1
CM YK BG-MYBG FRIDAY, JANUARY 17, 2014 12 THE HINDU FRIDAY, JANUARY 17, 2014 BANGALORE EDITORIAL T he agreement between India and Sri Lanka to empty their jails of each other’s fishermen is an encouraging sign that both sides have the will to resolve a long-standing irritant in bi- lateral ties. At Wednesday’s meeting between Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar and Sri Lankan Fisheries and Aquatic Minister Rajitha Senaratne, both sides agreed to release all fishermen in their custody except those who face charges other than crossing the International Maritime Boundary Line. With this con- fidence building measure, both sides must now sit down to the challenge of finding a long-term solution to the problems of the fishing communities in the region. Over the years, Tamil Nadu fishermen have with in- creasing stridency made the demand for the right to fish in the entire Palk Bay, describing it as their “tradi- tional fishing grounds”. It is no longer just about fishing rights around Kachchatheevu. The reason is that the catch is better on the Sri Lankan side. This is no accident. Bad practices such as the indiscriminate use of trawlers that dredge right down to the sea bed have depleted the resources along the Tamil Nadu coast. On the other side, the long years of conflict during which fishermen in Northeast Sri Lanka were barely allowed by the Sri Lankan Navy to put their boats out a few hundred metres into the sea has ensured that fish and other marine resources are still plentiful. Now that there are no military restrictions on fishing off North- east Sri Lanka, Tamil fishermen there who are still struggling to rebuild their lives find themselves in daily competition with Tamil Nadu fishermen for what they claim is rightfully theirs. Worse, the fishermen from the Indian side, better organised and equipped with bigger boats and better nets, use the same practices that ravaged their side of the bay. It is no surprise that an agreement — finalised in 2008 when the Sri Lankan military operations against the LTTE were intensifying — that was favourable to Indian fishermen is now seen by the Sri Lankan side as requiring re-negotiation. The solution to the problem may well come from the fishermen themselves. With the backing of the two capitals, they are to hold a meeting of their representatives on January 20 and may explore options such as licensing and placing re- strictions on the number of fishing days. Ultimately, however, the real solution for both, especially on the Indian side, lies in preserving what is left by moving away from coastal to deep sea fishing. The State govern- ment and the Centre must also encourage fishermen to diversify into related activities such as deep-freezing, preserving and canning. That could even pave the way for collaboration between Indian and Sri Lankan fish- ing communities. The way forward is to find ways to complement each other’s livelihoods, instead of just competing over scarce resources. Easing tensions in the Palk Bay There is a tremendous new energy on the streets of Delhi and, almost surreally, it is spreading to other parts of the country. The phenomenon is a tribute to the Aam Aadmi Party, a spunky political debutant already in government in the national Capital and with plans to contest over 400 Lok Sabha seats. In retrospect, it is clear that the Arvind Kejriwal-led AAP tapped into popular re- sentments bubbling under the surface. The emotions found release with Mr. Kejriwal’s promise of systemic overhaul and transfor- mative politics. The stampeding crowds at the AAP’s offices, the rush of the who’s who to join its rolls and the frightened responses of its political rivals, all speak to the new- comer’s emergence as a harbinger of hope in a political environment sullied by greed, graft, waste and incompetence. Great expectations Yet the danger with excessive expectation is that it can quickly turn into disillusion- ment and despair. The AAP faces two poten- tial pitfalls. First is its near free-for-all style of governance, evident in such hasty and baffling decisions as turning the Delhi Secre- tariat into a Janata durbar (since dropped) and calling upon people to sting corrupt offi- cers. Without a proper structure and dis- cipline, these solutions can degenerate into tools of vigilantism, leading to a blurring of lines between liberty and licence. The second is the AAP’s refusal to define itself ideologically. In an interview to CNN- IBN, the AAP’s national executive member, Yogendra Yadav, denied that the party was socialist and said that the “binaries of the 20th century, either Left or Right, do not make sense”. An entry in the AAP website, now removed, had ridiculed the demand for ideological clarity, saying ideology was for pundits whereas the AAP saw itself as solu- tion-based, open to using solutions from the Left and the Right. The attractions of a solution-based, com- monsensical approach are undoubtedly enormous, especially to audiences fatigued by the opportunistic aspects of politics. It is also true that there is a jaded, outmoded feel to politics compartmentalised as Right or Left; secular or communal. More so when parties and politicians themselves feel no discomfort in crossing the divide, often for the flimsiest of reasons. But can a party function without a sense of history, without an understanding of its own roots and why and how it has evolved to its present? The Anna movement had a strongly regressive