Upload
ian-whiting
View
213
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Bedford Camera Club Newsletter April 2012
Citation preview
1
In Focus
The Bulletin of Bedford Camera Club – April 2012 www.bedfordcameraclub.co.uk Editor Martin Nellist
10 Glebe Road
Ampthill
Bedford
MK45 2TH
Tel: 01525 403417
Email: [email protected]
Next issue September 2012
Closing date for copy Tuesday 12th
August 2012.
Contents President’s Message ....................................................... 2 Editorial ......................................................................... 2 The Club Web Site, www.bedfordcameraclub.co.uk ..... 2 Evening with Ted Rowe, 22
nd November. ..................... 3
Three-way Battle, Letchworth, Biggleswade, and
Bedford .......................................................................... 3 Panel Evening, 6th December ........................................ 3 Bedford and Milton Keynes Waterway Trust by David
Fowler, 13th
December ................................................... 4 'Points of View' Competition', 20
th December, 2011 ..... 4
Members' Evening, January 3rd
2012 ............................. 5 Architects Association Trophy and NALGO Challenge
Cup, 17th
January 2012 .................................................. 5 'Mood and Colour' by Hugh Milsom, January 10
th 2012 6
Cambridge Digital Inter-Club Competition, January 21st
2012 ............................................................................... 6 AV Competition, 24
th January, 2012.............................. 7
Old Photographs: Their history and caring for your
collection by Helen Dawkins LRPS, 31st January 2012 7 Competition: Mist, Steam or Smoke, 7
th February, 20127
Annual Exhibition - Projected Digital Image Judging,
14th
February 2012. ........................................................ 8 'Monochrome in the Digital Darkroom' by Mike Fuller,
28th
February 2012 ......................................................... 8 Competition: Book or Film Title, 6
th March 2012 ......... 8
In The Raw! ................................................................... 9 Audio Visual – One Shot ............................................... 9 Refreshments ................................................................. 9 Cycle Cross – Box End Park, Kempston, ...................... 9 Ken Holland – Looking At Photographs ...................... 10 A Checklist for the Judge ............................................. 10 Police Compensate Parade-Ban Photographer ............. 11 St Ives Photographic Club's Annual Exhibition ........... 11 Men and Women of Letters - A Personal Opinion ....... 11 External Competitions ................................................. 12 Complaint about consistency of judging and PAGB
defence. ........................................................................ 14 An Exception to the Rule ............................................. 14 Audio-Visual Awards .................................................. 14 Oh, what a tangled web……… .................................... 14 The Olympic Connection ............................................. 15 Samuel Sugden ............................................................ 16 The Famous Dig for Victory (foot on the Spade) poster
..................................................................................... 16
2
President’s Message
Reflecting on my 2 years as
President has highlighted my
pleasure in working with such
a great group of people to
develop our common interest.
Bedford Camera club has
undergone considerable
transition in that time. Our
website has evolved still
further. We have a very slick
database from which to select
images for external competitions. And of course
members sitting at the back of the hall are now able to
see the prints whilst they are being judged via projection
and a rapid manipulation of a camera image. Our
membership has increased by 10% as have the number
of competition entries each time. The really pleasing
aspect of the increased membership is the enthusiasm of
the newcomers to get involved in all aspects of club life
from helping with the coffee rota to entering
competitions to taking part in club outings. The club
outings have also been a very enjoyable and integral part
of the life of the club. As you know they vary from the
extremely informal drink in a local hostelry after a
meeting, through the Annual dinner in May to a
weekend away in the Autumn. All social activities are
open to all members. Long may they continue.
The really big event of each year is of course the Annual
Exhibition. In 2011 Mike Quickenden, as he did for,
several years previously, took on the whole task and a
splendid Exhibition was set up in the Bedford High
School for Girls on Bromham Road. This year Alan
Horn is organising another splendid Exhibition in the,
even more centrally situated, Harpur Suite. I am really
looking forward to it and I know you will all support the
event in whatever way you can. Please persuade family
and friends to come along. Once again Dave Hodgson,
the Mayor of Bedford, has agreed to open the Exhibition
and to present the Trophies on the evening of April 19th
.
Whoever takes over as my successor will have the
privilege of working with a first class committee whose
commitment has been second to none. I wish the Camera
Club even more success in the future. It has been an
honour to act as President and you have my heartfelt
appreciation of your friendship and support over the last
two years.
Thank You.
Remember
The Amateur is waiting for the next piece of equipment.
The Professional is waiting for the Money
And the Master is waiting for The Light!
Thank you
Diana Moss
Editorial
This is something of a bumper edition with items from
our usual contributors augmented by three historical
items and news from the PAGB. I particularly enjoyed
Bob Moore's comments, written with his tongue stuck
firmly in his cheek, on photographic qualifications.
At the personal level, I have bought a bridge camera, the
Canon SX40HS, because on many occasions toting an
SLR, and additional telephoto lens, around has proved to
be too much like hard work. Even with an X35 zoom,
this new camera is very light and gives excellent results.
Unfortunately, it does not take RAW but I have
confirmed that in CS5 I can read Jpegs into the Camera
RAW converter so all is not completely lost.
I have become involved in a project to digitise 35mm
monochrome negatives from the mid-1950s. The main
problem is that that part of the scanner software which
reduces dust and scratches does not work on
monochrome negatives. I can clean them up in
Photoshop using a combination of the noise and
scratches filter in both 'lighten' and 'darken' modes,
content-aware, the clone tool, and Neat Image but it is
tedious. Any ideas?
The closing date for the next issue is 12th
August 2012. I
am happy to take submissions in longhand but prefer to
be emailed Word documents. My thanks to contributors
to this issue and to Diana, John Holt, Simon, Marilyn
and Vaughan for proof reading, and to Piers Hemy, way
up in the Black Isle, north of Inverness, for continuing to
be our printer.
Martin Nellist
The Club Web Site,
www.bedfordcameraclub.co.uk
The Bedford Camera Club web site continues to grow.
Various members are doing an excellent job of keeping
selected pages up-to-date. Here are some changes and
additions that may have escaped your notice.
Club > Membership gives full details of how to join the
club.
The Competitions pages now include many of the full
results as well as winning images in the gallery.
Galleries > Members will showcase your images; to add
your own section send up to 10 of your chosen images to
Diana. Also for those who maintain their own image
web site, e.g. on Flickr or Picasa, you can include a link
to your web site.
The Members > Tips page is updated regularly with new
tips and other information.
Links > Tuition lists some local organizations that can
improve your photographic skills.
Links > Great Photographers is a new page with links
to photographers (past or present) who are the world's
best but who are not so easily discovered as the galleries
of the more commercially astute photographers. When
3
you find some hidden talent let us know and share it on
this page.
The Members menu gives access to the pages which are
exclusive to club members. You need to sign in using
the login name and password that has been supplied to
you. Here you can find details about the group FLICKR
page and a list of money-saving offers and discounts
available to club members.
News > Web Site Activity lists most of the recent
changes made to the web site. Viewing this page avoids
the need to open every page to find what has changed.
Web Statistics In February 2012 we had 620 visits to the club web site,
256 were unique visitors. 33% were new visitors. 6,038
pages were viewed. This works out at almost 10
pages/visit with an average of over 5 minutes each spent
on the web site.
205 only visited once in February but they stayed to
view 1,224 pages.
246 came from a Google, Yahoo or Bing search. 14
arrived from a link on the EAF web site.
The vast majority were from the UK; examples: 143
from Bedford, 98 from London, 47 from Milton Keynes,
27 from Luton and 23 from the Cambridge areas.
The Gallery page was the most popular.
For a small club of fewer than 70 members these
statistics are very encouraging. The statistics were
collected using Google Analytics.
FLICKR There is a Flickr group for Bedford Camera Club
members. Simply open your own account on
www.flickr.com - it is free for up to 200 images - and
request to join the club group.
