Upload
lymien
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PRSA Nashville
January 19, 2009
2009 Edelman Trust Barometer
Edelman Trust Barometer at a glance
Tenth edition
4,475 people in 20 countries on 5 continents
Ages 25 to 64
College-educated
In top 25% of household income per age group in each country
Report significant media consumption and engagement in
business news and public policy
A decade of insights from the Edelman Trust Barometer
3
Rising Influence of NGOs2001
Fall of the celebrity CEO2002
Earned media more credible than advertising2003
U.S. companies in Europe suffer trust discount2004
Trust shifts from “authorities” to peers2005
“A person like me” is most credible spokesperson2006
Business more trusted than government and media2007
Young influencers have more trust in business2008
College Athletic Departments
Univ. of Alabama
Univ. of Florida
Vanderbilt Univ.
Univ. of Tennessee
Athletic Directors
Football Coaches
Women's Basketball Coach
What a difference a year-and-a-half makes
January 19, 2009May 14, 2007
2008: A year unlike any other
Dow Jones Industrial Average: Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 15, 2008
51%
58%
41%
75%
49%
74%
47%49%
35%
30%
45% 45%
61%
43% 42%
55%
61%
39%
54%
49%
38%
27%
65%
40%
65%
41%45%
33%29%
45%47%
63%
45% 45%
62%
69%
51%
71%
39%
68%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%2008 2009
Trust in business is country-specific
7
% who trust business to do what is right
A10. [Business in general TRACKING] I am going to read you a list of institutions. For each one, please tell me how much you TRUST that institution to do what is right. Please use a nine-
point scale where one means that you "DO NOT TRUST THEM AT ALL" and nine means that you "TRUST THEM A GREAT DEAL". (Top 4 Box) Informed publics 35-64 (global 18 countries,
excluding Australia, Indonesia)
Trust Down Trust Steady Trust UpNew
additions
in 2009
62%
83%79%
77%74% 73%
69%67% 67% 67% 66%
62% 61%
56% 55% 54%50% 49% 49%
32%
21%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%% who trust companies less
Companies less trusted now than year ago
8
A60 Thinking about everything you have read, seen, or heard about business in the last year, in general, do you trust corporations a lot less, a little less, the same, a little more, or a lot more
than you did at the same time last year? (Bottom 2 Box: Trust less) 25-64 Informed publics in 20 countries
Business still more trusted than government in 13 of 20 countries
A 8,10. [Government in general, business in general TRACKING] I am going to read you a list of institutions. For each one, please tell me how much you TRUST that institution to do what is
right. Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you "DO NOT TRUST THEM AT ALL" and nine means that you "TRUST THEM A GREAT DEAL.” (Top 4 Box) Informed publics 35-
64 (global 20 countries, including Australia, Indonesia)
9
50%
65% 65% 63%
69% 68%
47%
51%
38%
45%
40% 41%
45% 45%
33%
27%
45%
29%
71%
62%
39%
45%41%
43% 45%
51% 52%
33%
39%
30%
38%34% 35%
41%43%
35%32%
51%
36%
80%
74%
53%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%Business in general Government in general
Business more trusted Government more trusted
Technology remains most trusted industry sector globally
10
45%
46%
56%
53%
56%
59%
57%
55%
62%
61%
65%
77%
40%
42%
45%
50%
53%
55%
55%
55%
55%
57%
57%
66%
76%
Insurance
Media companies
Banks
Entertainment
Pharmaceuticals
Food
Retail
Energy
CPG manufacturers
Automotive
Health care industry
Biotech/life sciences
Technology
2009 2008
A25-37. [TRACKING] Now I would like to focus on your trust in different industry sectors. Please tell me how much you TRUST businesses
in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use a nine-point scale where one means that you "DO NOT TRUST
THEM AT ALL" and nine means that you "TRUST THEM A GREAT DEAL.” (Top 4 Box) Informed publics 35-64 in 18 countries 2008-2009
N/A
In emerging economies, industries that suffer in West remain trusted
A25-37. [TRACKING] Now I would like to focus on your trust in different industry sectors. Please tell me how much you TRUST businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use a
nine-point scale where one means that you "DO NOT TRUST THEM AT ALL" and nine means that you "TRUST THEM A GREAT DEAL." (Top 4 Box) Informed publics 35-64
11
72% 72% 72%
55%
80%83% 84%
67%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Automotive Energy Banks Media companies
2008 2009
China
52%
59%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Banks
2008 2009
Brazil
79%
72%
83%
55%
81%
71%
81%
65%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Automotive Energy Banks Media companies
2008 2009
India
Four Global Issues:
Who Is Responsible for Causing and Solving?
Global
Warming
Energy
Costs
Access to
Affordable
Healthcare
Financial
Credit Crisis
Government and business share responsibility for causing global issues
13
.
