21
ERCOT’s Experiences in Using ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in State Estimation Murali Boddeti, Diran Obadina, Freddy Garcia, N. D. R. Sarma, Yang Wu*, Venkata Kanduri Kanduri El ti R li bilit C il f T I Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. *Alstom Grid IEEE PES Panel session on ‘State Estimation Pseudo Measurements’ July 2011, Detroit

2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

ERCOT’s Experiences in Using ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in State

EstimationMurali Boddeti, Diran Obadina, Freddy

Garcia, N. D. R. Sarma, Yang Wu*, Venkata KanduriKanduri

El t i R li bilit C il f T IElectric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.*Alstom Grid

IEEE PES Panel session on‘State Estimation Pseudo Measurements’

July 2011, Detroit

Page 2: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

ERCOT - Introduction

Single Interconnection, with no synchronous ties to any other region in North America

Responsible for all transmission equipment operating at 60 kV and above (69, 138, 345 kV)

Five DC Ties to external regions Five DC Ties to external regionso 1 in North Texas, 1 in East Texas, 3 to Mexico

Utilizes Alstom’s EMS for its Real-Time Network Security Analysis applications

Facilitates competitive markets to help achieve reliabilityreliability

Operates as Nodal Market as of 1st Dec, 2010

2

Page 3: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

About ERCOT

85% f T l d 85% of Texas load 550 generating units, ~6000 buses; ~7000 branches Peak demand: 65778 MW (08/23/2010) Peak demand: 65778 MW (08/23/2010)Wind capacity: 9500 MWWind generation record: 7355 MW (06-19-2011), d ge e at o eco d 355 (06 9 0 ),

~15% of load at that time

3

Page 4: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

ERCOT

4

Page 5: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

KEY SE Role

Filters redundant real time measurements –eliminates incorrect measurements

Produces a Real Time Network modelo Allows determination of power flows in areas not directly

meteredo Used for real time monitoringo Used for real time Market and congestion managemento Used to uncover potential operational problems related to n-1o Used to uncover potential operational problems related to n-1

security, voltage and transient stability

Results used for adapting the load parameterso Used for Day-Ahead Market and other forward marketso Off-line power flows and stability studies

5

Page 6: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

ERCOT SE

Conventional State Estimator , i.e., RT modeling decomposed into (1) Processing statuses of

it h (2) P i f l d t iswitches (2) Processing of analog data, given network topology and parameters

Uses MW/MVAR, KV, tap. Uses MW/MVAR, KV, tap. Executes periodically (5 mins); on demand; or grid

event RT measurements collected via ICCP links with TSPs

every 10 secs Network observability of over 99% Network observability of over 99% Measurement redundancy of about 2.0

6

Page 7: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

ERCOT SE

Unobservable buses result from– Temporary loss of ICCP link– Temporary loss of measurement point (from the RTU)– Unavailable/inadequate measurements

Unavailable/inadequate measurements typically at lower KV level (69KV); typically affecting radial lines and tap loadsp

SE extended to unobservable buses through the addition of Pseudo measurements

Challenge is to avoid corrupting the states estimated from telemetry

7

Page 8: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

Handling Temporary Loss of Telemetered Data

Continue to use old telemetered values for a configurable number of SE executions

l ( l i t )cycles(several minutes)

Progressively reduced measurement confidence Progressively reduced measurement confidence values (increased measurement variance)

Stale measurements subsequently dropped and replaced with pseudo measurements based on load predictions and generation schedulespredictions and generation schedules

8

Page 9: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

Pseudo Measurements

Calculated based on telemetered valueso Predefined Calculated point in SCADA (RTMONI)

C (C C )o Topology-based Calculated Point (CALCM)

Load Schedules Load Schedules

Operator Overrides

9

Page 10: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

RTMONI Calculation

Short-term SCADA calculation tool

Used until the telemetry is available at calculated Used until the telemetry is available at calculated point

Can be defined online without DB load

Ease of use made a tool for pseudo measurement Ease of use made a tool for pseudo measurement modeling by the shift engineer

10

Page 11: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

RTMONI Calculation

Fig1 Example without RTMONI CalculationsFig1. Example without RTMONI Calculations

11

Page 12: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

RTMONI Calculation

Fig2. Example with RTMONI Calculations

12

Page 13: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

CALCM Function

Addition of calculated measurements using network topology information

Accurate than RTMONI

13

Page 14: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

CALCM Function

Fig 4: CALCM Calculations

14

Page 15: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

Load Schedules

Classified into various weather zones in Texas Conforming and non conforming classification Conforming and non-conforming classification Used as pseudo measurement when telemetry

is unavailable Adapted in real-time with SE results Adapted parameters used in study applications

and foward marketsand foward markets

15

Page 16: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

Load Schedules

16

Fig 6: Load Schedules and Bus Load Forecast

Page 17: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

Operator Overrides

Breaker and Switch status Analog values

17

Page 18: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

Measurement Relative Confidence Values -

Zero Injection Bus 0.001

True measurement 0.01

Pseudo Measurement 0.1

Stale measurement 0 01*3K (K=SE execution Stale measurement 0.01*3K (K=SE execution count since declared stale)

18

Page 19: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

Conclusions

Pseudo Measurements used to extend SE solution to unobservable parts of the networko Derived from load predictions & generation p g

scheduleso Derived as calculations from telemetry

Operator entryo Operator entry Old measurements used to maintain

observability in the event of temporary loss of telemetry

Appropriate confidence factor weightings used to avoid corrupting states estimated from p gtelemetry data

19

Page 20: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

Questions ?

20

Page 21: 2 ERCOT’s Experiences in Using Pseudo Measurements in

21