17
20-Sep-11 1 Sprayed Seals AAPA Tour Stellenbosch Workshop 5 September 2011 G van Zyl/ K Louw/ G Fourie Question 1 What percentage of the South Africa network is sprayed seals? Rural >95% Urban – Varies CBDs <1% Larger Metros (Residential) Smaller Towns > 60% Question 2 What are the most common seal types, and aggregate sizes? sprayed seals? Seal Type Distribution (Western Cape 6 – year average) Slurry Seals, 7% Rejuvenation, 13% Asphalt, 2% Double seals, 5% Single seals, 51% Sand seals, 22% Asphalt 5% Cape Seal 8% Double Seal 6% Single seal 60% Slurry 1% Sand/Grit 11% Rej/DE 9% Western Cape - 2011 Last Surfacings Asphalt Cape Seal Double Seal Single seal Slurry Sand/Grit Rej/DE 19 Cape 9% 19/9 double 1% 16 Single 0% 13 Cape 0% 13/6 double 6% 13 Single 38% 13/Grit 6% 9 Single 15% 6,7 Single 11% 9/ Sand 1% Sand/Grit 12% Fine Slurry 0% Coarse Slurry 0% Micro Surf 1% Western Cape - 2011 Aggregate size Seal type % Network 19 Cape 8.9 19/9 double 0.5 16 Single 0.1 13 Cape 0.3 13/6 double 5.9 13 Single 38.4 13/Grit 5.9 9 Single 14.5 6,7 Single 11.0 9/ Sand 1.0 Sand/Grit 11.9 Fine Slurry 0.1 Coarse Slurry 0.1 Micro Surf 1.2

20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

1

Sprayed Seals

AAPA Tour

Stellenbosch Workshop

5 September 2011

G van Zyl/ K Louw/ G Fourie

Question 1

• What percentage of the South Africa network is sprayed seals?

• Rural >95%

• Urban – VariesCBDs <1%

Larger Metros (Residential)

Smaller Towns > 60%

Question 2

• What are the most common seal types, and aggregate sizes? sprayed seals?

Seal Type Distribution(Western Cape 6 – year average)

Slurry Seals, 7%

Rejuvenation, 13%

Asphalt, 2%Double seals,

5%

Single seals, 51%

Sand seals, 22%

Asphalt5%

Cape Seal8%

Double Seal6%

Single seal60%

Slurry1%

Sand/Grit11%

Rej/DE9%

Western Cape - 2011 Last Surfacings

Asphalt

Cape Seal

Double Seal

Single seal

Slurry

Sand/Grit

Rej/DE

19 Cape9%

19/9 double1% 16 Single

0%

13 Cape0%

13/6 double6%

13 Single38%

13/Grit6%

9 Single15%

6,7 Single11%

9/ Sand1%

Sand/Grit12%

Fine Slurry0%

Coarse Slurry0%

Micro Surf1%

Western Cape - 2011 Aggregate size

Seal type % Network19 Cape 8.919/9 double 0.516 Single 0.113 Cape 0.313/6 double 5.913 Single 38.413/Grit 5.99 Single 14.56,7 Single 11.09/ Sand 1.0Sand/Grit 11.9Fine Slurry 0.1Coarse Slurry 0.1Micro Surf 1.2

Page 2: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

2

Seal Type Distribution(SANRAL 2006)

Single seals, 10%

Double Seals, 65%

Cape Seal, 10%

Asphalt, 15%

60%

7%

13%

20%

DIFFERENT SEAL  TYPES  CONSTRUCTED  DURING  2010/11

19.0/9.5

19.0/6.7

19/6.7/6.7

13.2/6.7

13.2

Cape Seal

Question 3

• How commonly used are Cape Seals, has there application been mechanised, what traffic loading can be accommodated?Western Cape - 8% of network

Common as initial seal

SANRAL -10% as initial seal

Now – 9.5 CS also as temporary winter seal

• Prefer not to mechanise

• Traffic loading –WCPG (Design)

Construction seal structure – close with one slurry app

Mostly used for new construction/rehabilitation as primary seal on top of crushed aggregate base (G1/G2) - (GF)

High traffic Cape Seal

• Close matrix

• Drier slurry

• Hand appliedTyre in contact

with slurry

Tyre in contact with coarse aggregate

Tyre in contact with slurry

Tyre in contact with coarse aggregate

Design considerations

• Method of construction and effect

12

Page 3: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

3

WCPA material Manual Table 6-34:

E80 PER DAY (Both directions)

p

<50

51 - 100

101 - 150

151 - 200

201 – 250

251 – 300

>300

0,145

0,140

0,135

0,130

0,125

0,120

0,115

9,5 mm Cape Seal

Question 4

• What standard operations are used in sprayed sealing, are bitumen sprayers uniformly calibrated across the country, are bitumen sprayers certified to use in other jurisdictions?

