17
17.2 The equilibrium law •17.2.1 Solve homogeneous equilibrium problems using the expression for Kc. The use of quadratic equations will NOT be assessed.

17.2 The equilibrium law

  • Upload
    noelle

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

17.2 The equilibrium law. 17.2.1 Solve homogeneous equilibrium problems using the expression for Kc. The use of quadratic equations will NOT be assessed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 17.2 The equilibrium law

17.2 The equilibrium law

•17.2.1 Solve homogeneous equilibrium problems using the expression for Kc.

–The use of quadratic equations will NOT be assessed.

Page 2: 17.2 The equilibrium law

• In order to calculate the value of K, we need to know the concentration in mol/L or mol dm-3 of all reactants and products at equilibrium.

• Sometimes we do not immediately know all of the concentrations at equilibrium, but we are given enough information to determine all of the concentrations at equilibrium and then K.

Page 3: 17.2 The equilibrium law

For Example

0.100 mol/L Br2 and 0.100 mol/L F2

were initially mixed together and allowed to come to equilibrium according to the following reaction:

Br2(g) + F2(g) <-->2BrF(g)

At equilibrium the concentration of Br2 was found to be 0.00135 mol/L. Calculate the value of K.

Page 4: 17.2 The equilibrium law

Fill this in…

Br2(g) F2(g) 2BrF(g)

Initial Conc. 0.100M 0.100M 0

Change in conc.

Final Conc. 0.00135M

Page 5: 17.2 The equilibrium law

Should Look like:

Br2(g) F2(g) 2BrF(g)

Initial Conc. 0.100M 0.100M 0

Change in conc.

-0.09865M -0.09865M +[2 x 0.09865M] =0.1973M

Final Conc. 0.00135M 0.00135M 0.1973M

Page 6: 17.2 The equilibrium law

Good ol’ Stoichiometry

• We used stoichiometry (the relationship with the balanced chemical equation to help us solve for the final concentrations)

• Since Br2 and F2 were a 1:1 mole ratio and had the same initial concentration, they would have the same final.

• But BrF was a 1:2 mole ratio with Br2, so we had to double the change in concentration and therefore the final answer.

Page 7: 17.2 The equilibrium law

We’re not finished!

• Now we can solve for K because we found the final concentrations (at equilibrium)

• K =[BrF]2 / [Br2][F2]

=[0.1973M]2/ [0.00135M][0.00135M]

=2.15 x 104

Page 8: 17.2 The equilibrium law

Sample Problem 2 :

A closed container initially had a CO(g)concentration of 0.750 M and a H2O(g)concentration of 0.275 M. It was allowed to reach equilibrium. At equilibrium, analysis showed a CO2(g) concentration of 0.250 M.

The equation for the reaction is:CO(g) + H2O(g) <-->CO2(g) + H2(g)

Calculate KAnswer: K=5.00

Page 9: 17.2 The equilibrium law

SAMPLE PROBLEM 3A closed chemical system initially contained6.0 M SO2; 2.5 M NO2; and 1.0 M SO3.

Equilibrium was eventually reached for thereaction

SO2(g) + NO2(g)<--> SO3(g) + NO(g)

At equilibrium, the container was found to have 3.0 M SO3 present.

Calculate K.Answer: K=3.00

Page 10: 17.2 The equilibrium law

• A chemist puts 0.085 mol of N2 and 0.038 mol of O2 in a 1.0 L container, once equilibrium is reached its equilibrium constant is found to be 4.2 x10-8. What is the concentration of NO in the mixture at equilibrium?

• N2(g) + O2(g) < -- > 2NO(g)

Page 11: 17.2 The equilibrium law

answer

N2(g) O2(g) < -- > 2NO(g)

0.085 M 0.038 M 0

-x -x +2x

0.085-x 0.038-x 2x

Page 12: 17.2 The equilibrium law

Assumptions

• Normally, you would solve this using the quadratic equation, but IB has noted that their students will NOT need to use the quadratic equation.

• We’re going to do a short cut that we’ll check to make sure is okay later on.

• Instead of using 0.085-x, we’re going to ignore the x, same for 0.038-x (ignore the x) and solve for unknown

Page 13: 17.2 The equilibrium law

N2(g) O2(g) < -- > 2NO(g)

0.085 M 0.038 M 0

-x (ignore) -x (ignore) +2x

0.085 0.038 2x

Page 14: 17.2 The equilibrium law

• k = [2x]2 =4.2 x10-8

[0.085][0.038]

4x2 = (4.2x10-8) x [0.085] x [0.038]

4x2 = 1.357 x 10-10

x2 = 3.392 x 10-11

x = 5.82 x 10-6

[NO] = 2x = 2 x 5.82 x10-6 = 1.2 x10-5 M

Page 15: 17.2 The equilibrium law

• To show that the short cut was okay, check out your answer if the x wasn’t omitted.

• Ex: 0.085- 5.82 x 10-6 = 0.085 (when you only keep 2 sig figs) So it was okay to omit the x.

• In university you won’t be so lucky!!!

Page 16: 17.2 The equilibrium law

Additional practice:

Page 17: 17.2 The equilibrium law

Using quadratic: