Upload
sbsnews
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 6187
1/8
CABINET IN CONFIDENCE
43
Copy No
C B I N E T M I N U T E
Expenditure Review Committee
Canberra, 28 March 1989
No.
12380
ER)
Submission No. 6187
Sale o f the Commonwealth Uranium
Stockpi le
The Committee agreed t ha t : -
(a) d iscuss ions on the poss ib le sa le o f the
uranium
s tockpi l e
to
Queensland
Mines Ltd
QML)
cont inue ;
b)
the
discuss ions be conducted by t he Department
o f
Primary
Indus t r i es
and
Energy
with
the
Department
of
the
Prime Minis te r
and Cabinet ,
the
Department
of
Finance and
t he
Attorney-Genera l s Department consul ted as
necessary; and
(c) the Minis ter for Primary
Indus t r i e s
and
Energy bring forward a Submission
for
considera t ion
in the
1989-90
Budget context
fol lowing the
d i scuss ions r e f e r r e d
to
above.
Committee Secre tary
This
document
is
the property
of
the Australian Government
and is
not
to be
copied or reproduced
CABINET IN CONFIDENCE
[1]
8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 6187
2/8
i - - .
CABI
NET I
CO F
IDENCE
N 6 87
Subm ss on o
FOR C BINET
Copy No .
4_3
Title
Minister
Purpose/Issues
Sensitivity Criticism
Legislation
involved
ency:
critical significant
dates
1sultation:
M inisters/Depts
consulted
Is there
agreement?
Timing handling
of
announcement
Cost
SALE
OF THE COMMONWEALTH
URANIUM STOCKPILE
The
Hon
John Kerin
MP,
Minis te r
fo r
Primary
Indus t r ie s
and Energy
Sena tor
t h e
Hon
Pete r
Walsh,
Minis te r fo r Finance
Minute 12030 r equ i red
the
lodgement o f
a
Submission
address ing
the
poss ib le
sa l e
of t h e Commonwealth
uranium
s tockpi le
Government po l i cy proh ib i t i ng the es tab l i shment n
A u s t r a l i a of nuc lea r
power plants and
a l l
othe r
s tages
o f
t he
nuc lea r
fue l cyc le except
mining,
t oge the r with our abundant ore
rese rves ,
nega tes
any
requ i rement
to mainta in a
uranium
s tockpi le
in
A u s t r a l i a
Could
be some c r i t i c i s m
o f any
Government i n i t i a t i v e
to
market uranium
from the s tockpi le
No
The
s tockpi le s
a va luab le
asse t for
which t he
Government
has no fu r the r use .
I t s sa l e
would
make
a
s i g n i f i c a n t
revenue con t r ibu t ion and ' improve
the
Balance o f Payments
pos i t i on .
Prime
Minis te r
Cabinet The
Treasury
No.
The
Minis te r
fo r
Primary
Indus t r i e s
and Energy
Prime
Minis te r
Cabinet suppor t Option . The
Minis te r
fo r
Finance
The Treasury suppor t Option
B>
Consu l ta t ion
cowments Attachment A>
page 7
N/A
Opportuni ty
cos t s of mainta in ing the s tockpi le n
terms
o ~ n
r s t
fo 7gone .
~
o r _ ;_han ) 9 miAJ1,.qn per
annum ( a'nd
could
be cons i
era:Oly higher>
.
There
wi l l
a l so be maintenance cos t s
es t imated
a t 0.1 mil l ion>
in the medium term. Sale of t he s tockp i l e should
r e s u l t
n
revenue
of a t l e a s t 70 mil l ion
over
the
next
2-4 years .
This document is
the
property o the
ustral ian Government
and is not to
be
copied or
reproduced
CABINET IN CONFIDENCE
I
[2]
8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 6187
3/8
C BINET
N
ONFIDENCE
BACKGROUND
The
s tockpi le
con ta ins 2262
shor t tons
of uranium oxide
accumulated from t he
Commonwealth s
1960 s
mining
opera t ion
a t
Rum
Jungle .
Stockpi le
borrowing
by Ranger and
Nabar lek in the
e a r l y
1980 s and subsequent repayment has
r e su l t ed
in the
s toc kp i l e now
l a rge l y
being made up of Ranger
and
Nabar lek
mater i a l .
