Upload
alison-tucker
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop
Workshop Overview&
Introduction to Georgia’s Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Program
Page 22011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Review of Binder and CD
• Binder includes▪ Welcome/Agenda▪ Staff Contacts▪ CDBG Manual/Forms/Appendices▪ Revitalization Area Strategy (RAS) Manual
• CD Includes▪ CDBG Manual, Forms; RAS Manual; EIP &
RDF Manuals▪ CDBG Rehab Manual
Page 32011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Conference Overview- Part I
Boot Camp and Basic Application Development
• Intro to CDBG Program—Includes Set-Asides
• Documentation Guide - Forms 1-13
• Compliance/Historic Preservation
• Concurrent Sessions – Application Development▪ CDBG Public Facilities▪ Housing and Multi-Activity▪ Economic Development
Page 42011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Conference Overview- Part II
Competitiveness and New/Advanced Topics
• Concurrent Sessions – Examples of Successful Applications (Guest Speakers)▪ Public Facilities▪ Housing and Multi-Activity▪ Redevelopment Opportunities
• Advanced Topics▪ Rating and Selection▪ Readiness Bonus Points▪ Section 3/FHEO
• One-on-One Technical Assistance/Resource Tables
Page 52011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Conference Overview-Last Day
New Frontiers
• Revitalization Area Strategies/Opportunity Zones
• Review of Recent Changes to Application Development Process
• Timeliness Criteria
• News from DC
• Questions and Answers
Page 62011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Our Mission in the Next 30 Minutes
• Discuss the fundamentals of CDBG as preparation for review of DCA forms 1 – 13 and Compliance Overview
• Why is this important?▪ In order to submit a competitive application▪ Adequately plan your CDBG project▪ Successfully carryout your CDBG project
Page 72011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Introduction to CDBG
Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended,
created the CDBG program
(See CDBG History in 2011 Applicants’ Manual)
Page 82011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Introduction to CDBG
• The primary objective of the HCDA is ▪ development of viable communities through
the improvement of living conditions and the expansion of economic opportunities
▪ principally for persons of low- and moderate-income.
• Further, HCDA identifies three National Objectives▪ LMI Benefit▪ Removal of Slum and Blight▪ Immediate Threat and Danger
Page 92011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Eligible Applicants
• Non-entitlement Local Governments
• Generally▪ Cities with a population of less than 50,000▪ Counties with a population of less than
200,000▪ There are lots of exceptions!!▪ Review 2011 Manual for List of Ineligible Local
Governments▪ Final List for 2011 Not Determined
Page 102011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Typical CDBG Activities
• Water lines, sewer lines, lift stations, wells, pumps, drainage pipe, drainage structures, road paving, drainage inlets, buildings, equipment loans, elevated water storage tanks, homeowner and homebuyer activities, loans to businesses for fixed assets, etc.
• Also see 2011 Applicants’ Manual
Page 112011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
LMI National Objective
• Low- and moderate-income person means a member of a family having an income equal to or less than the Section 8 low-income limit established by HUD. Unrelated individuals will be considered as one-person families for this purpose.▪ That is, those families at 80 percent of less of
Area Median Income (AMI)
Page 122011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
LMI National Objective
• For CDBG, the law requires that overall benefit to L/M persons be at least 70%▪ Low/Mod Area Benefit (LMA)▪ Low/Mod Clientele (LMC)▪ Low/Mod Jobs (LMJ) (51% for jobs)
• For CDBG, the law requires that overall benefit to L/M persons be at least 100%▪ Low/Mod Housing (LMH)
Page 132011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
CDBG L/M Area Benefit (LMA)
• For projects that will benefit a geographic area—target area or city-wide area—▪ each activity (e.g., water improvements) must
benefit at least 70% LMI persons▪ and each geographic area chosen must contain a
population of at least 70% LMI persons.
Page 142011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
LMA (cont.)
• The boundaries proposed (and therefore the area where income surveys must be done) must include the entire area of benefit from the proposed project
Page 152011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Area of Non-benefit
LMA (cont.)
Area Boundary Water Improvement Area of Benefit
&TA Population of at least 70% LMI
Page 162011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Water ImprovementArea of Benefit – 50% LMI
LMA (cont.)
Target Area Boundary
TA Population of at least 70% LMI
Page 172011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
CDBG L/M Clientele Benefit (LMC)
• CDBG provides a “place” for LMI persons to receive a benefit▪ e.g., health center, senior center, etc.
• 70% of recipients of benefit must be LMI income persons; or
• HUD must presume 100% of the recipients of the service are LMI persons▪ abused children▪ battered spouses▪ elderly persons▪ severely disabled▪ homeless▪ Illiterate adults
Page 182011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
CDBG L/M Housing Benefit (LMH)
• 100% Benefit to L/M Households
Page 192011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
CDBG LMI Jobs Benefit
• For Economic Development Projects▪ 51% of jobs must be held or made available to
LMI persons
Page 202011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Other National Objectives
• Removal of Slum and Blight▪ DCA’s Redevelopment Fund Program
generally addresses this National Objective
• Immediate Threat and Danger▪ DCA’s IT&D Program generally
addresses this National Objective
Page 212011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Basic Limitations
Activities and projects are eligible for funding only to the extent:
• Local governments are applicants
• They are eligible according to law and regulation
• They primarily benefit low- and moderate-income persons or remove slum and blight.
