Upload
nishant-neogy
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
1/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
2/45
! Importance of measuring Procurement
! Key measures
!
Examples of different measuring techniques: – Procurement Savings Scorecard
– Industry Benchmarking
– Integration Savings Scorecard
! Next steps
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
3/45
! Procurement needs to demonstrate value deliveryto the organisation
! Appropriate measures ensure Procurement ismotivated and activities are aligned with thecorporate strategy
! Other parts of the organisation may also need
Procurement related KPIs, to ensure they complywith Procurement initiatives
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
4/45
STRATEGY
Financial
!Production costs!
COGS savings!Payment Terms
!Leveraged agreements
!Supplier consolidation
!Low cost countrysourcing!Competitive bidding
OrganisationalCapacity
!Team Satisfaction!Turnover
!Development
!Procurement Training
Business Processes
!Spend under contract!eProcurement usage
!Reverse auction use
!Purchasing card usage
!PO-invoice match rate
Customers & Stakeholders!Customer Satisfaction!Procurement team utilisation
!Cross Functional Groups
!Communication
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
5/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
6/45
Tactically……
! A scoreboard for procurement which - – Tracks progress toward financial goals – Quantifies procurement’s value contribution
! Which leads to - – Improved respect for procurement’s achievements – Attracting higher quality talent – Best-practice sharing within the procurement function
– Improved internal morale & unity within procurementStrategically……
! Leading companies will need to quantify value to its businesscustomers and the financial market
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
7/45
2 31
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
8/45
2 31PLAN
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
9/45
2 31What is the strategic landscape?
Why track savings?
What is the goal?
Who are the players?Decision to proceed
PLAN
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
10/45
DESIGN
2 31What is the strategic landscape?
Why track savings?
What is the goal?
Who are the players?Decision to proceed
PLAN
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
11/45
DESIGN
2 31What is the strategic landscape?
Why track savings?
What is the goal?
Who are the players?Decision to proceed
Reporting format & process
Categories
Reporting Rules
Approval ProcessReporting mechanism
PLAN
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
12/45
IMPLEMENTDESIGN
2 31What is the strategic landscape?
Why track savings?
What is the goal?
Who are the players?Decision to proceed
Reporting format & process
Categories
Reporting Rules
Approval ProcessReporting mechanism
PLAN
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
13/45
IMPLEMENTDESIGN
2 31What is the strategic landscape?
Why track savings?
What is the goal?
Who are the players?Decision to proceed
Reporting format & process
Categories
Reporting Rules
Approval ProcessReporting mechanism
Communication
Training
Ensuring Compliance
ReportingReview
PLAN
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
14/45
There is little or noprocurement savingsreporting and what is
reported is discounted bythe rest of the
organisation.
Procurement savings reportsare widely available and
believed by the rest of thecompany. Bottom line
benefits can be clearly traced
to procurement savings.
1 2 3 4 5
HighLow
Reporting must be:
! Endorsed by senior management
! In-line with financial reporting procedures
! Supported across the organisation
!
Easy for “savings reporters” to understand
The Faculty Optimal Business Practice Scale
! Develop purchasing performance metrics
! Establish regular savings reporting process
! Develop a savings target work plan for each
Division
Define CurrentState (As-Is)
1
Define IdealState (To-Be)
2
Undertake GapAnalysis
3
Develop Plan toaddress gaps
4
Cost BenefitAnalysis of
options
5
Approverecommendations
6
ImplementPlan
7
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
15/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
16/45
Senior management
!Commitment to cost
reduction!Current cost reductioninitiatives
!Support level for leveragedprocurement
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
17/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
18/45
Senior management
!Commitment to cost
reduction!Current cost reductioninitiatives
!Support level for leveragedprocurement
Finance
!Challenges in cost reporting,
including systems!View of procurementorganisation
!Challenging savings claims
!Where in the “bottom line”?
Procurement
!Current climate?
!Unquantified value contribution
!Concerned reporting is a nonvalue-add process
!Cautious of corporate“scorekeepers”
!Double-dipping, who takes glory?
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
19/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
20/45
! Who ‘owns’ cost reduction reporting within the organisation?
! How is procurement contribution optimised and recognised?
Senior management
!Commitment to cost
reduction!Current cost reductioninitiatives
!Support level for leveragedprocurement
Finance
!Challenges in cost reporting,
including systems!View of procurementorganisation
!Challenging savings claims
!Where in the “bottom line”?
Procurement
!Current climate?
!Unquantified value contribution
!Concerned reporting is a nonvalue-add process
!Cautious of corporate“scorekeepers”
!Double-dipping, who takes glory?
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
21/45
! Who ‘owns’ cost reduction reporting within the organisation?
! How is procurement contribution optimised and recognised?
! Further complicated with Division – Region – Corporate loyalties
Senior management
!Commitment to cost
reduction!Current cost reductioninitiatives
!Support level for leveragedprocurement
Finance
!Challenges in cost reporting,
including systems!View of procurementorganisation
!Challenging savings claims
!Where in the “bottom line”?
Procurement
!Current climate?
!Unquantified value contribution
!Concerned reporting is a nonvalue-add process
!Cautious of corporate“scorekeepers”
!Double-dipping, who takes glory?
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
22/45
! The spend
– Assets, goods, services – Strategic, Leveraged, Local
– Corporate, Divisional
! The savings type
– Structural – Cyclical
– Punctual
– Cost Avoidance
! The “saver” – location,
division, region! Time period – annual,
quarterly
! Actual vs projected
savings
How can savings be categorised to maximise value and havemeaning within, and outside of, the organisation?
