7/30/2019 1987 - BUFORA Conference - Harry Harris and Mike Sacks

1/2

ISSN 0143-8840

-The Journal ofTransient Aerial PhenomenaSeptember 1987 Vo . l . ume 5 No . 1

. '-'> '

4 - I '

~ by tM British Unidentified Fly1ng Object AMMfdt i e t i o n

7/30/2019 1987 - BUFORA Conference - Harry Harris and Mike Sacks

2/2

Abst rac ts cont .....Ti t l e Rendlesham Fores tNew Evidence .Speakers Harry Harr is andMike SacksAbst rac t :The de t a i l s of the involvemento f Harry Harr is and Mike Sacksin Rendlesham are asfol lows : -They were f i r s t a le r t ed to thecase by Jenny Randles whosuggested t h a t they contac tBrenda But ler and Dot St ree twhich they d id . Acting oninformat ion rece ived they thenproceeded to contac t eyewitnesses to the Rendleshaminc idents which resu l t ed int h e i r being inv i t ed to thebase under some degree ofconf iden t i a l i t y .Unt i l now they have not f e l tthemselves f ree to revea l a l lt ha t they have heard and seenwith regard to the i rinvest igat ions in to th i s casebut th i s i s to be pu t tor igh t s a t the BUFORA congressby reve la t ions never before ,so fa r as Harry and Mike a reaware, made publ ic .T i t l e

SpeakerAbst rac t :

UFOs Can SeriouslyDamage Your Health .Jenny Randles

This paper provides thegovernment heal th warning fo rc lose encounter wi tnesseswhich the government re fusesto give .By way o f case h is to r ie s apat te rn o f medical (o rphysio logica l ) e f f ec t s can bebu i l t up . A l eve l o f qui tesupr i s ing consistency emerge sand l eads to ideas fo r theac tua l energy assoc ia te d withUFOs t ha t might beresponsib le . Can we expla in

what i s going onterms o f UAP (o ratmospher ic phenomena)?cases such as car - s topsc l ues to more exot ic

purely innatura lOr doof fe randbeing

someconventional UFOsinvolved in a t l e a s tcases?The problems of medicalexplora t io n of cases i s thenopen to review . What has beendone? What has no t been done ?What are the d i f f i c u l t i e sinvolve d in comprehensive s tudyof c lose encounter witnesses?The second hal f o f the paperexamines what we know aboutmedical e f f ec t s , looking a tprevious work in s t a t i s t i c a l l ysurveying these phenomena . Fort h i s presenta t ion of anen t i re ly new s t a t i s t i c a lanalys i s of 3052 Bri t i sh casesbetween 1947 and 1987 has beenmade . This al lows very spec i f i cnew data on the incidence ofcases with physio logica le f fec t s , the type of phenomenamost commonly reported , thecategory of cases in whichphysio logica l e f fec t s arerepor ted , plus more in te res t ingand obl ique informat ion - suchas the type of witnessesinvolved , the dura t ion of thee f fec t s and the cor re la t ionwith landings , occupants andCE4 (a l ien contac t ) cases .A spec ia l look a t the problemscrea ted by CE4 cases leads in toa c los ing discuss ion of f iveprimary needs which thephysio logica l e f fec t casesd emostra te . These needs e f fec tUFO inves t iga tors , witnessesand the medical profess ion andcould in r are ins tancesmake the dif ference betweenl i f e (or ser iousi n j u ry / i l lne s s ) and death .

Journal of Trans ien t Aeria l Phenomena , September 1987 Page 7 .