2

1.what is a fallacy

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

nice topic

Citation preview

  • 12/3/13 Critical thinking web

    philosophy.hku.hk/think/fallacy/fallacy.php 1/2

    2004-2013 Joe Lau & Jonathan Chan Copyright and terms of use

    [TUTORIAL F01] What is a fallacy

    Fallacies are mistakes of reasoning, as opposed to making mistakes that are of a factualnature. If I counted twenty people in the room when there were in fact twenty-one, then I madea factual mistake. On the other hand, if I believe that there are round squares, I am believingsomething that is inconsistent. This is a mistake of reasoning, and a fallacy, since I shouldnot have believed something inconsistent if my reasoning is good.

    In some discussion, a fallacy is taken to be an undesirable kind of argument or inference.For example, a certain textbook explains "fallacy" as "an unreliable inference". In our view,this definition of fallacy is rather narrow, since we might want to count certain mistakes ofreasoning as fallacious even though they are not presented as arguments. For example,making a contradictory claim seems to be a case of fallacy, but a single claim is not anargument. Similarly, putting forward a question with an inappropriate presupposition mightalso be regarded as a fallacy, but a question is also not an argument. In both of thesesituations though, the person is making a mistake of reasoning since he is doing somethingthat goes against one or more principles of correct reasoning. This is why we would like todefine fallacies more broadly as violations of the principles of critical thinking, whether or notthe mistakes take the form of an argument.

    The study of fallacies is an application of the principles of critical thinking. Being familiar withtypical fallacies can help us avoid them. We would also be in a position to explain otherpeople's mistakes. There are different ways of classifying fallacies. Broadly speaking, wemight divide fallacies into four kinds.

    Fallacies of inconsistency: cases where something inconsistent or self-defeating has been proposed or accepted.Fallacies of inappropriate presumption: cases where we have an assumptionor a question presupposing something that is not reasonable to accept inthe relevant conversational context.Fallacies of relevance: cases where irrelevant reasons are being invoked orrelevant reasons being ignored.Fallacies of insufficiency: cases where the evidence supporting a conclusionis insufficient or weak.

    We shall discuss these fallacies in the next few tutorials.

  • 12/3/13 Critical thinking web

    philosophy.hku.hk/think/fallacy/fallacy.php 2/2