Mesozoic and Cenozoic Faunas and Biostratigraphy.The Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expendition.Transactions, Vol. 1: 132-191 (1974)Moscow

Fauna i biostratigrafiya mesozoya i kaynozoya Mongolii.Sovmestnaya Sovetsko-Mongolskaya Paleontologicheskaya EkspeditsiyaTrudy, Vol. 1: 132-191 (1974)Moskva, Izdadelstvo “Nauka”

E. A. Maleev

GIANT CARNOSAURS OF THEFAMILY TYRANNOSAURIDAE

This version represents a combination of separate translations by(1) Catherine Siskron and S. P. Welles and (2) Jisuo Jin

edited together by Matthew Carranooriginal page numbers noted thus: {}

{132} EDITOR’S NOTE

The manuscript of ‘Evgeni Aleksandrovich Maleev, who suddenly passed away in 1966,

has remained unfinished. As can be seen from the Introduction, which the author had time to

write, he intended to clarify not only, as is usual, the morphology and systematics, but also

questions of functional analyses, ecology of carnosaurs, their geologic age and geographic

distribution, as well as their significance in the Mesozoic terrestrial vertebrate faunas. But,

unfortunately, this was not able to come to pass.

The most complete was the chapter that contained a detailed morphological description

of Tarbosaurus, which is illustrated with the excellent work of artists P. V. Sivkov and K. P.

Meshkov. Undoubtedly this section of E. A. Maleev’s work represents a great deal of

interesting material for paleontologists in itself, as throughout the world there are only a few

monographs published on the gigantic carnosaurian dinosaurs; all of them were published

several decades ago, and naturally in several areas they are out of date with respect to the

current level of knowledge. In addition, among these monographs there is not a single one that

concerns itself with Asian carnosaurs, other than individual articles. For this reason the work

of E. A. Maleev is especially valuable, being the first detailed morphological description of

Asian carnosaurs, exemplified by Tarbosaurus.

In addition to the introduction and the chapter on morphology, the author also wrote a historical

sketch on the study of carnosaurs, in which he examines a considerable number of publications

on Jurassic and Cretaceous carnosaurs (primarily of North America, where most of the major

discoveries are known) over the last hundred years. The sketch remained unfinished, but even

in this incomplete state it offers useful information. The chapter dedicated to carnosaur

systematics, although not quite completed, had already been published as a separate article

(Maleev, 1968), and there is no point in duplicating it here. The remaining chapters listed by

the author were still in outline form and contained only notes from various sources.

Some tables of measurements were prepared by the author as blank forms but not filled

in with data. The completion of this task was accomplished by S. M. Kurzanov. Preparation of

the manuscript for publication was done by A.K. Rozhdestvenskiy.

The work of E. A. Maleev is particularly topical at this time, given the paleontological

expeditions currently underway in Mongolia.

INTRODUCTION

In the collection of dinosaurs from Central Asia in the Paleontological Institute of the

Academy of Science of the USSR, there is a great deal of gigantic carnosaur material. They are

one of the most interesting and highly organized animals among all reptiles. {133} This group

first appeared during the Triassic and existed until the end of the Mesozoic. Within the

boundaries of the USSR only fragmentary carnosaur remains are known from Kazakhstan,

Tadjhikistan, Zabaykal'ye, and the Far East. Thus the materials from the Mongolian National

Republic, consisting of several nearly complete skeletons, a series of skulls, and numerous

skeletal parts, not only open up the possibilities for research on the structures of these animals,

but also reveal a series of biological laws in the evolution of Mesozoic vertebrates.

In order to achieve this goal, the following problems will be addressed: 1) the

adaptation of carnosaurs to bipedal locomotion; 2) zonal distribution (biotypes of carnivorous

dinosaurs); 3) carnivorous dinosaurs as a biological type; 4) the formation of faunal complexes,

the paths of distribution, and the causes of extinction of carnosaurs; 5) geological distribution

and comparison of the dinosaur faunas of Asia and North America. Besides these major

questions, great attention will be paid to the analysis of particular adaptive structures in the

dinosaur skeleton, which are currently insufficiently studied and have not received correct

functional explanations.

It can undoubtedly be said that carnosaur evolution is one of the most interesting

problems in evolutionary paleozoology. Inasmuch as carnosaur remains are almost unknown in

the USSR, the situation arose that they were studied by foreign scientists. They have

accumulated a considerable number of facts and observations, but the existing concepts in

several cases are challenged by the biological peculiarities and evolution of certain groups.

The wide geographic distribution of carnivorous dinosaurs is of great geological

significance. Complex organisms, which rather precisely reflect their living conditions in their

structure, become not only records of stratigraphic sequences, but are also reliable indicators of

past physico-geographic environments, which are extremely important for paleogeographic

constructions and correlations of continental deposits, frequently across distant regions of

Europe, Asia and North America.

This work was based on material of gigantic carnosaurs from the family

Tyrannosauridae, representing the collections of the Mongolian Paleontological Expedition of

the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in 1946-1949 from the Nemegt Basin (Efremov, 1954a,

1955): 1) Tyrannosaurus bataar Maleev, 1955 – nearly complete skull with lower jaw and a

series of cervical vertebrae (No. 551-1); 2) Tarbosaurus efremovi Maleev, 1955 – three nearly

complete skeletons (Nos. 551-2, 551-4, 552-1), the first among them with a skull; 3)

Gorgosaurus lancinator Maleev, 1955 – a complete skull with lower jaw, a series of dorsal and

caudal vertebrae, limb bones (No. 553-1); 4) Gorgosaurus novojilovi Maleev, 1955 – a nearly

complete skeleton with skull (No. 552-2); 5) numerous pieces of skulls and postcranial

skeletons, belonging to no fewer than six individuals of Tarbosaurus efremovi1.

Preparation of the Mongolian material was executed with great competence by

preparators M. F. Luk’yanova and M. P. Zhukova of the Paleontological Institute of the

Academy of Sciences of the USSR.

The structure of the skulls and postcranial skeletons of Gorgosaurus, Tarbosaurus and

Tyrannosaurus have a great deal in common in spite of their different sizes. For this reason,

the description for all three genera is given based on the most completely preserved skeleton of

Tarbosaurus efremovi, which makes it possible {134} to avoid unnecessary repetition in the

description of the osteological materials and considerably reduces the volume of the article.

The excellent line drawings were produced by artists K. P. Meshkov, P. V. Sivkov and N. A.

Yan’shinov. The photographs were developed by photographers N. P. Finogenov and A. V.

1According to A. K. Rozhdenstvenskiy (1965), all the enumerated species are synonymous with one, which should be named Tarbosaurus bataar (Maleev). This point of view is also shared by other recent authors (Kielan-Jaworowska, 1967, 1969; Kielan-Jaworowska and Dovchin, 1968; Osmoska and Roniewicz, 1970; and D. Russell, 1970). – Editor’s note.

Skinder in the photolab of the Paleontological Institute. The author is very grateful to all the

individuals mentioned above.

C h a p t e r I

BRIEF HISTORICAL OUTLINE OF RESEARCH ON CARNIVOROUS DINOSAURS

The initial research on carnivorous and other dinosaurs in North America, where the

greatest number of discoveries is known, dates back to the second half of the last century,

which corresponded to the explosive development of vertebrate paleontology in the West.

During this period, such well-known American paleontologists as J. Leidy, O. C. March and E.

D. Cope were studying carnosaurs.

The first article on the carnivorous dinosaurs of North America was published by Leidy

in 1856. A tooth from the Cretaceous of Montana was described Deinodon horridus.

In 1866, Cope described Laelaps aquilunguis from several teeth and fragments of

postcranial skeleton from the Cretaceous of New Jersey.

Soon after, Leidy (1868) again described several huge serrated teeth from the Upper

Cretaceous of Montana, which he classified as belonging to the new genus Aublysodon.

In Leidy's work from 1870, we find the description of the posterior half of a skeleton

and caudal vertebrae of a dinosaur, which the author named Poecilopleuron valens2.

Three years later, Leidy (1873) provided an illustration, and redescribed this material

with minor changes as a the type species A. valens of the new genus Antrodemus, transformed

from Poecilopleuron valens.

In 1876, Cope (1876b) described a new species, Laelaps incrassatus, based on a tooth

from the Cretaceous of Montana, and stated that it was very closely related to Aublysodon

lateralis, Laelaps explanatus and L. falculus, described previously (Cope, 1876a).

At the same time, Cope (1876b) described three more species of Laelaps from Montana:

L. hazenianus, L. cristatus and L. laevifrons. In addition, Cope (1892) described two skulls

from the uppermost beds of the Laramie (Edmonton) Formation in Alberta, which are identical

to Laelaps incrassatus in their morphology.

2 This genus was established in Europe by R. Owen (1842), but is now regarded as a synonym of Megalosaurus (Buckland. 1842). – Editor's note.

In 1877, O. C. Marsh (1877a) reported that the genus name Laelaps was preoccupied by

Köch and suggested changing it to Dryptosaurus, based on the species Dryptosaurus (=

Laelaps) aquilunguis from the Upper Cretaceous of New Jersey.

In the same year, Marsh (1877b) published a description of a series of dorsal and caudal

vertebrae of a carnivorous dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic of Colorado. The vertebrae closely

resemble those of Antrodemus valens Leidy in shape and size. Marsh, however, created the

new genus Allosaurus, with A. fragilis as the type species; he proposed to eliminate the genus

name Antrodemus.

In 1884, Marsh published a diagnostic description of the order Theropoda, including

Ceratosaurus nasicornis from the Jurassic of Colorado, with a description and illustration of the

skull and postcranial skeleton. On the basis of the peculiar structure of the skull, he established

the new family Ceratosauridae. At the same time, Marsh described a new species based on the

fragments of a lower jaw and several teeth from the Upper Jurassic of Colorado – Labrosaurus

ferox. He stated that the representatives of this genus have more triangular teeth than other

theropods.

{135} R. Lydekker (1888) reexamined Marsh’s material of Ceratosaurus nasicornis and

came to the conclusion that C. nasicornis resembled Megalosaurus in the structure of its

postcranial skeleton, and on that basis removed the genus Ceratosaurus to the family

Megalosauridae.

Simultaneously with Lydekker’s article, Marsh (1888) published a note on a new

species of the genus Allosaurus – A. medius, based on fragments of teeth from the Lower

Cretaceous of Maryland.

Later, in 1890, Marsh gave a description on the new species of the genus Deinodon – D.

grandis, based on some metatarsal bones from the Upper Cretaceous of Montana. In the same

year, while preparing his manual on vertebrate paleontology – "Handbuch der Paläontologie" –

K. Zittel (1890) reexamined Leidy's (1873) description of the genus Antrodemus and

transferred it to the family Megalosauridae.

Similarly, Cope (1892) noted that the species Ceratosaurus nasicornis described by

Marsh (1884) is very similar to members of the family Megalosauridae in its postcranial

skeleton, and that it would be more appropriate to assign the specimens described by Marsh to

the genus Megalosaurus.

In 1896, O.C. Marsh described some isolated limb bones of a large carnivorous dinosaur

from the Cretaceous of Wyoming and assigned them to a new species of the genus

Ornithomimus – O. grandis. Later, O. P. Hay (1902) revised dinosaur systematics and

transferred all species of Labrosaurus to the genus Antrodemus.

In 1903, two articles from H. F. Osborn (1903a, b) appeared. In the first, he described

the skull and postcranial skeleton of a small carnivorous dinosaur, Ornitholestes hermanni,

from the Jurassic of Wyoming. In the second article, he described and illustrated the skull of

Creosaurus from the same deposits in Wyoming. The skull shows several primitive structures,

with three antorbital fenestrae; an elongated facial region; a shortened temporal portion; and

parietal bones highly extended posteriorly.

In 1905, Osborn described a large carnivorous dinosaur from hind limb bones from the

Upper Cretaceous of Montana as a representative of a new genus Tyrannosaurus. He reported

that the size of this carnosaur is greater any previously described carnivorous dinosaur. In the

same article, he gave a brief diagnosis of Dynamosaurus, which has small, plate-like dermal

ossifications as in other carnivorous dinosaurs. This group of carnosaurs was described earlier

as belonging to the single genus Dryptosaurus. Further, he mentioned the need to reexamine

the nomenclature of carnivorous dinosaurs.

In 1906, Osborn once again returned to his examination of Tyrannosaurus rex, using

additional, more complete materials from the Laramie formation of Montana, on the basis of

which he gave a diagnosis of the species and a short ecological characterization. In the same

article, he reexamined Marsh’s data on Ornithomimus grandis, which Osborn he transferred to

Tyrannosaurus rex based on its greater size and similarity. The fact that these remains belong

to the same genus is also supported by their identical geological age.

In 1909, Hay made the first attempt at a detailed anatomical analysis of the skull and

brain cavities of Triceratops, Iguanodon and Megalosaurus, and described the structure of the

brain from molds made from the brain cavities of these dinosaurs.

In A.S. Woodward’s article (1910), we find the description of the skull of

Megalosaurus bradleyi. The author pointed out the peculiar structure of the teeth and the

elongation of the facial portion of the skull.

R. S. Lull (1911) described a new species of the genus Dryptosaurus – D. potens, from

a single vertebra from the Lower Cretaceous of Maryland.

Subsequently, in 1912 H. F. Osborn returned to his study of the material on gigantic

carnosaurs of North America for the third time. He gave a detailed description and illustration

of the skull of Tyrannosaurus rex and made comparisons with the skull of Allosaurus. He

described the brain cavity and a brain cast of Tyrannosaurus rex for the first time. Five years

later, Osborn published (1917) his paper on {136} the morphological analysis of the skeletal

structures of Ornitholestes, Struthiomimus and Tyrannosaurus. In this paper, there is a brief

discussion of the presumed mode of life of Tyrannosaurus and small carnivorous dinosaurs.

The author noted that Tyrannosaurus had the best predatory mechanism among terrestrial

vertebrates. It combined destructive force and speed for hunting. In conclusion, he provided

skeletal reconstructions of Ornitholestes, Struthiomimus and Tyrannosaurus.

Almost simultaneously, L. M. Lambe’s monograph (1917) was published, with a

description of Gorgosaurus libratus from the Upper Cretaceous of Alberta (Canada). This was

the first description of a complete skeleton of a carnosaur from Canada, where until 1913 there

had only been descriptions of isolated bones from carnivorous dinosaurs. The monograph

provided excellent illustrations of the skull and many parts of the postcranial skeleton. In the

conclusion, the author proposed several ideas concerning the habits of carnivorous dinosaurs.

As the material on the different dinosaur groups accumulated, it became possible to

conduct more in-depth research, as well as make comparisons of individual organs and entire

organ systems between fossil and contemporary forms, even if only distantly related. Such an

attempt was originally made by Gregory and Camp (1918), who reconstructed of the pelvic

musculature of the carnivorous dinosaur Ornitholestes hermanni based on study of the

musculature of the alligator and ostrich. These works have had a great impact on subsequent

studies of the musculature of many dinosaurs.

In 1919, C. A. Matley (1919) published an interesting article about the dinosaurs of

India. The author gave a list of forms found there: Sauropoda – Titanosaurus indicus;

Carnosauria – Allosauridae; Coelurosauria – Compsognathidae, Coeluridae, Ornithomimidae.

In the conclusion he compared the Indian forms with the dinosaurs from Madagascar, and he

concluded that they are quite similar.

In the following year a large monograph by C.W. Gilmore (1920) was published,

containing descriptions of all carnivorous dinosaurs deposited in the National Museum of the

USA. He described Antrodemus and Ceratosaurus in particular detail. The author reviewed

the systematics and gave a survey of the carnivorous dinosaurs found in the Jurassic and

Cretaceous deposits of North America. Following Gilmore's work, W. D. Matthew and B.