streak. The AAP has moved away to saner positions without frontally con- fronting and interrogating that past. The AAP’s army of supporters may want to treat ideology as baggage and see the party as a grand standalone phenomenon, but that would be delusional because history has les- sons to offer to forget which is to risk repeat- ing it with tragic consequences. Previous movements Consider the fate of India’s previous anti- corruption movements. Two kinds of pop- ular movements have led to party formation in India — those based on self-respect and identity and the more pan-national ones fo- cussed on political corruption and misrule. The former category is made up of largely regional parties such as the Dravida Mun- netra Kazhagam (DMK), the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP). In the second category fall a series of anti- corruption mobilisations of which two are regarded as milestones in Indian political history — the Total Revolution call of 1974- 1975 and the anti-Bofors movement of 1988-1989. Led by Jaya Prakash Narayan and V.P. Singh respectively, both movements target- ed the Congress, and the end result of each formed a political alliance — the 1977 um- brella Janata Party and the 1989 Janata Dal coalition — that eventually disintegrated be- cause the leadership mistakenly believed that ideology could be brushed under the carpet. Both accommodated the RSS, believ- ing its involvement to be necessary to fight the ‘corrupt’ congress. But there is a curious back story to this story. The rightward tilt of the two movements can be traced back to 1971 when the Opposi- tion banded together into a Grand Alliance to fight Indira Gandhi’s ‘destructive’ politics. That alliance was routed. However, JP’s 1974 Total Revolution call and the then ongoing student protests in Gujarat provided the perfect backdrop for the Grand Alliance constituents to regroup. JP gave the constituents credibility and they gave his movement political muscle. This mutual support resulted in the formation, in 1974 itself, of the Janata Morcha, a loose coalition that went on to defeat the congress in the 1975 Gujarat assembly election. This setback, coupled with her unseating from the Rae Bareli Lok Sabha seat, led Indira Gandhi to impose the Emergency. The 1971 Grand Alliance was formed by the Congress (Organisation), the Swatantra Party, the Jan Sangh and the Praja and Sa- myukta Socialist Parties. The Congress (O) was backed by big business, the princely class and the media. The Swatantra Party drew its membership from the princes, wealthy industrialists and extreme right- wing elements. Driven by the RSS, the Jan Sangh had a clearly spelt-out Hindu nation- alist goal. The Socialist parties joined this grouping because like the rest they abhorred Indira Gandhi and saw her policies as de- structively leftist. The 1974-1975 Janata Morcha, which began as a coordination front for JP, consisted of the Congress (O), the Jan Sangh, the Socialist Party (formed by the merger of the two socialist parties) and the Bharatiya Lok Dal (BLD). The BLD in turn was a coalition of seven parties, among them the Charan Singh-led Bharatiya Kranti Dal and the Swatantra Party. The 1977 Janata Party was a product of the merger of the Congress (O), the Jan Sangh, the Bharatiya Lok Dal and the Socialist Party. Confusing? Far from it, what the narrative establishes is a rightwing continuum. The 1971 Grand Alliance, the 1974-1975 Janata Morcha and the 1977 Janata Party all had roughly the same constituents. The RSS pro- vided the logistical support for each of these formations as it would do more than a dec- ade later for the Janata Dal. Indeed, by 1989, the leading lights of the Janata movement had faded away. But, as before, the RSS and its political offshoot, now the Bharatiya Ja- nata Party, would drive the anti-corruption movement. JP believed that the RSS had changed. He said in March 1975: “I have to admit that the RSS has undergone a change and is still changing… By including these organisations in the movement for Total Revolution, I have made an attempt to decommunalise them and now they are not communal..” Indira Gandhi’s response to this was typically caus- tic: “Anybody who has read the speeches of RSS leaders can judge for himself … Many of them are positively against certain commu- nities in India… Such forces have been given respectability. They have been given an op- portunity to reach out to areas where they had no foothold before. This is extremely dangerous to the future of the country..” (Source: Ajit Bhattacharjee; Unfinished Revolution). JP’s blinkered view of the fight against corruption led to the inevitable. The social- ists opposed the Jan Sangh’s continuing alle- giance to the RSS, resulting in the collapse of the Janata Government. The fall of the V.P. Singh Government in 1989 was almost an action replay, with VP realising too late that his accommodation of the RSS and the BJP gave the latter credibility and a chance to revive itself post its 1984 debacle. The clash of ideologies was written into the script. Three interesting facts emerge from this. All pan-national anti-corruption move- ments so far have been against the Congress. All of them have had a strong right-wing content which led them to self-destruct. The Jan Sangh/BJP gained in respect and influ- ence by associating with these movements. The Anna movement was uncannily simi- lar to the earlier anti-corruption move- ments. The JP and