You control your own Flickr account, upload images and
can arrange your images into sets as normal. Select a
few of your images (we limit it to 5 per week) from your
uploaded pool and "link" them to the BCC group for
others to see your best work, review, comment or offer
help as required. We currently have 14 members using
the group and welcome more.
Full details available on the Members > Flickr Group
club web page.
Ian Whiting
Evening with Ted Rowe, 22nd
November.
Ted Rowe, a former member of BCC, came back at very
short notice to show us a selection of prints and 35mm
transparencies.
The prints were all printed quite recently directly from
Ted's SLR to an A4 Canon printer and without any
manipulation by computer. They illustrated Ted's ability
to compose his pictures in the camera view finder so that
he is able to produce high quality prints directly. An
object lesson for those of us who cannot resist putting
our files through Photoshop.
His transparencies were of a similar high standard and
brought back many memories for those of us who
remember Ted's complete dominance of former 35 mm
slide competitions and his success within the EAF and
international competitions.
Martin Nellist
Three-way Battle, Letchworth,
Biggleswade, and Bedford At Bedford Nov 29th 2011
It is gratifying to be able to say that Bedford won this
interclub competition which was judged by Keith Long
of Daventry. Needless to say we will probably invite
Keith to judge again!
PDIs
Lefkada Alan Horn 20
Feeding Frenzy Bruce Deacon 20
Redbilled Oxpeckers and
Rhino
John Pegram 19
Rural Tribesmen Vaughan
Southgate
19
Jostling For Position Bruce Deacon 18
Anyone for Champagne Claire Boardman 18
Rule Brittania Claire Boardman 17
Goliath Heron Strike John Pegram 17
Water Tower Steve Ridgway 17
The Start Martin Nellist 15
Prints
Hungarian Roundup David Shephard 20
First Corner John Pegram 20
Roaming in the Gloaming Jim Burnett 18
Windswept Stan Searle 17
Venice Impression Stan Searle 16
At the Waterhole John Pegram 16
Reflected Lily Martin Nellist 16
Patterned Beach Martin Nellist 16
Drops and Ripples Peter Robinson 15
Chapel Window Diana Moss 14
Martin Nellist
Panel Evening, 6th December
I compered and David Hogg supplied the technical
expertise to project the images from the prints for this
innovative evening in which authors were invited to
present and discuss from three to six prints relating to a
single theme.
The following members showed, and talked about, their
panels.
Tony Brooks showed six prints illustrating the build up
and dispersal of clouds over the sea during a squall at
Lyme Regis. An interesting sequence which we would
not normally have seen.
4
Deryck Cutler showed three prints of a creative image
of a watch and chain with a miniature cyclist made from
small watch parts riding up the chain (or Albert).
Produced by wet chemistry in the darkroom, one of the
prints had been produced by solarisation. The prints had
been entered successfully in international competition
when Deryck was pursuing his AFIAP and BPEE
awards.
Bruce Deacon. In four prints of horse racing, Bruce
showed how he had used manipulation, particularly
zoom or radial blur, within Photoshop to add
considerable drama to the original images.
David Hogg presented three beautifully taken prints of
aircraft - a formation of Red Arrows, a Chinook
helicopter and a Spitfire.
John Holt. In a panel entitled Day dreaming, John had
three prints in each of which a young lady was posed in
a situation which related to a bubble representing her
thoughts and expressing her ambition. An original idea.
Alan Horn showed us a selection from his intended
LRPS panel and then all ten prints were arranged on
easel for later discussion.
Moira McAneny had six prints of the impressive new
bridge from La Rochelle to Idere. These well composed
pictures were printed on Permajet Papyrus paper which
has a very 'arty' surface.
Diana Moss presented three prints of a Welsh mountain
stream but was not convinced that the third print fitted in
with the other two. This elicited useful comments from
the audience.
Martin Nellist had printed six panoramic prints of
Worbarrow Bay in Dorset. These had been created by
using Photoshop's Photomerge procedure to stitch from
one to ten exposures into one image. The resulting large
file size gave excellent fine detail in 57 cm wide prints.
John Pegram amused us with a Panel entitled
Bittersweet in which three prints told a fantasy crime
story in a 'Jellybaby' community.
Graham Pumphrey. Graham's interest is steam
locomotives and his panel was three very good prints of
locomotives which are still working.
Steve Ridgway showed six prints of the reservoirs and
parts of the reservoirs in the Upper Derwent Valley in
2009. These were HDR images formed by the merging
of three exposures from two-stop under to two stops
over.
Clive Walton showed four prints to illustrate how he
used Photoshop to extract a tame sea eagle from the
background, remove the jesses, and place the image into
a more natural scene. Two further prints illustrated the
use of 'Content aware' in Photoshop CS5 to remove
tourists from an image of the interior of the Hermitage in
St Petersburg.
David Hogg then showed a 5 minute video that he had
made the previous weekend of the St Martha on the Hill
church in Guildford. This showcased his skills in making
and using miniature helicopters for aerial still
photography, and combining them with short video clips
and time-lapse stills, and appropriate music into his
impressive video.
The evening was deemed a success and may well be
repeated in another year.
Martin Nellist
Bedford and Milton Keynes
Waterway Trust by David Fowler,
13th
December
David Fowler replaced Hilary Goldsmith for this talk
about the proposed navigable waterway which should
connect the Grand Union canal at Milton Keynes to the
River Great Ouse close to the weir at Kempston. He
summarised the off-on 200 year history of the project
before describing the route of the waterway now being
proposed. Leaving Milton Keynes the waterway will
pass either close to, or through Willen Lake, and follow
the Broughton Brook down to Junction 13 of the M1. It
will pass under the MI and roughly parallel the A421 to
pass close to the Stewartby lake before crossing the
A421 to pass over Brogborough hill and through the yet
to be built Enterprise Park south of Wootton and
alongside the new housing estate already being built at
Wootton. Initially the route through this area will be
marked by a series of small lakes. A new cycleway is
designed to follow the route past Wootton up to
Kempston and will be built well before the waterway.
David discussed the problems posed by rail and road
bridges along the route and that of climbing over
Brogborough hill. The innovative solution that this will
require is likely to attract tourists and provide photo
opportunities. The Trust is planning to buy and fit out a
narrowboat to provide trips along the Great Ouse to
publicise the project. This should also provide photo
opportunities. The project has grown to the extent that a
Consortium of local authorities and organisations has
been formed and is currently chaired by the Bedford
Mayor, Dave Hodgson. Although this was an unusual
evening for a Camera Club, the talk was full of interest
for residents of Bedford and Central Bedfordshire
Boroughs.
Martin Nellist
'Points of View' Competition', 20th
December, 2011
The images for this year's competition were taken in St
Albans between 10.30 and 3 pm on 16th
October. The
organisers, Mike Olney and Barrie Moss, were rather
taken aback by the larger than usual number (28) of
participants and prior to the judging evening reduced the
entry from each individual to a single image from each
of four out of the following six themes.
People at Leisure 19 entries
Sign of the Times 18 entries
Architecture 15 entries
Clash of Styles 14 entries
Abbey landscape 11 entries
Spirit of Old St Albans 11 entries
5
In the event only 22 members entered PDIs but this still
provided enough for an evening. Ian Johnson of the
Kempston Club judged. Thanks to Ian, Mike and Barrie.
The competition was won by Steve Ridgway, with Jim
Burnett second and Simon Bray third. Titles and the
points scored are given below.