Brown (1922) published an article on the systematics of carnivorous dinosaurs of North

America. At the end of their paper, they gave a description of a skull of a new carnivorous

dinosaur – Dromaeosaurus albertensis from the Cretaceous of Alberta (Canada). In 1923 the

same authors reported a new discovery of Gorgosaurus libratus Lambe and a new species – G.

sternbergi from the Cretaceous of Alberta. In the conclusion of the paper, they made

taphonomic observations concerning the burial of carnivorous dinosaurs.

In the same year, three articles by A. S. Romer (1923a, b, c) were published, containing

reconstructions of the pelvic musculature of dinosaurs. In the first article, the author made a

comparison of the pelvis of dinosaurs with that of birds. He wrote that for these groups the

ilium is typically elongated anteriorly, but that this character is not present in primitive

Paleozoic reptiles. Morphologically and functionally, this part of the pelvis has significant

differences in the two groups, which obviously indicates that they had independent histories. In

the second article, Romer some observations on the homology of the pelvic musculature of

crocodiles, birds and reptiles, and in the third – he gave a reconstruction of the pelvic

musculature of the dinosaur order Saurischia – reptile-like pelvis – with reference to the

musculature of crocodiles.

In 1928, W. A. Parks (1928) described Albertosaurus arctunguis from an incomplete

skeleton from the Cretaceous of Alberta. The author made a detailed comparison with other

previously described carnosaurs. In L. S. Russell’s article (1930), we find a brief survey of the

Cretaceous dinosaurs from Canada and the USA. The author provided detailed faunal lists

from various localities, {137} the geological distribution of well-known forms, and a

correlation of Cretaceous deposits of Canada and USA.

In the same year, O. Abel (1930) published his work on the reconstructed appearance

and habits of Tyrannosaurus rex. The author noted the weak development of the forelimbs and

the fact that the animal’s locomotion was achieved exclusively on the hind legs.

In 1933, the article of C. W. Gilmore appeared on the Cretaceous dinosaurs of Inner

Mongolia. The author indicated that Granger and Berkey (1922) and later Matthew (in Berkey

and Morris, 1927) incorrectly assigned the Iren Dabasu Formation to the Lower Cretaceous.

After a critical study of all the known species, Gilmore came to the conclusion that this fauna is

very similar to the Late Cretaceous fauna of North America, and apparently developed

simultaneously. Only the Ceratopsidae is missing in the Iren Dabasu faunal complex. In the

same article, the author described a large carnivorous dinosaur – Alectrosaurus olseni from the

bones of the fore- and hind limbs. The unusually gigantic size of the humerus and the large

unguals did not resemble those known earlier from Cretaceous deinodonts3.

In 1935, C. L. Camp (1935) described the fragmentary remains of carnivorous dinosaurs

from deposits thought to be Cretaceous in Xinjiang province (China). In the author's opinion,

these remains (several limb bone and pelvic fragments as well as teeth) indicate the presence of

huge carnivorous dinosaurs in Central Asia, possibly related to Tyrannosaurus. Further, the

author compared the Chinese finds with known carnosaurs, studied the histologic structure of

the bones, and on the basis of such studies determined the geologic age of the Xinjiang

dinosaurs as Jurassic.

In 1946, Gilmore described from a complete skull a new species of the genus

Gorgosaurus – G. lancensis from the Cretaceous of Montana. In the same article he reviewed

the systematics of Cretaceous carnosaurs, and designated a series of type species for many

genera, giving a greater taxonomic significance to the shape and number of teeth.

Five years later, E. H Colbert (1951) published an article on the evolution of dinosaurs.

The author recognized four lines of adaptive radiation, as well as one of the characteristic

peculiarities in the evolution of carnosaurs -- the disproportionate enlargement of the skull.

The first discovery of carnivorous dinosaurs in Tien Shan was published in a 1957

article by Young and Sun (1957), along with a description of the new species Szechuanosaurus

campi from the Cretaceous of the Turpan Basin.

W. Langston (1959), in a survey paper on the fossil vertebrates from Alberta, recorded

the great variety of fossil remains of carnosaurs in the Cretaceous deposits of North America.

For the Cretaceous of Canada, he recognized the presence of Gorgosaurus, Albertosaurus, and

Tyrannosaurus.

Until the 1960’s, reports on the carnosaurs of Central Asia were confined to the brief

articles of Gilmore (1933), Camp (1935) and a few others.

The extensive investigation of the dinosaurs of Asia were initiated by Soviet

paleontologists after the works of the Mongolian Paleontological Expedition by the Academy

of Sciences of the USSR (1946-1949). This expedition discovered a wealth of localities of

dinosaur and Tertiary mammal faunas. The Mongolian locations, such as Nemegt, Bayn-Shire,

3 The family Deinodontidae Cope, 1886 is now regarded as synonymous with Tyrannosauridae Osborn, 1906 – Editor’s note.

Altan-Teeli and others, are as rich as those of Europe, Africa and North America in terms of the

completeness of their paleontological material.

I. A. Efremov holds a special place among the investigators of the fauna of Central Asia

(Efremov 1949, 1950, 1953, 1954a,b, 1955, 1963). He wrote a series of survey papers on

various problems associated with the study of dinosaurs. These papers shed new light on the

historical development of dinosaurs, their habitat zones, formation of faunal complexes, burial

conditions, and geographical and geological distributions. {138} A series of articles describing

the dinosaurs of Central Asia was published by E. A. Maleev (1952a, b, c, 1953a, b, c, 1956,

1964a, b, 1965). In them he provided a monographic description of the armored dinosaurs and

preliminary descriptions of several genera and species of gigantic carnosaurs. A. K.

Rozhdestvenskiy (1952a, b, 1955, 1957, 1964) published papers on ornithopods.

Review of the literature over the last hundred years4 indicates that most of them

characteristically lack, or are deficient in, the functional and ecological aspects of the studied

material. Some publications present brief descriptions of isolated small collections, and many

genera and species are identified by poorly recognizable, fragmentary fossils. Characterizing

this period of development in vertebrate paleontology, L. S. Davitashvilii (1940, 1948)

correctly remarked that each scientist tried to identify as many species as possible. This lead to

an excessive number of taxa and complicated the systematics considerably.

C h a p t e r I I

SYSTEMATIC DESCRIPTION

SUBORDER THEROPODA

INFRAORDER CARNOSAURIA

F A M I L Y TYRANNOSAURIDAE OSBORN, 1906(= DEINODONTIDAE COPE, 1866)

D i a g n o s i s . Carnivorous dinosaurs of gigantic size and massive proportions. Skull

large with long, high jaws. Three antorbital fenestrae. Orbits rounded or bean-shaped. No

mobility between frontal and parietal. Quadrate highly elongated ventrally and firmly united

with the quadratojugal. Teeth large, saber-shaped, slightly recurved, and serrated on the edges. 4 In addition to this survey of literature, among it European, there is also the article of E.A. Maleev

(1968), published posthumously. – Editor’s note.

Premaxillary teeth smaller than those following. Neck short, wide; cervical vertebrae short,

opisthocoelous. Abdominal [ventral] ribs well developed. Forelimbs are highly reduced.

Manus bears two digits (I and II). Metacarpal Mc1 very short and wide; Mc2 longer, Mc3

rudimentary. Manual phalanges very short; ungual phalanges highly curved and compressed.

Pelvic bones firmly connected; ilium high, elongated; ischium moderately flattened distally but

not widened; pubis long, with a large distal symphysis. Hind limbs long, massive. Femur

approximately as long as the large tibia. Astragalus massive with an ascending process.

Metatarsals uniformly elongate. Middle metatarsal Mt3 sharply narrowed proximally and

tightly compressed between the two adjacent bones. Pedal phalanges massive, robust; unguals

moderately curved but not compressed.

F a m i l y c o m p o s i t i o n . The following genera are assigned to the family

Tyrannosauridae: Aublysodon (= Gorgosaurus), Tarbosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, and probably

Prodeinodon, Alectrosaurus, and also Genyodectes.

G e o g r a p h i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n . Asia and North America.

G e o l o g i c a l a g e . Late Cretaceous.

{139} Genus Tarbosaurus Maleev, 1955Tarbosaurus: Maleev, 1955 – Doklady Academy of Science USSR 104, No. 5, p. 780.

G e n u s t y p e – Tarbosaurus efremovi Maleev, 19555.

D i a g n o s i s . Size up to 10-12 meters in length. Skull lower but longer than that of

Tyrannosaurus. Lacrimal bony projections poorly developed or absent. Teeth laterally

compressed, elongate-oval in cross-section, with anteroposterior diameter greater than

transverse diameter; each tooth is differentiated by the more or less labial position of the

serrated edges and the size of the crown. Premaxilla bearing four teeth, maxilla 12-13, dentary

15; crown of largest tooth reaches 112 mm in height. First maxillary tooth considerably larger

than premaxillary teeth. Length ratio of humerus to scapula and of ulna to humerus is 1:3.

Femur massive, long, with a well-developed head. Length ratio of femur to humerus is 4:1.

Tibia massive, robust. Length ratio of femur to tibia is 1:1. Tail consists of no fewer than 35-

45 caudal vertebrae.

C o m p a r i s o n . In terms of absolute size, Tarbosaurus is smaller than

Tyrannosaurus; the skull of the former is less massive and more elongate, and the teeth are

more laterally compressed. The Mongolian form differs from Aublysodon (= Gorgosaurus) by

its larger skull, the absence of lacrimal bony projections, bean-shaped orbits, and greater

forelimb reduction. All these features suggest that this is an independent genus in the family

Tyrannosauridae (= Deinodontidae).

C o m p o s i t i o n o f s p e c i e s . The genus Tarbosaurus contains presently only

one species – T. efremovi Maleev, 19555.

G e o g r a p h i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n . Central Asia.

L o c a t i o n. Mongolia National Republic, Nemegt, 350 km west-southwest of the

Aimak [provincial] center of Dalan-Dzadagad.

G e o l o g i c a l a g e . Late Cretaceous.

Tarbosaurus efremovi Maleev, 19555

Tarbosaurus efremovi: Maleev, 1955. – Doklady Academy of Sciences USSR 104, No. 5, p. 780.

S p e c i e s t y p e . Skull and postcranial skeleton. No. 551-2, collection of PIN AN

SSSR [Paleontological Institute, Academy of Sciences, USSR].

D i a g n o s i s . See diagnosis for the genus Tarbosaurus.

DESCRIPTIONSkull and lower jaw (Figs. 1-20, Plate II, Fig. 1)

E x t e r n a l m o r p h o l o g y

The skull is massive, high, and triangular in outline. The lateral sides of the skull are

directed toward each other in such a manner that the bottom is wider than the top. In lateral

view, the skull appears quite light but strong, with several openings on each side. The posterior

part is high dorsoventrally and moderately widened in the orbital region. The facial part is

considerably elongated and slightly narrowed toward the rounded end of the snout.

{140} The orbit is large, with a bean-shaped outline. The upper margin of the orbit is

formed by the lacrimal, prefrontal and postorbital, its anterior margin by the lacrimal, ventrally

it is bordered by the jugal, and posteriorly by the postorbital. The first antorbital fenestra (ant1)

is the largest opening in the skull. Its upper margin is formed by the lacrimal and maxilla, its

anterior margin by the maxilla, ventrally by the maxilla and jugal, posteriorly by the lacrimal.

5 If one accepts the synonyms of A. K. Rozhdestvenskiy (1965), then the holotype would be skull No. 551-1, depicted and described by E. A. Maleev (1955a) as Tyrannosaurus bataar (in this case Figs. 48-51, Plate I, Fig. 1); all the remaining specimens (in this case Figs. 1-47, 52-66, Plate II, Figs. 1-2) would become paratypes. – Editor’s note.

The second antorbital fenestra (ant2) is pentagonal in shape, much smaller, and lies completely

in the posterior part of the maxilla. The third antorbital fenestra (ant3) is very small and oval-

shaped. Anteriorly it is delimited by the premaxilla, posteriorly by the maxilla.

The external nares are located near the edge of the face, and are elongate-oval in

outline. Anteriorly they are delimited by the premaxillae, posteriorly by the nasals. The

maxilla does not participate in the formation of the nares.

The jugal foramen (f. j.) is located in the anterior part of the jugal, directly below its

articulation with the lacrimal, and is oval shaped.

The lateral temporal fenestra (l. f.) has an irregular shape, and is elongated dorsally.

Dorsally it is delimited by the postorbital and squamosal, anteriorly by the descending process

of the postorbital and the ascending process of the jugal, ventrally by the jugal and

quadratojugal, and posteriorly by the quadratojugal and squamosal.

The upper temporal fenestra is large and elongated anteroposteriorly. Anteriorly it is

delimited by the parietal, postfrontal and postorbital, laterally by the postorbital and squamosal,

posteriorly by the squamosal, and internally by the parietal and squamosal.

{141}D e r m a l b o n e s o f t h e

d o r s a l a n d l a t e r a l s i d e s o f t h e s k u l l

P r e m a x i l l a e (Figs. 1, 2) – short right-triangular bones with long, thin processes

that proceed from the dorsal edge of the premaxillae and extend dorsally and posteriorly to

meet the nasal processes and form the outline of the external nares. Each premaxilla bears four

teeth. The premaxillary teeth are smaller in size than the maxillary teeth. The body of the bone

is slightly curved along the long axis up to the articulation with the opposite premaxilla. The

contact surface bears shallow pits and protuberances that firmly connect the two premaxillae.

Internally, directly below the naris, there is a deep, elongated furrow to accommodate the thin

anterior process of the maxilla. The external surface of the bone is slightly concave in dorsal

view, but in the middle it is convex, roughened, and bears numerous foramina and traces of

blood vessels that nourished the bone and teeth.

N a s a l s – (Figs. 1, 3) – long, massive, fused along the center into a single element.

The separation of the bones is visible anteriorly for a short distance in the shape of a

longitudinal narrow slit. In the anterior part the nasals are widened and thickened, but

posteriorly they are narrower and more dorsoventrally compressed. The dorsal surface is

convex and roughened for two-thirds of its length, while the posterior third is flat and smooth.

Along the whole length of the bone, small and {142} shallow openings for blood vessels are

present. The ventral surface is smooth, deeply concave transversely.

Anteriorly, each nasal is divided by deep groove into two processes: the massive, V-

shaped upper process, which meets with the rising process of the premaxilla above the external

naris; and a weaker descending process along the upper surface of the anterior edge of the

maxilla, where by meetings with the premaxilla it excludes the maxilla from participation in

bordering the external naris. The nasals articulate with the frontals by a narrow, triangular

suture. Laterally the nasal bones are articulated with the maxilla, lacrimal and prefrontal by

well-defined sutures.

M a x i l l a e (Figs. 1, 4) – the largest bones in the skull, triangular in outline, with a

bluntly sharpened anterior end, bear 12-13 teeth. The height of the maxilla gradually increases

posteriorly. Dorsally and posteriorly it extends into a large, narrowing process that meets the

nasal. and lacrimal. Together with the premaxilla, the maxilla limits a very small, oval-shaped

third antorbital fenestra (ant3) anteriorly. At the base of the palatal process, the bone is slightly

concave and perforated by the second antorbital fenestra (ant2). The posterior end of the

maxilla is deeply notched, bordering the first antorbital fenestra (ant1) anteriorly and ventrally.