Anna movements sought to overthrow the system and were set against the same background of corruption, run- away inflation and an explosion of public anger against those in power. V.P. Singh’s anti-Bofors campaign struck a powerful chord with the people in much the same way as did today’s 2G and other scandals. And like his predecessors, Anna chose to be ideol- ogy-neutral, associating himself with Baba Ramdev and holding up Narendra Modi as the ideal Chief Minister. His protégé Kiran Bedi has since come out in open support of Mr. Modi. Baba Ramdev was Mr. Kejriwal’s first port of call on his anti-corruption journey. It was later that he turned to Anna. But, since form- ing the AAP, Mr. Kejriwal has evolved in a more progressive direction, which is surely the reason why someone like Mallika Sarab- hai has joined the party. But the AAP also harbours the very regressive and gender- insensitive Kumar Vishwas, the video re- cordings of whose comic shows make for cringe-inducing viewing. The fight against corruption is critically important. But the neglect of ideology can prove ruinous for this cause. The AAP has a historic responsibility to make a clean break from the past and emerge as a party that can combine systemic overhaul with a progres- sive, clearly-articulated vision. [email protected] Too scared to turn left or right The Aam Aadmi Party is in favour of a solution-based, commonsensical approach to problems and seeks to escape the trappings of the Left or the Right Vidya Subrahmaniam Justice in the dock While no one can sit in judgment over cases involving sexual harassment by judges and whatever may have transpired within a room, it is anybody’s guess whether a woman would make a false allegation involving her modesty and against the higher judiciary (“The judges’ dilemma”, Jan. 16). I would like to narrate an incident. I once got a call from a higher official in the organisation where I worked. There was a lady employee present in his cabin, much junior to him and reporting to him indirectly. He discussed some details which did not concern me. Once she left, I asked him about the reason for calling me. In a very matter-of-fact manner, he replied that he had called me as a witness to guard himself against frivolous charges that could be raised in the future. He added that he had been following this procedure for long. This came from someone who was on the verge of retirement. It is imperative that those in power and in sensitive posts take sufficient safeguards as a preventive measure against false charges being levelled. A.V. Narayanan, Tiruchirapalli The din over the allegations made by an intern against former Supreme Court judge Justice A.K. Ganguly had barely died down when a fresh scandal involving another retired judge, Justice Swatanter Kumar, surfaced. The apex court, which had decreed that it was washing its hands of such matters after setting up a panel to probe Justice Ganguly’s alleged misconduct, has now had to take cognizance of this alleged offence as the intern has sought a permanent mechanism to probe such cases. Such a mechanism would be desirable as the accused, who suddenly find themselves caught in the eye of a storm, are made to face the brunt of the media onslaught. Justice (retd.) Swatanter Kumar’s plea for an injunction to restrain the media seems appropriate. C.V. Aravind, Bangalore Had there been an institutional mechanism to deal with unwelcome behaviour by judges toward interns, any grievances on the part of interns concerning powerful judges would have been redressed in a better manner. The resolution of a full court that no more representations against judges would be entertained goes against the rule of law. V. Kumar, Thekkurichy, Tamil Nadu The facts need to be ascertained given the potential damage that could be caused to persons who have occupied high office. The likelihood of false allegations cannot be entirely ruled out. So there should be a proper mechanism to ensure a level playing field to both parties. When a complaint is abnormally delayed, the benefit of the doubt can be given to the alleged perpetrator till it is proved otherwise. People occupying/who have occupied high office with a credible track record certainly deserve such immunity. Dr. D.V.G. Sankararao, Vizianagaram Our Supreme Court, in trying to seek a mechanism to probe charges against its judge, should consider the position of both parties. It needs to come up with strict punishment for both sexual harassment and attempts to tarnish the judiciary. Avrinder Grewal Noorwala, Punjab Rape of tourist The term Atithi devo bhava seems to have lost its meaning. It is more shocking that less than 13 months after the brutal Delhi gang rape, precious little seems to have changed in the capital (“Danish tourist gang-raped in Delhi”, Jan. 16). It is wrong to blame the AAP on this. Though the prevailing mindset in a male-dominated India cannot be changed overnight, more and more people are looking forward to any steps that the AAP government would come up with to prevent such incidents. Bidyut Kumar Chatterjee, Faridabad Operation Bluestar The news item headlined “RAW chief consulted MI6 in build-up to Operation Bluestar” (Jan. 16) did not come as a surprise. Countries around the world have similar arrangements. In one such incident, the GSG9 of Germany helped Israelis during the raid on Entebbe airport. In 1979, the U.S. helped train Saudi forces to break the Makkah siege. The King of Morocco