First Steve Ridgway
People at
leisure Today St Albans - Tomorrow
Wembley
20
Abbey
Landscape Viewed from Afar 18
Sign of the
Times Go On - Spoil Yourself 20
Spirit of Old St
Albans Holy Spirit 18.5
Total 76.5
Second Jim Burnett
Architecture Art Deco window and glazed
roof
15
People at leisure Some share, some don't 19
Sign of the
Times New and Gleaming 18
Spirit of Old St
Albans Conservation Area 18
Total Total 70
Third Simon Bray
Architecture Cathedral detail from
Sumpter Yard
15
People at leisure Leisure 18
Abbey
Landscape Cathedral from Verulam
Park
20
Sign of the
times Sign of the Times 15
Total 68
Martin Nellist
Members' Evening, January 3rd
2012
1. 'A Visit to Prague' by Terry Sykes.
Terry took us on a trip to the Czech Republic and
Slovakia returning via Bruges. Prague was the highlight
of the trip and most of his images were taken in, and
around, the centre of the city where the historic cathedral
is within the walls of the castle which is more decorous
than fortified.
2. 'From South Kensington to Piccadilly via
the Tropics' by Vaughan Southgate.
Vaughan began by explaining how his career in medical
parasitology had begun when he joined the staff of the
Natural History Museum in South Kensington. The
original structure was designed by Alfred Waterhouse,
who also designed the Law Courts in Bedford. Both
buildings are notable for their use of terracotta but the
Museum in particular not only has the patterned bricks
but also has many elaborate terracotta sculptures of
animals and plants. Vaughan showed images of these
and then of the quite recent extensions to the Museum
including the 'Cocoon', which houses many of the
Museum's collections. Traditionally these were stored in
formaldehyde but now modern additions are stored in
liquid nitrogen, which preserves the DNA.
Vaughan's particular research was concerned with the
disease bilharzia or schistomiasis, in which the parasite
is transmitted to man in water containing intermediate
host snails. A very clear explanation of the whole
problem was backed up by a series of images mostly
taken in Senegal where infected river water has been an
unintended consequence of man-made dams.
The talk concluded with an introduction to the Linnean
Society of London with which Vaughan is much
involved. Although he did not tell us this he is the
current President.
Martin Nellist
Architects Association Trophy and
NALGO Challenge Cup, 17th
January
2012
This year's competition was for prints only and the
themes were 'Architecture and Materials' and 'Urban
Life Decay' for the Architects Association Trophy and
the NALGO Challenge Cup respectively. Our judge,
Colin Strong was commendably brief and to the point
and managed to review over 100 prints.
In the Architecture competition prints by Martin Nellist,
Vaughan Southgate and Marilyn Southgate were placed
first, second and third but all three were awarded the full
20 marks.
1st After the rain Martin Nellist 20
2nd A Cambridge College Vaughan Southgate 20
3rd Converted Warehouse Marilyn Southgate 20
The Deep Paul Brook 19
Log Jam Diana Moss 19
Glass Frontage Jim Burnett 18
Urban Reflections David Hogg 18
Brick a Brac Terry Mann 18
Stairway to Heaven Martin Nellist 18
Through a Cathedral
Window
Marilyn Southgate 18
Wishful Thinking Clive Walton 18
Glimpse of the Taj
Mahal
Clive Walton 18
Dougga -- Tunisia Alan Woodward 18
In the NALGO Cup, Urban Life Decay was a difficult
subject to interpret for both the competitors and the
judge but Vaughan Southgate and Diana Moss both
scored the full 20 points and were first and second.
Claire Boardman was third with 19 points.
6
1st I Lived here Once Vaughan Southgate 20
2nd Now Open Diana Moss 20
3rd Room with a View Claire Boardman 19
The Demise of the
Corner Shop
Bruce Deacon 19
Tree House Alan Horn 18
Once Famous now
Forgotten
Alan Horn 18
Tavistock Street 2 Roy Kneeshaw 18
80 Tavistock Street Moira McAneny 18
Unfit for Purpose Mike Olney 18
Street Decay Graham Pumphrey 18
High Rise Decay Hollie Pumphrey 18
Result of Conflict Marilyn Southgate 18
Martin Nellist
'Mood and Colour' by Hugh Milsom,
January 10th
2012
Hugh Milsom came from Ware in Hertfordshire to talk
about the high-key landscapes for which he is well
known. After working with film for many years he has
now turned to digital and demonstrated that he has
mastered exposing and printing in this medium. He uses
Permajet papers with two Epson printers capable of
continuous printing on rolls of A2 width. He mostly uses
Oyster and Matte Plus but recently has been using the
new 'Distinction' paper.
He uses Camera RAW to produce several different
versions of the same file to blend in Photoshop and
latterly this has been from JPEG files which in CS5 can
be read into the Camera Raw converter. Some of the
images had been processed from JPEGS taken by Hugh's
partner on a compact camera without the facility to take
RAW. For the high-key effect it is necessary to force
the histogram to the right so that there are very few dark
pixels. His view on composition was that achieving a
balance is more important than conforming to the rule of
thirds. It seemed to me that in most of his images these
objectives did not conflict.
Finally Hugh finished with something entirely different.
These were pictures of murals on the walls of houses in
Belfast and these conformed to the usual rules of tone
and contrast. An excellent evening.
Martin Nellist
Cambridge Digital Inter-Club
Competition, January 21st 2012
37 clubs entered this prestigious competition. We were
required to submit 5 slides in each of five themes with a
reserve on hand had there been a tie. Breckland Imaging
Group were first with 95 points, Cambridge Camera
Club and Chelmsford Camera Club were second equal
with 91 points, and Ongar Photographic Club were
fourth with 89 points. Our closest neighbours, Ampthill
and District Camera Club were 7th
with 87 points, and
we were 17th with 82 points, just one point behind arch
rivals Shillington. Stan Searle pointed out that a number
of clubs were bracketed together on points which put the
total clubs into 19 slots and Bedford into the 9th slot.
Stan also reported that the hall was packed with an
estimated 250 people and that the event was conducted
with the usual Cambridge CC efficiency. Full results and
winning images are posted on the Cambridge Camera
Club website.
Club Name Total Posn
Breckland Imaging Group 95 1st
Cambridge Camera Club 91 2nd
Chelmsford Camera Club 91 2nd
Ongar Photographic Club 89 4th
Bury St Edmunds Photographic Society 88 5th
Ipswich & District Photographic
Society 88 5th
Ampthill & District Camera Club 87 7th
St Ives Photographic Club 87 7th
Upminster Camera Club 87 7th
Norfolk Photography Group 86 10th
Bottisham & Burwell Photographic
Club 85 11th
Stevenage Photographic Society 85 11th
Welwyn Garden City Photographic
Club 85 11th
Barnet & Finchley Photographic
Society 83 14th
Halstead & District Photographic
Society 83 14th
Shillington & District Camera Club 83 14th
Bedford Camera Club 82 17th
The judge, Leigh Preston FRPS EFIAP, gave the 'Roy
Pitman Award for the Best Image' to 'Keep Left' by
Daniel Beecroft of Ongar Photographic Club.
The categories and scores for the Bedford entry were as
follows:-
Theme Title Author Pts
Monochrome
Open
Water Tower Steve Ridgway 18
People Rule
Britannia
Claire
Boardman
14
Landscape Black Rock
Cottage
Tommy Babel 16
Natural
History
Redbilled
Oxpeckers
and Rhino
John Pegram 18
Open Jostling For
Position
Bruce Deacon 16
7
Reserve Feeding
Frenzy
Bruce Deacon NR
Martin Nellist
AV Competition, 24th
January, 2012
The best two of the six entries were selected by audience
voting and will represent the Club in the inter-club
competition for the Felicity Bickley Trophy.
Coast to Coast by John Pegram -1st
A well constructed sequence recalling John Peg ram's
walk from St Bees to Robin Hoods Bay. John made
effective use of multiple images of scenery and
additional information such as flowers or signposts.