• Yes – two centres

• Yes – Apply to all areas

• “Bakkie test” standard

• Kobus Louw

Question 4:

What standard operations are used in sprayed sealing, are bitumen sprayers uniformly

calibrated across the country, are bitumen sprayers certified to use in other jurisdictions ?

Transverse distribution

Page 4: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

4

TramlinesSpray bar

Inco

rre

ct h

eig

ht

Triple overlap Quadruple overlap

Spray bar

Inco

rre

ct h

eig

ht

Triple overlap Quadruple overlap

Spray bar

Co

rre

ct h

eig

ht

Triple overlap Only double overlap

Poor flair

Spray bar

Co

rre

ct h

eig

ht

Triple overlap Only double overlap

Poor flair

Question 5

• Are bitumen rubber & polymer modified binder sprayers different to normal bitumen sprayers – are they calibrated & certified differently?

• Kobus

Question 5:Are bitumen-rubber & polymer modified binder sprayers different to normal bitumen sprayers ? Are they calibrated and certified differently

Types of sprayers in South Africa:

• Acmar (French)

• Bearcat (American)

• Etnyre (American)

• Rosco (American)

• Privately constructed

SPRAYER CHARACTERISTICS

PRODUCT NOZZLE OUTPUT(l/min)

SYSTEMPRESSURE

(kPa)

Emulsion/Prime 7 – 9 100 - 150

Pen.Bitumen/PMB’s

13 – 15 150 – 200

Bitumen-Rubber 35 - 40 350 - 400

Question 8: What range of road grade and modified binders are used in sprayed sealing and what volumes or percentages are sprayed annually ?

BINDER CATEGORY BINDER TYPES RELATIVE %

Cutback Bitumen MC 3000 2

Penetration Grade Bitumen

80/100 3

Polymer Modified S-E1, S-E2, A-E2, A-P1 48

Bitumen-Rubber S-R1 5

Bitumen emulsion CRS 65/70, Anionic Stable Grade 60

35

Latex modified emulsion SC-E1 and SC-E2, Tack coats for UTFC,Microsurfacing

5

Precoats 2

Question 9:Are polymer modified emulsions used in sprayed sealing ? If yes, what are the key motivators and what are the operational and cost implications ?

BINDER RELATIVE COST(1,0 l/m2 net cold residual)

80/100 1,0

S-E1 1,16

Cationic Spray Grade 70% 1,21

Cationic Spray Grade 70 + 3% SBR 1,43

Cationic Spray Grade 70 + 5% SBR 1,59

Page 5: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

5

Question 6

• How are road surface types selected, is there a local or national norm, what factors are considered when selecting the given surface? Are there particular treatments used for particular reasons? Skid resistance / macro texture

Turning actions

Traffic volume/distribution - design

Noise

Maintenance capability

Gradient (Drainage/ Gradient)

Q6

Consultants are appointed for investigation, design, tender documentation and site supervision. Therefore, they will list a number of alternatives from which a recommended surfaced treatment will be motivated. Sanralwill assess the alternatives based on cost, motivation provided by Consultants, functionality, appropriateness, etc. and compare it with surfacings of adjacent sections on the same route

Question 7

• Is the type of binder to be used included in the selection process or is that determined by the seal design process?

• SANRALNot prescribed – CE to motivate

Condition, Traffic, Climate

• Western CapeRecommendation from PMS process

• Cracking condition

• Traffic

Question 8

• What range of road grade and modified binders are used in sprayed sealing and what volumes or percentages are sprayed annually?

• Kobus

BR1% PMB

11%

Pen7%

MC300013%

Emulsion47%

Mod Emulsion21%

Western Cape - 2011 Last Binder type

BR

PMB

Pen

MC3000

Emulsion

Mod Emulsion

Question 9

• Are polymer modified emulsions used in sprayed sealing? If yes what are the key motivators and what are the operational and cost implications?

