Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
179 GREENHILL ROAD
Environmental Noise Assessment
S4875C2 June 2016
Author Jason Turner (MAAS)
Reviewer Chris Turnbull (MAAS)
Sonus Pty Ltd 17 Ruthven Avenue
ADELAIDE SA 5000 Phone: +61 8 8231 2100
www.sonus.com.au ABN: 67 882 843 130
Contact: Jason Turner [email protected]
+61 (0) 410 920 122
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 2
INTRODUCTION
An environmental noise assessment of the proposed mixed use residential and commercial
development at 179 Greenhill Road has been conducted based on the JPE Design Studio
architectural drawings received via email on 19 May 2016.
The proposed development is located primarily in an Urban Corridor Zone of the Unley
Council Development Plan with a portion of the site extending into a Residential Streetscape
(Built Form) Zone. The nearest residences to the subject site are located in the Residential
Zone.
The assessment considers external noise intrusion from traffic on Greenhill Road and
provides information so that the dwellings can be designed in accordance with the Ministers
Specification SA78B. SA78B mandates façade construction requirements to ensure
adequate traffic noise levels inside residential development. The satisfactory inclusion of the
SA78B requirements forms part of the Building Rules Consent process in a similar way to
the internal party wall construction requirements.
Environmental noise from the development to surrounding residences is also considered
from car parking, commercial activity and mechanical plant operation associated with the
development.
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE Criteria The existing acoustic environment in the vicinity of the subject site is dominated by the
influence of Greenhill Road and George Street.
Noise sources at the development, comprising vehicle movements, small scale commercial
activity and mechanical plant operation, are unlikely to differ significantly from activities
already occurring in the locality.
Notwithstanding the above, objective criteria to prevent adverse impacts at the nearest
existing dwellings have been considered and are summarised below.
Development Plan The subject site is located on the border between an Urban Corridor and Residential
Streetscape (Built Form) Zone of the Unley Council Development Plan. The nearest
residences are located in the Residential Streetscape (Built Form) Zone. The Development
Plan has been reviewed and particular regard given to the following relevant provisions:
General Section - Interface Between Land Uses
OBJECTIVES
29. Development located and designed to minimise adverse impacts and conflict
between land uses.
30. Protect community health and amenity from adverse impacts of development.
31. Protect desired land uses from the encroachment of incompatible development.
PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
97. Development should not detrimentally affect the amenity of the locality or cause
unreasonable interference through any of the following:
…
(b) noise
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 4
103. Development that emits noise (other than music noise) should include attenuation
measures that achieve the relevant “Environment Protection (Noise) Policy” criteria
when assessed at the nearest existing noise sensitive premises.
105. Development proposing music should include noise attenuation measures that
achieve the following desired noise levels at the adjacent existing noise sensitive
development property boundary:
Less than 8 dB above the level of background noise (L90,15 min) in any octave band of
the sound spectrum and less than 5 dB(A) above the level of background noise
(LA90,15 min) for the overall (sum of all octave bands) A-weighted level
Environment Protection (Noise) Policy 2007 Interface Between Land Uses Principle of Development Control 103 references the current
Environment Protection (Noise) Policy, which is the Environment Protection (Noise) Policy
2007 (the Policy).
The Policy establishes goal noise levels based on the Development Plan Zone in which the
noise source (the development) and noise sensitive receiver (the nearest existing dwelling)
are located. For a proposed development which straddles an Urban Corridor Zone and a
residential zone, and surrounding dwellings in a residential area, the Policy recommends
goal noise levels of 52 dB(A) during the day (7am to 10pm) and 45 dB(A) during the night
(10pm to 7am).
When measuring or predicting noise levels for comparison with goal noise levels, penalties
may be applied for each characteristic of tone, impulse, low frequency or modulation of the
noise source. To apply a penalty, these characteristics must be fundamental to the nature
and impact of the noise rather than simply a part of it. Due to the nature of the existing
acoustic environment and the new noise sources associated with the development, a penalty
under the Policy is not warranted in this circumstance.
