Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2 - Deformation of mantle minerals
Les Houches 2018
2
Seismic data mantle structure and flow
horizontal shear waves velocities anisotropy (direction and amplitude)
Yuan and Beghein, 2013
Les Houches 2018
3
A multiscale problem
Ando et al, Nature, 2007
B. Reynard
rock
atomic
regional
103 km < 10-10 m
crystal
planet
Deformation and transformation processes span 10-9 s to 108 Yr
Les Houches 2018
4
q Deformation 101
q Agents of deformation at crystal scale ?
q Consequences on physical properties « Viscosity »
Preferred orientations and seismic velocities
q Experimental tools for HP deformation
q Where we stand for mantle minerals
q Deformation of multi-phase aggregates
Les Houches 2018
Deformation 101
Les Houches 2018
6
generic macroscopic case
Société Francophone des Biomatériaux Dentaires (SFBD) elastic deformation: linear and reversible
stress proportional to deformation : material elasticity, with E Young’s modulus, σ = E ε
σ
ε
Les Houches 2018
7
<- flow stress depends on T, P, microstructure, f(O2)…
Société Francophone des Biomatériaux Dentaires (SFBD) plastic deformation: non linear, irreversible
permanent deformation
σ = F/S
ε = ΔL/L0
generic macroscopic case
Les Houches 2018
8
P/T effects on rheology
T increase
P increase
Les Houches 2018
9
rock = polycrystal
What controls the macroscopic behavior ...?
Ando et al, Nature, 2007
Les Houches 2018
10
rock = polycrystal l individual crystals l grain boundaries l microstructure
l grain size(s) l grain orientations l grain shapes
l contrasts in mineral properties…. Ando et al, Nature, 2007
Les Houches 2018
What are the agents of deformation at the crystal and polycrystal scale ? Resulting physical properties ?
Les Houches 2018
12
Crystals deform through the motion of lattice defects
direct deformation: • many chemical bonds to break • energetically not favorable • high stress
S.Merkel Les Houches 2018
13
physics of worms l Let's consider a worm...
l This how they do...
crystals do the same...
Move all legs forward ? High energy cost.
S.Merkel Les Houches 2018
14
Crystals deform through the motion of lattice defects
Les Houches 2018
15
Point defects:
vacancy interstitial substitution
Mobility : diffusion
Rheoman.eu / Multiscale modeling of the mantle rheology, 2018, eds. P. Cordier, A. Goryaeva.
Les Houches 2018
16
Dislocation
Dislocations
Movie ref.: Kasher and Roberston, Acta Mater. 2012
Creep, in-situ
Les Houches 2018
17
dislocations q dislocation = linear defect
“line” in the crystal structure
q moves under the effect of a shear stress
q moves parallel to crystallographic plane(s) (more or less)
q Displacement prop. to some interatomic distance (Burgers vector)
shear stress
slip plane
edge dislocation
line
REF
Les Houches 2018
18
slip plane and directions depend on the structure
rule of thumb q Slip direction: short translation in the lattice q Slip plane: dense packing plane
example: MgO
MgO crystal structure
½<110> slip
½<110> slip in {100}, {110} or {111}
Which dislocation ?
Les Houches 2018
19
Dislocation climb
à Diffusion-mediated (high T)
Rheoman.eu / Multiscale modeling of the mantle rheology, 2018, eds. P. Cordier, A. Goryaeva.
Les Houches 2018
20
…multiple mechanisms:
l intra-granular - ‘Atomic’ diffusion (red arrows) - dislocation glide (blue edges) - dislocation climb (mediated by
diffusion)
l grain boundaries - diffusion (red arrows) - disclinations (spirals) - dislocation assisted boundary
sliding (green arrows, +planar defects)
- diffusion assisted boundary sliding
picture S. Merkel
Les Houches 2018
Consequences on microstructure and on physical properties
‘viscosity’
Les Houches 2018
22
Resulting properties: constitutive laws, from deformation to stress
!ε = !ε(P,T ,d ,COH ,...) ??????
