7
2007 Scores and Reporting NCLB

2007 Scores and Reporting

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2007 Scores and Reporting. NCLB. 2007 Scores and Reporting. NCLB AYP Calculations Based on all grades tested in reading and math Includes current year data only, no averaging this year (no Wellstone) Group size (N) based on 2007 tested population only No safe harbor for 2007 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 2007 Scores and Reporting

2007 Scores and Reporting

NCLB

Page 2: 2007 Scores and Reporting

2007 Scores and Reporting

• NCLB– AYP Calculations

• Based on all grades tested in reading and math

• Includes current year data only, no averaging this year (no Wellstone)

• Group size (N) based on 2007 tested population only

• No safe harbor for 2007

– Reports (little change to format)

Page 3: 2007 Scores and Reporting

AYP ReviewSchools/Districts are determined to have made AYP for a school

year if the school/district and all subpopulations of sufficient size:

(a) Met AMOs (% Proficient Goal) in reading and mathematics, and

(b) Showed progress on the “Other Academic Indicator”; and

graduation rate at the high school level and CATS classification at the elementary & middle school levels

(c) Tested at least 95% of enrolled students and all subpopulations of sufficient size

Remember that the data comes from KCCT Mathematics and Reading tests.

Page 4: 2007 Scores and Reporting

Number of target

goals met

Overall AYP

Specific target results for groups of

sufficient size

Title 1 Status for

07-08

Page 5: 2007 Scores and Reporting

Reading AYP

Math AYP

Overall AYP

Status of Consequences

Yearly Targets for Percent Proficient and

Above

Important Definitions

Page 6: 2007 Scores and Reporting

Number of students in each

subpopulation included in AMO

calculations.

Graphical representation of

data

Participation Rate

Reading AMOONLY values unique to this page

“Other” Indicator

Page 7: 2007 Scores and Reporting

Separate mathematics page, same format as reading