was protected by Jews, and Israelis shared their intelligence inputs (The Spymasters of Israel by Steward Steven). After signing the peace accord with the Palestinians, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin first visited Morocco on his way back from the U.S. The current controversy is just another one for the media to report on. Sunil Pradhan, Nuapada, Odisha Sharon’s legacy The Sabra and Shatila massacre, mostly of Palestinians and Lebanese Shias, was perpetrated by a Lebanese militia with ties to Syria in retaliation for the assassination of Lebanese President Bachir Gemayel. Ariel Sharon, then the Defence Minister of Israel, merely bore personal responsibility for ignoring the danger of bloodshed and revenge, forcing him to resign (“Troubled legacy of a bulldozer”, Jan. 16). When Time magazine published an article implying that Sharon was directly responsible for the massacre, Sharon sued it for libel in American courts. The jury concluded that the Time article included false allegations. The writer here is further resorting to half-truths to vilify Sharon, who was merely fighting for the survival of his country against terrorist attacks by groups which were committed to the destruction of the state of Israel. Vineeth Kumar, Bangalore Ariel Sharon was a war criminal who escaped justice by dying before he could be found accountable for his crimes. He proved himself to be a reckless, insubordinate commander who carried out many mass murders and attacks on civilian targets in Palestine, Syria and Egypt. Remarkably, despite Sharon’s controversial reputation, there was a pretty impressive list of people coming to his funeral. Nishita Aggarwal, Delhi Sanctity of Sanctum When I visited a temple near Burma colony in Thiruvanaikoil in Tamil Nadu, I was waiting for the person in charge to show karpura aaradhana to the deity. But he told me that I to can go directly to the sanctum sanctorum to pray as there was no need for anybody to come between me and God. Hindu religion is that simple! For progressive Hindus like me, the Chidambaram temple verdict surely does come as a setback. Though the Lord never intended to do injustice based on caste, it was added later by vested interests to justify discrimination by birth. In the case of the Chidambaram Temple, the battle might be lost but the war will be won eventually. S. Rajan Mahesh, Tiruchirapalli Sahara Pariwar The Sahara episode has indeed turned out to be a test of patience (“Testing the limits,” Jan. 16). It is surprising that the group finds novel ways to flout the rules and continue its operations. It is rather unfortunate that the group has not been moved against even after Supreme Court orders. Madhusree Guha, Kolkata LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Letters emailed to [email protected] must carry the full postal address and the full name or the name with initials. T he report of an RBI-appointed committee on financial inclusion and financial deepening has stimulated a wide-ranging debate on these crucial areas. However, policy measures initiated by the government and the RBI while adding to the numbers of new bank branches, new accounts and so on did not really enhance the quality of such inclusive practices. In September last year, the RBI asked the committee chaired by Nachiket Mor to pre- pare “a clear and detailed vision document” to lay down a set of “design principles” to guide national frame- works and regulation and to review existing strategies and institutions with a view to removing barriers to inclusion and to the deepening of the financial sector. The report, submitted in just over four months, is rich in detail, but its core agenda is to be seen in a few specific action points. Every Indian above 18 will have to be provided with a universal electronic bank account by January 2016, less than two years from now. Aad- haar will be the basis to open bank accounts. A vertical- ly differentiated banking system with payments banks for deposits and payments and wholesale banks for credit outreach will come up, with few entry barriers. No one can fault the committee for the lack of ambi- tion or a sense of urgency. It has underlined the urgen- cy by stipulating a distance rule — no one need walk for more than 15 minutes to reach a point of contact to avail a financial service. That has been one of the major areas of dissent within the committee, with two of its members seeking a more realistic timeframe. The com- mittee might have glossed over the huge costs that will have to be incurred in terms of physical infrastructure and human resources. No matter how important tech- nology will be in the emerging financial scene, the role of human resources cannot be discounted. The idea of setting up differentiated banks is not new. Regional rural banks and local area banks which fall in this category did not measure up despite being theoretical- ly sound. Their cost structure moved up in line with those of commercial banks, making them unviable. Despite a much lower capital requirement being stip- ulated for these banks, there may not be many takers for them. The assumption that Aadhaar will roll out across the country by the end of next year might be an optimistic one. Despite such doubts, the Nachiket Mor report is a truly visionary document that should help the Reserve Bank and the government to initiate spe- cific moves towards complete financial inclusion. A new paradigm for inclusion CARTOONSCAPE