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 5
Assessment Car Park Noise
The car parking arrangement of the proposed development is of good acoustic design such
that it is mostly enclosed or underground and the access ramp is centrally located in the site
away from other dwellings. A small number of ground level, outdoor car parks are provided
on the northern side of the development site; however nearby residences are shielded from
activity in this area by the main building of the proposed development.
Based on the above, noise from the proposed car park is predicted to be well within the
range of noise levels associated with existing vehicles on Greenhill Road and George Street
and will easily achieve the requirements of the Policy. As such, car parking activity within
the proposed development will not adversely impact on the amenity of existing dwellings in
the area.
Mechanical Plant At the development application stage of a project, the mechanical plant is generally not
designed or selected, and as such detailed predictions of the noise from the mechanical
plant cannot be made.
Based on mechanical plant typically used for developments of this nature, noise from the
plant can practicably achieve the Policy criteria when measured at the nearest existing
residences. Notwithstanding, it is recommended that a detailed assessment of mechanical
services noise be carried out following the final selection of mechanical plant, during the
detailed design phase of the project.
A suitable condition to ensure compliance with the Policy is as follows:
a maximum average noise level (Leq) of 52 dB(A) during the day (7am to 10pm) and,
a maximum average noise level (Leq) of 45 dB(A) during the night (10pm to 7am)
The above noise levels should be determined at the nearest dwelling in existence at the time
of development approval, and should be measured in accordance with the Environment
Protection (Noise) Policy 2007.
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 6
Commercial activity
The final tenant for the commercial aspect of the development is not yet known and
therefore the operating hours and detailed operational information cannot be defined.
In these circumstances, it is appropriate that future applications consider suitable conditions
to ensure compliance with the Policy and in the circumstance where music might be played,
to ensure compliance with relevant music criteria.
Based on the above, proposed conditions include the following:
a maximum average noise level (Leq) of 52 dB(A) during the day (7am to 10pm);
a maximum average noise level (Leq) of 45 dB(A) during the night (10pm to 7am);
for noise from patrons and plant and equipment; and
maximum music levels to achieve Interface Between Land Uses Principle of
Development Control 105 of the Development Plan (see above).
The above noise levels should be determined at the nearest dwelling in existence at the time
of development approval, and should be measured in accordance with the Environment
Protection (Noise) Policy 2007 in combination with any plant and equipment at the site.
The proposed layout of the development has been considered and the arrangement
provides the opportunity to conduct typical commercial activities which can practicably
comply with the above conditions.
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 7
EXTERNAL NOISE INTRUSION Criteria Ministers Specification SA78B
SA78B applies to “all Class 1, 2, 3, 4 or 9c aged care buildings that are in a designated area
identified on the Noise and Air Emissions Overlay in the relevant Development Plan”.
The subject site is located within a designated area of the Development Plan through the Air
and Noise Emissions Overlay of the Development Plan and Greenhill Road is designated to
be a “Type A” road within the Plan.
SA78B mandates façade construction requirements to be included into a residential
development to ensure adequate (internal) traffic noise levels. The satisfactory (and
mandatory) inclusion of the requirements forms part of the Building Rules Consent process
in a similar way to the Building Code of Australia requirements for party wall constructions.
SA78B assigns “sound exposure categories” to the façades of dwellings based on the
following;
the designation and speed of vehicles on the road network;
the distance from the road;
any shielding effects from buildings or structures;
the window area as a percentage of the floor area of the room; and
the proposed use of the room.
The “sound exposure categories” range from 1 to 5, with Category 1 requiring limited
acoustic treatment and Category 5 requiring extensive treatment.
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 8
Assessment
The sound exposure categories for facades on each level of the development are included in
Appendix A, and should be used for reference when applying the following construction
recommendations.
All facades in the development are either Category 1 or 2, which represents the lower end of
the range of acoustic treatments which can be applied. The higher end of the range would
be assigned to dwellings proposed in very close proximity to a major road.