Page 222011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
CDBG Ineligible Activities
• Acquisition of furnishings
• Acquisition of movable equipment, machinery
• Land write‑downs• Operating and
maintenance expenses• Buildings for the
conduct of general local government
• Direct grant assistance to a for-profit business
• Cost of furnishings and personal property
• Generally, construction of new housing
Page 232011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Resources
• CDBG 2011 Applicants’ Manual
• www.hud.gov
• www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/communitydevelopment/programs/stateadmin/
• 24 CFR 570.480 (State CDBG Regulations) at http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/
• Guide to National Objectives and Eligible Activities for State CDBG Programs (see 3rd bullet above)
Page 242011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Method of Distribution
• HCDA – 5304(a)(1)
• In the case of States receiving grants pursuant to section 5306(d) of this title, the statement of projected use of funds shall consist of the method by which the states will distribute funds to units of general local government.
Page 252011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Method of Distribution
Award From HUD—FY 2010 Example
• Total Award -- $43,644,802
• Available for Annual Competition $32,235,457+
• Employment Incentive Program $8,000,000
• The Redevelopment Fund $1,500,000
• Immediate Threat & Danger Program $500,000
Page 262011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Maximum Grant Amounts
• Single-Activity $500,000
• Multi-Activity $800,000
Page 272011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Method of Distribution – Rating & Selection
Demographic Need - absolute number in poverty 40
Demographic Need - percent of poverty person 40
Demographic Need - per capita income 40
Program Feasibility 110
Program Strategy 110
Project Impact 110
Leverage of Additional Resources 25
Bonus for Readiness to Proceed 5
Bonus points for RAS 20
Maximum Total Points 500
Page 282011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Demographics
• Measure of need based on most recent census data
• Applicants do not submit any information
• For submitted applications, counties are compared with counties and cities with cities
• See CDBG 2011 Applicants’ Manual for details
Page 292011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Basic Rating and Selection Approaches
• Panels score Feasibility, Strategy, Impact, assign Leverage amounts, and score Readiness Bonus Points
• Like applications are compared against like applications▪ Four review panels – Water & Sewer,
Buildings/Street and Drainage, Housing, ED
• RAS Applications are scored by a separate panel
Page 302011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Basic Rating and Selection Approaches
• Each application is read by two panel members and presented to the panel
• Scores are assigned and teams are checked for consistency
• Top rated applications receive a site visit and have their PERs/PARs reviewed by an independent engineer
Page 312011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Leverage
• Resources committed to and directly related to the project over and above the required cash match
• Evaluated on a per capita basis▪ Total dollars approved by panels for Leverage
is divided by jurisdiction population
• Like applications compared to like applications
Page 322011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Cash Match
• 5% of amounts from $300,001 to $500,000 in CDBG funds
• 10% of amounts from $500,001 to $800,000 in CDBG funds
Page 332011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Some Things to Think About
• Feasibility▪ Can the project be accomplished on time and
within budget?▪ Are the funding sources available now?▪ Is the project ready to go?▪ Is the project “blueprint” specific enough that
another knowledgeable person could carry it out?
Page 342011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Some Things to Think About
• Strategy▪ What are the community development needs and have
they been clearly defined?▪ What are the possible alternatives for addressing those
needs, i.e., have you done any brainstorming?▪ Have you systematically evaluated the alternatives
using cost as one criteria?▪ Is the alternative chosen eligible for funding?▪ Have you considered local funding?▪ Are you a Qualified Local Government?
Page 352011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Some Things to Think About
• Impact▪ How much of the identified need will be
eliminated?▪ How many people are benefiting?▪ Is the cost per person reasonable?▪ What is the extent of benefit to LMI income
persons?▪ Is quality of life improved?
Page 362011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Sources of Ideas for Project Development
• Local Comprehensive Plan
• Citizen Complaints
• Previous Engineering Studies
• Professional Standards
• City Staff/RDC Staff/Consultant Staff
• Other
Page 372011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Let’s Recap
• CD is $ invested to improve the quality of life
• Proposed activities must be grouped together in a meaningful way
• Many sources for ideas for projects
• Address all strategy, impact and feasibility issues
• Projects must address the needs of L/M persons or households
• Lots of eligible activities/some activities are ineligible
• Submit completed applications on time
Page 382011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Deadlines
CDBG Annual Competition
April 1, 2011
RAS Applications, Annual Reports, Renewals
April 1, 2011
Page 392011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 6-8, 2010
Be sure and read the CDBG 2011 Applicants’ Manual
Be sure and request technical assistance!