Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Set for the next leap
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013
Update | Sector: Financials
Sohail Halai ([email protected]) +91 22 3982 5430
Alpesh Mehta ([email protected]); + 91 22 3982 5415
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 2
ICICI Bank : Set for the next leap
Page No.
Summary ............................................................................................................ 3
Story in charts ................................................................................................ 4-5
Core RoE on the upswing - expect 17%+ by FY15E ...................................... 6-8
RAM improves decisively: RoE improvement on the cards ...................... 9-13
Consistently delivering on asset quality................................................... 14-16
Gradual improvement in margins to continue ........................................ 17-18
CASA ratio improves 1.7x since FY08 ........................................................ 19-21
Loan growth revives – retail loan to gather momentum ....................... 22-23
Healthy core operations; RoA's improved decisively .............................. 24-27
Financials and valuation ........................................................................... 28-29
Investors are advised to refer through disclosures made at the end of the Research Report.
ICICI BankCMP: INR1,163 TP: INR1,400 Buy
Valuation summary (INR b)Y/E March 2013E 2014E 2015E
NII 138.0 168.0 201.5
OP 131.4 162.5 194.8
NP 81.3 100.2 120.6
NIM (%) 3.0 3.2 3.2
EPS (INR) 70.5 86.9 104.6
EPS Gr. (%) 25.8 23.2 20.3
BV/Sh. (INR)* 454.3 510.8 578.6
ROE (%) 14.6 16.1 17.2
ROA (%) 1.6 1.7 1.7
Payout (%) 30.0 30.0 30.0
Valuations
P/E (x) 16.5 13.4 11.1
P/BV (x) 2.1 1.9 1.6
Adj P/ABV (x) 2.2 1.9 1.6
*BV adjusted for investment in
susbdiaries, Prices adj for sub value
17 January 2013
Update | Sector: Financials
Set for the next leapExpect earnings CAGR of 23%+; Rising RoEs to drive more re-rating
ICICI Bank (ICICIBC) is expected to deliver EPS CAGR of 23%+ over FY12-15E, on a higher
base of 25%+ over FY10-12, driving up the core RoE from ~10% in FY10 to 17%+ in
FY15E. Importantly, the Tier 1 would remain strong at 10%+ at end-FY15.
With a market share of 4.2% in the domestic loans and largest branch network in the
private financials, above industry growth and favorable margins will drive earnings.
ICICIBC has managed the asset quality well during the last 18 months of pain in the
Indian economy. While FY14 will be critical to see the fate of few large exposures, the
bank is confident of tiding over this without any dent on its profitability. Recovery in
Indian economy / corporate capex will be viewed positive for ICICIBC.
Valuations for ICICIBC will evolve as it delivers RoE improvement over the next 2 years
(to come at the near sector averages). Importantly, it will have scope to further boost
its leverage as capital may get boost from return of capital by key subsidiaries.
Subsidiaries transform from being guzzlers to capital providers to parentICICIBC has not infused any capital in its subsidiaries for the past three years.
Corrective measures and consolidation has led to significant CRAR improvement
for ICICI UK and ICICI Canada. Presently, most of the bank's subsidiaries have
become self-sufficient. In the medium term, listing of life insurance business
[capital support of INR49b (our estimate) under Basel III] and repatriation of
capital from international subsidiaries will reduce capital charge ensuring
dilution-free growth.
Core operations improve decisively, core RoE to reach 17%+ by FY15EICICIBC's risk adjusted margins (RAM) have improved sharply from a low of 1% in
FY10 to 2.2% in FY12, led by a 95bp fall in credit cost and 25bp by margins
improvement. Despite lower growth in fee income, continuous margin
improvement (~50bp over FY12-15) and strong asset quality performance will
translate into strong RoA's of ~1.7% and core RoE is expected to improve to 17%+.
Significant improvement in asset quality in challenging timesEven in challenging times, ICICIBC exhibited strong performance in asset quality,
with GNPA percentage declining over the past 10 quarters and provision coverage
ratio increasing from 53% in FY09 to 79% in 1HFY13. With retail delinquencies at
its historic lows credit cost estimates of average 70bp over FY13E-15E, compared
to 40bp in FY12, is conservative and factors the higher stress in corporate portfolio
leaving lower downside risk to our estimates.
Structural changes to ensure higher return ratios; valuation attractiveReturn ratios are on an upward trajectory and structurally core operations of
ICICIBC has improved significantly, which would enable it to sustain the ratios.
Further unlocking of value from subsidiaries could lead to re-rating of the stock.
ICICIBC trades at near five-year average valuation, which is unwarranted
considering expected improvement in growth and RoE. Maintain Buy.
Stock performance (1 year)
Shareholding pattern %
As on Dec-12 Sep-12 Dec-11
Promoter 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dom. Inst 24.8 25.3 27.8
Foreign 66.5 65.8 61.8
Others 8.7 8.9 10.4
3
BSE Sensex S&P CNX19,964 6,039
Bloomberg ICICIBC IN
Equity Shares (m) 1,152.8
M.Cap. (INR b)/(USD b) 1,359/24
52-Week Range (INR) 1,210/762
1,6,12 Rel.Perf.(%) -2/7/27
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 4
Story in charts Core operations have improved decisively...
Sharp improvement in liability profile and...
… Better risk management and focused growth (secured
loans)…
… is Yielding results now; margins have improved
structurally
… and credit cost is coming down
Cutting excess flab helped to improve/maintain ROA…
… despite being dragged down by fees; expect
contribution to stabilize
Sharp improvement in CASA ratio, 1.7x since FY08 Asset quality showing sharp improvement
Focused strategies leading to sharp improvement in NIM… … and fall in credit cost
Source: Company, MOSL
Lean cost structure now - Adopted branch banking model Fees growth expected to track balance sheet growth
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 5
Story in charts ... increasing leverage to boost RoEs
Core operations driving ROAs improvement….
…. Improving leverage will lead to core ROE of 17%+ by
FY15
Subsidiaries adequately capitalized; unlikely to need
capital anytime soon…
… capital repatriation and stake sale in insurance to lead
to improvement in Tier I in FY15
Trading at near LPA multiple expect re-rating as RoE's
evolve over next 2 years
NIM and Credit cost driving ROA higher RoE on an upward trajectory
Investment in subsidiaries likely to decline BASEL III: Adequately capitalized till FY15
Source: Company, MOSL
With a better RoE, PE below LPA; PBV at LPA
For illustrative purpose only, capitalization under BASEL III.
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 6
Moderation in growth and higher capital requirement brought RoEs lowerThough over FY03-05, ICICIBC reported an average RoE of ~20%, frequent dilutions
(FY05, FY06 and FY08) and consolidation in balance sheet over FY08-10 (post asset
quality issue in FY08) lowered the core RoE to 10% in FY10. The bank raised INR32.5b,
INR78.2b and INR194b in FY05, FY06 and FY08 respectively taking the cumulative capital
infusion to INR305b (~50% of existing net worth). The need to raise capital was 1) to
support domestic business growth and 2) enhance capital in subsidiaries (investment
of INR100b over FY06-10).
Core RoE on the upswing - expect 17%+ by FY15ESubsidiaries: From capital guzzlers to capital providers for lending business
ICICIBC's core operations have turned around and RoA has improved to 1.5%+ in FY12 led
by 1) higher margins, 2) sharp fall in credit cost and 3) control over opex. However, core
RoE improvement was restricted to just 13% due to strong capitalization (Tier I ratio -
12.5%+).
Improving margins are likely to compensate for any uptick in credit cost. Fee income
growth is expected to track balance sheet growth and as the benefit of correcting operating
inefficiencies is already reaped, fees and opex are unlikely to contribute meaningfully to
RoA improvement. Overall, we expect core RoA to improve to 1.7%+. As ICICIBC would
continue to leverage, core RoE is expected to improve to 17%+ by FY15E.
