Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
1998: A YEAR OF INNOVATIONIN (THE)
Richard B. LangleyGeodetic Research LaboratoryUniversity of New Brunswick
Invited presentation at the Association of New Brunswick Land SurveyorsAnnual General Meeting, Fredericton, N.B., 23 January 1999
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
GPS Accuracy: Lies, Damned Lies, and StatisticsF. van Diggelen, Ashtech, Inc.
January
¥ Popular accuracy measuresÐ r.m.s. (vertical)Ð circular error probableÐ r.m.s. (horizontal)Ð R95 (horizontal 95%)Ð 2 d.r.m.s.Ð r.m.s. (3D)Ð spherical error probable
¥ Common misconceptionsÐ r.m.s. precisely equals 1 sigmaÐ 2 d.r.m.s. means Òtwo-dimensional r.m.s.ÓÐ 2 d.r.m.s. is exactly equivalent to a 95% probability levelÐ r.m.s. is perfectly comparable with a 68% probability levelÐ the error distribution really is Gaussian
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
January, contÕd.
Dimensions Accuracymeasure
Probability Typical usage(dimensions)
1 r.m.s. 68 vertical
2 CEP 50 horizontal
2 r.m.s. 63-68 horizontal
2 R95 95 horizontal
2 2 d.r.m.s. 95-98 horizontal
3 r.m.s. 61-68 3D
3 SEP 50 3D
Accuracy Measures
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
January, contÕd.0.
0
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.4 m
MeasuredTheoretical
Measured andtheoretical DGPShorizontal errorsfrom 2 million datapoints
CEP = 42 cmr.m.s. = 52 cmR95 = 91 cm2 d.r.m.s. = 104 cm
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
The UTM Grid SystemR.B. Langley, UNB
February
¥ Coordinates and Projections
¥ MercatorÕs WorldÐ Adopting the ellipsoid
¥ A Universal ProjectionÐ UTM
Ð The grid¥ British National Grid¥ 500 km squares → 100 km squares → x,y coordinates
¥ Tower of London: TQ 336805 or 33.6 km E, 80.5 km N of SW corner of TQ
Ð Military grid reference¥ UNB Gillin Hall ref. point: (WGS 84) 682,725 m E; 5,091,225 m N, zone 19T
= MGRS 19TFL8272591225
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
February, contÕd.
0°0' 0"
84°
80°
0mN andincreasingnorthward
10,000,000mNand increasingsouthward
500,
000m
E
~68
0,00
0mE
~32
0,00
0mE
Exa
ct s
cale
Exa
ct s
cale
Scale increases
Scale decreases
69°W
72°W
66°W
Sca
le fa
ctor
= 0
.999
6
UTM zone 19 extends from 86°to 72° west longitude. As withall UTM zones, the scale factoris 0.9996 on the central meridianand true (unity) on two slightlycurved lines approximately 180km to either side. The shape ofthe zone has been exaggeratedfor clarity.
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
Pseudolites: Enhancing GPS with Ground-based Transmitters
S. Cobb and M. O’Connor, Integrinautics Corp.
March
¥ What is a Pseudolite?
¥ Primary Pseudolite UsesÐ Code-based ranging augmentation
Ð Code-phase differential ranging
Ð Carrier-phase differential ranging¥ Ambiguity resolution
Ð Indoor pseudolites
¥ The Near-far ProblemÐ Signal pulsing
Ð P-code use
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
March, contÕd.
L 1Filter
MicrowaveVCO
LoopFilter
PLLDivider
C/A CodeGenerator
ReferenceTCXO
Mixer Antenna
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
Integrity Beacon Landing System
March, contÕd.
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
Cellular Telephone Positioning Using GPS Time Synchronization
R. Klukas, Cell-Loc, Inc. and G. Lachapelle and M. Fattouche, U. of C.
April
¥ E-911 Cell Phone PositioningÐ FCC requires horizontal cell phone position to 125 m d.r.m.s. by
2001
¥ TOA EstimationÐ A system to horizontally position cellular telephones using
analogue AMPS (Advanced Mobile Phone Service)
¥ System DescriptionÐ Time tagging with GPSÐ Full correlation with MUSIC (Multiple Signal Identification and
Classification)Ð Position estimation
¥ Field TestsÐ Simulations used approximately 40 sites within a Calgary cellular
network; field tests with 4 sites
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
April, contÕd.
45 MHz 455 kHzBaseband
signal
Lockdetect
Digitalsignal
processor
Basebandsignal
GPSpulse
PLLchip
50 10 km
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
–1000
Nor
thin
g (m
eter
s)
–1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
WinwoodSheraton
Renfrew
Franklin
(a) Easting (meters)
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
–1000
Nor
thin
g (m
eter
s)
–1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
WinwoodSheraton
Renfrew
Franklin
(b) Easting (meters)
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
The Effect of Weather Fronts on GPS MeasurementsT. Gregorius and G. Blewitt, Univ. of Newcastle upon Tyne
May
¥ Atmospheric Delay
¥ The Positioning EffectÐ Height error = 3 x tropo delay error
¥ What is a Weather Front?
