12
2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 2009 1 Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report

March 2009 1Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Page 2: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Planning for 2010 & beyond Imagery …

March 2009 Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009 2

Where are we?

Where do we need to go?

How to get there?

How did we do?

2005 Imagery : ½ - 1 m.

Imagery Portal

Update Data:

Other datasets , (IR) Fund Stewardship

Need a Reliable Funding mechanism for current and

future data acqusitions

So far were on track for 2010. Future planning

needs to take place.

Page 3: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

History 20051st Step: Garner Support: In 2004, OGIC adopted Imagery Consortium MOU

March 2009 3Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

2nd Step: Coordinate with stakeholders and ink agreements.

Page 4: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Private

Fed

Local State

Vendor

GEO FSA

Federal Agencies

Interagency*

Partnership

* OBA assistance needed

Imagery Consortium

1/2 meter Imagery $250K to Vendor

$1mill transfer: Fed Agencies to FSA

One Meter Imagery:$1.2 Mill to Vendor

Agreement

Interagency

Contract Contract

Flow of Funds

$200k: Consortium/OGIC (Thru Geo) to FSA

$250k: Consortium/OGIC

(Thru Geo) to Vendor

March 2009 4Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

History 20052nd – Cont Workflows of inked agreements

Page 5: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

History – Cont

3rd Step: Vendor facilitates required task, delivers product to stakeholders.

March 2009 Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009 5

4th Step: QA/QC feedback process initiated via group of stakeholders

Page 6: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Hurry up and wait …

March 2009 Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009 6

GIS user

Page 7: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Final Delivery – Imagery distribute to stakeholders

March 2009 7Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Final Stage - Creation of portal for distribution of data

Page 8: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

How did we do & what did we Learn?

• Need for a more efficient contract mechanism for procuring data.

• Need to distribute data via portal.

• Need to make sure stewardship is not left out of ongoing efforts.

• Need to plan data acquisition in state biennial funding cycle, to take advantage of IFTN’s three-year data acquisition cycle.

March 2009 Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009 8

2005 Orthoimagery In Review

Page 9: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

March 2009 9Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

2010 Orthoimagery ApproachWere taking a more organized and efficient approach for 2010

All agency use the data but not all agencies help fund that data

Page 10: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

2010 Orthoimagery Status• 1st Step: Garner support …. Complete

– Everyone has need for imagery background dataset• All agency use the data but not all agencies help fund that data

• 2nd Step: Secure 1st round funding …. Almost complete– ½ meter funding is in place.

• $250,000 contributed by State of Oregon DAS• $49,000 contributed by ODOT for State portion of IFTN Cost• $25,000 also contributed by ODOT for Contract Management

March 2009 10Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Page 11: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

2010 Orthoimagery Status -Cont• 3rd Step: Mechanism to handle Imagery procurement

– Corp of Engineers in St Louis will manage Contract • State of Oregon will contract with fed agency (COE) to handle IFTN contract. This will reduce cost for contract management, and affectively stream line the project• COE will then contract with one of five pre-approved vendors ( Sanborn) for ½ meter and IR products, based on NAIP. They will also facilitate all QA/QC eliminating

the need for stakeholder s to QA/QC data.

• 4th Step: Secure 2nd round funding - IR add on product– Currently need to secure funding for buy up of IR dataset.

• Goal of $100,000 total for cost of additional buy up product.

– Need to secure funding for storage of Data and stewardship.• Storage costs at the SDC are becoming more of a factor. Distribution of data via portal has maintenance cost to consider.• OGIC Framework Funding: Could create problems for funding of competing themes• Better approach: Establish as an Biennium budgetary item for all agency’s, and /or solicit Funds via public outreach

March 2009 11Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Page 12: 2010 Orthoimagery Framework Progress Report March 20091Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009

Contacts:

R. Sounhein C. Smith GIS Coordinator State GIS Coordinator

Dept . State Lands DAS GEO Office(503) 986-5270 (503) 378-6066

[email protected] [email protected]

[email protected]

March 2009 Ortho FIT Status - Sounhein 2009 12

The End