Subsidiaries have become self-sufficient in funding their own growth. From being capital
guzzlers, they would provide capital to fund the bank’s core lending business.
Cumulative capital
infusion over FY06-08
was of INR305b (~50% of
existing net worth)
International subsidiaries adequately capitalized; Repatriation to boostcapitalizationICICIBC has not infused any capital in the international banking subsidiaries for the
past three years. Decline in balance sheet, lower MTM losses and internal accruals
led to significant improvement in capital adequacy ratios for ICICI UK and ICICI Canada
from 17.3% and 23.4% in FY10 to 33.6% and 34.1% in 2QFY13. ICICI Eurasia's CAR also
stands comfortable at 35%. With moderate growth plans for Canada and the UK
subsidiaries, ICICIBC mulls to repatriate excess capital from these subsidiaries.
Once capital is brought back into the parent company, it shall not only translate to
higher RoEs for international subsidiaries but also provide cushion to parent
Capitalization. The bank can potentially repatriate at least half of the capital ie US$350m
from the UK and CAD$500m from Canada. Thus, almost INR42b can be repatriated.
On a standalone basis, ICICIBC deducts 50% of the invested capital (i.e INR28b) in
Canada and UK Subs from Tier I capital and rest from Tier II capital. With repatriation
(assuming 50%), it would eventually give a benefit of INR14b to Tier I under current
Base II norms and INR28b under Basel III (whereby the entire investment in a subsidiary
has to be deducted from Tier I capital).
Repatriation of capital
would give a benefit of
INR14b to Tier I under
current Base II norms and
INR28b under Basel III
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 7
... and capital gains from ICICI Prulife will keep capitalization healthyListing of the insurance venture too shall bring capital for the bank. Based on our current
estimates, it can almost bring INR49b (based on FY15E) potential capital to ICICIBC. Of
this, INR41b would be capital gains which will be directly added to net worth and Tier I
capital. Currently, the principal amount of INR8.2b (for 23% stake) is deducted from Tier
I and Tier II capital both in equal proportion. But under Basel III, the entire amount
would be deducted from Tier I. Hence, under Basel III, overall Tier I capital addition is
likely to be INR49b (INR41b capital gains plus INR8.2b deducted from Tier I) in FY15E.
Under Basel III, overall
Tier I capital addition is
likely to be INR49b
(INR41b capital gains plus
INR8.2b deducted from
Tier I) from insurance
stake sale
Basel III: Adequately capitalized at least till FY16E (INR m)
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Assets 3,633,997 4,062,337 4,736,471 5,295,169 6,293,773 7,532,673 9,039,207 10,847,049 13,016,459
Growth 12 17 12 19 20 20 20 20
RWA 2,941,810 3,414,980 3,985,858 4,561,919 5,548,117 6,790,891 8,149,070 9,778,884 11,734,660
As a % of Assets 81 84 84 86 88 90 90 90 90
RoA 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Payout 33 31 29 30 30 30 30 30 30
Tier I Capital 410,620 449,750 505,183 566,595 568,292 724,248 818,042 930,595 1,065,658
Deductions 123,696 118,882 108,531 99,891 163,221 124,082 124,082 124,082 124,082
Investments in subs 64,116 65,412 65,831 65,831 131,661 95,022 95,022 95,022 95,022
Securitisation 36,170 23,590 13,640 5,000 2,500 0 0 0 0
DTA and Others 23,410 29,880 29,060 29,060 29,060 29,060 29,060 29,060 29,060
Tier I Capital 14.0 13.2 12.7 12.4 10.2 10.7 10.0 9.5 9.1
Tier I under Basel II Guidelines 11.2
Impact of Basel III (in bp) 99
Note: For illustrative purpose only Source: Company, MOSL
Impact of higher deduction
is 1% on Tier I capital
Addition to Tier I capital of INR41b
due to insurance stake sale
Lower deduction on account of insurance stake
sale of INR8b and capital repatriation of INR28b
Adequately
capitalized till FY16
Unlikely to raise capital till FY16E, unless growth outlook revives sharplyUnder Basel III, the bank is likely to take a capital charge of ~100bp, mainly due to
higher deduction of investment in subsidiaries. Repatriation of capital and reduction
in ICICI Prulife’s stake could lead to addition of ~INR41b to net worth and release of
INR36b capital charge while calculating CAR (under Basel III). Hence, we believe ICICIBC
is unlikely to raise capital till FY16. Our base case assumption factors ~20% CAGR in
risk weighted assets, insurance stake sale in FY15E and repatriation of capital from
the UK and Canadian subsidiaries.
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 8
Business growth and profitability declined over FY08-10 (%) Expect core RoE to reach 17%+
Source: Company, MOSL
Expect proportion of investment in subsidiaries (as a % of overall22% of the networth invested in to subsidiaries (INR b) networth) to come down (%)
Incremental capital infusion in subsidiaries (INR b)
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
ICICI Pru Life Ins 6.6 12.1 8.6 - - -
ICICI Lombard Gen Ins. 0.7 5.5 3.0 - 2.5 -
ICICI Pru AMC 0.5 - - - - -
ICICI Ventures - - - - - -
ICICI Securities - 2.4 - - - -
ICICI Home Finance 3.0 5.0 3.1 - - -
ICICI Bank UK - 17.7 - - - -
ICICI Bank Canada 4.0 9.5 20.0 - - -
Overall Investments 14.8 52.2 34.7 - 2.5 -
% of Netowrth 6.1 11.2 7.1 - 0.5 -
Networth 244 466 490 516 551 596
Source: Company, MOSL
Equity dilution of
16.317.2
19.2
Frequent equity dilution for growth and capital requirementof subsidiaries (INR b)
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 9
Sharp improvement in core profitability driven by focused strategiesICICIBC shifted its focus from aggressive growth (at times sacrificing profitability) and
market share to improving profitability even at the cost of growth. Over FY08-10,
sharp increase in slippages and moderate growth led to higher credit cost of 1.7%,
against an average of 0.5% over FY04-07, whereby RAM moderated to 1% in FY10 v/s
1.4% in FY07. While margins continued to improve post FY08 (NII/average asset
improved from 1.9% in FY07 to 2.2% in FY10) led by an improvement in liability profile,
moderation in growth and benefit of capital raising, higher credit cost kept RAM low
at less than 1.3% over FY08-10. To improve core operating profitability, management
adopted the following strategies:
(A) Unsecured retail loans trimmed to improve asset qualityTo build a healthy loan portfolio and resolve asset quality issues, ICICIBC reworked its
strategy by running down unsecured retail loan portfolio in favor of low-risk secured
loans and corporate loans. Thus, unsecured proportion of retail loans declined from
9.8% (INR220b) in FY08 to ~1.3% (INR35b) at end-FY12. A shift in portfolio mix towards
secured loans, tighter risk management practices and business loan sourcing via owned
branches instead of DSAs led to better credit appraisal and improvement in asset
quality. Hence, even in a phase of economic moderation, GNPAs declined from 4.6%
in FY10 to 3.1% at end-2HFY13, while NNPAs were down sharply to 66bp, against 1.9%.
RAM improves decisively: RoE improvement on the cardsTight control on opex compensated for muted fee income growth
De-risking loan portfolio by reducing proportion of unsecured loans Credit cost declined sharply (%)
Credit cost remained high over FY08-10 due to higher NPAs provision coupled with contracting balance sheet. Benign asset quality in retail
segment and higher proportion of secured loans led to strong asset quality performance over the past 8 quarters.
ICICIBC’s risk adjusted margin (RAM) has improved sharply from a low of 1% in FY10 to 2.2%
in FY12, of which 95bp is led by a sharp fall in credit cost (due to fall in proportion of unsecured
personal loans and credit cards and strong asset quality performance in corporate segment).
