Upload
nguyendat
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Texas Agricultural Statistical Districts
Refugio
D a w s o n
Howard Mi tche l l
Ster-ling
Glass-
cock
Mid-
land
Terrell
Pecos
Val Verde
Crockett
CraneW a r d
Wink lerLoving
Reeves
Culberson
BrewsterPresidio
Jeff Davis
WashingtonLee
Burleson
Bra
zo
s
Fayette
BastropAustin
Walker
Mont -
gomery
Gri
me
s
Wa
ll
er
Colorado
Travis
C a m p
Tit
us
Fra
nk
lin
W o o dRains
Hopk ins
Del ta
R e d
River
Mo
rris
Bowie
Mar ion
Coll ings-
worth
W h e e l e r
Hemphi l l
Child-
ress
Ange l ina
Ne
wto
n
Ja
sp
er
Sa
n
Au
gu
sti
ne
Sa
bin
e
T r i ni t y
SanJacinto
Nacog-
dochesCh
ero
ke
e
Hous ton
Orange
Hardin
Jefferson
C h a m -bers
Lib
ert
y
Gal-veston
Brazoria
Anderson
Robert-
son
Somerve l l
StephensPalo
Pinto
ErathEast-
land
Hood John-son
Mills
Coman-
che
Hami l ton
M cLennan
Y o a k u m
Bai ley
Cochran
Deaf
Smith
L u b b o c kHock ley
E lPaso
H a n s -ford
Sher-m a n
Lips-comb
Ochil-
t ree
RobertsHutchin-
sonMoore
San
Patricio Ar a
ns
as
Nueces
Jack son
Ca lhoun
Za
pa
ta
Jim
Hogg
Ellis
Mont -
agueGrayson
Cooke
Kauf-
m a n
Henderson
VanZandt
Cla
y
Wichita
Gregg
Smith
Rusk
Shackel-
ford
Throck -mor ton
Wi l -barger
Haskel l
M c
CullochL a m -
pasasSan
Saba
Panola
Free-
stoneLime-
stone
Harde-
m a n
LiveOak
Jim
We
lls
B rooks
Hidalgo
Bandera
Blan-
co
Kendal l
Real C o m a l
Burnet
Wharton
Fort
BendLa v a c a
Victoria
Cole-m a n
Dickens
Arm-
st rong
Stone-wal l
Run-
nels
T o mGreen
Kimble
Menard
Edwards
W e b b
Kinney
Ma
ve
ric
k
Guada-lupe
Gon-zales
D e
Witt
Karnes
L a
Salle
Atascosa
M c
Mul len
Hudspeth
7EdwardsPlateau
2-S Southern Low Plains
10-NSouth Texas
6Trans-Pecos
2-N Northern Low Plains
3 Cross Timbers
9Upper Coast
5-SSouthEast
Texas
1-S Southern High Plains
1-N Northern High Plains
5-N NorthEast
Texas
10-S Lower Val ley
8-N South Central
8-S Coastal Bend
4 Blacklands
And rews
ArcherBaylor
Bee
Bell
Bexar
Borden
Bosque
Briscoe
Brown
Caldwel l
Callahan
Cameron
Carson
Cass
Castro
Coke
Collin
ConchoCoryell
Cottle
Crosby
Dal lam
Dal las
Denton
Dimmit
Don ley
D u v a l
Ector
Falls
Fannin
Fisher
FloydFoard
Frio
Gaines
Garza
Gillespie
Gol iad
Gray
Hale
Hall
Harris
Harr ison
Hartley
Hays
Hil l
Hunt
Ir ion
Jack
Jones
Kenedy
Ken t
Kerr
King
Kleberg
K n o xLamar
L a m b
Leon
Llano
Lynn
Madison
Martin
Mason
Matagorda
Medina
Milam
Motley
Navarro
Nolan
Oldham
Parker
Parmer
Polk
Potter
Randal l
Reagan
Rockwal l
Schleicher
Scurry
Shelby
Starr
Sut ton
Swisher
Tarrant
Taylor
Terry
Tyler
Upshur
Upton
Uvalde
Wi l lacy
Wil l iamson
Wi lson
WiseYoung
Zavala
TexasAgricultural Statistics
2002
Compiled byCompiled byTexas Agricultural Statistics ServiceTexas Agricultural Statistics Service
P. O. Box 70Austin, Texas 78767
1.800.626.3142Fax: 1.800.842.1331
A cooperative function ofA cooperative function of
United States Department of AgricultureUnited States Department of Agriculture Texas Department of AgricultureTexas Department of Agriculture
Robin O. Roark, State DirectorRobin O. Roark, State Director Susan Combs, CommissionerSusan Combs, CommissionerDoyle Fuchs, Deputy State DirectorDoyle Fuchs, Deputy State Director Martin Hubert, Deputy CommissionerMartin Hubert, Deputy Commissioner
Special thanks to Mrs. Sondra Gail Lynch, NASDA Field Supervisory Enumerator, for the beautiful painting usedon the cover. Mrs. Lynch titled this painting “Sunrise Tractor” and her son was the inspiration for this painting.This work of art was used on posters throughout the country to promote the 2002 Census of Agriculture.
Prepared byPrepared byTexas Agricultural StatisticsTexas Agricultural Statistics
ServiceService
Administrative Support Administrative Support Dorothy Green Gloria Stevens
Estimates Division Estimates Division Charles Drain Jerry Ramirez Rebecca Baillie Tsion Belay Lorna Brown Maryann Coy Sylvia Dush Derek Giesler Evelyn Hargrove Gabriel Massiate Walter Philpot Carol Pittman Kenneth Rosbach Margie Whitcotton
Survey Division Survey Division Charles Wallis Carroll Draper Genell Harris Betty Johnson Jody McDaniel Rosie Villarreal Joye Barnett Cindi Chatterton Patsy Walker
Operations Division Operations Division Trent Wickwire Dick Anderson Robert Acosta Lydia Barker Carmen Breshers Mary Helen Garcia Cynthia Price Eric Stout Dale Turnipseed Nicole Weith Ross Foreman Steven Kowalik Trey Sitterle Kori Wilson
Support and cooperation from Texas farmers, ranchers andagribusinesses are the keys to accurate, reliable agriculturalstatistics. The Texas Agricultural Statistics Service (TASS)appreciates the many individuals who provided the survey datawhich were the foundation for the estimates in this bulletin. Wehope this publication will be a useful source of information toeveryone involved in agriculture.
Texas Agricultural Statistics (2002) provides data on cashreceipts, prices, livestock and livestock products, field crops,major vegetables, citrus fruits, peaches and pecans. The twomost recent years of district and county level data are includedfor all major livestock items. District and county level data arealso included for major crop items for 2001 and 2002.
The funding for publication of this annual bulletin was providedby the Texas Legislature through a cooperative programbetween the Texas Department of Agriculture and the TexasAgricultural Statistics Service of the United States Departmentof Agriculture.
Greetings:
The State of Texas is blessed with a strong spirit ofingenuity that has made us a national leader in both thenumber and diversity of our farms and ranches. Cotton, corn, feed grains, rice and wheat continue tobe among our state’s primary crops, but Texas is alsobecoming known for its fruit and vegetable crops.
From the wide open grassy plains of the Panhandle tothe deep woods of East Texas, the Lone Star State ishome to ranches of all sizes and kinds. Although mostranches are devoted to raising cattle, you will also findhorses, sheep, goats, hogs, chickens and exotic wildlifethroughout the state.
As a fifth generation Texan who grew up on a farm in West Texas, my roots run deep in Texasagriculture. Each day, the countless hours and tireless efforts of the men and women ofagriculture help feed, clothe, and shelter our world.
The Texas Agricultural Statistics Service has once again teamed up with the Texas Departmentof Agriculture to provide you the most comprehensive and detailed source of statistics onagriculture in the United States. With a state as large and diverse as Texas, this is no easy task. I appreciate the individuals who work diligently to produce such a valuable resource and thankthose of you who cooperated in compiling this report.
Sincerely,
Rick PerryGovernor
My Fellow Texans:
Looking back over the last few years, I’m amazedat how far we’ve come in such a short time – andhow much we have changed. Agriculture is trulyan ever-evolving industry, with massivetransformations in policy and technologyoccurring at what seems like a blink of an eye.From speaking out on child nutrition to tacklingwater issues to developing new initiatives toboost rural communities, we have madeenormous progress together, and the future isbright. It has been a whirlwind experience, and I am honored to continueserving the farmers and ranchers of Texas.
My family’s roots in agriculture date back many years, and they workedclosely with their neighbors and friends to survive drought and otherobstacles common to the industry. To me, this has become a prevailingtheme. Agriculture is an industry in which folks partner up, ride out thechallenges and share the successes. Even standing alone on my ranch inBrewster County I know that, as a rancher, I am not by myself in the vastlands of West Texas.
The Texas Department of Agriculture and the Texas AgriculturalStatistics Service partnered up by signing a Cooperative Agreement in1931 and began paving the way for expanded statistical estimates. With astate the size of Texas – nearly 800 miles wide, 800 miles long,encompassing 254 counties – this is no small task. Each year, TASScompiles its comprehensive statistics bulletin, and I appreciate the effortsof TASS and of the farmers and ranchers of Texas who help us gainvaluable insight into the industry. The numbers compiled by TASSspeak volumes about where we’ve been and where we’re headed. It is aninvaluable resource for policymakers and consumers alike, and I thankthe staff at TASS for their relentless commitment to accuracy and theircommendable dedication to Texas Agriculture. And I thank you for thevaluable information you provide to make these reports possible.
Sincerely,
Susan CombsCommissioner
Texas Agricultural Statistics ServiceP.O. Box 70, Austin, Texas 78767
www.nass.usda.gov/tx
A Message from the Director:Over the past several years I have had the distincthonor and pleasure to visit with a lot of wonderfulfolks involved in Texas agriculture. Each visit hasconfirmed what I learned early in my life on myparents’ ranch – Texas farmers and ranchers arewithout a doubt the most industrious, competent,and innovative group to be found. The fact is,agriculture, including all its agribusiness phases,adds over $80 billion to the economic activity ofTexas, making a significant impact on the State’seconomy.
The staff of the Texas Agricultural StatisticsService, in cooperation with the TexasDepartment of Agriculture, are proud to onceagain bring you this compilation of agricultural statistics. These statistics help assure that the results ofyour hard work are fairly and accurately represented in the market place as well as in State and Nationalpolicy decisions. Furthermore, we owe a large “thank you” to the producers and agribusiness operatorswho provided the data to make this publication possible.
Every five years we conduct the Census of Agriculture, and 2002 was the “Year of the Census”. TheCensus of Agriculture is the most comprehensive and detailed source of statistics portraying U.S.agriculture. In Texas alone, over 300,000 Ag Census report forms were mailed to farmers and ranchers. We worked diligently to make sure the agricultural community was aware that operations, large orsmall, needed to be counted – and we are gratified by the response. A tremendous “thank you” fortaking the time to complete and return your Ag Census form. The results of this important project willbe available in February 2004.
I also want to take this opportunity to emphasize our agency’s confidentiality pledge to you, theproducers and agribusiness operators included in our surveys. We do not disclose any data about anyindividual operation. The confidentiality of the answers you provide is protected by Federal law, Title7, U.S. Code. There has never been a breach of this trust and we will continue to vigorously safeguardthe privacy of your reports.
On behalf of all of us with Texas Agricultural Statistics Service, we wish you the very best – along witha beautiful Texas sky, and some rain, too!
Regards,
Robin O. RoarkDirector
Table of ContentsTable of Contents
2002 Agricultural Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Precipitation by Month and Agricultural Statistics District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
ECONOMIC STATISTICSECONOMIC STATISTICSNumber of Farms and Land in Farms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Farm Real Estate Value, Cash Rent and Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Cash Receipts by Commodity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Gross Income and Cash Receipts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Value Added to the Economy by Agricultural Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Farm Balance Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Leading States, Livestock and Crop Exports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Average Prices Received for Livestock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Average Prices Received for Crops, Citrus and Vegetables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Texas: Index Numbers of Prices Received by Farmers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
United States: Index Numbers of Prices Paid by Farmers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Farm Labor Workers by Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
LIVESTOCKLIVESTOCKGENERAL:GENERAL:Range and Pasture Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Leading States in Livestock Numbers and Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Livestock Operations by Species and Size Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
CATTLE (Beef and Dairy):CATTLE (Beef and Dairy):Cattle and Calves Inventory, Calf Crop, Production and Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Feeder Cattle Supply, Cattle on Feed and Number of Feedlots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Ten Leading Counties: All Cattle, Beef Cows and Milk Cows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Cattle Inventory and Milk Production County Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
DAIRY:DAIRY:Milk Cows and Milk Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Milk Cows, Average Value and Total Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Milk Cow Operations, Inventory and Milk Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Milk and Cream: Marketings, Income and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Manufactured Dairy Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
SHEEP:SHEEP:Ten Leading Counties: Sheep and Lambs, Ewes 1+, Wool Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Sheep and Lamb Inventory and Wool County Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Sheep and Lambs: Lamb Crop, Wool Production and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Sheep and Lambs: Production and Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Sheep and Lambs Inventory, Lamb Crop and Death Losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
GOATS:GOATS:Ten Leading Counties: All Goats, Angora Goats and Mohair Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Goats: Inventory and Mohair Production County Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Goats: Number by Type, Class, and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Goats: Death Losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Mohair Production and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
HOGS AND PIGS:HOGS AND PIGS:Hogs and Pigs District Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Hogs and Pigs Inventory, Pig Crop, Number by Class, Production and Income . . . . . . . . . 55
HORSES & OTHER EQUINE SPECIES:HORSES & OTHER EQUINE SPECIES:Inventory, Number Sold and Value of Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
POULTRY:POULTRY:Hens and Pullets of Laying Age and Commercial Broilers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Hens and Pullets Inventory, Eggs and Broiler Production: District Estimates . . . . . . . . . . 59
Chickens: Number and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Eggs: Production and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Commercial Broilers: Production and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Commercial Broilers: Hatchings by Month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Number of Layers and Egg Production by Month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Broilers: Eggs Set and Chicks Placed by Weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
MISCELLANEOUS LIVESTOCK:MISCELLANEOUS LIVESTOCK:Refrigerated Warehouses: Number and Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Slaughter Plants, Livestock and Poultry Slaughter Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Commercial Slaughter by Month and Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Commercial Slaughter, Liveweight and Red Meat Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Movement of Cattle and Calves Out Of and Into Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Movement of Sheep and Lambs Out Of and Into Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Auction Markets and Monthly Sales of Livestock, by Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Auction Markets by County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Colonies of Bees, Honey Production, Price and Stocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Catfish: Number of Operations, Water Area, Inventory, Weight and Value . . . . . . . . . . . 71
FIELD CROPSFIELD CROPSGENERAL:GENERAL:Crops Acreage, Yield, Production, Price and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
State Production Ranking by Crop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
CORNCORN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Irrigated by District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Nonirrigated by District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Corn Silage by District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
COTTON:COTTON:
American-Pima Cotton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Upland Cotton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Irrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Nonirrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Cottonseed: Production, Disposition, Price and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
OATSOATS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
PEANUTSPEANUTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Irrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Nonirrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
RICERICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
SORGHUMSORGHUM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
Irrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
Nonirrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
SOYBEANSSOYBEANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
Irrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Nonirrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
SUGARCANESUGARCANE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
SUNFLOWERSSUNFLOWERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
WHEATWHEAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
Irrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Nonirrigated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
GRAIN STORAGE:GRAIN STORAGE:Grain Stocks: Off-Farm and Total All Positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Off-Farm Wheat, Corn and Sorghum Stocks by Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
Rice Stocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Off-Farm Grain Storage Capacity by Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Off-Farm Grain Storage Capacity by County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
VEGETABLES, FRUIT AND PECANSVEGETABLES, FRUIT AND PECANSGENERAL:GENERAL:Vegetable, Fruit and Pecan Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
State Ranking: Harvested Acreage for Selected Vegetable Crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
VEGETABLES FOR FRESH MARKET:VEGETABLES FOR FRESH MARKET: Cabbage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Cantaloupes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Carrots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Celery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Chile Peppers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Sweet Corn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Cucumbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Honeydew Melons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Onions, Spring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Onions, Summer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Onions, All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Peppers, Bell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Spinach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Tomatoes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Watermelons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
VEGETABLES FOR PROCESSING:VEGETABLES FOR PROCESSING: Carrots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
Cucumbers for Pickles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
Spinach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
VEGETABLES FOR FRESH MARKET AND PROCESSING:VEGETABLES FOR FRESH MARKET AND PROCESSING: Potatoes, Spring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
Potatoes, Summer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
Potatoes, All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
Sweetpotatoes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
SELECTED VEGETABLES: DISTRICT ESTIMATES:SELECTED VEGETABLES: DISTRICT ESTIMATES: Cabbage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Onions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Potatoes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Cantaloupes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Honeydew Melons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
Watermelons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
FRUIT AND PECANS:FRUIT AND PECANS:Grapefruit and Oranges Production, Utilization and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
Peach Production, Price and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
State Ranking of Utilized Peach Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
Pecan Production Price and Value, by Variety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
State Ranking of Utilized Pecan Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
Grape Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
2002 AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY
The 2002 season began with moderately dry conditions across many areas of the state. Dryconditions were generally a carry-over from the previous fall. Heavy supplemental feeding was necessaryin many areas during late winter and continued well into the summer months. Small grains entered theyear under stressed conditions. Some abandonment occurred due to these conditions. As springapproached, statewide conditions remained variable. Planting of summer crops began on schedule insouthern locations and progressed northward. However, high winds and sparse amounts of moisturecaused delays in normal planting activities. Prewatering was required for many crops. Early maturity,abandonment, late or no emergence, and replanting were common across many areas of the state due tothe dry situation. Pastures further declined, which led to reduction in livestock herds. Passing storms ina few areas caused localized flooding, but no widespread rain events had taken place. By late spring,conditions had not changed much, except for some areas where severely dry conditions had caused majorstress to crops and pastures. Insect activity, especially from grasshoppers, reached critical levels and majordamage occurred to crops and pastures in many locations. By early summer, conditions had improved insome areas. Unseasonably heavy storms blanketed many areas of the state, bringing an end to parchedconditions. By mid to late summer, many pastures had recovered, and hay growth and production hadimproved. Rainfall amounts were ideal for some crops, but for some it came too late in the growing season.As summer progressed and fall began harvest was underway across the state. Harvest yields were belowaverage in areas that had been too dry during the growing season. Storms during fall months caused wetconditions in some areas, which hampered harvest activities and affected crop quality. Many pastures wereconsidered adequate as winter approached. Supplemental feeding was necessary in areas that remained dry.Planting of small grains progressed throughout the fall and early winter. Grazing of small grain fields wasactive in many locations. Moisture levels at year’s end were adequate in many areas as prospects for a newseason were good. Vegetable and citrus production progressed a little behind normal across Valley locations,but moisture levels had improved in the region.
Conditions in January were dry in many areas across the state. Harvest of previous year’s row cropshad been completed except for some isolated fields of cotton. Moisture stress continued from the previousyear in small grains. Some producers were forced to replant their grain as seedling death had occurred.Insect populations were active in some areas and further damage to many small grain crops was seen. Landpreparation was active in most areas. Pastures declined across the state due to the continued dry conditions.As a result of poor pasture conditions, body condition in livestock declined as many producers were unableto meet feed requirements. Supplemental feeding became necessary in most counties. Some planting hadbegun in South Texas and harvest of vegetables made progress.
1
Conditions were variable during the month of February. In early months some locations reportedrecord-breaking temperatures, however they were soon followed by passing cold fronts which brought highwinds and isolated snow showers to areas of the Plains. Elsewhere, only light rain showers were reported.Stress in small grains continued as the result of dry conditions. Insect populations continued to build andcaused varying levels of damage. Land preparation was active across the state, but some areas were too dryand producers waited for rainfall before beginning farming activities. Planting of summer crops continuedto move northward, but a few locations in southern areas were too wet and drying out was necessary. Rangeand pastures continued to decline across the state with the exception of some eastern locations whererainfall had been adequate. Supplemental feeding was heavy in most areas and some producers were totallyout of hay supplies. Harvest of vegetables continued in the Lower Valley.
March began with freezing and record low temperatures across many areas of the state. Some areasalso reported sleet and snow showers. Small grains were additionally stressed and some death loss in bothirrigated and dryland fields occurred. By mid month, conditions varied from extremely wet in some areasto dry and windy in others. Abandonment of acreage was being considered by many producers in drierareas. Land preparation continued where conditions allowed. Emergence of earlier planted crops wasvariable due to moisture shortages. Range and pasture conditions were variable across the state, andsupplemental feeding was active in many locations. Reduction and some herd liquidation continued tooccur. Water available to livestock remained short in a few locations. Harvest of vegetables continued inthe Valley and Winter Garden locations.
April began with normal temperatures across the state. Early in the month, some areas receivedsevere storms with heavy rainfall, while other areas remained dry. In many areas, small grains continuedto suffer from moisture stress. A few locations across the Plains reported a total loss of the wheat crop.Blowing dust delayed farming activities from time to time across areas of the Plains. By mid to late month,some widespread showers brought relief to many moisture stressed areas around the state. In areas whererains fell, small grains showed some recovery. Abandonment and crop failure had occurred in many otherlocations. Prewatering was necessary before many crops could be planted, and in some locations, rain wasneeded before planting could occur. In the wettest locations, range and pasture conditions improved,however some areas remained dry and water was unavailable to some livestock herds. Grasshopperpopulations increased and caused further crop damage across the state.
Conditions in May were generally dry across the state. High winds continued to deplete soilmoisture and blowing dust was a problem for many farming operations. In most areas, earlier planted cropscontinued to show signs of moisture stress, and maturity had accelerated some small grain fields. Dryplanting was the only option for some producers, but some areas were too dry to plant. Moisture wasextremely short in most areas of the state. By mid-month, some crop damage was reported in variouslocations as the result of heavy thunderstorms. The state remained mostly dry throughout the month.Livestock herd reductions were common and supplemental feeding remained a must in most areas. Wateravailable to livestock was depleted in some areas, and hauling water was necessary. Insect populations,especially grasshoppers, caused heavy losses to both crops and pastures in many areas.
2
June began with unsettled conditions in most areas of the state. Storms accompanied by heavyrainfall and some hail crossed portions of the Plains. Crop damage varied across the area, and some locationshad severe losses. Sea breeze showers occurred in southern locations, however only minor accumulationswere recorded. Replanting remained active as the result of earlier storms damage. In southern areas, manyproducers indicated rainfall had come too little and too late to benefit some row crops. Harvest of smallgrains was mostly completed. In areas where earlier heavy rains fell, some producers reported that smallgrains had sprouted heads. Some producers had not completed summer planting, but planting in dry soilswas the only option for many producers. Supplemental feeding of livestock remained active and someproducers were relying on CPR grazing to sustain their herds. Grasshopper populations were high andcaused major damage to crops and pastures.
Conditions in July changed rapidly for most of the state. Heavy rains associated with a tropical lowpressure came early in the month to many areas. Severe flooding replaced dry conditions in most areas ofthe state. A few lakes and rivers were filled or flowed at all time capacities. Property damage in some areaswas high, and some losses to livestock and crops occurred as the result of the heavy rainfall. Harvest ofsummer crops was on hold in many areas as conditions were too wet to support harvest equipment.Developing crops in wet areas benefitted and recovery of ranges and pastures had begun. Soils were dryingout by late month and harvest resumed in many locations. Land preparation was active and hayingoperations had moved forward. Despite the rain, some parts of the state remained dry and conditions wereunimproved in these locations. Supplemental feeding subsided in the wet areas, but continued in otherareas. Some areas had reported an abundance of hay by late month. Grasshopper and armywormpopulations were high in some areas at month’s end.
Conditions were seasonably hot in August across the state, but many areas received additionalmoisture during the month. Cool fronts and tropical moisture brought considerable amounts of moistureto many locations. However, a few areas remained dry during the month and crops in these areas remainedunder severe moisture stress. Harvest of summer crops became more widespread during the month andonly brief delays occurred from weather problems. Land preparation was active and planting of small grainshad begun in isolated locations. Haying operations were thriving and many producers reported a surplusof hay. Supplemental feeding was about normal for this time of year in most areas, but remained high inthe driest areas. Water available for livestock was short in many of these areas. Insect populations includinggreen bugs, armyworms, grasshoppers, and boll worms, remained high.
Early September was mostly hot across the state. Scattered thunderstorms, some severe, werereported in many areas of North Texas and the Edwards Plateau. Tropical Storm Fay dropped largeamounts of rain in coastal and some central locations. Land preparation and harvesting activities remainedactive across the state, but some delays occurred. Planting of small grains intensified with the aid of rainfallacross the state. Haying operations continued to improve, but some delays were seen from time to time.Some areas remained dry and moisture stress continued. Supplemental feeding remained necessary in someareas, but had eased in areas with improved pastures. Grasshopper pressure had decreased by late month,but many producers were experiencing armyworm problems.
3
Conditions in October were considerably cooler across the entire state. Areas of the Plains receivedheavy rainfall and some large hail early in the month, while parts of the Gulf Coast and East Texas receivedrainfall associated with Hurricane Lili. Remaining harvest moved ahead across the state, but delays werefrequent. Planting of small grains continued as conditions allowed. Land preparations were also active.Some areas remained excessively dry and progress in these areas was minimal. Pasture conditions werevariable across the state with some areas showing adequate recovery while others were severely poor. Haybaling operations remained active and many producers reported a surplus of hay. Supplemental feeding wasabout normal in most areas, however remained high in the driest locations. By late month, conditions haddeclined as light snow, freezing rain and showers crossed the Plains. Elsewhere, moderate to heavy rainfallsuspended farming activities.
Conditions in early November were mostly undesirable in many areas. Some areas received asmuch as five to six inches of rainfall. Freezing temperatures occurred in some areas of the Plains. By thesecond week, conditions had improved across the state and drying out was in progress. The warmertemperatures enhanced the growth of small grains as grazing of some small grain fields was in progress.Harvest of remaining row crops made good progress as drying out became sufficient in many locations. Asthe month progressed, light frost accelerated maturity in remaining summer crops in several areas.Supplemental feeding gradually increased across the state as pasture dormancy moved southward as theresult of colder sustained temperatures. End of season haying operations continued in a few locations.
Conditions in December were mostly cold and wet across many areas of the state. Widespreadsnowfall and freezing rain covered many areas of the Plains. Southern areas received varied amounts ofrainfall and some localized flooding was reported. Between weather fronts, harvest of summer crops wasmostly completed, however a few crops were abandoned due to the lingering wet conditions. Small grainscontinued to make progress, but colder conditions slowed the process. Land preparation and late plantingof small grains was active in a few areas where soils were dry enough. Supplemental feeding increased acrossthe state as winter like conditions remained constant. Sickness in livestock was about average for this timeof year. Citrus harvest was active in portions of the Lower Valley.
4
TEXAS RAINFALLPrecipitation (Inches) by Month, 2002 Season
Area Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annual
High Plains . . . . . . . . . . . .38 .59 1.19 1.16 .70 1.72 1.84 2.24 1.07 3.98 .36 .94 16.17
Low Rolling Plains . . . . . . .49 .87 2.15 1.54 .94 1.85 3.00 1.03 1.04 3.91 .43 1.94 19.19
North Central Texas . . . . 1.36 1.11 2.55 2.22 2.89 2.80 3.33 .99 2.04 3.38 1.04 3.08 26.79
East Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.06 1.87 2.86 1.14 2.39 3.13 3.10 2.07 2.24 5.45 1.56 2.79 30.66
Trans-Pecos . . . . . . . . . . .04 .79 .19 .16 .30 1.03 2.03 .77 .88 2.37 .18 .57 9.31
Edwards Plateau . . . . . . . .24 .56 1.12 .83 .89 1.79 3.40 .48 1.60 4.46 .47 1.01 16.85
South Central Texas . . . . .28 .49 .50 .43 1.43 2.14 4.17 1.33 3.31 4.07 1.36 2.93 22.44
Upper Coast . . . . . . . . . . 1.34 .83 1.39 .30 1.39 3.59 2.66 3.57 4.61 7.06 1.88 3.70 32.32
South Texas . . . . . . . . . . .00 .13 .09 .41 .57 1.41 4.52 1.04 4.77 1.92 1.36 .92 17.14
Lower Valley . . . . . . . . . . .04 .61 .02 .57 1.59 2.80 1.36 .99 4.05 3.13 2.55 .62 18.33
TEXAS RAINFALLPrecipitation (Percent of Normal) by Month, 2002 Season 1
Area Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annual
High Plains . . . . . . . . . . . 86 87 128 105 28 58 79 85 43 271 45 184 86
Low Rolling Plains . . . . . . 62 79 160 83 28 60 154 41 30 169 36 223 81
North Central Texas . . . . 77 49 96 69 61 80 157 46 54 98 43 159 79
East Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 54 75 29 47 75 104 81 55 139 37 69 67
Trans-Pecos . . . . . . . . . . 10 176 59 31 28 68 115 37 36 178 32 116 72
Edwards Plateau . . . . . . . 25 41 92 42 28 67 181 21 48 165 34 100 70
South Central Texas . . . . 13 22 29 17 33 55 182 50 71 121 53 148 65
Upper Coast . . . . . . . . . . 38 29 55 10 29 68 62 91 75 174 49 108 68
South Texas . . . . . . . . . . 0 10 11 23 18 49 276 44 126 76 109 93 73
Lower Valley . . . . . . . . . . 3 44 3 42 54 99 73 41 77 125 190 50 721 Normal is based on the 30-year period from 1961-90.
5
TEXAS: Number of Farms and Land in Farms by Economic Sales Class, 1997-2002 1
Year
Economic sales class Economic sales classAverage
size of farm$1,000 -$9,999
$10,000 -$99,999
$100,000and over Total $1,000 -
$9,999$10,000 -$99,999
$100,000and over Total
Number of farms Land in farms -1,000 acres Acres
1997 154,000 54,000 17,000 225,000 22,000 45,500 64,000 131,500 584
1998 153,000 56,000 17,000 226,000 22,000 45,500 64,000 131,500 582
1999 155,000 55,500 16,500 227,000 22,500 48,000 60,000 130,500 575
2000 153,000 56,000 17,000 226,000 21,000 48,000 61,000 130,000 575
2001 154,000 56,000 17,000 227,000 22,000 45,000 63,000 130,000 573
2002 156,000 57,000 17,000 230,000 22,300 45,700 63,000 131,000 570
1 A farm is defined as “any establishment from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were sold or would normally be sold during the year”.Government payments are included in sales. Institutional farms, experimental and research farms, and Indian Reservations are included as farms. Placeswith their entire acreage enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program, set-aside, or other government programs are considered operating farms. Landin farms is all land operated by farms during the year. It includes crop acreage, wasteland, woodland, pasture, land in summer fallow, idle cropland,and land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program and other set-aside or commodity acreage programs. It excludes public, industrial and grazingassociation land and nonagricultural land. It excludes all land operated by establishments not qualifying as farms.
6
LEADING STATES IN VALUE OF FARM REAL ESTATE, JANUARY 1, 2002*
State Million dollars
1 TEXAS 93,600
2 California 85,870
3 Illinois 73,128
4 Iowa 64,746
5 Missouri 45,448
6 Minnesota 41,325
7 Ohio 39,960
8 Indiana 39,886
9 Arizona 36,442
10 Wisconsin 35,650* Data for 2003 will not be available at time of publication.
TEXAS FARM REAL ESTATE DEBT:Amount Outstanding, By Lender, December 31, 1998-2001 1
Lender 1998 1999 2000 2001
Million dollars
Farm Credit System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,313 2,541 * 2,674 2,962
Farm Service Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 211 200 197
Life Insurance Companies . . . . . . . . . . . 454 487 * 486 494
All operating banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,265 1,388 * 1,486 1,554
Individuals and others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,160 1,160 * 1,139 1,162
Total farm real estate debt . . . . . . . . . . . 5,413 5,786 * 5,988 6,3681 Source: Economic Research Service/USDA. * Revised.
TEXAS REAL ESTATE VALUE AND CASH RENT
Year
Value of land and buildings, January 1 Annual gross cash rent
Total Average per acreCropland
PastureIrrigated Nonirrigated
Million dollars Dollars Dollars per acre
1997 . . . . . . . . . . 72,851 554 50.00 17.50 5.60
1998 . . . . . . . . . . 77,980 593 51.00 20.00 6.60
1999 . . . . . . . . . . 79,605 610 49.00 18.00 6.90
2000 . . . . . . . . . . 81,900 630 53.00 21.00 6.00
2001 . . . . . . . . . . 88,400 680 53.00 21.00 7.20
2002 . . . . . . . . . . 93,600 720 * 53.00 21.00 * 7.40
2003 . . . . . . . . . . 98,250 750 55.00 21.00 7.80* Revised.
7
Cattle & Calves46.3%
Greenhouse & Nursery10.6%
Cotton (lint and seed)7.7%
Broilers7.1%
Milk5.4%
Hay3.2%
Corn2.8%
Sorghum grain
2.4%Eggs2.2%
Wheat1.7%
Peanuts1.2%
Onions1.0%
Cantaloupes0.6%
Hogs0.5%
Rice0.5%
All Others6.9%
TEXAS AGRICULTURAL CASH RECEIPTS BY COMMODITY, 2002
TEXAS AGRICULTURAL CASH RECEIPTS BY COMMODITY, 2002
Rank Commodity Receipts 1 Percentof total
Thousand dollars
1 Cattle and calves 5,862,734 46.32 Greenhouse and nursery 1,348,136 10.63 Cotton (lint and seed) 974,366 7.74 Broilers 893,327 7.15 Milk (wholesale) 680,604 5.46 Hay 404,593 3.27 Corn 350,811 2.88 Sorghum grain 299,200 2.49 Eggs 273,312 2.210 Wheat 216,668 1.711 Peanuts 157,976 1.212 Onions 122,871 1.013 Cantaloupes 80,798 0.614 Hogs 65,974 0.515 Rice 62,252 0.5
All Others 875,191 6.9Total 12,668,813 100.0
1 Excluding government payments.
8
TEXAS GROSS INCOME, PRODUCTION EXPENSES AND NET INCOME FROM FARMING, 1998-20021
Year Grossfarm income
Total productionexpenses
Netfarm income Farms Net per
farm income
Million dollars Number Dollars
1998 . . . . . . . . . . * 15,495.0 * 12,079.9 * 3,415.1 226,000 * 15,111
1999 . . . . . . . . . . * 17,429.6 * 12,472.0 * 4,957.6 227,000 * 21,840
2000 . . . . . . . . . . * 16,555.8 * 12,696.8 * 3,859.0 226,000 * 17,075
2001 . . . . . . . . . . * 17,569.9 * 13,116.8 * 4,453.1 227,000 * 19,617
2002 . . . . . . . . . . 16,062.0 12,403.1 3,658.9 230,000 15,9081 See page 12 for greater detail. * Revised.
TEXAS AGRICULTURAL CASH RECEIPTSBY COMMODITY GROUPS AND GOVERNMENT PAYMENTS, 1998-2002
Commodity groups 1998 1999 2000 2001 20022002
percent of total
Thousand dollars Percent
Total all commodities plus government payments . . . . *14,156,229 *14,994,275 *14,615,795 *15,212,614 13,655,029 100.0
Government Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,001,887 1,961,835 1,647,066 1,703,168 986,216 7.2
All commodities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *13,154,342 *13,032,440 *12,968,729 *13,509,446 12,668,813 92.8
Livestock and products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,150,732 8,483,751 9,159,332 *9,344,703 8,087,670 59.2
Meat animals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,922,022 6,251,234 6,966,852 *6,955,913 5,973,351 43.7
Dairy products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876,531 839,400 766,078 *803,114 680,604 5.0
Poultry and eggs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,195,127 1,234,959 1,256,877 1,415,736 1,249,709 9.2
Miscellaneous livestock 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157,052 158,158 169,525 *169,940 184,006 1.3
Crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *5,003,610 *4,548,689 *3,809,397 *4,164,743 4,581,142 33.5
Food grains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493,246 357,840 *265,156 *351,231 280,995 2.1
Feed crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805,520 848,394 *1,016,837 *877,283 1,061,577 7.8
Cotton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,649,636 1,355,274 *573,971 *718,295 974,367 7.1
Oil crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282,679 227,716 *216,491 *240,856 198,482 1.5
Vegetables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442,774 *430,730 *434,313 *522,475 544,033 4.0
Fruits and nuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85,710 *125,937 *93,578 *109,435 73,155 0.5
All other crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,244,044 *1,202,798 *1,209,051 *1,345,167 1,448,533 10.6
1 Includes wool, mohair, honey, catfish, equine and other livestock. * Revised.
9
TEXAS AGRICULTURAL CASH RECEIPTS, BY COMMODITIES AND COMMODITY GROUPS, 1998-2002
Commodity 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Percentage of
all commodities2002 1
Thousand dollars Percent
All commodities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *13,154,342 *13,032,440 *12,968,729 *13,509,446 12,668,813 100.0 Livestock and products . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,150,732 8,483,751 9,159,332 *9,344,703 8,087,670 63.8 Cattle and calves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,775,190 6,124,290 6,815,081 6,812,228 5,862,734 46.3 Broilers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,400 883,227 880,498 1,058,616 893,327 7.1 Milk, wholesale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876,531 839,400 766,078 *803,114 680,604 5.4 Chicken eggs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253,646 240,509 256,903 267,077 273,312 2.2 Hogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85,073 70,456 113,497 *103,510 65,974 0.5 Sheep and lambs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,759 56,488 38,274 40,175 44,643 0.4 Honey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,344 5,599 4,728 *4,981 8,325 0.1 Wool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,815 3,898 3,678 3,122 3,760 4/
Mohair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,044 9,384 10,088 3,775 3,034 4/
Farm chickens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,988 2,151 2,866 2,403 2,465 4/
Catfish . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C 1,777 1,031 762 2,087 4/
Horses and mules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,000 NA NA NA NA 4/
All other livestock 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141,942 246,572 266,610 *244,940 247,405 2.0 Crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,003,610 *4,548,689 *3,809,397 *4,164,743 4,581,142 36.2 Greenhouse and nursery . . . . . . . . 1,166,183 1,122,089 *1,103,232 *1,245,893 1,348,136 10.6 Cotton lint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,469,246 1,205,274 *428,435 *577,627 811,497 6.4 Hay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152,656 178,364 280,671 *295,209 404,593 3.2 Corn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436,281 414,197 *439,530 *308,158 350,811 2.8 Sorghum grain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214,263 254,206 *295,067 *270,608 299,200 2.4 Wheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343,328 241,528 185,775 *270,756 216,668 1.7 Cottonseed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180,390 149,999 145,536 *140,668 162,869 1.3 Peanuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225,803 190,921 171,831 202,473 157,976 1.2 Onions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,226 93,788 96,342 106,386 122,871 1.0 Cantaloupes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,990 56,743 42,412 69,720 80,798 0.6 Rice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148,783 115,404 *78,762 *78,691 62,252 0.5 Sugarcane for sugar . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,494 26,962 *52,597 *56,702 56,702 0.4 Watermelons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,643 29,611 21,840 *32,400 56,610 0.4 Potatoes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,103 44,423 50,985 *52,358 51,707 0.4 Cabbage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,360 41,290 52,480 66,011 45,101 0.4 Pecans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,500 68,000 34,600 50,000 37,300 0.3 Cucumbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,350 22,396 19,688 *28,178 35,050 0.3 Soybeans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49,864 31,058 *38,752 *30,500 31,872 0.3 Grapefruit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,631 39,472 29,636 *23,831 15,570 0.1 Carrots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,994 32,259 15,684 *26,934 14,713 0.1 Honeydew melons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,650 17,111 14,131 13,608 14,433 0.1 Spinach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,903 11,344 12,239 *11,796 14,157 0.1 Peppers, chili . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NA NA 11,963 16,965 11,000 0.1 Sweetpotatoes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,614 *4,337 *4,469 *5,958 9,024 0.1 Sunflower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,922 5,670 5,866 7,849 8,633 0.1 Peppers, green . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,308 6,224 9,048 11,083 7,520 0.1 Peaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,880 6,820 10,034 14,820 6,840 0.1 Dry beans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,145 6,812 5,473 *5,274 6,592 0.1 Oats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,099 1,305 1,375 *2,725 6,488 0.1 Corn, sweet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 7,785 8,011 7,020 5,962 4/
Tomatoes, fresh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,292 6,086 5,879 6,480 5,760 4/
Oranges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,106 *3,715 *6,093 *8,238 4,628 4/
Grapes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NA NA NA 8,370 4,004 4/
Barley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 322 194 582 486 4/
Other crops 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *85,414 *113,174 *130,767 *110,872 113,319 0.9
1 Commodities are listed in order of importance for 2002 by crop items and by livestock items. 2 For 1999-2002 includes milkfat, turkeys eggs, equine,goats, goat milk and other poultry and livestock. For 1998 includes milkfat, turkey eggs, goats, goat milk, catfish and other poultry and livestock. 3 For1998-1999 includes peppers, chili, grapes, greens, okra, miscellaneous vegetables, field crops, fruit and nuts. For 2000 includes grapes, miscellaneousvegetables, field crops, fruit and nuts. For 2001-2002 includes miscellaneous vegetables, field crops, fruit and nuts. 4 Less than 0.05 percent. * Revised.C = Confidential. NA = Not Available.
10
TEXAS VALUE ADDED TO THE ECONOMY BY THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR, 1998-2002 1
Item 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Thousand dollars
Value of crop production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *4,404,621 *4,861,847 *3,887,054 *4,361,567 4,740,054 Food grains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *493,246 357,840 *265,156 *351,231 280,995 Feed crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *805,520 848,394 *1,016,837 *877,283 1,061,577 Cotton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,649,636 1,355,274 *573,971 *718,295 974,367 Oil crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *282,679 227,716 *216,491 *240,856 198,482 Fruits and tree nuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *85,710 *125,937 *93,578 *109,435 73,155 Vegetables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442,774 *430,730 *434,313 *522,475 544,033 All other crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1,244,044 *1,202,798 *1,209,051 *1,345,167 1,448,533 Home consumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,753 12,753 12,641 12,753 12,865 Value of inventory adjustment 2/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *(611,741) *300,405 *65,016 *184,072 146,047Value of livestock production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,952,112 8,395,081 9,062,728 *9,301,914 8,341,548 Meat animals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,922,022 6,251,234 6,966,852 *6,955,913 5,973,351 Dairy products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876,531 839,400 766,078 *803,114 680,604 Poultry and eggs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,195,127 1,234,959 1,256,877 1,415,736 1,249,709 Miscellaneous livestock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157,052 158,158 169,525 *169,940 184,006 Home consumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,785 15,732 18,637 19,438 17,592 Value of inventory adjustment 2/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (213,405) (104,402) (115,241) (62,227) 236,286Revenues from services and forestry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *2,136,337 *2,210,870 *1,958,910 *2,203,284 1,994,184 Machine hire and custom work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122,827 215,768 139,565 156,819 165,605 Forest products sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95,000 92,000 90,000 82,000 71,000 Other farm income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1,155,207 *1,170,861 *960,828 *1,123,101 926,267 Gross imputed rental value of farm dwellings . . . . *763,303 *732,241 *768,517 *841,364 831,312 Value of agricultural sector production . . . . . . . . . . . . *14,493,070 *15,467,798 *14,908,692 *15,866,765 15,075,786 Purchased inputs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *8,255,743 *8,470,164 *8,665,379 *8,961,034 8,310,537 Farm origin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,523,514 *3,524,232 *3,796,908 *3,823,975 3,524,696 Feed purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1,759,857 *1,595,008 *1,576,602 *1,655,071 1,538,769 Livestock and poultry purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,420,872 1,607,341 *1,910,964 1,826,119 1,651,503 Seed purchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342,785 321,883 309,342 342,785 334,424Manufactured inputs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1,659,061 *1,592,304 *1,709,181 *1,802,462 1,640,810 Fertilizers and lime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 569,038 553,268 *567,436 *594,595 533,466 Pesticides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369,772 340,359 352,965 369,772 344,561 Petroleum fuel and oils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *482,269 *458,616 *575,637 *599,157 540,170 Electricity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237,982 240,061 213,143 238,938 222,613Other purchased inputs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *3,073,168 *3,353,628 *3,159,290 *3,334,597 3,145,031 Repair and maintenance of capital items . . . . . . . . *658,745 *688,678 *699,557 *709,197 661,541 Machine hire and custom work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *292,031 320,135 377,253 278,107 286,292 Marketing, storage, and transportation expenses . *486,415 *535,794 *503,290 *444,954 454,075 Contract labor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *122,733 142,317 159,345 198,528 162,992 Miscellaneous expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1,513,244 *1,666,704 *1,419,845 *1,703,811 1,580,131 Net government transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *525,534 1,457,530 1,147,792 1,204,667 483,107 + Direct Government payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,001,887 1,961,835 1,647,066 1,703,168 986,216 – Motor vehicle registration and licensing fees . . . . *19,331 23,940 26,784 41,760 30,619 – Property taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *457,022 480,365 472,490 456,741 472,490 Gross value added . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *6,762,861 *8,455,164 *7,391,105 *8,110,398 7,248,356 – Capital consumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1,432,091 *1,451,544 *1,477,632 *1,533,569 1,594,402 Net value added . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *5,330,770 *7,003,620 *5,913,473 *6,576,829 5,653,954 Payments to stakeholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *1,915,691 *2,046,034 *2,054,504 *2,123,736 1,995,005 Employee compensation (total hired labor) . . . . . . *720,430 827,155 761,422 821,378 807,134 Net rent received by nonoperator landlords . . . . . *343,610 *352,008 *357,743 *446,508 324,753 Real estate and nonreal estate interest . . . . . . . . . *851,651 *866,871 *935,339 *855,850 863,118 Net farm income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *3,415,079 *4,957,586 *3,858,969 *4,453,093 3,658,949
Source: Economic Research Service. USDA 1 Final sector output is the gross value of the commodities and services produced within a year. Netvalue-added is the sector's contribution to the national economy and is the sum of the income from production earned by all factors-of-production. Netfarm income is the farm operators' share of income from the sector's production activities. The concept presented is consistent with that employed bythe Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2 A positive value of inventory change represents current-year production not sold byDecember 31. A negative value is an offset to production from prior years included in current-year sales. * Revised.
11
TEXAS FARM BALANCE SHEET (EXCLUDING OPERATOR HOUSEHOLDS), DECEMBER 31, 1997-2001
Item 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Number
Farms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225,000 226,000 227,000 226,000 227,000 Million dollars Farm assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *88,437.9 *89,415.2 *92,600.1 *98,865.8 103,182.4
Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68,841.8 70,276.8 *72,608.1 *78,370.7 82,980.7
Livestock and poultry 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,059.6 7,242.3 8,002.8 8,562.3 8,002.8
Machinery and motor vehicles 2 . . . . . . . *6,382.8 *6,489.7 *6,532.5 *6,587.7 6,702.7
Crops 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,028.1 1,145.9 1,100.3 795.3 651.1
Purchased inputs 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *159.2 *163.6 *130.8 *159.1 136.9
Financial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,966.4 *4,096.8 4,225.6 4,390.9 4,708.2
Farm debt 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,140.2 11,417.4 11,742.5 *12,353.2 12,843.6
Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,256.5 5,413.6 5,786.4 *5,985.5 6,368.3
Farm Credit System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,256.5 2,313.2 2,540.8 *2,674.2 2,962.3
Farm Service Agency 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234.8 220.7 210.9 199.9 196.5
Commercial banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,175.6 1,265.4 1,387.9 *1,485.8 1,553.6
Life insurance companies . . . . . . . . . . . . 417.9 454.2 486.6 *486.3 493.5
Individuals and others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,171.7 1,160.1 1,160.1 *1,139.3 1,162.4
Nonreal estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,883.7 6,003.8 5,956.2 6,367.8 6,475.3
Farm Credit System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 606.7 595.7 550.8 691.8 791.2
Farm Service Agency 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476.1 455.9 468.2 453.4 447.5
Commercial banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,344.3 3,434.9 3,366.8 3,573.6 3,560.1
Individuals and others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,456.6 1,517.3 1,570.4 1,648.9 1,676.6
Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *77,297.7 *77,997.8 *80,857.5 *86,512.5 90,338.8 PercentRatio: Debt/equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.4 14.6 14.5 *14.3 14.2
Debt/assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.6 *12.8 12.7 *12.5 12.5
Source: Economic Research Service, USDA 1 Excludes horses, mules, and broilers. 2 Includes only farm share value for trucks and autos. 3 All non-CCCcrops held on farms plus the value above loan rate for crops held under CCC. 4 Data for the value of purchased inputs are unavailable before 1984.5 Excludes debt for nonfarm purposes. 6 Farmers Home Administration prior to 1994. * Revised.