80% 81%77%
80%79%
84%81%
63%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Energy Costs Financial Credit Crisis Global Warming Affordable Healthcare
Government and regulators Businesses
E. 119-120, E124-125, 129-130, 134-135. Now thinking about (energy costs, financial credit crisis, global
warming, affordable healthcare), please tell me how responsible you think each of the following entities are for
contributing to (global issue)? TOP 4 BOX 25-64 informed publics in 20 countries
Trust wanes for traditional information sources
Ranking stays consistent
C95-98,103. [TRACKING] Now I’m going to read you a list of places where you might get information about a company. Please tell me how credible you believe each one of them is as a
source of information about the company—is it extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box), Informed publics ages 35-64 in 18 countries
56% 57%
49% 49% 49%47%47%
44%40%
38%36%
34%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Stock or industry analyst reports
Articles in business
magazines
Conversations with your friends
and peers
News coverage on the radio
Television news coverage
Articles in newspapers
2008 2009
14
38%
20%
27%
15%
Free content sources, such as wikipedia or
webportals*
Social networking sites (such as MySpace or
Facebook)
2008 2009
Trust in digital channels down but still important
Internet search engines most trusted
C95-110. [TRACKING] Now I’m going to read you a list of places where you might get information about a company. Please tell me how credible you believe each one of them is as a source
of information about the company—is it extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box), Informed publics ages 35-64 in 18 countries
15
35%
19%16%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Internet search engines e.g.
Google news, Yahoo news
Business Blogs Personal or Non Business Blogs
or bulletin boards
2009
*asked as “Free content encyclopedia
(such as Wikipedia)” in 2008
38%
31%
20%
26%24%
13%
Corporate communications such
as press releases, reports and emails
A company’s own website
Corporate or product advertising
2008 2009
Trust in corporate channels also down
Employees most trusted source
C99-101,109,110. [TRACKING] Now I’m going to read you a list of places where you might get information about a company. Please tell me how credible you believe each one of them is as a
source of information about the company—is it extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box), Informed publics ages 35-64 in 18 countries
16
40%
27%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Conversations with company
employees
Live communication such as a CEO
speech
2009
CEO credibility hits new low globally
Driven by drops in North America and Europe
D112-118. [TRACKING] Now I’m going to read you a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from that person, how
credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box) Informed Publics 35-64 in 18 countries
36%
46%
61%
29%31%
37%
21%
29%27%
23%25%
22%
29%
20%
43%
15%19%
29%
13%
21% 20%17%
19% 19%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%2008 2009
17
CEO credibility at
6-year low in US
Trust in nearly every spokesperson down
Academics, industry experts most credible
D112-118. [TRACKING] Now I’m going to read you a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from that person, how
credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box) Informed publics 35-64 in 18 countries
18
56% 57% 58%
49%
39%36%
32%
59%
47% 47%
38%
30% 29%27%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
An academic or expert on that
company's industry or issues*
Financial or industry analyst
A person like yourself
Non-profit organization or
NGO representative
Regular employee of a company
CEO of company Government official or regulator
2008 2009
*asked as “an
academic” in 2008
Overview
• Conducted a special abridged version of the annual Edelman Trust
Barometer. We surveyed 1,675 opinion leaders in six of the world’s largest
markets: China, France, Germany, India, UK and US.
• To gauge impact of last six months – the bankruptcies, bailouts,
nationalizations, and exec comp scrutiny-- on trust in business and brands:
• Has business regained its footing?
• Who are opinion leaders looking to for leadership to solve key societal issues–
business or government?
• What are the new expectations for business and its role in society?
• How do companies restore lost trust?
• How does trust – or the lack of it – affect product brand decisions?
•
January 2009
In U.S., trust in business was at lowest level, including post-Enron
20
How much do you trust business to do what is right?
44% 44%
48%
51%
48%49%
53%
58%
38%
32%
41%
35%
40%
36%
38%
34%
36%36%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
US UK/France/Germany
Informed publics 35-64 in the United States and UK/France/Germany
Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest
Enron, the dot-com bust
and September 11
20-point
drop
July 2009
Trust in business stable to up
How much do you trust business to do what is right?
Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest
21
36%
46%
30%34%
71%
62%
48%44%
41% 39%
75%
60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
US UK France Germany India China
Jan 09 Jul 09
+12
+11
The 12-point increase in U.S. includes the younger sample of 25- to 34- year-olds,
whose overall trust in business increased 26 points in six months.
Trust in government stable to up
How much do you trust government to do what is right?
Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest
22
43%
35%38%
26%
44%
74%
30%
40%
34% 36%
42%
72%
42%38% 40%
44%
55%
78%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
US UK France Germany India China
Jan 08 Jan 09 Jul 09
+13
+12
The 12-point increase in U.S. includes the younger sample of 25- to 34- year-olds,
whose overall trust in government increased 24 points in six months.