Les Houches 2018
23
Deformation to stress: constitutive laws
!ε = Aσ ne−QRT
!ε = Aσ nd − pCOHe−E+PV*RT
activation energy
stress exponent
activation energy E activation volume V*
grain size exponent
!ε = Ae−ERT
1− στ
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟p⎡
⎣
⎢⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥⎥
q
Low temperature
Under pressure
Peierls stress
Les Houches 2018
24
Deformation to stress: constitutive laws
!ε = Aσ nd − pCOHe−E+PV*RT
Olivine dislocation creep, Mei and Kohlstedt 2000
Les Houches 2018
25
Deformation to stress: constitutive laws
!ε = Aσ nd − pCOHe−E+PV*RT
Olivine dislocation and diffusion creep, Mei and Kohlstedt 2000
Les Houches 2018
26
association of plastic mechanisms
in series
in parallel
e.g. grain boundary sliding + dislocation creep
Les Houches 2018
27
Why n=3 or how to build a constitutive law
Strain produced by a density ρ of dislocations with b burgers vector, moving a distance x :
Les Houches 2018
28
Why n=3 or how to build a constitutive law
Strain produced by a density ρ of dislocations with b burgers vector, moving a distance x :
ε = ρbx
!ε = ρbvρ ≈σGb⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
2
constant (steady state) àwith v velocity
!ε∝σ 3v ≈ vC ∝σ
Weertman 1999: if dislocation climb + glide operate in series, and slower process is climb
à
Les Houches 2018
29
Exponents vs. deformation mechanisms
l Diffusion dominated regime - p > 0 - n ≈ 1 - newtonian viscosity, function of d and T
l Dislocation creep dominated regime - p ≈ 0 - n ≈ 2-5 - non-linear viscosity, depends on σ and T
l Grain boundary sliding - p ≈ 2 - n ≈ 2
Viscosity
Les Houches 2018
30
association of plastic mechanisms
in series
in parallel
e.g. grain boundary sliding + dislocation creep
Les Houches 2018
31
deformation maps dominant deformation mechanism, depending on external conditions
parameters: stress temperature grain size strain rate pressure…
several mechanisms can be active at the same time
Frost and Ashby, Deformation-Mechanism Maps
Les Houches 2018
32
When looking at experimental flow laws in the literature, keep in mind
• conditions under which they have been measured (P, T, ε, d, composition)
• several mechanisms may act concurrently - microstructural understanding (characterisation) is a must have for use of a flow law, and a fortiori for extrapolation
Les Houches 2018
33
Further consequences of pressure : the famous “a-slip to c-slip switch” in olivine slip systems
Les Houches 2018
34
Further consequences of pressure : the famous “a-slip to c-slip switch” in olivine slip systems
a
b
c
b
a
c
J. Durinck, P. Cordier
shear along <a> in (010)
shear along <c> in (010)
Les Houches 2018
Consequences on microstructure and on physical properties preferred orientations and seismic velocities
Les Houches 2018
36
Olivine (Mg,Fe)SiO4
P wave velocity 0 GPa – 300 K
Anisotropy: single crystal
Stereographic projection:
S. Merkel Les Houches 2018
37
Bridgmanite Single crystal anisotropy in both Vp and Vs about 8 % at 1000 km prof., 13 % at 2500 km.
D. Mainprice: Seismic anisotropy in the deep earth from a mineral and rock physics perspective, in Treatise on geophysics, vol.2, 2007 Images : Rheoman.eu / Multiscale modeling of the mantle rheology, 2018, eds. P. Cordier, A. Goryaeva.
Les Houches 2018
38
Bridgmanite single crystal at 88 GPa and 2000K
D. Mainprice: Seismic anisotropy in the deep earth from a mineral and rock physics perspective, in Treatise on geophysics, vol.2, 2007
Les Houches 2018
39
Post-perovskite Single crystal anisotropy in Vp 15% and Vs 22% at 120 GPa.
D. Mainprice: Seismic anisotropy in the deep earth from a mineral and rock physics perspective, in Treatise on geophysics, vol.2, 2007 Images : Rheoman.eu / Multiscale modeling of the mantle rheology, 2018, eds. P. Cordier, A. Goryaeva.
Les Houches 2018
40
D. Mainprice: Seismic anisotropy in the deep earth from a mineral and rock physics perspective, in Treatise on geophysics, vol.2, 2007
Post-perovskite single crystal
Les Houches 2018
41
No preferred orientations Random fabric Anisotropies of each crystal cancel each other
Anisotropy : polycrystal
Les Houches 2018 S. Merkel
42
Plastic deformation Dislocation glide Grain rotations Non-random crystal orientations
olivine ex. of slip system
Anisotropy: plastic deformation
Les Houches 2018 S. Merkel
43 Les Houches 2018 S. Merkel
Experimental tools for deformation
Les Houches 2018
45
high-pressure deformation tools
No stress probe available / large frictions above 2 GPa
Early 2000: new deformation apparatus needed, solid pressure medium + new measurement « device » needed….
