25
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

July 21, 2010

ITEM #12

Page 2: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Methodology Fourth triennial survey (2001, 2004, 2007, 2010)

Telephone survey of 6,629 randomly-selected employed residents of COG region (95% + 1.2%)

600 in each of 11 jurisdictions (95% + 4.0%)

Results expanded to regional population of workers

Also weighted to adjust sample for ethnicity

Data collection conducted by CIC Research, Inc.

Preliminary data analysis conducted by LDA Consulting

2

Page 3: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Survey TopicsContinued Tracking Questions

Current and past commute patterns

Telecommuting experience

Awareness/access to transit, HOV, P&R

Mass marketing awareness and influence

Awareness of CC, regional and local commute services

Employer commute assistance

New Sections for 2010

Personal / social benefits of ridesharing

Quality of life and satisfaction3

Page 4: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Preliminary Highlights Commute Patterns

Telework

Travel Facilities

Commute Ease and Satisfaction

Awareness of Commuter Connections

Employer Services

4

Page 5: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Commute Mode 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010

The share of drive alone trips dropped from 2001 to 2010. Transit and TW/ CWS have gained mode share since 2001; all of the increase occurred in telework

70%

17%

7%2% 3%

64%

21%

7%2%

6%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Drive Alone Transit Carpool/vanpool Bike/walk TW/CWS

2001 SOC

2004 SOC

2007 SOC

2010 SOC

Page 6: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Commute Mode by Region Sub-Area

Fewer than half of “Inner Core” area commuters drove alone, compared with 65% of commuters in the “Middle Ring” and 76% of commuters in the “Outer Ring” area

76%

3%

4%

0%

9%

7%

65%

17%

5%

1%

6%

6%

46%

24%

10%

9%

6%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Drive Alone

Train

Bus

Bike/walk

Carpool/vanpool

TW/CWS

Inner Core

Middle Ring

Outer Ring

6

Inner Core (Alexandria,

Arlington, DC)

Middle Ring(Fairfax,

Montgomery, Prince George’s)

Outer Ring(Calvert, Charles,

Frederick, Loudoun, Prince

William)

Page 7: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

22%

14%

54%

4%

6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Bike / walk

Carpool/vanpool

Bus

Train

Drive alone

54% of Current Alternative Mode Users Previously Drove Alone; the remaining 46% Shifted from Another Alternative Mode

46% of alternative mode users shifted from another alt mode

7

Previous modes

Page 8: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

7%

8%

8%

10%

10%

15%

18%

4%

3%

4%

3%

3%

4%

4%

5%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

Concern about environment

Weather

Parking cost too high

Employer/worksite moved

No parking

Got financial incentive

Congestion

Tired of driving

Moved to new residence

Close to work/transportation

Found carpool partner

Save time

No vehicle available

Changed jobs/work hours

Save money

18% of Residents Who Use Alternative Modes for Commuting Started Using These Modes to Save Money

n =

Page 9: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Telework has Grown Substantially Since 2001

A quarter of regional commuters telework at least occasionally. This is more than twice the percentage who teleworked in 2001.

11%13%

19%

25%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

2001 2004 2007 2010

2010:

600,000 teleworkers

9

Page 10: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Half of Teleworkers Telework at Least One Day per Week

The average telework frequency is 1.3 days per week

22%

30%

19%

12%

17%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Less than 1 day/ month

1-3 times permonth

1 day per week

2 days per week

3 or more daysper week

48% 1+ day per week

10

Page 11: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

29% of Workers Said Their Employer has a Formal Telework Program; About Half Said the Employer Does not Allow Telework

Half of Teleworkers Telework Under a Formal Program

11

29%

50%

22%

25%

50%

17%

46%

61%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All workers

Teleworkers

Non-teleworkers

Formal Informal No program

Page 12: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Telework has Grown in All Employer Type Groups. Since 2004, Federal agencies have more than doubled their telework percentage.

13%16%

7% 7%

15% 15%12%

6%

21%

16%

7%

28%26%

13%

21%

27%*

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Privateemployer

Non-profit Federal agency State/localagency

2001 2004 2007 2010

12

*Federal Teleworking was reported to be 10% nationwide as part of OPM’s 2010 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey

Page 13: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

About Six Percent of Teleworkers Received Telework Information from Commuter Connections Most Learned about TW from their Employer

71%

15%

5%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Employer

Initiated request on my own

Word of mouth

Commuter Connections / COG

Page 14: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Job not appropriate, 45%

Could telework, not interested,

9%

Could and would telework, 21%

Telework now, 25%

600,000 current teleworkers

Potential for 500,000 New Teleworkers

21% of workers “could and would” telework – that is, they have job responsibilities that could be performed through telework and they would like to telework if given the opportunity.