Addressing structural issues in the balance sheet and improvement in liability profile led to
a improvement in NIMs of 25bp over FY10-12. Cutting excess flab in the system drove
down cost to core income ratio to ~43% from highs of 58% in FY07.
Overall core PBT (core operating profit less NPA provisions) as a percentage to average
assets has improved to 1.9%+ in FY12 v/s 95bp over FY08-10. Despite a challenging scenario
to generate fee-based income, further improvement in margins and healthy asset quality
performance would keep core PBT strong over FY12-15E.
Increase in credit cost
impacted profitability.
Consolidation for
structural improvement
in balance sheet became
a key mantra.
Unsecured proportion of
loans declined from ~10%
(INR220b) to ~1.3%
(INR35b) at end-FY12
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 10
(B) Structural issues in balance sheet effectively dealt withLower CASA ratio, higher ALM mismatches (both domestic and overseas book), rising
share of international loans and overall aggressive growth leading to higher PSL
requirements etc kept margins lower till FY07 for ICICIBC, despite sharp increase in
high yielding unsecured retail loans. During the liquidity crisis period, margins fell
sharply due to higher roll-over cost of bulk deposits. Even aggressive growth in the
past, which led to risky underwriting, backfired leading to higher NPAs and interest
reversal. To improve margins, management focused on (a) improving CASA ratio (up
from 26% in FY08 to 40%+) and (b) reducing ALM mismatches. Strategies worked and
NIMs improved by 25bp despite higher NPAs in unsecured retail loans.
Continuous improvement in NII to average assets (%)
Share of CASA ratio improved significantly (%) CASA deposits improved while loans declined in FY10 (INR b)
Proportion of working capital finance rise; mismatches reduced considerablyICICIBC had a mismatched ALM in FY08, with 65%+ of deposits maturing within a year,
corresponding to only ~30% of loans maturing within the same period. However, it
increased the proportion of working capital finance to the corporate segment and
reduced exposure to short term bulk deposits, which resulted in a well-matched
ALM. Hence, the share of deposits maturing within a year declined to 48% in FY12,
while share of loans maturing within a year was stable at 29%.
Margins remained in a
narrow range of 2.1-2.3%
over FY08-10. A sharp
improvement in CASA
ratio during the
consolidation phase led
to structurally higher
NIMs even as the bank
reduced its high-yielding
unsecured loan portfolio
Focus on improving CASA
and reducing ALM
mismatches yielded
results
Source: Company, MOSL
ALM improved
significantly as bank
reduced its dependence
on short term bulk
deposits
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 11
(C) Focus on shedding excess flab; shift from agency model to branch bankingOf the 5C’s strategy introduced in FY08, improving cost efficiency was one of the
bank’s key focus areas. In the process, ICICIBC moved from an agency model to branch
banking to increase utilization of branches and tighten its risk management practices.
This also gave an opportunity to reduce opex as commission to DMA, which formed
25% of other operating expenditure, was significantly brought down to just 4% of
other opex. During FY08-12, operating expenses were largely flat, led by an 8% CAGR
decline in other operating expenses. Despite the sharp increase in branch network
and addition of Bank of Rajasthan over FY08-12, other operating expenses to average
assets ratio declined to 100bp, against 163bp in FY08 (DMA expenses which formed
40bp of average assets is now negligible).
ALM Profile: Gap in less than one year bucket reduced considerably
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
< 1 1yr - > 3 < 1 1yr > 3 < 1 1yr > 3 < 1 1yr > 3 < 1 1yr - > 3 < 1 1yr > 3
yr 3 yr yrs yr - 3 yr yrs yr - 3 yr yrs yr - 3 yr yrs yr 3 yr yrs yr - 3 yr yrs
Deposits 68.9 29.2 1.9 64.8 33.2 2.0 65.8 33.5 0.7 48.0 51.0 1.0 44.1 52.2 3.7 48.1 27.0 24.9
Borrowings 41.3 30.9 27.8 41.7 26.9 31.4 32.5 35.7 31.8 27.1 32.1 40.7 34.1 20.9 45.0 46.4 12.4 41.2
Advances 28.1 39.0 32.9 30.7 34.3 35.0 24.0 40.6 35.3 32.0 39.4 28.6 30.7 41.1 28.2 29.2 41.1 29.7
Investments 54.7 17.1 28.1 57.0 18.7 24.3 42.4 25.3 32.3 43.4 24.5 32.1 35.6 26.7 37.7 44.7 15.4 40.0
Source: Company, MOSL
Strong control over opex… (%)
Bank continues to grow
organically as well as
inorganically. Branch
network is 2x+ FY08
… despite rapid branch expansion is commendable (nos)
*Out of which 450 was on account of Bank of Rajasthan merger Source: Company, MOSL
ICICIBC derived
significant gains from
transiting to branch
banking model as against
agency model adopted
earlier
Despite the sharp
increase in branch
network and addition of
Bank of Rajasthan over
FY08-12, other operating
expenses to average
assets ratio declined to
100bp, against 163bp in
FY08
Addition of
507 branches
Addition of
154 branches
Addition of
291 branches
Addition of
822 branches*
Addition of
213 branches
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 12
Cost to core income ratio improved from ~58% in FY07 to 43% in FY12, while cost to
average assets ratio declined from 2.2% in FY07 to 1.8% in FY12 (compared to 280bp
for HDFCB and 230bp for AXSB) – the best among peers. The lower cost to average
assets ratio is partially led by higher share of international business (25%), compared
to peers.
Sharp improvement in cost to core income ratio (%) Cost to average assets ratio compared to peers (%)
While the cost to average assets ratio increased for peers over FY09-12, ICICIBC reported a sharp improvement and is now the best among peers.
Moderation in balance sheet growth; core profitability improved sharply...As mentioned earlier, ICICIBC effectively used the consolidation in business growth
phase (during FY08-10) to improve its balance sheet profile, address structural ALM
issues, improve risk management practices (credit cost declined to 40bp in FY12,
against 1.2% in FY08), shed excess flab in the system (cost to average asset ratio of
1.8% v/s 2.2% in FY08), reduce the risk on international subs books and for branch
expansion. Combination of these factors led to a sharp improvement in core
profitability, whereby RoA improved to 1.5% v/s 1.1% in FY10, despite pressure on
trading gains and fee income.
NIMs and opex control led to stable RoA (%) Asset quality and margins drive RoA (%)
Cost to average assets
best among peers
FY08-10: opex control
helped maintain RoA.
FY10-12: Sharp reduction
in credit cost drove
RoAs high
Blue indicates positive contribution to RoA; Black indicates negative carry on RoA's Source: Company, MOSL
Domestic cost to core income
ratio is at 47%, in our view
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 13
…despite fee income being a drag on RoAFee income CAGR over FY08-12 was near zero, compared to balance sheet growth of
4.5%+ over the same period. Thus, fee income to average assets ratio gradually declined
from 1.8% in FY08 to 1.5% in FY12 and dragged RoA lower. Deceleration in balance
sheet (especially retail loans), decline in commission from distribution of third party
products and challenging macro environment (lower syndication and capital market
related fees) led to muted fee income performance over FY08-12.
Fee income growth continues to lag loan growth
Deceleration in balance
sheet and decline in
commissions led to lower
fee income growth
Fee income to average assets ratio lower comparedFee income expected to improve over FY13E-15E to peers – scope for improvement (%)
Source: Company, MOSL
1.51.7
1.3
1.61.8 1.8
1.4
1.7 1.7
ICICIBC HDFCB AXSB
FY04-08 FY09-12 FY13-15E
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 14
Cushion built by improving PCR; Healthy asset quality performanceAggressive growth in unsecured segment (over FY04-08) followed by moderation in
economic growth exerted pressure on asset quality, with the slippage ratio increasing
to 2.6% over FY09/10, against an average of 1.8% during FY04-08. Overall GNPAs posted
26% CAGR rise over FY07-10, led by 28% CAGR in retail segment GNPAs. However post
FY10, improved risk management practices and sharp reduction in unsecured personal
loans helped bank to show a continuous improvement in asset quality (GNPA %
declining over past ten quarters). And to provide adequate cushion to the balance
sheet, bank prudently increased its provision coverage ratio from 51% in 2QFY10 to
79% (one of the best in the industry) which provides comfort. In our view, benign
asset quality trend in the retail segment and cautious approach adopted would keep
ICICIBC’s asset quality healthy.
