2 Risk Management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    1/18

    1

    www.ere.com.my

    Reducing Project Risk Through

    Effective Stakeholder Engagement :

    Lessons Learnt from Selected Projects in Malaysia

    Dr. Ir. G Balamurugan

    ERE Consulting Group Sdn Bhd

    www.ere.com.my

    www.ere.com.my

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    2/18

    2

    www.ere.com.my

    www.ere.com.my

    www.ere.com.my

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    3/18

    3

    www.ere.com.my

    www.ere.com.my

    www.ere.com.my

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    4/18

    4

    www.ere.com.my

    www.ere.com.my

    Dilemma

    Every project, no matter how well conceived ortechnically sound, will hurt or be perceived tohurt some interest or member of the public.

     And every member of the public has “veto

     power”, i.e. the ability to stop or seriously delay

    a project.

    www.ere.com.my

    Frustration

    We are trying to implement an infrastructureproject that will benefit the people..

    yet these people see us as their enemies.Ungrateful #&%$#@(

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    5/18

    5

    www.ere.com.my

    Typical Controversial Projects

    • Incinerators & landfills

    • Roads

    • Dams

    • Ports, marina & coastal defence

    • LRT / MRT

    • Housing, townships, cemetery, etc

    www.ere.com.my

    Controversy causes :

    • Project delays

    • Cost over-runs

    • Tarnishes proponent’s reputation

    • Increases scrutiny over project

    • Loss of government credibility

    • Essential infrastructure projects are stalled –therefore original problem remains unsolved

    www.ere.com.my

    Whenever there are

    public protests, projectsare scrutinized in greaterdetail :

    •Detailed EIA

    •Public review of projectdocuments

    •Independent expert opinions

    •Banks, insurance companies

    More scrutiny means more delaysand greater costs

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    6/18

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    7/18

    7

    www.ere.com.my

    Challenging

    Will not completely eliminaterisks

    www.ere.com.my

    Perceived level of credibility / trust

    • Non-governmental organizations

    • Scientists/ academics

    • Media

    • Trade unions, etc

    • Government - Federal- Local

    • Private companies

    www.ere.com.my

    1.

    Engage stakeholders

    strategically

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    8/18

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    9/18

    9

    www.ere.com.my

    www.ere.com.my

    2.

    Engagement must be continuous

    www.ere.com.my

    Engage Engage Engage

    Feasibility Design Construction

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    10/18

    10

    Close the loop

    INFORM

    FEEDBACK

    REVIEW

    INFORM

    FEEDBACK

    REVIEW

     Always follow up. It isdamaging to credibility if thereis no follow up withparticipants on decisionsmade in response to theirconcerns

    3.

    Provide appropriate informationcommunicate, communicate, communicate

    www.ere.com.my

    Stakeholders have varyinginformation needs

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    11/18

    11

    Provide information that allow stakeholdersunderstand your projects

    The need for the projectPolicy contextWhat problem it will solveHow it will benefit the stakeholdersHow it has been planned

    Project schedule (how long construction)Impacts, compensation, etc

    Provide informationthat allow stakeholdersunderstand yourprojects

    www.ere.com.my

    4.

    Demonstrate planning efforts

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    12/18

    12

    www.ere.com.my

    MRT Alignment Options

    Segment B1: Jalan BatuTiga to Tropicana

    Medical Centre

    Segment B2: Jalan

    Duta to Warisan

    www.ere.com.my

    5.

    Demonstrate technical basis

    www.ere.com.my

    • Demonstrate the sound technical basis.

     A sound logical and technical basis isnecessary to achieve publicconfidence.

    Department policies are not sufficient justification.

    Example : the briefing for NGOs

     Although there will bemorons in the crowd, the

    majority are intelligentpeople

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    13/18

    13

    6.

    Help stakeholders to engage better 

    Provide appropriate informationin an appropriate manner in anappropriate venue

    Date and time must suit localcommunities

    Use local languages / dialectwhere possible

    Provide translators

    Provide ample opportunity to askquestions

    Workshop expenses(travel/accommodation) paid for 

    7.

    Take ownership of the engagement

    process

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    14/18

    14

    Project Owner present at all dialogues [itwould be helpful if the representative can

    also speak well] 

    Senior executives must participate in thedialogues. Show that you are serious

    Do not rely too much on consultants

    www.ere.com.my

    8.

    Participatory planning

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    15/18

    15

    Participatory planning

    Community-mapping

    9.

    Empathy

    Empathy 

    Understand their problems andfrustrations AND demonstratethat you understand.

     Acknowledge past mistakes.

     Acknowledge achievements(e.g. Bundu Tuhan and KiauCCA)

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    16/18

    16

    www.ere.com.my

    10.

    Be aware of rumors

    www.ere.com.my

    • Espionage. Be aware of neighbourhood gossips, forumson the internet, media reports,

    www.ere.com.my

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    17/18

  • 8/13/2019 2 Risk Management

    18/18

    www.ere.com.my

    Thank you