500,000 “could and would” telework

Page 15: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Bus and Train Access By Area of Region

More than eight in ten respondents who lived in the “Inner Core” area of the region lived within ½ mile of a bus stop. In the “Middle Ring” area, about six in ten had a bus stop within ½ mile. Fewer than two in ten residents of “Outer Ring” jurisdictions had close access to bus.

85%

9%3% 0% 3%

56%

19%12%

6% 7%16%

8%

21%

34%

21%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Less than 0.5mi

0.5-0.9 mi 1.0-2.9 mi 3.0 mi ormore

Don't know

Inner Core Middle Ring Outer Ring

15

Inner Core (Alexandria, Arlington,

DC)

Middle Ring(Fairfax, Montgomery,

Prince George’s)

Outer Ring(Calvert, Charles,

Frederick, Loudoun, Prince William)

Page 16: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Availability and Use of HOV by Area of Region

Commuters who lived in outer jurisdictions were more likely to say they have HOV lanes available on their route to work. They also were more likely to use them, when they were available. Commuters in the Inner Core and Middle Rings used HOV lanes at about the same rate.

23%

33%

39%

6%

9%

15%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Inner Core

Middle Ring

Outer Ring

HOV Available

Used HOV

Page 17: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

54%

26%

53%63%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

All Region Inner Core Middle Ring Outer Ring

HOV Lanes Had Greater Mode Influence for Commuters in the Middle/Outer RingsMore than half of HOV users who lived in the Middle Ring and 63% who lived in the Outer Ring said HOV lanes influenced their decision to use alternative modes. These commuters had greater time savings from HOV lanes than did Core residents.

Average one-way time saving: 23 min 13 min 22 min 28 min

Page 18: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

74%

14% 12%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Not likely Somewhat likely Very likely

26% of Drive Alone Commuters would Consider Ridesharing to Use HOT Lanes for Free

Commuters who drove alone were asked how likely they would be to try carpooling or vanpooling if carpools/vanpools traveled for free or a reduced rate on High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes. 26% were somewhat or very likely to try.

26% somewhat or very likely

Page 19: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

N/A, 1%

About the same, 62%

More difficult,

25%

Easier, 12%

A Quarter of Commuters Said their Commute was More Difficult than a Year Ago, While 12% Have an Easier Commute

19

Page 20: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Respondents who Had More Difficult Commutes Overwhelmingly Said the Route was More Congested14% noted construction along the route to work

59%

19%

14%

11%

8%

4%

3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Route is more congested

Trip is slower, takes more time

Construction on route to work

Longer distance

Trains / buses more crowded

Gas prices are higher

More stressful

20

Page 21: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Respondents who Had Easier Commutes Said the Distance was Shorter, the Time Faster, or the Route Less Congested11% noted that construction along the route had been completed

Q58 In what way is your commute easier?

34%

29%

26%

11%

5%

4%

4%

4%

3%

2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Shorter distance

Trip is faster, takes less time

Route is less congested, road improvements

Construction on route has ended

Started using bus/train

Started driving to work

Less stressful

New transit vehicles / improved service

Started carpooling / vanpooling to work

Gas prices are lower

n = 681

21

Page 22: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Awareness of Regional Commute Information Resources has Grown Since 2001In 2010, 66% of respondents said there was a telephone number or web site for commute information, higher than the 51% who knew of these resources in 2007 and twice as high as the 33% of respondents who knew of these resources in 2001.

33%

46%51%

66%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2001 2004 2007 2010

22

Page 23: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Access to Employer Commute Services– Six in ten respondents (61%) who traveled to a worksite away

from home said their employers offered one or more alternative mode incentive or support services to employees at their worksites. This was higher than the 54% who noted having worksite services in 2007.

51%

53%

54%

61%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2001 SOC

2004 SOC

2007 SOC

2010 SOC

23

Page 24: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Next Steps

Review of Technical Report/Comment PeriodFinalize Technical Report in FY 2011Prepare and Publish General Public Report in

2011

24

Page 25: 2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12

Questions?Nicholas [email protected]

25