17
1 (15) Tracing Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli O103, O145 and O174 Infections from 1 Farm Residents to Cattle 2 3 4 5 Sirpa Heinikainen, 1 * Tarja Pohjanvirta, 1 Marjut Eklund, 2 Anja Siitonen, 2 Sinikka Pelkonen 1 6 Kuopio Research Unit, Department of Animal Diseases and Food Safety Research, Evira, Finnish 7 Food Safety Authority, P.O. Box 92, 70701 Kuopio, Finland 1 , 8 Enteric Bacteria Laboratory, National Public Health Institute, Mannerheimintie 166, 00300 9 Helsinki, Finland 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 Running title: Tracing non-O157 STEC infections to cattle 16 17 18 19 20 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 21 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland. 22 Phone: +358-20-7724963 Fax: +358-20-7724970. E-mail: [email protected] 23 ACCEPTED Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved. J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.00198-07 JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 5 September 2007 on May 22, 2021 by guest http://jcm.asm.org/ Downloaded from

2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

1 (15)

Tracing Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli O103, O145 and O174 Infections from 1

Farm Residents to Cattle 2

3

4

5

Sirpa Heinikainen,1* Tarja Pohjanvirta,

1 Marjut Eklund,

2 Anja Siitonen,

2 Sinikka Pelkonen

1 6

Kuopio Research Unit, Department of Animal Diseases and Food Safety Research, Evira, Finnish 7

Food Safety Authority, P.O. Box 92, 70701 Kuopio, Finland1, 8

Enteric Bacteria Laboratory, National Public Health Institute, Mannerheimintie 166, 00300 9

Helsinki, Finland2 10

11

12

13

14

15

Running title: Tracing non-O157 STEC infections to cattle 16

17

18

19

20

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 21

Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland. 22

Phone: +358-20-7724963 Fax: +358-20-7724970. E-mail: [email protected]

ACCEPTED

Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.00198-07 JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 5 September 2007

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 2: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

2 (15)

Abstract 24

Severe diarrheal infections caused by shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli O103:H2:stx1:eae-ε:ehx, 25

O145:H28:stx1:eae-γ:ehx (two cases in a family), and O174:H21:stx2c in farm residents were traced 26

to cattle. Molecular methods were applied in the isolation and characterization of the strains. The 27

causative strains were also isolated from cattle samples one or four months later. 28

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 3: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

3 (15)

Text 29

The most common and best-known shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) causing human 30

infections is serotype O157:H7. However, increasing number of other STEC serotypes, especially 31

those of serogroups O26, O103, O111 and O145, are reported to cause severe diseases (9, 25, 26). 32

In cattle, non-O157 STEC are carried by about one third of the animals (20). In the outbreaks, 33

infection vehicle is usually contaminated or undercooked food or water, and person-to-person 34

transmission is often seen within families. In sporadic cases contact to cattle is one of the major risk 35

factors (21). Tracing non-O157 to animals is reported only in a few cases (2, 5). The high 36

prevalence and divergence of non-O157 STECs in cattle and the lack of selective culture media 37

require molecular methods for identifying the causative strain. In the outbreak or trace back 38

situations, the strain characteristics dictates the methodology. In this study, we describe tracing 39

human O103:H2, O145:H28 and O174:H21 STEC infections to cattle farms. 40

41

In Finland, all patients with STEC infection are asked for their connection to cattle farms, and the 42

contact farms are sampled for STEC. During 2003-2006, four human non-O157 STEC cases had 43

contact to cattle farms. A 7-year-old boy living on a farm raising beef cattle (Farm A) was 44

hospitalized with bloody diarrhea. STEC O103:H2:stx1:eae-ε:Ehly was isolated from his stool 45

sample. In a family of five persons living on a dairy farm (Farm B1) both parents had abdominal 46

symptoms and two children were hospitalized with bloody diarrhea. STEC O145:H28:stx1:eae-47

γ:Ehly was isolated from the 5-year-old son and the mother, other fecal samples tested negative for 48