The ventral process of the maxilla is long, V-shaped, and elongated posteriorly, with its

narrowing end reaching the center of the orbit vertically and meeting the anterior end of the

jugal by an oblique suture. The ventral edge of the maxilla is convex in profile, rising slightly

toward the anterior end of the face. Below the alveolar edge of the maxillae protrude

interdental or alveolar plates, with a rough lingual surfaces.

{143} A massive palatal process protrudes in a horizontal direction on the interior side

of the bone almost along its whole length. The anterior end of this process is prominently

pointed, elongated anteriorly, and bears a deep longitudinal groove and ridge for articulation

with the opposite maxilla. The posterior end of the palatine process of the maxilla bears a row

of pits and tubercles, marking the location of its connection with the palatine and vomer. The

ventral surface of the palatal process is smooth and has a row of transverse indentations only

near the alveolar edge, perforated by foramina for blood vessels and nerves.

Above the palatal process, the surface of the maxilla is highly marked by numerous

depressions and cavities, separated from each other by bony protuberances, externally

resembling the olfactory region of the mammalian skull. In life these cavities may have served

as a chambers for a Jacobson’s organ.

J u g a l s (Figs. 1, 5) – thin, triradiate, elongated anteroposteriorly. The anterior end of

the jugal is widened dorsoventrally and connected by a deep suture with the posterior process of

the maxilla. On the dorsal edge of this section of the bone, there is a notch for articulation with

the lower branch of the lacrimal. Below the articulation with the lacrimal, the jugal is

perforated by a large, oval jugal foramen. The upper process of the jugal is strongly pointed at

the end and articulates with the descending process of the postorbital, forming a wide band that

separates the orbit from the lateral temporal fenestra. The posterior process has a deep notch for

receiving the finger-like process of the quadratojugal.

The external surface of the jugal is slightly convex, smooth, and is rough and bears a

series of foramina on its ventral edge; the internal surface is concave longitudinally and smooth.

The jugal limits the orbit and a small part of the first antorbital fenestra ventrally.

L a c r i m a l s (Figs. 1, 6) – V-shaped, forming the posterodorsal edge of the first

antorbital fenestra (ant1) and the anterior edge of the orbit. The upper process of the lacrimal

narrows slightly anteriorly and articulates by broad suture with the upper process of the maxilla

and nasal, and posteriorly with the prefrontal and postorbital. The lower process is widened

ventrally and articulates with the jugal. The external surface of the upper branch of the lacrimal

is very rough and bears a large, semilunate foramen, directed posteriorly.

{144} P r e f r o n t a l s – small, has a triangular outline6, occupies a narrow area in the

skull roof between the frontal, lacrimal, nasal and postorbital. It was impossible to examine the

detailed morphological characteristics of the prefrontal due to the absence of individual bones.

F r o n t a l s (Fig. 12) are relatively short and wide, occupy a central region of the roof

of the brain cavity, and are firmly connected by a deep suture to each other and to the

surrounding elements. Anteriorly the frontals are connected to the prefrontals and nasals,

laterally with the lacrimals and postorbitals, and posteriorly with the parietals. The median

suture between the frontals is easily visible along the anterior one-third of its length; posteriorly

the bones are tightly fused and the suture is invisible. On the posterior one-fourth of the bone

an external elevation is formed. The lacrimal and postorbital exclude the frontal from

participation in the formation of the dorsal margin of the orbit. Above the orbit, the surface of

6 It is possibile that these may be the posterior processes of the nasals, separated from the basal part by an accidental fissure. – Editor’s note.

the frontal is concave anteroposteriorly, forming a large part of the anterior border of the upper

temporal fenestra. The external surface of the frontal is smooth.

P o s t o r b i t a l s (Figs. 1, 7) – of massive, triradiate construction. The upper process

of the postorbital is short, wide, and directed internally. The second, narrower process is

directed posteriorly and ventrally, entering into the notch on the external side of the squamosal

and forming the upper temporal arch. The third, being the widest and longest process, is

directed ventrally along the upper process of the jugal, and together they form a wide band that

separates the orbit from the lateral temporal fenestra. The upper part of the bone is

considerably rough.

P a r i e t a l s (Fig. 12) form two crests upon fusing together –sagittal and

supraoccipital, the latter rising above the skull roof. The crest is slightly thickened and

elongated outward at a right angle from the median {145} axis of the parietals. The surface of

the parietal is deeply concave in front of the occipital crest. The median part of the bone is

strongly compressed, forming the inner border of the upper temporal fenestra. Posteriorly, the

parietals continue to the top of the paroccipital processes, where they enter into the notches of

the squamosal and connect with the prootic.

S q u a m o s a l s (Fig. 1) – massive and have a complex outline. The external surface

is convex, the internal is concave and cup-shaped. The anterior process is elongated, slightly

convex dorsally, and covered externally by the posterior process of the postorbital, which enters

into the deep longitudinal notch on the external surface of the squamosal, thus forming the

upper temporal arch. The inner process is broad and passes in front of the occipital crest

towards the posterior side of the upper temporal fenestra. The lower process is elongated

anteriorly and ventrally to contact the upper edge of the quadratojugal. Ventrally there is a

deep notch for the articulation with the quadrate.

Q u a d r a t o j u g a l s (Figs. 1, 8) – relatively small with irregular outlines. The

external surface is slightly convex transversely in the middle and flattened at the ends; the

internal surface is concave anteroposteriorly and bears large, nest-like recesses with sutural

edges at the top and bottom. It articulates with the quadrate by a vertical suture along the

posterior edge at the top and bottom. The central part of the bone is free and forms the external

boundary of the cranio-quadrate passage. The proximal end is moderately widened and

externally bears a large, sloping, triangular depression. The upper edge contacts the descending

process of the squamosal. The lower process is elongated anteriorly and passes between two

spur-like processes of the jugal, forming part of the lower edge of the lateral temporal fenestra.

D e r m a l b o n e s o f t h e v e n t r a l s i d e o f t h e s k u l la n d t h e p a l a t o q u a d r a t e r e g i o n

P a l a t i n e s – flat, thin, triangular in outline, directed anteriorly with sharp ends.

They limit the choanae laterally and posteriorly. The lateral edge is thickened and articulates

with the palatal process of the maxilla and jugal by a squamous suture, and medially and

posteriorly with pterygoid. The central part of the palatine is perforated by a large, oval

foramen. The dorsal side is slightly concave near the lateral edge, the remaining part is flat and

bears small rough spots, and the ventral side is smooth with several foramina for vessels.

P t e r y g o i d s (Fig. 9) – long with a complex outline. A thin, narrow process

extends forward from the anterior end and turns inward slightly, and is adjacent to the medial

edge of the palatine, excluding the contact of the palatines along the midline. The base of the

pterygoid is widened and connects to the posterior edge of the palatine by a squamous suture.

The thin, wide vertical process is directed posteroexternally, forming a mobile articulation with

the basipterygoid process of the basisphenoid, and connecting posteriorly with the plate-like

quadrate [pterygoid process]. The small horizontal process is elongated laterally and contacts

with the medial branch of the transversum, or ectopterygoid. The opposing pterygoids do not

meet along the midline, and the distance between them gradually widens posteriorly.

T r a n s v e r s a , or ectopterygoids (Fig. 10) – massive, short and subtriangular in

outline. The lateral branch is bent into a hook and is adjacent to the internal wall of the jugal.

A wider medial branch is directed slightly posteroventrally, where it contacts the ventral

process of the pterygoid. The dorsal surface is slightly {146} concave and smooth, and the

ventral surface is slightly convex and perforated by a large, oval foramen that leads into a huge

cavity.

Q u a d r a t e s (Fig. 11) – short and high. The anterior process is directed inward to

connect with the ascending process of the pterygoid. Dorsally, the quadrate meets the

squamosal, ventrally the lower jaw. The lower end is strongly widened transversely and bears

two articular surfaces, or condyles, divided by a wide diagonal furrow that correspond to the

articular surfaces of the articular. Externally, the quadrate connects with the quadratojugal.

The lateral surface of the quadrate is smooth, slightly concave medially, and bears two large

depressions that are divided by a nearly horizontal ridge.

{147} B r a i n c a s e a n d o c c i p i t a l r e g i o n o f t h e s k u l l

The sagittal section of the skull (Fig. 12) shows a large braincase that is elongated

anteroposteriorly. The anterior part is narrow, the middle is wide, and the posterior part is

high, sharply descending toward the foramen magnum. Inside the cranium, the borders of the

different bones and the exit foramina of the cranial nerves are clearly visible. The massive roof

of the braincase is formed by the supraoccipital, parietal and frontal. The solid base consists of

the laterosphenoid, basisphenoid, and basioccipital.

The solid fusion of many bones in the occipital region of the skull complicates the

detailed study of some of the elements. The occipital region is large and wide. The thick

occipital crest, formed by the parietals, protrudes sharply from the upper part of the occiput. Its

ventral edge continues towards the sides as a pointed process, which rests against the edge of

the paroccipitals.

The b a s i o c c i p i t a l (Figs. 12, 13) consists of a massive occipital condyle

(condylus occipitalis) and a wide ventral process. The smooth articular surface continues to the

lateral and ventral sides of the condyle. The occipital condyle is convexly rounded, protruding

sharply posteriorly and sloping slightly ventrally relative to the horizontal axis of the skull.

The middle part of the basioccipital borders the round foramen magnum ventrally. The ventral

process is elongated ventrally below the occipital condyle, and is connected laterally with the

ventral process of the exoccipitals and anteriorly with the basisphenoid. Ventrally the process

is slightly concave transversely in the center.

E x o c c i p i t a l s (Figs. 12, 13) are located above and to the side of the basioccipital,

and have the appearance of two wing-like plates, fusing laterally with the paroccipital

processes. The articulation of the exoccipitals on the midline above the foramen magnum

cannot be precisely defined on the existing specimens. Continuing ventromedially, they contact

the basioccipital and form the upper part of the lateral surface of the occipital condyle.

Dorsally, the exoccipitals articulate in the center with the supraoccipital, parietal and

squamosal.

The exit foramina for cranial nerves IX-XI and XII are located on the inner surface of

the exoccipital.

S u p r a o c c i p i t a l (Figs. 12, 13) – a relatively small bone, connected to the

parietals above and the exoccipitals laterally. The dorsal surface of the supraoccipital has a

small notch and a rough surface. This surface continues up to the lateral fossa, where the

ligamentum nuchae is attached. The ventral extension of the supraoccipital cannot be

determined because the sutures are highly fused, but apparently the supraoccipital is excluded

from participation in the upper border of the foramen magnum. A small ridge passes along the

middle of the posterior surface, gradually decreasing ventrally.

P a r o c c i p i t a l s , or opisthotics – high and elongated externally, posteriorly and

ventrally. Dorsally they contact the parietal and squamosal, medially the exoccipital, ventrally

the basisphenoid.

The b a s i s p h e n o i d (Fig. 12) has a subtriangular shape below. The basisphenoid

consists of two lateral plates, widened anteroposteriorly, and is adjacent to the basioccipital

processes. Posteriorly they connect with the ventral expansion of the paroccipital processes by

a suture.

{149} L o w e r J a w

The lower jaw consists of the dentary, splenial, angular, surangular, dental lamina,

prearticular, articular, and coronoid. The mandibular rami are relatively high, long, and

transversally compressed. The upper edge noticeably descends anteriorly and rises posteriorly

in the region of the dentary-surangular articulation. The lower edge is slightly concave for a

distance and rises gradually from the anterior end of the angular. There is no complete fusion

at the symphysis, and it apparently was held together with the help of cartilage or a ligament.

The d e n t a r y (Figs. 1, 14, 16) is long, high in the posterior part, and transversely

compressed. The anterior end is slightly pointed and extends dorsally. The ventral edge is

wide and rounded. The posterior end is deeply notched, and articulates dorsally with the

surangular and ventrally with the angular so that these bones overlap. The height of the dentary

gradually increases posteriorly, reaching a maximum at the articulation with the surangular.

Alveoli for 15 teeth are located along the dorsal edge, and the dentition occupies 95% of the

total length of the dentary. There are thin alveolar partitions between the alveoli, which are

widened lingually and {150} form wrinkled interdental plates, corresponding to similar ones in

the upper jaw. A longitudinal furrow for the dental artery passes along the base of these plates.

On the lingual side, the dentary is covered by the splenial and the dental lamina. Below the

dental lamina, a deep longitudinal groove passes medially along the dentary. The external

surface of the dentary is rough, slightly convex transversely, and bears numerous foramina. A

row of large foramina passes longitudinally below the tooth row, with one foramen per tooth.

These foramina undoubtedly served for the passage of nerves and blood vessels to nourish the

teeth.

D e n t a l l a m i n a [Supradentary] (Fig. 16) – thin, saber-shaped, overlaps the

interdental plates lingually, and extends for the entire length of the tooth row. The anterior end

is pointed, the posterior is curved into the shape of a handle. The external surface is slightly

convex anteroposteriorly and bears small fossae that correspond to the interdental plates.

The a n g u l a r (Figs. 1, 17) has a wing-like shape; at top it is partially covered by the

surangular, and it extends posterodorsally. A finger-like process protrudes from the anterior

edge, inserting between the dentary and the splenial on the lingual side. The posterior end is

widened and articulates with surangular by a squamous suture. Below this articulation, the

angular limits a small, elongated foramen ventrally. The external surface of the angular is

convex, smooth, and the lingual is slightly concave.

S u r a n g u l a r [Supraangular] (Fig. 18) – the second largest element of the mandible,

and forming its posterior part. In size it is only slightly smaller than the dentary. It is high in

the middle, narrowing slightly toward the ends. Its thin anterior end is thin and articulates with

the dentary by a squamous suture; the posterior end is greatly thickened and firmly connected

with the articular and prearticular, forming the labial part of the mandibular joint for

articulation with the quadrate. Here a short, bent process protrudes inward from the posterior

end, giving the surangular its maximal thickness. The suture between the surangular and

articular is crookedly curved posteriorly and lingually. The sutural border with the prearticular

is clearly visible for a considerable distance ventrally and anteriorly from the articular. The

dorsal edge is thick, curving lingually and slightly ventrally. On the anterior end and on the

lingual side, the surface for articulation with the edge of the dentary is quite rough. Posteriorly

from this articulation, the dorsal edge is perforated by a small foramen, which opens obliquely

posterolingually. The mandibular joint is located at the posterior end of the upper edge and is

separated from it by a curved, pointed process. The labial surface is convex and slightly rough;

the lingual surface is concave and almost smooth. At one-fourth the distance from the posterior

end, the bone is deeply concave and perforated by a large, round mandibular foramen. Below

this foramen there is a very rough area, elongated anteriorly for articulation with the lingual

surface of the angular.

A r t i c u l a r (Fig. 18) – massive and compact, forming the basal part of the

mandibular joint. The articular surface is strongly elongated transversely and divided into an

anterior, convex part and a posterior, concave section. Externally, the articular is overlapped

by the surangular, ventrally and lingually by the prearticular.

P r e a r t i c u l a r (Fig. 18) – narrow, curved, located in front of the articular.

Ventrally it articulates with the angular and forms the ventral border of the jaw. At the middle

of its length it is strongly curved dorsally, and wedges between the dorsal edge of the splenial

and the suture with the surangular with its pointed anterior end. The posterior end is very thick

and firmly joins with the articular. The line of contact with the articular is visible only from the

medial side.

S p l e n i a l (Fig. 19) – thin, triangular, adjacent to the lingual side of the posterior

part of the dentary. The dorsal edge {152} is thin and curved; the ventral is straight, slightly

thickened, and rough. The anterior part is perforated by a large, oval foramen.

T e e t h

The upper jaw bears four pre-maxillary and 13 maxillary teeth, and the lower jaw bears

15 teeth.