12
LEADING STATES IN COMMODITY VALUE OF LIVESTOCK EXPORTS, FISCAL 2002, PRELIMINARY
LIVE ANIMALS AND MEATMillion dollars
HIDES AND SKINSMillion dollars
1 Nebraska 929.8 1 Nebraska 353.4
2 Kansas 748.4 2 Kansas 322.6
3 TEXAS 696.3 3 TEXAS 283.5
4 Iowa 595.1 4 Colorado 134.5
5 Colorado 285.6 5 Wisconsin 114.8
6 Illinois 273.8 6 Utah 61.9
7 Minnesota 238.4 7 Minnesota 50.8
8 Kentucky 201.7 8 California 50.0
9 Wisconsin 194.3 9 Pennsylvania 49.2
10 North Carolina 193.8 10 Iowa 49.0
ANIMAL FATSMillion dollars
POULTRY AND PRODUCTSMillion dollars
1 Nebraska 94.9 1 Georgia 263.8
2 Kansas 84.7 2 Arkansas 252.6
3 TEXAS 73.1 3 Alabama 209.7
4 Colorado 31.5 4 North Carolina 209.4
5 Wisconsin 21.2 5 Mississippi 155.6
6 Iowa 19.3 6 TEXAS 123.0
7 Illinois 14.8 7 Indiana 82.8
8 California 13.8 8 Virginia 71.2
9 Pennsylvania 12.6 9 Pennsylvania 65.0
10 Minnesota 12.3 10 Delaware 59.7
DAIRY PRODUCTSMillion dollars
1 Wisconsin 223.5
2 California 215.0
3 Minnesota 74.2
4 New York 56.6
5 Idaho 52.0
6 Pennsylvania 47.7
7 Washington 40.5
8 Iowa 33.9
9 Ohio 26.4
10 TEXAS 24.5
13
LEADING STATES IN COMMODITY VALUE OF CROP EXPORTS, FISCAL 2002, PRELIMINARYCOTTON AND LINTERS
Million dollarsCOTTONSEED AND PRODUCTS
Million dollarsPEANUTS AND PRODUCTS
Million dollars
1 TEXAS 425.7 1 TEXAS 22.6 1 Georgia 102.1
2 California 286.1 2 Mississippi 11.5 2 TEXAS 67.5 3 Mississippi 235.8 3 California 11.1 3 Alabama 29.5
4 Georgia 218.5 4 Georgia 10.0 4 North Carolina 16.3
5 Arkansas 180.4 5 Arkansas 9.3 5 Florida 15.4
6 North Carolina 164.7 6 North Carolina 7.3 6 Oklahoma 12.4
7 Louisiana 101.8 7 Louisiana 5.0 7 Virginia 9.3
8 Tennessee 96.3 8 Tennessee 4.6 8 New Mexico 4.2
9 Alabama 90.6 9 Alabama 4.1 9 South Carolina 1.5
10 Arizona 70.5 10 Missouri 3.5
FEEDS AND FODDERSMillion dollars
TREE NUTSMillion dollars
WHEAT AND PRODUCTSMillion dollars
1 Kansas 349.3 1 California 1,121.0 1 Kansas 695.1
2 TEXAS 271.1 2 Oregon 37.3 2 North Dakota 558.2
3 Nebraska 181.7 3 Georgia 18.6 3 Washington 267.0
4 Iowa 105.4 4 TEXAS 13.7 4 TEXAS 249.1 5 Minnesota 75.2 5 Hawaii 12.6 5 Oklahoma 242.2
6 Colorado 61.2 6 New Mexico 11.8 6 Minnesota 203.2
7 Illinois 56.3 7 Arizona 3.9 7 Montana 196.7
8 Missouri 55.1 8 Louisiana 3.1 8 Ohio 174.8
9 Idaho 46.2 9 Oklahoma 2.9 9 Idaho 158.0
10 South Dakota 46.1 10 Alabama 2.7 10 Colorado 147.8
RICEMillion dollars
SUNFLOWER SEEDS AND OILMillion dollars
TOTAL AGRICULTURAL EXPORTSMillion dollars
1 Arkansas 369.0 1 North Dakota 94.1 1 California 7,160.0
2 California 206.2 2 South Dakota 63.6 2 Illinois 3,310.5
3 Louisiana 103.5 3 Kansas 25.0 3 Iowa 3,217.7
4 Mississippi 57.2 4 Colorado 13.3 4 Nebraska 3,144.8
5 TEXAS 50.7 5 TEXAS 7.7 5 Kansas 3,005.6
6 Missouri 42.6 6 Nebraska 5.3 6 TEXAS 2,932.7 7 Minnesota 4.7 7 Minnesota 2,202.4
8 North Dakota 1,933.7
9 Washington 1,787.7
10 Indiana 1,696.2
FRUITS AND PREPARATIONSMillion dollars
FEED GRAINS AND PRODUCTSMillion dollars
1 California 1,725.9 1 Illinois 1,054.7
2 Florida 614.6 2 Iowa 1,049.5
3 Washington 532.8 3 Nebraska 778.7
4 Oregon 97.9 4 Indiana 569.9
5 Michigan 79.5 5 Kansas 519.5
6 New York 61.3 6 Minnesota 512.1
7 TEXAS 42.3 7 Ohio 282.0
8 Hawaii 32.4 8 TEXAS 259.8 9 Pennsylvania 31.2 9 South Dakota 250.3
10 Arizona 27.9 10 Missouri 245.6
14
TEXAS AVERAGE PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS, 1998-2003
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Marketing year average 1
BEEF CATTLE: Dollars per cwt 2
1998 65.40 63.30 63.70 64.30 64.00 62.80 60.10 58.30 56.00 58.10 59.60 58.80 61.10
1999 60.50 62.50 63.60 63.30 63.30 66.70 65.00 65.70 64.10 66.10 66.90 68.20 64.60
2000 70.50 70.70 72.30 73.70 72.20 71.00 70.20 68.70 66.00 68.20 71.90 74.90 70.70
2001 78.30 77.40 79.50 78.60 78.20 75.00 73.10 72.50 71.80 66.80 64.60 66.50 73.50
2002 68.10 72.00 71.10 69.00 65.70 64.40 65.50 64.90 65.70 64.00 67.10 70.30 67.10
2003 73.40 76.90 74.10 75.80 74.90 74.80
CALVES: Dollars per cwt
1998 89.10 94.00 95.10 94.30 88.00 81.90 76.50 76.50 75.10 75.00 79.40 81.10 84.00
1999 83.10 87.50 88.70 89.50 87.40 90.10 91.00 91.00 90.80 89.80 90.80 95.60 89.50
2000 102.00 106.00 111.00 114.00 107.00 106.00 108.00 107.00 100.00 100.00 110.00 111.00 107.00
2001 111.00 109.00 113.00 110.00 113.00 108.00 104.00 105.00 110.00 101.00 94.80 102.00 107.00
2002 101.00 104.00 102.00 98.30 94.80 91.60 93.40 93.20 91.30 93.50 92.10 93.40 95.50
2003 94.20 97.70 96.20 99.50 97.60 98.20
COWS: Dollars per cwt 3
1998 33.70 35.30 36.40 35.30 33.20 34.20 32.50 31.80 30.50 29.30 28.40 29.10 32.10
1999 31.80 33.20 33.10 33.70 34.60 35.10 36.50 34.40 32.50 31.80 30.40 32.30 33.10
2000 34.20 34.80 38.40 38.80 36.30 39.30 36.20 35.80 33.50 33.60 36.30 36.10 36.00
2001 37.50 41.90 42.70 42.20 41.60 42.00 41.20 41.70 40.60 36.20 36.60 36.50 39.80
2002 38.30 40.50 39.40 38.80 37.40 37.40 37.00 35.70 34.70 33.20 32.80 33.80 36.50
2003 35.20 37.20 37.70 38.40 38.70 38.90
STEERS AND HEIFERS: Dollars per cwt
1998 67.80 65.70 66.10 67.20 67.00 65.00 62.20 60.30 59.20 61.30 63.10 61.70 63.70
1999 62.70 65.00 66.20 66.20 66.10 69.10 67.10 68.00 68.00 69.90 70.90 71.70 67.50
2000 73.20 73.80 75.20 77.20 75.70 73.50 73.50 71.20 70.00 72.00 75.80 78.70 74.00
2001 81.40 80.50 82.70 81.80 81.80 78.30 75.50 74.80 74.30 70.60 67.70 69.80 76.60
2002 71.00 74.40 73.90 71.60 68.50 67.10 67.60 67.10 68.00 67.80 70.90 74.40 70.00
2003 77.20 79.90 77.30 79.00 78.50 78.40
MILK COWS: Dollars per head 4
1998 1,070 1,110 1,120 1,200 1,130
1999 1,280 1,280 1,310 1,430 1,330
2000 1,420 1,400 1,380 1,400 1,400
2001 1,400 1,410 1,640 1,750 1,550
2002 1,750 1,700 1,650 1,500 1,650
2003 1,360 1,350 1,380
1 The marketing year for all cattle items is January through December. 2 Cows, steers and heifers combined. 3 Beef cows and cull dairy cows sold forslaughter. 4 Cows sold for dairy herd replacement. Marketing year average price is a rounded four-quarter average.
15
TEXAS AVERAGE PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS, 1998-2003
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Marketingyear average 1
MILK (WHOLESALE): Dollars per cwt
1998 15.40 15.40 14.70 14.60 14.00 14.10 13.50 15.60 17.20 17.60 17.90 18.20 15.70
1999 17.90 15.80 15.70 12.40 13.10 13.50 14.40 15.10 16.60 16.20 15.80 13.70 15.00
2000 13.40 13.10 13.10 13.00 13.10 13.30 13.50 13.50 13.70 13.80 13.60 14.00 13.40
2001 14.20 13.80 14.70 15.20 16.00 16.90 17.10 17.60 18.20 16.80 15.60 14.30 15.80
2002 * 14.40 14.00 13.30 * 13.00 12.60 * 12.10 12.10 12.40 12.70 13.00 12.80 12.80 12.90
2003 12.80 12.00 11.70 11.80 11.50 11.40
SHEEP: Dollars per cwt
1998 46.00 45.50 47.90 41.80 32.20 33.30 34.00 30.90 32.20 28.80 32.50 41.80 37.10
1999 37.00 35.40 41.40 41.70 39.70 38.60 44.40 39.70 38.60 33.40 37.50 39.60 38.90
2000 42.40 49.10 45.40 44.50 37.30 39.30 43.70 37.50 38.10 37.70 43.00 45.00 41.10
2001 50.20 54.00 52.50 42.10 41.60 38.30 39.60 36.40 35.30 33.80 37.00 42.30 42.70
2002 38.70 38.50 39.40 33.90 35.20 32.40 33.20 33.10 31.50 32.50 39.40 43.80 35.30
2003 46.30 48.30 47.30 35.50 35.40 33.50
LAMBS: Dollars per cwt
1998 74.30 75.30 71.70 67.30 63.80 89.30 83.00 84.00 74.30 69.70 63.70 67.00 73.30
1999 67.90 67.60 71.00 67.50 84.10 82.20 77.80 83.00 78.60 73.90 76.60 81.00 76.50
2000 72.80 75.20 84.70 84.70 94.40 86.00 87.00 84.10 81.40 77.80 73.80 73.30 81.20
2001 75.70 83.50 83.30 86.90 88.50 74.70 66.90 56.90 55.50 60.60 67.90 75.20 74.80
2002 71.80 79.00 76.10 70.80 69.60 73.20 75.90 74.90 75.20 77.70 86.70 89.70 75.90
2003 96.30 94.70 101.00 91.20 95.70 97.40
WOOL: Dollars per pound
1998 .63
1999 .49
2000 .49
2001 .52
2002 .68
MOHAIR: Dollars per pound
1998 2.59
1999 3.68
2000 4.30
2001 2.20
2002 1.60
1 The marketing year for milk, sheep, lambs, wool and mohair is January through December. * Revised.
16
TEXAS AVERAGE PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS, 1998-2003
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Marketingyear average 1
ALL HOGS: Dollars per cwt
1998 32.60 31.70 30.10 31.20 36.10 36.90 30.70 29.80 27.50 23.60 25.60 23.60 30.70
1999 24.30 24.70 23.50 25.40 31.80 29.60 25.20 29.30 29.80 31.00 29.30 31.10 27.50
2000 31.90 34.10 36.40 40.50 41.30 41.20 41.30 38.70 36.60 37.60 31.10 35.20 36.60
2001 34.70 35.20 40.00 41.30 43.30 44.40 43.10 42.50 40.90 37.10 33.30 30.80 39.10
2002 33.10 33.60 32.20 28.10 30.10 30.40 30.80 26.40 21.40 25.10 24.80 27.50 28.70
2003 29.30 30.90 31.40 31.30 35.30 35.00
BROILERS: Cents per pound
1997 40.0 38.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 35.0 33.0 33.0 37.0
1998 32.0 32.0 33.0 34.0 35.0 38.0 42.0 46.0 47.0 46.0 44.0 40.0 39.0
1999 40.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 36.0 35.0 37.0 3/ 37.0
2000 34.0
2001 39.0
2002 31.0
MARKET EGGS: Cents per dozen 2
1998 57.5 49.0 59.0 46.0 35.0 46.7 46.0 54.9 49.6 57.4 64.3 65.1 53.1
1999 55.0 48.0 53.0 47.0 32.0 35.0 35.0 39.0 38.0 27.0 52.0 35.0 44.0
2000 31.0 47.0 33.0 46.0 29.0 46.0 35.0 52.0 42.0 58.0 64.0 65.0 43.1
2001 49.0 53.0 49.0 51.0 32.0 32.0 34.0 37.0 37.0 46.0 52.0 43.0 44.9
2002 47.0 34.0 51.0 36.0 33.0 48.0 41.0 44.0 41.0 38.0 62.0 56.0 43.3
2003 56.0 53.0 53.0 47.0 35.0 44.0
1 The marketing year for hogs, broilers and market eggs is December through November. 2 Mid-month prices. 3 Monthly broiler prices discontinuedDecember, 1999.
17
TEXAS AVERAGE PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS, 1998-2003
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Marketingyear average 1
CORN: Dollars per bushel
1998 2.78 2.85 2.85 2.94 2.62 2.52 2.41 2.40 2.37 2.35 2.21 2.24 2.26
1999 2.25 2.18 2.16 2.16 2.15 2.20 1.90 1.95 2.06 2.21 2.04 2.02 2.07
2000 2.06 2.12 2.24 2.49 2.36 2.33 1.63 1.67 2.09 2.19 2.19 2.25 2.18
2001 2.38 2.13 2.21 2.16 2.05 2.23 2.32 2.29 2.35 2.35 2.23 2.26 2.29
2002 2.28 2.29 2.23 2.21 2.32 2.13 2.54 2.46 2.59 2.61 2.67 2.47 2.60
2003 2.52 2.59 2.66 2.59 2.56 2.56
COTTON LINT, UPLAND: Cents per pound
1998 55.9 57.9 59.1 59.9 60.8 67.9 70.3 65.9 60.5 60.8 59.1 52.8 56.1
1999 53.4 51.6 52.5 57.2 56.3 56.6 52.4 49.4 41.6 43.3 40.0 39.7 41.0
2000 38.1 45.4 41.3 40.1 41.4 40.2 45.2 50.7 51.6 52.6 53.2 48.3 45.9
2001 45.7 34.6 34.8 40.0 37.0 36.4 36.7 33.0 31.2 27.9 27.2 28.2 28.4
2002 27.8 27.6 28.9 26.8 27.3 33.0 30.7 34.6 34.6 36.4 38.9 39.9 38.3
2003 41.2 44.3 45.4 39.5 34.6 34.2
COTTONSEED: Dollars per ton 2
1998 111.00 108.00 113.00 128.00 136.00 136.00 138.00 131.00
1999 134.00 132.00 70.00 72.00 78.00 85.00 88.00 81.00
2000 85.00 81.00 78.00 90.00 110.00 112.00 108.00 102.00
2001 107.00 109.00 79.00 86.00 89.00 96.00 99.00 92.50
2002 93.00 89.00 97.00 106.00 109.00 105.00 103.00
2003 101.00 102.00
ALL HAY: Dollars per ton 3
1998 66.00 66.00 66.00 65.00 96.00 96.00 100.00 95.00 95.00 87.00 82.00 81.00 89.00
1999 72.00 88.00 82.00 80.00 87.00 86.00 70.00 73.00 74.00 68.00 71.00 67.00 71.50
2000 66.00 70.00 66.00 70.00 81.00 86.00 76.00 78.00 83.00 73.00 73.00 67.00 76.00
2001 67.00 73.00 69.00 71.00 86.00 81.00 79.00 84.00 78.00 68.00 73.00 70.00 75.00
2002 71.00 69.00 66.00 78.00 87.00 91.00 82.00 79.00 84.00 80.00 72.00 68.00 79.50
2003 71.00 74.00 75.00 69.00 90.00 91.00 84.00
ALFALFA HAY: Dollars per ton
1998 150.00 150.00 160.00 153.00 149.00 148.00 148.00 154.00 151.00 149.00 145.00 162.00 149.00
1999 152.00 152.00 136.00 154.00 132.00 136.00 129.00 134.00 135.00 128.00 128.00 129.00 132.00
2000 126.00 130.00 127.00 126.00 124.00 134.00 128.00 132.00 150.00 150.00 151.00 150.00 136.00
2001 147.00 154.00 148.00 144.00 143.00 136.00 132.00 140.00 150.00 145.00 155.00 155.00 143.00
2002 156.00 158.00 147.00 151.00 149.00 143.00 153.00 152.00 153.00 157.00 160.00 160.00 152.00
2003 164.00 160.00 146.00 137.00 153.00 155.00 155.001 The marketing season varies by crop: corn and Upland cotton, August through July; cottonseed, August through February; all hay and alfalfa hay,May through April. Marketing year average prices do not include government program payments or allowances for unredeemed loans and purchasesby the government. 2 Cottonseed prices for missing months are not published due to small volume of sales. 3 The all hay price is the weighted averageprice of the two groups, alfalfa and other hay.
18
TEXAS AVERAGE PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS, 1998-2003
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Marketingyear average 1
OTHER HAY: Dollars per ton 2
1998 62.00 60.00 60.00 57.00 60.00 66.00 80.00 80.00 83.00 79.00 77.00 76.00 75.50
1999 68.00 83.00 79.00 74.00 71.00 68.00 52.00 58.00 62.00 60.00 66.00 63.00 62.50
2000 63.00 65.00 62.00 65.00 66.00 68.00 61.00 65.00 69.00 62.00 66.00 62.00 64.50
2001 63.00 67.00 64.00 65.00 66.00 61.00 63.00 70.00 63.00 58.00 66.00 65.00 64.00
2002 67.00 62.00 61.00 72.00 65.00 72.00 61.00 61.00 62.00 64.00 62.00 61.00 63.00
2003 62.00 63.00 64.00 58.00 58.00 62.00
OATS: Dollars per bushel
1998 1.41 1.36 1.65 1.44
1999 1.27 1.55
2000 1.50 1.52 1.60
2001 2.20
2002 1.70
PEANUTS: Cents per pound
1998 21.7 24.1 23.4 30.5 24.6
1999 20.3 26.8 22.5 20.5 19.9 20.6
2000 24.6
2001 22.6
2002 18.2
POTATOES, SPRING AND SUMMER: Dollars per cwt 3
1998 9.35 9.10 9.75 9.15 9.35
1999 8.90 8.50 8.70 8.80 8.65
2000 8.60 8.10 12.00 10.90 10.10
2001 8.70 8.80 10.60 12.10 10.30
2002 8.25 8.00 12.30 12.00 10.70
2003 11.40 10.80
SORGHUM: Dollars per cwt
1998 4.39 4.48 4.38 4.13 4.18 4.23 4.02 3.68 3.56 3.67 3.70 3.53 3.76
1999 3.56 3.38 3.71 3.51 3.24 3.11 2.85 2.86 2.85 2.96 2.86 2.85 2.93
2000 2.89 3.20 3.38 3.36 3.50 3.45 2.89 2.84 3.11 3.23 3.60 3.28 3.28
2001 3.59 3.82 3.79 3.56 3.33 3.93 3.62 3.56 3.69 3.65 3.58 3.64 3.64
2002 3.65 3.55 3.44 3.30 3.39 4.09 4.29 4.27 4.17 4.36 4.21 4.17 4.20
2003 4.05 4.10 3.87 4.06 3.88 4.00 1 The marketing season varies by crop: other hay and oats, May through April; peanuts, August through April; sorghum, June through May; springpotatoes, April through June; summer potatoes, July through September. Marketing year average prices do not include government program paymentsor allowances for unredeemed loans and purchases by the government. 2 Includes all kinds of hay except alfalfa. 3 Marketing year average price is forall potatoes.
19
TEXAS AVERAGE PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS, 1998-2003
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Marketingyear average 1
WHEAT: Dollars per bushel
1998 3.05 3.12 3.07 2.89 2.97 2.66 2.60 2.38 2.37 2.62 2.71 2.71 2.66
1999 2.72 2.56 2.47 2.39 2.43 2.35 2.18 2.36 2.36 2.22 2.25 2.03 2.28
2000 2.23 2.29 2.45 2.28 2.62 2.51 2.39 2.34 2.49 2.65 2.69 2.68 2.52
2001 2.69 2.72 2.70 2.68 2.92 2.85 2.74 2.64 2.59 2.57 2.54 2.48 2.78
2002 2.58 2.59 2.53 2.66 2.75 2.70 3.16 3.61 4.18 4.37 4.02 3.49 3.00
2003 3.25 3.21 3.09 3.02 3.05 2.92
GRAPEFRUIT: Dollars per box 2/ 3/
1998 3.05 3.56 2.80 3.13 2.88 11.63 8.04 6.54 4 3.57
1999 4.19 3.63 2.78 2.83 2.72 11.74 8.63 5.14 4 4.65
2000 4.72 3.60 3.99 2.66 2.21 5.35 4.27 3.84 2.00 4 5.16
2001 1.52 1.06 .87 .48 .19 .49 10.89 5.98 4.99 4 1.56
2002 2.38 1.95 .75 1.13 .85 .57 3.89 1.93 4 2.77
2003 1.68 1.31 1.28 1.88 1.78
ORANGES: Dollars per box 2/ 5/
1998 1.18 1.66 3.74 2.58 3.00 6.12 6.88 6.26 4 2.56
1999 6.74 8.38 3.89 5.13 5.38 9.53 7.31 5.16 4 6.51
2000 2.75 2.51 2.54 2.47 2.15 6.30 5.06 1.83 1.81 4 4.84
2001 .21 .07 .43 1.69 2.33 1.48 7.33 4.21 2.75 4 1.20
2002 1.84 2.48 3.99 4.34 3.42 4.23 1.84 4 3.34
2003 1.05 1.69 2.00 6.36 8.11
1 The marketing season varies by crop: wheat, May through April; grapefruit, October through May; oranges, October through April. Marketing yearaverage prices do not include government program payments or allowances for unredeemed loans and purchases by the government. 2 Equivalenton-tree price for all methods of sale. 3 Eighty pound box. 4 Year harvest was complete. 5 Eighty-five pound box.
20
TEXAS AVERAGE PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS, 1998-2002
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Marketingyear average 1
CARROTS FOR FRESH MARKET: Dollars per cwt
1998 18.00 19.40 20.70 20.30 22.70 24.10 20.50
1999 27.00 29.00 32.10 32.80 31.00 24.00 30.00
2000 21.00 15.80 15.80 21.20 16.10
2001 19.50 22.50 25.60 29.50 24.60 25.90
2002 20.20 21.80 23.60 25.50 22.00
HONEYDEW MELONS FOR FRESH MARKET: Dollars per cwt
1998 38.70 33.40 38.10
1999 27.80 39.00 30.30 29.10
2000 25.80 25.60 25.60
2001 47.60 28.90 28.20 34.30 37.80
2002 29.10 26.30 29.10 29.10 28.60 28.30
ONIONS FOR FRESH MARKET: Dollars per cwt
Spring:
1998 22.80 20.30 20.80 21.70
1999 17.20 17.00 18.80 17.40
2000 13.40 17.00 19.40 18.20 17.20
2001 18.10 18.10 18.60 20.00 18.50
2002 20.80 21.00 23.60 21.40
Summer:
1998 24.70 20.40 23.40
1999 22.20 21.40 22.00
2000 24.20 18.40 23.20
2001 21.00 17.80 20.20
2002 22.50 21.20 22.20
1 The marketing year varies by crop: carrots, December through June; honeydew melons, April through September; spring onions, April through July;summer onions, May through September.
21
TEXAS INDEX NUMBERS OF PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS, 1998-2003 (1990-92=100)
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Average
ALL FARM PRODUCTS
1998 96 95 95 95 95 97 95 94 91 93 93 91 94
1999 90 90 90 89 89 91 88 88 87 87 87 86 89
2000 87 90 90 91 92 90 89 90 90 92 95 96 91
2001 98 98 96 97 97 97 94 94 92 90 84 82 93
2002 85 * 87 * 87 * 85 84 * 83 86 87 87 87 89 90 86
2003 96 95 94 93 91
ALL CROPS
1998 106 108 109 108 110 113 114 108 103 104 101 98 107
1999 95 93 94 96 94 94 87 85 81 81 77 75 88
2000 76 83 81 81 84 82 80 84 88 90 92 89 84
2001 89 89 79 79 82 82 82 82 78 73 70 72 80
2002 * 72 * 87 * 70 71 * 74 * 79 81 85 83 85 85 82 79
2003 82 85 85 82 79
ALL LIVESTOCK
1998 90 88 88 88 87 88 85 86 84 87 88 87 87
1999 88 88 89 86 86 90 89 91 90 91 93 92 89
2000 93 94 95 97 95 95 94 93 91 93 97 100 95
2001 103 103 105 106 105 105 100 101 100 99 89 90 101
2002 * 92 * 97 * 96 * 92 * 89 85 89 88 89 87 92 95 91
2003 102 101 98 99 98
* Revised.
22
UNITED STATES INDEX NUMBERS OF PRICES PAID BY FARMERS,INTEREST, TAXES, WAGE RATES AND RELATED DATA, 2001 AND 2002
Indexes and ratios1910-14 = 100 1990-92 = 100
2001 2002 2001 2002PRODUCTION ITEMS Feed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530 547 109 112 Livestock and poultry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 1,419 1,306 111 102 Seed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,306 1,402 132 142 Fertilizer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 451 397 123 108 Agricultural chemicals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 745 736 * 121 119 Fuels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 915 819 * 119 106 Farm supplies and repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906 927 128 131 Autos and trucks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,141 3,082 118 116 Farm machinery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 3,601 3,848 144 153 Building materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,646 1,654 121 122 Farm services and rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,422 1,426 – – Farm services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – 121 120 Rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – 117 119
Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 2,738 2,615 * 109 104
Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,330 3,378 124 126
Wage rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,468 5,705 146 153
Production items, interest, taxes and wage rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 1,633 1,632 122 122
Family living . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,682 1,709 131 133
Commodities and services, interest, taxes and wage rates . . . . . . . . * 1,642 1,646 * 123 124
Prices received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 649 621 * 102 98
Parity ratio 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 40 38 * 83 79
Adjusted parity ratio 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 40 – –1 Ratio of prices received by farmers to the index of commodities and services, interest, taxes and wage rates. 2 Ratio of the index of prices received byfarmers, after adjustment for government payments, to the index of prices paid for commodities and services, interest, taxes and wage rates. * Revised.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PAYMENTS AS PERCENTAGE OF CASH RECEIPTS FROM MARKETINGS,INDEX OF PRICES RECEIVED, PRICES PAID, PARITY RATIO AND ADJUSTED PARITY RATIO, 1998-2002
Year
Governmentpayments as
percent of cashreceipts frommarketings
1910-14 = 100 Parity ratio 1
Prices received index Pricespaid index Actual Adjusted 3
Actual Adjusted 2
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]Percent
1998 . . . . . . 6.21 645 685 1,532 42 451999 . . . . . . * 11.47 606 * 676 1,531 40 442000 . . . . . . * 11.82 * 611 * 683 1,594 38 432001 . . . . . . * 10.21 649 * 715 * 1,642 * 40 442002 . . . . . . 6.14 621 659 1,646 38 401 Parity ratios are computed monthly by dividing the index of prices received for all farm products by the index of prices paid for Commodities andServices, Interest, Taxes and Wage Rates (both monthly indexes using a 1910-14 base). The annual parity ratio is a straight average of the twelveindividual (January through December) monthly ratios. 2 Adjusted to include government payments by multiplying column 2 by the ratio of [(100 +column 1 value)/100]. 3 The adjusted ratio includes government payments to farmers. * Revised.
23
SOUTHERN PLAINS:Farm Labor, Workers on Farms, by Quarter, 1998-2003 1
Year andmonth 2
Hired Wage rate by type of worker
Number ofworkers
Workers employed for:All hiredworkers Field Livestock Field and
livestock150 daysor more
149 daysor less
Thousands Dollars per hour
1998
January . . . . . . . . 52 44 8 7.04 6.59 6.65 6.61
April . . . . . . . . . . . 58 47 11 6.72 6.20 6.29 6.25
July . . . . . . . . . . . 63 45 18 6.32 5.98 5.98 5.98
October . . . . . . . . 53 37 16 6.77 6.14 6.58 6.28
1999
January . . . . . . . . 48 39 9 6.93 6.49 6.58 6.53
April . . . . . . . . . . . 51 37 14 7.18 6.41 6.66 6.51
July . . . . . . . . . . . 60 39 21 6.60 6.23 6.40 6.26
October . . . . . . . . 52 39 13 7.24 6.48 7.29 6.74
2000
January . . . . . . . . 44 32 12 7.52 7.06 7.10 7.08
April . . . . . . . . . . . 63 41 22 7.47 6.90 7.48 7.12
July . . . . . . . . . . . 77 51 26 7.38 6.56 7.55 6.85
October . . . . . . . . 61 49 12 7.59 6.71 7.30 6.95
2001
January . . . . . . . . 65 54 11 7.98 7.35 7.71 7.53
April . . . . . . . . . . . 77 59 18 7.86 7.10 7.71 7.33
July . . . . . . . . . . . 85 62 23 7.23 6.58 7.23 6.85
October . . . . . . . . 68 54 14 8.01 7.16 7.97 7.52
2002
January . . . . . . . . 61 54 7 8.05 7.82 7.37 7.57
April . . . . . . . . . . . 60 50 10 7.95 6.92 7.78 7.31
July . . . . . . . . . . . 74 55 19 7.53 7.06 7.23 7.14
October . . . . . . . . 58 46 12 7.57 7.05 7.32 7.18
2003
January . . . . . . . . 50 40 10 8.85 8.13 8.51 8.29
April . . . . . . . . . . . 49 38 11 8.31 7.62 7.98 7.75
1 Oklahoma and Texas. 2 Data collected for week containing the 12th of the month.
24
TEXAS RANGE AND PASTURE:First of Month Condition as Percent of Normal, May-November, 1998-2002
Year May June July August September October November Average
Percent
1998 . . . . . 60 41 30 25 40 48 56 43
1999 . . . . . 65 72 76 67 48 41 36 58
2000 . . . . . 50 51 62 44 26 26 42 43
2001 . . . . . 62 62 48 36 44 54 47 50
2002 . . . . . 46 39 43 57 54 53 60 50
25
LEADING STATES IN LIVESTOCK NUMBERS AND PRODUCTION 1
CATTLE OPERATIONSNumber
ALL CATTLE & CALVESThousand head
VALUE OF ALL CATTLE & CALVESMillion dollars
1 TEXAS 151,000 1 TEXAS 14,000 1 TEXAS 8,400 2 Missouri 68,000 2 Kansas 6,350 2 California 4,883 3 Oklahoma 60,000 3 Nebraska 6,200 3 Nebraska 4,464
4 Tennessee 51,000 4 Oklahoma 5,400 4 Kansas 4,255 5 Kentucky 46,000 5 California 5,250 5 Oklahoma 3,510
6 Wisconsin 38,000 6 Missouri 4,500 6 Wisconsin 3,267 7 Iowa 34,000 7 South Dakota 3,700 7 Missouri 2,970
7 Kansas 34,000 8 Iowa 3,600 8 South Dakota 2,923 9 Arkansas 30,000 9 Wisconsin 3,300 9 Iowa 2,628
10 Minnesota 29,000 10 Colorado 2,650 10 Colorado 2,041
ALL COWSThousand head
BEEF COWS THAT HAVE CALVEDThousand head
CALF CROPThousand head
1 TEXAS 5,800 1 TEXAS 5,489 1 TEXAS 5,000 2 California 2,420 2 Missouri 2,116 2 Missouri 2,090 3 Missouri 2,250 3 Oklahoma 2,042 3 California 2,040
4 Oklahoma 2,130 4 Nebraska 1,934 4 Oklahoma 1,930 5 Nebraska 2,000 5 South Dakota 1,686 5 South Dakota 1,840
6 South Dakota 1,780 6 Kansas 1,525 6 Nebraska 1,820 7 Kansas 1,630 7 Montana 1,402 7 Kansas 1,510
8 Wisconsin 1,500 8 Kentucky 1,120 8 Montana 1,490 9 Montana 1,420 9 Tennessee 1,106 9 Wisconsin 1,350
10 Kentucky 1,240 10 Iowa 992 10 Iowa 1,110 10 Kentucky 1,110
CATTLE ON FEED IN LOTS WITH1,000+ HEAD CAPACITY
FED CATTLE MARKETEDThousand head
STEERS 500 POUNDS AND OVERThousand head
1 TEXAS 2,630,000 1 TEXAS 5,980 1 TEXAS 2,750 2 Kansas 2,200,000 2 Kansas 5,495 2 Nebraska 2,000
2 Nebraska 2,140,000 3 Nebraska 4,610 3 Kansas 1,970 4 Colorado 1,020,000 4 Colorado 2,470 4 Oklahoma 1,230
5 California 490,000 5 Oklahoma 770 5 Iowa 1,040 6 Iowa 355,000 6 Idaho 728 6 Colorado 870
7 Oklahoma 330,000 7 Iowa 712 7 South Dakota 730 8 Idaho 295,000 8 California 671 8 California 615
9 Arizona 289,000 9 Washington 508 9 Missouri 485 10 South Dakota 205,000 10 South Dakota 422 10 Minnesota 470
ALL HEIFERS 500 POUNDS AND OVERThousand head
ALL SHEEP & LAMBSThousand head
WOOL PRODUCTIONThousand pounds
1 TEXAS 2,580 1 TEXAS 1,050 1 TEXAS 5,530 2 Kansas 1,920 2 California 790 2 Wyoming 3,750
3 Nebraska 1,690 3 Wyoming 460 3 California 3,650 4 California 1,090 4 South Dakota 380 4 South Dakota 3,105
5 Oklahoma 910 5 Colorado 370 5 Colorado 3,070 6 Iowa 830 6 Utah 320 6 Montana 2,691
7 Colorado 790 7 Montana 300 7 Utah 2,650 7 South Dakota 790 8 Idaho 260 8 Idaho 2,115
7 Wisconsin 790 9 Iowa 250 9 New Mexico 1,750 10 Missouri 680 10 Oregon 235 10 Iowa 1,300
1 All rankings are based on end-of-year 2002 or January 1, 2003 data.
26
LEADING STATES IN LIVESTOCK NUMBERS AND PRODUCTION 1
MOHAIR PRODUCTIONThousand pounds
ALL GOATSThousand head
ANGORA GOATSThousand head
1 TEXAS 1,896 1 TEXAS 1,200 1 TEXAS 260 2 Arizona 140 2 Arizona 30 3 New Mexico 70 3 New Mexico 15
VALUE OF ALL GOATSThousand dollars
VALUE OF ANGORA GOATSThousand dollars
1 TEXAS 109,200 1 TEXAS 14,300 2 Arizona 1,800 3 New Mexico 900
LOWFAT ICE CREAM MIXThousand gallons
VALUE OF ALL SHEEP AND LAMBSThousand dollars
MARKET SHEEP AND LAMBSThousand head
1 TEXAS 24,201 1 California 85,320 1 California 435
2 Indiana 16,251 2 TEXAS 82,950 2 TEXAS 200 3 Illinois 15,483 3 Wyoming 41,860 3 Colorado 185
4 California 15,245 4 South Dakota 36,860 4 Wyoming 100
5 Ohio 9,780 5 Colorado 35,150 5 Iowa 80
6 Missouri 9,236 6 Utah 32,640 6 Oregon 78
7 Pennsylvania 7,840 7 Iowa 31,500 7 Arizona 66
8 Michigan 5,728 8 Montana 29,400 8 South Dakota 65
9 Missouri 3,860 9 Idaho 25,740 9 Minnesota 40
10 New York 3,044 10 Oregon 21,855 9 New Mexico 40
CATTLE SLAUGHTEREDThousand head
SHEEP AND LAMBS SLAUGHTEREDThousand head
TOTAL REGULAR ICE CREAMThousand gallons
1 Nebraska 7,862 1 Colorado 1,148 1 California 131,526
2 Kansas 7,405 2 Iowa 473 2 Indiana 79,324
3 TEXAS 6,474 3 TEXAS 337 3 Pennsylvania 55,995
4 Colorado 2,596 4 Illinois 205 4 TEXAS 53,098 5 Wisconsin 1,665 5 Michigan 197 5 Minnesota 46,136
6 California 1,294 6 New Jersey 114 6 Ohio 37,127
7 Pennsylvania 1,041 7 Pennsylvania 70 7 New York 36,441
8 Illinois 942 8 New York 38 8 North Carolina 32,703
9 Washington 853 9 Indiana 36 9 Michigan 27,218
10 Idaho 828 10 Utah 32 10 Florida 24,803
RED MEAT PRODUCTIONMillion pounds
ICE CREAM MIX, REGULARThousand gallons
MILK SHERBET MIXThousand gallons
1 Nebraska 7,599 1 California 64,681 1 California 4,980
2 Iowa 6,225 2 Pennsylvania 42,587 2 Ohio 2,215
3 Kansas 5,883 3 Indiana 36,469 3 New York 1,834
4 TEXAS 4,880 4 Massachusetts 34,866 4 Pennsylvania 1,701
5 Illinois 2,626 5 TEXAS 30,848 5 Indiana 1,632
6 Minnesota 2,275 6 Minnesota 25,170 6 TEXAS 1,107 7 Colorado 2,185 7 Illinois 22,274 7 Illinois 1,066
8 North Carolina 2,062 8 New York 20,206 8 North Carolina 973
9 Indiana 1,383 9 North Carolina 17,265 9 Utah 860
10 Wisconsin 1,353 10 Ohio 17,183 10 Massachusetts 8301 All rankings are based on end-of-year 2002 or January 1, 2003 data.
27
LEADING STATES IN LIVESTOCK NUMBERS AND PRODUCTION 1
BROILERS PRODUCEDMillion head
TOTAL LIVESTOCK SLAUGHTERINGESTABLISHMENTS - Number
MILK COWS THAT HAVE CALVEDThousand head
1 Georgia 1,291 1 Pennsylvania 331 1 California 1,680 2 Arkansas 1,186 2 Iowa 171 2 Wisconsin 1,265 3 Alabama 1,051 3 Ohio 160 3 New York 680 4 Mississippi 770 4 Montana 157 4 Pennsylvania 590 5 North Carolina 735 5 Missouri 149 5 Minnesota 480 6 TEXAS 588 6 TEXAS 144 6 Idaho 390 7 Maryland 293 7 Minnesota 140 7 TEXAS 311 8 Kentucky 270 8 Illinois 118 8 New Mexico 310 9 Virginia 266 9 Wisconsin 117 9 Michigan 301 10 Delaware 257 10 Kansas 104 10 Ohio 260
TOTAL EGG PRODUCTIONMillion eggs
HENS & PULLETS OF LAYING AGEThousand head
CALVES SLAUGHTEREDThousand head
1 Iowa 9,910 1 Iowa 37,749 1 Pennsylvania 190 2 Ohio 7,940 2 Ohio 30,995 2 New York 169 3 Pennsylvania 6,520 3 Pennsylvania 24,180 3 Wisconsin 148 4 California 6,124 4 Indiana 23,018 4 California 121 5 Indiana 5,973 5 California 22,542 5 New Jersey 116 6 Georgia 4,961 6 Georgia 20,069 6 Illinois 104 7 TEXAS 4,774 7 TEXAS 18,775 7 Michigan 41 8 Arkansas 3,329 8 Arkansas 14,312 8 Indiana 29 9 Minnesota 3,124 9 Nebraska 11,468 9 Ohio 23 10 Nebraska 2,977 10 Minnesota 11,460 10 TEXAS 21
MILK PRODUCTIONMillion pounds
CREAMED COTTAGE CHEESEThousand pounds
MILK COW OPERATIONSNumber
1 California 34,884 1 New York 60,528 1 Wisconsin 17,800 2 Wisconsin 22,074 2 Illinois 32,532 2 Pennsylvania 9,900 3 New York 12,217 3 California 31,086 3 Minnesota 7,200 4 Pennsylvania 10,775 4 Ohio 19,600 4 New York 7,100 5 Minnesota 8,458 5 Iowa 18,139 5 Ohio 5,100 6 Idaho 8,155 6 Kentucky 15,380 6 Missouri 3,500 7 New Mexico 6,316 7 TEXAS 15,094 7 Iowa 3,200 8 Michigan 5,945 8 Indiana 14,930 7 Michigan 3,200 9 Washington 5,620 9 Pennsylvania 13,344 9 Indiana 2,600 10 TEXAS 5,300 10 Missouri 10,700 10 Kentucky 2,500
12 TEXAS 1,900
ALL HOGS AND PIGSThousand head
HOGS SLAUGHTEREDThousand head
1 Iowa 15,300 1 Iowa 28,832 2 North Carolina 9,600 2 North Carolina 10,224 3 Minnesota 5,900 3 Illinois 9,216 4 Illinois 4,050 4 Minnesota 8,843 5 Indiana 3,150 5 Indiana 6,953 6 Missouri 2,950 6 Nebraska 6,945 7 Nebraska 2,900 7 Oklahoma 4,546 8 Oklahoma 2,490 8 South Dakota 4,306 9 Kansas 1,530 9 Virginia 4,124 10 Ohio 1,440 10 Pennsylvania 2,628 12 TEXAS 930 17 TEXAS 430
1 All rankings are based on end-of-year 2002 or January 1, 2003 data.
28
TEXAS NUMBER OF LIVESTOCK OPERATIONS BY SPECIES, 1998-2002
Year Cattle Beef cows Milk cows Hogs Sheep
Number
1998 . . . . . . . . . . 147,000 131,000 3,200 5,000 7,000
1999 . . . . . . . . . . 153,000 135,000 2,800 4,600 7,000
2000 . . . . . . . . . . 152,000 133,000 2,500 4,300 6,800
2001 . . . . . . . . . . 151,000 133,000 2,100 4,000 6,800
2002 . . . . . . . . . . 151,000 133,000 1,900 3,800 6,800
TEXAS CATTLE OPERATIONS AND INVENTORY, BY SIZE GROUPS, 1998-2002
Year
Operations 1 having: Percent of inventory on operations having:
1-49head
50-99head
100-499head
500-999head
1,000+head
1-49head
50-99head
100-499head
500-999head
1,000+head
1,000 Percent
1998 . . . . . . . 96.0 24.0 23.0 2.6 1.4 12.0 11.0 31.0 12.0 34.0
1999 . . . . . . . 103.0 22.0 24.0 2.7 1.3 13.0 11.0 30.0 12.0 34.0
2000 . . . . . . . 101.0 24.0 23.0 2.6 1.4 12.0 12.0 29.0 12.0 35.0
2001 . . . . . . . * 103.0 22.0 * 22.3 2.4 1.3 12.0 11.0 30.0 11.0 36.0
2002 . . . . . . . 103.0 22.0 22.3 2.3 1.4 13.0 11.0 29.0 11.0 36.01 An operation is any place having one or more head of cattle on hand during the year. Percents reflect average distributions based primarily onbeginning-of-year and mid-year surveys. * Revised.
TEXAS BEEF COW OPERATIONS AND INVENTORY, BY SIZE GROUPS, 1998-2002
Year
Operations 1 having: Percent of inventory on operations having:
1-49head
50-99head
100-499head
500+head
1-49head
50-99head
100-499head
500+head
1,000 Percent
1998 . . . . . . . . . 103.0 15.8 11.3 0.9 29.0 18.0 37.0 16.0
1999 . . . . . . . . . 106.0 16.5 11.6 0.9 29.0 19.0 37.0 15.0
2000 . . . . . . . . . 104.0 17.0 11.1 0.9 29.0 20.0 35.0 16.0
2001 . . . . . . . . . 104.0 17.0 11.1 0.9 29.0 20.0 35.0 16.0
2002 . . . . . . . . . 104.0 17.0 11.1 0.9 29.0 20.0 37.0 14.01 An operation is any place having one or more beef cows on hand during the year. Percents reflect average distributions based primarily on beginning-of-year and mid-year surveys.
29
TEXAS CATTLE AND CALVES: Inventory, Calf Crop and Disposition, 1998-2003 1
Year On handJanuary 1
Calfcrop
Calf crop as percent
of cows on hand
January 1
Inshipments
Marketings 2 Farmslaughterof cattle
and calves 3
Deaths
Cattle Calves Cattle Calves
1,000 head Percent 1,000 head
1998 . . . . 14,500 5,250 89 3,250 8,250 105 15 270 260
1999 . . . . 14,100 5,150 89 3,470 8,200 110 15 255 240
2000 . . . . 13,900 5,100 88 3,690 8,325 125 15 290 235
2001 . . . . 13,700 5,050 88 3,420 7,935 120 15 265 235
2002 . . . . 13,600 5,000 86 3,350 7,285 130 15 290 230
2003 . . . . 14,0001 Balance sheet estimates. Total of marketings, farm slaughter, deaths and on hand end-of-year equals total of calf crop, inshipments and on handbeginning-of-year. 2 Includes custom slaughter for use on farms where produced and state outshipments, but excludes interfarm sales within the state.3 Excludes custom slaughter for farmers at commercial establishments.
TEXAS CATTLE AND CALVES: Number by Classes, January 1, 1999-2003
Year
Cows and heifersthat have calved
Heifers 500 poundsand over
Steers, bullsand heifers
Total
Value
Beefcows
Milkcows
Allcows
Replacements
OtherSteers 500 lbs.and over
Bulls 500 lbs.and over
Steers,heifers& bullsunder
500 lbs.
Averageper
headTotal
Beef cow
Milk cow
1,000 head Dollars 1,000 dollars
1999 5,530 340 5,870 820 110 1,660 2,590 380 2,670 14,100 500.00 7,050,000
2000 5,430 350 5,780 760 90 1,630 2,580 380 2,680 13,900 560.00 7,784,000
2001 5,465 345 5,810 720 100 1,630 2,430 370 2,640 13,700 610.00 8,357,000
2002 5,440 310 5,750 750 100 1,650 2,540 370 2,440 13,600 610.00 8,296,000
2003 5,489 311 5,800 760 110 1,710 2,750 370 2,500 14,000 600.00 8,400,000
TEXAS CATTLE AND CALVES: Production and Income, 1998-2002
Year Production 1 Marketings 2Price per 100 pounds Cash
receipts 3Value of homeconsumption
GrossincomeCattle Calves
1,000 pounds Dollars 1,000 dollars
1998 . . . . . 7,442,737 9,436,100 61.10 84.00 5,775,190 13,338 5,788,528
1999 . . . . . 7,416,721 9,463,125 64.60 89.50 6,124,290 14,383 6,138,673
2000 . . . . . 7,469,430 9,613,250 70.70 107.00 6,815,081 16,821 6,831,902
2001 . . . . . 7,734,268 9,244,750 73.50 107.00 6,812,228 17,556 6,829,784
2002 . . . . . 7,183,427 8,713,500 67.10 95.50 5,862,734 15,688 5,878,4221 Adjustments made for inshipments and changes in inventory. 2 Excludes custom slaughter for use on farms where produced and interfarm sales withinthe state. 3 Includes receipts from marketings and sale of farm slaughter.
30
TEXAS FEEDER CATTLE SUPPLY: Inventory January 1, 1999-2003Item 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
1,000 headTotal calves, steers and heifers 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,920 6,890 6,700 6,630 6,960
Calves, steers and heifers in feedlots 2 . . . . . . . . 2,719 2,899 2,929 2,877 2,629
Total feeder supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,201 3,991 3,771 3,753 4,3311 Excludes heifers for cow replacement. 2 In lots with 1,000+ head capacity.
TEXAS CATTLE ON FEED: Inventory January 1 and Annual Marketings, by Districts, 2001-2003 1
DistrictCattle on feed inventory - January 1 Annual fed cattle marketings
2002 2003 2001 2002
1,000 headDistrict 1-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,341 2,193 4,949 4,952
District 1-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 185 436 454
District 2-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 59 123 131
District 2-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 29 94 78
District 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 22 49 44
District 8-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 38 78 77
District 10-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 54 124 119
Other Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 50 177 125
STATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,880 2,630 6,030 5,9801 Districts 3, 4, 5-N, 5-S, 6, 8-S, 9 and 10-S combined into “Other Districts” to avoid disclosing individual operations.
TEXAS NUMBER OF CATTLE FEEDLOTSAND NUMBER OF GRAIN-FED CATTLE MARKETED, BY SIZE GROUPS, 1998-2002 1
Feedlot capacity (head) 1998 1999 2000 2001 20021,000–1,999 Feedlots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number 7 6 6 6 6 Grain-fed cattle marketed . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 10 10 8 8 102,000–3,999 Feedlots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number 6 7 6 6 5 Grain-fed cattle marketed . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 20 20 17 22 154,000–7,999 Feedlots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number 19 17 15 14 15 Grain-fed cattle marketed . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 140 140 125 90 858,000–15,999 Feedlots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number 27 27 29 27 26 Grain-fed cattle marketed . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 420 385 470 450 39016,000–31,999 Feedlots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number 36 36 32 36 35 Grain-fed cattle marketed . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 1,270 1,170 1,160 1,160 1,18032,000 and Over Feedlots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number 47 49 49 49 49 Grain-fed cattle marketed . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 4,200 4,340 4,410 4,300 4,300TOTAL Feedlots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number 142 142 137 138 136 Grain-fed cattle marketed . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 6,060 6,065 6,190 6,030 5,9801 Number of feedlots with 1,000 head or more capacity is number of lots operating any time during year.