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
23/45
Structural
Sustainable, medium-longterm price change
Cyclical A savings that wasachieved based onmarket factors,
rather than purenegotiation skills
Punctual
A one-off savingsachieved through anidentified marketopportunity
Cost Avoidance
‘Holding the line’ oncosts, when anincrease wasproposed
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
24/45
Finance & Procurement need to work closely to developthe procurement savings reporting rules, considering –
! Positive and adverse cost movements
! Cost issues outside the control of procurement
! Consolidated account rules – minority shares etc
! Inter-company/division price reductions
! Savings passed on to customers
! Currency or hedging gains/losses! Total cost of ownership issues - defining “value-add” vs
bottom line benefits such as improved vendor terms
! Timing differences – lagging & leading indicators
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
25/45
Each Division’s Procurement Manager & CFO agree on the procurement savingsachieved, based on the categories and “rules” developed for the system and report
the agreed upon numbers to their respective corporate functions
Corporate Finance and Procurementreport the same numbers to senior
management
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
26/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
27/45
! How are you going to gain commitment to reporting?
! What is procurement’s current attitude to being measured/accountable?
! What is the relationship between procurement & finance? And other groups?
! Is procurement a unified group? Is there a procurementcommunity within the organisation?
! How is a reporting system going to be used/easy forreporters?
! Who “owns” cost reduction reporting within the organisation
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
28/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
29/45
! Comprehensive Benchmarking Study to measureand compare performance of the Procurementfunction
! Gathers feedback from internal customers, teammembers, managers and peers to provide a 360degree review of Procurement
! Involves qualitative and quantitative measures aswell as comparison against other industry bestpractices
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
30/45 p
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
31/45
I n d u s t r y C o n t e x t
p p
l y B
a s e
D y
n p
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
32/45
GOVERNANCESTRATEGYSYSTEMS
PEOPLE & COMMUNICATIONSCORPORATE SPONSORSHIP & CULTURE I n
d u s t r y C o n t e x t
p p
l y B
a s e
D y
n
ENABLERS ENABLERS
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
33/45 p
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
34/45
GOVERNANCESTRATEGYSYSTEMS
PEOPLE & COMMUNICATIONSCORPORATE SPONSORSHIP & CULTURE
PAYORDER
NEGOTIATE
I n d u s t r y C o n t e x t
p p
l y B
a s e
D y
n
RESULTS
ENABLERS ENABLERS
IMPACTIMPACT
EXECUTIONEXECUTION
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
35/45
GOVERNANCESTRATEGYSYSTEMS
PEOPLE & COMMUNICATIONSCORPORATE SPONSORSHIP & CULTURE
PAYORDER
NEGOTIATE
RESULTS
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
36/45
Cost CultureInfluence & ScopeSenior ManagementCommitmentOrganisationalComplianceMetrics & Alignment
StructureKnowledege & SkillsCareer Development
CommunicationTraining
ControlsAuthoritiesSystem Controls
System SuitabilityReporting & DecisionSupporteProcurement
StrategyUnderstandingStrategy RelevanceSpend Segmentation
Category Strategy
New Supplier OutreachCreating CompetitionTenderingContract NegotiationSupplier SelectionContract StructureContract ManagementSupplier ManagementSupplier PerformanceManagement
Ordering Tools
Payment Tools
Payment Terms
ReportingKey IndicatorsValue Add /Effectiveness
GOVERNANCESTRATEGYSYSTEMS
PEOPLE & COMMUNICATIONSCORPORATE SPONSORSHIP & CULTURE
PAYORDER
NEGOTIATE
RESULTS
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
37/45
The Faculty Definition:
Influence and scope describes
the procurement department’s
ability to penetrate and
influence the way the company
buys. A high level of influence
and scope means procurement
is deeply involved in all
purchasing decisions and is
very well integrated into theorganisation.
Procurement is apart time job for anoperator or clerical
employee.
Procurement has ahigh level ofrespect and
influence over theorganisation’s
purchasingdecisions.
1 5
The Faculty Optimal Business Practice Scale
V. Low V. High
V .
L o w
V .
H i g h
Improve
HighLow
Org
Primary role is tokeep the factory
running. All majordecisions made by
user of thecategory/
commodity.
Procurement isassigned a large
number ofcategories, butmajor areas arestill under controlof operations or
end-users.
Procurementmanages the
majority ofcorporate spend
2 3 4
Organisation’s Internal Perspective/Rating
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
38/45
1. Structure and influence of Procurement within theorganisation
2. The direct/indirect dichotomy
3. Developing people and procurement as a place towork
4. Communicating the value of procurement
5. Total Cost of Ownership
6. Supplier management
7. eProcurement and systems to drive Procurementinitiatives
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
39/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
40/45
! Identify, quantify and establish plan to capture synergyopportunities
! Base all savings estimates on chosen Financial year
budget! Quantify unit cost savings by estimated volume
! Pro-rata volume across combined companies
!Factor in adjustments for timing and cashflowconsiderations
! Becomes key action plan for delivering synergy benefits
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
41/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
42/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
43/45
Procurement Integration ScorecardSummary of Individual Initiatives
Year 1
Black: $1.2
Green: $2.4
Red: $5.2
Amber: $3.3
Year 2
Black: $1.4
Green: $2.8
Red: $6.1
Amber: $3.7
Year 3
Black: $1.6
Green: $3.2
Red: $7.4
Amber: $4.6
$5.6
TotalOpportunity
$6.5
TotalOpportunity
$7.7
TotalOpportunity
Black = Banked
Green = High confidence
Red = Low confidence
Amber = Medium confidence
Opportunity Key
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
44/45
8/16/2019 2005 National Procurement Summit Presentation 1st September
45/45