Shiga toxins (Stx). The father also worked on another dairy farm (Farm B2). A man living on a 49

dairy farm (Farm C) had fallen ill with severe watery diarrhea and abdominal pains after cleaning 50

the cowshed with a pressure cleaner. STEC O174:H21:stx2c was isolated from his stool sample. 51

52

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 4: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

4 (15)

The stool samples of the patients were tested for Stx in the local hospitals and the Stx positive fecal 53

cultures were sent to the National Public Health Institute (KTL) for further studies (14, 8). The 54

isolated strains were analyzed for the O:H serotype (14), enterohemolysin (Ehly) production (14), 55

the subtype of the stx (12) and eae genes (11), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profile 56

(11, 28) The data on characteristics including electronic PFGE profiles of the human STEC strains 57

were sent to the Finnish Food Safety Authority (Evira) for comparison with those of the farm 58

isolates. 59

60

Altogether, 303 samples were taken from the four contact farms (Table 1). The first fecal samples 61

were taken within 2-4 weeks after the first symptoms in the families. If the STEC strain causing 62

human infection was recovered from the first samples, samples were taken also from the farm 63

environment, and a risk management plan to reduce spreading of the infection was made. Follow-up 64

fecal and environmental samples were taken after 3-6 months. 65

66

The samples were analyzed for the presence of O103:H2:stx1:eae-ε:ehx (Farm A), 67

O145:H28:stx1:eae-γ:ehx (Farms B1 and B2) and O174:H21:stx2c (Farm C). Instead of analysis for 68

Ehly, the ehx gene encoding it, was searched for (22). Samples were enriched in modified tryptone 69

soy broth with novobiocin supplement (mTSBn) and cultured on sorbitol MacConkey (SMAC) 70

and/or tryptone bile X-glucuronide (TBX) agar plates. For serogroups O103 and O145, 71

immunomagnetic separation (IMS) was made from the enrichment broth according to the 72

manufacturer's (Dynal Biotech, Smestad, Norway) instructions. From all primary culture plates stx1, 73

stx2, eae, ehx and saa genes were detected by multiplex PCR (22). The last samples from Farm A 74

and samples from Farm B1 were also analyzed by PCR to detect serogroup specific genes for O103 75

and O145, respectively (24). In the O174 case, the stx2 positive colonies were first recognized by 76

PCR or colony hybridization and after the isolation were O serotyped. Of all strains, the O 77

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 5: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

5 (15)

serogroup was confirmed by agglutination with antisera. The flagellar H antigens and stx2 subtypes 78

were determined by PCR-RFLP of the fliC or stx2 gene, respectively (10, 7). The eae gene was 79

subtyped by PCR (7). XbaI-PFGE was performed following the PulseNet protocol (28). To 80

overcome DNA degradation of the O174 strains, the electrophoresis was run in HEPES buffer (19). 81

82

All of the three causative STEC strains were isolated from cattle’s fecal samples in the first 83

sampling (Table 1). The isolates were considered as causative STEC strains if they were 84

indistinguishable by their pheno- and genotypic characteristics from the corresponding human 85

isolates (Figure 1). The causative strains were isolated from environmental samples only once 86

(Farm A). None of the feed samples tested positive for the stx genes in PCR. All farms had also stx 87

positive fecal samples not corresponding with the human strains, which indicates multiple STEC 88

strains present in the cattle, but not causing disease in the residents of these farms. 89

90

In Farm A, the causative strain O103:H2:stx1:eae-ε:ehx (Figure 1) was isolated with IMS from six 91

of the first fecal samples in May and one of the environmental (drinking cup) samples in June 92

(Table 1). In October, a closely related STEC O103:H2:stx1:eae-ε:ehx strain with only one band 93

difference in the PFGE profile compared to the causative strain (Figure 1) was isolated by colony 94

hybridization from one environmental sample from a calf feed alley. It is likely that the difference 95

in PFGE profile was due to the causative O103 STEC strain changing over the time. stx1 or stx2 96

genes were detected in 95% (19 of 20 samples) of the fecal samples in May and in 33% (5/15) of 97

the environmental samples in June. In October, one of the four pooled fecal (prevalence less than 98