The premaxillary teeth (Fig. 2) are considerably smaller in size than the subsequent

maxillary teeth. The anterior surface of each tooth is strongly convex, and the lateral sides are

somewhat compressed and slightly flattened. The anteroposterior diameter is greater than the

transverse diameter. The anterior convexity is equal to the posterior concavity. The enamel is

thin, forming serrated ridges on all the teeth, which are located on both the labial and lingual

surfaces.

The maxillary teeth (Figs. 1, 4, 20) are large, saber-shaped, and different from one

another in size and shape; they are located in sequential order from suboval in cross-section to

laterally compressed, in which the serrated edges are located on the anterior and posterior edges

of the crown. The teeth change shape towards external or labial surface, which changes its

direction and shortens, while the lingual surface expands to the point where both the labial and

the lingual surfaces become equal. This change is observed from the first to the fourth tooth in

the row; the fourth tooth is intermediate, and the fifth resembles the following teeth in the row.

All the teeth are narrower towards the apex, becoming bluntly pointed and slightly

curved posteriorly. This curvature is more pronounced in the distal half of the crown. The

anterior serrated edge ends midway between the crown and base, whereas the posterior

serrations continue to the base. The edges are serrated along their entire length, with two

serrations per millimeter. The serrations are transversely compressed, very regularly

positioned, with hardly any noticeable change in size between the apex and the base of the

tooth. The first through fifth teeth are the largest in the row. A change in size occurs

posteriorly, with teeth 12-13 being the smallest. Several teeth were broken during life and

slightly worn down in the middle of the lateral surface of the crown. Most of the maxillary

teeth are identical in general morphology to those from the lower jaw.

Mandibular teeth (Figs. 1, 14-16). 15 teeth are located on each side of the jaw. The

mandibular teeth are somewhat smaller in size than those of the upper jaw, but are equal in

shape. {153} The lingual surface is more convex than the labial. The crowns are slightly

concave on the lingual surface near the base of the tooth. The first and third teeth of this row

are suboval in cross-section. The anterior surface is strongly convex, and the serrated edge is

located somewhat obliquely on the labial and lingual surfaces. The third mandibular tooth is

intermediate in shape, whereas the fourth is similar to subsequent teeth. Teeth 4-15 are more

laterally compressed, lenticular in cross-section, and have serrated edges that are located

directly on the anterior and posterior edges of the crown. The size of the teeth in this row

decreases posteriorly starting with the 12th tooth, with teeth 14 and 15 being the smallest.

S u c c e s s i o n o f t e e t h (Fig. 20). The teeth of carnosaurs were replaced

throughout their life. Each new tooth appeared on the lingual side of the root of the old tooth.

At this point, the lingual surface of the root was slightly indented and the apex of the new tooth

was initially observed. As the new tooth grew, the root of the functional tooth was partially

resorbed and the latter was gradually pushed out. The growing tooth gradually moved toward

the center of the alveolus, directly below the old tooth. The cut-in tooth was sharp and double

edges, i.e. both the anterior and the posterior sides were serrated. During the last stage, the

apex of the tooth became recurved slightly posteriorly, and the tooth became similar in shape to

a saber.

T a b l e 1Skull dimensions of Tarbosaurus efremovi, PIN No. 551-3

(in mm)

Length of skull from premaxilla to mandibular condyle – 1130Length of skull from premaxilla to occipital condyle – 1085Maximum length of maxilla – 670Maximum height of maxilla – 290Length of dental row of maxilla – 510Length of lower jaw – 1090Maximum length of dentary – 780Maximum height of dentary – 270Length of dental row of dentary – 470Maximum length of surangular – 520Maximum height of surangular – 210

{154} The posterior edge remained sharp, and the anterior became dull, giving the tooth its

necessary strength.

An X-ray shows that behind the growing but not yet functioning tooth, there is the germ

of another tooth, which could quickly form and become functional. In this manner we find an

interrupted succession of teeth among carnivorous dinosaurs. An analogous succession of teeth

can be observed in some modern reptiles, for example in Gavialis gangeticus of India.

P o s t c r a n i a l s k e l e t o n (Figs. 21-50, Table I, Fig. 2)

The most complete postcranial skeletons are those of specimen No. 552-1 from Tsagan-

Ula in the Nemegt Basin (only the last caudal vertebrae are missing), and specimen No. 551-2

from Nemegt itself. From other Nemegt Basin collections there are series of cervical, dorsal

and caudal vertebrae, as well as pelvic and limb bones.

V e r t e b r a l C o l u m n

The vertebral column is compact with highly shortened cervical and trunk sectors. The vertebral formula can be expressed in the following way: C – 9; CD – 2; D – 11; L – 1; S – 5; CO – 40-45.

Cervical vertebrae (Figs. 21-22) are high and massive. In the articulated spine they form a compact cervico-dorsal curvature that is convex dorsally.

The atlas (Fig. 21) is extremely compressed anteroposteriorly and, as in all saurischian dinosaurs, consists of four elements: hypocenter [centrum], two neurapophyses [neural arches], and a serrated (odontoid) process which firmly fuses with the centrum of the axis. The hypocenter is nearly rectangular. The anterior surface is cup-shaped for articulation with the occipital condyle of the skull. The middle of the upper surface is deeply concave and slightly sloping on the posterior side to accommodate the odontoid process. The upper edge is recessed

and articulated with the proximal end of the neurapophysis. The posterior surface is smooth and nearly vertical. The ventral surface is transversely convex, slightly roughened, and bears small fossae and facets for articulation with the cervical ribs on both sides. The proximal end of the neurapophysis is widened and bears two articular facets. The posterior facet faces posteroventrally and articulates with the protruding apex of the hypocenter [centrum]. The anterior facet faces slightly anteroventrally and participates in the formation of the cup-like recess (part of the articulation) for the occipital condyle. The upper part of the neurapophysis produces two processes: the first is short and curved, directed inward, and forming the circular foramen of the cerebrospinal canal with the process of the opposite side, but apparently did not close along the midline, so that the articulation between them was accomplished by a ligament or cartilage. The second, or upper, process is extended dorsally and slightly laterally, and leans somewhat posteriorly. Wide postzygapophyseal facets for articulation with the axis are found on the medial side of these processes.

A x i s [Epistropheus] (Fig. 22). The centrum of this vertebra is massive and high. The articular surfaces are transversely widened. The dorsal edge of the anterior surface, with which the odontoid process articulated, is straight, and the lower edge is broadly rounded. The ventral surface is concave anteroposteriorly and convex transversely. The lateral sides are slightly compressed and perforated by a small foramen, which opens {155} behind the anterior end of the axis. The neural arch is high, crowned by a strong neural spine, which rises and extends slightly posteriorly. The dorsal edge of the neural spine has a deep notch and is trident-shaped.

The prezygapophyses are more weakly developed than the postzygapophyses. They consist of small projections extending anterolaterally from the neural arch. The articular facets are elongate-oval. Large, triangular fossae are located behind the facets to accommodate the atlantal postzygapophyses. The postzygapophyses are massive and project far posterolaterally, with articular facets directed ventrolaterally. A large, triangular depression is located medially between the facets, extending inside the neural arch and above the neural canal. The neural canal is narrow and rounded, and the vertical diameter is greater than the other diameters. The diapophyses are weakly developed, and descend below the suture line that connects the neural arch with the centrum.

3 r d – 9 t h c e r v i c a l v e r t e b r a e (Fig. 22). Behind the axis there are seven vertebrae, which are quite similar in shape. The centrum is opisthocoelous. The anterior articular surface is convex and slopes slightly ventrally; the posterior is recessed in a cup-like shape, lower than the anterior, and sharply bent back along the lower edge, which has an almost spoon-like shape. The slope of the articular surfaces gradually diminishes anteriorly, and in the last set of vertebrae in this series the surfaces become parallel. The lateral sides are slightly depressed behind the transverse processes. At this point there are small oval fossae that lead to

the spinal cavity, which undoubtedly indicate pneumaticity. The neural arch is wide and high. The neural spines are high and spade-shaped, with slightly widened ends. They gradually decrease in anteroposterior diameter, widen transversely and shorten in height. The anterior and posterior surfaces of the processes are slightly recessed and rough. {156} There is a conical depression with smooth sides at the base of the spine anteriorly, and a blunt tongue-shaped projection is developed on the posterior side, which is elongated posteriorly. These structure served as accessory articulations, in addition to the zygapophyses. They gradually decrease in size posteriorly. The neural canal is low and triangular in outline. The transverse processes are short, closely appressed to the sides of the vertebrae, and along most of its length are fused with the base of the neural arch and the upper part of the centrum. The tubercular articular facets are directed ventrally. Posteriorly, the neural spines become gradually elongated, thickened, and more horizontal. The capitular facets are large, and protrude sharply laterally in the lower part of the vertebrae, near the anterior end of the centrum.

The prezygapophyses and postzygapophyses are huge, widely-spaced processes. The articular surfaces of the prezygapophyses are slightly convex, oval in outline, and directed dorsomedially; the postzygapophyses are directed ventrolaterally. The size of the pre- and postzygapophyses gradually increases in posteriorly.

{157} D o r s a l v e r t e b r a e (Figs. 23, 24A, B) are sharply differentiated from the cervicals in terms of centrum configuration, the shape of articular surfaces of the transverse processes and neural spines, and the position and shape of capitular and tubercular facets. In the articulated spinal column they form the steepest dorso-sacro curvature along the whole length of the spine up to the pelvic bones.

The first dorsal vertebrae (Fig. 23) are amphicoelous or procoelous, the anterior articular surface is strongly concave, and the posterior is flattened and slightly concave dorsoventrally. The height of the centrum surpasses its length, and the largest diameter is vertical. The lateral surface is strongly concave and perforated by oval foramina. The ventral surface is concave anteroposteriorly and bears a sharply expressed keel. The capitular facets are large, oval-elliptical in shape, located in the lower part of the centrum in anterior vertebrae and then gradually shift position to reach the base of the neural arch in the middle vertebrae of the column. The neural arch is high and relatively narrow. The neural canal is small, oval in outline, and its vertical diameter is the largest. The transverse processes are long, gradually narrow toward the top, elongate laterally and dorsally, and slope slightly posteriorly. Ventrally, the processes are reinforced by vertical plates, which pass from the anterior and posterior end of the neural arch. Above the base of the processes, these plates coalesce to form a single supporting flank. As a consequence, deep depressions are formed lateral to the neural arch, and the transverse process takes on a triangular shape. The tubercular facets are located on the top

of the transverse processes, protruding dorsoventrally and articulating by laterally- and slightly ventrally-directed surfaces.

The neural spines are wide, gradually narrowing toward the apex, tilt slightly posteriorly, and the transverse diameter is the greatest. The anterior surface is weakly convex and nearly smooth, and the posterior surface is concave and bears a very rough area to facilitate the attachment of ligaments and muscles. The prezygapophyses are the most strongly developed, extending anterodorsally beyond the limits of the anterior end of the centrum. The articular facets are slightly convex, oval-elongated in shape, directed dorsomedially, and the maximal diameter is transverse. The postzygapophyses project very little beyond the end of the centrum. The articular facets are smooth, and directed ventrolaterally.

In successive dorsal vertebrae some changes can be observed in comparison with the previous vertebrae described above. There is a gradual increase in the height and length of the centrum, although length increases less markedly than height. The degree of concavity at the lateral and ventral sides also increases. Because of the strong ventral concavity, the vertebrae become shorter in the ventral part than at the base of the neural arch. The transverse processes change in shape and the angle of slope. They gradually become narrower and take on a horizontal position. This is particularly noticeable on the vertebrae after the 9th. The neural spines increase in height, become narrow transversely, and elongate anteroposteriorly, almost touching one another. The anterior and posterior sides of the neural spines become more curved/concave and undulating. The capitular facets in all the vertebrae behind the 5th are located at the base of the neural arch and protrude strongly laterally.

In the last few presacral (lumbar) vertebra, the transverse process is shortened and stands at almost a right angle to the neural arch. The capitular facet decreases, the tubercular shifts its position forward on the transverse process. The articular surface is directed anteroventrally.

All of the vertebrae in this series have developed accessory articulations (zygantrum and zygosphene), but they are more weakly expressed than in the cervical vertebrae.

S a c r a l v e r t e b r a e (Fig. 25). The sacrum consists of five vertebrae, which are firmly fused together and are partially covered {159} by the ilia. The first vertebra is located opposite the contact point of the ilium and pubis. The second and third vertebrae are visible through the acetabulum; the fourth is located opposite the junction of the ilium and ischium; the fifth is clearly visible at the end of the postacetabular part of the ilium. The centra of the sacral vertebrae are very similar to those of the last dorsal/presacral, but they are even more compressed laterally and ventrally. The transverse processes are very short, wide, and slightly curved upward. The ventral processes are fused with the thick sacral ribs, and their distal ends firmly fuse with the medial surface of the ilia, creating an immobile connection between the

pelvis and spinal column. The neural spines are high, highly elongated anteroposteriorly, and their apices are coarsely roughened and articulated together in the longitudinal vertical plate.

C a u d a l v e r t e b r a e (Figs. 26, 27A, B, 28A, B). The last vertebrae are missing in the series, but we can suppose that the complete tail consisted of 40-45 vertebrae. The first caudal vertebrae are massive, high, and the height of the centrum exceeds its length. The centra are strongly compressed laterally and widened at the ends. The ventral side is concave anteroposteriorly and bears a small groove in the middle. The articular surfaces are amphicoelous; the anterior surfaces are more concave than the posterior, but in the middle of the tail these surfaces become identical. On both ends, there are sloping surfaces for articulation with the chevrons below the articular surface. The transverse processes are wide, short, and extend horizontally from the base of the neural arch, almost at a right angle. In the first two vertebrae they are slightly curved posteriorly and come close to the medial surface of the postacetabular part of the ilium. The neural arch is low and massive. The neural canal is small and circular. The neural spines are high, relatively thin transversely, highly elongated anteroposteriorly, and tilt slightly backwards; the height of the spine is almost equal to the height of the centrum. At the base the spines are strongly recessed anteriorly and posteriorly; in the upper half they are thick and very rough up to the apex of the spine. The prezygapophyses are more developed than the postzygapophyses, widely expanded, and the articular facets face dorsomedially. The postzygapophyses are located at the base of the neural spines, and are considerably higher than the prezygapophyses. Their articular facets are approach slightly, and are directed ventrally and slightly laterally.

More posteriorly, the caudal vertebrae (Fig. 27A, B) gradually decrease in height and increase in length, taking on an elongated cylindrical shape. The neural spines become smaller and shorter, decreasing to the level of the postzygapophyses and becoming even more elongated anteroposteriorly, becoming almost as long as the centrum. The transverse processes are gradually reduced and {160} disappear altogether in the posterior caudal vertebrae. The prezygapophyses are greatly increased in size, reaching almost the length of the centrum. They become less tilted, more laterally compressed, and have a greater vertical diameter. The articular facets are flat and directed medially.

C h e v r o n s (Fig. 29A, B) are located between the caudal vertebrae, starting with the second and continuing up to the 35-37th. In the first vertebrae they are long and V-shaped. The proximal end is divided into two branches, which bear well-developed articular facets for connecting with the centrum. The haemal canal is small and elongated dorsoventrally. The distal end is highly laterally compressed and slightly bent posteriorly.