Faces by Barrie Moss - 2nd
A sequence to the record 'Smile' of portrait and figure
studies of great variety although not many smiling. The
image best fitting the bill was a close up of the smiling
face of a racing cyclist.
Floral Glories by Clive Walton
A straightforward succession of very good flower
images but which needed a story.
St Petersburg by Clive Walton
This was a very well constructed tour of St Petersburg.
Excellent images were augmented by helpful lettering
and the spine-chillingly deep voice of a Russian bass
with choir accompaniment.
Battle of Blood by Terry Mann
A sequence of shots of a reconstruction of the battle of
Tewkesbury. Either by choice of taking angle or by
digital manipulation, Tony had removed almost all
traces of modern civilisation (cars, ordinary civilians).
To complete the effect he had added realistic battle
scene sound effects.
Colorama by Deryck Cutler
With the theme of colour, this AV was an eclectic
compilation of coloured images which were held
together by the frequent overlaid presence of a small boy
in a cloak.
Martin Nellist
Old Photographs: Their history and
caring for your collection by Helen
Dawkins LRPS, 31st January 2012
Helen Dawkins first reviewed the history of print
photography from the Daguerreotypes and Ambrotypes
of the early years of the nineteenth century through to
demise of film photography at the end of the twentieth.
William Fox Talbot's introduction of negatives allowed
the printing of multiple copies and then on to early
specialised types of prints such as Carte Visite cards,
mourning photos, prisoner photos, and the records made
in the 1870s by Barnardos of children being sent to the
colonies. The Postcard was introduced in 1894 but it was
not until 1904 that the back was divided for address and
message. Prior to that, messages were scribbled on the
edge of the picture. In the First World War the YMCA
organised amateurs to take snaps of men destined for the
front. By that time the Kodak Box Brownie was widely
available. These types of photographs are what Helen
Dawkins is interested in restoring, not, as you might
expect, by digital means, but by using film and wet
printing methods. In this she is aiming not to produce the
best possible image with improved tone and contrast, but
to produce an image which is a cleaned up version of the
original. One problem with old and faded photographs is
the precipitation of the silver particularly in the shadow
areas. Helen tackles this by photographing the original
through polarising filters.
Martin Nellist
Competition: Mist, Steam or Smoke,
7th
February, 2012
Our judge, Jim Hartje ARPS, DPAGB, APAGB, EFIAP,
from Peterborough dealt with 40 prints and 57 PDIs in a
brisk workmanlike manner praising all the images but
also explaining how they could be improved. He
frequently suggested improved crops and tended to be
severe on burnt out highlights. In the print section he
was not fond of coloured mounts.
Jim is a Permajet representative and he left us with very
useful catalogues and a code to obtain free delivery on
orders.
Prints
Claire Boardman Barns in the Mist 20 1st
Bruce Deacon The Farrier 20 2nd
Graham
Pumphrey
Emerging from the
Tunnel
19 3rd
Bruce Deacon Mountain Mist 18
Janice Elliott Misty Mountain 18
Paul Brook Burn Out 17
Paul Brook Early Morning Mist 17
Jim Burnett Dirty Old Town 17
Janice Elliott Old St Albans 17
Marilyn
Southgate
A Good Smoke 17
Clive Walton Psychedelic Smoke 17
PDIs
Janice Elliott Misty Heron 20 1st
Paul Brook The Heat of the
Battle
20 2nd
Peter Robinson Cigarette Break 19 3rd
Paul Brook Victory Salute 19
Hilary Nellist Old Geyser 18
Vaughan
Southgate
No Fishing Today 18
Brian Felles Battle Hardened 17
Alan Horn Alaska on Thames 17
Barrie Moss The River Bank in
Autumn
17
8
Martin Nellist Geyser 17
Peter Robinson NFU Fire Insurance 17
Terry Sykes Halong Bay 17
Tom Yates Early Morning Mist 17
Martin Nellist
Annual Exhibition - Projected Digital
Image Judging, 14th
February 2012.
On Saturday 11th
February a team of 12 Club members
led by Alan Horn assembled in Renhold Village Hall to
assist Paul Radden and David Steel respectively to judge
the PDI and Print entries to the Annual Exhibition. All
went very smoothly and by lunchtime over 300 PDIs and
a similar number of prints had been scrutinised and
marks awarded and entered into laptops. With the job
completed most of the crew hosted the judges to lunch at
the Horse and Jockey in Ravensden.
The evening of 14th
February had been set aside for Paul
Radden to give his comments on the successful PDI
entries, but unfortunately work commitments prevented
his joining us. So instead Matthew Rowntree, Clive
Williams, Mike Clifton and Simon Bray, the members
present at the judging, gave their interpretation of Paul's
comments on a selection of the successful images. This
worked surprisingly well, partly due to some amusing
banter and heckling from the audience.
Novice class. Most of the images entered in this class
would have more than held their own in the Open
classes and this bodes well for the future. The class was
won by Paul Brook with a stunning close-up aerial view
of a racing motorcycle in which both the rider and
machine were totally in focus.
J R Bryant cup for a set of three PDIs on a theme. The
judge had been firmly of the opinion that, since the
images had to be judged on serial projection, it was very
important that they formed a coherent progress on a
clear theme with no unnecessary switches between
portrait and landscape format or changes in colour. First
place went to Clive Walton's creative studio shots of
'Psychedelic Smoke'
Monochrome Open. Quite a few of the very good
images had an enhanced clarity and contrast suggesting
that they might have been processed through some of the
specialist monochrome software such NIK Silver EFEX.
The winner was a white Dahlia by Martin Nellist.
Colour Open. From a high quality field, John Pegram's
Winile (Winner) & Menzi (Creator) was placed First and
also judged to be the Best Portrait.
The full results will be in the catalogue which will be
available for the Exhibition on 19-21st April in the
Harpur Suite.
Martin Nellist
'Monochrome in the Digital
Darkroom' by Mike Fuller, 28th
February 2012
Mike and Ursula Fuller, members of Benfleet Camera
Club, had travelled the not inconsiderable distance from
Canvey Island to talk to us about producing high quality
monochromes in digital. Mike stressed the importance of
using original colour images and converting to
Greyscale in RAW. The real advantage of RAW is the
greater range of tones; JPEG processing tends to throw
them away. If forced to take JPEG then taking three
exposures can help capture the full range.
Mike opens the RAW file into Photoshop as a Smart
Object (Shift-click on Open Image) and, if necessary,
creates more additional Smart Objects with different edit
settings. This allows him to take the layers back into
RAW for further processing if required. Blending these
images in layers usually requires making selections to
derive masks. Mike usually expands these selections by
1 pixel and feathers by 2 or 3 pixels. Mike had put this
information and much, much more into a DVD which he
had available for purchase. He and Ursula also have a
website at www.naturalworldfineart.com and can be
contacted by email at [email protected].
They offer a service for calibrating monitors and printers
and Mike talked a little about setting up Epson and
Canon printers for printing monochrome. He
recommended adding a sepia or similar tone if it was not
possible completely to remove a magenta or cyan cast
from a mono print. For Canon printers (9000 series) like
mine he recommended using the 'Greyscale' setting with
'Printer managing the colours'.
A useful tip for CS5 users, who find it frustrating that it
is difficult easily to view two open images at the same
time as was the default in CS3, is to uncheck the 'Open
Documents as Tabs' in Preferences>File Handling.
Finally I must mention that Mike also showed an
example of using a 'Flood Filter' to add water and
reflections to the base of a picture. Go to
flamingpear.com to see more examples.
Martin Nellist
Competition: Book or Film Title, 6th
March 2012
Our judge, Chris Baldwin from Daventry, was faced
with a large and very varied entry from which to choose
the best images combining good photography with an
acceptable interpretation of the theme.
Both Claire Boardman's winning print, Brief Encounter,
and Marilyn Southgate's winning PDI Titanic were
imaginative and humorous interpretations of the theme.
