86
2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois [email protected]

2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

2011 PE Review:IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics

Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WREProfessor and Assistant Dean

University of [email protected]

Page 2: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Acknowledgements:

Daniel Yoder, I-A, PE Review 2006Rafael (Rafa) Muñoz-Carpena, I-A, PE Review 2007-09

Rod Huffman, PE Review coordinator

Page 3: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Session Topics

• Hydrology

• Hydraulics of Structures

• Open Channel Flow

Page 4: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Hydrology

• Hydrologic Cycle

• Precipitation– Average over Area– Return Period

• Abstractions from Rainfall

• Runoff– Hydrographs– Determination methods

Page 5: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Hydraulics of Structures

• Weir flow

• Orifice flow

• Pipe flow

• Spillway flow– Stage-Discharge relationship

Page 6: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Open Channel Flow

• Channel geometries– Triangular– Trapezoid– Parabolic

• Manning’s equation– Manning roughness, “n”

• Grass waterway design

Page 7: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

A few comments

• Material outlined is about 3 weeks or more in a 3-semester hour class. I’m compressing at least 6 hours of lecture and 3 laboratories into 2 hours, so I will:– Review highlights and critical points– Do example problems

• You need to:– Review and tab references– Do additional example problems, or at least

thoroughly review examples in references

Page 8: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Hydrologic Cycle

From Fangmeier et al. (2006)

Page 9: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Precipitation

• Input to the Rainfall-Runoff process

• Forms include:– Rainfall– Snow– Hail– Sleet

• Measured directly

• Varies temporally and areally

Page 10: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Rainfall Data

• Daily

• Hourly

• 15-minute

• Continuous

• Reported as depth, which is really volume over a given area, over a period of time

Page 11: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Average Rainfall

• Simple arithmetic average

• Theissen Polygon

Page 12: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Example 1

How do different calculation methods of rainfall average compare?

Consider:

Page 13: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Raingage data

• Gages (clockwise from upper left): 1.9”, 2.1”, 1.8”, 1.9”, 2.1”, 2.2”

Arithmetic average: 2.0”

Page 14: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Theissen Polygons

• Areas closest to each raingage determined by perpendicular bisectors of each line between raingages.

• Areas for each raingage, again clockwise from upper left: 65ac, 150ac, 55ac, 140ac, 215 ac, 270ac

• Figure is repeated with Theissen polygon construction added.

Page 15: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Is the watershed averagerainfall using the TheissenPolygon method most nearly:

A. 2.0”B. 2.1”C. 2.2”D. 1.9”

Page 16: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Theissen calculation

• Uses areal weighted average, so the sum of the products of area x depth divided by total area

• Hint: If you measure the areas yourself, the denominator should be the sum of the areas, not the known watershed area

• So, average Theissen rain: Answer B, 2.1” (65*1.9+150*2.1+55*1.8+140*1.9+215*2.1+270*2.

2)/(65+150+55+140+215+270)=2.07”, which is best represented as 2.1” given most data is 2 significant digits.

Page 17: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Return Period (two descriptions)

• A 10 year-24 hour rainfall volume is that depth of rainfall over a 24 hour period that is met or exceeded, on the long-term average, once every 10 years.

• Another way to describe it is the 24 hour rainfall depth that has a 1 in 10 (10%) chance to be met or exceeded each year, on the long term average.

Page 18: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

US 100yr-24hr Rainfall

100yr-24hr data from TP-40 (Hershfield (1961) as referenced by Fangmeier et al. (2006)

Page 19: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Return Period Data

• Constructed from historical rainfall data

• Available in tabular form via website or state USDA-NRCS reports.

• Available as national maps (similar to previous slide) in several references such as Haan, Barfield & Hayes (1994).

Page 20: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Example

A reservoir is to be designed to contain the runoff from a 10yr-24hr rainfall event in Northeastern Illinois. What rainfall volume is to be considered?

A. 4.5”B. 3.9”C. 4.1”D. Cannot estimate from available maps

Page 21: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

10yr-24hr map from Haan, Barfield & Hayes (1994)

Page 22: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Example

• Answer is C. From map, 10yr-24hr rainfall in NE Illinois is just over 4”, use 4.1” to be conservative.

Page 23: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Abstractions from Rainfall

• Abstractions from rainfall are “losses” from rainfall that do not show up as storm water runoff:– Interception– Evapotranspiration– Storage

• In bank• On surface

– Infiltration

Page 24: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Runoff by other names…

• “Effective” rainfall

• Rainfall “excess”

Page 25: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Runoff

If rainfall rate exceeds the soil infiltration capacity, ponding begins, and any soil surface roughness creates storage on the surface. After at least some of those depressions are filled with water, runoff begins. Additional rain continues to fill depressional storage and runoff rate increases as more of the hill slope and subsequently the watershed contributes runoff.