T a b l e 2Dimensions of the cervical, dorsal and sacral vertebrae of Tarbosaurus

efremovi, PIN No. 551-2 (in mm)

Measurements Vertebraecervical dorsal sacralIII-VIII (middle) I-V

Maximum length of the hypocenter 80 100 170Maximum height of the hypocenter 110 155 –

A change in chevron morphology occurs in subsequent vertebrae, consisting mainly of the following: chevron length decreases, the distal end becomes highly elongated anteroposteriorly to form a distinctive keel, and the posterior elongation is greater than the anterior at this point. But the anterior and posterior elongations become equal from about the 14-15th vertebrae. The haemal canal is reduced to an inconspicuous foramen. The articular facets approach one another, forming a saddle-like surface. A peculiar relationship between the length of the chevron and the extent of the anteroposterior elongation of the distal end can be observed: the shorter the chevron, the larger the distal end and, conversely, the longer the chevron, the weaker the anteroposterior elongation of the distal end.

T a b l e 3Dimensions of cervical and dorsal vertebrae of Tyrannosaurus bataar,

PIN No. 551-1 (in mm)

Measurements Vertebraecervical dorsal

III IV III IVMaximum length of the hypocenter 65 75 80 105Maximum height of the hypocenter 130 140 155 160Maximum height with the neural arch 270 295 410 415Transverse diameter of the hypocenter 150 175 145 160

R i b s

{161} C e r v i c a l r i b s . The first cervical ribs are short, compact, and triangular in outline. The rib head is short, slightly bent down, compressed laterally, and blunt at the end. Behind the head there is a slight widening, which forms a wide neck that bears a tubercle. This widening gives the rib its maximal width. The capitular and the tubercular articular surfaces are equal in size, flat, and nearly circular in outline. More posteriorly, the ribs gradually increase in size, become more massive, and longer; they are wide at the proximal end, quickly narrowing downward and becoming very thin distally. The capitular part of the rib is more

elongated anteriorly than in the first rib. All the ribs have the usual double attachment: the head to the centrum of the vertebra, and the tubercle to the transverse process.

D o r s a l ( p e c t o r a l ) r i b s (Fig. 30 A, B) are long and thin; they gradually increase in size from the first to the fifth and sixth, and {162} and then quickly decrease to the 11th. The proximal part of the rib is widened and strongly curved, and the distal end is narrow and much less curved. The tubercle is separated from the head by a long, laterally compressed neck. The height of the neck increases from the head to the tubercle. In the first ribs, the neck is concave dorsoventrally, and in the more posterior ones it is nearly straight. The proximal end of the neck is slightly bent forward and upward to articulate with the capitular facet of the vertebra. The articular facet of the head is convex, oval-elongate in shape, and the vertical diameter is the largest. The tubercle expands posterodorsally and extends posteriorly almost to the horizontal, with the anteroposterior diameter being the greatest. The articular facet is slightly convex anteroposteriorly and directed laterally and slightly backwards.

The widened part of the rib below the tubercle is strongly curved anteriorly and is L-shaped in cross-section. The dorsal side is nearly flat, the anterior side is slightly concave due to the broad and elongate tubercle, and the posteroventral side is deeply concave. At the lower end, the widened part the rib becomes nearly rectangular; the dorsal and ventral sides are almost equal, and the posterior side is wider than the anterior. More distally, the rib becomes semicircular in cross-section and narrowly oval near the end.

A b d o m i n a l r i b s (Fig. 31) include a two-sided first (central) rib and one-sided side lateral. The lateral ribs are connected in pairs with each other, like interlaced fingers of two hands, forming a strong abdominal armor, similar in its construction to the armor of the tuatara Sphenodon punctatus. The armor extended from the posterior edge of the sternum to the distal end of the pubis. The maximum width of the armor was apparently located somewhat anterior to its mid-length, and the anterior end was wider than the posterior. Each rib consists of two parts: the widened, relatively flattened base which bears the head, and a short, weak rod-shaped second part. The head is oval, rough, and bent slightly posteroventrally. At mid-length the rib is rectangular {163} in cross-section; the distal end is narrow and bears a longitudinal groove to accommodate of the rod-shaped part, which connects the abdominal rib with the corresponding dorsal (pectoral) rib.

The articulation of the abdominal ribs with each other at the midline of the armor was formed by interlacing between pairs. On each rib there are two rough surfaces for articulation: one on the upper side of the anterior edge, the other on the lower side near the posterior edge. These structures are irregularly oval, separated by small gaps into two to three parts of unequal size. The presence of such surfaces apparently indicates mobility between ribs. The ribs increase in length from the first to the seventh and then gradually shorten posteriorly.

S t e r n u m . Only small fragments are preserved, which do not provide a full idea of its shape and dimensions.

S h o u l d e r g i r d l e

S c a p u l a (Fig. 32) – long and narrow, widened at both ends, consists of an elongated blade and a short anterior part. The posterior region is strongly curved inward, so that the blade lies on the dorsal surface of the first four dorsal ribs, following their curvature. The blade is almost straight laterally, slightly curved anteriorly, and convex transversely on top. Its anterior part has an oval cross-section, which narrows anteriorly, and is slightly flattened on the inner side. The anterior part of the scapula is widened and highly elongated along the entire contact with the coracoid. The ventral edge of this part is thickened and forms a large part of the glenoid fossa. The contact with the coracoid is marked by a well-defined suture. The lateral and medial surfaces of the scapula are nearly smooth. There is an inconspicuous roughness, present as a longitudinal band along entire posterior part of the blade on the outside.

The glenoid fossa (Fig. 32) is slightly concave and extends parallel to the longitudinal axis of the scapula. The external edge is slightly rounded and protruding.

C o r a c o i d (Fig. 32) – a relatively large, thin bone, subrectangular in shape. The lower anterior and lower posterior angles are rounded. The proximal end is firmly connected to the scapula, forming the lower half of the glenoid fossa. The anterior edge of the coracoid is thin and suggests the presence of a very large cartilaginous part, which connected to the sternum. The posterior edge below the glenoid fossa is thick, curved in an arch, and ovally rounded. The coracoid foramen (foramen coracoideum) is small, rounded, and located a small distance from the glenoid fossa. The external surface of the coracoid is slightly convex, whereas the inner surface is concave anteroposteriorly.

T a b l e 4Dimensions of the bones of the shoulder region of Tarbosaurus

efremovi, PIN No. 552-1 (in mm)

S c a p u l aLength up to posterior edge of the glenoid cavity 750Width of the proximal end 215Thickness of the proximal end 42Width of the distal end 95Thickness of the distal end 9

C o r a c o i dWidth of the proximal end 215Thickness of the proximal end 42Width of the distal end 190

Thickness of the distal end 10

G l e n o i dTotal length (from the upper scapular edge to the lower coracoid) 60Width in the horizontal direction 45Depth 17

{164} F o r e l i m b s

The structure of the forelimbs is very interesting, representing one of the most striking characteristics of carnivorous dinosaurs. These limbs are so short that some scientists doubted at first that they belonged to the giant carnosaurs until complete skeletons were discovered. The marked reduction of the forelimbs is also characteristic for the representatives of the genus Tarbosaurus.

H u m e r u s (Figs. 33A, B). It is very short, semi-cylindrical, and hollow, slightly curved outwards and slightly tilted anteromedially at the distal end. Its length reaches only one-fourth that of the femur (Figs. 40A, B). Its proximal end is wide and bears a well-developed head of nearly elliptical shape; the maximal diameter is transverse. The articular surface is convex, more elongated posteriorly than anteriorly. Below the head, there is a rough tubercular area on the posterior surface which apparently served as an attachment site for M. latissimus dorsi, M. scapulohumeralis and M. subscapulocoracoideus – muscles that straightened and elevated the humerus. The roughness is considerably less on the medial or anterior surface of the humerus, where apparently M. coracobrachialis, M. supracoracoideus and M. pectoralis were attached. A delta-shaped or radial crest rises a little above the middle of the bone on the anterior edge, curving slightly medially. The dorsal surface of the crest is very rough, and apparently served as the attachment site for M. deltoideus and M. humeroradialis. Below the crest the shaft is compressed, the cross-section is elliptical, and the anteroposterior diameter is the greatest. The distal cross-section becomes semicircular and farther down again takes on an elliptical shape; the largest diameter is transverse. The distal end is less wide transversely; the external surface is convex, the inner slightly concave transversely. A small radial condyle protrudes from the preaxial edge, and a larger, more convex ulnar condyle extends from the postaxial edge. The surface of the bone is flattened between the condyles and is slightly concave. The articular surface of the condyles is turned slightly inward and only insignificantly passes on the external surface. On the distal end of the humerus it is not possible to discern distinct {165} areas for muscle attachments, as this entire surface is nearly smooth. An rough area with inconspicuous relief is present in condylar area, where the extensors of the antebrachium were apparently attached.

The shape of the glenoid fossa of the scapulocoracoid and the outline of the humeral head indicate that, in the articulated forelimb, the humerus was directed with its medial surface anteromedially, and with the lateral surface directed posterolaterally.

The longitudinal axis of the humerus formed a wide angle with the long axis of the scapula, and in general was inclined toward the sagittal plane of the body. Because the articular surface of the condyles – radial and ulnar – are directed slightly inward, consequently the general orientation of the forelimbs was also turned inward.

R a d i u s (Fig. 34). It is short with widened ends, the proximal larger than the distal. Its length is considerably less than half the length of the humerus. The anterior surface is slightly concave and somewhat slanted towards the ulna. The ulnar surface is flat transversely and rough at the point of contact with the ulna. The proximal part of the bone has an oval cross-section, the middle is subangular-subrounded, and the distal part nearly rounded. The proximal articular surface is concave, oval-elongated in shape, and the transverse diameter is the largest. The distal articular surface is flat, rounded, and has a small depression for the radiale. Above the joint, the anterior surface is slightly indented and rough, the roughness serving for attachment of ligaments and musculature.

U l n a (Fig. 34). It is short, thick, widened and proximally thickened. It is slightly longer than the radius, but considerably shorter than the humerus. The ratio of humeral to ulnar length is 2.25:1. The external surface of the bone is convex and slightly rough in the proximal part . The middle part is compressed and slightly twisted along the axis. The proximal end has a subtriangular outline, is directed laterally toward the radius, and bears a shallow incisura radialis which weakly grasps the upper end of the radius. The olecranon process is weakly developed and protrudes slightly above the articular surface. {166} The articular surface for the humerus is transversely narrow and curved anteroposteriorly. The articular surface for connection with the intermedium and ulnare is flat and narrow anteroposteriorly.

C a r p u s (Fig. 35). Of all the carpus bones only the intermedium is well preserved; the others are fragmentary and can only be judged by their position relative to the adjacent bones of the manus.

M e t a c a r p u s (Fig. 36) It consists of three metacarpal bones (Mc). Mc1 is a short, massive bone, slightly tilted inward and closely adjacent to Mc2 in the proximal part. The proximal end is triangular, and the largest diameter is transverse. The articular surface for the intermedium and radiale is flat and slightly curved ventrally. The distal end is narrower than the proximal. The articular surface for the first phalanx of the finger is saddle-shaped, with a deep furrow that divides it into two unequal facets. The external facet is considerably larger than the internal. The articular surface of the facet is widened upward, with equal elevations anteriorly and posteriorly. Ligament fossae are located on the lateral sides of the distal end,

with the external outlined much better than the internal. The dorsal surface is flattened transversely and smooth, whereas the palmar surface is slightly concave and rough for ligament attachment. Mc2 is twice as long as Mc1. The proximal end is rectangular, widened transversely, and tilted inward. There is a wide notch for contact with Mc1 on the lateral side. The articular surface for the ulnare and intermedium is rough and concave anteroposteriorly. The distal articular surface is composed of two equal facets divided by a wide groove. The ligament fossae are deeper than on Mc1. The dorsal surface is flattened and tilted slightly externally. Markedly deep grooves are present in the proximal part for the attachment of ligaments, and there is a deep triangular fossa in the distal part. The palmar surface is flattened and slightly rough. Mc3 is a short, thin bone, slightly curved inward and pointed at the distal end.

P h a l a n g e s (Figs. 36, 37A, B, C.). Phalangeal formula: I-2, II-3; the phalanges of the third digit are fully reduced.

First-order phalanges. The basal phalanx of digit I is long, laterally compressed along the axis, and widened on the ends. The proximal {167} surface for articulation with the metacarpus is deeply concave dorsoventrally and divided by a small keel into two unequal facets. The external facet is considerably larger than the inner. The proximal end is more strongly widened than the distal. The surface for the ungual phalanx extends more ventrally than dorsally, is divided by a notch in the middle, and is saddle-shaped. The ligament fossae are deep and oval. The dorsal surface is transversely convex and evenly rounded on both sides; the palmar surface is flat and slightly rough. A wide fossa for muscle attachment is observed on the distal part of this surface.

The first phalanx of digit II is short and wide. It is considerably smaller than the second phalanx of this digit. The proximal end is thickened and widened ventrally. The articular surface is deeply concave dorsoventrally and is divided by a low keel into two equal facets. The ligament fossae are considerably less well-developed and lower in relief than in the basal phalanx of digit I. The distal articular surface is saddle-shaped, the facets are more developed ventrally than dorsally, the surface is convex transversely, and tilted more towards the outside than the inside. A deep, triangular fossa for ligament attachment is observed at the distal end. The palmar surface is flat and slightly concave dorsoventrally.

Second-order phalanges. The second phalanx of digit II is longer than the preceding one. The proximal end is strongly widened anteroposteriorly and bears a smooth, deeply concave articular surface. The ligament fossae are well-developed and pronounced on the distal end. The dorsal surface is transversely convex and sharply rounded laterally. The palmar surface is concave in the proximal part, and flat and rough in the distal part. {168}

T a b l e 5Dimensions of bones of the front limbs of Tarbosaurus efremovi,

PIN No. 552-1 (in mm)

Measurements

hum

erus

radi

us

ulna Mc1 Mc2

phalanges

I ph1

II ph1

III ph2

full length 255 110 115 38 60 65 35 55transverse diameter of proximal end 70 19 45 20 35 20 25 15transverse diameter of the distal end 55 23 29 15 25 15 22 17maximal diameter in the middle of the bone 47 19 22 16 19 14 17 13

Ungual phalanges (Fig. 37A, B, C) are of medium size, strongly laterally compressed, steeply curved and pointed at the end. Along the lateral sides, deep longitudinal grooves are developed anteroposteriorly, which at the proximal end curve downward and pass on the ventral surface. The articular surface is oval-elongate and deeply curved dorsoventrally. On the palmar surface a rough tubercle for the attachment of M. flexor profundus stands out clearly.

P e l v i c g i r d l e

The pelvis is the largest element in the skeleton. The ilia, pubes, and ischia are well-developed and firmly articulated with each other by means of sutures, forming a powerful midline structure to support the entire body.

I l i u m (Fig. 38). The ilium is high, long, strongly arched transversely, and elongated more posteriorly than anteriorly from the acetabulum. The bone is thin along its entire length with the exception of the acetabular region, where it is massive and thick. The preacetabular part is higher than the postacetabular. The greatest height is reached in the anterior part due to the ventral development of the lower end into a nearly hook-like shape. The postacetabular part is more massive, with its ventral edge thickened and is curved obliquely dorsomedially. The dorsal edge has an irregular outline – wavy and slightly rounded beyond the middle of the bone. The bone as a whole is tilted medially, and the opposing dorsal margins approach one another above the sacral neural spines (Fig. 30).

The pubic peduncle is massive, wide, sharply expanded ventrally, and forms a wide, rough articular surface. The posterior edge of the peduncle is concave and limits the acetabulum anteriorly. The ischial peduncle is somewhat weaker than the pubic peduncle,

forming a narrower contact surface with the ischium. The anterior surface of the peduncle is slightly concave dorsoventrally and limits the acetabulum posteriorly.