25%) and one of the 18 environmental (6%) samples were stx positive. 99

100

In Farm B1, the causative STEC strain O145:H28:stx1:eae-γ:ehx (Figure 1) was isolated with IMS 101

from one of the three pooled fecal samples in the first sampling in February (Table 1). The strain 102

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 6: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

6 (15)

was not recovered from subsequent samples in March and September. The strain was not recovered 103

from Farm B2. At Farm B1 in individual fecal samples stx genes were detected in 3% (1/33) in 104

March and in 33% (9/27) in September. In the environmental samples stx genes were detected in 105

0% (0/22) in March and 8% (2/26) in September. 106

107

In Farm B1, the father who was working with cattle was the first one to fell ill. Subsequently, 5-108

year-old son, mother and 4-year-old daughter developed symptoms and STEC O145 strain was 109

isolated from the son and the mother. STEC O145 identical with the human strains was isolated 110

from cattle at the family’s home farm. It is possible that the original transmission was from the 111

cattle to the father and the infection spread within the family through person-to-person contact. In 112

our previous study we found that one third of all STEC infections were secondary infections within 113

families (13). Although the STEC strain was isolated only from two family members it is possible 114

that all four persons with symptoms were infected with the same strain. In the follow-up samples 115

one month and six moths later the causative strain was no longer detectable in the farm, suggesting 116

transient colonization of STEC O145 in the cattle. The fact that STEC O145 still is one of the most 117

common serogroups infecting humans (29) but is only occasionally isolated from cattle (8, 17) 118

might be associated with its transient nature. Based on this, it is important to take the fecal samples 119

as soon as possible in trace back situations 120

121

In Farm C, the causative strain O174:H21:stx2c (Figure 1) was isolated from one animal in the first 122

sampling in June. Also a strain of STEC O174:H21:stx2c with a four-band difference in PFGE 123

profile was isolated from the same animal (Figure 1). The causative strain was not isolated from any 124

of the samples taken in July. In October, the causative strain was again isolated from an other 125

animal, but not from the environmental samples. Fecal samples positive for stx genes varied from 126

61% (11/18) in the first sampling in June, to 4% (1/26) in July and 26% (9/35) in October (Table 1). 127

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 7: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

7 (15)

From the environmental samples stx genes were detected in 4% (1/23) in July and 6% (1/18) in 128

October. In previous longitudinal study on a dairy farm, we detected a STEC O174:H21 strain with 129

a virulence gene and PFGE profile identical with the human strain in this study. The strain persisted 130

on the farm for one year with unchanged PFGE profile (S. Heinikainen, V. Seppänen, T. 131

Pohjanvirta, and S. Pelkonen, Abstr. Verocytotoxigenic E. coli in Europe. Epidemiology of 132

Verocytotoxigenic E. coli., abstr. 134, 2001). This particular STEC O174:H21 clonal line may be 133

persistent in the cattle and difficult to eradicate from the farm. In Farm C, the causative strain was 134

not observed in the samples taken after one month from the first samples, but was again isolated 135

three months later. The O174 strain might have persisted on the farm even for years, before the 136

cleaning of the cowshed with a pressure cleaner exposed the farmer to the causative strain in 137

numbers enough to lead in symptomatic infection. 138

139

Specific PCR methods (1, 4, 6, 7, 10, 15, 22, 24) and IMS (23, 30) are a powerful help when certain 140

characteristics, including virulence-associated genes, O antigens etc. must be screened. However, 141

IMS is currently available only for the most common STEC serogroups O26, O103, O111, O145 142

and O157. For O174, no specific PCR or IMS were available. Thus, the only virulence gene that 143

could be detected from the mixed cultures was stx2 as the causative strain was negative for eae and 144

ehx. The recently published O174 specific PCR (6) helps in screening for STEC of this serogroup. 145

The final trace back of the causative strains to cattle was made by PFGE, which is considered the 146

golden standard for genetic comparison of the outbreak related STEC strains (3, 16). 147