The PRINT results were as follows: -
9
1st Claire Boardman Brief Encounter 23 points
2nd
Paul Brook Fight Club 21.5 points 3rd Wendy Robinson Traffic Jam 20 points There were 48 entries in the PRINT COMPETITION
The PDI results were as follows:-
1st Marilyn Southgate Titanic 23 points
2nd Tony Beaumont Jamaica Inn 21.5 points
3rd
Clive Williams Taxi Driver 20 points
There were 49 entries in the PDI COMPETITION.
Martin Nellist
In The Raw!
Several months ago Diana distributed forms asking
members to record what they might like to learn in more
detail regarding photography. One of my options was
RAW and it wasn’t long before I received an email from
Ian Whiting giving me details of what would be
involved and where the meetings would be held.
Three members attended the first meeting which went
into the whys and wherefores of RAW. I really found the
first session quite mind boggling but by the time I left
the first meeting, was beginning to see what the
advantages of this subject were.
As we were all busy in the run up to Christmas our next
meeting didn’t happen until the 9th
February where I
attended along with Tony Brooks.
On this evening I found it a lot more interesting because
it was the practical side of it and Ian was showing us
exactly what to do and how to achieve the effects.
Frantically writing notes that I could understand, I went
home full of enthusiasm thinking ‘right I’ll try this at the
weekend!’ Which I did, but not totally getting it right but
feeling confident that I had a better understanding from
what I had been shown. Tony Brooks had also lent me
his version of the Canon Digital Photo Professional
Instruction Manual to look through in order to get more
of an idea of what it is all about and from this I am now
down loading the version for my Canon camera.
These tutorials have done exactly what was intended in
stirring an interest in the subject. Rome wasn’t built in a
day but now I have the confidence to move forward,
which I probably wouldn’t have done on my own.
Thanks also to Barbara, Ian’s wife who kept us refreshed
on these two occasions.
Moira McAneny
Audio Visual – One Shot
One of the other subjects I opted for was the Audio
Visual as I would dearly like to try and enter next year’s
competition. On one of our Tuesday evening interval
breaks Matthew Rowntree brought his laptop in and
several members were shown how to download the One
Shot Programme. He also ran through how it worked. I
haven't had a chance to start that yet but again it’s stirred
my interest and I’m keen to do it just as soon as time
permits. So thank you Matthew once again; it was much
appreciated.
This is everything I would expect from a Camera Club.
It is helping me to become a better photographer and
giving me practical help which sometimes is much better
than reading a manual.
Moira McAneny
Refreshments
I would just like to thank all the members who have this
term put their names down to help with the refreshments
during the interval and also those who have said they
will step in at the last minute if the designated rota
person cannot make it. Diana asked me at the beginning
of the club’s year if I would be prepared to manage the
refreshments. No pressure of course. Although yes is
what I said and I must say I have enjoyed the task but
without the help of your good selves it would have been
a great deal harder. By the way the recruitment list is
always on the table if anyone who has not had the
pleasure and feel they might like to have a go. On your
first time I will show you the ropes and if I can do it
anyone can!
Moira McAneny
Cycle Cross – Box End Park,
Kempston, 20
th November 2011
At the 15th
November Club Night, Terry Sykes informed
members that there would be a Cycle Cross Competition
on the forthcoming Sunday at Box End Park. Races
would start, Children between 11 -12am, Novices 12 –
1.00pm and the main event from 1.00 – 2.00pm.
I decided to go along to this event as did several other
members of the club. I thought it might be helpful in
gaining more experience on taking movement. The
morning was quite foggy and especially so at the venue.
I arrived with my friend just as the sun was beginning to
burn through, although at times difficult to see the
competitors. The course was 2.5 miles long which I
believe had to be attacked five times, some on the flat
but most of the time up and down hill including a couple
of jumps which most carried their bikes over. Crashes
were in abundance and on occasion, I was in the right
place at the right time!
In the fog the lake looked mystical, fog does funny
things and I hope I achieved a result of this whilst
waiting for the main race to start. I hadn’t been to one of
these events before so it was a bit of a job deciding
where to stand and although they all started at the same
time it wasn’t long before the group dispersed. In fact
once you’d found a bend or top or bottom of a hill to
10
stand, you didn’t necessarily have to move as it was a
continual stream of riders coming through. Several
crashed on bends and I learnt a few more choice words
by the time I went home that I hadn’t necessarily heard
before!
After the event had finished several of us met socially
for a hot drink in the club house and spoke of how much
we had enjoyed the morning.
So thank you Terry for informing us of this event . It
was appreciated by us all.
Moira McAneny
Ken Holland – Looking At
Photographs
A recent book 'Looking at Photographs', which Ken
Holland, ARPS DPAGB, wrote from the point of view
of a judge, prompted me to wonder if there might be
anything useful in it for us as exhibitors.
Ken’s introduction to camera club competitions, having
submitted an image of the Red Arrows in formation, was
the throwaway comment from the judge ‘I’ve never been
very interested in aeroplanes, next slide please’.
Subsequently Ken tried, without success, to find real
guidance on judging photographic images. ‘Looking at
Photographs’ resulted from a compilation of his own
lecture notes for a seminar on judging.
He is careful to stress that the thoughts he propounds are
personal. I have simply extracted his thoughts about
what constitutes a ‘good photograph’ from the book and
to which I will give more consideration, before taking
another photograph.
Ken suggests that communication is of the essence and
at least one of the following functions should be
fulfilled.
Is it a personal statement?
Is it a technical record, i.e. a record shot?
Is it a personal record?
So my first question is – Why am I taking this
picture?
Ken then goes on to ask himself the following additional
questions.
These are not in any order of priority and it is accepted
that all take practice.
How well has the information been conveyed?
What did the photographer have in mind when
taking the shot?
A technically perfect shot may be quite
uninteresting if the subject matter is boring.
Look for something even slightly out of the
ordinary which many people would not notice
in everyday life.
So I have listed a few additional thoughts that Ken
would be having whilst judging in order to address the
questions outlined above.
The principal subject should be clearly defined.
Is it? ‘KISS – Keep it Simple Stupid!’
Although interpretation is always personal,
does the interpretation do the subject justice?
Has the image achieved its purpose? Does it
have impact?
Would the subject benefit from a different
format?
Would a filter, or lack of, make any difference?
Would the subject be better placed elsewhere?
What depth of field is best?
Look for psychological links and contrasts. Ken
gives the example of a clown and a nun sitting
together!
Visual contrast gives impact.
How is the eye encouraged to ‘read’ the image?
The closing chapters of his book deal with general
considerations for any picture as well as what he would
look for in judging a variety of photographic genres.
To sum up:-
Why have you taken this image in the first place?
What are you trying to show the viewer?
Reference: Royal Photographic Society magazine,
December 2012/January 2012, Volume 151 Number 10
The booklet can be obtained from www.lowenna.co.uk
(£4.00 + £1.00 post) if bought directly from Ken. More
if purchased from the publisher.
Diana Moss
A Checklist for the Judge
At the request of the PAGB, Ken Holland produced this
checklist for judging.
11
DO Watch good judges at work.
Ask why a picture was made, not how.
Appraise, assess and analyse.
Evaluate the whole image.
Talk about emotional aspects as well as technical.
Manage your time.
Make three positive comments about each image.
Smile often.
Suggest ways an image might be improved.
Assess the quality of the photography.
Remember it’s not an exact science.
DO NOT Pass judgement.
Repeat yourself.
Lecture.
Explain how a picture was taken, or made in Photoshop.
Display your personal prejudices.
Criticise.
Insist on the “rules”.
Try to crop every image.
Display too many irritating mannerisms.
Touch the image with your fingers.
Dissect an image into small pieces.
Praise mediocre work too highly.
PLEASE Be confident and enjoy it.