2. The s tockpi le value i s around SA7 m
a t
cur ren t spot pr ices
o r some SA16 m
based on t he
cur ren t f loor
p r i c e .
3 . Attempts to s e l l the s tockpi le over a
number
of
year s v ia
ex i s t i ng
producers have
proved
unsuccess fu l ,
because
t he
pr i c e
t h e Commonwealth has been seeking
has not been a t t r a c t i v e given t he producers low
product ion cos t s ,
t h e i r
des i re
to dispose
o f t h e i r
own
product ion
f i r s t
and
t he i r
a b i l i t y to
buy
any a dd i t i ona l
m a te r i a l they requi re
on t he spo t market
a t
lower
pr i ces .
4. Factors i n f luenc ing the dec i s ion
to
s e l l through
ex i s t i ng
producers inc luded:
a>
t he h igher
pr i c e obta inable for a long
te rm
suppl ie r ,
as opposed to
a
one-off sa le ;
(b)
t he
p o s s ib i l i t y
of as s i s t i ng producers
in obta in ing
cont rac t s ;
c> the producers concern t ha t the Commonwealth should
not
compete aga ins t them o r undercut them by
se l l i ng
a t a
pr i c e below
the
f loor pr ice ; and
d>
consis tency with the exi s t ing th ree mines
po l i cy .
C BINE
IN CONFIDENCE
[3]
8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 6187
4/8
C BINET
IN
CONFIDENCE
5.
The Commonwealth informal ly i nv i t ed fu r the r of fe r s fo r
the
s tockp i l e from ex i s t ing
producers
in 1987.
Queensland ines
Ltd QML> was t he only
company
to
submit a proposa l
based
a t
nea r spo t pr ices a t t ha t
t ime , and fo r
de l i ve r y
over a number
o f yea rs . QML s i n t e r e s t flows
from i t s
es ire to be seen as a
cont inuing long term
s upp l i e r of uranium. Treatment
a t i t s
Nabarlek plan t
has ceased and
access
to t he s t ockp i l e would al low QML to cont inue to
opera te in
the market un t i l t discovered o the r
depos i t s which
t
envisages would a l low
t
to
keep the Nabarlek m i l l in
opera t ion
.
6 .
The
Mini s t e r
fo r
Primary
Indus t r i es
and Energy
author i sed
h i s Department
to
have discuss ions
with
QML
to confi rm
t ha t
under ex i s t ing po l i cy
t he Government s
f loo r p r i ce
would apply
to
any expor ts
of s tockp i le m a t e r ia l and
to
seek
to
narrow
the
gap between QML s
purchase
o f f e r
and
cu r r en t expor t
pr i ce s .
OPTIONS
7 .
There
a re
th ree bas ic
opt ions
fo r d i sposa l
of
t he
s tockpi le :
cont inue di scuss ions with QML with a
view
to concluding
a
sa le ;
b> c a l l fo r
express ions of
i n t e r e s t both
in
Aus t ra l i a and
from overseas for purchase of the
s tockpi le ;
o r
c> mainta in t he s tockpi le
for l a t e r sa l e in the
expec ta t ion t ha t pr ices genera l ly w i l l improve over the
next
4-5 years
.
CONSIDERATION OF
THE
OPTIONS
Option A
8. Option A i s
favoured
by the Minis te r for
Primary
Indus t r i es
and Energy
because t
would
avoid:
a> con f l i c t with Government pol i cy
; and
CABINET IN CONFIDENCE
[4]
8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 6187
5/8
CABINET IN ONFIDENCE
depress ing an
a l ready
depressed
uranium market , r e su l t i ng i n
a
poor
r e tu rn
to
the
Commonwealth and an adverse
impact
on the for thcoming
ERA
cont rac t
renewal nego t i a t ions cover ing over ha l f
A u s t r a li a s annual uranium expor t s .
9.
There i s
an
i ncen t ive
for QML to
acqu i re
the s tockpi le in
orde r f o r t to be seen to remain in t he market
as
a long term
supp l i e r , and
t he r e fo r e ,
in
conc luding
any sa l e
the
Commonwealth would
expect
to b e t t e r QML s
presen t o f f e r
thereby maximising
overa l l re turns
to the
Commonwealth.
