Upload
archibald-kennedy
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Evaluating Evidence Note well: these samples are not
models; they only serve to stimulate discussion.
Look at Activity C from tutorial 5, paragraphs A and B. Discuss in a small group.
Inductive Arguments and Statistical Evidence Look at the questions from Diestler
(1998). Then evaluate the four claims on page 12.
Section A (No marks awarded) Identify the main parts of the writer’s argument (main claim, key arguments, premises and evidence) through a graphic representation.
Section B (20 marks) Write a 200-250 word summary of the writer's argument
Correctly identifies the writer’s main claim and key arguments/claims.
Identifies all of the relationships between the main claim and key arguments.
a clear relational pattern between ideas … effective use of transition markers to link ideas.
Uses appropriate reporting verbs. See the rubric for more details
Section B (20 marks) Write a 200-250 word summary of the writer's argument
Correctly identifies the writer’s main claim and key arguments/claims.
Identifies all of the relationships between the main claim and key arguments.
a clear relational pattern between ideas … effective use of transition markers to link ideas.
Uses appropriate reporting verbs. See the rubric for more details
Section C
paraphrase and evaluate ONE key argument used by the writer to support his main claim
You should identify the form of the argument, state a well-articulated thesis on the quality of the argument (weak or strong) and defend your evaluation with reasons…500-550 words…TWO sources…Reference List at the end of your paper.
Section C
paraphrase and evaluate ONE key argument used by the writer to support his main claim
You should identify the form of the argument, state a well-articulated thesis on the quality of the argument (weak or strong) and defend your evaluation with reasons…500-550 words…TWO sources…Reference List at the end of your paper.
Section C The identification of a key argument is
complete: all premises and evidence were identified.
Correctly identifies the form of the argument and effectively applies the understanding of the criteria for a sound deductive argument or a strong inductive argument to the evaluation of the key argument.
states a clear position on the quality of the key argument
See the rubric for more details
Section C The identification of a key argument is
complete: all premises and evidence were identified.
Correctly identifies the form of the argument and effectively applies the understanding of the criteria for a sound deductive argument or a strong inductive argument to the evaluation of the key argument.
states a clear position on the quality of the key argument
See the rubric for more details
How to structure Assignment 1? Discuss in a small group: How many paragraphs in each section? Will you have a thesis statement? How many topic sentences? What will be the content of each
paragraph in section C? For section C, where will you put the key
argument and premises?
Σ CO2 = P * S * E * C What is the claim? C must go to zero.
What are the premises?1. Σ CO2 = P * S * E * C
2. P cannot go to zero. 3. S cannot go to zero. 4. E cannot go to zero.5. Σ CO2 must go to zero.
Therefore, C must go to zero. Inductive or deductive?
Σ CO2 = P * S * E * C What is the claim? C must go to zero.
What are the premises?1. Σ CO2 = P * S * E * C
2. P cannot go to zero. 3. S cannot go to zero. 4. E cannot go to zero.5. Σ CO2 must go to zero.
Therefore, C must go to zero. deductive?
What is a miracle? [countable] an act or event that does not follow
the laws of nature and is believed to be caused by God -- synonym wonder
[singular] (informal) a lucky thing that happens that you did not expect or think was possible an economic miracle It’s a miracle (that) nobody was killed in the
crash. It would take a miracle to make this business
profitable. a miracle cure
What is a miracle? How does Gates use the term miracle? How is this different from Hutson’s use
of superstition?
For next time You will be choosing your teams for
Assignment 2 on Monday (3 per team) For tutorial 7, following the three steps
of Assignment 1, analyze “In Defense of Superstition”. Bring two printed copies of your draft to class. Note well: your tutor cannot give you specific feedback on your actual Assignment 1 draft.