  AND  ENHANCE  CONNECTIONS  TO  THE  FARM  

CENTER  AND  STREET  MARKET

Page 3: WordPress.com · 2012. 2. 19. · E d u c ati o n C e n t re UBC Farm East Malll indmill ater ower dwalk Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture Urban Ag. 1.70 FSR 4 storeys 37 units

LAND USE & DENSITY ANALYSIS |snapshot

THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA

BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009

B4A

2A2B

2C

G

4A

3A

3F

3B

D

2E

2F

3C

D

3E

B1E1F

1C

5A

D2

6

7

8

0

25

6

20

9

2

4B4B4B4A4A4A

2A2A2A2B2B2B

C2C2C

2G2G2G

4A4A4A

3A3A3A

3F3F3F

3B3B3B

2D2D2D

2E2E2E

2F2F2F

3C3C3C

3D3D3D

3E3E3E

1B1B1B1E1E1E1F1F1F

1C1C1C

55A5A

5D5D5D11

2222222

3333333 666666666

777

88888888

000000110000

1111

221122225555155

6666616666

00000022222202000

9911999999

121222

4B4A

2A2B

2C

2G

4A

3A

3F

3B

2D

2E

2F

3C

3D

3E

1B1E1F

1C

5A

5D1

2

3

45

6

7

8

10

11

12

13

14

9

15

16

17

18

20

19

21

LOCATIONThe South Campus neighbourhood is located south of 16th Avenue, bounded by Paci! c Spirit Park to the east and Marine Drive to the southwest, at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC.

VISIONTo provide infrastructure for a vibrant, livable community that integrates - and indeed, celebrates - the UBC Farm, provides for future growth, and connects agriculture with commerce.

CORE PRINCIPLES• Enmesh sustainability within all aspects of design;• Design around and in response to existing natural and built environ-

ment, including the UBC Farm and Neighbourhood Village.• Consider neighborhood as micro-climate/ecosystem; • Prioritize land use ef! ciency, by minimizing the scale of features to

maximize ef! ciency; • Increase residential density and provide a range of housing options; • Facilitate the use of alternative modes of transportation; and• Balance innovation with pragmatism.

MAIN FEATURESOur design seeks to emphasize three special areas:(1) Intersect between the Commercial Village (Wesbrook Mall) and the greenway;(2) Greenway, running parallel between Biney and Gray Avenues, con-necting the Commercial Village with the UBC Farm; and(3) Farm Entrance, featuring an Agricultural Education Centre as an institutional and community resource.

DENSITYThe authors of this plan strongly recommend that the UBC Farm remain intact. Here, the entire population from the proposed Future Housing Reserve on the Farm is completely transferred to the Northeast Sub-Area of South Campus (to lots shown in red, above). It is expected that the population would increase by approximately 2,250 people, or by 57%, as compared to the estimated total population for South Campus as laid out in UBC’s OCP (6,231 compared to 3978 persons, respec-tively).

Page 1

Pacifi c Spirit Regional Park

LotArea

LotName

ZoningType

No.Storeys

Bldg.Footprint FSR

3611 SC1B Low 3 1,685 1.43437 SC1C Low 3 1,604 1.43978 SC1E Low 3 1,856 1.42258 SC1F Medium 4 903 1.64,658 SC2A High 18 725 2.804,639 SC2B High 18 722 2.805,138 SC2C High 18 799 2.805,120 SC2D High 18 796 2.805,219 SC2E High 18 812 2.805,179 SC2F Medium 4 2,071 1.605,209 SC2G Medium 4 2,083 1.602,359 SC3A Medium 4 944 1.605,133 SC3B Medium 4 2,053 1.606,880 SC3C Medium 4 3,440 2.008,432 SC3D Low 4 4,216 2.004,663 SC3E Low 3 2,176 1.402,280 SC3F Medium 4 912 1.601,768 SC4A Mixed Use 4 707 1.603,190 SC4A Mixed Use 4 1,276 1.60

28,896 SC4B Mixed Use 4 11,559 1.605,072 SC5A Medium 4 2,029 1.602,268 SC5D Medium 4 907 1.604,107 1 Medium 4 1,715 1.67