Griggs, Heard, Paterson…
Deformation-Dia (2003)
Rotational Drickamer (RDA, 2001)
D T-cup (2010?)
DAC
geot
herm
Multi-anvil
Les Houches 2018
46
Diamond anvil cells
Les Houches 2018
images S. Merkel
q Highest pressure tool (to lower mantle, core conditions)
q Sample sizes: 100’s microns x 10’s microns
q Laser heat, resistive heat: large T range
q « uncontrolled » deformation
few 100 microns
47
Large volume presses q Lower pressures q Larger samples ! larger grain sizes possible q Smaller T gradients q Control H2O, f(O2) q (easier) decoupling of
deformation from pressure (constant V) Durham et al, 2002
D-Dia
Les Houches 2018
48
Les Houches 2018
ESRF ID06-LVP
49
Highest pressures and shear geometry
Nishiyama et al, 2008,
Kawazoe et al, 2009
Experimental cell for RDA Yamazaki and Karato, Rev Sci Instr (2001)
Rotational Drickamer (RDA): opposed anvils D-Dia double-stage
Les Houches 2018
50
Measuring stresses under high pressure ?
Coupling high pressure tools with synchrotron radiation: in-situ measures
Inc. X rays
ψ
Inc. X rays
ψq Transparent anvils (sintered
diamonds, cBN, …) q Transparent high pressure
cell (amorphous boron – epoxy, graphite furnace, hBN…)
Compres.us
Wang et al. 2003
Les Houches 2018
51
D-Dia typical cell assemblies
1.6 mm 2.0 mm
Boron + epoxy
1.2 mm
crushable alumina
densified alumina
BN
graphite
1.2 mm
Sample
thermocouple
buffer rod (Vp, Vs)
Les Houches 2018
52
radiography for strain in-situ
Time (s)
Str
ain
(% (
dε/dt=2.7 10-6 s-1
dε/dt=1.7 10-5 s-1
Metal sheets above and below P = 7 GPa T = 1673 K
pictures P. Raterron
Les Houches 2018
53
diffraction for stress in-situ
nλ = 2dsinθ
www.hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu
Les Houches 2018
54
diffraction for stress in-situ polycrystal diffraction of monochromatic x-rays
nλ = 2dsinθ
Les Houches 2018
55
diffraction for stress in-situ
figure S. Merkel
Les Houches 2018
56
diffraction for stress in-situ Unrolled pattern (« cake »)
Measures: • isotropic part σP • t = σ1-σ3
elastic theory, Sing et al, 1998, Uchida et al, 1996
Les Houches 2018
57
diffraction for stress in-situ
q lattice strains: for each diffraction plane, a « stress » measure
macroscopic stress … ? not straigthforward ! Some tools exist but still no satisfactory way to have « absolute » stress measurements.
Les Houches 2018
58
X-ray diffraction for microstructure
peak intensities variations and broadening q preferred orientations
« texture » q microstrains, crystallite size
preferred orientation -> slip systems -> + elastic constants = seismic properties of rocks
inverse pole figure for the maximum compression direction,
assuming cylindrical symmetry olivine at 5GPa, 1600K, strain
11%
Les Houches 2018
59
q Experimental tools exist at the relevant P and T. f(O2), H2O can be (somewhat) controlled.
q Natural strain rates *convection* down to 10-14, 10-16 s-1… : not attainable experimentally.
q Go to natural microstructures
q Models
q Experiments and models need to be validated by geophysical observations and/or geological samples
Les Houches 2018
60
Numerical modeling state of the art : example of MgO
Amodeo et al, 2018 Amodeo et al, 2016 Amodeo et al, 2014
Atomistic calculations Dislocation cores, lattice scale
Dislocation dynamics « DD » Dislocation interactions
crystal scale
Finite elements models polycristal
Great for bridging temporal scales Complex compositions and large unit cells: difficult ! Grain growth, nucleation, … currently not possible
Multiscale modeling of the mantle rheology, 2018, eds. P. Cordier, A. Goryaeva.
Les Houches 2018
Where we stand on mantle minerals (experimental) deformation
Les Houches 2018
62
(non exhaustive) experimental data on mantle minerals deformation
slip systems/deformation mechanisms
controlled deformation experiments
comments
olivine +++ +++ increasingly sophisticated constitutive laws and deformation maps
majorite + +
wadsleyite ++ +(+)
ringwoodite ++ +(+) LVP difficult
bridgmanite ++ (+) DAC most of the stab. field
post-perovskite
++ - DAC only
periclase +++ at ambient PT
++ Commonly investigated in material science
perovskites +++ at ambient PT
+ ? Commonly investigated in material science
Les Houches 2018
63
Wadsleyite deformation map
Farla et al, PCM2015
Les Houches 2018
64
Merkel and Cordier, 2016 in Deep earth: physics and chemistry of the lower mantle and core.
