220179206 D G Tharindu(HSNS367) Written Assignment

1.pdfby Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

Submission date: 20-Aug-2018 03:20PM (UTC+1000)Submission ID: 991417318File name:140127_Tharindu_Dushyantha_Dewalegama_Gamacharige_220179206_D_G_Tharindu__HSNS367__Written_Assignment_1_1416_1364423613.pdfWord count: 2761Character count: 15551

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

16%SIMILARITY INDEX

10%INTERNET SOURCES

6%PUBLICATIONS

14%STUDENT PAPERS

1 8%

2 2%

3 1%

4 1%

5 1%

6 1%

7 1%

8 1%

9 <1%

10 <1%

11 <1%

12 <1%

13 <1%

220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS367) Written Assignment 1.pdfORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to University of New EnglandStudent Paper

Submitted to Utica CollegeStudent Paper

www.cersh.com.auInternet Source

www.gapha.orgInternet Source

Submitted to Curtin University of TechnologyStudent Paper

Submitted to Flinders UniversityStudent Paper

www.reference.comInternet Source

www.sahealth.sa.gov.auInternet Source

Submitted to University of WollongongStudent Paper

iepcp.org.auInternet Source

Submitted to University of NewcastleStudent Paper

www.health.nsw.gov.auInternet Source

Norma Whittaker. "Disorders andInterventions", Springer Nature, 2004Publicat ion

14 <1%

Exclude quotes Of f

Exclude bibliography Of f

Exclude matches Of f

apps.who.intInternet Source

FINAL GRADE

25/40

220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS367) Written Assignment 1.pdfGRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructorvery good q 1 but consider his mental health alsomany grammatical errors-assistance is avilable f orthis f rom the universityq2-elaborate more on the various team membersroles

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

Comment 1a good intro

Comment 2Incidence;

Comment 3incidence

PAGE 3

Comment 4A

Comment 5the

PAGE 4

Comment 6is

Comment 7a

Comment 8Justin

PAGE 5

Comment 9the

Comment 10with a

Comment 11scope

Comment 12

the

Comment 13A

PAGE 6

Comment 14the

Comment 15their

Comment 16the

Comment 17the

PAGE 7

Comment 18ive stopped correcting grammar f rom here

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

Comment 19add pg numbers

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

RUBRIC: HSNS367 A1 2018

CRITERIA 1 Q1 (20%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(40)

N(35)

CRITERIA 2 Q2 (20%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

63 / 100

65 / 100

Discuss the relevant assessments required f or the patient in the selected case study.

Outstanding discussion of the assessments used in the diagnosis of the chosencase.<br />Excellent use of evidence to support discussion using a wide range ofhigh quality resources.<br />

Outstanding discussion of the assessments used in the diagnosis of the chosencase.<br />Excellent use of evidence to support discussion using a wide range ofhigh quality resources.<br />

Outstanding discussion of the assessments used in the diagnosis of the chosencase.<br />Excellent use of evidence to support discussion using a wide range ofhigh quality resources.<br />

Thorough discussion of the assessments used in the diagnosis of the chosen case.<br />Ef f ective use of a wide range of evidence to support discussion<br />

Thorough discussion of the assessments used in the diagnosis of the chosen case.<br />Ef f ective use of a wide range of evidence to support discussion<br />

An ef f ective discussion <br />of the assessments used in the diagnosis of thechosen case.<br />Discussion is supported by a range of evidenced basedresources, developing crit ical analysis.<br />

An ef f ective discussion <br />of the assessments used in the diagnosis of thechosen case.<br />Discussion is supported by a range of evidenced basedresources, developing crit ical analysis.<br />

Some discussion of the assessments used in the diagnosis of the chosen case.<br/>Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence ofattempt at analysis of literature.<br />

Some discussion of the assessments used in the diagnosis of the chosen case.<br/>Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence ofattempt at analysis of literature.<br />

Some discussion of the assessments used in the diagnosis of the chosen case.<br/>Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence ofattempt at analysis of literature.<br />

Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on the assessments used in thediagnosis of the chosen case.<br />Not supported by evidence or supported by non-evidence based sources; lit t le or no attempt at analysis of sources.<br />

Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on the assessments used in thediagnosis of the chosen case.<br />Not supported by evidence or supported by non-evidence based sources; lit t le or no attempt at analysis of sources.<br />

Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on the assessments used in thediagnosis of the chosen case.<br />Not supported by evidence or supported by non-evidence based sources; lit t le or no attempt at analysis of sources.<br />

60 / 100

Discuss the role of the sexual health team members involved in the care of the case study.

