21
2008/11/08 GPW2008 1 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics Yamagata University

2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2008/11/08GPW20083 Where do we want to go? Using Marvin Minsky’s Society of Mind theory for game playing What are the primitive agents? Input agents: perception of board and pieces Output agents: playing moves First step Studying perception to understand input agents

Citation preview

Page 1: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 1

A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features

and Memory in Shogi

Reijer GrimbergenDepartment of Informatics

Yamagata University

Page 2: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 2

OutlineWhere do we want to go?A reproduction experiment in shogiExperimental resultsConclusions and future work

Page 3: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 3

Where do we want to go?Using Marvin Minsky’s Society of Mind theory for game playingWhat are the primitive agents?

Input agents: perception of board and piecesOutput agents: playing moves

First stepStudying perception to understand input agents

Page 4: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 4

Hypotheses about perceptionHypothesis 1: It is easier to perceive one’s own pieces than the pieces of the opponent

Page 5: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 5

Hypotheses about perceptionHypothesis 2: It is easier to perceive pieces in hand than pieces on the board

Page 6: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 6

Hypotheses about perceptionHypothesis 3: It is easier to perceive pieces that are promoted than pieces that are not promoted

Page 7: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 7

Hypotheses about perceptionHypothesis 4: Pieces closer to oneself are easier to perceive than pieces further away

Page 8: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 8

Hypotheses about perceptionHypothesis 5: Bigger pieces are easier to perceive than smaller pieces

Page 9: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 9

Reproduction experimentSeven subjects

Early twentiesOnly rudimentary knowledge of shogi

Ten positionsEach hypothesis tested by using two positionsPerceptual features related to the other hypotheses identical

ReproductionEach position was shown for 5 secondsReproduce the position

Page 10: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 10

Reproduction experimentHypothesis 1: It is easier to perceive one’s own pieces than the pieces of the opponent

Page 11: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 11

ResultsHypothesis 1: It is easier to perceive one’s own pieces than the pieces of the opponent

Subject Position 1 Position 2S1 Opponent piece Own pieceS2 Own piece Own pieceS3 Own piece Opponent pieceS4 Own piece Opponent pieceS5 Opponent piece Own pieceS6 Own piece Opponent pieceS7 Opponent piece Own piece

Page 12: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 12

Reproduction experimentHypothesis 2: It is easier to perceive pieces in hand than pieces on the board

Page 13: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 13

ResultsHypothesis 2: It is easier to perceive pieces in hand than pieces on the board

Subject Position 3 Position 4S1 Board piece Board pieceS2 Board piece Board pieceS3 Board piece Board pieceS4 Piece in hand Board pieceS5 Board piece Board pieceS6 Board piece Board pieceS7 Board piece Board piece

Page 14: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 14

Reproduction experimentHypothesis 3: It is easier to perceive pieces that are promoted than pieces that are not promoted

Page 15: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 15

ResultsHypothesis 3: It is easier to perceive pieces that are promoted than pieces that are not promoted

Subject Position 5 Position 6S1 Promoted piece Promoted pieceS2 Unpromoted piece Promoted pieceS3 Promoted piece Unpromoted pieceS4 Promoted piece Unpromoted pieceS5 Unpromoted piece Unpromoted pieceS6 Unpromoted piece Promoted pieceS7 Unpromoted piece Promoted piece

Page 16: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 16

Reproduction experimentHypothesis 4: Pieces closer to oneself are easier to perceive than pieces further away

Page 17: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 17

ResultsHypothesis 4: Pieces closer to oneself are easier to perceive than pieces further away

Subject Position 7 Position 8S1 Close piece Close pieceS2 Close piece Close pieceS3 Close piece Close pieceS4 Far piece Far pieceS5 Close piece Far pieceS6 Close piece Close pieceS7 Far piece Far piece

Page 18: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 18

Reproduction experimentHypothesis 5: Bigger pieces are easier to perceive than smaller pieces

Page 19: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 19

ResultsHypothesis 5: Bigger pieces are easier to perceive than smaller pieces

Subject Position 9 Position 10S1 Bigger piece Smaller pieceS2 Bigger piece Smaller pieceS3 Smaller piece Bigger pieceS4 Smaller piece Bigger pieceS5 Bigger piece Smaller pieceS6 Bigger piece Smaller pieceS7 Bigger piece Smaller piece

Page 20: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 20

ConclusionsHypothesis 1 and 3 must be discarded

No evidence that one’s own pieces are easier to perceive than the pieces of the opponentNo evidence that promoted pieces are easier to perceive than non-promoted pieces

Hypothesis 2, 4 and 5 unclearSize, closeness and the difference between pieces in hand and on the board may be factors influencing perception

Page 21: 2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics

2008/11/08 GPW2008 21

Future WorkFurther investigate hypotheses

Increase the number of subjects

Primary assumption correct?Are pieces that are reproduced first really easier to remember?

Build a working system