The only disadvantage of
op t ion A
i s
t h a t
r e t u rns
to
t he
Commonwealth
would
be
spread over a
number
of
ye a r s .
On t he
othe r
hand,
QML
would
assume immediate
r e s p o n s i b i l i t y
for
maintenance
cos t s .
10.
I f
op t ion A i s accepted , fo l lowing on
from
e a r l i e r
d i s c us s ions , t he next s tep would be t he commencement of
d e t a i l e d nego t i a t ions
between QML
and
the Department
of
Primary
Indus t r i e s and Energy
DPIE> with o f f i c e r s from t he
Prime
M i n i s te r s
Department ,
Attorney-G eneral s
and
the
Department
of
Finance a l s o being consul ted
as
necessary . Cabinet approval
would
be sought
for any deal which
might
be negot ia ted
with
QML
Opt ion
B
11. Option B
i s
favoured
by
t he
Min i s t e r for Finance,
who
cons ide rs t h a t t he
Commonwealth
should not r e s t r i c t i t s e l f to
one
po t en t i a l buyer in seeking to
dispose of
t he s toc kp i l e .
Unless
and
u n t i l
market
reac t ions to the
proposed
sa l e a re
se r i ous l y t e s t ed , the re
can be no ce r t a in ty tha t
any deal
which
might be nego t i a t ed with QML i s t he
most
sa t i s f ac to ry to the
Government - e i t h e r
in
terms of pr ice
o r wider
uranium po l i cy
cons ide ra t ions .
The proposal to i nv i t e express ions
of i n t e r e s t
in
purchas ing the s toc kp i l e , both in Aus t ra l ia
and
from
overseas ,
would
not necessa r i ly
ru l e
out the eventual
sa le
of
CABINET IN CONFIDENCE
[5]
8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 6187
6/8
8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 6187
7/8
CABINET IN CONFIDENCE
6
RECOMMENDATIONS
15.
The
Minis t e r
for
Primary
Indus t r ie s
and Energy
recommends
t h a t Cabinet
agree tha t :
discuss ions
on t he poss ib le
sa l e
o f t he uranium
s tockpi le to Queensland
Mines
Ltd be continued;
t hese d i scuss ions be conducted by DPIE,
with
o f f i c e r s
from the
Departments
of Prime Minis t e r and Cabine t ,
the
Attorney-General and
Finance being
consu l ted
as
necessary ;
and
c) the mat te r
be
r e f e r r e d back to Cabinet for decis ion in
the
l i g h t of t he
outcome
o f discuss ions with QML
l6 . The Minis t e r for Finance
recommends
t h a t Cabinet agree t ha t :
r e spons ib i l i t y for handl ing the proposed sa l e of the
uranium s tockpi le be
t r ans fe r red
to TFAS with an
o f f i c e r from DPIE being
seconded
to a s s i s t
the
Task
Force in t he
sa l e
process i t h i s
i s des i red ;
the
TFAS be
author ised to
i nv i t e express ions
of
i n t e r e s t
both with in Aust ra l i a
and
from overseas in
t he poss ib le
purchase
of
the
uranium
s toc kp i l e ; and
t he ma t t e r be r e f e r r e d back to Cabinet for decis ion in
t he
l i g h t of the express ions
o f
i n t e r e s t rece ived .
8 December 1988
JOHN KERIN
PETER
WALSH
C BINET IN CONFIDENCE
[7]
8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 6187
8/8
CABINET IN CONFIDENCE
TT CHMENT
A
CONSULTATION
The
Treasury
The
Treasury Department suppor t s the
recommendations by
the
Minis t e r for Finance
Prime Minis ter and Cabinet
2 The Department of
Prime
Minis te r and Cabinet suppor ts the
con t inua t ion of discuss ions between Department of
Primary
Indus t r i e s
and Energy
and
QML
on
t he poss ib le
sa l e
of
the
uranium
s toc kp i l e with
consu l t a t ion with
re levant
depar tments
as
ou t l ined
in recommendations lS and
The
Department
notes
t h a t t he Minis te r wi l l r e f e r t he mat te r back to
Cabinet
fo r a f ina l dec i s ion
in
t he l i g h t of t he
outcome
of those
discuss ions .
[8]