Be brief and concise.
Be honest.
Be a “critical friend”.
Be modest.
Be open minded.
Be punctual.
Be helpful and encourage high standards.
Be fair.
Be informed and unbiased.
Be friendly, humorous, light-hearted and respectful.
Be entertaining and interesting.
Be enthusiastic.
(I would find it difficult to follow this advice at all well
so it is probably a good job I have no intention of trying
to be a judge! - Martin Nellist)
Police Compensate Parade-Ban
Photographer
A teenager who was wrongly barred by police from
taking photographs of an Armed Forces Day parade in
Romford, London, has been compensated. Lawyers
acting for Jules Matteson then aged 15 - said a police
inspector had described taking photographs in public as
"anti social behaviour". "The inspector told Jules he was
a public nuisance ..," said the spokesman. "He described
the act of taking photographs as 'silly' and 'gay' and
'stupid'," The solicitor said Jules had "politely"
maintained that the police were not entitled to interfere
with his right to report, however in response, the
inspector told him: "I consider you a threat under the
Terrorism Act young man. I've had enough'." A
Metropolitan Police spokesman said an out-of-court
settlement had been reached with the force paying out
compensation and legal fees. This report, originally from BBC NEWS LONDON,
appeared in PAGB e-News No. 54, December 2011.
St Ives Photographic Club's Annual
Exhibition
I went to St. Ives Photographic Club’s exhibition on
November 26th
It had been advertised on our notice
board. It was unusual in that it was non-competitive;
members generally had one side of a panel each
although a few shared a panel. The only judging was by
members of the public who were asked to note their
“best three” prints. A noticeable feature was that high
gloss prints, which were much favoured in the days of
Cibachrome, were difficult to view due to the light
reflected on them from the strings of overhead lights.
We used that lighting system when we held our
exhibition in the Harpur Suite some years ago. Over the
years St Ives have used a number of ways of holding
prints on their panels. At one time they used light weight
plastic channels which were attached to the panels with
Velcro. We copied that system for one of our
exhibitions. This time they used transparent triangular
corner protectors which obviously had Velcro patches on
the rear. This gave a very neat appearance.
PDIs were back projected on a good-sized screen most
of the time I was there. Being non-competitive,
members were free to show work which they liked rather
than what a judge would like. An enjoyable visit.
John Holt
Men and Women of Letters - A
Personal Opinion by Bob Moore, Hon.FRPS. Hon.PAGB.
MPAGB, FBIPP. FIPF. AFIAP. BPE5*.
Etc., Etc., Etc.
(I very much enjoyed this article which appeared in
PAGB e-news No 57 of February 2012. Bob Moore is a
former President of the RPS and a very well known
photographer in the Club world. At one time he was a
regular visiting lecturer to BCC. Editor)
When I first joined a camera club in the 1960's, yes it is
that long ago, letters after photographers' names were
few and far between. The odd ARPS and the very
occasional FRPS. A speaker with an FRPS received red
carpet treatment in the early 1970's! When a camera club
chairman now introduces a speaker it sometimes is a
matter of mirth and embarrassment when reading out the
lecturer’s long list of letters. In fact, some club lecturers
and exhibitors are loaded down with more letters than
the alphabet! I wonder if the average club member is
12
interested. For what it's worth, I think there are too many
distinctions and some, I'm afraid, are pretty meaningless.
Only club photography seems bothered with letters.
Successful rose growers don't apply for an Associateship
of Rose Society Enthusiasts. Do they? I suppose a
cynical view would be that they bring cash in for the
organisations that award them, but do they really mean
very much? The system is obviously a complete
mishmash. A number of distinctions are awarded for
exhibiting in approved exhibitions. A number for
submitting panels of related and unrelated prints or PDIs
to bodies of self appointed experts. Some letters are
awarded for services to photography. In fact, it's very
difficult to know the difference between many of them.
Let's take a look at the most popular distinctions that UK
camera club members may be tempted to chase - sorry
apply for. Each has its own peculiarities and you can
pick and choose.
British Photographic Exhibitions. (BPE) currently has 18
exhibitions. Collect acceptances and convert them into
points. Accumulated they add up to BPE Crown Awards
and beyond to the slightly overstated Fellow of BPE. No
payment, except for exhibition entry fees.
Federation Internationale de L'Art Photographique
(FIAP) is a predominately European organisation that
promotes and approves International exhibitions around
the world. It offers AFIAP & EFIAP – for accumulated
acceptances in approved exhibitions. Panels have to be
submitted for MFIAP and holders are rare.
The Royal Photographic Society awards the oldest and
once the most prestigious of all distinctions. However
their crown seems to be slipping slightly. Probably
because of the preponderance of other distinctions and
the fact that, to keep your hard won letters, a
membership fee of about £100 is payable every year.
They offer LRPS, ARPS & FRPS. Panels of images
must be submitted with the required fee. Worryingly,
some well known camera club lecturers have recently
abandoned their membership of the RPS.
Photographic Society of America. (PSA). Count your
acceptances in PSA approved exhibitions for Star ratings
that eventually get you on to Galaxy's, APSA, FPSA,
etc! Star gazing without a telescope! Still a minority
interest amongst UK club photographers at present, but
increasing in popularity and the PSA would like to be
more involved in the UK.
The PAGB is a relative newcomer to the awards
bandwagon. They offer CPAGB, DPAGB and MPAGB.
Panels of Prints or PDIs are submitted and are assessed
by 6 Adjudicators as individual images. If successful,
you keep the letters for life with no further fee. That
must be an attraction! They also award the coveted
APAGB and the rarer HonPAGB for services to club
photography.
There are many others. Read any International
Exhibition catalogue and you'll be amazed that some
snappers have rows and rows of letters, especially from
mainland Europe and the Far East who are the top dogs
at chasing letters. I've recently had the good fortune to
be awarded a Fellowship Artist of the Romanian
Telephoto Society. Prefixed with OLD - should look
good in any high class catalogue.
So what drives club photographers to get involved, often
at a substantial cost? Personal ego, prestige and
recognition are high on the list. If you are looking for
recognition from other photographers, it's probably true
that the MPAGB now holds the most prestige. They
certainly don't give many of those away. I think the
PAGB has possibly overtaken the RPS in the prestige
stakes, certainly amongst club members. It's also true
that there are a number of wonderfully talented
photographers who have no letters and are not interested
in spending time and money to obtain them.
So please don't judge photographers by their letters.
Judge them by the images they produce! I'm thinking of
starting a new body which will award Fellowships Of
the Organisation of Letter Seekers. Any Takers? Not
sure yet of the criteria requirements but I'll think of
something that will line my pockets!
External Competitions
Well everyone, it has been a mixed bag of results
throughout the season and I am absolutely no clearer as
to what the judges are looking for. Some of the images
we have entered have done well in our Annual
Exhibition and internal competitions but have failed to
impress a different judge or judges in other
competitions.
I often wonder what the winning formula is and as I
have told you all before, male muscles seem to impress
female judges, so I think you men had better get those
lapsed gym memberships up and running again so that
we have some material to work with. Having said that
we may have a David Beckham body double in the club
already, but I expect you are just shy.
Failing the ‘developing the muscles of our male
members route’, we all need to invest in some
underwater camera equipment. The few underwater
images that have appeared in this year’s External
Competitions always seem to score quite highly. One
judge said it was simply because of their rarity.
However, before we all go out into the ‘deep’ to capture
some ancient underwater wreck or some rare lesser
spotted Scorpion Fish, just be warned that there are
many dangers to be faced underwater that you simply
wouldn’t have on a photo shoot in Bedford. Actually, on
second thoughts you might; they are just different
dangers.