Page 26: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Rainfall/Runoff process

Page 27: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Time of Concentration, tc

The time from the beginning of runoff to the time at which the entire watershed is contributing runoff that reaches the watershed outlet is called the Time of Concentration. It is also described as the “travel time from the hydraulically most remote point in a watershed to the outlet”.

Page 28: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Curve Number method

Page 29: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

CN Method, continued

Page 30: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Time of Concentration, tc

Page 31: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

CN values

Page 32: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Runoff Volume determination

Page 33: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Runoff Example

In a previous problem, a design rain event in NE Illinois was determined to be 4.1”. Assuming the watershed in question was a completed 300 ac residential area with an average lot size of ½ ac, all on Hydrologic Group C soils, what is the needed pond volume?

A: 2.5 runoff-inchesB: 53 acre-inchesC: 630 acre-ftD: 53 acre-ft

Page 34: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Runoff Example, continued

Page 35: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Runoff Volume determination

Page 36: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Answer to Runoff Example

The answer is D, 53 acre-ft. From the table, the CN for Hyd group C soil with ½-ac lot is 80. Using the graph with a 4.1” rainfall, runoff depth is 2.1”. Volume is then 300ac*2.1in = 630 ac-in, divided by 12 is 53 ac-ft.

Page 37: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Additional example

You discover that the subdivision is actually 100 acres of ½ ac lots on C soils, 100 acres of ½ ac lots on D soils, 50 acres of ¼ ac lots on B soils and 50 acres of townhouses on A soils. What CN value would you use?

A: 79

B: 85

C: 80

D: 75

Page 38: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Answer

The correct answer is C, 80. Use an area-weighted average, similar to Theissen method. The respective CN values for ½ ac on C, ½ ac on D, ¼ ac on B and townhouses on A are 80, 85, 75 & 77. The area-weighted CN is then (80*100+85*100+75*50+77*50)/300 = 80.33, which is more appropriately 80.

Page 39: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Peak Discharge

The CN method also provides for Peak Discharge estimation, using graphs or tables. Required information includes average watershed slope, watershed flow path length, CN, and rainfall depth. The graphical method from the EFM is:

Page 40: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Peak Runoff Discharge

Page 41: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Peak Discharge Example

Same residential watershed that produced 2.1” of runoff from a 4.1” rainfall. Flow length is 2500’, slope is 2%. CN is 80, so S is 2.5”. Ia = 0.2*S = 0.5”. Ia/P = 0.5/4.1=0.122.

Tc = 2500^0.8*(1000/80-9)^0.7/1140/2^0.5

=0.8hr

Page 42: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Example solution

From graph, with Ia/P of 0.122 and Tc of 0.8hr, unit peak discharge is 0.57 cfs/ac/in or qp = 0.57*300*2.1 = 360 cfs

Page 43: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Rational Method

The Rational Equation is:

Qp = CiA

where:C is a coefficienti is rainfall intensity of duration tc

A is area in acres

C is approximately 0.4, A is 300ac, i is 2” in 30min, so 4iph,peak rate is then 0.4*300*4 = 480 cfs

Page 44: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

10yr, 1yr rainfall in NE IL

From:http://www.erh.noaa.gov/er/hq/Tp40s.htm

Page 45: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Hydraulics of Structures

Flow through structures is important given that such structures control the rate of flow. Sizing of such structures is then important to allow flow to pass while protecting downstream areas from the effects of too high a flow rate. Structures may also be used for measurement of water flow. Each type of structure will produce different types of flow depending upon size and flow rate passing through it.

Page 46: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Weirs

• Sharp-crested

• Broad-crested

Page 47: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Weir Equation

(from EFH-Ch03 Hydraulics)

Page 48: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Sharp-Crested Weir

(from EFH-Ch03 Hydraulics)

Page 49: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

More complex weirs(from Haan et al., 1994)

Page 50: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Example

• You are measuring flow using a 90° V-notch weir. H is measured as 0.53’ at 2.5’ upstream of the weir. What is the flow rate?

A. 230 gpm

B. 0.51 cfs

C. 0.51 gpm

D. A & B

Page 51: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Answer

• The answer is D. The equation from Haan et al (1994) is:

Page 52: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Answer, continued

• Q = 2.5*H^2.5, where Q is in cfs and H is in feet

• Q=2.5*(0.53)^2.5=0.511 cfs or 0.51 cfs

• Q=0.51 cfs*60sec/min*7.48gal/cf=230 gpm

• Note: Both answers contain 2 significant figures

Page 53: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Orifice Flow

• Submerged vs Free Outlet

• Shapes affecting C

Page 54: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Submerged Orifice

Page 55: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Free Discharge Orifice

Page 56: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Orifice Coefficients

Page 57: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Example

• Markers Mark distillery just moved a 3’ diameter barrel of their bourbon over their charcoal filter bed to drain the bourbon into the system to be bottled. The bung plug is removed instantaneously, allowing barrel strength bourbon to flow freely from the 2” diameter bung, which can be considered a sharp-edged orifice. What is the initial flow rate (assuming same specific gravity as water, which is an incorrect assumption)?

