1987 Crash

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 1987 Crash

    1/7

  • 8/13/2019 1987 Crash

    2/7

  • 8/13/2019 1987 Crash

    3/7

    BRIEF INTRODUCTION

    Attempts to explain the crash in the stock market around the world in

    October 1987

    Reason cited was the major economic developments took place around

    that time

    Alternative hypothesis: reason behind crash because it was expected to

    crash (Rational Bubble)

    Bianchard and Watson (1992) model of a rational bubble

    Approach taken in was that Marketswas overvalued,hence expected to

    crash

    Alternative approach of using Options Prices decline whether a crash was

    expected

    Out of the money puts which provide crash insurance, were unusually

    expensive then the out-of-the-money calls.

    A jump-diffusion model fitted to option prices during 1987, and expected

    negative jumps invariably found prior to crash.

  • 8/13/2019 1987 Crash

    4/7

    THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS

    Fundamental to the pricing of options Derivation from the actual

    distribution of the asset price of an equivalent riskneutraldistribution

    that summarizes the prices of relevant

    Options priced at discounted expected value of their future payoffs

    Most of the standard specifications of the models can be inconsistent with

    observed option prices

    Implication of the models suggest OTM puts should trade at slight

    discount relative to OTM calls, contrary to fact

    The parameters of the riskneutralprocess implicit (via non linear least

    squares):

    The volatility conditional on no jumps, Probability of jump

    The mean jump size conditional

    The standard deviation of jump sizes

  • 8/13/2019 1987 Crash

    5/7

    Theoretical work is summarized concerning the relationship between

    OTM call and put option prices for standard distributional hypotheses.

    Most of the specifications of these models were ruled out a priori as

    inconsistent with observed option prices.

    This imply that OTM puts should trade at a slight discount relative to OTM

    calls.

    Because of this, transactions prices for American options of S&P 500

    futures indicate either that market participants expected substantial

    negative jumps(i.e. crashes) in the market during the year preceding the

    crash or that they thought market volatility would rise rapidly if the

    market fell.

  • 8/13/2019 1987 Crash

    6/7

    ESTIMATION Stochastic Differential equation

    dS/S = [ - kbardt]dt + SDdZ + kdq

    Where,

    = instantaneous cum dividend expected return on the asset

    dt = flow rate

    Sd= instantaneous variance on no jumpsZ = Standard Weiner Process

    k = random percentage jump conditional jump upon a Poisson

    distributed event

    = the frequency of Poisson events

  • 8/13/2019 1987 Crash

    7/7

    SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Strong perception of downside risk on the market during the year

    preceding the stock market crash

    Program trading strategies

    Portfolio insurance

    Macroeconomic causes included international disputes about foreignexchange and interest rates, and fears about inflation.

    Two methods were used

    OTM puts which provide crash insurance were unusually expensive toOTM Calls

    A jump diffusion model was fitted to daily options prices in 1987 and

    expected negative jumps were invariably found starting a year prior to

    crash