My third line of attack is to get everybody in the club to
spend their money on exotic holidays and locations. At a
recent LRPS ( Licentiate of the Royal Photographic
Society) advisory day, several possible panels for
submission that were considered to have a good chance
of success were taken almost entirely in wonderfully
13
vibrant, colourful and stimulating places that just
couldn’t fail to produce those exquisite images that
always seem to impress judges. However, you still need
to be in the right place at the right time, (with your
camera of course), to produce that image with the
magical winning formula; whatever that is.
I have seriously considered whether it is best to put our
cards (or should I say PDIs and prints) on the table and
play to the judges personal favourite genres or subjects.
The Selection Committee have debated the subject and
whilst some, and I think it is fair to say the majority,
think that this is a good idea, the counter argument is
that a judge may simply be more critical of a subject that
he or she is particularly fond of or indeed excels in
personally.
The next plan of attack is for us all to move to Norfolk
so that we can take endless Natural History images. At
the recent St. Ives Print Competition, Norfolk PG came
second with all Natural History entries, 7 of the 8 were
of birds, all fantastic shots, with a Red Squirrel thrown
in to make up the eighth entry.
Failing all of the above, we simply need to kidnap some
famous photographer and somehow persuade him or her
of the benefits of becoming a member of our fabulous
club. Look at what we can offer. BCC is friendly,
sociable, entertaining, offers value for money, a varied
programme and improvement in one’s photography (we
may be struggling with that one, as they must clearly be
at the top of their game already if they are going to be of
use to us; although it is often said that there is always
room for improvement). We can then use his/her award
winning images, which all the judges have seen and are
aware of the images’ success and therefore wouldn’t
dare award it anything less than 10/10 or 20/20. Other
clubs do the same so why not BCC? Actually I don’t
think they actually kidnap the photographers so we must
think of another means of persuasion; any ideas?
So, as you can see, there is no tried and tested method of
gaining success in any competition. All I do know is that
without members’ images we don’t have much choice to
start with. I would like to thank all those who have
submitted their work for the Selection Committee to
choose from. Although we have a faithful few members
who do offer their work for External Competitions, it
has been very encouraging to see an increase in the
number of authors we have been able to select from.
There are at least 15 different authors whose work has
been selected for the EAF (East Anglian Federation)
Print Championship.
Above all, we photographers need to get out and about
with our cameras and not be shy about sharing our work
with others. Many of us have said that we sometimes
don’t see a fault or problem in our work, or indeed an
area which could be improved with just a minor tweak
or adjustment despite looking very closely at it.
Someone else looking at it may see something obvious
that we ourselves have missed.
We don’t all have to be a whizz kid with Photoshop,
Elements or CS , a simple crop is sometimes all that is
required to get an image from a 15/20 to perhaps a top
three place in a competition.
Perhaps we should spend some time next season when
we all bring in a couple of images and in small groups
we can simply talk about where improvements could be
made. Positive criticism is always required but just
removing too much sky or dust spots from an image are
very simple ways of improving one’s work. However,
don’t take any comments personally and remember as
long as YOU like the image that is what is important.
So we are nearly at the end of the 2011/2012 External
Competition season and the results so far are as follows:-
Beds Invitation - Judge - Daphne Hanson CPAGB,
APAGB - a disappointing result. We came last out of 16
clubs.
Best score - Ball on Water - Claire Boardman - 16/20
3-Way Battle between Bedford, Biggleswade and
Letchworth -Judge - Keith Long ARPS Hooray! We
won. Both Biggleswade and Letchworth beat us quite
convincingly in the Beds Invitation Competition so a
very good result.
Best scores PDIs
Feeding Frenzy by Bruce Deacon - 20/20 and Best PDI
in the competition.
Lefkada by Alan Horn 20/20
Red Billed Oxpeckers and Rhino by John Pegram 19/20
Senegalese Tribesmen by Vaughan Southgate 19/20
Best scores Prints -
Hungarian Roundup by David Shephard 20/20 and best
print in the competition.
First Corner - John Pegram 20/20
Cambridge Camera Club Inter - Club Digital
Competition - Judge - Leigh Preston FRPS
We came 17 out of 37 clubs.
Best scores -
Water Tower by Steve Ridgway 18/20
Red Billed Oxpecker and Rhino by John Pegram 18/20
EAF PDI Championship - Judges - Colin Harrison
FRPS, MPAGB, EFIAP, David E Gibbins ARPS,
APAGB, AFIAP and Graham Hodgkiss ARPS,
DPAGB, APAGB, AFIAP
We came 21st out of 38 clubs. I think this was a very
respectable result for such a big competition.
Best scores
Feeding Frenzy by Bruce Deacon 13/15
Jostling For Position by Bruce Deacon 12/15
Tunnel Vision by Steve Ridgway 12/15
All Shall Be Equal Before The Law by John Pegram
12/15
St. Ives Interprint Competition - Judge Rosemary
Wilman Hon.FRPS, AFIAP, BPE5*
We came =20th
out of 30 clubs.
Best scores
Hungarian Roundup by David Shephard - 9.5/10
14
Robin by David Hogg - 8/10
Lone Cricket by Martin Nellist - 8/10
The Brotherhood Challenge Cup (Peterborough) is
the next External Competition, followed by the EAF
Print Championship, The 3-WAY Battle between
Bedford, Shillington and Kempston and then the New
City PS Digital Central Challenge Cup. The Felicity
Bickley Trophy is an AV (Audio/ Visual) competition
and takes place at the end of March. We are the current
holders of the Trophy.
Claire Boardman
Complaint about consistency of
judging and PAGB defence.
The PAGB received the following complaint from an
aggrieved Club member:
“The whole PAGB awards have no merit as there is no
consistency in any of the judging. This means that they
have no value. The whole award system for the PAGB
is a nonsense and a complete lottery.
In short the whole thing is a complete farce. I re-
entered six prints which I had entered on my first
attempt at this award; every single one scored less than
last time. The six prints together scored a whole 14
points less than last time.
I appreciate that there will always be discrepancies,
but a good print doesn’t become a poor one overnight.” The PAGB felt the letter deserved a response and here is
an extract from the reply;
I don't know specifically how the score for each of
your 6 photographs changed but I have to say that a
difference of 14 points over 6 pictures is about as
consistent as anyone could reasonably expect with 6
different judges. If they look at a picture which is
borderline then they have to decide to vote for it (4) or
declare it a near miss (3). This can be a tiny movement
but if two or more judges move from 4 to 3 then your
score drops by 2 points or more.
Neither judging panel is wrong, nor is either panel
necessarily correct. Perhaps the first panel averaged
out a little high and the second a little low. The
photograph is still borderline - sometimes it will get a
passing score, sometimes it will not. We have observed
that re-submitted prints sometimes score higher the
second time around but that has never elicited a
complaint.
We work very hard to ensure consistency, and our
judges are the best there are, but photography judging
is not a science. There are no real objective criteria to
assess against and nobody is pretending that there isn't
a little bit of luck involved. If your total entry is
borderline, you have at least as much chance of failing
as you have of passing.
An Exception to the Rule (Here is another interesting snippet from the PAGB e-
news)
There have been a number of queries why photographs
entered by one of the judges of the recent PAGB Inter-
Federation Annual PDI Competition were accepted into
the Exhibition. At the eleventh hour one of the people
booked to judge the Annual Competition/Exhibition was
unfortunately taken ill and could not travel to East
Anglia on the morning of the competition. In order for
the adjudication to take place, a PAGB judge had to be
found. After telephoning various PAGB judges in the
area, Barbie Lindsay MPAGB EFIAP stepped in at the
very last moment. Barbie had entries in the competition
and offered to withdraw them. However this would have
unfairly penalised her Federation and it was decided that
they should remain. Each of Barbie’s photographs was
scored by the other two judges and a score was added
which “averaged” those two as much as possible. This is
not the normal procedure and judges’ work is not
normally permissible. On this occasion an exception had
to be made in order for the judging to go ahead as
planned.