• Western CapeYes often

Climatic conditions and cracking

Cost

• Haulage of water

• Split application of binder

• Total (11%- 50% more)

Page 6: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

6

Question 10

• Does the public sector participate in sprayed sealing (percentage private to public)?Western Cape still – Yes

Lower order roads

Question 11

• Are binders bought in bulk by the client? If yes how is binder allocated to contracts? No

QUESTION 11:Are binders bought in bulk by the client. If yes, how is binder allocated to contracts ?

• Exception to the rule for clients to buy bitumen directly from refineries

• Binders are supplied on a first come, first serve basis

• Refiners may ask secondary producers for a forecast of expected demand

Question 12

• Are newer sprayers with different international technologies being used?

• Kobus

QUESTION 12: Are newer sprayers with different international technologies being used ?

Features:

• Computer controlled binder pump

• Oil jacketed spray bars

• Pneumatically controlled actuators

• No flexible hoses

• Spray bar extends on a rack

Question 13• Has the comparative performance of the

various polymer modified binders and rubber bitumen used in seals been reviewed? Not sufficiently

CSIR Rust

• Crack study (100 – 200 - 300 micron) (Pen,PMB,BR)

BR versus Conventional (Old TPA Study)

• Performance from PMS data

WCPG (HDM Calibration sections )

Page 7: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

7

Hardening/ Oxidation (WCPA)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Degree Dry (0

‐5)

Year

13,2 mm Modified Binders

M13(2) L13 (1) M13 (1) R13 (1) L13 (2)

Linear (M13(2)) Linear (L13 (1)) Linear (M13 (1)) Linear (R13 (1)) Linear (L13 (2))

SC-E1S-E1

S-R1

Question 14

• What has been the experience with the performance of SBS seals with the onset of winter?High risk – sensitive

Perception – High SBS (S-E2) very sensitive

Adhesion to precoated stone ?

Issue 3: Polymer Modified binders

Why is it happening?

• Poor adhesionToo low application rates

Contact area ?

Precoating ?

Question 15/17

• Are performance or functional specifications used in the purchase of surface seals?

• No not yet

Question 16• Are there best practice procedures forsurface pre-treatments including rut filling,

surface rejuvenation and crack sealing;

cutting back of binders,

the use of bitumen emulsions;

use of self propelled chip spreaders versus spreader boxes,

calibration of sprayers,

on site blending of bitumen rubber,

pre-coating of aggregates, and

priming of base courses.

• Yes to most – but could be updated (TRH3, SABITA Manuals)

Sprayed Seals

Question 16: Available best practice procedures

• Surface pre-treatments including rut filling (TRH 3)• Surface rejuvenation and crack sealing (TRH 3 – Manual

20)• Cutting back of binders (TRH3)• The use of bitumen emulsions (Manual 30)• Use of self propelled chip spreaders vs spreader boxes

(No)• Calibration of sprayers (Manual 31)• On-site blending of bitumen rubber (No)• Pre-coating of aggregates (Manual 26)• Priming of base courses (Manual 26)

Page 8: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

8

Question 18

• What allowances are made in the variations of material qualities to achieve optimal use of scarce natural aggregates? Manual 10 - Recommendations

• Is this included integrated into the seal design and the performance evaluation?Yes – only in rational design (wearing)

Yes – local experiences with quartzitic agg and poriusaggregates (Slag & dolerite)

Generally NO

Question 19

• What impacts have industrial occupational health and safety requirements had on sprayed sealing operations and materials selection?

SANRAL (GF)• Tar based products were banned• Consideration given to the use of emulsion

where labour intensive work is involved, e.gpatching with emulsion treated material.

• Stricter control measures at sites regarding H&S audits and compliance with legislation

Question 20

• What allowance is made in the design spray rate to differentiate between the performance properties of the different binders?Performance ?

