Upload
mohammed-azarudeen
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Distribution of Probability
Citation preview
Probability & Distributions
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Random Experiment
An experiment whose outcome is not predictable in advance,
but all possible outcomes are known.
Sample space:
The set of all possible outcomes is called a sample
space,denoted by S.
Eg. (1) Random experiment : Tossing two fair coins
S = {HH, HT, TH, TT}
(3) Life time of the bulb : S = {0, }
Here Life Testing is an Random Experiment
Event : Any subset of the sample space is called an event,
generally denoted by A, B,….
Probability Concepts
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Probability Axioms
(1) First axiom:
The probability of an event is a non-negative real number:
(2) Second axiom : The probability of the Sample space =1
(3) Third axiom :
Any countable sequence of disjoint events E1,E2,... satisfies
When the events are not disjoint then:
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
• If there are 35 black and 65 white marbles are there
in a black box. The probability that one marble
selected at random from the box is black is 0.35.
This could be determined by the following.
1. Set the TOTAL to 0
2. Select one marble at random from the box.
3. Determine the marble’s color. Add +1 to our total if the
marble is black, 0 otherwise.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 at least 1000 times, each time
selecting from all 100 marbles (simple random selection
with replacement).
5. Divide the TOTAL observed by the total number of iterations
(1000) and that fraction would be the estimated probability
of selecting a black marble at random.
Probability = Relative frequency
1. What is the probability of observing 3 or 4 on the toss
of a single die?
2. What is the probability of observing a total of 13 on
the toss of two dies?
3. What is the probability of observing a total of 5 on the
toss of two dies?
4. A coin and a die are tossed simultaneously. What is the
probability of getting tail from coin tossing and
observing even number on a Die.
5. In a box there are 6 blue and 4 red marbles are there.
What is the probability that one marble selected at
random from the box is red?
Exercise on Probability
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
• Binomial Distribution
• Poisson Distribution
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Discrete Distributions
• The experiment consists of n identical trials (simple experiments).
• Each trial results in one of two outcomes (success or failure)
• The probability of success on a single trial is equal to p and p remains
the same from trial to trial.
• The trials are independent, that is, the outcome of one trial does not
influence the outcome of any other trial.
• The random variable y is the number of successes observed during n
trials.
Mean
Standard deviation = np
=
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Binomial Distribution
Experiment: 5 fair coins are tossed.
Event of interest: the number of heads.
Each coin represents a Bernouilli Trial
with probability of a head coming up (a
success) of .5.
The sum of Bernouilli trials is a binomial
random variable, in this case with n=5,
p=.5.
Class Frequency
0 1
1 11
2 11
3 19
4 6
5 2
The Experiment is repeated 50 times.
0 1 2 3 4 5
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Binomial Distribution Example
Binomial Distribution - THeoritical Example
0.03125
0.15625
0.3125 0.3125
0.15625
0.03125
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0 1 2 3 4 5
No. of Heads
Pd
f valu
e f
or
gett
ing
no
. o
f
head
s
A random variable X is said to have a Poisson
Distribution if
P(X=x) = e- x / x ! x = 0,1,……. > 0
is called the parameter of the distribution.
Other Forms of Poisson Distribution:
1) P(X=x) = e-np (np)x / x !
where x no. of defects in iron sheet (or) fabric (or) no. of spelling mistakes
in a volumunised book etc. n = for a given value p = probability of getting
a defect (from the previous available data)
2) P(X=r) = e-t (t)r / r !
where r = the no. of failures in time t = failure rate per hour based
on the data
t = for a given time expressed in hours
P(r) = Probability of getting r failures in time t
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Poisson Distribution
Example of Poisson Distribution-Wars by Year
• Number of wars beginning by year for years 1482-1939.