The acetabulum is large, deep, and generally rounded. The dorsal surface of the acetabulum, formed by the ilium, is concave anteriorly, flattened posteriorly, and tilted outward. The acetabulum is directed slightly posteroexternally.

The external surface of the ilium is very rough and bears numerous grooves, tubercles and fossae for muscle attachment. Rough regions are clearly visible on the ventral surface, indicating the contact between the ilium and the transverse processes of the sacral vertebrae (Fig. 39).

{169} P u b i s (Fig. 38). It is massive and long. The proximal end is widened anteroposteriorly and connects dorsally with the pubic peduncle of the ilium by a straight suture, and posteriorly with the anterior edge of the ischium to form the lower border of the acetabulum. Farther ventrally, the bone is strongly curved laterally, deeply concave anteriorly and correspondingly convex posteriorly, and gradually narrows but then quickly widens distally to acquire a foot-shape at the end. This end is thickened transversely at the anterior end and pointed in a V-shape posteriorly. It is more elongated posteriorly than anteriorly from the longitudinal axis of the bone. The general length of the distal widening is twice the maximum width (anteroposterior diameter) of the proximal part. In its upper half, the bone is oval in cross-section and the anteroposterior diameter is the greatest, whereas in the lower half the shaft thickens and becomes rounded anteriorly, the largest diameter changing from anteroposterior to transverse. In the articulated pelvis, the pubic bones bound a narrow, V-shaped pseudo-cavity laterally (Fig. 39). Ventrally they articulate medially via their tubercular surfaces, the roughness of which diminishes distally on the medial surface and the pubic foot, and the two pubes come very close to each other, forming a huge hammer-like symphyseal "foot" (Fig. 39), which is nearly triangular at the bottom. The widened base of the symphysis is directed anteriorly at a low angle to the horizontal axis of the ilia, but the general direction is parallel to the longitudinal axis. Its external surface is slightly concave dorsoventrally and nearly smooth, whereas the ventral surface {170} is very rough and bears numerous fossae and tubercles, indicating the possibility of a thick cartilaginous "cushion" underneath. Complete fusion of the pubes at the symphysis is not observed, and it apparently occurred via a very strong ligament.

The i s c h i u m (Fig. 38) is not as thick as the pubis. The proximal end is wide, flat, and forms two well-developed processes. The anterior process articulates with the posterior process of the pubis by a straight suture forms part of the lower edge of the acetabulum, while the posterior process contacts peduncle of the ilium. This contact surface is deeply concave and very rough. On its posterior edge, below the articulation with the ilium, there is a very clearly defined rough area for muscle attachment. The bone is inclined posteroventrally, and gradually

narrows and becomes thin in the lower half, terminating in a narrow, round ends. The distal end bears some roughness, the medial surface of the distal half is flat, and the lateral is convexly rounded. The ends of the ischia approach each other very closely and seem to be almost fused, but there was no actual fusion, and articulation was apparently achieved via a strong, elastic ligament.

T a b l e 6Dimensions of the pelvic bones of Tarbosaurus efremovi,

PIN No. 551-2(in mm)

I l i u mMaximum length 1080Length of the preacetabular part from the middle of the dorsal edge of acetabulum

530

Length of the postacetabular part from the middle of the dorsal edge of acetabulum

580

Height from the upper edge of the acetabulum (with restoration 350Height from the lower edge of the ischial foot 460Height from the lower edge of the pubic foot 480External diameter of the acetabulum 220

I s c h i u mMaximum length from the middle of the suture with the ilium to the distal end 750Length of the chord, which limits the acetabulum 90Vertical length of the contact with the pubis 110Maximum width of the proximal end 230Maximum thickness near the distal end 35

P u b i sMaximum length from the middle of the contact with the ilium to the anterior edge of the distal symphysis 860Length of the chord, which limits the acetabulum 120Maximum width in the middle of the bone 75Maximum thickness (transverse diameter) in the middle of the bone 70Maximum length of the distal symphysis 590

H i n d l i m b s

The hind limbs are massive, long, and very similar in structure to those of giant running birds. The femur, tibia, and fibula are of almost the same length, but the tarsus is especially elongated. The total length of the hind limbs is four times that of the forelimbs.

{171} F e m u r (Fig. 40A, 41). This is the longest and thickest limb bone, slightly curved laterally in the anteroposterior direction. The middle part of the shaft is angularly round in cross-section. The head is large, cylindrical, and sits at almost a right angle to the longitudinal axis, with a small deviation anterodorsally. In the pelvic-femoral articulation, the head enters deeply inside the acetabulum (Fig. 39). The articular surface of the head is well

rounded and not separated from the greater trochanter by a neck. The greater trochanter is located on the same line as the head, the upper surface of which extends onto the trochanter. The lesser trochanter is very well-developed, located on the anterior edge of the lateral surface, and its free upper end rises up to the level of the greater trochanter, where it is separated sharply by a narrow groove that passes mediolaterally. The external surface of the lesser trochanter is convex, very rough, and rounded posteriorly toward the widely convex posterior surface of the bone; the inner surface is concave and extends smoothly to the anterior surface of the proximal end.

{172} A triangular rough area clearly stands out on the medial surface of the femur, at the level of the upper third – the inner or fourth trochanter.

The anterior surface of the femur is free of any irregularities or crests, but in its distal sector there is a wide, triangular fossa with a sharply expressed longitudinal intercondylar groove (fossa intercondyloidea), for attachment of the tibial extensor muscles. Its distal end is wider transversely than anteroposteriorly, and the condylar part is well developed.

The condyles are expanded ventrally and markedly posteriorly from the longitudinal axis of the bone. The fibular condyle is wider and more ventrally elongated than the inner tibial condyle. On the lateral surface of the former, there is a wide groove for the tendons of the tibial flexor muscles. Above the condyles, the surface is very rough for attachment of the knee ligaments.

T i b i a (Fig. 42). It is a little shorter than the femur; it is slightly twisted along the long axis and weakly curved anterolaterally. The proximal end is wide anteroposteriorly, and the distal end is widened transversely. The shaft is flattened anteroposteriorly and oval in transverse cross-section. The proximal articular surface is very rough, subtriangular in outline, with its apex directed anteriorly, and the posterior part has two tubercles divided by a wide groove. The surface of the tubercles is smooth and projects considerably onto the posterior part of the bone. A huge tibial process – processus tibialis – projects from the medial side, with the apex directed vertically and anteroexternally. The lateral surface is deeply concave transversely and very rough along the contact with the proximal end of the fibula. The medial surface is convex and very rough. The cnemial process – processus cnemialis – is strongly developed and projects as a vertical crest from the external edge of the bone. The anterior surface of the process is flattened, the posterior is curved and very rough. The external edge is curved anteriorly and contacts the fibula. Below the cnemial process, the external surface of the bone is flattened with sharp edges.

On the distal end of the tibia, two well-defined callosities protrude for contact with the astragalus and calcaneum. The external callosity is more convex and more elongated ventrally

than the inner one. The anterior side is concave transversely and closely contacts the ascending process of the astragalus; the posterior side is flat and smooth.

F i b u l a (Fig. 43). It is long, narrow, and nearly straight; its is little shorter than the tibia. The proximal end is slightly thickened and widened anteroposteriorly. The upper half of the bone is crescentic in transverse cross-section; it is concave on the medial side and convex on the lateral; at mid-length the cross-section is semicircular – the medial side is flat and the anteroposterior diameter is the largest. The distal end is curved laterally, convex ventrally, semi-oval in cross-section, and narrows posteriorly. The fibula is closely appressed to the tibia along most of its length, having rough contacts with the external tubercle of the proximal end, the cnemial process, the ascending process of the astragalus, and the upper surface of the calcaneum, which extends forward from the edge of the tibia.

T a r s u s . The tarsus consists of five bones: the astragalus and calcaneum, which form the proximal row, and three flat, angular bones in the distal row.

A s t r a g a l u s (Fig. 42). The astragalus is largest bone in comparison with the other tarsals. It has a massive, wide base and a long, thin ascending process that is closely appressed to the anterior surface of the tibia. The base of the astragalus, is convex anteroventrally and slightly laterally compressed. This compression is more noticeable {173} near the fibula than on the medial side, as a result of which the medial convexity is broader and less steep than the lateral. The dorsal surface corresponds to the distal end of the tibia, being deeply concave anteroposteriorly and transversely. The surface opposite the calcaneum is more concave than the free medial surface, which is slightly tilted and flattened. The ascending process is triangular in outline, wide at its base, and narrows rapidly towards the apex, becoming very thin at the top. Its lateral edge is rough and flattened for close contact with the medial edge of the fibula. The anterior surface of the ascending process is slightly bent posteriorly from the base of the astragalus and bears a considerable notch in the middle. Apparently complete fusion between the astragalus and tibia did not occur.

C a l c a n e u m (Fig. 42). The calcaneum is small and laterally compressed. The anteroposterior diameter is greater than the vertical. The dorsal articular surface is slightly widened and deeply concave anteroposteriorly for contact with the distal end of the fibula. Posteriorly, the calcaneum meets the tibia with a surface that continues posteroventrally, with its greatest curvature medially. The medial surface is convex and contacts the astragalus. The ventral and anterior surfaces are convex and their curvature matches that of the astragalus. The lateral surface is smooth, slightly medially concave, and separated from the rounded surface of the anterior end by an elevated edge.

D i s t a l t a r s a l s (Fig. 44A). These are flat, disc-shaped bones, almost all of the same size and located at the same level – on the posterior edge of the dorsal surface of

metatarsals II, III, and IV. The posterolateral edge of the tarsals is thick; the anteromedial is thinner.

M e t a t a r s u s (Fig. 43-45). The metatarsus consists of five bones – metatarsals I-V. Metatarsals II, III, and IV are long, massive, and have wide ends; they functioned fully as elements of support. They are closely pressed together along their entire length, except for a short distance where Mt II and Mt IV are curve outward from Mt III, leaving its distal end free. In general, the metatarsal region is similar in construction to that of birds and saltatory mammals (jerboas, kangaroo).

Metatarsal I is strongly reduced to a short, phalanx-like bone, which is attached to the medial edge of the posterior surface of Mt II, below mid-length (Fig. 44B). Its general orientation {174} is directly posteriorly, at 40-45o to the longitudinal axis of Mt II. In this posterior position Mt I is turned outward from the medial edge of Mt II. The dorsal surface is directed medially, the plantar laterally. The external surface is turned slightly anteriorly, while the inner is directed posteriorly. The plantar surface is wide, smooth, dorsally narrow, and rough. The distal articular surface is trochlear-shaped, divided by a small groove that becomes a wide depression on the plantar surface. The articular surface extends more onto the posterior side and is insignificantly elongated dorsally. Above the articular surface, the anterior and posterior sides are compressed and bear large ligament fossae; the anterior fossa is deeper than the posterior. The upper half of the bone is tilted and turned anteriorly for contact with Mt II. The surface of the contact is flat and rough.

Metatarsal II is a little shorter than Mt III and Mt IV, but is broader and more massive. The proximal end is widened more anteroposteriorly than transversely. Laterally the bone shows some bending – it is concave anteriorly, and the distal condyle is directed slightly posteromedially; in posterior view it is straighter and a low crest projects posteriorly {175} at mid-length. The external surface is wide, flat, and slightly concave on the side facing Mt III; the anterior surface is convex and distally it is slightly tilted externally; the inner surface is wide and deep in the region contacting Mt III; the posterior surface is somewhat rounded and rough. The proximal articular surface has a triangular outline, is flat, and very rough. Below the proximal widening, the becomes rounded in cross-section, but distally it is more oval. The distal articular surface for the first phalanx of the digit II is more expanded than on Mt V, bent slightly inward, and convex in both direction, but more anteroposteriorly. The surface extends more anterodorsally than posterodorsally. Posteriorly, it is divided by a deep groove into two lateral convexities. Deep, rough-surfaced ligament fossae are developed above the articular surface, on the inner and outer sides. The inner fossa facing Mt III is larger than the outer fossa. The surface for contact with Mt I is slightly depressed and rough. The anterior and

posterior proximal regions of the bone are very rough. The bone is hollow throughout its length.

Metatarsal III is considerably longer than Mt II and Mt IV; it is elongated more ventrally and anteriorly at its distal end. The bone has a spool-shaped outline dorsally, is highly laterally compressed, and reaches its maximum dimension in the distal half of its length. Proximally it is displaced posteriorly, being compressed between Mt II and Mt IV, and visible only from the posterior (Fig. 44A); ventrally the bone widens considerably and becomes visible in both directions. Here the bone is flattened laterally and closely contacts Mt II and Mt IV by a clearly defined suture; these latter practically cover it posteriorly. The contact surface opposite Mt II is more tilted than that opposite Mt IV. At the point where Mt II and Mt IV deviate outwards, Mt III abruptly widens posteriorly but still retains a smaller diameter than on the anterior surface. The distal end is wider than that of Mt II and the Mt IV; the anteroposterior diameter of the side facing Mt II is greater than that facing Mt IV.

The articular surface for the first phalanx of digit III is slightly flattened transversely and extends more anterodorsally than posterodorsally. There is no clear division of the posterior part of the surface into lateral convexities as is the case with Mt II and Mt IV (Fig. 44C). The ligament fossae are deeper than in Mt II and Mt IV. The fossa located laterally, and the one facing Mt II is larger than the external fossa. Anteriorly, a groove is present above the articular surface, extended across the bone and deepened in its middle part.

Metatarsal IV is slightly longer than Mt II. The proximal end is wider anteroposteriorly than transversely; the anterior surface is convex, slightly laterally compressed, and rounded externally; the external surface is flat and meets the posterior at a sharp angle. The inner side is curved at the top and partially encircles the proximal part of Mt III; farther down, the surface becomes flattened and contacts Mt III for the most part. Below this contact, the bone bends sharply outward – the anterointernal edge extends anteriorly in an undulating manner, and it is noticeably extended into an anterior position at the distal end. Thus from this point of divergence, the anterior surface becomes equally convex {176} from the anterointernal to the posteroexternal edge. Below, the internal surface is longitudinally concave and bears a deep ligament fossa. At the top, the bone is triangular in cross-section, it is square at mid-length, and again resumes a triangular shape with a rounded external side. The posterior surface is curved below the proximal widening; in the middle it is flat and widened inward, reaching the contact with Mt II and fully covering the posterior side of Mt III at this point. On the distal end, there is a deep groove and the bone is slightly compressed. A blunt crest passes curvilinearly upward from the external edge of the articular surface to the inner edge of the middle of the opposite side. The articular surface for the first phalanx of digit IV is less transversely widened than on

Mt III and Mt II; it is equally convex anteroposteriorly and transversely, and posteriorly it is divided by a deep groove into two lateral convexities.

Metatarsal V (Fig. 45) is strongly reduced, short, and curved. Its length is considerably less than half that of Mt III. The upper half is widened transversely and slightly convex; the distal half is strongly laterally compressed and passes curvilinearly inward. The curvature of the bone is most conspicuous at mid-length. The anterior surface in the proximal part is tilted gently outwards, tubercular, and closely contacts the rough area on the posterior surface of Mt IV. The internal surface is rounded and nearly smooth; the posterior surface is slightly convex and rough along the edges. The distal end has furrows directed lengthwise.

P e d a l P h a l a n g e s (Figs. 43, 44). Phalangeal formula: I–1, II–3, III–4, IV–5. The first digit is the most highly reduced in comparison with the remaining three. It is not opposed to the other three, but rather is located almost at a right angle to them, and was not used at a supportive element of the foot (Fig. 44B). The end of its ungual phalanx hardly reached below the end of Mt II, and was located a considerable distance above the ground. Three other digits, DII, DIII and DIV, are long and massive, supplied with strong, sharp claws. The third digit is the longest and extends farther forward than DII and DIV; the fourth digit is slightly longer than the second.