Prevent chip loss/ bleeding (Envelope)

Risk of attracted traffic – minimum

Crack reflection – Maximum

Conversion factors (TRH3 + recommended changes)

S-E1 Conversion

S-E1 ADJUSTMENT (Conventional to modified binder)

Traffic (ELV) Single seal Double SealSplit

application double seal

< 5000 1.3 1.1 1.2

5000 - 20000 1.2 1.0 1.1

> 20000 1.1 1.0 1.0

S-E2 Conversion

S-E2 ADJUSTMENT (Conventional to modified binder)

Traffic (ELV) Single seal Double SealSplit

application double seal

< 5000 1.4 1.2 1.3

5000 - 20000 1.3 1.1 1.2

> 20000 1.2 1.0 1.1

S-R1

S-R1 ADJUSTMENT (Conventional to modified binder)

Traffic (ELV) Single seal Double SealSplit

application double seal

< 5000 2.0 1.8 ? - ?

5000 - 20000 1.9 1.7 ? - ?

> 20000 1.8 1.6 ? - ?

Page 9: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

9

Question 21

• What tests and acceptance criteria are use for granular base courses prior to sealing ie% dry back, embedment etc

• Density

• 50% of OMC (Prime/ Seal !!)

• Curing periods for pre-treatments – COLTO

• No Specs on embedment – but does indicate problem in Crushed stone base

- Test result interpretation !!!

Question 22

• What is the maximum traffic volume and other limiting factors used for spray seals selection ?

• TRH3 – Research base – 10 000 ELVs

• Extrapolation – 40 000 ELVs

• Experience/ Trials – no real limits but dependent on sub-strate softness

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

0-200 200-500 500-1000

1000-2000

2000-4000

4000-6000

6000-10000

10000-20000

20000-50000

50000-100000

>100000

Netw

ork

Dis

tanc

e (k

m)

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) (Both Directions)

Traffic DistributionSouth African Surfaced Rural Road Network

LVSR

TRH3 Confidence (10 000 ELVs)

TRH3 Extended (40 000 ELVs) ?

Question 23

• How do they address seal failures iebleeding, flushing, Dry aggregate layer before reseal

Roll in precoated aggregate

• stripping, Cat spray grade cover spray

Back chipping

Precoated Grit

• ravelling etc? Rejuvenation spray

MC 300 + Grit

Slurry

Question 24

• How is funding for sealing and maintenance procured? WCPG/ NamRA – PMS Strategic analysis

• How are sites for sealing selected? WCPG/ NamRA - Tactical analysis, Reseal Need

Index

• What process is used to rank these sites? WCPG – RNI + Panel Inspection

Nam RA – Remaining Life to RNI = 50 + traffic

Question 25• What percentage of roads is resealed

annually? Used to be 7- 12% (Ave 10%)

Back Log

• What is the life expectancy of seals in South Africa? Average 8 – 15 years (Average 10 years)

Thin initial seals = 3 years

Page 10: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

10

• Road Authority A 6500 km surfaced

Cycle used to be 7 – 12 years

Now: Seal age 76% > 12 years

No reseal since 2005

55

Issue 1: Preventive Maintenance

Expenditure on road infrastructure

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04

Year

Ran

d (m

illion

s)

KILOMETRE ROADS RESEALED FROM 1986

0

200

400

600

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

00

01

02

03

04

Year resealed

Kilo

met

re le

ngt

h

Class 6

Class 5

Class 4

Class 2

Class 1

PAVED ROADS - SEAL AGES

30%

22%24%

16%

2% 6%

>20

17-20

13-16

9-12

6-8

<5

Issue 1: Preventive Maintenance

Road Authority B – 6200 km

Issue 1: Preventive Maintenance

Road Authority C – 6100 km surfaced

• Seal age (40% older than 10 years)

Question 26

• To what extent are geotextile seals used? Are there any guidelines for the use of geotextile seals in areas of high stress? Geotextile patching – High

Full-scale reseal – Low

Guidelines – TRH3

Question 27

• What properties are specified for sealing aggregates? Is a minimum average least dimension required? Hardness (ACV/ 10% FACT)

PSV

Durability

Grading (Single sized aggregate)

Dust

Flakiness

ALD

Binder/ Aggregate adhesion

Question 28

• Bitumen rubber seals using high binder application rates have been reported on (Jooste K & van Zyl GD 2010). How are these seals performing? Under what conditions are they used? Extremely well, especially 19/9.5

Very high application rates 4 – 5 l/m2

Mainly holding actions

Page 11: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

11

Slurry: Question 1

• What is the primary use of slurry seals? Urban networks? Rural network?