148

Detection of non-O157 STEC bacteria still remains a challenge for diagnosing of human infections 149

and monitoring the prevalence of STEC in cattle. This study shows that there are already good 150

methods available to trace back particular STEC infections to farms. To our experience, the most 151

efficient method for the strain isolation is IMS together with specific PCRs to detect O serogroup 152

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 8: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

8 (15)

and virulence factors. For samples with low numbers of STEC bacteria, or if IMS is not available, 153

colony hybridization increases the strain isolation efficiency. 154

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 9: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

9 (15)

Reference List 155

156

1. Adu-Bobie, J., G. Frankel, C. Bain, A. G. Goncalves, L. R. Trabulsi, G. Douce, S. 157

Knutton, and G. Dougan. 1998. Detection of intimins alpha, beta, gamma, and delta, four 158

intimin derivatives expressed by attaching and effacing microbial pathogens. J. Clin. 159

Microbiol. 36:662-668. 160

2. Allerberger, F., A. W. Friedrich, K. Grif, M. P. Dierich, H. J. Dornbusch, C. J. Mache, 161

E. Nachbaur, M. Freilinger, P. Rieck, M. Wagner, A. Caprioli, H. Karch, and L. B. 162

Zimmerhackl. 2003. Hemolytic-uremic syndrome associated with enterohemorrhagic 163

Escherichia coli O26:H infection and consumption of unpasteurized cow's milk. Int. J. Infect. 164

Dis. 7:42-45. 165

3. Barrett, T. J., P. Gerner-Smidt, and B. Swaminathan. 2006. Interpretation of pulsed-field 166

gel electrophoresis patterns in foodborne disease investigations and surveillance. Foodborne 167

Pathog. Dis. 3:20-31. 168

4. Bastian, S. N., I. Carle, and F. Grimont. 1998. Comparison of 14 PCR systems for the 169

detection and subtyping of stx genes in Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Res. 170

Microbiol. 149:457-472. 171

5. Beutin, L., M. Bulte, A. Weber, S. Zimmermann, and K. Gleier. 2000. Investigation of 172

human infections with verocytotoxin-producing strains of Escherichia coli (VTEC) belonging 173

to serogroup O118 with evidence for zoonotic transmission. Epidemiol. Infect. 125:47-54. 174

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 10: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

10 (15)

6. Beutin, L., Q. Kong, L. Feng, Q. Wang, G. Krause, L. Leomil, Q. Jin, and L. Wang. 175

2005. Development of PCR assays targeting the genes involved in synthesis and assembly of 176

the new Escherichia coli O174 and O177 O antigens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5143-5149. 177

7. Blanco, J. E., M. Blanco, M. P. Alonso, A. Mora, G. Dahbi, M. A. Coira, and J. Blanco. 178

2004. Serotypes, virulence genes, and intimin types of Shiga toxin (verotoxin)-producing 179

Escherichia coli isolates from human patients: prevalence in Lugo, Spain, from 1992 through 180

1999. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:311-319. 181

8. Blanco, M., S. Schumacher, T. Tasara, C. Zweifel, J. E. Blanco, G. Dahbi, J. Blanco, and 182

R. Stephan. 2005. Serotypes, intimin variants and other virulence factors of eae positive 183

Escherichia coli strains isolated from healthy cattle in Switzerland. Identification of a new 184

intimin variant gene (eae-eta2). BMC. Microbiol. 5:23. 185

9. Brooks, J. T., E. G. Sowers, J. G. Wells, K. D. Greene, P. M. Griffin, R. M. Hoekstra, 186

and N. A. Strockbine. 2005. Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Infections 187

in the United States, 1983-2002. J. Infect. Dis. 192:1422-1429. 188

10. De Baets, L., I. Van der Taelen, M. De Filette, D. Pierard, L. Allison, H. De Greve, J. P. 189

Hernalsteens, and H. Imberechts. 2004. Genetic typing of shiga toxin 2 variants of 190