31
1 dot = 10,000 headDots indicate inventory without respect
to geographic location within the county.
TEXAS ALL CATTLE AND CALVESJanuary 1, 2003
TEN LEADING COUNTIES: JANUARY 1, 2003 INVENTORY
All Cattle and Calves All Beef Cows All Milk Cows
Rank County Number Percentof state Rank County Number Percent
of state Rank County Number Percentof state
1,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 head
1 Deaf Smith 619 4.4 1 Gonzales 79 1.4 1 Erath 63.0 20.3
2 Parmer 327 2.3 1 Lavaca 79 1.4 2 Hopkins 31.9 10.3
3 Castro 284 2.0 3 Fayette 75 1.4 3 Comanche 23.9 7.7
4 Hansford 244 1.7 4 De Witt 65 1.2 4 Lamb 11.5 3.7
5 Hartley 208 1.5 5 Leon 60 1.1 5 Tom Green 11.1 3.6
5 Erath 208 1.5 6 Lee 58 1.1 6 El Paso 11.0 3.5
7 Swisher 193 1.4 7 Austin 56 1.0 7 Archer 10.1 3.2
8 Dallam 188 1.3 8 Brazoria 55 1.0 7 Wood 10.1 3.2
9 Moore 166 1.2 8 Colorado 55 1.0 9 Hamilton 8.2 2.6
10 Randall 163 1.2 10 Houston 53 1.0 10 Van Zandt 7.9 2.5
10 Gonzales 163 1.2
32
1 dot = 5,000 headDots indicate inventory without respect
to geographic location within the county.
1 dot = 500 headDots indicate inventory without respect
to geographic location within the county.
TEXAS BEEF COWS THAT HAVE CALVEDJanuary 1, 2003
TEXAS MILK COWS THAT HAVE CALVEDJanuary 1, 2003
33
TEXAS CATTLE: Inventory and Milk Production
Districtand county
January 1 InventoryMilk
productionAll cattleand calves 1
Beef cows Milk cows
2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2 20021,000 head Million pounds
Armstrong 31 37 5 10Briscoe 14 15 6 9Carson 54 52 18 14Castro 291 284 9 12 2.0 2.0 33.4 34.3Dallam 210 188 15 16 * *Deaf Smith 670 619 20 16 1.9 5.8 31.1 113.5Floyd 68 79 10 10Gray 66 77 4 11 * *Hale 83 84 8 7 * *Hansford 245 244 6 5Hartley 200 208 10 9 *Hemphill 73 82 23 17Hutchinson 23 27 7 10Lipscomb 37 45 9 14 *Moore 174 166 8 15Ochiltree 111 117 13 12Oldham 70 80 20 17Parmer 360 327 7 9 * 2.8 28.7Potter 30 55 3 7Randall 170 163 12 17 0.9 * 14.5Roberts 27 29 10 12Sherman 151 152 7 4Swisher 183 193 15 17Other Counties 6.1 10.4 100.0 153.5DISTRICT 1-N 3,341 3,323 245 270 10.9 21.0 179.0 330.0
Andrews 16 13 7 6Bailey 106 90 4 4 3.1 4.4 52.1 104.9Cochran 27 4 4 3Crosby 12 13 8 6Dawson 6 6 4 4Gaines 44 44 7 6Glasscock 9 9 7 5Hockley 34 37 6 4Howard 13 13 7 7 * *Lamb 85 97 5 9 11.0 11.5 180.5 238.7Lubbock 51 52 7 11Lynn 8 8 3 5Martin 10 10 7 6Midland 18 17 11 10 *Terry 6 7 3 4Yoakum 8 15 6 10Other Counties 0.5 0.1 7.4 0.4DISTRICT 1-S 453 435 96 100 14.6 16.0 240.0 344.0
Borden 13 13 7 8Childress 14 15 10 8Collingsworth 36 37 17 17Cottle 27 28 21 18Dickens 20 23 16 14Donley 77 73 27 26Foard 15 16 7 8 * *Garza 14 15 9 9Hall 16 17 10 9Hardeman 27 26 10 12 * *Kent 23 23 17 17King 20 24 11 16Motley 22 23 19 15Wheeler 99 86 30 24Wichita 37 38 20 17 * *
34
TEXAS CATTLE: Inventory and Milk Production
Districtand county
January 1 InventoryMilk
productionAll cattleand calves 1
Beef cows Milk cows
2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2 20021,000 head Million pounds
Wilbarger 50 52 24 26Other Counties 1.1 12.0DISTRICT 2-N 510 509 255 244 * 1.1 12.0
Baylor 53 55 5 10Coleman 56 55 33 33 *Fisher 30 30 15 13 * *Haskell 26 30 14 11Jones 48 52 12 16 *Knox 60 59 14 12Mitchell 21 18 13 9Nolan 22 21 18 14 * *Runnels 38 44 10 14 1.7 2.1 29.0 28.1Scurry 25 25 4 8 * *Stonewall 26 25 16 14Taylor 59 45 15 26 * *Other Counties 3.8 4.9 62.0 63.9DISTRICT 2-S 464 459 169 180 5.5 7.0 91.0 92.0
Archer 77 81 7 22 13.8 10.1 228.2 232.0Brown 61 62 27 28 3.6 3.3 60.0 63.5Callahan 57 65 27 39Clay 97 97 30 36 2.7 1.9 44.6 45.3Comanche 115 117 34 38 28.3 23.9 467.0 448.0Eastland 57 61 40 35 0.5 * 8.1Erath 194 208 16 29 82.3 63.0 1,362.0 1,325.0Hood 32 40 17 16 * *Jack 53 55 25 26 * *Mills 45 46 17 20 * *Montague 86 80 30 35 0.8 0.8 13.4 11.6Palo Pinto 44 45 28 24 * *Parker 81 86 22 29 3.5 3.7 57.0 58.8Shackelford 40 41 15 16 * *Somervell 6 7 4 4 *Stephens 27 30 19 16Throckmorton 41 39 17 18Wise 83 80 37 42 2.2 2.3 36.8 36.4Young 55 56 18 19 * *Other Counties 3.3 4.0 52.9 67.4DISTRICT 3 1,251 1,296 430 492 141.0 113.0 2,330.0 2,288.0
Bell 47 51 33 29 * *Bosque 56 58 30 31 * *Collin 37 41 23 20 * 0.7 4.7Cooke 83 89 43 40 2.7 3.1 44.0 44.8Coryell 68 71 36 32Dallas 17 20 11 12Delta 17 19 12 10 * *Denton 55 57 41 32 * *Ellis 55 56 22 27 * *Falls 89 104 40 43 * *Fannin 68 67 25 34 * *Grayson 65 69 36 36 0.8 1.1 14.0 10.6Hamilton 68 69 22 26 8.8 8.2 146.0 151.3Hill 64 63 27 32 3.0 3.0 48.8 50.5Hunt 55 58 36 34 * 0.8 3.9Johnson 73 81 20 34 7.5 7.5 124.0 99.8Kaufman 82 85 39 34 * *Lamar 88 90 50 48 1.3 1.6 21.6 24.3Limestone 81 91 55 45McLennan 87 93 36 35 2.9 4.9 47.0 47.6Milam 96 105 62 51
35
TEXAS CATTLE: Inventory and Milk Production
Districtand county
January 1 InventoryMilk
productionAll cattleand calves 1
Beef cows Milk cows
2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2 20021,000 head Million pounds
Navarro 86 89 51 48 * *Rockwall 8 8 4 5Tarrant 31 31 12 16 * *Williamson 65 69 24 28 * *Other Counties 4.3 6.5 68.6 61.5DISTRICT 4 1,541 1,634 790 782 31.3 37.4 514.0 499.0
Anderson 83 86 49 51 * 0.5 7.0Bowie 65 66 25 33 2.0 1.6 32.7 35.7Camp 18 26 12 17 0.9 0.6 15.3 8.6Cass 31 33 23 22 * *Cherokee 84 82 32 42 4.0 4.5 65.9 56.7Franklin 43 42 15 19 4.4 3.5 72.8 72.3Gregg 11 11 6 7Harrison 46 46 32 28Henderson 89 89 41 45 1.0 1.9 15.9 17.2Hopkins 149 150 30 48 31.9 31.9 524.4 522.7Houston 99 99 66 53Marion 7 7 5 4Morris 16 23 12 16 * *Nacogdoches 58 60 36 38 0.7 1.5 12.1 12.3Panola 46 46 28 29 * *Rains 24 24 13 13 2.1 1.6 35.1 32.0Red River 75 78 45 46 * *Rusk 55 57 35 33 * *Shelby 47 47 30 31 *Smith 61 61 39 36 * *Titus 40 40 25 26 * *Upshur 51 53 19 26 3.5 2.6 58.4 64.6Van Zandt 107 105 41 50 6.3 7.9 104.7 105.8Wood 65 69 26 27 8.7 10.1 143.4 138.0Other Counties 2.0 2.8 30.3 20.1DISTRICT 5-N 1,370 1,400 685 740 67.5 71.0 1,111.0 1,093.0
Angelina 25 27 19 17Brazos 49 52 36 32 * *Freestone 83 86 59 49Grimes 82 88 45 45 0.6 0.6 10.4 6.8Hardin 7 7 6 5Jasper 13 18 11 11Leon 91 93 61 60Madison 46 48 40 32Montgomery 23 27 17 19Newton 5 5 3 4Polk 20 20 14 14Robertson 81 88 66 52 * *Sabine 6 6 3 3San Augustine 12 12 8 9San Jacinto 15 16 10 10 *Trinity 23 23 15 15Tyler 14 14 10 10Walker 30 33 16 22Waller 45 47 36 31 * *Other Counties 0.9 1.4 12.6 13.2DISTRICT 5-S 670 710 475 440 1.5 2.0 23.0 20.0
Brewster 30 28 18 20Crane 9 8 6 6Culberson 15 27 7 8Ector 9 9 7 7El Paso 30 34 1 4 15.4 11.0 253.9 241.6Hudspeth 28 28 13 14 * *
36
TEXAS CATTLE: Inventory and Milk Production
Districtand county
January 1 InventoryMilk
productionAll cattleand calves 1
Beef cows Milk cows
2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2 20021,000 head Million pounds
Jeff Davis 28 29 12 13Loving 2 2 1 1Pecos 39 40 11 16 * *Presidio 31 30 17 15Reeves 32 32 2 5 2.9 3.0 47.6 64.7Terrell 9 10 4 5Ward 5 5 3 2Winkler 8 8 3 6Other Counties 0.3 0.5 4.5 3.7DISTRICT 6 275 290 105 122 18.6 14.5 306.0 310.0
Bandera 12 13 9 8Blanco 22 22 15 14Burnet 41 42 29 27Coke 17 17 9 9Concho 22 24 16 13Crockett 21 23 15 13Edwards 15 17 12 11Gillespie 46 49 34 30 * *Irion 12 13 10 7Kendall 18 18 13 12Kerr 19 20 15 12Kimble 18 19 14 13Kinney 15 15 8 9Lampasas 36 43 23 23 * *Llano 40 42 27 22McCulloch 31 35 23 20 * *Mason 40 42 29 24Menard 15 15 11 9Reagan 9 10 6 6Real 7 8 6 5San Saba 59 62 26 26Schleicher 20 20 15 13Sterling 19 18 11 10Sutton 18 19 14 12Tom Green 59 58 13 14 6.7 11.1 111.3 121.2Upton 7 7 5 4Uvalde 58 61 21 16Val Verde 17 20 6 8Other Counties 0.5 0.9 7.7 7.8DISTRICT 7 713 752 435 390 7.2 12.0 119.0 129.0
Austin 85 90 60 56Bastrop 83 86 53 50Bee 50 53 32 32Bexar 57 63 36 32 * *Burleson 74 79 45 46 * *Caldwell 44 48 30 26Colorado 83 86 58 55 * *Comal 14 15 10 10De Witt 88 100 62 65 * 0.5 6.3Fayette 122 125 86 75 1.0 1.2 15.7 17.7Goliad 51 52 35 33Gonzales 154 163 72 79 * *Guadalupe 50 54 33 30 0.6 0.5 9.3 10.0Hays 24 25 16 11Karnes 64 68 47 43 * *Lavaca 110 119 82 79 0.6 1.1 10.2 11.3Lee 87 92 61 58Medina 59 72 26 33 * *Travis 54 56 21 19 *
37
TEXAS CATTLE: Inventory and Milk Production
Districtand county
January 1 InventoryMilk
productionAll cattleand calves 1
Beef cows Milk cows
2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2 20021,000 head Million pounds
Washington 82 84 53 41 0.7 1.1 10.7 11.0Wilson 83 93 46 44 2.3 3.7 37.7 39.4Other Counties 1.5 1.9 24.4 15.3DISTRICT 8-N 1,518 1,623 964 917 6.7 10.0 108.0 111.0
Aransas 1 3 1 2Kleberg 94 89 38 28Nueces 13 14 5 8 * *Refugio 30 38 25 23San Patricio 24 26 8 9 * *DISTRICT 8-S 162 170 77 70 * *
Brazoria 77 80 64 55Calhoun 18 19 14 12Chambers 24 27 22 19Fort Bend 55 59 40 40Galveston 13 15 8 9Harris 54 60 33 38 * 0.8 8.0Jackson 46 48 36 32Jefferson 42 42 36 31Liberty 36 41 27 27Matagorda 64 66 52 46Orange 9 10 7 7Victoria 58 63 40 41Wharton 64 70 46 43DISTRICT 9 560 600 425 400 * 0.8 8.0
Atascosa 84 84 29 34 0.8 0.9 13.7 13.3Brooks 40 43 6 16Dimmit 25 34 7 11Duval 44 43 27 28 * *Frio 72 72 10 18 *Jim Hogg 26 25 19 15Jim Wells 45 49 14 28 2.7 3.5 43.9 42.6Kenedy 47 44 21 25La Salle 33 39 14 15Live Oak 45 44 22 26McMullen 27 27 13 16Maverick 37 38 11 5Webb 78 78 43 40Zapata 21 22 13 15Zavala 38 42 9 8Other Counties 0.3 0.3 4.4 2.1DISTRICT 10-N 662 684 258 300 3.8 4.7 62.0 58.0
Cameron 14 13 3 6Hidalgo 30 30 6 10 * *Starr 57 56 18 16Willacy 9 16 4 10DISTRICT 10-S 110 115 31 42 * *
Other Districts 1.4 0.5 23.0 6.0
STATE 13,600 14,000 5,440 5,489 310.0 311.0 5,106.0 5,300.0
1 Includes cattle on feed. 2 Revised. * Milk cows and milk production are not published for counties and districts with less than 500 milk cows or withless than three producers, but their estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
38
TEXAS MILK PRODUCTION: Number of Milk Cows,Total Milk Production and Production Per Cow, by Months, 1998-2002
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annual
MILK COWS: 1,000 head 1 2
1998 368 365 362 359 356 353 350 347 344 342 341 340 352
1999 340 341 342 342 345 346 346 346 346 346 348 348 345
2000 350 350 350 350 350 350 349 348 346 345 345 344 348
2001 341 338 335 332 329 326 324 322 318 315 312 310 325
2002 310 310 309 309 309 307 307 308 310 310 310 311 309
MILK PRODUCTION: Million pounds 3
1998 493 471 534 535 527 466 425 415 394 431 438 476 5,605
1999 503 488 556 528 523 460 424 379 389 434 449 485 5,618
2000 530 518 579 543 539 474 431 412 396 440 423 451 5,736
2001 465 434 489 476 477 427 * 392 * 369 356 * 392 398 * 431 *5,106
2002 462 434 496 490 485 539 416 397 389 419 417 456 5,300
MILK PRODUCTION PER COW: Pounds 3
1998 1,340 1,290 1,475 1,490 1,480 1,320 1,215 1,195 1,145 1,260 1,285 1,400 15,923
1999 1,480 1,430 1,625 1,545 1,515 1,330 1,225 1,095 1,125 1,255 1,290 1,395 16,284
2000 1,515 1,480 1,655 1,550 1,540 1,355 1,235 1,185 1,145 1,275 1,225 1,310 16,483
2001 1,365 1,285 1,460 1,435 1,450 1,310 *1,210 *1,145 1,120 *1,245 1,275 *1,390 *15,711
2002 1,490 1,400 1,605 1,585 1,570 1,430 1,355 1,290 1,255 1,350 1,345 1,465 17,152
1 Includes dry cows; excludes heifers not yet fresh. 2 Annual average is simple average of months. 3 Excludes milk sucked by calves. * Revised.
39
TEXAS MILK COWS:Inventory and Value; Replacement Heifers Inventory, January 1, 1999-2003
YearMilk cows that have calved Heifers 500 pounds
and over beingkept for milk cow
replacementNumber Average value Total value
1,000 head Dollars 1,000 dollars 1,000 head
1999 . . . . . . . . . 340 1,280 435,200 110
2000 . . . . . . . . . 350 1,420 497,000 90
2001 . . . . . . . . . 345 1,400 483,000 100
2002 . . . . . . . . . 310 1,550 480,500 100
2003 . . . . . . . . . 311 1,650 513,150 110
TEXAS MILK COW OPERATIONS AND INVENTORY, BY SIZE GROUPS, 1998-2002
Year
Operations 1 having: Percent of inventory on operations having:
1-29head
30-49head
50-99head
100-199head
200-499head
500+head
1-29head
30-49head
50-99head
100-199head
200-499head
500+head
Number Percent
1998 1,500 200 400 500 400 200 .8 2.0 8.2 20.0 29.0 40.0
1999 1,300 190 380 390 370 170 1.0 2.0 8.0 17.0 32.0 40.0
2000 1,100 140 330 400 360 170 1.0 1.4 6.6 17.0 32.0 42.0
2001 950 100 250 320 320 160 1.0 1.0 5.0 14.0 31.0 48.0
2002 900 90 200 290 260 160 1.0 1.0 4.5 13.5 27.0 53.01 An operation is any place having one or more milk cows on hand during the year, excluding cows used to nurse calves. Percents reflect averagedistributions based primarily on end-of-year surveys.
TEXAS MILK COWS:Number of Milk Cow Operations, Inventory and Production of Milk and Milkfat, 1998-2002
Year Number ofoperations
Annualaverage
number ofmilk cows 1
Production of milk and milkfat 2
Per milk cow Percent of fatin all milkproduced
Total
Milk Milkfat Milk Milkfat
Thousands Pounds Percent Million pounds
1998 . . . . . . . 3.2 352 15,923 568 3.57 5,605 200.1
1999 . . . . . . . 2.8 345 16,284 586 3.60 5,618 202.2
2000 . . . . . . . 2.5 348 16,483 602 3.65 5,736 209.4
2001 . . . . . . . 2.1 325 * 15,711 * 575 3.66 * 5,106 * 186.9
2002 . . . . . . . 1.9 309 17,152 635 3.70 5,300 196.11 Average number during year excluding heifers that have not freshened. 2 Excludes milk sucked by calves. * Revised.
40
TEXAS MILK AND CREAM: Marketings, Income and Value, 1998-2002
Year
Combined marketings of milk and cream Used for milk, creamand butter on operations
where producedGross
producerincome 3
Valueof milk
produced 2/ 4/Milkutilized
Average returns 1 Cash receipts frommarketings
Per 100pounds milk
Per poundmilkfat
Milkutilized Value 2
Million lbs. Dollars 1,000 dols. Million lbs. 1,000 dollars
1998 . . . 5,583 15.70 4.40 876,531 1 157 876,688 879,985
1999 . . . 5,596 15.00 4.17 839,400 1 150 839,550 842,700
2000 . . . 5,717 13.40 3.67 766,078 1 134 766,212 768,624
2001 . . . * 5,083 15.80 4.32 * 803,114 2 316 * 803,430 * 806,748
2002 . . . 5,276 12.90 3.49 680,604 2 258 680,862 683,7001 Cash receipts divided by milk for milkfat represented in combined marketings. 2 Valued at average return per 100 pounds of milk in combinedmarketings of milk and cream. 3 Cash receipts from marketings of milk and cream plus value of milk used for home consumption. 4 Includes value ofmilk fed to calves. * Revised.
TEXAS MILK AND CREAM: Quantity Used and Marketed, Price and Cash Receipts, 1998-2002
YearTotalmilk
produced
Milk usedwhere produced Milk marketed by producers
Fed tocalves 1
Used for milk,cream and butter
Sold to plants anddealers as whole milk 2
Quantity Price per100 pounds Cash receipts
Million pounds Dollars 1,000 dollars
1998 . . . . . . . . 5,605 21 1 5,583 15.70 876,531
1999 . . . . . . . . 5,618 21 1 5,596 15.00 839,400
2000 . . . . . . . . 5,736 18 1 5,717 13.40 766,078
2001 . . . . . . . . * 5,106 21 2 * 5,083 15.80 * 803,114
2002 . . . . . . . . 5,300 22 2 5,276 12.90 680,6041 Excludes milk sucked by calves. 2 Includes sales directly to consumers by producers who sell only milk from their herds; includes milk produced byinstitutional herds. * Revised.
TEXAS MANUFACTURED DAIRY PRODUCTS: Production of Specified Products, 1998-2002Product 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Thousand poundsCOTTAGE CHEESE: Curd 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,926 9,313 9,624 4/ 15,366
Creamed 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,307 5,789 7,709 10,307 15,094
Lowfat 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,280 4,543 4,304 4/ 7,087
Thousand gallonsFROZEN PRODUCTS AND MIX: Total ice cream, regular . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,168 69,685 63,542 * 61,740 53,098
Total ice cream regular, hard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53,387 60,461 56,351 50,859 47,575
Total milk sherbet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/ 4/ 4/ 1,897 1,752
Ice cream mix, regular . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,396 39,226 33,983 * 32,787 30,848
Lowfat ice cream mix 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,030 20,738 20,824 25,406 24,401
Milk sherbet mix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,299 1,420 1,290 1,197 1,1071 Mostly used for processing into fully creamed or lowfat cottage cheese. 2 Milkfat content 4.0 percent or more. 3 Milkfat content less than 4.0 percent.4 To avoid disclosure of individual operations, production is not shown when fewer than three plants reported. 5 Includes milkshake mix. * Revised.
41
1 dot = 1,000 headDots indicate inventory without respect
to geographic location within the county.
TEXAS ALL SHEEP AND LAMBSJanuary 1, 2003
TEN LEADING COUNTIES
All Sheep and Lambs Ewes 1 Year Old + Wool Production, 2002
Rank County Number Percentof state Rank County Number Percent
of state Rank County Number Percentof state
1,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 lbs.
1 Val Verde 105.0 10.0 1 Val Verde 90.0 13.2 1 Val Verde 751.0 13.6
2 Crockett 101.0 9.6 2 Crockett 65.0 9.6 2 Crockett 643.0 11.6
3 Tom Green 85.0 8.1 3 Pecos 35.0 5.1 3 Pecos 423.0 7.6
4 Pecos 58.0 5.5 3 Schleicher 35.0 5.1 4 Tom Green 400.0 7.2
5 Concho 50.0 4.8 5 Tom Green 32.0 4.7 5 Menard 265.0 4.8
6 Gillespie 45.0 4.3 6 Concho 31.0 4.6 6 Concho 260.0 4.7
6 Schleicher 45.0 4.3 7 Edwards 26.0 3.8 7 Schleicher 258.0 4.7
8 Menard 40.0 3.8 8 Menard 25.0 3.7 8 Gillespie 200.0 3.6
9 Sterling 37.0 3.5 8 Sterling 25.0 3.7 9 Sterling 173.0 3.1
10 Sutton 32.0 3.0 9 Gillespie 24.0 3.5 9 Sutton 173.0 3.1
42
TEXAS SHEEP AND WOOL: Inventory, Sheep Shorn, Wool Production and Fleece Weight
Districtand county 1
January 1 InventorySheep and
lambs shorn 2Wool
producedAverage
fleece weightAll sheepand lambs
Ewes 1 yearand older
2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 20021,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 pounds Pounds
Castro * 20.0 2.5 21.0 137.0 6.5Floyd * 1.2 1.0 4.0 4.0Swisher 1.0 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.9 7.0 8.5 7.0 9.4Other Counties 26.0 2.8 1.6 1.5 40.0 2.1 178.0 12.5 4.5 6.0DISTRICT 1-N 27.0 25.0 2.0 4.0 41.0 25.0 185.0 162.0 4.5 6.5
Bailey 8.5 7.0 1.4 1.2 5.6 2.6 43.0 13.0 7.7 5.0Glasscock 8.0 7.4 7.6 7.3 9.0 4.9 72.0 42.3 8.0 8.6Howard * 1.3 1.0 1.6 12.0 7.5Lubbock * 1.0 0.9 0.7 3.8 5.4Other Counties 3.5 2.3 3.0 1.6 3.4 1.2 23.0 6.9 6.8 5.8DISTRICT 1-S 20.0 19.0 12.0 12.0 18.0 11.0 138.0 78.0 7.7 7.1
Borden * 2.0 1.7 2.8 17.5 6.3Other Counties 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.5 3.0 0.7 23.0 3.5 7.7 5.0DISTRICT 2-N 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.5 23.0 21.0 7.7 6.0
Coleman 17.0 12.0 11.2 10.0 10.0 7.0 77.0 56.0 7.7 8.0Mitchell 3.0 1.5 2.7 1.1 5.8 1.3 49.0 10.0 8.4 7.7Nolan 4.7 2.5 2.4 1.3 3.0 3.5 37.0 30.0 12.3 8.6Runnels 17.0 14.0 8.0 9.5 10.5 19.0 74.0 127.0 7.0 6.7Taylor * 1.0 0.6 0.8 3.3 4.1Other Counties 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.4 10.0 9.7 5.9 6.9DISTRICT 2-S 44.0 33.0 26.0 24.0 31.0 33.0 247.0 236.0 8.0 7.2
Brown 5.0 3.0 3.4 2.7 2.3 1.7 16.0 9.0 7.0 5.3Comanche 6.0 5.0 3.7 4.3 2.6 1.6 20.0 14.0 7.7 8.8Erath 1.9 4.5 1.5 2.8 3.0 3.0 11.0 27.0 3.7 9.0Jack * 1.5Mills 22.0 22.0 14.1 15.5 14.0 22.8 101.0 102.0 7.2 4.5Wise * 1.0 0.2 1.8 9.0Other Counties 5.1 5.0 3.3 4.7 2.1 1.7 13.0 12.2 6.2 7.2DISTRICT 3 40.0 42.0 26.0 30.0 24.0 31.0 161.0 166.0 6.7 5.4
Bell 1.4 2.5 1.1 2.0 0.8 0.9 4.8 5.5 6.0 6.1Bosque * 1.6 1.2 0.7 5.0 7.1Cooke * 1.2 1.0 0.3 1.9 6.3Coryell 5.8 5.3 3.7 3.9 3.5 4.2 31.0 17.0 8.9 4.0Dallas * 1.6 0.8 0.5 3.6 7.2Denton 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.7 4.5 4.0 5.0 5.7Grayson * 1.0 0.8 0.4 2.4 6.0Hamilton 14.7 9.0 8.5 7.4 9.5 9.7 76.0 48.0 8.0 4.9Hill * 1.0 0.8 0.2 1.0 5.0McLennan 1.6 1.5 1.1 1.3 0.9 0.5 7.2 2.9 8.0 5.8Williamson 3.4 2.9 2.0 2.4 1.5 1.6 12.0 9.2 8.0 5.8Other Counties 7.9 6.3 5.8 4.4 2.9 2.3 17.5 10.5 6.0 4.6DISTRICT 4 36.0 35.0 23.0 27.0 20.0 22.0 153.0 111.0 7.7 5.0
43
TEXAS SHEEP AND WOOL: Inventory, Sheep Shorn, Wool Production and Fleece Weight
Districtand county 1
January 1 InventorySheep and
lambs shorn 2Wool
producedAverage
fleece weightAll sheepand lambs
Ewes 1 yearand older
2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 20021,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 pounds Pounds
Harrison * 1.0Houston * 3.0 2.2Other Counties 1.5 3.0 1.0 1.8 0.4 5.0 3.0 29.0 7.5 5.8DISTRICT 5-N 1.5 7.0 1.0 4.0 0.4 5.0 3.0 29.0 7.5 5.8
Other Counties 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.1 0.4 1.4 2.0 5.5 5.0 3.9DISTRICT 5-S 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.1 0.4 1.5 2.0 6.0 5.0 4.0
Crane * 1.7 1.6 4.0 2.5Pecos 65.0 58.0 42.0 35.0 45.0 50.0 371.0 423.0 8.2 8.5Terrell 15.0 14.0 11.5 9.0 13.0 7.4 101.0 46.0 7.8 6.2Other Counties 2.0 1.3 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 14.0 7.0 7.0 7.0DISTRICT 6 82.0 75.0 55.0 45.0 60.0 60.0 486.0 480.0 8.1 8.0
Bandera 4.0 6.0 2.8 3.0 2.2 4.0 15.0 25.0 6.8 6.3Blanco 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.7 30.0 25.0 7.5 6.8Burnet 2.0 3.0 1.4 2.0 1.5 1.0 10.0 7.0 6.7 7.0Coke 32.0 20.0 17.0 13.0 35.0 12.0 178.0 101.0 5.1 8.4Concho 50.0 50.0 32.0 31.0 60.0 37.0 373.0 260.0 6.2 7.0Crockett 109.0 101.0 80.0 65.0 75.0 88.0 578.0 643.0 7.7 7.3Edwards 32.0 30.0 23.0 26.0 23.0 24.0 183.0 152.0 8.0 6.3Gillespie 47.0 45.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 22.0 195.0 200.0 7.0 9.1Irion 19.0 18.0 12.0 11.0 14.9 12.0 116.0 113.0 7.8 9.4Kendall 12.0 14.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 10.0 49.0 57.0 6.1 5.7Kerr 16.0 14.0 10.0 9.0 11.0 8.0 82.0 53.0 7.5 6.6Kimble 17.0 16.0 14.0 11.0 12.0 10.0 84.0 74.0 7.0 7.4Kinney 24.0 20.0 17.0 11.0 18.0 9.0 115.0 85.0 6.4 9.4Lampasas 9.0 8.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 23.0 16.0 7.7 5.3Llano 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.3 3.0 2.0 7.5 6.7McCulloch 28.0 29.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 16.0 100.0 112.0 6.3 7.0Mason 6.0 6.0 3.1 3.6 2.0 3.0 14.0 23.0 7.0 7.7Menard 47.0 40.0 21.0 25.0 60.0 40.0 332.0 265.0 5.5 6.6Reagan 10.0 10.0 8.0 7.2 9.0 9.0 65.0 43.0 7.2 4.8Real 6.0 5.0 5.0 2.9 5.0 3.0 34.0 20.0 6.8 6.7San Saba 3.0 4.0 2.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 14.0 15.0 4.7 5.0Schleicher 52.0 45.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 39.0 266.0 258.0 7.6 6.6Sterling 44.0 37.0 39.0 25.0 38.0 24.0 282.0 173.0 7.4 7.2Sutton 37.0 32.0 26.0 23.0 24.0 23.0 197.0 173.0 8.2 7.5Tom Green 101.0 85.0 50.0 32.0 71.0 48.0 537.0 400.0 7.6 8.3Upton 13.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 12.0 10.0 92.0 70.0 7.7 7.0Uvalde 22.0 18.0 15.0 14.0 14.0 12.0 92.0 76.0 6.6 6.3Val Verde 108.0 105.0 81.0 90.0 82.0 114.0 511.0 751.0 6.2 6.6DISTRICT 7 857.0 778.0 559.0 509.0 667.0 588.0 4,570.0 4,192.0 6.9 7.1
44
TEXAS SHEEP AND WOOL: Inventory, Sheep Shorn, Wool Production and Fleece Weight
Districtand county 1
January 1 InventorySheep and
lambs shorn 2Wool
producedAverage
fleece weightAll sheepand lambs
Ewes 1 yearand older
2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 20021,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 pounds Pounds
Bee * 1.3 1.1 0.7 5.1 7.3Bexar 1.2 2.3 0.9 1.1 0.3 0.9 1.9 4.5 6.3 5.0Comal 1.2 1.8 0.9 1.3 0.5 1.2 3.4 4.8 6.8 4.0Guadalupe 1.0 2.0 0.8 1.5 0.3 0.5 2.1 3.5 7.0 7.0Hays 1.7 3.1 1.2 2.7 0.5 1.0 3.5 4.6 7.0 4.6Medina * 2.2 1.4 0.2 1.2 6.0Travis * 1.1 0.3 1.2 4.0Other Counties 4.9 7.2 4.2 5.9 1.4 2.2 8.1 9.1 5.8 4.1DISTRICT 8-N 10.0 21.0 8.0 15.0 3.0 7.0 19.0 34.0 6.3 4.9
Brazoria * 1.1 1.0 0.1 0.4 4.0Harris * 1.5 1.0 0.8 4.9 6.1Other Counties 2.5 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.5 0.1 3.0 0.7 6.0 7.0DISTRICT 9 2.5 4.0 1.3 3.0 0.5 1.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Webb * 1.2 1.2 0.9 4.5 5.0Other Counties 3.0 1.3 2.0 0.8 1.5 0.5 12.0 2.0 8.0 4.0DISTRICT 10-N 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.4 12.0 6.5 8.0 4.6
Other Districts 1.0 2.5 0.7 0.7 0.2 0.6 1.0 2.5 5.0 4.2
STATE 1,130.0 1,050.0 720.0 680.0 870.0 790.0 6,003.0 5,530.0 6.9 7.0
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 all sheep and lambs in both 2002 and 2003 are not shown in the table, but their estimates are includedin other counties, districts, other districts and state totals. 2 Sheep and lambs shorn in both spring and fall are counted only once. Include fed sheepand lambs shorn. * Estimates are not published for counties or districts having less than 1,000 head or where individual operations would be disclosedbut their estimates are included in other counties, districts, other districts and state totals.
45
TEXAS SHEEP AND LAMBS: Inventory, Lamb Crop and Disposition, 1998-2003 1
Year On handJanuary 1
Lamb cropInship-ments
of sheepand lambs
Marketings 2Farm
slaughter,sheep and
lambs
Deaths
Number
Percent ofJanuary 1
ewes1 year +
Sheep Lambs Sheep Lambs
1,000 head Percent 1,000 head
1998 . . . . 1,530 800 91 78 170 736 2 60 90
1999 . . . . 1,350 700 80 66 191 618 2 40 65
2000 . . . . 1,200 570 72 54 176 361 2 50 85
2001 . . . . 1,150 570 80 77 59 496 2 40 70
2002 . . . . 1,130 540 75 128 162 495 2 39 50
2003 . . . . 1,050
1 Balance sheet estimates. Total of marketings, farm slaughter, deaths and sheep and lambs on hand end-of-the year equals total lamb crop,inshipments and on hand at the beginning of the year. 2 Includes custom slaughter for use on farms where produced and state outshipments; excludesinterfarm sales within the state.
TEXAS SHEEP AND LAMBS: Inventory by Class and Value, January 1, 1999-2003
Classes 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Breeding sheep and lambs . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 1,050 950 840 890 850
Ewes 1 year old and older . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 880 790 710 720 680
Rams 1 year old and older . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 40 40 35 40 40
Replacement lambs under 1 year old . 1,000 head 130 120 95 130 130
Market sheep and lambs . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 300 250 310 240 200
All sheep and lambs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 1,350 1,200 1,150 1,130 1,050
Value per head . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dollars 71.00 79.00 80.00 78.00 79.00
Total value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 dollars 95,850 94,800 92,000 88,140 82,950
TEXAS WOOL: Production and Value, 1998-2002
Item 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Sheep shorn 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 1,300 1,170 1,130 870 790
Weight per fleece . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pounds 7.1 6.8 6.6 6.9 7.0
Total wool production . . . . . . . . . 1,000 pounds 9,230 7,956 7,506 6,003 5,530
Price per pound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dollars .63 .49 .49 .52 .68
Total value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 dollars 5,815 3,898 3,678 3,122 3,760
1 Includes shearing at commercial feed yards; sheep and lambs shorn both spring and fall are counted only once.
46
TEXAS SHEEP AND LAMBS: Production and Income, 1998-2002Item 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
1,000 poundsProduction 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,564 63,017 45,441 48,084 48,860 Marketings 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94,750 85,575 58,000 56,875 69,650 Price per 100 pounds: Dollars Sheep . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37.10 38.90 41.10 42.70 35.30 Lambs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73.30 76.50 81.20 74.80 75.90
1,000 dollarsCash receipts 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,759 56,488 38,274 40,175 44,643 Value of home consumption . . . . . . . . . . 171 201 208 175 197 Gross income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,930 56,689 38,482 40,350 44,840 1 Adjustments made for inshipments and changes in inventory. 2 Excludes custom slaughter for use on farms where produced and interfarm sales. 3
Includes receipts from marketings and sales of farm slaughter.
TEXAS SHEEP AND LAMBS: Inventory, Lamb Crop and Losses, 1998-2002Item 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
1,000 headJanuary 1 Inventory: All sheep and lambs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,530 1,350 1,150 1,130 1,050 Lamb crop 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800 700 570 570 540Losses: Total: Sheep . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 40 50 40 39 Lambs: After marking, docking or branding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 65 85 70 50 Predators: Sheep: Coyotes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 6.0 na na na
Dogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 4.2 na na na
Mountain lions, cougars or pumas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 0.3 na na na
Foxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 0.6 na na na
Eagles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 0.3 na na na
Bobcats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 1.8 na na na
All other animals 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 0.8 na na na
Total sheep losses from predators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 14.0 20 20 14 Lambs: After marking, docking or branding: Coyotes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 23.0 na na na
Dogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 4.0 na na na
Mountain lions, cougars or pumas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 0.8 na na na
Foxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 3.1 na na na
Eagles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 4.6 na na na
Bobcats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 7.0 na na na
All other animals 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . na 2.5 na na na
Total lamb losses from predators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 45.0 57 45 34All other causes 3: Sheep . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 26 30 20 25 Lambs: After marking, docking or branding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 20 28 25 161 Lambs marked, docked or branded includes lambs born during the period January 1 through December 31. 2 Includes ravens, vultures, wolves, pigsand other animals. 3 Includes diseases, weather, theft and unknown. na - not available.
47
1 dot = 1,000 headDots indicate inventory without respect
to geographic location within the county.
TEXAS ALL GOATS AND KIDSJanuary 1, 2003
TEN LEADING COUNTIES
All Goats Angora Goats Mohair Production, 2002
Rank County Number Percentof state Rank County Number Percent
of state Rank County Number Percentof state
1,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 lbs.
1 Edwards 89.0 7.4 1 Edwards 65.0 25.0 1 Edwards 507.0 26.7
2 Val Verde 78.0 6.5 2 Val Verde 37.0 14.2 2 Sutton 205.0 10.8
3 Sutton 75.0 6.3 3 Sutton 24.0 9.2 2 Val Verde 205.0 10.8
4 Mills 56.0 4.7 4 Kinney 11.0 4.2 4 Gillespie 85.0 4.5
5 Crockett 45.0 3.8 4 McCulloch 11.0 4.2 5 Crockett 72.0 3.8
6 Kimble 41.0 3.4 6 Gillespie 10.0 3.8 6 Pecos 58.3 3.1
6 Uvalde 41.0 3.4 7 Crockett 9.0 3.5 7 Kimble 55.0 2.9
8 Gillespie 38.0 3.2 8 Kendall 7.0 2.7 8 Mills 49.0 2.6
9 Schleicher 37.0 3.1 9 Pecos 6.5 2.5 9 McCulloch 47.0 2.5
10 Tom Green 35.0 2.9 10 Mills 6.0 2.3 10 Kendall 45.0 2.4
10 Concho 6.0 2.3 10 Kinney 45.0 2.4
48
TEXAS ANGORA GOATSJanuary 1, 2003
49
1 dot = 1,000 headDots indicate inventory without respect
to geographic location within the county.
TEXAS GOATS: Inventory, Goats Clipped, Mohair Production and Clip Weight
Districtand county
January 1 Inventory Angora goats andkids clipped 2
Mohairproduction
Averageclip weightAll goats 1 Angora goats
2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 20021,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 pounds Pounds
Other Counties 4.0 5.0DISTRICT 1-N 4.0 5.0 *
Bailey * 1.3 * *Glasscock 3.5 1.3 *Midland 1.3 3.9 *Terry * 2.3 *Other Counties 8.2 8.2DISTRICT 1-S 13.0 17.0 * *
Hardeman * 1.5Other Counties 5.0 3.5DISTRICT 2-N 5.0 5.0
Coleman 10.0 7.5 * *Jones * 2.2 * *Nolan 1.2 1.2 * *Runnels 5.4 6.1 * *Taylor 2.3 2.0 *Other Counties 4.1 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.5 12.0 20.0 8.0 8.0DISTRICT 2-S 23.0 24.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.5 12.0 20.0 8.0 8.0
Brown 10.0 13.0 * 2.0 1.2 8.6 7.2Callahan 2.8 3.0 * 0.1 0.6 6.0Comanche 7.0 8.0 1.5 * 1.7 9.0 5.3Eastland 6.0 7.0 * *Erath 6.0 8.0 * *Hood 2.3 2.9 *Jack * 3.0 * *Mills 52.0 56.0 7.0 6.0 5.6 5.5 37.0 49.0 6.6 8.9Palo Pinto 5.0 5.0 * *Parker 4.0 4.5 * *Somervell * 1.1 * *Stephens 3.4 2.5 * *Wise 2.4 5.0 *Young 2.7 3.0 * *Other Counties 3.4 2.0 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.2 19.0 22.8 7.0 7.1DISTRICT 3 107.0 124.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 65.0 81.0 6.5 8.1
Bell 8.0 9.0 * *Bosque 5.0 6.0 * *Collin 1.0 2.5 *Cooke * 1.5Coryell 18.0 20.0 5.0 5.0 3.5 3.4 24.0 31.5 6.9 9.3Dallas 1.3 2.1 * *Denton 1.0 1.3 *Ellis 1.4 2.0 * *Fannin 3.0 2.0 *Grayson * 1.2Hamilton 17.0 18.0 4.0 3.7 4.3 1.9 28.0 17.5 6.5 9.2Hill 2.5 3.0 * *Hunt 1.1 2.0Johnson 2.2 3.1Kaufman 1.4 2.0 * *Limestone * 1.0
50
TEXAS GOATS: Inventory, Goats Clipped, Mohair Production and Clip Weight
Districtand county
January 1 Inventory Angora goats andkids clipped 2
Mohairproduction
Averageclip weightAll goats 1 Angora goats
2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 20021,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 pounds Pounds
McLennan 1.2 3.0 * *Milam 1.0 1.1Navarro 1.0 2.0Tarrant 1.5 2.5 * 0.1 0.5 5.0Williamson 12.0 15.0 * *Other Counties 3.4 2.7 3.0 2.3 2.2 1.6 19.0 12.5 8.6 7.8DISTRICT 4 83.0 103.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 7.0 71.0 62.0 7.1 8.9
Harrison 1.0 *Marion 1.1 * *Panola * 1.0Smith 3.0 3.0 *Upshur 1.3 1.0Van Zandt 1.0 1.0 *Other Counties 7.6 9.0DISTRICT 5-N 15.0 15.0 * *
Freestone 1.5 *Montgomery 1.6 2.5 *Other Counties 5.9 8.5DISTRICT 5-S 9.0 11.0 * *
Crane * 1.0Pecos 35.0 30.0 6.0 6.5 7.0 5.9 50.0 58.3 7.1 9.9Terrell 26.0 20.0 6.0 5.5 8.0 4.8 64.0 32.5 8.0 6.8Other Counties 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.2 17.8 8.1DISTRICT 6 65.0 56.0 12.0 14.0 15.0 13.0 114.0 109.0 7.6 8.4
Bandera 30.0 22.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 14.0 15.0 7.0 8.3Blanco 15.0 14.0 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.5 14.0 20.0 5.4 8.0Burnet 16.0 16.0 1.0 * 0.9 7.0 7.8Coke 11.0 14.0 * *Concho 17.0 18.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 5.3 48.0 41.0 8.0 7.7Crockett 56.0 45.0 11.0 9.0 12.0 8.9 72.0 72.0 6.0 8.1Edwards 99.0 89.0 47.0 65.0 55.0 60.0 392.0 507.0 7.1 8.5Gillespie 41.0 38.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 11.6 77.0 85.0 7.7 7.3Irion 11.0 10.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.4 18.0 13.0 12.0 9.3Kendall 17.0 16.0 4.0 7.0 5.0 5.7 36.0 45.0 7.2 7.9Kerr 19.0 17.0 3.0 2.0 3.1 2.8 23.0 22.0 7.4 7.9Kimble 43.0 41.0 8.0 5.0 9.6 6.7 74.0 55.0 7.7 8.2Kinney 35.0 25.0 13.0 11.0 11.0 7.7 56.0 45.0 5.1 5.8Lampasas 21.0 20.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 3.2 37.0 25.0 7.4 7.8Llano 4.0 4.0 * 1.1 1.0 7.0 7.0McCulloch 15.0 23.0 * 11.0 5.9 47.0 8.0Mason 17.0 11.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 24.0 26.0 8.0 8.7Menard 31.0 26.0 4.0 2.0 2.4 2.8 17.0 18.0 7.1 6.4Reagan 2.0 4.0 *Real 13.0 12.0 3.0 3.0 3.3 2.8 20.0 21.0 6.1 7.5San Saba 9.0 7.0 * *Schleicher 37.0 37.0 2.0 2.8 3.7 2.8 22.0 22.0 5.9 7.9Sterling 4.0 3.0 * *Sutton 86.0 75.0 23.0 24.0 21.0 26.0 136.0 205.0 6.5 7.9Tom Green 32.0 35.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 3.8 23.0 29.0 7.7 7.6
51
TEXAS GOATS: Inventory, Goats Clipped, Mohair Production and Clip Weight
Districtand county
January 1 Inventory Angora goats andkids clipped 2
Mohairproduction
Averageclip weightAll goats 1 Angora goats
2002 2003 2002 2003 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 20021,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 head 1,000 pounds Pounds
Upton 3.0 3.0Uvalde 47.0 41.0 13.0 5.0 14.0 4.0 76.0 31.0 5.4 7.8Val Verde 97.0 78.0 37.0 37.0 38.0 26.7 200.0 205.0 5.3 7.7Other Counties 4.0 3.4 3.9 3.6 24.0 26.0 6.2 7.2DISTRICT 7 828.0 744.0 205.0 217.0 216.0 200.0 1,410.0 1,582.0 6.5 7.9
Bastrop 1.5 2.0 * 0.1 0.4 4.0Bee 4.0 3.5 * *Bexar 3.0 6.0 * 2.0 3.5 20.1 5.7Burleson 1.4 1.0 *Caldwell 3.0 1.8 * *Comal 7.0 8.0 1.0 * 1.1 6.0 5.5Fayette 1.3 1.2Goliad 6.0 2.0 * *Guadalupe 5.0 4.4 * *Hays 9.0 9.0 1.0 * 1.0 6.0 6.0Karnes 1.7 2.0Lee 1.0 1.1 *Medina 2.0 2.5 * *Travis 3.0 3.5 * *Washington 1.0 1.0 * 0.1 0.2 4.0Wilson 1.5 1.2 * 0.1 0.2 4.0Other Counties 2.6 2.8 5.0 3.0 3.9 2.9 24.0 16.7 6.2 5.8DISTRICT 8-N 54.0 53.0 7.0 5.0 6.0 6.7 36.0 38.0 6.0 5.7
Other Counties 2.0 2.0DISTRICT 8-S 2.0 2.0
Brazoria 1.6 1.5 * *Galveston 1.0 * *Harris 3.0 4.0 * *Liberty 1.4 1.0 *Other Counties 4.0 5.5DISTRICT 9 11.0 12.0 * *
Dimmit * 2.0Jim Wells 7.0 5.0 *Live Oak 5.0 5.0 *Maverick 4.0 5.0Webb 8.0 4.0 *Other Counties 4.0 5.0DISTRICT 10-N 28.0 26.0 * *
Hidalgo 1.6 1.3Other Counties 1.4 1.7DISTRICT 10-S 3.0 3.0
Other Districts 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.8 8.0 4.0 5.3 5.0
STATE 1,250.0 1,200.0 250.0 260.0 260.0 240.0 1,716.0 1,896.0 6.6 7.9
1 Includes Angora goats for mohair production, meat type goats, milk goats and goats used for other purposes. 2 Angora goats and kids clipped bothspring and fall are counted only once. * Counties and districts with less than 1,000 all goats and kids and/or Angora goats and kids or less than threeproducers are not published to avoid disclosing individual operations, but their estimates are included in other counties, districts, other districts and statetotals.
52
TEXAS GOATS: Number by Type, Class and Value, January 1, 1999-2003
Year
Angora Other goats(Spanish,milk, etc.)