Consistently delivering on asset qualityEstimate credit cost of 70bp over FY13-15E
Consistent improvement in asset quality amidst tough macro Net slippage ratio declined sharply over FY10-12
Lower share of unsecured personal loans coupled with improved risk management practices
has helped ICICIBC to show a continuous improvement in asset quality (GNPAs percentage
declining over the past 10 quarters) even in a challenging macro environment.
Retail delinquency is at its historic lows leading to lower credit cost. ICICIBC has utilized this
opportunity to shore up its provision coverage ratio from 53% in FY09 to 79% in 1HFY13. We
are factoring a credit cost of 70bp in the overall portfolio for FY13E. Of which, if we assume
credit cost of 50bp on corporate loan portfolio (given very low delinquency in retail and
international portfolio) and with a 75% PCR, it implies net slippage ratio of 1.75%, which is
fairly conservative in our view.
While some stress in the large corporate segment may emanate, historic performance of
managing stress accounts viz. Kingfisher and Deccan Chronicle and lower restructured loan
portfolio should be given due credit. We estimate credit cost to increase to an average of
70bp over FY13E-15E, compared to 40bp in FY12. However, it would be offset by higher
NIMs and RAM is expected to remain healthy at 2.4%+ over FY13-15E v/s 2.2% in FY12.
Improvement in asset
mix, better risk
management practies
led to fall in GNPAs
Source: Company, MOSL
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 15
Strong growth in corporate segment over FY09-12While overall loans clocked a CAGR of 5% over FY09-12, higher growth came from
domestic corporate segment (CAGR of 30%+ over FY09-12), and its share in overall
loans increased from 12% at end-FY08 to 23% at end-FY12. International portfolio and
SME CAGR over FY09-12 was at just 8% and 15% respectively. On a sector-wise analysis,
key growth drivers for ICICIBC over FY09-12 were 1) power (~38% CAGR and now
forms 5.4% of overall loans), 2) infrastructure (24% CAGR and now forms 6.9% of
overall loans) and 3) services – finance (26% CAGR and now forms 6% of overall loans).
Due to challenging macro environment and infrastructure related issues, strong
growth in corporate segment (especially power and infrastructure) remains a risk.
However, asset quality performance so far increases confidence.
Sector-wise GNPAs exhibits healthy trend
% of overall loans CAGR % GNPA
FY12 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 over FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
(INR m) FY09-12
Services- Non Finance 194,810 7.5 7.2 7.7 7.4 5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2
Infrastructure 181,960 4.2 5.5 5.8 6.9 24 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Iron/steel and products 122,310 4.4 4.6 4.2 4.7 7 0.4 1.7 0.2 0.8
Services – finance 156,410 3.5 3.4 7.2 6.0 26 1.7 3.8 1.4 0.7
Food and beverages 67,790 2.4 3.3 3.1 2.6 8 1.9 2.6 4.1 3.9
Power 141,240 2.4 3.0 4.4 5.4 38 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1
Chemical and fertilizers 34,980 2.3 2.5 1.3 1.3 -12 3.8 5.3 7.0 4.5
Wholesale/retail trade 50,060 1.2 2.4 2.3 1.9 24 5.6 4.9 7.4 4.2
Electronics and engineering 56,610 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.2 16 2.2 2.2 1.5 4.2
Construction 57,970 1.1 1.0 1.6 2.2 34 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Mining 84,030 0.0 0.2 1.8 3.2 329 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Source: Company, MOSL
Power projects in which ICICIBC participated have a DSCR of 1.5x+ and the average
break-even PLF is ~60%. Of the total power sector exposure, ~30-35% is in the nature
of working capital facilities. Of the project finance exposure, ~65% is covered by
PPAs. Of the total project finance facilities to thermal power generation sector, ~45-
50% of the exposure is based on captive coal. Thus, stress remains manageable.
Healthy performance in retail and international portfoliosRetail delinquency is at its historic lows and is also evident in performance of some
peers viz. HDFCB and IIB which are predominantly a retail lender. While credit cost on
retail portfolio would be negligible for FY13, we factor credit cost of 70bp (in line with
management guidance) for the overall portfolio for FY13. Lower credit cost on retail
loans is also driven by healthy recoveries from written off retail accounts in the past.
The international portfolio (25% of overall) is also exhibiting strong performance.
Thus, estimated credit cost would largely (assuming 50bp of 70bp) pertain to domestic
corporate/other loans (40% of overall). This implies credit cost of 125bp on corporate/
other loan portfolio and with an assumption of 75% PCR, it implies net slippage ratio
of 1.7%, which is conservative in our view.
Increase in infrastructure
and power segment has
raised concerns;
performance so far better
than expectation
Credit cost of 125bp on
corporate/other loan
portfolio and with an
assumption of 75% PCR, it
implies net slippage ratio
of 1.7%, which is
conservative in our view
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 16
Proactive recognition of NPAs; lower restructured loansICICIBC’s handling of some stress accounts viz. Kingfisher and Deccan Chronicle
(proactively recognized and provided 85% on the same) and lower restructured loans
(1.5% of overall loans) should be given due credit. If stress in the environment
continues, then slippages are bound to increase (though manageable considering
performance so far) and have been adequately factored. We assume credit cost at an
average of 70bp over FY13E-15E, compared to 40bp in FY12. However, it would be
offset by higher NIMs and RAM is expected to remain healthy at ~2.4% over FY12-15E.
Proporation of restructured loans remains low Credit cost contained even as bank continues to shore up PCR
RAM at 5-year high… …and strong performance is expected to continue
Source: Company, MOSL
RAM improves sharply by 170bp, from its bottom, and at 5-year high. Strong asset quality performance coupled with structural improvement
in NIMs led to higher RAM
(%)
76.6
Risk adjusted margin (%)Risk adjusted margin (%)
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 17
Focus on core liabilities; CASA growth maintains pace on a higher baseOne of the key success factors to improve bank’s margins has been the drastic
improvement in liability profile. We believe improvement in CASA ratio has been a
key driver for margin improvement and has also negated the impact of falling
proportion of high yielding unsecured retail loan. With balance sheet growth resuming,
we believe further improvement in CASA ratio is unlikely; however, strong branch
expansion and technology upgradation would help ICICIBC to keep the CASA growth
pace in line with overall balance sheet growth.
Winding up of margin-dilutive unsecured loan book behindWith unsecured loan book at ~1.3% of the overall loan book, the pace of decline in
high-yielding loans is largely behind. Further, NPAs from unsecured retail loans also
led to higher accumulation of non-interest bearing assets in the balance sheet. As the
large write-offs have already taken place and asset quality is showing positive trend,
we believe it shall provide a cushion to margins.
Securitization losses to decline, leading to margins improvement of 5bpsICICIBC had aggressively securitized its retail loan portfolio over FY04-07 and with an
increase in delinquency ratio, securitized losses increased. Over FY08-11, the bank
booked losses on securitization of INR5b per year, which had a negative impact of
~15bp on margins; losses declined to INR2b in FY12 and the negative impact on margins
was 5bp. In FY13E, securitization losses are expected to be negligible and thus would
further aid margins expansion.