Escherichia coli by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Appl. Environ. 191

Microbiol. 70:6309-6314. 192

11. Eklund, M., M. Bielaszewska, U. M. Nakari, H. Karch, and A. Siitonen. 2006. Molecular 193

and phenotypic profiling of sorbitol-fermenting Escherichia coli O157:H- human isolates 194

from Finland. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:634-641. 195

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 11: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

11 (15)

12. Eklund, M., K. Leino, and A. Siitonen. 2002. Clinical Escherichia coli strains carrying stx 196

genes: stx variants and stx-positive virulence profiles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4585-4593. 197

13. Eklund, M., J. P. Nuorti, P. Ruutu, and A. Siitonen. 2005. Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli 198

(STEC) infections in Finland during 1998-2002: a population-based surveillance study. 199

Epidemiol. Infect. 133:845-852. 200

14. Eklund, M., F. Scheutz, and A. Siitonen. 2001. Clinical isolates of non-O157 Shiga toxin-201

producing Escherichia coli: serotypes, virulence characteristics, and molecular profiles of 202

strains of the same serotype. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2829-2834. 203

15. Fratamico, P. M., C. E. Briggs, D. Needle, C. Y. Chen, and C. Debroy. 2003. Sequence of 204

the Escherichia coli O121 O-antigen gene cluster and detection of enterohemorrhagic 205

Escherichia coli O121 by PCR amplification of the wzx and wzy genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 206

41:3379-3383. 207

16. Gerner-Smidt, P., J. Kincaid, K. Kubota, K. Hise, S. B. Hunter, M. A. Fair, D. Norton, 208

A. Woo-Ming, T. Kurzynski, M. J. Sotir, M. Head, K. Holt, and B. Swaminathan. 2005. 209

Molecular surveillance of shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 by PulseNet USA. J. Food 210

Prot. 68:1926-1931. 211

17. Geue, L., M. Segura-Alvarez, F. J. Conraths, T. Kuczius, J. Bockemuhl, H. Karch, and 212

P. Gallien. 2002. A long-term study on the prevalence of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia 213

coli (STEC) on four German cattle farms. Epidemiol. Infect. 129:173-185. 214

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 12: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

12 (15)

18. Keskimäki, M., M. Saari, T. Heiskanen, and A. Siitonen. 1998. Shiga toxin-producing 215

Escherichia coli in Finland from 1990 through 1997: prevalence and characteristics of 216

isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3641-3646. 217

19. Koort, J. M., S. Lukinmaa, M. Rantala, E. Unkila, and A. Siitonen. 2002. Technical 218

improvement to prevent DNA degradation of enteric pathogens in pulsed-field gel 219

electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3497-3498. 220

20. Naylor, S. W., D. L. Gally, and J. C. Low. 2005. Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli in 221

veterinary medicine. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 295:419-441. 222

21. O'Brien, S. J., G. K. Adak, and C. Gilham. 2001. Contact with farming environment as a 223

major risk factor for Shiga toxin (Vero cytotoxin)-producing Escherichia coli O157 infection 224

in humans. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:1049-1051. 225

22. Paton, A. W. and J. C. Paton. 2002. Direct detection and characterization of Shiga toxigenic 226

Escherichia coli by multiplex PCR for stx1, stx2, eae, ehxA, and saa. J. Clin. Microbiol. 227

40:271-274. 228

23. Pearce, M. C., C. Jenkins, L. Vali, A. W. Smith, H. I. Knight, T. Cheasty, H. R. Smith, G. 229

J. Gunn, M. E. Woolhouse, S. G. Amyes, and G. Frankel. 2004. Temporal shedding 230

patterns and virulence factors of Escherichia coli serogroups O26, O103, O111, O145, and 231

O157 in a cohort of beef calves and their dams. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1708-1716. 232

24. Perelle, S., F. Dilasser, J. Grout, and P. Fach. 2004. Detection by 5'-nuclease PCR of 233

Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli O26, O55, O91, O103, O111, O113, O145 and 234

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 13: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

13 (15)