All goats (Angora and other)
Does1+
Bucks1+
Muttons1+ Kids Total
Allgoats
Valueper head
Totalvalue
1,000 head 1,000 head Dollars 1,000 dollars
1999 . . . . 370 15 85 80 550 800 1,350 53.00 71,550
2000 . . . . 260 10 40 60 370 930 1,300 57.00 74,100
2001 . . . . 228 9 30 33 300 1,100 1,400 75.00 105,000
2002 . . . . 170 9 25 46 250 1,000 1,250 85.00 106,250
2003 . . . . 191 9 20 40 260 940 1,200 91.00 109,200
TEXAS GOATS: Losses, 1998-2002
Item 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
1,000 head
Total Losses:
All goats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 120 145 95 122
Predator:
All goats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 95 97 66 85
Other 1:
All goats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 25 48 29 37
1 Includes diseases, weather, theft and unknown.
TEXAS MOHAIR: Production and Value, 1998-2002
Item 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Angora goats clipped 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 620 375 345 260 240
Average clip per goat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pounds 7.5 6.8 6.8 6.6 7.9
Total mohair production . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 pounds 4,650 2,550 2,346 1,716 1,896
Price per pound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dollars 2.59 3.68 4.30 2.20 1.60
Total value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 dollars 12,044 9,384 10,088 3,775 3,034
1 Angora goats and kids clipped both spring and fall are counted only once.
53
ALL HOGS AND PIGSDecember 1, 2002
Under 20,000
20,000 to 49,999
50,000 +
TEXAS HOG INVENTORY, DECEMBER 1, 2001-2002DISTRICT AND STATE
DistrictAll hogs and pigs
2001 2002
1,000 headDISTRICT 1-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807.0 835.0DISTRICT 1-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.0 2.0DISTRICT 2-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 *DISTRICT 2-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 *DISTRICT 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.0 9.0DISTRICT 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.0 6.0DISTRICT 5-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28.0 31.0DISTRICT 5-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 4.0DISTRICT 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 *DISTRICT 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.0 13.0DISTRICT 8-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.0 25.0DISTRICT 8-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 *DISTRICT 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 *DISTRICT 10-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 1.0DISTRICT 10-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 1.0OTHER DISTRICTS . . . . . . . . . . . 3.0STATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900.0 930.0
* Estimates are not published for districts having less than 1,000 all hogs or whereindividual operations would be disclosed, but estimates for these districts are included inother districts and state total.
54
TEXAS HOGS: Inventory, Pig Crop and Disposition, 1998-2003 1
YearOn hand
December 1previous year
Sowsfarrowed
Pigsper litter
Total pigssaved Inshipments Marketings 2 Farm
slaughter 3 Deaths
1,000 head Number 1,000 head
1998 . . . . . . . 580 116 8.5 981 315 1,170 6 60
1999 . . . . . . . 640 151 9.3 1,404 315 1,318 6 165
2000 . . . . . . . 870 154 9.5 1,455 225 1,314 6 310
2001 . . . . . . . 920 161 8.8 * 1,429 111 1,210 6 335
2002 . . . . . . . 900 184 8.9 1,640 46 1,358 6 295
2003 . . . . . . . 9301 Balance sheet estimates. Total of marketings, farm slaughter, deaths and hogs on hand at end-of-year equals total pigs saved, inshipments and onhand at beginning-of-year. 2 Includes custom slaughter for use on farms where produced and state outshipments; excludes interfarm sales within thestate. 3 Excludes custom slaughter for farmers at commercial establishments. * Revised.
TEXAS HOGS AND PIGS: Number by Class and Value, December 1, 1998-2002
Year Breedinghogs
Market hogs and pigsAll
hogs
All hogs
Less than60 pounds
60-119pounds
120-179pounds
180 poundsand over Total Value
per headTotalvalue
1,000 head Dollars 1,000 dols.
1998 . . . . 80 210 120 115 115 560 640 44.00 28,160
1999 . . . . 80 280 190 160 160 790 870 64.00 55,680
2000 . . . . 85 215 175 200 245 835 920 68.00 62,560
2001 . . . . 100 * 260 * 140 * 165 * 235 800 900 71.00 63,900
2002 . . . . 105 240 230 180 175 825 930 62.00 57,660* Revised.
TEXAS HOGS: Production and Income, 1998-2002
Year Production 1 Marketings 2 Price per 100 pounds
Cashreceipts 3
Value of homeconsumption
Grossincome
1,000 pounds Dollars 1,000 dollars
1998 . . . . . . . . 271,444 277,485 30.70 85,973 1,276 86,349
1999 . . . . . . . . 274,572 257,790 27.50 70,456 1,148 71,604
2000 . . . . . . . . 328,732 311,980 36.60 113,497 1,608 115,105
2001 . . . . . . . . * 260,875 * 265,540 39.10 * 103,510 1,707 * 105,217
2002 . . . . . . . . 224,641 223,710 28.70 65,974 1,281 67,2551 Adjustments made for inshipments and changes in inventory. 2 Excludes custom slaughter for use on farms where produced and interfarm sales. 3
Includes receipts from marketings and sales of farm slaughter. * Revised.
55
HORSES AND OTHER EQUINE SPECIES 1: Inventory, 1998-1999 2
Item January 1,1998
January 1,1999
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 595 600
1 Includes horses, ponies, mules, donkeys and burros. 2 Horse and other equine inventory numbers will be published again in 2004.
HORSES AND OTHER EQUINE SPECIES 1: Number Sold and Value of Sales, 1997-1998 2
Sales January 1,1997
January 1,1998
Number sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 58 60
Value of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 dollars 86,000 90,000
1 Includes horses, ponies, mules, donkeys and burros. 2 Horse and other equine sales and values will be published again in 2004.
56
HENS AND PULLETS OF LAYING AGEInventory, December 1, 2002
Under 100,000
1,000,000 +
COMMERCIAL BROILERSAnnual Production, 2002
Under 5,000,000
5,000,000 to 99,999,999
100,000,000 +
58
TEXAS POULTRY: Inventory, Egg and Broiler Production
Districts 1
December 1 InventoryHens and pullets
of laying age
Annual production
Eggs 2 Commercial broilers 2
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 head 1,000 eggs 1,000 head
DISTRICT 3 335 * 83,000 * *
DISTRICT 4 1,520 * 352,000 * *
DISTRICT 5-N 4,835 4,752 1,131,000 1,087,000 405,102 422,728
DISTRICT 5-S 1,393 1,341 352,000 321,000 83,015 84,872
DISTRICT 8-N 6,918 8,496 1,792,000 2,332,000 76,557 79,620
DISTRICT 9 3,642 * 948,000 * *
OTHER DISTRICTS 392 4,186 76,000 1,034,000 826 880
STATE 19,035 18,775 4,734,000 4,774,000 565,500 588,100
1 Districts with less than 5,000 hens and pullets of laying age in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their inventories are includedin the totals. 2 Annual estimates cover the period December 1 of previous year through November 30 of year denoted. * Estimates are not publishedfor districts having less than 5 million commercial broilers or where individual operations would be disclosed. The estimates for these districts are includedin other districts and state totals.
TEXAS EGGS AND BROILERSVALUE OF PRODUCTION, 1982-2002
59
TEXAS CHICKENS: Numbers and Value, December 1, 1998-2002 1
Year
Hens and pulletsof laying age
Pulletsnot of
laying age
Otherchickens
Allchickens
All chickens
Hens Pullets Value per head Total value
1,000 head Dollars 1,000 dollars
1998 . . . . . 6,759 10,848 6,260 533 24,400 2.80 68,320
1999 . . . . . 9,236 8,929 5,740 495 24,400 2.80 68,320
2000 . . . . . 7,708 10,952 6,260 440 25,360 2.20 55,792
2001 . . . . . 7,434 11,601 6,638 428 26,101 2.50 65,253
2002 . . . . . 7,247 11,528 6,303 428 25,506 2.20 56,1131 Excludes commercial broilers.
TEXAS CHICKENS: Lost, Sold and Value of Sales, 1998-2002 1
YearHead Live weight
Price perpound
Valueof salesLost Sold Sold Average weight
per bird sold
1,000 head 1,000 pounds Pounds Cents 1,000 dollars
1998 . . . . . . 3,681 10,404 50,980 4.9 3.9 1,988
1999 . . . . . . 2,853 12,370 58,139 4.7 3.7 2,151
2000 . . . . . . 3,312 14,520 68,244 4.7 4.2 2,866
2001 . . . . . . 2,526 14,301 68,645 4.8 3.5 2,403
2002 . . . . . . 2,504 12,897 63,195 4.9 3.9 2,4651 Estimates exclude broilers and cover the 12-month period December 1 previous year through November 30 of the year denoted.
TEXAS EGGS: Production and Value, 1998-2002 1
Year Averagenumber layers
Eggsper layer 2
Totalproduction
Price perdozen eggs sold
Value ofproduction
1,000 head Number Millions Cents 1,000 dollars1998 . . . . . . . . . . 17,079 249 4,257 71.5 253,646
1999 . . . . . . . . . . 17,382 254 4,413 65.4 240,509
2000 . . . . . . . . . . 17,423 254 4,423 69.7 256,903
2001 . . . . . . . . . . * 18,744 253 4,734 67.7 267,077
2002 . . . . . . . . . . 18,608 257 4,774 68.7 273,3121 Estimates cover the 12-month period December 1 previous year through November 30 of the year denoted. 2 Total egg production divided by theaverage number of layers on hand. * Revised.
TEXAS COMMERCIAL BROILERS: Production and Value, 1998-2002 1
Year Numberproduced
Priceper head
Average liveweight per broiler
Poundsproduced
Priceper pound
Value ofproduction 2
1,000 head Dollars Pounds 1,000 pounds Cents 1,000 dollars
1998 . . . . . . 480,000 1.76 4.5 2,160,000 39.0 842,400
1999 . . . . . . 507,900 1.74 4.7 2,387,000 37.0 883,227
2000 . . . . . . 551,000 1.60 4.7 2,589,700 34.0 880,498
2001 . . . . . . 565,500 1.87 4.8 2,714,400 39.0 1,058,616
2002 . . . . . . 588,100 1.52 4.9 2,881,700 31.0 893,3271 Estimates cover the 12-month period December 1 previous year through November 30 of the year denoted. 2 Gross income including value of homeconsumption.
60
TEXAS CHICKS: Commercial Hatchings, by Month, 1998-2002
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total
BROILERS: 1,000 head
1998 45,737 41,314 47,026 43,746 45,666 45,516 46,615 45,648 44,570 45,769 42,718 48,636 542,961
1999 48,386 43,316 49,605 48,902 50,053 47,689 48,791 47,583 46,322 48,337 46,486 50,161 575,631
2000 51,458 48,714 53,449 52,323 55,293 50,822 50,721 49,099 50,630 51,171 47,982 53,567 615,229
2001 53,070 47,612 54,366 53,153 56,586 54,589 53,816 51,994 51,934 53,056 48,497 *54,208 *632,881
2002 56,335 50,822 57,159 55,612 57,878 55,577 55,363 53,967 51,600 53,164 50,197 55,603 653,277
* Revised.
TEXAS CHICKENS AND EGGS: Number of Layers,Eggs per 100 Layers and Egg Production, by Months, 1998-2002
Year Dec. 1 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov.
LAYERS DURING MONTH: 1,000 Head 2
1998 17,132 17,116 17,327 17,374 17,154 17,040 16,759 16,692 16,817 16,791 17,186 17,580
1999 17,608 17,587 17,384 17,483 17,477 17,333 17,395 17,071 17,029 17,169 17,268 17,796
2000 17,899 17,853 17,756 17,278 17,172 17,208 16,749 16,426 17,004 17,490 17,847 18,422
2001 18,624 18,662 18,851 18,969 19,074 18,903 18,455 18,348 18,554 18,763 18,811 18,915
2002 19,291 19,118 18,943 18,971 18,476 18,102 18,073 18,199 18,276 18,484 18,651 18,707
EGGS PER 100 LAYERS: Number
1998 2,171 2,133 1,899 2,187 2,104 1,978 1,927 2,157 2,188 2,067 2,054 2,059
1999 2,175 2,098 1,910 2,162 2,031 2,100 2,098 2,185 2,196 2,114 2,166 2,152
2000 2,252 2,151 1,949 2,153 2,137 2,144 2,078 2,161 2,129 2,041 2,118 2,074
2001 2,185 2,181 1,931 2,156 2,102 2,158 2,086 2,131 2,097 2,004 2,110 2,115
2002 2,198 2,045 1,863 2,240 2,127 2,166 2,152 2,225 2,172 2,099 2,214 2,160
EGGS PRODUCED: Millions
1998 372 365 329 380 361 337 323 360 368 347 353 362
1999 383 369 332 378 355 364 365 373 374 363 374 383
2000 403 384 346 372 367 369 348 355 362 357 378 382
2001 407 407 364 409 401 408 385 391 389 376 397 400
2002 424 391 353 425 393 392 389 405 397 388 413 404
1 December of preceding year. 2 Average during month.
61
BROILERS: Eggs Set and Chicks Placed by Weeks, Texas, 2001-2002Weekending
Eggs set Chicks placed
2001 1 2002 2 2001 1 2002 2
ThousandsJANUARY: 5 . . . . . . . . . 14,444 15,369 11,268 11,936 12 . . . . . . . . 14,292 14,969 11,218 11,964
19 . . . . . . . . 14,407 14,693 11,351 12,19126 . . . . . . . . 14,455 15,310 11,182 12,100
FEBRUARY: 2 . . . . . . . . . 13,976 15,092 11,086 11,7469 . . . . . . . . . 14,601 15,253 11,206 11,60816 . . . . . . . . 14,565 15,353 11,232 12,13223 . . . . . . . . 14,694 15,358 10,863 12,044
MARCH: 2 . . . . . . . . . 14,735 15,314 11,438 12,2119 . . . . . . . . . 14,756 15,319 11,551 12,21216 . . . . . . . . 14,729 15,327 11,653 12,18623 . . . . . . . . 14,875 15,375 11,742 12,15730 . . . . . . . . 14,707 15,377 11,576 12,096
APRIL: 6 . . . . . . . . . 15,299 15,569 11,513 12,10913 . . . . . . . . 15,226 15,444 11,635 12,22620 . . . . . . . . 15,222 15,442 11,509 12,24327 . . . . . . . . 15,276 15,524 12,017 12,330
MAY: 4 . . . . . . . . . 15,272 15,484 11,929 12,18911 . . . . . . . . 15,263 15,516 11,929 12,17218 . . . . . . . . 15,280 15,383 12,167 12,20425 . . . . . . . . 15,275 15,271 12,117 12,281
JUNE: 1 . . . . . . . . . 14,788 15,322 12,204 12,2928 . . . . . . . . . 14,783 15,289 12,068 12,12115 . . . . . . . . 14,836 15,249 12,124 12,14722 . . . . . . . . 14,838 14,661 11,858 12,28229 . . . . . . . . 13,178 14,495 11,798 12,199
JULY: 6 . . . . . . . . . 14,785 15,151 11,846 12,19713 . . . . . . . . 14,366 14,683 11,879 11,72520 . . . . . . . . 14,338 14,627 10,384 11,50027 . . . . . . . . 13,908 14,688 11,772 11,998
AUGUST: 3 . . . . . . . . . 14,161 14,763 11,398 11,72910 . . . . . . . . 13,693 14,236 11,270 11,65817 . . . . . . . . 14,135 14,549 10,902 11,63324 . . . . . . . . 14,566 13,526 11,042 11,73131 . . . . . . . . 14,769 14,354 10,683 11,155
SEPTEMBER: 7 . . . . . . . . . 14,208 15,194 11,259 11,42314 . . . . . . . . 13,205 14,680 11,596 10,57221 . . . . . . . . 13,761 13,229 11,910 11,17328 . . . . . . . . 14,523 15,071 11,425 11,883
OCTOBER: 5 . . . . . . . . . 14,861 14,414 10,613 11,82512 . . . . . . . . 14,201 14,013 10,965 10,33219 . . . . . . . . 12,830 13,044 11,619 11,89626 . . . . . . . . 12,181 12,465 11,838 11,388
NOVEMBER:
2 . . . . . . . . . 14,171 14,486 11,281 11,096
9 . . . . . . . . . 14,419 15,342 10,136 10,41716 . . . . . . . . 14,163 14,758 9,523 10,04023 . . . . . . . . 14,586 15,223 11,157 11,62330 . . . . . . . . 14,832 14,940 11,452 12,241
DECEMBER: 7 . . . . . . . . . 14,933 14,873 11,241 11,71014 . . . . . . . . 14,935 15,134 11,569 12,08321 . . . . . . . . 15,040 14,759 11,795 11,82128 . . . . . . . . 15,387 14,890 11,831 11,729
TOTALS . . . . . . . . . . . . 754,729 773,841 594,620 613,9561 Includes weeks ending January 6, 2001 through December 29, 2001. 2 Includes weeks ending January 5, 2002 through December 28, 2002.
62
TEXAS REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSES: Number and Capacity of General Storage by Type October 1, 1997, 1999 and 2001 1
Item 1997 1999 2001
Number
Number of Refrigerated Warehouses:
Public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 38 44
Private and semi-private . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 33 24
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 71 68
1,000 cubic feet
Gross Refrigerated Space:
Public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130,296 125,049 143,459
Private and semi-private . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,380 29,483 13,191
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148,676 154,532 156,650
Gross Cooler Space:
Public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,446 19,287 28,879
Private and semi-private . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,994 18,449 8,819
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,440 37,736 37,698
Gross Freezer Space:
Public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101,850 105,762 114,580
Private and semi-private . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,385 11,034 4,373
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108,236 116,796 118,953
1 Data are collected biennially.
63
SLAUGHTER PLANTS: Number of Establishments, January 1, 2002-2003
Rank 1 StateUnder federal inspection Other Total
2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003
1 Pennsylvania 118 114 215 217 333 331
2 Iowa 22 23 139 148 161 171
3 Ohio 17 19 146 141 163 160
4 Montana 11 10 139 147 150 157
5 Missouri 51 48 97 101 148 149
6 TEXAS 43 44 84 100 127 144
7 Minnesota 30 29 113 111 143 140
8 Illinois 28 28 90 90 118 118
9 Wisconsin 15 16 100 101 115 117
10 Kansas 17 16 87 88 104 1041 Top ten states ranked by total number of establishments in 2003.
TEXAS COMMERCIAL SLAUGHTER: Livestock and Poultry, 1998-2002 1
Species 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
CATTLE
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 6,767 6,735 6,606 6,463 6,472
Federally inspected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 6,704 6,685 6,566 6,427 6,436
Percent of total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percent 99 99 99 99 99
CALVES
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 43 34 46 22 21
Federally inspected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 38 27 23 18 17
Percent of total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percent 88 79 50 82 81
HOGS
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 324 383 387 396 430
Federally inspected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 175 210 247 287 338
Percent of total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percent 54 55 64 72 79
SHEEP
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 1/ 533 472 450 337
Federally inspected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 1/ 503 444 423 289
Percent of total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percent 1/ 94 94 94 86
YOUNG CHICKENS
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 506,515 544,952 585,868 608,459 626,304
Federally inspected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 head 506,515 544,952 585,868 608,459 626,304
Percent of total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percent 100 100 100 100 1001 Not published to avoid disclosing individual operations.
64
TEXAS COMMERCIAL SLAUGHTER: Livestock and Poultry, by Months, 1998-2002
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total
CATTLE: 1,000 head 1
1998 566.9 509.7 565.0 554.3 572.7 613.7 592.7 594.3 579.9 581.0 515.8 521.0 6,767.0
1999 559.0 495.3 572.2 562.0 582.2 612.1 594.4 576.6 584.4 567.7 524.1 505.3 6,735.3
2000 547.8 531.3 564.4 513.1 609.5 591.4 544.8 599.7 580.4 554.7 508.0 460.6 6,605.6
2001 560.5 471.3 558.1 510.5 595.9 582.0 550.9 604.6 488.5 553.2 497.3 490.1 6,462.9
2002 537.7 429.1 492.3 545.8 613.4 568.9 570.2 594.7 520.8 590.1 518.7 489.8 6,471.6
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annualaverage
CATTLE AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT: Pounds
1998 1,125 1,133 1,131 1,130 1,142 1,142 1,149 1,158 1,159 1,149 1,141 1,147 1,142
1999 1,153 1,154 1,149 1,139 1,136 1,146 1,161 1,160 1,160 1,148 1,141 1,150 1,150
2000 1,151 1,148 1,149 1,134 1,132 1,145 1,162 1,171 1,170 1,158 1,149 1,144 1,151
2001 1,158 1,143 1,134 1,126 1,135 1,153 1,180 1,193 1,194 1,179 1,179 1,186 1,163
2002 1,184 1,171 1,165 1,164 1,165 1,180 1,202 1,214 1,204 1,203 1,184 1,190 1,186
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total
CALVES: 1,000 head 1
1998 4.2 3.4 2.8 2.0 1.9 2.4 3.5 4.4 5.2 4.7 4.1 4.3 43.0
1999 3.3 2.6 2.0 1.1 2.1 1.9 1.9 4.2 3.5 4.0 4.2 3.3 34.1
2000 2.9 3.3 5.1 4.7 4.9 3.4 7.3 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.8 46.1
2001 2.5 1.9 1.8 1.3 .9 1.1 1.8 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.0 21.5
2002 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.1 .8 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.1 3.1 2.2 3.2 20.6
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annualaverage
CALVES AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT: Pounds
1998 406 405 430 515 484 504 439 400 404 417 420 415 427
1999 446 455 516 513 473 498 479 415 434 415 419 410 444
2000 432 452 466 491 411 477 414 215 289 314 326 318 400
2001 338 421 504 571 579 563 415 396 364 351 324 358 412
2002 470 537 540 562 542 529 494 458 386 322 366 352 430
1 Totals may not add due to rounding.
65
TEXAS COMMERCIAL SLAUGHTER: Livestock and Poultry, by Months, 1998-2002
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total
HOGS: 1,000 head 1
1998 28.3 23.1 31.1 24.4 28.2 25.9 28.2 28.2 26.1 25.9 25.6 29.1 324.2 1999 29.2 27.6 30.4 29.6 28.2 27.7 27.6 34.3 32.5 33.9 40.1 41.2 382.5 2000 33.2 32.7 30.6 26.8 28.1 28.6 29.0 38.4 31.0 37.3 35.1 36.4 387.1 2001 35.7 34.3 35.3 32.5 31.3 30.8 28.4 32.5 31.2 34.4 34.9 34.6 396.0 2002 34.5 32.7 35.4 37.7 33.8 29.6 34.7 35.2 35.7 39.9 39.3 41.0 429.5
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annualaverage
HOGS AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT: Pounds 1998 321 328 300 312 290 300 277 304 305 293 329 313 306 1999 319 322 331 336 310 345 336 339 349 307 310 323 327 2000 326 314 321 319 315 328 331 309 308 314 324 308 318 2001 285 285 289 279 278 299 307 295 301 310 326 322 298 2002 306 273 294 275 291 294 273 277 261 266 287 291 282
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total
SHEEP: 1,000 head 1/ 2/
1999 37.0 38.8 60.3 41.2 50.3 42.1 36.0 36.2 42.9 44.5 47.2 56.2 532.6 2000 42.7 44.0 47.3 46.3 38.6 33.9 30.9 33.6 32.4 36.9 40.3 45.3 472.0 2001 40.6 36.3 44.1 38.0 33.8 32.6 32.1 38.1 34.2 43.5 38.6 37.7 449.8 2002 37.2 33.5 31.5 27.7 30.0 23.9 25.8 23.3 22.7 26.4 25.2 29.4 336.8
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annualaverage
SHEEP AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT: Pounds1999 128 129 130 130 130 133 128 126 128 130 132 134 130 2000 134 134 139 134 131 128 123 128 131 134 136 139 133 2001 139 138 140 138 138 131 131 137 140 140 136 137 137 2002 139 133 133 126 126 123 125 120 116 130 122 118 127
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total
YOUNG CHICKENS: Million head 1/ 3/
1998 42.1 37.9 41.8 43.3 40.9 41.2 43.0 44.4 42.5 45.3 40.5 43.5 506.4 1999 43.7 40.7 45.9 46.3 45.8 46.9 46.7 46.7 46.2 44.1 45.5 46.4 545.0 2000 47.0 44.9 50.1 44.8 54.1 51.6 48.9 53.4 45.7 51.3 47.8 46.2 585.9 2001 50.9 44.5 51.6 48.5 54.1 50.2 51.8 56.2 47.2 55.4 50.1 48.0 608.5 2002 51.3 47.1 50.8 53.3 57.1 50.2 56.0 54.4 51.1 56.9 47.9 50.2 626.3
1 Totals may not add due to rounding. 2 1998 not published to avoid disclosing individual operations. 3 Data from federally inspected slaughter plants.
TEXAS COMMERCIAL LIVESTOCK SLAUGHTER: Live Weight and Red Meat Production, 1998-2002
YearTotal live weight 1 Total red meat
production 2Cattle Calves Sheep and lambs Hogs
1,000 pounds
1998 . . . . . . . . . . 7,730,824 18,349 3/ 99,028 4,862,100
1999 . . . . . . . . . . 7,744,483 15,121 69,216 125,006 4,910,500
2000 . . . . . . . . . . 7,604,784 18,438 62,853 122,980 4,844,000
2001 . . . . . . . . . . 7,515,759 8,869 61,749 118,070 4,780,800
2002 . . . . . . . . . . 7,675,296 8,863 42,692 121,127 4,880,0001 Includes slaughter in federally inspected and in other slaughter plants, but excludes animals slaughtered on farms. 2 Includes total beef, veal, pork,lamb and mutton; excludes farm slaughter. 3 Not published to avoid disclosing individual operations.
66
CATTLE AND CALVES: Movement Out of and Into Texas on Health Certificates, 2002 1
Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) and U.S. Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service/VeterinaryServices (USDA/APHIS/VS) tabulate head counts from health certificates. These tabulations include truck and rail movements outof and into Texas. Under Texas law, all livestock must have a health certificate unless consigned to a state or federally inspectedslaughtering establishment or specifically approved livestock market.
OUTSHIPMENTS (1,000 Head)Destination of cattle and calves as designated on health certificates tabulated by TAHC and USDA/APHIS/VS, 2002. Data include animals designatedfor slaughter and reflect movement to other states and countries, including Mexico. States receiving less than 500 head are not shown.
INSHIPMENTS (1,000 Head)Origin of cattle and calves as designated on health certificates tabulated by TAHC and USDA/APHIS/VS, 2002. Data exclude animals designated forslaughter and reflect movement from other states and countries, including Mexico. States sending less than 500 head are not shown.
1 Cattle tabulations do not include dairy cattle.67
CA
1 0
AZ
3
CO
1 1
W Y2
436MEXICO
SHIPPED OUT OF TEXAS
473
1
SD
M N
2
1
M O
1
OK
KS
1 KY2
2
FL
CA
OR
2
1 5
ID
7
CO
NM
6
6 1
NE
W Y
2
SD
1 9
1
SHIPPED INTO
KS
TEXAS
127
71
OK1
M O
2 4
IA
1
M I
SHEEP AND LAMBS: Movement Out of and Into Texas on Health Certificatesand Sheep Scabies Inspection Certificates, 2002
Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) and U.S. Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service/VeterinaryServices (USDA/APHIS/VS) tabulate health certificates and sheep scabies inspection certificates. These tabulations include truck andrail movements out of and into Texas. Under Texas law, all livestock must have a health certificate unless consigned to a state orfederally inspected slaughtering establishment or specifically approved auction market.
OUTSHIPMENTS (1,000 Head)Destination of sheep and lambs shipped out of Texas (truck and rail) as designated on health certificates or sheep scabies inspection certificatestabulated by TAHC and USDA/APHIS/VS, 2002. Data include animals designated for slaughter and reflect movement to other states and countries,including Mexico. States receiving less than 500 head are not shown.
INSHIPMENTS (1,000 Head)Origin of sheep and lambs shipped into Texas (truck and rail) as designated on health certificates or sheep scabies inspection certificates tabulated byTAHC and USDA/APHIS/VS, 2002. Data exclude animals designated for slaughter and reflect movement from other states only. States sending lessthan 500 head are not shown.
68
TEXAS LIVESTOCK AUCTION MARKETS
There are 162 state inspected livestock auctions in Texas. The map below shows the distribution of state inspectedauctions as of December, 2002. Counts of livestock are taken from inspection receipts filed by auction inspectors of theTexas Animal Health Commission (TAHC). Monthly tabulations are available through the cooperation of the TAHC.
MONTHLY SALES OF LIVESTOCK AT TEXAS AUCTION MARKETS, BY SPECIES, 1998-2002Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total
1,000 headCattle and calves 1998 . . . . . . . . . 464 353 427 470 538 504 692 546 479 602 517 370 5,962
1999 . . . . . . . . . 514 432 444 414 430 410 436 549 595 685 513 345 5,767
2000 . . . . . . . . . 542 397 406 400 485 381 513 596 594 549 416 333 5,612
2001 . . . . . . . . . 397 304 360 386 435 470 451 496 443 601 384 332 5,059
2002 . . . . . . . . . 456 313 348 340 411 411 318 445 490 496 514 298 4,840
Sheep and goats 1998 . . . . . . . . . 103 92 152 141 185 169 164 133 156 122 84 79 1,580
1999 . . . . . . . . . 110 94 168 116 160 138 143 179 158 140 108 101 1,615
2000 . . . . . . . . . 109 135 145 153 196 139 129 167 137 114 75 66 1,565
2001 . . . . . . . . . 76 79 96 109 134 137 130 135 106 143 88 90 1,323
2002 . . . . . . . . . 107 101 221 125 151 163 125 218 128 115 84 73 1,611
Hogs 1998 . . . . . . . . . 10 8 10 10 12 12 9 9 9 12 9 7 117
1999 . . . . . . . . . 7 8 9 8 9 9 7 8 7 8 9 7 96
2000 . . . . . . . . . 8 7 7 8 7 7 5 6 6 8 7 5 81
2001 . . . . . . . . . 6 5 5 6 6 6 4 4 4 7 6 5 64
2002 . . . . . . . . . 7 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 6 9 8 7 69
69
TEXAS AUCTION MARKETS BY COUNTY, DECEMBER 2002County
and districtNumber of
livestock auctionsCounty
and districtNumber of
livestock auctionsCounty
and districtNumber of
livestock auctions Dallam 1 Hill 2 Burnet 1 Floyd 1 Hunt 1 Blanco 1 Lipscomb 1 Johnson 3 Gillespie 2 Potter 2 Kaufman 1 Kimble 1 Swisher 2 Lamar 2 Lampasas 3District 1-N 7 Limestone 1 Llano 1
McLennan 2 Mason 1 Bailey 1 Milam 2 San Saba 1 Howard 1 Navarro 1 Tom Green 1 Lubbock 2 Tarrant 1 Uvalde 1 Midland 1 Williamson 1 District 7 13District 1-S 5 District 4 31
Austin 2 Collingsworth 1 Anderson 1 Bastrop 1 Wilbarger 1 Bowie 2 Bee 1District 2-N 2 Camp 1 Bexar 1
Cherokee 2 Burleson 1 Coleman 2 Gregg 1 Caldwell 2 Haskell 1 Henderson 2 Colorado 1 Mitchell 1 Hopkins 3 DeWitt 1 Nolan 1 Houston 1 Fayette 2 Taylor 1 Nacogdoches 1 Gonzales 2District 2-S 6 Panola 1 Guadalupe 1
Rains 1 Karnes 2 Archer 1 Rusk 1 Lavaca 1 Brown 1 Shelby 1 Lee 4 Clay 1 Titus 2 Medina 1 Comanche 2 Upshur 1 Washington 1 Eastland 2 Van Zandt 3 District 8-N 24 Erath 4 Wood 1 Mills 1 District 5-N 25 Brazoria 1 Montague 1 Harris 4 Palo Pinto 1 Angelina 2 Jackson 1 Parker 2 Brazos 1 Liberty 1 Wise 2 Grimes 1 Wharton 2 Young 1 Jasper 1 District 9 9District 3 19 Leon 1
Madison 1 Atascosa 1 Bosque 2 Montgomery 2 Frio 1 Cooke 2 Polk 1 Jim Wells 1 Coryell 1 Robertson 1 Live Oak 1 Dallas 1 Tyler 1 District 10-N 4 Denton 2 Walker 1 Ellis 2 District 5-S 13 Hidalgo 1 Fannin 2 Starr 1 Grayson 1 El Paso 2 District 10-S 2 Hamilton 1 District 6 2
STATE TOTAL 162
TEXAS COLONIES OF BEES, HONEY PRODUCTION, PRICE AND STOCKS, 1998-2002
YearNumber of
coloniesYield
per colony
All honeyValue
of productionHoney stocks on
hand December 15ProductionAverage price receivedby farmers (per pound)
1,000 Pounds 1,000 pounds Cents 1,000 dollars 1,000 pounds1998 . . . . . . . . . . . 91 77 7,007 62 4,344 1,6121999 . . . . . . . . . . . 108 81 8,748 64 5,599 2,799
2000 . . . . . . . . . . . 105 79 8,295 57 4,728 2,9862001 . . . . . . . . . . . 97 79 7,663 * 65 * 4,981 1,533
2002 . . . . . . . . . . . 114 67 7,638 109 8,325 985* Revised.
70
TEXAS CATFISH: Number of Operations and Water Area, January 1, 1999-2003
Item 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number 51 49 43 34 30
Water surface area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acres 1,620 580 600 580 395
TEXAS CATFISH: Inventory, Number and Total Liveweight, January 1, 1999-2003
Item
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Number Totalliveweight Number Total
liveweight Number Totalliveweight Number Total
liveweight Number Totalliveweight
Inventory: 1,000
Broodfish . . . . . . 9 46 16 55 7 26 6 23 14 60
Fingerlings . . . . . 6,150 214 750 24 570 20 670 25 800 32
Total stockers . . . 730 150 320 70 1,025 127 360 56 365 65
Small food size . . 410 451 340 396 155 157 105 103 105 105
Medium food size 200 385 75 151 105 229 45 87 55 110
Large food size . . 63 221 50 238 24 83 25 86 29 107
TEXAS CATFISH: Number, Weight and Value of Sales, January 1, 1998-2002
Item 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
All stockers:
Total number sold . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 670 460 360 350 1/
Total pounds sold . . . . . . 1,000 pounds 387 89 99 90 1/
Average value per pound . . . . Dollars 1.13 1.07 1.50 1.70 1/
Total value of sales . . . . . 1,000 dollars 437 95 149 153 1/
Fingerlings and fry:
Total number sold . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 3,500 1/ 1,030 930 2,500
Total pounds sold . . . . . . 1,000 pounds 187 1/ 19 10 105
Average value per pound . . . . Dollars 2.67 1/ 4.16 5.00 4.90
Total value of sales . . . . . 1,000 dollars 499 1/ 79 50 515
All food size:
Total number sold . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 1,240 510 330 290 550
Total pounds sold . . . . . . 1,000 pounds 1,670 1,200 692 430 950
Average value per pound . . . . Dollars 1.44 1.33 1.16 1.30 1.51
Total value of sales . . . . . 1,000 dollars 2,405 1,596 803 559 1,435 1 Not published to avoid disclosing individual operations.
71
TEXAS CROPS:Acreage, Yield, Production and Value, 1998-2002
Crop and yearAcreage Yield per
harvestedacre
Unit ProductionMarketing yearaverage price
Value ofproductionPlanted Harvested
1,000 acres 1,000 units Dollars 1,000 dollarsBeans, dry edible
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 13.5 1,000 Lbs.:Cwt 135 19.40 2,6191999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 47.0 1,490 Lbs.:Cwt 701 13.50 9,4642000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 16.6 950 Lbs.:Cwt 158 19.00 3,0022001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 26.4 1,320 Lbs.:Cwt 348 20.00 6,9602002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37.5 32.5 970 Lbs.:Cwt 315 20.00 6,300
Corn1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,400 1,850 100 Bushels 185,000 2.26 418,1001999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,950 1,770 129 Bushels 228,330 2.07 472,6432000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,100 1,900 124 Bushels 235,600 2.18 513,6082001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,600 1,420 118 Bushels 167,560 2.29 383,7122002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,050 1,820 113 Bushels 205,660 2.60 534,716
Corn, silage 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 19 Tons 2,850 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 21 Tons 2,310 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 20 Tons 2,600 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 17 Tons 2,210 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 18 Tons 2,160
Cotton, American-Pima 1 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105.0 32.0 791 Lbs.:Bales 52.7 .93 23,5251999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.0 32.0 669 Lbs.:Bales 44.6 .85 18,1972000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.0 16.0 930 Lbs.:Bales 31.0 .938 13,9572001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.0 16.5 1,059 Lbs.:Bales 36.4 .862 15,0612002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.5 18.3 1,110 Lbs.:Bales 42.3 .797 14,920
Cotton, Upland 1
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,650 3,300 524 Lbs.:Bales 3,600 .561 969,4081999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,150 5,100 475 Lbs.:Bales 5,050 .410 993,8402000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,400 4,400 430 Lbs.:Bales 3,940 .459 868,0612001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,000 4,250 481 Lbs.:Bales 4,260 .284 580,7232002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,600 4,500 538 Lbs.:Bales 5,040 .383 919,200
Hay, all 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,040 1.70 Tons 6,870 89.00 564,9901999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,530 2.38 Tons 13,135 71.50 870,6302000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,120 2.16 Tons 8,880 76.00 607,0802001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,230 2.07 Tons 10,837 75.00 743,8912002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,630 2.46 Tons 13,850 79.50 930,400
Hay, alfalfa1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 4.50 Tons 630 149.00 93,8701999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 5.50 Tons 715 132.00 94,3802000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 4.00 Tons 480 136.00 65,2802001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 4.90 Tons 637 143.00 91,0912002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 5.00 Tons 650 152.00 98,800
Hay, other1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,900 1.60 Tons 6,240 75.50 471,1201999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,400 2.30 Tons 12,420 62.50 776,2502000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,000 2.10 Tons 8,400 64.50 541,8002001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,100 2.00 Tons 10,200 64.00 652,8002002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,500 2.40 Tons 13,200 63.00 831,600
Oats1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600 130 53 Bushels 6,890 1.44 9,9221999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 670 110 44 Bushels 4,840 1.55 7,5022000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600 100 43 Bushels 4,300 1.60 6,8802001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 725 160 45 Bushels 7,200 2.20 15,8402002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 750 160 44 Bushels 7,040 1.70 11,968
74
TEXAS CROPS:Acreage, Yield, Production and Value, 1998-2002
Crop and yearAcreage Yield per
harvestedacre
Unit ProductionMarketing yearaverage price
Value ofproductionPlanted Harvested
1,000 acres 1,000 units Dollars 1,000 dollarsPeanuts
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370 335 2,740 Pounds 917,900 .246 225,8031999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 280 3,310 Pounds 926,800 .206 190,9212000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425 275 2,540 Pounds 698,500 .246 171,8312001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425 310 2,890 Pounds 895,900 .226 202,4732002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 280 3,100 Pounds 868,000 .182 157,976
Rice1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 283 5,600 Lbs.:Cwt 15,846 9.32 147,6851999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 259 5,900 Lbs.:Cwt 15,272 6.04 92,2432000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 214 6,700 Lbs.:Cwt 14,342 5.82 83,4702001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 216 6,850 Lbs.:Cwt 14,790 4.61 68,1822002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 206 7,100 Lbs.:Cwt 14,616 4.20 61,387
Sorghum 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 2,300 2,576 Lbs.:Cwt 59,248 3.76 223,2381999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,150 2,950 3,528 Lbs.:Cwt 104,076 2.93 304,7942000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,000 2,350 3,416 Lbs.:Cwt 80,276 3.28 263,7642001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,500 2,600 2,800 Lbs.:Cwt 72,800 3.64 264,9922002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,200 2,550 2,856 Lbs.:Cwt 72,828 4.20 305,878
Sorghum, silage 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 9 Tons 7201999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 11 Tons 7702000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 10 Tons 6002001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 9 Tons 6302002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 12 Tons 1,080
Soybeans1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440 270 22.0 Bushels 5,940 4.50 26,7301999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400 380 27.0 Bushels 10,260 4.20 43,0922000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290 260 27.0 Bushels 7,020 4.40 30,8882001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 225 26.0 Bushels 5,850 4.60 26,9102002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 215 28.0 Bushels 6,020 5.20 31,304
Sugarcane (for sugar and seed)1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.6 32.6 Tons 1,064 24.90 26,4941999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.0 33.3 Tons 1,033 26.10 26,9622000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46.3 38.6 Tons 1,789 29.80 53,3122001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47.0 41.7 Tons 1,962 28.90 56,7022002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45.0 37.5 Tons 1,687 2/ 2/
Sunflowers 3
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 44 675 Pounds 29,700 12.10 3,6141999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 67 900 Pounds 60,300 13.60 8,2262000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 45 778 Pounds 35,000 10.30 3,6162001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 103 1,168 Pounds 120,300 10.30 12,3262002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 34 935 Pounds 31,800 14.50 4,594
Wheat, winter 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,100 3,900 35 Bushels 136,500 2.66 363,0901999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,200 3,400 36 Bushels 122,400 2.28 279,0722000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,000 2,200 30 Bushels 66,000 2.52 166,3202001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,600 3,200 34 Bushels 108,800 2.78 302,4642002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,400 2,700 29 Bushels 78,300 3.00 234,9001 Marketing year average price on per pound basis. 2 State estimates available February 2004. 3 Marketing year average price on cwt basis.
75
STATE RANKING BY PRODUCTION FOR SELECTED CROPS, 2001 AND 2002
UPLAND COTTON - PRODUCTION ALL HAY - PRODUCTION
State 2001 State 2002 State 2001 State 2002
1,000 bls. 1,000 bls. 1,000 tons 1,000 tons
1 TEXAS 4,260 1 TEXAS 5,000 1 TEXAS 10,837 1 TEXAS 13,850
2 Mississippi 2,396 2 Mississippi 1,980 2 South Dakota 9,150 2 California 9,594
3 Georgia 2,220 3 Georgia 1,650 3 California 8,915 3 Missouri 7,840
4 Arkansas 1,833 4 Arkansas 1,650 4 Kansas 7,980 4 Kansas 6,965
5 California 1,770 5 California 1,430 5 Missouri 7,853 5 Minnesota 6,610
6 North Carolina 1,673 6 Tennessee 813 6 Nebraska 7,578 6 Nebraska 5,950
7 Louisiana 1,034 7 North Carolina 790 7 Minnesota 6,195 7 Iowa 5,645
8 Tennessee 978 8 Louisiana 750 8 Iowa 5,565 8 Idaho 5,608
9 Alabama 920 9 Missouri 610 9 Kentucky 5,545 9 Kentucky 5,520
10 Missouri 695 10 Alabama 575 10 North Dakota 5,065 10 Wisconsin 5,340
OTHER HAY - PRODUCTION AMERICAN-PIMA COTTON - PRODUCTION
State 2001 State 2002 State 2001 State 2002
1,000 tons 1,000 tons 1,000 bls. 1,000 bls.
1 TEXAS 10,200 1 TEXAS 13,200 1 California 639.0 1 California 580
2 Missouri 6,480 2 Missouri 6,460 2 TEXAS 36.4 2 TEXAS 39
3 Kentucky 4,620 3 Kentucky 4,620 3 Arizona 14.5 3 Arizona 16
3 Tennessee 4,620 4 Tennessee 4,400 4 New Mexico 10.5 4 New Mexico 14
5 Kansas 3,840 5 Oklahoma 3,840
6 Oklahoma 3,080 6 Arkansas 3,510
7 Arkansas 2,730 7 Kansas 3,450
8 South Dakota 2,550 8 New York 2,415
9 Nebraska 2,430 9 North Dakota 2,035
10 Virginia 2,400 10 Ohio 1,980
PEANUT - PRODUCTION SORGHUM GRAIN - PRODUCTION
State 2001 State 2002 State 2001 State 2002
1,000 lbs. 1,000 lbs. 1,000 cwt 1,000 cwt
1 Georgia 1,711,620 1 Georgia 1,313,000 1 Kansas 130,200 1 Kansas 75,600
2 TEXAS 895,900 2 TEXAS 868,000 2 TEXAS 72,800 2 TEXAS 72,828
3 Alabama 532,325 3 Alabama 379,250 3 Nebraska 19,992 3 Arkansas 9,918
4 North Carolina 356,475 4 North Carolina 210,000 4 Missouri 11,581 4 Missouri 8,806
5 Florida 250,100 5 Florida 197,800 5 Louisiana 9,996 5 Nebraska 8,400
6 Virginia 234,750 6 Oklahoma 159,600 6 Oklahoma 8,467 6 Oklahoma 8,316
7 Oklahoma 197,890 7 Virginia 119,700 7 Arkansas 8,187 7 Louisiana 7,484
8 New Mexico 67,044 8 New Mexico 54,000 8 Colorado 5,298 8 Illinois 3,579
9 South Carolina 30,600 9 South Carolina 19,140 9 South Dakota 4,956 9 Mississippi 3,493
10 Illinois 4,528 10 South Dakota 1,714
76
STATE RANKING BY PRODUCTION FOR SELECTED CROPS, 2001 AND 2002
SORGHUM SILAGE - PRODUCTION RICE - PRODUCTION
State 2001 State 2002 State 2001 State 2002
1,000 tons 1,000 tons 1,000 cwt 1,000 cwt
1 Kansas 1,200 1 TEXAS 1,080 1 Arkansas 102,858 1 Arkansas 96,752
2 TEXAS 630 2 Kansas 700 2 California 38,490 2 California 42,989
3 South Dakota 475 3 Georgia 260 3 Louisiana 30,014 3 Louisiana 29,400
4 Colorado 240 4 South Dakota 220 4 Mississippi 16,698 4 Mississippi 16,192
5 Nebraska 220 5 Nebraska 188 5 TEXAS 14,790 5 TEXAS 14,616
6 Georgia 200 6 Arizona 180 6 Missouri 12,420 6 Missouri 11,011
7 New Mexico 176 7 Oklahoma 170
8 Arizona 114 8 New Mexico 154
9 Oklahoma 108 9 Colorado 135
10 California 60 10 California 68
SUGARCANE - PRODUCTION (For Sugar and Seed) WINTER WHEAT - PRODUCTION
State 2001 State 2002 State 2001 State 2002
1,000 tons 1,000 tons 1,000 bu. 1,000 bu.
1 Florida 16,338 1 Florida 17,606 1 Kansas 328,000 1 Kansas 267,300
2 Louisiana 14,335 2 Louisiana 14,355 2 Oklahoma 122,100 2 Washington 103,250
3 TEXAS 1,962 3 Hawaii 2,284 3 TEXAS 108,800 3 Oklahoma 98,000
4 Hawaii 1,932 4 TEXAS 1,687 4 Washington 106,750 4 TEXAS 78,300
5 Colorado 66,000 5 Idaho 54,510
6 Ohio 60,300 6 Ohio 50,220
7 Nebraska 59,200 7 Nebraska 48,640
8 Idaho 51,830 8 Arkansas 38,640
9 Arkansas 50,440 9 Colorado 36,300
10 Illinois 43,920 10 Missouri 34,200
SUNFLOWER SEED - PRODUCTION OATS - PRODUCTION
State 2001 State 2002 State 2001 State 2002
1,000 lbs. 1,000 lbs. 1,000 bu. 1,000 bu.
1 North Dakota 1,473,300 1 North Dakota 1,710,050 1 North Dakota 14,880 1 Minnesota 15,960
2 South Dakota 995,810 2 South Dakota 373,750 2 Minnesota 12,600 2 Wisconsin 15,000
3 Kansas 391,890 3 Kansas 151,590 3 Wisconsin 12,480 3 Iowa 13,300
4 Colorado 208,100 4 Colorado 86,050 4 Iowa 9,100 4 North Dakota 12,760
5 TEXAS 120,300 5 TEXAS 63,000 5 South Dakota 7,800 5 TEXAS 7,040
6 Nebraska 83,350 6 Nebraska 31,800 6 Pennsylvania 7,475 6 Pennsylvania 7,015
7 Minnesota 74,200 7 Minnesota 24,700 7 TEXAS 7,200 7 South Dakota 4,500
8 Ohio 6,205 8 Michigan 4,160
9 New York 5,520 9 Ohio 3,720
10 Nebraska 3,666 10 New York 3,630
77
STATE RANKING BY PRODUCTION FOR SELECTED CROPS, 2001 AND 2002
CORN FOR GRAIN - PRODUCTION CORN SILAGE - PRODUCTION
State 2001 State 2002 State 2001 State 2002
1,000 bu. 1,000 bu. 1,000 tons 1,000 tons
1 Iowa 1,664,400 1 Iowa 1,963,500 1 Wisconsin 11,310 1 Wisconsin 11,680
2 Illinois 1,649,200 2 Illinois 1,496,000 2 California 8,190 2 California 10,140
3 Nebraska 1,139,250 3 Minnesota 1,051,900 3 Pennsylvania 7,840 3 Minnesota 7,650
4 Indiana 884,520 4 Nebraska 940,800 4 New York 7,760 4 New York 7,540
5 Minnesota 806,000 5 Indiana 631,620 5 Minnesota 7,000 5 Pennsylvania 6,440
6 Ohio 437,460 6 Wisconsin 391,500 6 Nebraska 4,675 6 Iowa 6,270
7 Kansas 387,350 7 South Dakota 304,000 7 Iowa 4,255 7 South Dakota 5,520
8 South Dakota 370,600 8 Kansas 290,000 8 Kansas 4,130 8 Nebraska 4,513
9 Missouri 345,800 9 Missouri 283,500 9 South Dakota 3,885 9 Colorado 3,600
10 Wisconsin 330,200 10 Ohio 252,560 10 Michigan 3,640 10 Kansas 3,570
12 TEXAS 167,560 12 TEXAS 205,660 14 TEXAS 2,210 15 TEXAS 2,160
DRY EDIBLE BEANS - PRODUCTION SOYBEAN - PRODUCTION
State 2001 State 2002 State 2001 State 2002
1,000 cwt 1,000 cwt 1,000 bu. 1,000 bu.