ALM issues resolved in international balance sheetInternational margins have already bounced back to 1.4% in 1HFY13, against an average
of ~85bp in FY11 and 1.25% in FY12. While further improvement would be a challenge,
if maintained at similar levels going forward, it would translate into 15bp improvement
in international NIMs over FY13 and provide a cushion to global margins.
Gradual improvement in margins to continueALM in better shape
Structural improvement in liability profile (CASA ratio improved to 40%+ in FY12 v/s 26% in
FY08) and lower securitization losses drove NIMs from 2.2% in FY08 to 2.7% in FY12 and 3%
in 1HFY13 – domestic NIMs are much higher at 3.4% at end-2QFY13.
In the backdrop of ICICIBC winding up high yielding unsecured loans (now 1.3% of overall
loans, against ~9.8% in FY08) in favor of lower yielding corporate and secured loans, NIMs
performance becomes more commendable.
With higher CASA ratio at 40%+, well-matched ALM, no securitization losses and stable/
falling share of international loans with relatively higher margins than past, overall margins
are expected to improve in FY13E-15E. We expect FY13E NIMs to be higher at 3% and
improve further 3.2% over FY14E-15E.
Benefit of improved
liability profile will
continue
In FY13E, securitization
losses are expected to be
negligible and thus
would further aid
margins expansion.
International margins to
improve further
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 18
Higher margin domestic business to grow faster than international businessICICIBC has identified secured retail loans and domestic corporate loans as the key
focus area for growth. Management is not very optimistic on growth in the
international portfolio. Growth in retail loans has already started showing traction
and domestic corporate growth remains strong driven by working capital requirements.
In our view, for every 5% change in the mix, reported margins shall show an
improvement of 10bp in overall margins.
With an improvement in liability profile, CoF increase has been Margins at historically high level but expectedrestricted, thus providing a cushion to margins (%) to improve further (%)
Source: Company, MOSL
Both domestic and international NIMs haveStructurally moving to higher NIMs (%) improved significantly (%)
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 19
CASA ratio improves 1.7x since FY08Branch expansion and use of superior technology to keep CASA ratio healthy
Over FY08-12, while CASA CAGR was 15%, overall deposits were flat leading to higher CASA
ratio of 40%+ in FY12 as against 26% in FY08.
Strong branch additions over the past two years, increasing branch productivity and qualitative
balance sheet growth would keep CASA ratio strong at 39%+.
With ~15% of the branch network less than 18-24 months old (excluding the branches from
merger of BoR), incremental contribution from these branches are expected to increase
significantly as they ride through the cycle of maturity.
CASA growth remains healthy; CASA ratio improves 1.7x since FY08ICICIBC was in a consolidation mode over FY08-10 to realign its liability profile by
aggressively shedding short term bulk deposits and increasing thrust on CASA
mobilization. Over FY08-12, CASA CAGR was 15%, while overall deposits were flat and
provided fillip to CASA ratio which increased from 26% in FY08 to 40%+ in FY12. If we
see in isolation, term deposits at end-FY12 were still lower by ~19% than that in FY08,
which demonstrated the bank’s key focus to build a strong balance sheet rather than
chase growth. Strong branch additions over the past two years, increasing branch
productivity and qualitative balance sheet growth could keep CASA ratio strong at
39%+.
Aggressive shedding of bulk deposits and thrust on CASA… (%) …provided strong boost to CASA ratio
Impressive traction in SA deposits, 2x rise in branch network to provide fillipWith a revamp in its deposit-taking strategy, ICICIBC started refocusing on the branch
banking model instead of agency model followed earlier. Coupled with it, an increase
in branch network by 2x+ over FY08 to 2,700+ helped it increase the proportion of
retail deposits in its book. SA deposits’ growth rebounded sharply to ~28% over FY10/
11, against 5% in FY09 (though partially led by the financial crisis). Consequently,
percentage of SA deposits to total deposits increased to 30%, against 16% in FY08. We
expect SA deposits accretion to remain healthy at a CAGR of 17% over FY12/15.
Strong branch additions
over the past two years,
increasing branch
productivity and
qualitative balance sheet
growth led to strong
CASA ratio of 39%+
We expect SA deposits
accretion to remain
healthy at a CAGR of
17% over FY12/15.
Source: Company, MOSL
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 20
SA deposit growth lower than peers, but should be seen in the context of lower balance sheet growth as well (%)
SA deposit growth remains healthy Sharp rise in proportion of SA deposits in overall deposits (%)
Maturing branch network to aid CASA mobilizationDue to a strong expansion in branch network, ICICIBC’s CASA per branch declined
from INR734m in FY07 to INR420m in FY12 and remained low compared to AXSB’
INR607m and HDFCB’s INR527m. We note that the high difference in CASA per branch
is due to CA per branch, while the difference in SA deposit per branch is lower, with
SA deposits per branch for ICICIBC at INR288m per branch as against INR326m for
HDFCB and INR343m for AXSB. With nearly ~15% of the branch network less than 18-
24 months old (excluding branches from merger of BoR), incremental contribution
from these branches are expected to increase significantly as they ride through the
cycle of maturity. Further, the bank has guided for balance sheet growth to be in line
with industry/marginally above industry average, which should help it sustain a CASA
ratio at ~40%.
Merger of Bank of Rajasthan (BoR): ICICIBC merged BoR which had a branch network of 463 and total business of INR230b with
itself in August 2010. Over 60% of 463 BoR’s branches were in the state of Rajasthan which would provide ICICIBC a strong hold
in that region. Compared to ICICIBC, erstwhile BoR’s branches were grossly underutilized. BoR’s business per branch was
INR505m, compared to ICICIBC’s INR2.2b. With concentrated presence in northern India, ICICIBC would be able to benefit in the
longer time horizon.
(SA deposit growth) (Balance sheet growth)
Incremental contribution
from new branches are
expected to increase
significantly as they ride
through the cycle of
maturity
Source: Company, MOSL
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 21
Bank resorted to organic and inorganic expansion Branch addition remain strong (addition during the year)
* HDFC merger with CBOP; # ICICIBC merger with Bank of Rajasthan Source: Company, MOSL
Strong branch expansion and moderation in business led to CASA per branch low against peers’decline in CASA per branch (INR m) expect improvement (INR m)
CAGR of 22%
CAGR of 30%
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 22
Domestic loan CAGR to remain healthy at 20%+ over FY12-15EPost consolidation over FY08-10, ICICIBC’s trend on the growth path was led by a
strong growth in corporate segment, which reported a CAGR of ~36% over FY10-12
compared to overall loan growth of 18%. The other key drivers for growth were SME
(36%+, albeit on a lower base) and CV loans (higher share of bought portfolio 19%+).
While the near term driver would continue to be corporate loans (working capital
loans and disbursements from past sanctions), increasing momentum in all segments
of secured retail portfolio is positive. We expect domestic loan CAGR to be at 20%+
over FY12-15E. Growth in international segment is likely to be opportunistic and we
factor 5% growth in FY13E and to be largely in line with overall growth for FY14E/15E.
Loan growth revives – retail loan to gather momentumHigher capitalization to ensure dilution-free growth
After a period of consolidation over FY08-10, the bank resumed on the growth path with a
loan CAGR of 18% over FY10/12. Initial phase of growth was driven by domestic corporate
loans (+36%); but in the past few quarters, retail segment too picked up with the entire
secured segment in retail showing signs of improvement.
Further, a drag on overall loans due to winding up of unsecured loans would be lower, with its
proportion to overall loans now being insignificant.
For FY12-15E, domestic loan growth is expected to post a CAGR of 20%+ and international loan
portfolio is expected to clock a CAGR of 15%. This would be supported by strong capitalization,
with CAR at 19% (of which Tier I is at 12.5%+). Further repatriation of capital from subsidiaries
and release of capital from insurance venture shall ensure dilution-free growth till FY16E.
