Upload
jitender-thakur
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 1987 Crash
1/7
8/13/2019 1987 Crash
2/7
8/13/2019 1987 Crash
3/7
BRIEF INTRODUCTION
Attempts to explain the crash in the stock market around the world in
October 1987
Reason cited was the major economic developments took place around
that time
Alternative hypothesis: reason behind crash because it was expected to
crash (Rational Bubble)
Bianchard and Watson (1992) model of a rational bubble
Approach taken in was that Marketswas overvalued,hence expected to
crash
Alternative approach of using Options Prices decline whether a crash was
expected
Out of the money puts which provide crash insurance, were unusually
expensive then the out-of-the-money calls.
A jump-diffusion model fitted to option prices during 1987, and expected
negative jumps invariably found prior to crash.
8/13/2019 1987 Crash
4/7
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
Fundamental to the pricing of options Derivation from the actual
distribution of the asset price of an equivalent riskneutraldistribution
that summarizes the prices of relevant
Options priced at discounted expected value of their future payoffs
Most of the standard specifications of the models can be inconsistent with
observed option prices
Implication of the models suggest OTM puts should trade at slight
discount relative to OTM calls, contrary to fact
The parameters of the riskneutralprocess implicit (via non linear least
squares):
The volatility conditional on no jumps, Probability of jump
The mean jump size conditional
The standard deviation of jump sizes
8/13/2019 1987 Crash
5/7
Theoretical work is summarized concerning the relationship between
OTM call and put option prices for standard distributional hypotheses.
Most of the specifications of these models were ruled out a priori as
inconsistent with observed option prices.
This imply that OTM puts should trade at a slight discount relative to OTM
calls.
Because of this, transactions prices for American options of S&P 500
futures indicate either that market participants expected substantial
negative jumps(i.e. crashes) in the market during the year preceding the
crash or that they thought market volatility would rise rapidly if the
market fell.
8/13/2019 1987 Crash
6/7
ESTIMATION Stochastic Differential equation
dS/S = [ - kbardt]dt + SDdZ + kdq
Where,
= instantaneous cum dividend expected return on the asset
dt = flow rate
Sd= instantaneous variance on no jumpsZ = Standard Weiner Process
k = random percentage jump conditional jump upon a Poisson
distributed event
= the frequency of Poisson events
8/13/2019 1987 Crash
7/7
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Strong perception of downside risk on the market during the year
preceding the stock market crash
Program trading strategies
Portfolio insurance
Macroeconomic causes included international disputes about foreignexchange and interest rates, and fears about inflation.
Two methods were used
OTM puts which provide crash insurance were unusually expensive toOTM Calls
A jump diffusion model was fitted to daily options prices in 1987 and
expected negative jumps were invariably found starting a year prior to
crash