1 North Dakota 6,200 1 North Dakota 10,626 1 Iowa 480,480 1 Iowa 494,880
2 Nebraska 3,185 2 Michigan 4,903 2 Illinois 477,900 2 Illinois 449,780
3 Colorado 1,785 3 Nebraska 3,465 3 Indiana 273,910 3 Minnesota 308,850
4 California 1,496 4 Minnesota 2,475 4 Minnesota 266,400 4 Indiana 235,750
5 Minnesota 1,575 5 Idaho 1,907 5 Nebraska 222,950 5 Nebraska 176,330
6 Idaho 1,424 6 California 1,762 6 Ohio 187,780 6 Missouri 170,000
7 Michigan 780 7 Colorado 1,519 7 Missouri 186,200 7 Ohio 141,300
8 Washington 578 8 Washington 820 8 South Dakota 143,040 8 South Dakota 126,790
9 Wyoming 514 9 Wyoming 624 9 Arkansas 91,200 9 Arkansas 96,480
10 TEXAS 348 12 TEXAS 315 10 Kansas 87,360 10 North Dakota 86,790
24 TEXAS 5,850 24 TEXAS 6,020
ALFALFA HAY - PRODUCTION
State 2001 State 2002
1,000 tons 1,000 tons
1 California 7,272 1 California 8,094
2 South Dakota 6,600 2 Minnesota 5,280
3 Nebraska 5,148 3 Idaho 5,000
4 Minnesota 5,075 4 Iowa 4,875
5 Iowa 4,625 5 Wisconsin 4,620
6 Idaho 4,368 6 Nebraska 4,050
7 Wisconsin 4,250 7 Kansas 3,515
8 Kansas 4,140 8 South Dakota 3,360
9 Colorado 3,610 9 Michigan 3,150
10 North Dakota 3,360 10 Montana 2,940
27 TEXAS 637 28 TEXAS 650
78
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
CORNAcres Planted - 2002
LEADING COUNTIES IN CORN PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
Rank County 2001Production
Percentof state Rank County 2002
ProductionPercentof state
1,000 bushels 1,000 bushels
1 Dallam 23,905 14.3 1 Dallam 25,865 12.6
2 Hartley 19,590 11.7 2 Hartley 23,064 11.2
3 Moore 11,398 6.8 3 Sherman 14,988 7.3
4 Sherman 10,152 6.1 4 Moore 13,674 6.6
5 Castro 9,820 5.9 5 Castro 12,513 6.1
6 Parmer 5,530 3.3 6 Falls 7,556 3.7
7 Williamson 5,340 3.2 7 Hansford 7,190 3.5
8 Wharton 4,702 2.8 8 Williamson 6,067 3.0
9 Jackson 4,263 2.5 9 Parmer 5,512 2.7
10 Bell 3,656 2.2 10 Bell 4,994 2.4
79
TEXAS ALL CORNAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Carson 7.6 11.8 7.4 11.5 155.8 181.7 1,153 2,089 25Castro 66.0 68.2 54.8 57.4 179.2 218.0 9,820 12,513 5Dallam 136.5 135.0 126.3 132.3 189.3 195.5 23,905 25,865 1Deaf Smith 23.5 18.7 18.1 15.4 128.1 174.9 2,319 2,693 20Floyd 6.8 5.6 4.8 4.5 124.8 190.2 599 856 41Gray 3.8 4.9 3.8 4.6 164.7 172.2 626 792 43Hale 19.5 21.0 17.2 16.7 142.3 178.3 2,447 2,978 17Hansford 17.6 40.0 12.5 36.0 161.0 199.7 2,012 7,190 7Hartley 109.3 114.5 102.8 108.1 190.6 213.4 19,590 23,064 2Hutchinson 7.7 13.0 6.6 10.6 190.2 209.7 1,255 2,223 23Lipscomb 2.9 3.3 2.7 3.1 182.2 203.2 492 630 50Moore 65.5 68.0 61.8 64.5 184.4 212.0 11,398 13,674 4Ochiltree 9.3 12.5 7.8 11.4 148.7 204.9 1,160 2,336 22Parmer 40.0 41.7 29.0 27.6 190.7 199.7 5,530 5,512 9Randall 2.9 2.9 1.6 0.9 186.9 145.6 299 131 87Roberts 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.2 173.9 203.2 400 447 58Sherman 65.5 83.0 60.4 74.2 168.1 202.0 10,152 14,988 3Swisher 8.9 8.8 6.2 6.3 122.6 199.5 760 1,257 29Other Counties 1.2 0.8 0.9 0.7 154.4 184.3 139 129DISTRICT 1-N 597.0 656.0 527.0 588.0 178.5 203.0 94,056 119,367
Bailey 6.0 6.5 4.9 3.8 142.2 174.5 697 663 49Crosby 1.5 1.3 0.1 0.5 140.0 100.0 14 50 102Lamb 30.7 30.5 18.3 21.6 153.4 166.7 2,807 3,600 15Other Counties 0.8 1.7 0.7 1.1 142.9 156.4 100 172DISTRICT 1-S 39.0 40.0 24.0 27.0 150.8 166.1 3,618 4,485
Donley 1.2 0.9 85.6 77 93Wichita 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.0 54.2 59.0 65 59 99Other Counties 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.1 62.5 67.3 50 74DISTRICT 2-N 2.5 3.5 2.0 3.0 57.5 70.0 115 210
Comanche 3.2 5.1 0.3 0.5 56.7 58.0 17 29 106Erath 1.8 1.3 0.2 0.2 45.0 55.0 9 11 108Other Counties 1.0 1.6 0.5 0.3 86.0 100.0 43 30DISTRICT 3 6.0 8.0 1.0 1.0 69.0 70.0 69 70
Bell 52.1 77.3 49.1 76.9 74.5 64.9 3,656 4,994 10Bosque * 1.5 1.3 142.3 185 78Collin 1.1 38.0 1.1 35.6 70.9 83.0 78 2,955 18Cooke 1.0 1.9 1.0 1.6 61.0 100.0 61 160 83Coryell 9.5 7.5 8.5 6.8 40.0 46.5 340 316 70Dallas 3.0 4.7 2.5 4.3 40.0 76.3 100 328 67Delta 4.3 6.3 4.0 6.1 90.0 73.8 360 450 57Denton * 4.4 4.4 80.0 352 65Ellis 11.5 35.0 11.0 34.8 72.7 82.8 800 2,881 19Falls 44.8 77.5 40.6 76.8 74.3 98.4 3,016 7,556 6Fannin 7.3 15.0 7.1 14.5 73.2 80.9 520 1,173 33Grayson 3.6 17.5 3.5 17.0 64.3 84.6 225 1,439 27Hill 40.0 59.0 20.9 36.6 67.0 92.8 1,400 3,397 16Hunt * 5.1 4.9 66.9 328 67Johnson 1.6 3.2 1.1 2.9 80.0 79.7 88 231 74Kaufman 3.8 3.5 74.3 260 73Lamar 12.0 23.4 11.7 22.9 112.3 56.8 1,314 1,301 28Limestone 6.0 14.5 5.8 13.9 81.0 78.9 470 1,097 35McLennan 53.2 65.0 42.1 60.8 73.8 68.3 3,108 4,151 11Milam 25.2 59.3 24.7 58.2 78.0 68.3 1,927 3,974 12Navarro 3.0 13.3 2.8 12.8 94.6 90.2 265 1,155 34Williamson 65.0 115.5 60.1 110.2 88.9 55.1 5,340 6,067 8Other Counties 2.8 1.3 2.4 1.2 76.7 75.0 184 90DISTRICT 4 347.0 650.0 300.0 608.0 77.5 73.8 23,252 44,840
80
TEXAS ALL CORNAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Bowie 7.3 9.0 7.3 7.8 108.9 99.1 795 773 47Camp 1.3 1.2 86.7 104 89Houston 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 110.0 87.2 110 218 76Red River 6.9 10.3 6.5 8.6 119.8 101.3 779 871 40Other Counties 0.8 1.4 0.2 0.9 110.0 57.8 22 52DISTRICT 5-N 16.0 24.5 15.0 21.0 113.7 96.1 1,706 2,018
Brazos 5.8 6.6 5.6 5.0 118.4 99.8 663 499 55Grimes 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.6 120.0 92.5 228 148 85Robertson 4.7 7.6 4.0 7.0 97.3 111.7 389 782 45Walker 2.3 1.6 90.0 144 86Waller 8.8 9.0 8.2 8.7 124.1 56.9 1,018 495 56Other Counties 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.1 120.0 80.0 36 8DISTRICT 5-S 22.0 28.0 20.0 24.0 116.7 86.5 2,334 2,076
El Paso 5.0 4.9 2.5 202.0 505 54Hudspeth 1.9 * 0.5 176.0 88Other Counties 1.1 0.6DISTRICT 6 8.0 5.5 0.5 2.5 176.0 202.0 88 505
Gillespie 2.2 1.7 2.1 1.3 52.9 43.8 111 57 100Lampasas * 1.1 0.4 80.0 32 104McCulloch * 1.4 0.6 73.3 44 103Tom Green 3.5 3.1 3.0 1.4 123.3 123.6 370 173 79Uvalde 20.3 18.2 19.5 16.9 122.8 125.1 2,394 2,115 24Other Counties 2.0 0.5 1.4 0.4 99.3 67.5 139 27DISTRICT 7 28.0 26.0 26.0 21.0 115.9 116.6 3,014 2,448
Austin 2.1 4.1 2.0 4.1 91.0 72.9 182 299 71Bastrop 1.5 2.3 1.4 1.5 66.4 46.7 93 70 95Bee 28.8 28.2 25.6 22.9 44.8 34.3 1,148 785 44Bexar 14.4 12.9 13.9 11.8 70.1 65.6 974 774 46Burleson 7.7 14.0 7.5 13.0 100.7 91.9 755 1,195 31Caldwell 7.3 8.4 7.2 8.3 78.9 38.2 568 317 69Colorado 11.3 16.0 11.1 15.1 103.4 79.0 1,148 1,193 32Comal 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 68.5 51.5 89 67 96De Witt 8.7 9.2 8.6 8.6 82.4 43.4 709 373 63Fayette 10.1 10.8 9.9 10.3 85.5 41.4 846 426 60Goliad 7.2 7.1 7.2 4.8 63.9 35.2 460 169 81Gonzales 5.5 5.7 5.0 4.8 63.6 40.6 318 195 77Guadalupe 22.9 23.9 21.3 22.8 71.0 40.6 1,512 926 38Hays 5.1 3.6 5.0 3.4 60.4 30.9 302 105 88Karnes 16.7 15.1 16.5 11.9 41.0 14.5 677 173 79Lavaca 6.0 6.6 5.9 6.0 73.1 36.7 431 220 75Lee 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 80.7 44.2 113 53 101Medina 24.1 23.3 23.3 21.7 95.1 85.9 2,216 1,864 26Travis 8.2 18.8 7.8 15.5 73.1 37.0 570 573 52Washington 1.0 1.7 0.6 1.6 35.0 50.6 21 81 90Wilson 11.7 10.5 11.5 8.4 51.3 50.8 590 427 59DISTRICT 8-N 203.0 225.0 194.0 199.0 70.7 51.7 13,722 10,285
Kleberg 4.7 4.2 19.3 81 90Nueces 20.5 32.0 19.4 25.1 57.2 41.5 1,109 1,042 36Refugio 18.8 16.6 18.5 15.1 92.2 58.5 1,706 883 39San Patricio 15.7 21.7 14.1 17.1 53.6 33.0 756 565 53DISTRICT 8-S 55.0 75.0 52.0 61.5 68.7 41.8 3,571 2,571
Brazoria 1.3 2.5 1.3 2.5 100.0 29.6 130 74 94Calhoun 15.5 13.0 14.9 10.8 100.0 56.1 1,490 606 51Chambers * 2.3 0.9 90.0 81 90
81
TEXAS ALL CORNAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Fort Bend 16.8 21.0 16.1 19.5 107.7 64.0 1,734 1,248 30Harris 5.5 5.8 5.2 5.0 113.5 82.4 590 412 61Jackson 52.5 57.0 52.1 56.4 81.8 64.1 4,263 3,614 14Jefferson 1.0 1.9 0.9 0.7 90.0 90.0 81 63 98Liberty 4.0 15.5 3.6 14.6 68.1 57.5 245 839 42Matagorda 4.7 11.0 4.6 11.0 100.0 30.5 460 335 66Victoria 30.0 38.0 28.5 35.7 110.5 69.7 3,150 2,490 21Wharton 41.5 49.0 39.1 47.4 120.3 83.0 4,702 3,933 13Other Counties 0.2 0.2 105.0 21DISTRICT 9 173.0 217.0 166.5 204.5 101.3 67.0 16,866 13,695
Atascosa 4.3 2.7 2.8 2.2 93.9 72.7 263 160 83Duval * 2.5 0.8 37.5 30 105Frio 4.0 3.2 3.5 2.7 120.0 99.3 420 268 72Jim Wells 21.0 27.0 19.8 21.9 34.6 30.5 685 667 48Live Oak 14.1 13.0 13.7 6.7 42.7 24.0 585 161 82Zavala 3.9 5.1 3.7 4.4 95.4 83.9 353 369 64Other Counties 1.7 0.5 1.5 0.3 71.3 93.3 107 28DISTRICT 10-N 49.0 54.0 45.0 39.0 53.6 43.2 2,413 1,683
Cameron 16.2 9.4 13.8 4.9 58.8 77.3 811 379 62Hidalgo 30.0 21.1 26.5 13.9 56.6 67.6 1,500 940 37Starr 4.0 2.2 2.7 0.3 27.0 46.7 73 14 107Willacy 3.8 4.3 3.5 0.9 84.0 71.1 294 64 97DISTRICT 10-S 54.0 37.0 46.5 20.0 57.6 69.9 2,678 1,397
Other Districts 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 116.0 20.0 58 10
STATE 1,600.0 2,050.0 1,420.0 1,820.0 118.0 113.0 167,560 205,660
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals. * Less than 1,000 acres planted. Acreage and production estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
82
TEXAS IRRIGATED CORNAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
District
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
DISTRICT 1-N 587.0 654.0 519.0 586.5 179.8 203.2 93,313 119,192
DISTRICT 1-S 37.0 38.5 23.5 26.5 151.7 167.4 3,564 4,435
DISTRICT 2-N * 2.0 1.5 88.0 132
DISTRICT 3 3.0 5.0 0.6 0.5 73.3 58.0 44 29
DISTRICT 4 6.0 9.0 5.5 8.0 91.6 110.4 504 883
DISTRICT 5-N * 1.0 1.0 116.0 116
DISTRICT 5-S 6.0 7.0 5.5 6.5 115.5 130.3 635 847
DISTRICT 6 8.0 5.5 0.5 2.5 176.0 202.0 88 505
DISTRICT 7 24.7 21.5 23.0 18.5 122.6 123.9 2,819 2,293
DISTRICT 8-N 30.0 35.0 28.5 33.0 108.0 98.8 3,077 3,262
DISTRICT 8-S 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 108.8 69.0 272 207
DISTRICT 9 6.0 7.0 5.5 6.0 129.3 116.2 711 697
DISTRICT 10-N 10.6 11.0 9.5 9.0 116.1 92.1 1,103 829
DISTRICT 10-S 28.0 20.0 25.0 17.0 74.0 76.5 1,850 1,301
Other Districts 1.2 0.5 0.4 0.5 150.0 20.0 60 10
STATE 750.0 820.0 649.0 720.0 166.5 187.1 108,040 134,738
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED CORNAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
District
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
DISTRICT 1-N 10.0 2.0 8.0 1.5 92.9 116.7 743 175
DISTRICT 1-S 2.0 1.5 0.5 0.5 108.0 100.0 54 50
DISTRICT 2-N 2.0 1.5 1.9 1.5 52.6 52.0 100 78
DISTRICT 3 3.0 3.0 0.4 0.5 62.5 82.0 25 41
DISTRICT 4 341.0 641.0 294.5 600.0 77.2 73.3 22,748 43,957
DISTRICT 5-N 15.5 23.5 14.9 20.0 113.8 95.1 1,695 1,902
DISTRICT 5-S 16.0 21.0 14.5 17.5 117.2 70.2 1,699 1,229
DISTRICT 7 3.3 4.5 3.0 2.5 65.0 62.0 195 155
DISTRICT 8-N 173.0 190.0 165.5 166.0 64.3 42.3 10,645 7,023
DISTRICT 8-S 52.5 72.0 49.5 58.5 66.6 40.4 3,299 2,364
DISTRICT 9 167.0 210.0 161.0 198.5 100.3 65.5 16,155 12,998
DISTRICT 10-N 38.4 43.0 35.5 30.0 36.9 28.5 1,310 854
DISTRICT 10-S 26.0 17.0 21.5 3.0 38.5 32.0 828 96
Other Districts 0.3 0.3 80.0 24
STATE 850.0 1,230.0 771.0 1,100.0 77.2 64.5 59,520 70,922
83
TEXAS CORN SILAGEAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
District 1Acreage
harvestedYield per
harvested acre Production
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 20021,000 acres Tons 1,000 tons
DISTRICT 1-N 66.0 63.0 20.7 24.2 1,368.0 1,525.0
DISTRICT 1-S 11.0 12.0 21.7 22.7 239.0 272.0
DISTRICT 3 5.0 7.0 12.6 14.0 63.0 98.0
DISTRICT 4 35.5 30.0 11.9 6.3 423.0 189.0
DISTRICT 5-N 2.0 10.5 21.0
DISTRICT 6 7.0 3.0 6.6 8.0 46.0 24.0
DISTRICT 7 * 2.0 13.0 26.0
DISTRICT 8-N 1.5 1.0 10.7 5.0 16.0 5.0
DISTRICT 10-S 2.0 15.0 30.0
Other Districts 2.0 12.5 25.0
STATE 130.0 120.0 17.0 18.0 2,210.0 2,160.0
1 Districts with less than 1,000 acres harvested in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in other districts.
84
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
AMERICAN PIMA COTTONAcres Planted - 2002
TEXAS AMERICAN-PIMA COTTONAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds Bales
El Paso 13.5 14.6 13.5 14.4 1,067 1,120 30.0 33.6 1Hudspeth 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9 1,024 1,071 6.4 8.7 2Other Counties 0.4DISTRICT 6 16.9 18.5 16.5 18.3 1,059 1,110 36.4 42.3
Other Districts 0.1
STATE 17.0 18.5 16.5 18.3 1,059 1,110 36.4 42.3
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals. * Less than 1,000 acres planted. Acreage and production estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
85
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
UPLAND COTTONAcres Planted - 2002
LEADING COUNTIES IN UPLAND COTTON PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
Rank County 2001Production
Percentof state Rank County 2002
ProductionPercentof state
Bales Bales
1 Hale 371,500 9.4 1 Hale 370,000 8.7
2 Lamb 250,000 6.3 2 Lamb 308,000 7.2
3 Gaines 190,000 4.8 3 Gaines 254,000 6.0
4 Floyd 189,000 4.8 4 Lubbock 237,000 5.6
5 San Patricio 170,000 4.3 5 Hockley 228,300 5.4
6 Castro 157,000 4.0 6 Lynn 195,100 4.6
7 Parmer 153,700 3.9 7 Dawson 190,000 4.5
8 Lubbock 146,000 3.7 8 Crosby 187,000 4.4
9 Nueces 139,000 3.5 9 Parmer 179,000 4.2
10 Hockley 135,000 3.4 10 Castro 174,600 4.1
86
TEXAS ALL UPLAND COTTONAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds Bales
Armstrong 1.0 * 0.7 549 800Briscoe 41.0 39.3 39.4 27.7 415 425 34,100 24,500 46Carson 7.2 9.3 6.8 8.4 642 806 9,100 14,100 58Castro 81.7 81.2 80.3 77.3 938 1,084 157,000 174,600 10Dallam 1.6 * 0.6 400 500Deaf Smith 35.0 54.3 29.7 30.1 687 850 42,500 53,300 22Floyd 177.1 175.8 167.6 118.0 541 548 189,000 134,600 14Gray * 2.1 1.1 349 800 113Hale 266.7 256.7 261.0 219.5 683 809 371,500 370,000 1Hartley 7.0 7.4 3.3 1.0 495 528 3,400 1,100 109Parmer 74.4 80.5 73.1 78.7 1,009 1,092 153,700 179,000 9Potter * 1.3 1.3 480 1,300 105Randall 4.2 5.5 3.7 2.3 519 689 4,000 3,300 88Swisher 81.2 84.2 78.5 70.4 737 708 120,500 103,800 17Other Counties 1.9 2.4 1.3 1.2 702 640 1,900 1,600DISTRICT 1-N 780.0 800.0 746.0 637.0 700 800 1,088,000 1,062,000
Andrews 28.1 24.7 17.2 19.3 335 388 12,000 15,600 55Bailey 86.0 83.0 69.8 49.5 419 592 61,000 61,000 21Cochran 132.6 131.5 113.5 95.5 440 596 104,000 118,500 15Crosby 224.4 211.2 172.5 202.5 326 443 117,000 187,000 8Dawson 309.0 293.0 84.5 216.5 466 421 82,000 190,000 7Gaines 292.5 265.8 191.5 195.0 476 625 190,000 254,000 3Glasscock 92.4 83.6 30.0 56.5 560 370 35,000 43,500 30Hockley 257.4 251.2 165.5 225.0 392 487 135,000 228,300 5Howard 128.5 130.4 25.3 77.3 152 310 8,000 50,000 24Lamb 205.9 205.5 170.0 195.0 706 758 250,000 308,000 2Lubbock 264.0 265.5 193.5 228.5 362 498 146,000 237,000 4Lynn 299.5 292.0 110.3 277.0 268 338 61,500 195,100 6Martin 157.0 156.5 25.4 61.6 350 312 18,500 40,000 33Midland 34.8 32.0 14.0 13.8 309 330 9,000 9,500 69Terry 265.7 252.9 188.5 186.0 304 430 119,500 166,500 11Yoakum 147.2 129.2 87.5 79.0 447 529 81,500 87,000 18DISTRICT 1-S 2,925.0 2,808.0 1,659.0 2,178.0 414 483 1,430,000 2,191,000
Borden 21.2 20.5 5.5 16.4 323 383 3,700 13,100 59Childress 39.4 40.7 36.1 34.8 266 400 20,000 29,000 44Collingsworth 18.1 34.5 17.3 33.8 449 419 16,200 29,500 43Cottle 19.0 18.9 14.2 17.9 203 282 6,000 10,500 67Dickens 24.3 22.2 23.1 21.8 254 337 12,200 15,300 56Donley 13.5 11.1 12.2 10.3 421 443 10,700 9,500 69Foard 13.7 4.6 4.0 3.6 228 253 1,900 1,900 98Garza 44.8 43.1 24.1 40.3 319 397 16,000 33,300 40Hall 57.9 84.3 50.6 81.4 304 297 32,000 50,400 23Hardeman 7.9 4.4 5.3 4.3 408 636 4,500 5,700 79Kent 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.6 248 332 1,500 1,800 100King 2.8 2.7 1.3 1.7 222 254 600 900 111Motley 29.9 24.7 27.0 23.5 169 249 9,500 12,200 62Wheeler 4.8 5.5 4.7 5.3 409 516 4,000 5,700 79Wichita 18.7 13.3 8.8 12.8 191 244 3,500 6,500 76Wilbarger 31.0 23.8 25.9 22.5 180 335 9,700 15,700 54DISTRICT 2-N 350.0 357.0 263.0 333.0 277 347 152,000 241,000
Baylor 5.0 5.9 3.9 5.6 332 489 2,700 5,700 79Coleman 5.0 3.6 3.5 3.5 192 288 1,400 2,100 95Fisher 73.7 65.9 66.7 64.3 245 340 34,000 45,500 29Haskell 95.7 83.9 91.8 82.7 282 412 54,000 71,000 19Jones 100.6 72.3 78.4 71.2 214 275 35,000 40,800 32Knox 29.5 26.1 26.5 25.7 601 768 33,200 41,100 31Mitchell 58.6 55.0 43.0 54.4 219 346 19,600 39,200 34
87
TEXAS ALL UPLAND COTTONAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds Bales
Nolan 55.7 49.9 50.5 48.5 201 354 21,100 35,800 37Runnels 57.3 46.2 51.4 45.2 215 319 23,000 30,000 42Scurry 64.4 52.0 52.4 50.9 188 339 20,500 35,900 36Stonewall 7.3 5.9 6.7 5.7 215 404 3,000 4,800 84Taylor 17.2 12.3 15.2 11.3 237 259 7,500 6,100 78DISTRICT 2-S 570.0 479.0 490.0 469.0 250 366 255,000 358,000
Brown 2.2 1.3 0.5 0.8 192 240 200 400 115Clay 1.7 * 1.0 144 300Shackelford 2.5 1.5 2.4 1.2 260 360 1,300 900 111Throckmorton 3.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 154 320 800 1,600 102Other Counties 2.2 1.7 1.6 1.6 120 330 400 1,100DISTRICT 3 12.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 180 320 3,000 4,000
Bell 1.5 * 1.5 416 1,300Collin 2.9 1.1 2.8 0.9 360 587 2,100 1,100 109Delta 1.3 1.6 1.2 1.2 440 640 1,100 1,600 102Ellis 34.4 23.1 34.2 22.3 441 624 31,400 29,000 44Falls 5.5 * 3.7 519 4,000Fannin 1.2 * 1.1 480 1,100Hill 23.1 16.5 23.0 15.8 361 744 17,300 24,500 46Hunt 3.5 2.6 3.4 2.5 452 518 3,200 2,700 92Lamar 2.9 1.8 2.9 1.4 364 514 2,200 1,500 104Limestone 3.0 1.6 3.0 1.4 400 446 2,500 1,300 105McLennan 7.1 3.5 7.1 3.3 487 698 7,200 4,800 84Milam 6.1 4.4 5.9 4.0 594 756 7,300 6,300 77Navarro 17.3 14.0 17.0 13.2 339 745 12,000 20,500 48Williamson 21.8 8.0 20.8 7.5 508 608 22,000 9,500 69Other Counties 3.4 3.8 3.4 3.5 466 576 3,300 4,200DISTRICT 4 135.0 82.0 131.0 77.0 432 667 118,000 107,000
Houston 2.6 2.8 1.6 2.0 480 672 1,600 2,800 90Red River 4.6 2.5 4.6 2.5 490 710 4,700 3,700 86Other Counties 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.5 420 480 700 500DISTRICT 5-N 8.0 6.0 7.0 5.0 480 672 7,000 7,000
Brazos 7.8 7.8 7.5 7.8 710 800 11,100 13,000 61Robertson 21.7 20.5 21.5 20.3 534 818 23,900 34,600 39Walker 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.0 524 576 1,200 1,200 107Other Counties 1.2 1.3 0.9 0.9 427 640 800 1,200DISTRICT 5-S 32.0 31.0 31.0 30.0 573 800 37,000 50,000
El Paso 9.0 6.7 8.7 6.1 1,324 1,338 24,000 17,000 50Hudspeth 8.0 7.4 8.0 6.0 1,200 1,360 20,000 17,000 50Pecos 6.5 5.6 6.5 5.6 849 943 11,500 11,000 66Reeves 5.7 2.0 5.2 2.0 591 1,296 6,400 5,400 83Other Counties 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.3 880 960 1,100 600DISTRICT 6 30.0 22.0 29.0 20.0 1,043 1,224 63,000 51,000
Coke 4.1 2.9 0.4 0.8 360 420 300 700 114Concho 28.9 22.3 26.1 22.3 211 329 11,500 15,300 56McCulloch 3.9 4.1 3.5 3.9 165 295 1,200 2,400 93Reagan 38.2 27.9 8.6 11.8 547 692 9,800 17,000 50Schleicher 7.5 6.8 6.0 5.2 392 258 4,900 2,800 90Tom Green 87.7 71.1 79.7 65.9 325 339 54,000 46,600 27Upton 17.3 10.0 5.7 6.3 581 526 6,900 6,900 75Uvalde 5.9 7.0 5.7 7.0 926 1,083 11,000 15,800 53Other Counties 1.5 0.9 1.3 0.8 517 900 1,400 1,500DISTRICT 7 195.0 153.0 137.0 124.0 354 422 101,000 109,000
88
TEXAS ALL UPLAND COTTONAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds Bales
Austin 4.3 3.4 2.6 3.1 628 867 3,400 5,600 82Bee 13.1 12.3 13.1 8.3 495 653 13,500 11,300 65Burleson 11.1 6.6 11.0 6.2 620 1,014 14,200 13,100 59Caldwell 3.3 2.4 3.1 2.1 449 503 2,900 2,200 94Colorado 6.8 2.9 4.1 1.9 644 884 5,500 3,500 87Goliad 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 480 617 1,500 1,800 100Karnes 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.0 480 576 1,200 1,200 107Medina 4.3 3.3 4.3 3.2 1,194 1,140 10,700 7,600 74Travis 3.3 1.9 3.1 1.6 294 570 1,900 1,900 98Other Counties 3.1 2.3 3.0 2.2 672 829 4,200 3,800DISTRICT 8-N 52.0 38.0 47.0 31.0 603 805 59,000 52,000
Kleberg 43.3 38.5 18.0 37.0 427 475 16,000 36,600 35Nueces 144.6 131.0 117.0 110.0 570 598 139,000 137,000 13Refugio 41.2 44.0 40.6 28.4 875 592 74,000 35,000 38San Patricio 132.0 124.0 130.5 111.3 625 712 170,000 165,000 12Other Counties 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.3 533 640 1,000 400DISTRICT 8-S 362.0 338.0 307.0 287.0 625 626 400,000 374,000
Brazoria 7.7 5.8 7.7 5.7 692 674 11,100 8,000 73Calhoun 27.5 32.3 25.8 13.0 683 665 36,700 18,000 49Fort Bend 61.0 50.8 58.3 50.1 605 641 73,500 66,900 20Jackson 35.5 30.2 30.5 29.5 738 755 46,900 46,400 28Matagorda 35.0 29.3 33.5 28.6 960 839 67,000 50,000 24Victoria 19.3 14.0 16.7 11.5 612 501 21,300 12,000 63Wharton 79.0 67.6 75.5 66.6 792 819 124,500 113,700 16DISTRICT 9 265.0 230.0 248.0 205.0 737 738 381,000 315,000
Brooks 1.4 * 1.1 436 1,000Duval 1.5 * 0.9 480 900Frio * 1.0 1.0 1,008 2,100 95Jim Wells 15.3 12.6 12.6 9.0 423 619 11,100 11,600 64Live Oak 3.5 2.0 3.2 1.8 360 560 2,400 2,100 95Zavala 2.8 4.3 2.8 4.3 857 915 5,000 8,200 72Other Counties 2.5 2.1 2.4 1.9 720 505 3,600 2,000DISTRICT 10-N 27.0 22.0 23.0 18.0 501 693 24,000 26,000
Cameron 81.4 72.8 48.0 30.1 517 486 51,700 30,500 41Hidalgo 85.0 66.2 48.5 34.2 693 688 70,000 49,000 26Starr 3.0 3.6 2.6 2.5 609 576 3,300 3,000 89Willacy 87.6 84.4 24.9 13.2 328 382 17,000 10,500 68DISTRICT 10-S 257.0 227.0 124.0 80.0 550 558 142,000 93,000
STATE 6,000.0 5,600.0 4,250.0 4,500.0 481 538 4,260,000 5,040,000
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals. * Less than 1,000 acres planted. Acreage and production estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
89
TEXAS IRRIGATED UPLAND COTTONAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds Bales
Briscoe 24.0 21.9 24.0 18.4 530 548 26,500 21,000Carson 5.0 6.5 4.7 6.0 735 960 7,200 12,000Castro 78.0 80.2 77.9 77.1 955 1,086 155,000 174,500Deaf Smith 27.0 31.2 23.0 27.5 772 908 37,000 52,000Floyd 125.5 130.0 120.6 86.0 653 647 164,000 116,000Hale 242.0 240.0 238.5 208.0 708 842 352,000 365,000Hartley 1.4 2.0 1.1 1.0 655 528 1,500 1,100Parmer 70.0 77.0 69.0 76.7 1,043 1,114 150,000 178,000Randall 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 600 773 2,500 2,900Swisher 72.0 74.0 69.5 66.4 780 742 113,000 102,700Other Counties 2.1 2.2 1.7 2.1 649 640 2,300 2,800DISTRICT 1-N 649.0 667.0 632.0 571.0 768 864 1,011,000 1,028,000
Andrews 9.0 7.7 8.2 7.3 585 815 10,000 12,400Bailey 36.0 30.6 29.8 29.0 660 794 41,000 48,000Cochran 71.0 70.4 69.0 65.5 563 722 81,000 98,500Crosby 136.0 120.4 98.0 114.0 451 602 92,000 143,000Dawson 56.0 51.0 52.5 50.0 622 864 68,000 90,000Gaines 184.0 159.2 167.5 154.0 519 729 181,000 234,000Glasscock 23.5 23.9 23.0 22.5 668 693 32,000 32,500Hockley 139.0 137.7 92.0 127.0 522 674 100,000 178,300Howard 2.5 1.4 2.3 1.3 417 738 2,000 2,000Lamb 163.5 162.0 150.5 159.0 753 863 236,000 286,000Lubbock 171.5 177.0 131.0 148.0 447 600 122,000 185,000Lynn 80.5 77.0 35.8 76.0 389 594 29,000 94,100Martin 10.5 10.0 10.4 9.6 692 685 15,000 13,700Midland 8.0 6.3 7.0 5.8 480 579 7,000 7,000Terry 125.5 115.9 119.0 108.0 387 589 96,000 132,500Yoakum 63.5 59.5 61.0 58.0 567 621 72,000 75,000DISTRICT 1-S 1,280.0 1,210.0 1,057.0 1,135.0 538 690 1,184,000 1,632,000
Borden 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 704 750 2,200 2,500Childress 6.1 7.5 6.1 7.3 708 723 9,000 11,000Collingsworth 5.6 8.5 5.3 8.3 860 954 9,500 16,500Cottle 1.8 1.4 1.8 1.4 667 651 2,500 1,900Dickens 3.1 2.7 3.1 2.7 325 764 2,100 4,300Donley 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.1 522 644 5,000 5,500Garza 12.2 11.6 10.6 10.3 543 643 12,000 13,800Hall 8.2 11.0 7.8 10.4 677 618 11,000 13,400Hardeman 3.0 2.3 2.8 2.3 600 897 3,500 4,300Motley 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.0 600 600 2,500 2,500Wheeler 1.3 2.0 1.2 2.0 800 840 2,000 3,500Wilbarger 1.0 * 0.9 693 1,300Other Counties 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.6 640 640 400 800DISTRICT 2-N 51.0 56.0 48.0 53.0 630 725 63,000 80,000
Baylor * 1.3 1.1 873 2,000Fisher 2.2 1.8 2.2 1.8 873 933 4,000 3,500Haskell 16.3 14.3 15.8 13.7 668 841 22,000 24,000Knox 16.0 16.0 16.0 15.8 846 1,048 28,200 34,500Mitchell 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 736 800 4,600 5,000Nolan 2.7 2.0 2.5 2.0 691 1,032 3,600 4,300Runnels 1.4 1.7 1.4 1.7 514 565 1,500 2,000Scurry 1.4 * 1.4 514 1,500Other Counties 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.9 734 935 2,600 3,700DISTRICT 2-S 45.0 42.0 44.0 41.0 742 925 68,000 79,000
Other Counties 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 720 720 3,000 3,000DISTRICT 4 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 720 720 3,000 3,000
90
TEXAS IRRIGATED UPLAND COTTONAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds Bales
Houston * 1.0 1.0 720 1,500Red River * 1.0 1.0 720 1,500Other Counties 1.0 1.0 480 1,000DISTRICT 5-N 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 480 720 1,000 3,000
Brazos 5.4 4.3 5.4 4.3 800 949 9,000 8,500Robertson 18.6 18.7 18.6 18.7 568 834 22,000 32,500DISTRICT 5-S 24.0 23.0 24.0 23.0 620 856 31,000 41,000
El Paso 9.0 6.7 8.7 6.1 1,324 1,338 24,000 17,000Hudspeth 8.0 7.4 8.0 6.0 1,200 1,360 20,000 17,000Pecos 6.5 5.6 6.5 5.6 849 943 11,500 11,000Reeves 5.7 2.0 5.2 2.0 591 1,296 6,400 5,400Other Counties 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.3 880 960 1,100 600DISTRICT 6 30.0 22.0 29.0 20.0 1,043 1,224 63,000 51,000
Concho 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 600 1,020 2,000 3,400Reagan 7.4 8.7 7.4 8.3 584 925 9,000 16,000Tom Green 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 670 811 18,000 21,800Upton 5.3 5.2 5.3 4.6 607 668 6,700 6,400Uvalde * 6.7 6.7 1,118 15,600Other Counties 6.8 0.9 6.8 0.9 868 960 12,300 1,800DISTRICT 7 34.0 36.0 34.0 35.0 678 891 48,000 65,000
Bee 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 1,029 1,034 3,000 2,800Burleson 7.9 5.0 7.9 5.0 711 1,056 11,700 11,000Medina * 2.8 2.8 1,217 7,100Other Counties 4.7 0.9 4.7 0.9 1,256 1,120 12,300 2,100DISTRICT 8-N 14.0 10.0 14.0 10.0 926 1,104 27,000 23,000
San Patricio 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 1,234 1,371 18,000 20,000DISTRICT 8-S 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 1,234 1,371 18,000 20,000
Victoria 1.0 1.0 720 1,500Wharton 5.0 2.6 5.0 2.6 912 868 9,500 4,700Other Counties 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 960 446 2,000 1,300DISTRICT 9 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.0 891 720 13,000 6,000
Frio * 1.0 1.0 1,008 2,100Zavala 2.8 4.3 2.8 4.3 857 915 5,000 8,200Other Counties 2.2 0.7 2.2 0.7 873 1,166 4,000 1,700DISTRICT 10-N 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 864 960 9,000 12,000
Cameron 36.8 24.6 35.0 22.1 617 554 45,000 25,500Hidalgo 42.5 33.0 40.0 30.0 780 744 65,000 46,500Starr * 1.7 1.7 706 2,500Willacy 7.6 3.7 5.9 3.2 732 525 9,000 3,500Other Counties 2.1 2.1 686 3,000DISTRICT 10-S 89.0 63.0 83.0 57.0 706 657 122,000 78,000
STATE 2,238.0 2,150.0 1,987.0 1,966.0 643 762 2,661,000 3,121,000
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated Upland cotton are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practicesare included in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated Upland cotton estimated.Acres and production included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
91
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED UPLAND COTTONAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds Bales
Briscoe 17.0 17.4 15.4 9.3 237 181 7,600 3,500Carson 2.2 2.8 2.1 2.4 434 420 1,900 2,100Castro 3.7 1.0 2.4 0.2 400 240 2,000 100Deaf Smith 8.0 23.1 6.7 2.6 394 240 5,500 1,300Floyd 51.6 45.8 47.0 32.0 255 279 25,000 18,600Hale 24.7 16.7 22.5 11.5 416 209 19,500 5,000Hartley 5.6 5.4 2.2 415 1,900Parmer 4.4 3.5 4.1 2.0 433 240 3,700 1,000Randall 2.2 3.5 1.7 0.5 424 384 1,500 400Swisher 9.2 10.2 9.0 4.0 400 132 7,500 1,100Other Counties 2.4 3.6 0.9 1.5 480 288 900 900DISTRICT 1-N 131.0 133.0 114.0 66.0 324 247 77,000 34,000
Andrews 19.1 17.0 9.0 12.0 107 128 2,000 3,200Bailey 50.0 52.4 40.0 20.5 240 304 20,000 13,000Cochran 61.6 61.1 44.5 30.0 248 320 23,000 20,000Crosby 88.4 90.8 74.5 88.5 161 239 25,000 44,000Dawson 253.0 242.0 32.0 166.5 210 288 14,000 100,000Gaines 108.5 106.6 24.0 41.0 180 234 9,000 20,000Glasscock 68.9 59.7 7.0 34.0 206 155 3,000 11,000Hockley 118.4 113.5 73.5 98.0 229 245 35,000 50,000Howard 126.0 129.0 23.0 76.0 125 303 6,000 48,000Lamb 42.4 43.5 19.5 36.0 345 293 14,000 22,000Lubbock 92.5 88.5 62.5 80.5 184 310 24,000 52,000Lynn 219.0 215.0 74.5 201.0 209 241 32,500 101,000Martin 146.5 146.5 15.0 52.0 112 243 3,500 26,300Midland 26.8 25.7 7.0 8.0 137 150 2,000 2,500Terry 140.2 137.0 69.5 78.0 162 209 23,500 34,000Yoakum 83.7 69.7 26.5 21.0 172 274 9,500 12,000DISTRICT 1-S 1,645.0 1,598.0 602.0 1,043.0 196 257 246,000 559,000
Borden 19.7 18.9 4.0 14.8 180 344 1,500 10,600Childress 33.3 33.2 30.0 27.5 176 314 11,000 18,000Collingsworth 12.5 26.0 12.0 25.5 268 245 6,700 13,000Cottle 17.2 17.5 12.4 16.5 135 250 3,500 8,600Dickens 21.2 19.5 20.0 19.1 242 276 10,100 11,000Donley 8.8 6.6 7.6 6.2 360 310 5,700 4,000Garza 32.6 31.5 13.5 30.0 142 312 4,000 19,500Hall 49.7 73.3 42.8 71.0 236 250 21,000 37,000Hardeman 4.9 2.1 2.5 2.0 192 336 1,000 1,400Kent 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.6 248 332 1,500 1,800King * 2.7 1.7 254 900Motley 27.7 22.5 25.0 21.5 134 217 7,000 9,700Wheeler 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.3 274 320 2,000 2,200Wichita 18.7 13.3 8.8 12.8 191 244 3,500 6,500Wilbarger 30.0 * 25.0 161 8,400Other Counties 16.2 27.7 5.0 25.5 202 316 2,100 16,800DISTRICT 2-N 299.0 301.0 215.0 280.0 199 276 89,000 161,000
Baylor * 4.6 4.5 395 3,700Coleman 5.0 3.6 3.5 3.5 192 288 1,400 2,100Fisher 71.5 64.1 64.5 62.5 223 323 30,000 42,000Haskell 79.4 69.6 76.0 69.0 202 327 32,000 47,000Knox 13.5 10.1 10.5 9.9 229 320 5,000 6,600Mitchell 55.6 52.0 40.0 51.4 180 319 15,000 34,200Nolan 53.0 47.9 48.0 46.5 175 325 17,500 31,500Runnels 55.9 44.5 50.0 43.5 206 309 21,500 28,000Scurry 63.0 * 51.0 179 19,000Stonewall * 5.9 5.7 404 4,800Other Counties 128.1 134.7 102.5 131.5 214 289 45,600 79,100DISTRICT 2-S 525.0 437.0 446.0 428.0 201 313 187,000 279,000
92
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED UPLAND COTTONAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds Bales
Brown 2.2 1.3 0.5 0.8 192 240 200 400Clay 1.7 * 1.0 144 300Shackelford 2.5 1.5 2.4 1.2 260 360 1,300 900Throckmorton 3.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 154 320 800 1,600Other Counties 2.2 1.7 1.6 1.6 120 330 400 1,100DISTRICT 3 12.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 180 320 3,000 4,000
Bell 1.5 * 1.5 416 1,300Collin 2.9 1.1 2.8 0.9 360 587 2,100 1,100Delta 1.3 1.6 1.2 1.2 440 640 1,100 1,600Ellis 34.4 23.1 34.2 22.3 441 624 31,400 29,000Hill 23.1 16.5 23.0 15.8 361 744 17,300 24,500Hunt 3.5 2.6 3.4 2.5 452 518 3,200 2,700Lamar 2.9 * 2.9 364 2,200Limestone 3.0 1.6 3.0 1.4 400 446 2,500 1,300Navarro 17.3 14.0 17.0 13.2 339 745 12,000 20,500Williamson 21.8 8.0 20.8 7.5 508 608 22,000 9,500Other Counties 21.3 11.5 19.2 10.2 498 649 19,900 13,800DISTRICT 4 133.0 80.0 129.0 75.0 428 666 115,000 104,000
Houston * 1.8 1.0 624 1,300Red River * 1.5 1.5 704 2,200Other Counties 7.0 0.7 6.0 0.5 480 480 6,000 500DISTRICT 5-N 7.0 4.0 6.0 3.0 480 640 6,000 4,000
Brazos 2.4 3.5 2.1 3.5 480 617 2,100 4,500Robertson 3.1 1.8 2.9 1.6 314 630 1,900 2,100Walker 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.0 524 576 1,200 1,200Other Counties 1.2 1.3 0.9 0.9 427 640 800 1,200DISTRICT 5-S 8.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 411 617 6,000 9,000
Concho 27.3 20.7 24.5 20.7 186 276 9,500 11,900McCulloch 3.9 4.1 3.5 3.9 165 295 1,200 2,400Reagan 30.8 19.2 1.2 3.5 320 137 800 1,000Schleicher 7.5 6.8 6.0 5.2 392 258 4,900 2,800Tom Green 74.8 58.2 66.8 53.0 259 225 36,000 24,800Upton 12.0 4.8 0.4 1.7 240 141 200 500Other Counties 4.7 3.2 0.6 1.0 320 288 400 600DISTRICT 7 161.0 117.0 103.0 89.0 247 237 53,000 44,000
Austin 4.3 3.4 2.6 3.1 628 867 3,400 5,600Bee 11.7 11.0 11.7 7.0 431 583 10,500 8,500Burleson 3.2 1.6 3.1 1.2 387 840 2,500 2,100Caldwell 3.3 2.4 3.1 2.1 449 503 2,900 2,200Colorado 6.8 2.9 4.1 1.9 644 884 5,500 3,500Goliad 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 480 617 1,500 1,800Karnes 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.0 480 576 1,200 1,200Travis 3.3 1.9 3.1 1.6 294 570 1,900 1,900Other Counties 2.7 1.9 2.6 1.7 480 621 2,600 2,200DISTRICT 8-N 38.0 28.0 33.0 21.0 465 663 32,000 29,000
Kleberg 43.3 38.5 18.0 37.0 427 475 16,000 36,600Nueces 144.6 131.0 117.0 110.0 570 598 139,000 137,000Refugio 41.2 44.0 40.6 28.4 875 592 74,000 35,000San Patricio 125.0 117.0 123.5 104.3 591 667 152,000 145,000Other Counties 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.3 533 640 1,000 400DISTRICT 8-S 355.0 331.0 300.0 280.0 611 607 382,000 354,000
93
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED UPLAND COTTONAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds Bales
Brazoria 7.7 5.8 7.7 5.7 692 674 11,100 8,000Calhoun 27.5 32.3 25.8 13.0 683 665 36,700 18,000Jackson 35.5 * 30.5 738 46,900Victoria 18.3 14.0 15.7 11.5 605 501 19,800 12,000Wharton 74.0 65.0 70.5 64.0 783 818 115,000 109,000Other Counties 95.0 108.9 90.8 106.8 732 728 138,500 162,000DISTRICT 9 258.0 226.0 241.0 201.0 733 738 368,000 309,000
Duval 1.5 * 0.9 480 900Jim Wells * 12.6 9.0 619 11,600Other Counties 20.5 3.4 17.1 3.0 396 384 14,100 2,400DISTRICT 10-N 22.0 16.0 18.0 12.0 400 560 15,000 14,000
Cameron 44.6 48.2 13.0 8.0 247 300 6,700 5,000Hidalgo 42.5 33.2 8.5 4.2 282 286 5,000 2,500Starr * 1.9 0.8 300 500Willacy 80.0 80.7 19.0 10.0 202 336 8,000 7,000Other Counties 0.9 0.5 288 300DISTRICT 10-S 168.0 164.0 41.0 23.0 234 313 20,000 15,000
STATE 3,762.0 3,450.0 2,263.0 2,534.0 339 364 1,599,000 1,919,000
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated Upland cotton are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practicesare included in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated Upland cotton estimated.Acres and production included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
94
TEXAS COTTONSEED: Production, Farm Disposition, Price and Value, 1998-2002 1
Crop year Production
Farm dispositionSeed used for
planting 3Marketing yearaverage price
per ton
Value ofproductionTotal sales
to oil millsOthersales 2
1,000 tons 1,000 tons Dollars 1,000 dollars
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,558.0 1,227.0 331.0 62.4 131.00 204,098
1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,987.0 1,115.0 872.0 64.2 81.00 160,947
2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,589.0 1,253.0 336.0 60.2 102.00 162,078
2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,724.0 1,028.0 696.0 56.2 92.50 159,470
2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,855.0 1,109.0 746.0 58.2 103.00 204,352
1 Includes Upland and American-Pima cottonseed, 2002 crop preliminary. 2 Includes planting seed, feed, exports, interfarm sales, shrinkage, losses andother uses. 3 Included in "other" farm disposition. Planting seed for next year's crop.