Loan growth improves, expect to be in line with industry average Expect share of retail loans to stabilize (%)
Source: Company, MOSL
Post consolidation, ICICIBC resumed on the growth path led by a growth in corporate segment
The near term loan
growth driver would be
corporate loans however
an increasing momentum
in all segments of
secured retail portfolio is
positive
Decline in share of retail loans to overall loans likely to be arrestedLed by higher repayments/writeoffs, retail loans declined by 15% CAGR over FY09-12
and at end-2QFY13 it formed ~34% of the overall loans, against 58% in FY08. Within
the retail segment, unsecured retail loan registered the sharpest fall of 40%+ over
FY09-12. However, in the past three quarters, loan book has stabilized indicating the
Retail loans to grow 17-
18% over FY12/15, against
5% CAGR over FY10-12
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 23
Growth in retail segment moderates (YoY, %) Decline in unsecured personal loan has been arrested (%)
Source: Company, MOSL
Drag on retail growth due to unsecured retail proportion behind, while housing and auto loan growth has improved in YTDFY12. With a
reversal in interest rate cycle and management focus, expect it to improve further
negative drag of it on overall loans seems to be limited in the future. Within retail,
growth in housing loan and auto/CV loan resumed to ~15% YoY in 1HFY13 (against a
decline of ~33% over FY08-10). We expect retail loans to grow 17-18% over FY12/15,
against 5% CAGR over FY10-12.
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 24
Healthy core profitability; RoA's improved decisivelyValuations at LPA; will evolve as RoE's improve over next two years
Structural drivers for strong core operations (1) margin improvement (2) stable cost to average
assets and (3) healthy asset quality performance (though factored higher credit cost) should
enable bank to deliver core PBT of 2% - highest in last decade.
Fee income growth though is expected to improve, is conservatively factored in at lower than
balance sheet growth (CAGR of 13% v/s balance sheet CAGR of 17%), leading to negative carry
on RoA's.
RoA's have improved decisively and with increasing leverage, core RoE to improve to 17%+ by
FY15E. Further, with stock trading at LPA, we expect valuations to evolve as growth visibility
improves and RoE's increase.
Excess flab already shed; fee income growth to improve and its drag onRoA to reduceCommendable performance over cost helped the bank absorb impact of lower RAM
and muted fee income growth, thus keeping core-PBT largely stable at 90bp over
FY08-10. However, in our view, ICICIBC has utilized the benefit of cost reduction and
it is unlikely to drive RoA higher. With increasing branch presence, growing share of
retail business and higher employee base, we assume operating expense to register
17% CAGR over FY12-15E. However, cost to average assets ratio is expected to remain
stable at ~1.8% over FY13E/15E.
Factoring in fee income
growth of 18% in FY14/15 ,
however with recovery in
macro-economic
environement, corporate
fees could provide
upside
Despite moderation in
risk adjusted core
income, strong control
on opex kept core
profitability healthy over
FY08-10. Further increase
was led by strong
improvement in RAM
Structural improvements to aid core operating profit; NIMs expected toremain healthy, to drive core operating profitIn our view, structural drivers for strong operations are in place and the bank would
maintain core operating profit at 190bp+ over FY13E-15E. Though expected
improvement in NIMs and stable credit cost shall drive core operating profit, continued
pressure in fee income would negate the benefit to some extent. Further cushion to
RoA would be provided by improved contribution from non-core income (trading
gains and dividend from subs), which is expected to improve from just 18bp in FY12 to
30bp+ by FY15E.
Core PBT (as a % of average assets) to remain healthy
Source: Company, MOSL
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 25
Valuations will evolve as RoE's improve over next two yearsWhile RoA's has improved decisively to 1.5%+, lower leverage restricted improvement
in RoE. The bank has a CAR of 18.3%, with Tier I at 12.8%, which implies it is currently
under-leveraged (core) at 9.5x, compared to 11.x for HDFCB and 12.6x for AXSB. Going
forward, balance sheet size is expected to post a CAGR of 16%+ over FY12/15E and we
expect core leverage to increase to 11x. Increasing leverage would drive RoE's higher
to 17%+. Further, with ICICIBC trading at near LPA BV multiple, we expect valuations
will evolve as bank continue to deliver higher RoE's. Maintain Buy with a TP of 1,400.
RoA's have improved
decisively and increasing
leverage would be a key
for RoE improvement
ICICIBC has utilized the
benefit of cost reduction
and it is unlikely to drive
RoA higher
Fee income to average assets, cost to average assets ratios expected to remain stable
Source: Company, MOSL
ICICI Bank: SOTP FY15ETotal Total Value per % of
Value Value Share Total
INR b USD b INR Value Rationale
ICICI Bank 1,334 24.3 1,157 82.7 2x FY15E BV ex Investment in key ventures;
Implied 12.4x core EPS
Key Ventures
ICICI Pru Life Insurance 159 2.9 138 9.8 Apprisal Value; 74% Economic stake
ICICI Bank Canada (100% Subsidiary) 52 0.9 45 3.2 1x FY15E BV
ICICI Bank UK (100% Subsidiary) 34 0.6 29 2.1 1x FY15E BV
ICICI Home Finance (100% Subsidiary) 32 0.6 28 2.0 2x FY15E BV
ICICI Pru Asset Management (51% stake) 19 0.3 16 1.2 Valued at 4% of Total AUM exp in FY15
ICICI Securities 14 0.3 12 0.9 12x FY15E PAT
ICICI Lombard General Insurance (74% stake) 19 0.3 16 1.2 1x FY15 Networth
ICICI Ventures 10 0.2 9 0.6 10% FY15E AUMs
ICICI Securities PD 10 0.2 9 0.6 1x FY15 Networth
Total Value of Ventures 348 6.3 302 21.6
Less: 20% holding Discount 70 1.3 60 4
Value of Key Ventures 278 5.1 241 17.3
Target Price Post 20% Holding Co. Disc. 1,612 29.4 1,399 100
Current Value 1,341 24.5 1,163
Upside - % 20.3 20.3 20.3
Target Price w/o 20% Holding Co. Disc. 1,682 30.7 1,459
CMP (INR) 1,341 24.5 1,163
Upside - % 25.4 25.4 25.4
Source: MOSL
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 26
RoA improvement to be driven by core operating performance (%)
Y/E March FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13E FY14E FY15E
Net Interest Income 1.92 2.13 1.86 1.89 1.96 2.15 2.19 2.34 2.44 2.75 2.90 2.91
Fee income 1.11 1.50 1.65 1.68 1.78 1.67 1.52 1.67 1.52 1.39 1.42 1.40
Core Operating Income 3.03 3.64 3.51 3.57 3.74 3.82 3.71 4.01 3.96 4.14 4.32 4.32
Operating Expenses 2.42 2.51 2.39 2.24 2.19 1.81 1.58 1.72 1.78 1.82 1.84 1.81
Employee cost 0.47 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.51 0.52 0.73 0.80 0.83 0.84 0.84
Other operating expenses 1.95 2.01 1.87 1.70 1.63 1.30 1.06 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97
Core operating Profits 0.61 1.13 1.12 1.33 1.55 2.01 2.13 2.29 2.18 2.32 2.48 2.51
Non Core Other Income 1.53 0.89 0.73 0.64 0.59 0.28 0.49 0.06 0.18 0.30 0.33 0.31
Operating Profits 2.14 2.02 1.86 1.97 2.14 2.29 2.62 2.35 2.36 2.62 2.80 2.82
NPA provisions 0.40 -0.08 0.38 0.48 0.68 0.96 1.17 0.51 0.23 0.36 0.38 0.38
Other Provisions 0.10 0.38 0.00 0.27 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.13 0.04 0.06 0.06
Provisions 0.50 0.29 0.38 0.75 0.78 0.98 1.18 0.59 0.36 0.40 0.43 0.44
PBT 1.64 1.73 1.48 1.22 1.36 1.31 1.44 1.76 2.00 2.22 2.37 2.37
Tax 0.23 0.36 0.27 0.18 0.24 0.35 0.36 0.42 0.53 0.60 0.64 0.63
RoA 1.41 1.37 1.21 1.04 1.12 0.96 1.08 1.34 1.47 1.62 1.73 1.74
DuPont Comparison with peers (%)
Axis Bank HDFC Bank ICICI Bank
Average Average Average
FY04-07 FY08-12 FY13-15E FY04-07 FY08-12 FY13-15E FY04-07 FY08-12 FY13-15E
1) Net Interest Income 2.4 3.0 3.2 3.7 4.3 4.1 2.0 2.2 2.9
2) Fee income 1.2 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.4
Fee to core Income 34.1 37.4 36.1 30.4 29.3 29.3 43.2 42.4 33.0
Core operating Income 3.6 4.8 4.9 5.3 6.1 5.8 3.4 3.8 4.3
3) Operating Expenses 1.9 2.3 2.3 2.5 3.1 2.7 2.4 1.8 1.8
Cost to Core Income 53.3 47.8 45.5 48.2 50.3 45.4 69.6 47.2 42.9
Employee cost 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.2 1.1 0.5 0.6 0.8
Other operating expenses 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.9 1.6 1.9 1.2 1.0
Core Operating Profits 1.7 2.5 2.7 2.7 3.1 3.2 1.0 2.0 2.4
Trading and others 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.3
Operating Income 2.2 2.9 3.0 2.7 3.2 3.3 2.0 2.4 2.7
Provisions 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.4
4) NPA provisions 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.4
Other Provisions 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
PBT 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.0 2.2 2.8 1.5 1.6 2.3
Tax 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.4 0.6
Tax Rate 34.2 34.2 32.5 30.5 31.5 31.6 17.0 24.1 26.8
5) RoA 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.9 1.3 1.2 1.7
Source: Company, MOSL
Comments 1): NII to average assets has improved, but remains low compared to peers due to higher share of international
portfolio. Domestic margins are at ~3.4%.