External Walls
External walls in Category 2 facades are required to achieve an Rw + Ctr ≥ 50. The following
wall constructions will achieve this rating; however, other options can be developed or
reviewed if required as the detailed design progresses:
a brick / masonry veneer construction incorporating:
o a row of 70mm x 35mm timber studs or 64mm steel studs at 600mm centers;
o a cavity of 25mm between leaves;
o 75mm thick glass or mineral wool insulation with a density of 11kg/m3 or
75mm thick polyester insulation with a density of 14kg/m3, positioned
between studs, and;
o one layer of 10mm plasterboard fixed to the inside face;
a lightweight construction incorporating;
o Staggered steel studs in 150mm thick tracks, with:
o two layers of 16mm fire rated plasterboard on one side of the studwork;
o two layers of 9mm fibre cement sheet on the other side of the studwork, and;
o 75mm thick insulation with a minimum density of 14kg/m3 within the cavity.
a precast concrete construction comprising;
o precast panel of minimum thickness 150mm
o 1 layer of 13mm fire rated plasterboard directly mounted on furring channels
on the internal side; and
o 25mm thick insulation with minimum density 14kg/m3 within a cavity no less
than 50mm.
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 9
External walls in Category 1 facades are required to achieve an Rw + Ctr ≥ 45. The Category
2 wall constructions stated above will inherently achieve this rating. Rationalisation of
options for Category 1 facades can be developed or reviewed during the detailed design
phase if required.
Roof and Ceiling System
The Roof and Ceiling system requirements of SA78B are Category 1 and therefore require
no specific acoustic treatment.
Ventilation
If outside air ventilation other than openable windows is provided across Category 1 or 2
facades then that ventilation system must be designed to achieve an Rw rating of 40.
Further advice can be provided if required as the detailed design progresses.
Solid External Doors
Solid external doors in a Category 2 façade are required to achieve an Rw of 27 or higher.
This acoustic rating can typically be achieved with a 35mm thick solid core door, fully fitted
with Raven “RP8” and “RP10” (or equivalent) acoustic doors seals. These seals should be
fitted and adjusted to ensure that the doors are sealed as close as practicable to airtight
when closed. There are no specific requirements for solid external doors in Category 1
facades.
Windows and Glazed Doors
The SA78B requirements for windows and glazed doors are dependent on the facade
category, the area of glazing as a percentage of floor area, and the proposed room function.
The airborne noise ratings (Rw + Ctr) required by SA78B for the glass selections are provided
in the following table:
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 10
Room Area of window and external glass
doors as a percentage of the floor area of the room
Minimum Required
Rw + Ctr
Category 1 Category 2
Bedrooms (including attached ensuites and walk-in-robes)
Not more than 20% 25 28
More than 20% but not more than 40% 28 31
More than 20% but not more than 40% 31 34
More than 20% but not more than 40% 34
More than 80% 37
Kitchens, living rooms, and laundry spaces
Not more than 20% 22 25
More than 20% but not more than 40% 25 28
More than 20% but not more than 40% 28 31
More than 20% but not more than 40% 31 34
More than 80% 34
Rooms which fall into the grey areas of the table are outside the “deemed-to-satisfy”
provisions of SA78B and detailed advice on the approach taken should be sought from the
building certifier due to the ambiguity of the relevant provisions. At this stage of the project,
the construction associated with an Rw + Ctr of 37 in the following table can be taken to be
representative of the final design solution. Minimum acoustic treatments required to achieve
each specified Rw + Ctr are included in the following table:
Rw + Ctr Minimum Required Construction for
External Glazed Doors
Minimum Requirement Construction for
Windows
22 Rating can be achieved with 4mm glass in
any arrangement.
Rating can be achieved with 3mm glass in any
arrangement.
25 Rating can be achieved with 4mm glass in
any arrangement.
Rating can be achieved with 4mm glass in any
arrangement.