17th Jan Hindu

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Good article

Citation preview

Page 1: 17th Jan Hindu

CMYK

BG-MYBG

FRIDAY, JANUARY 17, 2014

12 THE HINDU FRIDAY, JANUARY 17, 2014

BANGALORE

EDITORIAL

The agreement between India and Sri Lanka to

empty their jails of each other’s fishermen is

an encouraging sign that both sides have the

will to resolve a long-standing irritant in bi-

lateral ties. At Wednesday’s meeting between Union

Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar and Sri Lankan

Fisheries and Aquatic Minister Rajitha Senaratne, both

sides agreed to release all fishermen in their custody

except those who face charges other than crossing the

International Maritime Boundary Line. With this con-

fidence building measure, both sides must now sit

down to the challenge of finding a long-term solution to

the problems of the fishing communities in the region.

Over the years, Tamil Nadu fishermen have with in-

creasing stridency made the demand for the right to

fish in the entire Palk Bay, describing it as their “tradi-

tional fishing grounds”. It is no longer just about fishing

rights around Kachchatheevu. The reason is that the

catch is better on the Sri Lankan side. This is no

accident. Bad practices such as the indiscriminate use

of trawlers that dredge right down to the sea bed have

depleted the resources along the Tamil Nadu coast. On

the other side, the long years of conflict during which

fishermen in Northeast Sri Lanka were barely allowed

by the Sri Lankan Navy to put their boats out a few

hundred metres into the sea has ensured that fish and

other marine resources are still plentiful. Now that

there are no military restrictions on fishing off North-

east Sri Lanka, Tamil fishermen there who are still

struggling to rebuild their lives find themselves in daily

competition with Tamil Nadu fishermen for what they

claim is rightfully theirs. Worse, the fishermen from

the Indian side, better organised and equipped with

bigger boats and better nets, use the same practices

that ravaged their side of the bay.

It is no surprise that an agreement — finalised in

2008 when the Sri Lankan military operations against

the LTTE were intensifying — that was favourable to

Indian fishermen is now seen by the Sri Lankan side as

requiring re-negotiation. The solution to the problem

may well come from the fishermen themselves. With

the backing of the two capitals, they are to hold a

meeting of their representatives on January 20 and

may explore options such as licensing and placing re-

strictions on the number of fishing days. Ultimately,

however, the real solution for both, especially on the

Indian side, lies in preserving what is left by moving

away from coastal to deep sea fishing. The State govern-

ment and the Centre must also encourage fishermen to

diversify into related activities such as deep-freezing,

preserving and canning. That could even pave the way

for collaboration between Indian and Sri Lankan fish-

ing communities. The way forward is to find ways to

complement each other’s livelihoods, instead of just

competing over scarce resources.

Easing tensions inthe Palk Bay

There is a tremendous new energy on thestreets of Delhi and, almost surreally, it isspreading to other parts of the country. Thephenomenon is a tribute to the Aam AadmiParty, a spunky political debutant already ingovernment in the national Capital and withplans to contest over 400 Lok Sabha seats.

In retrospect, it is clear that the ArvindKejriwal-led AAP tapped into popular re-sentments bubbling under the surface. Theemotions found release with Mr. Kejriwal’spromise of systemic overhaul and transfor-mative politics. The stampeding crowds atthe AAP’s offices, the rush of the who’s whoto join its rolls and the frightened responsesof its political rivals, all speak to the new-comer’s emergence as a harbinger of hope ina political environment sullied by greed,graft, waste and incompetence.

Great expectations

Yet the danger with excessive expectationis that it can quickly turn into disillusion-ment and despair. The AAP faces two poten-tial pitfalls. First is its near free-for-all styleof governance, evident in such hasty andbaffling decisions as turning the Delhi Secre-tariat into a Janata durbar (since dropped)and calling upon people to sting corrupt offi-cers. Without a proper structure and dis-cipline, these solutions can degenerate intotools of vigilantism, leading to a blurring oflines between liberty and licence.

The second is the AAP’s refusal to defineitself ideologically. In an interview to CNN-IBN, the AAP’s national executive member,Yogendra Yadav, denied that the party wassocialist and said that the “binaries of the20th century, either Left or Right, do notmake sense”. An entry in the AAP website,now removed, had ridiculed the demand forideological clarity, saying ideology was forpundits whereas the AAP saw itself as solu-tion-based, open to using solutions from theLeft and the Right.

The attractions of a solution-based, com-monsensical approach are undoubtedlyenormous, especially to audiences fatiguedby the opportunistic aspects of politics. It is

also true that there is a jaded, outmoded feelto politics compartmentalised as Right orLeft; secular or communal. More so whenparties and politicians themselves feel nodiscomfort in crossing the divide, often forthe flimsiest of reasons.

But can a party function without a sense ofhistory, without an understanding of its ownroots and why and how it has evolved to itspresent? The Anna movement had a stronglyregressive streak. The AAP has moved awayto saner positions without frontally con-fronting and interrogating that past. TheAAP’s army of supporters may want to treatideology as baggage and see the party as agrand standalone phenomenon, but thatwould be delusional because history has les-sons to offer to forget which is to risk repeat-ing it with tragic consequences.

Previous movements

Consider the fate of India’s previous anti-corruption movements. Two kinds of pop-ular movements have led to party formationin India — those based on self-respect andidentity and the more pan-national ones fo-cussed on political corruption and misrule.The former category is made up of largelyregional parties such as the Dravida Mun-netra Kazhagam (DMK), the Telugu DesamParty (TDP), the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP)and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP).