95
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
OATSAcres Planted - 2002
LEADING COUNTIES IN OAT PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
Rank County 2001Production
Percentof state Rank County 2002
ProductionPercentof state
1,000 bushels 1,000 bushels
1 Hamilton 800.0 11.1 1 Hamilton 560.0 8.0
2 Medina 685.0 9.5 2 Coryell 530.0 7.5
3 McLennan 550.0 7.6 3 McLennan 460.0 6.5
4 Coryell 510.0 7.1 4 Coleman 400.0 5.7
5 Uvalde 325.0 4.5 5 Medina 400.0 5.7
6 Cooke 320.0 4.4 6 Cooke 344.0 4.9
7 Gillespie 240.0 3.3 7 Falls 285.0 4.0
8 Limestone 220.0 3.1 8 Brown 260.0 3.7
9 Coleman 205.0 2.8 9 Limestone 250.0 3.6
10 Falls 190.0 2.6 10 Uvalde 210.0 3.0
96
TEXAS OATSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Briscoe 1.3 1.0 0.2 0.1 30.0 41.0 6.0 4.1 86Carson * 1.2 0.4 45.0 18.0 61Castro 5.8 4.0 0.3 0.2 40.0 25.0 12.0 5.0 84Deaf Smith 4.5 3.4 1.4 1.1 45.0 41.8 63.0 46.0 36Floyd 5.2 3.1 1.5 1.0 29.3 42.0 44.0 42.0 38Hale 2.6 1.5 0.8 0.5 30.0 41.0 24.0 20.5 55Hansford 1.8 1.3 1.2 0.9 33.3 41.0 40.0 36.9 43Hartley 2.2 * 0.3 33.3 10.0Moore 1.4 2.0 0.3 0.5 30.0 41.0 9.0 20.5 55Ochiltree 1.2 * 0.2 38.0 7.6Parmer 2.6 2.1Sherman 2.3 1.5 0.4 0.3 35.0 41.3 14.0 12.4 69Swisher 3.8 2.0 1.0 0.7 33.0 40.0 33.0 28.0 49Other Counties 5.3 6.9 1.4 1.3 31.7 41.2 44.4 53.6DISTRICT 1-N 40.0 30.0 9.0 7.0 34.1 41.0 307.0 287.0
Bailey 2.2 2.2 0.3 0.3 33.3 53.0 10.0 15.9 66Crosby 1.5 4.1 0.1 0.1 35.0 53.0 3.5 5.3 82Lamb 2.2 3.0 0.2 0.2 25.0 53.0 5.0 10.6 77Lubbock 2.3 2.2 0.7 0.7 31.4 53.0 22.0 37.1 42Lynn * 1.0 0.1 53.0 5.3 82Other Counties 4.8 5.5 0.7 0.6 33.6 53.0 23.5 31.8DISTRICT 1-S 13.0 18.0 2.0 2.0 32.0 53.0 64.0 106.0
Childress 1.2 * 0.3 26.7 8.0Cottle 1.8 * 0.3 40.0 12.0Dickens 1.4 * 0.1 45.0 4.5Foard * 1.8 0.1 20.0 2.0 96Wheeler 1.0 *Wichita 1.5 2.5 0.1 0.1 28.0 35.0 2.8 3.5 90Wilbarger 4.3 6.2 0.8 0.6 47.5 27.0 38.0 16.2 64Other Counties 3.8 5.5 1.4 1.2 39.8 30.3 55.7 36.3DISTRICT 2-N 15.0 16.0 3.0 2.0 40.3 29.0 121.0 58.0
Baylor 3.0 18.0 0.6 1.2 20.0 50.0 12.0 60.0 28Coleman 19.0 15.0 7.5 12.6 27.3 31.7 205.0 400.0 4Fisher * 1.0 0.2 30.0 6.0 81Haskell 2.6 3.5 0.7 1.5 42.9 46.7 30.0 70.0 23Jones 2.2 2.1 0.7 1.5 21.4 48.7 15.0 73.0 21Knox 1.1 3.2 0.5 1.0 44.0 49.0 22.0 49.0 34Mitchell 1.0 *Runnels 5.4 6.2 1.3 2.7 30.8 27.4 40.0 74.0 20Scurry 1.4 1.2 0.3 0.6 26.7 26.7 8.0 16.0 65Stonewall * 1.2 0.8 38.8 31.0 47Taylor 2.2 2.8 1.2 2.5 28.3 32.0 34.0 80.0 19Other Counties 2.1 1.8 0.7 0.4 24.3 55.0 17.0 22.0DISTRICT 2-S 40.0 56.0 13.5 25.0 28.4 35.2 383.0 881.0
Archer * 4.5 0.1 40.0 4.0 87Brown 15.5 20.8 4.3 5.2 26.7 50.0 115.0 260.0 8Callahan 2.5 3.6 1.0 1.3 47.0 38.5 47.0 50.0 32Comanche 8.5 10.0 0.7 1.3 52.9 44.6 37.0 58.0 30Eastland 1.5 2.3 0.4 0.5 41.5 40.0 16.6 20.0 58Erath 3.0 2.7 0.2 0.3 45.0 40.0 9.0 12.0 70Hood 2.0 2.2 0.2 0.3 35.0 43.3 7.0 13.0 68Mills 11.0 12.5 2.6 3.3 43.1 42.4 112.0 140.0 12Palo Pinto 1.5 * 0.1 36.0 3.6Shackelford 1.5 2.5 0.7 0.9 39.0 46.7 27.3 42.0 38Stephens 1.0 1.6 0.6 0.8 31.7 38.8 19.0 31.0 47Throckmorton * 3.0 0.2 46.5 9.3 78
97
TEXAS OATSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Wise 1.5 2.2 0.2 39.0 7.8 80Young 1.5 6.0 0.9 1.1 37.0 50.0 33.3 55.0 31Other Counties 5.0 4.1 0.3 0.5 37.3 39.8 11.2 19.9DISTRICT 3 56.0 78.0 12.0 16.0 36.5 45.1 438.0 722.0
Bell 11.5 10.6 2.8 2.7 53.6 49.1 150.0 132.5 13Bosque 9.0 10.0 1.8 1.8 55.6 49.4 100.0 89.0 18Collin 1.6 2.3 0.5 0.5 57.0 56.0 28.5 28.0 49Cooke 8.5 9.4 4.7 4.6 68.1 74.8 320.0 344.0 6Coryell 34.0 32.5 10.0 9.8 51.0 54.1 510.0 530.0 2Denton 3.0 4.4 1.1 1.1 57.3 45.5 63.0 50.0 32Ellis 3.0 4.8 0.9 1.2 58.9 38.3 53.0 46.0 36Falls 60.0 55.0 5.3 5.2 35.8 54.8 190.0 285.0 7Fannin 2.5 4.1 1.5 1.5 40.0 45.3 60.0 68.0 24Grayson 4.0 4.9 0.8 0.8 43.8 47.5 35.0 38.0 41Hamilton 30.0 26.5 13.0 11.0 61.5 50.9 800.0 560.0 1Hill 7.5 4.8 2.0 2.0 50.0 49.5 100.0 99.0 16Hunt * 1.1 0.5 48.0 24.0 52Johnson 5.0 5.1 0.9 0.9 62.2 66.7 56.0 60.0 28Kaufman 3.0 2.9 0.5 1.4 60.0 71.4 30.0 100.0 15Limestone 15.0 15.9 4.0 3.9 55.0 64.1 220.0 250.0 9McLennan 35.0 33.7 8.4 8.2 65.5 56.1 550.0 460.0 3Milam 11.0 10.5 1.2 1.2 72.5 52.5 87.0 63.0 25Navarro 5.0 4.9 1.0 1.0 65.0 49.0 65.0 49.0 34Williamson 17.5 14.0 1.3 1.3 50.0 46.5 65.0 60.5 27Other Counties 3.9 2.6 0.8 0.4 56.9 52.5 45.5 21.0DISTRICT 4 270.0 260.0 62.5 61.0 56.4 55.0 3,528.0 3,357.0
Houston 1.4 1.5Red River 1.5 1.3Other Counties 4.1 5.2 0.5 60.0 30.0DISTRICT 5-N 7.0 8.0 0.5 60.0 30.0
Leon 1.2 * 0.1 61.0 6.1Robertson 5.0 3.7 0.9 0.7 61.0 48.6 54.9 34.0 46Other Counties 3.8 3.3 0.3 46.7 14.0DISTRICT 5-S 10.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 61.0 48.0 61.0 48.0
Hudspeth * 3.0 0.6 29.7 17.8 62Other Counties 3.0 2.0 0.5 0.4 28.0 30.5 14.0 12.2DISTRICT 6 3.0 5.0 0.5 1.0 28.0 30.0 14.0 30.0
Burnet 1.5 1.7 0.6 0.6 18.8 27.5 11.3 16.5 63Coke 2.5 2.0 0.8 0.8 24.3 25.0 19.4 20.0 58Concho 4.0 2.5 0.9 0.9 26.4 29.6 23.8 26.6 51Gillespie 12.0 13.0 4.6 4.4 52.2 35.0 240.0 154.0 11Kendall 3.5 3.0 0.6 0.6 40.0 32.2 24.0 19.3 60Kerr 3.0 * 0.2 27.5 5.5Kinney * 2.4 0.3 29.0 8.7 79Lampasas 7.5 9.0 1.9 1.8 38.4 39.2 73.0 70.5 22McCulloch 8.0 13.0 3.5 3.4 28.6 30.3 100.0 103.0 14Mason 3.0 4.5 0.7 0.7 40.0 30.0 28.0 21.0 54San Saba 3.0 6.2 0.7 0.7 51.4 28.9 36.0 20.2 57Schleicher 5.5 3.8 1.7 1.4 35.3 29.0 60.0 40.6 40Tom Green 3.0 3.8 1.2 1.2 26.7 29.2 32.0 35.0 45Uvalde 30.0 31.3 7.5 7.0 43.3 30.0 325.0 210.0 10Other Counties 6.5 5.8 1.1 1.2 33.6 28.0 37.0 33.6DISTRICT 7 93.0 102.0 26.0 25.0 39.0 31.2 1015.0 779.0
98
TEXAS OATSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Bastrop 4.0 1.2 0.2 0.1 40.0 35.0 8.0 3.5 90Bee 2.0 3.4 0.4 0.3 30.0 36.7 12.0 11.0 75Bexar 9.0 9.5 1.5 1.0 36.7 35.5 55.0 35.5 44Burleson 1.5 2.9 0.2 0.1 45.0 35.0 9.0 3.5 90Caldwell 2.5 3.8 0.1 0.1 40.0 35.0 4.0 3.5 90Comal 1.2 1.0 0.1 0.1 40.0 37.0 4.0 3.7 88De Witt 1.5 1.6 0.1 0.1 30.0 37.0 3.0 3.7 88Fayette * 1.9Goliad 2.5 *Gonzales 1.0 * 0.1 35.0 3.5Guadalupe 3.0 2.8 0.4 0.3 50.0 36.7 20.0 11.0 75Hays 1.5 2.1 0.2 0.3 42.5 40.0 8.5 12.0 70Karnes 7.0 8.5 0.4 0.3 47.5 40.0 19.0 12.0 70Lee 1.8 1.7 0.5 0.3 50.0 50.0 25.0 15.0 67Medina 29.5 19.0 13.4 9.0 51.1 44.4 685.0 400.0 4Travis 3.5 3.7 0.5 0.3 34.0 40.0 17.0 12.0 70Wilson 14.5 15.5 0.9 0.6 22.2 36.7 20.0 22.0 53Other Counties 2.0 3.4 0.1 36.0 3.6DISTRICT 8-N 88.0 82.0 19.0 13.0 47.0 42.5 893.0 552.0
San Patricio * 2.0Other Counties 2.0 1.0DISTRICT 8-S 2.0 3.0
Other Counties 3.0 4.0 0.5 0.5 28.0 24.0 14.0 12.0DISTRICT 9 3.0 4.0 0.5 0.5 28.0 24.0 14.0 12.0
Atascosa 25.0 25.9 0.3 0.2 26.7 22.5 8.0 4.5 85Dimmit 3.0 2.3Duval * 2.3 0.1 25.0 2.5 94Frio 26.0 22.8 5.0 2.6 33.4 23.8 167.0 62.0 26Jim Wells * 2.0La Salle 6.5 5.0 0.9 0.5 34.4 24.0 31.0 12.0 70Live Oak 4.2 6.5 0.2 0.1 30.0 25.0 6.0 2.5 94McMullen * 1.4Zavala 15.0 10.5 4.4 2.4 32.7 38.3 144.0 92.0 17Other Counties 4.3 1.3 0.2 0.1 30.0 25.0 6.0 2.5DISTRICT 10-N 84.0 80.0 11.0 6.0 32.9 29.7 362.0 178.0
Other Counties 1.0 1.0DISTRICT 10-S 1.0 1.0
STATE 725.0 750.0 160.0 160.0 45.0 44.0 7,200.0 7,040.0
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals. * Less than 1,000 acres planted. Acreage and production estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
99
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
PEANUTSAcres Planted - 2002
LEADING COUNTIES IN PEANUT PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
Rank County 2001Production
Percentof state Rank County 2002
ProductionPercentof state
1,000 pounds 1,000 pounds
1 Gaines 252,758 28.2 1 Gaines 279,870 32.2
2 Terry 91,823 10.2 2 Terry 123,300 14.2
3 Yoakum 72,533 8.1 3 Yoakum 69,000 7.9
4 Collingsworth 58,832 6.6 4 Collingsworth 63,000 7.3
5 Dawson 53,962 6.0 5 Dawson 51,398 5.9
6 Frio 47,950 5.4 6 Hockley 30,219 3.5
7 Hockley 36,813 4.1 7 Frio 29,000 3.3
8 Atascosa 34,800 3.9 8 Andrews 22,600 2.6
9 Andrews 22,988 2.6 9 Donley 20,000 2.3
10 Comanche 20,670 2.3 10 Haskell 19,300 2.2
100
TEXAS ALL PEANUTSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 pounds
Briscoe 2.0 2.1 1.8 2.1 3,675 3,185 6,615 6,690 18Other Counties 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.5 2,315 3,110 463 1,555DISTRICT 1-N 2.3 2.6 2.0 2.6 3,540 3,170 7,078 8,245
Andrews 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.6 4,035 4,035 22,988 22,600 8Bailey * 1.1 1.1 2,820 3,100 26Cochran 4.4 6.1 4.0 6.1 2,920 3,005 11,675 18,330 11Dawson 14.5 14.0 14.2 14.0 3,800 3,670 53,962 51,398 5Gaines 68.0 68.8 66.2 68.3 3,820 4,100 252,758 279,870 1Hockley 12.6 10.4 12.5 10.4 2,945 2,905 36,813 30,219 6Lamb 2.7 3.0 2.7 3.0 3,080 3,740 8,310 11,217 14Lubbock 3.9 * 3.9 2,760 10,767Lynn 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.2 2,990 3,165 4,183 3,800 24Terry 29.0 33.0 28.6 33.0 3,210 3,735 91,823 123,300 2Yoakum 20.2 22.4 20.0 22.4 3,625 3,080 72,533 69,000 3Other Counties 1.6 1.2 1.3 1.2 2,810 3,395 3,653 4,074DISTRICT 1-S 164.0 166.8 160.5 166.3 3,550 3,710 569,465 616,908
Childress 4.2 4.4 3.5 2.0 1,875 2,410 6,560 4,816 23Collingsworth 83.2 66.4 25.0 38.4 2,355 1,640 58,832 63,000 4Cottle 4.2 1.0 2.0 1.0 1,485 3,420 2,966 3,421 25Donley 4.9 5.1 4.7 5.1 3,600 3,920 16,916 20,000 9Hall 44.2 7.7 14.1 7.3 1,275 2,410 18,000 17,600 12Motley 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.7 2,415 2,925 7,002 7,892 16Wheeler 14.4 8.9 2.0 7.8 1,370 1,070 2,740 8,336 15Wilbarger 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.7 3,165 2,745 7,914 7,413 17Other Counties 1.5 1.1 1.4 1.0 1,475 1,560 2,068 1,560DISTRICT 2-N 162.2 100.0 58.1 68.0 2,115 1,970 122,998 134,038
Haskell 5.6 6.6 5.5 6.5 3,155 2,970 17,361 19,300 10Stonewall 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.1 290 2,140 436 2,352 27Other Counties 1.0 0.5 0.9 0.4 1,255 2,210 1,130 884DISTRICT 2-S 8.2 8.6 7.9 8.0 2,395 2,815 18,927 22,536
Brown 1.7 * 1.6 1,595 2,548Comanche 15.6 3.3 14.0 3.2 1,475 1,970 20,670 6,300 20Eastland 9.2 2.8 8.6 2.6 1,385 1,925 11,920 5,000 22Erath 2.7 1.0 2.6 0.9 1,305 2,110 3,396 1,900 29Parker 1.2 * 0.5 400 200Wise 1.0 * 1.0 2,830 2,830Other Counties 2.6 2.7 2.3 2.2 1,090 1,085 2,506 2,390DISTRICT 3 34.0 9.8 30.6 8.9 1,440 1,750 44,070 15,590
Denton 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1,015 925 1,220 1,200 31Fannin 2.5 * 1.8 835 1,500Grayson 1.6 1.0 1.6 1.0 1,155 1,550 1,850 1,550 30Other Counties 2.9 1.0 2.7 0.8 2,370 2,350 6,403 1,880DISTRICT 4 8.3 3.3 7.3 3.1 1,505 1,495 10,973 4,630
Other Counties 1.5 1.0 645 645DISTRICT 5-N 1.5 * 1.0 645 645
Waller 2.0 1.6 2.0 1.6 1,990 1,315 3,980 2,100 28Other Counties 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 200 1,500 20 150DISTRICT 5-S 2.1 1.7 2.1 1.7 1,905 1,325 4,000 2,250
Mason 1.8 1.2 1.7 1.2 3,765 4,250 6,400 5,100 21Other Counties 1.1 0.4 1.0 0.3 2,810 3,665 2,810 1,100DISTRICT 7 2.9 1.6 2.7 1.5 3,410 4,135 9,210 6,200
101
TEXAS ALL PEANUTSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 pounds
Lee 1.9 * 1.8 1,285 2,310Wilson 5.2 2.4 4.5 2.4 2,555 2,720 11,500 6,523 19Other Counties 3.4 1.6 2.7 1.4 1,695 1,630 4,574 2,285DISTRICT 8-N 10.5 4.0 9.0 3.8 2,045 2,320 18,384 8,808
Atascosa 11.7 6.2 11.6 6.2 3,000 2,565 34,800 15,903 13Frio 14.4 8.3 14.4 8.1 3,330 3,580 47,950 29,000 7Other Counties 1.2 0.7 1.2 0.7 3,350 3,780 4,020 2,647DISTRICT 10-N 27.3 15.2 27.2 15.0 3,190 3,170 86,770 47,550
Other Districts 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.1 2,115 1,130 3,380 1,245
STATE 425.0 315.0 310.0 280.0 2,890 3,100 895,900 868,000
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals. * Less than 1,000 acres planted. Acreage and production estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
102
TEXAS IRRIGATED PEANUTSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 pounds
Other Counties 2.1 2.4 1.9 2.4 3,665 3,360 6,963 8,065DISTRICT 1-N 2.1 2.4 1.9 2.4 3,665 3,360 6,963 8,065
Andrews 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.6 4,035 4,035 22,988 22,600Bailey * 1.1 1.1 2,820 3,100Cochran * 6.1 6.1 3,005 18,330Lamb 2.7 3.0 2.7 3.0 3,080 3,740 8,310 11,217Lubbock 3.9 * 3.9 2,760 10,767Lynn 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.2 2,990 3,165 4,183 3,800Yoakum 20.2 22.4 20.0 22.4 3,625 3,080 72,533 69,000Other Counties 129.4 126.6 126.3 126.1 3,560 3,870 449,899 488,121DISTRICT 1-S 163.3 166.0 160.0 165.5 3,555 3,725 568,680 616,168
Childress 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.5 2,890 3,045 5,200 4,566Collingsworth 14.0 13.4 14.0 13.4 3,430 3,655 48,000 49,000Cottle 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2,535 3,420 2,534 3,421Donley * 5.1 5.1 3,920 20,000Hall 5.1 6.7 5.1 6.6 2,940 2,605 15,000 17,200Wheeler * 1.1 1.1 3,485 3,836Other Counties 11.3 5.8 11.1 5.8 3,110 2,815 34,540 16,340DISTRICT 2-N 33.3 35.0 33.0 34.5 3,190 3,315 105,274 114,363
Other Counties 5.9 7.5 5.9 7.3 3,105 2,965 18,315 21,656DISTRICT 2-S 5.9 7.5 5.9 7.3 3,105 2,965 18,315 21,656
Comanche 5.0 2.1 4.9 2.1 2,460 2,620 12,050 5,500Eastland 3.8 1.3 3.8 1.2 2,015 3,335 7,650 4,000Erath 1.1 * 1.1 1,990 2,191Other Counties 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.7 1,510 2,855 2,564 2,000DISTRICT 3 11.6 4.2 11.5 4.0 2,125 2,875 24,455 11,500
Other Counties 3.1 1.0 3.1 0.8 2,590 2,940 8,035 2,350DISTRICT 4 3.1 1.0 3.1 0.8 2,590 2,940 8,035 2,350
Mason 1.8 1.2 1.7 1.2 3,765 4,250 6,400 5,100Other Counties 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.3 3,800 3,665 2,660 1,100DISTRICT 7 2.5 1.5 2.4 1.5 3,775 4,135 9,060 6,200
Wilson 3.2 * 3.0 2,665 8,000Other Counties 1.2 2.6 1.0 2.6 2,805 3,010 2,805 7,823DISTRICT 8-N 4.4 2.6 4.0 2.6 2,700 3,010 10,805 7,823
Frio * 8.3 8.1 3,580 29,000Other Counties 25.8 6.4 25.7 6.4 3,285 2,795 84,470 17,900DISTRICT 10-N 25.8 14.7 25.7 14.5 3,285 3,235 84,470 46,900
Other Districts 1.0 0.1 1.0 0.1 2,230 2,000 2,230 200
STATE 253.0 235.0 248.5 233.2 3,375 3,580 838,287 835,225
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated peanuts are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practices areincluded in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated peanuts estimated. Acresand production included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
103
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED PEANUTSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 pounds
Childress 2.3 2.5 1.7 0.5 800 500 1,360 250Collingsworth 69.2 53.0 11.0 25.0 985 560 10,832 14,000Cottle 3.2 1.0 430 432Hall 39.1 1.0 9.0 0.7 335 570 3,000 400Wheeler * 7.8 6.7 670 4,500Other Counties 15.1 0.7 2.4 0.6 875 875 2,100 525DISTRICT 2-N 128.9 65.0 25.1 33.5 705 585 17,724 19,675
Other Counties 2.3 1.1 2.0 0.7 305 1,255 612 880DISTRICT 2-S 2.3 1.1 2.0 0.7 305 1,255 612 880
Comanche 10.6 1.2 9.1 1.1 945 725 8,620 800Eastland 5.4 1.5 4.8 1.4 890 715 4,270 1,000Erath 1.6 * 1.5 805 1,205Parker 1.2 * 0.5 400 200Wise 1.0 * 1.0 2,830 2,830Other Counties 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.4 1,130 955 2,490 2,290DISTRICT 3 22.4 5.6 19.1 4.9 1,025 835 19,615 4,090
Denton * 1.3 1.3 925 1,200Other Counties 5.2 1.0 4.2 1.0 700 1,080 2,938 1,080DISTRICT 4 5.2 2.3 4.2 2.3 700 990 2,938 2,280
Other Counties 1.5 1.0 645 645DISTRICT 5-N 1.5 * 1.0 645 645
Other Counties 2.0 2.0 1,825 3,650DISTRICT 5-S 2.0 * 2.0 1,825 3,650
Wilson 2.0 * 1.5 2,335 3,500Other Counties 4.1 1.4 3.5 1.2 1,165 820 4,079 985DISTRICT 8-N 6.1 1.4 5.0 1.2 1,515 820 7,579 985
Other Counties 1.5 1.5 1,535 2,300DISTRICT 10-N 1.5 * 1.5 1,535 2,300
Other Districts 2.1 4.6 1.6 4.2 1,595 1,160 2,550 4,865
STATE 172.0 80.0 61.5 46.8 935 700 57,613 32,775
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated peanuts are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practices areincluded in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated peanuts estimated. Acresand production included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
104
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
RICEAcres Planted - 2002
LEADING COUNTIES IN RICE PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
Rank County 2001Production
Percentof state Rank County 2002
ProductionPercentof state
1,000 cwt 1,000 cwt
1 Wharton 3,780 25.6 1 Wharton 4,000 27.4
2 Colorado 2,365 16.0 2 Colorado 2,300 15.7
3 Matagorda 1,580 10.7 3 Matagorda 1,700 11.6
4 Brazoria 1,170 7.9 4 Jefferson 1,080 7.4
5 Jackson 1,060 7.2 5 Jackson 1,000 6.8
6 Jefferson 1,000 6.8 6 Brazoria 955 6.5
7 Chambers 750 5.1 7 Chambers 755 5.2
8 Liberty 740 5.0 8 Fort Bend 690 4.7
9 Waller 630 4.3 9 Liberty 580 4.0
10 Fort Bend 590 4.0 10 Waller 568 3.9
105
TEXAS RICEAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Bowie 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 5,800 5,380 87 70 16Hopkins 1.5 1.1 1.5 1.1 6,330 6,360 95 70 16Red River 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6,800 6,800 68 68 18DISTRICT 5-N 4.0 3.4 4.0 3.4 6,250 6,120 250 208
Waller 7.0 7.1 7.0 7.1 9,000 8,000 630 568 10Other Counties 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.6 4,500 5,830 36 35DISTRICT 5-S 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.7 8,540 7,830 666 603
Austin 2.6 1.7 2.6 1.7 7,880 7,650 205 130 13Colorado 32.2 30.9 32.2 30.9 7,340 7,440 2,365 2,300 2Lavaca 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 5,940 5,560 107 100 15DISTRICT 8-N 36.6 34.4 36.6 34.4 7,310 7,350 2,677 2,530
Brazoria 15.1 14.1 15.1 14.1 7,750 6,770 1,170 955 6Calhoun 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 8,330 7,670 125 115 14Chambers 13.5 13.3 13.5 13.3 5,560 5,680 750 755 7Fort Bend 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 6,780 7,930 590 690 8Harris 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.1 7,000 6,670 140 140 11Jackson 15.8 14.1 15.8 14.1 6,710 7,090 1,060 1,000 5Jefferson 19.0 18.4 19.0 18.4 5,260 5,870 1,000 1,080 4Liberty 12.7 9.8 12.7 9.8 5,830 5,920 740 580 9Matagorda 24.5 24.6 24.5 24.6 6,450 6,910 1,580 1,700 3Victoria 2.0 1.8 2.0 1.8 8,000 7,780 160 140 11Wharton 51.6 50.2 51.6 50.2 7,330 7,970 3,780 4,000 1Other Counties 1.2 1.9 1.2 1.9 8,500 6,320 102 120DISTRICT 9 167.6 160.5 167.6 160.5 6,680 7,020 11,197 11,275
STATE 216.0 206.0 216.0 206.0 6,850 7,100 14,790 14,616
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals.
106
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
SORGHUMAcres Planted - 2002
LEADING COUNTIES IN SORGHUM PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
Rank County 2001Production
Percentof state Rank County 2002
ProductionPercentof state
1,000 cwt 1,000 cwt
1 Hidalgo 3,400 4.7 1 Nueces 5,827 8.0
2 Wharton 3,248 4.5 2 San Patricio 3,540 4.9
3 Nueces 3,065 4.2 3 Wharton 3,043 4.2
4 San Patricio 2,745 3.8 4 Hidalgo 2,666 3.7
5 Hill 2,595 3.6 5 Floyd 2,034 2.8
6 Cameron 2,440 3.4 6 Hale 1,910 2.6
7 Willacy 2,140 2.9 7 Cameron 1,806 2.5
8 Parmer 1,990 2.7 8 Carson 1,782 2.4
9 Hockley 1,790 2.5 9 Hill 1,770 2.4
10 Matagorda 1,550 2.1 10 Matagorda 1,754 2.4
107
TEXAS ALL SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Armstrong 25.0 28.4 23.0 26.1 1,609 2,222 370 580 41Briscoe 9.8 9.8 7.3 7.5 1,849 2,493 135 187 77Carson 47.0 57.0 41.0 55.9 2,439 3,188 1,000 1,782 8Castro 33.5 39.0 29.5 25.0 4,407 2,880 1,300 720 29Dallam 23.0 30.5 21.9 12.0 1,826 2,633 400 316 63Deaf Smith 81.0 115.3 60.2 65.0 2,500 2,303 1,505 1,497 13Floyd 33.0 67.4 28.7 58.5 1,899 3,477 545 2,034 5Gray 24.5 27.3 16.5 26.8 2,242 3,082 370 826 24Hale 33.0 57.4 29.0 51.5 3,069 3,709 890 1,910 6Hansford 59.0 110.1 46.7 47.1 2,484 2,720 1,160 1,281 17Hartley 28.0 31.5 20.0 15.5 2,050 3,903 410 605 38Hemphill 1.5 1.0 1.4 0.7 2,857 1,714 40 12 148Hutchinson 14.4 23.7 11.4 13.0 3,298 2,662 376 346 60Lipscomb 9.5 12.5 9.0 11.1 2,889 2,811 260 312 64Moore 35.9 48.6 33.5 27.5 3,418 3,938 1,145 1,083 19Ochiltree 61.5 98.4 46.3 66.0 3,089 2,536 1,430 1,674 11Oldham 16.2 34.8 12.6 11.7 1,905 1,111 240 130 89Parmer 53.0 57.3 49.3 38.3 4,037 3,956 1,990 1,515 12Potter 6.2 5.7 6.0 4.7 1,833 2,106 110 99 98Randall 24.1 32.8 20.5 18.5 2,429 2,476 498 458 50Roberts 2.9 3.3 2.7 2.9 2,815 2,483 76 72 107Sherman 44.0 44.9 37.5 25.5 4,053 2,310 1,520 589 40Swisher 34.0 47.3 31.0 27.2 2,629 2,482 815 675 31DISTRICT 1-N 700.0 984.0 585.0 638.0 2,835 2,932 16,585 18,703
Andrews 8.4 5.0 6.3 1.7 1,413 1,235 89 21 141Bailey 36.0 40.3 31.5 37.3 1,984 2,241 625 836 23Cochran 35.3 48.9 22.5 44.9 1,422 1,913 320 859 22Crosby 39.2 14.6 28.5 11.7 1,772 1,778 505 208 74Dawson 174.0 55.6 45.5 40.7 1,273 1,550 579 631 34Gaines 64.0 45.0 23.1 27.8 1,494 1,392 345 387 54Glasscock 62.0 15.5 18.0 10.0 1,361 620 245 62 112Hockley 99.0 45.7 84.5 41.7 2,118 1,532 1,790 639 33Howard 59.0 19.0 6.0 13.0 1,333 969 80 126 90Lamb 59.0 27.8 56.0 23.8 2,438 3,277 1,365 780 27Lubbock 81.6 47.8 73.0 43.1 1,767 2,137 1,290 921 21Lynn 159.5 15.8 87.0 11.6 1,672 1,043 1,455 121 93Martin 107.2 56.7 30.2 31.6 1,411 1,633 426 516 45Midland 20.3 19.8 7.0 4.8 1,429 1,688 100 81 104Terry 55.3 46.3 11.8 36.0 2,119 1,311 250 472 48Yoakum 55.2 40.2 19.1 32.3 1,414 1,427 270 461 49DISTRICT 1-S 1,115.0 544.0 550.0 412.0 1,770 1,728 9,734 7,121
Borden 12.0 3.8 4.0 1.5 2,500 1,933 100 29 135Childress 1.2 4.1 0.5 4.1 2,800 3,049 14 125 91Collingsworth 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.9 3,545 2,889 39 26 137Cottle 1.5 * 0.9 2,556 23Dickens 2.4 1.9 1.2 1.4 2,417 2,571 29 36 132Donley 2.9 2.0 1.8 1.9 2,889 2,526 52 48 117Foard 12.0 4.6 8.5 3.3 2,471 3,333 210 110 95Garza 9.9 3.5 6.3 3.2 2,524 3,031 159 97 101Hall * 3.0 2.9 2,793 81 104Hardeman 3.5 1.7 1.8 1.3 2,611 2,462 47 32 134Kent 1.6 1.8 1.0 1.1 2,400 1,364 24 15 146King * 1.1 1.0 2,900 29 135Motley 1.1 * 0.4 2,750 11Wheeler 2.8 2.9 1.3 2.7 2,462 1,852 32 50 116Wichita 3.4 2.0 2.5 1.6 2,400 2,375 60 38 128Wilbarger 4.9 6.0 3.5 5.4 2,143 2,685 75 145 86Other Counties 0.6 1.4 0.2 0.7 2,500 3,286 5 23DISTRICT 2-N 61.0 41.0 35.0 33.0 2,514 2,679 880 884
108
TEXAS ALL SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Baylor 1.4 4.8 0.9 4.6 1,778 3,652 16 168 79Coleman 10.0 7.2 5.8 6.9 1,259 1,333 73 92 102Fisher 3.0 6.2 1.2 6.0 1,500 1,733 18 104 96Haskell 9.6 12.3 6.7 12.0 1,687 2,600 113 312 64Jones 11.2 12.2 6.7 11.8 3,164 2,034 212 240 69Knox 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 1,957 2,286 45 48 117Mitchell 8.4 3.8 2.5 2.5 1,040 1,600 26 40 125Nolan 3.2 5.2 1.5 4.7 1,800 1,447 27 68 110Runnels 23.1 21.6 10.5 20.0 1,714 1,675 180 335 61Scurry 10.2 8.6 4.5 8.1 1,000 1,457 45 118 94Stonewall 2.6 1.4 2.0 1.0 1,350 2,400 27 24 138Taylor 3.8 7.3 2.4 6.8 1,167 2,059 28 140 87DISTRICT 2-S 89.0 93.0 47.0 86.5 1,723 1,953 810 1,689
Brown 2.1 1.7 0.2 1.2 2,000 2,000 4 24 138Comanche 5.3 5.9 1.9 3.7 2,211 3,324 42 123 92Eastland * 1.3 1.1 3,364 37 130Erath 5.1 2.7 0.7 1.4 1,000 2,786 7 39 126Mills 1.0 * 0.6 2,500 15Throckmorton * 2.2 2.0 3,250 65 111Wise 1.7 * 1.4 2,143 30Young 2.5 1.3 1.5 0.8 2,333 2,625 35 21 141Other Counties 3.3 2.9 1.7 2.3 2,882 2,826 49 65DISTRICT 3 21.0 18.0 8.0 12.5 2,275 2,992 182 374
Bell 23.0 17.2 21.0 17.0 4,810 3,582 1,010 609 37Bosque 2.0 1.2 1.7 1.1 1,765 4,364 30 48 117Collin 16.0 13.4 14.8 13.2 4,493 4,189 665 553 43Cooke 14.0 8.4 13.8 8.2 2,717 3,537 375 290 67Coryell 7.0 5.9 6.6 5.7 1,970 2,632 130 150 84Dallas 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.5 2,727 3,133 30 47 121Denton 15.0 12.3 14.0 12.1 3,057 3,645 428 441 52Ellis 15.5 16.0 14.5 15.3 5,345 4,085 775 625 35Falls 7.5 9.8 7.0 9.4 3,929 2,543 275 239 70Fannin 9.0 3.7 6.2 3.6 3,226 4,500 200 162 81Grayson 20.0 9.2 19.0 8.8 2,921 4,466 555 393 53Hamilton 4.0 3.5 3.4 2.8 1,912 3,536 65 99 98Hill 63.0 38.0 61.0 37.6 4,254 4,707 2,595 1,770 9Hunt 10.0 7.4 9.7 7.3 2,320 5,288 225 386 55Johnson 8.5 9.0 8.3 8.2 2,108 3,744 175 307 66Kaufman 2.0 1.5 1.7 1.4 4,412 5,143 75 72 107Lamar 4.5 3.4 4.4 3.3 4,773 4,970 210 164 80Limestone 3.5 1.9 3.4 1.8 2,647 4,000 90 72 107McLennan 21.5 16.6 20.5 16.4 3,585 3,305 735 542 44Milam 12.0 11.0 11.0 10.8 5,455 4,093 600 442 51Navarro 14.0 13.0 13.7 12.2 3,650 5,025 500 613 36Rockwall 5.8 6.1 5.6 6.0 4,018 3,650 225 219 73Tarrant 3.5 2.0 3.4 1.8 4,265 4,056 145 73 106Williamson 31.0 28.6 30.0 28.3 3,100 3,590 930 1,016 20Other Counties 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 3,500 4,500 7 9DISTRICT 4 314.0 241.0 296.0 234.0 3,733 3,992 11,050 9,341
Anderson 2.6 1.9 2.6 0.5 2,538 4,400 66 22 140Bowie 2.4 * 2.4 5,000 120Other Counties 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.5 4,000 3,933 60 59DISTRICT 5-N 7.0 4.0 6.5 2.0 3,785 4,050 246 81
109
TEXAS ALL SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Brazos 4.4 3.5 4.0 3.3 4,400 4,545 176 150 84Hardin 1.0 * 0.8 3,250 26Robertson 3.1 2.5 3.0 2.3 3,667 3,870 110 89 103Walker 1.5 1.4 3,214 45Other Counties 1.5 1.0 1.3 0.9 3,769 4,000 49 36DISTRICT 5-S 11.5 7.0 10.5 6.5 3,867 4,231 406 275
Hudspeth 1.0 * 0.8 1,750 14Reeves * 2.9Other Counties 2.5 2.1 1.7 0.5 3,118 3,400 53 17DISTRICT 6 3.5 5.0 2.5 0.5 2,680 3,400 67 17
Coke 3.0 * 2.0 2,250 45Concho 5.7 8.0 3.1 7.7 1,387 2,351 43 181 78Gillespie 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.6 2,333 2,313 35 37 130McCulloch 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.8 1,875 2,250 15 18 144Reagan 1.0 3.4 0.5 0.4 2,200 4,750 11 19 143San Saba 1.0 * 0.7 3,571 25Schleicher 1.5 2.3 0.9 0.4 2,556 500 23 2 149Tom Green 23.6 32.1 22.0 30.8 2,568 1,958 565 603 39Upton * 4.1 0.6 2,833 17 145Uvalde 14.1 13.7 12.4 11.7 3,952 4,248 490 497 47Other Counties 2.6 2.4 1.6 1.5 2,875 3,000 46 45DISTRICT 7 56.0 69.0 45.5 55.5 2,853 2,557 1,298 1,419
Austin 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3,824 4,818 130 159 82Bastrop 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.6 3,214 3,000 45 48 117Bee 17.9 18.1 16.4 16.0 3,012 2,313 494 370 57Bexar 12.6 11.2 12.0 10.8 3,058 2,519 367 272 68Burleson 6.4 9.2 5.6 9.1 4,196 3,824 235 348 59Caldwell 6.0 5.9 5.5 5.8 4,364 3,414 240 198 75Colorado 1.5 2.7 1.4 2.5 4,286 4,040 60 101 97Comal 1.1 1.2 0.9 1.1 5,111 3,545 46 39 126De Witt 1.0 * 0.9 4,444 40Fayette 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 4,071 2,500 57 35 133Goliad 1.5 * 1.4 2,571 36Gonzales 2.0 1.4 1.9 1.3 5,263 3,385 100 44 122Guadalupe 23.5 21.5 22.3 20.8 3,453 2,466 770 513 46Hays 2.2 3.4 2.0 3.1 4,000 1,968 80 61 114Karnes 5.5 3.9 4.0 2.7 3,500 2,037 140 55 115Lavaca 1.0 * 0.7 4,000 28Medina 23.8 25.8 22.5 24.3 3,844 2,790 865 678 30Travis 12.0 13.0 11.7 12.8 3,761 2,906 440 372 56Wilson 15.4 14.8 14.7 13.4 3,571 2,604 525 349 58Other Counties 1.1 3.4 0.9 3.0 3,111 2,767 28 83DISTRICT 8-N 141.0 142.0 131.0 133.0 3,608 2,801 4,726 3,725
Kleberg 42.0 43.0 22.0 42.1 2,000 2,969 440 1,250 18Nueces 159.2 167.8 131.2 166.5 2,336 3,500 3,065 5,827 1Refugio 22.9 23.8 22.0 22.0 4,545 3,286 1,000 723 28San Patricio 89.8 94.0 84.8 93.0 3,237 3,806 2,745 3,540 2Other Counties 0.1 0.4 0.4 3,500 14DISTRICT 8-S 314.0 329.0 260.0 324.0 2,788 3,504 7,250 11,354
Brazoria 5.2 17.0 4.8 16.1 4,896 5,118 235 824 25Calhoun 6.5 5.6 6.2 5.4 4,839 4,222 300 228 72Chambers 1.5 9.3 1.5 6.0 5,000 5,417 75 325 62Fort Bend 23.4 34.0 23.0 33.5 5,217 4,110 1,200 1,377 15Galveston * 1.4 1.4 4,429 62 112Jackson 26.0 31.0 25.4 30.2 5,118 4,368 1,300 1,319 16
110
TEXAS ALL SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Jefferson 1.4 2.2 1.4 1.3 2,857 3,154 40 41 124Liberty 3.7 15.3 3.7 14.6 3,162 4,500 117 657 32Matagorda 30.4 37.4 29.9 36.9 5,184 4,753 1,550 1,754 10Victoria 15.8 16.7 15.5 16.3 4,710 3,503 730 571 42Wharton 62.8 64.1 61.3 63.7 5,299 4,777 3,248 3,043 3Other Counties 1.3 1.0 1.3 0.6 5,692 1,333 74 8DISTRICT 9 178.0 235.0 174.0 226.0 5,097 4,517 8,869 10,209
Atascosa 3.8 3.8 3.4 3.1 1,853 1,387 63 43 123Brooks 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 1,130 1,652 26 38 128Duval 13.9 12.2 13.4 7.9 1,754 2,468 235 195 76Frio 6.0 5.8 4.8 4.3 2,500 2,279 120 98 100Jim Wells 50.0 47.3 46.5 41.8 1,871 1,885 870 788 26La Salle 2.5 1.0 2.0 0.7 2,000 1,857 40 13 147Live Oak 4.8 6.5 3.8 5.3 2,553 2,585 97 137 88McMullen 1.6 2.0 0.5 0.1 2,200 2,000 11 2 149Zavala 7.1 5.2 6.9 4.1 3,551 3,780 245 155 83Other Counties 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.4 3,929 2,143 55 30DISTRICT 10-N 94.0 88.0 85.0 71.0 2,073 2,111 1,762 1,499
Cameron 96.5 104.0 87.7 80.5 2,782 2,243 2,440 1,806 7Hidalgo 141.0 153.7 130.0 134.7 2,615 1,979 3,400 2,666 4Starr 54.0 43.0 50.8 20.4 1,880 1,152 955 235 71Willacy 103.5 99.3 95.5 79.9 2,241 1,790 2,140 1,430 14DISTRICT 10-S 395.0 400.0 364.0 315.5 2,455 1,945 8,935 6,137
STATE 3,500.0 3,200.0 2,600.0 2,550.0 2,800 2,856 72,800 72,828
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals. * Less than 1,000 acres planted. Acreage and production estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
111
TEXAS IRRIGATED SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Armstrong 1.0 1.6 1.0 1.5 1,000 5,333 10 80Briscoe 2.5 3.8 2.0 3.7 1,750 3,189 35 118Carson 8.4 11.0 8.0 10.9 5,125 4,239 410 462Castro 20.5 20.0 18.5 18.0 5,946 3,111 1,100 560Dallam 7.5 10.0 7.4 5.0 2,568 4,620 190 231Deaf Smith 30.0 36.0 24.2 30.0 3,492 3,787 845 1,136Floyd 16.0 38.0 15.7 36.5 2,070 4,668 325 1,704Gray 2.0 2.9 2.0 2.8 4,250 4,500 85 126Hale 23.0 39.4 22.5 37.5 3,400 4,587 765 1,720Hansford 15.0 13.9 14.7 12.6 4,150 5,206 610 656Hartley 8.0 11.0 6.5 10.0 3,231 5,600 210 560Hutchinson 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.0 5,364 5,100 236 204Lipscomb 2.0 1.3 2.0 1.1 6,500 5,636 130 62Moore 19.5 17.7 19.5 17.0 4,615 5,612 900 954Ochiltree 11.5 14.6 11.3 14.0 6,106 5,207 690 729Oldham 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.7 3,636 4,286 40 30Parmer 32.5 25.9 30.5 24.0 4,918 5,308 1,500 1,274Randall 4.6 5.9 4.5 4.0 5,289 5,000 238 200Roberts 1.2 * 1.2 4,000 48Sherman 24.0 15.7 23.5 11.5 5,362 3,348 1,260 385Swisher 19.0 17.2 18.3 13.8 3,525 3,623 645 500Other Counties 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.4 4,167 4,500 50 63DISTRICT 1-N 255.0 293.0 240.0 260.0 4,301 4,521 10,322 11,754
Bailey 11.0 4.9 10.5 4.7 3,333 5,319 350 250Cochran 4.3 4.2 3.5 3.9 3,143 2,308 110 90Crosby 18.2 6.5 16.0 6.4 1,906 2,344 305 150Dawson 2.0 1.3 0.5 1.2 2,800 3,500 14 42Gaines 4.0 2.0 3.6 1.8 2,778 2,278 100 41Hockley 36.0 13.5 35.5 12.7 2,775 2,220 985 282Lamb 23.0 14.6 22.0 13.5 3,977 4,600 875 621Lubbock 29.6 30.6 27.0 29.2 2,648 2,373 715 693Lynn 26.5 1.8 22.0 1.7 2,477 3,118 545 53Terry 3.3 5.2 2.8 4.5 2,679 2,111 75 95Yoakum 3.2 * 1.1 2,727 30Other Counties 0.9 1.4 0.5 1.4 3,000 2,786 15 39DISTRICT 1-S 162.0 86.0 145.0 81.0 2,841 2,909 4,119 2,356
Donley 1.4 * 1.3 2,923 38Garza * 2.0 2.0 3,400 68Other Counties 2.6 2.0 2.2 2.0 2,955 3,350 65 67DISTRICT 2-N 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 2,943 3,375 103 135
Haskell * 1.1 1.0 4,000 40Other Counties 2.0 0.9 1.5 0.5 3,333 3,400 50 17DISTRICT 2-S 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 3,333 3,800 50 57
Comanche 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.7 1,375 3,429 11 24Other Counties 0.8 0.8 0.2 0.8 500 3,750 1 30DISTRICT 3 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.5 1,200 3,600 12 54
Other Counties 1.0 1.0 3,800 38DISTRICT 4 * 1.0 1.0 3,800 38
Robertson 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 3,667 3,714 55 52Other Counties 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 5,200 3,833 26 23DISTRICT 5-S 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4,050 3,750 81 75
112
TEXAS IRRIGATED SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Reeves * 2.9Other Counties 2.0 2.1 1.5 0.5 3,267 3,400 49 17DISTRICT 6 2.0 5.0 1.5 0.5 3,267 3,400 49 17