The basal phalanges are massive, and are larger proximally than distally. They are compressed at mid-length and curved dorsoventrally at the bottom. All the phalanges of the third digit are bilaterally symmetrical, while in DII and DIV they are higher on the side directed toward DIII, and gently tilted on the opposite side. In the first-order phalanges, the proximal articular surface is slightly curved dorsoventrally, whereas in the second- and third-order phalanges it is more depressed and slightly convex transversely. A vertical crest is developed in the middle of the surface, which passes

T a b l e 7Dimensions of hind limb bones of Tarbosaurus efremovi,

PIN No. 551-2 (in mm)

F e m u rMaximum length – 970Distance from the medial surface of the head to the lateral surface of the greater trochanter – 210Anteroposterior diameter of the trunk at mid-length – 110Circumference of the trunk at mid-length – 390

T i b i a Maximum length – 850Anteroposterior diameter at mid-length – 100Transverse diameter at mid-length – 100Length, including astragalus – 880

Maximum transverse diameter of the proximal end – 170Maximum anteroposterior diameter of the proximal end – 370Transverse diameter of the distal end – 200

F i b u l a Maximum length – 780Anteroposterior diameter of the proximal end – 190Anteroposterior diameter of the axis in the middle – 550Anteroposterior diameter of the distal end – 550

A s t r a g a l u s Maximum height –Width at the bottom – 170Distance from the anterior surface of the external convexity to the posterior edge – 95Distance from the anterior surface of the inner convexity to the posterior edge – 130Distance from the anterior surface of the central depression to the posterior edge – 50

C a l c a n e u m Maximum length – 85Maximum height – 90Maximum width at bottom – 30

M e t a t a r s a l sMetatarsal I, maximum length (restoration) – 90?Width of the distal articular surface of Mt I – 35Length of contact surface for Mt Il – 60Metatarsal II, maximum length – 455Width of the distal articular surface at the mid-length of Mt II – 75Metatarsal III, maximum length – 540Width of the distal articular surface at the mid-length of Mt III

– 75

Metatarsal IV, maximum length – 510Width of the distal articular surface at the mid-length of Mt IV

– 60

Metatarsal V, maximum length (reconstructed) – 220?

Anteroposterior diameter near the upper end of the Mt IV – 35Transverse width near the dorsal end – 10

P e d a l P h a l a n g e s

DI length – 105 Ph1, width – 20Ph1, length – 75 Ph2 (ungual), length – 55DII (incomplete) DIV (incomplete)Ph1, length – 140 Ph1, length – 100Ph1, width – 50 Ph1, width – 60DIII length – 380 Ph2, length –Ph1, length – 135 Ph2, width –Ph1, width – 60 Ph3, length – 60Ph2, length – 100 Ph3, width – 55Ph2, width – 50 Ph4, length – 45Ph3, length – 80 Ph4,width – 45Ph3, width – 45 Ph5 (ungual), length –Ph4 (ungual), length – 95

{183} more dorsally and posteriorly than ventrally. The distal articular surface is saddle-shaped. In the first-order phalanges, this surface is elongated more posterodorsally than posteroventrally. In contrast, the distal articular surface expands more posteroventrally in other phalanges. All the phalanges have well-developed, deep ligament fossae on the distal end. They are equal on the phalanges of the third digit, but unequal on the phalanges of DII and DIV. The ligament fossae on the side directed toward DIII are larger and deeper than those on the opposite side. The dorsal surface of the phalanges is convex transversely and concave at the distal end. The palmar surface is concave, rough, and at the proximal end bears large tubercles at the edges for muscle attachment.

T a b l e 8Comparative measurements of skull elements of carnosaurs from the Late

Cretaceous of Central Asia (in mm)

NomenclatureG

orgo

saur

us

novo

jilov

iPI

N N

o. 5

52-2

Gor

gosa

urus

la

ncin

ator

PIN

No.

553

-1

Tarb

osau

rus

efre

mov

iPI

N N

o. 5

51-3

Tarb

osau

rus

bata

arPI

N N

o. 5

51-1

Length of skull from premaxilla to mandibular joint – 970 1130 –Length of skull from premaxilla to occipital condyle 700 825 1085 1220Maximum length of maxilla 270 490 670 –Maximum height of maxilla – 240 290 –Length of dental row of maxilla 200 370 510 –Length of lower jaw – 830 1090 –Maximum length of dentary 380 600 780 –Maximum height of dentary – 150 270 –Length of dental row of dentary 210 370 470 –Maximum length of surangular – 400 520 –Maximum height of surangular – 160 210 –Number of teeth: in the premaxilla – 4 4 – in the maxilla 12 12 13 – in the lower jaw 15 – 15 –

T a b l e 9Comparative measurements of skulls of North American and Central Asian carnivorous

dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous (in mm)

Nomenclature North America1 Central Asia

Gor

gosa

urus

la

ncen

sis

No.

754

1

G. s

tern

berg

iN

o. 5

664

G. l

ibra

tus

No.

212

0

G. l

ibra

tus

No.

533

6

Tyra

nnos

auru

s re

x A

MN

H

Gor

gosa

urus

no

vojil

ovi

PIN

No.

552

-2

G. l

anci

nato

rPI

N N

o. 5

53-1

Tarb

osau

rus

efre

mov

iPI

N N

o. 5

51-3

Tyra

nnos

auru

s ba

taar

PIN

No.

551

-1

Length of skull from premaxilla to mandibular condyle 570 678 – 980 1355 – 970 1130 –Length of skull from premaxilla to occipital condyle 572 – – 925 1210 700 825 1085 1220Height of skull from upper occipital crest to mandibular joint 205 – 393 635 – – – – 190Width of skull along quadratojugal – – – 380 835 – – – –Length of dental row of upper jaw 300 340 – 495 – 200 370 510 –Length of lower jaw 570 690 950 999 1205 – 830 1090 –Height of snout over the last tooth 171 160 – 260 – – 240 370 –

8 Measurements after C. W. Gilmore (1946).

T a b l e 1 0Comparative measurements of pelvic bones of North American and Central Asian

carnivorous dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous (in mm)

Nomenclature North America1 Central Asia

Albe

rtos

auru

s2

Gor

gosa

urus

2

Tyra

nnos

auru

s2

Antr

odem

us2

Gor

gosa

urus

no

vojil

ovi

PIN

No.

552

-2

Tarb

osau

rus

efre

mov

iPI

N N

o. 5

51-2

IliumExternal length 980 984 1515 672-720 625 1080Length of the preacetabular part from middle of acetabulum 505 457 – – 350 530Length of postacetabular part from middle of acetabulum 475 527 – – 275 580Height of anterior plate 400 438 – – 190 –Height of posterior plate 250 216 – – 140 –Horizontal diameter of acetabulum 210 (?) 216 590 180-222 120 350 (?)Height over the middle of acetabulum 300 (?) 393 530 283-335 175 350 (?)Height over the foot for pubis 420 (?) 457 770 392 250 480 (?)

IschiumMaximum length from the middle of suture with ilium to distal end

660 762 1110 – – 750

Width across foot 210 – 360 – 125 230Width of distal end 30 43 – 93-135 – –Thickness of distal end 18 18 – – – 35 (?)

PubisMaximum length 1030 980 1320 680-740 460 860

Length of distal symphysis 600 563 600 370-465 335 590Thickness of distal symphysis at mid-length 140 106 260 370-465 335 590Circumference of shaft above distal symphysis

212 – – – 130 –

1 Measurements after W. A. Parks (1928). 2 Species not indicated.

T a b l e 1 1Comparative measurements of vertebral columns of North American and Central Asian carnivorous dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous (in mm)

Nomenclature North America 1 Central Asia

Gor

gosa

urus

st

ernb

ergi

No.

56

64

Gor

gosa

urus

lib

ratu

s No.

21

20

Tyra

nnos

auru

s

Gor

gosa

urus

no

vojil

ovi P

IN

No.

552

-2

Tarb

osau

rus

efre

mov

i PIN

N

o. 5

51-2

2

Length of 9 cervical vertebrae 600 – 960 450 660Length of 23 presacral vertebrae 1642 – 3144 880? 2160Length of sacrum 472 690 975 450 700Length of 24 caudal vertebrae 2450 – – 1970? –

1 According to W. D. Matthew and B. Brown (1923).2 – Editor’s Note.

T a b l e 1 2Comparative measurements of forelimb bones of North American and Central

Asian carnivorous dinosaurs from Late Cretaceous (in mm)

Nomenclature North America1 Central Asia

Albe

rtos

auru

s2

Gor

gosa

urus

2

Tyra

nnos

auru

s2

Antr

odem

us2

Gor

gosa

urus

no

vojil

ovi

PIN

No.

552

-2

Tarb

osau

rus

efre

mov

iPI

N N

o. 5

52-1

HumerusMaximum length 303 324 180? 310 – 255Transverse width of distal end 40? 55 – 118 30 70Width along deltoid crest 58 64 – 100 – 55Anteroposterior diameter of external condyle 65 – – – 30 –Anteroposterior diameter of inner condyle 33 – – – – –

23 – – – –

UlnaMaximum length 163 180 – 263 – 115Maximum diameter of proximal end 53 55 – 90 – 45Maximum diameter of distal end 37 34 – 55 – 29

RadiusMaximum length 136 156 – 222 – 110Maximum width of proximal end 36 37 – 56 – 19Maximum width of distal end – 30 – 40 – 23Metacarpal I, length 40 48 – 73 35 38Width near proximal end 23 22 – 35 15 20Width near distal end 25 26 – 36 15 15Metacarpal II, length 80 98 – 122-125 45 60Width near proximal end 42 32 – 56-63 15 35Width near distal end 28 27 – 46 14 25

PhalangesD1Ph1, length 85 98 – 136-138 – 65Width near proximal end 28 30 – – – 20Width near distal end 28 25 – – – 15Ph2 (ungual), length along upper curvature 115 95 – 118-120 – –Ph2 height of articular facet 42 36 – – – –DIIPh1 length 45 57 – 94 45 35Width of proximal end 30 32 – – 17 25Ph2 length 70 83 – 102 – 55Width of proximal end 20 30 – – – 15Width near distal end 18 24 – – – 17Ph3 length along upper curvature 100 – – 95 – –Height of articular facet 32 - – – – –1 Measurements after W. A. Parks (1928). 2 Species not indicated.

{187} The ungual phalanges (Fig. 46A, B, C) are thick, curved downward, and pointed at the end, being subcircular in cross-section. The dorsal and palmar surfaces are widened and convex. The ungual phalanx of DIII is bilaterally symmetrical. The surface of the ungual phalanges of DII and DIV directed toward DIII is flatter than the opposite surface, which is convex away from DIII. Along the sides of the phalanges, deep longitudinal grooves extend from the top to the proximal end. The groove facing DIII is deeper than the opposite one. Both furrows are equal on the ungual phalanx of the third digit. The proximal articular surface is curved transversely and more strongly elongated dorsally and posteriorly. The palmar surface is slightly flattened and very rough in the proximal part. The ungual phalanx of DIII is considerably larger than that of DII and DIV. During life, the horny cover which covered these phalanges formed solid, sharp claws.

T a b l e 1 3Comparative measurements of the shoulder girdle of North American and Central

Asian carnivorous dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous (in mm)

Nomenclature North America1 Central Asia

Albe

rtos

auru

s2

Gor

gosa

urus

2

Tyra

nnos

auru

s2

Antr

odem

us2

Gor

gosa

urus

no

vojil

ovi

PIN

No.

552

-2

Tarb

osau

rus

efre

mov

iPI

N N

o. 5

52-1

Joint length of scapula and coracoid 830 1086 – 795 – –Length of scapula 740 876 950 652 330 –Width distal end of scapula 225 175 – 145 40 95Minimum width 63 56 – 52 25 –Thickness of scapula at articulation with coracoid

28? 40 – – 15 42

Width of proximal end 150 – – 175 60 215

CoracoidMaximum length 148 210 – 120 90 –Maximum height 245 – – – 110 –1 Measurements after W. A. Parks (1928). 2 Species not indicated.

T a b l e 1 4Number of teeth in the jaws of North American and Central Asian carnivorous

dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous

Nomenclature

Skull elements

North America1 Central Asia

Gor

gosa

urus

lanc

inat

or

G. s

tern

berg

i

G. l

ibra

tus

Albe

rtos

auru

ssa

rcop

hagu

s

Tyra

nnos

auru

sre

x

Gor

gosa

urus

no

vojil

ovi

PIN

No.

552

-2

G. l

amci

nato

rPI

N N

o. 5

53-1

Tarb

osau

rus

efre

mov

iPI

N N

o. 5

51-2

f2

Tyra

nnos

auru

s ba

taar

PIN

No.

551

-1Maxilla 4 15 (?) 13 12 12 12 12 13 13Premaxilla 4 (?) 4 – 4 4 4 4 4Dentary – – 14 14-15 13-14 15 – 15 15

1 Measurements after C. W. Gilmore (1946). 2 Specimen No. 551-3 has 12 teeth in the maxilla – Editor’s note.

T a b l e 1 5Comparative measurements of hind limb bones of North American and Central Asian

carnivorous dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous

Nomenclature North America1 Central Asia

Albe

rtos

auru

s

Gor

gosa

urus

Tyra

nnos

auru

s

Antr

odem

us

Gor

gosa

urus

no

vojil

ovi

PIN

No.

552

-2

Tarb

osau

rus

efre

mov

iPI

N N

o. 5

51-2

Femur rt.-lt. rt.-lt.Maximum length 1020 1040 1300 645-850 560-560 960-970Anteroposterior diameter at mid-length 118 136 180 72-95 (?) 55-60 -110Width through condyles ? – 340 145-182 120-115 220-Thickness of external condyle 200 – – – 95-105 160-Circumference at mid-length 350 – – – 205-195 -390

TibiaMaximum length 980 – 1140 690 585-585 890-850Length with astragalus 1030 (?) 1000 – – 605-605 880Anteroposterior diameter at mid-length 73 – – – 45-45 100Transverse diameter at mid-length 115 – – – 60-55 100Transverse diameter of proximal end 215 – – 210 85-90 170Transverse diameter of distal end 265 – – 185 130-110 200

FibulaMaximum length 875 883 1025 623 – 525 780Width of proximal end 195 180 250 145 – 110 165 –Diameter of shaft at mid-length 42 47 – – 25 55Width of distal end 55 50 130 59 30 55

AstragalusVertical length 250 300 270 115-125 200 –Maximum width 260 208 300 132-155 125 170

MetatarsalsMetatarsal II, length 540 508 615 270-320 365 470-455Transverse diameter (width) of proximal end

85 – – 60-67 70 140

Thickness of proximal end 155 – – - 95 135Width of distal end 80 77 – 72-76 45 75Metatarsal III, length 590 594 600 327-353 420 530-540Width of distal end 88 92 140 80-80 50 75Metatarsal IV, length 558 546 600 275-324 395 510Width of distal end 65 65 – 57-65 40 60Metatarsal V, length 225 216 – – – 220Anteroposterior diameter of proximal end 45 41 – – – 35Thickness near proximal end 30 27 – – – 10Thickness near distal end 20 26 – – – 15

PhalangesD IIIPh1, length 200 163 – 110-116 90 135Width of proximal end 100 82 – – 50 95Width of distal end 90 – – – 45 85Ph2, length 140 122 – 90-94 70 100Width of proximal end 90 64 – – 45 85Width of distal end 70 – – – 40 75Ph3, length 100 93 – 66-74 55 80Width of proximal end 73 54 – – 40 65Width of distal end 58 – – – 30 55Tibia-femur ratio 0.96 0.93 0.90 – > 1.00 0.93-0.96Fibula-femur ratio 0.85 0.85 0.71 – 0.94 0.80Metatarsal III-tibia ratio 0.60 0.60 0.60 (?) – 0.72 0.59-0.64Metatarsal II-tibia ratio 0.55 0.52 0.54 – 0.63 0.53-0.54Metatarsal-femur ratio 0.53 0.50 0.47 – 0.75 0.55-0.56Ph2 D III-metatarsal III ratio 0.34 0.27 – – 0.17 0.19

1 Measurements after W. A. Parks (1928).

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Davimashvili, L. Sh. 1940. Development of ideas and methods in paleontology since Darwin. Moscow, pp. 1-263.