In the second category fall a series of anti-corruption mobilisations of which two areregarded as milestones in Indian politicalhistory — the Total Revolution call of 1974-1975 and the anti-Bofors movement of1988-1989.

Led by Jaya Prakash Narayan and V.P.Singh respectively, both movements target-ed the Congress, and the end result of eachformed a political alliance — the 1977 um-

brella Janata Party and the 1989 Janata Dalcoalition — that eventually disintegrated be-cause the leadership mistakenly believedthat ideology could be brushed under thecarpet. Both accommodated the RSS, believ-ing its involvement to be necessary to fightthe ‘corrupt’ congress. But there is a curiousback story to this story.

The rightward tilt of the two movementscan be traced back to 1971 when the Opposi-tion banded together into a Grand Allianceto fight Indira Gandhi’s ‘destructive’ politics.That alliance was routed.

However, JP’s 1974 Total Revolution calland the then ongoing student protests inGujarat provided the perfect backdrop forthe Grand Alliance constituents to regroup.JP gave the constituents credibility and theygave his movement political muscle. Thismutual support resulted in the formation, in1974 itself, of the Janata Morcha, a loosecoalition that went on to defeat the congressin the 1975 Gujarat assembly election. Thissetback, coupled with her unseating fromthe Rae Bareli Lok Sabha seat, led IndiraGandhi to impose the Emergency.

The 1971 Grand Alliance was formed bythe Congress (Organisation), the SwatantraParty, the Jan Sangh and the Praja and Sa-myukta Socialist Parties. The Congress (O)was backed by big business, the princelyclass and the media. The Swatantra Partydrew its membership from the princes,wealthy industrialists and extreme right-wing elements. Driven by the RSS, the JanSangh had a clearly spelt-out Hindu nation-alist goal. The Socialist parties joined thisgrouping because like the rest they abhorredIndira Gandhi and saw her policies as de-structively leftist. The 1974-1975 JanataMorcha, which began as a coordination frontfor JP, consisted of the Congress (O), the Jan

Sangh, the Socialist Party (formed by themerger of the two socialist parties) and theBharatiya Lok Dal (BLD). The BLD in turnwas a coalition of seven parties, among themthe Charan Singh-led Bharatiya Kranti Daland the Swatantra Party. The 1977 JanataParty was a product of the merger of theCongress (O), the Jan Sangh, the BharatiyaLok Dal and the Socialist Party.

Confusing? Far from it, what the narrativeestablishes is a rightwing continuum. The1971 Grand Alliance, the 1974-1975 JanataMorcha and the 1977 Janata Party all hadroughly the same constituents. The RSS pro-vided the logistical support for each of theseformations as it would do more than a dec-ade later for the Janata Dal. Indeed, by 1989,the leading lights of the Janata movementhad faded away. But, as before, the RSS andits political offshoot, now the Bharatiya Ja-nata Party, would drive the anti-corruptionmovement.

JP believed that the RSS had changed. Hesaid in March 1975: “I have to admit that theRSS has undergone a change and is stillchanging… By including these organisationsin the movement for Total Revolution, I havemade an attempt to decommunalise themand now they are not communal..” IndiraGandhi’s response to this was typically caus-tic: “Anybody who has read the speeches ofRSS leaders can judge for himself … Many ofthem are positively against certain commu-nities in India… Such forces have been givenrespectability. They have been given an op-portunity to reach out to areas where theyhad no foothold before. This is extremelydangerous to the future of the country..”(Source: Ajit Bhattacharjee; UnfinishedRevolution).

JP’s blinkered view of the fight againstcorruption led to the inevitable. The social-ists opposed the Jan Sangh’s continuing alle-giance to the RSS, resulting in the collapse ofthe Janata Government. The fall of the V.P.Singh Government in 1989 was almost anaction replay, with VP realising too late thathis accommodation of the RSS and the BJPgave the latter credibility and a chance torevive itself post its 1984 debacle. The clashof ideologies was written into the script.

Three interesting facts emerge from this.All pan-national anti-corruption move-ments so far have been against the Congress.All of them have had a strong right-wingcontent which led them to self-destruct. TheJan Sangh/BJP gained in respect and influ-ence by associating with these movements.

The Anna movement was uncannily simi-lar to the earlier anti-corruption move-ments. The JP and Anna movements soughtto overthrow the system and were set againstthe same background of corruption, run-away inflation and an explosion of publicanger against those in power. V.P. Singh’santi-Bofors campaign struck a powerfulchord with the people in much the same wayas did today’s 2G and other scandals. Andlike his predecessors, Anna chose to be ideol-ogy-neutral, associating himself with BabaRamdev and holding up Narendra Modi asthe ideal Chief Minister. His protégé KiranBedi has since come out in open support ofMr. Modi.