Tom Green 2.6 2.1 2.5 2.1 5,600 2,524 140 53Uvalde 6.6 6.8 6.3 6.8 5,000 5,382 315 366Other Counties 0.8 1.1 0.7 1.1 4,143 4,455 29 49DISTRICT 7 10.0 10.0 9.5 10.0 5,095 4,680 484 468
Bee 1.9 1.0 1.8 1.0 4,944 4,800 89 48Burleson 3.3 5.0 3.1 5.0 5,645 4,360 175 218Medina 5.8 5.1 5.6 5.1 6,071 5,549 340 283Wilson 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.2 5,714 4,833 80 58Other Counties 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 4,500 6,429 27 45DISTRICT 8-N 13.0 13.0 12.5 13.0 5,688 5,015 711 652
San Patricio * 1.0 1.0 6,300 63Other Counties 1.0 1.0 5,000 50DISTRICT 8-S 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5,000 6,300 50 63
Brazoria 2.4 2.4 5,875 141Other Counties 2.0 1.6 2.0 1.6 5,250 5,313 105 85DISTRICT 9 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 5,250 5,650 105 226
Frio 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 5,000 2,778 90 50Zavala 4.1 3.2 4.0 3.2 4,625 4,219 185 135Other Counties 2.9 2.0 2.7 2.0 3,370 2,250 91 45DISTRICT 10-N 9.0 7.0 8.5 7.0 4,306 3,286 366 230
Cameron 46.5 38.8 45.7 38.5 3,611 3,223 1,650 1,241Hidalgo 46.0 37.7 45.0 36.7 4,000 4,578 1,800 1,680Starr 2.0 2.5 1.8 2.4 3,056 2,708 55 65Willacy 8.5 6.0 8.5 5.9 4,000 3,898 340 230DISTRICT 10-S 103.0 85.0 101.0 83.5 3,807 3,851 3,845 3,216
Other Districts 1.0 0.5 3,600 18
STATE 568.0 515.0 529.5 470.0 3,837 4,115 20,315 19,341
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated wheat are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practices areincluded in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated sorghum estimated. Acresand production included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
113
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Armstrong 24.0 26.8 22.0 24.6 1,636 2,033 360 500Briscoe 7.3 6.0 5.3 3.8 1,887 1,816 100 69Carson 38.6 46.0 33.0 45.0 1,788 2,933 590 1,320Castro 13.0 19.0 11.0 7.0 1,818 2,286 200 160Dallam 15.5 20.5 14.5 7.0 1,448 1,214 210 85Deaf Smith 51.0 79.3 36.0 35.0 1,833 1,031 660 361Floyd 17.0 29.4 13.0 22.0 1,692 1,500 220 330Gray 22.5 24.4 14.5 24.0 1,966 2,917 285 700Hale 10.0 18.0 6.5 14.0 1,923 1,357 125 190Hansford 44.0 96.2 32.0 34.5 1,719 1,812 550 625Hartley 20.0 20.5 13.5 5.5 1,481 818 200 45Hutchinson 10.0 19.2 7.0 9.0 2,000 1,578 140 142Lipscomb 7.5 11.2 7.0 10.0 1,857 2,500 130 250Moore 16.4 30.9 14.0 10.5 1,750 1,229 245 129Ochiltree 50.0 83.8 35.0 52.0 2,114 1,817 740 945Oldham 15.0 33.7 11.5 11.0 1,739 909 200 100Parmer 20.5 31.4 18.8 14.3 2,606 1,685 490 241Randall 19.5 26.9 16.0 14.5 1,625 1,779 260 258Roberts 1.7 * 1.5 1,867 28Sherman 20.0 29.2 14.0 14.0 1,857 1,457 260 204Swisher 15.0 30.1 12.7 13.4 1,339 1,306 170 175Other Counties 6.5 8.5 6.2 6.9 1,613 1,739 100 120DISTRICT 1-N 445.0 691.0 345.0 378.0 1,815 1,838 6,263 6,949
Bailey 25.0 35.4 21.0 32.6 1,310 1,798 275 586Cochran 31.0 44.7 19.0 41.0 1,105 1,876 210 769Crosby 21.0 8.1 12.5 5.3 1,600 1,094 200 58Dawson 172.0 54.3 45.0 39.5 1,256 1,491 565 589Gaines 60.0 43.0 19.5 26.0 1,256 1,331 245 346Glasscock 62.0 15.5 18.0 10.0 1,361 620 245 62Hockley 63.0 32.2 49.0 29.0 1,643 1,231 805 357Howard 59.0 19.0 6.0 13.0 1,333 969 80 126Lamb 36.0 13.2 34.0 10.3 1,441 1,544 490 159Lubbock 52.0 17.2 46.0 13.9 1,250 1,640 575 228Lynn 133.0 14.0 65.0 9.9 1,400 687 910 68Terry 52.0 41.1 9.0 31.5 1,944 1,197 175 377Yoakum 52.0 * 18.0 1,333 240Other Counties 135.0 120.3 43.0 69.0 1,395 1,507 600 1,040DISTRICT 1-S 953.0 458.0 405.0 331.0 1,386 1,440 5,615 4,765
Borden 12.0 3.8 4.0 1.5 2,500 1,933 100 29Childress 1.2 * 0.5 2,800 14Cottle 1.5 * 0.9 2,556 23Dickens 2.4 * 1.2 2,417 29Donley 1.5 * 0.5 2,800 14Foard 12.0 * 8.5 2,471 210Garza * 1.5 1.2 2,417 29Kent 1.6 1.8 1.0 1.1 2,400 1,364 24 15King * 1.1 1.0 2,900 29Motley 1.1 * 0.4 2,750 11Wichita 3.4 2.0 2.5 1.6 2,400 2,375 60 38Other Counties 20.3 26.8 12.0 22.6 2,433 2,695 292 609DISTRICT 2-N 57.0 37.0 31.5 29.0 2,467 2,583 777 749
Coleman 10.0 7.2 5.8 6.9 1,259 1,333 73 92Fisher * 6.2 6.0 1,733 104Haskell * 11.2 11.0 2,473 272
114
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Mitchell 8.4 3.8 2.5 2.5 1,040 1,600 26 40Nolan 3.2 * 1.5 1,800 27Stonewall 2.6 1.4 2.0 1.0 1,350 2,400 27 24Taylor 3.8 7.3 2.4 6.8 1,167 2,059 28 140Other Counties 59.0 53.9 31.3 50.8 1,850 1,890 579 960DISTRICT 2-S 87.0 91.0 45.5 85.0 1,670 1,920 760 1,632
Brown * 1.7 1.2 2,000 24Comanche 4.1 4.7 1.1 3.0 2,818 3,300 31 99Erath * 2.7 1.4 2,786 39Mills 1.0 * 0.6 2,500 15Throckmorton * 2.2 2.0 3,250 65Young 2.5 1.3 1.5 0.8 2,333 2,625 35 21Other Counties 11.4 3.4 3.8 2.6 2,342 2,769 89 72DISTRICT 3 19.0 16.0 7.0 11.0 2,429 2,909 170 320
Bell 23.0 17.2 21.0 17.0 4,810 3,582 1,010 609Bosque 2.0 1.2 1.7 1.1 1,765 4,364 30 48Collin 16.0 13.4 14.8 13.2 4,493 4,189 665 553Cooke 14.0 8.4 13.8 8.2 2,717 3,537 375 290Coryell 7.0 5.9 6.6 5.7 1,970 2,632 130 150Dallas 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.5 2,727 3,133 30 47Denton 15.0 * 14.0 3,057 428Ellis 15.5 16.0 14.5 15.3 5,345 4,085 775 625Falls 7.5 9.8 7.0 9.4 3,929 2,543 275 239Fannin 9.0 3.7 6.2 3.6 3,226 4,500 200 162Grayson 20.0 9.2 19.0 8.8 2,921 4,466 555 393Hamilton 4.0 3.5 3.4 2.8 1,912 3,536 65 99Hill 63.0 38.0 61.0 37.6 4,254 4,707 2,595 1,770Hunt 10.0 * 9.7 2,320 225Johnson 8.5 9.0 8.3 8.2 2,108 3,744 175 307Kaufman 2.0 1.5 1.7 1.4 4,412 5,143 75 72Lamar 4.5 3.4 4.4 3.3 4,773 4,970 210 164Limestone 3.5 1.9 3.4 1.8 2,647 4,000 90 72Milam 12.0 11.0 11.0 10.8 5,455 4,093 600 442Navarro 14.0 13.0 13.7 12.2 3,650 5,025 500 613Rockwall 5.8 6.1 5.6 6.0 4,018 3,650 225 219Tarrant 3.5 2.0 3.4 1.8 4,265 4,056 145 73Williamson 31.0 28.6 30.0 28.3 3,100 3,590 930 1,016Other Counties 21.5 35.6 20.7 35.0 3,585 3,829 742 1,340DISTRICT 4 313.5 240.0 296.0 233.0 3,733 3,993 11,050 9,303
Anderson * 1.9 0.5 4,400 22Bowie 2.4 * 2.4 5,000 120Other Counties 4.1 2.1 3.6 1.5 3,000 3,933 108 59DISTRICT 5-N 6.5 4.0 6.0 2.0 3,800 4,050 228 81
Hardin 1.0 * 0.8 3,250 26Robertson 1.6 1.1 1.5 0.9 3,667 4,111 55 37Walker 1.5 1.4 3,214 45Other Counties 5.4 3.9 4.8 3.6 4,146 4,528 199 163DISTRICT 5-S 9.5 5.0 8.5 4.5 3,824 4,444 325 200
Other Counties 1.5 1.0 1,800 18DISTRICT 6 1.5 1.0 1,800 18
115
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
Coke 3.0 * 2.0 2,250 45Concho * 8.0 7.7 2,351 181Gillespie 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.6 2,333 2,313 35 37McCulloch 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.8 1,875 2,250 15 18Reagan 1.0 * 0.5 2,200 11San Saba 1.0 * 0.7 3,571 25Schleicher 1.5 2.3 0.9 0.4 2,556 500 23 2Tom Green 21.0 30.0 19.5 28.7 2,179 1,916 425 550Uvalde 7.5 6.9 6.1 4.9 2,869 2,673 175 131Other Counties 7.5 8.8 4.0 1.4 1,500 2,286 60 32DISTRICT 7 46.0 59.0 36.0 45.5 2,261 2,090 814 951
Austin 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3,824 4,818 130 159Bastrop 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.6 3,214 3,000 45 48Bee 16.0 17.1 14.6 15.0 2,774 2,147 405 322Burleson 3.1 4.2 2.5 4.1 2,400 3,171 60 130Caldwell 6.0 5.9 5.5 5.8 4,364 3,414 240 198Colorado 1.5 2.7 1.4 2.5 4,286 4,040 60 101Comal 1.1 1.2 0.9 1.1 5,111 3,545 46 39De Witt 1.0 * 0.9 4,444 40Fayette 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 4,071 2,500 57 35Goliad 1.5 * 1.4 2,571 36Gonzales 2.0 1.4 1.9 1.3 5,263 3,385 100 44Guadalupe 23.5 21.5 22.3 20.8 3,453 2,466 770 513Hays 2.2 3.4 2.0 3.1 4,000 1,968 80 61Karnes 5.5 3.9 4.0 2.7 3,500 2,037 140 55Lavaca 1.0 * 0.7 4,000 28Medina 18.0 20.7 16.9 19.2 3,107 2,057 525 395Travis 12.0 13.0 11.7 12.8 3,761 2,906 440 372Wilson 14.0 13.6 13.3 12.2 3,346 2,385 445 291Other Counties 13.1 13.9 12.3 13.1 2,992 2,366 368 310DISTRICT 8-N 128.0 129.0 118.5 120.0 3,388 2,561 4,015 3,073
Kleberg 42.0 43.0 22.0 42.1 2,000 2,969 440 1,250Nueces * 167.8 166.5 3,500 5,827Refugio 22.9 23.8 22.0 22.0 4,545 3,286 1,000 723San Patricio * 93.0 92.0 3,779 3,477Other Counties 248.1 0.4 215.0 0.4 2,679 3,500 5,760 14DISTRICT 8-S 313.0 328.0 259.0 323.0 2,780 3,496 7,200 11,291
Brazoria 5.2 14.6 4.8 13.7 4,896 4,985 235 683Calhoun 6.5 5.6 6.2 5.4 4,839 4,222 300 228Chambers 1.5 9.3 1.5 6.0 5,000 5,417 75 325Fort Bend 23.4 34.0 23.0 33.5 5,217 4,110 1,200 1,377Galveston * 1.4 1.4 4,429 62Jackson 26.0 31.0 25.4 30.2 5,118 4,368 1,300 1,319Jefferson 1.4 * 1.4 2,857 40Liberty * 15.3 14.6 4,500 657Victoria 15.8 16.7 15.5 16.3 4,710 3,503 730 571Other Counties 96.2 103.1 94.2 100.9 5,185 4,719 4,884 4,761DISTRICT 9 176.0 231.0 172.0 222.0 5,095 4,497 8,764 9,983
Brooks 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 1,130 1,652 26 38Duval * 12.2 7.9 2,468 195Frio 4.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 1,000 1,920 30 48Jim Wells 50.0 * 46.5 1,871 870
116
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED SORGHUMAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 cwt
La Salle 2.5 * 2.0 2,000 40Live Oak * 6.5 5.3 2,585 137McMullen 1.6 2.0 0.5 0.1 2,200 2,000 11 2Zavala 3.0 2.0 2.9 0.9 2,069 2,222 60 20Other Counties 21.4 51.9 19.3 45.0 1,860 1,842 359 829DISTRICT 10-N 85.0 81.0 76.5 64.0 1,825 1,983 1,396 1,269
Cameron 50.0 65.2 42.0 42.0 1,881 1,345 790 565Hidalgo 95.0 116.0 85.0 98.0 1,882 1,006 1,600 986Starr 52.0 40.5 49.0 18.0 1,837 944 900 170Willacy 95.0 93.3 87.0 74.0 2,069 1,622 1,800 1,200DISTRICT 10-S 292.0 315.0 263.0 232.0 1,935 1,259 5,090 2,921
STATE 2,932.0 2,685.0 2,070.5 2,080.0 2,535 2,571 52,485 53,487
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated wheat are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practices areincluded in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated sorghum estimated. Acresand production included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
117
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
SOYBEANSAcres Planted - 2002
LEADING COUNTIES IN SOYBEAN PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
Rank County 2001Production
Percentof state Rank County 2002
ProductionPercentof state
1,000 bushels 1,000 bushels
1 Lamar 428.5 7.3 1 Wharton 532.0 8.8
2 Matagorda 425.0 7.3 2 Lamar 341.0 5.7
2 Victoria 425.0 7.3 3 Ochiltree 324.0 5.4
4 Wharton 413.0 7.1 3 Victoria 324.0 5.4
5 Jackson 298.0 5.1 5 Carson 293.0 4.9
6 Delta 290.0 5.0 6 Fannin 276.0 4.6
7 Ochiltree 252.9 4.3 7 Matagorda 263.0 4.4
8 Hunt 250.0 4.3 8 Hale 241.0 4.0
9 Fannin 230.0 3.9 9 Jackson 235.0 3.9
10 Carson 171.5 2.9 10 Floyd 212.0 3.5
118
TEXAS ALL SOYBEANSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Carson 5.0 6.3 4.6 6.3 37.3 46.5 171.5 293.0 5Castro 2.1 1.0 2.1 1.0 29.9 47.0 62.7 47.0 33Dallam 1.5 2.5 1.3 2.5 40.0 40.0 52.0 100.0 21Deaf Smith 3.5 2.4 3.2 2.3 31.3 36.5 100.0 84.0 24Floyd * 5.5 5.2 40.8 212.0 10Gray 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.1 47.5 61.8 38.0 68.0 25Hale * 7.0 6.7 36.0 241.0 8Hansford 3.5 4.7 3.1 4.7 47.7 43.2 148.0 203.0 11Hartley 2.2 1.1 2.0 1.1 47.5 45.5 95.0 50.0 32Hutchinson 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 39.0 49.1 39.0 54.0 28Moore 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.5 50.0 61.3 85.0 92.0 23Ochiltree 5.1 7.8 5.0 7.7 50.6 42.1 252.9 324.0 3Roberts 1.0 * 0.8 51.1 40.9Sherman 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.0 43.1 52.5 77.5 105.0 19Swisher * 1.6 1.6 23.8 38.0 36Other Counties 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.3 37.2 50.0 85.5 115.0DISTRICT 1-N 33.0 48.0 29.7 47.1 42.0 43.0 1,248.0 2,026.0
Gaines 1.4 0.2 15.0 3.0Lubbock 1.2 1.3 0.5 1.3 26.0 23.5 13.0 30.5 37Other Counties 2.9 2.0 2.6 2.0 21.2 21.8 55.0 43.5DISTRICT 1-S 5.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 21.5 22.4 71.0 74.0
Wilbarger 2.2 2.3 1.8 1.8 22.2 11.1 40.0 20.0 42Other Counties 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 30.0 27.1 24.0 19.0DISTRICT 2-N 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.5 24.6 15.6 64.0 39.0
Collin 5.4 1.7 3.6 1.3 11.9 15.4 43.0 20.0 42Cooke 1.1 * 0.9 20.0 18.0Dallas 5.5 4.8 5.1 4.6 23.5 25.0 120.0 115.0 17Delta 13.2 9.5 13.1 9.3 22.1 18.3 290.0 170.0 13Ellis 4.0 3.4 3.2 3.2 19.4 21.3 62.0 68.0 25Falls 8.1 3.0 7.4 2.8 19.8 18.2 146.5 51.0 30Fannin 12.9 9.7 10.0 9.6 23.0 28.8 230.0 276.0 6Grayson 1.8 * 1.7 16.5 28.0Hunt 10.1 7.2 9.0 6.8 27.8 21.8 250.0 148.0 16Kaufman 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.7 33.3 30.6 50.0 52.0 29Lamar 26.6 15.5 25.6 15.5 16.7 22.0 428.5 341.0 2McLennan 4.6 1.4 4.3 1.3 20.2 20.0 87.0 26.0 38Other Counties 2.7 4.5 2.3 3.9 19.6 22.8 45.0 89.0DISTRICT 4 97.5 62.5 87.7 60.0 20.5 22.6 1,798.0 1,356.0
Bowie 7.2 7.9 6.3 7.9 20.0 20.4 126.0 161.0 15Hopkins 1.0 0.9 22.2 20.0Red River 7.5 6.3 6.9 6.3 22.5 29.4 155.0 185.0 12Other Counties 0.8 0.3 0.7 0.3 20.0 20.0 14.0 6.0DISTRICT 5-N 16.5 14.5 14.8 14.5 21.3 24.3 315.0 352.0
Brazos 1.1 0.9 22.2 20.0 42Robertson 2.3 3.3 2.2 2.9 25.0 38.3 55.0 111.0 18Other Counties 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 20.0 25.0 4.0 5.0DISTRICT 5-S 2.5 4.8 2.4 4.0 24.6 34.0 59.0 136.0
Burleson 5.2 3.1 4.7 2.9 27.0 35.9 127.0 104.0 20Colorado 5.6 2.5 4.5 1.7 20.0 30.0 90.0 51.0 30Goliad * 1.0 1.0 22.0 22.0 40Other Counties 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.9 21.7 20.5 39.0 39.0DISTRICT 8-N 13.5 8.7 11.0 7.5 23.3 28.8 256.0 216.0
119
TEXAS ALL SOYBEANSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Brazoria 2.3 2.8 2.0 2.5 32.5 24.8 65.0 62.0 27Calhoun 5.4 6.1 5.0 5.2 23.0 18.3 115.0 95.0 22Chambers 1.5 1.8 1.4 1.7 25.0 25.3 35.0 43.0 35Fort Bend 5.3 4.4 4.0 3.1 32.5 14.2 130.0 44.0 34Harris * 1.0 1.0 23.0 23.0 39Jackson 14.8 13.6 12.6 11.8 23.7 19.9 298.0 235.0 9Jefferson 1.4 1.2 1.2 0.9 25.0 23.3 30.0 21.0 41Liberty 3.6 7.0 3.1 6.5 22.6 26.2 70.0 170.0 13Matagorda 14.6 11.1 12.8 10.5 33.2 25.0 425.0 263.0 7Victoria 18.9 15.7 16.0 14.5 26.6 22.3 425.0 324.0 3Wharton 18.2 19.8 13.9 18.0 29.7 29.6 413.0 532.0 1Other Counties 0.5 0.5 24.0 12.0DISTRICT 9 86.5 84.5 72.5 75.7 27.8 23.9 2,018.0 1,812.0
Other Districts 2.0 0.7 1.0 0.4 21.0 22.5 21.0 9.0
STATE 260.0 230.0 225.0 215.0 26.0 28.0 5,850.0 6,020.0
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals. * Less than 1,000 acres planted. Acreage and production estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
120
TEXAS IRRIGATED SOYBEANSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Castro * 1.0 1.0 47.0 47.0Dallam 1.5 2.5 1.3 2.5 40.0 40.0 52.0 100.0Deaf Smith 3.5 * 3.2 31.3 100.0Floyd * 5.5 5.2 40.8 212.0Gray * 1.1 1.1 61.8 68.0Hansford 3.5 * 3.1 47.7 148.0Hartley * 1.1 1.1 45.5 50.0Moore 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.5 50.0 61.3 85.0 92.0Sherman 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.0 43.1 52.5 77.5 105.0Swisher * 1.6 1.6 23.8 38.0Other Counties 19.2 29.7 17.9 29.4 42.8 43.1 765.5 1,266.0DISTRICT 1-N 31.4 46.0 29.0 45.4 42.3 43.6 1,228.0 1,978.0
Other Counties 5.0 2.7 3.0 2.7 21.7 24.1 65.0 65.0DISTRICT 1-S 5.0 2.7 3.0 2.7 21.7 24.1 65.0 65.0
Other Counties 1.5 1.5 44.7 67.0DISTRICT 4 * 1.5 1.5 44.7 67.0
Bowie * 1.5 1.5 27.3 41.0Other Counties 1.0 1.0 28.0 28.0DISTRICT 5-N * 2.5 2.5 27.6 69.0
Robertson * 2.3 2.3 42.2 97.0Other Counties 2.0 2.0 25.0 50.0DISTRICT 5-S 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.3 25.0 42.2 50.0 97.0
Burleson 3.2 1.7 3.1 1.7 30.6 51.2 95.0 87.0Other Counties 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 23.3 30.0 7.0 3.0DISTRICT 8-N 3.5 1.8 3.4 1.8 30.0 50.0 102.0 90.0
Wharton 1.0 1.6 0.9 1.5 42.2 34.7 38.0 52.0Other Counties 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.7 46.7 25.7 28.0 18.0DISTRICT 9 1.7 2.5 1.5 2.2 44.0 31.8 66.0 70.0
Other Districts 2.3 0.7 2.1 0.6 32.4 40.0 68.0 24.0
STATE 45.9 60.0 41.0 59.0 38.5 41.7 1,579.0 2,460.0
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated wheat are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practices areincluded in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated soybeans estimated. Acresand production included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
121
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED SOYBEANSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Other Counties 1.6 2.0 0.7 1.7 28.6 28.2 20.0 48.0DISTRICT 1-N 1.6 2.0 0.7 1.7 28.6 28.2 20.0 48.0
Wilbarger 2.2 * 1.8 22.2 40.0Other Counties 0.3 0.3 23.3 7.0DISTRICT 2-N 2.5 * 2.1 22.4 47.0
Collin 5.4 1.7 3.6 1.3 11.9 15.4 43.0 20.0Cooke 1.1 * 0.9 20.0 18.0Dallas 5.5 4.8 5.1 4.6 23.5 25.0 120.0 115.0Delta 13.2 * 13.1 22.1 290.0Ellis 4.0 3.4 3.2 3.2 19.4 21.3 62.0 68.0Fannin 12.9 * 10.0 23.0 230.0Grayson 1.8 * 1.7 16.5 28.0Hunt 10.1 7.2 9.0 6.8 27.8 21.8 250.0 148.0Kaufman 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.7 33.3 30.6 50.0 52.0McLennan * 1.4 1.3 20.0 26.0Other Counties 41.5 40.7 39.1 39.6 17.8 21.7 697.0 860.0DISTRICT 4 97.0 61.0 87.2 58.5 20.5 22.0 1,788.0 1,289.0
Bowie * 6.4 6.4 18.8 120.0Other Counties 15.7 5.6 14.0 5.6 20.0 29.1 280.0 163.0DISTRICT 5-N 15.7 12.0 14.0 12.0 20.0 23.6 280.0 283.0
Brazos 1.1 0.9 22.2 20.0Robertson * 1.0 0.6 23.3 14.0Other Counties 0.4 0.2 25.0 5.0DISTRICT 5-S * 2.5 1.7 22.9 39.0
Burleson 2.0 1.4 1.6 1.2 20.0 14.2 32.0 17.0Colorado 5.6 2.5 4.5 1.7 20.0 30.0 90.0 51.0Goliad * 1.0 1.0 22.0 22.0Other Counties 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.8 21.3 20.0 32.0 36.0DISTRICT 8-N 10.0 6.9 7.6 5.7 20.3 22.1 154.0 126.0
Brazoria 2.3 * 2.0 32.5 65.0Calhoun 5.4 6.1 5.0 5.2 23.0 18.3 115.0 95.0Chambers 1.5 1.8 1.4 1.7 25.0 25.3 35.0 43.0Fort Bend 5.3 * 4.0 32.5 130.0Jefferson 1.4 1.2 1.2 0.9 25.0 23.3 30.0 21.0Liberty 3.6 7.0 3.1 6.5 22.6 26.2 70.0 170.0Victoria 18.9 15.7 16.0 14.5 26.6 22.3 425.0 324.0Wharton 17.2 18.2 13.0 16.5 28.8 29.1 375.0 480.0Other Counties 29.2 32.0 25.3 28.2 27.9 21.6 707.0 609.0DISTRICT 9 84.8 82.0 71.0 73.5 27.5 23.7 1,952.0 1,742.0
Other Districts 2.5 3.6 1.4 2.9 21.4 11.4 30.0 33.0
STATE 214.1 170.0 184.0 156.0 23.2 22.8 4,271.0 3,560.0
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated wheat are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practices areincluded in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated soybeans estimated. Acresand production included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
122
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
SUGARCANEAcres Harvested For Sugar - 2002
TEXAS SUGARCANE FOR SUGARAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county
Acreage harvested Yield per harvested acre Production Productionranking2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres Tons 1,000 tons
Cameron 19.6 18.5 41.4 38.8 811.2 717.3 2Hidalgo 20.1 19.5 40.7 39.3 817.8 766.4 1Willacy 5.8 5.3 51.0 40.5 296.0 214.8 3DISTRICT 10-S 45.5 43.3 42.3 39.2 1,925.0 1,698.5
Other Districts .5 .3 24.0 21.7 12.0 6.5
STATE 46.0 43.6 42.1 39.1 1,937.0 1,705.0
123
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
SUNFLOWERSAcres Planted - 2002
LEADING COUNTIES IN SUNFLOWER PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
Rank County 2001Production
Percentof state Rank County 2002
ProductionPercentof state
1,000 pounds 1,000 pounds
1 Moore 22,400 18.6 1 Moore 4,800 15.1
2 Hartley 10,740 8.9 2 Lubbock 2,400 7.5
3 Sherman 9,650 8.0 3 Lynn 2,230 7.0
4 Lamb 9,200 7.6 4 Crosby 2,080 6.5
5 Ochiltree 8,350 6.9 5 Floyd 2,000 6.3
6 Lubbock 7,150 5.9 6 Dawson 1,564 4.9
7 Carson 6,500 5.4 7 Jim Wells 1,500 4.7
8 Crosby 4,800 4.0 8 Carson 1,325 4.2
9 Hale 4,300 3.6 9 Lamb 1,300 4.1
10 Hockley 3,950 3.3 10 Hartley 1,280 4.0
124
TEXAS SUNFLOWERSAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Pounds 1,000 pounds
Carson 7.2 1.5 6.7 1.2 970 1,104 6,500 1,325 8Dallam 3.3 * 3.3 930 3,070Floyd 4.4 2.7 4.4 2.5 848 800 3,730 2,000 5Gray 5.0 * 4.9 510 2,500Hale 3.6 1.0 3.4 0.6 1,265 1,403 4,300 842 13Hansford 1.0 * 1.0 1,140 1,140Hartley 5.1 1.4 5.1 1.3 2,106 985 10,740 1,280 10Lipscomb 1.9 * 1.9 853 1,620Moore 13.6 6.3 11.2 5.0 2,000 960 22,400 4,800 1Ochiltree 7.2 * 7.0 1,193 8,350Parmer 1.5 * 1.5 1,233 1,850Sherman 5.3 1.2 5.1 0.9 1,892 1,000 9,650 900 12Swisher 3.1 * 3.0 1,265 3,796Other Counties 2.1 5.3 2.0 3.5 991 912 1,982 3,193DISTRICT 1-N 64.3 19.4 60.5 15.0 1,349 956 81,628 14,340
Bailey 1.5 * 1.5 1,267 1,900Cochran 1.1 1.4 1.1 0.3 745 667 820 200 15Crosby 6.8 1.4 6.8 1.3 706 1,600 4,800 2,080 4Dawson 2.0 1.8 869 1,564 6Hockley 3.9 * 3.9 1,013 3,950Lamb 8.5 1.4 8.0 1.2 1,150 1,083 9,200 1,300 9Lubbock 10.7 3.0 10.6 2.8 675 857 7,150 2,400 2Lynn 3.7 2.5 3.7 2.3 1,027 970 3,800 2,230 3Other Counties 0.8 2.8 0.7 2.5 829 925 580 2,312DISTRICT 1-S 37.0 14.5 36.3 12.2 887 991 32,200 12,086
Kleberg 1.6 0.9 867 780 14Other Counties 1.1 1.1 743 817DISTRICT 8-S * 2.7 2.0 799 1,597
Jim Wells 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.0 1,000 750 2,900 1,500 7Other Counties 0.1 0.1 0.1 2,000 200DISTRICT 10-N 3.0 2.3 3.0 2.0 1,033 750 3,100 1,500
Hidalgo * 1.5 1.5 820 1,230 11Other Counties 1.2 0.4 1.2 0.3 1,000 707 1,200 212DISTRICT 10-S 1.2 1.9 1.2 1.8 1,000 801 1,200 1,442
Other Districts 2.5 1.2 2.0 1.0 1,086 835 2,172 835
STATE 108.0 42.0 103.0 34.0 1,168 935 120,300 31,800
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals. * Less than 1,000 acres planted. Acreage and production estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
125
1 dot = 1,000 acresDots indicate acreage without respect
to geographic location within the county.
WHEATAcres Planted - 2002
LEADING COUNTIES IN WHEAT PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
Rank County 2001Production
Percentof state Rank County 2002
ProductionPercentof state
1,000 bushels 1,000 bushels
1 Hansford 7,190 6.6 1 Dallam 4,240 5.4
2 Sherman 5,680 5.2 2 Sherman 3,535 4.5
3 Ochiltree 4,950 4.5 3 Haskell 2,890 3.7
4 Deaf Smith 4,750 4.4 4 Hartley 2,815 3.6
5 Dallam 4,460 4.1 5 Knox 2,350 3.0
6 Parmer 3,865 3.6 6 Collin 2,280 2.9
7 Moore 3,800 3.5 7 Hill 2,275 2.9
8 Haskell 3,570 3.3 8 Runnels 2,090 2.7
9 Castro 3,050 2.8 9 Moore 1,945 2.5
10 Knox 2,975 2.7 10 Fannin 1,915 2.4
126
TEXAS ALL WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Armstrong 50.2 54.7 41.0 29.8 35.6 19.2 1,460 573 43Briscoe 40.5 38.0 27.0 7.4 25.5 18.9 688 140 77Carson 101.0 97.0 74.0 35.5 39.7 15.8 2,940 560 45Castro 185.0 177.0 73.0 41.0 41.8 41.5 3,050 1,700 18Dallam 125.0 147.0 88.0 84.5 50.7 50.2 4,460 4,240 1Deaf Smith 165.0 207.0 117.0 66.0 40.6 27.3 4,750 1,800 14Floyd 60.0 97.5 51.4 42.0 25.3 17.9 1,300 750 32Gray 54.5 60.5 40.5 20.8 25.9 17.8 1,050 370 52Hale 40.0 72.0 26.0 24.5 41.3 30.2 1,073 740 33Hansford 200.0 231.0 155.0 67.0 46.4 25.6 7,190 1,715 17Hartley 80.0 106.0 46.0 59.5 50.2 47.3 2,310 2,815 4Hemphill 12.6 20.5 7.4 8.5 29.5 10.9 218 93 97Hutchinson 72.0 82.0 63.0 18.0 34.3 20.3 2,160 365 53Lipscomb 34.5 44.3 21.5 10.4 28.6 10.6 615 110 87Moore 108.0 121.0 85.0 41.0 44.7 47.4 3,800 1,945 9Ochiltree 177.0 191.0 143.0 32.5 34.6 17.2 4,950 560 45Oldham 42.0 36.0 31.9 3.0 30.1 16.0 960 48 115Parmer 140.0 187.0 93.0 41.0 41.6 23.8 3,865 977 27Potter 19.0 17.5 12.8 8.7 34.1 13.7 437 119 85Randall 90.0 105.0 67.0 13.5 33.9 22.2 2,270 300 57Roberts 11.7 19.0 10.5 7.4 24.0 30.4 252 225 67Sherman 157.0 166.0 115.0 81.0 49.4 43.6 5,680 3,535 2Swisher 135.0 163.0 74.0 22.0 35.5 21.8 2,630 480 48DISTRICT 1-N 2,100.0 2,440.0 1,463.0 765.0 39.7 31.6 58,108 24,160
Andrews 3.1 1.7 1.3 0.2 24.6 30.0 32 6 151Bailey 76.5 78.0 36.0 23.5 37.8 13.6 1,360 320 55Cochran 26.0 42.0 13.0 9.2 23.8 17.4 310 160 74Crosby 21.5 35.0 5.6 19.0 16.6 11.9 93 227 66Dawson 21.0 18.5 4.0 1.5 29.5 23.3 118 35 126Gaines 58.0 59.0 21.0 30.5 33.6 21.6 705 660 36Glasscock 50.3 38.3 7.0 14.2 13.1 17.1 92 243 62Hockley 18.0 20.3 7.5 5.2 30.7 19.4 230 101 92Howard 15.1 10.4 6.0 1.6 28.3 18.8 170 30 128Lamb 59.0 82.0 20.0 9.5 37.5 24.2 750 230 64Lubbock 13.5 34.0 3.1 10.2 24.2 22.5 75 230 64Lynn 11.0 26.8 1.5 5.7 25.3 23.2 38 132 83Martin 17.5 25.5 1.7 2.6 27.6 18.5 47 48 115Midland 10.0 9.5 1.0 0.4 20.0 25.0 20 10 145Terry 18.5 28.0 8.3 10.2 31.9 28.4 265 290 59Yoakum 22.0 46.0 12.0 11.5 50.4 27.7 605 318 56DISTRICT 1-S 441.0 555.0 149.0 155.0 33.0 19.6 4,910 3,040
Borden 6.1 8.5 0.8 1.0 22.5 22.0 18 22 132Childress 45.6 47.5 25.5 31.7 17.5 19.5 447 618 39Collingsworth 21.8 22.5 8.6 5.4 27.3 19.6 235 106 90Cottle 26.0 26.3 6.0 7.6 23.3 15.9 140 121 84Dickens 23.6 22.9 7.4 2.8 18.8 25.2 139 71 105Donley 12.1 12.8 6.0 4.7 31.7 29.8 190 140 77Foard 72.0 90.5 40.0 52.2 30.0 27.9 1,200 1,456 20Garza 1.9 8.0 0.5 3.5 24.0 22.9 12 80 102Hall 15.7 17.5 2.2 1.6 27.3 23.1 60 37 123Hardeman 90.0 101.6 39.3 58.2 21.4 24.5 840 1,427 21Kent 18.0 19.2 3.5 3.6 25.7 18.6 90 67 107King 15.5 21.0 5.0 8.6 22.0 20.9 110 180 71Motley 8.0 14.7 1.5 2.8 36.0 15.4 54 43 119Wheeler 19.3 23.3 9.2 2.8 19.7 12.7 181 36 125Wichita 87.0 110.2 34.4 60.0 29.1 29.8 1,000 1,790 15Wilbarger 157.4 142.5 75.1 65.5 25.3 27.7 1,899 1,816 12DISTRICT 2-N 620.0 689.0 265.0 312.0 25.0 25.7 6,615 8,008
127
TEXAS ALL WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Baylor 135.4 121.2 70.3 28.2 23.8 33.2 1,670 937 28Coleman 42.1 60.1 27.1 45.1 26.9 20.0 728 903 29Fisher 65.3 60.4 19.2 3.8 26.1 18.9 501 72 104Haskell 161.0 157.5 129.0 125.5 27.7 23.0 3,570 2,890 3Jones 120.0 155.0 70.0 97.1 27.1 18.3 1,900 1,773 16Knox 195.5 188.0 122.5 104.0 24.3 22.6 2,975 2,350 5Mitchell 26.4 24.0 9.2 4.5 24.8 21.6 228 97 95Nolan 17.3 25.7 12.2 12.7 23.7 18.6 289 236 63Runnels 100.2 128.5 77.2 108.4 27.9 19.3 2,157 2,090 8Scurry 36.2 37.1 7.6 5.5 16.2 15.5 123 85 101Stonewall 47.6 45.5 28.7 23.2 25.9 25.9 744 600 40Taylor 83.0 97.0 59.0 69.0 32.2 26.2 1,900 1,810 13DISTRICT 2-S 1,030.0 1,100.0 632.0 627.0 26.6 22.1 16,785 13,842
Archer 84.0 70.1 17.0 1.1 26.5 27.3 450 30 128Brown 13.0 16.5 3.5 5.5 24.9 25.5 87 140 77Callahan 41.0 44.1 18.0 8.4 35.6 26.6 640 224 68Clay 78.0 55.0 11.4 15.0 30.3 29.0 345 435 49Comanche 9.6 17.0 2.1 2.1 29.0 32.9 61 69 106Eastland 13.9 17.0 2.1 4.5 26.2 30.0 55 135 82Erath 3.0 6.1 0.8 0.4 31.3 35.0 25 14 140Jack 7.0 6.0 0.3 0.5 20.0 28.0 6 14 140Mills 3.0 4.0 0.4 1.8 30.0 25.0 12 45 118Montague 21.0 20.0 2.6 3.7 26.9 29.7 70 110 87Palo Pinto 5.5 6.3 0.7 1.3 38.6 30.8 27 40 122Parker 3.0 3.8 0.4 0.7 30.0 28.6 12 20 134Shackelford 25.0 26.0 18.0 16.0 25.8 25.6 465 410 50Stephens 7.0 13.0 0.5 5.5 26.0 18.2 13 100 93Throckmorton 65.0 68.1 40.0 27.1 28.3 30.6 1,130 830 31Wise 7.0 9.5 2.5 2.0 30.0 30.0 75 60 109Young 86.0 83.0 30.0 10.0 25.0 29.0 750 290 59Other Counties 3.0 4.5 0.2 0.4 30.0 30.0 6 12DISTRICT 3 475.0 470.0 150.5 106.0 28.1 28.1 4,229 2,977
Bell 15.3 21.5 11.0 19.8 37.7 33.4 415 662 35Bosque 8.5 8.6 5.5 4.4 28.2 21.6 155 95 96Collin 33.0 55.0 28.0 49.5 37.5 46.1 1,050 2,280 6Cooke 29.0 41.0 13.0 28.0 33.8 45.2 440 1,265 23Coryell 9.5 19.0 8.0 18.0 40.0 35.6 320 640 38Dallas 6.5 6.3 3.5 4.8 37.1 42.3 130 203 69Delta 8.0 12.0 7.0 11.5 42.9 49.1 300 565 44Denton 28.0 49.0 19.0 36.0 29.5 31.3 560 1,125 25Ellis 47.0 48.0 33.0 36.0 36.1 34.6 1,190 1,245 24Falls 15.0 22.0 4.5 15.0 30.0 39.7 135 595 41Fannin 58.0 76.0 30.0 45.0 31.3 42.6 940 1,915 10Grayson 40.0 54.0 14.0 43.0 37.1 44.4 520 1,910 11Hamilton 7.5 8.7 3.0 3.6 31.7 31.9 95 115 86Hill 42.3 53.0 33.0 49.5 41.5 46.0 1,370 2,275 7Hunt 20.0 30.0 14.5 28.2 33.8 46.1 490 1,300 22Johnson 22.2 22.3 8.0 13.5 31.9 49.3 255 665 34Kaufman 14.0 16.0 2.0 7.0 37.5 42.1 75 295 58Lamar 19.2 23.0 13.0 20.0 35.0 55.0 455 1,100 26Limestone 3.5 5.0 0.5 1.5 30.0 41.3 15 62 108McLennan 29.0 42.1 23.0 39.1 44.3 39.8 1,020 1,555 19Milam 6.0 8.8 2.0 4.5 39.0 33.3 78 150 75Navarro 19.0 28.5 6.0 8.5 36.7 42.4 220 360 54Rockwall 6.0 6.2 3.0 4.1 33.3 41.5 100 170 73Tarrant 6.0 8.5 3.5 6.0 28.6 29.2 100 175 72Williamson 7.5 10.5 2.0 7.0 41.0 28.3 82 198 70DISTRICT 4 500.0 675.0 290.0 503.5 36.2 41.5 10,510 20,920
128
TEXAS ALL WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Anderson 3.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 34.0 40.0 68 60 109Bowie 15.0 13.0 3.5 5.5 34.3 44.5 120 245 61Henderson 2.8 0.5 40.0 20 134Hopkins 4.0 2.7 0.4 0.7 35.0 28.6 14 20 134Houston 1.0 1.9 0.1 0.5 30.0 16.0 3 8 147Rains 1.3 1.3 0.1 0.3 30.0 40.0 3 12 142Red River 9.0 8.2 1.5 2.1 36.7 42.4 55 89 99Van Zandt 1.1 1.4 0.2 0.1 35.0 40.0 7 4 155Other Counties 2.6 3.5 0.2 0.3 35.0 6.7 7 2DISTRICT 5-N 37.0 38.0 8.0 11.5 34.6 40.0 277 460
Hardin 1.8 * 1.1 34.5 38Robertson 1.2 1.3 0.7 0.2 27.1 30.0 19 6 151Other Counties 2.0 3.7 0.2 2.3 35.0 30.0 7 69DISTRICT 5-S 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.5 32.0 30.0 64 75
El Paso * 1.6 0.3 50.0 15 139Hudspeth * 1.1 1.0 43.0 43 119Pecos 7.8 5.8 2.5 3.2 32.0 30.6 80 98 94Reeves 4.0 3.8 1.3 0.8 38.5 37.5 50 30 128Other Counties 1.2 1.7 0.2 1.2 40.0 34.2 8 41DISTRICT 6 13.0 14.0 4.0 6.5 34.5 34.9 138 227
Burnet * 1.1 0.3 26.7 8 147Coke 15.0 14.0 5.3 6.3 17.0 14.3 90 90 98Concho 61.0 58.5 41.3 33.4 25.5 17.5 1,052 585 42Gillespie 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.3 30.7 20.0 138 86 100Irion * 1.0 0.2 17.5 4 157Kinney 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 33.3 20.0 20 6 151Lampasas 1.7 2.2 0.6 1.4 41.7 26.4 25 37 123McCulloch 46.0 45.2 36.0 33.1 30.6 26.7 1,100 883 30Mason 6.1 5.5 1.0 1.6 25.0 21.9 25 35 126Menard 3.1 3.2 2.0 1.7 37.5 13.5 75 23 131Reagan 20.5 21.8 2.3 3.6 32.2 22.2 74 80 102San Saba 20.6 10.2 12.5 4.6 43.6 30.2 545 139 81Schleicher 15.2 10.9 12.2 2.4 24.3 17.9 297 43 119Sterling 9.3 8.0 3.2 1.0 30.3 20.0 97 20 134Sutton 1.2 1.4 0.5 0.5 36.0 14.0 18 7 150Tom Green 56.6 65.5 37.0 30.5 25.7 21.6 950 660 36Upton 10.0 10.7 1.0 0.6 28.0 20.0 28 12 142Uvalde 18.4 24.5 15.0 18.8 33.7 29.0 505 545 47Other Counties 2.7 3.3 1.0 1.4 35.0 19.6 35 28DISTRICT 7 293.0 293.0 176.0 146.0 28.8 22.5 5,074 3,290
Bastrop * 1.2 0.1 20.0 2 158Bee 1.2 2.2 0.8 1.0 30.0 9.0 24 9 146Bexar 4.3 9.8 3.1 7.1 38.7 21.1 120 150 75Burleson 1.6 1.9 1.5 0.8 36.0 27.5 54 22 132Caldwell 1.6 2.5 0.8 0.7 38.8 17.1 31 12 142Guadalupe 4.7 9.5 4.0 6.8 37.5 20.6 150 140 77Hays 2.2 3.9 1.3 2.5 38.5 24.0 50 60 111Karnes 3.1 3.9 2.5 2.0 38.0 8.5 95 17 138Medina 15.6 22.4 15.0 15.6 38.1 23.9 572 373 51Travis 3.2 5.8 3.0 3.7 35.0 28.4 105 105 91Wilson 2.3 4.4 2.1 2.6 28.1 18.1 59 47 117Other Counties 2.2 2.5 1.4 1.1 35.7 21.8 50 24DISTRICT 8-N 42.0 70.0 35.5 44.0 36.9 21.8 1,310 961
Other Counties 1.0DISTRICT 8-S * 1.0
129
TEXAS ALL WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
Production Productionranking
Planted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Brazoria 1.0 3.9 0.7 2.6 42.9 23.1 30 60 111Calhoun 1.4 *Chambers 5.0 2.2 1.5 0.1 40.0 20.0 60 2 158Liberty 1.5 * 0.9 44.4 40Wharton 1.8 1.9 0.2 0.4 40.0 20.0 8 8 147Other Counties 2.8 4.0 0.7 0.9 40.0 22.2 28 20DISTRICT 9 13.5 12.0 4.0 4.0 41.5 22.5 166 90
Atascosa 3.3 5.1 2.0 2.6 26.0 21.2 52 55 114Frio 9.5 8.2 8.0 3.1 33.4 18.7 267 58 113Jim Wells 1.0 *La Salle 1.8 * 0.8 31.3 25Live Oak 3.0 2.8 1.1 0.7 18.2 5.7 20 4 155McMullen 2.0 2.2 1.7 0.7 23.5 8.6 40 6 151Zavala 7.6 15.4 6.3 8.3 27.3 12.9 172 107 89Other Counties 0.3 2.3 0.1 0.6 20.0 16.7 2 10DISTRICT 10-N 28.5 36.0 20.0 16.0 28.9 15.0 578 240
Other Counties 2.0 1.0 10.0 10DISTRICT 10-S * 2.0 1.0 10.0 10
Other Districts 2.0 1.0 36.0 36
STATE 5,600.0 6,400.0 3,200.0 2,700.0 34.0 29.0 108,800 78,300
1 Counties and districts with less than 1,000 acres planted in both 2001 and 2002 are not included in the table, but their estimates are included in thetotals. * Less than 1,000 acres planted. Acreage and production estimates are included in other counties, district, other districts and state totals.