2a 3 1,5502b 3 1,4063a 4 3,0893b 3 8173c 4 1,489

2,208 4 Medium 4 1,077 1.952,361 5 High 4 1,400 2.37

6a 3 8206b 4 696

2,366 7 High 5 1,035 2.192,213 8 Medium 4 1,059 1.912,729 9 High 4 1,610 2.362,412 10 Mixed Use 4 1,606 2.662,340 11 High 4 1,270 2.173,215 12 High 4 2,048 2.55

13a 3 1,00013b 4 766

2,421 14 Medium 3 1,372 1.7015a 5 1,00515b 4 72515c 4 66715d 4 56416a 4 1,23716b 4 1,17516c 4 933

2,455 17 Medium 4 1,313 2.143,672 18 Low 4 1,441 1.573,085 19 Medium 4 1,349 1.75

20a 4 84420b 4 1,707

4,413 21 Medium 4 1,878 1.70

2.425,103

1,771 2.96

2.162,157

6,077 1.68

1.94

1.673,623

6,914

High

Low

Medium

2.455,235

High

High

High

Medium

ResidentialOnly

Res. units per m^2

(110m^2/unit)

Populationper unit

(2.0/unit)5,055 46 924,812 44 875,569 51 1013,613 33 66

13,043 119 23712,988 118 23614,386 131 26214,335 130 26114,614 133 2668,286 75 1518,334 76 1523,775 34 698,213 75 149

13,760 125 25016,864 153 3076,528 59 1193,649 33 662,122 19 393,829 35 70

30,515 277 5558,115 74 1483,629 33 666,860 62 125

4,308 39 785,600 51 102

5,175 47 944,236 39 776,440 59 1174,818 44 885,080 46 928,192 74 149

4,116 37 75

5,252 48 955,764 52 1055,396 49 98

7,512 68 137

112 225

42 85

3,376 31 61

13,380 122 243

6,064 55 110

12,849 117 234

48 95

4,659

12,356

5,244

Wesbrook M

all

Pacifi c Spirit Regional Park

West 16th Avenue

East Malll

Binney Avenue

Gary Avenue

Commercial VillageCommunity

Centre

School

Plaza

Greenway

Green Edge

Green Edge

PlayingField

Binning Ro

ad

UBC Farm

Agricultural Education

Centre

Mixed-Use

Greenway

Future Housing Reserve

To Marine Drive

To Academic Core

Medium to High Density Residential

Low DensityResidential

Mixed-Use

MediumDensity Residential

Park

Park

Pacifi c Spirit Regional Park

To Marine Drive

N

!

"

#W

esb

roo

k Ma

ll

Green Edge

Green Edge

High DensityResidential

Medium DensityResidential

High DensityResidential

LOT NUMBERS

SCALE IS 1:2000

Page 4: WordPress.com · 2012. 2. 19. · E d u c ati o n C e n t re UBC Farm East Malll indmill ater ower dwalk Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture Urban Ag. 1.70 FSR 4 storeys 37 units

DETAILED STUDY AREA |greenway

THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA

BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009

Page 2PO

LYCU

LTU

RE

CRO

P RO

TATI

ON

COVE

R C

ROPS

OP

OP

ROOTATT

TTAA

LAND ECONOMICS - MARKETING

ANIM

AL

INTE

GRA

TIO

N

AGRO-ECOLOGY

AGRO

-FO

REST

RY

EDIB

LE

LAN

DSC

APE

1.60 FSR

2.55 FSR

1.67 FSR

2.19 FSR

2.96 FSR

VICINITY MAP

FARM & COMMUNITY INTEGRATION

Com

merce

Agriculture

Detail Design Area

CommunityVillageNode

FoodPrecinct

Node

Agricul

tura

l

Residentia

l Density

Intensity

Agricultural Education

Centre

UBC Farm

East MalllWindmill

WaterTower

Boardwalk

UrbanAgriculture

UrbanAgriculture

UrbanAg.

