Upload
chase-richardson
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2007 NCSBN IRE Fellowship Project
2007 NCSBN IRE Fellowship Project
Kathy Chastain, RN, MN, Practice Mgr.Julie George, RN, MSN, FRE, Associate Executive Director
ProblemProblem
Board resources may be spent needlessly on matters that do not violate nursing law
Employers and Boards have few tools to guide their analysis of events
BackgroundBackground
NC is a mandatory reporting state Existing culture of “blame” for error Need to distinguish error from
intentional misconduct NCBON strategic initiative to move
toward “Just Culture”
“Just Culture”“Just Culture”
Focus on behavioral choice, not outcome
Levels of risk Systems design Categories of: human error, at-risk
behavior, and reckless behavior
Multi-Year ProjectMulti-Year Project
Year 1: Development of reporting tool to guide employers and Board staff in review of incidents
Tool to be aligned with Just Culture philosophy and existing algorithm
Year 1Year 1
Work with David Marx on implementing Just Culture in NC
Collaboration with others Literature review Review of state regulations Design of tool
Criteria
Human Error At Risk Behaviors Reckless Behaviors Score
0 Points 1 Point 2 Points 3 Points 4 Points 5 Points
Awareness Meant to do one thing but did another - accidental
Considered negligible risk to patient/benefit to patient/nurse
Considered minimal to moderate risk for patient/benefit to patient outweighed risk/emergent situation
Considered moderate to high risk for patient/failed to utilize resources/non-emergent situation
Considered moderate to high risk for patient/clearly a prudent nurse would not have done/risk to patient outweight beneift
Considered high risk for patient/benefit to nurse evident/no regard for patient safety
Policy/System
No policy/procedureUnintentional breech (accidental)Systems design flaw (others likely to make same error)
Common practice of staff (cultural norm) – practice slightly different than policy/procedure (bending of rules)
Individual practice slightly different than policy/procedure - no evidence of cultural norm (bending of rules)
Failed to check policy/procedure or utilize resources prior to performing unfamiliar task
Individual knowingly disregarded policy/procedure or bypassed system to achieve perceived expectations of management, patient or others
Individual knowingly disregarded policy/procedure or bypassed system for own personal gain
Competency Accidental event regardless of level of competency
Advanced beginner, needs supervision, understands procedure but may not understand theory
Competent in performing task/procedure correctly, used minor discretion in carrying out work, aware of safety issues but in this incident cut corners
Proficient in performing task/procedure correctly, understands rationale of correct action yet regularly deviates from standards
Proficient in performing task/procedure, is in a position to negatively influence others by action
Incompetent, Individual knowingly accepted assignment to perform task/procedure without possessing the necessary knowledge/skills/ability and did not seek assistance
Repetitive No prior counseling for practice issues
Prior counseling for single non-related practice issue within last year
Prior counseling for single related issue within last year
Prior counseling for same issue within last year
Prior counselings for various practice issues within the last year with some attempts at remediation
Prior counseling for same or related issue within the last six months. No or limited evidence that remedial steps were taken by nurse to improve own practice
Credibility Identified own error and self reported
Readily admitted error when made aware and accepts responsibility for own action
Acknowledged role in error but attributes to circumstances and/or blames others to justify actions
Continued to deny responsibility until confronted with evidence
Denied any responsibility despite evidence presented
Evidence demonstrates individual took active steps to cover up error or failed to disclose known error
Options for event review:Options for event review:
Consultation only Employer directed corrective action Formal corrective action Formal reporting
Year 2Year 2
Evaluate tool through pilot project
Participating pilot hospitals must have had formal Just Culture training
Pilot ProjectPilot Project
Hospitals use complaint evaluation tool to determine whether Board should be contacted for practice incidents
Differentiate incidents resulting from human error from those resulting from at-risk and reckless behaviors
ScenariosScenarios
Desired Outcomes Desired Outcomes
Common framework for review or practice events that lends itself to continuous quality improvement
Balance individual and system accountability
Consistency in how practice breakdown is reported and addressed
ContactsContacts
Contacts: Telephone: (919) 782-3211 Kathy Chastain, RN, MN
[email protected] ext 227
Linda Burhans, RN, PhD(c)
[email protected] ext 265
Julie George, RN, MSN, FRE
[email protected] ext 276