¥ Delay Estimation Models
¥ Fronts and GPS PrecisionÐ Improving repeatability
Ð Vertical velocity
Ð The horizontal factor
¥ Remedies and PossibilitiesÐ Radiosondes, satellites (GPS/MET), data editing
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
May, contÕd.
0.5 - 1º
WARMAIR
COLDAIR
COLDAIR
War
m F
ront
al Z
oneC
old Frontal Zone
~500 km ~100 km ~100 km ~800 km
tropopause
ground surface
direction of motion
~ 1 km
RA
IN &
CL
OU
D R A I
N & C
L O
U D
drydry
~ 1
0 km
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
May, contÕd.
2.32
2.34
2.36
2.38
2.40
2.42
2.44
Time past 00:00 on 28 November 1996 (hours)
Tot
al tr
opos
pher
ic z
enith
del
ay (
m)
GPS estimates Front model: r.m.s. = 6.1 mm Standard model: r.m.s. = 11.6 mm
Cold surface frontWarm surface front
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
June
The NSTB: A Stepping Stone to WAASAndrew Hanson, Stanford University
¥ WAAS in PracticeÐ Reference stations
Ð Error models
¥ The Stanford Connection
¥ WAAS MetricsÐ Accuracy
Ð Integrity
Ð Availability
¥ Flight Testing
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
June, contÕd.
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
A Primer on GPS AntennasR.B. Langley, UNB
July
¥ Fields and Waves
¥ Antenna CharacteristicsÐ Axial ratio
Ð Impedance
Ð Standing Wave Ratio
Ð Bandwidth
Ð Gain pattern
Ð Ground planes
Ð Phase-centre variation
¥ Low Noise Preamp
¥ Transmission Lines
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
July, contÕd.
x
y
z
t
x
y
At a fixed point in space, theelectric field vector of a right-hand circularly polarized waverotates clockwise as seen fromthe wave’s source.
The electric and magnetic fields aretransverse to the direction ofpropagation, and the fields aremutually perpendicular.
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
July, contÕd.
Microstrip patch
Quadrifilar helix
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
RTK GPSR.B. Langley, UNB
September
¥ A Fix on Accuracy
¥ Carrier-phase PositioningÐ Post-processed
Ð Real time
Ð Correction message formats: RTCM SC-104
¥ RTK System Architecture
¥ The Data LinkÐ Propagation distances; path loss; viability
¥ RTK SolutionsÐ OTF
Ð GLONASS
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
September, contÕd.
Standalone
Static Stop and Go
Pseudokinematic Rapid Static
Kinematic
Post-processed Real-time
Differential
Surveying
Carrier Phase(RTK)
Pseudorange(DGPS)
Differential Standalone
Navigation
GPS Positioning
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
September, contÕd.
Reference station Rover
RTK Hardware
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
GPS MATLAB Toolbox ReviewA.K. Tetewsky and A. Soltz, Draper Laboratory
October
¥ What is MATLAB?
¥ The ToolboxesÐ GNSS Toolbox, Orion Dynamics and Control Corp.
Ð Constellation Toolbox, Constell, Inc.
Ð SatNav Toolbox, GPSoft LLC
Ð GPS Signal Simulator Toolbox, Navsys Corp.
¥ Simulation ChallengesÐ Scenario simulation; GPS measurement selection, navigation
accuracy, algorithm development; fault monitoring; readingrecorded data; total receiver simulation; presentation graphics
¥ Experiences
¥ Suggestions
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
October, contÕd.
Toolbox Overview
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
October, contÕd.
GPS Measurement Selection, Navigation Accuracy,and Algorithm Development
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
The GPS End-of-Week RolloverR.B. Langley, UNB
November
¥ GPS TimeÐ GPS Time = UTC + 13 seconds + δÐ Z Count
Ð Time of week
¥ The RolloverÐ Similar to Y2K problems
Ð On 21/22 August 1999, GPS Week 1023 is followed by Week 0
¥ Receiver EffectsÐ Currently marketed receivers shouldnÕt be affected
Ð For some, a firmware upgrade is available
Ð Noncompliant: wrong date, wrong satellite coordinates, refuse tocompute positions, long startup times, fail to lock onto satellites
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
November, contÕd.
0 1 2 403,199 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
X1 epochs
0 1.5 sec 3.0 sec 7 days
P epoch
14 days
Week 0 Week 1 Week 1023 Week 0
403,199 403,199 403,199
19.6 years
Week 2
P epoch P epoch P epochP epoch
The inherent, fundamental GPS timing unit is the 1.5-second repetition periodof the P-code’s X1 subcode. The P-code is reset every week or 403,200 X1epochs. The GPS week number count is reset every 1024 weeks orapproximately 19.6 years.
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
November, contÕd.
GPS Week Cycle Start of Week 0 End of Week 1023
1 January 6, 1980(44244)
August 21, 1999(51411)
2 August 22, 1999(51412)
April 6, 2019(58579)
3 April 7, 2019(58580)
November 20, 2038(65747)
Start and end dates of the first three GPS week cycles.
(The numbers in parentheses are the corresponding modified Julian dates.)
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick
1999