Upload
arjan-haring
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/7/2019 20110401 Draft Proposal PhD Research Arjan Haring
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/20110401-draft-proposal-phd-research-arjan-haring 1/3
8/7/2019 20110401 Draft Proposal PhD Research Arjan Haring
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/20110401-draft-proposal-phd-research-arjan-haring 2/3
Detail: speedometer 2009 Ford Fusion Infotropism display
Example 2: Health promotion
Another field in which interaction designers are primarily focused on changing behavior is the domain of
mobile health devices. Philips developed DirectLife which is a combination of an activity monitor and a
web-based service. DirectLife users can see statistics and results of their physical activities. The system
aims to stimulate people to become and stay physically active.
Another initiative that focuses on stimulating physical activity is the exercise-challenge service
IMoveYou.com which enables users to publicly challenge friends to reach specific health-related goals.
IMoveYou founder and designer Jen McCabe declares that its design is based on principles that come
from the field of behavioral economics.
Philips DirectLife Social media initiative I Move You
Example 3: Commerce
On a simple level, interaction designers are influencing behavior change in commercial settings too. At
Dutch bank ABN AMRO, interaction designers use social pressure to stimulate clients to make an
appointment with mortgage advisors. And the discount airline Ryanair uses the psychological principle
of scarcity as a way of influencing consumers to act.
These last two examples are inspired by the work of professor Robert Cialdini. In the 1970s, Cialdini
researched different compliance practitioners (e.g. Hare Krishna fundraisers and car salesmen), and
identified widely applicable psychological principles for changing behavior .
8/7/2019 20110401 Draft Proposal PhD Research Arjan Haring
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/20110401-draft-proposal-phd-research-arjan-haring 3/3
Existing theoretical models and their shortcomings
Though interaction design is influenced by behavioral sciences, the use of well-founded theories and
frameworks that focus on behavior change is fragmented. The available frameworks, BJ Foggs 8-Step
Design Process for Behavior Change, and the Persuasive Systems Design (PSD) framework by Hari Oinas-
Kukkonen, aim to give designers a framework to develop and evaluate their products by. Though Foggs
design process is highly accessible, it is too brief and generic to inform interaction designers properly.
The PSD model is a more extensive framework but is rooted in software engineering, which is why its
applicability to common interaction design practices is limited.
The field is also hampered by a lack of methodologies for measuring behavioral change
In line with the fragmented use of well-founded theories and frameworks, there are only few studies
available that report about measuring behavioral change induced by interaction design. There a few
studies that evaluate the effect of the designs, especially in a real world setting, more studies would
benefit practitioners that want to demonstrate their added value.
Need for research
Here are the two main research problems that emerge from the field of designing for behavior change:
1. Create an overview of current approaches, methods and techniques of persuasive product- andservice development, and their applicability in the interaction design practice.
2. Develop metrics that can demonstrate the effect of behavior change efforts and conduct studies to
validate these metrics .
Research objective
The objective of this research project is to investigate the effectiveness of different design frameworks
that focus on behavior change in the domain of sustainability, health or commerce. The results of this
research will inform interaction designers in such a way that they can make better-founded decisions for
an approach, method or technique within persuasive product- and service development.