130
TEXAS IRRIGATED WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Armstrong 4.2 4.7 3.0 3.8 53.3 20.5 160 78Briscoe 2.5 4.0 2.0 2.4 44.0 20.8 88 50Carson 31.0 22.0 20.0 12.5 47.0 24.8 940 310Castro 110.0 105.0 45.0 34.0 45.6 46.2 2,050 1,570Dallam 80.0 105.0 54.0 81.0 64.1 51.6 3,460 4,180Deaf Smith 65.0 72.0 49.0 31.0 54.1 41.9 2,650 1,300Floyd 8.0 17.5 7.4 2.0 40.5 35.0 300 70Gray 8.5 10.5 5.5 3.8 45.5 31.6 250 120Hale 25.0 40.0 16.0 14.0 52.5 45.0 840 630Hansford 80.0 86.0 70.0 42.0 58.4 31.0 4,090 1,300Hartley 50.0 65.0 32.0 55.0 58.8 50.0 1,880 2,750Hutchinson 22.0 20.0 19.0 12.0 47.9 22.9 910 275Lipscomb 8.5 8.3 3.5 2.4 47.1 16.7 165 40Moore 48.0 59.0 40.0 37.0 57.5 50.7 2,300 1,875Ochiltree 32.0 36.0 21.0 15.0 50.0 20.0 1,050 300Oldham 2.0 2.0 1.9 0.7 47.4 21.4 90 15Parmer 60.0 99.0 35.0 30.0 59.0 26.7 2,065 800Randall 16.0 15.0 9.0 9.0 52.2 26.7 470 240Roberts 2.7 3.0 2.5 2.9 40.0 51.7 100 150Sherman 86.0 96.0 70.0 76.0 61.4 45.5 4,300 3,460Swisher 35.0 38.0 23.0 12.0 43.5 30.0 1,000 360Other Counties 1.6 2.0 1.2 1.5 45.8 21.3 55 32DISTRICT 1-N 778.0 910.0 530.0 480.0 55.1 41.5 29,213 19,905
Bailey 36.5 42.0 16.0 6.5 53.4 20.0 855 130Cochran 8.0 12.0 5.0 4.2 30.0 21.4 150 90Crosby 1.5 5.0 0.6 2.0 30.0 24.0 18 48Dawson 4.0 4.5 2.0 0.5 40.0 40.0 80 20Gaines 28.0 40.0 15.0 28.0 40.0 22.5 600 630Hockley 3.0 5.3 1.5 2.6 33.3 27.3 50 71Lamb 35.0 55.0 11.5 6.0 51.3 30.8 590 185Lubbock 3.5 9.0 1.6 4.2 31.3 33.3 50 140Lynn 1.5 6.8 0.5 3.0 30.0 29.0 15 87Martin 2.5 2.5 0.7 0.6 38.6 30.0 27 18Midland 1.5 0.3 30.0 9Terry 7.5 13.0 3.8 7.2 44.7 33.3 170 240Yoakum 12.0 27.0 8.5 9.5 62.4 30.0 530 285Other Counties 1.0 1.4 0.3 0.4 40.0 30.0 12 12DISTRICT 1-S 144.0 225.0 67.0 75.0 47.0 26.2 3,147 1,965
Childress * 2.0 0.7 25.7 18Collingsworth * 1.5 1.4 28.6 40Donley 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.5 35.0 33.3 70 50Garza * 3.0 1.0 30.0 30Hall 1.2 1.5 0.7 0.6 35.7 25.0 25 15Hardeman 2.0 1.6 1.3 0.6 46.2 26.7 60 16Wheeler * 1.3 0.3 35.0 11Wilbarger 2.4 2.5 2.1 0.5 35.2 32.0 74 16Other Counties 3.8 3.3 1.9 1.4 37.4 28.2 71 40DISTRICT 2-N 12.0 19.0 8.0 8.0 37.5 29.4 300 235
Haskell 11.0 11.5 9.0 7.5 37.8 25.3 340 190Knox 15.5 13.0 12.5 12.0 34.0 33.3 425 400Mitchell 1.4 * 0.7 40.0 28Stonewall 1.6 2.4 0.7 2.2 34.3 22.7 24 50Other Counties 1.5 3.1 1.1 2.3 39.1 25.7 43 59DISTRICT 2-S 31.0 30.0 24.0 24.0 35.8 29.1 860 699
131
TEXAS IRRIGATED WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Comanche 1.1 2.0 0.5 0.1 32.0 120.0 16 12Eastland * 1.5 0.8 50.0 40Other Counties 0.9 0.5 0.1 80.0 8DISTRICT 3 2.0 4.0 0.5 1.0 32.0 60.0 16 60
Other Counties 1.0 1.0 0.5 40.0 20DISTRICT 4 1.0 1.0 0.5 40.0 20
Other Counties 1.0 0.5 20.0 10DISTRICT 5-N 1.0 0.5 20.0 10
El Paso * 1.6 0.3 50.0 15Pecos 5.8 3.3 2.0 2.9 35.0 31.0 70 90Reeves 4.0 * 1.3 38.5 50Other Counties 1.2 6.1 0.2 2.8 40.0 39.6 8 111DISTRICT 6 11.0 11.0 3.5 6.0 36.6 36.0 128 216
Concho 1.0 1.5 0.9 0.4 35.6 37.5 32 15Mason * 1.3 0.6 25.0 15Tom Green 6.6 8.5 6.0 7.5 33.3 53.3 200 400Uvalde 4.4 7.0 4.0 5.8 42.5 36.2 170 210Other Counties 3.0 2.7 2.1 1.7 38.6 35.3 81 60DISTRICT 7 15.0 21.0 13.0 16.0 37.2 43.8 483 700
Medina 1.6 2.4 1.6 1.6 47.5 30.0 76 48Other Counties 0.4 1.6 0.4 0.4 40.0 40.0 16 16DISTRICT 8-N 2.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 46.0 32.0 92 64
Atascosa * 2.3 0.7 21.4 15Frio 5.0 3.6 3.8 2.0 40.0 21.5 152 43Zavala 2.6 4.4 1.4 1.0 30.0 25.0 42 25Other Counties 1.4 0.7 0.8 0.3 33.8 23.3 27 7DISTRICT 10-N 9.0 11.0 6.0 4.0 36.8 22.5 221 90
STATE 1,005.0 1,237.0 654.0 617.0 52.7 38.8 34,460 23,964
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated wheat are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practices areincluded in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated wheat estimated. Acres andproduction included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
132
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Armstrong 46.0 50.0 38.0 26.0 34.2 19.0 1,300 495Briscoe 38.0 34.0 25.0 5.0 24.0 18.0 600 90Carson 70.0 75.0 54.0 23.0 37.0 10.9 2,000 250Castro 75.0 72.0 28.0 7.0 35.7 18.6 1,000 130Dallam 45.0 42.0 34.0 3.5 29.4 17.1 1,000 60Deaf Smith 100.0 135.0 68.0 35.0 30.9 14.3 2,100 500Floyd 52.0 80.0 44.0 40.0 22.7 17.0 1,000 680Gray 46.0 50.0 35.0 17.0 22.9 14.7 800 250Hale 15.0 32.0 10.0 10.5 23.3 10.5 233 110Hansford 120.0 145.0 85.0 25.0 36.5 16.6 3,100 415Hartley 30.0 41.0 14.0 4.5 30.7 14.4 430 65Hutchinson 50.0 62.0 44.0 6.0 28.4 15.0 1,250 90Lipscomb 26.0 36.0 18.0 8.0 25.0 8.8 450 70Moore 60.0 62.0 45.0 4.0 33.3 17.5 1,500 70Ochiltree 145.0 155.0 122.0 17.5 32.0 14.9 3,900 260Oldham 40.0 34.0 30.0 2.3 29.0 14.3 870 33Parmer 80.0 88.0 58.0 11.0 31.0 16.1 1,800 177Randall 74.0 90.0 58.0 4.5 31.0 13.3 1,800 60Roberts 9.0 16.0 8.0 4.5 19.0 16.7 152 75Sherman 71.0 70.0 45.0 5.0 30.7 15.0 1,380 75Swisher 100.0 125.0 51.0 10.0 32.0 12.0 1,630 120Other Counties 30.0 36.0 19.0 15.7 31.6 11.5 600 180DISTRICT 1-N 1,322.0 1,530.0 933.0 285.0 31.0 14.9 28,895 4,255
Bailey 40.0 36.0 20.0 17.0 25.3 11.2 505 190Cochran 18.0 30.0 8.0 5.0 20.0 14.0 160 70Crosby 20.0 30.0 5.0 17.0 15.0 10.5 75 179Dawson 17.0 14.0 2.0 1.0 19.0 15.0 38 15Gaines 30.0 19.0 6.0 2.5 17.5 12.0 105 30Hockley 15.0 15.0 6.0 2.6 30.0 11.5 180 30Lamb 24.0 27.0 8.5 3.5 18.8 12.9 160 45Lubbock 10.0 25.0 1.5 6.0 16.7 15.0 25 90Lynn 9.5 20.0 1.0 2.7 23.0 16.7 23 45Martin 15.0 23.0 1.0 2.0 20.0 15.0 20 30Midland 10.0 8.0 1.0 0.1 20.0 10.0 20 1Terry 11.0 15.0 4.5 3.0 21.1 16.7 95 50Yoakum 10.0 19.0 3.5 2.0 21.4 16.5 75 33Other Counties 67.5 49.0 14.0 15.6 20.1 17.1 282 267DISTRICT 1-S 297.0 330.0 82.0 80.0 21.5 13.4 1,763 1,075
Childress * 45.5 31.0 19.4 600Collingsworth * 21.0 4.0 16.5 66Cottle 26.0 * 6.0 23.3 140Donley 9.5 10.5 4.0 3.2 30.0 28.1 120 90Foard 72.0 * 40.0 30.0 1,200Garza * 5.0 2.5 20.0 50Hall 14.5 16.0 1.5 1.0 23.3 22.0 35 22Hardeman 88.0 100.0 38.0 57.6 20.5 24.5 780 1,411Kent 18.0 * 3.5 25.7 90King 15.5 21.0 5.0 8.6 22.0 20.9 110 180Wheeler * 22.0 2.5 10.0 25Wilbarger 155.0 140.0 73.0 65.0 25.0 27.7 1,825 1,800Other Counties 209.5 289.0 86.0 128.6 23.4 27.4 2,015 3,529DISTRICT 2-N 608.0 670.0 257.0 304.0 24.6 25.6 6,315 7,773
Haskell 150.0 146.0 120.0 118.0 26.9 22.9 3,230 2,700Jones 120.0 * 70.0 27.1 1,900Knox 180.0 175.0 110.0 92.0 23.2 21.2 2,550 1,950Mitchell 25.0 * 8.5 23.5 200
133
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Stonewall 46.0 43.1 28.0 21.0 25.7 26.2 720 550Taylor 83.0 97.0 59.0 69.0 32.2 26.2 1,900 1,810Other Counties 395.0 608.9 212.5 303.0 25.5 20.2 5,425 6,133DISTRICT 2-S 999.0 1,070.0 608.0 603.0 26.2 21.8 15,925 13,143
Archer 84.0 * 17.0 26.5 450Brown 13.0 16.5 3.5 5.5 24.9 25.5 87 140Callahan 41.0 * 18.0 35.6 640Clay 78.0 55.0 11.4 15.0 30.3 29.0 345 435Comanche 8.5 15.0 1.6 2.0 28.1 28.5 45 57Eastland * 15.5 3.7 25.7 95Erath 3.0 * 0.8 31.3 25Hood 2.5 * 0.2 30.0 6Jack 7.0 6.0 0.3 0.5 20.0 28.0 6 14Mills 3.0 4.0 0.4 1.8 30.0 25.0 12 45Montague 21.0 20.0 2.6 3.7 26.9 29.7 70 110Palo Pinto 5.5 6.3 0.7 1.3 38.6 30.8 27 40Parker 3.0 3.8 0.4 0.7 30.0 28.6 12 20Shackelford 25.0 26.0 18.0 16.0 25.8 25.6 465 410Somervell * 0.9 0.3 30.0 9Stephens 7.0 13.0 0.5 5.5 26.0 18.2 13 100Throckmorton 65.0 * 40.0 28.3 1,130Wise 7.0 9.5 2.5 2.0 30.0 30.0 75 60Young 86.0 83.0 30.0 10.0 25.0 29.0 750 290Other Counties 13.5 191.5 2.1 37.0 26.2 29.5 55 1,092DISTRICT 3 473.0 466.0 150.0 105.0 28.1 27.8 4,213 2,917
Bell * 21.5 19.8 33.4 662Bosque 8.5 * 5.5 28.2 155Collin 33.0 55.0 28.0 49.5 37.5 46.1 1,050 2,280Cooke 29.0 41.0 13.0 28.0 33.8 45.2 440 1,265Coryell 9.5 19.0 8.0 18.0 40.0 35.6 320 640Dallas 6.5 * 3.5 37.1 130Delta 8.0 12.0 7.0 11.5 42.9 49.1 300 565Denton 28.0 49.0 19.0 36.0 29.5 31.3 560 1,125Ellis 47.0 48.0 33.0 36.0 36.1 34.6 1,190 1,245Falls 15.0 22.0 4.5 15.0 30.0 39.7 135 595Fannin 58.0 76.0 30.0 45.0 31.3 42.6 940 1,915Grayson 40.0 54.0 14.0 43.0 37.1 44.4 520 1,910Hamilton 7.5 * 3.0 31.7 95Hill * 53.0 49.5 46.0 2,275Hunt 20.0 30.0 14.5 28.2 33.8 46.1 490 1,300Kaufman 14.0 16.0 2.0 7.0 37.5 42.1 75 295Lamar * 23.0 20.0 55.0 1,100Limestone 3.5 5.0 0.5 1.5 30.0 41.3 15 62McLennan 29.0 * 23.0 44.3 1,020Milam 6.0 8.8 2.0 4.5 39.0 33.3 78 150Navarro 19.0 28.5 6.0 8.5 36.7 42.4 220 360Rockwall 6.0 6.2 3.0 4.1 33.3 41.5 100 170Tarrant 6.0 8.5 3.5 6.0 28.6 29.2 100 175Williamson 7.5 10.5 2.0 7.0 41.0 28.3 82 198Other Counties 98.0 87.0 65.0 64.9 38.4 40.3 2,495 2,613DISTRICT 4 499.0 674.0 290.0 503.0 36.2 41.6 10,510 20,900
Anderson 3.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 34.0 40.0 68 60Bowie 15.0 13.0 3.5 5.5 34.3 44.5 120 245Henderson 2.8 0.5 40.0 20Hopkins 4.0 * 0.4 35.0 14Houston 1.0 1.9 0.1 0.5 30.0 16.0 3 8Rains 1.3 1.3 0.1 0.3 30.0 40.0 3 12
134
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Red River 9.0 * 1.5 36.7 55Van Zandt 1.1 1.4 0.2 0.1 35.0 40.0 7 4Other Counties 2.6 13.4 0.2 2.6 35.0 38.8 7 101DISTRICT 5-N 37.0 37.0 8.0 11.0 34.6 40.9 277 450
Hardin 1.8 * 1.1 34.5 38Robertson 1.2 1.3 0.7 0.2 27.1 30.0 19 6Other Counties 2.0 3.7 0.2 2.3 35.0 30.0 7 69DISTRICT 5-S 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.5 32.0 30.0 64 75
Pecos 2.0 2.5 0.5 0.3 20.0 26.7 10 8Other Counties 0.5 0.2 15.0 3DISTRICT 6 2.0 3.0 0.5 0.5 20.0 22.0 10 11
Burnet * 1.1 0.3 26.7 8Coke 15.0 14.0 5.3 6.3 17.0 14.3 90 90Concho 60.0 57.0 40.4 33.0 25.2 17.3 1,020 570Gillespie 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.3 30.7 20.0 138 86Lampasas 1.7 * 0.6 41.7 25McCulloch 46.0 * 36.0 30.6 1,100Mason * 4.2 1.0 20.0 20Sterling * 8.0 1.0 20.0 20Sutton 1.2 * 0.5 36.0 18Tom Green 50.0 57.0 31.0 23.0 24.2 11.3 750 260Upton 10.0 * 1.0 28.0 28Uvalde 14.0 17.5 11.0 13.0 30.5 25.8 335 335Other Counties 75.6 108.2 32.7 48.1 33.2 25.0 1,087 1,201DISTRICT 7 278.0 272.0 163.0 130.0 28.2 19.9 4,591 2,590
Bastrop * 1.2 0.1 20.0 2Bee 1.2 2.2 0.8 1.0 30.0 9.0 24 9Burleson 1.6 * 1.5 36.0 54Caldwell 1.6 2.5 0.8 0.7 38.8 17.1 31 12Guadalupe 4.7 9.5 4.0 6.8 37.5 20.6 150 140Hays 2.2 3.9 1.3 2.5 38.5 24.0 50 60Karnes 3.1 3.9 2.5 2.0 38.0 8.5 95 17Medina 14.0 20.0 13.4 14.0 37.0 23.2 496 325Travis 3.2 5.8 3.0 3.7 35.0 28.4 105 105Other Counties 8.4 17.0 6.2 11.2 34.4 20.3 213 227DISTRICT 8-N 40.0 66.0 33.5 42.0 36.4 21.4 1,218 897
Other Counties 1.0DISTRICT 8-S * 1.0
Brazoria 1.0 3.9 0.7 2.6 42.9 23.1 30 60Calhoun 1.4 *Chambers 5.0 2.2 1.5 0.1 40.0 20.0 60 2Liberty 1.5 * 0.9 44.4 40Wharton 1.8 1.9 0.2 0.4 40.0 20.0 8 8Other Counties 2.8 4.0 0.7 0.9 40.0 22.2 28 20DISTRICT 9 13.5 12.0 4.0 4.0 41.5 22.5 166 90
Atascosa * 2.8 1.9 21.1 40Frio 4.5 4.6 4.2 1.1 27.4 13.6 115 15Jim Wells 1.0 *Live Oak 3.0 2.8 1.1 0.7 18.2 5.7 20 4McMullen 2.0 2.2 1.7 0.7 23.5 8.6 40 6Zavala 5.0 11.0 4.9 7.3 26.5 11.2 130 82Other Counties 4.0 1.6 2.1 0.3 24.8 10.0 52 3DISTRICT 10-N 19.5 25.0 14.0 12.0 25.5 12.5 357 150
135
TEXAS NONIRRIGATED WHEATAcreage, Yield and Production, 2001 and 2002
Districtand county 1
Acreage Yield perharvested acre
ProductionPlanted Harvested
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
1,000 acres 1,000 acres Bushels 1,000 bushels
Other Counties 2.0 1.0 10.0 10DISTRICT 10-S * 2.0 1.0 10.0 10
Other Districts 2.0 1.0 36.0 36
STATE 4,595.0 5,163.0 2,546.0 2,083.0 29.2 26.1 74,340 54,336
1 When less than 1,000 acres of dryland or irrigated wheat are estimated for a county or district, the acres and production for both practices areincluded in “other counties” or “other districts” to avoid disclosure. * Less than 1,000 planted acres of dryland or irrigated wheat estimated. Acres andproduction included in “other counties” or “other districts”.
136
TEXAS GRAIN STOCKS: Off-Farm and Total All Positions, 1998-2003
Yearbeginning
September 1
September 1 December 1 March 1 June 1(old crop) stocks
Off-farm 1 Total allpositions 2 Off-farm 1 Total all
positions 2 Off-farm 1 Total allpositions 2 Off-farm 1 Total all
positions 2
1,000 bushelsBARLEY
1998-1999 . * * * * 57 * 21 *1999-2000 . 47 * 53 * 67 * * *2000-2001 . 37 37 * * 53 53 69 692001-2002 . 52 52 24 24 58 58 51 512002-2003 . 22 22 24 24 * * * *
OATS1998-1999 . 995 * 392 * 582 * 323 *1999-2000 . 1,831 * 2,003 * 3,522 * 2,036 *2000-2001 . 997 * * * * * * *2001-2002 . 5,572 * * * * * * *2002-2003 . * * * * * * * *
WHEAT1998-1999 . 132,238 139,538 108,851 111,851 87,686 89,286 59,591 60,3911999-2000 . 135,792 143,292 104,136 106,736 76,121 77,921 67,400 68,4002000-2001 . 108,679 114,679 82,484 84,184 66,995 67,895 54,694 55,3942001-2002 . 152,900 157,900 120,650 122,950 90,032 91,532 74,535 75,5352002-2003 . 114,182 117,482 89,826 91,826 60,005 61,305 32,821 33,4211 Includes stocks at mills, elevators, warehouses, terminals and processors. 2 Off-farm total plus farm stocks. * Not published to avoid disclosure ofindividual operations.
TEXAS GRAIN STOCKS: Off-Farm and Total All Positions, 1998-2003
Yearbeginning
December 1
December 1 March 1 June 1 September 1(old crop) stocks
Off-farm 1 Total allpositions 2 Off-farm 1 Total all
positions 2 Off-farm 1 Total allpositions 2 Off-farm 1 Total all
positions 2
1,000 bushelsCORN
1998-1999 . . . . 112,764 * 79,979 * 40,857 * 15,660 *1999-2000 . . . . 108,715 * 70,932 * 37,222 * 10,064 *2000-2001 . . . . 102,450 * 78,169 * 50,237 * 20,116 *2001-2002 . . . . 90,629 * 67,748 * 41,645 * 15,961 *2002-2003 . . . . 97,977 * 73,837 * 45,831 *
SOYBEANS 1998-1999 . . . . 2,737 * 1,678 * 717 * 389 *1999-2000 . . . . 7,032 * 5,783 * 1,438 * 543 *2000-2001 . . . . 3,980 * 1,635 * 783 * 726 *2001-2002 . . . . 3,718 * 1,611 * 583 * 483 *2002-2003 . . . . 2,169 * 1,205 * 596 *
SORGHUM 1,000 cwt1998-1999 . . . . 29,940 32,572 24,098 25,890 10,806 11,142 6,007 6,1191999-2000 . . . . 44,130 46,930 32,582 34,150 18,969 19,249 4,790 4,9582000-2001 . . . . 20,900 24,260 16,401 17,633 6,152 6,432 2,879 2,9912001-2002 . . . . 28,829 31,629 18,763 19,883 10,102 10,270 5,810 5,8662002-2003 . . . . 28,820 31,620 19,519 20,359 8,915 9,0831 Includes stocks at mills, elevators and warehouses, terminals and processors. 2 Off-farm total plus farm stocks. * Not published to avoid disclosureof individual operations.
137
TEXAS OFF-FARM WHEAT STOCKS BY AREA, 1998-2003
Area 1 September 1 December 1 March 1 June 1 2
-- 1,000 bushels --WEST TEXAS
1998-1999 . . . . . . . . . . 81,473 53,837 44,776 28,347
1999-2000 . . . . . . . . . . 69,946 51,926 41,464 43,344
2000-2001 . . . . . . . . . . 59,655 39,500 31,167 20,058
2001-2002 . . . . . . . . . . 95,607 80,701 56,706 34,956
2002-2003 . . . . . . . . . . 63,364 50,282 33,057 17,930
NORTH TEXAS1998-1999 . . . . . . . . . . 31,557 41,353 32,533 22,386
1999-2000 . . . . . . . . . . 53,596 37,793 27,659 17,809
2000-2001 . . . . . . . . . . 33,826 29,954 22,637 24,836
2001-2002 . . . . . . . . . . 41,794 28,409 22,096 30,317
2002-2003 . . . . . . . . . . 35,989 24,393 15,527 8,934
SOUTH TEXAS1998-1999 . . . . . . . . . . 19,208 13,661 10,377 8,859
1999-2000 . . . . . . . . . . 12,251 14,417 6,998 6,247
2000-2001 . . . . . . . . . . 15,198 13,030 13,191 9,800
2001-2002 . . . . . . . . . . 15,499 11,540 11,230 9,262
2002-2003 . . . . . . . . . . 14,829 15,151 11,422 5,9571 West Texas - Agricultural Statistics Districts 1 and 6; North Texas - Agricultural Statistics Districts 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7; South Texas - Agricultural StatisticsDistricts 8, 9 and 10. 2 Old crop stocks.
TEXAS GRAIN STOCKS: Off-Farm Feed Grain Stocks by Area, 1998-2003
Area 1 December 1 March 1 June 1 Sept. 1 2 December 1 March 1 June 1 Sept. 1 2
CORN SORGHUM1,000 bushels 1,000 cwt
WEST TEXAS1998-1999 . . . . . 91,691 64,822 35,193 13,299 10,334 10,163 6,175 4,524
1999-2000 . . . . . 80,043 56,783 30,155 8,632 20,272 17,626 13,007 4,314
2000-2001 . . . . . 80,152 58,244 41,426 16,924 8,125 5,904 3,279 2,012
2001-2002 . . . . . 63,817 51,130 30,830 13,561 13,578 10,467 6,341 5,046
2002-2003 . . . . . 73,454 59,629 38,446 – 14,603 12,160 6,166 –
NORTH TEXAS
1998-1999 . . . . . 8,530 5,503 2,443 781 3,816 4,589 965 725
1999-2000 . . . . . 10,968 6,383 2,734 381 6,289 2,841 789 98
2000-2001 . . . . . 11,880 9,363 4,304 1,198 2,660 3,549 914 588
2001-2002 . . . . . 13,167 4,782 2,784 728 6,034 1,870 986 82
2002-2003 . . . . . 14,598 7,413 2,623 – 1,933 1,276 538 –
SOUTH TEXAS1998-1999 . . . . . 12,543 9,654 3,221 1,580 15,790 9,347 3,666 758
1999-2000 . . . . . 17,704 7,766 4,332 1,051 17,569 12,115 5,173 388
2000-2001 . . . . . 10,418 10,562 4,507 1,994 10,115 6,948 1,959 279
2001-2002 . . . . . 13,645 11,836 8,031 1,672 9,217 6,425 2,775 682
2002-2003 . . . . . 9,926 6,795 4,762 – 12,283 6,083 2,211 –1 West Texas - Agricultural Statistics Districts 1 and 6; North Texas - Agricultural Statistics Districts 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7; South Texas - Agricultural StatisticsDistricts 8, 9 and 10. 2 Old crop stocks.
138
TEXAS RICE STOCKS ON FARMS AND IN MILLS AND WAREHOUSES, 1998-2003
YearDecember 1 stocks March 1 stocks August 1 (old crop) stocks
Rough Milled Rough Milled Rough Milled
1,000 cwt
1998-1999 . . . . 8,029 1,131 6,208 643 691 825
1999-2000 . . . . 7,775 923 4,235 472 500 238
2000-2001 . . . . 9,179 801 3,620 567 440 443
2001-2002 . . . . 8,458 855 7,782 606 2,210 773
2002-2003 . . . . 10,714 1,023 5,310 952
TEXAS OFF-FARM GRAIN STORAGE CAPACITY: By Area, December 1, 1998-2002 1
Year West Texas 2 North Texas 3 South Texas 4 Total
1,000 bushels
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333,098 114,428 130,534 578,060
1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327,660 117,409 127,231 572,300
2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338,371 115,023 146,606 600,000
2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365,794 135,831 128,375 630,000
2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371,771 148,061 130,168 650,000
1 Excludes capacity used to store only rice, peanuts, cottonseed, peas or dry edible beans. 2 West Texas - Agricultural Statistics Districts 1 and 6. 3 NorthTexas - Agricultural Statistics Districts 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7. 4 South Texas - Agricultural Statistics Districts 8, 9 and 10.
139
TEXAS OFF-FARM GRAIN STORAGE CAPACITY: By County, December 1, 2001-2002 1
Districtand county 2001 2002 District
and county 2001 2002 Districtand county 2001 2002
1,000 bushels 1,000 bushels 1,000 bushelsDISTRICT 1-N DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 8-N Carson 9,276 8,386 Archer 447 500 Bee 3,523 3,649
Castro 2,097 2,097 Clay 315 * Bexar 953 756
Dallam 19,564 19,786 Other counties 2,066 1,413 Gonzales 403 403
Deaf Smith 25,319 25,657 TOTAL 2,828 1,913 Guadalupe 1,493 1,296
Floyd 11,174 10,593 Karnes 1,116 1,110
Gray 4,378 4,378 DISTRICT 4 Medina 1,992 2,076
Hale 39,097 31,181 Bosque 332 353 Wilson 1,316 1,316
Hansford 14,197 14,197 Collin 6,347 4,021 Other counties 4,660 4,656
Lipscomb 3,308 3,339 Cooke 1,402 1,201 TOTAL 15,456 15,262
Moore 22,613 22,613 Coryell 768 739
Ochiltree 11,364 10,684 Delta 361 361 DISTRICT 8-S Parmer 35,241 34,376 Falls 1,386 1,592 Nueces 30,561 29,451
Potter 31,873 31,873 Fannin 2,104 2,238 Refugio 4,557 4,149
Sherman 12,551 12,662 Grayson 3,897 8,680 San Patricio 7,493 8,027
Swisher 25,448 35,457 Hill 4,044 2,303 Other counties 1,585 1,585
Other counties 12,924 15,636 Hunt 1,657 1,650 TOTAL 44,196 43,212
TOTAL 280,424 282,915 Lamar 3,825 3,780
McLennan 6,052 5,723 DISTRICT 9DISTRICT 1-S Milam 694 2,341 Harris 18,100 19,905
Bailey 15,462 20,429 Navarro 1,645 882 Jackson 827 831
Gaines 6,014 6,014 Tarrant 48,044 51,760 Matagorda 6,002 6,062
Hockley 12,112 11,634 Williamson 7,295 7,285 Other counties 12,815 12,500
Lamb 11,795 11,862 Other counties 4,747 4,378 TOTAL 37,744 39,298
Lubbock 18,902 18,911 TOTAL 94,600 99,287
Terry 9,927 9,927 DISTRICT 10-N Yoakum 3,761 3,761 DISTRICT 5-N Atascosa 979 *
Other counties 7,145 6,066 TOTAL 1,800 1,660 Jim Wells 1,527 1,527
TOTAL 85,118 88,604 Other counties 971 1,535
DISTRICT 5-S TOTAL 3,477 3,062
DISTRICT 2-N TOTAL 1,526 1,020
Hardeman 2,617 2,823 DISTRICT 10-S Wichita 6,837 5,820 DISTRICT 6 Cameron 10,775 9,074
Other counties 7,080 3,295 TOTAL 252 252 Hidalgo 11,374 12,899
TOTAL 16,534 11,938 Other counties 5,353 7,361
DISTRICT 7 TOTAL 27,502 29,334
DISTRICT 2-S McCulloch 516 591
Baylor 1,092 1,092 Tom Green 1,490 1,687
Jones 2,620 2,050 Uvalde 4,489 3,625
Knox 3,210 3,201 Other counties 1,659 16,833
Runnels 589 354 TOTAL 8,154 22,736 STATE TOTAL 630,000 650,000 Taylor 1,181 1,181
Other counties 1,697 1,629
TOTAL 10,389 9,5071 Excludes capacity used to store only rice, peanuts, cottonseed, peas or dry edible beans. * Not shown to avoid individual plant disclosure; capacityis included in other counties and district totals.
140
Texas Vegetable,Texas Vegetable,Fruit and Pecan SummaryFruit and Pecan Summary
Vegetables Texas continued to be one of the five leading states in production of fresh market vegetables.
In 2002, Texas ranked fifth in area harvested, accounting for 4.8 percent of the United States vegetableacreage. Texas also ranked fifth in production, with 4.5 percent of the U.S. total, and fourth in value,accounting for 4.2 percent of the U.S. total. In 2002, Texas producers harvested 125,000 acres ofcommercial vegetables, down 8 percent from the year before. The value of production from thisacreage and products totaled $429 million, up 1 percent from 2001. Total production of all vegetablecrops decreased from 2001. Production was influenced mostly by a drop in harvested acres. Onionswere the number one cash vegetable crop for Texas, cantaloupe was second followed by watermelons.
CitrusTexas grapefruit production for the 2002-2003 season totaled 5.65 million boxes, down 4
percent. The 2002-2003 all orange production totaled 1.57 million boxes, down 10 percent. Quality wasslightly lower than the previous season.
PecansThe 2002 Texas pecan crop was estimated at 40 million pounds, down 35 million pounds from
the 2001 crop. Pecan production was affected by heavy rains and flooding. Prices increased from theprevious year and averaged 83.5 cents per pound. Production of native varieties totaled 20 millionpounds, down from the 25 million pounds produced in 2001; production of improved varieties totaled20 million pounds, down from 50 million pounds in 2001.
PeachesTexas utilized peach production for 2002 was estimated at 238,000 bushels, down from 542,000
bushels in 2001. Bad weather and a late freeze damaged a large portion of the 2002 crop potential.Utilized production is the total of peach sales for fresh market and processing, as well as peachesconsumed on the farm. Total production in 2002 was 250,000 bushels.
GrapesBad weather, disease and pests played a big role in curtailing the 2002 Texas grape production
tonnage. Texas vineyards and wineries were only able to harvest 4,400 tons of grapes for wineproduction. Production decreased by more than one-half of the 9,300 tons produced in 2001. Anestimated 2,900 producing acres were available for harvest and yielded an average of 1.5 tons per acre,down 1.7 tons from one year earlier. The total estimated value of the 2002 crop was $4.0 million withan average value per ton of $910. Total value of production decreased by 52 percent from 2001.
143
STATE RANKING BY PRODUCTION FOR SELECTED VEGETABLE CROPS, 2002
Rank State Production Rank State Production Rank State Production
WATERMELONS - 1,000 cwt SPINACH - 1,000 cwt CABBAGE - 1,000 cwt
1 Florida 7,590 1 California 3,200 1 California 4,750
2 TEXAS 6,660 2 Arizona 945 2 New York 4,130
3 California 6,018 3 TEXAS 242 3 TEXAS 2,784
4 Georgia 5,100 4 Colorado 216 4 Florida 2,560
5 Arizona 2,562 5 New Jersey 157 5 Georgia 2,360
CANTALOUPES - 1,000 cwt CHILE PEPPERS - 1,000 cwt HONEYDEW MELONS - 1,000 cwt
1 California 13,451 1 New Mexico 1,800 1 California 3,774
2 Arizona 4,440 2 California 644 2 Arizona 775
3 TEXAS 2,565 3 TEXAS 275 3 TEXAS 510
4 Georgia 1,254 4 Arizona 190
5 Indiana 540
ONIONS, ALL - 1,000 cwt CARROTS - 1,000 cwt SWEETPOTATOES - 1,000 cwt
1 California 18,548 1 California 22,330 1 North Carolina 4,810
2 Oregon 10,662 2 Michigan 1,452 2 California 2,444
3 Washington 9,356 3 Georgia 1,410 3 Mississippi 1,968
4 TEXAS 5,705 4 Colorado 1,400 4 Louisiana 1,875
5 Idaho 5,056 5 TEXAS 580 5 TEXAS 561
PEPPERS, BELL - 1,000 cwt CUCUMBERS - 1,000 cwt POTATOES, ALL - 1,000 cwt
1 California 6,930 1 Georgia 2,920 1 Idaho 133,385
2 Florida 5,950 2 Florida 2,850 2 Washington 95,200
3 New Jersey 962 3 Michigan 1,140 3 Wisconsin 31,125
4 North Carolina 910 4 California 1,032 4 Colorado 30,189
5 Georgia 520 5 New York 828 5 Oregon 24,936
8 TEXAS 160 8 TEXAS 450 14 TEXAS 5,360
TOMATOES - 1,000 cwt SWEET CORN - 1,000 cwt
1 Florida 14,400 1 Florida 5,641
2 California 11,550 2 California 4,080
3 Ohio 2,479 3 New York 3,498
4 Virginia 1,520 4 Georgia 3,125
5 South Carolina 1,326 5 Ohio 1,253
17 TEXAS 180 17 TEXAS 288
144
TEXAS VEGETABLES FOR FRESH MARKET:Acreage, Yield, Production, Price and Value, 1998-2002
YearAcreage Yield
per acre ProductionMarketing yearaverage price
per cwtValue
Planted Harvested
Acres Cwt 1,000 cwt Dollars 1,000 dollars
CABBAGE
1998 . . . . . . . . 9,000 8,500 400 3,400 20.40 69,360
1999 . . . . . . . . 9,800 9,200 340 3,128 13.20 41,290
2000 . . . . . . . . 10,700 10,000 410 4,100 12.80 52,480
2001 . . . . . . . . 10,000 9,300 390 3,627 18.20 66,011
2002 . . . . . . . . 9,500 8,700 320 2,784 16.20 45,101
CANTALOUPES
1998 . . . . . . . . 10,500 10,000 210 2,100 31.90 66,990
1999 . . . . . . . . 11,700 11,100 180 1,998 28.40 56,743
2000 . . . . . . . . 11,800 10,800 170 1,836 23.10 42,412
2001 . . . . . . . . 12,200 11,200 250 2,800 24.90 69,720
2002 . . . . . . . . 10,000 9,500 270 2,565 31.50 80,798
CARROTS
1998 . . . . . . . . 4,200 4,000 245 980 20.50 20,090
1999 . . . . . . . . 5,500 5,100 200 1,020 30.00 30,600
2000 . . . . . . . . 4,900 4,600 190 874 16.10 14,071
2001 . . . . . . . . * 3,500 * 3,200 300 * 960 25.90 * 24,864
2002 . . . . . . . . 3,000 2,900 200 580 22.00 12,760
CELERY
1998 . . . . . . . . 500 500 600 300 13.90 4,170
1999 . . . . . . . . 600 600 620 372 10.10 3,757
2000 . . . . . . . . 300 300 650 195 16.00 3,120
2001 . . . . . . . . 400 400 650 260 15.00 3,900
2002 1 . . . . . . .
CHILE PEPPERS
2000 . . . . . . . . 6,100 5,500 2.50 13,750 43.50 11,963
2001 . . . . . . . . 7,000 6,500 3.00 19,500 43.50 16,965
2002 . . . . . . . . 6,000 5,500 2.50 13,750 40.00 11,000
1 Estimate discontinued in 2002. * Revised.
145
TEXAS VEGETABLES FOR FRESH MARKET:Acreage, Yield, Production, Price and Value, 1998-2002
YearAcreage Yield
per acre ProductionMarketing yearaverage price
per cwtValue
Planted Harvested
Acres Cwt 1,000 cwt Dollars 1,000 dollars
SWEET CORN
1998 . . . . . . . . 5,900 4,800 90 432 19.50 8,424
1999 . . . . . . . . 5,100 4,500 100 450 17.30 7,785
2000 . . . . . . . . 4,800 4,300 90 387 20.70 8,011
2001 . . . . . . . . 4,400 3,900 100 390 18.00 7,020
2002 . . . . . . . . 3,800 3,600 80 288 20.70 5,962
CUCUMBERS
1998 . . . . . . . . 1,700 1,500 75 113 23.80 2,689
1999 . . . . . . . . 2,000 1,800 90 162 23.40 3,791
2000 . . . . . . . . 1,900 1,800 200 360 24.10 8,676
2001 . . . . . . . . 2,000 1,800 210 378 24.20 9,148
2002 . . . . . . . . 1,900 1,800 250 450 24.60 11,070
HONEYDEW MELONS
1998 . . . . . . . . 2,500 2,300 190 437 38.10 16,650
1999 . . . . . . . . 2,900 2,800 210 588 29.10 17,111
2000 . . . . . . . . 2,600 2,400 230 552 25.60 14,131
2001 . . . . . . . . 2,000 1,800 200 360 37.80 13,608
2002 . . . . . . . . 1,800 1,700 300 510 28.30 14,433
ONIONS, SPRING
1998 . . . . . . . . 12,000 11,400 255 2,907 21.70 63,082
1999 . . . . . . . . 13,800 12,700 285 3,620 17.40 62,988
2000 . . . . . . . . 15,900 13,500 310 4,185 17.20 71,982
2001 . . . . . . . . 15,200 14,200 325 4,615 18.50 85,378
2002 . . . . . . . . 16,200 15,000 315 4,725 21.40 101,115
ONIONS, SUMMER
1998 . . . . . . . . 4,200 4,000 290 1,160 23.40 27,144
1999 . . . . . . . . 3,800 3,500 400 1,400 22.00 30,800
2000 . . . . . . . . 4,100 3,500 300 1,050 23.20 24,360
2001 . . . . . . . . 2,800 2,600 400 1,040 20.20 21,008
2002 . . . . . . . . 3,000 2,800 350 980 22.20 21,756
146
TEXAS VEGETABLES FOR FRESH MARKET:Acreage, Yield, Production, Price and Value, 1998-2002
YearAcreage Yield
per acre ProductionMarketing yearaverage price
per cwtValue
Planted Harvested
Acres Cwt 1,000 cwt Dollars 1,000 dollars
ONIONS, ALL
1998 . . . . . . . . 16,200 15,400 264 4,067 22.20 90,226
1999 . . . . . . . . 17,600 16,200 310 5,020 18.70 93,788
2000 . . . . . . . . 20,000 17,000 308 5,235 18.40 96,342
2001 . . . . . . . . 18,000 16,800 337 5,655 18.80 106,386
2002 . . . . . . . . 19,200 17,800 321 5,705 21.50 122,871
PEPPERS, BELL
1998 . . . . . . . . 1,600 1,500 120 180 29.50 5,308
1999 . . . . . . . . 1,500 1,400 180 252 24.70 6,224
2000 . . . . . . . . 1,400 1,300 200 260 34.80 9,048
2001 . . . . . . . . 1,200 1,100 250 275 40.30 11,083
2002 . . . . . . . . 900 800 200 160 47.00 7,520
SPINACH
1998 . . . . . . . . 2,700 2,500 90 225 39.40 8,865
1999 . . . . . . . . 2,600 2,100 70 147 46.20 6,791
2000 . . . . . . . . 3,000 2,600 85 221 37.70 8,332
2001 . . . . . . . . * 2,900 * 2,500 90 * 225 36.20 * 8,145
2002 . . . . . . . . 2,600 2,200 110 242 46.00 11,132
TOMATOES
1998 . . . . . . . . 1,700 1,400 100 140 37.80 5,292
1999 . . . . . . . . 1,700 1,600 120 192 31.70 6,086
2000 . . . . . . . . 1,500 1,400 130 182 32.30 5,879
2001 . . . . . . . . 1,300 1,200 150 180 36.00 6,480
2002 . . . . . . . . 1,000 900 200 180 32.00 5,760
WATERMELONS
1998 . . . . . . . . 41,000 38,400 170 6,528 5.46 35,643
1999 . . . . . . . . 39,700 37,200 200 7,440 3.98 29,611
2000 . . . . . . . . 47,000 40,000 140 5,600 3.90 21,840
2001 . . . . . . . . 50,000 45,000 160 7,200 4.50 32,400
2002 . . . . . . . . 40,000 37,000 180 6,660 8.50 56,610
* Revised.
147
TEXAS VEGETABLES FOR PROCESSING:Acreage, Yield, Production, Price and Value, 1998-2002
YearAcreage Yield
per acre ProductionMarketing yearaverage price
per tonValue
Planted Harvested
Acres Tons Tons Dollars 1,000 dollars
CARROTS
1998 . . . . . . . . 2,900 2,700 7.50 20,250 94.00 1,904
1999 . . . . . . . . 2,000 1,900 14.80 28,120 59.00 1,659
2000 . . . . . . . . 2,300 2,100 16.00 33,600 48.00 1,613
2001 . . . . . . . . 2,500 2,300 18.24 41,960 49.30 2,070
2002 . . . . . . . . 2,100 1,900 18.22 34,620 56.40 1,953
CUCUMBERS FOR PICKLES
1998 . . . . . . . . 9,900 9,400 6.30 59,220 332.00 19,661
1999 . . . . . . . . 10,200 9,600 5.70 54,720 340.00 18,605
2000 . . . . . . . . 7,000 6,300 4.60 28,980 380.00 11,012
2001 . . . . . . . . * 11,500 * 11,000 5.00 * 55,000 346.00 * 19,030
2002 . . . . . . . . 11,500 11,000 5.00 55,000 436.00 23,980
SPINACH
1998 . . . . . . . . 5,400 5,000 8.50 42,500 95.00 4,038
1999 . . . . . . . . 5,200 4,900 9.89 48,440 94.00 4,553
2000 . . . . . . . . 5,500 5,100 8.68 44,280 88.20 3,907
2001 . . . . . . . . 4,600 4,200 10.26 43,100 84.70 3,651
2002 . . . . . . . . 4,700 4,400 8.84 38,910 77.70 3,025
* Revised.
148
TEXAS VEGETABLES FOR FRESH MARKET AND PROCESSING:Acreage, Yield, Production, Price and Value, 1998-2002
YearAcreage Yield
per acre ProductionMarketing yearaverage price
per cwtValue
Planted Harvested
Acres Cwt 1,000 cwt Dollars 1,000 dollars
POTATOES, SPRING
1998 . . . . . . . . 10,800 10,300 170 1,751 9.15 16,022
1999 . . . . . . . . 10,300 9,800 235 2,303 8.55 19,691
2000 . . . . . . . . 9,800 9,300 240 2,232 8.15 18,191
2001 . . . . . . . . 9,500 9,000 230 2,070 8.75 18,113
2002 . . . . . . . . 12,500 12,000 170 2,040 8.15 16,626
POTATOES, SUMMER
1998 . . . . . . . . 9,100 8,200 380 3,116 9.45 29,446
1999 . . . . . . . . 8,600 8,000 370 2,960 8.75 25,900
2000 . . . . . . . . 8,400 7,800 380 2,964 11.50 34,086
2001 . . . . . . . . 8,500 8,000 390 3,120 11.40 35,568
2002 . . . . . . . . 8,800 8,300 400 3,320 12.30 40,836
POTATOES, ALL
1998 . . . . . . . . 19,900 18,500 263 4,867 9.35 45,468
1999 . . . . . . . . 18,900 17,800 296 5,263 8.65 45,591
2000 . . . . . . . . 18,200 17,100 304 5,196 10.10 52,277
2001 . . . . . . . . 18,000 17,000 305 5,190 10.30 53,681
2002 . . . . . . . . 21,300 20,300 264 5,360 10.70 57,156
SWEETPOTATOES
1998 . . . . . . . . 6,400 5,600 45 252 16.40 4,133
1999 . . . . . . . . 5,600 5,000 70 350 16.40 5,740
2000 . . . . . . . . 5,500 5,100 45 230 16.50 3,795
2001 . . . . . . . . 4,200 3,800 100 380 18.70 7,1096
2002 . . . . . . . . 3,500 3,300 170 561 17.90 10,042
149
TEXAS SELECTED VEGETABLES:Harvested Acreage by District, 2001-2002
DistrictCabbage Onions Potatoes
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
Acres
District 1-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300 300 100 200 3,700 3,300
District 1-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300 300 600 200 2,600 3,200
District 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,700 1,400 300
District 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,500 1,700 1,000 1,800 200
District 8-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 1,000 100 100
District 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 100 200 200
District 10-N . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,700 1,500 2,700 2,500 8,500 9,500
District 10-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,600 3,900 10,500 11,500 2,000 1,600
STATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,300 8,700 16,800 17,800 17,000 18,300
TEXAS SELECTED FRESH MARKET VEGETABLES:Harvested Acreage by District, 2001-2002
DistrictCantaloupes Honeydew Melons Watermelons
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002
Acres
District 1-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800 700
District 1-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800 300 10,000 10,000
District 2-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 200 1,000 800
District 2-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 200 1,500 1,300
District 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,100 800 3,500 2,100
District 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 400 500 500
District 5-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,500 1,200
District 5-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 700
District 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,200 2,200 200 100 300 300
District 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400 600 100 500 300
District 8-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,000 1,600
District 8-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,200 800
District 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 400
District 10-N . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,200 1,000 200 200 10,000 4,800
District 10-S . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,900 3,800 1,400 1,300 11,000 11,500
STATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,200 9,500 1,800 1,700 45,000 37,000
150
TEXAS GRAPEFRUIT AND ORANGES: Production, Utilization and Value, 1998-2003
Crop year ProductionUtilization of production
Price 1 Value ofproductionFresh use Processing
1,000 boxes Dollars per box 1,000 dollars
GRAPEFRUIT1998-1999 . . . . . . 6,100 4,087 2,013 5.79 35,307
1999-2000 . . . . . . 5,930 3,872 2,058 6.30 37,342
2000-2001 . . . . . . 7,200 4,055 3,145 2.68 19,324
2001-2002 . . . . . . 5,900 3,900 2,000 3.91 23,040
2002-2003 2 . . . . . 5,650
EARLY AND MIDSEASON ORANGES1998-1999 . . . . . . 1,250 1,023 227 8.14 10,181
1999-2000 . . . . . . 1,460 1,129 331 6.46 9,428
2000-2001 . . . . . . 2,000 1,080 920 2.38 4,758
2001-2002 . . . . . . 1,530 1,228 302 4.52 6,910
2002-2003 2 . . . . . 1,350
VALENCIA ORANGES1998-1999 . . . . . . 180 95 85 5.37 966
1999-2000 . . . . . . 200 150 50 3.73 745
2000-2001 . . . . . . 235 191 44 3.32 781
2001-2002 . . . . . . 210 166 44 5.51 1,158
2002-2003 2 . . . . . 220
ALL ORANGES1998-1999 . . . . . . 1,430 1,118 312 7.80 11,147
1999-2000 . . . . . . 1,660 1,279 381 6.13 10,173
2000-2001 . . . . . . 2,235 1,271 964 2.48 5,539
2001-2002 . . . . . . 1,740 1,394 346 4.64 8,068
2002-2003 2 . . . . . 1,570
1 Equivalent packing house door returns. 2 Preliminary.
STATE RANKINGS FOR GRAPEFRUIT AND ALL ORANGE PRODUCTION, 2000-2001 AND 2001-2002
GRAPEFRUIT ALL ORANGES
StateUtilized
production2000-2001
StateUtilized
production2001-2002
StateUtilized
production2000-2001
StateUtilized
production2001-2002
1,000 Boxes 1,000 Boxes 1,000 Boxes 1,000 Boxes
1 Florida 46,000 1 Florida 46,700 1 Florida 223,300 1 Florida 230,000
2 TEXAS 7,200 2 TEXAS 5,900 2 California 54,500 2 California 56,000
3 California 6,300 3 California 6,000 3 TEXAS 2,235 3 TEXAS 1,740
4 Arizona 250 4 Arizona 160 4 Arizona 900 4 Arizona 520
151
TEXAS PEACHES: Production, Price and Value of Utilized Production, 1998-2002 1
YearProduction Price per
bushelValue of utilized
productionTotal Utilized
1,000 bushels Dollars 1,000 dollars
1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 396 24.96 9,880
1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 229 29.76 6,820
2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438 360 27.84 10,034
2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 625 542 27.36 14,820
2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 238 28.80 6,840
1 Fresh market only.
STATE RANKING OF UTILIZED PEACH PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
State 2001Utilized production State 2002
Utilized production
1,000 bushels 1,000 bushels
1 California 34,938 1 California 38,958
2 Georgia 2,604 2 South Carolina 2,708
3 South Carolina 1,771 3 Georgia 2,125
4 Pennsylvania 1,542 4 Pennsylvania 1,229
5 New Jersey 1,458 5 New Jersey 1,188
6 Washington 1,146 6 Washington 1,167
7 Michigan 875 7 Alabama 396
8 TEXAS 542 8 Colorado 385
9 Alabama 458 9 Illinois 344
10 Colorado 365 10 Michigan 292
11 TEXAS 238
152
TEXAS UTILIZED PECAN PRODUCTION, PRICE AND VALUE OF PRODUCTION, BY VARIETY, 1998-2002
Cropyear
Improved varieties Native and seedling All pecans
Utilizedproduction
Priceper pound
Value ofutilized
production
Utilizedproduction
Priceper pound
Value ofutilized
production
Utilizedproduction
Priceper pound
Value ofutilized
production
1,000 lbs. Cents 1,000 dols. 1,000 lbs. Cents 1,000 dols. 1,000 lbs. Cents 1,000 dols.
1998 . . . . 20,000 130.0 26,000 10,000 85.0 8,500 30,000 115.0 34,500
1999 . . . . 35,000 100.0 35,000 55,000 60.0 33,000 90,000 75.6 68,000
2000 . . . . 22,000 130.0 28,600 8,000 75.0 6,000 30,000 115.0 34,600
2001 . . . . 50,000 80.0 40,000 25,000 40.0 10,000 75,000 66.7 50,000
2002 . . . . 20,000 102.0 20,400 20,000 65.0 13,000 40,000 83.5 33,400
STATE RANKING OF UTILIZED PECAN PRODUCTION, 2001 AND 2002
State 2001Utilized production
State 2002Utilized production
1,000 pounds 1,000 pounds
1 Georgia 110,000 1 Georgia 45,000
2 TEXAS 75,000 2 TEXAS 40,000
3 New Mexico 60,000 3 New Mexico 36,000
4 Arizona 21,000 4 Arizona 16,000
5 Oklahoma 20,000 5 Oklahoma 10,000
6 Alabama 15,000 6 Louisiana 6,000
7 Louisiana 14,000 7 Alabama 5,000
8 Mississippi 4,500 8 California 3,800
9 South Carolina 4,000 9 Mississippi 3,000
10 California 3,700 10 Kansas 2,900
153
TEXAS GRAPE PRODUCTION, 2001-2002
Variety
Bearingacreage
Non-bearingacreage
Yieldper acre
Utilizedproduction
Priceper ton
2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 1
Acres Acres Tons Tons Dollars
Cabernet Sauvignon . . . 700 720 70 50 3.0 1.5 2,130 2,100 1,020 1,110
Chardonnay . . . . . . . . . 570 550 80 60 2.6 .6 1,480 350 1,060 1,130
Sauvignon Blanc . . . . . . 370 380 0 0 4.7 2.2 1,750 850 840 700
Chenin Blanc . . . . . . . . 360 360 20 20 4.7 .8 1,700 300 650 600
Merlot . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300 290 60 20 2.4 1.9 730 550 1,050 1,010
All other 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600 600 170 200 2.5 2.1 1,510 1,250 850 830
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,900 2,900 400 350 3.2 1.5 9,300 4,400 900 910
1 Revised July 2003. 2 The leading grape varieties not listed separately include Riesling, Zinfandel, Ruby Cabernet, Pinot Noir and Muscat Blanc. Thesevarieties ranged in acreage between 50 and 100 acres, respectively.
154
PRSRTBOUND PRINTED MATTERPOSTAGE & FEES PAID
National AgriculturalStatistics ServicePermit No. G-38
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURENATIONAL AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE AGRICULTURAL STATISTICIAN P.O. BOX 70 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78767 OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Bulletin 261September 2003
2,200