1.70 FSR4 storeys37 units

2.36 FSR4 storeys59 units

1.91 FSR4 storeys39 units

4 storeys47 units

3-4 storeys55 units

OpenSpace

4 storeys74 units

2.17 FSR4 storeys46 units

OpenSpace

Boardwalk

OpenSpace

UrbanAgriculture

PrivateCourtyard

Semi-PrivateCourtyard

OpenSpace

Semi-PrivateCourtyard

Private

Private

Private

PublicPlaza

Playground

Greenway Path

Gre

enw

ay P

ath

Path

way

UrbanAgriculture

UrbanAgriculture

PathwayConnecting

to Trail Network

Private

Private

Private

“Flower Canal”

2.66 FSR4 storeys44 units

2.37 FSR4 storeys51 units

3-4 storeys48 units

1.95 FSR4 storeys39 units

3 storeys33 units

PlazaAccess

Gary

Ave

nue

Binney Avenue

CaféSeating

Heart of Commercial

Village(see section on p. 5)

Wesbrook M

all

PathwayConnecting

to School

Water Drainage

Water Drainage

A Functional Greenway: Connecting the Natural Environment with Commodifi ed Land Uses Through Principles of Sustainable Agriculture.

N

SCALE IS 1:500

Page 5: WordPress.com · 2012. 2. 19. · E d u c ati o n C e n t re UBC Farm East Malll indmill ater ower dwalk Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture Urban Ag. 1.70 FSR 4 storeys 37 units

PUBLIC SPACE|transition

THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA

BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009

Page 3

PRINCIPLES FOR PUBLIC SPACEThe following principles for public places in UBC South Campus will provide the framework for a range of open spaces, including plazas, greenways, trail systems, natural landscapes, and urban agriculture: • Emphasize diversity, catering to a variety of functions and aesthetics;• Protects, conserves, and contributes to eco-system of neighborhood;• Encourages non-motorized transportation;• Promotes public health through active recreation, food security, & enhanced air quality. • Directly exposes community residents to agriculture.• Facilitates positive inhabitant interaction, & provides for strengthened community identityKey features to the design are the public plaza and greenway. The greenway is meant to provide a natu-ral gradient and transitional experience between the Commercial Village and the UBC Farm. The landscape will be organic and natural, including native species of plantings, in addition to a special

emphasis on edible, herbal or " oral (i.e. productive) vegetation. The plaza serves as a central place for community gatherings, weekend markets, and offers equitable space for the neighbourhood’s political, cultural, spiritual activities.

Open spaces double as a circulation path for pedestrians and cyclists, connecting major hubs (e.g., the Commercial Village) and nodes. The greenway, in particular, differs from a traditional park in that it also serves as pathway or bridge between popular destinations. Strong emphasis is placed on non-motor-ized transportation.

Our design draws on compact building form to establish a strong public/private realm interface. The gentle slope from the greenway upwards to private residences further distinguishes this interface.

“WALKING” NARRATIVEThe diagram above demonstrates the layering of private to public space. In addition to the highly public greenway, the design provides for private, resident-only open space and gardens in between residential buildings.

From the plaza, we follow linear garden plots are woven into the verdant greenway. This initial experi-ence is more formalized compared to the rest of the greenway, with a single straight pathway and orga-nized garden landscapes. A comfortable outdoor room, replete with playground, is provided for children and families, embraced by the intimate residential scale. The transition between the public greenway and private residences has also been carefully considered. The spaces will step up progressively, ! rst into a layer of small, enclosed yards, and next up to private decks that allow space for grills or patio fur-niture, and entrances to personal homes.

As we continue down the pathway, we cross a trail that connects to the greater trail network. This trail

system provides a connection to the Paci! c Spirit Regional Park, and meanders about the farm. In this-sense, residents are invited into the farm.

Past this trail crossing, we gradually realize that the landscape is changing and becoming less organized and linear, and more organic and natural. A less ridgid “building wall” is the ! rst indication of this subtle, " owing evolution. There is a creek, which we learn is for water drainage. The waterway informs the topography in this location, as well as our paths. At this point there is a division of pathways. One is a continuation of the straight, concrete pathway, offering ef! cient access to the farm. The alternative path is a rustic boardwalk that undulates, overlapping and crossing vegetation and water. This boardwalk signi! es our desire to “tread lightly” on the soil. The boardwalk is surrounded by lush, native vegetation, as well as more cultivated edible gardens.