Davimashvili, L. Sh. 1948. History of evolutionary paleontology from Darwin to our day. Moscow–Leningrad, pp. 1-575.

Efremov, I. A. 1949. Preliminary result of work I of the Mongolian Paleontological Expedition of the Academy of Sciences, USSR. – Trudy Mongolskoy Komissii AN SSSR, vol. 38, pp. 8-27.

Efremov, I. A. 1950. Taphonomy and geological record. – Trudy PIN AN SSSR, vol. 24, pp. 1-176.Efremov, I. A. 1953. Problems of dinosaur research. – Priroda, no. 6, pp. 26-37.Efremov, I. A. 1954a. Paleontological research in the Mongolian People's Republic (preliminary result of the

expeditions of 1946, 1947, and 1949). – Trudy Mongolskoy Komissi AN SSSR, v. 59, pp. 3-32.Efremov, I. A. 1954b. Some observations on the problems of historical development of dinosaurs. – Trudy PIN

AN SSSR, v. 48, pp. 126-141.Efremov, I. A. 1955. Dinosaur burial in Nemegt (Southem Gobi, Mongolian People's Republic). – Problems of

the Geology of Asia, v. 2, pp. 789-890.Efremov, I. A. 1963. Perspectives of development of paleontological research in Mongolia. Materialy po

geologii MNR. Gostoptekhizdat, Moscow, pp. 82-92.Maleev, Ye. A. 1952a. Some observations on the geological age of stratigraphical distribution of armoured

dinosaurs of Mongolia. – Doklady AN SSSR, v. 86, no. 4, pp. 893-896.Maleev, Ye. A. 1952b. New family of armored dinosaurs from Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. – Doklady AN

SSSR, v. 87, no. 1, pp. 131-134.Maleev, Ye. A. 1952c. New ankylosaurs from Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. – Doklady AN SSSR, v. 87, no. 2,

pp. 273-276.Maleev, Ye. A. 1953. Discovery of new armoured dinosaurs in Mongolia. – Priroda, no. 1, pp. 109-112.Maleev, Ye. A. 1954a. Armoured dinosaurs of the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. – Trudy pPIN AN SSSR, v.

48, pp. 142-170.Maleev, Ye. A. 1954b. New cheloniform reptile from Mongolia. – Priroda, no. 3, pp. 106-108.Maleev, Ye. A. 1955a. Gigantic camivorous dinosaurs of Mongolia. – Doklady AN SSSR, v. 104, no. 4, pp. 634-

637.Maleev, Ye. A. 1955b. New carnivorous dinosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. – Doklady AN

SSSR, v. 104, no. 5, pp. 779-782.Maleev, Ye. A. 1955c. Camivorous dinosaurs of Mongolia. – Priroda, no. 6, pp. 112-115.Maleev, Ye. A. 1956. Armored dinosaurs of the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia, Part 2. – Trudy PIN AN SSSR,

v. 62, pp. 51-91.Maleev, Ye. A. 1964a. Suborder Theropoda. Camivorous dinosaurs. In: Bases of Paleontology [Osnovy

paleontologii], "Amphibians, Reptiles, and Birds" volume; Moscow, "Nauka" publication, pp. 529-540.Maleev, Ye. A. 1964b. Suborder Ankylosauria. In Bases of Paleontology [Osnovy paleontologii], "Amphibians,

Reptiles, and Birds" volume; Moscow, "Nauka" publication, pp. 547-577.Maleev, Ye. A. 1965. On the brain of camivorous dinosaurs. – Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, no. 2, pp. 141-143.Maleev, Ye. A. 1968. On the systematics of camosaurs. In: Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic amphibians and

reptiles of USSR; Moscow, "Nauka" publication, pp. 92-96.Rozhdestvenskiy, A. K. 1952a. Excavation of lauanodon in Mongolia. – Doklady AN SSSR, v. 84, no. 6, pp.

1243-1246.Rozhdestvenskiy, A. K. 1952b. New representative of duck-billed dinosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous rocks of

Mongolia. – Doklady AN SSSR, v. 86, no. 2, pp. 405-408.Rozhdestvenskiy, A. K. 1955. New data on psittacosaurs - Cretaceous ornithopods. – Problems of the Geology of

Asia, v. 2, pp. 783-788 [AN SSSR publication].Rozhdestvenskiy, A. K. 1957. Duck-billed dinosaurs - saurolophs from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. –

Vertebrata Palasiatica, v. 1, no. 2, pp. 129-149.Rozhdestvenskiy, A. K. 1964. Suborder Omithopoda. In: Bases of Paleontology [Osnovy paleontologii],

"Amphibians, Reptiles, and Birds" volume; Moscow, "Nauka" publication, pp. 553-572.Rozhdestvenskiy, A. K. 1965. Age revision and some problems of systematics of Asian dinosaurs. –

Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, no. 3, pp. 95-109.

FIGURE CAPTIONS

Fig. 1. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-3. Lateral view of skull and lower jaw (Maleev, 1955b).ang – angular; sa – surangular; d – dentary; sq – squamosal;ju – jugal; ant1 – first antorbital fenestra;l – lacrimal; ant2 – second antorbital fenestra;mx – maxilla; ant3 – third antorbital fenestra;n – nasal; jf – jugal foramen;pmx – praemaxilla; lf – lateral temporal fossa;po – postorbital; nr – nasal opening;qj – quadratojugal; or – orbit.

Fig. 2. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-3. Anterior view of premaxillae.md – maxillary teeth;pd – premaxillary teeth;nu – upper premaxillary process.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 1.

Fig. 3. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-3. Dorsal view of nasals.pu – processes of the nasal for articulation with the premaxilla and maxilla.

Fig. 4. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-3. Lingual view of maxilla.dm – functioning teeth; oc – openings for blood vessels;dr – replacement tooth; pu – edge for articulation with praemaxilla;jo – maxillary cavity; tp – alveolar plates.nmx – palatal process of the maxilla; Remaining designations are the same as in Fig. 1.nu – process for articulation with nasal and lacrimal;

Fig. 5. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Lateral view of left jugal.cu – posterior edge for articulation with quadratojugal; lu – notch for articulation with lacrimal; mu – edge for articulation with maxilla; on – lower margin of orbit; vp – process for articulation with postorbital.

Fig. 6. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-3. Lateral view of right lacrimal.j – process for articulation with jugal; mj – process for articulation with maxilla and nasal.

Fig. 7. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Lateral view of left postorbital.fi – process for articulation with frontal; ij – process for articulation with jugal; is – process for articulation with squamosal.

Fig. 8. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Lateral view of left quadratojugal.sj – process for articulation with jugal; su – edge for articulation with the process of squamosal.

Fig. 9. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Ventral view of left pterygoid.bu – process for articulation with basisphenoid;eu – process for articulation with ectopterygoid;pp – process for articulation with palatine and vomer;qu – process for articulation with quadrate;

sn – process for articulation with palatine.

Fig. 10. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Ventral view of right ectopterygoid.ov – oval opening;pu – process for articulation with pterygoid;us – process for articulation with jugal.

Fig. 11. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Medial view of left quadrate.pu – process for articulation with pterygoid;sd – condyles for articulation with articular;su – surface for articulation with squamosal.

Fig. 12. Tarbosaurus efremovi. Sagittal section of skull through braincase.boc – basioccipital; bsp – basisphenoid; exoc – exoccipital; fr – frontal; osp – orbitosphenoid (+ laterosphenoid?); pa – parietal; psp – presphenoid; soc – supraoccipital; on – exit foramen for nerves.

Fig. 13. Tarbosaurus efremovi. Occipital region of the skull.coc – condylus occipitalis; fmo – foramen magnum.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 12.

Fig. 14. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Medial view of left dentary. sl – symphyseal region.Other designations are the same as in Figs. 1 and 4.

Fig. 15. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-3.A – crown of a functional mandibular tooth;B – cross-section.

Fig. 16. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-3. Medial view of anterior part of the right lower jaw.sd – dental lamina [supradentary]. Other designations are the same as in Figs. 1 and 14.

Fig. 17. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Medial view of left angular.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 1

Fig. 18. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Medial view of posterior part of the left lower jaw.art – articular; prart – prearticular; fos – surangular foramen. Other designations are the same as in Fig. 1.

Fig. 19. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Medial view of right splenial.au – process for contact with angular; du – side adjacent to dentary; pu – process for contact with prearticular.

Fig. 20. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-1. Medial view of part of the upper jaw.Other designations are the same as in Figs. 1 and 4.

Fig. 21. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Anterior view of first cervical vertebra (atlas).ain – hypocenter; np – neuropophysis.

Fig. 22. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Lateral view of axis and subsequent cervical vertebrae.

ax. in – odontoid process; d – transverse process; p – capitular facets; pz – postzygapophysis; s – neural spine of the axis; z – prezygapophysis.

Fig. 23. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Lateral view of anterior dorsal vertebrae.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 22.

Fig. 24. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Dorsal vertebra.A – anterior view;B – posterior view;nc – neural canal;zf – zygosphene;zg – zygantrum.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 22.

Fig. 25. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Lateral view of sacral vertebrae (S1–S5).

Fig. 26. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Lateral view of caudal vertebra from the middle part of the tail.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 22.

Fig. 27. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 553-2. Posterior caudal vertebrae in dorsal view (A) and lateral view (B).Other designations are the same as in Fig. 22.

Fig. 28. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 553-2. Posterior caudal vertebra in anterior view (A) and posterior view (B).Other designations are the same as in Fig. 22.

Fig. 29. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Lateral view of chevrons of the anterior (A) and posterior (B) caudal vertebrae.

Fig. 30. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Anterior (A) and middle (B) dorsal ribs.c – head;t – tubercle.

Fig. 31. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Ventral view of abdominal ribs.cr – anterior (central rib); cb – lateral ribs.

Fig. 32. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-6. Medial view of left scapulocoracoid.k – coracoid; s – scapula; cf – coracoid foramen; gv – glenoid fossa.

Fig 33. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Left humerus in external view (A) and internal view (B).cr – radial condyle;cu – ulnar condyle;dg – deltoid crest;hc – humeral head.

Fig. 34. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Bones of the antebrachium in articulation.r – radius;u – ulna.

Fig. 35. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Left carpus – intermedium.

Fig. 36. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Anterior view of left manus in articulation (Maleev, 1964a).

Fig. 37. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Ungual phalanx of manual digit I in lateral view.A – overall view;B – articular surface for preceding phalanx;C – cross-section in middle part.

Fig. 38. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Lateral view of pelvic girdle (Maleev, 1955a).il – ilium; is– ischium; p – pubis; s – sacral vertebra; vp – acetabulum. Fig. 39. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Pelvic and hind limb bones in articulation.f – femur; dp – transverse process and rib of sacral vertebra; s – centrum of sacral vertebra; sp – pubic symphysis. Other designations are the same as in Fig. 38.

Fig. 40. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Comparison of femur (A) with humerus (B) (Maleev 1955c).gt – greater trochanter; h – femoral head; lt – lesser trochanter; tc – tibial condyle; nc – fibular condyle.

Fig. 41. Tarbosaurus efremov. PIN No. 551-2. Posterior view of left femur (Maleev, 1955c).rt – 4th trochanter. Other designations are the same as in Fig. 40.

Fig. 42. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 551-2. Anterior view of left tibia and tarsus.as – astragalus; ca – calcaneum; fb – fibula; t – tibia; cp – cnemial crest; vp – ascending process of astragalus; pt – tibial process.

Fig. 43. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Anterior view of left pes (Maleev, 1964a).Mt2–Mt4 – metatarsals; II–IV – digits.

Fig. 44. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Metatarsals in dorsal view (A), posterior view (B), ventral view (C) and disarticulated (D).Mt1–Mt4 – metatarsals; td – distal tarsals.

Fig. 45. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Lateral view of 5th metatarsal (Mt5).

Fig. 46. Tarbosaurus efremovi. PIN No. 552-1. Ungual pedal phalanx.A – lateral view; B – articular surface for preceding phalanx; C – cross-section at mid-length.

Fig. 47. Skeleton of Tarbosaurus efremovi. Reconstruction (Maleev, 1964a).

Fig. 48. Tyrannosaurus bataar. PIN No. 551-1. Lateral view of skull and lower jaw (Maleev, 1955a).Other designations are the same as in Fig. 1.

Fig. 49. Tyrannosaurus bataar. PIN No. 551-1. Functional tooth.A – lateral view; B – cross-section at mid-length of the crown.

Fig. 50. Tyrannosaurus bataar. PIN No. 551-1. Anterior view of posterior cervical vertebra (Maleev, 1955a).Other designations are the same as in Fig. 22.

Fig. 50. Tyrannosaurus bataar. PIN No. 551-1. Lateral view of first two dorsal vertebrae.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 22.

Fig. 52. Gorgosaurus lancinator. PIN No. 553-1. Lateral view of skull and lower jaw (Maleev, 1955b).Other designations are the same as in Fig. 1.

Fig. 53. Gorgosaurus lancinator. PIN No. 553-1. Functional tooth of the lower jaw.

Fig. 54. Gorgosaurus lancinator. PIN No. 553-1. Lateral view of dorsal vertebrae.

Fig. 55. Gorgosaurus novojilovi. PIN No. 552-2. Lateral view of skull and lower jaw (Maleev, 1955b). Other designations are the same as in Fig. 1.

Fig. 56. Gorgosaurus novojilovi. PIN No. 552-2. Functioning tooth of the lower jaw.A – lateral view; B – cross-section at mid-length of the crown.

Fig. 57. Gorgosaurus novojilovi. PIN No. 552-2. Lateral view of third cervical vertebra.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 22.

Fig. 58. Gorgosaurus novojilovi. PIN No. 552-2. Lateral view of first dorsal vertebra.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 22.

Fig. 59. Gorgosaurus novojilovi. PIN No. 552-2. Lateral view of left scapulocoracoid.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 32.

Fig. 60. Gorgosaurus novojilovi. PIN No. 552-2. Anterior view of left femur.Other designations are the same as in Fig. 40.

Fig. 61. Gorgosaurus novojilovi. PIN No. 552-2. Bones of the right lower hind limb.A – dorsal view; B – anterior view. Other designations are the same as in Fig. 42.

Fig. 62. Gorgosaurus novojilovi. PIN No. 552-2. Anterior view of right pes (Maleev, 1964a).Other designations are the same as in Fig. 43.

Fig. 63. Gorgosaurus novojilovi. PIN No. 552-2. Mounted skeleton.

PLATE CAPTIONS

P l a t e IFig.1. Skull of Tyrannosaurus bataar, PIN No. 551-1.

Fig. 2. Skeletons of Tarbosaurus efremovi. Left – No. 552-17; right – No. 551-2.

P l a t e I IFig. 1. Skull of Tarbosaurus efremovi.Fig. 2. Skull of Gorgosaurus lancinator, PIN No. 553-1.

7 see note page 154.