Why? Tangible, quantifiable actions
23
58%
61%
62%
78%
80%
81%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Continued to spend money on philanthropy
Reduced marketing budgets
Closed non-profitable business units
Fired non-performing management teams
Reduced CEO and executive pay
Repaid bailout or loan money to the government
Would you trust a company more or less if that company took this action?
Informed publics ages 25 to 64
Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest
July 2009
The state of trust in six countries
24
51% 51%
70%
46%
52% 50%48%44%
41% 39%
75%
60%
42%38% 40%
44%
55%
78%
37%
28%
35%39%
53%
67%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
US UK France Germany India China
NGOs Business Government Media
How much do you trust each institution to do what is right?
Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest
January 2009
In U.S., trust in every industry had declined; banks and automotive led the way
How much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right?
69%
60%
44%
49% 50%
58%
64%
54% 54%
73%
63%
80%
36%33%
25%
31%33%
42%
49%
40%42%
62%
54%
73%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2008 2009
25
-33
-27
Informed publics ages 35 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9=highest
Technology most trusted industry in five of the six countries
26
80% 81%
72%
62%
93%
88%
72% 71%69%
56%
86%84%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
US UK France Germany India China
Technology Food Healthcare Biotech/life sciences Retail Banks
Technology
#3 in France
(66%)
How much do you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right?
Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest
But We’re Still
in the Middle of the Game
1% 1%
24%
10%
34% 34%
10%17%
29%
37%
22%28%
17%
12%
18%24%
19%
24%
59%59%
25% 24%23%
12%12% 10%
5% 5% 2% 1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
India China US Germany France UK
Excellent
Good
Neither good nor bad
Fair
Poor
Reputation of MNCs struggling in West
28
Informed publics ages 25-64 in six countries; Responses Excellent, Good, Neither good nor bad, Fair, and Poor
How would you describe the overall reputation of large global businesses?
13%24%29%30%69%71%
Reputation
rated good
or excellent
20%
9%
40%
33%
38%
55%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Has government
intervened enough in
global business?
Business is not doing enough to help solve economic crisis
29
Have global businesses
cooperated enough with
government?
Informed publics ages 25-64 in six countries; responses Too much, The right amount and Not enough
Too much Too much
Right
amount
Right
amount Not enoughNot enough
―The social
responsibility
of business is
to increase its profits.‖
Milton Friedman, 1970
Stakeholder, not shareholder, world
31
70%
58%
49%45%
40%
26%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Customers Employees Investors Society Local Communites*
Government
How important do you believe the interests of each of the following stakeholders
should be to a CEO’s business decisions?
* Communities where the business operates
Informed publics ages 25-64 in six countries
Extremely important responses only
“Hard and soft” measures needed to rebuild trust
32
Informed publics ages 25-64 in six countries
Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest
43%
66%
69%
69%
70%
70%
75%
78%
81%
82%
82%
82%
89%
90%
91%
93%
93%
94%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Protect profit margins
Increase shareholder value
CEO appearances
Discount pricing
Eliminate financial incentives for taking risks
Communicate messages through multiple media channels
Pay senior executives mostly in stock
Reduce the gap between CEO and average workers pay
Commit resources to the public good
Increase profitability and performance
Partner with third parties to solve major global problems
Make progress on environmental initiatives
Drive better innovation
Create and keep jobs
Communicate frequently and honestly
Transparent and honest business practices
Keep producing quality products and services
Treat employees well
Would trust a company more or less for taking each of the following actions?
Business expected to take on global issues
33
85% 84% 82% 80%76% 75% 73%
Manage business operations to ensure companies survive
global economic crisis
Ensure efficiency of business operations
Create solutions to reduce energy costs
Cooperate with government to help
solve the global economic crisis
Provide access to affordable healthcare
Create solutions to minimize global
warming
Promote free trade
How important do you believe it is for business to do each of these things?
Informed publics ages 25 to 64Responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest
But MNCs have not taken enough action
34
71% 70%
64%
55%52%
49%
Create solutions to minimize global
warming
Create solutions to reduce energy costs
Provide access to affordable healthcare
Cooperate with government to help
solve the global economic crisis
Manage their business operations to ensure that their companies
survive the global economic crisis
Ensure efficiency of business operations
In U.S.: 62%
Informed publics ages 25 to 64; not enough responses only
Have global businesses taken too much, the right amount, or not enough action on each of these things?
