3
1 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF Splash Mitigation 12 July 2011 Neutrino Factory Mercury Pool Splash Mitigation V.B. Graves IDS Videoconference July 12, 2011

1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF Splash Mitigation 12 July 2011 Neutrino Factory Mercury Pool Splash Mitigation V.B. Graves

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1 Managed by UT-Battellefor the U.S. Department of Energy NF Splash Mitigation 12 July 2011

Neutrino Factory Mercury Pool Splash Mitigation

V.B. Graves

IDS VideoconferenceJuly 12, 2011

2 Managed by UT-Battellefor the U.S. Department of Energy NF Splash Mitigation 12 July 2011

Splash Mitigation

• Study 2 assumed a particle bed of tungsten balls to minimize effects of jet entering pool• Many other feasible concepts

to accomplish this function• Simulation/analytical studies

may be useful to limit options• Pool circulation and drainage

locations also need to be studied• Prototypic testing needed for

comparison & final determination

3 Managed by UT-Battellefor the U.S. Department of Energy NF Splash Mitigation 12 July 2011

Issues & Questions

• Do jet & beam drill hole into mercury pool?• Narrow or wide channel? Deep or shallow?• How & where to incorporate drainage? Upstream or

downstream?• How to protect downstream beam window from waves

and splashes?• Is the steady-state condition calmer than start-up?• Can these mitigation options be easily simulated? What

about doing water tests?