Comments 2): Fee income contribution to RoA lower than peers. Faster than expected economic recovery, leverage on strong
corporate relationship and improving growth in retail loan would gradually improve fee income contribution
Comments 3): Strong control on opex resulting in best-in-class cost to average asset ratio
Comments 4): Strong asset quality performance over past two years is commendable
Comments 5): RoAs has improved decisively and is now best in the class
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 27
ICICIBC: One-year forward PBV and RoE ICICIBC: One-year forward PE and RoA
ICICIBC: One-year forward PBV ICICIBC: One-year forward PE
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 28
Financials and Valuation
Income Statement (INR Million)
Y/E March 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E
Interest Income 257,069 259,741 335,427 404,434 456,258 544,608
Interest Expended 175,926 169,572 228,085 266,458 288,261 343,127
Net Interest Income 81,144 90,169 107,342 137,977 167,997 201,481
Change (%) -3.0 11.1 19.0 28.5 21.8 19.9
Other Income 74,777 66,479 75,028 84,902 101,331 118,395
Net Income 155,920 156,648 182,369 222,879 269,328 319,876
Change (%) -2.4 0.5 16.4 22.2 20.8 18.8
Operating Exp. 58,598 66,172 78,504 91,484 106,877 125,093
Operating Profits 97,322 90,475 103,865 131,395 162,450 194,784
Change (%) 9.0 -7.0 14.8 26.5 23.6 19.9
Provisions & Cont. 43,869 22,868 15,830 20,008 25,194 30,732
PBT 53,453 67,607 88,034 111,387 137,257 164,052
Tax 13,203 16,093 23,382 30,075 37,059 43,474
Tax Rate (%) 24.7 23.8 26.6 27.0 27.0 26.5
PAT 40,250 51,514 64,653 81,313 100,197 120,578
Change (%) 7.1 28.0 25.5 25.8 23.2 20.3
Dividend (Including Tax) 15,020 18,170 21,228 28,541 35,169 42,323
Core PPP* 85,512 92,625 103,995 125,895 154,950 187,284
Change (%) 0.8 8.3 12.3 21.1 23.1 20.9
*Core PPP is (NII+Fee income-Opex)
Balance Sheet (INR Million)
Y/E March 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E
Share Capital 14,649 15,018 15,028 15,028 15,028 15,028
Equity Share Capital 11,149 11,518 11,528 11,528 11,528 11,528
Preference Capital 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500
Reserves & Surplus 505,035 539,391 592,525 645,297 710,325 788,580
Net Worth 519,684 554,409 607,552 660,324 725,352 803,608
Of which Equity Net Worth 516,184 550,909 604,052 656,824 721,852 800,108
Deposits 2,020,166 2,256,021 2,555,000 2,980,269 3,595,791 4,394,202
Change (%) -7.5 11.7 13.3 16.6 20.7 22.2
Of which CASA Deposits 842,158 1,016,465 1,110,194 1,240,225 1,451,924 1,699,998
Change (%) 34.4 20.7 9.2 11.7 17.1 17.1
Borrowings 939,136 1,092,043 1,398,149 1,461,891 1,742,093 2,058,712
Other Liabilities & Prov. 155,012 159,864 175,770 192,684 230,538 276,151
Total Liabilities 3,633,997 4,062,337 4,736,471 5,295,169 6,293,773 7,532,673
Current Assets 388,737 340,901 362,293 393,353 484,987 599,633
Investments 1,208,928 1,346,860 1,595,600 1,715,270 1,972,561 2,268,445
Change (%) 17.3 11.4 18.5 7.5 15.0 15.0
Loans 1,812,056 2,163,659 2,537,277 2,945,821 3,555,546 4,334,655
Change (%) -17.0 19.4 17.3 16.1 20.7 21.9
Net Fixed Assets 32,127 47,443 46,147 45,571 46,495 48,918
Other Assets 192,149 163,475 195,154 195,154 234,185 281,022
Total Assets 3,633,997 4,062,337 4,736,471 5,295,169 6,293,773 7,532,673
Asset Quality (%)
GNPA (INR m) 94,807 100,343 94,753 101,527 115,520 135,970
NNPA (INR m) 38,411 24,074 18,608 19,526 24,599 31,768
GNPA Ratio 5.1 4.5 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.1
NNPA Ratio 2.1 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
PCR (Excl Technical write off) 59.5 76.0 80.4 80.8 78.7 76.6
E: MOSL Estimates
NII CAGR of 23%+ over FY13-
15E on back of higher margins
and improving loan growth
Fee income growth to improve
On a higher base, PAT CAGR of
23% over FY12-15
Strong capitalization to ensure
dilution free growth
SA growth to remain healthy at
17%+ over FY13/15 and CASA
ratio to be strong at 39%+
Loan growth to improve led by
healthy growth in domestic
operations
ICICI Bank
17 January 2013 29
Financials and Valuation
Ratios
Y/E March 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E
Spreads Analysis (%)
Avg. Yield - Earning Assets 7.9 7.7 8.5 8.9 8.6 8.6
Avg. Yield on loans 8.7 8.3 9.4 10.1 9.6 9.6
Avg. Yield on Investments 5.8 6.2 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.7
Avg. Cost-Int. Bear. Liab. 5.2 4.8 5.7 5.8 5.4 5.6
Avg. Cost of Deposits 5.5 4.7 5.9 6.3 5.9 5.8
Interest Spread 2.7 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.0
Net Interest Margin 2.5 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.2
Profitability Ratios (%)
RoE 8.0 9.7 11.3 13.1 14.7 16.0
Adjusted RoE 9.6 11.5 12.8 14.6 16.1 17.2
RoA 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7
Int. Expended/Int.Earned 68.4 65.3 68.0 65.9 63.2 63.0
Other Inc./Net Income 48.0 42.4 41.1 38.1 37.6 37.0
Efficiency Ratios (%)
Op. Exps./Net Income* 40.7 41.7 43.0 42.1 40.8 40.0
Empl. Cost/Op. Exps. 32.9 42.6 44.8 45.3 45.8 46.2
Busi. per Empl. (INR m) 99.8 72.4 81.6 88.9 98.8 112.8
NP per Empl. (INR lac) 9.8 9.0 11.1 13.1 15.1 17.1
* ex treasury
Asset-Liability Profile (%)
Loan/Deposit Ratio 89.7 95.9 99.3 98.8 98.9 98.6
CASA Ratio % 41.7 45.1 43.5 41.6 40.4 38.7
Invest./Deposit Ratio 59.8 59.7 62.5 57.6 54.9 51.6
G-Sec/Invest. Ratio 56.6 47.6 54.5 53.3 57.6 58.3
CAR (BASEL II) 19.4 19.5 18.5 17.6 15.8 14.2
Tier 1 14.4 13.2 12.7 12.2 11.2 10.3
Valuation
Book Value (INR) 463.0 478.7 516.6 562.4 618.8 686.7
BV Growth (%) 5.1 3.4 7.9 8.9 10.0 11.0
Price-BV (x) 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7
ABV (for Subsidaries) (INR) 353.6 370.6 408.6 454.3 510.8 578.6
ABV Growth (%) 6.6 4.8 10.2 11.2 12.4 13.3
Price-ABV (x) 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.6
ABV (for Subs Invst & NPA) (INR) 329.5 356.0 397.3 442.5 495.8 559.3
Adjusted Price-ABV (x) 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.6
EPS (INR) 36.1 44.7 56.1 70.5 86.9 104.6
EPS Growth (%) 6.9 23.9 25.4 25.8 23.2 20.3
Price-Earnings (x) 20.7 16.5 13.4 11.1
Adj. Price-Earnings (x) 17.5 13.7 10.9 9.4
Dividend Per Share (INR) 12.0 14.0 16.5 21.2 26.1 31.4
Dividend Yield (%) 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.7
E: MOSL Estimates
Gradual improvement in
margin to continue, domestic
margin at historical high of
3.4%+ in 2QFY13
RoA's has improved decisively
to 1.6%+, increasing leverage
to boost RoE's to 17%+
Adequately capitalized till FY16
Trading at near LPA P/BV, with
evolving RoE's over next two
years valuations should
improve; Top Pick
Cost to income ratio expected
to decline gradually
Motilal Oswal Securities LtdMotilal Oswal Tower, Level 9, Sayani Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai 400 025
Phone: +91 22 3982 5500 E-mail: [email protected]
DisclosuresThis report is for personal information of the authorized recipient and does not construe to be any investment, legal or taxation advice to you. This research report does not constitute an offer, invitation or inducement