Slip systems in lower mantle minerals
Les Houches 2018
65
Ex. of seismic anisotropy of post-perovskite and D’’
DAC experiments
Wu et al, 2017
Les Houches 2018
66
Ex. of seismic anisotropy of post-perovskite and D’’
-> (001)[100] and [010] or {110} were active
DAC experiments Modeling slip systems
Wu et al, 2017
Les Houches 2018
67
Wu et al, 2017
Shear wave splitting larger than geophysical observations. Other deformation mechanisms which do not produce anisotropy ? - Diffusion ? - Planar defects ? - Second phase ?
Ex. seismic anisotropy of post-perovskite and D’’
Les Houches 2018
Multi-phase deformation
Les Houches 2018
69
load bearing frame interconnected weak layer Handy, 1994
q Which material is the weakest / strongest? q How do stress and strain partition in the phases? q What is the viscosity of the aggregate ?
Dealing with polymineralic deformation
Les Houches 2018
Bridgmanite/perovskite and MgO aggregates:
Les Houches 2018
71
Bridgmanite « strong »
+ periclase « weak »
Marquardt and Miyagi, 2015
q Is MgO weaker or stronger than bridgmanite ? q Which one controls the overall behavior ?
Les Houches 2018
72
elastic and plastic interactions between these phases and microstructural evolution ?
Experiments – Girard et al, 2015, 50% MgO – Kaercher et al, 2015, textures on two
phases analogs
Girard et al, Science 2015
Les Houches 2018
73
Girard et al, Science 2015
Bridgmanite and MgO deformed to large strains in Rotational Drickamer under lower mantle conditions
Les Houches 2018
74
Deformation experiments (D-DIA)
starting material
q Analog for the lower mantle (Mg,Fe)SiO3+(Mg,Fe)O q CaGeO3-pv + MgO two-phase polycrystal (70-30) q CaGeO3-Pv single-phase polycrystal, same P-T-deformation
paths q + unpub. run at strain > 25% 2-phases polycrystal, 1000K.
Les Houches 2018
800K$1000K$
600K$
1200K$
(0.01$
(0.008$
(0.006$
(0.004$
(0.002$
0$
0.002$
0.004$
0.006$
0.008$
0.01$
30$ 50$ 70$ 90$ 110$ 130$ 150$ 170$ 190$
Q(100)$Q(110)$Q(200)$Q(210)$Q(211)$Q(220)$
Textures$CaGePv$D0754$–$maximum$compressive$stress$inverse$pole$figures$$
Q(hkl)$
DiffracLon$#$
001$ 110$
111$
75
800K$1000K$
600K$
1200K$
(0.01$
(0.008$
(0.006$
(0.004$
(0.002$
0$
0.002$
0.004$
0.006$
0.008$
0.01$
30$ 50$ 70$ 90$ 110$ 130$ 150$ 170$ 190$
Q(100)$Q(110)$Q(200)$Q(210)$Q(211)$Q(220)$
Textures$CaGePv$D0754$–$maximum$compressive$stress$inverse$pole$figures$$
Q(hkl)$
DiffracLon$#$
001$ 110$
111$
Pv lattice strains in two-phase sample Wang et al, 2013
Les Houches 2018
76
MgO lattice strains in two-phase sample Wang et al, 2013
Les Houches 2018
77
9(2) GPa, 600 K
Bulk strain, %0 2 4 6 8 10 12
D0748, GePv single phase sampleD0754, GePv two-phased sampleGePv+MgO average in two phased sample
7(2) GPa, 800 K
Bulk strain, %0 2 4 6 8 10
5(1) GPa, 1000 K
Bulk strain, %0 2 4 6 8 10
Diff
eren
tial s
tres
s, G
Pa
0
1
2
3
4
5
GePv in two-phase
composite
Avg. GePv
+MgO
GePv single-phase
Wang, Hilairet et al. G3, 2013
q Two-phase sample stress average calculated with a Taylor approximation (volumetrically weighted average of phase stresses)
q Mechanical behavior still controlled by the strong phase (Pv)
……Larger strains and/or higher MgO content ?
Les Houches 2018
Les Houches 2018