28
Rating can typically be achieved with the
following systems:
minimum 6.38mm thick glass in
system with acoustic seals
Rating can typically be achieved with the
following systems:
6.38mm thick laminated glass as fixed
panes or in a system with acoustic
seals
31
Rating can typically be achieved with the
following systems:
minimum 10mm thick glass in a
system with acoustic seals
Rating can typically be achieved with the
following systems:
minimum 8.38mm thick laminated
glass as fixed panes or in a system
with acoustic seals
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 11
Rw + Ctr Minimum Required Construction for
External Glazed Doors
Minimum Requirement Construction for
Windows
34
Standard sliding door arrangements typically
will not achieve an airborne noise rating RW +
Ctr of 34 or higher. Options to achieve this
rating include the following systems:
Tandem sliding door arrangement
with minimum air gap of 100mm;
AWS “Thermally Broken Sliding
Door” with 8.5mm “VLAM Hush”
glass separated from 6.5mm “VLAM
Hush” glass by a 10mm air cavity
Rating can typically be achieved with the
following systems:
12.38mm thick laminated glass as
fixed panes or in a system with
acoustic seals
8.5 mm thick “VLAM Hush” glass as
fixed panes or in a system with
acoustic seals
37
Standard sliding door arrangements typically
will not achieve an airborne noise rating RW +
Ctr of 37 or higher. Options to achieve this
rating include the following system:
Tandem sliding door arrangement
consisting of a 6mm thick glass door
separated from a 4mm thick glass
door by a minimum 100 mm air gap.
Rating can typically be achieved with the
following systems:
12.5mm thick “VLAM Hush” glass as
fixed panes or in a system with
acoustic seals
Double glazing with a 6mm thick glass
pane separated from a 4mm thick
pane by a minimum 100mm air gap
To incorporate SA78B into the development as the design progresses, the following
procedure will need to be followed during the design stage of the project, when the relevant
information is finalised:
calculate the final window area as a percentage of the floor area for each room in the
proposed development;
assign appropriate treatments using the areas;
rationalise the glass selections as required to ensure the minimum requirements are
met.
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 12
CONCLUSION
A noise assessment has been made for the proposed residential and commercial
development at 179 Greenhill Road, Adelaide.
The external noise intrusion component of the assessment has been conducted in
accordance with the procedures of Minister’s Specification SA78B Construction
Requirements for the control of external sound and the likely extent of treatments provided.
The final extent of treatments will be the subject of the detailed design process.
The assessment also considers environmental noise generated by mechanical plant, car
parking and potential commercial activities associated with the development. Car parking
activities are expected to easily achieve the requirements of the Environment Protection
(Noise) Policy 2007 due to the enclosed and centralised car parking arrangement. Conditions
to ensure compliance with the relevant environmental noise standards have been proposed for
the mechanical services systems and for the future café use, for application when the details
of these activities are known.
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 13
APPENDIX A
Ministers Specification SA78B Façade Categories
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 14
Figure 1: Ground Floor Façade Categories
Legend
Category 1
Category 2
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 15
Figure 2: First Floor Façade Categories Legend
Category 1
Category 2
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 16
Figure 3: Second Floor Façade and Roof Categories
Legend
Category 1
Category 2
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 17
Figure 4: Third Floor Façade and Roof Categories
Legend
Category 1
Category 2
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 18
Figure 5: Fourth Floor Façade Categories
Legend
Category 1
Category 2
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 19
Legend
Category 1
Category 2
Figure 6: Fifth Floor Façade and Roof Categories
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 20
Figure 7: Sixth Floor Façade Categories
Legend
Category 1
Category 2
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 21
Legend
Category 1
Category 2
Figure 8: Seventh Floor Façade Categories
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 22
Legend
Category 1
Category 2
Figure 9: Eighth Floor Façade and Roof Categories
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 23
Legend
Category 1
Figure 10: Ninth Floor Façade and Roof Categories
179 Greenhill Road Environmental Noise Assessment June 2016 S4875C2 Page 24
Figure 11: Top Level Roof Categories
Legend
Category 1