• UrbanOverlays – Slurry & Microsurfacing

• RuralTexture treatments

Cape Seals

Shape correction

Long-term overlay not common anymore

Slurry Seals

Question 2:

* Are slurry/microsurfacings used as rut filling and overlays ?* Are they used to improve skid resistance ?* What life expectancy is achieved ?* What mix design methods are used ?* Any lessons learnt or mix design guidelines ?* Are there performance records ?

Slurry: Question 2

• Are slurry / micro-surfacings used as rut filling and overlays? Yes, but agg grading different

• Are they used to improve skid resistance? No

• What life expectancy is achieved? Depend on pavement condition and components (2 – 10)

• What mix design methods are used? Man 28

• Any lessons learnt or best practice guides? Man 28

• Are there performance records? - ???

Slurry: Question 4

• Is the equipment used of a similar type / standardised?

Page 12: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

12

Slurry Seals

Question 4: Are slurry/microsurfacings sold under brand names ? Are they included in a HAPAS type certification process ?

Slurry: Question 5

• Are they using PMB emulsions in their slurry seals if so what kind?

Page 13: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

13

TG 1 Guideline TEXTURE TREATMENT

• When required Very coarse/ varying

texture Existing texture (consider

existing seal type) Alternative texture

treatments • (6,7mm stone seal, grit

seal, fine slurry) Concerns (e.g. time to

stabilise)

• Warning Not on bleeding/ tacky

surfaces

Impact of no texture treatment Pre-treatment ignored

Rejuvenation: Question 1

• Is surface enrichment a common practice?Yes – for RA still active

Page 14: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

14

Rejuvenation: Question 2

• What is the primary motivation for using surface rejuvenation? Dry/ Brittleness of binder

Sensitivity to aggregate loss

Availability of voids

Rejuvenation: Question 3

• Is it included in seal design and application?Not in design of seals

As selection of pre-treatment

Trial recommendations

Typical (0.8 – 1.0 l/m2 50/50 Stable grade emulsion)

Rejuvenation: Question 4

• What selection / performance criteria are used in choosing a surface enrichment product? Traffic accommodation

Available voids

DE required

Rejuvenation: Question 5

• What application rates are used? What are the costs / area of the products used?DE – 0.8 – 1.0 l/m2 (50/50 60% Stable Anionic)

Rejuvenator e.g. MSP3 0.4-0.5 l/m2

Costs

Surface Rejuvenation

Question 5: What application rates are used ? What are the costs/area of products used

Answer: * Application rates – 0,4 to 0,5 l/m2

* Costs around Cape Town - R5-00/m2

* Costs in Namibia – R6-00 to R7-00/m2

Page 15: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

15

Rejuvenation: Question 6

• What binder types are used for surface enrichment?

Rejuvenation: Question 7

• Are special commercial products / petroleum product formulations used for rejuvenation?

Surface Rejuvenation

Question 7: Are special commercial products/petroleum product formulations used for rejuvenation ?

• Specific brand names being used• Usually inverted emulsions

containing some aromatic oil

Page 16: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

16

Rejuvenation: Question 8

• Is there a formal design process?

• No Typical

Trial

Rejuvenation: Question 9

• What are the life cycle cost benefits of surface rejuvenation? Effect seal life increase 3-4 years

Cover Spray

• Prefer conventional Cat spray grade

• Low/ undiluted

• Time to settle

Cat Spray grade on old seal

Page 17: 20-Sep-11 - AAPA Qaapaq.org/q/2011st/docs/110905_van_Zyl-Louw_Sprayed_Sealsx6.pdf20-Sep-11 3 WCPA material Manual Table 6-34: E80 PER DAY (Both directions) p

20-Sep-11

17

Polymer Modified Rejuvenation: Question 10

• What rejuvenation treatments are used on asphalt surfaced pavements where the environment rather than loading is the major influence on deterioration? (eg low volume residential streets in cities) Anionic Stable emulsion

Other experiments (Stability problem) – CSIR doc

Surface Rejuvenation

Question 10: What rejuvenation treatments are used on asphalt surfaced pavements where the environment rather than loading is the major influence on deterioration ? (eg. low volume residential streets in cities)

• Rejuvenation treatments not normally used on hot-mix asphalt surfaces

• Also not recommended in residential areas

THE END