to invest in securities or other investments and Motilal Oswal Securities Limited (hereinafter referred as MOSt) is not soliciting any action based upon it. This report is not for public distribution and has beenfurnished to you solely for your information and should not be reproduced or redistributed to any other person in any form.
Unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this information, is prohibited. The person accessing this information specifically agrees to exempt MOSt or any of its affiliatesor employees from, any and all responsibility/liability arising from such misuse and agrees not to hold MOSt or any of its affiliates or employees responsible for any such misuse and further agrees to hold MOSt
or any of its affiliates or employees free and harmless from all losses, costs, damages, expenses that may be suffered by the person accessing this information due to any errors and delays.
The information contained herein is based on publicly available data or other sources believed to be reliable. While we would endeavour to update the information herein on reasonable basis, MOSt and/or itsaffiliates are under no obligation to update the information. Also there may be regulatory, compliance, or other reasons that may prevent MOSt and/or its affiliates from doing so. MOSt or any of its affiliates oremployees shall not be in any way responsible and liable for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report . MOSt or any of its affiliates
or employees do not provide, at any time, any express or implied warranty of any kind, regarding any matter pertaining to this report, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitnessfor a particular purpose, and non-infringement. The recipients of this report should rely on their own investigations.
This report is intended for distribution to institutional investors. Recipients who are not institutional investors should seek advice of their independent financial advisor prior to taking any investment decisionbased on this report or for any necessary explanation of its contents.
MOSt and/or its affiliates and/or employees may have interests/positions, financial or otherwise in the securities mentioned in this report. To enhance transparency, MOSt has incorporated a Disclosure of Interest
Statement in this document. This should, however, not be treated as endorsement of the views expressed in the report.
Disclosure of Interest Statement ICICI Bank1. Analyst ownership of the stock No2. Group/Directors ownership of the stock No3. Broking relationship with company covered No4. Investment Banking relationship with company covered No
Analyst CertificationThe views expressed in this research report accurately reflect the personal views of the analyst(s) about the subject securities or issues, and no part of the compensation of the research analyst(s) was, is, orwill be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations and views expressed by research analyst(s) in this report. The research analysts, strategists, or research associates principally responsible
for preparation of MOSt research receive compensation based upon various factors, including quality of research, investor client feedback, stock picking, competitive factors and firm revenues.
Regional Disclosures (outside India)This report is not directed or intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity resident in a state, country or any jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary tolaw, regulation or which would subject MOSt & its group companies to registration or licensing requirements within such jurisdictions.
For U.K.This report is intended for distribution only to persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments as described in Article 19 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FinancialPromotion) Order 2005 (referred to as "investment professionals"). This document must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not investment professionals. Any investment or investment activity towhich this document relates is only available to investment professionals and will be engaged in only with such persons.
For U.S.Motilal Oswal Securities Limited (MOSL) is not a registered broker - dealer under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the"1934 act") and under applicable state laws in the United States.In addition MOSL is not a registered investment adviser under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act" and together with the 1934 Act, the "Acts), and under applicable statelaws in the United States. Accordingly, in the absence of specific exemption under the Acts, any brokerage and investment services provided by MOSL, including the products and services described herein
are not available to or intended for U.S. persons.
This report is intended for distribution only to "Major Institutional Investors" as defined by Rule 15a-6(b)(4) of the Exchange Act and interpretations thereof by SEC (henceforth referred to as "major institutional
investors"). This document must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not major institutional investors. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only available to majorinstitutional investors and will be engaged in only with major institutional investors. In reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 15a-6 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the "Exchange Act") and interpretations thereof by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in order to conduct business with Institutional Investors based in the U.S., MOSL has entered into
a chaperoning agreement with a U.S. registered broker-dealer, Motilal Oswal Securities International Private Limited. ("MOSIPL"). Any business interaction pursuant to this report will have to be executed withinthe provisions of this chaperoning agreement.
The Research Analysts contributing to the report may not be registered /qualified as research analyst with FINRA. Such research analyst may not be associated persons of the U.S. registered broker-dealer,MOSIPL, and therefore, may not be subject to NASD rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communication with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analystaccount.
For SingaporeMotilal Oswal Capital Markets Singapore Pte Limited is acting as an exempt financial advisor under section 23(1)(f) of the Financial Advisers Act(FAA) read with regulation 17(1)(d) of the Financial Advisors
Regulations and is a subsidiary of Motilal Oswal Securities Limited in India. This research is distributed in Singapore by Motilal Oswal Capital Markets Singapore Pte Limited and it is only directed in Singaporeto accredited investors, as defined in the Financial Advisers Regulations and the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289), as amended from time to time.In respect of any matter arising from or in connection with the research you could contact the following representatives of Motilal Oswal Capital Markets Singapore Pte Limited:
Nihar Oza Kadambari BalachandranEmail: [email protected] Email : [email protected]: (+65) 68189232 Contact: (+65) 68189233 / 65249115
Office address: 21 (Suite 31), 16 Collyer Quay, Singapore 049318