Page 58: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Answers

A: 0.5 cfs

B: 83 gpm

C: 26.6 gpm

D: 200 L/hr

Page 59: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Solution

Q=0.61*A*(2*g)^0.5*h^0.5

=0.61*(π*1”^2)*(2*32.2f/s/s)^0.5*3’^0.5

=0.61*3.1415/144*(64.4)^0.5*3^0.5

=0.185 cfs

Q=83 gpm (answer B)

Page 60: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Pipe flow

When considering pipe flow in a structure, Bernoulli’s equation is used:

Frictional losses are multiples of the velocity head (V2/2g)and are additive.

Page 61: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Head loss under pipe flow

• Entrance loss (Ke)

• Bend loss (Kb)

• Pipe friction loss (Kc)

• Each coefficient is documented in references

Considering the Bernoulli equation for a spillway,the pressure at entrance and exit is atmospheric,the elevation difference is the water surface elevationdifference between upstream and downstream,and the remaining term is the velocity head plus losses

Page 62: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Consider the following

Page 63: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Pipe flow

Page 64: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Spillway considerations

A given spillway may have several discharge relationships (weir, orifice, pipe) depending upon the head (stage). The stage discharge curve then becomes a combination curve, with the type of relationship allowing the highest flow at a given head in control.

Consider a drop inlet control structure:

Page 65: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu
Page 66: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Stage-Discharge Curve

Page 67: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Example

An 18” CMP with an 18” vertical riser is used as the principal spillway for a pond. The pipe is 50’ long with one 90° bend. The top of the inlet is 10’ above the bottom of the outlet. Develop the stage-discharge relationship assuming a free outfall.

Page 68: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Weir flow

Basic equation:

Given 18” riser, length of weir is 2πr, or 4.7’, so

Page 69: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Orifice flow

Basic orifice equation:

Given 18” riser and assuming C’ of 0.6,

Page 70: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Pipe flow

Basic pipe flow equation:

After looking up each parameter:

Page 71: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Stage-Discharge Relationship

Page 72: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Open Channel Flow

Flow through open channels is another important area to consider and review. Velocity and flow rate are usually calculated using Manning’s equation, which considers flow geometry, channel roughness and slope.

Page 73: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Manning’s Equation

Where:

V= flow velocity in fpsRh = Hydraulic Radius in ftS = Energy gradeline slope in ft/ft (=bed slope for normal flow)n = Manning coefficient1.49 = conversion from SI to English units

Hydraulic radius is the flow area divided by the wetted perimeter.

Page 74: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Open Channel Flow – Channel Geometry

Page 75: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Manning “n” values

Page 76: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Example

What is the flow rate for a rectangular finished (clean) concrete channel with a base width of 8’, channel slope of 0.5%, with a “normal” water depth of 2’?

A: 140 cfsB: 8.5 cfsC: 100 cfsD: 200 cfs

Page 77: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Solution

n is 0.015, Rh is 8*2 sq.ft./(2+8+2) ft, S is 0.005 ft/ft, soV = 8.5 ft/sec

Q = V*A= 8.5 ft/sec*16 sq.ft. = 140 cfs

Page 78: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Vegetated Waterway Design

The design of a vegetated waterway is an iterative process, considering both capacity when the grass is unmowed and hence higher resistance to flow and stability when recently mowed and more susceptible to bed scour at high flow velocities. Fortunately, the EFM has tables of suitable channel dimensions.

Page 79: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Design steps from EFH:

Page 80: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Example

A subdivision produces a peak runoff rate of 60 cfs from a 10yr-24hr rainfall. A vegetated waterway with an average slope of 3% is to be planted with Kentucky bluegrass. The soil at the waterway site is easily eroded. The waterway will be constructed with a parabolic shape. What top width and depth are required (ignoring freeboard)?

Page 81: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Choices

A: 20’, 2’

B: 18.5’, 1.1’

C: 15’, 1.5’

D: 12’, 0.6’

Page 82: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Permissible Velocity

Kentucky bluegrass on a 3% slope easily eroded soil can handle up to 5 fps.

Page 83: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Resistance to flow

Kentucky bluegrass has a C resistance when unmowedand a D resistance when cut to 2” height

Page 84: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

EFM table

Page 85: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Solution

Reading the chart for 60cfs, V1 of 5fps, a top width of 18.5’ with a depth of 1.1’ is suitable, so answer B.

Page 86: 2011 PE Review: IV-A: Hydrology and Hydraulics Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Professor and Assistant Dean University of Illinois mch@illinois.edu

Questions?