Outstanding discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Excellent use of evidence basedresources used to support discussion using a wide range of high quality resources.<br />

Outstanding discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Excellent use of evidence basedresources used to support discussion using a wide range of high quality resources.<br />

Outstanding discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Excellent use of evidence based

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(40)

N(35)

CRITERIA 3 Q3 (40%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

resources used to support discussion using a wide range of high quality resources.<br />

Thorough discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition<br />in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Ef f ective use of a widerange of evidence to support discussion.<br />

Thorough discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition<br />in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Ef f ective use of a widerange of evidence to support discussion.<br />

An ef f ective discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition<br />in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported bysome evidenced based resources; developing crit ical analysis.<br />

An ef f ective discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition<br />in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported bysome evidenced based resources; developing crit ical analysis.<br />

Some discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition in relation to the chosen case study. <br />Discussion is supported bysome evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at analysis of literature.<br/>

Some discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition in relation to the chosen case study. <br />Discussion is supported bysome evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at analysis of literature.<br/>

Some discussion on the sexual health team involved in the management of thecondition in relation to the chosen case study. <br />Discussion is supported bysome evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at analysis of literature.<br/>

Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on the sexual health team involvedin the management of the condition<br />in relation to the chosen case study.<br/>Not supported by evidence or supported by non-evidence based sources; lit t le orno attempt at analysis of sources.<br />

Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on the sexual health team involvedin the management of the condition<br />in relation to the chosen case study.<br/>Not supported by evidence or supported by non-evidence based sources; lit t le orno attempt at analysis of sources.<br />

Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on the sexual health team involvedin the management of the condition<br />in relation to the chosen case study.<br/>Not supported by evidence or supported by non-evidence based sources; lit t le orno attempt at analysis of sources.<br />

65 / 100

Outline the education needs f or the patient within the case study

Outstanding outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen conditionin relation to the chosen case study.<br />Excellent use of evidence based resourcesused to support discussion using a wide range of high quality resources.<br />

Outstanding outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen conditionin relation to the chosen case study.<br />Excellent use of evidence based resourcesused to support discussion using a wide range of high quality resources.<br />

Outstanding outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen conditionin relation to the chosen case study.<br />Excellent use of evidence based resourcesused to support discussion using a wide range of high quality resources.<br />

Thorough outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen condition inrelation to the chosen case study.<br />Ef f ective use of a wide range of evidence tosupport discussion<br />

Thorough outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen condition inrelation to the chosen case study.<br />Ef f ective use of a wide range of evidence to

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(40)

N(35)

CRITERIA 4 (10%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C

support discussion<br />

A clear outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen condition inrelation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported by some evidencedbased resources; developing crit ical analysis.<br />

A clear outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen condition inrelation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported by some evidencedbased resources; developing crit ical analysis.<br />

A clear outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen condition inrelation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported by some evidencedbased resources; developing crit ical analysis. A brief outline only of the educationneeds of the patient with the chosen condition in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence ofattempt at analysis of literature.<br />

A clear outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen condition inrelation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported by some evidencedbased resources; developing crit ical analysis. A brief outline only of the educationneeds of the patient with the chosen condition in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence ofattempt at analysis of literature.<br />

A clear outline of the education needs of the patient with the chosen condition inrelation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported by some evidencedbased resources; developing crit ical analysis. A brief outline only of the educationneeds of the patient with the chosen condition in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence ofattempt at analysis of literature.<br />

Outline is unclear or there is no outline provided of the education needs of thepatient with the chosen condition in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Notsupported by evidence or supported by non-evidence based sources; lit t le or noattempt at analysis of sources.<br />

Outline is unclear or there is no outline provided of the education needs of thepatient with the chosen condition in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Notsupported by evidence or supported by non-evidence based sources; lit t le or noattempt at analysis of sources.<br />

Outline is unclear or there is no outline provided of the education needs of thepatient with the chosen condition in relation to the chosen case study.<br />Notsupported by evidence or supported by non-evidence based sources; lit t le or noattempt at analysis of sources.<br />

45 / 100

Follows requirements f or structure, presentation\ngrammar and spelling.

Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment

Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment

Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment

Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment

Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment

Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres to

(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(40)

N(35)

CRITERIA 5 (10%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

grammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places

Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places

Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion

Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion

Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion

Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

75 / 100

Follows requirements f or ref erencing (APA 6th Edition) and the application of evidence

Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list <br /> <br />Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughoutthe assignment<br />

Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list <br /> <br />Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughoutthe assignment<br />

Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list <br /> <br />Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughoutthe assignment<br />

Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list<br /><br />Principally acknowledges sources used throughout theassignment<br />

Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list<br /><br />Principally acknowledges sources used throughout theassignment<br />

A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment<br />

A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment<br />

Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout theassignment<br />

Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout theassignment<br />

Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the

N(45)

N(40)

N(35)

assignment<br />

Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout <br /><br />Litt le or noacknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment<br />

Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout <br /><br />Litt le or noacknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment<br />

Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout <br /><br />Litt le or noacknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment<br />