Upload
noah-gardner
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2008
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Geospatial Metadata: Intermediate CourseModule 3: Metadata Catalogs and Geospatial One Stop (GOS)
2
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Training Structure
Agenda
How do I share my information with others?
Overview of catalog implementation options
Implementation considerations
Catalog characteristics
EPA Implementation Example
Overview of Geospatial One Stop (GOS)
Materials
Metadata catalog comparison spreadsheet
Summary
3
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Learning Objectives
After completing this module the student can:
Describe what types of catalog implementations are available
List some pros and cons of each option
Describe three key considerations for choosing a catalog implementation
Describe the features that GOS has to offer
Describe how to register a catalog at GOS
4
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Metadata Catalogs and Sharing
How do I share my information with others?
Implementations Website Catalog Web Accessible Folder (waf) Z39.50 metadata clearinghouse Metadata Service Geospatial Data Portal
Internet
Metadata CollectionUser Query
Internet / Intranet
Data Set
5
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Metadata Catalogs and Sharing
Catalog Implementation Considerations
What are your needs?
Ease of implementation and maintenance?
Freeware?
Integration with COTS products?
Large-scale, robust enterprise catalog?
Advanced administration & management?
Contribute to NSDI and GOS?
Others?
6
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Catalog Characteristics
Website Catalog Simple framework; usually not a lot of overhead to maintain*
Users do not need special tools for access
Usually easy to use with browse access for data layers
May not require special software to implement
Static pages may not be suitable for large collections of data
May not readily lend itself to sharing with other catalogs
* If you have a lot of data/metadata that change frequently this option may not be simple to maintain
Example from MassGIS website
7
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Catalog Characteristics
Web Accessible Folder (WAF)Simple framework; not a lot of overhead to maintainUsers do not need special tools for accessDoes not require special softwareInterface may not be intuitive for various users
May want to customize for ease of useEPA Example: http://geodata.epa.gov/WAF/Readily lends itself to sharing with GOS & NSDI
8
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Catalog Characteristics
Z39.50 metadata clearinghouseTypically relatively simple to set up and maintain
Works with both the NSDI Clearinghouse and GOS
A web based interface should be developed for human interaction
Can be implemented using freeware Isite software is free; GeoNetwork is open-source
ESRI’s ArcIMS Metadata Service can be configured to use Z39.50 connector
More Information: http://www.fgdc.gov/
dataandservices/getisite http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/
9
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Catalog Characteristics
Metadata Service May require more overhead and software/hardware to set up and manage
Users may need special tools for access unless a web based interface is created for interacting with the service
Usually readily accessible from ArcCatalog
Provides browse capability for records
Usually readily lends itself to sharing with other catalogs and clearinghouses
Requires special software; a common implementation is the ESRI Metadata Service which comes with ArcIMS.
10
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Catalog Characteristics
Geospatial Data PortalRequires the most overhead and software/hardware to set up and manage
Usually includes the most powerful tools for metadata management
Group access Distributed management tools ‘Harvesting’
Usually readily accessible from ArcCatalog
Readily lends itself to sharing with other catalogs and clearinghouses
Requires special software; common implementations include ESRI Geospatial Portal Toolkit and GeoNetwork
Some Examples: Geography Network, Geospatial One Stop, EPA’s GDG, Conservation GeoPortal
11
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
EPA’s GeoData Gateway
Catalog Implementation ExampleEPA’s GeoData Gateway (GDG)
Implemented initially in 2006
Key out of the box capabilities search user management map viewer harvesting ArcCatalog integration
Customized to meet EPA’s needs Group Management Single Sign On Record-level security (external access)
Additional Considerations Policies and procedures Communication, outreach & training
12
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
EPA’s GeoData Gateway
Demonstration
13
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
The GOS Portal – www.geodata.gov
What is GOS?
An intergovernmental project supporting E-Gov initiative seeking to:
Encourage collaboration
Leverage geospatial resources and best practices
Improve geospatial resource access, re-use and sharing
Resources available at GOS
Live Data and Maps Downloadable DataOffline DataDocuments
14
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
The GOS Portal – www.geodata.gov
What features does it offer?
Search & Discovery
Access Resources
View Data Services
Browse Communities
Post data acquisition plans
Publish metadata
Manage Metadata
15
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Registering with GOS
How do I publish to GOS?
Create an account
Publish metadata Harvesting
Online Metadata Creation Form
Online Upload Metadata File Utility
Manage metadata
16
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Registering with GOS
Harvesting Options: Z39.50 server
Open Archive Initiative for Harvesting Protocol (OAI-PMH)
ArcIMS Metadata Server
Web-accessible folder (WAF)
Catalog Service for the Web (CS-W)
17
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Registering with GOS
Publishing Options
Online Metadata Creation Form Stores metadata at GOS
Online Upload Metadata File Utility XML or SGML
18
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Registering with GOS
Manage Metadata
Publishers manage their own collections
View records
Download
Edit
Delete
Check online linkage
Transfer ownership
19
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
FGDC NSDI Components http://www.fgdc.gov/components
GOS http://www.geodata.gov
NSDI Clearinghouse http://clearinghouse1.fgdc.gov/
EPA’s Public Website and Metadata Service http://geodata.epa.gov
Z39.50 http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/
GeoNetwork http://geonetwork-opensource.org/
ESRI Portal Toolkit http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/gisportal-toolkit/index.html
Metadata Catalogs and GOS
20
EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project
Registering with GOS
Metadata Catalogs and GOS Quiz!
Name one benefit and one drawback of implementing a geospatial portal as opposed to implementing a website catalog
Contents at a Web Accessible Folder (WAF) can be readily viewed through ArcCatalog True False
At GOS, a user cannot:A. Search for geospatial resourcesB. Access geospatial resourcesC. Post data acquisitionsD. Purchase data using a debit card