Baba Ramdev was Mr. Kejriwal’s first portof call on his anti-corruption journey. It waslater that he turned to Anna. But, since form-ing the AAP, Mr. Kejriwal has evolved in amore progressive direction, which is surelythe reason why someone like Mallika Sarab-hai has joined the party. But the AAP alsoharbours the very regressive and gender-insensitive Kumar Vishwas, the video re-cordings of whose comic shows make forcringe-inducing viewing.

The fight against corruption is criticallyimportant. But the neglect of ideology canprove ruinous for this cause. The AAP has ahistoric responsibility to make a clean breakfrom the past and emerge as a party that cancombine systemic overhaul with a progres-sive, clearly-articulated vision.

[email protected]

Too scared to turn left or rightThe Aam Aadmi Party is in favour of asolution-based, commonsensical approachto problems and seeks to escape thetrappings of the Left or the Right

Vidya Subrahmaniam

Justice in the dockWhile no one can sit in judgmentover cases involving sexualharassment by judges andwhatever may have transpiredwithin a room, it is anybody’s guesswhether a woman would make afalse allegation involving hermodesty and against the higherjudiciary (“The judges’ dilemma”,Jan. 16). I would like to narrate anincident. I once got a call from ahigher official in the organisationwhere I worked. There was a ladyemployee present in his cabin,much junior to him and reportingto him indirectly. He discussedsome details which did not concernme. Once she left, I asked himabout the reason for calling me. Ina very matter-of-fact manner, hereplied that he had called me as awitness to guard himself againstfrivolous charges that could beraised in the future. He added thathe had been following thisprocedure for long. This came fromsomeone who was on the verge ofretirement. It is imperative thatthose in power and in sensitiveposts take sufficient safeguards as apreventive measure against falsecharges being levelled.

A.V. Narayanan,Tiruchirapalli

The din over the allegations madeby an intern against formerSupreme Court judge Justice A.K.Ganguly had barely died downwhen a fresh scandal involvinganother retired judge, JusticeSwatanter Kumar, surfaced. Theapex court, which had decreed thatit was washing its hands of suchmatters after setting up a panel toprobe Justice Ganguly’s alleged

misconduct, has now had to takecognizance of this alleged offenceas the intern has sought apermanent mechanism to probesuch cases. Such a mechanismwould be desirable as the accused,who suddenly find themselvescaught in the eye of a storm, aremade to face the brunt of the mediaonslaught. Justice (retd.)Swatanter Kumar’s plea for aninjunction to restrain the mediaseems appropriate.

C.V. Aravind,Bangalore

Had there been an institutionalmechanism to deal withunwelcome behaviour by judgestoward interns, any grievances onthe part of interns concerningpowerful judges would have beenredressed in a better manner. Theresolution of a full court that nomore representations againstjudges would be entertained goesagainst the rule of law.

V. Kumar,Thekkurichy, Tamil Nadu

The facts need to be ascertainedgiven the potential damage thatcould be caused to persons whohave occupied high office. Thelikelihood of false allegationscannot be entirely ruled out. Sothere should be a propermechanism to ensure a levelplaying field to both parties. Whena complaint is abnormally delayed,the benefit of the doubt can begiven to the alleged perpetrator tillit is proved otherwise. Peopleoccupying/who have occupied highoffice with a credible track recordcertainly deserve such immunity.

Dr. D.V.G. Sankararao,Vizianagaram

Our Supreme Court, in trying toseek a mechanism to probe chargesagainst its judge, should considerthe position of both parties. Itneeds to come up with strictpunishment for both sexualharassment and attempts totarnish the judiciary.

Avrinder GrewalNoorwala, Punjab

Rape of tourist

The term Atithi devo bhava seemsto have lost its meaning. It is moreshocking that less than 13 monthsafter the brutal Delhi gang rape,precious little seems to havechanged in the capital (“Danishtourist gang-raped in Delhi”, Jan.16). It is wrong to blame the AAP onthis. Though the prevailingmindset in a male-dominated Indiacannot be changed overnight, moreand more people are lookingforward to any steps that the AAPgovernment would come up with toprevent such incidents.

Bidyut Kumar Chatterjee,Faridabad

Operation Bluestar

The news item headlined “RAWchief consulted MI6 in build-up toOperation Bluestar” (Jan. 16) didnot come as a surprise. Countriesaround the world have similararrangements. In one suchincident, the GSG9 of Germanyhelped Israelis during the raid onEntebbe airport. In 1979, the U.S.helped train Saudi forces to breakthe Makkah siege. The King ofMorocco was protected by Jews,and Israelis shared theirintelligence inputs (TheSpymasters of Israel by Steward

Steven). After signing the peaceaccord with the Palestinians,Israeli Prime Minister YitzhakRabin first visited Morocco on hisway back from the U.S. The currentcontroversy is just another one forthe media to report on.