In U.S.: 55%
In U.S.: 65%
In U.S.: 68%
In U.S.: 56%In U.S.: 57%
“NOT ENOUGH”
The Role of Trust
in Product Marketing
Informed publics more likely to switch brands because of
something positive they read, saw, or heard about that brand
36
Informed publics ages 25 to 64 in six countries
Yes responses only
29%
33%
45%
48%
53%
62%
Connected with a brand through a social networking site
Lost trust in a brand because of poor financial performance of the parent company
Switched brands because you stopped trusting a brand
Switched brands because of something negative you read, saw or heard about that brand
Switched brands because another brand cost less
Switched brands because of something positive you read, saw or heard about that brand
In recession,
cost only
marginally
more
important
than trust
Have you taken any of the following actions in relation to product or service brands that you use?
Quality, reliability, and past personal experiences most important factors in determining how
much one trusts a product or service brand
37
Informed publics ages 25 to 64; responses 6-9 only on 1-9 scale; 9 = highest
22%
39%
42%
57%
59%
67%
68%
75%
79%
81%
83%
88%
90%
94%
94%
96%
Endorsement by a celebrity
Endorsement by a public figure
Advertisements
Positive media coverage
Financial performance
Recommendation from an expert
Association with a good cause
Recommendation from a person like you
Recommendation from friends or family
Innovation
Company reputation
Value
Safety
Past personal experiences
Reliability
Quality
How important are each of the following factors in determining how much you trust a product or service brand?
What We Have Learned
Diminished
trust impedes
business license
to operate
______
Regulation ≠
abdication
______
A public
company serves
shareholders
and society
______
Partnership is
the solution
______
Public Engagement: A Strategy for Changing
Policy and Communication
Shared
Sacrifice
Continuous
Conversation
Private Sector
Diplomacy
Mutual Social
Responsibility
Private Sector Diplomacy
Shape policy on world’s most pressing
problems, including ones that don’t concern
company’s industry
Partner with government, NGOs to drive
decision-making and set strategy on major
societal issues
― …Come together—government, NGOs and
business—in new approach to solving big
problems facing our country. … This can work.‖
– H. Lee Scott, Jr.,
President and CEO, Wal-Mart
Shared SacrificeContinuous
Conversation
Private Sector
Diplomacy
Mutual Social
Responsibility
Mutual Social Responsibility
Benefit society and the bottom line
Integrate approaches to societal
problems into products and services
Involve employees and customers in
decisions and actions about company’s
social responsibility
Starbucks invites customers to
partner as a force for good
Shared SacrificeContinuous
Conversation
Private Sector
Diplomacy
Mutual Social
Responsibility
Shared Sacrifice
Set collaborative tone for company:
we’re all in this together
Equitable compensation (executive pay cuts, bonus
forfeiting) sends powerful message
Communicate with employees, welcome their voices
Shared SacrificeContinuous
Conversation
Private Sector
Diplomacy
Mutual Social
Responsibility
―Heavy equipment maker Caterpillar
Inc announced in late December it
would cut executive pay in half, and
many salaried employees would see
cuts of as much as 15 percent.‖
– Wall Street Journal
Continuous Conversation
Be agile and “of the moment”
Inform, don’t control the
conversation
Say... then do as you say
Johnson & Johnson among first
companies to join public
conversation on health
Shared SacrificeContinuous
Conversation
Private Sector
Diplomacy
Mutual Social
Responsibility
Study conclusions
• Trust has either stabilized or risen, but we’re only in the middle
of the game
• Tangible, quantifiable corporate actions have led to trust rise – repaying
loans, cutting executive comp, firing poor management
• Moving from shareholder to stakeholder world
• “Hard and soft” measures rebuild trust – quality products, treating
employees well, transparency, frequent communication
• Business expected to partner with government and NGOs to address
economy, energy, environment, healthcare
• Trust plays key role in brand choices
The way forward for business
• No quick fix through a single set of actions: long-term proposition
• Play a broader role in society; collaborate more
• Balance investor interests with customer and employee interests
• Square mutual social responsibility and shared purpose with
profit-making strategy
• Communicate frequently and transparently
A Ten Year Overview of Trust
The 2009 Midyear Edelman Trust Survey was produced by research firm StrategyOne.
Methodology: The survey consisted of 15-minute telephone interviews from May 26 to July 3, 2009.
The survey sampled 1,675 informed publics in two age groups (25-34 and 35-64) in six countries:
U.S., U.K., France, Germany, China, and India. The respondents were college-educated, in the top
25% of household income per age group in each country, and reported significant media
consumption and engagement in business news and public policy.
U.S.: N= 500 (ages 25-34: n=100; ages 35-64 n=400)
China: N=375 (ages 25-34: n=75; ages 35-64 n=300)
U.K., France, Germany, India (per country): N=200 (ages 25-34: n=50; ages 35-64 n=150)
For more information on the Edelman Trust Barometer and to view past results, please visit
www.edelman.com/trust.
.
August 3, 2009
2009 Special Midyear Trust Survey