Table of Frequency counts and proportions (458 years):
wars Frequency Proportion
0 242 0.5284
1 148 0.3231
2 49 0.1070
3 15 0.0328
4 4 0.0087
More 0 0
• Total Wars: 0(242) + 1(148) + 2(49) + 3(15) + 4(4) = 307
• Average Wars per year: 307 wars / 458 years = 0.67 wars/year
Using Poisson Distribution as Approximation
• Since mean of empirical (observed) distribution
is 0.67, use that as mean for Poisson distribution
(that is, set = 0.67)
– p(0) = (e-0)/0! = e-0.67 = 0.5117
– p(1) = (e-1)/1! = e-0.67(0.67) = 0.3428
– p(2) = (e-2)/2! = e-0.67(0.67)2/2 = 0.1149
– p(3) = (e-3)/3! = e-0.67(0.67)3/6 = 0.0257
– p(4) = (e-4)/4! = e-0.67(0.67)4/24 = 0.0043
– P(Y5) = 1-P(Y4)=
1-.5117-.3428-.1149-.0257-.0043=0.0006
Comparison of Observed and Model
Probabilities
• In EXCEL, the function =POISSON(y,,FALSE)
returns p(y) = e-y/y!
wars Frequency Proportion Model
0 242 0.5284 0.5117
1 148 0.3231 0.3428
2 49 0.1070 0.1149
3 15 0.0328 0.0257
4 4 0.0087 0.0043
More 0 0 0.0006
The model provides a good fit to the observed data. Formal
tests of goodness-of-fit are covered in the sequel course.
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Poisson Distribution – Empirical Data Graph
Poisson Distribution Empirical -Graph
(No. of Wars held during 1482-1939)
242
148
49
154 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11No. of Wars
No
. o
f Y
ears
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Poisson Distribution – Theoretical -Graph
Poisson PDF values (theoritical) for occuring
no. of warsin a year
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10No. of wars
Pro
b o
f o
ccu
rin
g n
o. o
f w
ars
• Normal Distribution
• Exponential Distribution
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Continuous Distributions
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Find P(2 < X < 4) when X ~ N(5,2).
The standarization equation for X is:
Z = (X-)/ = (X-5)/2
when X=2, Z= -3/2 = -1.5
when X=4, Z= -1/2 = -0.5
P(2<X<4) = P(X<4) - P(X<2)
P(X<2) = P( Z< -1.5 )
= P( Z > 1.5 ) (by symmetry)
P(X<4) = P(Z < -0.5)
= P(Z > 0.5) (by symmetry)
P(2 < x < 4) = P(X<4)-P(X<2)
= P(Z>0.5) - P( Z > 1.5)
= 0.3085 - 0.0668 = 0.2417
x
y
-4-3-2-101234
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
• If a continuous variable is monitored (such as
the length of the rod from cutting process) the
variable will usually be distributed normally
about a mean .
• Spread of values may be measured in terms of
population standard deviation which defines
the width of the bell-shaped curve.
• = 150 mm
• = 5 mm
The Normal Distribution
68.27% of the steel rods produced will lie with in ± 5
mm of the mean ( ± )
95.45% of the rods will lie within ± 10 mm (( ± 2)..
99.73% of the rods will lie within ± 15 mm (( ± 3).
The Normal Distribution
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
The Normal Distribution
• From the table, at the value + 1.96
• 0.025 (2.5%) of the population exceeds this
length.
• Hence, 95% population lies within + 1.96.
• Similarly, 99.8% of the rod lengths lie with
+ 3.09
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Lengths of 100 steel rods (mm) 144 146 154 146
151 150 134 153
145 139 143 152
154 146 152 148
157 153 155 157
157 150 145 147
149 144 137 155
141 147 149 155
158 150 149 156
145 148 152 154
151 150 154 153
155 145 152 148
152 146 152 142
144 160 150 149
150 146 148 157
147 144 148 149
155 150 153 148
157 148 149 153
153 155 149 151
155 142 150 150
146 156 148 160
152 147 158 154
143 156 151 151
151 152 157 149
154 140 157 151
Quality for
Competitiveness
August, 2003 MSQM-BITS, Pilani 22
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Quality for
Competitiveness
August, 2003 MSQM-BITS, Pilani 23
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Quality for
Competitiveness
August, 2003 MSQM-BITS, Pilani 24
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Quality for
Competitiveness
August, 2003 MSQM-BITS, Pilani 25
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
Quality for
Competitiveness
August, 2003 MSQM-BITS, Pilani 26
Electronics Test & Development Centre, Chennai
Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
=NORMDIST(260,255,50,TRUE)
Quality for
Competitiveness
August, 2003 MSQM-BITS, Pilani 27