Upload
ila-richard
View
36
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2005 BIOMASS PROGRAM Biennial Peer Review WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION. Larry Russo November 14, 2005. EERE Program Peer Review Criteria. “In-Progress” Review (minimum every 2 years) Project Level: Are Projects being done right? Program Level: Are the right projects being done? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
2005 BIOMASS PROGRAMBiennial Peer Review
WELCOMEAND
INTRODUCTION
Larry RussoNovember 14, 2005
EERE Program Peer Review Criteria
• “In-Progress” Review (minimum every 2 years)• Project Level: Are Projects being done right?• Program Level: Are the right projects being done?
• Rigorous, Formal and Documented
• Objective Criteria
• Qualified and Independent Reviewers (COI disclosure)
• Reviewer Judgments Relate to Criteria and Associated Questions
• Program Manager Review and Response
• Peer Review Report is a Public Document
Why Are We Here ?
Why a Peer Review• Biennial program reviews are an EERE requirement• More Importantly, provides input necessary to keep the program on point and
focused• Transparent, non-biased evaluation of technical, scientific, and business aspects
of the program projects, project results, and program management• Opportunity for an outside perspective• Results of the review will be used by the program to guide future activities
Objectives: • Evaluate the Programs’ approach
• Is there continuity?, Is it functional?• Are we working on the right things?• Does our structure lead to accomplishing the Program’s, EERE’s and DOE’s
goals and objectives?• Is our Portfolio balanced?
• The right mix of core R&D and pre-commercialization efforts• Have we identified the right technological barriers and are they being addressed?
Review Scope and Process
REVIEW SCOPE• 85% of Program spending is required to be reviewed• FY 2005 R&D Portfolio worth approximately $80.2 million, including
congressionally directed funds• All competitively awarded, congressionally directed, and program management
projects, active in FY 2005, will be reviewed• Each program platform has performed interim project reviews, the results of
which will be summarized in each platform session, along with a summary of analysis efforts associated with that platform
• Some projects will be reviewed via poster sessions• The reviewer comments will all be included – consensus opinions and comments
are NOT encouraged
REVIEWER SELECTION• A Steering Committee was selected by the program staff to lead the review effort
according to EERE guidelines• The Steering Committee has knowledge of the Program BUT have no active
projects or affiliations with the Program or projects being reviewed• Steering Committee identified non-biased technical reviewers for each portion of
the program according to EERE guidelines• ALL REVIEWERS HAVE IDENTIFIED ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST
OBP Recent Review History
Sub-Program
or Project
SpecificReviews
Oct 2003 Dec 2005
11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Nov 2003OBP Peer Review MYTP EmphasisAfter merger of 3 former programs;
BioPowerBiofuels
Bioproducts
Nov 2005OBP Peer Review
Biorefinery Emphasis
AugNew EERE
Peer Review Guidance
Mar DOE/USDA
JointFeedstocks
Portfolio S/G Review
JanNew EERE
MYPP Guidance
Nov 2004OBP ImplementedNew Biorefinery
Pathway Approach
SepNREL Sugar
Platform Integration
Project S/G Review
AugMajor
Public-Private Partnership
Project S/G Reviews
MayNREL Sugar
Platform AppliedFundamentals
ProjectS/G Review
JunThermochemical
Platform Portfolio &
Sugar Platform Pretreatment/Hydrolysis
Portfolio S/G Reviews
20052004
AugProducts Portfolio
S/G Review
AugOBP
MYPP Updated
OBP Goal Hierarchy
DOE's Strategic GoalProtect our national and economic
security by promoting a diverse supply of reliable, affordable and
environmentally sound energy.
EERE Strategic GoalsDramatically reduce or even end
dependence on foreign oilCreate the new, domestic bioindustry
Feedstock GoalDevelop sustainable technologies to supply biomass to biorefineries
Biochemical Platform GoalDevelop biochemical conversion technologies to produce low-cost
sugars from lignocellulosic biomass
Thermochemical Platform Goal
Develop thermochemical conversion technologies to
produce chemical building blocks from lignocellulosic biomass
Products GoalDevelop technologies to produce fuels, chemicals and power from bio-based sugars and chemical
building blocks
Integrated Biorefinery GoalEstablish integrated biorefineries
through public-private partnerships
Biomass Program GoalsDevelop biomass and biorefinery-related technologies to the point that they are cost and performance competitive and are used by
the nation’s transportation, energy, chemical and power industries to meet their market objectives.
OBP Peer Review Structure
FeedstockInterface
Reviewers
BiochemicalConversionReviewers
ThermochemicalConversionReviewers
ProductsPlatform
Reviewers
IntegratedBiorefineryReviewers
Steering Committee ReviewersSelect Technical Reviewers
Review Entire ProgramEnsure Program Integration and Connectivity
Role of Reviewers and Audience
Steering Committee• Independently select technical review teams• Review program structure, mgt & portfolio decision making
processes, portfolio balance, connectivity to outputs• A 30,000 foot view of the portfolio
Technical Reviewers• Identify technical gaps• Evaluate projects for technical soundness and strategic fit• Evaluate whether the Technology Elements aligned to the pathways
Audience Members • Identify potential new areas of interest to the Biomass Program• Provide feedback on both the portfolio and program level.
Steering Committee
Carol Babb - Amgen
Bill Cruickshank - Natural Resources Canada
Joe Fagan - Strategic Funding Resources
Herb Kosstrin - R.W. Beck
Technical Reviewers• Feedstocks
• David Bransby, Auburn University• Mark Stumborg, Agriculture and Agrifood Canada• Blair Wright, Transfeeder, Inc.
• Biochemical• Bob Benson, Private Consultant• Don Johnson, Grain Processing Corporation (Retired)• John Cundiff, VT – Biological Systems Engineering
• Thermochemical• Doug Albertson, Energy Products of Idaho (Retired)• Andrew Himmelblau (Geo-Centers)
• Products• Fred Barlow, Eastman Chemical (Retired)• Angelo Montanga, Consultant• Ron Rosseau, Georgia Tech
• Integrated Biorefinery• Jacqueline Broder, TVA• Dave Kelsall, Ethanol Technology• Frank Aerstin, Midland Engineering• Jim Stewart, Stewart Consulting
Agenda
Day 1
Biomass Program Overview 8:30 AM 2:30 PM
Biomass Feedstock Interface 2:30 PM 4:05 PM
Thermochemical Conversion Platform 4:05 PM 6:00 PM
Day 2
Biochemical Conversion Platform 8:30 AM 11:00 AM
Poster Sessions 11:00 AM 2:00 PM
Products Platform 2:00 PM 4:30 PM
Day 3
Integrated Biorefinery 8:30 AM 5:00 PM
Closing 5:00 PM 5:30 PM