Sunil Pradhan,Nuapada, Odisha

Sharon’s legacy

The Sabra and Shatila massacre,mostly of Palestinians andLebanese Shias, was perpetratedby a Lebanese militia with ties toSyria in retaliation for theassassination of LebanesePresident Bachir Gemayel. ArielSharon, then the Defence Ministerof Israel, merely bore personalresponsibility for ignoring thedanger of bloodshed and revenge,forcing him to resign (“Troubledlegacy of a bulldozer”, Jan. 16).When Time magazine published anarticle implying that Sharon wasdirectly responsible for themassacre, Sharon sued it for libel inAmerican courts. The juryconcluded that the Time articleincluded false allegations. Thewriter here is further resorting tohalf-truths to vilify Sharon, whowas merely fighting for the survivalof his country against terroristattacks by groups which werecommitted to the destruction ofthe state of Israel.

Vineeth Kumar,Bangalore

Ariel Sharon was a war criminalwho escaped justice by dyingbefore he could be foundaccountable for his crimes. Heproved himself to be a reckless,insubordinate commander who

carried out many mass murdersand attacks on civilian targets inPalestine, Syria and Egypt.Remarkably, despite Sharon’scontroversial reputation, there wasa pretty impressive list of peoplecoming to his funeral.

Nishita Aggarwal,Delhi

Sanctity of Sanctum

When I visited a temple nearBurma colony in Thiruvanaikoil inTamil Nadu, I was waiting for theperson in charge to show karpuraaaradhana to the deity. But he toldme that I to can go directly to thesanctum sanctorum to pray asthere was no need for anybody tocome between me and God. Hindureligion is that simple! Forprogressive Hindus like me, theChidambaram temple verdictsurely does come as a setback.Though the Lord never intended todo injustice based on caste, it wasadded later by vested interests tojustify discrimination by birth. Inthe case of the ChidambaramTemple, the battle might be lostbut the war will be won eventually.

S. Rajan Mahesh,Tiruchirapalli

Sahara Pariwar

The Sahara episode has indeedturned out to be a test of patience(“Testing the limits,” Jan. 16). It issurprising that the group findsnovel ways to flout the rules andcontinue its operations. It is ratherunfortunate that the group has notbeen moved against even afterSupreme Court orders.

Madhusree Guha,Kolkata

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Letters emailed to [email protected] must carry the fullpostal address and the full name or the name with initials.

The report of an RBI-appointed committee on

financial inclusion and financial deepening

has stimulated a wide-ranging debate on

these crucial areas. However, policy measures

initiated by the government and the RBI while adding

to the numbers of new bank branches, new accounts

and so on did not really enhance the quality of such

inclusive practices. In September last year, the RBI

asked the committee chaired by Nachiket Mor to pre-

pare “a clear and detailed vision document” to lay down

a set of “design principles” to guide national frame-

works and regulation and to review existing strategies

and institutions with a view to removing barriers to

inclusion and to the deepening of the financial sector.

The report, submitted in just over four months, is rich

in detail, but its core agenda is to be seen in a few

specific action points. Every Indian above 18 will have

to be provided with a universal electronic bank account

by January 2016, less than two years from now. Aad-

haar will be the basis to open bank accounts. A vertical-

ly differentiated banking system with payments banks

for deposits and payments and wholesale banks for

credit outreach will come up, with few entry barriers.

No one can fault the committee for the lack of ambi-

tion or a sense of urgency. It has underlined the urgen-

cy by stipulating a distance rule — no one need walk for

more than 15 minutes to reach a point of contact to

avail a financial service. That has been one of the major

areas of dissent within the committee, with two of its

members seeking a more realistic timeframe. The com-

mittee might have glossed over the huge costs that will

have to be incurred in terms of physical infrastructure

and human resources. No matter how important tech-

nology will be in the emerging financial scene, the role

of human resources cannot be discounted. The idea of

setting up differentiated banks is not new. Regional

rural banks and local area banks which fall in this

category did not measure up despite being theoretical-

ly sound. Their cost structure moved up in line with

those of commercial banks, making them unviable.

Despite a much lower capital requirement being stip-

ulated for these banks, there may not be many takers

for them. The assumption that Aadhaar will roll out

across the country by the end of next year might be an

optimistic one. Despite such doubts, the Nachiket Mor

report is a truly visionary document that should help

the Reserve Bank and the government to initiate spe-

cific moves towards complete financial inclusion.

A new paradigm for inclusion

CARTOONSCAPE