Daphne Hanson – PAGB Competitions
Administration Officer
Audio-Visual Awards
After considerable head scratching and consultation, the
PAGB have finally confirmed agreement of a
deceptively simple but groundbreaking redefinition of
Audio- Visual Production to be used for Awards for
Photographic Merit in AV. This ensures that the makers
of both traditional and modern AV productions can
continue to strive for PAGB Awards.
“An AV Production submitted for a PAGB Award for
Photographic Merit should predominately consist of a
sequence of still photographic images, the majority of
such images being the original work of the entrant,
together with a synchronised sound track. The use of
third party images, animated graphics, video clips or
other visual material, whilst not excluded, should be
limited and appropriate to the production. Entrants
must confirm that they have obtained legal consent for
the use of any visual or audio material used in the
production other than their own original content.”
Oh, what a tangled web………
In late 2011, it was reported that an entry in the PAGB
GB Cup (Small Clubs) 2011 competition included an
image which appeared to infringe the PAGB rule that all
images entered must be entirely the work of the
individual photographer.
The matter was referred to the PAGB Standards sub-
committee to investigate under the PAGB Breach of
Rules Procedure. It was admitted by the photographer
that he had acquired a photograph, via the internet,
which was subsequently adjusted and passed off as his
own original work. The PAGB were satisfied that the
15
misdemeanour lay with the individual photographer and
that Oldham PS was unaware that this was the case.
The PAGB decided that the image in question should be
retrospectively disqualified from the competition. Both
Oldham PS and the individual concerned were notified
of this decision and neither chose to appeal. The PAGB
considered the loss of placing represented sufficient
penalty for Oldham PS.
The photographer concerned has been notified that he is
excluded from all PAGB competitions and patronage
events but may request a review of this decision after
three years.
After the disqualification of the illegal photograph, the
results were recalculated and Duston promoted to 3rd
place. Duston were informed but, unfortunately, it was
not possible to do anything about the CD AV show that
was already in circulation The PAGB regretted that
Duston were unable fully to enjoy their success at the
time but issued belated congratulations.
(The moral of this tale is not to become obsessive about
winning! Editor)
The Olympic Connection
In this Olympic year I think it is appropriate to mention
Bedford Camera Club's connection with the Olympic
Games. One of the eighteen founder members of the
Club was Adolphe Abrahams, the older brother by 16
years of Harold Abrahams, the Olympic Gold Medallist
(100m in 1924), a celebrated sports commentator for the
BBC for about 40 years, and the subject of the film
'Chariots of Fire'.
But this is not the connection to the Olympic movement
that I have in mind. In fact, as Harold was quick to
acknowledge, his elder brother's interest in athletics and
his expertise as a physician with a special knowledge in
sports medicine were instrumental in developing the
sports careers of Harold and another older brother
Sidney, an Olympic long-jumper.
In 1906, Adolphe was 23 and I am not sure whether or
not he had qualified as a doctor at that time. In 1909
when he wrote an article for 'The Amateur Photographer
and Photography News' there was no mention of his
medical qualification.
The article was entitled 'Common or Garden' Focal
Plane Photography. Its message was that 'best training
for photography is photography' and that to take
'instantaneous photographs' with the fairly recently
introduced focal-plane shutters it was necessary to
practise. Adolphe seems to have roped in his three
younger brothers and two sisters to provide moving
subjects of the type he might encounter on the athletics
field. I have inserted one of these 'A Garden
Steeplechase' because it appears to include all the family
(plus one) and that it is highly probable that Harold and
Sidney are two of the three hurdlers. Also, it was almost
certainly taken at their family home in Bedford.
I am not sure how long Adolphe remained a member of
Bedford Camera Club but during World War 1 he was
attached to the Royal Army Medical Corps. In 1919 he
was appointed consultant at Westminster Hospital and
lecturer in its Medical School of which he later became
Dean. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal College of
Physicians in 1931 and went on to gain many more
honours for his services to medicine including a
knighthood.
A Garden Steeplechase
However, back to his connection with the Olympics for,
from 1912 to 1948, he was medical officer of the British
Olympic Teams. Then in 1953 together with his friend
Sir Arthur Porritt he founded the British Association of
Sport and Exercise Medicine (www.basem.co.uk). Sir
Adolphe was the founder President and held the office
until his death in the winter of 1967. Sir Arthur Porritt, a
finalist in the 200m in the 1924 Olympics, held the post
Sir Adolphe Abrahams - from a Bromide
Print in the National Portrait Gallery by
Walter Stoneman in 1944
16
of Chairman and subsequently became Governor-
General of New Zealand. BASEM has always
maintained strong links with the Olympic movement.
Of course, his younger brother Harold, with his Olympic
success, his work for the BBC and the 'Chariots of Fire'
has the higher profile, and indeed there are plans to
install a Heritage Fund plaque at Harold's former
Bedford home in the run up to the 2012 London
Olympics. But Bedford Camera Club's connection to the
Olympics is Sir Adolphe.
Martin Nellist
Samuel Sugden
Simon Bray passed to me an enquiry from Mrs Penny
Hoskyn of West Byfleet, Surrey asking about her great-
uncle, Samuel Sugden's, connection with Bedford
Camera Club. I was able to tell her that Samuel Sugden
was the Club President in 1927 and won the Challenge
Cup in 1923, 1925 and 1927. I was also able to supply a
copy of a magazine article about BCC from The New
Photographer, March, 1928, and from which I obtained
the image.
Penny was disappointed that we did not have any copies
of the winning images but she has now made contact
with Samuel's grand-daughter who just may have a few
images. If she does I hope we can get some copies for
the Club archives.
Although Samuel worked in Bedford for a number of
years, he also worked in the potteries as a painter, and
Penny understands that he decorated the finger plates
commonly fitted to doors of that period. He was also a
church organist. If any member has any other
information, I should be pleased to forward it to Penny.
Martin Nellist
The Famous Dig for Victory (foot on
the Spade) poster
(I have copied this item by Rob Foster from Issue No 1
2012 of the Allotment and Leisure Gardener. Can you
solve the final question? Surely CS5 and Content-Aware
was not available in 1939! Editor)
On September 3rd 1939 plans were put into operation to
encourage the public to grow their own vegetables. The
campaign failed to capture the public’s imagination and
was slow to take off. Eventually it was decided that a
really effective slogan was needed; "Grow more Food"
was rejected as being too Victorian at the time. The
Ministry of Slogans Department worked flat out to find
three-word phrases that would set the wheels in motion
without frightening anyone. It wasn’t until the autumn of
1939 that the Evening Standard published a leader on the
war effort and pointed out that we should have to dig for
victory as well as work or fight for victory. Nobody
estimated the importance or the consequences of that
leader-writers choice of words.
lt was soon spotted in the first edition of the Evening
Standard by Mr B W Haddon, chairman of the Ministry
of Agriculture's Advisory Committee on Publicity and
by Mr A Knee, Head of the Ministry’s Press and
Publicity Branch. They contacted each other and the
slogan of the war was born. "Dig for Victory" soon
passed into the language, while "Dig to Live" and "Dig
for Dear Life" slipped out.
17
The next requirement for the campaign was a really
striking poster. The Ministry was flooded with
suggestions from professional and amateur artists, but
most, it was decided, were too complicated or wishy-
washy. lt was by accident that the foot on the spade
poster came into being. A Mr F G Stevens was turning
out his desk drawer when he found a rough photographic
layout that had been sent in some months previously by
Morgan Wills Studio. It was a photograph of one of
their employees’ feet poised on a spade. So it was that
the famous foot on the spade poster came into being.
However, one question remains unanswered; where is
the other foot'? Because the one pictured must be his left
foot. (Or as Hilary commented 'How did a 'Knee' lose a
foot?')