O157:H7, associated with the world's most frequent clinical cases. Mol. Cell Probes 18:185-235

192. 236

25. Pradel, N., K. Boukhors, Y. Bertin, C. Forestier, C. Martin, and V. Livrelli. 2001. 237

Heterogeneity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from hemolytic-238

uremic syndrome patients, cattle, and food samples in central France. Appl. Environ. 239

Microbiol. 67:2460-2468. 240

26. Prager, R., S. Annemuller, and H. Tschäpe. 2005. Diversity of virulence patterns among 241

shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from human clinical cases-need for more detailed 242

diagnostics. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 295:29-38. 243

27. Prager, R., U. Strutz, A. Fruth, and H. Tschäpe. 2003. Subtyping of pathogenic 244

Escherichia coli strains using flagellar (H)-antigens: serotyping versus fliC polymorphisms. 245

Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 292:477-486. 246

28. Ribot, E. M., M. A. Fair, R. Gautom, D. N. Cameron, S. B. Hunter, B. Swaminathan, 247

and T. J. Barrett. 2006. Standardization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for the 248

subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet. Foodborne 249

Pathog. Dis. 3:59-67. 250

29. Sonntag, A. K., R. Prager, M. Bielaszewska, W. Zhang, A. Fruth, H. Tschäpe, and H. 251

Karch. 2004. Phenotypic and genotypic analyses of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O145 252

strains from patients in Germany. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:954-962. 253

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 14: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

14 (15)

30. Tutenel, A. V., D. Pierard, D. Vandekerchove, H. J. Van, and Z. L. De. 2003. Sensitivity 254

of methods for the isolation of Escherichia coli O157 from naturally infected bovine faeces. 255

Vet. Microbiol. 94:341-346. 256

257

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 15: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

15 (15)

Figure legends 258

259

Figure 1 260

PFGE profiles of the human and cattle STEC isolates. Lanes: M, molecular weight control S. 261

Braenderup H9812; 1, human O103 isolate; 2, farm A O103 isolate in May; 3, farm A O103 isolate 262

in June; 4, farm A O103 isolate in October; 5, human O145 isolate; 6, farm B1 O145 isolate in 263

February; 7, human O174 isolate; 8 and 9, farm C O174 isolates in June; 10, farm C O174 isolates 264

in October. 265

ACCEPTED

on May 22, 2021 by guest

http://jcm.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 16: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

1 (1)

Table 1. Isolation of the causative STEC strains from the contact farms.

No. of samples

causative strain isolated / total (stx positive primary culture) Causative human

STEC strain

Farm

Sampling

month Cattle fecal,

individual

(n = 159)

Cattle fecal,

pooleda

(n = 17)

Environment

(n = 122)

Feed

(n = 5)

May 6 / 20 (19)

June 1 / 15 (5) 0 / 1 (0)

O103:H2

stx1:eae-ε:ehx

Farm A

October 0 / 4 (1) 0b / 18 (1)

February 1 / 3 (1)

March 0 / 33 (1) 0 / 4 (0) 0 / 22 (0) 0 / 3 (0)

O145:H28

stx1:eae-γ:ehx

Farm B1

September 0 / 27 (9) 0 / 3 (1) 0 / 26 (2)

Farm B2 February 0 / 2 (2)

June 1c / 18 (11)

July 0 / 26 (1) 0 / 1 (0) 0 / 23 (1) 0 / 1 (0)

O174:H21

stx2c

Farm C

October 1 / 35 (9) 0 / 18 (1)

a From 3-13 animals

b A strain related (a one-band difference in PFGE) to the causative strain was recovered

c An additional O174 strain with a four-band difference in PFGE with the causative strain was recovered

ACCEPTED on M

ay 22, 2021 by guesthttp://jcm

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 17: 2 Farm Residents to Cattle ACCEPTED...2007/09/05  · 21 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Kuopio Research 22 Unit, P.O. Box 92, FI-70701

1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10 MMM

Figure 1

ACCEPTED on M

ay 22, 2021 by guesthttp://jcm

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from