We arrive at the Farm!

AERIAL OF PUBLIC PLAZA & PARK

“FORMAL” GREENWAY PATH TOWARDS FARM

BOARDWALK, WATER, & PRODUCTIVE LANDSCAPE INTERACT

PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC PLAZA & COMMERCIAL VILLAGE CENTRE

“ORGANIC” GREENWAY PATH TOWARDS FARM

Street & Sidewalk

Housing Units

Private Gardens

Housing Units

Walking Path

Greenway ParkDrainage Water

Course

BoardwalkHousing Units

Private Gardens

PERSPECTIVE & SECTION OF GREENWAY

Page 6: WordPress.com · 2012. 2. 19. · E d u c ati o n C e n t re UBC Farm East Malll indmill ater ower dwalk Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture Urban Ag. 1.70 FSR 4 storeys 37 units

THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA

BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS |integration Page 4

SYSTEMS ANALYSISA key focus of this design is to provide strong linkages between the farm and the South Campus Community. Through the integration of drainage, irrigation, power generation, food production and circulation, a strong relationship is envisioned between the proposed community and the neighboring agricultural land. The pro-posed design is based on principles of resource exchange and urban design that invites the public to engage in farming activities. These principles are embodied in each individual system.

A. Water Systems • Collects runoff from roofs and non-street drainage to be collected for re-use as farming irrigation. • Storage and treatment of water located at the entrance to the farm (adjacent to Agricultural Education Cen-tre).

B. Energy Systems• Alternative energy sources include solar panels and wind mills. • Converts renewable energy (wind) to potential energy through elevated water storage at farm irrigation wa-ter tower.

C. Food Systems• Agricultural food production is introduced to the community through a strong connection with the farm.• Farmers markets and urban agriculture extend the culture of food production into the community.

D. Transportation and Circulation• Range of transportation options and pedestrian-friendly environment give this community a variety of mo-bility options, thereby reducing the reliance on the private automobile.• Non-motorized transportation (walking, biking, and wheeling), in particular, have been consciously integrat-ed within the design of the greenway and streetscape.

“When we tug at a single thing in nature, we fi nd it

attached to the rest of the world.” —John Muir

A

C

B

D

EXAMPLES OF BOARDWALK & WATER FEATRUES

CROSS-SECTION ILLUSTRATING INTEGRTION OF SYSTEMS

VIEW FROM FARM

SYSTEMS INTEGRATION DIAGRAM

Primary Water Treatment &

Pump Station

Page 7: WordPress.com · 2012. 2. 19. · E d u c ati o n C e n t re UBC Farm East Malll indmill ater ower dwalk Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture Urban Ag. 1.70 FSR 4 storeys 37 units

THE SITE: SOUTH CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOODTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER B.C. CANADA

BY PASSMORE, FITZGERALD & OWEN FOR DR. MAGED SENBELPLAN587B |URBAN DESIGN STUDIO | Spring 2009

COMPLETE, COMPACT COMMUNITY |balance Page 5

3m 1.5m 3m 0.5m 6.5m 3m 6.5m 1.5m 3m

Recreational Space

Productive Agricultural SpaceOpen Plaza

OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM

Community Shuttle Stop

Community Entry Point

Public Transit Bus Stop

Transit and Vehicle Route

GreenwayVehicle RouteTrail

OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM

FIGURE GROUND

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Cho

ice

sH

ous

ing

Op

tions

Eco

log

ica

lPr

ese

rva

tion

Mix

ed

Land

Use

s

GOAL STATEMENT: Create more accessible land use patterns and improve transportation options, with special emphasis on public transit and active modes of transport.

GOAL STATEMENT: To provide for a variety of different uses and community members, for ultimate neighborhood vitality and sustainability. This means enforcing socially responsible poli-cies that support a representative diversity including income, age, ethnicity, family size.

GOAL STATEMENT: By minimizing carbon emissions and maximizing resource conservation through green infrastructure and vegetated surface area, this community will strive to function as a natural ecosystem.